Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Amputation Surgical Principles

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Amputation Surgical Principles

Comprehensive guide to amputation surgical principles - level selection, myodesis vs myoplasty, bone handling, nerve management, prosthetic considerations, phantom limb pain for orthopaedic exam

complete
Updated: 2025-01-08
High Yield Overview

AMPUTATION SURGICAL PRINCIPLES

Level Selection | Myodesis vs Myoplasty | Prosthetic Considerations | Multidisciplinary Approach

VascularMost common indication (80%)
MyodesisGold standard muscle fixation
70-80%Phantom limb pain incidence
MDTMultidisciplinary team essential

AMPUTATION INDICATIONS

Vascular
PatternPVD, diabetes, gangrene (80%)
TreatmentOptimize level for healing and prosthesis
Trauma
PatternMangled extremity, irreconstructible
TreatmentPreserve maximum length, early soft tissue cover
Infection
PatternUncontrolled sepsis, necrotizing fasciitis
TreatmentGuillotine then revision when infection controlled
Malignancy
PatternTumour limb salvage not possible
TreatmentWide margins, skip metastases consideration

Critical Must-Knows

  • Myodesis = muscle sutured to bone (optimal function), myoplasty = muscle to fascia/muscle
  • Bone handling: Round edges, bevel tibia anteriorly, adequate bone length for lever arm
  • Nerve management: Identify, transect sharply under tension, allow retraction into soft tissues
  • Prosthetic consideration: Preserve joints where possible, adequate soft tissue envelope
  • Phantom limb pain affects 70-80% - multifactorial, prevention with perioperative analgesia

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Equal anterior-posterior flaps for transfemoral, longer posterior flap for transtibial
  • "
    Maintain knee for BKA - reduces energy expenditure by 40-60% vs AKA
  • "
    Traction neurectomy reduces neuroma pain - pull nerve, transect sharply, allow retraction
  • "
    Staged approach for infection: guillotine then definitive closure when sepsis controlled

Critical Amputation Surgical Exam Points

Level Selection Principles

Preserve maximum functional length while ensuring healing. For vascular disease, balance healing potential (more proximal heals better) against function (more distal preserves joints). Knee preservation is paramount - reduces energy expenditure by 40-60% compared to transfemoral. Always consider prosthetic requirements.

Myodesis vs Myoplasty

Myodesis = muscle attached directly to bone through drill holes or suture anchors. Provides optimal muscle tension and proprioception. Myoplasty = muscle sutured to opposing muscle or fascia. Quicker but less stable. Myodesis is the gold standard for functional amputation - know this distinction.

Nerve and Bone Management

Nerves: Identify major nerves, apply gentle traction, transect sharply with new blade, allow proximal retraction into soft tissues away from scar. Bone: Rasp edges smooth, bevel tibia anteriorly to prevent skin breakdown, adequate length for lever arm and prosthetic socket.

Phantom Limb Pain

Affects 70-80% of amputees. Distinct from residual limb pain. Risk factors: preoperative pain, traumatic amputation. Prevention: perioperative epidural/nerve blocks. Treatment is multimodal - mirror therapy, gabapentinoids, antidepressants, TENS. Counsel patients preoperatively.

Amputation Level Selection Guide

IndicationPreferred LevelKey PrincipleProsthetic Consideration
Diabetic foot with gangreneTransmetatarsal or transtibialPreserve knee if vascular supply adequateShort BKA still better than AKA
Critical limb ischaemia, failed revascularizationTranstibial if popliteal pulse, else transfemoralLevel determined by healing potentialConsider vascular input for level selection
Trauma with mangled extremityMost distal viable levelPreserve length, consider reconstruction firstMESS score greater than 7 indicates amputation
Osteosarcoma distal femurTransfemoral with wide marginOncological margin takes priority (greater than 2cm)Consider skip metastases, rotationplasty alternative
Necrotizing fasciitisGuillotine at viable levelLife before limb - emergent debridementRevise to definitive level when sepsis controlled
Mnemonic

VICTIMAmputation Indications

V
Vascular disease
PVD, diabetes - most common indication (80%)
I
Infection
Uncontrolled sepsis, necrotizing fasciitis, osteomyelitis
C
Congenital
PFFD, fibular hemimelia - functional improvement
T
Trauma
Mangled extremity, irreconstructible vascular injury
I
Ischaemia
Irreversible ischaemia, failed revascularization
M
Malignancy
Tumour where limb salvage not possible

Memory Hook:The limb became a VICTIM of disease requiring amputation

Mnemonic

FLAPSTranstibial Amputation Technique

F
Flap design
Long posterior flap (gastrocnemius) for durable coverage
L
Length preservation
Minimum 12-15cm from tibial tuberosity for prosthesis
A
Anterior tibia bevel
Bevel anterior tibia to prevent skin breakdown
P
Posterior myodesis
Secure gastrocnemius to tibia anteriorly
S
Sharp nerve transection
Transect nerves sharply under tension, allow retraction

Memory Hook:Good FLAPS make a good stump - posterior flap is key for BKA

Mnemonic

MIRRORSPhantom Limb Pain Management

M
Mirror therapy
Visual feedback reduces phantom pain
I
Injections
Nerve blocks, trigger point injections
R
Rehabilitation
Desensitization, graded motor imagery
R
Rx medications
Gabapentinoids, amitriptyline, duloxetine
O
Opioid adjuncts
Short-term only, avoid long-term use
R
Residual limb care
Socket fit, neuroma management
S
TENS stimulation
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation

Memory Hook:Use MIRRORS to treat phantom pain - mirror therapy is evidence-based

Overview and Epidemiology

Amputation is the surgical removal of part or all of a limb. While historically considered a failure of treatment, modern amputation surgery is a reconstructive procedure aiming to create a functional residual limb optimized for prosthetic fitting and rehabilitation.

Epidemiology:

  • Lower limb amputations are 10-20 times more common than upper limb
  • Vascular disease (peripheral vascular disease, diabetes) accounts for approximately 80% of major amputations
  • Incidence increases with age - 65% occur in patients over 65 years
  • Diabetes increases amputation risk 15-40 fold
  • Male predominance (2:1 ratio)

Modern Amputation Philosophy

Amputation is reconstruction, not failure. The goal is to create a residual limb that maximizes function and quality of life. This requires attention to bone length, soft tissue envelope, muscle stabilization, and prosthetic considerations. A well-performed amputation with good rehabilitation can provide excellent functional outcomes.

Indications - The VICTIM Mnemonic:

Vascular Disease (80%)

  • Peripheral vascular disease: Critical limb ischaemia, gangrene
  • Diabetic foot disease: Infection, osteomyelitis, Charcot collapse
  • Failed revascularization
  • Unsalvageable tissue loss

Trauma and Tumour

  • Trauma: Mangled extremity, irreconstructible injury (MESS greater than 7)
  • Malignancy: Where limb salvage not possible, skip metastases
  • Palliative amputation for fungating tumours
  • Failed limb salvage with recurrence

Contraindications (Relative):

  • Inadequate healing potential (assess with vascular studies)
  • Unrealistic patient expectations
  • Inability to participate in rehabilitation
  • Life expectancy precluding benefit from rehabilitation

Pathophysiology and Wound Healing

Factors Affecting Wound Healing

Understanding the pathophysiology of wound healing is crucial for successful amputation surgery, particularly in the vascular population.

Factors Affecting Amputation Healing

FactorEffect on HealingClinical Implication
Peripheral vascular diseaseReduced tissue perfusion, impaired oxygen deliveryConsider vascular input, may need more proximal level
Diabetes mellitusMicroangiopathy, neuropathy, impaired immunityOptimize HbA1c less than 8%, aggressive infection control
SmokingVasoconstriction, impaired wound healingCessation essential - increases healing by 30%
MalnutritionAlbumin less than 30 g/L impairs healingNutritional optimization preoperatively
Renal failureUraemia impairs healing, calciphylaxis riskDialysis optimization, higher complication rates

Vascular Assessment

Clinical Assessment:

  • Palpable pulses: Femoral, popliteal, posterior tibial, dorsalis pedis
  • Tissue perfusion: Skin temperature, capillary refill, tissue viability
  • Ankle-brachial index (ABI): Less than 0.4 suggests poor healing potential
  • Toe pressures: Greater than 30 mmHg associated with healing

Investigations:

  • Doppler arterial studies
  • Angiography (CT or conventional) if revascularization considered
  • Transcutaneous oxygen tension (TcPO2): Greater than 30-40 mmHg predicts healing

Level Selection in Vascular Disease

The most distal level that will heal should be chosen. However, a failed distal amputation requiring revision is worse than a primary proximal amputation. Vascular surgery input is essential - consider revascularization to enable more distal amputation. TcPO2 greater than 30-40 mmHg at proposed level predicts healing.

Phantom Limb Phenomena

Phantom Limb Sensation:

  • Non-painful awareness of amputated limb
  • Universal after amputation
  • Usually diminishes over time

Phantom Limb Pain (PLP):

  • Painful sensations perceived in the amputated limb
  • Affects 70-80% of amputees
  • Can be immediate or delayed onset
  • Character: burning, cramping, shooting, stabbing

Pathophysiology of Phantom Pain:

  1. Peripheral mechanisms: Neuroma formation, ectopic discharge
  2. Spinal cord changes: Dorsal horn sensitization
  3. Cortical reorganization: Somatosensory cortex remapping
  4. Central sensitization: Altered pain processing

Preoperative Pain is Risk Factor

Patients with significant preoperative pain have higher rates of phantom limb pain. This supports the hypothesis that central sensitization occurs before amputation. Perioperative epidural or peripheral nerve blocks may reduce phantom pain incidence.

Clinical Presentation and Assessment

Indications by Aetiology

Vascular Disease and Diabetes

Indications:

  • Critical limb ischaemia with rest pain
  • Gangrene (dry or wet)
  • Non-healing ulcers despite revascularization
  • Failed bypass or angioplasty
  • Extensive tissue loss precluding reconstruction

Assessment:

  • Vascular surgery consultation
  • Consider revascularization to enable more distal amputation
  • Optimize medical comorbidities (diabetes, cardiac disease)
  • Nutritional assessment

Level Selection:

  • TcPO2 greater than 30-40 mmHg predicts healing
  • Palpable pulse at level above amputation favourable
  • When in doubt, vascular opinion essential

Traumatic Amputation

Indications:

  • Mangled extremity (MESS score greater than 7)
  • Irreversible ischaemia (greater than 6 hours warm ischaemia)
  • Irreconstructible vascular injury
  • Massive soft tissue loss precluding reconstruction
  • Patient factors precluding salvage

Assessment:

  • MESS (Mangled Extremity Severity Score)
  • Limb Salvage Index, NISSSA score
  • Warm ischaemia time
  • Associated injuries (polytrauma assessment)

Principles:

  • Preserve maximum length
  • Early soft tissue coverage
  • Consider staged approach
  • Psychological support early

MESS Score

MESS greater than or equal to 7 is associated with amputation. Components: skeletal/soft tissue injury (1-4), limb ischaemia (1-3, doubled if greater than 6 hours), shock (0-2), age (0-2). Note: MESS should not be used in isolation - clinical judgment remains paramount.

Infection

Indications:

  • Life-threatening sepsis from limb source
  • Necrotizing fasciitis not controlled by debridement
  • Refractory osteomyelitis with systemic sepsis
  • Gas gangrene (Clostridial myonecrosis)
  • Fungal infections in immunocompromised

Principles:

  • Life before limb - emergent amputation may be life-saving
  • Guillotine amputation initially if unwell
  • Staged revision when sepsis controlled
  • Wide margins for necrotizing fasciitis
  • ICU support often required

Guillotine Amputation:

  • Rapid, life-saving procedure
  • Transect all tissues at same level
  • Leave open, do not close
  • Negative pressure dressing
  • Revise to definitive level in 48-72 hours when stable

Oncological Amputation

Indications:

  • Primary bone or soft tissue sarcoma where limb salvage not possible
  • Tumour involving neurovascular bundle
  • Pathological fracture with contamination
  • Failed limb salvage with local recurrence
  • Palliation for fungating tumour

Principles:

  • Wide surgical margins (greater than 2cm bone, cuff of normal tissue)
  • Do NOT enter tumour (contamination worsens prognosis)
  • Consider skip metastases (whole bone MRI)
  • Oncology MDT discussion essential
  • Consider alternatives: rotationplasty, prosthetic replacement

Level Selection:

  • Dictated by tumour location and margins
  • Preserve joint above if possible
  • Bone margin confirmed by frozen section if needed

Preoperative Assessment Checklist

Medical Optimization

  • Vascular assessment: ABI, toe pressures, TcPO2
  • Cardiac optimization: Functional status, echo if indicated
  • Diabetes control: HbA1c target less than 8%
  • Nutrition: Albumin greater than 30 g/L
  • Smoking cessation: Refer to Quitline

Multidisciplinary Planning

  • Prosthetist: Early involvement for level planning
  • Physiotherapy: Preoperative conditioning, wheelchair training
  • Occupational therapy: Home assessment, equipment needs
  • Psychology: Counselling for body image, grief
  • Social work: Discharge planning, support services

Investigations

Investigation Protocol for Amputation Planning

VascularVascular Assessment

Essential for vascular amputations:

  • Ankle-brachial index (ABI): Less than 0.4 suggests poor healing
  • Toe pressures: Greater than 30 mmHg associated with healing
  • Duplex ultrasound: Assess arterial and venous patency
  • CT angiography: If revascularization being considered
  • TcPO2: Greater than 30-40 mmHg at proposed level predicts healing
ImagingPlain Radiographs and Advanced Imaging

All cases:

  • Plain radiographs of affected limb
  • Assess bone quality, level of disease
  • For trauma: Full trauma series

Oncology:

  • MRI whole bone (skip metastases)
  • CT chest (staging)
  • PET scan if indicated
LaboratoryBlood Tests

Preoperative baseline:

  • Full blood count, coagulation studies
  • Urea, electrolytes, creatinine
  • HbA1c (diabetes control)
  • Albumin, prealbumin (nutrition)
  • CRP, ESR (infection)
  • Blood cultures if sepsis suspected
SpecialistSpecialist Consultations

Multidisciplinary team:

  • Vascular surgery: Level selection, revascularization options
  • Prosthetist: Early involvement for optimal stump planning
  • Anaesthesia: Perioperative nerve blocks (phantom pain prevention)
  • Pain service: Preoperative pain management plan

TcPO2 for Level Selection

Transcutaneous oxygen tension (TcPO2) is a useful predictor of healing. TcPO2 greater than 40 mmHg has high probability of healing. TcPO2 less than 20 mmHg predicts healing failure. Between 20-40 mmHg is indeterminate - clinical judgment required.

Management Principles

Level Selection Principles

Goals:

  1. Most distal level that will heal
  2. Preserve joints where possible (especially knee)
  3. Adequate bone length for prosthetic lever arm
  4. Sufficient soft tissue for durable coverage
  5. Consider prosthetic requirements

Lower Limb Amputation Levels

LevelIndicationsAdvantagesDisadvantages
Toe/ray amputationLocalized gangrene, osteomyelitisPreserves foot function, no prosthesis neededHigh revision rate in vascular disease
TransmetatarsalForefoot gangrene, diabetic footAmbulation without prosthesis possibleEquinovarus deformity risk, healing issues
Syme (ankle disarticulation)Ankle pathology, heel pad viableEnd-bearing, long lever armCosmesis issues, requires experienced surgeon
Transtibial (BKA)Most common major amputationPreserves knee - 40-60% less energy vs AKAHigher revision rate in PVD than AKA
Knee disarticulationLong femoral stump not possibleEnd-bearing, long lever arm, no bone cutBulky prosthetic knee, limited cosmesis
Transfemoral (AKA)Knee preservation not possibleHigh healing rate (90%+)Significant energy expenditure increase
Hip disarticulationProximal thigh tumour, traumaComplete limb removalVery high energy expenditure, limited prosthetic use

Preserve the Knee

Knee preservation is paramount. Energy expenditure for ambulation with transtibial amputation is 40-60% less than transfemoral. Even a short transtibial amputation is preferable to transfemoral if healing is achievable. Vascular input is essential for level decisions.

Soft Tissue Management

Flap Design:

  • Equal flaps: Transmetatarsal, transfemoral (equal anterior-posterior)
  • Long posterior flap: Transtibial (Burgess technique) - gastrocnemius provides durable coverage
  • Skew flaps: Alternative for transtibial with medial/lateral flaps
  • Fish-mouth flaps: Toe and ray amputations

Principles:

  1. Adequate length for tension-free closure
  2. Viable, well-vascularized tissue
  3. No dog ears or redundant tissue
  4. Muscle padding over bone end
  5. Scar placement: Away from weight-bearing areas and prosthetic socket pressure points

Tension-Free Closure:

  • Flaps should approximate without tension
  • If tight, consider shortening bone
  • Never close under tension (increases wound failure)
  • Drain if large dead space

Myodesis vs Myoplasty

Myodesis (Gold Standard):

  • Muscle sutured directly to bone
  • Through drill holes or suture anchors
  • Provides optimal muscle tension and proprioception
  • Better residual limb function
  • Recommended for all functional amputations

Technique:

  1. Drill 2-3 holes in bone end
  2. Pass heavy non-absorbable suture through muscle
  3. Secure muscle to bone at resting tension
  4. Opposing muscles (agonist-antagonist balance)

Myoplasty:

  • Muscle sutured to opposing muscle or fascia
  • Quicker, simpler procedure
  • Less stable residual limb shape
  • Consider in elderly, non-ambulatory, or palliative

Myodesis Advantages

Myodesis provides: (1) Physiological muscle tension for proprioception, (2) Stable residual limb shape, (3) Better prosthetic control, (4) Reduced muscle atrophy. This is the expected answer when asked about muscle management in amputation.

Bone Handling Principles

Bone Length:

  • Adequate length for lever arm (prosthetic function)
  • Short stump = poor prosthetic control
  • Too long = inadequate soft tissue coverage
  • Transtibial: Minimum 12-15 cm from tibial tuberosity
  • Transfemoral: Minimum 10-12 cm from greater trochanter

Bone End Treatment:

  1. Smooth edges: Rasp all bone edges to prevent skin irritation
  2. Anterior tibial bevel: 45-degree anterior bevel prevents anterior pressure
  3. Fibula: Cut 1-2 cm shorter than tibia (BKA)
  4. Periosteal handling: Minimize stripping to prevent ring sequestra

Special Considerations:

  • Ertl procedure: Synostosis between tibia and fibula for end-bearing stump
  • Bone grafting: Rarely needed except trauma reconstruction
  • Osteomyoplasty: Periosteal flaps for healing in vascular patients

Surgical Technique

Transtibial (Below-Knee) Amputation

Indications:

  • Most common major amputation
  • Vascular disease with viable knee
  • Trauma with adequate proximal tissue
  • Infection controlled at this level

Preoperative Planning:

  • Confirm vascularity (clinical, TcPO2)
  • Mark level: Minimum 12-15 cm from tibial tuberosity
  • Posterior flap length = 1.5 times AP diameter of leg

Transtibial Amputation Steps

Step 1Positioning and Marking

Supine position, tourniquet if applicable (avoid in PVD).

Mark level at junction of proximal and middle third of tibia.

Mark anterior fish-mouth incision.

Posterior flap: One-third circumference of leg, extending distally.

Step 2Anterior Dissection

Incise skin and deep fascia anteriorly.

Identify and ligate anterior tibial vessels.

Identify deep peroneal nerve - transect sharply under tension.

Divide anterior compartment muscles.

Step 3Bone Division

Tibia: Score periosteum, cut with oscillating saw.

Create 45-degree anterior bevel to prevent skin pressure.

Fibula: Cut 1-2 cm shorter than tibia.

Rasp all bone edges smooth.

Step 4Posterior Dissection

Create long posterior myocutaneous flap.

Based on gastrocnemius and soleus (soleus often trimmed).

Identify and ligate posterior tibial and peroneal vessels.

Identify tibial and sural nerves - transect sharply under tension.

Step 5Myodesis and Closure

Drill holes in anterior tibia.

Suture posterior muscle flap to anterior tibia (myodesis).

Close deep fascia over muscle.

Skin closure: Interrupted or subcuticular, no tension.

Apply soft dressing, rigid cast, or IPOP (immediate post-op prosthesis).

Technical Pearls:

  • Long posterior flap: Gastrocnemius provides durable, well-vascularized coverage
  • Nerve handling: Gentle traction, sharp transection, allow retraction
  • Hemostasis: Meticulous - haematoma increases infection risk
  • No drain vs drain: Surgeon preference; drain if large dead space

Transfemoral (Above-Knee) Amputation

Indications:

  • Failed or contraindicated transtibial
  • Vascular disease with poor healing potential distally
  • Trauma with extensive thigh involvement
  • Tumour requiring femoral resection

Level:

  • Minimum 10-12 cm from greater trochanter
  • Optimal: Junction of middle and distal third of femur
  • Preserve adductors insertion if possible

Transfemoral Amputation Steps

Step 1Marking and Incision

Equal anterior and posterior fish-mouth flaps.

Apex at level of bone division.

Flap length = one-third circumference each side.

Identify femoral vessels in femoral triangle.

Step 2Anterior Dissection

Incise through quadriceps.

Identify and ligate superficial femoral artery and vein.

Identify femoral nerve - transect sharply.

Divide quadriceps at level of bone cut.

Step 3Femur Division

Score periosteum circumferentially.

Divide femur with oscillating saw.

Rasp edges smooth.

Maintain length if possible for lever arm.

Step 4Posterior Dissection

Divide hamstrings and adductors.

Identify sciatic nerve - this is crucial.

Ligate accompanying vessel before transection.

Transect nerve sharply under gentle traction.

Step 5Myodesis and Closure

Myodesis of adductors to lateral femur (prevents abduction contracture).

Myodesis of quadriceps and hamstrings over bone end.

Close fascia lata.

Skin closure without tension.

Adductor Myodesis Essential

Myodesis of adductors to lateral femur prevents abduction contracture, which significantly impairs prosthetic fitting and function. This is a common exam point - always mention adductor stabilization in transfemoral amputation.

Nerve Handling Technique

Principle: Minimize neuroma formation and position nerve away from pressure areas.

Technique - Traction Neurectomy:

  1. Identify nerve proximally
  2. Ligate accompanying vessels (vessel runs with nerve)
  3. Apply gentle longitudinal traction
  4. Use fresh, sharp blade
  5. Transect cleanly in single motion
  6. Allow nerve to retract into proximal soft tissues
  7. Position away from scar and pressure areas

Major Nerves by Level:

  • Transtibial: Deep peroneal, tibial, sural, superficial peroneal
  • Transfemoral: Sciatic (dividing to tibial and peroneal), femoral

Neuroma Prevention:

  • Sharp transection (not avulsion)
  • Adequate proximal retraction
  • Away from scar and prosthetic pressure
  • Some surgeons: Epineural cap, nerve burial in bone/muscle

Traction Neurectomy

Traction neurectomy is the standard technique: gentle traction on nerve, sharp transection with new blade, allowing proximal retraction into soft tissue bed away from scar and prosthetic pressure areas. This reduces symptomatic neuroma formation.

Guillotine (Emergency) Amputation

Indications:

  • Life-threatening sepsis from limb source
  • Necrotizing fasciitis
  • Gas gangrene
  • Patient too unstable for definitive procedure

Principle:

  • Life before limb - rapid procedure to remove septic focus
  • All tissues transected at same level
  • No flaps, no closure
  • Minimal surgical time

Technique:

  1. Rapid circumferential incision through all soft tissues
  2. Transect bone at same level
  3. Ligate major vessels only (minimum haemostasis)
  4. Identify and transect nerves
  5. Apply negative pressure wound dressing
  6. Leave completely open

Staged Approach:

  • ICU resuscitation and sepsis control
  • Revision to definitive amputation at 48-72 hours
  • May require further debridement
  • Definitive closure when infection controlled

Complications

Wound-Related Complications

Wound Complications

ComplicationIncidenceRisk FactorsManagement
Wound infection10-15%Diabetes, PVD, malnutritionAntibiotics, drainage, debridement if needed
Wound dehiscence5-10%Tension closure, poor vascularityVAC therapy, revision if extensive
Wound necrosis/failure5-20% (higher in PVD)Inadequate blood supply, wrong levelDebridement, may need more proximal revision
Haematoma5%Poor haemostasis, anticoagulationAspiration or surgical evacuation

Revision Amputation:

  • Required in 5-30% depending on level and indication
  • Higher revision rates with more distal amputations in PVD
  • Consider vascular surgery input before revision

Phantom Limb Pain and Residual Limb Pain

Phantom Limb Pain (PLP):

  • Painful sensations in the absent limb
  • Incidence: 70-80% of amputees
  • Character: Burning, shooting, cramping, stabbing
  • Can occur immediately or delayed

Risk Factors for PLP:

  • Preoperative pain (strongest predictor)
  • Traumatic amputation
  • Psychological distress
  • Upper limb amputation

Management of Phantom Limb Pain:

  1. Pharmacological:

    • First-line: Gabapentin, pregabalin
    • Tricyclics: Amitriptyline, nortriptyline
    • SNRIs: Duloxetine, venlafaxine
    • Opioids: Short-term only, avoid chronic use
  2. Non-pharmacological:

    • Mirror therapy (strong evidence)
    • Graded motor imagery
    • TENS
    • Residual limb care (socket fit, desensitization)

Residual Limb Pain:

  • Pain in the actual stump (distinct from phantom pain)
  • Causes: Neuroma, bone spur, infection, poor socket fit
  • Management: Address underlying cause

Phantom vs Residual Limb Pain

Distinguish phantom limb pain from residual limb pain. Phantom = pain perceived in absent limb (central mechanism). Residual = pain in stump (local cause - neuroma, bone spur, socket issues). Management differs significantly.

Additional Complications

Neuroma:

  • Painful nerve ending
  • Presents with Tinel sign over stump
  • Management: Desensitization, injection, surgical revision

Contractures:

  • Hip flexion (transfemoral), knee flexion (transtibial)
  • Prevention: Positioning, early physiotherapy, prone lying
  • Treatment: Stretching, serial casting, surgical release if severe

Bone Complications:

  • Heterotopic ossification
  • Bone spur formation
  • Osteomyelitis
  • Terminal overgrowth (paediatric - appositional bone growth)

Cardiovascular:

  • DVT/PE (immobility)
  • Cardiac events (high-risk population)
  • Prophylaxis: LMWH, early mobilization

Psychological:

  • Depression (30-50% of amputees)
  • Anxiety, PTSD (especially trauma)
  • Body image disturbance
  • Early psychological support essential

Evidence Base and Key Studies

LEAP Study - Limb Salvage vs Amputation in Trauma

2
Bosse MJ, MacKenzie EJ, Kellam JF, et al. • N Engl J Med (2002)
Key Findings:
  • Prospective study comparing limb salvage vs amputation for severe lower extremity trauma
  • No significant difference in functional outcomes at 2 years between groups
  • Salvage patients had more secondary procedures and complications
  • Psychological outcomes similar between groups
  • Cost of salvage significantly higher than amputation
Clinical Implication: Amputation provides equivalent functional outcomes to limb salvage in severe trauma. Decision should be individualized based on patient factors and injury pattern.
Limitation: Selection bias, heterogeneous injuries, difficulty randomizing.

Burgess Posterior Myoplasty Technique

4
Burgess EM, Romano RL, Zettl JH • Bull Prosthet Res (1969)
Key Findings:
  • Described long posterior myocutaneous flap for transtibial amputation
  • Gastrocnemius provides durable, well-vascularized coverage
  • Superior healing rates compared to anterior flaps
  • Better prosthetic fitting with muscle-padded stump
  • Became the standard technique for BKA
Clinical Implication: Long posterior flap (Burgess technique) is the gold standard for transtibial amputation. Provides reliable healing and functional stump.
Limitation: Descriptive technique paper, no RCT comparison.

Mirror Therapy for Phantom Limb Pain

2
Chan BL, Witt R, Charrow AP, et al. • N Engl J Med (2007)
Key Findings:
  • RCT of mirror therapy for phantom limb pain in combat amputees
  • Mirror therapy group: 100% reduction in pain at 4 weeks
  • Control (covered mirror): No improvement
  • Proposed mechanism: Visual feedback resolves cortical conflict
  • Simple, no-cost intervention
Clinical Implication: Mirror therapy is an effective, low-cost treatment for phantom limb pain. Should be part of standard rehabilitation.
Limitation: Small sample size, short follow-up, military population.

Perioperative Epidural Analgesia and Phantom Pain

2
Karanikolas M, Aretha D, Tsolakis I, et al. • Reg Anesth Pain Med (2011)
Key Findings:
  • RCT of perioperative epidural analgesia for amputation
  • Epidural group: Lower phantom limb pain at 6 months
  • Proposed mechanism: Prevents central sensitization
  • Optimized perioperative pain control beneficial
  • Combined with multimodal analgesia
Clinical Implication: Perioperative epidural or regional analgesia may reduce phantom limb pain incidence. Consider for all major amputations.
Limitation: Single-center study, technique variation.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOAdvanced

EXAMINER

"A 68-year-old diabetic male presents with wet gangrene of his left foot extending to the mid-foot. He has had a failed femoral-popliteal bypass 6 months ago. His ankle-brachial index is 0.3 and toe pressures are unrecordable. How would you manage this patient?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient has critical limb ischaemia with wet gangrene following failed revascularization. Given the wet gangrene, urgent surgical intervention is required as this represents an infectious emergency. My approach would be systematic. For immediate management, I would commence IV antibiotics covering gram-positive, gram-negative, and anaerobes such as piperacillin-tazobactam. I would obtain urgent vascular surgery consultation to assess any revascularization options, though with failed bypass and very low ABI, options may be limited. I would optimize his diabetes and cardiac status. Regarding level selection, with unrecordable toe pressures and ABI of 0.3, healing potential distally is poor. I would request TcPO2 measurements at proposed levels. A transtibial amputation would be my preferred level to preserve the knee, but this requires adequate healing potential - I would discuss with vascular surgery and consider angiography if any revascularization option exists to improve distal perfusion. If transtibial healing is deemed unlikely, a transfemoral amputation would be necessary. For surgical technique, I would perform a long posterior flap transtibial amputation if proceeding at that level, with meticulous nerve handling using traction neurectomy technique, myodesis of the posterior flap, and tension-free closure. I would involve the prosthetist early and ensure psychological support is in place.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Wet gangrene is an emergency - urgent debridement/amputation
Vascular surgery input essential for level selection
TcPO2 greater than 30-40 mmHg predicts healing
Preserve knee if healing potential adequate
Multidisciplinary team approach
COMMON TRAPS
✗Delaying surgery for wet gangrene (infection spreading)
✗Not involving vascular surgery in level decision
✗Choosing level based on convenience rather than healing potential
✗Forgetting to optimize diabetes and comorbidities
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What flap design would you use for transtibial amputation?"
"How would you manage this patient if they develop phantom limb pain?"
"What are the advantages of preserving the knee?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"Describe the surgical technique for transtibial amputation, focusing on the key principles that optimize prosthetic function."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Transtibial amputation aims to create a functional residual limb optimized for prosthetic fitting. For patient positioning, I position the patient supine with a tourniquet if the patient has adequate vascularity, though I would avoid tourniquet in vascular patients. For level, I aim for minimum 12-15 cm from the tibial tuberosity to provide adequate lever arm for prosthetic control. For flap design, I use the Burgess long posterior myocutaneous flap - this is based on gastrocnemius which provides durable, well-vascularized coverage. The anterior incision is fish-mouth shaped at the level of bone division, with the posterior flap extending distally for approximately 1.5 times the anterior-posterior diameter of the leg. For anterior dissection, I identify and ligate the anterior tibial vessels, identify the deep peroneal nerve and transect it sharply under gentle traction allowing retraction. For bone division, I divide the tibia with an oscillating saw, creating a 45-degree anterior bevel to prevent skin pressure. The fibula is cut 1-2 cm shorter than the tibia and all bone edges are rasped smooth. For nerve management, I identify the tibial and sural nerves in the posterior compartment, apply gentle traction, and transect sharply with a fresh blade, allowing proximal retraction away from the scar. The crucial step is myodesis - I drill holes in the anterior tibia and suture the gastrocnemius flap securely to bone, maintaining physiological muscle tension. This provides proprioception, stable shape, and prevents muscle atrophy. Closure is fascia over muscle, then skin without tension. A soft dressing, rigid cast, or immediate post-operative prosthesis may be applied depending on local protocols.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Long posterior flap (Burgess technique) for durable coverage
45-degree anterior tibial bevel prevents skin breakdown
Fibula cut 1-2 cm shorter than tibia
Traction neurectomy for all major nerves
Myodesis of gastrocnemius to tibia is gold standard
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not mentioning the anterior tibial bevel
✗Describing myoplasty instead of myodesis
✗Forgetting to address nerve handling
✗Not specifying minimum bone length (12-15 cm)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the difference between myodesis and myoplasty?"
"How would you modify your technique for a vascular patient?"
"What are the advantages of the long posterior flap?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"A patient 6 months post-transfemoral amputation complains of severe burning pain in their absent leg. How would you assess and manage this patient?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient is describing phantom limb pain, which affects 70-80% of amputees. The burning quality is typical. My assessment would first differentiate phantom limb pain from residual limb pain by taking a thorough history. Phantom pain is perceived in the absent limb while residual limb pain is in the stump itself. I would characterize the pain including timing, triggers, relieving factors, and severity. I would examine the residual limb for local causes including neuroma (Tinel sign), socket fit issues, infection, or bone spurs. I would assess psychological wellbeing as depression and anxiety exacerbate phantom pain. For management, I would take a multimodal approach. Pharmacologically, first-line agents are gabapentinoids such as gabapentin or pregabalin which are effective for neuropathic pain. Tricyclic antidepressants like amitriptyline can be added. SNRIs such as duloxetine are useful, especially with comorbid depression. I avoid long-term opioids. Non-pharmacologically, mirror therapy has strong evidence from the Chan study in NEJM 2007 - the patient views their intact limb in a mirror, creating the illusion of the missing limb, which resolves cortical conflict. Graded motor imagery and TENS are also helpful. I would optimize residual limb care including socket fit, as prosthetic issues can exacerbate pain. I would involve the multidisciplinary team including pain specialist, prosthetist, physiotherapy, and psychology. For refractory cases, options include targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR), revision surgery for symptomatic neuroma, or neuromodulation techniques.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Distinguish phantom pain from residual limb pain
Gabapentinoids are first-line pharmacotherapy
Mirror therapy has strong evidence
Multidisciplinary approach essential
Optimize prosthetic fit and residual limb care
COMMON TRAPS
✗Confusing phantom and residual limb pain
✗Recommending opioids as first-line therapy
✗Not mentioning mirror therapy
✗Focusing only on pharmacological management
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the proposed mechanism of mirror therapy?"
"What are risk factors for developing phantom limb pain?"
"How might perioperative management reduce phantom pain incidence?"

Australian Context

Epidemiology in Australia

  • Diabetes prevalence increasing - 5.3% of population, higher in Indigenous Australians
  • Amputation rates 3 times higher in diabetic vs non-diabetic
  • Indigenous Australians have 13 times higher amputation rate
  • Peripheral vascular disease remains predominant indication
  • Regional variation with higher rates in rural/remote areas

Healthcare Access

  • State amputee rehabilitation units in major centers
  • PBS-subsidized prosthetics for eligible patients
  • Limbs 4 Life support organization (national)
  • NDIS funding for prosthetics and rehabilitation
  • Telehealth options for remote follow-up

Multidisciplinary Care in Australia:

The Australian model emphasizes multidisciplinary amputation rehabilitation. State amputee rehabilitation units provide comprehensive services including:

  • Prosthetist assessment and fitting (often same-day or early)
  • Physiotherapy for gait training and strengthening
  • Occupational therapy for ADL modification
  • Psychology support for adjustment and body image
  • Social work for community reintegration

Indigenous Health Considerations:

Indigenous Australians have significantly higher amputation rates due to higher prevalence of diabetes, later presentation, and reduced access to preventive care. Culturally appropriate services, community engagement, and improved access to vascular and podiatric services are priorities. The Close the Gap initiative includes targets for reducing amputation disparities.

Smoking Cessation Resources

Quitline (13 7848) should be offered to all patients preoperatively. Smoking cessation improves wound healing by approximately 30% and is critical for amputation success. Nicotine replacement therapy is PBS-subsidized.

AMPUTATION SURGICAL PRINCIPLES

High-Yield Exam Summary

Indications (VICTIM)

  • •Vascular: PVD, diabetes - 80% of amputations
  • •Infection: Uncontrolled sepsis, necrotizing fasciitis
  • •Congenital: PFFD, fibular hemimelia
  • •Trauma: Mangled extremity, MESS greater than 7
  • •Ischaemia: Irreversible, failed revascularization
  • •Malignancy: Limb salvage not possible

Level Selection

  • •Most distal level that will heal
  • •Preserve knee - 40-60% less energy vs AKA
  • •TcPO2 greater than 30-40 mmHg predicts healing
  • •Vascular surgery input essential for PVD
  • •Minimum 12-15 cm from tibial tuberosity (BKA)

Technique Principles

  • •Myodesis: Muscle to bone (gold standard)
  • •Myoplasty: Muscle to muscle/fascia (quicker)
  • •Long posterior flap for BKA (Burgess)
  • •45-degree anterior tibial bevel
  • •Traction neurectomy: Pull, sharp transect, retract

Nerve Management

  • •Identify nerve proximally
  • •Apply gentle longitudinal traction
  • •Transect sharply with fresh blade
  • •Allow retraction into soft tissues
  • •Position away from scar and pressure

Phantom Limb Pain

  • •Affects 70-80% of amputees
  • •Risk factor: Preoperative pain
  • •First-line: Gabapentinoids
  • •Mirror therapy: Strong evidence (NEJM 2007)
  • •Prevention: Perioperative regional analgesia

Complications

  • •Wound failure: 5-20% (higher in PVD)
  • •Revision rate: 5-30% depending on level
  • •Contractures: Prevent with early PT
  • •Neuroma: Tinel sign, desensitization/injection
  • •Depression: 30-50%, early psych support
Quick Stats
Reading Time101 min
Related Topics

Bone Transport Techniques

Deformity Analysis - CORA and MAD

Gout and Crystal Arthropathy

Ilizarov External Fixation