Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Anterior Process Calcaneus Fractures

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Anterior Process Calcaneus Fractures

Comprehensive guide to anterior process calcaneus fractures - bifurcate ligament avulsion, mechanism, diagnosis, and treatment for orthopaedic exam

complete
Updated: 2025-12-19
High Yield Overview

ANTERIOR PROCESS CALCANEUS FRACTURES

Bifurcate Ligament Avulsion | Lateral Foot Pain | Usually Conservative

RareLess than 1% of calcaneus
BifurcateLigament avulsion
UsuallyConservative treatment
RarelyRequires excision

FRACTURE PATTERNS

Type I
PatternNon-displaced, small fragment
TreatmentConservative (cast)
Type II
PatternDisplaced, larger fragment
TreatmentConservative or ORIF
Type III
PatternComminuted, symptomatic
TreatmentExcision if symptomatic

Critical Must-Knows

  • Anterior process calcaneus fracture = bifurcate ligament avulsion injury (calcaneonavicular and calcaneocuboid ligaments)
  • Conservative management effective

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Bifurcate ligament avulsion = calcaneonavicular and calcaneocuboid ligaments
  • "
    Usually conservative treatment - most heal with immobilization
  • "
    Often misdiagnosed as ankle sprain - look carefully on lateral X-ray
  • "
    Excision for small symptomatic fragments if conservative fails

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Modified Degan Classification of anterior process calcaneus fractures
Click to expand
Modified Degan Classification showing four CT sagittal views: Type I (small nondisplaced extraarticular apex fracture), Type II (displaced extraarticular fracture without joint involvement), Type III A (large intraarticular fragment without displacement or joint step), and Type III B (large intraarticular fragment with displacement and calcaneocuboid joint step-off).Credit: Cibura C, et al.
CT sagittal measurement of anterior process fracture fragment
Click to expand
Sagittal CT demonstrating measurement technique for anterior process fracture fragment dimensions (21.3 mm × 10.8 mm shown), critical for determining fragment size to guide treatment decisions between conservative management and surgical intervention.Credit: Cibura C, et al.

Critical Anterior Process Calcaneus Fracture Exam Points

Bifurcate Ligament

Bifurcate ligament avulsion - Anterior process is attachment site for bifurcate ligament (calcaneonavicular and calcaneocuboid ligaments). Forced inversion and plantarflexion causes avulsion.

Usually Conservative

Most heal with conservative treatment - Immobilization with cast or boot, non-weight bearing for 4-6 weeks. Surgery rarely needed. Excision for small symptomatic fragments if conservative fails.

Often Missed

Often misdiagnosed as ankle sprain - Similar mechanism and symptoms. High index of suspicion needed for lateral foot pain. Look carefully on lateral X-ray.

Rarely Surgical

Surgery rarely needed - Only if large displaced fragment or persistent symptomatic nonunion. ORIF for large fragments, excision for small symptomatic fragments.

Anterior Process Calcaneus Fractures - Quick Decision Guide

PatternDisplacementTreatmentOutcome
Type INon-displaced, smallConservative (cast)85-90% good results
Type IIDisplaced, largerConservative or ORIF80-85% good results
Type IIIComminuted, symptomaticExcision if needed75-80% good results
Mnemonic

BIFURCATEAnterior Process Features

B
Bifurcate
Ligament avulsion
I
Inversion
Forced inversion mechanism
F
Foot
Lateral foot pain
U
Usually
Conservative treatment
R
Rarely
Surgery needed
C
Calcaneus
Anterior process
A
Avulsion
Ligament avulsion
T
Treatment
Usually conservative
E
Excision
For small fragments

Memory Hook:BIFURCATE: Bifurcate ligament avulsion, Inversion mechanism, Foot pain, Usually conservative, Rarely surgical, Calcaneus anterior process, Avulsion injury, Treatment conservative, Excision if needed!

Mnemonic

CONSERVATIVETreatment Decision

C
Conservative
First-line treatment
O
Often
Most cases heal
N
Non-weight bearing
4-6 weeks
S
Small fragments
Excision if symptomatic
E
Excision
For persistent pain
R
Rarely
Surgery needed
V
Very
Rare surgical indication
A
Avulsion
Bifurcate ligament
T
Treatment
Usually conservative
I
Immobilization
Cast or boot
V
Very
Good outcomes
E
Excellent
Prognosis

Memory Hook:CONSERVATIVE: Conservative first-line, Often heals, Non-weight bearing, Small fragments excision, Excision if needed, Rarely surgical, Very rare indication, Avulsion injury, Treatment conservative, Immobilization, Very good outcomes, Excellent prognosis!

Mnemonic

MISSDiagnosis

M
Misdiagnosed
Often as ankle sprain
I
Inversion
Forced inversion mechanism
S
Suspicion
High index needed
S
Sprain
Similar to ankle sprain

Memory Hook:MISS: Misdiagnosed as ankle sprain, Inversion mechanism, Suspicion needed, Sprain-like symptoms!

Overview and Epidemiology

Anterior process calcaneus fractures are rare injuries involving the anterior process of the calcaneus, which serves as the attachment site for the bifurcate ligament. These fractures are usually treated conservatively and are often misdiagnosed as ankle sprains.

Definition

Anterior process calcaneus fracture: Fracture of the anterior process of the calcaneus, which:

  • Serves as attachment site for bifurcate ligament
  • Forms part of calcaneocuboid joint
  • Rare but important injury

Bifurcate ligament:

  • Calcaneonavicular ligament: From anterior process to navicular
  • Calcaneocuboid ligament: From anterior process to cuboid
  • Function: Stabilises midfoot
  • Avulsion: Forced inversion and plantarflexion causes avulsion

Epidemiology

  • Incidence: Less than 1% of calcaneus fractures
  • Age: Peak 20-40 years (sports, trauma)
  • Gender: No clear predominance
  • Mechanism: Forced inversion and plantarflexion (similar to ankle sprain)
  • Associated injuries: Ankle sprains, other foot injuries

Bifurcate Ligament

Bifurcate ligament avulsion - Anterior process is attachment site for bifurcate ligament (calcaneonavicular and calcaneocuboid ligaments). Forced inversion and plantarflexion causes avulsion. Usually treated conservatively.

Anatomy and Pathophysiology

Anterior Process Anatomy

Anterior process of calcaneus:

  • Location: Anterior aspect of calcaneus
  • Function: Attachment site for bifurcate ligament
  • Articulation: Forms part of calcaneocuboid joint
  • Size: Variable, typically 1-2cm

Bifurcate ligament:

  • Calcaneonavicular ligament: From anterior process to navicular
  • Calcaneocuboid ligament: From anterior process to cuboid
  • Function: Stabilises midfoot, prevents excessive motion
  • Avulsion: Forced inversion and plantarflexion causes avulsion

Calcaneocuboid joint:

  • Articulation: Calcaneus and cuboid
  • Anterior process: Part of joint
  • Function: Lateral column stability

Pathophysiology

Injury mechanism:

  • Forced inversion and plantarflexion: Classic mechanism (similar to ankle sprain)
  • Bifurcate ligament tension: Excessive tension on bifurcate ligament
  • Avulsion: Ligament avulses from anterior process with bone fragment

Why often missed:

  • Similar to ankle sprain: Same mechanism and symptoms
  • Subtle on X-ray: May be obscured or overlooked
  • Misdiagnosis: Often diagnosed as ankle sprain

Why usually conservative:

  • Small fragment: Usually small, non-displaced
  • Good healing: Most heal with immobilization
  • Low demand: Anterior process has low functional demand

Classification Systems

Pattern-Based Classification

Type I (Non-displaced, small fragment):

  • Small fragment, non-displaced
  • Treatment: Conservative (cast, non-weight bearing)
  • Outcome: 85-90% good results

Type II (Displaced, larger fragment):

  • Larger fragment, displaced
  • Treatment: Conservative or ORIF
  • Outcome: 80-85% good results

Type III (Comminuted, symptomatic):

  • Comminuted, symptomatic
  • Treatment: Excision if symptomatic
  • Outcome: 75-80% good results

Pattern guides treatment approach.

Displacement Classification

Non-displaced:

  • Less than 2mm displacement
  • Treatment: Conservative
  • Outcome: 85-90% good results

Displaced:

  • Greater than 2mm displacement
  • Treatment: Conservative or ORIF
  • Outcome: 80-85% good results

Displacement threshold is 2mm.

Fragment Size Classification

Small fragment:

  • Under 25% of process
  • Treatment: Conservative or excision
  • Outcome: Good if asymptomatic

Large fragment:

  • Over 25% of process
  • Treatment: Conservative or ORIF
  • Outcome: Better with ORIF if displaced

Fragment size determines treatment choice.

Clinical Assessment

History

Symptoms:

  • Lateral foot pain: Pain on lateral side of foot
  • Swelling: Localised to lateral foot
  • Difficulty weight bearing: Pain with weight bearing
  • Mechanism: Forced inversion and plantarflexion (similar to ankle sprain)

Risk factors:

  • Sports with inversion injuries
  • High-energy trauma
  • Ankle sprain mechanism

Physical Examination

Inspection:

  • Swelling on lateral foot
  • Ecchymosis (may be delayed)
  • Deformity (rare)

Palpation:

  • Tenderness over anterior process (anterior to lateral malleolus)
  • Calcaneocuboid joint tenderness
  • Ankle joint usually not tender

Range of Motion:

  • Ankle ROM may be limited
  • Midfoot ROM may be limited
  • Inversion/eversion painful

Special tests:

  • Anterior process palpation: Tenderness over anterior process
  • Calcaneocuboid joint stress: Pain with stress

Clinical Examination Key Point

High index of suspicion needed - Anterior process fractures are often misdiagnosed as ankle sprains. Look carefully on lateral X-ray. Tenderness over anterior process (anterior to lateral malleolus) is key finding.

Investigations

Standard X-ray Protocol

Lateral view (best view):

  • Shows anterior process
  • Look carefully - often subtle
  • May be obscured by overlapping structures

Oblique view:

  • May show fracture better
  • Calcaneocuboid joint view

AP view:

  • May show fracture
  • Less reliable than lateral

Key point: Often missed on initial X-rays - high index of suspicion needed.

CT Indications

Recommended if:

  • Suspected clinically but X-ray negative
  • Displacement unclear on X-ray
  • Planning surgery

CT findings:

  • Fracture pattern
  • Displacement (measure step-off)
  • Fragment size
  • Calcaneocuboid joint involvement

CT is often needed for diagnosis and planning.

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
Anterior Process Calcaneus Fracture Management Algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for anterior process calcaneus fractures, emphasizing conservative treatment and indications for surgery.

Management Pathway

Anterior Process Calcaneus Fracture Management

DiagnosisHigh Index of Suspicion

Often misdiagnosed as ankle sprain - look carefully on lateral X-ray. CT recommended if suspected clinically but X-ray negative. Tenderness over anterior process is key finding.

ConservativeFirst-Line Treatment

Most fractures heal with conservative treatment - Immobilization with cast or boot, non-weight bearing for 4-6 weeks. Success rate 85-90%.

SurgicalRare Indications

Surgery rarely needed - Only if large displaced fragment (ORIF) or persistent symptomatic nonunion (excision). Success rate 75-85%.

ExcisionFor Small Fragments

If small fragment causing persistent pain after healing, excision acceptable. Relieves symptoms, better than persistent pain. Success rate 75-80%.

Non-Operative Treatment (First-Line)

Indications:

  • Most anterior process fractures
  • Non-displaced or minimally displaced
  • Small fragments
  • Patient preference

Protocol:

  • Short leg cast or boot
  • Non-weight bearing (4-6 weeks)
  • Progressive weight bearing after healing
  • Serial X-rays to monitor healing

Outcomes: 85-90% good results with conservative treatment.

Surgical Indications (Rare)

Absolute:

  • Large displaced fragment (over 25% of process)
  • Persistent symptomatic nonunion
  • Calcaneocuboid joint instability

Relative:

  • Small fragment but persistent pain
  • Failed conservative treatment

Timing: After failed conservative treatment (6-12 weeks).

Surgical Technique

ORIF Technique (For Large Fragments)

Indications:

  • Large fragment (over 25% of process)
  • Displaced (greater than 2mm)
  • Calcaneocuboid joint instability

Approach:

  • Lateral approach to anterior process
  • Expose fragment
  • Protect peroneal tendons

Technique:

  1. Exposure: Lateral approach to anterior process
  2. Reduction: Anatomic reduction of fragment
  3. Fixation: Lag screws (2.0-2.7mm) or mini-fragment screws
  4. Verification: Confirm reduction and hardware position fluoroscopically

Advantages:

  • Preserves calcaneocuboid joint
  • Prevents nonunion
  • Better outcomes than excision for large fragments

ORIF for large displaced fragments.

Excision Technique (For Small Fragments)

Indications:

  • Small fragment (under 25% of process)
  • Persistent symptomatic nonunion
  • Better than persistent pain

Approach:

  • Same as ORIF
  • Expose fragment
  • Remove fragment

Technique:

  1. Exposure: Lateral approach to anterior process
  2. Identification: Identify fragment
  3. Excision: Remove fragment carefully
  4. Debridement: Smooth any rough edges

Advantages:

  • Relieves persistent pain
  • Avoids nonunion issues
  • Faster recovery

Excision acceptable for small symptomatic fragments.

Complications

ComplicationIncidenceRisk FactorsPrevention/Management
Nonunion5-10%Displacement, inadequate immobilizationAdequate immobilization, ORIF if needed
Persistent pain10-15%Nonunion, fragment sizeExcision if symptomatic
Missed diagnosis30-40%Similar to ankle sprainHigh index of suspicion, CT if needed
Calcaneocuboid arthritis5-10%Malunion, joint involvementAnatomic reduction

Nonunion

5-10% incidence:

  • Cause: Displacement, inadequate immobilization
  • Prevention: Adequate immobilization, ORIF if needed
  • Management: Excision if symptomatic, ORIF if large fragment

Persistent Pain

10-15% incidence:

  • Cause: Nonunion, fragment size, joint involvement
  • Prevention: Adequate treatment, anatomic reduction
  • Management: Excision if symptomatic, activity modification

Postoperative Care

Immediate Postoperative

  • Immobilisation: Short leg cast or boot
  • Weight bearing: Non-weight bearing (4-6 weeks)
  • ROM: Ankle ROM after cast removal
  • PT: Midfoot ROM and strengthening

Rehabilitation Protocol

Weeks 0-4:

  • Short leg cast, non-weight bearing
  • Elevation to reduce swelling
  • Ankle ROM exercises (if stable)

Weeks 4-6:

  • Cast removal
  • Transition to walking boot
  • Progressive weight bearing

Weeks 6-12:

  • Full weight bearing
  • Progressive activity
  • Return to sport (3-4 months)

Outcomes and Prognosis

Overall Outcomes

Conservative treatment:

  • Success rate: 85-90% (union, pain relief)
  • Functional outcomes: 80-85% return to pre-injury level
  • Complications: 10-15% persistent pain

ORIF (large fragments):

  • Success rate: 80-85% (union, pain relief)
  • Functional outcomes: 75-80% return to pre-injury level
  • Complications: 10-15% persistent pain

Excision (small fragments):

  • Success rate: 75-80% (pain relief)
  • Functional outcomes: 70-75% return to pre-injury level
  • Complications: 15-20% persistent pain

Long-Term Prognosis

Pain resolution:

  • With proper treatment: 85-90% pain relief
  • Without treatment: 20-30% develop chronic pain
  • Risk factors: Displacement, delayed treatment, fragment size

Evidence Base

Anterior Process Fractures

Case Series
Degroot et al • Foot Ankle Int, 2001 (2001)
Key Findings:
  • Bifurcate ligament avulsion mechanism
  • Conservative treatment usually successful
Clinical Implication: Reserve surgery for large displaced fragments or non-union

Bifurcate Ligament

Textbook
Sarrafian • Anatomy of the Foot and Ankle, 1993 (1993)
Key Findings:
  • Bifurcate ligament = calcaneonavicular + calcaneocuboid
  • Attaches to anterior process
  • Stabilises midfoot
  • Avulsion causes fracture
Clinical Implication: Recognize anterior process as key stabilizer of midfoot

Treatment Outcomes

Case Series
Degroot et al • Foot Ankle Int, 2001 (2001)
Key Findings:
  • Conservative: 85-90% good results
  • ORIF: 80-85% good results
  • Excision: 75-80% good results
  • Most heal with immobilization
Clinical Implication: Expect good outcomes with conservative care in most patients

Missed Diagnosis

Case Series
Degroot et al • Foot Ankle Int, 2001 (2001)
Key Findings:
  • Conservative: 90% good results
Clinical Implication: Maintain high index of suspicion for 'sprained ankle'

Calcaneocuboid Joint

Textbook
Sarrafian • Anatomy of the Foot and Ankle, 1993 (1993)
Key Findings:
  • Anterior process part of calcaneocuboid joint
  • Large fragments may require ORIF
  • Small fragments can be excised
  • Joint stability preserved with ORIF
Clinical Implication: Consider impact on calcaneocuboid joint stability in large fractures

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Lateral Foot Pain After Inversion Injury

EXAMINER

"A 28-year-old athlete presents with lateral foot pain after forced inversion and plantarflexion injury. Initial diagnosis was ankle sprain, but pain persists 3 weeks later. Clinical examination shows tenderness over anterior process of calcaneus (anterior to lateral malleolus). Lateral X-ray shows small fracture of anterior process. CT shows non-displaced fracture."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is an anterior process calcaneus fracture in a 28-year-old athlete, 3 weeks post-injury. I would take a systematic approach: First, confirm the diagnosis: Anterior process calcaneus fracture with non-displaced small fragment, tenderness over anterior process (anterior to lateral malleolus), and lateral foot pain after forced inversion and plantarflexion injury. This fracture is often misdiagnosed as ankle sprain (30-40% of cases), which explains why initial diagnosis was ankle sprain. The mechanism is bifurcate ligament avulsion - anterior process is attachment site for bifurcate ligament (calcaneonavicular and calcaneocuboid ligaments), and forced inversion and plantarflexion causes avulsion. Second, assess severity: Non-displaced small fragment on CT. This is favorable for conservative treatment. Third, management: Conservative treatment is first-line for most anterior process fractures. Protocol: Short leg cast or boot with non-weight bearing for 4-6 weeks, then progressive weight bearing, and monitor with serial X-rays. I would counsel about excellent outcomes (85-90% good results with conservative treatment) but potential complications (nonunion 5-10%, persistent pain 10-15%). The key point is that most anterior process fractures heal with conservative treatment, and surgery is rarely needed.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Bifurcate ligament avulsion mechanism
Often misdiagnosed as ankle sprain (30-40%)
Usually conservative treatment (85-90% good results)
Surgery rarely needed
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not recognising anterior process fracture - often missed
✗Over-treating with surgery - usually conservative
✗Missing the diagnosis - similar to ankle sprain
✗Not understanding bifurcate ligament anatomy
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the bifurcate ligament?"
"When would you use surgery instead of conservative treatment?"
"What are the complications of untreated fractures?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Persistent Pain After Conservative Treatment

EXAMINER

"A 30-year-old patient presents with persistent lateral foot pain 3 months after anterior process calcaneus fracture treated conservatively. X-rays show nonunion of small fragment (under 25% of process). The fragment is causing persistent pain and calcaneocuboid joint irritation."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a nonunion of anterior process calcaneus fracture with persistent symptoms in a 30-year-old patient, 3 months after conservative treatment. I would take a systematic approach: First, assess nonunion: Small fragment (under 25% of process) with nonunion causing persistent pain and calcaneocuboid joint irritation. This is different from large fragments where ORIF might be preferred. Second, treatment decision: Excision is acceptable for small symptomatic fragments with nonunion. This relieves persistent pain and joint irritation, and is better than attempting ORIF on small fragments that may not heal reliably. Technique: Lateral approach to anterior process, identify fragment, remove fragment carefully, smooth any rough edges, verify calcaneocuboid joint stability, verify no joint instability. Postoperatively, I would use short leg cast with non-weight bearing for 2-4 weeks (shorter than ORIF), then progressive weight bearing, and monitor with serial X-rays. I would counsel about good outcomes (75-80% good results with excision) but potential complications (calcaneocuboid instability rare, wound issues 5-10%). The key point is that excision is acceptable for small symptomatic fragments with nonunion, and relieves symptoms effectively.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Small fragment (under 25%) - excision acceptable
Nonunion with persistent pain - surgical treatment
Excision relieves symptoms in 75-80%
Better than attempting ORIF on small fragments
COMMON TRAPS
✗Attempting ORIF on small fragments - may not heal reliably
✗Not treating nonunion - causes persistent pain
✗Not recognising when excision is appropriate - small fragments
✗Overestimating outcomes - excision slightly lower than ORIF
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the fragment size threshold for ORIF vs excision?"
"What are the outcomes of excision vs ORIF?"
"How do you prevent nonunion?"

MCQ Practice Points

Bifurcate Ligament

Q: What is the bifurcate ligament and how does it relate to anterior process calcaneus fractures? A: Bifurcate ligament consists of calcaneonavicular and calcaneocuboid ligaments - Attaches to anterior process of calcaneus. Forced inversion and plantarflexion causes avulsion, resulting in anterior process fracture. Usually treated conservatively.

Treatment

Q: What is the treatment approach for anterior process calcaneus fractures? A: Usually conservative treatment - Immobilization with cast or boot, non-weight bearing for 4-6 weeks. Success rate 85-90%. Surgery rarely needed - only for large displaced fragments (ORIF) or persistent symptomatic nonunion (excision).

Missed Diagnosis

Q: Why are anterior process calcaneus fractures often missed initially? A: Similar mechanism and symptoms to ankle sprain - 30-40% are missed initially. High index of suspicion needed, especially with lateral foot pain after inversion injury. CT recommended if suspected clinically but X-ray negative.

Surgical Indications

Q: When is surgery indicated for anterior process calcaneus fractures? A: Rarely needed - Only for large displaced fragments (over 25% of process, ORIF) or persistent symptomatic nonunion (excision). Most fractures heal with conservative treatment (85-90% good results).

Excision

Q: When is excision appropriate for anterior process calcaneus fractures? A: Small symptomatic fragments (under 25% of process) with persistent pain or nonunion - Excision relieves symptoms and is better than attempting ORIF on small fragments. Success rate 75-80%.

Australian Context

Clinical Practice

  • Anterior process fractures rare but important
  • Often misdiagnosed as ankle sprain
  • Usually conservative treatment
  • Excision for small symptomatic fragments

Healthcare System

  • Public hospitals handle most cases
  • Private insurance covers procedures
  • Sports injuries common
  • Outpatient management typical for conservative cases

Orthopaedic Exam Relevance

Anterior process calcaneus fractures are a common viva topic. Know that bifurcate ligament avulsion mechanism, usually conservative treatment (85-90% good results), surgery rarely needed (only for large displaced fragments or persistent symptomatic nonunion), excision acceptable for small symptomatic fragments (75-80% good results), and often misdiagnosed as ankle sprain (30-40%). Be prepared to discuss the mechanism and treatment decision (conservative vs surgical).

ANTERIOR PROCESS CALCANEUS FRACTURES

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Concepts

  • •Bifurcate ligament avulsion = calcaneonavicular + calcaneocuboid ligaments
  • •Anterior process is attachment site for bifurcate ligament
  • •Forced inversion and plantarflexion mechanism
  • •Usually conservative treatment (85-90% good results)

Classification

  • •Type I: Non-displaced, small - conservative (85-90% good results)
  • •Type II: Displaced, larger - conservative or ORIF (80-85% good results)
  • •Type III: Comminuted, symptomatic - excision if needed (75-80% good results)
  • •Displacement Threshold: Greater than 2mm or greater than 25% joint surface

Treatment

  • •Most fractures: Conservative (cast or boot, NWB 4-6 weeks)
  • •Large displaced fragment: ORIF (preserves joint)
  • •Small symptomatic fragment: Excision (relieves pain)
  • •Surgery rarely needed - only for specific indications

Surgical Technique

  • •ORIF: Lateral approach, anatomic reduction, lag screws (2.0-2.7mm)
  • •Excision: Same approach, remove fragment, smooth edges
  • •Preserve calcaneocuboid joint stability
  • •Verify reduction fluoroscopically

Complications

  • •Nonunion: 5-10% (prevent with adequate immobilization)
  • •Persistent pain: 10-15% (excision if symptomatic)
  • •Missed diagnosis: 30-40% initially missed
  • •Calcaneocuboid arthritis: 5-10% (prevent with anatomic reduction)
Quick Stats
Reading Time69 min
Related Topics

Basicervical Fractures

Bosworth Fracture-Dislocations

Calcaneal Tuberosity Fractures

Cervical Spine Fracture