Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Cervical Spine Fracture

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Cervical Spine Fracture

Comprehensive guide to cervical spine fractures for FRCS exam preparation

complete
Updated: 2025-12-25
High Yield Overview

CERVICAL SPINE FRACTURE

Immobilization | ATLS | Upper vs Subaxial

C-spineImmobilize until cleared
C1/C2Upper cervical
C3-C7Subaxial
SLICSubaxial classification

Key Patterns

C1 (Jefferson)
PatternBurst fracture of atlas
TreatmentUsually conservative (collar)
C2 (Odontoid)
PatternDens fracture
TreatmentType II: Surgery often needed
C2 (Hangman)
PatternBilateral C2 pars fracture
TreatmentHalo or surgery
Subaxial
PatternSLIC scoring
TreatmentScore greater than or equal to 5: Surgery

Critical Must-Knows

  • ATLS immobilization until cleared clinically and radiologically
  • Upper cervical (C1-C2) injuries have specific patterns
  • Subaxial cervical (C3-C7): Use SLIC score to guide treatment
  • MRI if neurological deficit or to assess ligaments
  • NEXUS or Canadian C-spine rules for clearance

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Jefferson fracture: Lateral mass spread greater than 7mm = TAL rupture
  • "
    Odontoid Type II (base of dens) has high nonunion rate
  • "
    Hangman's is usually stable (paradoxically) unless severe
  • "
    SLIC greater than or equal to 5 = surgery, 3-4 = equivocal, less than 3 = conservative

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

2-panel cervical spine imaging (A,B) in 67-year-old male with C2-C4 fracture after fall: (A) lateral X-ray with arrow indicating fracture, (B) coronal CT reconstruction with arrows showing fracture ex
Click to expand
2-panel cervical spine imaging (A,B) in 67-year-old male with C2-C4 fracture after fall: (A) lateral X-ray with arrow indicating fracture, (B) coronalCredit: Morita Y et al. - Medicine (Baltimore) via Open-i (NIH) - PMC4616526 (CC-BY 4.0)
2-panel X-rays in ankylosing spondylitis patient with occult cervical fracture: (a) lateral view showing bamboo spine appearance, (b) AP view showing fused spine - illustrates difficulty detecting fra
Click to expand
2-panel X-rays in ankylosing spondylitis patient with occult cervical fracture: (a) lateral view showing bamboo spine appearance, (b) AP view showing Credit: Yagi M et al. - Case Rep Orthop via Open-i (NIH) - PMC4578748 (CC-BY 4.0)

Critical Cervical Spine Fracture Points

Immobilization

All trauma patients: Assume C-spine injury until cleared. Rigid collar, log-roll, in-line immobilization for intubation. NEXUS/Canadian C-spine rules guide clearance.

Upper Cervical

C1 (Atlas): Jefferson (burst) - TAL integrity key. C2 (Axis): Odontoid (Type I/II/III) and Hangman's (bilateral pars). Require specialized imaging and often halo or surgery.

SLIC Score

Subaxial Injury Classification (C3-C7). Scores morphology, disco-ligamentous complex, neurology. Score greater than or equal to 5 = surgery. 3-4 = equivocal. Less than 3 = conservative.

MRI

Essential if: Neurological deficit, obtunded patient, suspected ligamentous injury. May show disc herniation, cord contusion, ligament disruption.

At a Glance

Cervical spine fractures require immediate immobilization until clinically and radiologically cleared using NEXUS or Canadian C-spine rules. Upper cervical injuries (C1-C2) include Jefferson fracture (C1 burst - lateral mass spread greater than 7mm indicates TAL rupture), odontoid fractures (Type II at dens base has highest nonunion rate requiring surgery), and Hangman's fracture (bilateral C2 pars - paradoxically stable unless severely displaced). Subaxial injuries (C3-C7) are classified using the SLIC score combining morphology, disco-ligamentous complex status, and neurological status; scores ≥5 indicate surgery, ≤2 conservative management, 3-4 equivocal. MRI is essential for neurological deficit or suspected ligamentous injury.

Mnemonic

1-2-3Odontoid Fracture Types

I
Tip of dens (avulsion)
Stable, conservative
II
Base of dens (waist)
Unstable, high nonunion, often surgery
III
Into C2 body
Extends into body, usually heals (halo)

Memory Hook:Type II = Trouble (high nonunion)!

Overview

Cervical spine fractures are potentially devastating injuries. The priority is to protect the spinal cord while evaluating and treating the bony and ligamentous injury.

ATLS Approach

  • Immobilize in rigid collar
  • Log-roll for turns
  • In-line immobilization for airway management
  • Do NOT remove collar until cleared

Imaging

X-rays: Less commonly used now (CT is standard).

CT: Primary imaging for bony injury.

MRI: For neurological deficit, to assess ligaments, disc, and cord.

Upper Cervical (C1-C2)

Jefferson Fracture: Burst fracture of C1 (atlas) - typically 4-part fracture of both arches.

Mechanism: Axial load (e.g., diving).

Key: Assess transverse atlantal ligament (TAL) integrity.

Rule of Spence: Combined lateral mass overhang greater than 7mm on open-mouth X-ray suggests TAL rupture → unstable.

Treatment:

  • TAL intact: Rigid collar or halo
  • TAL ruptured: Surgical stabilization (C1-C2 fusion)
Axial CT scan showing Jefferson fracture of the C1 atlas
Click to expand
Jefferson fracture: Axial CT demonstrating a burst fracture of the C1 ring (atlas). Note the fractures through both the anterior and posterior arches. The Rule of Spence applies when measuring lateral mass overhang on coronal images - combined overhang greater than 7mm indicates TAL rupture and instability.Credit: Utz M, Khan S, O'Connor D, Meyers S. Insights into Imaging 2013 - CC-BY 4.0

Odontoid (Dens) Fracture:

Type I: Avulsion of tip (rare). Stable. Conservative.

Type II: Fracture through base of dens (most common). High nonunion risk. Often requires anterior odontoid screw or posterior C1-C2 fusion.

Type III: Fracture extends into C2 body. Better blood supply. Usually heals with halo.

Risk factors for Type II nonunion: Age greater than 50, displacement greater than 5mm, posterior displacement.

Hangman's Fracture: Bilateral fracture through C2 pars interarticularis.

Mechanism: Hyperextension + axial load.

Paradoxically often neurologically intact (fracture decompresses canal by enlarging it).

Classification (Levine-Edwards):

  • Type I: Less than 3mm displacement → collar
  • Type II: Greater than 3mm, angulation → halo or surgery
  • Type IIA: Significant angulation, flexion mechanism → traction contraindicated, surgery
  • Type III: With facet dislocation → surgery
CT scan showing bilateral C2 pars interarticularis fractures (Hangman's fracture)
Click to expand
Hangman's fracture: Sagittal and axial CT images demonstrating traumatic spondylolisthesis of C2 with bilateral pars interarticularis fractures. This injury pattern typically results from hyperextension with axial loading. Despite the dramatic appearance, patients are often neurologically intact because the fracture paradoxically enlarges the spinal canal.Credit: Utz M, Khan S, O'Connor D, Meyers S. Insights into Imaging 2013 - CC-BY 4.0

Subaxial Cervical (C3-C7)

SLIC Score (Subaxial Injury Classification)

FeaturePoints
Morphology
Compression1
Burst2
Distraction3
Rotation/Translation4
DLC (Disco-Ligamentous)
Intact0
Indeterminate1
Disrupted2
Neurology
Intact0
Root injury1
Incomplete cord3
Complete cord2
Ongoing compression + neuro+1

Total Score:

  • Less than 3: Conservative (collar)
  • 3-4: Equivocal (surgeon discretion)
  • Greater than or equal to 5: Surgery

Common Patterns

Facet Dislocation: Unilateral or bilateral. Rotational/translational injury. Usually requires reduction and fusion.

Compression Fracture: Anterior wedging. May be stable if posterior elements intact.

Burst Fracture: Retropulsion into canal. May need surgery if cord compression.

Spinal Cord Protection

The primary goal in cervical spine trauma is to protect the spinal cord from further injury. Maintain immobilization until fully assessed. Any neurological deterioration requires urgent MRI and surgical consultation.

Anatomy

Upper Cervical Spine (C0-C2)

Atlantooccipital Joint (C0-C1)

  • Allows 50% of cervical flexion-extension
  • Stabilized by tectorial membrane, alar ligaments, cruciate ligament

Atlas (C1)

  • Ring structure without vertebral body
  • Anterior and posterior arches with lateral masses
  • Articulates with occipital condyles superiorly, C2 inferiorly

Axis (C2)

  • Contains odontoid process (dens) projecting superiorly
  • Dens articulates with anterior arch of C1
  • Transverse atlantal ligament (TAL) holds dens against C1 anterior arch
  • Large spinous process and pars interarticularis

Key Ligaments

  • Transverse Atlantal Ligament (TAL): Primary stabilizer of C1-C2; prevents anterior translation of C1
  • Alar Ligaments: Limit rotation
  • Tectorial Membrane: Continuation of PLL to occiput
  • Cruciate Ligament: TAL + vertical bands

Subaxial Cervical Spine (C3-C7)

Vertebral Structure

  • Anterior column: Vertebral body, intervertebral disc
  • Posterior column: Pedicles, lateral masses, facet joints, laminae, spinous processes
  • Uncovertebral joints (joints of Luschka): Unique to cervical spine

Disco-Ligamentous Complex (DLC)

  • Anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL)
  • Posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL)
  • Intervertebral disc
  • Facet joint capsules
  • Ligamentum flavum
  • Interspinous ligament

Neural Structures

  • Spinal cord: Terminates as conus at L1-L2
  • Cervical roots exit above same-numbered vertebra (C6 root exits at C5-C6)
  • Vertebral arteries traverse foramen transversarium C6-C1

Classification

Occipital Condyle Fractures (Anderson & Montesano)

TypeDescriptionStability
IImpaction from axial loadStable
IIBasilar skull fracture extensionStable
IIIAvulsion by alar ligamentPotentially unstable

Atlantooccipital Dissociation (Traynelis)

TypeDirectionTreatment
IAnteriorFusion
IILongitudinal (distraction)Fusion
IIIPosteriorFusion

C1 Ring Fractures (Jefferson)

  • Burst fracture from axial load
  • Typically 4-part (both arches)
  • Rule of Spence: Lateral mass overhang greater than 7mm = TAL rupture = unstable

Odontoid Fractures (Anderson & D'Alonzo)

TypeLocationNonunion RiskTreatment
ITip (avulsion)LowCollar
IIBase (waist)High (40%)Surgery often
IIIInto C2 bodyLowHalo

Hangman's Fracture (Levine-Edwards)

TypeDisplacementAngulationTreatment
ILess than 3mmMinimalCollar
IIGreater than 3mmPresentHalo or surgery
IIAMinimalSevereSurgery (traction contraindicated)
IIIFacet dislocationSevereSurgery

SLIC Score (Subaxial Injury Classification)

Morphology

PatternPoints
No abnormality0
Compression1
Burst2
Distraction3
Rotation/Translation4

Disco-Ligamentous Complex (DLC)

StatusPoints
Intact0
Indeterminate1
Disrupted2

Neurological Status

FindingPoints
Intact0
Root injury1
Complete cord injury2
Incomplete cord injury3
Ongoing cord compression + deficit+1

Treatment Guide

  • Score ≤3: Non-operative (collar)
  • Score 4: Surgeon discretion
  • Score ≥5: Operative

AOSpine Subaxial Classification

Type A: Compression

  • A0: Minor, non-structural
  • A1: Compression/wedge
  • A2: Split/pincer
  • A3: Incomplete burst
  • A4: Complete burst

Type B: Tension Band Injuries

  • B1: Posterior tension band injury (bony)
  • B2: Posterior tension band injury (ligamentous)
  • B3: Anterior tension band injury (hyperextension)

Type C: Translation/Rotation

  • Any displacement in axial plane
  • Most unstable

Modifiers

  • M1: Posterior tension band unclassifiable
  • N0-N4: Neurological status
  • F: Facet injury specifier

Clinical Assessment

Primary Survey (ATLS)

Airway with C-spine protection

  • In-line stabilization for intubation
  • Avoid neck extension
  • Consider awake fiberoptic intubation if time permits

Breathing and Circulation

  • Neurogenic shock: Hypotension + bradycardia (loss of sympathetic tone)
  • Differentiate from hypovolemic shock

Disability

  • GCS and pupillary response
  • Spinal cord injury level

Neurological Examination

Motor Assessment (ASIA/ISNCSCI)

LevelKey MuscleAction
C5BicepsElbow flexion
C6Wrist extensorsWrist extension
C7TricepsElbow extension
C8FDP (middle finger)Finger flexion
T1InterosseiFinger abduction

Sensory Assessment

LevelKey Dermatome
C4Top of shoulders
C5Lateral arm
C6Thumb
C7Middle finger
C8Little finger
T1Medial arm

ASIA Impairment Scale

  • A: Complete - No motor/sensory function in S4-S5
  • B: Sensory incomplete - Sensory but no motor below level, including S4-S5
  • C: Motor incomplete - Motor function preserved, majority of key muscles less than 3/5
  • D: Motor incomplete - Motor function preserved, majority ≥3/5
  • E: Normal

Clearance Criteria

Canadian C-Spine Rules

  1. Any high-risk factor? → Imaging
    • Age ≥65, dangerous mechanism, paresthesias
  2. Any low-risk factor allowing ROM? → Can assess ROM
    • Simple rear-end MVC, ambulatory, delayed pain onset
  3. Can actively rotate 45° each direction? → No imaging needed

NEXUS Criteria (all must be present)

  • No midline tenderness
  • No focal neurological deficit
  • Normal alertness
  • No intoxication
  • No distracting injury

Investigations

Imaging Algorithm

CT Cervical Spine (First-line)

  • Indicated for all significant trauma
  • Skull base to T1 (include C7-T1 junction)
  • 100% sensitivity for fractures
  • Assess: Alignment, fracture pattern, canal compromise
Multiplanar CT reconstruction of cervical spine fracture
Click to expand
Comprehensive CT assessment of cervical spine trauma: (a) Coronal reconstruction showing vertebral body alignment and lateral mass integrity. (b) Sagittal reconstruction demonstrating overall cervical lordosis, vertebral body heights, and facet alignment. (c) Coronal view of cervicothoracic junction - critical to include C7-T1 in all trauma imaging. (d) Sagittal view showing fracture detail. Multiplanar CT reconstruction is the gold standard for cervical spine trauma assessment with 100% sensitivity for fractures.Credit: Open-i/PMC - CC BY 4.0

MRI Cervical Spine

  • Indications:
    • Neurological deficit
    • Obtunded patient (cannot clinically clear)
    • Suspected ligamentous injury (DLC)
    • Suspected disc herniation
  • Findings: Cord edema/contusion, disc herniation, ligament rupture (bright T2 signal)
  • Timing: Within 24-72 hours for acute injury

CT Angiography

  • Indications:
    • Fracture through foramen transversarium
    • Facet subluxation/dislocation
    • High-energy mechanism
  • Screens for vertebral artery injury (dissection, occlusion)

Key Imaging Findings

Upper Cervical

  • Jefferson: Open-mouth (odontoid) view - lateral mass overhang
  • Odontoid: Sagittal CT - fracture line location
  • Hangman: Bilateral C2 pars fractures

Subaxial

  • Facet dislocation: Perched or locked facets on sagittal CT
  • DLC disruption on MRI: Bright signal in ligaments/disc
  • Canal compromise: Measure for surgical planning

Laboratory Studies

  • FBC, coagulation profile (pre-operative)
  • Group and screen
  • Consider arterial blood gas if respiratory compromise

Management

📊 Management Algorithm
Management algorithm for Cervical Spine Fracture
Click to expand
Management algorithm for Cervical Spine FractureCredit: OrthoVellum

Immediate Management

Immobilization

  • Rigid cervical collar (properly sized)
  • Log-roll precautions
  • In-line stabilization for all procedures

Hemodynamic Support

  • Target MAP 85-90 mmHg for spinal cord injury
  • Differentiate neurogenic from hypovolemic shock
  • Vasopressors if needed (norepinephrine)

Steroids

  • Methylprednisolone NO LONGER recommended
  • AANS/CNS guidelines: Risks outweigh benefits
  • May increase infection, GI bleeding risk

Thromboprophylaxis

  • High risk for VTE
  • Mechanical prophylaxis immediately
  • Chemical prophylaxis within 72 hours (if no active bleeding)

Non-Operative Management

Rigid Collar

  • Aspen, Miami J, or Philadelphia collar
  • Duration: 6-12 weeks typically
  • Indications: Stable injuries, SLIC ≤3

Halo Vest

  • More rigid immobilization
  • Indications:
    • Odontoid Type III
    • Some Hangman's fractures
    • Unstable injuries in patients unfit for surgery
  • Duration: 8-12 weeks
  • Complications: Pin site infection, loosening, pressure sores, dysphagia

Traction

  • Gardner-Wells tongs or halo ring
  • Start at 5-10 lbs, increase by 5 lbs per level
  • Serial X-rays during reduction
  • Contraindicated: Hangman's Type IIA (flexion-distraction), atlantooccipital dissociation

Surgical Indications

Absolute

  • SLIC score ≥5
  • Progressive neurological deficit
  • Unstable injuries (failed conservative)
  • Bilateral facet dislocation

Relative

  • SLIC 4 (surgeon discretion)
  • Incomplete SCI with cord compression
  • Unable to tolerate collar/halo

Timing of Surgery

Early surgery (within 24 hours) for:

  • Incomplete spinal cord injury with compression
  • Progressive deficit
  • Bilateral locked facets

STASCIS Study: Early decompression (≤24h) associated with improved neurological outcomes in incomplete SCI

Approach Selection

Anterior Approach

  • Corpectomy and strut graft
  • ACDF (Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion)
  • Indicated for: Disc herniation, burst fracture, kyphosis

Posterior Approach

  • Lateral mass screws (C3-C6)
  • Pedicle screws (C2, C7)
  • Indicated for: Facet fractures, posterior ligamentous injury

Combined Approach

  • 360° fusion for severe instability
  • Circumferential decompression

Surgical Technique

C1-C2 Fusion Techniques

Posterior C1-C2 Fusion (Harms Technique)

  • C1 lateral mass screws + C2 pedicle screws
  • Rod fixation
  • Bone graft between C1-C2
  • Advantages: Direct visualization, high fusion rate
  • Risks: Vertebral artery injury (C2 pedicle)

Gallie Fusion

  • Sublaminar wire around C1 and C2
  • Structural bone graft
  • Older technique, less rigid than screw fixation

Brooks Fusion

  • Bilateral sublaminar wires around C1-C2
  • Two bone blocks

Anterior Odontoid Screw

Indications:

  • Type II odontoid fracture (favorable pattern)
  • Non-comminuted, not too oblique
  • Preserved transverse ligament

Technique:

  • Anterior Smith-Robinson approach to C2-C3
  • Cannulated screw from C2 body into dens
  • Preserves C1-C2 rotation

Contraindications:

  • Transverse fracture line (screw parallel to fracture)
  • Oblique fracture (from anterosuperior to posteroinferior)
  • Pathological bone
Lateral cervical spine X-ray showing anterior odontoid screw fixation
Click to expand
Anterior odontoid screw fixation: Postoperative lateral radiograph demonstrating a single anterior lag screw traversing a Type II odontoid fracture. This technique allows direct compression across the fracture site and preserves C1-C2 rotation. Patient selection is crucial - the fracture line must be suitable (not too transverse or posteriorly oblique) for screw purchase.Credit: James Heilman MD, Wikimedia Commons - CC-BY-SA 4.0

ACDF (Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion)

Position: Supine, neck in neutral with slight extension

Approach:

  1. Smith-Robinson approach (medial to carotid sheath)
  2. Transverse skin incision at level
  3. Platysma in line with fibres
  4. Between carotid sheath (lateral) and trachea/esophagus (medial)
  5. Longus colli retraction, expose disc

Procedure:

  1. Complete discectomy
  2. Decompression of spinal cord/nerve root
  3. Endplate preparation (preserve subchondral bone)
  4. Cage or structural graft insertion
  5. Anterior plate fixation

Corpectomy

Indications:

  • Burst fracture with retropulsion
  • Multi-level pathology
  • Severe kyphosis

Technique:

  • Remove vertebral body (use burr, preserve posterior cortex until last)
  • Structural strut graft (fibula, cage) spanning defect
  • Long anterior plate fixation

Lateral Mass Screw Fixation (C3-C6)

Magerl Technique:

  • Entry: 1mm medial and superior to lateral mass center
  • Trajectory: 25° lateral, 45° cephalad
  • Length: 14-16mm typically
  • Risk: Nerve root injury if too medial

Roy-Camille Technique:

  • Entry: Center of lateral mass
  • Trajectory: 10° lateral, perpendicular to posterior cortex
  • Risk: Facet joint violation

C7 Pedicle Screws

  • Lateral mass often too small
  • Entry: Junction of lateral mass and lamina
  • Trajectory: 30° medial, slight cephalad
  • Use fluoroscopy or navigation

Posterior Cervical Fusion

Technique:

  1. Midline incision, subperiosteal dissection
  2. Expose lateral masses bilaterally
  3. Lateral mass screws C3-C6 (or C7 pedicle screws)
  4. Rod contouring and placement
  5. Decortication and bone grafting

Bone Graft Options:

  • Local bone from decompression
  • Iliac crest
  • Allograft

Complications

Neurological Complications

Spinal Cord Injury Progression

  • Secondary injury from edema, ischemia
  • Prevented by: Immobilization, MAP support, early decompression

Iatrogenic Injury

  • Screw malposition (cord, nerve root, vertebral artery)
  • Excessive retraction
  • Decompression injury

Surgical Complications

Anterior Approach

  • Dysphagia: 2-60% (usually transient)
  • Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy: 2-11% (hoarseness)
  • Esophageal injury: Rare but serious
  • Vascular injury: Carotid, vertebral artery

Posterior Approach

  • Vertebral artery injury: 0.1-4% (C2 pedicle screws highest risk)
  • C5 palsy: 2-16% (deltoid weakness)
  • Wound infection: 1-3%

Hardware Complications

  • Screw pullout
  • Rod fracture
  • Cage subsidence
  • Plate migration

Fusion Complications

Nonunion (Pseudarthrosis)

  • Risk factors: Smoking, multilevel, osteoporosis
  • Higher in upper cervical injuries

Adjacent Segment Disease

  • Increased stress on adjacent levels
  • May require extension of fusion

Medical Complications

  • DVT/PE (high risk in SCI)
  • Pneumonia (especially high cervical SCI)
  • Pressure ulcers
  • Autonomic dysreflexia (injuries above T6)

Postoperative Care

Immediate Postoperative

Neurological Monitoring

  • Hourly motor/sensory checks for first 24-48 hours
  • Document any changes immediately
  • Low threshold for repeat MRI if deterioration

Airway Management

  • Risk of airway compromise (anterior approach swelling)
  • Keep intubated if extensive anterior surgery
  • Soft diet initially, swallow assessment if dysphagia

Hemodynamic Support

  • Continue MAP targets 85-90 mmHg for SCI
  • Monitor for neurogenic shock

Immobilization

After Posterior Fusion

  • Rigid collar for 6-12 weeks (depends on construct stability)
  • Flexion-extension X-rays at 6 weeks to assess fusion

After Anterior Surgery

  • Collar for 6-12 weeks
  • Earlier mobilization if anterior plate used

After Halo

  • Pin care: Clean daily, check torque weekly
  • Duration 8-12 weeks

Rehabilitation

Early Mobilization

  • Sit up day 1 if stable fixation
  • Physical therapy for range of motion
  • Occupational therapy for ADLs

SCI Rehabilitation

  • Transfer to spinal cord injury unit
  • Multidisciplinary team approach
  • Bladder/bowel program
  • Skin care

Follow-up

  • 2 weeks: Wound check, X-ray
  • 6 weeks: Clinical review, flexion-extension X-rays
  • 3 months: Assess fusion
  • 12 months: Final outcome assessment, CT for fusion

Outcomes

Neurological Outcomes

Complete SCI (ASIA A)

  • Less than 5% chance of significant motor recovery
  • Rehabilitation focused on adaptation, ADLs

Incomplete SCI (ASIA B-D)

  • Better prognosis for neurological recovery
  • Early decompression improves outcomes (STASCIS)
  • Central cord syndrome: Upper limb worse than lower

Root Injury

  • Good prognosis for recovery
  • 70-90% have meaningful improvement

Fracture-Specific Outcomes

Odontoid Type II

  • Conservative: 40-50% nonunion in elderly
  • Surgical: 90%+ fusion rate

Jefferson Fracture

  • Intact TAL: Excellent outcomes with collar
  • Ruptured TAL: Good outcomes after fusion

Hangman's Fracture

  • Type I/II: Generally excellent outcomes
  • Type III: Good outcomes after surgical stabilization

Subaxial Fractures

  • SLIC-guided treatment has good outcomes
  • Fusion rates greater than 95% for posterior instrumentation

Functional Outcomes

Return to Work

  • Variable based on injury severity and occupation
  • SCI: ~35% return to some form of employment

Long-term Issues

  • Chronic neck pain: 20-40%
  • Adjacent segment disease: 2.9% per year
  • Reduced cervical ROM (especially after fusion)

Mortality

  • Complete SCI: 1-year mortality 15-20%
  • Upper cervical injuries: Higher mortality if associated with brain injury
  • Elderly odontoid fractures: High mortality with conservative or operative

Evidence Base

STASCIS - Timing of Decompression in SCI

2
Fehlings MG, Vaccaro A, Wilson JR, et al. • PLoS One (2012)
Key Findings:
  • Early surgery (within 24h) vs delayed decompression
  • 2.8x higher odds of 2+ grade ASIA improvement with early surgery
  • No increase in complications with early surgery
  • Supports early decompression for incomplete SCI
Clinical Implication: Early decompression (within 24 hours) recommended for incomplete spinal cord injury.

NASCIS III - Methylprednisolone in SCI

1
Bracken MB, Shepard MJ, Holford TR, et al. • JAMA (1997)
Key Findings:
  • High-dose methylprednisolone within 8 hours of injury
  • Modest neurological improvement at 1 year
  • Increased complications (infections, GI bleeding)
  • AANS/CNS now recommend AGAINST routine use
Clinical Implication: Methylprednisolone no longer recommended for acute SCI due to complications outweighing benefits.

SLIC Classification Validation

3
Vaccaro AR, Hulbert RJ, Patel AA, et al. • Spine (2007)
Key Findings:
  • SLIC score correlates with treatment recommendations
  • Score less than 4: Non-operative appropriate
  • Score greater than 4: Operative treatment indicated
  • High inter-observer reliability
Clinical Implication: SLIC score provides reliable guidance for operative vs non-operative treatment of subaxial injuries.

Odontoid Fractures in Elderly

3
Koivikko MP, Kiuru MJ, Koskinen SK, et al. • Spine (2004)
Key Findings:
  • Type II fractures: 40-50% nonunion with conservative treatment in elderly
  • High mortality in elderly with either treatment
  • Surgical stabilization associated with higher fusion rate
  • No clear mortality benefit of surgery
Clinical Implication: Surgery improves fusion rates but mortality remains high in elderly odontoid fractures - individualize treatment.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Odontoid Fracture

EXAMINER

"An 80-year-old man falls and has neck pain. CT shows a fracture at the base of the odontoid (Type II). How do you manage?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a **Type II odontoid fracture** - a fracture through the base (waist) of the dens. Type II fractures are notorious for a high nonunion rate, especially in elderly patients, due to the poor blood supply at the dens base and the shearing forces across the fracture. Risk factors for nonunion include age greater than 50 (this patient is 80), displacement greater than 5mm, and posterior displacement. For immediate management, I would maintain the patient in a rigid cervical collar and perform a full neurological examination. I would obtain MRI to assess for spinal cord edema or ligamentous injury. For treatment, given his age and the high nonunion risk with conservative treatment (up to 40-50% in elderly), I would recommend **surgical stabilization**. Options include **anterior odontoid screw fixation** if the fracture is favorable (non-comminuted, not too oblique) or **posterior C1-C2 fusion** (Harms technique or similar). Posterior fusion has higher fusion rates but sacrifices rotation at C1-C2. In an elderly patient, posterior fusion may be preferred. Alternative conservative treatment with a halo vest is possible but poorly tolerated in the elderly (high complication rate including pneumonia, pressure sores).
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Type II = base of dens = high nonunion
Age greater than 50 increases nonunion risk
Surgery often needed: anterior screw or posterior fusion
Halo poorly tolerated in elderly
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not knowing odontoid fracture types
✗Recommending halo for elderly Type II
✗Not mentioning high nonunion risk
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is a Jefferson fracture?"
"What is the SLIC score?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Bilateral Facet Dislocation - Reduction Dilemma

EXAMINER

"A 45-year-old presents following a motor vehicle accident with severe neck pain and neurological deficit. He has reduced power in his hands bilaterally (4/5) but normal lower limb power and sensation. CT cervical spine shows bilateral facet dislocation at C5-C6 with significant anterior translation. You classify this as ASIA C incomplete spinal cord injury. The neurosurgical team asks whether you want to proceed with closed reduction in the emergency department or obtain an MRI first. What are the key considerations and how would you proceed?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a bilateral facet dislocation at C5-C6, which is a highly unstable injury representing a rotation/translation injury pattern. Using the SLIC classification, this scores 4 points for morphology (rotation/translation), likely 2 points for disco-ligamentous complex disruption (bilateral facet dislocation implies severe ligamentous injury), and 3 points for incomplete cord injury, giving a total SLIC score of 9, well above the threshold of 5 for operative management. The critical decision here is whether to perform MRI before attempting closed reduction. This is controversial because there are two competing concerns. The first concern is that approximately 40-50% of bilateral facet dislocations have an associated traumatic disc herniation which may not be visible on CT. If we perform closed reduction without knowing about a disc herniation, we risk pushing the disc posteriorly into the spinal canal during the reduction maneuver, potentially causing catastrophic neurological deterioration. However, the counter-argument is that this patient has an incomplete spinal cord injury with ongoing compression (the dislocation is compressing the cord), and the STASCIS study showed that early decompression within 24 hours significantly improves neurological outcomes - we are racing against time. My approach would be to obtain an urgent MRI cervical spine if it can be done rapidly (within 1-2 hours) and the patient is stable for transfer. The MRI will show disc herniation, cord edema, and ligamentous injury. If there is significant disc herniation, I would proceed directly to operative management with anterior discectomy to remove the disc, then either reduce intraoperatively or do a combined anterior-posterior approach. If there is no disc herniation on MRI, closed reduction with awake neurological monitoring is reasonable. For the closed reduction technique, I would use Gardner-Wells tongs with progressively increasing weight (starting at 10 lbs, adding 5 lbs per cervical level), performing serial X-rays, and maintaining awake neurological monitoring. If reduction is achieved, I would then proceed to definitive surgical stabilization. If MRI cannot be obtained rapidly or the patient is deteriorating neurologically, I would proceed urgently to the operating theatre for open reduction and stabilization, likely via a posterior approach initially to achieve reduction and stabilization, potentially followed by anterior discectomy if needed.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Bilateral facet dislocation = SLIC score typically greater than or equal to 9 (rotation/translation 4 + DLC disrupted 2 + incomplete SCI 3)
40-50% have associated disc herniation - risk of neurological deterioration if reduced blindly
MRI before reduction controversial: Balance disc detection vs time to decompression (STASCIS)
Closed reduction: Gardner-Wells tongs, 10 lbs + 5 lbs per level, awake monitoring, serial X-rays
Early surgery (within 24h) for incomplete SCI with compression improves outcomes
COMMON TRAPS
✗Attempting closed reduction without considering disc herniation risk
✗Delaying treatment for non-urgent MRI when patient is neurologically deteriorating
✗Not knowing SLIC scoring for this injury pattern
✗Performing reduction under general anesthesia without awake neurological monitoring
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What would you do if closed reduction fails?"
"Describe the anterior approach to C5-C6 for this injury"
"What are the neurological outcomes for incomplete SCI with early vs delayed surgery?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Post-Operative C5 Palsy - Complication Management

EXAMINER

"A 52-year-old underwent posterior cervical fusion C4-C7 with lateral mass screw fixation yesterday for a burst fracture of C5 with SLIC score of 6. Pre-operatively he had intact neurology (ASIA E). Post-operative day 1, he reports new onset weakness in both shoulders. On examination, you find bilateral deltoid weakness (3/5) and biceps weakness (3/5), but normal triceps, wrist extensors, and hand function. Sensation is intact. He is otherwise well with stable vital signs and no wound issues. What is your differential diagnosis and how would you manage this?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This clinical picture is most consistent with C5 nerve root palsy, which is a well-recognized complication of posterior cervical spine surgery occurring in 2-16% of cases, particularly after multi-level decompression and fusion. The pattern of bilateral deltoid and biceps weakness (both C5 innervated) with preserved C6 (wrist extensors), C7 (triceps), and C8-T1 (hand intrinsics) function strongly suggests C5 root involvement rather than cord injury. However, I must exclude more sinister causes before attributing this to the common post-operative C5 palsy. My differential diagnosis includes: First, epidural hematoma causing cord or nerve root compression - this would be a surgical emergency. Second, direct iatrogenic injury to C5 nerve roots bilaterally from lateral mass screws placed too medially or cephalad. Third, cord injury from intraoperative compression, retraction, or ischemia. Fourth, classic post-operative C5 palsy from nerve root traction related to posterior cord shift after decompression. My immediate management would be to obtain an urgent MRI cervical spine to rule out hematoma or significant cord compression. I would assess the screw positions on CT to ensure no obvious malposition. I would perform a detailed motor and sensory examination documenting all levels, and specifically check for upper motor neuron signs (hyperreflexia, clonus, Babinski) which would suggest cord pathology rather than isolated root injury. If the MRI shows an epidural hematoma causing significant cord compression or if there are any upper motor neuron signs or sensory level suggesting cord injury, I would proceed urgently to surgical decompression and evacuation of the hematoma. If the MRI shows only expected post-operative changes with no hematoma and no cord compression, and screw positions are acceptable, and the examination is consistent with isolated C5 root palsy without cord signs, then this is likely the common post-operative C5 palsy and can be managed conservatively. The proposed mechanism is that after posterior decompression and fusion, the spinal cord drifts posteriorly and this traction effect particularly affects the C5 nerve root which exits at a sharp angle and has the shortest course to the intervertebral foramen. Conservative management includes physiotherapy, occupational therapy for shoulder stabilization exercises, and reassurance that most cases gradually improve over 6-12 months, though some patients have persistent weakness. I would document carefully, discuss with the patient, and arrange close follow-up to monitor for recovery.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
C5 palsy: 2-16% incidence after posterior cervical surgery, bilateral deltoid/biceps weakness
Must exclude epidural hematoma (urgent MRI) - surgical emergency if present
Mechanism: Posterior cord shift after decompression causes C5 root traction (shortest/sharpest angle)
Distinguish from cord injury: No sensory level, no upper motor neuron signs, isolated C5 distribution
Most cases improve over 6-12 months with physiotherapy, some have persistent deficit
COMMON TRAPS
✗Assuming it's benign C5 palsy without excluding hematoma or cord injury
✗Not obtaining urgent MRI to rule out compressive lesion
✗Confusing C5 palsy (root) with cord injury (would have sensory level, UMN signs)
✗Not counseling patient about typical recovery timeline and potential for permanent deficit
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What are other complications specific to anterior cervical surgery?"
"How would you manage a recurrent laryngeal nerve injury?"
"What is the risk of vertebral artery injury with C2 pedicle screws?"

MCQ Practice Points

Exam Pearl

Q: What are the Canadian C-Spine Rules for determining need for radiography?

A: High-risk factors (mandates imaging): Age 65+; Dangerous mechanism (fall greater than 1m, axial load to head, MVC greater than 100km/h, rollover, ejection, bicycle struck by vehicle); Paresthesias in extremities. Low-risk factors (allows ROM assessment): Simple rear-end MVC, sitting in ED, ambulatory, delayed pain onset, no midline tenderness. If low-risk present AND can actively rotate neck 45° L and R = no imaging needed. High sensitivity for clinically significant injury.

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the classification of upper cervical (C0-C2) injuries?

A: Occipital condyle fractures (Anderson & Montesano): Types I-III based on mechanism. Atlantooccipital dissociation (Traynelis): Type I-III based on direction. C1 ring fractures (Jefferson): Burst pattern from axial load. Odontoid fractures (Anderson & D'Alonzo): Type I (tip), II (waist - most common, highest nonunion), III (body). Hangman's fracture (Levine & Edwards): Bilateral C2 pars fractures, Types I-III.

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the SLIC classification for subaxial cervical spine injuries?

A: Subaxial Injury Classification (SLIC) guides treatment. Morphology: Compression (1), Burst (2), Distraction (3), Translation/Rotation (4). Disco-ligamentous complex (DLC): Intact (0), Indeterminate (1), Disrupted (2). Neurological status: Intact (0), Root injury (1), Complete cord (2), Incomplete cord (3), Ongoing compression with deficit (+1). Total score: Less than 4 = non-operative; 4 = surgeon discretion; greater than 4 = operative.

Exam Pearl

Q: What imaging is recommended for cervical spine trauma evaluation?

A: CT cervical spine: First-line imaging for all significant trauma; Includes skull base to T1; Superior to plain films for bony injury. MRI: Indicated for neurological deficit; Assesses spinal cord, disc herniation, ligamentous injury (DLC); Timing controversial but generally within 24-72 hours. CT angiography: If vertebral artery injury suspected (fracture through foramen transversarium, facet subluxation). Flexion-extension X-rays: Rarely used acutely; May assess stability after collar period.

Exam Pearl

Q: What are the principles of initial management of cervical spine injuries?

A: Immobilization: Rigid collar (properly sized), log-roll precautions, in-line stabilization. Airway: Early intubation if needed using in-line stabilization (avoid neck extension). Methylprednisolone: Previously standard, now not recommended (AANS/CNS guidelines - risks outweigh benefits). Maintain MAP: Greater than 85-90 mmHg for spinal cord injury to optimize perfusion. Early surgery: Consider for incomplete SCI with ongoing compression, deteriorating neurology, unstable injuries. DVT prophylaxis: High risk population.

Australian Context

Epidemiology

  • Incidence: ~1,500 new spinal cord injuries per year in Australia
  • Cervical spine: Most common level of SCI
  • Causes: Motor vehicle accidents (40%), falls (30%), sports (10%)
  • High-risk populations: Young males, elderly (falls)

Trauma System

Major Trauma Centres

  • Royal Melbourne Hospital (Victoria)
  • Alfred Hospital (Victoria)
  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (NSW)
  • Royal North Shore Hospital (NSW)
  • Royal Brisbane Hospital (Queensland)
  • Royal Adelaide Hospital (South Australia)
  • Royal Perth Hospital (Western Australia)

Spinal Cord Injury Units

  • Austin Hospital (Victoria)
  • Royal Rehab (NSW)
  • Princess Alexandra Hospital (Queensland)

Guidelines

  • NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation: Spinal Cord Injury Guidelines
  • ANZICS Trauma Guidelines: ICU management of spinal cord injury
  • Australasian Trauma Guidelines: C-spine clearance protocols

Rehabilitation and Funding

  • TAC/icare: Transport accident coverage for motor vehicle trauma
  • NDIS: Supports for permanent disability from SCI
  • WorkCover: Work-related spinal injuries
  • Lifetime Care and Support: NSW severe injury scheme

RACS Considerations

  • FRCS (Orth) candidates should be familiar with:
    • SLIC and upper cervical classifications
    • ATLS principles of cervical immobilization
    • Surgical approach selection
    • Timing of surgery in SCI

CERVICAL SPINE FRACTURE

High-Yield Exam Summary

Immediate Management

  • •ATLS immobilization
  • •Rigid collar until cleared
  • •CT then MRI if indicated

Upper Cervical

  • •Jefferson (C1 burst): TAL integrity key
  • •Odontoid Type II: High nonunion, often surgery
  • •Hangman: Often neurologically intact

SLIC (Subaxial)

  • •Score morphology, DLC, neurology
  • •Score greater than or equal to 5 = surgery
  • •Less than 3 = conservative

Surgical Options

  • •Anterior: Corpectomy, ACDF
  • •Posterior: Lateral mass screws, fusion
Quick Stats
Reading Time94 min
🇦🇺

FRACS Guidelines

Australia & New Zealand
  • NHMRC Guidelines
  • MBS Spine Items
Related Topics

Anterior Process Calcaneus Fractures

Basicervical Fractures

Bosworth Fracture-Dislocations

Calcaneal Tuberosity Fractures