Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Anterior Tibial Tendon Rupture

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Anterior Tibial Tendon Rupture

Comprehensive guide to anterior tibial tendon rupture including diagnosis, management, and surgical reconstruction techniques for the FRACS exam

complete
Updated: 2026-01-02
High Yield Overview

Anterior Tibial Tendon Rupture

Primary Dorsiflexor Rupture

80%TA contribution to dorsiflexion
3:1Male predominance
70-80%Strength recovery with EHL transfer

By Chronicity

Critical Must-Knows

  • Anterior ankle mass with palpable gap + preserved toe extension = TA rupture
  • Acute (less than 4 weeks) with gap less than 3cm: primary repair
  • Chronic or gap greater than 3cm: EHL transfer reconstruction
  • Always fuse/tenodese hallux IP joint with EHL transfer

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Distinguish from L5 radiculopathy (weak EHL) and peroneal palsy (weak eversion)
  • "
    EDL compensation masks diagnosis - always test heel walking
  • "
    8 weeks immobilization minimum to prevent re-rupture

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

anterior-tibial-tendon-rupture imaging 1
Click to expand
Clinical imaging for anterior-tibial-tendon-ruptureCredit: Rajeev A et al. via Int J Surg Case Rep via PMC4573416 (CC-BY)
anterior-tibial-tendon-rupture imaging 2
Click to expand
Clinical imaging for anterior-tibial-tendon-ruptureCredit: Rajeev A et al. via Int J Surg Case Rep via PMC4573416 (CC-BY)

Exam Warning

The Triple Differential

1. TA Rupture: Anterior mass + Slap foot + Toe Extension Intact. 2. L5 Radiculopathy: Foot drop + EHL Weakness + Sensory changes. 3. Peroneal Nerve: Foot drop + Eversion Weakness + 1st web space numb.

Missed Diagnosis Trap

EDL Compensation: Patients can still dorsiflex using extensors/peroneals, but cannot heel walk. Always test heel walking.

Biomechanics

Loss of Eccentric Control: Leads to 'Slap Foot' at heel strike. Swing Phase: High steppage to clear toes.

Management

Acute (less than 4wk): Repair. Chronic: EHL Transfer (most common).

Anatomy and Biomechanics

Tibialis Anterior Tendon Anatomy

The tibialis anterior is the primary ankle dorsiflexor with critical function during gait cycle.

Origin and Course

  • Origin: Lateral tibial condyle, proximal two-thirds lateral tibial shaft, interosseous membrane, deep fascia
  • Muscle belly: Largest and most medial of anterior compartment muscles
  • Myotendinous junction: Junction occurs 5-7 cm proximal to ankle joint
  • Tendon course: Crosses ankle joint beneath extensor retinaculum in medial-most tunnel
  • Insertion: Medial and plantar aspect of medial cuneiform and base of first metatarsal
  • Tendon width: Approximately 10-15 mm at insertion, thickest of ankle tendons

Vascular Anatomy

  • Proximal blood supply: Anterior tibial artery branches to muscle belly
  • Intratendinous vascularity: Longitudinal vessels within tendon substance
  • Zone of hypovascularity: Beneath extensor retinaculum where rupture typically occurs
  • Distal blood supply: Branches from dorsalis pedis near insertion
  • Watershed zone: 2-3 cm proximal to insertion with reduced perfusion

Retinacular Anatomy

Superior, inferior, and stem components of extensor retinaculum constrain ankle tendons. Separate compartments for TA, EHL, EDL, and peroneals beneath retinaculum. TA occupies most medial tunnel beneath extensor retinaculum, susceptible to stenosis.

Biomechanical Function

  • Primary dorsiflexor: Accounts for 80% of ankle dorsiflexion strength
  • Gait importance: Essential for heel strike and toe clearance during swing phase
  • Supination force: Secondary function as hindfoot invertor (synergist with TP)
  • Arch support: Contributes to medial longitudinal arch stability
  • Load tolerance: Can generate forces up to 3-4 times body weight
  • Excursion: Approximately 25-30 mm of tendon excursion with full ankle motion

At a Glance

Anterior tibial tendon rupture is a rare injury typically affecting older males with degenerative tendinopathy, occurring at the hypovascular zone beneath the extensor retinaculum. Clinical features include an anterior ankle mass (retracted tendon), palpable gap, and slap foot gait with forefoot-first contact. Diagnosis is often delayed because EDL compensation masks the dorsiflexion weakness. Differential diagnosis includes peroneal nerve palsy and L5 radiculopathy—distinguish by intact toe extension (EHL, EDL) with isolated TA loss. MRI confirms rupture location and tendon quality. Acute complete ruptures (under 4 weeks) are managed with primary end-to-end repair if tension-free. Chronic or large gaps require reconstruction using EHL transfer (most common), EDL transfer, or allograft interposition. Post-operative immobilisation for 6-8 weeks is essential.

Mnemonic

DISSTibialis Anterior Functions

D
Dorsiflexion
Primary ankle dorsiflexor - 80% of power
I
Inversion
Secondary hindfoot supination/inversion
S
Swing clearance
Toe clearance during swing phase of gait
S
Strike stabilization
Eccentric control during heel strike to prevent foot slap

Memory Hook:TA tendon function? Don't DISS the dorsiflexor

Overview

Anterior Tibial Tendon Rupture

Anterior tibial tendon (ATT) rupture is an uncommon but significant injury affecting the primary dorsiflexor of the foot. It may be acute (traumatic) or chronic (degenerative), with distinct presentations and management strategies.

Key Features:

  • Third most common lower limb tendon rupture (after Achilles and patellar)
  • Often misdiagnosed initially (up to 25% delayed diagnosis)
  • Typically affects older patients (greater than 45 years) with degenerative ruptures
  • Acute ruptures occur in younger, active patients
  • Surgical repair generally recommended for active patients

Epidemiology

FactorDetails
IncidenceRare - estimated 1% of lower limb tendon ruptures
AgeBimodal: young (trauma) and elderly (degeneration)
SexMale predominance (3:1)
SideNo significant laterality difference

Risk Factors:

  • Local corticosteroid injection
  • Systemic corticosteroid use
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Inflammatory arthropathies (RA, gout, psoriatic arthritis)
  • Fluoroquinolone antibiotics
  • Chronic renal disease
  • Peripheral vascular disease
  • Obesity

Mechanism of Injury

Acute Rupture:

  • Forced plantarflexion against resisted dorsiflexion
  • Direct trauma (lacerations)
  • Sports: skiing, basketball, dancing
  • Eccentric loading during falls

Chronic/Degenerative Rupture:

  • Attritional failure at hypovascular zone (2-3cm proximal to insertion)
  • Progressive weakening from tendinosis
  • Often insidious onset, minimal trauma
  • May follow minor stumble or missed step

Zone of Rupture:

  • Most common: 0-3cm from navicular insertion
  • Hypovascular watershed zone
  • Mechanical stress concentration point

Pathophysiology

Mechanisms of Rupture

Anterior tibial tendon rupture occurs through degenerative and traumatic mechanisms affecting a hypovascular zone.

Degenerative Rupture (Most Common)

  • Age-related tendinosis: Collagen degeneration with mucoid changes
  • Hypovascular zone: Reduced blood supply beneath extensor retinaculum
  • Mechanical wear: Repetitive friction against superior extensor retinaculum
  • Tibial osteophytes: Inferior anterior tibial lip spurs causing mechanical attrition
  • Systemic factors: Diabetes, inflammatory arthropathy, fluoroquinolone use
  • Steroid injections: Previous local corticosteroid may predispose to rupture

Traumatic Rupture

  • Laceration: Direct penetrating injury to anterior ankle
  • Forced plantarflexion: Eccentric loading during fall or stumble
  • Avulsion injury: Sudden forceful dorsiflexion against resistance
  • Iatrogenic: Surgical injury during ankle arthroscopy or anterior ankle procedures
  • Ankle fracture-dislocation: High-energy trauma with tendon disruption

Chronic Attrition

The combination of intrinsic and extrinsic factors leads to gradual tendon failure:

  • Intrinsic factors: Tendon degeneration, age greater than 45 years, hypovascular zone
  • Extrinsic factors: Retinacular stenosis, tibial osteophytes, tight footwear
  • Inflammatory conditions: Rheumatoid arthritis, seronegative spondyloarthropathy, gout
  • Metabolic disorders: Diabetes mellitus, renal failure, hypercholesterolemia

Rupture Classification

Rupture Classification and Characteristics

typetimingtendonQualitygapSizesurgicalOptions
Acute CompleteLess than 4 weeks from injuryUsually good quality endsVariable, often less than 3 cmPrimary repair usually feasible
Chronic CompleteGreater than 4 weeks from injuryDegenerated ends, muscle retractionOften greater than 3 cmReconstruction required (transfer or graft)
Partial TearVariable onset, progressive symptomsIntact fibers with intratendinous splitNot applicableDebridement and repair if greater than 50%
Insertional AvulsionAcute traumatic eventGood tendon with bone fragmentMinimal if bone fixation immediateBone reattachment with suture anchors
Mnemonic

RUPTUREDRisk Factors for TA Tendon Rupture

R
Retinaculum stenosis
Tight extensor retinaculum causing friction
U
Underlying arthropathy
Rheumatoid arthritis, seronegative spondyloarthropathy
P
Previous steroid injection
Local corticosteroid weakens tendon
T
Tibial osteophytes
Anterior distal tibia spurs causing attrition
U
Uncontrolled diabetes
Metabolic impairment of tendon healing
R
Repetitive microtrauma
Chronic overload in athletes or workers
E
Elderly patient
Age-related tendon degeneration
D
Drugs (fluoroquinolones)
Quinolone antibiotics associated with rupture risk

Memory Hook:What gets RUPTURED? The TA tendon in these scenarios

Anatomy

Tibialis Anterior Tendon Anatomy

Origin:

  • Lateral tibial condyle
  • Upper 2/3 lateral tibial surface
  • Interosseous membrane
  • Deep fascia

Course:

  • Most medial tendon in anterior compartment
  • Passes under superior extensor retinaculum
  • Passes under inferior extensor retinaculum (Y-shaped)
  • Crosses ankle joint anteriorly

Insertion:

  • Medial cuneiform (plantar and medial surfaces)
  • Base of first metatarsal
  • Wide footprint: 10-15mm

Relations:

  • Lateral: EHL tendon, deep peroneal nerve, anterior tibial artery
  • Medial: saphenous vein and nerve (more proximal)

Blood Supply

Vascular Zones:

ZoneLocationVascularity
ProximalMusculotendinous junctionWell-vascularized
Mid2-3cm proximal to insertionHYPOVASCULAR (watershed)
DistalInsertionOsseous supply

Clinical Significance:

  • Hypovascular zone corresponds to most common rupture site
  • Similar to Achilles tendon watershed zone
  • Explains degenerative tendinosis pattern
  • Important for surgical planning (repair vs reconstruction)

Biomechanical Function

Primary Actions:

  • Ankle dorsiflexion (most powerful dorsiflexor)
  • Foot inversion
  • Arch support during stance

Gait Cycle Role:

  • Heel strike: Eccentric control of plantarflexion
  • Swing phase: Concentric dorsiflexion for foot clearance
  • Loading response: Decelerates foot drop

Functional Consequences of Rupture:

  • Foot drop/slapping gait
  • Increased trip hazard
  • Compensatory hip/knee flexion
  • Loss of first ray stability

Classification

Classification by Acuity

TypeTimingCharacteristics
Acuteless than 6 weeksClear injury event, definable tendon ends
Subacute6-12 weeksDelayed presentation, some retraction
Chronicgreater than 12 weeksSignificant retraction, often degenerative

Clinical Implications:

  • Acute: Primary repair often feasible
  • Subacute: Repair possible but may need augmentation
  • Chronic: Usually requires reconstruction (graft or transfer)

Classification by Location

ZoneLocationTreatment Considerations
Zone 1Musculotendinous junctionRare, muscle friable, challenging repair
Zone 2Mid-tendon (under retinaculum)Common site, repair through retinaculum
Zone 3Distal (0-3cm from insertion)MOST COMMON, direct repair to bone

Retinaculum Considerations:

  • Zone 2 ruptures may require retinacular release for access
  • Risk of bowstringing if retinaculum not reconstructed

Classification by Severity

GradeDescriptionImaging Features
PartialIncomplete tendon disruptionIncreased signal, some fibers intact
CompleteFull-thickness ruptureGap, fluid signal, retracted ends
Complete with retractionSignificant proximal migrationgreater than 3cm gap, often chronic

Degenerative vs Traumatic:

FeatureDegenerativeTraumatic
Agegreater than 60 yearsAny age
OnsetInsidiousAcute event
Tendon qualityPoor, friableGood
Repair potentialMay need augmentationPrimary repair possible

History and Symptoms

The clinical presentation varies based on acuity and degree of rupture.

Acute Rupture

  • Sudden onset pain: Sharp anterior ankle pain during specific event
  • Popping sensation: Audible or palpable snap at time of injury
  • Immediate weakness: Inability to dorsiflex ankle or walk on heels
  • Anterior ankle swelling: Visible mass from rolled-up proximal tendon stump
  • Activity recall: Often occurs during plantar flexion against resistance

Chronic Rupture

  • Gradual weakness: Progressive difficulty with stairs and inclines
  • Slap foot gait: Foot slaps down after heel strike due to loss of eccentric control
  • Toe catching: Stumbling over ground irregularities from reduced clearance
  • Compensatory fatigue: EDL overuse causing anterior shin discomfort
  • Delayed presentation: Often misdiagnosed as sprain or neuropathy

Functional Deficits

  • Heel walking impossible: Cannot walk on heels due to absent dorsiflexion strength
  • Stair difficulties: Ascending stairs requires hip and knee compensation
  • Gait abnormalities: Steppage gait or circumduction to clear foot
  • Running impairment: Cannot run due to loss of push-off control
  • Footwear problems: Difficulty donning shoes from weak dorsiflexion

Physical Examination

Systematic examination confirms the diagnosis and assesses compensatory mechanisms.

Inspection

  • Anterior ankle mass: Bulge from retracted proximal tendon stump
  • Palpable gap: Defect palpable distal to extensor retinaculum
  • Muscle atrophy: TA muscle wasting in chronic cases (rare due to intramuscular tear pattern)
  • Gait observation: Slap foot or steppage pattern
  • Toe clawing: Compensatory EDL overactivity causing toe hyperextension

Palpation

  • Tendon continuity: Gap palpable 2-4 cm above insertion typically
  • Rolled tendon: Proximal stump palpable as firm mass
  • Point tenderness: Local pain at rupture site in acute injuries
  • Distal stump: Thin or absent tendon palpable distally

Functional Testing

Ankle dorsiflexion strength typically grade 0-1 with complete rupture despite EDL compensation. Partial tears or chronic compensated ruptures may demonstrate grade 2-3 strength from EDL. Normal or increased toe extension from compensatory EDL overactivity.

Specific tests:

  • Resisted dorsiflexion: Severe weakness or absent function with resistance
  • Heel walking: Inability to walk on heels (pathognomonic for TA dysfunction)
  • Toe dorsiflexion: Preserved or enhanced from EDL compensation
  • Passive plantarflexion: May reproduce pain at rupture site if acute
  • Thompson test analogue: Squeezing TA belly does not produce dorsiflexion

Differential Diagnosis Testing

  • L5 radiculopathy: Check EHL strength (should be normal in isolated TA rupture)
  • Common peroneal nerve: Assess ankle eversion (should be normal)
  • Deep peroneal nerve: Test sensation first web space (should be intact)
  • Compartment syndrome: Assess for firmness and pain with passive stretch (absent in isolated rupture)

Exam Pearl

The key clinical finding is a palpable anterior ankle mass with a distal gap, combined with inability to heel walk despite preserved toe dorsiflexion. This triad distinguishes TA rupture from neurological causes of foot drop. The "reverse Thompson test" (squeezing TA muscle belly produces no ankle dorsiflexion) confirms the diagnosis.

Investigations

Imaging Studies

Imaging confirms the clinical diagnosis and guides treatment planning.

Radiographs

Views: Weight-bearing AP, lateral, and oblique foot-ankle

Oblique foot radiograph showing tibialis anterior avulsion fracture
Click to expand
Oblique radiograph of the right foot in traumatic tibialis anterior avulsion. In cases of forceful dorsiflexion against resistance, a small bony fragment may avulse at the medial cuneiform or base of the first metatarsal - the dual insertion site of the tibialis anterior tendon. Plain radiographs are often normal in degenerative ruptures; bony avulsion is more common in younger patients with traumatic mechanisms.Credit: Rajeev A et al., Int J Surg Case Rep - CC BY 4.0

Findings:

  • Usually normal in acute ruptures
  • Chronic cases may show:
  • Anterior distal tibial osteophytes (site of mechanical attrition)
  • Soft tissue swelling or calcification anterior ankle
  • First ray elevation from loss of plantarflexion force
  • Arthritic changes if inflammatory etiology
  • Avulsion fracture at cuneiform or first metatarsal base (rare)

Ultrasound

Advantages: Dynamic assessment, real-time evaluation, cost-effective

Technique:

  • High-frequency linear probe (10-15 MHz)
  • Long-axis and short-axis imaging of entire tendon
  • Compare to contralateral side
  • Dynamic testing with active dorsiflexion

Findings:

  • Complete tendon discontinuity with gap
  • Hypoechoic or anechoic rupture site
  • Proximal tendon retraction and thickening
  • Hematoma or fluid in gap
  • Measure gap size (critical for surgical planning)
  • Partial tears show incomplete fiber disruption

MRI

Protocol: Ankle-foot protocol with T1, T2, STIR sequences in axial, sagittal, and coronal planes

Sagittal T1-weighted MRI of ankle showing tibialis anterior tendon region
Click to expand
Sagittal T1-weighted MRI of the ankle demonstrating normal course of tendons along the anterior ankle. In tibialis anterior rupture, MRI shows discontinuity of the tendon with retraction of the proximal stump, increased T2 signal at the rupture site, and potential fluid filling the gap. The tibialis anterior tendon courses along the anterior aspect of the ankle, inserting onto the medial cuneiform and first metatarsal base.Credit: Rajeev A et al., Int J Surg Case Rep - CC BY 4.0

Indications:

  • Uncertain diagnosis
  • Pre-operative planning
  • Assessment of chronic ruptures
  • Evaluation of tendon quality
  • Identify associated pathology

Key findings:

MRI Characteristics by Chronicity

findingacutechronicsignificance
Tendon ContinuityComplete disruption with wavy retracted endsWide gap with muscle retraction and fatty infiltrationDetermines feasibility of primary repair
Gap SizeTypically 1-3 cm, measured in neutral positionOften greater than 4 cm with maximal plantarflexionGap greater than 3 cm requires reconstruction
Tendon QualityNormal signal in proximal/distal stumpsDegenerated stumps with increased T2 signalPoor quality precludes primary repair
Muscle ChangesNormal muscle bulk and signalAtrophy and fatty infiltration of TA muscleSevere atrophy indicates poor functional recovery potential
RetinaculumIntact but may show fluid/edemaThickened with scarring and adhesionsChronic stenosis contributes to rupture

Advanced Imaging

  • CT scan: Rarely needed, may help identify bony pathology
  • Nerve conduction studies: If suspicion of neurological cause for foot drop
  • EMG: Distinguish denervation from tendon rupture in unclear cases
Mnemonic

GAPSMRI Findings in TA Tendon Rupture

G
Gap in tendon
Complete discontinuity with measured defect
A
Atrophy of muscle
TA muscle wasting and fatty infiltration in chronic cases
P
Proximal retraction
Retracted proximal stump forming anterior ankle mass
S
Signal abnormality
Increased T2 signal in degenerated tendon ends

Memory Hook:MRI shows GAPS in ruptured TA tendon

Non-Operative Management

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
Management algorithm for Anterior Tibial Tendon Rupture
Click to expand

Non-operative management is reserved for specific patient populations with acceptable functional compensation.

Indications

  • Sedentary elderly patients: Minimal functional demands, acceptable gait with EDL compensation
  • Severe medical comorbidities: Prohibitive surgical risk
  • Patient preference: Informed decision declining surgery despite deficits
  • Partial tears: Less than 50% cross-sectional area involved with good strength
  • Chronic ruptures with good compensation: Well-adapted gait with minimal disability

Contraindications to Conservative Care

  • Young active patients requiring normal gait mechanics
  • Inability to compensate with EDL (weak toe extension)
  • Progressive deformity or gait deterioration
  • Patient desire for optimal functional restoration
  • Occupation requiring normal dorsiflexion (e.g., driving, climbing)

Non-Operative Protocol

Phase 1 (0-6 weeks): Protection and adaptation

  • AFO (ankle-foot orthosis): Articulated or fixed AFO to assist dorsiflexion
  • Immobilization: Short leg cast or boot if acute and painful
  • Weight-bearing: As tolerated with assistive device if needed
  • Pain management: NSAIDs, ice, elevation for acute symptoms

Phase 2 (6-12 weeks): Functional adaptation

  • Gait training: Compensatory strategies using EDL and hip flexors
  • Strengthening: EDL and peroneals to optimize compensation
  • Proprioception: Balance training to reduce fall risk
  • Orthotic refinement: Adjust AFO for optimal function

Phase 3 (3-6 months): Long-term management

  • Permanent AFO: Custom molded articulated AFO for daily use
  • Footwear modification: Rocker bottom sole to assist heel-toe transition
  • Activity modification: Avoid activities requiring heel walking or dorsiflexion
  • Surveillance: Monitor for progressive deformity or gait dysfunction

Outcomes of Conservative Treatment

  • Function: Acceptable for low-demand activities, limited for sports
  • Gait: Persistent abnormality with slap foot or steppage pattern
  • Satisfaction: Variable, depends on functional demands and expectations
  • Complications: Chronic ankle pain, ankle stiffness, falls from tripping
  • Long-term: May develop secondary issues (back pain from gait asymmetry)

Non-operative management of complete TA tendon rupture results in permanent functional deficit. AFO is required indefinitely for optimal gait. This approach should only be chosen after thorough discussion of limitations and with appropriate patient selection (elderly, sedentary, high surgical risk).

Operative Management

Management Algorithm

Treatment Algorithm

Patient FactorAcute (less than 6 weeks)Chronic (greater than 12 weeks)
Young, activePrimary repairReconstruction (EHL transfer or graft)
Middle-aged, moderate activityPrimary repair ± augmentationReconstruction
Elderly, low demandConservative trialConservative (AFO)
High surgical riskConservativeConservative

Decision Points:

  1. Gap size: less than 3cm = repair; greater than 3cm = reconstruction
  2. Tendon quality: Good = repair; Poor/degenerative = augment or reconstruct
  3. Muscle status: Minimal atrophy = repair; Severe atrophy = consider conservative
  4. Patient goals: High function = surgery; Minimal demands = conservative

Surgical Options Summary

TechniqueIndicationAdvantagesDisadvantages
Primary repairAcute, less than 3cm gapSimple, native tendonLimited to early presentation
Augmented repairGap 3-5cm, poor qualityStronger constructDonor site morbidity
EHL transferChronic, greater than 5cm gapReliable, same incisionWeak EHL
FDL/FHL transferAlternative to EHLStrong tendonSeparate incision
AllograftLarge defects, revisionNo donor morbidityCost, disease risk
Synthetic graftRevision casesAvoids donor siteLimited long-term data

Most Common Approaches:

  • Acute: Direct repair with Krackow or Kessler suture
  • Chronic: EHL transfer (most common reconstruction)

Technique Selection by Scenario

Scenario 1: Acute rupture, good tendon

  • Primary end-to-end repair
  • Krackow or modified Kessler core suture
  • Epitendinous running suture
  • Post-op: NWB cast 6 weeks

Scenario 2: Acute rupture, poor tendon quality

  • Primary repair with turn-down flap augmentation
  • Or EHL transfer augmentation
  • Post-op: As above

Scenario 3: Chronic rupture, large gap

  • EHL transfer with tenodesis to distal stump
  • IP joint fusion if hallux weakness concern
  • Or allograft reconstruction

Scenario 4: Revision or failed repair

  • Allograft reconstruction
  • Consider synthetic augmentation
  • Optimize biology (PRP, etc.)

Surgical Indications and Timing

Surgery is the preferred treatment for most patients with complete TA tendon rupture.

Indications for Surgery

  • Complete acute rupture: Less than 4 weeks old in active patients
  • Symptomatic chronic rupture: Functional impairment despite conservative trial
  • Young active patients: Desire for optimal functional restoration
  • Failed conservative management: Progressive symptoms or inadequate compensation
  • Large partial tears: Greater than 50% cross-sectional involvement
  • Occupational requirement: Jobs requiring normal ankle dorsiflexion

Timing Considerations

  • Acute ruptures (less than 4 weeks): Primary repair often feasible
  • Subacute ruptures (4-12 weeks): May require augmentation or short reconstruction
  • Chronic ruptures (greater than 12 weeks): Reconstruction with tendon transfer or allograft
  • Emergency surgery: Not required unless open injury with contamination

Pre-Operative Planning

  • MRI review: Assess gap size, tendon quality, muscle status
  • Surgical approach selection: Based on rupture location and chronicity
  • Reconstruction strategy: Primary repair vs. augmentation vs. reconstruction
  • Graft/transfer planning: Identify donor tendon or arrange allograft
  • Patient counseling: Realistic expectations for recovery timeline (6-12 months)

Surgical Techniques

End-to-End Tendon Repair

Indications:

  • Acute rupture (less than 4 weeks)
  • Gap less than 3 cm with ankle in plantarflexion
  • Good quality tendon ends
  • No significant muscle retraction

Patient Positioning:

  • Supine with bump under ipsilateral hip
  • Thigh tourniquet (250-300 mmHg)
  • Ensure foot mobile for intraoperative positioning

Surgical Approach:

  • Longitudinal incision over anterior ankle (8-12 cm)
  • Center over palpable gap or TA tendon course
  • Incise skin and subcutaneous tissue
  • Identify and protect superficial peroneal nerve branches
  • Open extensor retinaculum along medial border

Tendon Preparation:

  • Identify proximal and distal tendon stumps
  • Debride degenerated or frayed tissue to healthy tendon
  • Freshen ends with sharp blade (perpendicular cuts)
  • Assess gap with ankle in maximal plantarflexion
  • If gap greater than 3 cm, consider augmentation or reconstruction

Repair Technique:

  • Krackow suture configuration: Locking stitches in each stump
  • Suture material: Non-absorbable braided (FiberWire, Ethibond) size 2 or 0
  • Core suture: 4-6 strand repair for optimal strength
  • Tensioning: Repair with ankle in 10-15 degrees plantarflexion
  • Epitendinous suture: Running 4-0 absorbable to smooth repair site
  • Test repair: Ensure intact with passive ankle dorsiflexion to neutral

Augmentation Options (if tension on repair):

  • Turndown flap: Proximally based TA tendon flap to bridge gap
  • EHL transfer: Add EHL as side-to-side augmentation
  • Plantaris graft: Harvest plantaris for interpositional graft
  • EDL transfer: Transfer central EDL slip for reinforcement

Retinaculum Management:

  • Excise portion of superior retinaculum to decompress repair
  • Avoid complete retinaculum excision (prevents bowstringing)
  • Ensure tendon glides smoothly beneath retinaculum

Closure:

  • Close retinaculum loosely if intact
  • Subcutaneous layer with 3-0 absorbable suture
  • Skin closure with 4-0 nylon or staples
  • Apply soft dressing and posterior splint in 10-15 degrees plantarflexion

Post-Operative Protocol:

  • 0-2 weeks: NWB in posterior splint, plantarflexed position
  • 2-6 weeks: NWB in cast or boot, gradual bring to neutral by week 6
  • 6-8 weeks: Begin PWB in neutral boot, gentle AROM exercises
  • 8-12 weeks: Progress to FWB, weaning from boot, start strengthening
  • 3-6 months: Gradual return to activities, continue rehabilitation
  • 6-12 months: Full recovery expected with return to impact activities

The superficial peroneal nerve crosses the anterior ankle and is at risk during exposure. Identify and protect throughout procedure. Excessive tension on the repair increases failure risk - if gap greater than 3 cm even in plantarflexion, consider augmentation or reconstruction rather than tensioned primary repair.

Extensor Hallucis Longus Tendon Transfer

Indications:

  • Chronic rupture with gap greater than 3 cm
  • Failed primary repair
  • Poor quality TA tendon precluding primary repair
  • Subacute rupture (4-12 weeks) with muscle retraction
  • Most common reconstruction technique

Advantages:

  • In-phase transfer (both are dorsiflexors)
  • Strong donor tendon with good excursion
  • Preserves ankle power (approximately 70-80% of normal)
  • Autograft avoids allograft disease transmission
  • Single incision technique possible

Disadvantages:

  • Loss of independent hallux extension
  • Cock-up hallux deformity possible (rare if IP joint fused/tenodesis)
  • Insufficient strength in heavy patients (greater than 100 kg)

Surgical Technique:

1. Incision and Exposure:

  • Longitudinal anterior ankle incision as for primary repair
  • Identify TA tendon stumps and EHL tendon
  • EHL is second medial tendon, confirm by moving hallux

2. EHL Harvest:

  • Transect EHL at level of distal TA stump
  • Dissect EHL proximally to midfoot level
  • Maintain adequate length for tension-free transfer
  • Preserve neurovascular bundle lateral to EHL

3. Hallux Management (prevent cock-up deformity):

  • Option A: IP joint arthrodesis (gold standard, prevents deformity)
  • Option B: EHL distal stump tenodesis to EPL or capsule
  • Option C: Accept loss of hallux extension (acceptable in elderly)

4. Transfer Technique:

  • Create bone tunnel in medial cuneiform at TA insertion OR
  • Suture EHL to distal TA stump if adequate length
  • Route EHL through tunnel or to stump with appropriate tension
  • Tension with ankle in neutral and slight hindfoot inversion
  • Secure with suture anchors or transosseous sutures

5. Proximal Augmentation (if available):

  • Suture EHL side-to-side to proximal TA stump
  • Creates broad surface area for tendon healing
  • Augments strength of reconstruction

Closure and Post-Op: Same as primary repair protocol

Expected Outcomes:

  • 85-90% good-to-excellent results
  • Restoration of 70-80% ankle dorsiflexion strength
  • Return to most activities including running
  • Minimal functional deficit from hallux extension loss
  • Satisfaction rates greater than 90% in most series

Exam Pearl

EHL transfer is the workhorse reconstruction for chronic TA tendon ruptures. The key technical points are: adequate EHL length, appropriate tensioning at neutral ankle dorsiflexion, and hallux IP arthrodesis or tenodesis to prevent cock-up deformity. Results are excellent with restoration of functional dorsiflexion in most patients.

Alternative Reconstruction Techniques

EDL Transfer:

  • Technique: Transfer central or lateral EDL slip to TA insertion
  • Indications: EHL unavailable or inadequate, chronic rupture
  • Advantages: Preserves EHL function, in-phase transfer
  • Disadvantages: Weaker than EHL transfer, may lose lesser toe extension
  • Results: Good outcomes but less powerful than EHL transfer

Allograft Reconstruction:

  • Indications: Failed prior reconstruction, bilateral ruptures, revision surgery
  • Graft options: Semitendinosus, gracilis, tibialis anterior allograft
  • Technique: Interpositional graft with bone tunnel or suture fixation
  • Advantages: Preserves native tendons, strong reconstruction
  • Disadvantages: Disease transmission risk (minimal with screening), slower incorporation, higher cost
  • Results: Good outcomes in experienced hands, 80-85% success

Autograft Reconstruction:

  • Plantaris graft: Harvest plantaris for augmentation or short gaps
  • Peroneus tertius: Transfer if present and adequate size (variable anatomy)
  • Free tendon graft: Gracilis or semitendinosus autograft (extensive surgery)

Combined Procedures:

  • EHL transfer + allograft: For very large gaps or poor quality tendon
  • EDL + EHL: Both transferred for maximum strength in high-demand patients
  • Synthetic augmentation: Augment repair with synthetic mesh or tape (limited evidence)

Salvage Options

Ankle Fusion (arthrodesis):

  • Indications: Failed multiple reconstructions, severe arthritis, neuropathic ankle
  • Technique: Tibiotalar arthrodesis in 5 degrees dorsiflexion
  • Outcome: Eliminates need for dorsiflexion, altered gait but stable ankle
  • Last resort: Only for severe failures with joint damage

Permanent AFO:

  • Accept tendon rupture and use orthosis long-term
  • Discussed in non-operative section
  • May be appropriate after failed reconstruction in elderly patients

Comparison of Reconstruction Techniques

Reconstruction Technique Comparison

techniquestrengthRecoverydonorMorbiditysurgicalTimesuccessRate
Primary Repair90-100% if successfulNone45-60 minutes85-90% if acute, proper tension
EHL Transfer70-80% of normalLoss of hallux extension (minimal functional impact)90-120 minutes85-90% in most series
EDL Transfer60-70% of normalReduced lesser toe extension90-120 minutes75-85%, weaker than EHL
Allograft70-85% with incorporationNone120-150 minutes80-85%, slower recovery

Choose reconstruction technique based on: (1) chronicity and gap size, (2) tendon quality, (3) patient demands and weight, (4) surgeon experience, and (5) previous surgical history. EHL transfer is most reliable for chronic ruptures. Allograft reserved for revision cases or bilateral injuries. Primary repair only for acute ruptures with tension-free approximation.

Outcomes of TA Tendon Reconstruction

3
Foot Ankle Int (2019)
Key Findings:
  • 86% good-to-excellent outcomes at 3.2-year follow-up
  • Primary repair: 92% strength recovery but 25% failure in chronic ruptures
  • EHL transfer: 76% strength recovery with 89% good-to-excellent results
  • Complications: infection 2%, re-rupture 4%, nerve injury 3%
Clinical Implication: Primary repair preferred for acute ruptures; EHL transfer is reliable for chronic cases with low failure rate.

Complications

Surgical Complications

Understanding and preventing complications is essential for optimal outcomes.

Intraoperative Complications

  • Neurovascular injury: Superficial peroneal nerve (2-3%), anterior tibial artery (rare)
  • Deep peroneal nerve: At risk with deep dissection, causes first web space numbness
  • Inadequate gap closure: Excessive tension on repair leading to early failure
  • Incorrect tension: Over-tight (equinus contracture) or under-tight (weak dorsiflexion)
  • Donor site injury: EHL laceration during harvest, hallux devascularization (rare)

Early Post-Operative Complications

Common Early Complications

complicationincidencepresentationmanagement
Wound Complications5-8%, higher in diabeticsDelayed healing, dehiscence, superficial infectionLocal wound care, oral antibiotics, revision closure if severe
Re-Rupture4-6% overall, higher with primary repair of chronic rupturesAcute pain, loss of dorsiflexion, palpable gap recursRevision surgery with reconstruction (EHL transfer or allograft)
DVT/PELess than 1% with prophylaxisCalf swelling, positive D-dimer, PE symptomsAnticoagulation, may require admission for PE
Compartment SyndromeRare (less than 0.5%)Severe pain, tense leg, pain with passive stretchEmergency fasciotomy if confirmed by pressure measurement

Late Complications

  • Persistent weakness: Incomplete strength recovery, more common with reconstructions
  • Ankle stiffness: Limited dorsiflexion from prolonged immobilization or adhesions
  • Hallux deformity: Cock-up hallux after EHL transfer without IP fusion/tenodesis
  • Gait abnormalities: Persistent slap foot or steppage despite intact repair
  • Chronic pain: Anterior ankle pain from adhesions, nerve injury, or arthrofibrosis
  • Tendon adhesions: Scarring to retinaculum limiting gliding
  • Equinus contracture: From excessive plantarflexion during immobilization

Specific Complication Management

Re-Rupture:

  • Diagnosis: Clinical examination, ultrasound or MRI confirmation
  • Timing: Usually within first 3 months post-operatively
  • Causes: Excessive tension, premature weight-bearing, poor tendon quality
  • Management: Revision surgery with reconstruction (EHL transfer preferred)
  • Prevention: Adequate immobilization (8 weeks minimum), appropriate tension, patient compliance

Persistent Weakness:

  • Evaluation: Compare to contralateral ankle dorsiflexion strength
  • Acceptable: 70-80% strength after EHL transfer, 90%+ after primary repair
  • Causes: Muscle atrophy, incomplete healing, adhesions, inadequate rehabilitation
  • Management: Prolonged physiotherapy (6-12 months), AFO if severe
  • Consider: Revision surgery if less than 50% strength and daily impairment

Nerve Injury:

  • Superficial peroneal nerve: Numbness dorsum of foot, usually resolves 3-6 months
  • Deep peroneal nerve: First web space numbness, persistent but not functionally limiting
  • Painful neuroma: Rare, may require neuroma excision or nerve decompression
  • Prevention: Careful dissection, protect nerve branches throughout

The most significant complication is re-rupture, which occurs in 4-6% of cases. Risk factors include chronic ruptures treated with primary repair under tension, inadequate immobilization duration, and premature return to activities. Ensure 8 weeks of strict immobilization and gradual progression through rehabilitation phases to minimize risk.

Complications After TA Tendon Surgery

4
J Foot Ankle Surg (2020)
Key Findings:
  • 24% complication rate in 67 patients at 2-year follow-up
  • Re-rupture 6%, superficial infection 7.5%, nerve injury 6%
  • All infections resolved with oral antibiotics
  • 85% overall satisfaction despite complications
Clinical Implication: Complications are manageable; re-rupture and nerve injury are main concerns requiring careful surgical technique.

Return to Activity and Outcomes

Complications

Early Complications (0-6 weeks)

ComplicationIncidenceManagement
Wound infection3-8%Oral/IV antibiotics, debridement if deep
Wound dehiscence2-5%Dressings, secondary closure, skin graft
Nerve injury5-10%Observation (usually transient)
DVT/PEless than 1%Prophylaxis, treatment anticoagulation
Hematoma2-3%Aspiration or evacuation

Wound Problems:

  • Higher risk in chronic ruptures with poor tissue
  • Diabetes and PVD increase risk
  • Careful tissue handling essential

Late Complications (beyond 6 weeks)

ComplicationIncidenceManagement
Re-rupture4-6%Revision with EHL transfer or graft
Persistent weakness10-20%Physiotherapy, AFO if severe
Ankle stiffness5-10%Physiotherapy, manipulation
AdhesionsVariableTenolysis if severe
Cock-up hallux10-15% (EHL transfer)IP fusion or tenodesis

Risk Factors for Re-rupture:

  • Chronic rupture with primary repair
  • Early weight-bearing
  • Poor tendon quality
  • Non-compliance with immobilization

Complication Prevention

Surgical Technique:

  • Careful tissue handling
  • Protect nerve branches
  • Adequate suture strength
  • Appropriate tension setting
  • Consider augmentation for poor tissue

Postoperative Care:

  • Strict immobilization 6-8 weeks
  • Gradual weight-bearing progression
  • Supervised physiotherapy
  • Patient education on compliance

Specific Prevention:

  • Cock-up hallux: IP fusion or tenodesis with EHL transfer
  • Adhesions: Early protected motion when healed
  • Stiffness: Physiotherapy from week 8

Recovery Timeline and Expectations

Understanding the prolonged recovery process is essential for patient counseling.

Rehabilitation Phases

Immobilization in plantarflexion gradually brought to neutral. Non-weight bearing progressing to partial weight bearing.

Active range of motion, progressive weight bearing, gait normalization. Begin gentle strengthening.

Progressive resistance exercises, proprioception training, functional activities. Return to low-impact activities.

Sport-specific training, gradual return to full activities. Complete recovery expected by 12 months.

Functional Outcomes

Expected Functional Recovery

outcomeprimaryRepairehlTransfernonOperative
WalkingNormal gait by 3-4 monthsNormal gait by 4-6 monthsPermanent slap foot gait, AFO dependent
Stairs/InclinesFull function by 4-6 monthsNear-normal by 6-9 monthsPermanent difficulty, uses handrail
RunningReturn to running 6-9 monthsReturn to running 9-12 monthsUsually not possible
Sports/ImpactFull return 9-12 months, 90% performanceMost sports 12+ months, 75-85% performanceHigh-impact sports not feasible

Strength Recovery

  • Primary repair: 90-100% contralateral strength if successful
  • EHL transfer: 70-80% contralateral strength (functionally adequate)
  • EDL transfer: 60-70% contralateral strength (may limit high-level sports)
  • Allograft: 70-85% strength once fully incorporated (12-18 months)
  • Non-operative: 20-30% strength from EDL compensation alone

Patient Satisfaction

Studies report high satisfaction rates across surgical interventions:

  • Primary repair: 90-95% satisfied with outcome
  • EHL transfer: 85-90% satisfied despite some weakness
  • Revision surgery: 70-80% satisfied (lower due to complications/reoperations)
  • Non-operative: 40-60% satisfied, limited by persistent functional deficits

Return to Work

  • Sedentary work: 6-8 weeks with protected weight-bearing
  • Light duty: 12-16 weeks with gradual transition
  • Heavy labor: 6-9 months minimum, may require job modification
  • Driving: Right foot 3-4 months once off immobilization and adequate strength

Prognostic Factors

Favorable outcomes:

  • Acute rupture (less than 4 weeks) treated with primary repair
  • Good quality tendon and muscle
  • Young patient with good rehabilitation compliance
  • Non-smoking, non-diabetic, healthy weight
  • Appropriate surgical technique and post-operative protocol

Poor prognostic factors:

  • Chronic rupture (greater than 6 months) with muscle atrophy
  • Failed prior surgery
  • Diabetes, smoking, obesity
  • Poor compliance with immobilization or rehabilitation
  • Inflammatory arthropathy affecting healing

Long-Term Functional Outcomes

3
Foot Ankle Surg (2021)
Key Findings:
  • AOFAS scores improved from 48 to 89 at 5-year follow-up
  • Primary repair: 94% strength recovery vs EHL transfer: 77%
  • 91% returned to desired activity level
  • 93% patient satisfaction overall
Clinical Implication: Both primary repair and EHL transfer provide excellent long-term outcomes; primary repair offers better strength recovery when feasible.

Viva Scenarios

Outcomes

Functional Outcomes by Treatment

Outcome MeasurePrimary RepairEHL TransferNon-operative
AOFAS Score85-9580-9060-70
Strength recovery90-100%70-80%20-30%
Return to normal gait95%85%less than 50%
Patient satisfaction90-95%85-90%40-60%
Return to sport85-90%70-80%Limited

Timeline to Recovery:

  • Normal walking: 3-4 months (repair), 4-6 months (transfer)
  • Running: 6-9 months (repair), 9-12 months (transfer)
  • Full sport: 9-12 months (repair), 12+ months (transfer)

Surgical vs Non-operative Comparison

ParameterSurgicalNon-operative
Dorsiflexion strengthNear-normal20-30%
Gait patternNormalSlap foot, steppage
Orthotic dependenceNonePermanent AFO
Fall riskNormalIncreased
Sport participationYesLimited
Quality of lifeNormalReduced

Key Finding: Surgery provides significantly better functional outcomes in active patients. Non-operative management is only appropriate for elderly, sedentary, or high-risk patients.

Prognostic Factors

Favorable:

  • Acute presentation (less than 4 weeks)
  • Good tendon quality
  • Minimal muscle atrophy
  • Young, healthy patient
  • Non-smoker, non-diabetic
  • Compliant with rehabilitation

Unfavorable:

  • Chronic rupture (greater than 3 months)
  • Severe tendon degeneration
  • Significant muscle atrophy/fatty infiltration
  • Elderly with comorbidities
  • Smoker, diabetic, obese
  • Poor rehabilitation compliance
  • Prior failed surgery

Evidence Base

Key Studies - Surgical Outcomes

StudyDesignNKey Finding
Bernhard 2020Systematic review31890% good/excellent outcomes with surgery
Dooley 1980Case series16First major series describing EHL transfer
Markarian 1998Comparative32Primary repair superior when possible
Elias 2021Meta-analysis412Surgery significantly better than conservative

Evidence Summary:

  • Level IV evidence predominates (case series)
  • No RCTs comparing surgical vs non-operative
  • Consistent finding: surgery superior for active patients

Technique Comparison Evidence

ComparisonFindingLevel
Primary vs EHL transferPrimary better strength if achievableIV
EHL with vs without IP fusionIP fusion prevents cock-up halluxIV
Allograft vs autograftSimilar outcomes, no donor morbidityIV
Augmentation benefitReduces re-rupture in marginal tissueIV

Current Recommendations:

  • Primary repair preferred when gap less than 3cm and tissue quality good
  • EHL transfer for chronic ruptures or large gaps
  • IP fusion or tenodesis with EHL transfer to prevent deformity

Rehabilitation Evidence

Immobilization Duration:

  • Traditional: 8 weeks non-weight-bearing
  • Recent trend: Accelerated protocols (4-6 weeks) in primary repair
  • Evidence: Limited, accelerated may be safe in select cases

Weight-Bearing Progression:

  • No high-quality studies comparing protocols
  • General consensus: Gradual progression from 6-8 weeks
  • Touch-weight bearing may begin earlier

Strength Recovery:

  • Isokinetic testing shows 90%+ recovery with primary repair
  • EHL transfer achieves 70-80% - functionally adequate
  • Full recovery takes 12+ months

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Acute TA Tendon Rupture in Active Patient

EXAMINER

"A 52-year-old recreational runner presents to your clinic 10 days after acute onset of anterior ankle pain while running downhill. He describes a pop and immediate weakness. Examination reveals a palpable anterior ankle mass, a gap 3 cm above the TA insertion, and inability to heel walk. MRI shows complete TA tendon rupture with 2.5 cm gap in neutral position and good quality tendon ends. He is otherwise healthy and wants to return to running."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is an acute complete TA tendon rupture in an active patient who is an excellent surgical candidate. The 10-day timeframe is within the acute window where primary repair is likely feasible. MRI confirms complete rupture with a gap that should be repairable with ankle plantarflexion, and good tendon quality is favorable for primary repair.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Diagnosis: Acute complete TA tendon rupture, within surgical window (less than 4 weeks)
Surgical indication: Active patient with complete rupture desiring return to running
Approach: Primary end-to-end repair with Krackow suture technique
Positioning: Ankle in 10-15 degrees plantarflexion to achieve tension-free repair
Gap assessment: 2.5 cm gap in neutral becomes less than 2 cm in plantarflexion - repairable
Augmentation decision: Consider turndown flap or EHL augmentation if any tension on repair
Post-operative protocol: 8 weeks immobilization (first 2 weeks NWB plantarflexed, progress to neutral by 6 weeks)
Expected outcome: 90-100% strength recovery, return to running 6-9 months
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not assessing gap with ankle plantarflexed intraoperatively - may inappropriately proceed with tensioned repair
✗Inadequate immobilization duration (less than 8 weeks) leading to re-rupture risk
✗Promising early return to running (needs minimum 6 months for tendon maturation)
✗Failing to consider augmentation if any concern about tension on repair
✗Not discussing alternative of EHL transfer if primary repair not feasible intraoperatively
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"Walk me through your Krackow suture technique for the repair"
"At surgery you find the gap is 4 cm even in maximal plantarflexion - what do you do now?"
"What are the advantages and disadvantages of adding EHL as augmentation to the primary repair?"
"He asks when he can return to running - what is your timeline and criteria?"
"At 6 weeks post-op he has dorsiflexed his ankle against your protocol and now has recurrent pain and weakness - what is your approach?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 2: Chronic TA Tendon Rupture with Diagnostic Uncertainty

EXAMINER

"A 68-year-old man presents with 9 months of progressive difficulty walking and frequent tripping. He cannot recall a specific injury. He was initially diagnosed with sciatica and had lumbar spine MRI which was unremarkable. On examination, he has weak ankle dorsiflexion (2/5) but normal toe extension (5/5). He can evert the ankle normally. There is a subtle anterior ankle fullness. Ankle sensation is intact. He ambulates with a steppage gait pattern. You order an MRI which shows complete TA tendon rupture with 5 cm gap, degenerated tendon ends, and moderate TA muscle atrophy with early fatty infiltration."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a chronic missed TA tendon rupture presenting as foot drop, misdiagnosed as neurological pathology. The key differentiating features are preserved toe extension from intact EHL (unlike L5 radiculopathy or peroneal nerve palsy) and palpable anterior ankle mass. The 9-month delay, large gap, and muscle changes make primary repair impossible - reconstruction is required.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Delayed diagnosis: Common scenario - TA rupture often missed and attributed to neurological cause
Clinical differentiation: Preserved EHL (toe extension) distinguishes from L5/peroneal nerve palsy
Chronic rupture: 9 months with large gap (5 cm) and muscle atrophy
Reconstruction required: Primary repair not feasible with this gap and tendon quality
EHL transfer: Best option for chronic rupture reconstruction
Muscle atrophy: Moderate atrophy acceptable (severe atrophy greater than 50% volume predicts poor recovery)
Hallux management: IP arthrodesis or tenodesis essential to prevent cock-up deformity
Realistic expectations: Will achieve 70-80% strength, functional for activities but not elite sport
COMMON TRAPS
✗Attempting primary repair which will fail due to excessive gap and poor tendon quality
✗Not considering muscle atrophy in prognosis - severe atrophy (greater than 50%) predicts poor functional recovery
✗Performing EHL transfer without hallux IP fusion/tenodesis - will develop cock-up hallux
✗Over-promising strength recovery - EHL transfer achieves 70-80% not 100%
✗Not explaining prolonged recovery (9-12 months to full function)
✗Offering non-operative management without discussing permanent deficits requiring AFO
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"Describe your EHL transfer technique including hallux management"
"How do you determine appropriate tensioning of the EHL transfer intraoperatively?"
"What if his MRI showed 60% fatty infiltration of the TA muscle - how does this change your management?"
"He asks about non-operative management with an AFO - what are the pros and cons you discuss?"
"At 1 year post-op he has good function but his hallux is developing a cock-up deformity - what happened and what are your options?"

MCQ Practice Points

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the typical patient demographic and mechanism for anterior tibial tendon rupture?

A: Typically affects elderly patients (60-80 years) with spontaneous or low-energy rupture. Risk factors include: diabetes mellitus, inflammatory arthritis, corticosteroid use, and chronic tendinopathy. Often occurs with minor trauma (stumbling, missing a step) in a chronically weakened tendon. The zone of relative hypovascularity at the inferior extensor retinaculum is the most common rupture site.

Exam Pearl

Q: What are the clinical features of anterior tibial tendon rupture?

A: Gait abnormality: Steppage gait (high-stepping to clear foot) or slap gait (foot slaps during heel strike). Weakness: Unable to dorsiflex ankle against resistance. Palpable defect: Gap at the anterior ankle, though swelling may obscure this. Pseudotumor: Mass from retracted tendon stump may be palpable. Foot drop: Inability to clear foot during swing phase. Differential includes common peroneal nerve palsy (sensory changes, different weakness pattern).

Exam Pearl

Q: What are the surgical treatment options for anterior tibial tendon rupture?

A: Acute ruptures (less than 6 weeks): Primary repair with end-to-end suture if possible. Chronic ruptures: Often require augmentation due to tendon degeneration and gap. Options include: EHL transfer (extensor hallucis longus) - most common; Peroneus tertius transfer; Allograft reconstruction; Free gracilis/semitendinosus graft. The tendon is repaired through an anterior ankle incision, often requiring Z-lengthening.

Exam Pearl

Q: Why is EHL (extensor hallucis longus) the preferred tendon transfer for chronic anterior tibial tendon rupture?

A: EHL is preferred because: (1) Similar line of pull to tibialis anterior; (2) Adequate strength (approximately 80% of tibialis anterior); (3) Sufficient length for transfer; (4) Minimal donor morbidity - hallux IP joint extension loss is well-tolerated. Technique involves harvesting EHL distally, weaving through tibialis anterior stump, and anchoring to medial cuneiform/navicular with interference screw or suture anchors.

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the expected functional outcome after anterior tibial tendon repair or reconstruction?

A: Good to excellent outcomes in 80-90% of cases with surgical treatment. Most patients regain independent ambulation without orthotic support. Residual findings may include: Mild weakness of dorsiflexion (grade 4/5 power), altered gait pattern with reduced push-off, and prolonged rehabilitation (3-6 months). Non-operative treatment (AFO) is reserved for sedentary elderly patients with high surgical risk.

Australian Context

Australian Epidemiology

Incidence:

  • Rare injury: estimated less than 0.5 per 100,000 person-years
  • Higher rates in active elderly population
  • Increasing with aging population and activity levels

Demographics:

  • Mean age: 60-70 years for degenerative ruptures
  • Male predominance (3:1)
  • Risk factors: diabetes (higher in Aboriginal communities), corticosteroid use

Regional Considerations:

  • Higher rates of delayed presentation in rural/remote areas
  • Limited access to foot/ankle subspecialty expertise outside major centres
  • Telemedicine increasingly used for initial assessment

Australian Clinical Guidelines

Antibiotic Prophylaxis (eTG):

  • Cefazolin 2g IV within 60 minutes of incision
  • Alternative: Clindamycin 600mg IV if penicillin allergic
  • Single dose sufficient for most cases

VTE Prophylaxis (NHMRC):

  • Mechanical prophylaxis for all patients
  • Pharmacological prophylaxis for extended immobilization
  • Enoxaparin 40mg SC daily or rivaroxaban 10mg daily for 2-4 weeks

Postoperative Protocol:

  • Non-weight-bearing in cast 6-8 weeks
  • Transition to CAM boot with physiotherapy
  • Full recovery expected 9-12 months

PBS Considerations:

  • Rivaroxaban and enoxaparin PBS listed for orthopaedic prophylaxis
  • Paracetamol and NSAIDs first-line analgesia
  • Opioids for short-term breakthrough pain only

Follow-up Recommendations:

  • 2 weeks: Wound check, cast change
  • 6 weeks: Remove immobilization, commence ROM
  • 3 months: Assess strength, gait
  • 12 months: Final outcome assessment

TA Tendon Rupture Exam Essentials

High-Yield Exam Summary

Must-Know Anatomy

  • •TA: primary dorsiflexor, 80% of ankle dorsiflexion power
  • •Origin: lateral tibia, insertion: medial cuneiform and first MT base
  • •Hypovascular zone beneath extensor retinaculum - rupture site
  • •Superficial peroneal nerve crosses anterior ankle - protect during surgery
  • •Three retinacular bands constrain tendons - excise superior portion for decompression

Classic Presentation

  • •Elderly male, often spontaneous or minor trauma
  • •Anterior ankle mass (rolled-up tendon) with distal gap
  • •Unable to heel walk despite preserved toe extension (EHL intact)
  • •Slap foot gait - forefoot hits ground before heel
  • •Often misdiagnosed as sciatica or peroneal nerve palsy

Key Differentiation

  • •TA rupture: weak dorsiflexion, normal toe extension (EHL), palpable mass
  • •L5 radiculopathy: weak dorsiflexion AND weak EHL, radicular pain
  • •Peroneal nerve palsy: weak dorsiflexion AND eversion, foot numbness
  • •Compartment syndrome: tense leg, severe pain, pain with passive stretch
  • •Pseudoparalysis: pain limiting function, improves with anesthesia

Imaging Essentials

  • •MRI gold standard: confirms rupture, measures gap, assesses muscle/tendon quality
  • •Acute: gap less than 3 cm, good tendon quality, no muscle atrophy
  • •Chronic: gap greater than 4 cm, degenerated tendon, muscle atrophy/fatty infiltration
  • •Ultrasound: dynamic assessment, can diagnose acute ruptures
  • •XR: usually normal, may show tibial osteophytes in chronic cases

Treatment Algorithm

  • •Acute (less than 4 weeks) + gap less than 3 cm: primary Krackow repair
  • •Acute but gap greater than 3 cm: augment with EHL or turndown flap
  • •Chronic (greater than 4 weeks) or gap greater than 3 cm: EHL transfer reconstruction
  • •Severe muscle atrophy or revision: consider allograft or EDL transfer
  • •Non-operative: AFO only for sedentary elderly with high surgical risk

Surgical Pearls

  • •Primary repair: Krackow locking sutures, repair in 10-15 degrees plantarflexion
  • •EHL transfer: hallux IP fusion/tenodesis mandatory to prevent cock-up deformity
  • •Tension with ankle neutral dorsiflexion, slight hindfoot inversion
  • •Excise portion of superior retinaculum to decompress repair site
  • •Post-op: 8 weeks immobilization essential, NWB initially progressing by weeks

Viva Traps

  • •Primary repair under tension will fail - augment or reconstruct if gap greater than 3 cm
  • •EHL transfer achieves 70-80% strength NOT 100% - set realistic expectations
  • •Muscle atrophy greater than 50% predicts poor recovery even with surgery
  • •Return to running needs 6-9 months minimum, full recovery 12 months
  • •Re-rupture risk highest with inadequate immobilization or chronic rupture primary repair

Critical Numbers

  • •Gap less than 3 cm: primary repair feasible if acute and in plantarflexion
  • •8 weeks: minimum immobilization duration to prevent re-rupture
  • •70-80%: expected strength recovery with EHL transfer
  • •90-95%: good-excellent results with appropriate surgery and patient selection
  • •4-6%: re-rupture rate overall, higher with tensioned repairs
Quick Stats
Reading Time139 min
Related Topics

Ankle Impingement Syndromes

Anterior Ankle Impingement

Baxter's Nerve Entrapment

Bunionette Deformity (Tailor's Bunion)