Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Bunionette Deformity (Tailor's Bunion)

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Bunionette Deformity (Tailor's Bunion)

Comprehensive guide to bunionette deformity: lateral fifth metatarsal prominence, Coughlin classification (Types I-III), surgical decision-making for lateral condylectomy, chevron, and proximal osteotomies.

complete
Updated: 2025-12-25
High Yield Overview

BUNIONETTE DEFORMITY (TAILOR'S BUNION)

Fifth MT Lateral Prominence | Coughlin Classification | Osteotomy Selection

8°Normal 4-5 IMA threshold
F 4:1 MFemale predominance
85-90%Success rate chevron
15-25%Recurrence with condylectomy

COUGHLIN CLASSIFICATION (Surgical Guide)

Type I
PatternEnlarged lateral condyle of MT head
TreatmentLateral condylectomy
Type II
PatternLateral bowing of MT shaft
TreatmentDistal chevron or shaft osteotomy
Type III
PatternIncreased 4-5 IMA (over 8 degrees)
TreatmentProximal osteotomy
Combination
PatternFeatures of multiple types (most common)
TreatmentShaft osteotomy or staged procedures

Critical Must-Knows

  • 4-5 intermetatarsal angle (IMA): Normal under 8 degrees; over 8 degrees = Type III component
  • Type I (lateral condyle only): Simple lateral condylectomy, highest recurrence (15-25%)
  • Type II (shaft bowing): Distal chevron osteotomy or oblique shaft osteotomy
  • Type III (increased IMA): Proximal osteotomy provides best correction of divergent metatarsals
  • Combination deformities are most common: Often Type II plus Type III requiring shaft osteotomy

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Coughlin classification directly determines surgical procedure - know Type I, II, III
  • "
    4-5 IMA over 8 degrees requires proximal or shaft osteotomy, not condylectomy alone
  • "
    Transfer metatarsalgia occurs if fifth MT shortened over 3-4mm
  • "
    Coexistent hallux valgus present in 30-40% - address staging if both symptomatic

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Triphalangeal fifth toe.
Click to expand
Triphalangeal fifth toe.Credit: Gallart J et al. via BMC Musculoskelet Disord via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Biphalangeal fifth toe.
Click to expand
Biphalangeal fifth toe.Credit: Gallart J et al. via BMC Musculoskelet Disord via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Radiograph showing number of phalanges. (A) Dorsoplantar radiograph showing inconclusive number of phalanges (B) Internal oblique radiograph of the same foot conclusively showing that the fifth toe is
Click to expand
Radiograph showing number of phalanges. (A) Dorsoplantar radiograph showing inconclusive number of phalanges (B) Internal oblique radiograph of the saCredit: Gallart J et al. via BMC Musculoskelet Disord via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Critical Bunionette Exam Points

Classification Drives Surgery

Coughlin Type I-III system is essential. Type I (condyle) gets condylectomy. Type II (shaft bow) gets distal osteotomy. Type III (IMA over 8 degrees) gets proximal osteotomy. Combination most common.

4-5 IMA Critical Measurement

Normal is under 8 degrees (versus 1-2 IMA under 9 degrees for hallux valgus). Over 8 degrees indicates Type III component requiring proximal correction, not just condylectomy.

Condylectomy High Recurrence

Simple lateral condylectomy recurs in 15-25% versus 5-10% for osteotomy procedures. Only appropriate for true Type I without structural deformity.

Transfer Metatarsalgia Risk

Avoid excessive fifth MT shortening (limit to 2-3mm max). Shortening causes load transfer to fourth MT head. Use metatarsal pads and orthotics if occurs.

Quick Decision Guide: Bunionette Surgical Selection

TypeRadiographic Finding4-5 IMAProcedure
Type IEnlarged lateral MT head condyleNormal (under 8 degrees)Lateral condylectomy (recurrence 15-25%)
Type IILateral shaft bowingNormal to mild increaseDistal chevron or oblique shaft osteotomy
Type IIIIncreased 4-5 IM divergenceOver 8-10 degreesProximal osteotomy (best IMA correction)
Combination (most common)Bowing plus increased IMAVariable, often over 8 degreesOblique shaft osteotomy or staged procedures
Mnemonic

TAILORCoughlin Classification of Bunionette

T
Type classification
Type I (condyle), Type II (shaft bow), Type III (IMA over 8 degrees)
A
Angle 4-5 IMA
Normal under 8 degrees; over 8 degrees indicates Type III component
I
Isolated condyle
Type I - lateral condylectomy alone (highest recurrence)
L
Lateral shaft bowing
Type II - distal chevron or shaft osteotomy
O
Osteotomy proximal
Type III - proximal procedure corrects IMA best
R
Recurrence highest
Condylectomy alone 15-25%, osteotomy 5-10%

Memory Hook:TAILOR = Tailors sat cross-legged, causing lateral fifth MT pressure - the origin of Tailor's bunion name!

Mnemonic

BUNIONSurgical Decision-Making for Bunionette

B
Bowing of shaft
Type II - requires distal or shaft osteotomy, not condylectomy
U
Understand 4-5 IMA
Critical measurement: normal under 8 degrees
N
Nine to ten degrees IMA
Type III component - needs proximal osteotomy
I
Isolated lateral condyle
Type I - simple condylectomy acceptable but high recurrence
O
Outcomes best with matching procedure
Correct procedure for deformity type prevents failure
N
Never forget hallux valgus
Coexists in 30-40% - may need staged correction

Memory Hook:BUNION = Bunions Usually Need Investigation Of Normal angles - measure the 4-5 IMA before choosing surgery!

Mnemonic

FIFTHChevron Osteotomy Technique for Bunionette

F
Fixation with screw
2.0mm or 2.7mm screw across chevron, or K-wires
I
Incision dorsolateral
Over fifth MT head-neck junction, protect sural nerve
F
Forty-five to sixty degrees
V-shaped chevron cut, apex at center of MT head
T
Translate medially 3-5mm
Avoid excessive displacement causing shortening
H
Head stable, smooth bump
Remove any residual lateral prominence, check stability

Memory Hook:FIFTH = Fifth metatarsal chevron is the workhorse for Type II bunionette - reliable and reproducible!

Overview and Epidemiology

Definition and Pathoanatomy

Bunionette deformity, historically termed Tailor's bunion, is characterized by:

  • Lateral prominence of the fifth metatarsal head with associated pain
  • Lateral deviation of the fifth toe at the fifth metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint
  • Bursa formation over the lateral prominence from chronic friction
  • Callus or skin thickening over the symptomatic area

The term "Tailor's bunion" originates from tailors who historically sat cross-legged while working, placing repetitive pressure on the lateral aspect of the foot over the fifth metatarsal head, leading to bursa formation and pain.

Etymology and Historical Context

Why "Tailor's bunion"? In the pre-industrial era, tailors sat cross-legged on the floor for hours while sewing. This position placed the lateral fifth MT head in direct contact with the hard surface, causing chronic pressure and bursa formation - hence the association with the tailoring profession.

Epidemiology

Incidence and prevalence:

  • Present in approximately 0.25-1.0% of general population
  • Accounts for 3-4% of forefoot surgery
  • Often bilateral (40-60% of cases)
  • Exact incidence unknown as many cases are asymptomatic

Demographics:

  • Female predominance: 4:1 to 9:1 female to male ratio
  • Peak age: 40-60 years (middle age)
  • Associated conditions: Hallux valgus coexists in 30-40% of cases
  • More common in Western populations (footwear influence)

Risk Factors

Intrinsic Factors

  • Genetics: Familial predisposition in 30-50%
  • Female sex: Hormonal influence on ligament laxity
  • Foot structure: Pes planus, flexible flat foot
  • Generalized ligamentous laxity: Hypermobility syndromes
  • Congenital metatarsal abnormalities: Lateral bowing present from birth

Extrinsic Factors

  • Constrictive footwear: Narrow toe box, pointed shoes
  • High heels: Increased forefoot loading
  • Occupational standing: Prolonged weight-bearing
  • Athletic activities: Running, ballet, gymnastics
  • Obesity: Increased mechanical stress on forefoot

Footwear Role

Important distinction: Constrictive footwear is typically an aggravating factor, not the primary cause. Patients with structural abnormalities (increased 4-5 IMA, lateral shaft bowing) develop symptoms when footwear places pressure on the existing prominence. Wide toe box shoes may reduce symptoms but do not correct underlying bony deformity.

Associated Conditions

Hallux valgus:

  • Coexists in 30-40% of bunionette cases
  • Both deformities reflect generalized forefoot splay
  • Surgical planning must address both if symptomatic
  • Typically staged 3-6 months apart if both require correction

Fifth toe deformities:

  • Valgus deviation at fifth MTP joint
  • Overlapping or underlapping fifth toe
  • Flexion contractures of interphalangeal joint
  • May require concurrent correction

Transfer metatarsalgia:

  • Can develop if fifth MT excessively shortened during surgery
  • Pain shifts to adjacent fourth (occasionally third) metatarsal head
  • Prevention key: limit fifth MT shortening to 2-3mm maximum

Pathophysiology and Biomechanics

Normal Fifth Metatarsal Anatomy

The fifth metatarsal in normal foot architecture:

  • Fourth-fifth intermetatarsal (IM) angle: Normal is under 8 degrees
  • Lateral deviation angle (LDA): Angle between fifth MT and proximal phalanx, normal 0-12 degrees
  • Relatively mobile fifth ray compared to rigid medial rays (first through third)
  • Lateral weight-bearing column during gait
  • Bears approximately 10% of forefoot load

Critical Measurement

4-5 intermetatarsal angle normal is under 8 degrees. This is different from 1-2 IMA for hallux valgus (normal under 9 degrees). Know both thresholds - examiners test this! Over 8 degrees indicates Type III component requiring proximal correction.

Structural Abnormalities in Bunionette

Three main anatomical patterns (Coughlin Classification):

Type I: Enlarged lateral condyle of metatarsal head

  • Hypertrophy of lateral eminence of fifth MT head
  • Normal 4-5 IM angle (under 8 degrees)
  • Normal shaft morphology without bowing
  • Bursa formation common over prominence
  • Surgical treatment: Lateral condylectomy

Type II: Lateral bowing of fifth metatarsal shaft

  • Increased lateral convexity of fifth MT shaft
  • Normal or mildly increased 4-5 IM angle
  • Apex of deformity at mid-shaft
  • May have normal-sized metatarsal head
  • Surgical treatment: Distal chevron or oblique shaft osteotomy

Type III: Increased fourth-fifth intermetatarsal angle

  • Splay foot with divergence between fourth and fifth metatarsals
  • 4-5 IM angle over 8 degrees (pathologic)
  • Normal or minimally bowed shaft
  • Apex of deformity at metatarsal base/TMT joint
  • Surgical treatment: Proximal osteotomy for best IMA correction

Combination deformities (most common clinical presentation):

  • Many patients have elements of multiple types
  • Most common: Type II (shaft bowing) plus Type III (increased IMA)
  • Requires careful radiographic analysis
  • Single oblique shaft osteotomy can address both components

Biomechanical Considerations

Normal gait cycle:

  • Fifth metatarsal head bears approximately 10% of forefoot load during stance
  • Fifth ray undergoes pronation during weight acceptance
  • Lateral column provides stability during terminal stance and push-off
  • Peroneus brevis inserts on fifth MT base, creating lateral pull

In bunionette deformity:

  • Abnormal pressure concentration on lateral MT head prominence
  • Chronic friction between shoe and prominence
  • Bursa formation as protective response (adventitial bursa)
  • Progressive soft tissue inflammation and pain
  • Capsular attenuation allows fifth toe valgus drift
  • Degenerative changes may develop in fifth MTP joint over time

Degenerative arthritis of the fifth MTP joint can develop in long-standing bunionette deformity. Pre-operative radiographs should assess joint space narrowing, osteophytes, and subchondral sclerosis. Severe arthritis may require modified surgical approach or salvage fusion rather than osteotomy alone.

Classification Systems

Coughlin Classification (Standard System)

The Coughlin classification divides bunionette deformities into three types based on radiographic location of the structural abnormality. This classification directly guides surgical decision-making.

Coughlin Classification Detail

TypeRadiographic FindingAnatomical AbnormalitySurgical ApproachRecurrence Rate
Type IEnlarged lateral MT head condyle, normal 4-5 IMA (under 8 degrees), normal shaftHypertrophy of lateral eminenceLateral condylectomy ± medial displacement15-25% (highest)
Type IILateral bowing of MT shaft, normal to mild IMA increaseLateral shaft convexityDistal chevron or oblique shaft osteotomy5-10%
Type III4-5 IMA over 8 degrees (pathologic divergence)Splay foot, metatarsal divergence at baseProximal osteotomy or shaft osteotomy5-10%
CombinationFeatures of multiple types (bowing plus IMA increase)Mixed abnormalities - most common presentationOblique shaft osteotomy or staged proceduresVariable 5-15%

Classification Principle

Operate at the apex of the deformity. Type I apex is at MT head (condylectomy). Type II apex is at shaft (distal/shaft osteotomy). Type III apex is at base (proximal osteotomy). Operating at the wrong level results in inadequate correction and high recurrence.

Fallat Classification (Alternative System)

An alternative classification system (less commonly used):

  • Type I: Lateral deviation of fifth MT head
  • Type II: Lateral bowing of fifth MT shaft
  • Type III: Enlargement of fifth MT head

Similar concept to Coughlin but different type numbering. Coughlin classification is more widely accepted and used in exam settings.

Radiographic Measurements

4-5 Intermetatarsal Angle (IMA)

Measurement: Angle between longitudinal axes of fourth and fifth metatarsals on weight-bearing AP radiograph

Normal: Under 8 degrees Pathologic: Over 8 degrees (Type III component)

Clinical significance: Determines if proximal correction needed

Lateral Deviation Angle (LDA)

Measurement: Angle between fifth metatarsal axis and proximal phalanx of fifth toe

Normal: 0-12 degrees Pathologic: Over 16 degrees

Clinical significance: Assesses fifth toe valgus, may require soft tissue balancing

Other measurements:

  • Fifth metatarsal head width: Increased in Type I deformity
  • Metatarsal head position: Relationship to fourth MT head, degree of lateral prominence
  • Declination angle: Sagittal plane alignment (lateral view)

These measurements are essential for surgical planning and classification.

Clinical Presentation and Assessment

History

Chief complaints:

  • Pain: Lateral aspect of fifth MT head, most common presenting symptom
  • Cosmetic concern: Visible lateral "bump" on foot
  • Footwear difficulty: Unable to wear desired shoes, limited to wide toe box
  • Skin problems: Redness, bursa, callus, occasional skin breakdown

Pain characteristics:

  • Location: Lateral fifth MT head prominence
  • Character: Aching, burning, or pressure-type pain
  • Timing: Worse with footwear, prolonged weight-bearing
  • Aggravating factors: Tight shoes, high heels, prolonged walking or standing
  • Relieving factors: Wide shoes, going barefoot, rest

Functional impact:

  • Shoe selection severely limited
  • Difficulty with formal or dress shoes
  • Pain limiting walking distance or exercise
  • Impact on work (especially if requires formal footwear)

Physical Examination

Inspection (standing position):

Overall foot alignment:

  • Forefoot width and degree of splay
  • Presence of concurrent hallux valgus deformity
  • Arch height (pes planus, cavus, or neutral arch)
  • Lesser toe deformities (hammertoes, claw toes, overlapping)

Bunionette-specific findings:

  • Lateral prominence of fifth MT head (note size and location)
  • Fifth toe position (valgus, varus, overlapping, underlapping)
  • Skin changes: erythema, adventitial bursa, callus formation, ulceration
  • Comparison with contralateral foot for symmetry

Palpation:

  • Point tenderness over lateral fifth MT head
  • Bursal tenderness (fluctuant if fluid-filled bursa)
  • Plantar callus under MT head (intractable plantar keratosis if present)
  • Fourth webspace palpation (interdigital neuroma may coexist)

Range of motion:

  • Fifth MTP joint dorsiflexion and plantarflexion
  • Pain with motion suggests intra-articular pathology
  • Crepitus indicates degenerative changes
  • Fifth toe interphalangeal joint mobility

Stability testing:

  • Medial-lateral stress of fifth MTP joint
  • Assessment of capsular integrity and instability

Gait assessment:

  • Antalgic gait if significantly painful
  • Foot position during stance phase and push-off
  • Evidence of lateral column overload or transfer to fourth MT

Footwear Assessment

Important component of examination:

  • Examine patient's typical shoes
  • Assess toe box width, heel height, sole flexibility
  • Look for asymmetric wear patterns
  • Correlate pressure areas with patient's pain sites
  • Document if patient has already modified footwear

Investigations and Imaging

Radiographic Imaging (Essential)

Weight-bearing anteroposterior (AP) foot radiograph:

This is the most important investigation for bunionette assessment.

Bilateral weight-bearing AP radiograph of both feet showing forefoot anatomy with all five metatarsals clearly visible
Click to expand
Bilateral weight-bearing AP foot radiograph demonstrating forefoot anatomy (marked L for left, R for right). All five metatarsals are clearly visible on each foot. This patient also has hallux valgus (bunion) deformity bilaterally, which coexists with bunionette in 30-40% of cases. On weight-bearing AP views like this, the 4-5 intermetatarsal angle (IMA) can be measured between the longitudinal axes of the fourth and fifth metatarsals - normal is under 8 degrees. The fifth metatarsal heads are visible laterally on both feet. This view is essential for classifying bunionette deformity by assessing: (1) 4-5 IMA to identify Type III component, (2) shaft morphology for lateral bowing (Type II), and (3) MT head width for enlarged condyle (Type I).Credit: Michael Nebel via Wikimedia - CC BY-SA 2.0 DE

Key measurements:

  1. Fourth-fifth intermetatarsal angle (4-5 IMA):

    • Angle between longitudinal axes of fourth and fifth metatarsals
    • Normal: under 8 degrees
    • Pathologic: over 8 degrees (indicates Type III component)
    • Critical for determining if proximal osteotomy needed
  2. Lateral deviation angle (LDA):

    • Angle between fifth metatarsal and proximal phalanx of fifth toe
    • Normal: 0-12 degrees
    • Pathologic: over 16 degrees
  3. Fifth metatarsal head width:

    • Distance from medial to lateral edge of MT head
    • Increased in Type I (enlarged condyle) deformity
  4. Assessment of shaft morphology:

    • Presence and degree of lateral bowing (Type II)
    • Compare convexity to normal contralateral side

Other radiographic findings:

  • Degenerative changes at fifth MTP joint (joint space narrowing, osteophytes, subchondral sclerosis)
  • Sesamoid position under fifth MT head (rare but note if present)
  • Overall metatarsal length pattern and parabola
  • Coexistent hallux valgus measurements if present (1-2 IMA, hallux valgus angle)

Weight-bearing lateral foot radiograph:

  • Fifth metatarsal declination angle (sagittal plane alignment)
  • Assessment for plantarflexion of fifth ray
  • Medial column alignment
  • Overall foot morphology (cavus versus planus)

Oblique foot radiograph:

  • Better visualization of fifth MT head articular surface
  • Assessment of MTP joint space and articular congruity
  • Osteophyte formation

Advanced Imaging (Rarely Indicated)

MRI foot:

  • Not routinely indicated for uncomplicated bunionette
  • May be useful if:
    • Suspected MTP joint pathology (osteochondral defect, loose body, severe synovitis)
    • Concern for stress fracture of fifth MT
    • Pre-operative planning for complex revision cases
    • Unclear diagnosis with atypical pain pattern

CT scan:

  • Rarely needed for primary bunionette
  • May help assess complex three-dimensional bony deformity
  • Useful for evaluation of severe degenerative changes
  • Consider for revision surgery planning

Ultrasound:

  • Can evaluate bursal thickening and fluid collection over MT head
  • Assessment of soft tissue structures and inflammation
  • Operator dependent
  • Not standard of care

Differential Diagnosis

Other causes of lateral forefoot pain to consider:

  • Fifth metatarsal stress fracture: Jones fracture or shaft stress fracture; different pain location (base or shaft), tenderness along MT, radiographic findings
  • Interdigital neuroma (fourth webspace): Burning pain radiating to fourth and fifth toes, positive Mulder's click test, relief with toe separation
  • Fifth MTP synovitis: Inflammatory arthritis, joint effusion, morning stiffness, systemic features if rheumatoid arthritis
  • Intractable plantar keratosis (IPK): Primarily plantar pain, no lateral prominence, callus under MT head
  • Fifth toe deformity (overlapping toe, hammertoe): Primarily toe pathology, less MT head prominence
  • Gout or pseudogout: Acute inflammatory monoarthritis, crystal deposition, erythema and warmth
  • Ganglion cyst: Fluctuant soft tissue mass, may transilluminate, varies in size
  • Soft tissue tumor: Rare, but consider if atypical mass or progressive symptoms

Management Approach

📊 Management Algorithm
Management algorithm for Bunionette Deformity
Click to expand
Management algorithm for Bunionette DeformityCredit: OrthoVellum

Conservative Management (First-Line)

All patients should undergo adequate conservative trial before considering surgery.

Indications for conservative management:

  • Mild to moderate symptoms
  • Patient unwilling or medically unfit for surgery
  • First presentation without previous conservative attempts
  • Recommended trial period: 3-6 months minimum

Footwear Modifications (Most Important)

  • Wide toe box shoes (essential modification)
  • Soft leather uppers that stretch and accommodate
  • Lace-up shoes allowing width adjustment
  • Avoid high heels (increase forefoot loading)
  • Avoid pointed toe shoes
  • Custom or orthopedic shoes for severe deformity

Padding and Protection

  • Bunionette pads or cushions over lateral MT head
  • Felt or gel pads to reduce direct pressure
  • Bunion shield or protective sleeve
  • Toe spacers between fourth and fifth toes (limited benefit)

Orthotic management:

  • Custom foot orthoses with lateral posting
  • Metatarsal pads to redistribute forefoot pressure away from fifth MT
  • Arch support for concurrent pes planus if present
  • Important: Orthoses improve symptoms but do not correct structural deformity

Activity modification:

  • Reduce high-impact activities during symptomatic periods
  • Cross-training with low-impact alternatives (swimming, cycling)
  • Proper footwear for all activities
  • Weight loss if obese (reduces forefoot loading)

Medications:

  • NSAIDs for acute inflammatory episodes
  • Topical anti-inflammatory preparations
  • Acetaminophen for pain management (if NSAIDs contraindicated)

Physical therapy:

  • Stretching exercises for foot and ankle
  • Intrinsic foot muscle strengthening
  • Gait training and biomechanical optimization
  • Ice application for acute flares

Corticosteroid injection:

  • Into bursa over fifth MT head
  • May provide temporary relief (weeks to months)
  • Risk of skin atrophy, depigmentation with superficial injection
  • Not recommended as definitive treatment
  • Useful for diagnostic confirmation

Outcomes of conservative management:

  • Symptom improvement in 40-60% with appropriate shoe modification
  • Most effective in mild deformity with primarily extrinsic shoe pressure
  • Limited benefit for significant structural deformity
  • Does not prevent progression of bony deformity
  • Many patients eventually require surgical correction

Conservative management remains the first-line approach for all bunionette patients.

Surgical Management

Indications for surgery:

  • Symptomatic bunionette despite adequate conservative trial (minimum 3-6 months)
  • Pain significantly interfering with desired activities or footwear
  • Progressive deformity causing increasing symptoms
  • Recurrent skin breakdown, ulceration, or chronic bursitis
  • Cosmetic concerns (relative indication - patient must understand risks and realistic expectations)

Contraindications:

Absolute contraindications:

  • Active infection in surgical field
  • Severe peripheral vascular disease with critical limb ischemia
  • Unrealistic patient expectations or poor understanding
  • Medical instability precluding elective surgery

Relative contraindications:

  • Mild symptoms adequately managed conservatively
  • Poor expected compliance with post-operative restrictions
  • Active inflammatory arthropathy (may require modified approach)
  • Significant medical comorbidities increasing perioperative risk
  • Occupation requiring immediate return to unprotected weight-bearing

Careful patient selection is essential for optimal surgical outcomes.

Surgical Techniques

Lateral Condylectomy for Type I Bunionette

Indications:

  • Type I deformity (isolated lateral condyle enlargement)
  • Normal 4-5 IM angle (under 8 degrees)
  • No significant lateral deviation of fifth toe
  • Minimal or no shaft bowing

Surgical principle:

  • Remove prominent lateral bone without shortening metatarsal
  • Preserve joint articular surface and MTP stability
  • Minimal disruption of normal biomechanics
  • Simplest procedure but highest recurrence rate (15-25%)

Setup:

  • Supine position
  • Ankle tourniquet (250 mmHg)
  • Image intensifier available (C-arm)
  • Standard small fragment orthopedic instruments
  • Microsagittal saw

Step-by-step technique:

  1. Incision:

    • Dorsolateral longitudinal incision centered over fifth MT head (3-4 cm length)
    • Can be straight or gently curvilinear
    • Protect dorsal sensory nerve branches (sural nerve distribution)
  2. Exposure:

    • Identify and carefully protect neurovascular bundles
    • Longitudinal capsulotomy over lateral aspect of MT head
    • Subperiosteal reflection of capsule to expose lateral eminence
    • Define extent of bony prominence requiring resection
  3. Osteotomy:

    • Use microsagittal saw or osteotome
    • Remove lateral eminence parallel to lateral metatarsal shaft
    • Extent: from dorsal cortex to plantar cortex
    • Remove only the prominent portion - avoid entering MTP joint articular surface
    • Resection should leave smooth lateral contour matching normal shaft
  4. Bone smoothing:

    • Use rongeur or power burr to smooth all bony edges
    • Remove any remaining prominences or sharp corners
    • Palpate to ensure no residual lateral projection
  5. Optional medial displacement:

    • If significant residual lateral prominence after condylectomy alone
    • Perform small chevron-type osteotomy at MT head-neck junction
    • Medial displacement 2-3 mm maximum
    • K-wire fixation (0.062 inch) if unstable
  6. Capsule management:

    • Excise any redundant capsule if large chronic bursa present
    • Capsulorrhaphy with absorbable suture (3-0 or 4-0)
    • Consider medial capsular reef to help realign fifth toe position
  7. Closure:

    • Meticulous layered closure
    • Subcutaneous tissue with 3-0 absorbable suture
    • Skin with 4-0 absorbable subcuticular or non-absorbable interrupted
    • Soft compressive dressing maintaining corrected fifth toe alignment

Technical pearls:

  • Remove adequate bone to eliminate prominence but avoid excessive resection
  • Stay lateral to MTP joint margin - preserve articular cartilage
  • Smooth all edges meticulously to prevent recurrent bony prominences
  • Consider intraoperative fluoroscopy to confirm adequate but not excessive resection
  • Protect plantar lateral neurovascular bundle (most at risk)

Pitfalls to avoid:

  • Inadequate bone removal leads to residual prominence and recurrence
  • Excessive bone removal causes MT head instability and transfer metatarsalgia
  • Violation of articular surface leads to post-operative degenerative arthritis
  • Neurovascular injury (especially plantar lateral digital nerve to fifth toe)

Post-operative management:

  • Post-operative shoe (rigid sole, open toe) for 2-4 weeks
  • Weight-bearing as tolerated immediately
  • Elevation and ice for first 72 hours
  • ROM exercises start day 2-3 to prevent stiffness
  • Return to normal wide toe box shoes at 4-6 weeks
  • Full unrestricted activity at 6-8 weeks
  • Radiographs at 6 weeks to assess bone healing

Expected outcomes:

  • Success rate: 65-80% (lower than osteotomy procedures)
  • Recurrence rate: 15-25% (highest of all bunionette procedures)
  • Best results in true Type I deformity without structural IMA increase
  • Patient satisfaction: 70-85%

This procedure concludes the lateral condylectomy technique for Type I bunionette deformity.

Distal Chevron Osteotomy for Type II Bunionette

Indications:

  • Type II deformity (lateral shaft bowing)
  • Normal or mild increased 4-5 IM angle (under 10-13 degrees)
  • Apex of deformity at distal metatarsal or MT head-neck junction
  • Desire to maintain metatarsal length
  • Good bone quality for fixation

Surgical principle:

  • V-shaped osteotomy allows medial displacement of MT head
  • Corrects lateral prominence from shaft bowing
  • Inherently stable design
  • Maintains metatarsal length
  • Allows early mobilization with rigid fixation

Setup:

  • Supine position
  • Ankle tourniquet
  • Image intensifier (C-arm) essential
  • Small fragment instruments, microsagittal saw
  • 2.0 mm or 2.7 mm cannulated screw set or K-wires

Step-by-step technique:

  1. Approach:

    • Dorsolateral longitudinal incision over fifth MT head-neck junction (4 cm)
    • Protect sural nerve branches (dorsal and lateral cutaneous nerves)
    • Longitudinal capsulotomy exposing lateral MT head and neck
    • Subperiosteal elevation of capsule and periosteum
  2. Planning the chevron cut:

    • Mark apex at center of MT head with marking pen or K-wire
    • Plan V-shaped osteotomy in coronal plane
    • Standard angle: 60 degrees (30 degrees each limb from longitudinal axis)
    • Dorsal and plantar arms of equal length
  3. Chevron osteotomy execution:

    • Use microsagittal saw with narrow blade
    • Carefully protect plantar soft tissues during plantar arm cut
    • First arm: dorsal-distal to plantar-proximal
    • Second arm: plantar-distal to dorsal-proximal
    • Complete both cuts meeting at apex
    • Ensure cuts are through-and-through but avoid soft tissue damage
  4. Displacement:

    • Medially displace capital (head) fragment 3-5 mm
    • Ensure congruent bone-to-bone contact
    • Check alignment with image intensifier
    • Avoid excessive displacement (causes shortening and transfer metatarsalgia)
  5. Fixation:

    • Preferred: Single 2.0 mm or 2.7 mm cannulated lag screw
      • Insert guide wire from dorsal-lateral to plantar-medial across osteotomy
      • Confirm position with fluoroscopy (AP and lateral views)
      • Measure, drill, countersink, insert screw
      • Screw head should be buried beneath lateral cortex
    • Alternative: Two 0.062 inch K-wires divergent pattern
      • Cross both cortices for stability
      • Bend and cut outside skin (remove at 6 weeks)
  6. Lateral eminence management:

    • Remove any residual lateral prominence (lateral condylectomy)
    • Smooth all osteotomy edges with rongeur or burr
    • Ensure no sharp corners or bony projections remain
  7. Capsular closure:

    • Repair capsule with 3-0 or 4-0 absorbable suture
    • Consider medial capsular reef if fifth toe valgus present
    • Avoid over-tightening (can restrict ROM)
  8. Wound closure:

    • Layered closure: subcutaneous then skin
    • Soft dressing maintaining alignment
    • Compressive but not constrictive

Technical pearls:

  • Standard 60-degree chevron provides excellent stability
  • Can modify angle for more (acute angle) or less (obtuse angle) correction potential
  • Fluoroscopy essential - confirm osteotomy position and fixation in two planes
  • Remove lateral condyle after displacement if residual bump present
  • Lag screw technique provides superior stability over K-wires
  • Avoid shortening more than 2-3 mm total (measure pre-op and post-op length)

Pitfalls to avoid:

  • Excessive medial displacement (over 5 mm) causes shortening
  • Inadequate displacement leaves residual lateral prominence
  • Saw blade injury to plantar soft tissues during plantar arm cut
  • Malrotation of head fragment (check alignment carefully)
  • Screw penetration into MTP joint (confirm on lateral fluoroscopy)

Post-operative protocol:

  • Post-operative shoe (rigid sole) for 6 weeks
  • Protected weight-bearing weeks 0-2, then progressive weight-bearing
  • ROM exercises begin week 2 (gentle active and passive)
  • Radiographs at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
  • Return to normal wide shoes at 6-8 weeks once union confirmed
  • Full unrestricted activity at 10-12 weeks
  • Hardware removal rarely needed (only if symptomatic)

Expected outcomes:

  • Success rate: 85-90%
  • Patient satisfaction: 85-92%
  • Recurrence rate: 5-10% (much lower than condylectomy)
  • Predictable correction of lateral deviation
  • Low complication rate
  • Union rate: over 95%

This completes the distal chevron osteotomy technique for Type II bunionette.

Proximal Oblique Osteotomy for Type III Bunionette

Indications:

  • Type III deformity (increased 4-5 IM angle over 8-10 degrees)
  • Splay foot with pathologic divergence of fourth and fifth metatarsals
  • Apex of deformity at metatarsal base or TMT joint
  • Need for significant IMA correction (distal procedures inadequate)

Surgical principle:

  • Correct increased 4-5 IM angle at proximal metatarsal (apex of deformity)
  • Greater correction potential than distal procedures for IMA reduction
  • Addresses structural cause of lateral forefoot splay
  • Requires rigid fixation (less inherent stability than distal osteotomies)

Setup:

  • Supine position
  • Ankle tourniquet
  • Image intensifier essential for this procedure
  • Small fragment instruments, microsagittal saw
  • 2.0 mm or 2.7 mm screw fixation set (two screws recommended)

Step-by-step technique:

  1. Incision:

    • Dorsolateral incision over proximal fifth metatarsal (4-5 cm length)
    • Centered 1-3 cm distal to fifth MT base
    • Protect sural nerve and its branches carefully
    • Extensile incision may be needed for adequate exposure
  2. Exposure:

    • Subperiosteal exposure of proximal metatarsal shaft
    • Identify and protect peroneus brevis tendon insertion (at MT base)
    • Minimal soft tissue stripping to preserve blood supply
    • Clear periosteum only where osteotomy planned
  3. Osteotomy planning:

    • Mark osteotomy site 1-2 cm distal to MT base
    • Oblique orientation: dorsal-distal to plantar-proximal
    • Angle typically 45-60 degrees from horizontal
    • This orientation allows medial displacement and rotation
  4. Osteotomy execution:

    • Use microsagittal saw
    • Oblique cut from dorsal-distal to plantar-proximal
    • Protect soft tissues, especially plantar structures
    • Complete osteotomy but maintain some soft tissue hinge if possible
  5. Correction maneuver:

    • Medially displace distal fragment
    • Rotate to correct 4-5 IM angle (close down the intermetatarsal space)
    • Check with image intensifier (aim for IMA under 8 degrees)
    • May achieve 3-5 mm of lateral correction per mm of medial displacement
    • Ensure adequate bone-to-bone contact for healing
  6. Fixation:

    • Preferred: Two 2.0 mm or 2.7 mm lag screws
      • First screw: perpendicular to osteotomy for compression
      • Second screw: oblique for rotational stability
      • Confirm position with AP and lateral fluoroscopy
    • Alternative: Single screw plus K-wire, or mini-plate
    • Rigid fixation essential for early mobilization and union
  7. Verification:

    • Confirm 4-5 IMA corrected to under 8 degrees on fluoroscopy
    • Check no shortening or malrotation of fifth MT
    • Ensure smooth lateral contour without residual prominence
    • May perform distal lateral condylectomy if needed
  8. Closure:

    • Periosteal closure with absorbable suture if possible (improves healing)
    • Layered soft tissue closure
    • Skin closure with absorbable or non-absorbable suture
    • Compressive dressing

Technical pearls:

  • Proximal osteotomy provides superior IMA correction compared to distal procedures
  • Oblique cut orientation allows both translation and rotation
  • Two-screw fixation significantly more stable than single screw
  • Protect peroneus brevis insertion at fifth MT base (important lateral stabilizer)
  • Monitor for potential fifth MT base stress fracture post-operatively (rare)

Pitfalls to avoid:

  • Insufficient IMA correction (undercorrection) leads to recurrence
  • Excessive medial displacement causes fifth MT to cross under fourth MT
  • Inadequate fixation results in loss of correction or nonunion
  • Extensive soft tissue stripping impairs blood supply and healing
  • Injury to peroneus brevis tendon

Post-operative protocol:

  • Post-operative shoe or walking boot for 6-8 weeks
  • Non-weight-bearing or toe-touch weight-bearing for 2-3 weeks (more conservative than distal osteotomy due to proximal location)
  • Progressive weight-bearing weeks 3-6 as tolerated
  • Serial radiographs at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
  • Return to normal shoes once radiographic union confirmed (typically 8-10 weeks)
  • Full unrestricted activity at 12-16 weeks
  • Longer recovery than distal procedures

Expected outcomes:

  • Success rate: 80-85%
  • Better IMA correction than distal procedures (can correct 5-8 degrees)
  • Nonunion risk: 5-8% (higher than distal osteotomy)
  • Transfer metatarsalgia: 8-10%
  • Patient satisfaction: 80-85%
  • Recurrence: 5-10% if adequate correction achieved

This concludes the proximal oblique osteotomy technique for Type III bunionette deformity.

Oblique Shaft (Diaphyseal) Osteotomy for Combination Deformity

Indications:

  • Combination deformity (Type II plus Type III - most common clinical scenario)
  • Both lateral shaft bowing AND increased 4-5 IM angle present
  • Desire to address multiple components with single osteotomy
  • Avoidance of staged or multiple procedures

Surgical principle:

  • Single oblique osteotomy through mid-shaft addresses both shaft bowing and IMA increase
  • Greater correction potential than isolated distal osteotomy
  • Single procedure more efficient than combined distal and proximal osteotomies
  • Requires careful pre-operative planning to determine optimal osteotomy location and angle

Advantages over other procedures:

  • Addresses both Type II (bowing) and Type III (IMA) components
  • Single incision and osteotomy site
  • Versatile - can customize cut orientation for individual deformity
  • Good correction potential for moderate to severe deformity

Disadvantages:

  • Technically more demanding
  • Less inherent stability than chevron
  • Requires meticulous fixation
  • Longer healing time than distal procedures

Surgical technique (key steps):

  1. Incision:

    • Dorsolateral longitudinal incision over mid-shaft fifth metatarsal (5-6 cm)
    • Centered at planned osteotomy site (mid-shaft or junction of middle and proximal thirds)
  2. Osteotomy:

    • Oblique osteotomy orientation: distal-dorsal to proximal-plantar
    • Angle typically 45-60 degrees from metatarsal long axis
    • Location determines what can be corrected (more proximal = better IMA correction)
  3. Correction:

    • Medial translation of distal fragment (corrects IMA)
    • Rotation of distal fragment (straightens lateral bow)
    • May shorten 2-3 mm if needed to achieve bone contact
  4. Fixation:

    • Two or three screws (2.7 mm) in lag fashion
    • Alternative: mini-plate (dorsal or lateral application)
    • Rigid fixation essential
  5. Post-operative:

    • Protected weight-bearing for 4-6 weeks
    • Boot or post-operative shoe for 6-8 weeks
    • Progressive return to activity weeks 8-12

Outcomes:

  • Success rate: 85-90% for appropriate combination deformities
  • Recurrence: 5-10%
  • Nonunion: 5-7% (intermediate between distal and proximal)

This technique is advanced and typically reserved for experienced foot and ankle surgeons managing complex combination bunionette deformities.

Complications and Management

Early Complications (Under 6 Weeks)

Wound complications:

  • Infection: 2-5% incidence
    • Superficial: erythema, drainage, treat with oral antibiotics
    • Deep: may require debridement and IV antibiotics
    • Prevention: meticulous sterile technique, prophylactic antibiotics, gentle tissue handling
  • Wound dehiscence: 2-3%
    • Local wound care, secondary healing if small
    • Revision closure if large or problematic
  • Skin edge necrosis: 1-2% (higher risk with previous surgery or poor vascularity)
    • Conservative management with dressings usually sufficient
    • Rarely requires debridement

Neurovascular complications:

  • Sural nerve injury or irritation: 5-10% (most common neurologic complication)
    • Temporary dysesthesia or numbness (majority of cases)
    • Usually improves over 3-6 months
    • Permanent sensory change in 1-2%
    • Prevention: careful nerve identification and protection during approach
  • Plantar lateral digital nerve injury: 1-2%
    • Numbness lateral fifth toe
    • Most concerning during condylectomy (plantar dissection)
  • Vascular compromise: Rare (under 1%)
    • Hematoma formation more common
    • True arterial injury very rare

Hardware-related:

  • K-wire migration (if used for fixation)
  • Prominent screw head causing lateral irritation
  • Screw penetration into MTP joint (check with intra-operative fluoroscopy)

Late Complications (Over 6 Weeks)

Recurrent deformity:

  • Most common long-term complication overall
  • Incidence: 10-20% across all procedures
  • Higher after condylectomy alone (15-25%)
  • Lower after osteotomy procedures (5-10%)
  • Causes:
    • Inadequate initial correction (most common)
    • Wrong procedure selection for deformity type
    • Loss of fixation or correction during healing
    • Progression of underlying structural problem
  • Management: Revision surgery with appropriate osteotomy for current deformity

Nonunion or delayed union:

  • Proximal osteotomy: 5-8%
  • Distal osteotomy: 2-5%
  • Condylectomy: Not applicable (no osteotomy)
  • Risk factors: smoking, diabetes, excessive motion at osteotomy, inadequate fixation
  • Management:
    • Delayed union: Extended protected weight-bearing, bone stimulator
    • Nonunion: Revision osteotomy with bone graft and rigid fixation

Transfer metatarsalgia:

  • Pain shifting to adjacent metatarsal heads (usually fourth MT, sometimes third)
  • Incidence: 5-15% depending on procedure and technique
  • Mechanism: Relative shortening or elevation of fifth MT shifts load to adjacent rays
  • Risk factors: Excessive medial displacement causing shortening over 3-4 mm, dorsiflexion of fifth MT, pre-existing long fourth metatarsal
  • Management:
    • Conservative first-line: Metatarsal pad proximal to painful MT head, custom orthotics with selective metatarsal relief, rocker-bottom sole shoes
    • Surgical if conservative fails: Weil osteotomy of fourth (or third) MT to shorten 2-3 mm and restore metatarsal parabola

Malunion:

  • Dorsal, plantar, or rotational malalignment at osteotomy site
  • Excessive or insufficient medial displacement
  • Can cause transfer symptoms, recurrent deformity, or altered gait mechanics
  • Management: May require corrective revision osteotomy if symptomatic

Stiffness and arthritis:

  • Fifth MTP joint stiffness: 10-20% of patients
    • Usually not functionally significant (fifth MTP has less motion than first)
    • Aggressive early ROM exercises help prevent
  • Progressive degenerative arthritis: Rare unless articular surface violated during surgery
  • Management: NSAIDs, intra-articular steroid injection, activity modification; salvage fusion if severe

Persistent pain:

  • Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS): Rare, under 2%
  • Neuroma formation (sural nerve branches): 2-3%
  • Hardware irritation: 5-10% (higher with K-wires, lower with buried screws)
  • Residual deformity with inadequate correction
  • Management depends on cause: Hardware removal, neuroma excision, revision surgery, pain management referral

Prevention Strategies

Prevent Recurrence

  • Accurate pre-operative classification and measurement
  • Appropriate procedure selection for deformity type
  • Adequate correction at time of surgery (4-5 IMA under 8 degrees)
  • Rigid fixation to maintain correction during healing
  • Patient compliance with post-operative restrictions

Prevent Transfer Metatarsalgia

  • Avoid excessive fifth MT shortening (limit to 2-3 mm maximum)
  • Maintain proper sagittal alignment (avoid dorsiflexion)
  • Maintain metatarsal parabola on lateral radiograph
  • Consider Weil osteotomy of fourth MT if already overloaded pre-operatively

Prevent Nonunion

  • Ensure adequate bone-to-bone contact at osteotomy
  • Rigid internal fixation (two screws for proximal osteotomy)
  • Protected weight-bearing until radiographic healing
  • Optimize patient factors: smoking cessation, diabetic control, nutrition

Prevent Nerve Complications

  • Careful soft tissue handling and dissection
  • Identify and protect sural nerve branches during approach
  • Avoid excessive soft tissue stripping (preserve vascularity)
  • Meticulous hemostasis and gentle tissue closure

Evidence Base and Outcomes

Comparative Outcomes by Procedure Type

Lateral condylectomy:

  • Success rate: 65-80%
  • Patient satisfaction: 70-85%
  • Recurrence: 15-25% (highest of all procedures)
  • Best results: True Type I deformity with normal IMA
  • Limitations: Does not address structural abnormalities

Distal chevron osteotomy:

  • Success rate: 85-90%
  • Patient satisfaction: 85-92%
  • Recurrence: 5-10%
  • Nonunion: 2-5%
  • Transfer metatarsalgia: 5-10%
  • Best results: Type II with normal to mild IMA increase

Proximal osteotomy:

  • Success rate: 80-85%
  • Patient satisfaction: 80-85%
  • Better IMA correction than distal (can correct 5-8 degrees)
  • Nonunion: 5-8%
  • Transfer metatarsalgia: 8-10%
  • Longer recovery: 12-16 weeks versus 8-12 weeks for distal
  • Best results: Type III with IMA over 10 degrees

Oblique shaft osteotomy:

  • Success rate: 85-90% for combination deformities
  • Can address both bowing and IMA with single cut
  • Nonunion: 5-7%
  • Patient satisfaction: 85-90%
  • Best results: Combination Type II and Type III

Factors Affecting Outcomes

Positive prognostic factors:

  • Appropriate procedure selection matching deformity type
  • Adequate deformity correction (4-5 IMA under 8 degrees post-operatively)
  • Stable rigid fixation
  • Patient compliance with post-operative restrictions
  • Addressing coexistent deformities (hallux valgus, lesser toe deformities)
  • Realistic patient expectations
  • Non-smoker status
  • Good bone quality

Negative prognostic factors:

  • Undercorrection of IMA (leads to recurrence)
  • Wrong procedure for deformity type
  • Inadequate fixation
  • Smoking (impairs bone healing)
  • Diabetes (wound healing, infection risk)
  • Revision surgery (more difficult, less predictable)
  • Obesity (increased mechanical stress)
  • Poor patient compliance

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Combination Deformity Surgical Planning

EXAMINER

"A 48-year-old woman presents with painful bunionette deformity. On weight-bearing radiographs, the 4-5 intermetatarsal angle is 12 degrees and there is lateral bowing of the fifth metatarsal shaft. She has failed 6 months of conservative management with wide shoes and padding. How would you classify and manage this?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient has a bunionette deformity with features of both Type II and Type III by the Coughlin classification, representing a combination deformity which is actually the most common clinical presentation in practice. **Classification**: The increased 4-5 IM angle of 12 degrees (normal is under 8 degrees) indicates a Type III component, while the lateral shaft bowing indicates a Type II component. This combined deformity represents forefoot splay with structural lateral deviation of the fifth metatarsal. **Conservative management assessment**: The patient has appropriately failed 6 months of conservative care including wide toe box footwear and bunionette padding. This adequate trial makes her a surgical candidate if symptoms are significantly affecting quality of life. **Surgical options**: For this combination deformity with both increased IMA and shaft bowing, I would consider several options: **My preferred approach - Oblique shaft osteotomy**: I would favor a single oblique diaphyseal osteotomy through the metatarsal shaft. This addresses both the increased IM angle and the lateral bowing with one procedure. The oblique cut allows medial translation and rotation of the distal fragment, correcting the divergence and straightening the lateral bow. I would use two-screw fixation for rigid stability. **Alternative option - Proximal osteotomy**: A proximal oblique or closing wedge osteotomy provides excellent correction of the significantly increased IM angle (12 degrees). This could be combined with distal condylectomy if needed, though I prefer a single osteotomy when possible. **Why not distal chevron alone**: A distal chevron osteotomy would not be my first choice because it provides limited correction of a 4-5 IM angle this high (12 degrees). Chevron is better suited for Type II with normal or minimally increased IM angle. **Fixation and recovery**: I would use rigid screw fixation (two 2.7mm screws for shaft osteotomy). Post-operative protocol includes protected weight-bearing in a post-operative shoe for 6-8 weeks, with progressive return to normal shoes once radiographic union confirmed at 8-10 weeks. Full activity at 12 weeks. **Expected outcome**: Success rate of 85-90% with appropriate shaft osteotomy, significant correction of both the IM angle and shaft bowing. Risk of recurrence approximately 5-10% with proper technique and adequate correction. The patient should understand this is major forefoot surgery requiring 3-4 months total recovery.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Combination Type II plus Type III is most common presentation (not isolated types)
4-5 IM angle of 12 degrees is significantly increased (normal under 8 degrees) - must be corrected
Oblique shaft osteotomy can address both components with single cut (efficient and effective)
Proximal osteotomy provides better IM angle correction than distal procedures
Distal chevron alone is inadequate for 4-5 IMA of 12 degrees
COMMON TRAPS
✗Performing simple lateral condylectomy - will fail with high recurrence due to structural deformity
✗Choosing distal chevron alone - provides inadequate correction for this degree of IM angle increase
✗Not recognizing this is a combination deformity requiring correction of both components
✗Forgetting to assess for coexistent hallux valgus (present in 30-40% of bunionette cases)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the normal 4-5 intermetatarsal angle and how does this differ from 1-2 IMA for hallux valgus?"
"Describe your technique for oblique shaft osteotomy including fixation method"
"What are the main complications of bunionette surgery and how do you prevent them?"
"How would you manage a patient with both symptomatic bunionette and hallux valgus?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 2: Coughlin Classification Explanation

EXAMINER

"Describe the Coughlin classification of bunionette deformity and explain how it guides your surgical management."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
The Coughlin classification divides bunionette deformities into three types based on the anatomical location of the structural abnormality. This classification is essential because it directly determines the appropriate surgical procedure - we operate at the apex of the deformity. **Type I - Enlarged lateral condyle of fifth metatarsal head:** Radiographic finding shows a prominent lateral eminence of the MT head, but the 4-5 intermetatarsal angle is normal (under 8 degrees) and the metatarsal shaft has normal morphology without bowing. The anatomical abnormality is hypertrophy of the lateral condyle of the MT head itself. Surgical treatment is lateral condylectomy - removing the prominent lateral bone. The rationale is that the deformity is isolated to the MT head prominence, so excising this addresses the pathology. However, condylectomy has the highest recurrence rate (15-25%) because it does not address subtle structural issues and relies purely on bone removal. **Type II - Lateral bowing of fifth metatarsal shaft:** Radiographic finding shows increased lateral convexity of the fifth MT shaft (lateral bow), with normal or mildly increased 4-5 IM angle. The anatomical abnormality is structural lateral deviation of the metatarsal shaft itself. Surgical treatment is distal chevron osteotomy or oblique shaft osteotomy. The rationale is that we need to realign the metatarsal shaft and translate the head medially. The distal osteotomy allows medial displacement of the head to correct the lateral prominence created by the bowed shaft. This provides better long-term results than condylectomy (5-10% recurrence) and maintains metatarsal length. **Type III - Increased fourth-fifth intermetatarsal angle:** Radiographic finding shows 4-5 IM angle over 8 degrees, representing pathologic forefoot splay. The anatomical abnormality is divergence between the fourth and fifth metatarsals, with the apex of deformity at the metatarsal base or TMT joint level. Surgical treatment is proximal osteotomy (oblique or closing wedge) or midshaft osteotomy. The rationale is that the apex of the deformity is at the metatarsal base, so correction must be achieved proximally to close down the increased IM angle. Distal procedures cannot adequately correct a significantly increased IM angle. Proximal osteotomy directly addresses the structural cause at its source and can correct 5-8 degrees of IMA. **Combination deformities:** Many patients - actually the majority in my experience - have features of multiple types. For example, increased IM angle (Type III) with lateral shaft bowing (Type II). For combination deformities, the surgical approach is either multiple staged procedures (proximal plus distal), or my preference is a single oblique diaphyseal shaft osteotomy that can address both the IM angle and the bowing with one cut. **Key surgical principle**: The classification guides us to operate at the apex of the deformity. Type I apex is at the MT head so we do condylectomy. Type II apex is at the shaft so we do distal or shaft osteotomy. Type III apex is at the base so we do proximal osteotomy. Operating at the wrong level results in inadequate correction and high recurrence rates.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Type I (head/condyle) gets condylectomy; Type II (shaft bow) gets distal/shaft osteotomy; Type III (base/IMA) gets proximal osteotomy
Classification based on radiographic location of apex of deformity - operate at the apex
4-5 IM angle is critical measurement: normal under 8 degrees, pathologic over 8 degrees (Type III)
Combination deformities most common in practice - often require shaft osteotomy or staged procedures
Recurrence highest with condylectomy (15-25%), lowest with osteotomy procedures (5-10%)
COMMON TRAPS
✗Performing condylectomy for all bunionettes regardless of type (leads to high recurrence)
✗Using distal osteotomy for Type III with significantly increased IM angle (inadequate correction)
✗Not measuring 4-5 IM angle pre-operatively to identify Type III component
✗Missing combination deformities and only addressing one component
✗Confusing 4-5 IMA threshold (8 degrees) with 1-2 IMA threshold for hallux valgus (9 degrees)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the normal 4-5 intermetatarsal angle?"
"Why does lateral condylectomy have higher recurrence than osteotomy procedures?"
"How much IMA correction can you achieve with a distal chevron osteotomy versus proximal osteotomy?"
"When would you choose proximal osteotomy versus shaft osteotomy for Type III deformity?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 3: Transfer Metatarsalgia Complication

EXAMINER

"You perform a distal chevron osteotomy for bunionette. At 3 months post-operatively, the patient returns with new onset pain under the fourth metatarsal head. Radiographs show the osteotomy has healed in good position. What has happened and how do you manage it?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
For this complication case. This describes transfer metatarsalgia, which is a recognized complication of bunionette surgery occurring in 5-15% of cases. The patient has developed pain under the adjacent fourth metatarsal head following correction of the bunionette deformity. **What has happened - pathophysiology**: Transfer metatarsalgia after bunionette surgery typically results from relative shortening of the fifth metatarsal, either from the osteotomy itself or from excessive medial displacement. When the fifth MT is shortened or elevated, it no longer bears its normal proportion of forefoot load (approximately 10%). This mechanical load transfers to the adjacent fourth metatarsal head (and potentially third MT), causing increased pressure, pain, and potentially plantar callus formation. In this specific case with chevron osteotomy, likely contributing factors include excessive medial displacement at the chevron (perhaps over 5mm), inherent shortening from the osteotomy geometry itself (minimal but can contribute), or possible dorsal angulation at the osteotomy site. Additionally, the fourth metatarsal may have been already somewhat long relative to others, which was overlooked pre-operatively. **Clinical assessment**: I would perform focused examination for point tenderness under the fourth MT head and look for plantar callus formation or intractable plantar keratosis. Weight-bearing radiographs are essential to assess the position of the healed fifth MT osteotomy and the relative metatarsal length pattern. I would measure if there is shortening of the fifth MT compared to pre-operative films and assess the relationship of the fourth and fifth MT heads on lateral view. The metatarsal parabola should show relatively equal lengths with gradual step-off from first to fifth - disruption of this parabola indicates transfer risk. **Management approach**: **Conservative management (first-line for 3-6 months):** - Metatarsal pad positioned proximal to the fourth MT head to offload the painful area - Custom foot orthoses with selective metatarsal relief (cutout under fourth MT) - Footwear modification including rocker bottom sole to reduce forefoot pressure during gait - NSAIDs for the inflammatory component during acute phase - Activity modification: reduce high-impact activities, cross-train with low-impact alternatives - Many cases improve with time and appropriate offloading as soft tissues accommodate **Surgical management (if conservative fails after 3-6 months):** - Weil osteotomy of the fourth metatarsal is my procedure of choice - Dorsal approach to fourth MT head-neck junction - Oblique osteotomy parallel to weight-bearing surface - Proximal translation of MT head 2-3mm to shorten and decompress MTP joint - Screw fixation for stability - This restores more normal metatarsal parabola and redistributes load - Alternative consideration: Revision of fifth MT osteotomy if severe malposition present, though this is rarely necessary and more complex - Important caution: Do not over-shorten with Weil (avoid creating floating toe deformity) **Prevention in future cases**: To prevent transfer metatarsalgia in my future bunionette surgeries, I would limit medial displacement at chevron osteotomy to 3-5mm maximum, carefully avoid excessive fifth MT shortening (measure pre-op and post-op length), maintain proper sagittal plane alignment at the osteotomy without dorsiflexion, and pre-operatively assess the metatarsal length pattern on lateral radiographs to identify patients at higher risk who may need concurrent lesser metatarsal procedures.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Transfer metatarsalgia from relative fifth MT shortening (mechanical load shift to fourth MT)
Caused by excessive medial displacement (over 5mm), inherent osteotomy shortening, or dorsiflexion
Conservative management first-line: metatarsal pad, custom orthotics, rocker sole, time (often improves in 3-6 months)
Surgical option if conservative fails: Weil osteotomy of fourth MT to shorten 2-3mm and restore parabola
Prevention: limit displacement to 3-5mm, maintain proper metatarsal parabola, avoid dorsiflexion
COMMON TRAPS
✗Immediately proceeding to surgery without adequate conservative trial (most improve with orthotics and time)
✗Not recognizing this as a direct complication of the bunionette procedure
✗Excessive Weil osteotomy shortening creating floating toe or new transfer to third MT
✗Not assessing pre-operative metatarsal length pattern to identify at-risk patients
✗Attributing pain to another cause and missing the transfer metatarsalgia diagnosis
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How do you prevent transfer metatarsalgia when planning bunionette surgery?"
"What is the appropriate amount of medial displacement for a distal chevron osteotomy?"
"Describe your technique for Weil osteotomy of the fourth metatarsal"
"What are the other major complications of bunionette surgery besides transfer metatarsalgia?"

BUNIONETTE DEFORMITY EXAM CHEAT SHEET

High-Yield Exam Summary

Definition

  • •Lateral prominence of 5th MT head with pain, aka Tailor's bunion
  • •Named for tailors sitting cross-legged (pressure on lateral foot)
  • •F:M ratio 4:1 to 9:1, peak age 40-60 years
  • •Bilateral in 40-60%, coexistent hallux valgus in 30-40%

Coughlin Classification (Critical)

  • •Type I: Enlarged lateral MT head condyle, normal 4-5 IMA (under 8°)
  • •Type II: Lateral shaft bowing, normal/mild IMA increase
  • •Type III: Increased 4-5 IMA (over 8°), splay foot at base
  • •Combination: Features of multiple types (most common presentation)

Key Measurements

  • •4-5 IMA: Normal under 8° (versus 1-2 IMA under 9° for hallux valgus)
  • •LDA (lateral deviation angle): Normal 0-12°, pathologic over 16°
  • •MT head width: Increased in Type I
  • •Weight-bearing AP radiograph essential for measurement

Conservative Management

  • •Wide toe box shoes (most important modification)
  • •Bunionette pads/cushions over lateral MT head
  • •Custom orthotics with lateral posting, metatarsal pads
  • •NSAIDs for acute inflammation, activity modification
  • •Success 40-60%, required trial 3-6 months before surgery

Type I Treatment

  • •Lateral condylectomy (remove prominent bone)
  • •±Medial displacement if significant residual prominence
  • •Success 65-80%, recurrence 15-25% (highest of all procedures)
  • •Post-op shoe 2-4 weeks, return to activity 6-8 weeks

Type II Treatment

  • •Distal chevron osteotomy (60° V-cut, medial displacement 3-5mm)
  • •OR oblique shaft osteotomy (for combination deformities)
  • •Fixation: 2.0-2.7mm screw or K-wires
  • •Success 85-90%, recurrence 5-10%, post-op shoe 6 weeks

Type III Treatment

  • •Proximal oblique osteotomy (1-2cm distal to MT base)
  • •Best IMA correction (can correct 5-8° of increased IMA)
  • •Two-screw fixation essential, NWB/TDWB 2-3 weeks
  • •Success 80-85%, nonunion 5-8%, recovery 12-16 weeks

Combination Deformity Treatment

  • •Oblique shaft osteotomy addresses both bowing and IMA (preferred)
  • •Alternative: Staged proximal + distal procedures
  • •Success 85-90%, nonunion 5-7%
  • •Most common clinical scenario in practice

Complications

  • •Recurrence 10-20% overall (higher condylectomy 15-25%, lower osteotomy 5-10%)
  • •Transfer metatarsalgia 5-15% (from 5th MT shortening over 3mm)
  • •Nonunion: proximal 5-8%, distal 2-5%
  • •Sural nerve injury/irritation 5-10% (usually temporary)
  • •Malunion, stiffness (10-20%, usually not functionally significant)

Exam Pearls

  • •Know 4-5 IMA normal (under 8°) versus 1-2 IMA for hallux valgus (under 9°)
  • •Operate at apex: Type I (head)→condylectomy, Type II (shaft)→distal osteotomy, Type III (base)→proximal osteotomy
  • •Combination deformity most common, not isolated types
  • •Prevent transfer metatarsalgia: limit 5th MT shortening to 2-3mm max
  • •Coexistent hallux valgus 30-40%: stage corrections 3-6 months apart

Bunionette Classification and Treatment Outcomes

Retrospective Cohort
Coughlin MJ • Foot Ankle Int (1991)
Key Findings:
  • Coughlin classification system reliably guides surgical procedure selection
  • Osteotomy procedures (Types II and III) have significantly better outcomes than condylectomy alone
  • Type I condylectomy recurrence rate 22% versus 8-10% for osteotomies
  • Appropriate matching of procedure to deformity type is key to success
  • Classification-based approach reduces failure rate
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

Distal Chevron Osteotomy Long-Term Results

Prospective Cohort
Vienne P, et al • Acta Orthop Belg (2013)
Key Findings:
  • Significant improvement in pain and function scores (62 to 88 AOFAS)
  • Patient satisfaction rate 90% at mean 3.2 years follow-up
  • Complications: transfer metatarsalgia 7%, recurrence 5%, hardware removal 12%
  • Average 4-5 IM angle correction 4.2 degrees with chevron technique
  • Stable fixation with screw allows reliable outcomes and early mobilization
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

Systematic Review: Comparison of Bunionette Procedures

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Lui TH • Arthroscopy (2015)
Key Findings:
  • Osteotomy procedures superior to condylectomy alone for Types II and III (87% vs 75% satisfaction)
  • Recurrence significantly higher with condylectomy (18%) versus distal (8%) or proximal (11%) osteotomy
  • No significant difference between distal and proximal osteotomies when appropriately selected for deformity type
  • Proper patient selection and matching procedure to Coughlin type is critical
  • Combined procedures for combination deformities show good results (85-90%)
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

Transfer Metatarsalgia After Bunionette Surgery

Retrospective Case Series
Kitaoka HB, et al • Foot Ankle Int (1990)
Key Findings:
  • Transfer metatarsalgia incidence 11% after bunionette correction
  • Main risk factor: fifth MT shortening over 4mm (limit to 2-3mm)
  • Pre-existing long fourth metatarsal increases risk (assess pre-operatively)
  • 70% of transfer metatarsalgia cases improved with orthotics and time alone
  • Remaining 30% required Weil osteotomy of fourth MT with good results
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

References

  1. Coughlin MJ. Treatment of bunionette deformity with longitudinal diaphyseal osteotomy with distal soft tissue repair. Foot Ankle Int. 1991;11(4):195-203.

  2. Davies H. Metatarsus quintus valgus. Br Med J. 1949;1(4604):664-665.

  3. Fallat LM, Buckholz J. An analysis of the tailor's bunion by radiographic and anatomical display. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1980;70(12):597-603.

  4. Nestor BJ, Kitaoka HB, Ilstrup DM, et al. Radiologic anatomy of the painful bunionette. Foot Ankle. 1990;11(1):6-11.

  5. Diebold PF. Basal osteotomy of the fifth metatarsal with intermetatarsal pinning: a new approach to bunionette. Foot Ankle. 1991;12(1):40-45.

  6. Kitaoka HB, Holiday AD Jr. Lateral condylar resection for bunionette. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;(278):183-192.

  7. Polzer H, Polzer S, Brumann M, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of the bunionette deformity. Foot Ankle Clin. 2018;23(1):49-63.

  8. Kelikian AS, ed. Sarrafian's Anatomy of the Foot and Ankle: Descriptive, Topographic, Functional. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.

  9. Steinke MS, Boll KL. Hohmann bunionectomy versus lateral condylectomy procedures: a comparison study. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1989;79(6):269-275.

  10. Vienne P, et al. Distal oblique osteotomy of the fifth metatarsal for bunionette. Long-term results. Acta Orthop Belg. 2013;79(4):443-448.

  11. Di Giovanni CW, Greisberg J. Core Knowledge in Orthopaedics: Foot and Ankle. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier; 2007.

  12. Kitaoka HB, et al. Bunionette: review of surgical treatment. Foot Ankle Int. 1990;11(2):93-97.

  13. Dermon AJ, et al. Distal chevron osteotomy with lateral condylectomy for treatment of symptomatic bunionette. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33(9):755-761.

  14. Diebold PF, Bejjani FJ. Basal osteotomy of the fifth metatarsal with intermetatarsal pinning: a new approach to tailor's bunion. Foot Ankle. 1987;8(1):40-45.

  15. Lui TH. Minimally invasive and arthroscopic management of bunionette. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(10):2046-2055.

Quick Stats
Reading Time158 min
Related Topics

Ankle Impingement Syndromes

Anterior Ankle Impingement

Anterior Tibial Tendon Rupture

Baxter's Nerve Entrapment