BUNIONETTE DEFORMITY (TAILOR'S BUNION)
Fifth MT Lateral Prominence | Coughlin Classification | Osteotomy Selection
COUGHLIN CLASSIFICATION (Surgical Guide)
Critical Must-Knows
- 4-5 intermetatarsal angle (IMA): Normal under 8 degrees; over 8 degrees = Type III component
- Type I (lateral condyle only): Simple lateral condylectomy, highest recurrence (15-25%)
- Type II (shaft bowing): Distal chevron osteotomy or oblique shaft osteotomy
- Type III (increased IMA): Proximal osteotomy provides best correction of divergent metatarsals
- Combination deformities are most common: Often Type II plus Type III requiring shaft osteotomy
Examiner's Pearls
- "Coughlin classification directly determines surgical procedure - know Type I, II, III
- "4-5 IMA over 8 degrees requires proximal or shaft osteotomy, not condylectomy alone
- "Transfer metatarsalgia occurs if fifth MT shortened over 3-4mm
- "Coexistent hallux valgus present in 30-40% - address staging if both symptomatic
Clinical Imaging
Imaging Gallery



Critical Bunionette Exam Points
Classification Drives Surgery
Coughlin Type I-III system is essential. Type I (condyle) gets condylectomy. Type II (shaft bow) gets distal osteotomy. Type III (IMA over 8 degrees) gets proximal osteotomy. Combination most common.
4-5 IMA Critical Measurement
Normal is under 8 degrees (versus 1-2 IMA under 9 degrees for hallux valgus). Over 8 degrees indicates Type III component requiring proximal correction, not just condylectomy.
Condylectomy High Recurrence
Simple lateral condylectomy recurs in 15-25% versus 5-10% for osteotomy procedures. Only appropriate for true Type I without structural deformity.
Transfer Metatarsalgia Risk
Avoid excessive fifth MT shortening (limit to 2-3mm max). Shortening causes load transfer to fourth MT head. Use metatarsal pads and orthotics if occurs.
Quick Decision Guide: Bunionette Surgical Selection
| Type | Radiographic Finding | 4-5 IMA | Procedure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type I | Enlarged lateral MT head condyle | Normal (under 8 degrees) | Lateral condylectomy (recurrence 15-25%) |
| Type II | Lateral shaft bowing | Normal to mild increase | Distal chevron or oblique shaft osteotomy |
| Type III | Increased 4-5 IM divergence | Over 8-10 degrees | Proximal osteotomy (best IMA correction) |
| Combination (most common) | Bowing plus increased IMA | Variable, often over 8 degrees | Oblique shaft osteotomy or staged procedures |
TAILORCoughlin Classification of Bunionette
Memory Hook:TAILOR = Tailors sat cross-legged, causing lateral fifth MT pressure - the origin of Tailor's bunion name!
BUNIONSurgical Decision-Making for Bunionette
Memory Hook:BUNION = Bunions Usually Need Investigation Of Normal angles - measure the 4-5 IMA before choosing surgery!
FIFTHChevron Osteotomy Technique for Bunionette
Memory Hook:FIFTH = Fifth metatarsal chevron is the workhorse for Type II bunionette - reliable and reproducible!
Overview and Epidemiology
Definition and Pathoanatomy
Bunionette deformity, historically termed Tailor's bunion, is characterized by:
- Lateral prominence of the fifth metatarsal head with associated pain
- Lateral deviation of the fifth toe at the fifth metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint
- Bursa formation over the lateral prominence from chronic friction
- Callus or skin thickening over the symptomatic area
The term "Tailor's bunion" originates from tailors who historically sat cross-legged while working, placing repetitive pressure on the lateral aspect of the foot over the fifth metatarsal head, leading to bursa formation and pain.
Etymology and Historical Context
Why "Tailor's bunion"? In the pre-industrial era, tailors sat cross-legged on the floor for hours while sewing. This position placed the lateral fifth MT head in direct contact with the hard surface, causing chronic pressure and bursa formation - hence the association with the tailoring profession.
Epidemiology
Incidence and prevalence:
- Present in approximately 0.25-1.0% of general population
- Accounts for 3-4% of forefoot surgery
- Often bilateral (40-60% of cases)
- Exact incidence unknown as many cases are asymptomatic
Demographics:
- Female predominance: 4:1 to 9:1 female to male ratio
- Peak age: 40-60 years (middle age)
- Associated conditions: Hallux valgus coexists in 30-40% of cases
- More common in Western populations (footwear influence)
Risk Factors
Intrinsic Factors
- Genetics: Familial predisposition in 30-50%
- Female sex: Hormonal influence on ligament laxity
- Foot structure: Pes planus, flexible flat foot
- Generalized ligamentous laxity: Hypermobility syndromes
- Congenital metatarsal abnormalities: Lateral bowing present from birth
Extrinsic Factors
- Constrictive footwear: Narrow toe box, pointed shoes
- High heels: Increased forefoot loading
- Occupational standing: Prolonged weight-bearing
- Athletic activities: Running, ballet, gymnastics
- Obesity: Increased mechanical stress on forefoot
Footwear Role
Important distinction: Constrictive footwear is typically an aggravating factor, not the primary cause. Patients with structural abnormalities (increased 4-5 IMA, lateral shaft bowing) develop symptoms when footwear places pressure on the existing prominence. Wide toe box shoes may reduce symptoms but do not correct underlying bony deformity.
Associated Conditions
Hallux valgus:
- Coexists in 30-40% of bunionette cases
- Both deformities reflect generalized forefoot splay
- Surgical planning must address both if symptomatic
- Typically staged 3-6 months apart if both require correction
Fifth toe deformities:
- Valgus deviation at fifth MTP joint
- Overlapping or underlapping fifth toe
- Flexion contractures of interphalangeal joint
- May require concurrent correction
Transfer metatarsalgia:
- Can develop if fifth MT excessively shortened during surgery
- Pain shifts to adjacent fourth (occasionally third) metatarsal head
- Prevention key: limit fifth MT shortening to 2-3mm maximum
Pathophysiology and Biomechanics
Normal Fifth Metatarsal Anatomy
The fifth metatarsal in normal foot architecture:
- Fourth-fifth intermetatarsal (IM) angle: Normal is under 8 degrees
- Lateral deviation angle (LDA): Angle between fifth MT and proximal phalanx, normal 0-12 degrees
- Relatively mobile fifth ray compared to rigid medial rays (first through third)
- Lateral weight-bearing column during gait
- Bears approximately 10% of forefoot load
Critical Measurement
4-5 intermetatarsal angle normal is under 8 degrees. This is different from 1-2 IMA for hallux valgus (normal under 9 degrees). Know both thresholds - examiners test this! Over 8 degrees indicates Type III component requiring proximal correction.
Structural Abnormalities in Bunionette
Three main anatomical patterns (Coughlin Classification):
Type I: Enlarged lateral condyle of metatarsal head
- Hypertrophy of lateral eminence of fifth MT head
- Normal 4-5 IM angle (under 8 degrees)
- Normal shaft morphology without bowing
- Bursa formation common over prominence
- Surgical treatment: Lateral condylectomy
Type II: Lateral bowing of fifth metatarsal shaft
- Increased lateral convexity of fifth MT shaft
- Normal or mildly increased 4-5 IM angle
- Apex of deformity at mid-shaft
- May have normal-sized metatarsal head
- Surgical treatment: Distal chevron or oblique shaft osteotomy
Type III: Increased fourth-fifth intermetatarsal angle
- Splay foot with divergence between fourth and fifth metatarsals
- 4-5 IM angle over 8 degrees (pathologic)
- Normal or minimally bowed shaft
- Apex of deformity at metatarsal base/TMT joint
- Surgical treatment: Proximal osteotomy for best IMA correction
Combination deformities (most common clinical presentation):
- Many patients have elements of multiple types
- Most common: Type II (shaft bowing) plus Type III (increased IMA)
- Requires careful radiographic analysis
- Single oblique shaft osteotomy can address both components
Biomechanical Considerations
Normal gait cycle:
- Fifth metatarsal head bears approximately 10% of forefoot load during stance
- Fifth ray undergoes pronation during weight acceptance
- Lateral column provides stability during terminal stance and push-off
- Peroneus brevis inserts on fifth MT base, creating lateral pull
In bunionette deformity:
- Abnormal pressure concentration on lateral MT head prominence
- Chronic friction between shoe and prominence
- Bursa formation as protective response (adventitial bursa)
- Progressive soft tissue inflammation and pain
- Capsular attenuation allows fifth toe valgus drift
- Degenerative changes may develop in fifth MTP joint over time
Degenerative arthritis of the fifth MTP joint can develop in long-standing bunionette deformity. Pre-operative radiographs should assess joint space narrowing, osteophytes, and subchondral sclerosis. Severe arthritis may require modified surgical approach or salvage fusion rather than osteotomy alone.
Classification Systems
Coughlin Classification (Standard System)
The Coughlin classification divides bunionette deformities into three types based on radiographic location of the structural abnormality. This classification directly guides surgical decision-making.
Coughlin Classification Detail
| Type | Radiographic Finding | Anatomical Abnormality | Surgical Approach | Recurrence Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type I | Enlarged lateral MT head condyle, normal 4-5 IMA (under 8 degrees), normal shaft | Hypertrophy of lateral eminence | Lateral condylectomy ± medial displacement | 15-25% (highest) |
| Type II | Lateral bowing of MT shaft, normal to mild IMA increase | Lateral shaft convexity | Distal chevron or oblique shaft osteotomy | 5-10% |
| Type III | 4-5 IMA over 8 degrees (pathologic divergence) | Splay foot, metatarsal divergence at base | Proximal osteotomy or shaft osteotomy | 5-10% |
| Combination | Features of multiple types (bowing plus IMA increase) | Mixed abnormalities - most common presentation | Oblique shaft osteotomy or staged procedures | Variable 5-15% |
Classification Principle
Operate at the apex of the deformity. Type I apex is at MT head (condylectomy). Type II apex is at shaft (distal/shaft osteotomy). Type III apex is at base (proximal osteotomy). Operating at the wrong level results in inadequate correction and high recurrence.
Clinical Presentation and Assessment
History
Chief complaints:
- Pain: Lateral aspect of fifth MT head, most common presenting symptom
- Cosmetic concern: Visible lateral "bump" on foot
- Footwear difficulty: Unable to wear desired shoes, limited to wide toe box
- Skin problems: Redness, bursa, callus, occasional skin breakdown
Pain characteristics:
- Location: Lateral fifth MT head prominence
- Character: Aching, burning, or pressure-type pain
- Timing: Worse with footwear, prolonged weight-bearing
- Aggravating factors: Tight shoes, high heels, prolonged walking or standing
- Relieving factors: Wide shoes, going barefoot, rest
Functional impact:
- Shoe selection severely limited
- Difficulty with formal or dress shoes
- Pain limiting walking distance or exercise
- Impact on work (especially if requires formal footwear)
Physical Examination
Inspection (standing position):
Overall foot alignment:
- Forefoot width and degree of splay
- Presence of concurrent hallux valgus deformity
- Arch height (pes planus, cavus, or neutral arch)
- Lesser toe deformities (hammertoes, claw toes, overlapping)
Bunionette-specific findings:
- Lateral prominence of fifth MT head (note size and location)
- Fifth toe position (valgus, varus, overlapping, underlapping)
- Skin changes: erythema, adventitial bursa, callus formation, ulceration
- Comparison with contralateral foot for symmetry
Palpation:
- Point tenderness over lateral fifth MT head
- Bursal tenderness (fluctuant if fluid-filled bursa)
- Plantar callus under MT head (intractable plantar keratosis if present)
- Fourth webspace palpation (interdigital neuroma may coexist)
Range of motion:
- Fifth MTP joint dorsiflexion and plantarflexion
- Pain with motion suggests intra-articular pathology
- Crepitus indicates degenerative changes
- Fifth toe interphalangeal joint mobility
Stability testing:
- Medial-lateral stress of fifth MTP joint
- Assessment of capsular integrity and instability
Gait assessment:
- Antalgic gait if significantly painful
- Foot position during stance phase and push-off
- Evidence of lateral column overload or transfer to fourth MT
Footwear Assessment
Important component of examination:
- Examine patient's typical shoes
- Assess toe box width, heel height, sole flexibility
- Look for asymmetric wear patterns
- Correlate pressure areas with patient's pain sites
- Document if patient has already modified footwear
Investigations and Imaging
Radiographic Imaging (Essential)
Weight-bearing anteroposterior (AP) foot radiograph:
This is the most important investigation for bunionette assessment.

Key measurements:
-
Fourth-fifth intermetatarsal angle (4-5 IMA):
- Angle between longitudinal axes of fourth and fifth metatarsals
- Normal: under 8 degrees
- Pathologic: over 8 degrees (indicates Type III component)
- Critical for determining if proximal osteotomy needed
-
Lateral deviation angle (LDA):
- Angle between fifth metatarsal and proximal phalanx of fifth toe
- Normal: 0-12 degrees
- Pathologic: over 16 degrees
-
Fifth metatarsal head width:
- Distance from medial to lateral edge of MT head
- Increased in Type I (enlarged condyle) deformity
-
Assessment of shaft morphology:
- Presence and degree of lateral bowing (Type II)
- Compare convexity to normal contralateral side
Other radiographic findings:
- Degenerative changes at fifth MTP joint (joint space narrowing, osteophytes, subchondral sclerosis)
- Sesamoid position under fifth MT head (rare but note if present)
- Overall metatarsal length pattern and parabola
- Coexistent hallux valgus measurements if present (1-2 IMA, hallux valgus angle)
Weight-bearing lateral foot radiograph:
- Fifth metatarsal declination angle (sagittal plane alignment)
- Assessment for plantarflexion of fifth ray
- Medial column alignment
- Overall foot morphology (cavus versus planus)
Oblique foot radiograph:
- Better visualization of fifth MT head articular surface
- Assessment of MTP joint space and articular congruity
- Osteophyte formation
Advanced Imaging (Rarely Indicated)
MRI foot:
- Not routinely indicated for uncomplicated bunionette
- May be useful if:
- Suspected MTP joint pathology (osteochondral defect, loose body, severe synovitis)
- Concern for stress fracture of fifth MT
- Pre-operative planning for complex revision cases
- Unclear diagnosis with atypical pain pattern
CT scan:
- Rarely needed for primary bunionette
- May help assess complex three-dimensional bony deformity
- Useful for evaluation of severe degenerative changes
- Consider for revision surgery planning
Ultrasound:
- Can evaluate bursal thickening and fluid collection over MT head
- Assessment of soft tissue structures and inflammation
- Operator dependent
- Not standard of care
Differential Diagnosis
Other causes of lateral forefoot pain to consider:
- Fifth metatarsal stress fracture: Jones fracture or shaft stress fracture; different pain location (base or shaft), tenderness along MT, radiographic findings
- Interdigital neuroma (fourth webspace): Burning pain radiating to fourth and fifth toes, positive Mulder's click test, relief with toe separation
- Fifth MTP synovitis: Inflammatory arthritis, joint effusion, morning stiffness, systemic features if rheumatoid arthritis
- Intractable plantar keratosis (IPK): Primarily plantar pain, no lateral prominence, callus under MT head
- Fifth toe deformity (overlapping toe, hammertoe): Primarily toe pathology, less MT head prominence
- Gout or pseudogout: Acute inflammatory monoarthritis, crystal deposition, erythema and warmth
- Ganglion cyst: Fluctuant soft tissue mass, may transilluminate, varies in size
- Soft tissue tumor: Rare, but consider if atypical mass or progressive symptoms
Management Approach

Conservative Management (First-Line)
All patients should undergo adequate conservative trial before considering surgery.
Indications for conservative management:
- Mild to moderate symptoms
- Patient unwilling or medically unfit for surgery
- First presentation without previous conservative attempts
- Recommended trial period: 3-6 months minimum
Footwear Modifications (Most Important)
- Wide toe box shoes (essential modification)
- Soft leather uppers that stretch and accommodate
- Lace-up shoes allowing width adjustment
- Avoid high heels (increase forefoot loading)
- Avoid pointed toe shoes
- Custom or orthopedic shoes for severe deformity
Padding and Protection
- Bunionette pads or cushions over lateral MT head
- Felt or gel pads to reduce direct pressure
- Bunion shield or protective sleeve
- Toe spacers between fourth and fifth toes (limited benefit)
Orthotic management:
- Custom foot orthoses with lateral posting
- Metatarsal pads to redistribute forefoot pressure away from fifth MT
- Arch support for concurrent pes planus if present
- Important: Orthoses improve symptoms but do not correct structural deformity
Activity modification:
- Reduce high-impact activities during symptomatic periods
- Cross-training with low-impact alternatives (swimming, cycling)
- Proper footwear for all activities
- Weight loss if obese (reduces forefoot loading)
Medications:
- NSAIDs for acute inflammatory episodes
- Topical anti-inflammatory preparations
- Acetaminophen for pain management (if NSAIDs contraindicated)
Physical therapy:
- Stretching exercises for foot and ankle
- Intrinsic foot muscle strengthening
- Gait training and biomechanical optimization
- Ice application for acute flares
Corticosteroid injection:
- Into bursa over fifth MT head
- May provide temporary relief (weeks to months)
- Risk of skin atrophy, depigmentation with superficial injection
- Not recommended as definitive treatment
- Useful for diagnostic confirmation
Outcomes of conservative management:
- Symptom improvement in 40-60% with appropriate shoe modification
- Most effective in mild deformity with primarily extrinsic shoe pressure
- Limited benefit for significant structural deformity
- Does not prevent progression of bony deformity
- Many patients eventually require surgical correction
Conservative management remains the first-line approach for all bunionette patients.
Surgical Techniques
Lateral Condylectomy for Type I Bunionette
Indications:
- Type I deformity (isolated lateral condyle enlargement)
- Normal 4-5 IM angle (under 8 degrees)
- No significant lateral deviation of fifth toe
- Minimal or no shaft bowing
Surgical principle:
- Remove prominent lateral bone without shortening metatarsal
- Preserve joint articular surface and MTP stability
- Minimal disruption of normal biomechanics
- Simplest procedure but highest recurrence rate (15-25%)
Setup:
- Supine position
- Ankle tourniquet (250 mmHg)
- Image intensifier available (C-arm)
- Standard small fragment orthopedic instruments
- Microsagittal saw
Step-by-step technique:
-
Incision:
- Dorsolateral longitudinal incision centered over fifth MT head (3-4 cm length)
- Can be straight or gently curvilinear
- Protect dorsal sensory nerve branches (sural nerve distribution)
-
Exposure:
- Identify and carefully protect neurovascular bundles
- Longitudinal capsulotomy over lateral aspect of MT head
- Subperiosteal reflection of capsule to expose lateral eminence
- Define extent of bony prominence requiring resection
-
Osteotomy:
- Use microsagittal saw or osteotome
- Remove lateral eminence parallel to lateral metatarsal shaft
- Extent: from dorsal cortex to plantar cortex
- Remove only the prominent portion - avoid entering MTP joint articular surface
- Resection should leave smooth lateral contour matching normal shaft
-
Bone smoothing:
- Use rongeur or power burr to smooth all bony edges
- Remove any remaining prominences or sharp corners
- Palpate to ensure no residual lateral projection
-
Optional medial displacement:
- If significant residual lateral prominence after condylectomy alone
- Perform small chevron-type osteotomy at MT head-neck junction
- Medial displacement 2-3 mm maximum
- K-wire fixation (0.062 inch) if unstable
-
Capsule management:
- Excise any redundant capsule if large chronic bursa present
- Capsulorrhaphy with absorbable suture (3-0 or 4-0)
- Consider medial capsular reef to help realign fifth toe position
-
Closure:
- Meticulous layered closure
- Subcutaneous tissue with 3-0 absorbable suture
- Skin with 4-0 absorbable subcuticular or non-absorbable interrupted
- Soft compressive dressing maintaining corrected fifth toe alignment
Technical pearls:
- Remove adequate bone to eliminate prominence but avoid excessive resection
- Stay lateral to MTP joint margin - preserve articular cartilage
- Smooth all edges meticulously to prevent recurrent bony prominences
- Consider intraoperative fluoroscopy to confirm adequate but not excessive resection
- Protect plantar lateral neurovascular bundle (most at risk)
Pitfalls to avoid:
- Inadequate bone removal leads to residual prominence and recurrence
- Excessive bone removal causes MT head instability and transfer metatarsalgia
- Violation of articular surface leads to post-operative degenerative arthritis
- Neurovascular injury (especially plantar lateral digital nerve to fifth toe)
Post-operative management:
- Post-operative shoe (rigid sole, open toe) for 2-4 weeks
- Weight-bearing as tolerated immediately
- Elevation and ice for first 72 hours
- ROM exercises start day 2-3 to prevent stiffness
- Return to normal wide toe box shoes at 4-6 weeks
- Full unrestricted activity at 6-8 weeks
- Radiographs at 6 weeks to assess bone healing
Expected outcomes:
- Success rate: 65-80% (lower than osteotomy procedures)
- Recurrence rate: 15-25% (highest of all bunionette procedures)
- Best results in true Type I deformity without structural IMA increase
- Patient satisfaction: 70-85%
This procedure concludes the lateral condylectomy technique for Type I bunionette deformity.
Complications and Management
Early Complications (Under 6 Weeks)
Wound complications:
- Infection: 2-5% incidence
- Superficial: erythema, drainage, treat with oral antibiotics
- Deep: may require debridement and IV antibiotics
- Prevention: meticulous sterile technique, prophylactic antibiotics, gentle tissue handling
- Wound dehiscence: 2-3%
- Local wound care, secondary healing if small
- Revision closure if large or problematic
- Skin edge necrosis: 1-2% (higher risk with previous surgery or poor vascularity)
- Conservative management with dressings usually sufficient
- Rarely requires debridement
Neurovascular complications:
- Sural nerve injury or irritation: 5-10% (most common neurologic complication)
- Temporary dysesthesia or numbness (majority of cases)
- Usually improves over 3-6 months
- Permanent sensory change in 1-2%
- Prevention: careful nerve identification and protection during approach
- Plantar lateral digital nerve injury: 1-2%
- Numbness lateral fifth toe
- Most concerning during condylectomy (plantar dissection)
- Vascular compromise: Rare (under 1%)
- Hematoma formation more common
- True arterial injury very rare
Hardware-related:
- K-wire migration (if used for fixation)
- Prominent screw head causing lateral irritation
- Screw penetration into MTP joint (check with intra-operative fluoroscopy)
Late Complications (Over 6 Weeks)
Recurrent deformity:
- Most common long-term complication overall
- Incidence: 10-20% across all procedures
- Higher after condylectomy alone (15-25%)
- Lower after osteotomy procedures (5-10%)
- Causes:
- Inadequate initial correction (most common)
- Wrong procedure selection for deformity type
- Loss of fixation or correction during healing
- Progression of underlying structural problem
- Management: Revision surgery with appropriate osteotomy for current deformity
Nonunion or delayed union:
- Proximal osteotomy: 5-8%
- Distal osteotomy: 2-5%
- Condylectomy: Not applicable (no osteotomy)
- Risk factors: smoking, diabetes, excessive motion at osteotomy, inadequate fixation
- Management:
- Delayed union: Extended protected weight-bearing, bone stimulator
- Nonunion: Revision osteotomy with bone graft and rigid fixation
Transfer metatarsalgia:
- Pain shifting to adjacent metatarsal heads (usually fourth MT, sometimes third)
- Incidence: 5-15% depending on procedure and technique
- Mechanism: Relative shortening or elevation of fifth MT shifts load to adjacent rays
- Risk factors: Excessive medial displacement causing shortening over 3-4 mm, dorsiflexion of fifth MT, pre-existing long fourth metatarsal
- Management:
- Conservative first-line: Metatarsal pad proximal to painful MT head, custom orthotics with selective metatarsal relief, rocker-bottom sole shoes
- Surgical if conservative fails: Weil osteotomy of fourth (or third) MT to shorten 2-3 mm and restore metatarsal parabola
Malunion:
- Dorsal, plantar, or rotational malalignment at osteotomy site
- Excessive or insufficient medial displacement
- Can cause transfer symptoms, recurrent deformity, or altered gait mechanics
- Management: May require corrective revision osteotomy if symptomatic
Stiffness and arthritis:
- Fifth MTP joint stiffness: 10-20% of patients
- Usually not functionally significant (fifth MTP has less motion than first)
- Aggressive early ROM exercises help prevent
- Progressive degenerative arthritis: Rare unless articular surface violated during surgery
- Management: NSAIDs, intra-articular steroid injection, activity modification; salvage fusion if severe
Persistent pain:
- Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS): Rare, under 2%
- Neuroma formation (sural nerve branches): 2-3%
- Hardware irritation: 5-10% (higher with K-wires, lower with buried screws)
- Residual deformity with inadequate correction
- Management depends on cause: Hardware removal, neuroma excision, revision surgery, pain management referral
Prevention Strategies
Prevent Recurrence
- Accurate pre-operative classification and measurement
- Appropriate procedure selection for deformity type
- Adequate correction at time of surgery (4-5 IMA under 8 degrees)
- Rigid fixation to maintain correction during healing
- Patient compliance with post-operative restrictions
Prevent Transfer Metatarsalgia
- Avoid excessive fifth MT shortening (limit to 2-3 mm maximum)
- Maintain proper sagittal alignment (avoid dorsiflexion)
- Maintain metatarsal parabola on lateral radiograph
- Consider Weil osteotomy of fourth MT if already overloaded pre-operatively
Prevent Nonunion
- Ensure adequate bone-to-bone contact at osteotomy
- Rigid internal fixation (two screws for proximal osteotomy)
- Protected weight-bearing until radiographic healing
- Optimize patient factors: smoking cessation, diabetic control, nutrition
Prevent Nerve Complications
- Careful soft tissue handling and dissection
- Identify and protect sural nerve branches during approach
- Avoid excessive soft tissue stripping (preserve vascularity)
- Meticulous hemostasis and gentle tissue closure
Evidence Base and Outcomes
Comparative Outcomes by Procedure Type
Lateral condylectomy:
- Success rate: 65-80%
- Patient satisfaction: 70-85%
- Recurrence: 15-25% (highest of all procedures)
- Best results: True Type I deformity with normal IMA
- Limitations: Does not address structural abnormalities
Distal chevron osteotomy:
- Success rate: 85-90%
- Patient satisfaction: 85-92%
- Recurrence: 5-10%
- Nonunion: 2-5%
- Transfer metatarsalgia: 5-10%
- Best results: Type II with normal to mild IMA increase
Proximal osteotomy:
- Success rate: 80-85%
- Patient satisfaction: 80-85%
- Better IMA correction than distal (can correct 5-8 degrees)
- Nonunion: 5-8%
- Transfer metatarsalgia: 8-10%
- Longer recovery: 12-16 weeks versus 8-12 weeks for distal
- Best results: Type III with IMA over 10 degrees
Oblique shaft osteotomy:
- Success rate: 85-90% for combination deformities
- Can address both bowing and IMA with single cut
- Nonunion: 5-7%
- Patient satisfaction: 85-90%
- Best results: Combination Type II and Type III
Factors Affecting Outcomes
Positive prognostic factors:
- Appropriate procedure selection matching deformity type
- Adequate deformity correction (4-5 IMA under 8 degrees post-operatively)
- Stable rigid fixation
- Patient compliance with post-operative restrictions
- Addressing coexistent deformities (hallux valgus, lesser toe deformities)
- Realistic patient expectations
- Non-smoker status
- Good bone quality
Negative prognostic factors:
- Undercorrection of IMA (leads to recurrence)
- Wrong procedure for deformity type
- Inadequate fixation
- Smoking (impairs bone healing)
- Diabetes (wound healing, infection risk)
- Revision surgery (more difficult, less predictable)
- Obesity (increased mechanical stress)
- Poor patient compliance
Exam Viva Scenarios
Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination
Scenario 1: Combination Deformity Surgical Planning
"A 48-year-old woman presents with painful bunionette deformity. On weight-bearing radiographs, the 4-5 intermetatarsal angle is 12 degrees and there is lateral bowing of the fifth metatarsal shaft. She has failed 6 months of conservative management with wide shoes and padding. How would you classify and manage this?"
Scenario 2: Coughlin Classification Explanation
"Describe the Coughlin classification of bunionette deformity and explain how it guides your surgical management."
Scenario 3: Transfer Metatarsalgia Complication
"You perform a distal chevron osteotomy for bunionette. At 3 months post-operatively, the patient returns with new onset pain under the fourth metatarsal head. Radiographs show the osteotomy has healed in good position. What has happened and how do you manage it?"
BUNIONETTE DEFORMITY EXAM CHEAT SHEET
High-Yield Exam Summary
Definition
- •Lateral prominence of 5th MT head with pain, aka Tailor's bunion
- •Named for tailors sitting cross-legged (pressure on lateral foot)
- •F:M ratio 4:1 to 9:1, peak age 40-60 years
- •Bilateral in 40-60%, coexistent hallux valgus in 30-40%
Coughlin Classification (Critical)
- •Type I: Enlarged lateral MT head condyle, normal 4-5 IMA (under 8°)
- •Type II: Lateral shaft bowing, normal/mild IMA increase
- •Type III: Increased 4-5 IMA (over 8°), splay foot at base
- •Combination: Features of multiple types (most common presentation)
Key Measurements
- •4-5 IMA: Normal under 8° (versus 1-2 IMA under 9° for hallux valgus)
- •LDA (lateral deviation angle): Normal 0-12°, pathologic over 16°
- •MT head width: Increased in Type I
- •Weight-bearing AP radiograph essential for measurement
Conservative Management
- •Wide toe box shoes (most important modification)
- •Bunionette pads/cushions over lateral MT head
- •Custom orthotics with lateral posting, metatarsal pads
- •NSAIDs for acute inflammation, activity modification
- •Success 40-60%, required trial 3-6 months before surgery
Type I Treatment
- •Lateral condylectomy (remove prominent bone)
- •±Medial displacement if significant residual prominence
- •Success 65-80%, recurrence 15-25% (highest of all procedures)
- •Post-op shoe 2-4 weeks, return to activity 6-8 weeks
Type II Treatment
- •Distal chevron osteotomy (60° V-cut, medial displacement 3-5mm)
- •OR oblique shaft osteotomy (for combination deformities)
- •Fixation: 2.0-2.7mm screw or K-wires
- •Success 85-90%, recurrence 5-10%, post-op shoe 6 weeks
Type III Treatment
- •Proximal oblique osteotomy (1-2cm distal to MT base)
- •Best IMA correction (can correct 5-8° of increased IMA)
- •Two-screw fixation essential, NWB/TDWB 2-3 weeks
- •Success 80-85%, nonunion 5-8%, recovery 12-16 weeks
Combination Deformity Treatment
- •Oblique shaft osteotomy addresses both bowing and IMA (preferred)
- •Alternative: Staged proximal + distal procedures
- •Success 85-90%, nonunion 5-7%
- •Most common clinical scenario in practice
Complications
- •Recurrence 10-20% overall (higher condylectomy 15-25%, lower osteotomy 5-10%)
- •Transfer metatarsalgia 5-15% (from 5th MT shortening over 3mm)
- •Nonunion: proximal 5-8%, distal 2-5%
- •Sural nerve injury/irritation 5-10% (usually temporary)
- •Malunion, stiffness (10-20%, usually not functionally significant)
Exam Pearls
- •Know 4-5 IMA normal (under 8°) versus 1-2 IMA for hallux valgus (under 9°)
- •Operate at apex: Type I (head)→condylectomy, Type II (shaft)→distal osteotomy, Type III (base)→proximal osteotomy
- •Combination deformity most common, not isolated types
- •Prevent transfer metatarsalgia: limit 5th MT shortening to 2-3mm max
- •Coexistent hallux valgus 30-40%: stage corrections 3-6 months apart
Bunionette Classification and Treatment Outcomes
- Coughlin classification system reliably guides surgical procedure selection
- Osteotomy procedures (Types II and III) have significantly better outcomes than condylectomy alone
- Type I condylectomy recurrence rate 22% versus 8-10% for osteotomies
- Appropriate matching of procedure to deformity type is key to success
- Classification-based approach reduces failure rate
Distal Chevron Osteotomy Long-Term Results
- Significant improvement in pain and function scores (62 to 88 AOFAS)
- Patient satisfaction rate 90% at mean 3.2 years follow-up
- Complications: transfer metatarsalgia 7%, recurrence 5%, hardware removal 12%
- Average 4-5 IM angle correction 4.2 degrees with chevron technique
- Stable fixation with screw allows reliable outcomes and early mobilization
Systematic Review: Comparison of Bunionette Procedures
- Osteotomy procedures superior to condylectomy alone for Types II and III (87% vs 75% satisfaction)
- Recurrence significantly higher with condylectomy (18%) versus distal (8%) or proximal (11%) osteotomy
- No significant difference between distal and proximal osteotomies when appropriately selected for deformity type
- Proper patient selection and matching procedure to Coughlin type is critical
- Combined procedures for combination deformities show good results (85-90%)
Transfer Metatarsalgia After Bunionette Surgery
- Transfer metatarsalgia incidence 11% after bunionette correction
- Main risk factor: fifth MT shortening over 4mm (limit to 2-3mm)
- Pre-existing long fourth metatarsal increases risk (assess pre-operatively)
- 70% of transfer metatarsalgia cases improved with orthotics and time alone
- Remaining 30% required Weil osteotomy of fourth MT with good results
References
-
Coughlin MJ. Treatment of bunionette deformity with longitudinal diaphyseal osteotomy with distal soft tissue repair. Foot Ankle Int. 1991;11(4):195-203.
-
Davies H. Metatarsus quintus valgus. Br Med J. 1949;1(4604):664-665.
-
Fallat LM, Buckholz J. An analysis of the tailor's bunion by radiographic and anatomical display. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1980;70(12):597-603.
-
Nestor BJ, Kitaoka HB, Ilstrup DM, et al. Radiologic anatomy of the painful bunionette. Foot Ankle. 1990;11(1):6-11.
-
Diebold PF. Basal osteotomy of the fifth metatarsal with intermetatarsal pinning: a new approach to bunionette. Foot Ankle. 1991;12(1):40-45.
-
Kitaoka HB, Holiday AD Jr. Lateral condylar resection for bunionette. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;(278):183-192.
-
Polzer H, Polzer S, Brumann M, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of the bunionette deformity. Foot Ankle Clin. 2018;23(1):49-63.
-
Kelikian AS, ed. Sarrafian's Anatomy of the Foot and Ankle: Descriptive, Topographic, Functional. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.
-
Steinke MS, Boll KL. Hohmann bunionectomy versus lateral condylectomy procedures: a comparison study. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1989;79(6):269-275.
-
Vienne P, et al. Distal oblique osteotomy of the fifth metatarsal for bunionette. Long-term results. Acta Orthop Belg. 2013;79(4):443-448.
-
Di Giovanni CW, Greisberg J. Core Knowledge in Orthopaedics: Foot and Ankle. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier; 2007.
-
Kitaoka HB, et al. Bunionette: review of surgical treatment. Foot Ankle Int. 1990;11(2):93-97.
-
Dermon AJ, et al. Distal chevron osteotomy with lateral condylectomy for treatment of symptomatic bunionette. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33(9):755-761.
-
Diebold PF, Bejjani FJ. Basal osteotomy of the fifth metatarsal with intermetatarsal pinning: a new approach to tailor's bunion. Foot Ankle. 1987;8(1):40-45.
-
Lui TH. Minimally invasive and arthroscopic management of bunionette. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(10):2046-2055.