Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Bennett's Fractures

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Bennett's Fractures

Comprehensive guide to Bennett's fracture-dislocation of the thumb metacarpal base including mechanism, classification, reduction techniques, and surgical fixation for orthopaedic examination

complete
Updated: 2024-12-16

Bennett's Fractures

High Yield Overview

BENNETT'S FRACTURE

Intra-articular Fracture-Subluxation | Thumb MC Base | AOL Anchors Fragment

80%Of thumb MC base fractures
Over 1mmStep requires surgery
40%CMC contribution to hand function
20-30%Arthritis risk even with anatomic reduction

FRACTURE PATTERN CLASSIFICATION

Bennett
Pattern2-part fracture, volar-ulnar fragment + shaft
TreatmentCRPP or ORIF with lag screw
Rolando
Pattern3-part or comminuted articular fracture
TreatmentORIF +/- external fixation
Extra-articular
PatternTransverse or oblique base fracture
TreatmentThumb spica cast

Critical Must-Knows

  • APL is the main deforming force - pulls shaft dorsally, radially, proximally
  • AOL (anterior oblique ligament) keeps volar fragment reduced to trapezium
  • Over 1mm articular step = surgical indication
  • Reduction: Traction, Abduction, Pressure on MC base (TAP maneuver)

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Know the difference: Bennett (2-part) vs Rolando (comminuted)
  • "
    K-wire MC1-trapezium is most common fixation method
  • "
    Roberts view = true AP of thumb CMC (hyperpronated thumb)
  • "
    Saddle joint anatomy is FREQUENTLY tested in vivas

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

bennetts-fractures imaging 1
Click to expand
Clinical imaging for bennetts-fracturesCredit: Base of Thumb Fractures Review, Cureus 2025 via PMC11785513 (CC-BY 4.0)
bennetts-fractures imaging 2
Click to expand
Clinical imaging for bennetts-fracturesCredit: Base of Thumb Fractures Review, Cureus 2025 via PMC11785513 (CC-BY 4.0)
bennetts-fractures imaging 3
Click to expand
Clinical imaging for bennetts-fracturesCredit: Base of Thumb Fractures Review, Cureus 2025 via PMC11785513 (CC-BY 4.0)
bennetts-fractures imaging 4
Click to expand
Clinical imaging for bennetts-fracturesCredit: Base of Thumb Fractures Review, Cureus 2025 via PMC11785513 (CC-BY 4.0)
Anatomical illustration showing deforming forces in Bennett's fracture
Click to expand
Deforming forces in Bennett's fracture: The adductor pollicis pulls the thumb metacarpal shaft medially, while the abductor pollicis longus (APL) exerts the main deforming force pulling the shaft dorsally, radially, and proximally. The extensor pollicis longus contributes to extension. These combined forces cause the characteristic dorsal-radial subluxation of the metacarpal shaft while the small volar-ulnar fragment remains attached to the trapezium via the anterior oblique ligament (AOL).Credit: Base of Thumb Fractures Review, Cureus 2025 via PMC11785513 (CC-BY 4.0)

Classic Eponymous Fracture

Deforming Forces

APL pulls shaft dorsally/radially and proximally. Adductor pollicis contributes to deformity. These forces make closed reduction unstable.

Key Ligament - AOL

Anterior oblique ligament (beak ligament) is KEY. Keeps volar fragment attached to trapezium. This is why fragment stays reduced.

Quick Decision Guide - Bennett's Fracture Management

ScenarioDecisionRationale
Non-displaced, stable in castConsider conservativeRare - most require fixation
Articular step under 1mm after CRThumb spica + close follow-upMust monitor for displacement
Articular step over 1mmSurgical fixation (CRPP or ORIF)Prevent arthritis
Large fragment over 30%Consider lag screw fixationGood purchase for compression
Small fragment under 15%K-wire fixation preferredScrew purchase inadequate
Failed closed reductionOpen reduction (Wagner approach)Direct visualization needed
Comminuted pattern (Rolando)ORIF +/- external fixationWorse prognosis expected
Post-traumatic arthritisCMC arthrodesis or arthroplastySalvage procedure

Mnemonics and Memory Aids

Mnemonic

BENNETTBENNETT for Fracture Features

B
Base
of thumb metacarpal involved
E
Edward
Bennett described in 1882
N
Not
a simple fracture - it's a fracture-subluxation
N
Need
to reduce - APL pulls shaft dorsally
E
Extra-articular
fragment stays (AOL intact)
T
Thumb
function depends on anatomic reduction
T
Treatment
closed reduction and K-wire or ORIF

Memory Hook:The fracture is named BENNETT - remember what makes it special!

Mnemonic

APLAPL for Deforming Forces

A
Abductor
pollicis longus is the key deforming force
P
Pulls
the shaft Proximally, Laterally (radially)
L
Leaves
the volar fragment attached to trapezium

Memory Hook:APL is the villain - it Abducts, Pulls, and Luxates the thumb!

Mnemonic

AOLAOL for Stability

A
Anterior
Oblique Ligament - strongest CMC ligament
O
Originates
from trapezium to volar MC1 base
L
Ligament
remains intact, keeping volar fragment reduced

Memory Hook:AOL is the hero - it keeps the small fragment at home (Always On Location)

Overview and Epidemiology

Overview

Bennett's fracture is an intra-articular fracture-subluxation of the first carpometacarpal (CMC) joint, first described by Edward Hallaran Bennett in 1882. It represents the most common fracture involving the thumb metacarpal base (approximately 80% of thumb MC base fractures) and is considered an unstable injury due to the powerful deforming forces acting on the thumb. The fracture pattern consists of a small triangular volar-ulnar fragment that remains in anatomic position (held by the intact anterior oblique ligament) while the metacarpal shaft subluxates dorsally and radially, pulled by the abductor pollicis longus (APL). Anatomic reduction is essential to preserve the critical function of the thumb CMC joint and prevent post-traumatic arthritis.

Anatomy and Biomechanics

Anatomy and Biomechanics

Thumb CMC Joint Anatomy

Articular Surfaces:

  • Saddle-shaped (bi-concave/bi-convex) joint
  • Allows circumduction and opposition
  • Most mobile CMC joint in the hand
  • Critical for grip strength (accounts for 40% of hand function)

Ligamentous Stabilizers:

LigamentLocationFunction
Anterior Oblique (AOL)Volar-ulnarPRIMARY STABILIZER - resists dorsal subluxation
Dorsoradial (DRL)Dorsal-radialSecondary stabilizer
Posterior Oblique (POL)Dorsal-ulnarRotational stability
Intermetacarpal (IML)Between MC1-MC2Limits abduction
Dorsal IntermetacarpalDorsalLimits flexion

The AOL (Beak Ligament):

  • Origin: Volar tubercle of trapezium
  • Insertion: Volar-ulnar base of MC1
  • Strongest stabilizer of CMC joint
  • Remains attached to volar fracture fragment
  • This is why the small fragment stays reduced

Muscle Forces

Deforming Forces on Metacarpal Shaft:

  • APL: Pulls shaft dorsally and radially (MAIN DEFORMER)
  • Adductor pollicis: Pulls shaft ulnarly
  • EPL/EPB: Contribute to extension

Result:

  • Shaft subluxates dorsal, radial, and proximal
  • Volar-ulnar fragment stays anatomic (AOL intact)
  • Creates step-off and joint incongruity

Fracture Mechanics

Mechanism:

  • Axial load on partially flexed thumb
  • Typically from punching, fall on outstretched thumb
  • Impact transmitted along thumb ray to CMC joint

Fracture Pattern:

  • Two-part fracture (simple Bennett)
  • Triangular volar-ulnar fragment (typically small)
  • Larger metacarpal shaft fragment (subluxated)

Classification Systems

Classification

Bennett vs Rolando vs Extra-articular

Bennett Fracture (Two-Part):

  • Two-part intra-articular fracture
  • Volar-ulnar fragment attached to trapezium
  • Most common pattern (80%)

Rolando Fracture (Three-Part or Comminuted):

  • Comminuted intra-articular fracture
  • Y-shaped or T-shaped pattern
  • Worse prognosis due to articular damage

Extra-articular Base Fracture:

  • Transverse or oblique fracture
  • Does not involve CMC joint
  • Better prognosis

Bennett's fracture is the most common pattern accounting for approximately 80% of thumb metacarpal base fractures.

Gedda Classification (Historical)

TypeDescription
Type ILarge single volar fragment with subluxation
Type IIImpaction fracture without subluxation
Type IIISmall volar fragment with dislocation
Gedda Type I Bennett's fracture patterns
Click to expand
Gedda Type I Bennett's fracture: Line drawings showing the spectrum of fracture patterns from normal anatomy (left) to classic Bennett fracture with large volar fragment and metacarpal subluxation. Note the small volar-ulnar fragment that remains attached to the trapezium while the shaft displaces dorsally and radially.Credit: Base of Thumb Fractures Review, Cureus 2025 via PMC11785513 (CC-BY 4.0)
Gedda Type III Bennett's fracture pattern
Click to expand
Gedda Type III Bennett's fracture: Line drawings showing the classic small triangular volar-ulnar fragment (characteristic 'beak' fragment) with complete dislocation of the metacarpal shaft. This is the most common Bennett's fracture pattern where the small fragment remains anatomically reduced by the intact AOL.Credit: Base of Thumb Fractures Review, Cureus 2025 via PMC11785513 (CC-BY 4.0)

Fragment Size Classification

Small Fragment (less than 15%):

  • Harder to fix with screws
  • K-wire fixation often preferred
  • Good prognosis if reduced

Large Fragment (15-30%):

  • Amenable to screw fixation
  • Better purchase for internal fixation

Very Large Fragment (greater than 30%):

  • Consider lag screw fixation
  • May need plate if comminuted

Fragment size directly influences fixation choice and surgical approach.

Clinical Presentation

Clinical Presentation

History

Mechanism:

  • Axial load on flexed thumb (punching)
  • Fall onto extended thumb
  • Sports injury (skiing, football, rugby)
  • Motor vehicle accident

Symptoms:

  • Immediate pain at thumb base
  • Swelling over thenar eminence
  • Inability to grip or pinch
  • Thumb deformity (shortened/pronated)

Physical Examination

Inspection:

  • Swelling at thenar eminence
  • Ecchymosis at thumb base
  • Thumb appears shortened
  • Possible angulation/deformity

Palpation:

  • Point tenderness over CMC joint
  • Crepitus with gentle motion
  • Assess metacarpal stability

Assessment:

  • Document neurovascular status
  • Check for associated injuries
  • Test thumb opposition (if tolerable)

Key Examination Findings

Positive Grind Test:

  • Axial load + rotation at CMC joint
  • Produces pain and crepitus
  • Indicates CMC pathology

Instability Assessment:

  • Compare to contralateral thumb
  • Assess dorsal-volar translation
  • Document baseline laxity

Investigations

Investigations

Radiographic Assessment

Standard Views:

  1. PA (Posteroanterior): Oblique view of CMC best
  2. True Lateral: Shows dorsal subluxation
  3. Roberts View: Thumb fully pronated, beam perpendicular
  4. Stress Views: If ligamentous injury suspected

Robert's View Technique:

  • Place thumb flat on cassette (hyperpronated)
  • Beam perpendicular to thumb MC
  • Shows CMC joint in true AP

Radiographic Findings

Key Measurements:

  • Articular step-off (greater than 1mm = significant)
  • Fragment size (% of articular surface)
  • Degree of subluxation

Signs of Bennett's:

  • Triangular volar-ulnar fragment at CMC
  • Dorsal/radial subluxation of MC shaft
  • Widening of CMC joint space
  • Overlap of MC1 and trapezium on lateral

CT Imaging

Indications:

  • Complex fracture patterns
  • Surgical planning
  • Assessment of fragment size
  • Evaluation of articular congruity

CT Findings:

  • Better delineation of fragment size
  • Assessment of comminution
  • 3D reconstruction for surgical planning

MRI (Rarely Needed)

Indications:

  • Suspected ligamentous injury without fracture
  • Occult fracture evaluation
  • Post-reduction instability

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
Management algorithm for Bennett's Fracture
Click to expand

Management

Treatment Goals

  1. Anatomic articular reduction (less than 1mm step)
  2. Stable fixation allowing early motion
  3. Restore CMC joint stability
  4. Prevent post-traumatic arthritis

Non-Operative Treatment

Indications (Rare):

  • Non-displaced fractures (less than 1mm step)
  • Perfect reduction maintained in cast
  • Elderly/low-demand patients

Technique:

  • Closed reduction under fluoroscopy
  • Thumb spica cast in slight extension/abduction
  • Close radiographic follow-up (weekly x 3)
  • Total immobilization 4-6 weeks

Closed Reduction Technique (TAP Maneuver):

  1. Longitudinal Traction on thumb
  2. Abduction of thumb ray
  3. Direct Pressure over MC base (push volar-ulnar)
  4. Pronation of thumb
  5. Hold position, apply thumb spica

Problems with Non-Operative:

  • High rate of redisplacement
  • Difficult to maintain reduction
  • Most require surgical stabilization

Non-operative treatment is rarely successful for true Bennett's fractures due to the powerful deforming forces.

Operative Treatment

Surgical Indications:

  • Articular step greater than 1mm
  • Subluxation/dislocation that cannot be reduced
  • Unstable after closed reduction
  • Fragment greater than 15-20% articular surface

Surgical Options:

MethodIndicationTechnique
CRPPMost casesK-wire MC1-trapezium +/- MC1-MC2
ORIFLarge fragment, failed CRWagner approach, lag screw
ArthroscopyDirect visualization1.9mm scope, radial portal

Special Considerations

Workers' Compensation Cases:

  • Document mechanism clearly
  • Pre-operative photographs
  • Objective outcome measures
  • Functional capacity evaluation if needed

High-Performance Athletes:

  • Early surgical fixation preferred
  • Aggressive supervised rehabilitation
  • Consider protective splinting for return
  • Monitor for chronic instability

Elderly Patients:

  • Consider comorbidities
  • May accept some displacement
  • Lower functional demands
  • Balance surgery risks vs benefits

Treatment decisions should be individualized based on patient factors, activity level, and fracture characteristics.

Surgical Technique

Surgical Technique

Closed Reduction and Percutaneous K-Wire Fixation

Most Common Technique

Step-by-Step:

  1. Closed reduction under fluoroscopy
  2. K-wire (1.1-1.4mm) through MC1 into trapezium
  3. May add second K-wire through fragment
  4. Or pin MC1 to MC2 (prevents redisplacement)
  5. Protect with thumb spica
  6. Remove wires at 4-6 weeks

K-Wire Options:

  • MC1 to trapezium: Direct joint stabilization
  • MC1 to MC2: Indirect stabilization
  • Through fragment: Fragment fixation (if large enough)
K-wire fixation of thumb CMC joint
Click to expand
Thumb CMC joint K-wire fixation: (a) Intraoperative photograph showing the dorsolateral approach with K-wire percutaneous pinning and capsular repair. (b) Post-operative AP radiograph confirming K-wire placement across the thumb carpometacarpal joint. This is the standard fixation technique for Bennett's fracture-dislocation - the K-wire crosses from MC1 into the trapezium, maintaining reduction while the fracture heals.Credit: Gumustas SA et al., Turk J Emerg Med (PMC4909983) - CC-BY

K-Wire Placement Tips

Avoid placing wires too close to articular surface. Entry point should be proximal enough to avoid CMC joint penetration. Fluoroscopy in multiple planes is essential.

Open Reduction Internal Fixation

Indications:

  • Large articular fragment (greater than 20%)
  • Failed closed reduction
  • Complex fracture patterns
  • Need for direct articular visualization

Wagner Approach (Volar-Radial):

  1. Incision at thumb CMC along thenar crease
  2. Protect radial artery branches (terminal branches)
  3. Reflect thenar muscles ulnarly
  4. Visualize joint capsule
  5. Open capsule to expose fracture
  6. Reduce under direct visualization
  7. Fix with screws or K-wires

Fixation Options:

  • Mini-fragment screws (1.5-2.0mm)
  • Lag screw technique for large fragments
  • K-wires for small fragments
  • Supplemental K-wire MC1-trapezium

Structures at Risk

  • Radial artery (terminal branches)
  • Superficial radial nerve branches
  • APL tendon

Arthroscopic-Assisted Reduction

Advantages:

  • Direct visualization of articular reduction
  • Minimal soft tissue trauma
  • Can assess cartilage injury
  • Theoretically better outcomes

Technique:

  • 1.9mm arthroscope via radial portal
  • Ulnar portal for instrumentation
  • Reduction under direct visualization
  • Percutaneous K-wire fixation

Limitations:

  • Requires specialized equipment
  • Steep learning curve
  • Limited availability

Arthroscopy is most useful when reduction quality needs direct confirmation or cartilage assessment is required.

Complications

Complications

Early Complications

Malreduction:

  • Most common complication
  • Greater than 1mm step leads to arthritis
  • May require revision surgery

Pin Site Infection:

  • Occurs in 2-5% of K-wire cases
  • Usually superficial
  • Treat with oral antibiotics
  • Early wire removal if deep infection

Loss of Reduction:

  • More common with conservative treatment
  • May occur after wire removal
  • Close radiographic follow-up essential

Late Complications

Post-Traumatic Arthritis:

  • Most significant long-term complication
  • Risk increases with articular incongruity
  • May require CMC arthrodesis or arthroplasty
  • Incidence: 20-30% at long-term follow-up

Stiffness:

  • Common, especially after prolonged immobilization
  • Early motion when fracture stable
  • Hand therapy essential

Weakness:

  • Grip and pinch strength affected
  • Usually recovers over 6-12 months
  • May have persistent subtle weakness

CMC Instability:

  • Ligamentous incompetence after healing
  • May require ligament reconstruction
  • Rare if fracture anatomically reduced

Malunion:

  • Results from inadequate reduction
  • Causes altered CMC mechanics
  • May accelerate arthritic change
  • Corrective osteotomy rarely indicated

Postoperative Care

Postoperative Care

Timeline

PhaseTimeframeFocus
ProtectionWeeks 0-4/6Immobilization, swelling control
Early MotionWeeks 4/6-8K-wire removal, gentle ROM
StrengtheningWeeks 8-12Progressive grip/pinch
Return to Activity12+ weeksSport-specific, full function

Immobilization Protocol

Post-Op Care:

  • Thumb spica splint/cast for 4-6 weeks
  • Protect pin sites if K-wires present
  • Elevation and ice for initial swelling
  • Regular neurovascular checks

Pin Site Care:

  • Daily cleaning with normal saline or dilute betadine
  • Monitor for signs of infection (erythema, drainage)
  • No submersion in water
  • Patient education on warning signs

Proper immobilization and pin site care are essential for preventing complications.

Rehabilitation Protocol

Phase 1 (Weeks 0-4/6): Protection

  • Strict immobilization in thumb spica
  • Active finger ROM (unaffected digits)
  • Edema control with elevation
  • Shoulder and elbow exercises

Phase 2 (Weeks 4/6-8): Early Motion

  • K-wire removal at 4-6 weeks
  • Removable thumb splint for protection
  • Gentle active ROM exercises
  • Progress to passive ROM if stiff
  • Scar massage once healed

Phase 3 (Weeks 8-12): Strengthening

  • Progressive grip strengthening
  • Putty exercises for pinch strength
  • Functional activities introduction
  • Sport-specific training begins

Phase 4 (Weeks 12+): Return to Activity

  • Full unrestricted activity
  • Sport-specific conditioning
  • May need protective taping for contact sports

Hand therapy supervision optimizes functional recovery and minimizes complications.

Return to Work/Sport Guidelines

Activity TypeTimeframe
Desk work2-4 weeks
Light manual work8-10 weeks
Heavy manual work12-16 weeks
Contact sports12-16 weeks
Competitive sports16+ weeks

Sport-Specific Considerations:

  • Ball sports: protective splinting initially
  • Combat sports: full healing required
  • Climbing: grip strength critical

Return to full activity depends on fracture healing, strength recovery, and functional demands.

Outcomes and Prognosis

Outcomes and Prognosis

Prognostic Factors

Good Prognosis:

  • Anatomic reduction (less than 1mm step)
  • Small articular fragment
  • Young patient
  • Early treatment
  • Stable fixation

Poor Prognosis:

  • Articular step greater than 2mm
  • Large fragment involvement
  • Delayed treatment
  • Associated soft tissue injury
  • Comminuted pattern (Rolando)

Long-Term Results

Anatomic Reduction:

  • 80-90% good/excellent results
  • Low rate of symptomatic arthritis
  • Near-normal grip/pinch strength

Non-Anatomic Reduction:

  • 50-60% good results
  • Higher rate of arthritis
  • May require salvage procedure

Comparison to Rolando Fracture

FactorBennett'sRolando
Pattern2-partComminuted
FixationEasierMore difficult
PrognosisBetterWorse
Arthritis Rate20%40-50%

Evidence Base

Evidence Base

Articular Step-Off and Arthritis

III
Kjaer-Petersen et al. • Journal of Hand Surgery British (1990)
Key Findings:
  • Articular incongruity greater than 1mm associated with significantly higher rates of post-traumatic arthritis at long-term follow-up
Clinical Implication: Anatomic reduction with less than 1mm step-off is the treatment goal

K-Wire vs Screw Fixation

III
Lutz et al. • Archives of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery (2003)
Key Findings:
  • No significant difference in functional outcomes between K-wire and screw fixation when anatomic reduction achieved
Clinical Implication: K-wire fixation is acceptable for most Bennett's fractures

Long-Term Outcomes of Bennett's Fractures

III
Timmenga et al. • Journal of Hand Surgery American (1994)
Key Findings:
  • At 11-year follow-up, 89% of anatomically reduced fractures had good/excellent results vs 56% with residual displacement
Clinical Implication: Anatomic reduction is critical for long-term outcomes

Closed vs Open Treatment

IV
Livesley • Journal of Hand Surgery British (1990)
Key Findings:
  • Closed reduction with K-wire fixation achieved acceptable results in 92% of cases when anatomic reduction obtained
Clinical Implication: Closed treatment is effective when adequate reduction can be achieved

Arthroscopic-Assisted Treatment

IV
Pomares et al. • Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation (2016)
Key Findings:
  • Arthroscopic-assisted reduction allowed direct visualization and accurate reduction with good functional outcomes
Clinical Implication: Arthroscopy is a useful adjunct for difficult reductions

Australian Guidelines

Hand Trauma Management:

  • Royal Australasian College of Surgeons guidelines
  • Emphasis on early fixation and mobilization
  • Referral to hand surgeon recommended

PBS Considerations:

  • Fixation hardware not PBS listed
  • Private health insurance or self-funding

Viva Questions

Viva Scenarios

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"A 28-year-old male presents after punching a wall with a painful swollen thumb. X-rays show a Bennett's fracture with 2mm subluxation. How would you manage this patient?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Key Discussion Points:

  • Bennett's is a fracture-SUBLUXATION - not just a fracture
  • Deforming force is APL pulling shaft dorsal/radial
  • Volar fragment held by AOL (anterior oblique ligament)
  • Greater than 1mm step is surgical indication
  • K-wire options: MC1-trapezium (direct), MC1-MC2 (indirect)
  • Must achieve anatomic reduction to prevent arthritis
  • Post-traumatic arthritis occurs in 20-30% even with good reduction
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Bennett's is a fracture-SUBLUXATION
APL is the deforming force (pulls proximal/dorsal)
Small volar fragment held by AOL
Must reduce to less than 1mm step-off
COMMON TRAPS
✗Accepting 2mm displacement
✗Missing the subluxation on X-ray
✗Failing to check for Rolando pattern
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What specific ligament holds the volar fragment?"
"Why is conservative management rarely successful?"
"What are the long-term risks if malreduced?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"Describe the anatomy of the thumb CMC joint and explain why Bennett's fracture is inherently unstable."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Key Discussion Points:

  • Thumb CMC is a saddle joint (biconcave-biconvex) allowing circumduction
  • Key stabilizer is AOL (anterior oblique ligament) - strongest ligament
  • AOL attaches to volar-ulnar MC1 base
  • In Bennett's, AOL keeps volar fragment reduced to trapezium
  • APL inserts on dorsal MC1 base - pulls shaft dorsal, radial, proximal
  • Adductor pollicis pulls shaft ulnarly
  • Result: shaft subluxates while volar fragment stays anatomic
  • Instability from loss of bony buttress against APL pull
  • Joint incongruity leads to post-traumatic arthritis
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Saddle joint anatomy (biconcave/biconvex)
AOL (Anterior Oblique Ligament) is key stabilizer
APL inserts on base of MC1 dorsal
Adductor pollicis inserts on MC1 shaft medial
COMMON TRAPS
✗Confusing APL role (it distracts)
✗Forgetting the Adductor deforming force
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"Where exactly does the APL insert?"
"What view best shows the articular profile?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

EXAMINER

"You attempt closed reduction of a Bennett's fracture under fluoroscopy but cannot achieve anatomic reduction. What are your options and considerations?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Key Discussion Points:

  • Reasons for irreducibility: interposed soft tissue, fragment rotation, inadequate traction
  • Open reduction through Wagner (volar-radial) approach
  • Protect: radial artery (terminal branch), superficial radial nerve
  • Fixation based on fragment size: screws if greater than 30%, K-wires if smaller
  • Lag screw technique for compression across fracture
  • Always consider supplemental MC1-trapezium wire for stability
  • Arthroscopic-assisted reduction is alternative if available
  • Goal remains less than 1mm articular step
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Wagner approach (volar-radial)
Protect Radial Artery and Sensory Nerve
Lag screw for large fragments
K-wire for small fragments
Must visualize articular surface
COMMON TRAPS
✗Injuring the superficial radial nerve
✗Inadequate exposure of the joint
✗Using a screw for a fragment that is too small (needs K-wire)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the plane of the Wagner approach?"
"When is arthroscopy useful?"
"How long for post-op immobilization?"

MCQ Practice Points

MCQ Practice Points

Ligament Anatomy

Q: Which ligament keeps the volar-ulnar fragment of a Bennett's fracture reduced to the trapezium?

A: Anterior Oblique Ligament (AOL) - Also called the "beak ligament." This is the primary stabilizer of the thumb CMC joint and attaches to the volar-ulnar base of the first metacarpal. Because this ligament remains intact, the small triangular fragment stays in anatomic position.

Deforming Forces

Q: What is the main deforming force in a Bennett's fracture and in which direction does it displace the metacarpal shaft?

A: Abductor Pollicis Longus (APL) is the main deforming force. It pulls the metacarpal shaft dorsally, radially, and proximally. Secondary deforming forces include adductor pollicis and the extensor pollicis muscles.

Surgical Threshold

Q: What is the articular step-off threshold for surgical intervention in Bennett's fracture?

A: Greater than 1mm of articular step-off is the accepted threshold for surgical intervention. Studies have shown that articular incongruity of more than 1mm is associated with significantly higher rates of post-traumatic arthritis at long-term follow-up.

Radiographic View

Q: What is the Roberts view and why is it useful for evaluating Bennett's fractures?

A: The Roberts view is a true AP view of the thumb CMC joint obtained by placing the thumb flat on the cassette (hyperpronated) with the beam perpendicular to the metacarpal. It provides the best view of the CMC joint and accurately shows the articular step-off and subluxation.

Bennett vs Rolando

Q: What is the key difference between a Bennett's fracture and a Rolando fracture?

A: Bennett's fracture is a two-part intra-articular fracture-subluxation with a small volar-ulnar fragment. Rolando fracture is a comminuted (three-part or more) intra-articular fracture with a Y or T pattern. Rolando fractures have a worse prognosis due to greater articular destruction.

Fixation Method

Q: A patient has a Bennett's fracture with a fragment involving 10% of the articular surface. What is the preferred fixation method?

A: Percutaneous K-wire fixation is preferred for small fragments. K-wires from MC1 to trapezium (direct) and/or MC1 to MC2 (indirect) provide adequate stabilization. Screw fixation is not ideal for small fragments due to inadequate purchase and risk of fragmentation.

Australian Context

Australian Context

Epidemiology in Australia:

Bennett's fractures are common in the Australian population, particularly in young males involved in contact sports (rugby, AFL) and manual occupations. The pattern of axial loading injury from punching is frequently seen in Emergency Departments, particularly on weekend nights. Hand trauma represents a significant burden on the Australian healthcare system.

Management Considerations:

Most Bennett's fractures in Australia are managed in the public hospital system, with surgical cases typically performed as day surgery procedures. K-wire fixation remains the most common technique, with ORIF reserved for larger fragments or failed closed reduction. Metropolitan centres with hand surgery units typically manage complex cases, while regional centres may transfer patients requiring ORIF.

Rehabilitation Access:

Hand therapy services are generally accessible through public hospital outpatient departments, though wait times may vary. Private health insurance holders often access faster rehabilitation services. The Medicare system covers surgical consultations and procedures, with rebates available for hand therapy under chronic disease management plans in some cases.

Workers' Compensation:

Bennett's fractures are commonly claimed under workers' compensation schemes (WorkCover, Comcare) when sustained in occupational settings. Documentation of mechanism and functional impact is critical for claim management. Return to work timelines depend heavily on occupation type, with manual workers requiring longer recovery periods.

Exam Cheat Sheet

Exam Day Cheat Sheet

Bennett's Fractures - Key Points

High-Yield Exam Summary

Definition

  • •Intra-articular fracture-SUBLUXATION of thumb MC base
  • •Two-part: volar-ulnar fragment + subluxated shaft
  • •NOT the same as Rolando (which is comminuted)
  • •Instability defined by dorsal/radial shaft migration

Key Anatomy

  • •AOL (anterior oblique ligament) = primary stabilizer
  • •AOL keeps volar fragment attached to trapezium
  • •APL = main deforming force (pulls dorsal/radial/proximal)
  • •Thumb CMC = saddle joint (40% of hand function)

Surgical Indications

  • •Articular step greater than 1mm
  • •Subluxation that cannot be reduced closed
  • •Unstable after closed reduction
  • •Rotational malalignment (rare but possible)

Fixation Options

  • •K-wire MC1 to trapezium (most common)
  • •K-wire MC1 to MC2 (indirect)
  • •Lag screw (if fragment large enough)
  • •ORIF via Wagner approach if closed fails

Complications

  • •Post-traumatic arthritis (20-30%)
  • •Malreduction
  • •Stiffness
  • •Pin site infection

Quick Reference: Key Numbers

ParameterValue
Articular step thresholdgreater than 1mm = surgery
CMC contribution to hand function40%
Thumb spica duration4-6 weeks
K-wire removal4-6 weeks
Arthritis rate (anatomic reduction)20%
Arthritis rate (non-anatomic)50%+
Return to full activity10-12 weeks
Quick Stats
Reading Time80 min
Related Topics

Rolando's Fractures

Phalangeal Fractures

Thumb UCL Injuries (Gamekeeper's/Skier's Thumb)

Acetabular Fractures