Bennett's Fractures
BENNETT'S FRACTURE
Intra-articular Fracture-Subluxation | Thumb MC Base | AOL Anchors Fragment
FRACTURE PATTERN CLASSIFICATION
Critical Must-Knows
- APL is the main deforming force - pulls shaft dorsally, radially, proximally
- AOL (anterior oblique ligament) keeps volar fragment reduced to trapezium
- Over 1mm articular step = surgical indication
- Reduction: Traction, Abduction, Pressure on MC base (TAP maneuver)
Examiner's Pearls
- "Know the difference: Bennett (2-part) vs Rolando (comminuted)
- "K-wire MC1-trapezium is most common fixation method
- "Roberts view = true AP of thumb CMC (hyperpronated thumb)
- "Saddle joint anatomy is FREQUENTLY tested in vivas
Clinical Imaging
Imaging Gallery





Classic Eponymous Fracture
Deforming Forces
APL pulls shaft dorsally/radially and proximally. Adductor pollicis contributes to deformity. These forces make closed reduction unstable.
Key Ligament - AOL
Anterior oblique ligament (beak ligament) is KEY. Keeps volar fragment attached to trapezium. This is why fragment stays reduced.
Quick Decision Guide - Bennett's Fracture Management
| Scenario | Decision | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Non-displaced, stable in cast | Consider conservative | Rare - most require fixation |
| Articular step under 1mm after CR | Thumb spica + close follow-up | Must monitor for displacement |
| Articular step over 1mm | Surgical fixation (CRPP or ORIF) | Prevent arthritis |
| Large fragment over 30% | Consider lag screw fixation | Good purchase for compression |
| Small fragment under 15% | K-wire fixation preferred | Screw purchase inadequate |
| Failed closed reduction | Open reduction (Wagner approach) | Direct visualization needed |
| Comminuted pattern (Rolando) | ORIF +/- external fixation | Worse prognosis expected |
| Post-traumatic arthritis | CMC arthrodesis or arthroplasty | Salvage procedure |
Mnemonics and Memory Aids
BENNETTBENNETT for Fracture Features
Memory Hook:The fracture is named BENNETT - remember what makes it special!
APLAPL for Deforming Forces
Memory Hook:APL is the villain - it Abducts, Pulls, and Luxates the thumb!
AOLAOL for Stability
Memory Hook:AOL is the hero - it keeps the small fragment at home (Always On Location)
Overview and Epidemiology
Overview
Bennett's fracture is an intra-articular fracture-subluxation of the first carpometacarpal (CMC) joint, first described by Edward Hallaran Bennett in 1882. It represents the most common fracture involving the thumb metacarpal base (approximately 80% of thumb MC base fractures) and is considered an unstable injury due to the powerful deforming forces acting on the thumb. The fracture pattern consists of a small triangular volar-ulnar fragment that remains in anatomic position (held by the intact anterior oblique ligament) while the metacarpal shaft subluxates dorsally and radially, pulled by the abductor pollicis longus (APL). Anatomic reduction is essential to preserve the critical function of the thumb CMC joint and prevent post-traumatic arthritis.
Anatomy and Biomechanics
Anatomy and Biomechanics
Thumb CMC Joint Anatomy
Articular Surfaces:
- Saddle-shaped (bi-concave/bi-convex) joint
- Allows circumduction and opposition
- Most mobile CMC joint in the hand
- Critical for grip strength (accounts for 40% of hand function)
Ligamentous Stabilizers:
| Ligament | Location | Function |
|---|---|---|
| Anterior Oblique (AOL) | Volar-ulnar | PRIMARY STABILIZER - resists dorsal subluxation |
| Dorsoradial (DRL) | Dorsal-radial | Secondary stabilizer |
| Posterior Oblique (POL) | Dorsal-ulnar | Rotational stability |
| Intermetacarpal (IML) | Between MC1-MC2 | Limits abduction |
| Dorsal Intermetacarpal | Dorsal | Limits flexion |
The AOL (Beak Ligament):
- Origin: Volar tubercle of trapezium
- Insertion: Volar-ulnar base of MC1
- Strongest stabilizer of CMC joint
- Remains attached to volar fracture fragment
- This is why the small fragment stays reduced
Muscle Forces
Deforming Forces on Metacarpal Shaft:
- APL: Pulls shaft dorsally and radially (MAIN DEFORMER)
- Adductor pollicis: Pulls shaft ulnarly
- EPL/EPB: Contribute to extension
Result:
- Shaft subluxates dorsal, radial, and proximal
- Volar-ulnar fragment stays anatomic (AOL intact)
- Creates step-off and joint incongruity
Fracture Mechanics
Mechanism:
- Axial load on partially flexed thumb
- Typically from punching, fall on outstretched thumb
- Impact transmitted along thumb ray to CMC joint
Fracture Pattern:
- Two-part fracture (simple Bennett)
- Triangular volar-ulnar fragment (typically small)
- Larger metacarpal shaft fragment (subluxated)
Classification Systems
Classification
Bennett vs Rolando vs Extra-articular
Bennett Fracture (Two-Part):
- Two-part intra-articular fracture
- Volar-ulnar fragment attached to trapezium
- Most common pattern (80%)
Rolando Fracture (Three-Part or Comminuted):
- Comminuted intra-articular fracture
- Y-shaped or T-shaped pattern
- Worse prognosis due to articular damage
Extra-articular Base Fracture:
- Transverse or oblique fracture
- Does not involve CMC joint
- Better prognosis
Bennett's fracture is the most common pattern accounting for approximately 80% of thumb metacarpal base fractures.
Clinical Presentation
Clinical Presentation
History
Mechanism:
- Axial load on flexed thumb (punching)
- Fall onto extended thumb
- Sports injury (skiing, football, rugby)
- Motor vehicle accident
Symptoms:
- Immediate pain at thumb base
- Swelling over thenar eminence
- Inability to grip or pinch
- Thumb deformity (shortened/pronated)
Physical Examination
Inspection:
- Swelling at thenar eminence
- Ecchymosis at thumb base
- Thumb appears shortened
- Possible angulation/deformity
Palpation:
- Point tenderness over CMC joint
- Crepitus with gentle motion
- Assess metacarpal stability
Assessment:
- Document neurovascular status
- Check for associated injuries
- Test thumb opposition (if tolerable)
Key Examination Findings
Positive Grind Test:
- Axial load + rotation at CMC joint
- Produces pain and crepitus
- Indicates CMC pathology
Instability Assessment:
- Compare to contralateral thumb
- Assess dorsal-volar translation
- Document baseline laxity
Investigations
Investigations
Radiographic Assessment
Standard Views:
- PA (Posteroanterior): Oblique view of CMC best
- True Lateral: Shows dorsal subluxation
- Roberts View: Thumb fully pronated, beam perpendicular
- Stress Views: If ligamentous injury suspected
Robert's View Technique:
- Place thumb flat on cassette (hyperpronated)
- Beam perpendicular to thumb MC
- Shows CMC joint in true AP
Radiographic Findings
Key Measurements:
- Articular step-off (greater than 1mm = significant)
- Fragment size (% of articular surface)
- Degree of subluxation
Signs of Bennett's:
- Triangular volar-ulnar fragment at CMC
- Dorsal/radial subluxation of MC shaft
- Widening of CMC joint space
- Overlap of MC1 and trapezium on lateral
CT Imaging
Indications:
- Complex fracture patterns
- Surgical planning
- Assessment of fragment size
- Evaluation of articular congruity
CT Findings:
- Better delineation of fragment size
- Assessment of comminution
- 3D reconstruction for surgical planning
MRI (Rarely Needed)
Indications:
- Suspected ligamentous injury without fracture
- Occult fracture evaluation
- Post-reduction instability
Management Algorithm

Management
Treatment Goals
- Anatomic articular reduction (less than 1mm step)
- Stable fixation allowing early motion
- Restore CMC joint stability
- Prevent post-traumatic arthritis
Non-Operative Treatment
Indications (Rare):
- Non-displaced fractures (less than 1mm step)
- Perfect reduction maintained in cast
- Elderly/low-demand patients
Technique:
- Closed reduction under fluoroscopy
- Thumb spica cast in slight extension/abduction
- Close radiographic follow-up (weekly x 3)
- Total immobilization 4-6 weeks
Closed Reduction Technique (TAP Maneuver):
- Longitudinal Traction on thumb
- Abduction of thumb ray
- Direct Pressure over MC base (push volar-ulnar)
- Pronation of thumb
- Hold position, apply thumb spica
Problems with Non-Operative:
- High rate of redisplacement
- Difficult to maintain reduction
- Most require surgical stabilization
Non-operative treatment is rarely successful for true Bennett's fractures due to the powerful deforming forces.
Surgical Technique
Surgical Technique
Closed Reduction and Percutaneous K-Wire Fixation
Most Common Technique
Step-by-Step:
- Closed reduction under fluoroscopy
- K-wire (1.1-1.4mm) through MC1 into trapezium
- May add second K-wire through fragment
- Or pin MC1 to MC2 (prevents redisplacement)
- Protect with thumb spica
- Remove wires at 4-6 weeks
K-Wire Options:
- MC1 to trapezium: Direct joint stabilization
- MC1 to MC2: Indirect stabilization
- Through fragment: Fragment fixation (if large enough)

K-Wire Placement Tips
Avoid placing wires too close to articular surface. Entry point should be proximal enough to avoid CMC joint penetration. Fluoroscopy in multiple planes is essential.
Complications
Complications
Early Complications
Malreduction:
- Most common complication
- Greater than 1mm step leads to arthritis
- May require revision surgery
Pin Site Infection:
- Occurs in 2-5% of K-wire cases
- Usually superficial
- Treat with oral antibiotics
- Early wire removal if deep infection
Loss of Reduction:
- More common with conservative treatment
- May occur after wire removal
- Close radiographic follow-up essential
Late Complications
Post-Traumatic Arthritis:
- Most significant long-term complication
- Risk increases with articular incongruity
- May require CMC arthrodesis or arthroplasty
- Incidence: 20-30% at long-term follow-up
Stiffness:
- Common, especially after prolonged immobilization
- Early motion when fracture stable
- Hand therapy essential
Weakness:
- Grip and pinch strength affected
- Usually recovers over 6-12 months
- May have persistent subtle weakness
CMC Instability:
- Ligamentous incompetence after healing
- May require ligament reconstruction
- Rare if fracture anatomically reduced
Malunion:
- Results from inadequate reduction
- Causes altered CMC mechanics
- May accelerate arthritic change
- Corrective osteotomy rarely indicated
Postoperative Care
Postoperative Care
Timeline
| Phase | Timeframe | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Weeks 0-4/6 | Immobilization, swelling control |
| Early Motion | Weeks 4/6-8 | K-wire removal, gentle ROM |
| Strengthening | Weeks 8-12 | Progressive grip/pinch |
| Return to Activity | 12+ weeks | Sport-specific, full function |
Immobilization Protocol
Post-Op Care:
- Thumb spica splint/cast for 4-6 weeks
- Protect pin sites if K-wires present
- Elevation and ice for initial swelling
- Regular neurovascular checks
Pin Site Care:
- Daily cleaning with normal saline or dilute betadine
- Monitor for signs of infection (erythema, drainage)
- No submersion in water
- Patient education on warning signs
Proper immobilization and pin site care are essential for preventing complications.
Outcomes and Prognosis
Outcomes and Prognosis
Prognostic Factors
Good Prognosis:
- Anatomic reduction (less than 1mm step)
- Small articular fragment
- Young patient
- Early treatment
- Stable fixation
Poor Prognosis:
- Articular step greater than 2mm
- Large fragment involvement
- Delayed treatment
- Associated soft tissue injury
- Comminuted pattern (Rolando)
Long-Term Results
Anatomic Reduction:
- 80-90% good/excellent results
- Low rate of symptomatic arthritis
- Near-normal grip/pinch strength
Non-Anatomic Reduction:
- 50-60% good results
- Higher rate of arthritis
- May require salvage procedure
Comparison to Rolando Fracture
| Factor | Bennett's | Rolando |
|---|---|---|
| Pattern | 2-part | Comminuted |
| Fixation | Easier | More difficult |
| Prognosis | Better | Worse |
| Arthritis Rate | 20% | 40-50% |
Evidence Base
Evidence Base
Articular Step-Off and Arthritis
- Articular incongruity greater than 1mm associated with significantly higher rates of post-traumatic arthritis at long-term follow-up
K-Wire vs Screw Fixation
- No significant difference in functional outcomes between K-wire and screw fixation when anatomic reduction achieved
Long-Term Outcomes of Bennett's Fractures
- At 11-year follow-up, 89% of anatomically reduced fractures had good/excellent results vs 56% with residual displacement
Closed vs Open Treatment
- Closed reduction with K-wire fixation achieved acceptable results in 92% of cases when anatomic reduction obtained
Arthroscopic-Assisted Treatment
- Arthroscopic-assisted reduction allowed direct visualization and accurate reduction with good functional outcomes
Australian Guidelines
Hand Trauma Management:
- Royal Australasian College of Surgeons guidelines
- Emphasis on early fixation and mobilization
- Referral to hand surgeon recommended
PBS Considerations:
- Fixation hardware not PBS listed
- Private health insurance or self-funding
Viva Questions
Viva Scenarios
Exam Viva Scenarios
Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination
"A 28-year-old male presents after punching a wall with a painful swollen thumb. X-rays show a Bennett's fracture with 2mm subluxation. How would you manage this patient?"
Key Discussion Points:
- Bennett's is a fracture-SUBLUXATION - not just a fracture
- Deforming force is APL pulling shaft dorsal/radial
- Volar fragment held by AOL (anterior oblique ligament)
- Greater than 1mm step is surgical indication
- K-wire options: MC1-trapezium (direct), MC1-MC2 (indirect)
- Must achieve anatomic reduction to prevent arthritis
- Post-traumatic arthritis occurs in 20-30% even with good reduction
"Describe the anatomy of the thumb CMC joint and explain why Bennett's fracture is inherently unstable."
Key Discussion Points:
- Thumb CMC is a saddle joint (biconcave-biconvex) allowing circumduction
- Key stabilizer is AOL (anterior oblique ligament) - strongest ligament
- AOL attaches to volar-ulnar MC1 base
- In Bennett's, AOL keeps volar fragment reduced to trapezium
- APL inserts on dorsal MC1 base - pulls shaft dorsal, radial, proximal
- Adductor pollicis pulls shaft ulnarly
- Result: shaft subluxates while volar fragment stays anatomic
- Instability from loss of bony buttress against APL pull
- Joint incongruity leads to post-traumatic arthritis
"You attempt closed reduction of a Bennett's fracture under fluoroscopy but cannot achieve anatomic reduction. What are your options and considerations?"
Key Discussion Points:
- Reasons for irreducibility: interposed soft tissue, fragment rotation, inadequate traction
- Open reduction through Wagner (volar-radial) approach
- Protect: radial artery (terminal branch), superficial radial nerve
- Fixation based on fragment size: screws if greater than 30%, K-wires if smaller
- Lag screw technique for compression across fracture
- Always consider supplemental MC1-trapezium wire for stability
- Arthroscopic-assisted reduction is alternative if available
- Goal remains less than 1mm articular step
MCQ Practice Points
MCQ Practice Points
Ligament Anatomy
Q: Which ligament keeps the volar-ulnar fragment of a Bennett's fracture reduced to the trapezium?
A: Anterior Oblique Ligament (AOL) - Also called the "beak ligament." This is the primary stabilizer of the thumb CMC joint and attaches to the volar-ulnar base of the first metacarpal. Because this ligament remains intact, the small triangular fragment stays in anatomic position.
Deforming Forces
Q: What is the main deforming force in a Bennett's fracture and in which direction does it displace the metacarpal shaft?
A: Abductor Pollicis Longus (APL) is the main deforming force. It pulls the metacarpal shaft dorsally, radially, and proximally. Secondary deforming forces include adductor pollicis and the extensor pollicis muscles.
Surgical Threshold
Q: What is the articular step-off threshold for surgical intervention in Bennett's fracture?
A: Greater than 1mm of articular step-off is the accepted threshold for surgical intervention. Studies have shown that articular incongruity of more than 1mm is associated with significantly higher rates of post-traumatic arthritis at long-term follow-up.
Radiographic View
Q: What is the Roberts view and why is it useful for evaluating Bennett's fractures?
A: The Roberts view is a true AP view of the thumb CMC joint obtained by placing the thumb flat on the cassette (hyperpronated) with the beam perpendicular to the metacarpal. It provides the best view of the CMC joint and accurately shows the articular step-off and subluxation.
Bennett vs Rolando
Q: What is the key difference between a Bennett's fracture and a Rolando fracture?
A: Bennett's fracture is a two-part intra-articular fracture-subluxation with a small volar-ulnar fragment. Rolando fracture is a comminuted (three-part or more) intra-articular fracture with a Y or T pattern. Rolando fractures have a worse prognosis due to greater articular destruction.
Fixation Method
Q: A patient has a Bennett's fracture with a fragment involving 10% of the articular surface. What is the preferred fixation method?
A: Percutaneous K-wire fixation is preferred for small fragments. K-wires from MC1 to trapezium (direct) and/or MC1 to MC2 (indirect) provide adequate stabilization. Screw fixation is not ideal for small fragments due to inadequate purchase and risk of fragmentation.
Australian Context
Australian Context
Epidemiology in Australia:
Bennett's fractures are common in the Australian population, particularly in young males involved in contact sports (rugby, AFL) and manual occupations. The pattern of axial loading injury from punching is frequently seen in Emergency Departments, particularly on weekend nights. Hand trauma represents a significant burden on the Australian healthcare system.
Management Considerations:
Most Bennett's fractures in Australia are managed in the public hospital system, with surgical cases typically performed as day surgery procedures. K-wire fixation remains the most common technique, with ORIF reserved for larger fragments or failed closed reduction. Metropolitan centres with hand surgery units typically manage complex cases, while regional centres may transfer patients requiring ORIF.
Rehabilitation Access:
Hand therapy services are generally accessible through public hospital outpatient departments, though wait times may vary. Private health insurance holders often access faster rehabilitation services. The Medicare system covers surgical consultations and procedures, with rebates available for hand therapy under chronic disease management plans in some cases.
Workers' Compensation:
Bennett's fractures are commonly claimed under workers' compensation schemes (WorkCover, Comcare) when sustained in occupational settings. Documentation of mechanism and functional impact is critical for claim management. Return to work timelines depend heavily on occupation type, with manual workers requiring longer recovery periods.
Exam Cheat Sheet
Exam Day Cheat Sheet
Bennett's Fractures - Key Points
High-Yield Exam Summary
Definition
- •Intra-articular fracture-SUBLUXATION of thumb MC base
- •Two-part: volar-ulnar fragment + subluxated shaft
- •NOT the same as Rolando (which is comminuted)
- •Instability defined by dorsal/radial shaft migration
Key Anatomy
- •AOL (anterior oblique ligament) = primary stabilizer
- •AOL keeps volar fragment attached to trapezium
- •APL = main deforming force (pulls dorsal/radial/proximal)
- •Thumb CMC = saddle joint (40% of hand function)
Surgical Indications
- •Articular step greater than 1mm
- •Subluxation that cannot be reduced closed
- •Unstable after closed reduction
- •Rotational malalignment (rare but possible)
Fixation Options
- •K-wire MC1 to trapezium (most common)
- •K-wire MC1 to MC2 (indirect)
- •Lag screw (if fragment large enough)
- •ORIF via Wagner approach if closed fails
Complications
- •Post-traumatic arthritis (20-30%)
- •Malreduction
- •Stiffness
- •Pin site infection
Quick Reference: Key Numbers
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Articular step threshold | greater than 1mm = surgery |
| CMC contribution to hand function | 40% |
| Thumb spica duration | 4-6 weeks |
| K-wire removal | 4-6 weeks |
| Arthritis rate (anatomic reduction) | 20% |
| Arthritis rate (non-anatomic) | 50%+ |
| Return to full activity | 10-12 weeks |