Phalangeal Fractures
Phalangeal Fractures
Proximal and middle phalanx fractures of the digits
Fracture Types
Critical Must-Knows
- Rotational malunion is the most functionally limiting deformity
- Check for scissoring - all fingers should point to scaphoid tubercle when flexed
- PP apex volar angulation from intrinsic pull on proximal fragment
- MP angulation varies - proximal apex volar (central slip), distal apex dorsal (FDS)
Examiner's Pearls
- "Stable fractures: buddy tape + early motion
- "Unstable: K-wires, screws, or plate fixation
- "Unicondylar fractures often need ORIF to prevent angular deformity
- "Stiffness is the enemy - mobilize early when fixation stable
Rotation is King!
Rotational Assessment
All fingertips should point to SCAPHOID TUBERCLE when flexed. Look for SCISSORING of digits. Even 5 degrees rotation = 1.5cm overlap at fingertip. Rotational malunion is FUNCTIONALLY DEVASTATING.
Angulation Assessment
Apex volar angulation at PP (intrinsics pull proximal fragment). Variable angulation at MP (FDS vs central slip). Less angulation tolerated in index/long (more visible). More tolerated in ring/small (compensatory CMC motion).
At a Glance
| Scenario | Decision | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Stable, non-displaced fracture | Buddy tape + early motion | Low risk of displacement |
| Any rotational deformity | Closed reduction or ORIF | Cannot accept rotation |
| Transverse PP shaft fracture | K-wires or plate | High intrinsic deforming force |
| Short oblique/transverse | K-wires (cross-pattern) | Lag screws won't hold |
| Long spiral fracture | Lag screws | Ideal screw purchase |
| Comminuted fracture | Plate +/- bone graft | Need to span comminution |
| Unicondylar head/neck fracture | ORIF with screws | Prevent angular deformity |
| Bicondylar fracture | ORIF with mini-condylar plate | Restore articular surface |
| Open fracture | Irrigation, debridement, stabilization | Prevent infection |
| Pilon-type base fracture | Consider external fixation | Joint distraction helpful |
Mnemonics and Memory Aids
PHALANXPHALANX Fracture Assessment
Memory Hook:Assess the whole PHALANX before deciding treatment!
SCISSORSCISSOR Test for Rotation
Memory Hook:The SCISSOR test catches what others miss!
APEXAPEX Direction by Location
Memory Hook:Know your APEX direction for proper reduction!
Overview
Overview
Phalangeal fractures are among the most common upper extremity injuries, representing approximately 10% of all fractures. The proximal phalanx (PP) and middle phalanx (MP) present distinct management challenges due to the complex interplay of tendons, ligaments, and muscles surrounding each bone. Understanding the deforming forces acting on these fractures is essential for appropriate reduction and stable fixation.
The primary goal of treatment is to restore anatomic alignment, particularly rotation, while allowing early mobilization to prevent the stiffness that is the major cause of poor outcomes in these injuries. Even minor rotational malalignment can result in significant functional impairment, with scissoring of digits during grip and pinch activities. The hand surgeon's mantra "stable fracture, mobile joint" encapsulates the treatment philosophy.
Classification is based on bone involved (PP vs MP), location (base, shaft, neck, head), and fracture pattern (transverse, oblique, spiral, comminuted). Each combination has specific biomechanical implications that guide treatment selection.
Anatomy and Biomechanics
Anatomy and Biomechanics
Proximal Phalanx Anatomy
Structural Features:
- Broadest at base, tapers distally
- Biconcave base articulates with MC head
- Bicondylar head articulates with MP base
- Rectangular cross-section (makes plating easier)
Tendon Relationships:
- Extensor mechanism dorsal (conjoined lateral bands)
- FDP tendon volar (in sheath)
- Interossei insert on base (volar to axis)
- Lumbricals cross volar to MCP joint
Deforming Forces - PP:
| Fragment | Deforming Force | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Proximal | Interossei | Flexion |
| Distal | Central slip + lateral bands | Extension |
| Result | Apex volar angulation |
Middle Phalanx Anatomy
Structural Features:
- Shortest phalanx
- Base biconcave, head bicondylar
- More tubular than PP
Tendon Relationships:
- Central slip inserts on dorsal base
- FDS splits and inserts on volar-lateral shaft
- FDP passes between FDS slips
- Lateral bands converge to form terminal tendon
Deforming Forces - MP:
| Fracture Level | Proximal Pull | Distal Pull | Apex Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proximal to FDS | Central slip (extension) | FDS (flexion) | Apex volar |
| Distal to FDS | FDS (flexion) | Terminal tendon (extension) | Apex dorsal |
Vascular Supply
Digital Arteries:
- Proper digital arteries run along volar-lateral aspect
- Nutrient arteries enter volar cortex
- Periosteal stripping affects blood supply
Key Anatomical Points for Surgery
Safe Zones for K-wire Entry:
- Dorsal approach between extensor and lateral bands
- Avoid vincular system volarly
- Protect digital nerves at lateral aspect
Plate Placement:
- Lateral approach (between NV bundle and extensor)
- Dorsal approach (beneath extensor)
- Avoid volar plating (tendon adhesions)
Classification
Classification
Proximal Phalanx
| Location | Characteristics | Treatment Considerations |
|---|---|---|
| Base | Often intra-articular | May need ORIF for articular |
| Shaft | Strong deforming forces | K-wire or plate |
| Neck | Condylar fractures | Often need ORIF |
| Head | Unicondylar/bicondylar | ORIF for congruency |
Middle Phalanx
| Location | Characteristics | Treatment Considerations |
|---|---|---|
| Base | Often pilon-type | May need external fixation |
| Shaft | FDS insertion affects apex | Variable angulation |
| Neck | Rare | Reduction important |
| Head | Often associated with DIP injury | Rare |
AO/OTA Classification (Overview)
- A: Extra-articular
- B: Partial articular
- C: Complete articular
Clinical Presentation
Clinical Presentation
History
Mechanism:
- Direct blow (crush injury)
- Axial load (ball-handling sports)
- Twisting injury (spiral fractures)
- Fall on outstretched hand
- Industrial accidents
Key History Points:
- Hand dominance
- Occupation
- Sports/activities
- Previous hand injuries
- Time since injury
Physical Examination
Inspection:
- Swelling (localized vs diffuse)
- Deformity (angulation, shortening)
- Rotational malalignment
- Skin integrity (open fracture?)
- Nail bed alignment
Rotational Assessment - Critical:
- Semiflexion cascade: All fingertips should converge toward scaphoid tubercle
- Full flexion: Check for scissoring/overlap
- Finger extension: Assess nail plate alignment
- Compare to contralateral hand
Palpation:
- Point tenderness at fracture site
- Assess for crepitus (gentle)
- Evaluate stability
Neurovascular Examination:
- Digital sensation (radial and ulnar aspects)
- Capillary refill
- Allen test for digital arteries
Tendon Assessment:
- FDP function (DIP flexion)
- FDS function (isolated PIP flexion)
- Extensor function
- Note if pain limits assessment
Associated Injuries
- Tendon avulsions (mallet, jersey finger)
- Ligament injuries (collateral, volar plate)
- Nerve injuries (digital nerve laceration)
- Vascular injuries (in open fractures)
- Nail bed injuries
Investigations
Investigations
Radiographic Assessment
Standard Views:
- PA (posteroanterior): Fracture pattern, shortening
- True lateral: Angulation, displacement
- Oblique: Rotational assessment, condylar fractures
Key Radiographic Assessment:
- Fracture location (base/shaft/neck/head)
- Fracture pattern (transverse/oblique/spiral)
- Angulation (degree and apex direction)
- Shortening
- Articular involvement
- Bone quality

CT Imaging
Indications:
- Articular fractures (condylar, pilon)
- Complex comminuted patterns
- Surgical planning
- Unclear fracture pattern on XR
CT Advantages:
- 3D reconstruction
- Fragment number and size
- Articular surface assessment
- Guide surgical approach
MRI (Limited Role)
- Suspected ligament injury
- Occult fractures
- Tendon pathology
- Not routine for fractures
Ultrasound
- Dynamic tendon assessment
- Soft tissue masses
- Guided injections
Management Algorithm
Management Algorithm

Non-Operative Treatment
Indications:
- Stable, non-displaced fractures
- Acceptable alignment maintained
- No rotational deformity
- Patient compliance expected
Techniques:
1. Buddy Taping:
- Tape affected finger to adjacent finger
- Provides stability through adjacent digit
- Allows early motion
- Ideal for stable fractures
2. Extension Block Splinting:
- For base fractures with dorsal angulation
- MCP in 70-90 degrees flexion
- Prevents dorsal displacement
3. Alumifoam Splint:
- Custom molded
- Immobilizes fracture
- Allows motion of unaffected joints
Protocol:
- Immobilization: 3-4 weeks
- Begin ROM exercises early when stable
- Buddy tape for protection 4-6 weeks total
- Hand therapy referral for optimal outcomes
Key Success Factor: Early mobilization when fracture stable prevents stiffness complications.
Surgical Technique
Surgical Technique
Cross K-Wire Pattern (Most Stable)
- Setup: Fluoroscopy, mini C-arm, 0.045" or 0.062" K-wires
- Reduction: Achieve closed reduction, hold with reduction forceps
- First wire: Insert dorsal-lateral, aim distal-medial, cross fracture site
- Second wire: Insert dorsal-medial, aim distal-lateral, cross first wire
- Check: PA and lateral fluoroscopy for reduction and wire position
- Finish: Cut and bend wires outside skin, apply dressing
Intramedullary Bouquet Technique
- Used for transverse fractures
- Multiple 0.028" K-wires inserted retrograde from fracture site
- Drive across fracture into proximal fragment
- Provides rotational and angular stability
- Wires buried beneath skin
Advantage: Wires buried beneath skin, reducing pin site infection risk compared to percutaneous technique.
Complications
Complications
Early Complications
Malreduction:
- Rotational most significant
- May require revision fixation
- Prevention better than treatment
Infection:
- Higher risk with open fractures
- Pin site infection with K-wires
- Deep infection rare with proper technique
Neurovascular Injury:
- Digital nerve during approach
- Vascular compromise (rare)
Fixation Failure:
- Screw loosening
- K-wire migration
- Plate failure in comminuted fractures
Late Complications
Stiffness:
- MOST COMMON complication
- Affects PIP joint primarily
- Results from:
- Prolonged immobilization
- Tendon adhesions
- Capsular contracture
- Prevention: early motion
Malunion:
- Rotational most functionally significant
- Angulation may be tolerated
- May require corrective osteotomy
Nonunion:
- Uncommon in phalanges
- Risk factors: comminution, infection, motion at fracture
- Treatment: bone graft + rigid fixation
Post-Traumatic Arthritis:
- After articular fractures
- Risk proportional to articular incongruity
- May need arthrodesis
Tendon Adhesions:
- Common after dorsal surgery
- Extensor lag or flexion loss
- May need tenolysis
Cold Intolerance:
- Common in first year
- Usually improves
Comparison of Complication Risk
| Complication | K-wire | Screw | Plate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pin track infection | High | N/A | N/A |
| Stiffness | Low-Mod | Low | Moderate |
| Tendon adhesion | Low | Low | Higher |
| Hardware removal | Common | Rare | Sometimes |
Postoperative Care
Postoperative Care
Week 0-1: Protection Phase
Goals:
- Wound healing
- Control edema
- Protect fixation
Protocol:
- Splint protection (volar slab with MCP in flexion)
- Hand elevation above heart level
- Ice therapy 20 minutes every 2 hours
- Digital ROM exercises if fixation is rigid (plate/screws)
- K-wire cases: splint immobilization
- Monitor for infection (increased pain, erythema, drainage)
Wound Care:
- Dressing change at 2-3 days
- Suture removal at 10-14 days
- Pin site care (K-wires): daily cleaning with chlorhexidine
Week 1-3: Early Motion Phase
Goals:
- Prevent stiffness
- Maintain reduction
- Progress ROM
Protocol:
- Remove sutures at 10-14 days
- Hand therapy referral
- Active ROM exercises:
- MCP, PIP, DIP flexion/extension
- Tendon gliding exercises
- Place and hold exercises
- Avoid passive stretching initially
- Splint between exercises
- Edema control: compression glove, elevation, retrograde massage
K-Wire Management:
- Continue splint protection
- Active ROM of adjacent joints
- Pin site monitoring
Week 3-6: Progressive Motion Phase
Goals:
- Increase ROM
- Begin light functional use
- Remove K-wires if used
Protocol:
- Remove K-wires at 3-4 weeks (when fracture sticky)
- Increase frequency of ROM exercises
- Begin passive ROM (gentle)
- Dynamic splinting if stiffness developing:
- Extension turnbuckle for PIP flexion contracture
- Flexion strap for extension lag
- Light functional activities
- Buddy taping for protection
Radiographic Follow-up:
- XR at K-wire removal to confirm alignment maintained
- Check for callus formation
Week 6-12: Strengthening Phase
Goals:
- Restore grip strength
- Return to function
- Maximize ROM
Protocol:
- Progressive strengthening exercises:
- Putty exercises (soft to firm progression)
- Gripper exercises
- Functional activities
- Sport-specific training
- Work conditioning program
- Continue ROM exercises to plateau
Return to Activities:
- Desk work: 1-2 weeks (with protection)
- Light manual work: 6-8 weeks
- Heavy manual work: 10-12 weeks
- Contact sports: 10-12 weeks (with protection initially)
Hardware Removal
Indications for Removal:
- Symptomatic hardware (prominence, pain)
- Patient request
- Plate/screw removal: generally only if symptomatic
Timing:
- K-wires: 3-4 weeks routine
- Screws/plates: after fracture consolidation (12+ weeks) if needed
Red Flags Requiring Review
- Increasing pain after initial improvement
- Loss of reduction on radiographs
- Signs of infection (erythema, purulent drainage, fever)
- Worsening stiffness despite therapy
- Neurovascular compromise
- Pin migration or loosening
Outcomes and Prognosis
Outcomes and Prognosis
Prognostic Factors
Good Prognosis:
- Simple fracture pattern
- Anatomic reduction (especially rotation)
- Early motion achieved
- Young patient
- Single digit involved
Poor Prognosis:
- Comminuted fracture
- Residual rotation
- Prolonged immobilization
- Index/long finger (less CMC compensation)
- Multiple digit involvement
- Associated soft tissue injury
Expected Outcomes by Fixation
Conservative Treatment:
- 90% good/excellent for stable fractures
- ROM typically 80-90% of contralateral
- Minimal grip strength deficit
K-Wire Fixation:
- 80-85% good/excellent
- Stiffness main complication
- Slight grip strength reduction
Screw/Plate Fixation:
- 85-90% good/excellent
- Best ROM preservation
- Hardware issues may require removal
Return to Activity
| Activity | Timeframe |
|---|---|
| Desk work | 1-2 weeks (with splint) |
| Light manual work | 6-8 weeks |
| Heavy manual work | 10-12 weeks |
| Contact sports | 10-12 weeks |
| Full grip strength | 3-6 months |
Evidence and Guidelines
Evidence Base
Rotational Malalignment Impact
- 5 degrees of rotational malalignment results in approximately 1.5cm of digital overlap during grip, causing significant functional impairment
K-Wire vs Plate Fixation
- Plate fixation resulted in earlier return of motion but higher rate of extensor lag compared to K-wire fixation
Early Motion After Stable Fixation
- Early motion protocols after stable internal fixation resulted in better ROM outcomes than prolonged immobilization
Unicondylar Fracture Outcomes
- Displaced unicondylar fractures treated with ORIF had significantly better outcomes than those treated closed, with lower malunion rate
Stiffness Prevention
- Immobilization beyond 3 weeks significantly increases risk of stiffness at the PIP joint following phalangeal fracture
Viva Questions
Viva Scenarios
Exam Viva Scenarios
Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination
"A 35-year-old carpenter presents with a spiral fracture of the proximal phalanx of his ring finger sustained while using a power tool. There is 20 degrees of apex volar angulation and you suspect rotational malalignment. Describe your assessment and management."
Key Discussion Points:
- Rotational malalignment is NEVER acceptable - must correct surgically
- Spiral fractures: ideal for lag screw fixation (2-3 screws minimum)
- Rule: spiral length should be at least 2x bone diameter for screws
- PP apex volar angulation from intrinsic pull on proximal fragment
- Carpenter - needs full function for occupation
- Lateral approach: between NV bundle and lateral band
- Post-op: early motion to prevent stiffness
- Hand therapy critical for optimal outcome
"Explain the deforming forces acting on proximal phalanx fractures and why the apex of angulation is volar."
Key Discussion Points:
- Interosseous muscles insert on volar aspect of PP base
- Lumbricals also pass volar to MCP axis
- These FLEX the proximal fragment
- Central slip and lateral bands attach to distal fragment
- Extensor mechanism EXTENDS the distal fragment
- Result: proximal fragment flexes, distal extends
- Creates APEX VOLAR angulation
- Reduction: MCP flexion relaxes intrinsics, easier reduction
- Immobilization: intrinsic-plus position (MCP 70°, IP extended)
"A patient presents 3 weeks after injury with a stiff PIP joint following a middle phalanx shaft fracture that was treated in a splint. The fracture is uniting. What are the causes of stiffness and how would you manage this?"
Key Discussion Points:
- Stiffness is most common complication of phalangeal fractures
- PIP joint particularly prone to stiffness
- Causes: immobilization, edema, capsular contracture, tendon adhesions
- Prevention better than treatment: early motion when stable
- Immobilization beyond 3 weeks increases stiffness risk
- Treatment: hand therapy is cornerstone (ROM, splinting, scar management)
- Dynamic splinting: constant gentle force more effective than aggressive therapy
- Surgical options: capsulotomy, tenolysis (after 6 months if plateau)
- This case: 3 weeks immobilization is borderline - start therapy now
MCQ Practice Points
MCQ Practice Points
High-Yield Facts
Rotational Malalignment - The Deal Breaker
Q: Why is rotational malalignment the most critical assessment? A: 5° rotation = 1.5cm fingertip overlap - Even minor rotation causes functional scissoring. Unlike angulation, rotation does not remodel and causes permanent impairment. All fingertips must point to the scaphoid tubercle.
Deforming Forces - Know Your Apex
Q: What is the typical deformity of a proximal phalanx fracture? A: Apex Volar - The interossei flex the proximal fragment, while the central slip extends the distal fragment. Reduction requires flexing the MCP joint to relax the intrinsics.
Fixation Rules - Spiral vs Transverse
Q: When is lag screw fixation indicated? A: Long spiral fractures (greater than 2x bone diameter) - Requires sufficient length for 2-3 screws. Short oblique or transverse fractures require K-wires or plating as screws won't hold.
Stiffness - The Enemy
Q: what is the most common complication of phalangeal fractures? A: PIP Joint Stiffness - Risk increases significantly with immobilization greater than 3 weeks. The goal of fixation is "stable fracture, mobile joint" to allow immediate motion.
Surgical Approach Hazards
Q: Why is the volar approach avoided for phalangeal plating? A: Tendon Adhesions - The flexor tendons (FDS/FDP) are prone to adherence to the plate, causing stiffness. Lateral (preferred) or dorsal approaches are safer.
Unicondylar Fractures
Q: How must displaced unicondylar fractures be treated? A: ORIF - These are unstable intra-articular fractures. Without fixation, the condyle displaces proximally, causing angular deformity and arthritis.
Common Exam Traps
Trap 1: Accepting small rotational deformity
- WRONG: "5 degrees is minor"
- RIGHT: NO rotation acceptable (5° = 1.5cm overlap)
Trap 2: Using lag screws for short oblique fractures
- WRONG: Screws for all oblique fractures
- RIGHT: Need length at least 2x diameter for screw purchase
Trap 3: Volar approach for plating
- WRONG: Direct access to fracture
- RIGHT: NEVER volar (massive tendon adhesions)
Trap 4: Prolonged immobilization
- WRONG: "Immobilize 6 weeks for healing"
- RIGHT: Maximum 3 weeks if possible, early motion critical
Trap 5: Ignoring deforming forces
- WRONG: Just reduce the fracture
- RIGHT: Must understand apex direction (PP = volar, MP = variable)
Australian Context
Australian Context
Healthcare Access
Phalangeal fractures are commonly managed in both public and private sectors in Australia. Emergency departments provide initial assessment and reduction, with hand surgery consultation for complex fractures. Public hand clinics offer specialized care for fractures requiring surgery, though wait times can vary by location.
Hand Therapy Services
Early hand therapy referral is essential for optimal outcomes. Public hospital hand therapy services are available but may have waitlists. Private hand therapy is widely accessible in metropolitan areas, with many patients choosing private services to expedite rehabilitation. Workers' compensation cases typically receive priority access to therapy services.
Surgical Hardware and Costs
Mini-fragment fixation sets (1.5mm and 2.0mm plates and screws) are standard in Australian hospitals. These implants are not subsidized by the PBS as they are surgical prostheses. In the public system, hardware costs are covered by the hospital. Private patients may face out-of-pocket costs for implants depending on their insurance coverage. K-wires remain a cost-effective option and are universally available.
Workers' Compensation Considerations
Phalangeal fractures are common workplace injuries in Australia. WorkCover schemes in each state cover medical treatment, rehabilitation, and income support during recovery. Hand surgeons should provide detailed medical reports documenting injury mechanism, treatment, and expected recovery timeline. Return-to-work planning should consider the patient's specific occupational demands.
Medicolegal Documentation
Thorough documentation of rotational alignment and neurovascular status is essential. Progress notes should clearly document range of motion measurements and functional limitations. For compensation cases, independent medical examinations may be requested to assess impairment using standardized assessment tools.
Exam Cheat Sheet
Exam Day Cheat Sheet
Phalangeal Fractures - Key Points
High-Yield Exam Summary
Critical Assessment
- •ROTATION - most important (check scissoring)
- •All fingertips point to scaphoid tubercle in flexion
- •5 degrees rotation = 1.5cm fingertip overlap
- •No rotation is acceptable
Deforming Forces
- •PP: apex VOLAR (intrinsics flex proximal fragment)
- •MP proximal to FDS: apex volar (central slip)
- •MP distal to FDS: apex dorsal (FDS pulls)
- •MCP flexion relaxes intrinsics for reduction
Fixation Selection
- •Stable: buddy tape + early motion
- •Transverse/short oblique: K-wires or plate
- •Long spiral: lag screws (2-3 minimum)
- •Comminuted: plate to bridge
Complications
- •Stiffness - MOST COMMON complication
- •Prevention: early motion when stable
- •Malunion - rotational most significant
- •Adhesions - avoid volar plating
Quick Reference: Key Numbers
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| PP angulation acceptable | 10-15° |
| MP angulation acceptable | 15-20° |
| Rotation acceptable | NONE (0°) |
| 5° rotation overlap | 1.5cm at tip |
| Max immobilization | 3 weeks ideal |
| Lag screw minimum | 2 (prefer 3) |
| Spiral length for screw | at least 2x diameter |
| Return to full activity | 10-12 weeks |