Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Clavicle Fractures

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Clavicle Fractures

Comprehensive guide to clavicle fractures - Allman/Robinson classification, midshaft management controversy, ORIF indications, and surgical decision-making for orthopaedic exam

complete
Updated: 2024-12-14
High Yield Overview

CLAVICLE FRACTURES - CLASSIFICATION and MANAGEMENT

Location Determines Treatment | Midshaft Most Common | Displacement Key Factor

80%Are midshaft (Group I)
2cmShortening threshold for surgery
15%Nonunion with displaced midshaft (historical)
5-10%Lateral third fractures

ALLMAN CLASSIFICATION

Group I
PatternMiddle third (80%)
TreatmentConservative vs ORIF if displaced
Group II
PatternLateral third (15%)
TreatmentType-dependent; often surgical
Group III
PatternMedial third (5%)
TreatmentUsually conservative

Critical Must-Knows

  • Displacement and shortening are key surgical indications for midshaft fractures
  • COTS study showed improved union rates but no functional difference at 1 year
  • Type II lateral clavicle fractures are unstable - CC ligaments torn
  • Floating shoulder = scapula neck + clavicle - surgical stabilization often needed
  • Plate position: superior vs anteroinferior - both acceptable, different complications

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Edinburgh study changed practice - 15% nonunion rate for displaced midshaft
  • "
    Neer Type II lateral = CC ligament disruption = unstable = surgery
  • "
    Shortening over 2cm correlates with poor functional outcomes
  • "
    Medial clavicle fractures - CT for posterior displacement (vascular risk)

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Finite element models.(A) intact clavicle. (B) midshaft clavicular fractures fixed with a reconstruction plate. (C) midshaft clavicular fractures fixed with titanium elastic nail.
Click to expand
Finite element models.(A) intact clavicle. (B) midshaft clavicular fractures fixed with a reconstruction plate. (C) midshaft clavicular fractures fixeCredit: Zeng L et al. via PLoS ONE via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
The radiograph showing 100% displacement and more than 2 cm shortening of mid-shaft clavicle fracture
Click to expand
The radiograph showing 100% displacement and more than 2 cm shortening of mid-shaft clavicle fractureCredit: S Thyagarajan D et al. via Int J Shoulder Surg via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Plain x-ray showing midshaft clavicle fracture
Click to expand
Plain x-ray showing midshaft clavicle fractureCredit: Gill I et al. via Ann R Coll Surg Engl via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Preoperative radiograph showing mid shaft clavicle fracture and AC joint dislocation.
Click to expand
Preoperative radiograph showing mid shaft clavicle fracture and AC joint dislocation.Credit: Open-i / NIH via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
X-ray showing displaced middle third clavicle fracture
Click to expand
Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fracture: AP radiograph demonstrating a displaced middle third (Group I) clavicle fracture with complete displacement and shortening - the most common pattern accounting for 80% of all clavicle fractures.Credit: Trauma Monthly 2013 - PMC3728778 (CC-BY)

Critical Clavicle Fracture Exam Points

Displaced Midshaft

Shortening greater than 2cm and 100% displacement are key surgical indications. COTS/Edinburgh data showed improved union with ORIF but similar long-term function.

Lateral Classification

Neer Type II has CC ligament disruption = unstable = high nonunion rate. Type I (lateral to CC) and Type III (articular) are usually stable.

Medial Fractures

Posterior displacement is dangerous - CT essential. Risk to great vessels and trachea. Physis closes at 23-25 years - beware SC dislocation in young adults.

Floating Shoulder

Clavicle + scapula neck fracture = double disruption of superior shoulder suspensory complex. Often requires clavicle fixation for stability.

Quick Decision Guide

Fracture PatternKey FindingStabilityTreatment
Midshaft - minimal displacementLess than 100% displacement, shortening less than 2cmGood prognosisSling, early ROM, union expected
Midshaft - significantly displacedGreater than 2cm shortening, 100% displacementHigher nonunion riskDiscuss surgery - similar function at 1yr
Lateral Type IICC ligament disruption, unstable fragmentUnstableSurgical fixation - hook plate or sutures
Medial with posterior displacementCT shows posterior fragment near vesselsDangerousCT angiogram, likely open reduction
Floating shoulderClavicle + scapula neck fractureComplex instabilityClavicle ORIF stabilizes construct
Mnemonic

COTS - Midshaft ORIF Benefits

C
Cosmesis
Better cosmetic appearance with ORIF
O
Osseous union
Higher union rates with surgery
T
Time to union
Faster healing with fixation
S
Similar function
Similar DASH scores at 1 year

Memory Hook:COTS study showed ORIF gives better union but COmparable long-Term Score

Mnemonic

PLATE - Surgical Indications

P
Polytrauma
Early mobilization needed
L
Length (shortening greater than 2cm)
Key prognostic factor
A
Athlete/Laborer
Early return to activity desired
T
Threatened skin
Tenting, impending open fracture
E
Extreme displacement
100% displaced or comminuted

Memory Hook:PLATE the clavicle when these indications are met

Mnemonic

NEER - Lateral Clavicle Types

I
Intact CC ligaments
Type I: Fracture lateral to CC = stable
II
Interrupted CC ligaments
Type II: CC disruption = unstable = surgery
III
Into the joint
Type III: Articular surface = stable, may cause OA

Memory Hook:Type II = II ligaments torn (trapezoid + conoid) = Instability

Mnemonic

2-2-2 Rule for Midshaft Surgery

2
2cm shortening
Greater than 2cm indicates surgery
2
2 weeks to decide
Early ORIF within 2 weeks best outcomes
2
2x complication risk
Delayed fixation doubles complication rate

Memory Hook:If shortening exceeds 2cm, decide within 2 weeks or double your trouble

Overview and Epidemiology

Clavicle fractures are among the most common orthopaedic injuries, representing approximately 4-5% of all fractures. The clavicle is a unique bone that serves as the only bony connection between the upper limb and the axial skeleton.

Mechanism of injury:

  • Direct blow - fall onto the point of the shoulder (most common)
  • Indirect - FOOSH (fall on outstretched hand) transmits force
  • High-energy - motor vehicle accidents, sports injuries

Bimodal distribution:

  • Young males (high-energy sports/trauma)
  • Elderly (low-energy falls with osteoporosis)

S-Shaped Anatomy

The clavicle is S-shaped with the medial curve convex anteriorly and the lateral curve convex posteriorly. The junction of these curves (middle third) is the thinnest point and lacks ligamentous attachments, explaining the high fracture rate here.

Anatomy and Biomechanics

Bony anatomy:

  • First bone to ossify (5th week in utero)
  • Last bone to fuse (medial physis closes 23-25 years)
  • S-shaped: medial 2/3 convex anteriorly, lateral 1/3 convex posteriorly
  • Middle third is the thinnest with no ligamentous attachments

Muscular attachments:

  • SCM (sternocleidomastoid) - inserts medial third, elevates medial fragment
  • Trapezius - inserts lateral third, may elevate lateral fragment
  • Deltoid - originates from lateral third
  • Pectoralis major - originates from medial third, depresses fragment

Critical relationships:

Neurovascular Structures

Subclavian vessels and brachial plexus pass directly posterior to the middle third. The subclavius muscle and clavipectoral fascia provide protection. Acute vascular injury rare but posterior medial displacement is dangerous.

Ligamentous structures:

  • Coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments - trapezoid (lateral) and conoid (medial) - key stabilizers
  • Acromioclavicular ligament - horizontal stability of AC joint
  • Sternoclavicular ligaments - anchor medial clavicle

Deforming Forces

In midshaft fractures: medial fragment elevates (SCM pull) and retracts posteriorly (trapezius). Lateral fragment depresses (weight of arm) and medializes (pectoralis/deltoid). This creates the classic "step-off" deformity.

Vascular supply:

  • Periosteal vessels (branches of suprascapular, thoracoacromial, internal thoracic)
  • Nutrient artery enters near middle third
  • Comminuted fractures disrupt blood supply - higher nonunion risk

Classification Systems

Type V lateral clavicle fracture on AP shoulder radiograph
Click to expand
Neer Type V lateral clavicle fracture: AP radiograph of left shoulder demonstrating comminuted lateral third fracture with superior displacement of proximal segment. Type V fractures involve comminution and may have variable CC ligament involvement.Credit: Goss TP et al., Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol - PMC3537574 (CC-BY)
Mid-shaft clavicle fracture with AC joint dislocation representing floating shoulder variant
Click to expand
Complex shoulder trauma: AP radiograph showing mid-shaft clavicle fracture with complete displacement AND concomitant AC joint dislocation. This 'floating clavicle' pattern represents significant shoulder girdle instability requiring careful surgical planning to restore both the clavicle length and AC joint stability.Credit: Open-i / NIH - PMC5040563 (CC-BY)

Allman Classification (by location - most commonly used)

GroupLocationFrequencyKey Features
IMiddle third80%Between CC ligaments and costoclavicular ligament
IILateral third15%Lateral to CC ligaments
IIIMedial third5%Medial to costoclavicular ligament

Group I Significance

Middle third fractures occur at the junction of the two curves where the bone is thinnest and has no ligamentous attachments. This explains both the high incidence and propensity for displacement.

Robinson Classification (midshaft - displacement based)

TypeDescriptionSubtypeDetails
2ACortical alignmentA1/A2Undisplaced/Angulated
2BDisplacedB1/B2Simple/Wedge comminution

Key point: Type 2B fractures (displaced, especially 2B2 with comminution) have highest nonunion rates and are most likely to benefit from ORIF.

Neer Classification (lateral third - stability based)

TypeDescriptionCC LigamentsStability
ILateral to CC ligamentsIntactStable
IIBetween conoid and trapezoidDisruptedUnstable
IIAConoid attached to medialConoid intactLess unstable
IIBBoth ligaments on distal fragmentBoth tornMost unstable
IIIIntra-articular (AC joint)IntactStable
IVPediatric - physisIntactStable
VComminutedVariableVariable

Type II Surgical Indication

Neer Type II fractures have high nonunion rates (22-33%) due to CC ligament disruption leaving the medial fragment unstable. These typically require surgical stabilization.

Distal clavicle fracture classification diagram showing stable and unstable types
Click to expand
Distal Clavicle Classification: Overview showing stable fractures (Type I lateral to CC ligaments, Type III intra-articular) versus unstable patterns (Type II with CC ligament disruption requiring surgical stabilization).Credit: J Clin Med 2022 - PMC9572249 (CC-BY 4.0)
Radiographs and MRI demonstrating importance of accurate distal clavicle classification
Click to expand
Classification Diagnostic Pitfall: (A1-A2) True Neer Type I fracture. (B1-B2) Initially classified as Neer I on X-ray, but MRI (C1-C3) revealed CC ligament disruption - final diagnosis Craig IIc. Demonstrates importance of advanced imaging for accurate classification.Credit: J Clin Med 2022 - PMC9572249 (CC-BY 4.0)

Edinburgh Classification (most comprehensive)

Used in the landmark Edinburgh study that demonstrated 15% nonunion rate for displaced midshaft fractures.

  • Type 1: Medial (1A undisplaced, 1B displaced)
  • Type 2: Midshaft (2A undisplaced, 2B displaced)
  • Type 3: Lateral (3A undisplaced, 3B displaced)

Key finding: Type 2B (displaced midshaft) had significantly higher nonunion rate, changing the paradigm toward surgical management.

Clinical Presentation and Assessment

History:

  • Mechanism (fall onto shoulder, direct blow, FOOSH)
  • High vs low energy
  • Hand dominance
  • Occupation and activity level
  • Associated injuries (floating shoulder, chest trauma)

Physical examination:

Physical Examination Findings

FindingSignificanceAction Required
Visible/palpable deformityDisplacement presentAssess degree of shortening
Skin tentingImpending open fractureUrgent - relative surgical indication
Neurovascular deficitBrachial plexus/vascular injuryUrgent surgical exploration
Dyspnea/chest painPneumothoraxChest X-ray, tube thoracostomy if needed
Ipsilateral shoulder painFloating shoulderFull shoulder girdle imaging

Neurovascular examination:

  • Brachial plexus assessment (especially lateral cord - musculocutaneous, median)
  • Radial, ulnar, median nerve function
  • Distal pulses, capillary refill
  • Signs of venous congestion

Associated Injuries

Look for floating shoulder (clavicle + scapula neck), AC joint injury, pneumothorax (especially with first rib fracture), and brachial plexus injury (particularly in high-energy trauma).

Signs of significant displacement:

  • Obvious step-off deformity
  • Shortening (compare to contralateral side)
  • Tenting of skin
  • Pain with any shoulder movement

Investigations

Radiographic Examples

Displaced midshaft clavicle fracture with post-operative plate fixation
Click to expand
Midshaft clavicle fracture management: (A) Pre-operative AP radiograph showing displaced midshaft clavicle fracture with shortening and comminution - note the superior displacement of the medial fragment due to sternocleidomastoid pull. (B) Post-operative view demonstrating anatomic reduction and stable fixation with a superior clavicle locking plate. Plate fixation restores clavicular length and prevents the complications associated with significant shortening.Credit: Open-i/PMC - CC BY 4.0
4-panel series showing displaced clavicle fracture patterns
Click to expand
Spectrum of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures: (A-D) Various presentations of midshaft clavicle fractures demonstrating typical displacement patterns with the medial fragment elevated by sternocleidomastoid and the lateral fragment depressed by arm weight. Note varying degrees of shortening and comminution. Displacement of more than 2cm shortening or more than 100% displacement are relative indications for surgical fixation in active patients.Credit: Open-i/PMC - CC BY 4.0

Standard imaging:

AP Clavicle X-ray:

  • 15-degree cephalic tilt provides best view
  • Assess displacement, shortening, comminution
  • Measure shortening by comparing to contralateral side

45-degree cephalic tilt view:

  • Separates clavicle from overlying ribs/scapula
  • Better assessment of displacement and comminution

Shortening Measurement

Measure clavicle length on AP X-ray from sternal to acromial end. Compare to contralateral side. More than 2cm shortening is a key surgical threshold. CT provides more accurate measurement if needed.

When to order CT:

CT Indications in Clavicle Fractures

IndicationRationale
Medial clavicle fractureAssess posterior displacement, vascular proximity
Complex lateral fractureDefine CC ligament attachment, fracture pattern
Floating shoulderDefine scapula fracture pattern for surgical planning
Comminuted midshaft (surgical planning)Accurate shortening measurement, fragment assessment

CT angiogram:

  • Indicated for medial fractures with posterior displacement
  • Any concern for vascular injury (expanding hematoma, pulse deficit)

Chest X-ray:

  • Rule out pneumothorax
  • Especially with first rib fracture or high-energy mechanism

Management

📊 Management Algorithm
Clavicle Fracture Management Algorithm
Click to expand
Visual Sketchnote Management Algorithm: Key decisions split by classification. Midshaft treatment depends on shortening >2cm. Lateral treatment depends on stability (Neer type). Medial fractures require exclusion of posterior vascular threat.Credit: OrthoVellum

Conservative management:

Most clavicle fractures can be treated conservatively with excellent outcomes.

Acute Phase (0-2 weeks)
  • Simple sling for comfort (arm sling preferred over figure-of-8)
  • Ice, analgesia
  • Gentle pendulum exercises when pain allows
Mobilization Phase (2-6 weeks)
  • Wean from sling as pain allows
  • Active ROM exercises below 90 degrees
  • Avoid heavy lifting
Strengthening Phase (6-12 weeks)
  • Progressive strengthening once clinical union
  • Return to non-contact sports typically 8-12 weeks
  • Contact sports delayed until radiographic union (12-16 weeks)

Figure-of-8 vs Sling

Simple arm sling is preferred over figure-of-8 brace. A Cochrane review showed no difference in outcomes, and figure-of-8 braces cause axillary discomfort and skin problems. Only advantage is cosmetic improvement of posture.

Surgical indications:

Absolute vs Relative Surgical Indications

TypeIndication
AbsoluteOpen fracture
AbsoluteNeurovascular compromise
AbsoluteImpending skin perforation (tenting)
AbsoluteFloating shoulder (some advocate)
RelativeShortening greater than 2cm
Relative100% displacement
RelativeNeer Type II lateral fracture
RelativePolytrauma/early mobilization needed
RelativePatient preference after counseling

Surgical Technique

Plate and screws - gold standard for midshaft fractures

Superior plating:

  • Easier exposure
  • Better cosmesis
  • Plate prominence, hardware irritation common

Anteroinferior plating:

  • Less prominence
  • Subcutaneous suture line
  • More difficult exposure
  • Protected from direct trauma

Plate selection:

  • 3.5mm reconstruction plate (can be contoured)
  • Precontoured clavicle plates (anatomic)
  • Locking plates for osteoporotic bone or comminution

Plate Position

Superior plating is most common but has higher hardware prominence. Anteroinferior plating is biomechanically similar with less prominence but technically more demanding. Both acceptable - surgeon preference.

Intraoperative photograph showing ORIF plate fixation of clavicle fracture
Click to expand
Intraoperative ORIF: Surgical photograph demonstrating superior plate and screw fixation of a displaced midshaft clavicle fracture. Note direct visualization of the fracture site with anatomic plate contouring along the superior clavicle surface.Credit: Trauma Monthly 2013 - PMC3728778 (CC-BY)
Mid-shaft clavicle fracture pre and post-operative with superior plate fixation
Click to expand
Midshaft clavicle ORIF in 16-year-old athlete: (a) Pre-operative AP showing completely displaced middle third fracture with significant shortening, (b) Post-operative with superior anatomic plate and screw fixation showing restored clavicle length and alignment. Excellent example of indication for surgical fixation - displaced fracture with shortening greater than 2cm.Credit: Fanter NJ et al., Sports Health - PMC4332647 (CC-BY)
Dual plating technique for comminuted clavicle fracture
Click to expand
Dual Plating Technique: Pre-operative displaced fracture (top left), post-operative dual plate fixation with anterior and superior plates (top right), and 6-month follow-up showing complete union (bottom). Option for highly comminuted fractures.Credit: Int J Bone Frag 2025 - PMC12267127 (CC-BY)

Intramedullary nail/pin - alternative for midshaft

Advantages:

  • Smaller incision
  • Less soft tissue stripping
  • Load-sharing device

Disadvantages:

  • Risk of medial migration
  • Skin irritation laterally
  • Less rotational control
  • Hardware removal often needed

Devices:

  • Titanium elastic nail (TEN)
  • Hagie pin
  • Rockwood pin

Best suited for: Simple, non-comminuted fractures where alignment is easily achieved

Mid-shaft clavicle fracture treated with intramedullary fixation showing pre and post-operative radiographs
Click to expand
Intramedullary fixation of midshaft clavicle fracture in a 17-year-old athlete: (a) Pre-operative AP radiograph showing displaced middle third fracture with significant shortening, (b) Post-operative radiograph demonstrating reduction and stabilization with intramedullary elastic nail. Note restoration of clavicle length with minimal incision approach.Credit: Fanter NJ et al., Sports Health - PMC4332647 (CC-BY)

Hook plate:

  • Hook sits under acromion
  • Good stability for unstable Type II
  • Subacromial impingement common
  • Removal required at 3-6 months

CC ligament reconstruction:

  • Dog bone button or suture fixation
  • Anatomic CC reconstruction
  • Can be combined with plate

Distal clavicle locking plate:

  • For Type III (articular) fractures
  • Locking screws in small distal fragment

Hook Plate Complications

Hook plates cause subacromial impingement and erosion in up to 30% of cases. Plan for routine removal at 3-6 months once union achieved.

Lateral clavicle fracture with plate fixation showing pre-operative and healed images
Click to expand
Lateral Clavicle Fracture Fixation: Comminuted lateral third fracture (AO 15.3) showing pre-operative displacement (left), post-operative locking plate reduction (center), and 6-month follow-up with complete callus formation (right).Credit: Int J Bone Frag 2025 - PMC12267127 (CC-BY)
Distal clavicle fracture surgical management with anatomical plate showing pre-operative, post-operative and healed stages
Click to expand
Neer Type IIb distal clavicle fracture in a 33-year-old man: (A) Pre-operative AP showing displaced fracture with superior migration of medial fragment, (B) Early post-operative appearance, (C) Anatomic reduction with micromovable anatomical acromioclavicular plate, (D) Complete union at follow-up. Type IIb fractures require surgical stabilization due to CC ligament disruption and high nonunion rates.Credit: Liu Q et al., Int J Med Sci - PMC3372936 (CC-BY)

Complications

Complications by Treatment Type

ComplicationConservative RateSurgical RateManagement
Nonunion5-15%1-2%Bone grafting, revision ORIF
MalunionVariableRareAccept most; osteotomy if symptomatic
Hardware irritationN/A20-40%Hardware removal at union
InfectionN/A1-2%Antibiotics, debridement if deep
Neurovascular injuryRare0.5-1%Intraop recognition, vascular repair
RefractureRare1-2%After hardware removal; wait 12 weeks

Nonunion:

Risk factors for nonunion:

  • Displacement greater than 100%
  • Shortening greater than 2cm
  • Comminution
  • Female sex
  • Older age
  • Smoking
  • Refracture

Nonunion Management

Clavicle nonunion treatment: plate fixation + bone grafting (iliac crest or local autograft). Address biomechanical (length, alignment) and biological (vascularity, bone quality) factors.

Malunion:

  • Shortening, angulation, and rotation
  • Usually well tolerated
  • Surgery only for symptomatic cases (shoulder dysfunction, cosmesis)
  • Corrective osteotomy with plate fixation

Hardware-Related Complications

Plate prominence is the most common reason for hardware removal (20-40% of patients). Counsel patients preoperatively. Anteroinferior plating may reduce this but is technically more demanding.

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

Post-ORIF protocol:

Week 0-2
  • Sling for comfort
  • Gentle pendulum exercises
  • No active elevation
  • Wound care
Week 2-6
  • Wean sling
  • Active assisted ROM
  • Progress to active ROM as tolerated
  • No lifting greater than 2-3kg
Week 6-12
  • Progressive strengthening
  • Return to desk work usually possible
  • No heavy lifting or contact sports
Week 12+
  • Confirm radiographic union
  • Return to full activities
  • Contact sports typically 4-6 months
  • Hardware removal if symptomatic (12+ months)

Key rehabilitation principles:

  • Early pendulum exercises prevent stiffness
  • Progressive loading only after clinical union
  • Hardware removal is optional unless symptomatic
  • Full sports clearance requires radiographic union

Return to Sport

Athletes can return to non-contact sports at 8-12 weeks with clinical union and adequate ROM. Contact sports require radiographic union, typically 4-6 months. Elite athletes may have earlier return with protective padding.

Outcomes and Prognosis

Prognosis by fracture type:

Fracture TypeConservative UnionORIF UnionNotes
Undisplaced midshaft95%+98-99%Conservative treatment preferred
Displaced midshaft85%98%ORIF faster union, similar function
Neer Type I lateral90%+95%+Conservative preferred
Neer Type II lateral67-78%90-95%ORIF strongly preferred
Medial clavicle90%+95%+Conservative unless displaced posteriorly

COTS Study Summary

Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society (COTS) 2007: RCT comparing ORIF vs conservative for displaced midshaft. ORIF showed lower nonunion (2.2% vs 15.1%), faster union, better early function. No difference in DASH scores at 1 year. Changed practice toward considering surgery for displaced fractures.

Factors affecting outcomes:

  • Degree of shortening (more than 2cm worse outcomes)
  • Smoking (delays union, increases complications)
  • Age and bone quality
  • Compliance with rehabilitation
  • Patient expectations and activity demands

Evidence Base

Level I
📚 Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society (COTS)
Key Findings:
  • ORIF reduced nonunion (2.2% vs 15.1%) and improved early function compared to conservative treatment for displaced midshaft fractures.
Clinical Implication: Surgical fixation should be discussed for significantly displaced midshaft fractures, though long-term function is similar.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007

Level II
📚 Edinburgh Study (Robinson)
Key Findings:
  • 15.1% nonunion rate for displaced (Edinburgh 2B) midshaft fractures treated conservatively. Challenged the 'benign fracture' paradigm.
Clinical Implication: Changed understanding of clavicle fracture natural history - displaced fractures have significant nonunion risk.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004

Level I
📚 COTS Study Long-term Follow-up
Key Findings:
  • At 5-year follow-up, no significant difference in DASH scores between operative and non-operative groups.
Clinical Implication: Long-term function is similar regardless of treatment method. Patient counseling should emphasize this.
Source: J Orthop Trauma 2015

Level I
📚 Virtanen Meta-analysis
Key Findings:
  • Plate fixation superior to conservative treatment for displaced midshaft fractures (OR 0.14 for nonunion). No difference for non-displaced fractures.
Clinical Implication: Surgery benefits displaced fractures but is not indicated for minimally displaced fractures.
Source: Acta Orthop 2012

Level I
📚 Figure-of-8 vs Sling (Cochrane)
Key Findings:
  • No difference in outcomes between figure-of-8 bandage and arm sling. Sling had fewer complications and better comfort.
Clinical Implication: Simple arm sling is preferred over figure-of-8 for conservative management.
Source: Cochrane Database 2016

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Displaced Midshaft Fracture

EXAMINER

"A 25-year-old male cyclist presents after a fall onto his right shoulder. X-ray shows a displaced midshaft clavicle fracture with 2.5cm shortening and 100% displacement. He is a manual laborer. How would you manage this patient?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Thank you. This 25-year-old manual laborer has a **displaced midshaft clavicle fracture** with concerning features. Let me approach this systematically. **Assessment:** I would confirm hand dominance, his specific occupational demands, and expectations regarding recovery time. Examination must confirm skin integrity for any tenting, complete neurovascular assessment of the brachial plexus and distal pulses, and exclusion of associated injuries including floating shoulder and chest trauma. **Classification:** This is an **Allman Group I** (middle third) and **Robinson 2B** (displaced) fracture. The key prognostic factors are present: greater than 2cm shortening and 100% displacement. **Management Discussion:** I would counsel him using the COTS study data. Surgery offers significant advantages including reduced nonunion rate (2.2% vs 15.1%) and faster union. However, functional outcomes at one year are similar between operative and non-operative management. Given his **multiple relative surgical indications** - greater than 2cm shortening, 100% displacement, manual occupation requiring early return to work - I would recommend ORIF. **Surgical Technique:** My preferred approach would be an anatomic precontoured plate positioned either superiorly or anteroinferiorly. I would achieve anatomic reduction, restore length, and apply compression with lag screws where possible. **Expected Outcomes:** Union rate approaches 98% with surgery. Return to light duties at 6-8 weeks, full manual work by 12 weeks, and I would counsel him about 20-40% chance of hardware prominence requiring later removal.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
History: hand dominance, occupation, activity level, expectations
Examination: skin integrity, neurovascular status, associated injuries
Imaging: AP clavicle with cephalic tilt, measure shortening
Classification: Robinson 2B - displaced midshaft
Counsel: explain COTS data - surgery improves union but similar long-term function
Indications for surgery present: greater than 2cm shortening, 100% displaced, manual worker
Surgical technique: superior or anteroinferior plate with compression and lag screws
Expected outcome: 98% union, return to work 6-8 weeks, full sports 4-6 months
COMMON TRAPS
✗Failing to measure shortening accurately
✗Not examining for floating shoulder or chest injuries
✗Recommending surgery as mandatory rather than discussing options
✗Forgetting to counsel about hardware prominence and possible removal
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"Would your management change if he were 75 years old with osteoporosis?"
"What about a professional rugby player wanting rapid return?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Lateral Third Fracture

EXAMINER

"A 45-year-old woman presents with a lateral third clavicle fracture. X-rays show the fracture between the CC ligaments with significant displacement of the medial fragment. What is your assessment and management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Thank you. This presentation describes a **Neer Type II lateral clavicle fracture**, which is the most unstable subtype with significant management implications. **Classification:** The fracture location between the CC ligaments indicates disruption of these critical stabilizers. The **medial fragment is elevated** by trapezius pull while lacking CC ligament restraint, explaining the characteristic displacement pattern. **Clinical Significance:** Type II fractures have the **highest nonunion rate** among lateral clavicle fractures, reported at 22-33% with conservative management. This is due to the biomechanical instability from CC ligament disruption. **Assessment:** I would examine the AC joint carefully to differentiate from pure AC joint dislocation, assess skin integrity over the prominent medial fragment, and evaluate neurovascular status. CT may help define whether this is Type IIA (conoid still attached to medial fragment) or Type IIB (both CC ligaments attached to distal fragment). **Management:** Given the high nonunion risk, I would **recommend surgical fixation**. Options include: - **Hook plate**: Provides excellent stability but requires routine removal at 3-6 months due to subacromial impingement risk of up to 30% - **CC ligament reconstruction** with suture button devices - **Distal clavicle locking plate** with supplementary CC fixation My preference would be a hook plate with planned removal, or alternatively CC reconstruction with a locking plate depending on bone quality and fracture pattern.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
This is a Neer Type II lateral clavicle fracture
CC ligament disruption leads to instability - medial fragment elevates
Type II has highest nonunion rate of lateral fractures (22-33%)
Examination: AC joint, CC ligament area, skin tenting
CT can help define fracture pattern and ligament attachment
Surgical fixation recommended for Type II
Options: hook plate (requires removal), CC reconstruction, distal locking plate
Hook plate subacromial impingement is common - plan removal at 3-6 months
COMMON TRAPS
✗Confusing with AC joint dislocation
✗Treating as stable Type I or III
✗Not planning for hook plate removal
✗Failing to recognize Type IIA vs IIB distinction
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What are the complications specific to hook plates?"
"How do you distinguish Type II from AC joint dislocation clinically and radiologically?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Medial Clavicle Injury

EXAMINER

"An 18-year-old presents with a medial clavicle injury after a rugby tackle. There is swelling at the sternoclavicular area, the patient reports difficulty swallowing, and the arm is held adducted. X-rays are difficult to interpret. What are your concerns and management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Thank you. This is a **critical scenario** that requires urgent attention. The clinical features raise high suspicion for a **posterior sternoclavicular injury** with potential mediastinal compromise. **Key Recognition:** At 18 years old, the **medial clavicle physis is still open** - it closes between 23-25 years, making it the last physis in the body to fuse. This is likely a **physeal fracture-separation** rather than a true SC dislocation. **Red Flags:** The dysphagia is extremely concerning as it indicates **posterior displacement** affecting the esophagus. The great vessels (innominate vein, subclavian vessels) and trachea are also at immediate risk. **Urgent Investigations:** This patient requires **emergency CT**, and given the clinical presentation, I would request **CT angiogram** to evaluate vascular compression or injury. Plain radiographs are notoriously difficult to interpret at the SC joint. **Management:** This requires **urgent reduction in the operating theatre** with: - General anaesthesia with muscle relaxation - **Cardiothoracic and vascular surgery standby** - Equipment for median sternotomy if needed **Technique:** Closed reduction involves placing the patient supine with a bolster between the scapulae. Apply longitudinal traction to the abducted arm while an assistant uses a towel clip on the medial clavicle to lever it anteriorly. If closed reduction fails, **open reduction** is mandatory given the risks of leaving posterior displacement. **Prognosis:** After successful reduction, the SC joint is typically stable - the strong periosteal sleeve and ligaments reattach to the reduced clavicle.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
High suspicion for posterior SC dislocation (not fracture - physis still open at this age)
Medial clavicle physis closes at 23-25 years - physeal fracture/separation likely
Posterior displacement threatens great vessels, trachea, esophagus
Dysphagia is a red flag for posterior displacement
Emergency CT essential - CT angiogram if any concern
Urgent reduction in OR with vascular surgery standby
Technique: closed reduction with towel clip on clavicle, traction/extension
If closed fails, open reduction required
SC joint is stable after reduction - ligaments reattach to periosteal sleeve
COMMON TRAPS
✗Dismissing as simple 'clavicle fracture'
✗Not recognizing that physis is still open at 18
✗Attempting reduction without vascular standby
✗Failing to get CT for posterior displacement
✗Missing the urgency of dysphagia/venous congestion
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How would you perform closed reduction of posterior SC dislocation?"
"What is the natural history of physeal injuries in this region?"

MCQ Practice Points

Classification Question

Q: What percentage of clavicle fractures occur in the middle third? A: 80%. The middle third is the thinnest portion of the clavicle, at the junction of the two curves, and lacks ligamentous attachments - making it the most vulnerable to fracture.

Anatomy Question

Q: At what age does the medial clavicle physis close? A: 23-25 years. This is the last physis in the body to fuse. Injuries in young adults appearing as SC dislocations are often physeal fracture-separations.

Surgical Indication Question

Q: What shortening threshold is a key indication for ORIF of midshaft clavicle fractures? A: Greater than 2cm shortening. Along with 100% displacement, this is associated with higher nonunion rates and functional impairment.

Evidence Question

Q: What was the key finding of the COTS study regarding operative vs non-operative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures? A: ORIF resulted in lower nonunion rates (2.2% vs 15.1%) and faster union, but no significant difference in functional scores at 1 year.

Lateral Fracture Question

Q: Which Neer classification type of lateral clavicle fracture has the highest nonunion rate? A: Type II (22-33% nonunion). The CC ligament disruption leaves the medial fragment unstable and elevated by the trapezius.

Australian Context

Clavicle fractures are common in Australian contact sports including AFL and rugby, with increasing incidence in cycling-related trauma. Management follows international evidence-based guidelines, with the COTS study influencing Australian practice toward considering surgical fixation for significantly displaced midshaft fractures. Public hospital waiting lists may influence timing of elective ORIF. Return to work considerations vary by occupation, with clerical workers typically managing with sling immobilization for 2-4 weeks, while manual laborers often require surgical fixation for earlier return to full duties at 8-12 weeks. WorkCover implications should be considered for occupational injuries.

CLAVICLE FRACTURES

High-Yield Exam Summary

CLASSIFICATION

  • •Allman: I (80% middle), II (15% lateral), III (5% medial)
  • •Neer lateral: I (stable), II (unstable - CC disrupted), III (articular)
  • •Robinson: 2A (aligned), 2B (displaced) - key for prognosis
  • •Edinburgh: expanded Robinson - includes comminution assessment

KEY NUMBERS

  • •Greater than 2cm shortening = consider ORIF
  • •15% nonunion rate for displaced midshaft (conservative)
  • •22-33% nonunion for Neer Type II (lateral)
  • •23-25 years = medial physis closure age

SURGICAL INDICATIONS

  • •Open fracture, neurovascular compromise
  • •Impending skin perforation (tenting)
  • •Shortening greater than 2cm, 100% displacement
  • •Neer Type II lateral fracture
  • •Floating shoulder (relative)
  • •Polytrauma needing early mobilization

COTS STUDY SUMMARY

  • •ORIF reduces nonunion: 2.2% vs 15.1%
  • •Faster union with surgery
  • •Better early function with ORIF
  • •NO DIFFERENCE in DASH at 1 year

SURGICAL OPTIONS

  • •Superior plate: easier exposure, more prominence
  • •Anteroinferior plate: less prominence, harder
  • •IM nail: smaller incision, migration risk
  • •Hook plate (lateral): needs removal at 3-6 months

TRAPS AND PEARLS

  • •Medial injury in less than 25yo = physeal, not SC dislocation
  • •Posterior medial displacement = CT angio, vascular risk
  • •Figure-of-8 no better than sling - sling preferred
  • •Floating shoulder = consider clavicle fixation
  • •Hook plate = plan for routine removal
Quick Stats
Reading Time102 min
Related Topics

Acetabular Fractures

Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries

Acute Compartment Syndrome

Ankle Fractures