A revision-complexity operation wearing a primary's name β plan for infection, stress risers, abductor loss and instability
- Conversion THA sits between primary and revision THA in complexity and complication profile; registries and payors increasingly classify it as revision-level surgery
- Rule out low-grade infection before conversion: CRP/ESR in all; aspiration when inflammatory markers raised, sinus, early fixation failure or lucency around implants
- Empty screw holes are stress risers reducing torsional strength for 8 to 12 weeks; stem must bypass the most distal defect by at least two cortical diameters
- Assess greater trochanter integrity and abductor function preoperatively β trochanteric non-union or escape drives instability and Trendelenburg gait
- Cut-out of a lag screw damages the acetabulum: assess for protrusio, cartilage penetration and medial wall defect on CT before templating the cup
- Elderly osteoporotic bone with a wide canal after nail removal often favours a cemented, or long cementless, stem; young dense bone favours cementless fit-and-fill or tapered designs
- βCut-out (varus collapse, screw migrating superolaterally through the head) is the commonest mechanical failure of cephalomedullary fixation; tip-apex distance greater than 25 mm is the classic risk factor
- βCut-through ('medial migration' or Z-effect) drives the screw axially through the head into the acetabulum without varus collapse β worse acetabular damage
- βA stripped or cold-welded screw is an expected event: have carbide extraction sets, trephines, left-handed reverse-threaded extractors and a metal-cutting burr available before you start
- βIntraoperative frozen section (greater than 5 polymorphonuclear cells per high-power field in 5 fields) helps decide implant versus staged strategy when infection is uncertain
Failed fixation may be septic failure in disguise. CRP/ESR for every patient; aspirate the hip when markers are raised or failure is early/atypical. Intraoperative frozen section and a minimum of 3 to 5 tissue cultures at conversion. An unrecognised infected conversion becomes an infected THA β a disaster.
Empty screw holes reduce torsional strength by up to 50 percent until they remodel. Intraoperative and early postoperative femoral fracture is the signature complication. Bypass the most distal defect by at least two cortical diameters; consider prophylactic cerclage before broaching; gentle rotation during dislocation and preparation.
Trochanteric non-union, abductor scarring from prior lateral approaches and altered proximal anatomy give conversion THA a dislocation rate several-fold higher than primary. Strongly consider dual mobility or larger heads; repair or claw-plate the trochanter; restore offset meticulously.
A screw that has penetrated the joint scores cartilage, may create a contained medial defect or protrusio, and can seed metallosis-like debris. CT the pelvis preoperatively; be prepared for medial bone grafting, a multihole shell with screws, and avoid reaming through a thin medial wall.
The Problem: Modes of Fixation Failure
Conversion THA is performed for failed internal fixation of proximal femoral fractures. Recognising the failure mode dictates the reconstructive problem.
Cut-out β varus collapse with superolateral migration of the lag screw through the femoral head. The dominant mechanical failure of intertrochanteric fixation.
- Risk factors: tip-apex distance greater than 25 mm, poor reduction (varus, posterior sag), unstable fracture patterns (reverse obliquity, subtrochanteric extension), osteoporosis, superior/anterior screw placement
- Reconstructive consequences: destroyed head and often acetabular scoring; varus proximal femur with medialised shaft; shortened, low-offset hip; greater trochanter may be non-united, migrated or fragmented
Cut-through (axial migration, "medial migration", Z-effect in dual-screw nails) β the screw perforates the head centrally into the acetabulum without varus collapse. Acetabular cartilage and medial wall damage is typically worse than cut-out; assess for protrusio.
Non-union β persistent pain, hardware fatigue (broken lag screw or nail at the aperture), progressive deformity. In the elderly, conversion arthroplasty is usually preferred over revision fixation; in the young, revision fixation with valgus osteotomy and grafting is considered first for intertrochanteric non-union.
Preoperative Assessment
Every failed fixation must be presumed potentially septic until worked up. Low-grade infection with organisms such as coagulase-negative staphylococci or Cutibacterium acnes commonly presents purely as mechanical failure.
Universal screening
- History: wound problems, prolonged drainage, antibiotics after the index surgery, night pain, systemic symptoms
- CRP and ESR in all patients. Normal values are reassuring but do not fully exclude low-grade infection
- Plain radiographs: lucency around screws or nail, periosteal reaction, sequestrum
Escalation β when to aspirate
- Raised CRP/ESR without another explanation
- Early failure (within months) or atypical failure pattern
- Any wound history, sinus or draining scar
- Aspirate sent for cell count, differential and culture (hold 14 days for slow-growing organisms). Some units aspirate around the nail or perform image-guided biopsy of the non-union site
Intraoperative strategy
- Send a minimum of 3 to 5 tissue samples from the fracture/implant interface with separate clean instruments; do not rely on swabs
- Frozen section where available: greater than 5 polymorphonuclear cells per high-power field in at least 5 fields suggests infection
- If overt infection is found intraoperatively: abandon single-stage conversion; debride, remove hardware, place an antibiotic spacer, and stage the arthroplasty
- If cultures return positive after an implanted conversion (unexpected positive cultures, reported in 5 to 15 percent), treat as early prosthetic joint infection with targeted antibiotics, with or without DAIR depending on organism, number of positive samples and clinical picture
Decision Thresholds: Who Gets What
- Preferred Treatment
- Single-stage conversion THA (hardware out same sitting)
- Rationale
- Single anaesthetic, immediate weight bearing, best function
- Preferred Treatment
- Revision fixation with valgus osteotomy and grafting
- Rationale
- Preserves native hip; arthroplasty reserved for failure
- Preferred Treatment
- Conversion THA
- Rationale
- Predictable pain relief; free vascularised grafting rarely justified at this age
- Preferred Treatment
- Staged: hardware removal, debridement, spacer, interval antibiotics, then THA
- Rationale
- Single-stage into an infected bed risks chronic PJI
- Preferred Treatment
- Conversion THA plus claw plate and cables, with or without advancement
- Rationale
- Untreated trochanteric escape drives dislocation and limp
- Preferred Treatment
- Excision arthroplasty
- Rationale
- Damage control; accept function loss
Single-stage removal and conversion is standard when infection is excluded β one anaesthetic, one rehabilitation. Staged removal (hardware out, cultures, interval, then THA) is chosen when: infection is suspected but unproven; extraction is expected to be destructive (broken intramedullary hardware needing an extensive approach); or the surgeon wants screw holes to consolidate before stem insertion in very osteoporotic bone. The cost of staging is two operations and interval disability; most modern series favour single-stage with a long-enough stem.
Operative Technique: Conversion THA
Position β lateral decubitus on a pegged table for posterior or anterolateral approach. The posterior approach gives extensile access to the femur and avoids further abductor injury but carries the higher baseline dislocation risk β a reason many surgeons pair it with dual mobility in conversions.
Imaging and equipment β image intensifier available (confirm complete hardware removal, stem position, bypass length). Universal screw removal set, carbide-tipped extraction bits, trephines matched to screw diameter, reverse-threaded extractors, metal-cutting burr, nail-specific extraction jig if identifiable from records, cerclage cables, claw/hook plate, revision stem inventory (long cementless and cemented options), multihole acetabular shells, dual mobility, allograft.
Preparation β identify the exact implant from operative notes before surgery; hold antibiotics until deep cultures taken if infection workup was equivocal, otherwise standard prophylaxis; tranexamic acid; cell salvage for anticipated blood loss.
Approach and dissection β incorporate or extend the previous lateral scar where practical. Expect scarred, distorted planes; identify the sciatic nerve deliberately in posterior approaches (scar tethers it closer than expected). Release adhesions before attempting dislocation β a stiff, screw-hole-riddled femur fractures with forced rotation.
Most intraoperative fractures in conversion THA occur during dislocation of a stiff hip or broaching past a sclerotic screw track. Release capsule and scar circumferentially before rotating; perform an in-situ neck cut if the hip will not dislocate easily; place a prophylactic cerclage cable in osteoporotic bone; use the image intensifier if the broach path is uncertain. If a fracture occurs: cerclage fixation and convert to a longer stem bypassing the fracture by two cortical diameters.
Complications: Rates, Prevention, Management
- Relative to Primary THA
- Several-fold higher; signature complication
- Prevention
- Bypass defects 2 cortical diameters; prophylactic cerclage; gentle dislocation
- Management
- Cerclage plus longer stem intraoperatively; Vancouver-based management postoperatively
- Relative to Primary THA
- 2 to 3 times higher; unexpected positive cultures 5 to 15 percent
- Prevention
- Preoperative workup, intraoperative cultures, staged surgery when septic
- Management
- Targeted antibiotics; DAIR or staged revision per PJI principles
- Relative to Primary THA
- Up to around 10 percent in some series
- Prevention
- Dual mobility/large heads, trochanteric fixation, offset restoration
- Management
- Closed reduction; recurrent instability β revise to dual mobility or constrained
- Relative to Primary THA
- Consistently greater
- Prevention
- Tranexamic acid, cell salvage, efficient hardware removal
- Management
- Transfusion per threshold
- Relative to Primary THA
- Common where trochanter compromised
- Prevention
- Stable claw-plate/cable fixation, protected abduction
- Management
- Accept fibrous union if stable; revise fixation for painful escape
- Relative to Primary THA
- Higher β collapse plus scar tethering sciatic nerve
- Prevention
- Careful templating; limit acute lengthening; identify nerve
- Management
- Shoe raise; nerve injury β release/observe per severity
Outcomes: Versus Primary THA and Versus Acute Arthroplasty
- Versus primary THA: conversion cases have longer operative time, greater blood loss, longer stay, and 2 to 3 times the rates of infection, dislocation and periprosthetic fracture. Patient-reported outcomes improve dramatically from the failed-fixation baseline but final scores are modestly below matched primaries. Registry and administrative data support classifying conversion THA nearer to revision than primary for risk adjustment and resource allocation
- Versus acute arthroplasty for the index fracture: patients converted after failed fixation fare worse than those treated with arthroplasty acutely β two operations, interval disability, bone and soft-tissue damage. This underpins the modern preference for arthroplasty over fixation in displaced femoral neck fractures of the elderly, and for meticulous reduction and tip-apex discipline when fixing trochanteric fractures
- Predictors of poorer outcome: trochanteric non-union, prior infection, protrusio/acetabular damage, multiple prior operations, poor abductor function
Tip-apex distance predicts lag screw cut-out
Salvage THA after failed intertrochanteric fixation
Arthroplasty versus internal fixation for displaced femoral neck fractures
Conversion THA carries revision-level risk
Guidelines, Registries & Global Practice
- Global epidemiology: hip fracture incidence is rising fastest in Asia, Latin America and the Middle East as populations age; where internal fixation of displaced neck fractures remains prevalent (resource-limited settings, younger fracture populations), the downstream conversion burden is proportionally larger
- Guideline landscape: AAOS and NICE hip fracture guidance both recommend arthroplasty (THA in suitable, previously mobile patients) for displaced intracapsular fractures in older adults β indirectly the most powerful conversion-prevention measure. BOAST hip fracture standards emphasise surgery within 36 hours and orthogeriatric co-management, principles that apply equally to conversion admissions. AO principles govern fixation quality (reduction, tip-apex distance) that determines failure rates. No society guideline prescribes conversion technique in detail; practice rests on cohort evidence and revision-arthroplasty principles
- Registry evidence: national joint registries (NJR, AJRR, AOANJRR, SHAR, Norwegian, NZJR) variably code conversion THA β some as primary with prior-fixation flag, some as revision β complicating comparison, but consistently show elevated early revision for dislocation, fracture and infection versus true primaries. Registry data support cemented stems in the elderly osteoporotic femur and document growing dual mobility use in high-instability-risk indications, including conversion
- Resource-setting variation: in high-resource settings, single-stage conversion with revision inventory and dual mobility is standard; in resource-limited settings, staged hardware removal followed by later THA, cemented monoblock stems and standard bearings remain common, and revision fixation is more often attempted in younger patients to avoid arthroplasty in settings without revision capacity
Controversies & Areas of Uncertainty
- Is conversion a primary or a revision? Classification affects registries, risk adjustment and resourcing. The complication profile argues for revision-level status; nomenclature remains inconsistent worldwide
- Single-stage versus staged hardware removal β most favour single-stage when infection is excluded, but staging retains advocates for very osteoporotic bone (allowing hole consolidation) and for equivocal infection workups
- Routine dual mobility β mitigates the elevated dislocation risk, but long-term data on intraprosthetic dislocation and polyethylene behaviour in younger conversion patients are incomplete; some surgeons reserve it for documented abductor deficiency
- Cemented versus cementless stems in the elderly conversion femur β cement gives immediate torsional protection across screw holes and registry support in osteoporotic bone, but cement extrusion through holes and cementing into a potentially contaminated bed concern some surgeons; long cementless tapered stems are the counter-argument
- Retained broken hardware β leave deep, sterile, non-obstructing fragments versus pursue complete removal at the cost of bone stock; no controlled evidence, individualised in practice
- Trochanteric non-union fixation β claw plates and cables improve position but re-non-union is frequent; whether aggressive fixation outperforms accepting a reduced fibrous union is unresolved
Mnemonics
SCREWSPreoperative Checklist for Conversion THA
Hook:You are taking out SCREWS β run the SCREWS checklist before you book the case.
DCTBStripped Screw Escalation Ladder
Hook:Don't Cause Trouble, Burr last β escalate stepwise, never destroy bone early.