Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Damage Control Orthopaedics

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Damage Control Orthopaedics

Comprehensive guide to damage control orthopaedics - polytrauma management, DCO vs ETC, timing of definitive fixation, physiological parameters for orthopaedic exam

complete
Updated: 2024-12-17
High Yield Overview

DAMAGE CONTROL ORTHOPAEDICS

Polytrauma | Temporary Stabilization | Second Hit Prevention

DCODamage Control Orthopaedics
ETCEarly Total Care alternative
pH 7.25Acidosis threshold
Day 5-10Definitive surgery window

PATIENT CATEGORIES

Stable
PatternNormal physiology, isolated injuries
TreatmentETC - definitive fixation immediately
Borderline
PatternModerate physiological derangement
TreatmentConsider DCO based on parameters
Unstable
PatternActive hemorrhage, acidosis
TreatmentDCO mandatory - external fixation
In Extremis
PatternMoribund, perimortem
TreatmentHemorrhage control only, no fracture care

Critical Must-Knows

  • DCO = temporary external fixation, delay definitive surgery until physiology normalizes
  • Second hit phenomenon - surgery adds insult to already inflamed patient
  • Borderline patients benefit most from DCO approach
  • Start definitive surgery day 5-10 when inflammation subsides
  • Lactate, pH, base deficit are key monitoring parameters

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    DCO prevents the 'second hit' of major surgery to inflammatory system
  • "
    External fixation of femur reduces pulmonary complications in polytrauma
  • "
    ISS greater than 20 + chest/head injury = consider DCO
  • "
    Only borderline patients need decision-making - stable gets ETC, unstable gets DCO
Knee-spanning external fixator in polytrauma patient - clinical and radiographic views
Click to expand
Damage control external fixation. (a) Intraoperative clinical photograph showing knee-spanning external fixator applied to a polytrauma patient with periarticular knee fracture (AO/OTA C2). Note the soft tissue swelling requiring temporary stabilization before definitive surgery. (b) AP radiograph confirming the construct with pins in the femur and tibia spanning the knee joint. This represents the first step in DCO - rapid temporary stabilization to control hemorrhage and minimize inflammatory burden.Credit: Bertrand ML et al., Open Orthop J (PMC4541416) - CC-BY 4.0

Critical DCO Exam Points

DCO Indications

Polytrauma patients with physiological derangement from multiple injuries. Key is recognizing the borderline patient who may decompensate with definitive surgery. ISS greater than 20, bilateral femur fractures, or chest/head injury are triggers.

Second Hit Phenomenon

Major surgery is an inflammatory insult. In polytrauma, the patient is already in systemic inflammatory response. Adding surgery creates a second hit that can precipitate ARDS, MOF, and death. DCO delays this until inflammation subsides.

Physiological Parameters

Monitor lactate, pH, base deficit to assess resuscitation status. Do NOT proceed to definitive surgery until: pH greater than 7.25, lactate less than 4, base deficit less than 6, temperature greater than 35C, platelets greater than 50.

Timing of Definitive Surgery

Day 1-4: Window of opportunity (if patient very stable) or Day 5-10: Safe window after inflammatory response subsides. Avoid days 2-4 in borderline patients (peak inflammation).

Quick Decision Guide

Patient StatusPhysiologyFracture ManagementKey Pearl
StableNormal lactate, pH, hemodynamicsEarly Total Care (ETC) - definitive fixationThis is the majority of trauma patients
BorderlineModerate derangement, responding to resuscitationDCO - external fixation, reassess dailyThis group benefits most from DCO
UnstableOngoing hemorrhage, acidosis despite resuscitationDCO mandatory - minimal interventionDefinitive surgery would be fatal
In ExtremisMoribund, cardiac arrest, perimortemHemorrhage control only, no fracture fixationFocus on survival, not fractures
Mnemonic

DAMAGEDamage Control Orthopaedics Indications

D
Deteriorating patient
Worsening physiology despite resuscitation
A
Acidosis (pH less than 7.25)
Metabolic acidosis marker
M
Multiple injuries (ISS greater than 20)
Polytrauma patient
A
Associated chest/head injury
High-risk injury patterns
G
Grossly unstable hemodynamics
Persistent hypotension
E
External fixation indicated
Temporizing stabilization

Memory Hook:If DAMAGE is present, do DCO to prevent the second hit!

Mnemonic

SAFEPhysiological Thresholds for Surgery

S
Seven point two five pH minimum
pH greater than 7.25 required
A
Adequate platelets (greater than 50)
Coagulation function
F
Four or less lactate
Lactate less than 4 mmol/L
E
Eighteen degrees normal temp
Temperature greater than 35C (avoid hypothermia)

Memory Hook:Is the patient SAFE for definitive surgery? Check these parameters!

Mnemonic

STOPSecond Hit Prevention

S
Stabilize with external fixator
Temporary fracture control
T
Time to resuscitate
Allow physiological recovery
O
Optimize in ICU
Correct derangements
P
Proceed day 5-10
Definitive surgery when safe

Memory Hook:STOP the second hit - stabilize temporarily and optimize before definitive surgery!

Overview and Epidemiology

Definition

Damage Control Orthopaedics (DCO) is a staged approach to managing fractures in polytrauma patients. The concept involves temporary stabilization (usually external fixation) followed by delayed definitive surgery once the patient's physiology has normalized.

Historical Context

Evolution from ETC to DCO:

  • 1980s-1990s: Early Total Care (ETC) paradigm - early definitive fixation of all fractures
  • Femoral nailing within 24 hours became standard
  • Recognition that some patients deteriorated after early surgery
  • Second hit phenomenon described - surgery adds inflammatory insult
  • DCO concept developed for high-risk polytrauma patients

Rationale

The Second Hit Phenomenon:

  • Major trauma causes systemic inflammatory response (SIRS)
  • Additional surgical insult amplifies the inflammatory cascade
  • Can precipitate ARDS, MOF, and death
  • DCO minimizes surgical trauma until inflammation subsides

Not All Patients Need DCO

DCO is only for unstable or borderline patients. The majority of trauma patients (stable physiology) should receive Early Total Care (ETC) with definitive fixation. DCO in stable patients delays mobilization and increases infection risk.

Australian Context

Major trauma occurs throughout Australia with variable access to definitive care. DCO allows rural hospitals to stabilize fractures for safe transfer to tertiary trauma centers. External fixation is a core skill for all orthopaedic surgeons.

Pathophysiology

The Inflammatory Response to Trauma

First Hit - The Injury:

  • Tissue damage releases damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs)
  • Activation of innate immune system
  • Cytokine release: IL-1, IL-6, TNF-alpha
  • Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)
  • Compensatory anti-inflammatory response (CARS)

Second Hit - Surgical Insult:

  • Additional tissue damage from surgery
  • Further cytokine release
  • Tips the balance toward hyperinflammation
  • End-organ damage: lungs (ARDS), kidneys, liver
  • Multi-organ failure (MOF)

Patient Classification

Polytrauma Patient Categories

CategoryDefinitionPhysiologyManagement
StableIsolated injuries, responding to resuscitationNormal lactate, pH, hemodynamicsETC - definitive surgery
BorderlineMultiple injuries, moderate derangementLactate 2-4, mild acidosis, soft tissue injuryDCO vs ETC - individualized decision
UnstableOngoing hemorrhage, not respondingLactate greater than 4, pH less than 7.25, coagulopathyDCO mandatory
In ExtremisMoribund, cardiac arrest, perimortemUnresponsive to resuscitationHemorrhage control only

Borderline Patients are Key

Stable patients get ETC. Unstable patients get DCO. The decision-making challenge is the BORDERLINE patient. Use physiological parameters, injury pattern (ISS, chest injury), and clinical trajectory to decide. When in doubt, choose DCO.

Classification

Parameters to Guide Decision-Making

Pro-DCO Indicators (favor temporary fixation):

ParameterThresholdReasoning
pHLess than 7.25Significant acidosis indicates poor perfusion
LactateGreater than 4 mmol/LMarker of tissue hypoxia
Base deficitGreater than 6Reflects degree of metabolic derangement
TemperatureLess than 35°CHypothermia impairs coagulation
PlateletsLess than 50Coagulopathy, ongoing hemorrhage
TransfusionGreater than 10 units in 24hMassive transfusion = unstable
INRGreater than 1.5Coagulopathy

Note: These are guidelines, not absolute cutoffs. Clinical judgment remains essential.

High-Risk Injury Patterns Favoring DCO

Injury Severity Score (ISS):

  • ISS greater than 20 = major polytrauma
  • ISS greater than 40 = severe polytrauma

Specific Injury Patterns:

  • Bilateral femur fractures
  • Femur fracture + chest injury
  • Femur fracture + head injury (GCS less than 8)
  • Pelvic ring disruption with hemorrhage
  • Multiple long bone fractures

Associated Injuries:

📊 Management Algorithm
Spine trauma classification with DCO approach recommendations
Click to expand
Spine trauma classification and DCO approach algorithm. Type A (compression) injuries are generally stable. Type B (distraction) and Type C (rotational) patterns are unstable. For unstable patterns (B1-B3, C1-C2), damage control spine surgery using percutaneous posterior instrumentation is recommended in the polytraumatized patient, with secondary anterior surgery once physiologically optimized. This algorithm integrates injury mechanism, stability assessment, and appropriate surgical approach.Credit: Schmidt OI et al., World J Emerg Surg (PMC2660300) - CC-BY 4.0

Specific Injury Patterns Requiring DCO:

  • Pulmonary contusion
  • Flail chest
  • Traumatic brain injury
  • Major vascular injury

The Femur-Chest Combination

Femoral shaft fracture + chest injury is the classic DCO indication. Early femoral nailing increases pulmonary complications (fat embolism, ARDS). External fixation allows fracture stabilization without the second hit of intramedullary nailing.

Windows of Opportunity

Day 0-1 (First 24 hours):

  • Window of opportunity IF patient is stable
  • Before maximal inflammatory response
  • ETC appropriate for stable patients

Day 2-4 (Peak Inflammation):

  • Maximum inflammatory response
  • AVOID major surgery in borderline patients
  • DCO patients should be in ICU optimizing

Day 5-10 (Immunological Window):

  • Inflammation subsiding
  • Safe for definitive conversion
  • Optimal time for external fixator conversion to nail

Day 10+ (Late Window): Infection risk increases and callus formation complicates surgery. Still preferable to operating during the inflammatory peak.

Clinical Assessment

Primary Survey

  • ATLS principles first and foremost
  • Control hemorrhage - pelvic binder, tourniquet
  • Resuscitation with blood products
  • Identify all injuries - tertiary survey essential
  • Classify patient - stable, borderline, unstable, in extremis

Ongoing Assessment

  • Trend physiological parameters - improving or deteriorating?
  • Response to resuscitation - key decision point
  • Serial lactate - most useful single parameter
  • Reassess regularly - status can change rapidly
  • Team communication - trauma team, anesthesia, ICU

Key Clinical Findings

Signs of Inadequate Resuscitation:

  • Persistent tachycardia despite fluid
  • Ongoing blood product requirements
  • Rising or static lactate
  • Worsening acidosis
  • Cold peripheries, delayed capillary refill

Signs of Adequate Resuscitation:

  • Normalizing heart rate
  • Decreasing blood product requirement
  • Falling lactate
  • Improving acidosis
  • Warm peripheries, urine output greater than 0.5ml/kg/hr

Do NOT Trust Blood Pressure Alone

Young patients compensate well. Blood pressure may be normal despite significant blood loss. Use lactate, base deficit, and clinical signs to assess perfusion. Hypotension is a LATE sign of decompensation.

Investigations

Immediate and serialBlood Gas (ABG/VBG)
On arrivalFull Blood Count
On arrivalCoagulation Profile
After primary survey stableCT Trauma Series
During resuscitationROTEM/TEG

Laboratory Monitoring

ParameterPro-ETCBorderlinePro-DCO
pHGreater than 7.357.25-7.35Less than 7.25
LactateLess than 22-4Greater than 4
Base deficitLess than 44-6Greater than 6
TemperatureGreater than 36°C35-36°CLess than 35°C
PlateletsGreater than 10050-100Less than 50

Lactate is King

Serial lactate is the single most useful parameter. A falling lactate indicates adequate resuscitation. A rising lactate despite resuscitation indicates ongoing hemorrhage or inadequate perfusion - this patient needs DCO, not definitive surgery.

Management

📊 Management Algorithm
DCO decision algorithm flowchart for polytrauma patients
Click to expand
DCO Management Algorithm - Patient category-based decision pathway for stable, borderline, unstable, and in extremis patientsCredit: OrthoVellum

Damage Control Orthopaedics Strategy

Goals of DCO:

  • Temporary fracture stabilization
  • Minimize surgical insult ("second hit")
  • Control hemorrhage from fractures
  • Allow patient resuscitation and optimization
  • Enable safe transfer to ICU

Temporizing Measures:

  • External fixation - pelvis, femur, tibia, humerus
  • Splinting - forearm, ankle, foot
  • Spanning plates - alternative for some sites
  • Wound VAC - open fractures

What NOT to Do in DCO: Definitive ORIF, intramedullary nailing with extensive reaming, prolonged surgical time, or non-essential procedures.

Converting to Definitive Fixation

Prerequisites for Conversion:

  • pH greater than 7.25
  • Lactate less than 4 (ideally less than 2)
  • Base deficit less than 6
  • Temperature greater than 35°C
  • Platelets greater than 50,000
  • Off vasopressors (ideally)
  • Improving trajectory

Optimal Timing:

  • Day 5-10 after injury
  • Inflammation has subsided
  • Patient is physiologically optimized
  • Plan as semi-elective procedure

Conversion Procedures: External fixator to intramedullary nail, external fixator to plate fixation, or staged soft tissue procedures as needed.

Staged conversion from external fixation to intramedullary nailing
Click to expand
Staged DCO to definitive fixation conversion. After initial external fixator stabilization, this 38-year-old polytrauma patient underwent definitive fixation once physiologically optimized. (a) Cephalomedullary nail for the intertrochanteric fracture component. (b) Retrograde femoral nail for the distal shaft component. This represents the Day 5-10 'window of opportunity' for definitive surgery after inflammation subsides.Credit: von Rüden C et al., J Orthop Surg Res (PMC4335365) - CC-BY 4.0

Early Total Care Remains Standard for Stable Patients

ETC Indications (Stable Patient):

  • Normal physiological parameters
  • Isolated injuries or limited polytrauma
  • Responding well to resuscitation
  • No high-risk injury patterns

Benefits of ETC:

  • Single anesthetic
  • Early mobilization
  • Shorter hospital stay
  • Reduced infection risk
  • Better functional outcomes

Classic ETC Example: Isolated femoral shaft fracture with normal lactate and pH, hemodynamically stable - same-day intramedullary nail is appropriate.

Surgical Technique

Anterior Pelvic External Fixation

Indications:

  • Unstable pelvic ring injury
  • Ongoing hemorrhage
  • Temporary stabilization

Technique: Position supine. Identify ASIS and iliac crest. Make 2cm incision over iliac crest, 3cm posterior to ASIS. Insert 5mm Schanz pins under image guidance, aiming toward AIIS. Two pins per side. Apply connecting bar across anterior pelvis. Tighten frame to reduce and stabilize.

Alternative: Pelvic C-clamp for posterior injuries (higher risk, requires experience).

Femoral External Fixation

Indications:

  • Femoral shaft fracture in DCO patient
  • Bilateral femur fractures
  • Femur + chest injury

Technique: Position supine. Make small incisions for pin insertion. Proximal pins: lateral greater trochanter (subtrochanteric fractures) or lateral femur (shaft fractures). Distal pins: lateral distal femur, avoiding knee joint. Use 5-6mm Schanz pins with sleeve. Apply longitudinal bar and reduce fracture. Check alignment on fluoro.

Conversion: External fixator to nail at day 5-10 when patient stable.

Damage Control Spine Surgery

Indications:

  • Unstable spine fracture in polytrauma patient
  • Incomplete neurological injury requiring decompression
  • Spinal cord compression with deficit

Percutaneous Posterior Approach (Preferred for DCO):

  • Minimal soft tissue dissection
  • Image-guided pedicle screw insertion
  • Reduces surgical insult in unstable patient
  • Allows secondary anterior surgery when stable
Staged percutaneous spine DCO with secondary anterior surgery
Click to expand
Staged DCO approach to thoracolumbar burst fracture in a 32-year-old polytrauma patient. (A-D) Pre-operative CT demonstrating burst fracture pattern. (E-F) Initial damage control with percutaneous posterior pedicle screw fixation - minimal surgical trauma. (G-J) Secondary staged anterior corpectomy and cage reconstruction after patient optimization at Day 7. This approach minimizes the 'second hit' while achieving definitive stabilization.Credit: Schmidt OI et al., World J Emerg Surg (PMC2660300) - CC-BY 4.0
Comprehensive spine polytrauma case with staged posterior-anterior fixation
Click to expand
Comprehensive polytrauma spine case. (A-D) Pre-operative imaging with X-rays and CT showing T12 compression and L1 burst fracture. (E) Initial posterior stabilization with pedicle screws. (F-I) Staged anterior approach with corpectomy, cage reconstruction, and final circumferential fixation. This exemplifies the DCO philosophy in spine: posterior stabilization first to minimize initial surgical burden, anterior reconstruction once physiology allows.Credit: Schmidt OI et al., World J Emerg Surg (PMC2660300) - CC-BY 4.0

Complications

Complications of DCO vs ETC

ComplicationDCO RiskETC Risk
ARDSLower in unstable patientsHigher if done in unstable patient
Pin site infection5-10%N/A
Delayed unionPossible if prolonged external fixationLower
Multi-organ failureReduced by avoiding second hitHigher in unstable patient
VTESimilarSimilar

Complications of External Fixation:

  • Pin site infection (5-10%)
  • Pin loosening
  • Malunion if pins placed incorrectly
  • Nerve injury from pin placement
  • Conversion complexity if pins in nail path

Pin Site Infection and Conversion

Pin site infection increases risk of deep infection after conversion to internal fixation. If significant pin site infection develops, consider a staged approach: remove external fixator, treat infection, then definitive fixation after pin sites healed.

Postoperative Care

After DCO Stabilization

ImmediateDay 0-1
First weekDay 2-4
Second weekDay 5-10
After definitive surgeryPost-Conversion

Daily Reassessment

Review physiological parameters daily. The goal is to convert to definitive fixation as soon as safely possible. Prolonged external fixation increases infection risk and complicates conversion surgery.

Outcomes and Prognosis

Evidence for DCO

Key Outcomes:

  • Reduced ARDS in patients with femur + chest injury
  • Lower mortality in borderline/unstable patients
  • Comparable long-term outcomes when DCO used appropriately

Appropriate Patient Selection:

  • DCO in stable patients = worse outcomes (delayed care)
  • DCO in unstable patients = improved survival
  • Key is identifying the borderline patient

Selection Bias

DCO vs ETC studies suffer from selection bias. Sicker patients get DCO, so direct comparisons are challenging. The principle of minimizing surgical insult in the already-stressed patient remains sound.

Evidence Base and Key Trials

Bone LB - DCO Original Concept

4
Bone et al. • J Trauma (1989)
Key Findings:
  • First description of damage control orthopaedics concept
  • Observations of deterioration after early femoral nailing in polytrauma
  • Proposed staged management for high-risk patients
  • Foundational paper for DCO philosophy
Clinical Implication: DCO concept originated from observing worse outcomes with aggressive early surgery in unstable polytrauma patients.
Limitation: Descriptive study without randomized comparison.

Pape HC - Timing of Femoral Nailing

3
Pape et al. • J Trauma (2002)
Key Findings:
  • Retrospective analysis of timing of femoral nailing in polytrauma
  • Early nailing (less than 24h) safe in stable patients
  • Early nailing with chest injury increases ARDS risk (21% vs 4%)
  • Borderline patients benefit from delayed fixation
Clinical Implication: Femur + chest injury is the classic DCO indication. Early nailing increases pulmonary complications in this group.
Limitation: Retrospective design with potential selection bias.

Tuttle MS - Safe Definitive Surgery Timing

3
Tuttle et al. • J Orthop Trauma (2014)
Key Findings:
  • Analysis of timing for conversion from external fixation to definitive fixation
  • Day 5-10 is the safe window after initial inflammatory response subsides
  • Earlier conversion (day 2-4) associated with higher complication rates
  • Physiological parameters should guide timing decisions
Clinical Implication: Plan definitive fixation for day 5-10 when safe. Avoid the inflammatory peak of days 2-4.
Limitation: Single-center retrospective study.

Vallier HA - DCO vs ETC Outcomes

3
Vallier et al. • J Orthop Trauma (2013)
Key Findings:
  • Prospective comparison of DCO vs ETC in polytrauma
  • No difference in outcomes when patients appropriately selected
  • Key is correct patient categorization, not blanket approach
  • Physiological parameters predict need for DCO
Clinical Implication: Patient selection is critical. Stable patients do well with ETC; unstable patients require DCO.
Limitation: Non-randomized comparison; selection bias inherent.

Roberts CS - Borderline Patient Criteria

5
Roberts et al. • Injury (2005)
Key Findings:
  • Proposed criteria for identifying borderline patients
  • ISS greater than 20 = major polytrauma
  • Bilateral femur fractures = high risk
  • Femur + chest injury or head injury = DCO indicated
Clinical Implication: Use these criteria for decision-making in borderline patients: ISS greater than 20, bilateral femur, chest/head injury.
Limitation: Expert consensus; not validated in RCT.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOAdvanced

EXAMINER

"A 28-year-old male is brought to ED following a high-speed motor vehicle accident. He has bilateral femoral shaft fractures and a pulmonary contusion. His lactate is 4.5, pH 7.28, and he has required 6 units of blood in the ED. How would you manage his femoral fractures?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
For this classic DCO scenario. This patient has polytrauma with bilateral femur fractures and chest injury, exactly the injury pattern where DCO has been shown to reduce pulmonary complications. His physiology is borderline to unstable with elevated lactate and metabolic acidosis despite significant transfusion. I would apply damage control orthopaedics principles. For immediate management, I would continue resuscitation with blood products targeting correction of acidosis and coagulopathy. For his fractures, I would apply bilateral femoral external fixators as temporary stabilization. This can be done rapidly, minimizes surgical insult, and controls hemorrhage from fracture ends. I would then admit to ICU for optimization. I would monitor serial lactate, pH, and base deficit daily. When his parameters normalize, typically day 5-10, I would convert the external fixators to intramedullary nails as semi-elective procedures. The key principle is avoiding the second hit of major intramedullary nailing while he is in systemic inflammatory response.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Bilateral femur + chest injury is classic DCO indication
External fixators for temporary stabilization
Convert to IM nail day 5-10 when physiologically optimized
Avoid second hit of major surgery during inflammatory response
COMMON TRAPS
✗Proceeding with early IM nailing in an unstable patient
✗Not recognizing elevated lactate as sign of inadequate resuscitation
✗Focusing on fractures before completing resuscitation
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What are the specific physiological thresholds you use for decision-making?"
"How would your management differ if he had an isolated femoral fracture?"
"What are the risks of prolonged external fixation?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"Explain the concept of damage control orthopaedics and when you would apply it."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Damage control orthopaedics is a staged approach to fracture management in polytrauma patients. The concept is based on the second hit phenomenon - major surgery causes an inflammatory insult that can tip an already compromised patient toward ARDS and multi-organ failure. DCO involves three phases. First, temporary stabilization with external fixation or splinting to control hemorrhage and allow patient resuscitation. Second, a period of ICU optimization where we correct physiological derangements including acidosis, coagulopathy, and hypothermia. Third, conversion to definitive fixation when physiological parameters normalize, typically day 5-10. I would apply DCO in unstable patients with ongoing hemorrhage or significant physiological derangement, particularly with high-risk injury patterns like bilateral femur fractures, femur with chest injury, or ISS greater than 20. Importantly, stable patients should receive early total care with definitive fixation as this provides better functional outcomes. The challenge is the borderline patient where careful assessment of physiological parameters guides decision-making.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Three phases: temporary stabilization, ICU optimization, definitive fixation
Second hit phenomenon is the rationale
Day 5-10 is safe window for conversion
Stable patients should receive ETC, not DCO
COMMON TRAPS
✗Applying DCO to stable patients (delays care unnecessarily)
✗Not understanding the three phases of DCO
✗Converting during inflammatory peak (days 2-4)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What parameters would make you choose DCO over early total care?"
"Why is the femur-chest combination particularly high risk?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"A polytrauma patient had a femoral external fixator applied 3 days ago for DCO. Today their lactate is 1.5, pH 7.38, and they are hemodynamically stable off vasopressors. When would you convert to definitive fixation?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient has made excellent physiological recovery and is now in the safe window for conversion to definitive fixation. Given it is day 3 post-injury, I would consider my timing options carefully. Day 5-10 is generally considered the optimal window for conversion as the initial inflammatory response has subsided. However, if the patient is very well and all parameters are normalized, there is evidence that conversion can be safe from day 5 onwards. I would plan conversion for day 5-7, treating it as a semi-elective procedure with full theatre team and blood products available. Before proceeding, I would confirm ongoing stability with repeat blood gas on the day of surgery. For the procedure itself, I would remove the external fixator, prepare the pin sites carefully, and proceed with antegrade intramedullary nailing. I would position the patient on a fracture table with good fluoroscopy access. If there had been any pin site infection, I would stage the approach with external fixator removal, pin site treatment, and delayed nailing.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Day 5-10 is optimal conversion window
Confirm physiological parameters before surgery
Plan as semi-elective procedure
Stage if pin site infection present
COMMON TRAPS
✗Converting too early (days 2-4) during inflammatory peak
✗Not reassessing physiological parameters on day of surgery
✗Ignoring pin site infection risks
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if there was purulent discharge from a pin site?"
"Would you use reamed or unreamed nailing?"

MCQ Practice Points

Second Hit Phenomenon Question

Q: What is the 'second hit' phenomenon in polytrauma management? A: Major surgery causes an additional inflammatory insult to an already compromised patient. This can precipitate ARDS and multi-organ failure. DCO minimizes this by delaying definitive surgery until the initial inflammatory response subsides.

DCO Indications Question

Q: What are the physiological thresholds that indicate a patient needs DCO rather than ETC? A: pH less than 7.25, lactate greater than 4 mmol/L, base deficit greater than 6, temperature less than 35°C, platelets less than 50,000. Also consider DCO for ISS greater than 20, bilateral femur fractures, or femur + chest/head injury.

Timing of Conversion Question

Q: When is the optimal time to convert external fixation to definitive fixation in DCO patients? A: Day 5-10 after injury. This is the immunological window after the initial inflammatory peak (days 2-4) has subsided. Convert when physiological parameters normalize (lactate less than 2, pH greater than 7.35).

Patient Categories Question

Q: What are the four patient categories in DCO decision-making? A: Stable (ETC appropriate), Borderline (individualized decision based on parameters), Unstable (DCO mandatory), In Extremis (hemorrhage control only, no fracture fixation).

Femur-Chest Combination Question

Q: Why is femoral fracture + chest injury a classic DCO indication? A: Early femoral nailing increases pulmonary complications in patients with chest injury (21% ARDS vs 4% with DCO). External fixation allows fracture stabilization without the second hit of intramedullary reaming.

Lactate Monitoring Question

Q: What is the single most useful parameter for monitoring resuscitation adequacy in polytrauma? A: Serial lactate. Falling lactate indicates adequate tissue perfusion. Rising or static lactate despite resuscitation suggests ongoing hemorrhage or inadequate perfusion - this patient needs DCO approach.

Australian Context

Trauma System

  • Major trauma centers in capital cities
  • Rural/remote patients transferred after stabilization
  • DCO allows safe inter-hospital transfer
  • Retrieval services coordinate complex transfers

Training Requirements

  • External fixation is SET competency requirement
  • All orthopaedic trainees should be proficient
  • Pelvic external fixation for hemorrhage control
  • EMST course teaches DCO principles

Rural and Remote Considerations

DCO is particularly relevant for rural Australia. Patients may require stabilization at a regional hospital before transfer. External fixation allows fracture control for safe transport over long distances.

DAMAGE CONTROL ORTHOPAEDICS

High-Yield Exam Summary

Patient Categories

  • •Stable: ETC - definitive fixation
  • •Borderline: Decision point - use parameters
  • •Unstable: DCO mandatory
  • •In Extremis: Hemorrhage control only

DCO Indications

  • •pH less than 7.25
  • •Lactate greater than 4
  • •ISS greater than 20
  • •Bilateral femur or femur + chest injury
  • •Ongoing hemorrhage despite resuscitation

Second Hit Phenomenon

  • •Surgery is inflammatory insult
  • •Can precipitate ARDS, MOF
  • •DCO minimizes surgical trauma
  • •Allow inflammation to subside

Timing

  • •Day 0-1: Window of opportunity if stable
  • •Day 2-4: Avoid surgery (peak inflammation)
  • •Day 5-10: Safe window for conversion
  • •Monitor lactate, pH, base deficit
Quick Stats
Reading Time82 min
Related Topics

Acetabular Fractures

Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries

Acute Compartment Syndrome

Ankle Fractures