EXTENSOR TENDON RECONSTRUCTION
Tendon Transfers | Grafts | Chronic Deficiency
Extensor Zones (Kleinert-Verdan)
Critical Must-Knows
- Full passive ROM is mandatory before any reconstruction attempt.
- EIP to EPL transfer is the gold standard for isolated EPL rupture.
- Timing: 3-6 months post-injury for scar maturation before reconstruction.
- Palmaris longus is the first-choice donor for free tendon grafts.
- Pulvertaft weave (3-4 weaves) is the standard tendon attachment technique.
- Vaughan-Jackson syndrome: Sequential ulnar-to-radial extensor ruptures in rheumatoid arthritis.
Examiner's Pearls
- "Always assess passive ROM before planning reconstruction
- "Two-stage reconstruction for severe scarring/adhesions
- "Rheumatoid cases require DRUJ synovectomy to prevent recurrence
- "Set tension with wrist neutral, MCP 45 degrees flexion
Clinical Imaging
Imaging Gallery




Critical Extensor Reconstruction Concepts
Passive ROM Prerequisite
Reconstruction fails if joints are stiff. Must achieve full passive ROM at all joints before attempting any extensor reconstruction. Release contractures first, reconstruct tendons second.
EIP to EPL Transfer
Gold standard for EPL rupture. EIP is expendable (EDC maintains index extension), has similar excursion to EPL, and provides 90-95% success rate for thumb extension restoration.
Tendon Graft Selection
Palmaris longus first choice. Present in 85%, provides 12-15cm length, minimal donor morbidity. Alternatives: plantaris (30cm), toe extensors, or ECRL slip.
Two-Stage Technique
For severe scarring. Stage 1: Silicone rod creates pseudosheath (3 months). Stage 2: Replace rod with tendon graft. Success rate 70-80% in difficult cases.
At a Glance
Extensor tendon reconstruction addresses chronic deficiency after failed primary repair or delayed presentation, with full passive ROM as an absolute prerequisite - stiff joints guarantee failure. EIP to EPL transfer is the gold standard for isolated EPL rupture (90-95% success rate), while palmaris longus is the first-choice free graft donor (present in 85%, 12-15cm length). Timing is 3-6 months post-injury for scar maturation. For severe scarring, two-stage reconstruction using a silicone rod to create a pseudosheath yields 70-80% success. In rheumatoid cases (Vaughan-Jackson syndrome), DRUJ synovectomy is mandatory to prevent recurrent ruptures.
DIP-MID-PIP-PROX-MCP-META-WRIST-FOREARMExtensor Zones of the Hand
Memory Hook:Start at the fingertip (DIP) and work proximally to remember extensor zones!
EIP BESTTendon Transfer Donors
Memory Hook:EIP BEST = the best expendable donors for extensor reconstruction!
SMARTReconstruction Prerequisites
Memory Hook:Be SMART before reconstruction - assess all prerequisites carefully!
Overview and Epidemiology
Extensor tendon reconstruction addresses chronic extensor deficiency through tendon transfers (rerouting expendable donors) or tendon grafts (bridging gaps with free tissue). Success depends on preserved passive joint mobility, appropriate donor selection, proper surgical technique, and intensive hand therapy.
Epidemiology
Chronic Extensor Deficiency:
- Failed primary repairs: 10-15% of acute extensor repairs develop chronic lag
- Delayed presentations: 20-30% of extensor injuries present beyond acute repair window
- Rheumatoid ruptures: Affect 10-15% of RA patients with wrist synovitis
- EPL ruptures post-Colles: 0.5-3% incidence, typically 4-12 weeks post-fracture
Demographics:
- Age distribution: Bimodal - young adults (traumatic), older adults (rheumatoid/atraumatic)
- Gender: Males greater than females for traumatic (3:1), females greater than males for rheumatoid (3:1)
- Occupation: Manual laborers, machinery operators at higher risk for trauma
Common Scenarios Requiring Reconstruction:
| Etiology | Typical Presentation | Preferred Technique |
|---|---|---|
| EPL rupture post-Colles | Loss of thumb IP extension 4-12 weeks post-fracture | EIP to EPL transfer |
| Rheumatoid sequential ruptures | Progressive loss of finger extension (ulnar to radial) | Side-to-side transfers, ECRB to EDC |
| Failed Zone V-VII repair | Chronic extensor lag after laceration repair | Free tendon graft or two-stage |
| Segmental tendon loss | Trauma with tissue loss | Free tendon graft (palmaris longus) |
| Post-burn contracture | Adherent extensors, MCP hyperextension | Tenolysis vs two-stage reconstruction |
Natural History Without Reconstruction
Functional Deficit Patterns:
- Thumb EPL loss: Inability to extend IP joint, weak pinch, difficulty with precision tasks
- Finger EDC loss: Extensor lag at MCP, compensatory hyperextension at IP joints
- Wrist extensor loss: Wrist drop, severe functional impairment
Adaptive Mechanisms:
- Adjacent tendon hypertrophy: Partial compensation from neighboring extensors
- Intrinsic muscle compensation: Limited MCP extension via intrinsics (inadequate)
- Functional adaptation: Activity modification, assistive devices
Anatomy and Pathophysiology

Passive ROM is Non-Negotiable
Cannot reconstruct active extension if passive range is limited. Stiff joints from arthritis, contracture, or adhesions must be addressed first through contracture release, joint mobilization, or arthrodesis. No tendon reconstruction will overcome fixed joint stiffness.
Extensor Anatomy
Thumb Extensors:
-
EPL (Extensor Pollicis Longus): Extends thumb IP and MCP joints, radial deviates wrist
- Origin: Ulna mid-shaft, interosseous membrane
- Course: Third dorsal compartment around Lister's tubercle
- Insertion: Distal phalanx base (dorsal)
- Excursion: 5-7cm
-
EPB (Extensor Pollicis Brevis): Extends thumb MCP joint
- First dorsal compartment with APL
- Insertion: Proximal phalanx base
-
APL (Abductor Pollicis Longus): Abducts and extends CMC joint
- First dorsal compartment
- Multiple insertions common
Finger Extensors:
-
EDC (Extensor Digitorum Communis): Common extensor to all four fingers
- Fourth dorsal compartment
- Interconnections via juncturae tendinum
- Independent MCP extension capability
-
EIP (Extensor Indicis Proprius): Independent index extensor
- Fifth dorsal compartment (with EDM)
- Lies ulnar to EDC index at MCP level
- Expendable donor - EDC provides adequate index extension
-
EDM (Extensor Digiti Minimi): Independent small finger extensor
- Fifth dorsal compartment
- Often duplicated
- Partially expendable
Extensor Hood Mechanism:
- Central slip inserts on middle phalanx base (PIP extension)
- Lateral bands join terminal tendon at DIP (DIP extension)
- Sagittal bands stabilize extensor at MCP (prevent subluxation)
- Intrinsics contribute via lateral bands

Expendable Donor Tendons
| Donor | Function Lost | Compensation | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| EIP | Independent index extension | EDC extends index adequately | None - ideal donor |
| Palmaris longus | Weak wrist flexion | FCR/FCU maintain flexion | Absent in 15% |
| EDM | Independent small extension | EDC extends small finger | Weakens small finger extension |
| ECRL slip | Slight wrist extension loss | ECRB/ECU maintain extension | Limited length |
| Plantaris | Trivial plantar flexion loss | Gastrocnemius/soleus maintain function | Requires foot incision |

Pathophysiology of Extensor Failure
Traumatic Extensor Loss
Mechanisms:
- Laceration injuries: Clean division allowing primary repair
- Crush/avulsion: Segmental loss requiring grafting
- Degloving: Extensive soft tissue damage, compromised healing
- Closed rupture: Forceful flexion against resistance (Zone V-VII)
Failed Primary Repair:
- Gap formation: Inadequate repair strength, excessive tension
- Adhesion formation: Insufficient early mobilization, excessive scarring
- Re-rupture: Premature rehabilitation, weak repair construct
- Tendon necrosis: Vascular compromise, infection
Chronic Presentation:
- Retraction: Proximal tendon retracts to muscle-tendon junction
- Muscle contracture: Myostatic contracture after 3-6 months
- Distal stump fibrosis: Scar tissue replaces distal tendon
- Joint stiffness: Secondary contractures from prolonged immobility
This pathophysiology necessitates reconstruction rather than delayed primary repair.
Biomechanical Principles
Tendon Excursion Requirements:
- Finger extensors (EDC): 5-6cm excursion for full MCP-IP motion
- Thumb extensors (EPL): 5-7cm excursion for full MCP-IP motion
- Wrist extensors: 3-4cm excursion for wrist motion
Donor-Recipient Matching:
- Match excursion requirements (EIP and EPL both 5-7cm - perfect match)
- Match direction of pull (straight line reduces friction)
- Match muscle strength (adequate motor power)
Tension Setting Principles:
- Wrist position: Neutral (0 degrees flexion-extension)
- MCP position: 45 degrees flexion for fingers, extended for thumb
- Test intraoperatively: Passive wrist motion should produce reciprocal finger motion (tenodesis effect)
- Avoid over-tensioning: Causes swan-neck deformity, joint stiffness
- Avoid under-tensioning: Results in extensor lag
Classification Systems
Reconstruction Type Classification
| Type | Technique | Indications | Success Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tendon Transfer | Reroute expendable donor to deficient extensor | Isolated loss, good vascularity, supple joints | 85-95% |
| Free Tendon Graft | Bridge gap with palmaris/plantaris | Segmental loss, clean wound | 75-85% |
| Side-to-Side Transfer | Connect adjacent EDC slips | Single EDC rupture with intact neighbors | 85-90% |
| Two-Stage Reconstruction | Stage 1: rod; Stage 2: graft | Severe scarring, adhesions, failed prior surgery | 70-80% |
Decision Algorithm by Clinical Scenario
For Isolated EPL Rupture:
- First choice: EIP to EPL transfer (90-95% success)
- If EIP unavailable: ECRB to EPL transfer (85-90% success)
- If both unavailable: Free palmaris longus graft (75-85% success)
For Single EDC Rupture:
- Adjacent tendon intact: Side-to-side transfer (85-90% success)
- Border digits: EIP (index) or EDM (small) to ruptured EDC (85% success)
- Central digits: Free graft if side-to-side inadequate (75-80% success)
For Multiple EDC Ruptures (Rheumatoid):
- Two ruptures: EIP to ulnar-most, side-to-side for radial (80-85% success)
- Three ruptures: ECRB to all EDC tendons with free grafts (75-85% success)
- Four or more: ECRB to EDC plus EIP to EPL if involved (70-80% success)
For Severe Scarring/Failed Prior Surgery:
- Two-stage reconstruction: Silicone rod (stage 1) then graft (stage 2) (70-80% success)
Zone-Specific Considerations
| Zone | Injury Pattern | Reconstruction Option | Special Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| I (DIP) | Mallet deformity | Terminal tendon advancement, free graft, fusion | Fusion often preferred if chronic |
| II-III (Middle phalanx, PIP) | Boutonniere deformity | Central slip reconstruction, lateral band rerouting | Complex - may need staged approach |
| IV-V (Proximal phalanx, MCP) | Extensor lag | Direct repair if acute, free graft if chronic | Good prognosis zone |
| VI (Metacarpal) | Clean laceration | Primary repair usually successful | Reconstruction rarely needed |
| VII (Wrist) | EPL rupture classic site | EIP to EPL transfer | Excellent outcomes |
| VIII (Forearm) | Muscle-tendon disruption | Direct repair vs free graft | Long immobilization needed |
Clinical Presentation
History
Chief Complaint:
- Inability to extend specific digit(s) or thumb
- Extensor lag: Incomplete extension despite effort
- Triggering/catching: Suggests adhesions rather than rupture
- Progressive weakness: Rheumatoid pattern
Timeline:
- Acute onset: Laceration, closed rupture (recent trauma)
- Subacute (weeks): Post-Colles EPL rupture (4-12 weeks)
- Progressive (months): Rheumatoid sequential ruptures
- Chronic (greater than 6 months): Failed repairs, late presentation
Functional Impact:
- Thumb EPL loss: Difficulty with precision pinch, turning keys, opening jars
- Finger EDC loss: Inability to release objects, weak grip, compensatory IP hyperextension
- Multiple digit involvement: Severe hand dysfunction, inability to work
Previous Interventions:
- Prior surgery: Number of procedures, types, outcomes
- Splinting history: Response to dynamic extension splints
- Therapy compliance: Intensive therapy required for success
Physical Examination
Inspection:
- Resting posture: Affected digit(s) in relative flexion
- Surgical scars: Indicate prior attempts, scar quality
- Skin quality: Thin, scarred skin suggests difficult reconstruction
- Muscle wasting: Thenar atrophy (EPL loss), forearm atrophy (long-standing)
Palpation:
- Tendon continuity: Palpate extensor mass during attempted extension
- Present: Thickened cord suggests intact but adherent tendon
- Absent: Gap or no palpable structure confirms rupture
- Distal DRUJ: Dorsal prominence, synovitis (rheumatoid)
- Muscle contraction: Palpable forearm muscle contraction despite no distal motion confirms rupture
Range of Motion:
Critical Assessment - PASSIVE ROM FIRST:
- PIPJ passive flexion-extension: Must be full (0-100 degrees)
- DIPJ passive flexion-extension: Must be full (0-80 degrees)
- MCP passive flexion-extension: Must be full (0-90 degrees)
- Thumb IP/MCP passive motion: Must be full
- Wrist passive motion: Should be functional (30-60 degrees flexion-extension)
If passive ROM limited - STOP. Address joint stiffness before any tendon work.
Active ROM:
- Isolated tendon testing:
- EPL: Extend thumb IP with hand flat on table (positive test = cannot lift thumb)
- EIP: Extend index finger with others flexed and held
- EDC: Extend each finger independently
- Extensor lag measurement: Degrees from full passive extension to active extension
- Compensatory patterns: IP hyperextension, intrinsic recruitment
Special Tests:
EPL Rupture Test:
- Hand flat on table, palm down
- Patient attempts to lift thumb off table
- Positive: Thumb remains flat (EPL ruptured)
- Negative: Thumb lifts easily (EPL intact)
Juncturae Tendinum Test:
- Immobilize middle, ring fingers in flexion
- Attempt index or small finger extension independently
- Limited extension: Dependent on juncturae (true independent extensor lost)
Intrinsic Tightness Test:
- Passively extend MCP joint, attempt PIP flexion
- Limited PIP flexion with MCP extended: Intrinsic tightness present
- Differentiate from extensor tightness (limits PIP flexion with MCP flexed)
Differential Diagnosis
| Presentation | Differential | Distinguishing Features |
|---|---|---|
| Loss of thumb IP extension | EPL rupture, PIN palsy, arthritis | PIN affects all extensors; arthritis has pain, crepitus |
| Loss of finger MCP extension | EDC rupture, PIN palsy, sagittal band rupture | PIN affects wrist extensors too; sagittal band = acute trauma with subluxation |
| Progressive finger drop | Rheumatoid ruptures, attrition from hardware, compartment syndrome | Rheumatoid has systemic disease; hardware visible on x-ray; compartment syndrome acute |
| Extensor lag with palpable tendon | Adhesions, partial rupture, extension contracture | Passive greater than active ROM; triggering sensation; contracture limits passive flexion |
Investigations
Imaging
Radiographs (AP, Lateral, Oblique):
Indications: All chronic extensor deficiency cases
Findings to assess:
- Bony prominences: Distal ulna (Vaughan-Jackson), Lister's tubercle (EPL rupture site)
- Malunion: Distal radius dorsal angulation causing tendon attrition
- Hardware: Prominent screws/plates causing mechanical attrition
- Arthritis: DRUJ, wrist, finger joints affecting reconstruction candidacy
- Fracture healing: Confirm union before reconstruction (Colles cases)
Ultrasound:
Indications:
- Confirm rupture vs adhesions
- Locate retracted tendon ends
- Assess tendon quality
Technique: High-frequency linear probe (greater than 10 MHz), dynamic assessment
Findings:
- Complete rupture: Tendon discontinuity, retracted stumps, gap
- Partial rupture: Thinned tendon, partial continuity
- Adhesions: Intact tendon with limited excursion
- Synovitis: Hypoechoic fluid around tendons (rheumatoid)
Advantages: Real-time, dynamic assessment, low cost, no radiation
MRI (T1, T2, STIR sequences):
Indications:
- Uncertain diagnosis
- Pre-operative planning for complex cases
- Assessment of muscle quality (atrophy, fatty infiltration)
- Evaluation of joint pathology
Findings:
- Tendon rupture: Signal discontinuity, tendon retraction, fluid in sheath
- Tendon quality: Thickened (chronic inflammation), thinned (attrition)
- Muscle atrophy: Reduced muscle bulk, T1 hyperintensity (fatty infiltration)
- Synovitis: T2/STIR hyperintensity around DRUJ, wrist
- Scar tissue: T1/T2 hypointensity in tendon bed
Limitations: Expensive, time-consuming, claustrophobia
Electrodiagnostic Studies (EMG/NCS):
Indications: Suspected nerve injury (PIN palsy) masquerading as tendon rupture
Findings:
- PIN palsy: Denervation in all finger/thumb extensors, wrist extensors (ECRB) spared
- Tendon rupture: Normal motor units, voluntary recruitment present
Useful to differentiate neurologic from tendon pathology.
Laboratory Studies
Rheumatoid Cases:
- Inflammatory markers: ESR, CRP (assess disease activity)
- Rheumatoid factor: Confirm RA diagnosis
- Anti-CCP antibodies: More specific for RA
Infection workup (if concerned):
- CBC: Leukocytosis suggests infection
- Blood cultures: If systemic signs
- Wound cultures: If draining sinus
Preoperative Assessment
Passive ROM Documentation:
- Critical: Measure and document passive ROM all joints
- Photography: Consider photos documenting passive motion
- Consent discussion: If passive ROM limited, discuss joint surgery first
Donor Availability:
- Palmaris longus test: Oppose thumb to small finger, flex wrist - look for central cord
- Present: 85% of population
- Absent: Consider plantaris or ECRL
- EIP presence: Should be present in all patients (very rare congenital absence)
Soft Tissue Assessment:
- Skin quality: Thin/scarred skin may require flap coverage
- Previous incisions: Plan incisions to avoid skin necrosis
- Infection history: Delay reconstruction if recent infection
Patient Factors:
- Occupation: Return to work expectations, timeline
- Hand dominance: Dominant hand may justify more aggressive reconstruction
- Therapy access: Access to certified hand therapist essential
- Compliance: Realistic assessment of ability to follow complex protocol
Management
Timing is Critical
Do NOT reconstruct before 3 months post-injury - scar tissue must mature. Do NOT delay beyond 6-12 months - muscle contracture and joint stiffness worsen outcomes. Optimal window: 3-6 months.
Non-Operative Management
Indications:
- Minimal functional deficit (patient acceptance)
- Severe medical comorbidities prohibiting surgery
- Inadequate passive ROM with refusal of joint surgery
- Very elderly/low-demand patients
Options:
Dynamic Extension Splinting:
- Relative indication: Recent rupture (less than 3 months), partial ruptures
- Mechanism: Outrigger provides passive extension force
- Duration: 6-12 weeks continuous wear
- Success: Low for complete ruptures (less than 20%), better for adhesions
Activity Modification:
- Adaptive equipment (built-up handles, key turners)
- Occupational therapy for compensatory strategies
- Acceptable for low-demand patients
Outcomes: Persistent functional deficit, progressive joint contracture, patient dissatisfaction common
Surgical Reconstruction
Patient Selection Criteria
Essential Prerequisites (SMART):
- Supple joints - Full passive ROM at all involved joints
- Mature scar - Minimum 3 months since injury/prior surgery
- Adequate soft tissue - Healthy skin coverage, no active infection
- Realistic expectations - Understanding of limitations, therapy commitment
- Therapy access - Access to certified hand therapist
Contraindications:
- Absolute: Active infection, inadequate passive ROM, unrealistic expectations
- Relative: Severe medical comorbidities, poor soft tissue, smoking (cessation 4 weeks pre-op)
Reconstruction Techniques
EIP to EPL Transfer Technique
Gold Standard for EPL Rupture
Indications:
- Chronic EPL rupture (post-Colles, rheumatoid, idiopathic)
- Failed EPL primary repair
- EPL loss from trauma
Advantages:
- EIP expendable (EDC provides adequate index extension)
- Similar excursion to EPL (5-7cm)
- Direct line of pull after rerouting
- Excellent success rate (90-95%)
Patient Positioning:
- Supine, arm on hand table
- Tourniquet on upper arm (250 mmHg)
- Hand pronated
Surgical Approach - Three Incisions:
Incision 1 - Dorsal Index MCP (2cm longitudinal):
- Identify EIP tendon (ulnar to EDC at MCP level)
- Typically both tendons visible to index - EIP is ulnar
- Tag EIP with marking suture
- Divide EIP as distally as possible (at extensor hood)
- Retrieve EIP proximally with traction
Incision 2 - Dorsal Wrist/Distal Forearm (4-5cm):
- Center over Lister's tubercle
- Extend 4cm proximally over EPL muscle belly
- Identify third dorsal compartment (EPL)
- Open compartment - find EPL distal stump (may be attenuated)
- Trace EPL muscle belly proximally - excise degenerated tendon
- Create subcutaneous tunnel from wrist incision to thumb (radial side)
Incision 3 - Thumb Dorsal IP Joint (1.5cm):
- Longitudinal over IP joint dorsum
- Identify EPL insertion on distal phalanx base
- Prepare EPL stump by freshening if adequate tissue
- If no distal stump: create bone tunnel in distal phalanx
Transfer Procedure:
- Retrieve EIP from index incision into wrist incision
- Pass EIP subcutaneously around radial wrist (mimic EPL course)
- Thread EIP through subcutaneous tunnel to thumb incision
- Weave EIP to EPL stump using Pulvertaft weave:
- Create 4-6mm longitudinal slit in EPL stump
- Pass EIP through slit
- Create second slit 5mm distal, pass EIP through again
- Repeat for 3-4 total weaves
- Suture each weave with 4-0 Ethibond/FiberWire
- Set tension: Wrist neutral, thumb MCP/IP joints extended (can passively flex to neutral)
- Intraoperative test: Passive wrist flexion extends thumb; wrist extension allows thumb flexion
- Trim excess EIP tendon
If no EPL distal stump available:
- Drill 2mm bone tunnel from dorsal to volar distal phalanx base
- Pass EIP through tunnel
- Suture to periosteum or button over volar pulp
Closure:
- Skin only (5-0 nylon or subcuticular)
- Avoid deep sutures (restrict glide)
Immobilization:
- Thumb spica splint
- Wrist 30 degrees extension
- Thumb CMC, MCP, IP extended
- Duration: 4 weeks
This technique provides excellent thumb extension restoration with minimal donor morbidity.
Addressing Underlying Pathology
Rheumatoid Cases - MUST ADDRESS DRUJ:
- DRUJ synovectomy: Remove inflammatory synovium
- Darrach procedure: Distal ulna excision (most common)
- Sauve-Kapandji: DRUJ fusion with proximal pseudarthrosis (preserves stability)
- Failure to address DRUJ: High re-rupture rate (up to 30%)
Post-Traumatic Cases:
- Remove prominent hardware: Screws, plates causing mechanical attrition
- Correct malunion: Osteotomy if severe dorsal angulation causing attrition
- Release scar/adhesions: Tenolysis of surrounding structures
Post-Burn Cases:
- Z-plasties: Lengthen contracted skin
- Skin grafts: Provide adequate soft tissue coverage
- Flap coverage: If deep structures exposed
Surgical Pearls and Pitfalls


Technical Pearls
Pulvertaft Weave Optimization:
- Three weaves minimum: Provides 80% strength
- Four weaves ideal: Provides 90% strength, optimal balance bulk vs strength
- Suture technique: Horizontal mattress preferred over simple sutures (better purchase)
- Taper final end: Smooth transition reduces catching sensation
Tension Setting Mastery:
- Critical determinant of outcome: Over-tension (swan-neck), under-tension (lag)
- Standard position: Wrist neutral, MCP 45 degrees flexion
- Intraoperative test: Passive wrist flexion should extend fingers reciprocally
- Allowance for stretch: Set slightly tighter than desired (grafts stretch 10-15% over 3 months)
Donor Tendon Harvest:
- Palmaris identification: Resist thumb opposition against resistance - central cord most prominent
- Tendon stripper use: Requires experience - can transect tendon if improper technique
- Tag orientation: Mark proximal vs distal end (maintain correct orientation during weaving)
Incision Planning:
- Avoid perpendicular scars: Zigzag or S-incisions prevent contracture
- Respect previous scars: Incorporate when possible, maintain blood supply
- Minimize skin trauma: Careful handling prevents wound complications
Common Pitfalls and Avoidance
Attempting Reconstruction with Stiff Joints:
- Error: Proceeding despite limited passive ROM
- Consequence: Reconstruction fails, wasted surgery
- Avoidance: Mandatory passive ROM documentation pre-op; release contractures first
Inadequate Scar Maturation:
- Error: Reconstruction less than 3 months post-injury
- Consequence: Excessive adhesions, poor glide, re-rupture
- Avoidance: Wait 3-6 months unless soft tissues pristine
Improper Tension Setting:
- Over-tensioning:
- Consequence: Swan-neck deformity, joint stiffness, pain
- Avoidance: Set with MCP 45 degrees flexion, allow passive finger flexion intraoperatively
- Under-tensioning:
- Consequence: Persistent extensor lag, weak extension
- Avoidance: Set tension slightly tighter than desired (accounts for stretch)
Inadequate Weave Security:
- Error: Only 1-2 weaves, or inadequate suturing
- Consequence: Juncture failure, gap formation, rupture
- Avoidance: Minimum 3 weaves, horizontal mattress sutures each weave
Choosing Wrong Reconstruction Type:
- Error: Single-stage graft in severely scarred bed
- Consequence: Massive adhesions, non-functional result
- Avoidance: Two-stage for severe scarring; transfer over graft when possible
Neglecting Underlying Pathology (Rheumatoid):
- Error: Reconstructing tendons without addressing DRUJ synovitis
- Consequence: Re-rupture rate up to 30%
- Avoidance: ALWAYS perform DRUJ synovectomy + Darrach/S-K in rheumatoid cases
Excessive Bulk at Juncture:
- Error: Too many weaves, bunching of sutures
- Consequence: Adhesions, catching sensation, limited ROM
- Avoidance: Taper final end, trim excess, smooth juncture
Troubleshooting Intraoperative Issues
Cannot Pass Tendon Through Scarred Bed:
- Use infant feeding tube as guide
- Create new subcutaneous tunnel if old bed too scarred
- Consider two-stage approach
Insufficient Graft Length:
- Use plantaris (longer than palmaris)
- Use two palmaris grafts end-to-end
- Consider ECRL slip as augmentation
EIP Not Identifiable:
- Rare but possible (congenital absence)
- Use EDC slip to index finger as alternative
- Consider ECRB to EPL if no alternatives
Weak Distal Stump (Cannot Weave):
- Anchor graft directly to bone (drill tunnel)
- Use bone anchor or suture anchor
- Button technique over volar pulp
Postoperative Management and Rehabilitation
Extensor Reconstruction Rehabilitation Protocol
Splint Type: Dorsal blocking splint or thumb spica (EPL cases)
Position:
- Wrist 30 degrees extension
- MCP 0 degrees extension (fingers) or thumb extended (EPL)
- IP joints free (allow gentle passive motion)
Activity:
- No active extension (protected healing)
- Passive IP/DIP flexion allowed (prevents stiffness)
- Edema control: Elevation, Coban wrapping
Purpose: Protect juncture healing (Pulvertaft weave or bone insertion).
Remove splint for exercises, reapply between sessions
Exercises:
- Place-and-hold: Passively extend digit, actively hold position (10 sec x 10 reps)
- Active extension: Gentle active extension within comfortable range
- Blocking exercises: Isolate MCP extension (hold PIP/DIP in slight flexion)
- Tendon gliding: Hook fist → straight fist → full extension sequence
Activity:
- Light ADLs (eating, grooming)
- NO gripping, NO lifting greater than 500g
Therapist supervision: Essential - prevent over-aggressive motion, monitor for complications.
Discontinue splint (except nighttime if extensor lag present)
Exercises:
- Progressive strengthening: Putty (soft → medium → firm progression)
- Resistance bands: Gentle resistance to extension
- Grip strengthening: Begin gentle grip exercises
- Functional activities: Light work simulation
Activity:
- Return to light work (sedentary jobs)
- Avoid heavy lifting (still less than 5kg)
Monitor: Extensor lag (if increasing, decrease activity intensity).
Unrestricted activity by 10-12 weeks
Goals:
- Full ROM restoration (0-90 degrees MCP, 0-100 degrees PIP)
- Strength 80-90% of contralateral
- No extensor lag (or less than 10 degrees acceptable)
Activity:
- Return to full work duties
- Return to sport (contact sports week 12)
- Heavy lifting permitted
Long-term: Continue strengthening if weakness persists; dynamic splinting if extensor lag greater than 20 degrees.
Protocol Modifications by Reconstruction Type
EIP to EPL Transfer:
- Thumb spica splint (wrist, thumb extended)
- Emphasize IP joint motion early (prevent stiffness)
- Begin pinch strengthening week 6
Free Tendon Graft:
- More conservative progression (graft weaker than transfer initially)
- Extend immobilization to 5 weeks if concerned about healing
- Slower strengthening progression
Two-Stage Reconstruction:
- Same as free graft protocol
- Higher vigilance for adhesions (aggressive therapy if motion plateaus)
- Consider early tenolysis (6 months) if severe adhesions
Side-to-Side Transfer:
- Can be slightly more aggressive (less tension on repair)
- Buddy tape affected and donor digits weeks 4-8
- Independent finger exercises less critical (coupled motion expected)
Monitoring for Complications
Extensor Lag:
- Acceptable: Less than 10 degrees (functional outcome)
- Concerning: 10-20 degrees (may improve with therapy)
- Unacceptable: Greater than 20 degrees (consider revision if persists beyond 3 months)
Adhesions:
- Clinical sign: Passive ROM greater than active ROM (discrepancy greater than 20 degrees)
- Management: Intensive hand therapy, dynamic splinting
- Surgical: Tenolysis at 6 months if failed conservative management
Swan-Neck Deformity:
- Cause: Over-tensioned reconstruction → MCP hyperextension, PIP flexion
- Prevention: Proper tension setting intraoperatively
- Management: PIP extension splinting; if severe, may need reconstruction release
Joint Stiffness:
- Prevention: Early passive IP motion during immobilization phase
- Management: Aggressive therapy, dynamic splinting, manipulation under anesthesia if refractory
Complications and Salvage
Complications of Extensor Tendon Reconstruction
| Complication | Incidence | Prevention | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adhesions limiting glide | 15-25% | Early passive motion, minimize trauma | Intensive therapy, tenolysis at 6+ months |
| Rupture of transfer/graft | 5-10% | Adequate immobilization, proper tension | Revision reconstruction vs salvage |
| Persistent extensor lag | 10-20% | Proper tension setting, compliant therapy | Dynamic splinting, revision if greater than 30 degrees |
| Joint stiffness (IP/MCP) | 15-25% | Early passive IP motion | Aggressive therapy, manipulation, possible release |
| Swan-neck deformity | 5% | Avoid over-tensioning | PIP extension splinting, release if severe |
| Donor site morbidity | Less than 5% | Careful harvest technique | Usually resolves spontaneously |
| Infection | 2-3% | Sterile technique, prophylactic antibiotics | Antibiotics, possible debridement |
| Quadriga effect | Rare | Proper tension setting, avoid over-lengthening | Revision to adjust length |
Tendon Adhesions
Most common complication (15-25% incidence)
Clinical Presentation:
- Limited active extension with full passive extension
- Discrepancy between active and passive ROM (greater than 20 degrees)
- Palpable thickening/triggering along tendon course
- Plateau in ROM improvement despite therapy
Management:
-
Conservative (first-line):
- Intensive hand therapy (work-hardening protocol)
- Dynamic extension splinting (low-load prolonged stress)
- Tendon gliding exercises, massage, ultrasound therapy
- Duration: 3-6 months trial
-
Surgical Tenolysis:
- Timing: Minimum 6 months post-reconstruction (allow scar maturation)
- Technique: Release adhesions circumferentially around tendon, preserve juncture
- Post-op: Immediate active motion (regional anesthesia catheter for pain control)
- Outcomes: 60-75% improvement in ROM (some recurrent adhesion expected)
Rupture of Transfer/Graft
Incidence: 5-10% (higher in two-stage, rheumatoid cases)
Timing:
- Early (less than 6 weeks): Inadequate immobilization, poor healing, premature therapy
- Late (greater than 3 months): Attrition over prominence, re-injury
Clinical Presentation:
- Sudden loss of extension (may feel/hear pop)
- Return to pre-operative extensor lag or worse
- Palpable gap or absence of tendon on attempted extension
Management:
Acute Rupture (less than 3 weeks):
- Revision reconstruction: Re-explore, assess juncture
- If clean separation: Re-weave with additional passes
- If tissue poor: Use new graft, alternative donor
- Success: 60-70% (lower than primary)
Chronic Rupture (greater than 3 months):
- Tendons retracted, scarred, muscle contracted
- Options:
- Alternative reconstruction: Different donor, two-stage if not previously done
- Arthrodesis: MCP or IP fusion (salvage for thumb, less acceptable for fingers)
- Acceptance: If minimal functional deficit
Rheumatoid re-rupture: Address underlying disease (biologics), repeat DRUJ surgery
Persistent Extensor Lag
Incidence: 10-20%
Etiology:
- Under-tensioning at initial surgery (most common)
- Graft stretch: 10-15% elongation over months
- Adhesions: Limited glide mimics lag
- Weak donor: Inadequate motor power
- Joint contracture: Secondary joint stiffness
Assessment:
- Measure lag: Degrees from full passive to full active extension
- Passive ROM: Confirms joints supple (rules out contracture)
- Tendon excursion: Palpate during active extension
Management:
Lag less than 10 degrees:
- Acceptable functional outcome
- Continue strengthening
- No further intervention
Lag 10-20 degrees:
- Trial of intensive therapy (3 months)
- Dynamic extension splinting
- Consider revision if no improvement
Lag greater than 20 degrees:
- Non-functional lag - revision indicated
- Options:
- Re-tension reconstruction (shorten transfer/graft)
- Alternative donor if original weak
- Arthrodesis if joints arthritic
Salvage Options for Failed Reconstruction
Second Reconstruction Attempt:
- Use alternative donor (if EIP failed, try ECRB to EPL)
- Two-stage if single-stage failed
- Address adhesions (tenolysis), correct tension
Arthrodesis:
- Indications: Multiple failed reconstructions, arthritic joints, patient acceptance
- Thumb IP arthrodesis: Excellent option (most IP motion occurs at MCP anyway)
- Finger MCP arthrodesis: Less acceptable (loses critical motion)
- Position: Thumb IP 10-15 degrees flexion, finger MCP 25-35 degrees flexion
Acceptance:
- Patient education regarding realistic outcomes
- Occupational therapy for adaptive strategies
- Acceptable if lag less than 30 degrees, functional use preserved
Outcomes and Evidence Base
Expected Outcomes by Reconstruction Type
| Reconstruction Type | Success Rate | Return to Function | Complication Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| EIP to EPL transfer | 90-95% | 3-4 months | Less than 10% |
| Free tendon graft (single-stage) | 75-85% | 4-6 months | 15-20% |
| Two-stage reconstruction | 70-80% | 6-9 months | 20-30% |
| Side-to-side transfer | 85-90% | 3-4 months | 10-15% |
| Rheumatoid reconstructions | 60-80% | 4-6 months | 20-30% |
Prognostic Factors
Positive Prognostic Factors:
- Full passive ROM pre-operatively (most critical)
- Clean, well-vascularized soft tissues (traumatic greater than rheumatoid)
- Single tendon reconstruction (multiple tendons worse)
- Transfer over graft (vascularized tissue heals better)
- Patient compliance with therapy (essential)
- Non-smoker (smoking impairs tendon healing)
- Younger age (better healing potential)
Negative Prognostic Factors:
- Limited passive ROM pre-op (poor outcomes despite surgery)
- Multiple prior surgeries (scarring, adhesions)
- Rheumatoid arthritis (disease progression)
- Smoking (nicotine impairs healing)
- Diabetes (impaired healing)
- Poor compliance (inadequate therapy)
- EIP to EPL transfer: 90-95% good to excellent results
- Restoration of functional thumb extension in 95%
- Complication rate less than 10% (adhesions, lag)
- Patient satisfaction high (90% would repeat surgery)
- Independent index finger extension preserved via EDC
- Free palmaris longus grafts for extensor reconstruction
- 70-80% satisfactory outcomes (good-excellent ROM, function)
- Adhesions most common complication (20-25%)
- Two-stage superior to single-stage in scarred beds (75% vs 60%)
- Passive ROM prerequisite confirmed - all failures had pre-op stiffness
- Rheumatoid extensor ruptures: side-to-side and ECRB to EDC techniques
- 60-80% satisfactory outcomes (lower than traumatic)
- Re-rupture rate 15-20% (vs 5% traumatic)
- Disease progression affects long-term results
- DRUJ synovectomy + Darrach essential to prevent recurrence
- Two-stage reconstruction with silicone rod (Hunter rod)
- Pseudosheath formation over 3 months around rod
- 70-75% success in severely scarred beds (vs 40-50% single-stage)
- Technique revolutionized reconstruction in difficult cases
- Rod migration and infection potential complications
- Pulvertaft weave technique for tendon-to-tendon juncture
- 3 weaves = 80% strength, 4 weaves = 90% strength
- Large surface area for healing, low bulk
- Superior to end-to-end techniques (less gap, better healing)
- Became gold standard worldwide for tendon attachment
Long-Term Outcomes
Function at 2 Years:
- EIP to EPL: 95% maintain functional thumb extension
- Free grafts: 80% maintain functional extension (some stretch/lag)
- Rheumatoid: 70% maintain function (disease progression affects outcome)
Patient Satisfaction:
- High (greater than 85%) for traumatic cases with successful reconstruction
- Moderate (60-70%) for rheumatoid cases (expectation management critical)
- Low (less than 50%) for failed reconstructions
Return to Work:
- Sedentary work: 3-4 months typical
- Manual labor: 4-6 months, may need job modification
- High demand athletes: 6-9 months, some permanent limitation
Evidence Base
Key Evidence for Extensor Tendon Reconstruction
Systematic Review: Tendon Transfer Outcomes
Methods: Systematic review of 42 studies (1,847 patients) examining outcomes of tendon transfers for extensor reconstruction
Key Findings:
- Overall success rate 85-92% for radial nerve palsy transfers
- FCR to EDC transfer: Mean TAM 240° (range 180-270°)
- PT to ECRB transfer: 90% achieved functional wrist extension
- EIP to EPL transfer: 95% patient satisfaction
Conclusion: Standardized tendon transfers provide reliable outcomes with high patient satisfaction
Pulvertaft Weave vs. Side-to-Side Repair
Methods: Biomechanical comparison and clinical outcomes of 86 tendon transfers
Key Findings:
- Pulvertaft weave: Ultimate load 70-80N, 3 passes optimal
- Side-to-side: Ultimate load 50-60N, faster to perform
- Clinical outcomes equivalent at 1 year
- Pulvertaft preferred for primary repairs, side-to-side for revisions
Conclusion: Pulvertaft weave remains gold standard for primary transfers; 3 passes provide optimal strength
Staged Silicone Rod Reconstruction
Methods: Case series of 67 patients with complex extensor defects requiring staged reconstruction
Key Findings:
- Stage 1: Rod insertion, 6-8 weeks conditioning
- Stage 2: Tendon grafting with 75% excellent results
- Palmaris longus graft most commonly used
- Synovitis rate 8% with Hunter rods
Conclusion: Two-stage reconstruction indicated for extensive scarring or failed primary repair
Australian Context
Rehabilitation Standards:
- Hand therapy essential post-operatively (typically 12-16 sessions)
- WorkCover protocols support 12-16 weeks recovery for manual workers
- TAC guidelines align with 4-6 month return to full function
Exam Viva Scenarios
Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination
Scenario 1: EPL Rupture Post-Colles Fracture
"A 62-year-old woman presents 8 weeks after successful closed reduction and casting of a displaced distal radius fracture. She has sudden onset inability to extend her thumb IP joint that occurred 2 days ago without trauma. Fracture is healed on x-ray. Examination shows inability to actively extend thumb IP joint, but full passive motion. She can palpate EPL muscle contraction in forearm. What is your diagnosis and management?"
Scenario 2: Rheumatoid Sequential Extensor Ruptures
"A 58-year-old woman with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis presents with progressive inability to extend her small and ring fingers at the MCP joints over the past 2 months. She has prominent distal ulna dorsally and synovial thickening at the wrist. Examination shows inability to actively extend small and ring finger MCPs, but passive extension is full. Middle finger extension is weak. What is your diagnosis and surgical management?"
Scenario 3: Failed Extensor Repair with Severe Scarring
"A 35-year-old carpenter had EDC lacerations to index and middle fingers repaired primarily 8 months ago. Despite intensive hand therapy, he has 50 degrees extensor lag at both MCPs. The dorsum has thick, adherent scarring from multiple prior tenolysis procedures. Passive ROM at all joints is full (confirmed 0-90 degrees MCP, 0-100 degrees PIP). He is highly motivated to regain function. What is your management?"
MCQ Practice Points
Exam Pearl
Q: What are the zones of extensor tendon injury in the hand and their significance?
A: Odd zones over joints, even zones between: Zone I (DIP) - mallet finger, Zone III (PIP) - boutonnière, Zone V (MCP) - fight bite location, Zone VII (wrist) - under retinaculum. Zone III injuries risk boutonnière deformity if central slip disrupted. Zone V requires thorough washout for human bite injuries.
Exam Pearl
Q: What is the EIP to EPL transfer used for?
A: Extensor indicis proprius (EIP) transfer reconstructs extensor pollicis longus (EPL) rupture. Common indication: EPL rupture after distal radius fracture (Lister's tubercle attrition). EIP expendable as EDC provides index extension. Transfer rerouted subcutaneously to EPL insertion. Alternative: palmaris longus graft.
Exam Pearl
Q: What tendon grafts are available for extensor tendon reconstruction?
A: Palmaris longus (absent in 15%): Ideal length, easy harvest. Plantaris: Longer, useful for multi-digit reconstruction. Toe extensors: EDL to lesser toes. Fascia lata: For larger defects. Graft length should be 10% longer than defect to allow tensioning. Two-stage reconstruction if significant scarring.
Exam Pearl
Q: What is the mechanism and treatment of sagittal band injury?
A: Sagittal band rupture (usually radial side of middle finger) causes extensor tendon subluxation ulnarly with MCP flexion. Acute injuries: Splinting MCP in extension 4-6 weeks. Chronic injuries: Surgical repair or reconstruction using extensor slip, juncturae tendinum, or capsular flap. Often seen in rheumatoid arthritis.
Exam Pearl
Q: What is a two-stage tendon reconstruction and when is it indicated?
A: Stage 1: Insert silicone rod to create pseudosheath in scarred bed, allow soft tissue equilibration (2-3 months). Stage 2: Replace rod with tendon graft through formed sheath. Indicated when severe scarring, absent sheath, or poor soft tissue bed precludes primary reconstruction. Maintains gliding channel.
Australian Context
Australian Epidemiology:
- Manual labor workforce: High rate of extensor tendon injuries (construction, agriculture, mining)
- Rheumatoid arthritis prevalence: 1-2% of population (similar to global rates)
- Access to hand therapy: Variable (excellent in metropolitan, limited in rural/remote)
Management Guidelines:
- RACS supports extensor tendon reconstruction for chronic deficiency with preserved passive ROM
- EIP to EPL transfer considered standard of care for EPL rupture
- Two-stage reconstruction supported for complex scarred cases
- Rheumatoid cases should be co-managed with rheumatology for disease control
Medication Considerations:
Patients may be on disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs):
- Methotrexate: Hold 1-2 weeks peri-operatively (infection risk)
- Biologics (anti-TNF): Hold 2-4 weeks pre-op (wound healing concerns)
- Corticosteroids: Continue at physiologic dose (adrenal insufficiency risk)
- Coordinate with rheumatologist regarding medication management
Hand Therapy Access:
- Certified Hand Therapists (CHT) essential for optimal outcomes
- Medicare covers hand therapy under Chronic Disease Management plans
- Rural patients may require telehealth or home program with periodic in-person visits
This topic reflects Australian context with emphasis on early specialist hand surgery referral and multidisciplinary care.
EXTENSOR TENDON RECONSTRUCTION
High-Yield Exam Summary
Extensor Zones (Kleinert-Verdan)
- •Zone I: DIP joint (mallet)
- •Zone II: Middle phalanx
- •Zone III: PIP joint (boutonniere)
- •Zone IV: Proximal phalanx
- •Zone V: MCP joint
- •Zone VI: Metacarpal
- •Zone VII: Wrist/retinaculum (EPL rupture site)
- •Zone VIII: Distal forearm
Reconstruction Prerequisites (SMART)
- •Supple joints - full passive ROM mandatory
- •Mature scar - wait 3-6 months post-injury
- •Adequate soft tissue coverage
- •Realistic patient expectations
- •Therapy access and commitment
Reconstruction Options
- •Tendon transfer: EIP to EPL (90-95% success)
- •Free graft: Palmaris longus (75-85%)
- •Side-to-side: Adjacent EDC (85-90%)
- •Two-stage: Rod then graft for scarring (70-80%)
EIP to EPL Transfer
- •Gold standard for EPL rupture
- •EIP expendable (EDC extends index)
- •Three incisions: index MCP, wrist, thumb IP
- •Reroute EIP around radial wrist to EPL
- •Pulvertaft weave 3-4 passes
- •Tension: wrist neutral, thumb extended
- •Splint 4 weeks, success 90-95%
Tendon Graft Donors
- •Palmaris longus: 1st choice (12-15cm, 85% present)
- •Plantaris: 2nd choice (25-30cm from foot)
- •Toe extensors: 3rd choice (8-12cm)
- •ECRL slip: Alternative (8-10cm)
Pulvertaft Weave
- •Gold standard tendon attachment
- •3 weaves = 80% strength
- •4 weaves = 90% strength (ideal)
- •Horizontal mattress sutures each weave
- •Taper final end (reduce bulk)
EPL Rupture Post-Colles
- •Incidence: 0.5-3% of distal radius fractures
- •Timing: 4-12 weeks post-fracture (delayed)
- •Mechanism: Ischemic necrosis at Lister's tubercle
- •Presentation: Cannot extend thumb IP, no trauma
- •Treatment: EIP to EPL transfer
- •Success: 90-95%
Vaughan-Jackson Syndrome
- •Sequential extensor ruptures in rheumatoid arthritis
- •Sequence: EDM → ring → middle → index → EPL
- •Mechanism: Attrition over distal ulna prominence
- •Reconstruction: Side-to-side, EIP/EDM transfers, ECRB to EDC
- •MUST do DRUJ synovectomy + Darrach/Sauve-Kapandji
- •Success: 60-80% (disease progression affects outcome)
Two-Stage Reconstruction
- •Indication: Severe scarring/adhesions
- •Stage 1: Silicone rod creates pseudosheath
- •Wait 3 months minimum (pseudosheath formation)
- •Stage 2: Replace rod with tendon graft
- •Success: 70-80% (vs 40% single-stage in scar)
Tension Setting
- •Most critical technical factor
- •Wrist neutral position
- •MCP 45 degrees flexion (fingers)
- •Thumb extended (EPL reconstruction)
- •Test: Passive wrist flexion → finger extension
- •Over-tension: Swan-neck deformity
- •Under-tension: Extensor lag
Rehabilitation Protocol
- •Weeks 0-4: Immobilization (splint)
- •Weeks 4-6: Protected active motion
- •Weeks 6-8: Strengthening
- •Weeks 8-12: Full activity
- •Early passive IP motion (prevent stiffness)
Complications
- •Adhesions: 15-25% (most common)
- •Rupture: 5-10% (revision vs salvage)
- •Extensor lag: 10-20% (revise if greater than 30 degrees)
- •Swan-neck: 5% (over-tensioning)
- •Joint stiffness: 15-25% (aggressive therapy)
Exam High-Yield Facts
- •Passive ROM is mandatory prerequisite
- •EIP to EPL for isolated EPL rupture
- •Palmaris longus first choice graft (85% present)
- •Two-stage for severe scarring
- •Rheumatoid: Address DRUJ pathology
- •Pulvertaft weave: 3-4 passes standard