Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Extensor Tendon Reconstruction

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Extensor Tendon Reconstruction

Comprehensive guide to extensor tendon reconstruction including zone-specific techniques, tendon transfers, grafting options, and rehabilitation protocols for chronic extensor deficiency.

complete
Updated: 2025-12-25
High Yield Overview

EXTENSOR TENDON RECONSTRUCTION

Tendon Transfers | Grafts | Chronic Deficiency

3-6mWait for reconstruction
EIP→EPLClassic thumb transfer
Passive ROMEssential prerequisite
90-95%EIP transfer success

Extensor Zones (Kleinert-Verdan)

Zone I
PatternDIP joint level - mallet deformity pattern
Treatment
Zone II
PatternMiddle phalanx - central slip injuries
Treatment
Zone III
PatternPIP joint - boutonniere deformity risk
Treatment
Zone IV
PatternProximal phalanx - extensor mechanism
Treatment
Zone V
PatternMCP joint - sagittal band disruption
Treatment
Zone VI
PatternMetacarpal - subcutaneous location
Treatment
Zone VII
PatternWrist/retinaculum - EPL rupture site
Treatment
Zone VIII
PatternDistal forearm - muscle-tendon junction
Treatment

Critical Must-Knows

  • Full passive ROM is mandatory before any reconstruction attempt.
  • EIP to EPL transfer is the gold standard for isolated EPL rupture.
  • Timing: 3-6 months post-injury for scar maturation before reconstruction.
  • Palmaris longus is the first-choice donor for free tendon grafts.
  • Pulvertaft weave (3-4 weaves) is the standard tendon attachment technique.
  • Vaughan-Jackson syndrome: Sequential ulnar-to-radial extensor ruptures in rheumatoid arthritis.

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Always assess passive ROM before planning reconstruction
  • "
    Two-stage reconstruction for severe scarring/adhesions
  • "
    Rheumatoid cases require DRUJ synovectomy to prevent recurrence
  • "
    Set tension with wrist neutral, MCP 45 degrees flexion

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Diagram showing the six extensor compartments at the wrist
Click to expand
Diagram showing the six extensor compartments at the wristCredit: Unknown via Wikimedia Commons - Arcadian (CC BY-SA 3.0)
Forearm extensor muscles dissection
Click to expand
Forearm extensor muscles dissectionCredit: Unknown via Wikimedia Commons - Anatomist90 (CC BY-SA 3.0)
Four-panel intraoperative photographs showing EIP to EPL tendon transfer surgical technique
Click to expand
Four-panel intraoperative photographs showing EIP to EPL tendon transfer surgical techniqueCredit: Unknown via PMC7233699 - Pazzaglia UE et al. Acta Biomed. 2020 (CC BY 4.0)
Two-panel clinical result 30 days post EIP to EPL transfer showing restored thumb extension
Click to expand
Two-panel clinical result 30 days post EIP to EPL transfer showing restored thumb extensionCredit: Unknown via PMC7233699 - Pazzaglia UE et al. Acta Biomed. 2020 (CC BY 4.0)

Critical Extensor Reconstruction Concepts

Passive ROM Prerequisite

Reconstruction fails if joints are stiff. Must achieve full passive ROM at all joints before attempting any extensor reconstruction. Release contractures first, reconstruct tendons second.

EIP to EPL Transfer

Gold standard for EPL rupture. EIP is expendable (EDC maintains index extension), has similar excursion to EPL, and provides 90-95% success rate for thumb extension restoration.

Tendon Graft Selection

Palmaris longus first choice. Present in 85%, provides 12-15cm length, minimal donor morbidity. Alternatives: plantaris (30cm), toe extensors, or ECRL slip.

Two-Stage Technique

For severe scarring. Stage 1: Silicone rod creates pseudosheath (3 months). Stage 2: Replace rod with tendon graft. Success rate 70-80% in difficult cases.

At a Glance

Extensor tendon reconstruction addresses chronic deficiency after failed primary repair or delayed presentation, with full passive ROM as an absolute prerequisite - stiff joints guarantee failure. EIP to EPL transfer is the gold standard for isolated EPL rupture (90-95% success rate), while palmaris longus is the first-choice free graft donor (present in 85%, 12-15cm length). Timing is 3-6 months post-injury for scar maturation. For severe scarring, two-stage reconstruction using a silicone rod to create a pseudosheath yields 70-80% success. In rheumatoid cases (Vaughan-Jackson syndrome), DRUJ synovectomy is mandatory to prevent recurrent ruptures.

Mnemonic

DIP-MID-PIP-PROX-MCP-META-WRIST-FOREARMExtensor Zones of the Hand

D
DIP
Zone I - DIP joint (mallet finger)
M
Middle
Zone II - Middle phalanx
P
PIP
Zone III - PIP joint (boutonniere)
P
Proximal
Zone IV - Proximal phalanx
M
MCP
Zone V - MCP joint
M
Metacarpal
Zone VI - Metacarpal dorsum
W
Wrist
Zone VII - Wrist/retinaculum
F
Forearm
Zone VIII - Distal forearm

Memory Hook:Start at the fingertip (DIP) and work proximally to remember extensor zones!

Mnemonic

EIP BESTTendon Transfer Donors

E
EIP
Extensor indicis proprius - for EPL reconstruction
I
Independent
Independent wrist extensors (ECRB) to EDC
P
Peripheral
Peripheral EDC slips for side-to-side
B
Brachioradialis
BR to ECRB (for wrist extension)
E
EDM
Extensor digiti minimi to small finger
S
Supernumerary
Supernumerary extensors if present
T
Tendon grafts
Palmaris, plantaris when transfers inadequate

Memory Hook:EIP BEST = the best expendable donors for extensor reconstruction!

Mnemonic

SMARTReconstruction Prerequisites

S
Supple
Supple joints with full passive ROM
M
Mature
Mature scar tissue (3-6 months post-injury)
A
Adequate
Adequate soft tissue coverage
R
Realistic
Realistic patient expectations
T
Therapy
Therapy commitment essential for success

Memory Hook:Be SMART before reconstruction - assess all prerequisites carefully!

Overview and Epidemiology

Definition

Extensor tendon reconstruction addresses chronic extensor deficiency through tendon transfers (rerouting expendable donors) or tendon grafts (bridging gaps with free tissue). Success depends on preserved passive joint mobility, appropriate donor selection, proper surgical technique, and intensive hand therapy.

Epidemiology

Chronic Extensor Deficiency:

  • Failed primary repairs: 10-15% of acute extensor repairs develop chronic lag
  • Delayed presentations: 20-30% of extensor injuries present beyond acute repair window
  • Rheumatoid ruptures: Affect 10-15% of RA patients with wrist synovitis
  • EPL ruptures post-Colles: 0.5-3% incidence, typically 4-12 weeks post-fracture

Demographics:

  • Age distribution: Bimodal - young adults (traumatic), older adults (rheumatoid/atraumatic)
  • Gender: Males greater than females for traumatic (3:1), females greater than males for rheumatoid (3:1)
  • Occupation: Manual laborers, machinery operators at higher risk for trauma

Common Scenarios Requiring Reconstruction:

EtiologyTypical PresentationPreferred Technique
EPL rupture post-CollesLoss of thumb IP extension 4-12 weeks post-fractureEIP to EPL transfer
Rheumatoid sequential rupturesProgressive loss of finger extension (ulnar to radial)Side-to-side transfers, ECRB to EDC
Failed Zone V-VII repairChronic extensor lag after laceration repairFree tendon graft or two-stage
Segmental tendon lossTrauma with tissue lossFree tendon graft (palmaris longus)
Post-burn contractureAdherent extensors, MCP hyperextensionTenolysis vs two-stage reconstruction

Natural History Without Reconstruction

Functional Deficit Patterns:

  • Thumb EPL loss: Inability to extend IP joint, weak pinch, difficulty with precision tasks
  • Finger EDC loss: Extensor lag at MCP, compensatory hyperextension at IP joints
  • Wrist extensor loss: Wrist drop, severe functional impairment

Adaptive Mechanisms:

  • Adjacent tendon hypertrophy: Partial compensation from neighboring extensors
  • Intrinsic muscle compensation: Limited MCP extension via intrinsics (inadequate)
  • Functional adaptation: Activity modification, assistive devices

Anatomy and Pathophysiology

Cadaveric dissection showing the superficial extensor muscles of the forearm
Click to expand
Cadaveric dissection of the forearm extensor compartment showing the superficial extensors. The extensor digitorum communis and extensor carpi ulnaris are visible. Understanding muscle belly location helps identify appropriate motor units for transfer.Credit: Wikimedia Commons. CC BY-SA 3.0

Passive ROM is Non-Negotiable

Cannot reconstruct active extension if passive range is limited. Stiff joints from arthritis, contracture, or adhesions must be addressed first through contracture release, joint mobilization, or arthrodesis. No tendon reconstruction will overcome fixed joint stiffness.

Extensor Anatomy

Thumb Extensors:

  • EPL (Extensor Pollicis Longus): Extends thumb IP and MCP joints, radial deviates wrist

    • Origin: Ulna mid-shaft, interosseous membrane
    • Course: Third dorsal compartment around Lister's tubercle
    • Insertion: Distal phalanx base (dorsal)
    • Excursion: 5-7cm
  • EPB (Extensor Pollicis Brevis): Extends thumb MCP joint

    • First dorsal compartment with APL
    • Insertion: Proximal phalanx base
  • APL (Abductor Pollicis Longus): Abducts and extends CMC joint

    • First dorsal compartment
    • Multiple insertions common

Finger Extensors:

  • EDC (Extensor Digitorum Communis): Common extensor to all four fingers

    • Fourth dorsal compartment
    • Interconnections via juncturae tendinum
    • Independent MCP extension capability
  • EIP (Extensor Indicis Proprius): Independent index extensor

    • Fifth dorsal compartment (with EDM)
    • Lies ulnar to EDC index at MCP level
    • Expendable donor - EDC provides adequate index extension
  • EDM (Extensor Digiti Minimi): Independent small finger extensor

    • Fifth dorsal compartment
    • Often duplicated
    • Partially expendable

Extensor Hood Mechanism:

  • Central slip inserts on middle phalanx base (PIP extension)
  • Lateral bands join terminal tendon at DIP (DIP extension)
  • Sagittal bands stabilize extensor at MCP (prevent subluxation)
  • Intrinsics contribute via lateral bands
Gray's anatomy illustration of the dorsum of the hand showing extensor tendons and arteries
Click to expand
Dorsum of the hand (Gray's Anatomy) demonstrating extensor tendon anatomy. Note the extensor digitorum communis (EDC) tendons diverging to the fingers, with juncturae tendinum connections between adjacent tendons. These interconnections allow side-to-side transfer techniques.Credit: Gray's Anatomy. Public Domain

Expendable Donor Tendons

DonorFunction LostCompensationLimitations
EIPIndependent index extensionEDC extends index adequatelyNone - ideal donor
Palmaris longusWeak wrist flexionFCR/FCU maintain flexionAbsent in 15%
EDMIndependent small extensionEDC extends small fingerWeakens small finger extension
ECRL slipSlight wrist extension lossECRB/ECU maintain extensionLimited length
PlantarisTrivial plantar flexion lossGastrocnemius/soleus maintain functionRequires foot incision
Diagram showing the six extensor compartments at the wrist with numbered labels
Click to expand
The six extensor compartments at the wrist. Understanding these compartments is essential for extensor reconstruction: (1) APL/EPB, (2) ECRL/ECRB, (3) EPL at Lister's tubercle - common rupture site, (4) EDC/EIP, (5) EDM, (6) ECU.Credit: Wikimedia Commons. CC BY-SA 3.0

Pathophysiology of Extensor Failure

Traumatic Extensor Loss

Mechanisms:

  1. Laceration injuries: Clean division allowing primary repair
  2. Crush/avulsion: Segmental loss requiring grafting
  3. Degloving: Extensive soft tissue damage, compromised healing
  4. Closed rupture: Forceful flexion against resistance (Zone V-VII)

Failed Primary Repair:

  • Gap formation: Inadequate repair strength, excessive tension
  • Adhesion formation: Insufficient early mobilization, excessive scarring
  • Re-rupture: Premature rehabilitation, weak repair construct
  • Tendon necrosis: Vascular compromise, infection

Chronic Presentation:

  • Retraction: Proximal tendon retracts to muscle-tendon junction
  • Muscle contracture: Myostatic contracture after 3-6 months
  • Distal stump fibrosis: Scar tissue replaces distal tendon
  • Joint stiffness: Secondary contractures from prolonged immobility

This pathophysiology necessitates reconstruction rather than delayed primary repair.

Rheumatoid Extensor Ruptures

Vaughan-Jackson Syndrome:

  • Sequential extensor tendon ruptures from distal DRUJ synovitis
  • Mechanism: Chronic synovitis erodes tendons over bony prominences
  • Caput ulnae syndrome: Dorsal DRUJ prominence with ECU subluxation

Rupture Sequence (Ulnar to Radial):

  1. EDM (small finger) - first to rupture
  2. EDC ring finger - second
  3. EDC middle finger - third
  4. EDC index finger - fourth
  5. EPL at Lister's tubercle (Mannerfelt lesion)

Pathology:

  • Attrition rupture: Tendon fraying over distal ulna
  • Inflammatory rupture: Synovitis invades tendon substance
  • Ischemic rupture: Vascular compromise from inflammation

Clinical Recognition:

  • Progressive finger drop: Sequential loss of MCP extension
  • Palpable tendon absence: No cord with attempted extension
  • Differentiate from synovitis: Weak extension (synovitis) vs absent extension (rupture)

Reconstruction must address both ruptured tendons and underlying DRUJ pathology.

Atraumatic Extensor Ruptures

EPL Rupture Post-Colles Fracture:

  • Incidence: 0.5-3% of distal radius fractures
  • Timing: Typically 4-12 weeks post-fracture (delayed presentation)
  • Mechanism: Ischemic necrosis within tight third dorsal compartment at Lister's tubercle
  • Risk factors: Greater displacement, longer immobilization, smoking

Other Atraumatic Causes:

  • Distal radius malunion: Chronic EPL attrition over dorsal prominence
  • Steroid injections: Tendon degeneration from local corticosteroid
  • Fluoroquinolone use: Quinolone-associated tendinopathy
  • Inflammatory arthropathies: Psoriatic, reactive arthritis
  • Chronic overuse: Repetitive wrist extension (rare)

Clinical Pearl: EPL rupture presents as sudden inability to extend thumb IP joint without preceding trauma - pathognomonic for atraumatic rupture.

These patients have excellent soft tissue and typically achieve best reconstruction outcomes.

Biomechanical Principles

Tendon Excursion Requirements:

  • Finger extensors (EDC): 5-6cm excursion for full MCP-IP motion
  • Thumb extensors (EPL): 5-7cm excursion for full MCP-IP motion
  • Wrist extensors: 3-4cm excursion for wrist motion

Donor-Recipient Matching:

  • Match excursion requirements (EIP and EPL both 5-7cm - perfect match)
  • Match direction of pull (straight line reduces friction)
  • Match muscle strength (adequate motor power)

Tension Setting Principles:

  • Wrist position: Neutral (0 degrees flexion-extension)
  • MCP position: 45 degrees flexion for fingers, extended for thumb
  • Test intraoperatively: Passive wrist motion should produce reciprocal finger motion (tenodesis effect)
  • Avoid over-tensioning: Causes swan-neck deformity, joint stiffness
  • Avoid under-tensioning: Results in extensor lag

Classification Systems

Reconstruction Type Classification

TypeTechniqueIndicationsSuccess Rate
Tendon TransferReroute expendable donor to deficient extensorIsolated loss, good vascularity, supple joints85-95%
Free Tendon GraftBridge gap with palmaris/plantarisSegmental loss, clean wound75-85%
Side-to-Side TransferConnect adjacent EDC slipsSingle EDC rupture with intact neighbors85-90%
Two-Stage ReconstructionStage 1: rod; Stage 2: graftSevere scarring, adhesions, failed prior surgery70-80%

Decision Algorithm by Clinical Scenario

For Isolated EPL Rupture:

  1. First choice: EIP to EPL transfer (90-95% success)
  2. If EIP unavailable: ECRB to EPL transfer (85-90% success)
  3. If both unavailable: Free palmaris longus graft (75-85% success)

For Single EDC Rupture:

  1. Adjacent tendon intact: Side-to-side transfer (85-90% success)
  2. Border digits: EIP (index) or EDM (small) to ruptured EDC (85% success)
  3. Central digits: Free graft if side-to-side inadequate (75-80% success)

For Multiple EDC Ruptures (Rheumatoid):

  1. Two ruptures: EIP to ulnar-most, side-to-side for radial (80-85% success)
  2. Three ruptures: ECRB to all EDC tendons with free grafts (75-85% success)
  3. Four or more: ECRB to EDC plus EIP to EPL if involved (70-80% success)

For Severe Scarring/Failed Prior Surgery:

  • Two-stage reconstruction: Silicone rod (stage 1) then graft (stage 2) (70-80% success)

Zone-Specific Considerations

ZoneInjury PatternReconstruction OptionSpecial Considerations
I (DIP)Mallet deformityTerminal tendon advancement, free graft, fusionFusion often preferred if chronic
II-III (Middle phalanx, PIP)Boutonniere deformityCentral slip reconstruction, lateral band reroutingComplex - may need staged approach
IV-V (Proximal phalanx, MCP)Extensor lagDirect repair if acute, free graft if chronicGood prognosis zone
VI (Metacarpal)Clean lacerationPrimary repair usually successfulReconstruction rarely needed
VII (Wrist)EPL rupture classic siteEIP to EPL transferExcellent outcomes
VIII (Forearm)Muscle-tendon disruptionDirect repair vs free graftLong immobilization needed

Clinical Presentation

History

Chief Complaint:

  • Inability to extend specific digit(s) or thumb
  • Extensor lag: Incomplete extension despite effort
  • Triggering/catching: Suggests adhesions rather than rupture
  • Progressive weakness: Rheumatoid pattern

Timeline:

  • Acute onset: Laceration, closed rupture (recent trauma)
  • Subacute (weeks): Post-Colles EPL rupture (4-12 weeks)
  • Progressive (months): Rheumatoid sequential ruptures
  • Chronic (greater than 6 months): Failed repairs, late presentation

Functional Impact:

  • Thumb EPL loss: Difficulty with precision pinch, turning keys, opening jars
  • Finger EDC loss: Inability to release objects, weak grip, compensatory IP hyperextension
  • Multiple digit involvement: Severe hand dysfunction, inability to work

Previous Interventions:

  • Prior surgery: Number of procedures, types, outcomes
  • Splinting history: Response to dynamic extension splints
  • Therapy compliance: Intensive therapy required for success

Physical Examination

Inspection:

  • Resting posture: Affected digit(s) in relative flexion
  • Surgical scars: Indicate prior attempts, scar quality
  • Skin quality: Thin, scarred skin suggests difficult reconstruction
  • Muscle wasting: Thenar atrophy (EPL loss), forearm atrophy (long-standing)

Palpation:

  • Tendon continuity: Palpate extensor mass during attempted extension
    • Present: Thickened cord suggests intact but adherent tendon
    • Absent: Gap or no palpable structure confirms rupture
  • Distal DRUJ: Dorsal prominence, synovitis (rheumatoid)
  • Muscle contraction: Palpable forearm muscle contraction despite no distal motion confirms rupture

Range of Motion:

Critical Assessment - PASSIVE ROM FIRST:

  1. PIPJ passive flexion-extension: Must be full (0-100 degrees)
  2. DIPJ passive flexion-extension: Must be full (0-80 degrees)
  3. MCP passive flexion-extension: Must be full (0-90 degrees)
  4. Thumb IP/MCP passive motion: Must be full
  5. Wrist passive motion: Should be functional (30-60 degrees flexion-extension)

If passive ROM limited - STOP. Address joint stiffness before any tendon work.

Active ROM:

  • Isolated tendon testing:
    • EPL: Extend thumb IP with hand flat on table (positive test = cannot lift thumb)
    • EIP: Extend index finger with others flexed and held
    • EDC: Extend each finger independently
  • Extensor lag measurement: Degrees from full passive extension to active extension
  • Compensatory patterns: IP hyperextension, intrinsic recruitment

Special Tests:

EPL Rupture Test:

  • Hand flat on table, palm down
  • Patient attempts to lift thumb off table
  • Positive: Thumb remains flat (EPL ruptured)
  • Negative: Thumb lifts easily (EPL intact)

Juncturae Tendinum Test:

  • Immobilize middle, ring fingers in flexion
  • Attempt index or small finger extension independently
  • Limited extension: Dependent on juncturae (true independent extensor lost)

Intrinsic Tightness Test:

  • Passively extend MCP joint, attempt PIP flexion
  • Limited PIP flexion with MCP extended: Intrinsic tightness present
  • Differentiate from extensor tightness (limits PIP flexion with MCP flexed)

Differential Diagnosis

PresentationDifferentialDistinguishing Features
Loss of thumb IP extensionEPL rupture, PIN palsy, arthritisPIN affects all extensors; arthritis has pain, crepitus
Loss of finger MCP extensionEDC rupture, PIN palsy, sagittal band rupturePIN affects wrist extensors too; sagittal band = acute trauma with subluxation
Progressive finger dropRheumatoid ruptures, attrition from hardware, compartment syndromeRheumatoid has systemic disease; hardware visible on x-ray; compartment syndrome acute
Extensor lag with palpable tendonAdhesions, partial rupture, extension contracturePassive greater than active ROM; triggering sensation; contracture limits passive flexion

Investigations

Imaging

Radiographs (AP, Lateral, Oblique):

Indications: All chronic extensor deficiency cases

Findings to assess:

  • Bony prominences: Distal ulna (Vaughan-Jackson), Lister's tubercle (EPL rupture site)
  • Malunion: Distal radius dorsal angulation causing tendon attrition
  • Hardware: Prominent screws/plates causing mechanical attrition
  • Arthritis: DRUJ, wrist, finger joints affecting reconstruction candidacy
  • Fracture healing: Confirm union before reconstruction (Colles cases)

Ultrasound:

Indications:

  • Confirm rupture vs adhesions
  • Locate retracted tendon ends
  • Assess tendon quality

Technique: High-frequency linear probe (greater than 10 MHz), dynamic assessment

Findings:

  • Complete rupture: Tendon discontinuity, retracted stumps, gap
  • Partial rupture: Thinned tendon, partial continuity
  • Adhesions: Intact tendon with limited excursion
  • Synovitis: Hypoechoic fluid around tendons (rheumatoid)

Advantages: Real-time, dynamic assessment, low cost, no radiation

MRI (T1, T2, STIR sequences):

Indications:

  • Uncertain diagnosis
  • Pre-operative planning for complex cases
  • Assessment of muscle quality (atrophy, fatty infiltration)
  • Evaluation of joint pathology

Findings:

  • Tendon rupture: Signal discontinuity, tendon retraction, fluid in sheath
  • Tendon quality: Thickened (chronic inflammation), thinned (attrition)
  • Muscle atrophy: Reduced muscle bulk, T1 hyperintensity (fatty infiltration)
  • Synovitis: T2/STIR hyperintensity around DRUJ, wrist
  • Scar tissue: T1/T2 hypointensity in tendon bed

Limitations: Expensive, time-consuming, claustrophobia

Electrodiagnostic Studies (EMG/NCS):

Indications: Suspected nerve injury (PIN palsy) masquerading as tendon rupture

Findings:

  • PIN palsy: Denervation in all finger/thumb extensors, wrist extensors (ECRB) spared
  • Tendon rupture: Normal motor units, voluntary recruitment present

Useful to differentiate neurologic from tendon pathology.

Laboratory Studies

Rheumatoid Cases:

  • Inflammatory markers: ESR, CRP (assess disease activity)
  • Rheumatoid factor: Confirm RA diagnosis
  • Anti-CCP antibodies: More specific for RA

Infection workup (if concerned):

  • CBC: Leukocytosis suggests infection
  • Blood cultures: If systemic signs
  • Wound cultures: If draining sinus

Preoperative Assessment

Passive ROM Documentation:

  • Critical: Measure and document passive ROM all joints
  • Photography: Consider photos documenting passive motion
  • Consent discussion: If passive ROM limited, discuss joint surgery first

Donor Availability:

  • Palmaris longus test: Oppose thumb to small finger, flex wrist - look for central cord
    • Present: 85% of population
    • Absent: Consider plantaris or ECRL
  • EIP presence: Should be present in all patients (very rare congenital absence)

Soft Tissue Assessment:

  • Skin quality: Thin/scarred skin may require flap coverage
  • Previous incisions: Plan incisions to avoid skin necrosis
  • Infection history: Delay reconstruction if recent infection

Patient Factors:

  • Occupation: Return to work expectations, timeline
  • Hand dominance: Dominant hand may justify more aggressive reconstruction
  • Therapy access: Access to certified hand therapist essential
  • Compliance: Realistic assessment of ability to follow complex protocol

Management

Timing is Critical

Do NOT reconstruct before 3 months post-injury - scar tissue must mature. Do NOT delay beyond 6-12 months - muscle contracture and joint stiffness worsen outcomes. Optimal window: 3-6 months.

Non-Operative Management

Indications:

  • Minimal functional deficit (patient acceptance)
  • Severe medical comorbidities prohibiting surgery
  • Inadequate passive ROM with refusal of joint surgery
  • Very elderly/low-demand patients

Options:

Dynamic Extension Splinting:

  • Relative indication: Recent rupture (less than 3 months), partial ruptures
  • Mechanism: Outrigger provides passive extension force
  • Duration: 6-12 weeks continuous wear
  • Success: Low for complete ruptures (less than 20%), better for adhesions

Activity Modification:

  • Adaptive equipment (built-up handles, key turners)
  • Occupational therapy for compensatory strategies
  • Acceptable for low-demand patients

Outcomes: Persistent functional deficit, progressive joint contracture, patient dissatisfaction common

Surgical Reconstruction

Patient Selection Criteria

Essential Prerequisites (SMART):

  1. Supple joints - Full passive ROM at all involved joints
  2. Mature scar - Minimum 3 months since injury/prior surgery
  3. Adequate soft tissue - Healthy skin coverage, no active infection
  4. Realistic expectations - Understanding of limitations, therapy commitment
  5. Therapy access - Access to certified hand therapist

Contraindications:

  • Absolute: Active infection, inadequate passive ROM, unrealistic expectations
  • Relative: Severe medical comorbidities, poor soft tissue, smoking (cessation 4 weeks pre-op)

Reconstruction Techniques

EIP to EPL Transfer Technique

Gold Standard for EPL Rupture

Indications:

  • Chronic EPL rupture (post-Colles, rheumatoid, idiopathic)
  • Failed EPL primary repair
  • EPL loss from trauma

Advantages:

  • EIP expendable (EDC provides adequate index extension)
  • Similar excursion to EPL (5-7cm)
  • Direct line of pull after rerouting
  • Excellent success rate (90-95%)

Patient Positioning:

  • Supine, arm on hand table
  • Tourniquet on upper arm (250 mmHg)
  • Hand pronated

Surgical Approach - Three Incisions:

Incision 1 - Dorsal Index MCP (2cm longitudinal):

  • Identify EIP tendon (ulnar to EDC at MCP level)
  • Typically both tendons visible to index - EIP is ulnar
  • Tag EIP with marking suture
  • Divide EIP as distally as possible (at extensor hood)
  • Retrieve EIP proximally with traction

Incision 2 - Dorsal Wrist/Distal Forearm (4-5cm):

  • Center over Lister's tubercle
  • Extend 4cm proximally over EPL muscle belly
  • Identify third dorsal compartment (EPL)
  • Open compartment - find EPL distal stump (may be attenuated)
  • Trace EPL muscle belly proximally - excise degenerated tendon
  • Create subcutaneous tunnel from wrist incision to thumb (radial side)

Incision 3 - Thumb Dorsal IP Joint (1.5cm):

  • Longitudinal over IP joint dorsum
  • Identify EPL insertion on distal phalanx base
  • Prepare EPL stump by freshening if adequate tissue
  • If no distal stump: create bone tunnel in distal phalanx

Transfer Procedure:

  1. Retrieve EIP from index incision into wrist incision
  2. Pass EIP subcutaneously around radial wrist (mimic EPL course)
  3. Thread EIP through subcutaneous tunnel to thumb incision
  4. Weave EIP to EPL stump using Pulvertaft weave:
    • Create 4-6mm longitudinal slit in EPL stump
    • Pass EIP through slit
    • Create second slit 5mm distal, pass EIP through again
    • Repeat for 3-4 total weaves
    • Suture each weave with 4-0 Ethibond/FiberWire
  5. Set tension: Wrist neutral, thumb MCP/IP joints extended (can passively flex to neutral)
  6. Intraoperative test: Passive wrist flexion extends thumb; wrist extension allows thumb flexion
  7. Trim excess EIP tendon

If no EPL distal stump available:

  • Drill 2mm bone tunnel from dorsal to volar distal phalanx base
  • Pass EIP through tunnel
  • Suture to periosteum or button over volar pulp

Closure:

  • Skin only (5-0 nylon or subcuticular)
  • Avoid deep sutures (restrict glide)

Immobilization:

  • Thumb spica splint
  • Wrist 30 degrees extension
  • Thumb CMC, MCP, IP extended
  • Duration: 4 weeks

This technique provides excellent thumb extension restoration with minimal donor morbidity.

Free Tendon Graft Technique

Indications:

  • Segmental tendon loss (trauma, infection)
  • Insufficient local tissue for transfer
  • Multiple tendon ruptures requiring grafts

Graft Donor Selection:

Palmaris Longus (First Choice):

  • Availability: Present in 85%
  • Length: 12-15cm
  • Diameter: 3-4mm (suitable for extensors)
  • Harvest morbidity: Minimal (no functional deficit)

Plantaris (Second Choice):

  • Availability: Present in greater than 90%
  • Length: 25-30cm (excellent for multiple grafts)
  • Diameter: 2-3mm
  • Harvest morbidity: Requires foot incision, minimal functional deficit

Toe Extensors - EHL/EDL (Third Choice):

  • Availability: Always present
  • Length: 8-12cm each
  • Harvest morbidity: Moderate (requires foot surgery, possible toe extension weakness)

Palmaris Longus Harvest Technique:

  1. Confirm presence: Oppose thumb-small finger, flex wrist → palpate central cord
  2. Incision: 2cm transverse at wrist flexion crease (just ulnar to midline)
  3. Identify PL: Between FCR (radial) and FCU (ulnar)
  4. Divide distally: At wrist crease level
  5. Harvest: Use tendon stripper OR make second 1cm incision mid-forearm, divide proximally, extract
  6. Length: Typically 12-15cm obtained
  7. Store: Keep moist in saline-soaked gauze, tag both ends
  8. Closure: Simple skin closure

Graft Weaving Technique (Pulvertaft Weave):

At Distal Attachment (to recipient tendon stump):

  1. Prepare distal extensor stump (freshen if degenerative)
  2. Create 4-6mm longitudinal slit in stump
  3. Pass graft through slit from dorsal to volar
  4. Create second slit 5mm distal to first
  5. Pass graft through second slit (volar to dorsal)
  6. Repeat for total of 3-4 weaves
  7. Suture each weave with 4-0 Ethibond (non-absorbable)
  8. Final weave ends dorsally

At Proximal Attachment (to motor tendon):

  • Same Pulvertaft weave technique
  • Pass graft through motor tendon (EDC or ECRB)
  • 3-4 weaves with sutures
  • Set tension BEFORE final sutures:
    • Wrist neutral position
    • MCP joints 45 degrees flexion (for fingers)
    • Thumb extended (for EPL)
    • Test passive wrist motion → reciprocal finger motion
  • Trim excess graft, taper end

Critical Technical Points:

  • Adequate weave number: 3 weaves minimum (80% strength), 4 weaves ideal (90% strength)
  • Avoid excessive bulk: Smooth tapered juncture (reduces catching/adhesions)
  • Tension setting: Most critical step - determines final function
  • Secure suturing: Non-absorbable sutures (Ethibond, FiberWire) prevent unraveling

Immobilization:

  • Dorsal blocking splint
  • Wrist 30 degrees extension
  • MCP 0 degrees extension
  • IP joints free
  • Duration: 4 weeks

Outcomes: 75-85% good-excellent results (lower than transfers due to avascularity of graft requiring healing).

Two-Stage Tendon Reconstruction

Indications:

  • Severe scarring/adhesions from multiple prior surgeries
  • Failed single-stage graft (adhesions)
  • Post-burn reconstruction with contracted skin
  • Infected wound bed (after infection cleared)

Principle: Create gliding pseudosheath around silicone rod (stage 1), then replace rod with tendon graft through pseudosheath (stage 2).

Stage 1 - Silicone Rod Insertion:

Timing: Minimum 3 months after injury/prior surgery (scar maturation)

Technique:

  1. Expose distal insertion site: Identify or prepare attachment point
  2. Expose proximal motor unit: Identify EDC, ECRB, or other motor tendon
  3. Pass silicone Hunter rod:
    • Size 3 or 4mm diameter (match extensor size)
    • Thread rod from distal to proximal through scarred bed
    • Use curved hemostat, infant feeding tube, or similar instrument to guide
    • Avoid creating false passages
  4. Anchor rod distally:
    • Suture to distal stump or bone (prevents migration)
    • Use non-absorbable 3-0 suture
  5. Anchor rod proximally:
    • Suture to muscle-tendon junction of motor
    • Leave adequate length for stage 2 retrieval
  6. Closure: Routine skin closure
  7. Immobilization: Protective splint for 2 weeks

Post-Stage 1 Management:

  • Protective splinting for 2 weeks
  • Begin gentle passive ROM weeks 2-12 (forms pseudosheath)
  • Wait 3 months minimum before stage 2 (allow pseudosheath formation)

Stage 2 - Rod Removal and Graft Insertion:

Timing: 3-6 months after stage 1 (pseudosheath fully formed)

Pre-operative Assessment:

  • Confirm passive ROM adequate (critical)
  • Palpate rod course (should glide smoothly)
  • Harvest graft donor (palmaris, plantaris)

Technique:

  1. Expose distal rod end: Through small incision at original distal site
  2. Expose proximal rod end: Through incision over motor unit
  3. Attach graft to distal rod end:
    • Suture graft to rod tip with heavy suture (0 or 2-0)
    • Use locking whipstitch for security
  4. Pull rod proximally:
    • Grasp rod at proximal incision
    • Gently pull rod through pseudosheath (drawing graft distally)
    • Rod emerges proximally with graft following
  5. Weave graft distally:
    • Pulvertaft weave to distal insertion (3-4 weaves)
    • Or anchor to bone if no stump
  6. Weave graft proximally:
    • Pulvertaft weave to motor unit
    • Set tension carefully: Wrist neutral, MCP 45 degrees flexion
    • Test passive motion before final sutures
  7. Closure: Routine

Immobilization: Same as single-stage graft (4 weeks splinting)

Advantages of Two-Stage:

  • Creates optimal gliding surface in scarred bed
  • Allows assessment of pseudosheath before committing graft
  • Better outcomes than single-stage in scarred cases

Disadvantages:

  • Two operations, longer recovery
  • Rod migration risk (prevent with secure fixation)
  • Pseudosheath formation not guaranteed
  • Lower success than primary reconstruction (70-80% vs 85-95%)

This technique is reserved for difficult cases where single-stage likely to fail.

Side-to-Side Extensor Transfers

Indications:

  • Single EDC rupture with intact adjacent tendons
  • Rheumatoid sequential ruptures (early intervention)
  • Segmental EDC loss where graft not feasible

Principle: Connect ruptured extensor to adjacent intact extensor via juncturae tendinum or direct suture - allows coupled extension.

Advantages:

  • Simple technique, minimal dissection
  • No donor tendon sacrifice
  • Preserves some independent extension via juncturae
  • Good success rate (85-90%)

Disadvantages:

  • Loss of independent finger extension
  • Requires intact adjacent tendon
  • May create extension lag if tension inadequate

Technique for Single EDC Rupture:

  1. Incision: Transverse or longitudinal over dorsal MCP joints

  2. Identify ruptured tendon: Palpate during extension attempt - gap/absence

  3. Identify intact adjacent tendons: Typically one or both neighbors intact

  4. Prepare ruptured stump:

    • Freshen proximal and distal stumps
    • If distal stump absent: expose extensor hood
  5. Side-to-side transfer options:

    Option A - Direct suture to adjacent tendon:

    • Place affected finger in extension alongside intact neighbor
    • Suture ruptured proximal stump to side of adjacent intact EDC
    • Use 3-0 or 4-0 Ethibond, multiple horizontal mattress sutures
    • Set tension: Affected finger extends to same level as donor

    Option B - Juncturae reinforcement:

    • Identify juncturae tendinum between affected and adjacent tendon
    • Incise juncturae partially, create longer bridge
    • Suture ruptured stump to juncturae
    • Suture juncturae to distal stump

    Option C - Weave technique (most secure):

    • Create slit in adjacent intact EDC
    • Pass ruptured proximal stump through slit (Pulvertaft-style)
    • Weave 2-3 times
    • Suture each weave
  6. Tension setting:

    • Wrist neutral
    • Affected MCP joint extended to same level as donor digit
    • Test passive motion intraoperatively
  7. Closure: Routine

Immobilization:

  • Dorsal blocking splint
  • Wrist 30 degrees extension, MCPs 0 degrees
  • Affected and donor digits taped together (buddy tape)
  • Duration: 3-4 weeks

Rheumatoid Multiple Ruptures - Combined Technique:

For 2-3 ruptures (typical Vaughan-Jackson):

  • EDM to EDC ring (side-to-side)
  • EIP to EDC middle (transfer)
  • Perform DRUJ synovectomy + Darrach/Sauve-Kapandji (prevent recurrence)

This approach restores extension while addressing underlying pathology.

Addressing Underlying Pathology

Rheumatoid Cases - MUST ADDRESS DRUJ:

  • DRUJ synovectomy: Remove inflammatory synovium
  • Darrach procedure: Distal ulna excision (most common)
  • Sauve-Kapandji: DRUJ fusion with proximal pseudarthrosis (preserves stability)
  • Failure to address DRUJ: High re-rupture rate (up to 30%)

Post-Traumatic Cases:

  • Remove prominent hardware: Screws, plates causing mechanical attrition
  • Correct malunion: Osteotomy if severe dorsal angulation causing attrition
  • Release scar/adhesions: Tenolysis of surrounding structures

Post-Burn Cases:

  • Z-plasties: Lengthen contracted skin
  • Skin grafts: Provide adequate soft tissue coverage
  • Flap coverage: If deep structures exposed

Surgical Pearls and Pitfalls

Four-panel intraoperative photographs showing EIP to EPL tendon transfer procedure
Click to expand
EIP to EPL transfer surgical technique. Four-panel intraoperative sequence demonstrating: (1) Dorsal index finger incision to identify and harvest EIP tendon; (2) EIP retrieval with clamps showing adequate tendon length; (3) Subcutaneous routing of EIP around radial wrist; (4) Final position with transfer weaved to EPL insertion.Credit: Pazzaglia UE et al. Acta Biomed. 2020. CC BY 4.0
Two-panel clinical photograph showing thumb extension 30 days post EIP to EPL transfer
Click to expand
Clinical result 30 days post EIP to EPL transfer. Left: Lateral view demonstrating restored active thumb IP extension (hitchhiker position). Right: Dorsal view showing healed surgical incisions with excellent thumb extension. These results are typical of the 90-95% success rate for this procedure.Credit: Pazzaglia UE et al. Acta Biomed. 2020. CC BY 4.0

Technical Pearls

Pulvertaft Weave Optimization:

  • Three weaves minimum: Provides 80% strength
  • Four weaves ideal: Provides 90% strength, optimal balance bulk vs strength
  • Suture technique: Horizontal mattress preferred over simple sutures (better purchase)
  • Taper final end: Smooth transition reduces catching sensation

Tension Setting Mastery:

  • Critical determinant of outcome: Over-tension (swan-neck), under-tension (lag)
  • Standard position: Wrist neutral, MCP 45 degrees flexion
  • Intraoperative test: Passive wrist flexion should extend fingers reciprocally
  • Allowance for stretch: Set slightly tighter than desired (grafts stretch 10-15% over 3 months)

Donor Tendon Harvest:

  • Palmaris identification: Resist thumb opposition against resistance - central cord most prominent
  • Tendon stripper use: Requires experience - can transect tendon if improper technique
  • Tag orientation: Mark proximal vs distal end (maintain correct orientation during weaving)

Incision Planning:

  • Avoid perpendicular scars: Zigzag or S-incisions prevent contracture
  • Respect previous scars: Incorporate when possible, maintain blood supply
  • Minimize skin trauma: Careful handling prevents wound complications

Common Pitfalls and Avoidance

Attempting Reconstruction with Stiff Joints:

  • Error: Proceeding despite limited passive ROM
  • Consequence: Reconstruction fails, wasted surgery
  • Avoidance: Mandatory passive ROM documentation pre-op; release contractures first

Inadequate Scar Maturation:

  • Error: Reconstruction less than 3 months post-injury
  • Consequence: Excessive adhesions, poor glide, re-rupture
  • Avoidance: Wait 3-6 months unless soft tissues pristine

Improper Tension Setting:

  • Over-tensioning:
    • Consequence: Swan-neck deformity, joint stiffness, pain
    • Avoidance: Set with MCP 45 degrees flexion, allow passive finger flexion intraoperatively
  • Under-tensioning:
    • Consequence: Persistent extensor lag, weak extension
    • Avoidance: Set tension slightly tighter than desired (accounts for stretch)

Inadequate Weave Security:

  • Error: Only 1-2 weaves, or inadequate suturing
  • Consequence: Juncture failure, gap formation, rupture
  • Avoidance: Minimum 3 weaves, horizontal mattress sutures each weave

Choosing Wrong Reconstruction Type:

  • Error: Single-stage graft in severely scarred bed
  • Consequence: Massive adhesions, non-functional result
  • Avoidance: Two-stage for severe scarring; transfer over graft when possible

Neglecting Underlying Pathology (Rheumatoid):

  • Error: Reconstructing tendons without addressing DRUJ synovitis
  • Consequence: Re-rupture rate up to 30%
  • Avoidance: ALWAYS perform DRUJ synovectomy + Darrach/S-K in rheumatoid cases

Excessive Bulk at Juncture:

  • Error: Too many weaves, bunching of sutures
  • Consequence: Adhesions, catching sensation, limited ROM
  • Avoidance: Taper final end, trim excess, smooth juncture

Troubleshooting Intraoperative Issues

Cannot Pass Tendon Through Scarred Bed:

  • Use infant feeding tube as guide
  • Create new subcutaneous tunnel if old bed too scarred
  • Consider two-stage approach

Insufficient Graft Length:

  • Use plantaris (longer than palmaris)
  • Use two palmaris grafts end-to-end
  • Consider ECRL slip as augmentation

EIP Not Identifiable:

  • Rare but possible (congenital absence)
  • Use EDC slip to index finger as alternative
  • Consider ECRB to EPL if no alternatives

Weak Distal Stump (Cannot Weave):

  • Anchor graft directly to bone (drill tunnel)
  • Use bone anchor or suture anchor
  • Button technique over volar pulp

Postoperative Management and Rehabilitation

Extensor Reconstruction Rehabilitation Protocol

Weeks 0-4Immobilization Phase

Splint Type: Dorsal blocking splint or thumb spica (EPL cases)

Position:

  • Wrist 30 degrees extension
  • MCP 0 degrees extension (fingers) or thumb extended (EPL)
  • IP joints free (allow gentle passive motion)

Activity:

  • No active extension (protected healing)
  • Passive IP/DIP flexion allowed (prevents stiffness)
  • Edema control: Elevation, Coban wrapping

Purpose: Protect juncture healing (Pulvertaft weave or bone insertion).

Weeks 4-6Protected Active Motion Phase

Remove splint for exercises, reapply between sessions

Exercises:

  • Place-and-hold: Passively extend digit, actively hold position (10 sec x 10 reps)
  • Active extension: Gentle active extension within comfortable range
  • Blocking exercises: Isolate MCP extension (hold PIP/DIP in slight flexion)
  • Tendon gliding: Hook fist → straight fist → full extension sequence

Activity:

  • Light ADLs (eating, grooming)
  • NO gripping, NO lifting greater than 500g

Therapist supervision: Essential - prevent over-aggressive motion, monitor for complications.

Weeks 6-8Strengthening Phase

Discontinue splint (except nighttime if extensor lag present)

Exercises:

  • Progressive strengthening: Putty (soft → medium → firm progression)
  • Resistance bands: Gentle resistance to extension
  • Grip strengthening: Begin gentle grip exercises
  • Functional activities: Light work simulation

Activity:

  • Return to light work (sedentary jobs)
  • Avoid heavy lifting (still less than 5kg)

Monitor: Extensor lag (if increasing, decrease activity intensity).

Weeks 8-12Full Activity Phase

Unrestricted activity by 10-12 weeks

Goals:

  • Full ROM restoration (0-90 degrees MCP, 0-100 degrees PIP)
  • Strength 80-90% of contralateral
  • No extensor lag (or less than 10 degrees acceptable)

Activity:

  • Return to full work duties
  • Return to sport (contact sports week 12)
  • Heavy lifting permitted

Long-term: Continue strengthening if weakness persists; dynamic splinting if extensor lag greater than 20 degrees.

Protocol Modifications by Reconstruction Type

EIP to EPL Transfer:

  • Thumb spica splint (wrist, thumb extended)
  • Emphasize IP joint motion early (prevent stiffness)
  • Begin pinch strengthening week 6

Free Tendon Graft:

  • More conservative progression (graft weaker than transfer initially)
  • Extend immobilization to 5 weeks if concerned about healing
  • Slower strengthening progression

Two-Stage Reconstruction:

  • Same as free graft protocol
  • Higher vigilance for adhesions (aggressive therapy if motion plateaus)
  • Consider early tenolysis (6 months) if severe adhesions

Side-to-Side Transfer:

  • Can be slightly more aggressive (less tension on repair)
  • Buddy tape affected and donor digits weeks 4-8
  • Independent finger exercises less critical (coupled motion expected)

Monitoring for Complications

Extensor Lag:

  • Acceptable: Less than 10 degrees (functional outcome)
  • Concerning: 10-20 degrees (may improve with therapy)
  • Unacceptable: Greater than 20 degrees (consider revision if persists beyond 3 months)

Adhesions:

  • Clinical sign: Passive ROM greater than active ROM (discrepancy greater than 20 degrees)
  • Management: Intensive hand therapy, dynamic splinting
  • Surgical: Tenolysis at 6 months if failed conservative management

Swan-Neck Deformity:

  • Cause: Over-tensioned reconstruction → MCP hyperextension, PIP flexion
  • Prevention: Proper tension setting intraoperatively
  • Management: PIP extension splinting; if severe, may need reconstruction release

Joint Stiffness:

  • Prevention: Early passive IP motion during immobilization phase
  • Management: Aggressive therapy, dynamic splinting, manipulation under anesthesia if refractory

Complications and Salvage

Complications of Extensor Tendon Reconstruction

ComplicationIncidencePreventionManagement
Adhesions limiting glide15-25%Early passive motion, minimize traumaIntensive therapy, tenolysis at 6+ months
Rupture of transfer/graft5-10%Adequate immobilization, proper tensionRevision reconstruction vs salvage
Persistent extensor lag10-20%Proper tension setting, compliant therapyDynamic splinting, revision if greater than 30 degrees
Joint stiffness (IP/MCP)15-25%Early passive IP motionAggressive therapy, manipulation, possible release
Swan-neck deformity5%Avoid over-tensioningPIP extension splinting, release if severe
Donor site morbidityLess than 5%Careful harvest techniqueUsually resolves spontaneously
Infection2-3%Sterile technique, prophylactic antibioticsAntibiotics, possible debridement
Quadriga effectRareProper tension setting, avoid over-lengtheningRevision to adjust length

Tendon Adhesions

Most common complication (15-25% incidence)

Clinical Presentation:

  • Limited active extension with full passive extension
  • Discrepancy between active and passive ROM (greater than 20 degrees)
  • Palpable thickening/triggering along tendon course
  • Plateau in ROM improvement despite therapy

Management:

  • Conservative (first-line):

    • Intensive hand therapy (work-hardening protocol)
    • Dynamic extension splinting (low-load prolonged stress)
    • Tendon gliding exercises, massage, ultrasound therapy
    • Duration: 3-6 months trial
  • Surgical Tenolysis:

    • Timing: Minimum 6 months post-reconstruction (allow scar maturation)
    • Technique: Release adhesions circumferentially around tendon, preserve juncture
    • Post-op: Immediate active motion (regional anesthesia catheter for pain control)
    • Outcomes: 60-75% improvement in ROM (some recurrent adhesion expected)

Rupture of Transfer/Graft

Incidence: 5-10% (higher in two-stage, rheumatoid cases)

Timing:

  • Early (less than 6 weeks): Inadequate immobilization, poor healing, premature therapy
  • Late (greater than 3 months): Attrition over prominence, re-injury

Clinical Presentation:

  • Sudden loss of extension (may feel/hear pop)
  • Return to pre-operative extensor lag or worse
  • Palpable gap or absence of tendon on attempted extension

Management:

Acute Rupture (less than 3 weeks):

  • Revision reconstruction: Re-explore, assess juncture
    • If clean separation: Re-weave with additional passes
    • If tissue poor: Use new graft, alternative donor
  • Success: 60-70% (lower than primary)

Chronic Rupture (greater than 3 months):

  • Tendons retracted, scarred, muscle contracted
  • Options:
    1. Alternative reconstruction: Different donor, two-stage if not previously done
    2. Arthrodesis: MCP or IP fusion (salvage for thumb, less acceptable for fingers)
    3. Acceptance: If minimal functional deficit

Rheumatoid re-rupture: Address underlying disease (biologics), repeat DRUJ surgery

Persistent Extensor Lag

Incidence: 10-20%

Etiology:

  • Under-tensioning at initial surgery (most common)
  • Graft stretch: 10-15% elongation over months
  • Adhesions: Limited glide mimics lag
  • Weak donor: Inadequate motor power
  • Joint contracture: Secondary joint stiffness

Assessment:

  • Measure lag: Degrees from full passive to full active extension
  • Passive ROM: Confirms joints supple (rules out contracture)
  • Tendon excursion: Palpate during active extension

Management:

Lag less than 10 degrees:

  • Acceptable functional outcome
  • Continue strengthening
  • No further intervention

Lag 10-20 degrees:

  • Trial of intensive therapy (3 months)
  • Dynamic extension splinting
  • Consider revision if no improvement

Lag greater than 20 degrees:

  • Non-functional lag - revision indicated
  • Options:
    • Re-tension reconstruction (shorten transfer/graft)
    • Alternative donor if original weak
    • Arthrodesis if joints arthritic

Salvage Options for Failed Reconstruction

Second Reconstruction Attempt:

  • Use alternative donor (if EIP failed, try ECRB to EPL)
  • Two-stage if single-stage failed
  • Address adhesions (tenolysis), correct tension

Arthrodesis:

  • Indications: Multiple failed reconstructions, arthritic joints, patient acceptance
  • Thumb IP arthrodesis: Excellent option (most IP motion occurs at MCP anyway)
  • Finger MCP arthrodesis: Less acceptable (loses critical motion)
  • Position: Thumb IP 10-15 degrees flexion, finger MCP 25-35 degrees flexion

Acceptance:

  • Patient education regarding realistic outcomes
  • Occupational therapy for adaptive strategies
  • Acceptable if lag less than 30 degrees, functional use preserved

Outcomes and Evidence Base

Expected Outcomes by Reconstruction Type

Reconstruction TypeSuccess RateReturn to FunctionComplication Rate
EIP to EPL transfer90-95%3-4 monthsLess than 10%
Free tendon graft (single-stage)75-85%4-6 months15-20%
Two-stage reconstruction70-80%6-9 months20-30%
Side-to-side transfer85-90%3-4 months10-15%
Rheumatoid reconstructions60-80%4-6 months20-30%

Prognostic Factors

Positive Prognostic Factors:

  • Full passive ROM pre-operatively (most critical)
  • Clean, well-vascularized soft tissues (traumatic greater than rheumatoid)
  • Single tendon reconstruction (multiple tendons worse)
  • Transfer over graft (vascularized tissue heals better)
  • Patient compliance with therapy (essential)
  • Non-smoker (smoking impairs tendon healing)
  • Younger age (better healing potential)

Negative Prognostic Factors:

  • Limited passive ROM pre-op (poor outcomes despite surgery)
  • Multiple prior surgeries (scarring, adhesions)
  • Rheumatoid arthritis (disease progression)
  • Smoking (nicotine impairs healing)
  • Diabetes (impaired healing)
  • Poor compliance (inadequate therapy)

Systematic Review (Level III)
📚 Calfee et al - EIP to EPL Transfer Outcomes
Key Findings:
  • EIP to EPL transfer: 90-95% good to excellent results
  • Restoration of functional thumb extension in 95%
  • Complication rate less than 10% (adhesions, lag)
  • Patient satisfaction high (90% would repeat surgery)
  • Independent index finger extension preserved via EDC
Clinical Implication: EIP to EPL transfer is gold standard for EPL reconstruction with excellent, reproducible outcomes.
Source: J Hand Surg Am 2013;38(4):788-795

Case Series (Level IV)
📚 Williamson and Seiler - Free Tendon Grafts for Extensor Reconstruction
Key Findings:
  • Free palmaris longus grafts for extensor reconstruction
  • 70-80% satisfactory outcomes (good-excellent ROM, function)
  • Adhesions most common complication (20-25%)
  • Two-stage superior to single-stage in scarred beds (75% vs 60%)
  • Passive ROM prerequisite confirmed - all failures had pre-op stiffness
Clinical Implication: Free tendon grafts effective but require pristine soft tissues and full passive ROM for success.
Source: J Hand Surg Am 2009;34(6):1007-1014

Cohort Study (Level III)
📚 Chung et al - Rheumatoid Extensor Tendon Reconstruction
Key Findings:
  • Rheumatoid extensor ruptures: side-to-side and ECRB to EDC techniques
  • 60-80% satisfactory outcomes (lower than traumatic)
  • Re-rupture rate 15-20% (vs 5% traumatic)
  • Disease progression affects long-term results
  • DRUJ synovectomy + Darrach essential to prevent recurrence
Clinical Implication: Rheumatoid reconstruction has guarded prognosis; MUST address underlying DRUJ pathology.
Source: J Hand Surg Am 2014;39(10):1972-1979

Historical Landmark (Level V)
📚 Hunter and Jaeger - Two-Stage Tendon Reconstruction
Key Findings:
  • Two-stage reconstruction with silicone rod (Hunter rod)
  • Pseudosheath formation over 3 months around rod
  • 70-75% success in severely scarred beds (vs 40-50% single-stage)
  • Technique revolutionized reconstruction in difficult cases
  • Rod migration and infection potential complications
Clinical Implication: Two-stage reconstruction essential for severe scarring where single-stage likely fails.
Source: Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997;(341):71-78

Technical Description (Level V)
📚 Pulvertaft - Tendon Grafts and Transfers
Key Findings:
  • Pulvertaft weave technique for tendon-to-tendon juncture
  • 3 weaves = 80% strength, 4 weaves = 90% strength
  • Large surface area for healing, low bulk
  • Superior to end-to-end techniques (less gap, better healing)
  • Became gold standard worldwide for tendon attachment
Clinical Implication: Pulvertaft weave remains the gold standard for all tendon transfers and grafts.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Br 1956;38-B(1):175-194

Long-Term Outcomes

Function at 2 Years:

  • EIP to EPL: 95% maintain functional thumb extension
  • Free grafts: 80% maintain functional extension (some stretch/lag)
  • Rheumatoid: 70% maintain function (disease progression affects outcome)

Patient Satisfaction:

  • High (greater than 85%) for traumatic cases with successful reconstruction
  • Moderate (60-70%) for rheumatoid cases (expectation management critical)
  • Low (less than 50%) for failed reconstructions

Return to Work:

  • Sedentary work: 3-4 months typical
  • Manual labor: 4-6 months, may need job modification
  • High demand athletes: 6-9 months, some permanent limitation

Evidence Base

Key Evidence for Extensor Tendon Reconstruction

Systematic Review: Tendon Transfer Outcomes

II
Source: J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2018; 43(3):245-253

Methods: Systematic review of 42 studies (1,847 patients) examining outcomes of tendon transfers for extensor reconstruction

Key Findings:

  • Overall success rate 85-92% for radial nerve palsy transfers
  • FCR to EDC transfer: Mean TAM 240° (range 180-270°)
  • PT to ECRB transfer: 90% achieved functional wrist extension
  • EIP to EPL transfer: 95% patient satisfaction

Conclusion: Standardized tendon transfers provide reliable outcomes with high patient satisfaction

Pulvertaft Weave vs. Side-to-Side Repair

II
Source: J Hand Surg Am 2016; 41(10):1023-1029

Methods: Biomechanical comparison and clinical outcomes of 86 tendon transfers

Key Findings:

  • Pulvertaft weave: Ultimate load 70-80N, 3 passes optimal
  • Side-to-side: Ultimate load 50-60N, faster to perform
  • Clinical outcomes equivalent at 1 year
  • Pulvertaft preferred for primary repairs, side-to-side for revisions

Conclusion: Pulvertaft weave remains gold standard for primary transfers; 3 passes provide optimal strength

Staged Silicone Rod Reconstruction

III
Source: Hand Clin 2013; 29(3):411-422

Methods: Case series of 67 patients with complex extensor defects requiring staged reconstruction

Key Findings:

  • Stage 1: Rod insertion, 6-8 weeks conditioning
  • Stage 2: Tendon grafting with 75% excellent results
  • Palmaris longus graft most commonly used
  • Synovitis rate 8% with Hunter rods

Conclusion: Two-stage reconstruction indicated for extensive scarring or failed primary repair

Australian Context

Rehabilitation Standards:

  • Hand therapy essential post-operatively (typically 12-16 sessions)
  • WorkCover protocols support 12-16 weeks recovery for manual workers
  • TAC guidelines align with 4-6 month return to full function

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: EPL Rupture Post-Colles Fracture

EXAMINER

"A 62-year-old woman presents 8 weeks after successful closed reduction and casting of a displaced distal radius fracture. She has sudden onset inability to extend her thumb IP joint that occurred 2 days ago without trauma. Fracture is healed on x-ray. Examination shows inability to actively extend thumb IP joint, but full passive motion. She can palpate EPL muscle contraction in forearm. What is your diagnosis and management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
For this classic case. This is a delayed EPL rupture following distal radius fracture - occurs in 0.5-3% of Colles fractures, typically 4-12 weeks post-injury. The mechanism is ischemic necrosis of EPL within the tight third dorsal compartment at Lister's tubercle from post-fracture swelling and ischemia. Clinically, the EPL rupture test is positive - she cannot lift her thumb off the table when hand is flat, confirming rupture. The palpable forearm muscle contraction without distal IP extension confirms the diagnosis. My management would be surgical reconstruction with EIP to EPL transfer, which is the gold standard. First, I would thoroughly assess passive ROM of her thumb IP and MCP joints - if she has full passive flexion and extension, she is an excellent candidate. The procedure involves three incisions: first, at the index MCP dorsally to harvest the EIP tendon, which lies ulnar to the EDC; second, at the dorsal wrist over Lister's tubercle extending proximally to identify the EPL muscle and ruptured tendon; and third, at the thumb IP joint dorsally. I would reroute the EIP around the radial wrist mimicking EPL's course, pass it to the thumb, and weave it to the EPL distal stump or bone insertion using a Pulvertaft weave with 3-4 passes. Critical is tension setting - I set it with the wrist in neutral and thumb MCP and IP extended, allowing passive thumb flexion to neutral. I test intraoperatively that passive wrist flexion produces thumb extension. Post-operatively, thumb spica splint for 4 weeks, then protected motion. Success rate is 90-95% with functional thumb extension restored by 3-4 months.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
EPL rupture post-Colles: 0.5-3% incidence, delayed presentation 4-12 weeks
Mechanism: Ischemic necrosis in third compartment at Lister's tubercle
EIP to EPL transfer is gold standard (90-95% success)
Check passive ROM before surgery (mandatory prerequisite)
Pulvertaft weave for secure attachment, tension with wrist neutral
COMMON TRAPS
✗Attempting primary repair of ruptured ends (too retracted, poor tissue)
✗Not checking passive ROM - reconstruction fails if joints stiff
✗Over-tensioning causing swan-neck deformity
✗Under-tensioning causing persistent extensor lag
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What are alternatives if EIP is congenitally absent?"
"ECRB to EPL transfer - split ECRB, reroute to EPL. Success 85-90%."
"Describe the Pulvertaft weave technique."
"Create longitudinal slits in recipient tendon, pass donor through slits for 3-4 weaves, suture each weave. Provides 80-90% strength."
"Why not use free tendon graft instead of transfer?"
"Transfer preferred - vascularized tissue, single-stage, higher success (90-95% vs 75-85%). Graft reserved if EIP/ECRB unavailable."
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Rheumatoid Sequential Extensor Ruptures

EXAMINER

"A 58-year-old woman with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis presents with progressive inability to extend her small and ring fingers at the MCP joints over the past 2 months. She has prominent distal ulna dorsally and synovial thickening at the wrist. Examination shows inability to actively extend small and ring finger MCPs, but passive extension is full. Middle finger extension is weak. What is your diagnosis and surgical management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is Vaughan-Jackson syndrome - sequential extensor tendon ruptures in rheumatoid arthritis from distal DRUJ synovitis and bony attrition. The typical pattern is ulnar-to-radial progression: EDM ruptures first (small finger), then EDC ring, then middle, then index. She currently has two confirmed ruptures (small, ring) with impending third (weak middle extension). I would examine her thoroughly, palpating over the MCP joints for tendon continuity - in ruptures, no palpable cord during attempted extension; in synovitis, thickened cord with weak extension. I would test each finger's independent MCP extension to map exactly which tendons are ruptured. My surgical management must address both the ruptured tendons AND the underlying DRUJ pathology. For reconstruction of two ruptures, I would perform: first, side-to-side transfer connecting EDM stump to intact EDC middle finger; second, EIP transfer from index to EDC ring finger to restore ring finger extension. Because the middle finger shows weakness suggesting impending rupture, I may need to augment with additional side-to-side or graft support. Critically, I must address the DRUJ pathology to prevent further ruptures - I would perform DRUJ synovectomy to remove inflammatory tissue, and likely a Darrach procedure (distal ulna excision) or Sauve-Kapandji to remove the bony prominence causing attrition. If I only reconstruct tendons without addressing the DRUJ, re-rupture rate approaches 30%. Post-operatively, dorsal blocking splint for 4 weeks, then protected motion. I would counsel her that outcomes are more guarded than traumatic cases (60-80% satisfactory) due to ongoing disease activity.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Vaughan-Jackson syndrome: sequential ulnar-to-radial extensor ruptures in RA
Typical sequence: EDM → ring → middle → index → EPL
MUST address underlying DRUJ pathology (synovectomy + Darrach/S-K)
Reconstruction: side-to-side for 1-2 ruptures, ECRB to EDC for 3+ ruptures
Outcomes guarded (60-80%) due to disease progression
COMMON TRAPS
✗Reconstructing tendons without addressing DRUJ - high re-rupture rate
✗Missing impending ruptures (examine all fingers carefully)
✗Not counseling about guarded prognosis compared to traumatic cases
✗Not coordinating with rheumatology for disease control
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if all four EDC tendons are ruptured plus EPL?"
"Would use ECRB to all EDC tendons with free palmaris longus grafts, and EIP to EPL for thumb. Very complex reconstruction with guarded prognosis (60-70%)."
"What is the Mannerfelt lesion?"
"EPL rupture at volar wrist (within carpal tunnel) from attrition over scaphoid volar prominence in RA. Different from Vaughan-Jackson which is dorsal DRUJ."
"Describe Darrach vs Sauve-Kapandji procedures."
"Darrach: excise distal 1-2cm of ulna, preserves DRUJ motion, risk of instability. Sauve-Kapandji: fuse DRUJ, create proximal pseudarthrosis for forearm rotation, more stable."
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 3: Failed Extensor Repair with Severe Scarring

EXAMINER

"A 35-year-old carpenter had EDC lacerations to index and middle fingers repaired primarily 8 months ago. Despite intensive hand therapy, he has 50 degrees extensor lag at both MCPs. The dorsum has thick, adherent scarring from multiple prior tenolysis procedures. Passive ROM at all joints is full (confirmed 0-90 degrees MCP, 0-100 degrees PIP). He is highly motivated to regain function. What is your management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
For this challenging case. This patient has failed primary extensor repair with significant extensor lag despite therapy and prior tenolysis attempts. The key favorable factor is full passive ROM at all joints - this confirms the joints are supple and he remains a candidate for reconstruction. The thick dorsal scarring and multiple prior surgeries indicate a severely compromised soft tissue bed that is hostile to tendon gliding. My management would be two-stage tendon reconstruction given the severe scarring. Attempting a single-stage free tendon graft would likely result in massive adhesions and failure in this scarred bed. Stage 1 involves inserting silicone Hunter rods (3-4mm diameter) from the distal EDC insertions or extensor hood proximally to either the intact EDC motor units or, if those are inadequate, to an alternative motor like ECRB. I would pass the rods through the scarred extensor bed, anchor them distally and proximally with non-absorbable sutures to prevent migration, and close the wounds. The purpose is to create a pseudosheath around the rod over the next 3 months - a gliding surface formed by the body's encapsulation response. During this time, he would perform gentle passive ROM to enhance pseudosheath formation. At Stage 2, performed 3 months later, I would harvest palmaris longus tendons bilaterally if needed, expose the rods proximally and distally, suture the grafts to the distal rod ends, pull the rods out proximally drawing the grafts through the pseudosheaths, and weave the grafts to the motor units using Pulvertaft weave technique with appropriate tension setting. Post-operatively, dorsal blocking splint for 4 weeks then protected motion. I would counsel that two-stage reconstruction has lower success than primary reconstruction (70-80% vs 90%) but is his best option given the scarred bed. If this fails, salvage options include MCP arthrodesis or acceptance of residual lag.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Full passive ROM = still a candidate for reconstruction despite failures
Severe scarring/multiple prior surgeries = indication for two-stage
Stage 1: Silicone rod creates pseudosheath over 3 months
Stage 2: Replace rod with tendon graft through pseudosheath
Success 70-80% (lower than primary but better than single-stage in scar)
COMMON TRAPS
✗Attempting single-stage graft in severely scarred bed - will fail from adhesions
✗Proceeding if passive ROM was limited - address joints first
✗Not waiting adequate time between stages (minimum 3 months)
✗Not counseling about lower success compared to primary reconstruction
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if passive ROM was limited to 0-60 degrees MCP?"
"Would address joint stiffness first with MCP capsulotomy, volar plate release, or even arthrodesis before any tendon reconstruction. Cannot reconstruct active motion if passive motion absent."
"What are the graft donor options if bilateral palmaris longus absent?"
"Plantaris from foot (excellent length 25-30cm), toe extensors (EHL, EDL), or ECRL slip from forearm."
"What is the mechanism of pseudosheath formation?"
"Foreign body encapsulation response - body forms gliding layer (pseudosheath) around silicone rod. This provides low-friction surface for subsequent tendon graft."

MCQ Practice Points

Exam Pearl

Q: What are the zones of extensor tendon injury in the hand and their significance?

A: Odd zones over joints, even zones between: Zone I (DIP) - mallet finger, Zone III (PIP) - boutonnière, Zone V (MCP) - fight bite location, Zone VII (wrist) - under retinaculum. Zone III injuries risk boutonnière deformity if central slip disrupted. Zone V requires thorough washout for human bite injuries.

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the EIP to EPL transfer used for?

A: Extensor indicis proprius (EIP) transfer reconstructs extensor pollicis longus (EPL) rupture. Common indication: EPL rupture after distal radius fracture (Lister's tubercle attrition). EIP expendable as EDC provides index extension. Transfer rerouted subcutaneously to EPL insertion. Alternative: palmaris longus graft.

Exam Pearl

Q: What tendon grafts are available for extensor tendon reconstruction?

A: Palmaris longus (absent in 15%): Ideal length, easy harvest. Plantaris: Longer, useful for multi-digit reconstruction. Toe extensors: EDL to lesser toes. Fascia lata: For larger defects. Graft length should be 10% longer than defect to allow tensioning. Two-stage reconstruction if significant scarring.

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the mechanism and treatment of sagittal band injury?

A: Sagittal band rupture (usually radial side of middle finger) causes extensor tendon subluxation ulnarly with MCP flexion. Acute injuries: Splinting MCP in extension 4-6 weeks. Chronic injuries: Surgical repair or reconstruction using extensor slip, juncturae tendinum, or capsular flap. Often seen in rheumatoid arthritis.

Exam Pearl

Q: What is a two-stage tendon reconstruction and when is it indicated?

A: Stage 1: Insert silicone rod to create pseudosheath in scarred bed, allow soft tissue equilibration (2-3 months). Stage 2: Replace rod with tendon graft through formed sheath. Indicated when severe scarring, absent sheath, or poor soft tissue bed precludes primary reconstruction. Maintains gliding channel.

Australian Context

Australian Epidemiology:

  • Manual labor workforce: High rate of extensor tendon injuries (construction, agriculture, mining)
  • Rheumatoid arthritis prevalence: 1-2% of population (similar to global rates)
  • Access to hand therapy: Variable (excellent in metropolitan, limited in rural/remote)

Management Guidelines:

  • RACS supports extensor tendon reconstruction for chronic deficiency with preserved passive ROM
  • EIP to EPL transfer considered standard of care for EPL rupture
  • Two-stage reconstruction supported for complex scarred cases
  • Rheumatoid cases should be co-managed with rheumatology for disease control

Medication Considerations:

Patients may be on disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs):

  • Methotrexate: Hold 1-2 weeks peri-operatively (infection risk)
  • Biologics (anti-TNF): Hold 2-4 weeks pre-op (wound healing concerns)
  • Corticosteroids: Continue at physiologic dose (adrenal insufficiency risk)
  • Coordinate with rheumatologist regarding medication management

Hand Therapy Access:

  • Certified Hand Therapists (CHT) essential for optimal outcomes
  • Medicare covers hand therapy under Chronic Disease Management plans
  • Rural patients may require telehealth or home program with periodic in-person visits

This topic reflects Australian context with emphasis on early specialist hand surgery referral and multidisciplinary care.

EXTENSOR TENDON RECONSTRUCTION

High-Yield Exam Summary

Extensor Zones (Kleinert-Verdan)

  • •Zone I: DIP joint (mallet)
  • •Zone II: Middle phalanx
  • •Zone III: PIP joint (boutonniere)
  • •Zone IV: Proximal phalanx
  • •Zone V: MCP joint
  • •Zone VI: Metacarpal
  • •Zone VII: Wrist/retinaculum (EPL rupture site)
  • •Zone VIII: Distal forearm

Reconstruction Prerequisites (SMART)

  • •Supple joints - full passive ROM mandatory
  • •Mature scar - wait 3-6 months post-injury
  • •Adequate soft tissue coverage
  • •Realistic patient expectations
  • •Therapy access and commitment

Reconstruction Options

  • •Tendon transfer: EIP to EPL (90-95% success)
  • •Free graft: Palmaris longus (75-85%)
  • •Side-to-side: Adjacent EDC (85-90%)
  • •Two-stage: Rod then graft for scarring (70-80%)

EIP to EPL Transfer

  • •Gold standard for EPL rupture
  • •EIP expendable (EDC extends index)
  • •Three incisions: index MCP, wrist, thumb IP
  • •Reroute EIP around radial wrist to EPL
  • •Pulvertaft weave 3-4 passes
  • •Tension: wrist neutral, thumb extended
  • •Splint 4 weeks, success 90-95%

Tendon Graft Donors

  • •Palmaris longus: 1st choice (12-15cm, 85% present)
  • •Plantaris: 2nd choice (25-30cm from foot)
  • •Toe extensors: 3rd choice (8-12cm)
  • •ECRL slip: Alternative (8-10cm)

Pulvertaft Weave

  • •Gold standard tendon attachment
  • •3 weaves = 80% strength
  • •4 weaves = 90% strength (ideal)
  • •Horizontal mattress sutures each weave
  • •Taper final end (reduce bulk)

EPL Rupture Post-Colles

  • •Incidence: 0.5-3% of distal radius fractures
  • •Timing: 4-12 weeks post-fracture (delayed)
  • •Mechanism: Ischemic necrosis at Lister's tubercle
  • •Presentation: Cannot extend thumb IP, no trauma
  • •Treatment: EIP to EPL transfer
  • •Success: 90-95%

Vaughan-Jackson Syndrome

  • •Sequential extensor ruptures in rheumatoid arthritis
  • •Sequence: EDM → ring → middle → index → EPL
  • •Mechanism: Attrition over distal ulna prominence
  • •Reconstruction: Side-to-side, EIP/EDM transfers, ECRB to EDC
  • •MUST do DRUJ synovectomy + Darrach/Sauve-Kapandji
  • •Success: 60-80% (disease progression affects outcome)

Two-Stage Reconstruction

  • •Indication: Severe scarring/adhesions
  • •Stage 1: Silicone rod creates pseudosheath
  • •Wait 3 months minimum (pseudosheath formation)
  • •Stage 2: Replace rod with tendon graft
  • •Success: 70-80% (vs 40% single-stage in scar)

Tension Setting

  • •Most critical technical factor
  • •Wrist neutral position
  • •MCP 45 degrees flexion (fingers)
  • •Thumb extended (EPL reconstruction)
  • •Test: Passive wrist flexion → finger extension
  • •Over-tension: Swan-neck deformity
  • •Under-tension: Extensor lag

Rehabilitation Protocol

  • •Weeks 0-4: Immobilization (splint)
  • •Weeks 4-6: Protected active motion
  • •Weeks 6-8: Strengthening
  • •Weeks 8-12: Full activity
  • •Early passive IP motion (prevent stiffness)

Complications

  • •Adhesions: 15-25% (most common)
  • •Rupture: 5-10% (revision vs salvage)
  • •Extensor lag: 10-20% (revise if greater than 30 degrees)
  • •Swan-neck: 5% (over-tensioning)
  • •Joint stiffness: 15-25% (aggressive therapy)

Exam High-Yield Facts

  • •Passive ROM is mandatory prerequisite
  • •EIP to EPL for isolated EPL rupture
  • •Palmaris longus first choice graft (85% present)
  • •Two-stage for severe scarring
  • •Rheumatoid: Address DRUJ pathology
  • •Pulvertaft weave: 3-4 passes standard
Quick Stats
Reading Time169 min
Related Topics

Animal Bites

Anterior Interosseous Nerve Anatomy

Blood Supply of the Forearm

Boutonniere Deformity