Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Femoral Shaft Fractures

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Femoral Shaft Fractures

Comprehensive orthopaedic exam guide to femoral shaft fractures - intramedullary nailing, antegrade vs retrograde, damage control orthopaedics, and ipsilateral femoral neck screening

gold
Updated: 2026-01-07
High Yield Overview

FEMORAL SHAFT FRACTURES

IMN Gold Standard | Early Fixation | Rotation Check | Screen for Neck Fx

95%Union rate with IMN
5%Ipsilateral neck fracture rate
24hTarget fixation time
1-1.5LBlood loss expected

WINQUIST-HANSEN CLASSIFICATION

Grade 0
PatternNo comminution, simple pattern
TreatmentStandard nail, can consider dynamic locking
Grade I
PatternSmall butterfly fragment (under 25%)
TreatmentStandard nail
Grade II
PatternLarger butterfly (25-50% circumference)
TreatmentStandard nail, static locking
Grade III
PatternLarge butterfly (over 50%)
TreatmentLong nail, static locking essential
Grade IV
PatternSegmental or circumferential bone loss
TreatmentLong nail, may need bone graft

Critical Must-Knows

  • Intramedullary nailing is gold standard (reamed, locked)
  • Screen for ipsilateral neck fracture - 5% incidence, easily missed
  • Early fixation (under 24h) reduces pulmonary complications in polytrauma
  • 1-1.5L blood loss expected - resuscitate before and during surgery
  • Rotation alignment - check clinically, compare to contralateral side

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Antegrade for most; retrograde for floating knee, bilateral, pregnancy, obesity
  • "
    Piriformis entry: risk of AVN in young - trochanteric entry safer
  • "
    Damage control: external fixation if physiologically unstable
  • "
    Check rotation intraoperatively - ER malrotation is most common error

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Comminuted femoral shaft fracture treated with IM nail and cerclage wiring
Click to expand
Three-panel radiographic series of a 19-year-old male with comminuted right femoral shaft fracture from motorcycle trauma: (A) Preoperative AP and lateral X-rays showing displaced comminuted fracture; (B) Postoperative images demonstrating intramedullary nail fixation with cerclage wiring achieving reduction; (C) 15-month follow-up showing complete fracture union.Credit: Wang TH et al., J Orthop Surg Res (PMC8348994) - CC BY 4.0
Severely comminuted femoral shaft fracture with cerclage wiring
Click to expand
Three-panel radiographic series of a 24-year-old male with severely comminuted right femoral shaft fracture: (A) Preoperative X-ray showing fracture with significant shortening; (B) Postoperative IM nail with cerclage wiring achieving anatomic reduction; (C) 14-month follow-up demonstrating complete bony union.Credit: Wang TH et al., J Orthop Surg Res (PMC8348994) - CC BY 4.0

Critical Femoral Shaft Fracture Points

Screen for Neck Fracture

5% have ipsilateral femoral neck fracture - easily missed on initial imaging. Get dedicated hip views or CT before nailing. Missing this is a major exam red flag.

Early Fixation

Fixation within 24 hours reduces pulmonary complications (ARDS, fat embolism) in polytrauma. Unless physiologically unstable, do not delay definitive fixation.

Rotation Check

ER malrotation is most common error. Check rotation intraoperatively: cortical diameter matching, compare to opposite leg, trochanter-patella relationship.

Damage Control

If physiologically unstable (hypothermia, coagulopathy, acidosis), apply external fixation as temporary stabilization. Convert to IMN when stable (24-72h).

At a Glance: Quick Decision Guide

ScenarioEntry PointNail LengthKey Consideration
Standard shaft fractureAntegrade (trochanteric preferred)Long nailCheck for neck fracture
Floating knee (ipsilateral tibia)Retrograde femurLong nailNail tibia separately
Bilateral femur fracturesRetrograde bothLong nailsPosition supine, easier access
PregnancyRetrogradeLong nailReduces radiation to pelvis
Polytrauma, unstable patientExternal fixationN/ADamage control, convert later
Proximal third fractureAntegradeLong nailPiriformis or trochanteric entry
Distal third fractureRetrograde or antegradeLong nailRetrograde gives better distal control
Mnemonic

RETROGRADEAntegrade vs Retrograde

R
Reproductive
Pregnancy - less pelvic radiation
E
Elevated BMI
Obesity - easier access
T
Two femurs
Bilateral fractures
R
Rather distal
Distal third fractures
O
Other leg broken
Floating knee - tibia fracture too

Memory Hook:Think RETROGRADE for pregnancy, obesity, bilateral, distal, or floating knee!

Mnemonic

SCREENCheck for Neck Fracture

S
Suspected in 5%
5% have ipsilateral neck fracture
C
CT if unclear
CT scan if X-ray equivocal
R
Review before nailing
Must exclude before reaming
E
Easily missed
Often non-displaced, subtle
E
Entry point critical
Neck fracture changes approach
N
Neck first if present
Fix neck before shaft

Memory Hook:SCREEN for neck fracture before every femoral shaft nailing!

Mnemonic

CORTICESRotation Assessment

C
Cortical diameter
Match cortical diameter on fluoro
O
Opposite limb
Compare to contralateral leg
R
Radiographic check
Intraop films both sides
T
Trochanter-patella
Relationship should match
I
Internal rotation
Check hip IR matches
C
Compare clinically
Foot progression angle
E
External rotation
ER is most common error
S
Symmetry
Aim for symmetry with other side

Memory Hook:CORTICES - Check rotation intraoperatively, ER malrotation is most common error!

Mnemonic

ENTRYEntry Point Choice

E
Entry choice matters
Piriformis vs trochanteric vs retrograde
N
No piriformis in young
Risk of AVN in young patients
T
Trochanteric preferred
Safer lateral entry for most
R
Retrograde options
Floating knee, pregnancy, bilateral
Y
Young patients
Avoid piriformis - trochanteric safer

Memory Hook:ENTRY point: Trochanteric is safest for most, avoid piriformis in young!

Overview and Epidemiology

Demographics

Bimodal Age Distribution:

  • Young adults (15-44): High-energy trauma (MVA, motorcycle, GSW)
  • Elderly (over 65): Low-energy falls, pathological fractures

Incidence:

  • 10-20 per 100,000 population per year
  • Male predominance (2:1) in high-energy
  • Associated injuries common in polytrauma (50%)

Mechanism:

  • Motor vehicle accidents (most common)
  • Motorcycle crashes
  • Falls from height
  • Gunshot wounds
  • Pedestrian vs vehicle

High-energy mechanisms predominate in the young, low-energy falls in the elderly.

Associated Injury Screening

Screen for These

  • Ipsilateral femoral neck fracture (5%) - easily missed
  • Floating knee (ipsilateral tibia fracture)
  • Knee ligament injuries (10-30%)
  • Hip dislocation
  • Vascular injury (rare but devastating)

Polytrauma Considerations:

  • Head injury common
  • Chest trauma (fat embolism risk)
  • Abdominal injuries
  • Other long bone fractures

Complete ATLS assessment is essential in all high-energy mechanisms.

Hemorrhage Management

Expected Blood Loss:

  • Closed fracture: 1-1.5 liters
  • Open fracture: Higher, variable
  • Can be occult - thigh swelling

Resuscitation:

  • Early blood products (massive transfusion protocol if indicated)
  • Avoid crystalloid over-resuscitation
  • Monitor hemoglobin perioperatively
  • Tranexamic acid consideration

Anticipate 1-1.5L blood loss and resuscitate accordingly.

Anatomy and Biomechanics

Femoral Shaft Anatomy

Definition:

  • From 5cm below lesser trochanter
  • To supracondylar metaphyseal flare
  • Approximately 40-50cm in length

Key Features:

  • Anterior bow (apex anterior, radius approximately 120cm)
  • Isthmus: narrowest point (9-12mm diameter)
  • Linea aspera: posterior ridge (muscle attachments)
  • Cortical bone throughout

Muscular Compartments:

  • Anterior: Quadriceps (encase anterior femur)
  • Medial: Adductors
  • Posterior: Hamstrings

Understanding muscle attachments helps predict deformity patterns.

Vascular Anatomy

Periosteal Supply:

  • Perforating branches of profunda femoris
  • Supply outer 1/3 of cortex
  • Preserved with careful technique

Endosteal Supply:

  • Nutrient artery (branch of profunda)
  • Enters posterior cortex at mid-shaft
  • Supplies inner 2/3 of cortex
  • Disrupted by fracture and reaming

Reaming Effect:

  • Temporarily disrupts endosteal supply
  • Provides local autograft (reaming debris)
  • Net effect: promotes healing

The biological benefit of reaming outweighs the temporary endosteal disruption.

Mechanical Principles

Load Transmission:

  • Primary weight-bearing bone of lower limb
  • Experiences bending, torsion, and axial load
  • Anterior bow affects nail insertion

Fracture Deformity:

  • Proximal third: Flexed, abducted, ER (like subtrochanteric)
  • Middle third: Variable based on muscles
  • Distal third: Extension (gastrocnemius)

Nail Biomechanics:

  • Intramedullary splint (load-sharing)
  • Length and diameter affect stiffness
  • Locking mode: static vs dynamic

Nail design must match the fracture pattern and patient factors.

Classification

Winquist-Hansen Classification

Describes comminution and guides locking strategy:

Winquist-Hansen Classification

GradeDescriptionStabilityLocking
Grade 0No comminutionStableDynamic possible
Grade ISmall butterfly (under 25%)StableDynamic possible
Grade IIButterfly 25-50%ModerateStatic preferred
Grade IIIButterfly over 50%UnstableStatic required
Grade IVCircumferential lossVery unstableStatic, may need graft
Winquist-Hansen classification radiographic examples
Click to expand
Radiographic examples demonstrating varying degrees of femoral shaft comminution. Classification guides locking strategy: stable patterns (Grades 0-I) may permit dynamic locking, while unstable patterns (Grades II-IV) require static locking to maintain length and rotation.Credit: Open-i/PMC - CC BY 4.0

Static vs Dynamic Locking

  • Dynamic locking: One end unlocked, allows axial compression with weight-bearing. For stable patterns (Grade 0-I).
  • Static locking: Both ends locked. For unstable patterns (Grade II-IV). Most femoral shaft fractures should be statically locked initially.

AO/OTA Classification

32 = Femoral Shaft:

AO/OTA 32 Classification

TypePatternDescription
32-ASimpleSpiral, oblique, or transverse - no comminution
32-BWedgeButterfly fragment with cortical contact
32-CComplexSegmental or highly comminuted, no cortical contact

Location-Based Classification

Fracture Location

LocationProximal DeformityConsiderations
Proximal thirdFlexed, abducted, ERLike subtrochanteric, antegrade preferred
Middle thirdVariableStandard approach, most common location
Distal thirdApex posterior (extension)Retrograde gives good control, or antegrade with blocking screws

History

History Taking

Mechanism Assessment:

  • High vs low energy
  • Direction of force
  • Associated injuries likely?
  • Position at time of injury

Patient Factors:

  • Age and baseline function
  • Comorbidities
  • Anticoagulation status
  • Previous surgery on this limb
  • Social circumstances (recovery needs)

A thorough history guides treatment decisions and expectations.

Examination

Physical Examination

General Findings:

  • Thigh swelling (blood loss indicator)
  • Shortening and rotation
  • Deformity visible
  • Skin condition (open vs closed)

Neurovascular:

  • Distal pulses (DP, PT)
  • Motor: dorsiflexion, plantarflexion, toe movements
  • Sensory: all dermatomes of foot
  • Compartments: thigh has 3 compartments

Associated Injury Screen:

  • Hip: pain, ROM if possible
  • Knee: effusion, ligament stability (exam under anesthesia often needed)
  • ATLS for polytrauma

Document baseline neurovascular status carefully before any intervention.

Ipsilateral Neck Fracture Screen

Do Not Miss

5% of femoral shaft fractures have ipsilateral neck fracture.

  • Often non-displaced and subtle
  • Missed neck fracture = disaster (AVN, nonunion)
  • Get dedicated hip views or CT before nailing
  • If present: fix neck FIRST, then shaft

Screening Protocol:

  1. Dedicated AP hip view
  2. Internal rotation view if possible
  3. CT scan if any suspicion
  4. Intraoperative screening if not done preop

Missing a neck fracture is a serious complication with significant medicolegal implications.

Investigations

Radiographic Protocol

Essential X-rays:

  • Full-length femur (AP and lateral) - MUST include hip and knee
  • AP pelvis - screen hip, compare sides
  • AP and lateral knee - assess for extension, ligament injury

CT Scan Indications:

  • Suspicion of ipsilateral neck fracture
  • Complex fracture pattern assessment
  • Pre-operative planning for difficult cases

MRI Considerations:

  • Occult neck fracture if CT inconclusive
  • Knee ligament injury assessment
  • Usually delayed, not acute

MRI is rarely needed acutely but valuable for occult injuries.

Comprehensive series showing femoral shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nailing
Click to expand
Comprehensive femoral shaft fracture IM nailing series (A-F): Each case shows pre-operative and post-operative AP/lateral radiographs demonstrating various fracture patterns and their treatment with antegrade intramedullary nailing. Note the consistent use of interlocking screws proximally and distally, appropriate nail length extending from piriformis fossa to distal metaphysis, and anatomic restoration of length, alignment, and rotation. IM nailing is the gold standard for femoral shaft fractures with union rates exceeding 98%.Credit: Open-i/PMC - CC BY 4.0

Laboratory Workup

Trauma Panel:

  • Full blood count (baseline Hb, platelets)
  • Coagulation studies (INR, PTT)
  • Group and screen/crossmatch (2-4 units)
  • Renal function
  • Blood gas if polytrauma

Intraoperative Monitoring:

  • Serial hemoglobin
  • Blood product availability
  • Cell saver consideration for bilateral/complex

Blood product availability is essential before starting surgery.

Surgical Planning

Measurements:

  • Femoral length (compare to contralateral)
  • Canal diameter at isthmus
  • Neck-shaft angle (for proximal fractures)

Decision Points:

  • Antegrade vs retrograde?
  • Entry point (piriformis vs trochanteric)?
  • Nail length and diameter?
  • Locking mode (static vs dynamic)?
  • Timing (immediate vs delayed)?

These decisions should be made before entering the operating room.

Management

📊 Management Algorithm
Femoral Shaft Fracture Management Algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for femoral shaft fractures detailing the approach for stable vs. unstable patients and entry point selection.Credit: OrthoVellum

Core Management Principles

Gold Standard:

  • Locked intramedullary nailing for virtually all femoral shaft fractures
  • Reamed, locked technique
  • Early fixation (within 24 hours if physiologically stable)

Goals:

  • Restore length, alignment, and rotation
  • Stable fixation for early mobilization
  • Preserve biology where possible

Timing Considerations:

  • Stable patient: Definitive IMN within 24 hours
  • Unstable patient: Damage control (external fixation), convert when stable
  • Early fixation reduces pulmonary complications (ARDS, fat embolism)

Early stabilization is both safe and beneficial in appropriately resuscitated patients.

Entry Point Selection

Antegrade Entry Points

EntryAdvantagesDisadvantages
PiriformisIn line with canal, good for narrow canalsAVN risk in young, difficult in obese
Trochanteric (Lateral)Low AVN risk, easier accessMay need slight valgus bend in nail, better for modern nails

Piriformis vs Trochanteric

Piriformis entry crosses the femoral neck blood supply - risk of AVN in young patients.

Trochanteric entry is now preferred for most cases - lower AVN risk, easier positioning. Most modern nails are designed for this entry.

Choosing Direction

Antegrade vs Retrograde

FactorAntegradeRetrograde
Standard femur fracturePreferredAlternative
Floating kneePossiblePreferred - easier
Bilateral fracturesPossiblePreferred - supine positioning
PregnancyHigher pelvic radiationPreferred - less pelvic radiation
ObesityDifficult accessPreferred - easier access
Proximal third fracturePreferred - better controlDifficult proximal locking
Knee pathology/TKAPreferredContraindicated

Surgical Technique

Positioning:

  • Antegrade: Fracture table (supine) or lateral decubitus
  • Retrograde: Supine, knee flexed over radiolucent triangle
Femoral shaft fracture positioning and surgical technique
Click to expand
Surgical positioning and technique for femoral shaft fracture fixation. Proper patient positioning on the fracture table is critical for achieving reduction and optimal implant placement during intramedullary nailing.Credit: Open-i/PMC - CC BY 4.0

Key Steps (Antegrade):

  1. Position, prep, drape whole leg
  2. Entry point identification (trochanteric or piriformis)
  3. Guidewire into femoral canal
  4. Opening reamer
  5. Ball-tipped guidewire across fracture
  6. Sequential reaming (1-1.5mm larger than nail)
  7. Nail insertion to correct depth
  8. Proximal locking (under fluoro)
  9. Distal locking (perfect circles technique)
  10. Final rotation and length check

Rotation Assessment:

  • Cortical diameter matching on fluoro
  • Compare trochanter-patella relationship to other side
  • Clinical assessment: hip IR/ER, foot progression angle

Multiple assessment methods should be used to confirm rotation alignment.

Damage Control Orthopaedics

Indications:

  • Physiological instability (hypothermia, coagulopathy, acidosis)
  • Massive transfusion ongoing
  • Head injury with raised ICP
  • Polytrauma with multiple priorities

Technique:

  • Spanning external fixator (hip to knee or simple femoral frame)
  • Stabilizes fracture, reduces bleeding
  • Allows other surgical priorities

Conversion to IMN:

  • When physiologically stable (24-72 hours typically)
  • Plan carefully for pin site infection risk
  • Remove ex-fix, prep widely, then nail

Conversion timing balances patient physiology with soft tissue and infection concerns.

Postoperative Care

Weight-Bearing:

  • WBAT for most patterns with adequate fixation
  • Protected for comminuted (Winquist III-IV)
  • Progress based on healing

DVT Prophylaxis:

  • LMWH for 4-6 weeks
  • Mechanical prophylaxis
  • Early mobilization critical

Follow-Up:

  • 2 weeks: Wound check
  • 6 weeks: X-rays, progress weight-bearing
  • 3 months: Assess union
  • 6 months: Confirm union, consider dynamization if delayed

Most patients return to normal activity by 4-6 months.

Surgical Technique

Exchange nailing technique diagram for femoral nonunion
Click to expand
Five-panel schematic demonstrating exchange nailing technique for femoral shaft nonunion: (A) Aseptic nonunion with prior nail in place; (B) Nail removal and wider reaming of canal; (C) Trochanteric cancellous bone graft harvest through nail inlet using straight gouge (measuring 1-3cm depth); (D) Harvested bone graft packed at the proximal bone segment around nonunion site; (E) New locked nail inserted with static locking screws.Credit: Wu CC, J Orthop Surg Res (PMC9258056) - CC BY 4.0

Antegrade Intramedullary Nailing - Standard Approach

Patient Positioning:

  • Fracture table with traction (most common)
  • OR lateral decubitus on radiolucent table
  • Ensure adequate C-arm access

Entry Point:

  • Piriformis fossa: standard trochanteric tip
  • Greater trochanter: for trochanteric entry nails
  • Medial to tip of GT, in line with femoral canal

Step-by-Step Technique:

  1. Position and prep entire limb
  2. Make 3-5cm incision proximal to GT
  3. Split gluteus medius in line with fibers
  4. Identify entry point with awl under fluoro
  5. Open canal with reamer or awl
  6. Pass guidewire across fracture
  7. Ream in 0.5mm increments to 1-1.5mm above nail diameter
  8. Insert nail over exchange guidewire
  9. Lock proximally (targeting jig)
  10. Verify length and rotation
  11. Lock distally (freehand or jig)
  12. Final imaging all planes

The antegrade approach is preferred for most femoral shaft fractures due to excellent biomechanical properties.

Intraoperative Technical Pearls

Reduction Techniques:

  • Closed reduction with traction and manipulation
  • Blocking (Poller) screws for metaphyseal extension
  • Reduction clamps percutaneously for simple patterns
  • Open reduction for irreducible fractures only

Avoiding Malrotation:

  • Compare cortical diameters proximal and distal
  • Assess lesser trochanter profile vs contralateral
  • Check patella-to-tubercle alignment clinically
  • Intraoperative CT if uncertain

Length Restoration:

  • Pre-operative templating essential
  • Compare to contralateral femur on traction
  • Overlay technique on AP views
  • Allow 1cm shortening in elderly if needed

Entry Point Considerations:

  • Piriformis entry: true anatomic axis
  • Trochanteric entry: avoids piriformis tendon damage
  • Avoid varus start (medial wall breach)

Meticulous attention to rotation and length prevents the most common technical errors.

Variations and Alternatives

Retrograde Nailing:

  • Indicated for: ipsilateral knee injury, pregnancy, obese patients
  • Entry: intercondylar notch, anterior to PCL
  • Cannot use for proximal third fractures

Plating Indications:

  • Narrow canal (below 8mm)
  • Existing hardware
  • Periarticular extension
  • Vascular repair requiring stability

External Fixation:

  • Damage control in polytrauma
  • Contaminated open fractures
  • Temporary stabilization

Pediatric Considerations:

  • Avoid piriformis entry (AVN risk)
  • Lateral trochanteric entry or flexible nails
  • Submuscular plating for school-age children

Technique selection depends on fracture pattern, patient factors, and available implants.

Complications

IM nail breakage complication in femoral shaft fracture
Click to expand
Multi-panel radiographic series demonstrating nail breakage complication: Far left shows preoperative distal femoral comminuted fracture; center panels show IM nail fixation with proximal and distal locking screws; black arrow indicates nail breakage at the nonunion site - a recognized complication of inadequate fixation stability; right panels show post-revision exchange nailing achieving solid union at 4 months.Credit: Wu CC, J Orthop Surg Res (PMC9258056) - CC BY 4.0

Intraoperative Complications

Malrotation:

  • Most common error (especially ER)
  • Prevention: careful intraoperative assessment
  • Check cortical diameter, compare to other side

Guidewire/Reamer Breakage:

  • Avoid excessive force
  • Ensure wire doesn't kink in canal
  • Retrieve broken hardware

Fracture Displacement:

  • Can occur during nail insertion
  • Maintain reduction during reaming and insertion
  • Use fracture table traction

Iatrogenic Fracture:

  • Entry point comminution
  • Distal fracture at nail tip
  • Avoid oversized nails in narrow canals

Careful technique and appropriate implant selection minimize these risks.

Early Complications

Fat Embolism Syndrome:

  • Petechial rash, hypoxia, confusion
  • Usually 24-72 hours post-injury
  • Supportive treatment, early fixation is protective

Pulmonary Complications:

  • ARDS in polytrauma
  • Early fixation reduces risk
  • Damage control if unstable

Compartment Syndrome:

  • Thigh compartments can be affected
  • Monitor for increasing pain, swelling
  • Fasciotomy if diagnosed

Infection:

  • Under 1% for closed nailing
  • Higher for open fractures
  • Antibiotics, debridement, may need nail exchange

Early recognition and aggressive management optimize outcomes.

Late Complications

Nonunion:

  • 2-5% with modern techniques
  • Risk factors: open fracture, comminution, infection
  • Treatment: exchange nailing, bone graft, plate augmentation

Malunion:

  • Rotation most common (ER)
  • Shortening if comminuted
  • Angular deformity rare with IMN
  • May need derotation osteotomy

Hardware Prominence:

  • Proximal screws causing trochanteric pain
  • Knee pain from retrograde nail
  • Remove hardware after union if symptomatic

Limb Length Discrepancy:

  • From shortening at fracture site
  • Shoe lift if under 2cm
  • May need lengthening if significant

Prevention through careful intraoperative length restoration is key.

Postoperative Care

Immediate Postoperative (Days 0-14)

Day of Surgery:

  • Neurovascular checks hourly for 4 hours
  • Pain management: multimodal analgesia
  • DVT prophylaxis: LMWH started 6-12h post-op
  • Check post-op X-rays for implant position

Day 1:

  • Sit out of bed with physio
  • Commence range of motion exercises
  • Weight-bearing as per fixation stability
  • Most IMN: WBAT (weight-bearing as tolerated)

First 2 Weeks:

  • Wound care and suture removal at 10-14 days
  • Continue DVT prophylaxis (4-6 weeks total)
  • Progress mobility with physio supervision
  • Monitor for wound complications

Early mobilization is critical to prevent complications and optimize outcomes.

Rehabilitation Phase (Weeks 2-12)

Week 2-6:

  • Progress weight-bearing per surgeon guidance
  • Active ROM exercises hip and knee
  • Gait training: progress from walker to crutches
  • Pool exercises if wound healed

Week 6-12:

  • X-ray review at 6 weeks to assess callus
  • Advance to single crutch, then cane
  • Strengthen hip abductors and quadriceps
  • Address any developing stiffness

Red Flags to Monitor:

  • Increasing pain (may indicate hardware failure)
  • New deformity
  • Wound drainage beyond 2 weeks
  • Persistent thigh swelling

Regular clinical and radiographic review ensures early detection of problems.

Return to Function (3-6 Months)

Month 3:

  • X-ray to assess union progress
  • If bridging callus: advance activities
  • Wean walking aids as strength permits
  • Commence light gym/cycling

Month 4-6:

  • Expect radiographic union by 4 months
  • Return to driving when off analgesia and able to brake
  • Gradual return to work (desk work earlier)
  • Sport-specific rehabilitation if athlete

Hardware Removal:

  • Not routine - only if symptomatic
  • Wait minimum 18-24 months post-union
  • Counsel re-fracture risk (refracture through screw holes)

Long-term Considerations:

  • Annual review until 2 years
  • Address any limb length discrepancy
  • Malrotation usually well tolerated under 15 degrees

Most patients achieve excellent functional outcomes with modern fixation techniques.

Outcomes and Prognosis

Union Rates

Outcomes with Modern IMN

MeasureResultNotes
Union rate95-98%Excellent with reamed locked nailing
Time to union3-4 monthsSimple patterns faster
Return to work4-6 monthsDepends on occupation
Malrotation rate5-15%Often under 10 degrees, well tolerated
Nonunion rate2-5%Higher in open, comminuted

Prognostic Factors

Favorable

  • Simple fracture pattern
  • Closed injury
  • Early fixation
  • Good reduction
  • Compliant patient

Unfavorable

  • Open fracture (especially Gustilo III)
  • Segmental or highly comminuted
  • Infection
  • Delayed fixation
  • Smoking

Evidence Base

Early vs Delayed Fixation in Polytrauma

Level II
Bone LB, Johnson KD, Weigelt J, Scheinberg R • J Bone Joint Surg Am (1989)
Key Findings:
  • Early fixation (less than 24h) of femoral shaft fractures in polytrauma patients significantly reduces ARDS, fat embolism, and pulmonary complications.
  • Delayed stabilization associated with higher pulmonary morbidity.
  • Stabilized fractures allow for upright positioning and better pulmonary toilet.
Clinical Implication: Femoral shaft fractures in polytrauma should be fixed within 24 hours if physiologically stable. 'Damage Control' with temporary Ex-Fix if unstable.
Limitation: Retrospective analysis of prospective data.

SPRINT Trial: Reamed vs Unreamed Nailing

Level I (RCT)
SPRINT Investigators • J Bone Joint Surg Am (2008)
Key Findings:
  • Reamed nailing generally preferred.
  • Closed fractures: No significant difference in reoperation rates between reamed and unreamed.
  • Open fractures: Trend towards lower reoperation/nonunion with reamed nailing.
  • Reaming provides autograft and increases nail-cortex contact.
Clinical Implication: Reamed nailing is the standard of care for both open and closed femoral shaft fractures.
Limitation: Large multicenter trial, high quality.

Ipsilateral Neck and Shaft Fractures

Level III
Tornetta P, Kain MS, Creevy WR • J Bone Joint Surg Am (2007)
Key Findings:
  • 5-10% of femoral shaft fractures have an associated ipsilateral neck fracture.
  • Neck fractures are often non-displaced and missed on initial plain films.
  • Pre-operative CT scan reduces the miss rate significantly.
  • Protocol: Dedicated neck fixation (screws) takes priority over shaft fixation.
Clinical Implication: Mandatory screening for neck fractures (CT preferred). Fix the neck first to prevent displacement.

Rotational Malalignment

Level IV
Bråten M, Terjesen T, Rossvoll I • J Bone Joint Surg Br (1993)
Key Findings:
  • Malrotation over 15 degrees leads to functional impairment.
  • External rotation is the most common error.
  • Clinical methods (foot position) and radiographic methods (lesser trochanter profile, cortical diameter) must be combined.
Clinical Implication: Intraoperative assessment of rotation is critical. Aim for less than 10 degrees difference from contralateral side.

Antegrade Entry Point: Piriformis vs Trochanteric

Level III
Ricci WM et al • J Orthop Trauma (2006)
Key Findings:
  • Trochanteric entry nails associated with less operative time and fluoroscopy.
  • Significantly lower risk of iatrogenic femoral neck fracture and AVN compared to piriformis entry.
  • Functional outcomes equivalent.
Clinical Implication: Trochanteric entry is safer and easier for most antegrade nailing, especially in obese patients.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Standard Femoral Shaft - Polytrauma

EXAMINER

"A 25-year-old male presents after motorcycle accident with closed femoral shaft fracture, pelvic fracture, and moderate head injury (GCS 13). BP 110/70 after resuscitation. How do you manage the femoral shaft?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a polytrauma patient with closed femoral shaft fracture. My first priority is resuscitation per ATLS principles - this patient has had ongoing hemodynamic compromise requiring resuscitation. With GCS 13 and now stable BP, I would advocate for early fixation within 24 hours as the evidence shows this reduces pulmonary complications. Before proceeding to theatre, I must screen for ipsilateral femoral neck fracture - 5% have this, and it's easily missed. I would get a CT pelvis anyway for the pelvic fracture, ensuring hip cuts are included to assess the neck. For fixation, I would use antegrade reamed locked intramedullary nailing with a trochanteric entry point - this avoids AVN risk. Long nail with static locking given significant trauma. I would check rotation intraoperatively by comparing cortical diameter and trochanter-patella relationship to the other side. Postoperatively, weight-bearing as tolerated, DVT prophylaxis, and close monitoring for fat embolism given polytrauma.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Early fixation within 24h reduces pulmonary complications
Screen for ipsilateral neck fracture before nailing
Reamed locked IMN is gold standard
Rotation check intraoperatively
DVT prophylaxis essential
COMMON TRAPS
✗Delaying fixation unnecessarily
✗Missing ipsilateral neck fracture
✗Not assessing rotation
✗Using piriformis entry in young patient
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if BP drops to 80/50 in theatre?"
"How do you check rotation intraoperatively?"
"What if you find a neck fracture on CT?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Floating Knee

EXAMINER

"A 32-year-old female has femoral shaft fracture and ipsilateral tibial shaft fracture after being hit by a car. What is your approach?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a floating knee injury - ipsilateral femoral and tibial shaft fractures. This is a high-energy pattern with likely soft tissue and ligamentous injury to the knee. My approach: First, complete assessment per ATLS, screen for vascular injury (knee dislocations/floating knee have high vascular injury rate), assess compartments of both thigh and leg, and document neurological status carefully. For imaging, I need full-length views of both femur and tibia, plus dedicated knee X-rays and hip views to screen for neck fracture. Both fractures require operative fixation. My preferred approach is retrograde femoral nailing and antegrade tibial nailing. Retrograde femur is preferred here because: supine positioning works for both, no need to reposition, same incision can be used, and it's faster. I would fix the femur first to restore limb length and alignment, then the tibia. For the knee, given the high-energy mechanism, I would counselsubagent the patient that formal knee ligament examination will be done once fractures are healed, and MRI at 6-8 weeks if clinically indicated.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Floating knee = high energy, check vascular status
Retrograde femur + antegrade tibia is efficient
Screen for femoral neck fracture
Knee ligament assessment delayed to after healing
Fix femur first
COMMON TRAPS
✗Missing vascular injury
✗Not assessing knee ligaments eventually
✗Using antegrade femur (can do, but retrograde more efficient)
✗Missing neck fracture
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if ABI is 0.7 on affected side?"
"Would you use the same approach for open fractures?"
"How do you assess knee stability acutely?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Ipsilateral Neck and Shaft

EXAMINER

"You are about to nail a femoral shaft fracture when your registrar shows you the CT scan that was done for abdominal trauma - there is a non-displaced femoral neck fracture on the same side. What is your plan?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This changes my surgical plan completely. Ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures occur in approximately 5% of shaft fractures, and the neck fracture is often non-displaced and subtle. The neck fracture takes priority because it is at risk of displacement during shaft manipulation and has the highest morbidity if missed (AVN, nonunion). My approach would be: First, fix the femoral neck fracture with cannulated screws - typically three 6.5mm or 7.3mm screws in an inverted triangle configuration. I would do this through a percutaneous or limited open approach, with careful attention to avoid displacement during positioning. After the neck is stabilized, I proceed with the shaft fixation. I have two main options: Option 1 - Reconstruction nail (cephalomedullary nail with proximal screws into head-neck): Allows fixation of both with single implant. However, the proximal screws may not provide as good a neck fixation as dedicated screws. Option 2 - Cannulated screws for neck, then antegrade nail for shaft: Separate fixation achieves better neck compression but requires avoiding the screws with the nail. I would discuss with senior colleagues, but my preference is Option 2 for better neck fixation, using a slightly more lateral nail entry to avoid the neck screws. Static locking for shaft.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Neck fracture takes priority - fix first
Risk of displacement during shaft manipulation
Options: reconstruction nail or separate fixation
Cannulated screws + separate nail often gives better neck fixation
High complication rate if neck missed or poorly fixed
COMMON TRAPS
✗Fixing shaft first (neck may displace)
✗Missing the neck fracture entirely
✗Inadequate neck fixation
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if the neck fracture is displaced?"
"Why not use reconstruction nail?"
"What is the AVN rate in this injury?"

MCQ Practice Points

Timing Question

Q: What is the recommended timing for femoral shaft fracture fixation in a polytrauma patient?

A: Within 24 hours if the patient is physiologically stable. Early fixation reduces pulmonary complications (ARDS, fat embolism). If unstable, damage control with external fixation.

Entry Point Question

Q: What is the main concern with piriformis entry for antegrade femoral nailing in a young patient?

A: Risk of AVN (avascular necrosis) of the femoral head. The entry violates the blood supply to the femoral head. Trochanteric entry is preferred to avoid this risk.

Associated Injury Question

Q: What associated injury must be screened for in all femoral shaft fractures?

A: Ipsilateral femoral neck fracture - occurs in 5% of cases and is easily missed. Get dedicated hip views or CT before nailing. If present, fix neck first.

Malrotation Question

Q: What is the most common rotational malalignment error in femoral nailing?

A: External rotation. Up to 5-15% of cases have some malrotation. ER is more common than IR. Check rotation intraoperatively using cortical diameter matching and comparison to contralateral side.

Retrograde Indications Question

Q: When is retrograde femoral nailing preferred over antegrade?

A: Floating knee (ipsilateral tibia fracture), bilateral femur fractures (easier positioning), pregnancy (less pelvic radiation), morbid obesity (easier access), and some distal third fractures.

Australian Context

Femoral shaft fractures are a significant burden on the Australian trauma system, with approximately 3,000 cases annually. High-energy mechanisms predominate in younger patients (motor vehicle accidents, motorcycle crashes), while low-energy falls cause most fractures in the elderly osteoporotic population. The bimodal age distribution reflects these different mechanisms, with peaks in young adult males and elderly females.

Australian trauma centers follow established Major Trauma Service guidelines for management. Early transfer to definitive care centers with orthopaedic trauma capability is prioritized, and damage control protocols are well-established for polytrauma patients. The Victorian State Trauma Registry and similar registries in other states provide valuable outcome data that informs best practice guidelines.

DVT prophylaxis follows Australian guidelines with LMWH (enoxaparin) as the standard agent, typically continued for 4-6 weeks following major lower limb trauma. Mechanical prophylaxis serves as an important adjunct, and extended chemoprophylaxis is recommended for high-risk patients. Early mobilization remains the cornerstone of thromboprophylaxis and is facilitated by stable internal fixation.

The prognosis for femoral shaft fractures treated with modern intramedullary nailing techniques is excellent in Australia, with union rates exceeding 95% and most patients returning to pre-injury function within 6 months. Access to rehabilitation services and occupational therapy support facilitates return to work and activities of daily living.

FEMORAL SHAFT FRACTURES

High-Yield Exam Summary

Gold Standard Treatment

  • •Reamed locked intramedullary nailing
  • •Early fixation (under 24h) in polytrauma
  • •Long nail preferred for most cases
  • •Static locking for comminuted patterns

Screen for Neck Fracture (SCREEN)

  • •5% have ipsilateral neck fracture
  • •Easily missed if non-displaced
  • •CT scan if X-ray unclear
  • •If present: fix neck FIRST

Entry Point Selection

  • •Trochanteric: Preferred for most (less AVN risk)
  • •Piriformis: Avoid in young (AVN risk)
  • •Retrograde: Floating knee, bilateral, pregnancy, obesity

Rotation Check (CORTICES)

  • •Cortical diameter matching on fluoro
  • •Opposite limb comparison
  • •Trochanter-patella relationship
  • •ER malrotation most common error

Damage Control Indications

  • •Hypothermia, coagulopathy, acidosis
  • •Massive transfusion ongoing
  • •Apply external fixator temporarily
  • •Convert to IMN when stable (24-72h)
Quick Stats
Reading Time109 min
Related Topics

Acetabular Fractures

Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries

Acute Compartment Syndrome

Ankle Fractures