Ipsilateral Clavicle + Glenoid/Scapula Neck | Double Disruption SSSC | Operative if Displaced
- Double disruption of SSSC creates floating shoulder (unstable)
- SSSC ring: clavicle → AC joint → acromion → spine → glenoid neck → CC ligaments → clavicle
- Fix the clavicle first - often restores alignment without direct scapula fixation
- Glenoid medialization over 1cm or angular deformity over 40° indicates instability
- High-energy mechanism - always assess for associated injuries (pulmonary, brachial plexus)
- “True floating shoulder requires TWO disruptions of the SSSC
- “Clavicle fixation alone may restore scapula alignment (indirect reduction)
- “GPA (Glenopolar Angle) under 20° indicates significant deformity
- “Associated with high-energy trauma - 80% have additional injuries
Superior Shoulder Suspensory Complex is a bone-ligament ring: clavicle → AC joint → acromion → scapula spine → glenoid neck → coracoclavicular ligaments → back to clavicle. Two disruptions = floating shoulder.
Fixing the clavicle alone often restores scapula alignment indirectly through intact CC ligaments. Assess post-clavicle fixation alignment before deciding on scapula surgery.
Key thresholds: clavicle shortening over 25mm, glenoid medialization over 1cm, GPA under 20°, angular deformity over 40°. Displacement indicates instability requiring fixation.
80% have associated injuries: rib fractures, pneumothorax, brachial plexus injury, head injury. Complete trauma workup mandatory. Often presents in polytrauma setting.
- SSSC Disruptions
- One
- Stability
- Stable
- Treatment
- Nonoperative or selective fixation
- SSSC Disruptions
- One
- Stability
- Stable
- Treatment
- Nonoperative (sling, early ROM)
- SSSC Disruptions
- Two
- Stability
- Borderline
- Treatment
- Consider clavicle fixation alone
- SSSC Disruptions
- Two
- Stability
- Unstable
- Treatment
- Clavicle fixation, reassess scapula
- SSSC Disruptions
- Two or more
- Stability
- Grossly unstable
- Treatment
- Fix clavicle AND scapula
CAGESSSSC Ring Components
Hook:The shoulder lives in a CAGE - break two bars and it floats free!
Overview and Epidemiology
Floating shoulder describes the combination of ipsilateral clavicle and scapula neck (or glenoid) fractures that result in the loss of the bony connection between the axial skeleton and the upper extremity. The term was first coined by Ganz and Noesberger in 1975.
Mechanism of injury:
- High-energy direct trauma to the shoulder (MVA, fall from height, motorcycle accidents)
- Force applied to the lateral aspect of the shoulder
- Axial loading through the humeral head
- Sequential failure of SSSC components
True floating shoulder requires disruption of BOTH superior AND inferior limbs of the SSSC. The biomechanical floating shoulder described by Goss requires disruption at two points creating instability. Not all combined clavicle-scapula fractures are unstable - intact CC ligaments may maintain stability.
Associated injuries (high-energy mechanism):
- Pulmonary: rib fractures (50%), pneumothorax, pulmonary contusion
- Neurological: brachial plexus injury (5-10%), head injury
- Vascular: subclavian/axillary injury (rare but devastating)
- Other: spine injuries, abdominal trauma
Anatomy and Biomechanics
The SSSC is a bone-soft tissue ring that suspends the upper extremity from the axial skeleton. Understanding this concept is fundamental to managing floating shoulder injuries.
SSSC Ring Components:
The ring consists of:
- Clavicle - medial strut
- AC joint - connects clavicle to acromion
- Acromion process - superior link
- Scapula spine - posterior connection
- Scapula body/glenoid neck - lateral strut
- Coracoid process - inferior link
- Coracoclavicular ligaments - completes the ring to clavicle
- Components
- Clavicle, AC joint, acromion
- Function
- Primary link to axial skeleton
- Components
- Coracoid, CC ligaments, glenoid neck
- Function
- Secondary support, vertical stability
Biomechanical principles:
Like a pelvic ring, the SSSC requires two disruptions to create instability. A single break (isolated clavicle OR isolated scapula neck) typically remains stable. Two breaks create a floating segment that can displace under the pull of attached muscles.
- Serratus anterior: protracts scapula
- Pectoralis minor: tilts glenoid inferiorly
- Gravity and arm weight: causes medialization
- Trapezius/levator: elevate medial scapula (if intact)
- The clavicle is the only bony connection between upper limb and axial skeleton
- Through intact CC ligaments, fixing the clavicle can indirectly reduce the scapula
- Restores the strut function supporting the shoulder
Classification Systems
Goss Classification (1993) - Based on SSSC disruptions
- Description
- One break in SSSC ring
- Stability
- Stable
- Description
- Two breaks in ring (floating shoulder)
- Stability
- Potentially unstable
- Description
- Three or more breaks
- Stability
- Unstable
Key concept: The degree of instability depends on:
- Number of disruptions
- Displacement at each site
- Integrity of remaining structures
- Clavicle fracture + scapula neck fracture (most common)
- Clavicle fracture + AC dislocation + glenoid fracture
- AC dislocation + coracoid fracture + scapula neck fracture
Clinical Assessment
- Mechanism: High-energy trauma (MVA, fall from height)
- Associated injuries: chest pain, dyspnea, head injury
- Hand dominance
- Occupation and functional demands
- Comorbidities affecting healing
- Inspection: swelling, deformity, skin tenting
- Palpation: clavicle, acromion, scapula spine
- ROM: usually severely limited by pain
- Neurovascular: brachial plexus exam essential
- Chest: auscultate for pneumothorax
Brachial plexus injury occurs in 5-10% of floating shoulder injuries. Test:
- C5: shoulder abduction, biceps
- C6: wrist extension, brachioradialis
- C7: elbow extension, triceps
- C8/T1: finger flexion and intrinsics
- Axillary nerve: regimental badge sensation, deltoid
- Shortened, drooping shoulder appearance
- Visible or palpable clavicle deformity
- Ecchymosis over shoulder girdle
- Scapula body may be palpable posteriorly
- Inability to actively elevate arm
- Chest: breath sounds, chest wall tenderness
- Neurology: complete brachial plexus exam
- Vascular: pulses, capillary refill, expanding hematoma
- SSSC Disruptions
- Two (clavicle + scapular neck)
- Key Distinguishing Feature
- Ipsilateral clavicle AND scapular neck fracture on imaging
- Stability / Treatment
- May be unstable - decide on displacement / GPA
- SSSC Disruptions
- One
- Key Distinguishing Feature
- Intact scapula on CT; SSSC broken in one place only
- Stability / Treatment
- Stable - selective fixation by clavicle criteria
- SSSC Disruptions
- One
- Key Distinguishing Feature
- Intact clavicle and CC ligaments
- Stability / Treatment
- Usually stable - nonoperative, early ROM
- SSSC Disruptions
- Two or more + soft tissue
- Key Distinguishing Feature
- Lateral scapular displacement on non-rotated chest film, vascular/plexus injury
- Stability / Treatment
- Limb-threatening - urgent vascular and neuro assessment
- SSSC Disruptions
- Two
- Key Distinguishing Feature
- AC widening / CC distance increase rather than scapular neck break
- Stability / Treatment
- Double disruption variant - assess displacement
- SSSC Disruptions
- Two
- Key Distinguishing Feature
- Coracoid base fracture on axillary/CT, not scapular neck
- Stability / Treatment
- Double disruption - fix medial-to-lateral if displaced
The most dangerous mimic is scapulothoracic dissociation - a closed forequarter amputation equivalent. Look for lateral scapular displacement on a non-rotated chest radiograph, an absent pulse, a flail/anaesthetic limb, and massive swelling. This is a vascular and brachial plexus emergency, not a fixation decision.
FLOATFloating Shoulder Assessment
Hook:When the shoulder FLOATs, follow this systematic assessment!
Investigations


Imaging Protocol
- AP chest: pulmonary injury, rib fractures
- AP clavicle: assess shortening, displacement
- Scapular Y view: glenoid position, GPA measurement
- Axillary lateral: glenoid articular surface
- AP shoulder: glenohumeral relationship
- 3D reconstruction: fracture pattern, displacement
- Glenoid articular involvement: size, displacement
- Scapula neck displacement: medialization measurement
- Surgical planning: plate contouring, screw trajectories
- CT angiography: if vascular injury suspected
- MRI: brachial plexus injury (subacute)
- EMG/NCS: delayed brachial plexus assessment
Key measurements on imaging:
- Method
- Angle between glenoid axis and scapula body on Y view
- Significance
- Under 20° = significant deformity
- Method
- Distance glenoid has shifted medially on CT
- Significance
- Over 1cm = operative indication
- Method
- Angulation of glenoid neck relative to body
- Significance
- Over 40° = instability
- Method
- Compare to contralateral or measure displacement
- Significance
- Over 25mm = consider fixation
The Glenopolar Angle: How to Measure the Decision Metric
The glenopolar angle (GPA) is the single most-cited number in this topic - it appears in the one-pager, the FLOAT mnemonic, the surgical thresholds and the viva follow-ups - yet candidates routinely fumble when asked how it is actually measured. Being able to draw it on demand separates a confident answer from a vague one.
Definition and technique (originally described by Bestard):
- Obtain a true AP (Grashey) or scapular Y view; a rotated film distorts the angle, so a reproducible projection - or a CT / 3D reconstruction - is preferred.
- Line 1: connect the most cranial and most caudal points of the glenoid cavity (the glenoid rim line).
- Line 2: connect the most cranial point of the glenoid to the most caudal point (inferior angle) of the scapular body.
- The GPA is the angle subtended between these two lines.
- Normal: 30-45° (mean around 40°).
- Under 20° signifies significant caudal tilt / inferior angulation of the glenoid and is the classic operative threshold; some authors use under 22°.
- A falling GPA reflects the glenoid rotating and dropping away from the scapular body - the exact deformity that impairs the concavity-compression and the abduction lever arm of the glenohumeral joint.
the GPA is not an arbitrary cut-off - it is the parameter that best tracks function. In the Lin randomised study the GPA after bony consolidation correlated strongly with both DASH and Constant scores, and combined clavicle-plus-scapula fixation restored the GPA best. In van Noort's series it was the caudally dislocated glenoid (a low-GPA equivalent) that produced the worst results (Constant 42 versus 85). Restoring glenoid position and GPA - not simply counting SSSC breaks - is therefore the true goal of treatment.
GPA measurement is projection-dependent and carries genuine interobserver variability on plain films, so an isolated borderline value should be confirmed on a reproducible view or on CT before it is used to justify or to refuse surgery.
If the examiner hands you a scapular Y or AP and asks you to measure the GPA, verbalise it: "One line through the superior and inferior glenoid poles, a second from the superior glenoid to the inferior scapular angle; normal is 30-45°, and under 20° is my operative threshold." Then add the judgement point: the GPA correlates with functional outcome, so restoring it - by clavicle fixation and, if it stays low, scapular ORIF - is the aim.
Management Algorithm

Key Decision Points:
Management Algorithm
- Count number of disruptions
- Single disruption: usually stable, nonoperative
- Double disruption: assess displacement
- GPA, medialization, angulation, clavicle shortening
- Minimally displaced: consider nonoperative or clavicle alone
- Significantly displaced: surgical stabilization
- Plate fixation of clavicle
- Intraoperative fluoro of scapula
- Reassess scapula alignment after clavicle fixation
- If alignment restored: stop
- If persistent displacement: proceed to scapula ORIF
Fixing the clavicle restores the strut function of the SSSC. Through intact CC ligaments, this can indirectly reduce the scapula. Studies show clavicle fixation alone achieves acceptable alignment in 60-70% of floating shoulders.
Timing of Fixation and the Polytrauma Decision
Because roughly 80% of these injuries occur in a polytrauma patient, when to operate is often a harder question than whether to operate - and it is a favourite viva branch precisely because the shoulder girdle must never be prioritised over the resuscitation.
The girdle injury is rarely the emergency. With two exceptions - an open fracture and a vascular injury requiring repair - the floating shoulder itself is not time-critical. The life-threatening companions take priority: tension or simple pneumothorax and haemothorax, flail chest and pulmonary contusion, closed head and cervical-spine injury, and - the dangerous mimic - scapulothoracic dissociation with subclavian/axillary disruption. ATLS priorities and the trauma team lead the first hours; the girdle is addressed once the patient is stabilised.
Damage control versus early appropriate care. In the physiologically deranged or borderline patient (persistent acidosis, high lactate or base deficit, coagulopathy, ongoing transfusion requirement, or a severe chest/head injury), definitive shoulder-girdle fixation is deferred - there is no physiological cost to waiting, and a prolonged lateral/prone scapular approach is poorly tolerated by an unstable patient. Once resuscitation endpoints normalise, early appropriate care applies and fixation proceeds.
Practical window. Clavicle-first fixation (and scapular ORIF if needed) is best performed while reduction is still straightforward - typically within the first one to two weeks, before early callus makes an indirect clavicle-led reduction of the scapula harder to achieve. Later fixation remains possible but is technically more demanding. The two-stage option - fix the clavicle acutely, reassess the scapula on imaging over the following one to two weeks, and add scapular fixation only if the glenoid stays displaced - is a legitimate way to shorten the initial anaesthetic in a marginal patient.
State the hierarchy explicitly: "Unless it is open or has a vascular injury, the floating shoulder is not an emergency. I would let ATLS and the trauma team lead, exclude the chest, neurovascular and scapulothoracic-dissociation injuries, and only take the girdle to theatre once the patient is physiologically stable - ideally within the first week or two while reduction is easy." This ranks life over limb-cosmesis and shows trauma judgement.
DIMSIndications for Scapula Fixation
Hook:DIMS your chances if you miss these indications for surgery!
Surgical Technique
- Beach chair or supine with bump
- Entire shoulder girdle in field
- Image intensifier available for scapula assessment
- Standard anterior or superior approach to clavicle
- Protect supraclavicular nerves
- Identify fracture pattern
- Superior plating: 3.5mm reconstruction or precontoured plate
- Anteroinferior plating: biomechanically stronger
- 3 screws each side of fracture minimum
- Lag screws for butterfly fragments
- Fluoro scapular Y view after clavicle fixation
- Measure GPA, medialization
- If acceptable → close
- If persistent displacement → proceed to scapula
Anteroinferior plate position is biomechanically superior for clavicle shaft fractures - resists bending forces better and has lower profile reducing hardware prominence.
Complications
- Incidence
- 10-20%
- Risk Factors
- Nonoperative displaced, inadequate fixation
- Management
- Osteotomy if symptomatic
- Incidence
- 5-10%
- Risk Factors
- Smoking, comminution, inadequate fixation
- Management
- Revision ORIF with bone graft
- Incidence
- 15-25%
- Risk Factors
- Prolonged immobilization, adhesive capsulitis
- Management
- Physiotherapy, manipulation, arthroscopy
- Incidence
- 5-10%
- Risk Factors
- High-energy mechanism, severe displacement
- Management
- Observation, exploration if no recovery
- Incidence
- 10-20%
- Risk Factors
- Superior plate position, thin patients
- Management
- Hardware removal after union
- Incidence
- Less than 5%
- Risk Factors
- Surgical approach, direct injury
- Management
- Observation, nerve release if no recovery
Outcome-related factors:
- Anatomic reduction achieved
- Single surgery (clavicle alone)
- Early mobilization
- Younger patient
- Isolated injury (no polytrauma)
- Persistent glenoid malposition
- Intra-articular involvement
- Associated brachial plexus injury
- Delayed treatment
- Polytrauma, ICU admission
Postoperative Care
Rehabilitation Protocol
- Sling immobilization
- Wound care
- Gentle pendulum exercises
- Elbow, wrist, hand ROM
- Passive and active-assisted ROM
- Forward flexion, external rotation in plane of scapula
- Avoid combined abduction/external rotation
- Continue sling when not exercising
- Discontinue sling
- Full active ROM progression
- Begin isometric strengthening
- Scapular stabilization exercises
- Progressive resistance exercises
- Rotator cuff strengthening
- Sport-specific training if applicable
- Return to non-contact activities
- Full strength and ROM
- Contact sports cleared
- Manual labor cleared
- Hardware removal if symptomatic (after 1 year)
Outcomes and Prognosis
Factors affecting outcome:
- Union Rate
- 85-90%
- Functional Outcome
- Fair to good
- Complications
- Malunion, weakness common
- Union Rate
- 95%
- Functional Outcome
- Good to excellent
- Complications
- Hardware prominence
- Union Rate
- 95%
- Functional Outcome
- Good to excellent
- Complications
- Longer surgery, nerve risk
Studies show operatively treated floating shoulder patients achieve Constant scores of 80-90% of contralateral side. Most return to pre-injury activity level. Residual weakness is more common with nonoperative treatment of displaced injuries.
Guidelines, Registries & Global Practice
Global epidemiology
- Scapular fractures account for under 1% of all fractures; the floating shoulder (ipsilateral clavicle + scapular neck) is a small subset, reported in roughly 0.1% of fractures.
- Around 10-15% of scapular neck/body fractures have an associated ipsilateral clavicle fracture.
- Predominantly young men (mean age late 30s) injured in motor vehicle and motorcycle crashes and falls from height; the high-energy mechanism explains the high rate of associated thoracic and neurovascular injury worldwide.
- Position on the Floating Shoulder
- Operate the displaced double disruption; clavicle-first then reassess
- Practical Emphasis
- Glenopolar angle, lateral border displacement, angulation as operative triggers
- Position on the Floating Shoulder
- Selective surgery; many isolated-looking patterns do well nonoperatively
- Practical Emphasis
- Polytrauma-led care, early mobilisation, individualised decision
- Position on the Floating Shoulder
- Surgery for medialisation over 20mm, angulation over 45°, GPA under 22°, intra-articular step
- Practical Emphasis
- Reproducible radiographic thresholds drive the decision
- Position on the Floating Shoulder
- No mandatory fixation; restore glenoid position and GPA
- Practical Emphasis
- Function tracks glenoid position more than the number of disruptions
Registry note: There is no dedicated implant registry for the floating shoulder (it is a fracture-fixation, not an arthroplasty, problem), so evidence rests on small series and a single small RCT rather than registry data - a key reason equipoise persists.
High- vs limited-resource practice variation
- High-resource: routine CT with 3D reconstruction for planning, precontoured clavicle and scapular plates, intraoperative fluoroscopy to confirm GPA, single-stage combined fixation when needed.
- Limited-resource: reliance on plain films (scapular Y plus axillary), conservative management for all but grossly displaced injuries, and clavicle-only fixation favoured to minimise theatre time and the morbidity of the posterior Judet approach.
- Across settings the converging principle is the same: reduce the glenoid/restore GPA and treat the patient's overall trauma burden first.
Controversies and Areas of Uncertainty
The floating shoulder is a classic viva topic precisely because the evidence is thin and genuine equipoise exists. Be ready to argue both sides.
Goss's biomechanical concept predicts instability from any double disruption, yet van Noort's multicentre series found the injury is not inherently unstable and that good function follows conservative care unless the glenoid is caudally dislocated. The modern view: instability depends on displacement, not the count of disruptions.
Dombrowsky's systematic review found comparable mean Constant scores (≈80% of ideal) for operative and nonoperative groups, but the small RCT (Lin et al.) favoured fixation for GPA and DASH/Constant. Selection - not a blanket rule - drives outcome.
Clavicle-first with intraoperative reassessment is widely taught, but indirect reduction of the scapula through intact CC ligaments is unreliable. Some surgeons argue a displaced scapular neck should be addressed directly rather than hoping the clavicle plate corrects the GPA.
Cited GPA cut-offs vary (under 20° vs under 22°), as do medialisation (over 10mm vs over 20mm) and angulation (over 40° vs over 45°) thresholds. These numbers are expert-derived, not validated prospectively; treat them as guides, not absolutes.
State the controversy explicitly: "There is no high-level consensus. I would individualise based on the degree of glenoid displacement and GPA, the patient's physiological status and demands, and the overall trauma burden - reserving combined fixation for the displaced, physiologically stable patient." This shows judgement rather than dogma.
MCQ Practice Points
Q: Which structure is NOT part of the Superior Shoulder Suspensory Complex?
A) Clavicle B) Coracoacromial ligament C) Coracoclavicular ligaments D) Acromion
A: B - The coracoacromial ligament connects coracoid to acromion but is not part of the SSSC ring. The SSSC includes: clavicle, AC joint, acromion, scapula spine, glenoid neck, coracoid, and CC ligaments.
Q: What glenopolar angle represents a surgical threshold in floating shoulder?
A) Less than 40° B) Less than 30° C) Less than 20° D) Less than 10°
A: C - GPA under 20° indicates significant angular deformity and is a surgical indication. Normal GPA is 30-45°.
Q: In the management of floating shoulder, the recommended initial surgical strategy is:
A) Fix scapula first, then assess clavicle B) Fix clavicle first, then assess scapula C) Always fix both clavicle and scapula D) Fix whichever has more displacement
A: B - Clavicle-first strategy is recommended. Fixing the clavicle restores the strut function and through intact CC ligaments often reduces the scapula indirectly. Assess scapula position after clavicle fixation.
Q: Which nerve is at risk during posterior approach to the scapula?
A) Axillary nerve B) Long thoracic nerve C) Suprascapular nerve D) Musculocutaneous nerve
A: C - The suprascapular nerve is at risk at the spinoglenoid notch during posterior scapula approaches. Injury causes infraspinatus weakness.
Q: What percentage of floating shoulder injuries have associated injuries due to high-energy mechanism?
A) 40% B) 60% C) 80% D) 95%
A: C - Approximately 80% of floating shoulder injuries have associated injuries including rib fractures, pneumothorax, brachial plexus injury, or head trauma due to the high-energy mechanism.
Q: What degree of glenoid medialization is considered a surgical indication in floating shoulder?
A) Greater than 5mm B) Greater than 1cm C) Greater than 2cm D) Greater than 3cm
A: B - Glenoid medialization greater than 1cm is a surgical indication. Other thresholds include GPA under 20° and angular deformity over 40°.
Exam Viva Scenarios
Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud
“A 35-year-old male motorcyclist presents after high-speed accident. X-rays show a displaced mid-shaft clavicle fracture and an ipsilateral scapula neck fracture. He has no neurovascular deficit. How would you assess and manage this patient?”
“A 55-year-old female falls from standing height onto her shoulder. X-rays show a minimally displaced mid-shaft clavicle fracture (10mm shortening) and an ipsilateral scapula neck fracture with GPA of 32°. She is a low-demand patient. How would you manage this?”
“You have fixed a displaced clavicle fracture as part of a floating shoulder. Intraoperative fluoroscopy shows the GPA is now 15° and there is 15mm glenoid medialization. How do you proceed?”
Definition & SSSC
- Double disruption of SSSC = floating shoulder
- SSSC ring: clavicle → AC joint → acromion → spine → glenoid → CC ligaments
- Single disruption = stable, double = potentially unstable
- 15% of scapula fractures have ipsilateral clavicle fracture
Key Measurements
- GPA normal 30-45°, surgical threshold under 20°
- Medialization surgical threshold over 1cm
- Angular deformity surgical threshold over 40°
- Clavicle shortening threshold over 25mm
Management Algorithm
- Step 1: Assess SSSC disruptions and displacement
- Step 2: Fix clavicle first (plate fixation)
- Step 3: Intraop fluoro to reassess scapula
- Step 4: If persistent displacement → scapula ORIF
- Clavicle alone restores alignment in 60-70%
Surgical Approaches
- Clavicle: anterior/superior approach, plate fixation
- Scapula: Judet posterior approach
- Judet: between deltoid and infraspinatus
- Protect suprascapular nerve at spinoglenoid notch
Complications
- Malunion 10-20% (especially nonoperative)
- Stiffness 15-25%
- Brachial plexus injury 5-10%
- Hardware prominence with clavicle plate
- Suprascapular nerve injury with scapula surgery
Evidence Base
Goss: Double Disruptions of the SSSC (concept paper)
- Defined the superior shoulder suspensory complex as a bone-soft tissue ring
- Introduced the 'double disruption' principle - two breaks create instability
- Unified previously isolated injury descriptions under one framework
- Surgical reduction/stabilisation indicated when displacement is unacceptable
Systematic Review: Conservative vs Surgical Floating Shoulder
- 17 studies, 371 shoulders; mean follow-up 49 months
- 58% treated surgically, 42% nonoperatively
- Mean Constant-Murley score 80% of ideal in BOTH operative and nonoperative groups
- Significant scapular neck displacement may benefit from combined fixation
RCT: Combined vs Clavicle-Alone vs Conservative (GPA correlation)
- Prospective randomised study, 39 patients, 3 arms, over 2 year follow-up
- Combined clavicle + scapula fixation gave the best post-union GPA (p=0.015)
- Combined group had best DASH and Constant scores (p=0.008 and 0.002)
- DASH and Constant scores strongly correlated with GPA after consolidation (p under 0.001)
The Floating Shoulder: A Multicentre Study (van Noort)
- 46 patients; 35 followed up, mostly treated conservatively
- Mean Constant 76 (conservative) vs 71 (operative) at 35 months
- Caudal glenoid dislocation was the key driver of poor results (Constant 42 vs 85)
- The injury is NOT inherently unstable
Coracoid (Type I) Fractures as SSSC Double Disruption
- 36 surgically treated type I coracoid fractures; double disruption in 94%
- Reduction proceeded medial-to-lateral, fixing the coracoid last
- Bone union in all fractures with no additional operations
- Mean Constant score ratio 93% of the normal side