Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Galeazzi Fractures

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Galeazzi Fractures

Comprehensive orthopaedic exam guide to Galeazzi fracture-dislocations - the fracture of necessity, DRUJ instability, ORIF with plate fixation, and rehabilitation

complete
Updated: 2025-12-17
High Yield Overview

GALEAZZI FRACTURE-DISLOCATION

Fracture of Necessity | ORIF Required | DRUJ Instability | Adult vs Pediatric Difference

ORIFTreatment of choice
DRUJKey associated injury
92%Success with operative treatment
JunctionMiddle-distal third radius

GALEAZZI COMPONENTS

Radius Fracture
PatternJunction of middle and distal thirds
TreatmentORIF with compression plate
DRUJ Disruption
PatternDislocation or subluxation
TreatmentStabilize after radius fixation
Equivalent
PatternUlnar styloid base fracture instead of true dislocation
TreatmentSame approach - fix radius, assess DRUJ

Critical Must-Knows

  • Fracture of Necessity - virtually always requires ORIF in adults
  • DRUJ instability is the key associated injury - always assess
  • Anatomic radius reduction usually restores DRUJ stability
  • Pediatric Galeazzi often treated conservatively (different than adults)
  • Compare to Monteggia: Galeazzi = Distal (DRUJ), Monteggia = Proximal (radial head)

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    G for GRUJ (distal), M for MPRUJ (proximal) - mnemonic for location
  • "
    Supination after fixation usually stabilizes DRUJ
  • "
    Brachioradialis deforming force causes shortening
  • "
    Check ulnar styloid - base fracture indicates DRUJ disruption
PA and lateral radiographs showing distal radius MIPO fixation
Click to expand
Galeazzi fracture surgical result. PA and lateral radiographs at 3 months post-operation demonstrating minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) fixation of a distal radius fracture. Note the anatomic reduction with restored radial length, alignment, and congruent DRUJ. The 'fracture of necessity' requires rigid internal fixation in adults to restore forearm mechanics and DRUJ stability.Credit: Chen Y et al., Orthop Surg (PMC5296855) - CC-BY 4.0

Critical Galeazzi Points for Exams

Fracture of Necessity

Called the fracture of necessity because operative treatment is essentially mandatory in adults. Conservative management leads to high failure rates (92% failure).

DRUJ Always Involved

The DRUJ is ALWAYS disrupted. After radius fixation, test DRUJ stability in supination and pronation. Most stable in supination.

Pediatric Difference

Children under 10 can often be treated conservatively with cast. Adults always need surgery. This is a common exam question contrast.

Radius First

Fix the radius fracture first with anatomic reduction and compression plating. This alone often restores DRUJ stability (80%).

At a Glance: Quick Decision Guide

ScenarioDecisionKey Point
ORIF radius with plateAssess DRUJ after fixation
Supination cast 6 weeksMost common outcome (80%)
Pin DRUJ in supination or repair TFCCOccurs in 20%
Consider conservative managementDifferent from adults
Indicates DRUJ disruptionFix if DRUJ unstable after radius
Urgent debridement then ORIFStandard open fracture protocol
Mnemonic

GRIPS vs MUGSSGaleazzi vs Monteggia Location

G
Galeazzi
Radius fracture + DRUJ disruption
R
Radius
Fracture of radius shaft
I
Inferior
Distal (inferior) radioulnar joint
P
Plus
Plus DRUJ disruption
S
S for distal
Points downward like S

Memory Hook:Galeazzi = Radius fracture + Inferior (distal) radioulnar joint disruption!

Mnemonic

SUPINATEDRUJ Stability Position

S
Supination
Position of maximum DRUJ stability
U
Ulna and radius
Come parallel in supination
P
Post-fixation
Test DRUJ after radius plate
I
Immobilize
Cast in supination if stable
N
Neutral if pinned
Or pin if unstable
A
Assess
Compare to contralateral side
T
TFCC
May need repair if unstable
E
Evaluate fully
Check stability in all positions

Memory Hook:SUPINATE - DRUJ is most stable in supination position!

Mnemonic

RDComponents of Galeazzi Injury

R
Radius fracture
Junction middle-distal third
D
DRUJ disruption
Dislocation or subluxation

Memory Hook:RD - Radius fracture plus DRUJ disruption equals Galeazzi!

Mnemonic

BPQDeforming Forces

B
Brachioradialis
Shortens the radius
P
Pronator quadratus
Pronates distal fragment
Q
Quadratus thumb
Creates apex dorsal angulation

Memory Hook:BPQ muscles cause the classic Galeazzi deformity pattern!

Overview and Introduction

What is a Galeazzi Fracture?

A Galeazzi fracture-dislocation consists of:

  1. Fracture of the radius shaft (typically junction of middle and distal thirds)
  2. Disruption of the DRUJ (distal radioulnar joint)

The DRUJ disruption may be:

  • True dislocation
  • Subluxation
  • Ulnar styloid base fracture (Galeazzi equivalent)

Historical Note

First described by Riccardo Galeazzi in 1934. Called the fracture of necessity by Hughston (1957) because operative treatment is necessary for good outcomes in adults.

Epidemiology

Incidence:

  • 3-7% of all forearm fractures
  • Less common than Monteggia fractures
  • Male predominance (3:1)
  • Peak age 30-40 years

Mechanism:

  • Fall on outstretched hand with forearm pronated (most common)
  • Direct blow to dorsoradial forearm
  • Axial load on hyperpronated wrist
  • High-energy trauma (motor vehicle accidents)

Galeazzi vs Monteggia - Key Differences

Comparison of Forearm Fracture-Dislocations

FeatureGaleazziMonteggia
Radius (distal)Ulna (proximal)
DRUJ (distal)Radiocapitellar (proximal)
Ulna from radius (DRUJ)Radial head
Always ORIFUsually ORIF
Conservative possible under age 10Often conservative

Anatomy and Pathophysiology

Distal Radioulnar Joint (DRUJ) Anatomy

Bony Articulation:

  • Ulnar head articulates with sigmoid notch of radius
  • Radius rotates around relatively fixed ulna (180° rotation)
  • Shallow articulation - relies heavily on soft tissue stability
  • Articular surface coverage approximately 60°

Soft Tissue Stabilizers:

  • TFCC (triangular fibrocartilage complex) - primary stabilizer
  • Dorsal and volar radioulnar ligaments (components of TFCC)
  • Pronator quadratus
  • Interosseous membrane (central band)
  • ECU subsheath
  • Ulnocarpal ligaments

DRUJ Instability Mechanism

The shallow sigmoid notch provides minimal bony constraint to DRUJ stability. The TFCC and IOM are the primary stabilizers. In Galeazzi fractures, the IOM is disrupted, and TFCC is often torn, leading to DRUJ instability that persists even after radius fracture fixation.

Deforming Forces

Proximal Fragment:

  • Pulled proximally by biceps and supinator
  • Variable rotation depending on fracture level
  • Tends to supinate if fracture is proximal to pronator teres

Distal Fragment:

  • Shortened by brachioradialis (primary deforming force)
  • Pronated by pronator quadratus
  • Typically apex dorsal angulation
  • Flexed by wrist flexors

Result:

  • Radius shortening
  • Angular deformity (apex dorsal)
  • Loss of radial bow
  • DRUJ incongruity with ulnar head prominence

Interosseous Membrane Role

Central Band:

  • Primary longitudinal stabilizer of forearm
  • Transmits 80% of axial load from radius to ulna
  • Disrupted in Galeazzi fractures
  • Runs obliquely from radius to ulna (proximal-distal)

Clinical Relevance:

  • IOM disruption contributes to radius shortening
  • May prevent closed reduction
  • Contributes to persistent DRUJ instability
  • Must be considered when assessing DRUJ stability after fixation

Classification Systems

Classification by Radial Fracture Location

Location-Based Classification

TypeLocationClinical Significance
Junction middle/distal thirdsClassic Galeazzi pattern, high DRUJ instability (most common)
True mid-shaft radiusLess DRUJ instability but still assess carefully
Proximal third radiusRare, consider Essex-Lopresti variant with IOM disruption

Classic Location

The classic Galeazzi fracture occurs at the junction of the middle and distal thirds of the radius. More distal fractures have HIGHER DRUJ instability risk. Fractures in the proximal third should raise suspicion for Essex-Lopresti injury (complete IOM disruption with proximal radius migration).

DRUJ Stability Classification

Post-Reduction Assessment:

  • Stable: DRUJ reduced and stable in all positions of rotation (80% of cases)
  • Unstable in pronation: DRUJ subluxates when forearm pronated - immobilize in supination
  • Unstable in all positions: Grossly unstable - requires DRUJ pinning or TFCC repair

Always Assess DRUJ Stability

After radial ORIF, DRUJ stability MUST be assessed intraoperatively. Test with radius stabilized and translate ulna dorsally/volarly. Compare to contralateral side. If unstable, the arm should be immobilized in supination or the DRUJ may need K-wire stabilization. Failure to address DRUJ instability leads to chronic pain and dysfunction.

Galeazzi Variants and Associated Injuries

Associated Injuries:

  • TFCC tear: Accompanies most Galeazzi fractures (90%)
  • Ulnar styloid fracture:
    • Base fracture - indicates TFCC avulsion and severe DRUJ instability
    • Tip fracture - less significant, can be ignored
  • IOM injury: Complete disruption contributing to instability
  • Carpal injuries: Rare but assess wrist ligaments
  • Essex-Lopresti: Proximal radius fracture with IOM disruption and DRUJ dislocation

Ulnar Styloid Base Fracture

A large ulnar styloid base fracture indicates significant TFCC avulsion and predicts DRUJ instability. This may require separate fixation if DRUJ remains unstable after radial fixation. In contrast, tip fractures are usually not clinically significant.

Clinical Assessment

History Taking

Mechanism of Injury:

  • Fall on outstretched hand (FOOSH) - most common
  • Forearm typically in pronation at time of impact
  • Direct blow to dorsal forearm
  • Sporting injury (cycling, contact sports)
  • Motor vehicle accident (high energy)

Symptoms:

  • Forearm pain and swelling
  • Wrist pain (DRUJ involvement)
  • Visible deformity
  • Inability to supinate or pronate forearm
  • Weakness of grip

Physical Examination

Inspection:

  • Forearm deformity and swelling
  • Wrist swelling (especially dorsal - DRUJ area)
  • Prominent ulnar head dorsally (DRUJ dislocation)
  • Skin integrity - check for open fracture
  • Radial shortening compared to opposite side

Palpation:

  • Point tenderness at radius fracture site
  • DRUJ tenderness dorsally
  • Ulnar styloid - check for base fracture
  • Interosseous membrane tenderness
  • Compartment assessment

Range of Motion:

  • Limited and painful supination/pronation
  • Usually cannot rotate forearm
  • Wrist motion limited by pain

Neurovascular Examination:

  • Median nerve: Sensation first web space, thumb opposition
  • Ulnar nerve: Sensation little finger, finger abduction
  • Radial nerve: Wrist/finger extension, sensation dorsal first web space
  • Vascular: Radial and ulnar pulses, capillary refill

DRUJ Stability Testing

Examination Technique:

  1. Stabilize radius firmly with one hand
  2. Translate ulna dorsally and volarly with other hand
  3. Assess amount of translation and compare to contralateral side
  4. Test in supination, neutral, and pronation positions
  5. Note position of maximum stability (usually supination)

Interpretation:

  • Increased translation compared to opposite side = instability
  • Pain with testing indicates ligament injury
  • Dorsal prominence of ulnar head = DRUJ dislocation
  • Usually most stable in supination

Investigations

Radiographic Assessment

Essential X-ray Views:

  • Full-length forearm radiographs (AP and lateral)
  • MUST include both elbow and wrist joints
  • Dedicated wrist views (PA and lateral)
  • Contralateral forearm for comparison if needed

Key Radiographic Findings:

AP View:

  • Radius fracture at middle-distal junction (typical)
  • DRUJ widening (greater than 2mm asymmetry)
  • Increased space between radius and ulna at DRUJ
  • Ulnar styloid base fracture (suggests DRUJ disruption)
  • Radial shortening relative to ulna

Lateral View:

  • Dorsal subluxation of ulnar head
  • Apex dorsal angulation of radius fracture
  • Loss of normal DRUJ relationship
  • Distal radius volar displacement possible

DRUJ Assessment on X-ray

On the AP view, look for DRUJ widening - greater than 2mm difference compared to opposite wrist is abnormal. On the lateral view, look for dorsal prominence of the ulnar head. Always obtain full forearm X-rays including both joints to avoid missing associated injuries.

Galeazzi fracture with DRUJ disruption - pre and post-operative imaging
Click to expand
Comprehensive Galeazzi injury case (a, b). (a) Pre-operative imaging: lateral wrist X-ray showing radius fracture with DRUJ disruption (arrow), and axial CT demonstrating DRUJ subluxation. (b) Post-operative imaging: AP and lateral views showing anatomic radius reduction with plate fixation and K-wire stabilization of the reduced DRUJ. Note the importance of addressing both components - the radius fracture and DRUJ stability.Credit: PMC - CC BY 4.0
Classic Galeazzi fracture radiographic appearance
Click to expand
Classic Galeazzi fracture-dislocation: (A) PA forearm radiograph demonstrating displaced fracture of the distal one-third of the radial shaft - the hallmark location for Galeazzi injuries, (B) Lateral wrist view showing dorsal DRUJ subluxation (arrowheads) with dorsal prominence of the ulnar head - confirming the associated DRUJ disruption that defines the Galeazzi lesion, (C) PA wrist view showing widening of the DRUJ space. This triad of distal radius fracture plus DRUJ disruption requires operative fixation in adults.Credit: Wong PK et al., Int J Emerg Med - PMC4519440 (CC-BY)

CT Scanning

Indications for CT:

  • Assess DRUJ congruity when plain films unclear
  • Complex intra-articular fracture patterns
  • Pre-operative planning for comminuted fractures
  • Post-operative assessment if DRUJ reduction questioned
  • Chronic DRUJ instability evaluation

Information Provided:

  • Detailed sigmoid notch anatomy and fracture fragments
  • Quantification of DRUJ subluxation
  • Associated fracture fragments (ulnar styloid)
  • Articular step-off assessment
Axial CT showing distal radius fracture comminution
Click to expand
CT assessment of distal radius fracture comminution. Axial CT images demonstrating the fracture pattern with comminution of the distal radius. CT provides critical information for surgical planning including assessment of articular involvement, fragment number and displacement, and sigmoid notch integrity. For complex intra-articular patterns, CT helps guide the surgical approach and fixation strategy.Credit: Chen Y et al., Hand Surg Rehabil (PMC6812281) - CC-BY 4.0

MRI Scanning

Role in Galeazzi Fractures:

  • Rarely needed in acute setting
  • May be useful in delayed or chronic cases

Indications:

  • TFCC assessment (tears, quality)
  • Chronic DRUJ instability evaluation
  • Persistent unexplained symptoms post-treatment
  • IOM assessment in suspected Essex-Lopresti

Findings:

  • TFCC tears (central perforations or peripheral detachments)
  • IOM disruption
  • Ligament injuries
  • Cartilage damage

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
Galeazzi Fracture Management Algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for Galeazzi fractures. Anatomic radius reduction is the priority. Assess DRUJ stability after fixation.Credit: OrthoVellum

Treatment Decision Tree

Management Based on Patient and Injury Factors

ScenarioTreatmentKey Points
ORIF radius with plateFracture of necessity - always operative
Consider closed reduction and castConservative possible if reduction acceptable
ORIF radius with plateTreat as adult
Supination cast 6 weeksMost common outcome (80%)
Pin DRUJ or repair TFCCOccurs in 20% of cases
Urgent debridement then ORIFStandard open fracture protocol

Core Management Principles

"Fracture of Necessity" Concept:

  • Operative treatment is mandatory in adults
  • Conservative treatment has 92% failure rate in adults
  • Goals: Anatomic radius reduction + stable DRUJ
  • Surgery typically performed within 24-48 hours

Key Treatment Steps:

  1. ORIF radius with compression plate (anatomic reduction)
  2. Assess DRUJ stability intraoperatively
  3. Stabilize DRUJ if unstable (pin or repair)
  4. Immobilize in position of stability (supination)
  5. Early mobilization protocol

Following these steps systematically ensures optimal outcomes.

Pediatric Considerations

Key Pediatric Difference

Children under 10 years can often be treated conservatively with closed reduction and cast immobilization in supination. The DRUJ is more likely to reduce and remain stable due to periosteal sleeve and remodeling potential.

Older children and adolescents (over 10 years) should be treated like adults with ORIF due to decreased remodeling potential.

Conservative Treatment Indications (Children):

  • Age under 10 years
  • Acceptable closed reduction achieved (less than 10° angulation)
  • DRUJ stable after reduction
  • Compliant child and family
  • Close follow-up available

Pediatric Technique:

  • Closed reduction under sedation or general anesthesia
  • Above-elbow cast in supination for 6 weeks
  • Weekly X-rays first 2-3 weeks to monitor for loss of reduction
  • If reduction lost - proceed to ORIF

Close monitoring is essential for conservative pediatric management success.

Pediatric floating forearm with intramedullary nail fixation
Click to expand
Pediatric forearm fractures treated with flexible intramedullary nails. Lateral radiograph showing both-bone forearm fractures in a child stabilized with titanium elastic nails (TEN). While this shows 'floating forearm' pattern rather than classic Galeazzi, it demonstrates the principle that pediatric forearm fractures can often be managed with minimally invasive techniques. For true Galeazzi in younger children, conservative treatment may be appropriate.Credit: PMC4557923 - CC-BY 4.0

Surgical Technique

ORIF of Radius Fracture

Pre-operative Planning:

  • Review full forearm X-rays including DRUJ
  • Plan approach based on fracture location
  • Template plate size and length
  • Consent for possible DRUJ stabilization

Patient Positioning:

  • Supine on operating table
  • Arm on radiolucent hand table
  • Tourniquet on upper arm (may not inflate if checking DRUJ stability without tourniquet)
  • C-arm positioned for AP and lateral views

Careful pre-operative planning facilitates smooth surgical execution.

Volar (Henry) Approach

Indications:

  • Distal third radius fractures (most common)
  • Junction middle-distal third (classic Galeazzi location)

Surgical Interval:

  • Between brachioradialis (radial nerve) and FCR (median nerve)

Technique:

  1. Incision: Curvilinear from biceps tendon to radial styloid, over FCR
  2. Dissection: Identify interval between brachioradialis and FCR
  3. Protection: Retract brachioradialis laterally (protects superficial radial nerve)
  4. Exposure: Incise deep fascia, supinate forearm to expose radius
  5. Vascular care: Protect radial artery (lies under FCR)

Volar Henry Approach Layers

The volar (Henry) approach uses the interval between brachioradialis (radial nerve) and FCR (median nerve). The superficial radial nerve lies on brachioradialis - retract carefully. The radial artery lies under FCR - identify and protect. Supinate the forearm to bring the volar radius into view. The PIN is generally safe with this approach as it passes dorsally through supinator.

Intraoperative photograph of pronator quadratus during volar approach
Click to expand
Volar approach to distal radius - pronator quadratus visualization. Intraoperative photograph showing the pronator quadratus muscle after elevation from the radius during the volar Henry approach. This muscle layer is incised and elevated to expose the volar radius for plate application. At closure, the pronator quadratus is repaired over the plate to reduce flexor tendon irritation.Credit: Chen Y et al., Orthop Surg (PMC4660810) - CC-BY 4.0

Dorsal (Thompson) Approach

Indications:

  • Middle third radius fractures
  • Dorsal plating preference

Surgical Interval:

  • Between ECRL/ECRB (radial nerve) and EDC (PIN)

Technique:

  1. Incision: Longitudinal over radius dorsum
  2. Dissection: Identify EDC and ECRL/ECRB
  3. PIN protection: Dissect carefully through supinator (PIN emerges here)
  4. Exposure: Supinate to bring radius into field

PIN Danger with Dorsal Approach

The posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) emerges through the supinator muscle approximately 6cm distal to the radial head. When using the Thompson approach, the supinator must be carefully elevated to protect the PIN. Excessive retraction or dissection can cause PIN palsy. Keep dissection within 9cm of radial head if possible.

Fracture Fixation Technique

Reduction:

  1. Clean fracture edges
  2. Anatomically reduce with clamps
  3. Restore radial length (compare to ulna length)
  4. Restore radial bow (10-12° maximum curvature)
  5. Correct rotation (use opposite forearm as template)

Plate Application:

  • 3.5mm compression plate (DCP or locking plate)
  • Position on volar or dorsal surface depending on approach
  • Minimum 6 cortices (3 screws) each side of fracture
  • Apply compression if fracture pattern allows
  • Bridge plate technique if comminuted

Fixation Principles:

  • Lag screw if suitable oblique fracture
  • Neutralization plate over lag screw
  • Bridge plating for comminution
  • Restore radial bow to preserve rotation

Radial Bow Restoration

The radius has a normal 10-12° volar bow with maximum curvature at the junction of proximal and middle thirds. Failure to restore this bow results in loss of pronation-supination (up to 50% loss). Use contralateral radiographs for comparison. Some surgeons pre-bend plates to match radial bow.

Galeazzi fracture pre and post-operative comparison with intramedullary fixation
Click to expand
Galeazzi fracture-dislocation treatment with intramedullary nail fixation in a 26-year-old male: (a) Preoperative AP and lateral radiographs showing displaced distal radius fracture with associated DRUJ disruption, (b) Postoperative films demonstrating anatomic reduction and stable fixation using elastic intramedullary nail technique. Note restoration of radial length and DRUJ alignment. While compression plating remains the gold standard, intramedullary fixation offers a minimally invasive alternative with reduced soft tissue disruption.Credit: Gadegone W et al., Indian J Orthop - PMC3270608 (CC-BY)

DRUJ Management

Intraoperative Assessment:

  1. Complete radius fixation first
  2. Release tourniquet (if used) or do not inflate
  3. Stabilize radius with one hand
  4. Translate ulna dorsally and volarly
  5. Test in supination, neutral, and pronation
  6. Compare to opposite wrist

If DRUJ Stable (80% of cases):

  • No additional procedure needed
  • Plan for supination immobilization post-operatively

If DRUJ Unstable:

Option 1: K-wire Fixation (Most Common)

  • Reduce DRUJ manually
  • Insert two 1.6mm K-wires from ulna to radius
  • Position in supination
  • Wires above joint, not through articular surface
  • Leave wires outside skin for removal at 6 weeks

Option 2: TFCC Repair

  • If clear TFCC tear identified
  • Open repair through dorsal incision
  • Anchor sutures to fovea or ulnar styloid

Option 3: Ulnar Styloid Fixation

  • If large base fragment (greater than 2mm)
  • Tension band wire or small screws
  • Restores TFCC attachment

Intraoperative DRUJ Check is Mandatory

ALWAYS check DRUJ stability after radial fixation under direct vision, NOT just on fluoroscopy. Position changes during imaging may give false impression of stability. Check actively by translating ulna while stabilizing radius. If any doubt about stability, immobilize in supination or consider pinning.

Key Technical Points

Reduction Requirements:

  • Anatomic radial length restoration (compare to ulna)
  • Correction of radial bow (10-12°)
  • Rotational alignment (check with elbow flexed 90°)
  • DRUJ congruence confirmed on fluoroscopy

Common Pitfalls:

  • Inadequate distal fixation (need 3 screws distal fragment)
  • Failure to restore radial bow → loss of rotation
  • Not checking DRUJ stability intraoperatively
  • PIN injury with dorsal approach (careful supinator elevation)
  • Malrotation of radius (use opposite side as template)

Attention to these technical details ensures successful surgical outcomes.

Complications

Early Complications (0-6 weeks)

Compartment Syndrome:

  • Forearm compartments at risk (volar and dorsal)
  • Monitor closely in first 48 hours post-operatively
  • Clinical diagnosis: Pain out of proportion, pain with passive stretch
  • Treatment: Urgent fasciotomy if diagnosed

Neurovascular Injury:

  • Superficial radial nerve: At risk with volar approach (lies on brachioradialis)
  • PIN: At risk with dorsal approach (emerges through supinator)
  • Median nerve: Rare but possible with volar approach
  • Posterior interosseous artery: Can bleed with dorsal approach

Wound Complications:

  • Infection (1-2% risk)
  • Wound dehiscence
  • Hematoma

Acute DRUJ Instability:

  • Most common early problem
  • May become apparent after cast removal
  • Requires assessment and possible secondary stabilization

Late Complications (After 6 weeks)

Persistent DRUJ Instability:

  • Most common late complication (10-15%)
  • Causes: Inadequate initial stabilization, missed TFCC tear, malunion
  • Presentation: Pain, weakness, clicking, instability sensation
  • Treatment: TFCC reconstruction, ulnar styloid ORIF if chronic nonunion
  • Salvage: Darrach procedure or Sauve-Kapandji if severe

Malunion:

  • Causes: Inadequate reduction, loss of fixation
  • Manifestations: Shortened radius, angular deformity, loss of bow
  • Consequences: DRUJ incongruity, loss of rotation, pain
  • Treatment: Corrective osteotomy if symptomatic

Nonunion:

  • Rare with rigid plate fixation (less than 2%)
  • Risk factors: Inadequate fixation, infection, smoking
  • Treatment: Revision ORIF with bone graft

Loss of Motion:

  • Supination/pronation loss (most common residual deficit)
  • Causes: DRUJ problems, malunion, soft tissue contracture
  • Prevention: Early motion protocol, anatomic reduction

Other Late Complications:

  • Heterotopic ossification (rare)
  • Radioulnar synostosis (very rare)
  • Post-traumatic arthritis (DRUJ or radiocarpal)
  • Hardware prominence or irritation
  • Chronic regional pain syndrome (CRPS)

Complication Prevention Strategies

For DRUJ Instability:

  • Ensure anatomic radius length restoration
  • Test DRUJ stability intraoperatively under direct vision
  • Immobilize in supination for 6 weeks
  • Pin if unstable (do not ignore instability)

For Malunion:

  • Anatomic reduction of radius fracture
  • Restore radial bow (10-12°)
  • Adequate plate fixation (3 screws minimum each side)
  • Assess reduction fluoroscopically before closure

For Stiffness:

  • Early finger and elbow motion (immediate)
  • Wrist motion after 6 weeks once healed
  • Avoid prolonged rigid immobilization beyond 6 weeks
  • Supervised hand therapy

For Nerve Injury:

  • Careful surgical dissection
  • Identify and protect nerves (superficial radial nerve, PIN)
  • Avoid excessive retraction
  • Post-operative nerve examination and documentation

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

Rehabilitation Protocol Timeline

Galeazzi Fracture Rehabilitation Protocol

Week 0-2Immediate Post-op

Above-elbow cast or splint in supination (if DRUJ stable) or sugar-tong splint. Elevation of limb. Finger ROM exercises encouraged. Wound checks at 2 weeks. Maintain shoulder and elbow mobility.

Week 2-6Protected Motion

Convert to below-elbow cast if DRUJ stable (elbow ROM allowed). Continue finger exercises. K-wires remain in place if DRUJ pinned. Radiographs at 6 weeks to assess healing.

Week 6-12Active Mobilization

Remove cast and K-wires. Begin active wrist ROM exercises. Active pronation-supination exercises started. Gentle strengthening if union confirmed. Hand therapy referral.

Month 3+Full Recovery

Progressive strengthening program. Return to sport when ROM and strength recovered (usually 3-4 months). Hardware removal if symptomatic (typically 12+ months). Full recovery expected by 6 months.

If DRUJ Stable Post-Fixation (80% of cases)

Immobilization Protocol:

  • Week 0-2: Above-elbow splint in supination with elbow 90°
  • Week 2-6: Convert to below-elbow cast in neutral or slight supination
  • Week 6: Remove cast, begin wrist ROM

Position Rationale:

  • Supination tightens dorsal DRUJ ligaments
  • Brings radius over ulna into reduced position
  • Minimizes stress on healing TFCC

Early Motion Protocol:

  • Immediate: Finger ROM (all joints), grip strengthening
  • Week 2: Elbow ROM exercises
  • Week 6: Wrist flexion/extension, forearm rotation
  • Week 8: Strengthening exercises

Expected outcome is excellent with full ROM recovery in 95% of cases.

If DRUJ Required Stabilization (20% of cases)

If K-wire Fixation Performed:

  • Above-elbow cast in supination for 4-6 weeks
  • K-wire removal at 6 weeks (in clinic, no anesthesia needed)
  • Protected motion for additional 2-4 weeks
  • Total immobilization 8-10 weeks

If TFCC Repair Performed:

  • Above-elbow cast for 4 weeks
  • Below-elbow cast for additional 2 weeks
  • Protected ROM exercises then hand therapy
  • Total immobilization 6-8 weeks

Supination Position Rationale

When DRUJ is unstable, immobilize in supination. This position tightens the dorsal radioulnar ligaments and brings the radius over the ulna into reduced position. Pronation will cause the DRUJ to subluxate dorsally due to laxity of volar ligaments. This is based on cadaveric studies showing maximum DRUJ stability in supination.

Physiotherapy Protocol

Therapy Goals

  • Full pronation-supination ROM (80° each)
  • Wrist flexion/extension 60° minimum
  • Grip strength 90% of opposite side
  • Pain-free wrist and forearm function
  • Return to pre-injury activities
  • Typical full recovery: 3-6 months

Red Flags During Recovery

  • Persistent DRUJ instability or clicking
  • Progressive loss of motion after initial gains
  • New neurological symptoms (weakness, numbness)
  • Signs of compartment syndrome (severe pain, tense forearm)
  • Wound complications (redness, drainage, dehiscence)
  • Failure to progress with therapy

Follow-up Schedule

Standard Follow-up:

  • 2 weeks: Wound check, X-ray (ensure no loss of reduction)
  • 6 weeks: Remove cast/K-wires, X-ray (assess union), begin wrist ROM
  • 12 weeks: X-ray, assess ROM and strength
  • 6 months: Final assessment, return to full activities

Discharge Criteria:

  • Fracture united (bridging callus on 3 cortices)
  • DRUJ stable clinically
  • ROM at least 80% of opposite side
  • Pain minimal or absent
  • Patient satisfied with function

Outcomes and Prognosis

Treatment Outcomes by Method

Outcome Data by Treatment Approach

Treatment MethodSuccess RateClinical Notes
92%Standard approach, excellent outcomes expected
85%For unstable DRUJ after fixation, good outcomes
8%High failure rate - do not use in adults
85%Acceptable option in young children

Prognostic Factors

Favorable Prognostic Factors:

Patient Factors

  • Younger age (under 50 years)
  • Child under 10 years (if conservative)
  • No smoking
  • Good compliance with rehabilitation
  • No significant comorbidities

Treatment Factors

  • Anatomic radius reduction achieved
  • DRUJ stable after radius fixation
  • Early surgery (under 1 week)
  • Rigid plate fixation
  • Early mobilization protocol followed

Unfavorable Prognostic Factors:

Injury Factors

  • High-energy mechanism
  • Open fracture
  • Significant soft tissue injury
  • Comminuted fracture pattern
  • Associated injuries

Treatment Complications

  • Residual radius malreduction
  • Persistent DRUJ instability
  • Delay to surgery (over 2 weeks)
  • Inadequate fixation
  • Loss of radial bow

Expected Outcomes

ROM Recovery:

  • 95% achieve at least 80% of opposite side pronation-supination
  • Wrist flexion/extension usually full or near-full
  • Elbow ROM should be full

Strength Recovery:

  • Grip strength recovers to 85-95% of opposite side
  • Time to full strength: 4-6 months

Return to Activities:

  • Light activities: 6-8 weeks
  • Heavy labor: 3-4 months
  • Contact sports: 4-6 months
  • Full unrestricted activity: 6 months

Residual Symptoms:

  • 10-15% have mild residual DRUJ discomfort
  • 5-10% have permanent minor loss of rotation
  • Less than 5% have significant disability

Evidence Base

The Fracture of Necessity Concept

Level IV
Hughston JC • J Bone Joint Surg Am (1957)
Key Findings:
  • Classic paper establishing that Galeazzi fractures treated conservatively have 92% failure rate in adults
  • Operative treatment achieves 92% success rate with anatomic reduction and plate fixation
  • Coined the term 'fracture of necessity' due to mandatory operative treatment requirement
Clinical Implication: Galeazzi fractures in adults require operative treatment with ORIF. Conservative management is not appropriate except in select pediatric cases under 10 years of age.

DRUJ Stability After Anatomic Radius Fixation

Level IV
Rettig ME, Raskin KB • J Hand Surg Am (2001)
Key Findings:
  • Anatomic restoration of radial length and bow is the primary determinant of DRUJ stability
  • 80% of DRUJs become stable after anatomic radius fixation alone
  • Failure to restore radial length results in persistent DRUJ instability in most cases
Clinical Implication: Focus on achieving anatomic radius reduction first. Test DRUJ stability after radius fixation - most will be stable without additional procedures. Pin DRUJ only if persistent instability documented.

Position of Maximum DRUJ Stability

Level III
Af Ekenstam F, Hagert CG • J Hand Surg Am (1985)
Key Findings:
  • DRUJ is most stable in supination due to tension in the volar radioulnar ligament and TFCC
  • Cadaveric biomechanical study demonstrating DRUJ translation is minimal in full supination
  • This is the optimal position for immobilization after Galeazzi fracture repair
Clinical Implication: After Galeazzi fixation, immobilize forearm in supination to maximize DRUJ stability during healing. This is based on sound biomechanical principles and is the standard immobilization protocol.

Pediatric Galeazzi Fractures - Conservative Management

Level IV
Walsh HP, McLaren CA, Owen R • J Bone Joint Surg Br (1987)
Key Findings:
  • Children under 10 years with Galeazzi injuries can be successfully treated with closed reduction and casting
  • Success rate 85% if reduction is acceptable and DRUJ is stable after reduction
  • Children over 10 years should be treated as adults with ORIF due to decreased remodeling potential
Clinical Implication: Unlike adults, young children (under 10) may be treated conservatively with good outcomes if closed reduction achieves acceptable alignment and DRUJ stability. Older children and adolescents should be treated operatively like adults.

Ulnar Styloid Base Fractures and DRUJ Instability

Level IV
Rozental TD, Beredjiklian PK, Bozentka DJ • J Hand Surg Am (2003)
Key Findings:
  • Ulnar styloid base fractures indicate TFCC avulsion and predict DRUJ instability
  • Ulnar styloid base fractures with persistent DRUJ instability after radius fixation benefit from direct repair
  • Tip fractures (distal to 50% of styloid length) do not require fixation and do not affect outcomes
Clinical Implication: Fix ulnar styloid base fractures only if DRUJ remains unstable after radius ORIF. This restores TFCC attachment. Distal tip fractures can be ignored as they are not biomechanically significant.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Classic Adult Galeazzi Fracture

EXAMINER

"A 35-year-old man presents to the emergency department after falling from his bicycle onto his outstretched hand. X-rays show a fracture of the radius at the junction of the middle and distal thirds with DRUJ widening visible on the AP view. How do you manage this patient?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

This is a classic Galeazzi fracture-dislocation consisting of a radius shaft fracture with DRUJ disruption. This is called the 'fracture of necessity' because operative treatment is mandatory in adults - conservative treatment has a 92% failure rate while surgical treatment achieves 92% success.

Initial Assessment: I would perform a thorough neurovascular examination checking median, ulnar, and radial nerve function, as well as radial and ulnar pulses. I would examine the DRUJ for instability and check for an ulnar styloid fracture which indicates DRUJ disruption severity.

Surgical Plan - ORIF of Radius: My surgical approach would be ORIF of the radius through a volar Henry approach. This uses the interval between brachioradialis (radial nerve) and FCR (median nerve). I would use a 3.5mm compression plate with at least 6 cortices of fixation (3 screws minimum) on each side of the fracture. The key is achieving anatomic reduction - restoring radial length by comparing to the ulna, restoring the radial bow (10-12 degrees), and correcting rotation by comparing to the opposite forearm.

DRUJ Assessment: After completing radius fixation, I would assess DRUJ stability by stabilizing the radius with one hand and testing ulnar translation dorsally and volarly with the other hand. I would test in supination, neutral, and pronation positions and compare to the opposite wrist. In most cases (approximately 80%), the DRUJ becomes stable once the radius is anatomically reduced.

Post-operative Management: If DRUJ is stable, I would immobilize in an above-elbow cast or splint in supination for 2 weeks, then convert to below-elbow cast for 4 more weeks (total 6 weeks). At 6 weeks I would remove the cast and begin wrist ROM exercises with hand therapy. If DRUJ is unstable, I would pin the DRUJ in reduced position with K-wires in supination or consider TFCC repair if a clear tear is identified.

Expected Outcome: With anatomic reduction and appropriate DRUJ management, I would expect 92% good to excellent results with full or near-full recovery of pronation-supination and return to normal activities by 3-4 months.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Recognize Galeazzi fracture-dislocation pattern
Fracture of necessity - always operative in adults
ORIF radius through volar approach
Assess DRUJ stability after radius fixation
Immobilize in supination if stable
COMMON TRAPS
✗Attempting conservative treatment in adult
✗Not assessing DRUJ stability intraoperatively
✗Immobilizing in pronation instead of supination
✗Inadequate radius fixation causing persistent instability
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if DRUJ remains unstable after radius fixation?"
"Why is supination the best position for immobilization?"
"Describe your surgical approach for the radius fracture"
"What are the deforming forces?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Pediatric Galeazzi - Conservative vs Operative

EXAMINER

"An 8-year-old girl fell on the playground. X-rays show a greenstick fracture of the distal radius with DRUJ widening. Her mother asks if surgery is needed. How do you counsel them and what is your treatment plan?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

This is a Galeazzi equivalent injury in a child under 10 years old. Importantly, treatment in children differs significantly from adults, and I would explain this to the family.

Counseling the Family: I would explain that while adults with this injury always require surgery, children's bones heal differently and have excellent remodeling potential. In children under 10, we can often achieve good outcomes with casting alone, avoiding surgery and its risks. The success rate with conservative management in young children is approximately 85%, compared to only 8% in adults.

Treatment Plan: My approach would be closed reduction under sedation or general anesthesia in the operating room. After achieving reduction, I would assess the DRUJ clinically for stability. If the radius is well reduced (less than 10 degrees angulation acceptable) and the DRUJ is stable, I would apply an above-elbow cast in supination with the elbow at 90 degrees for 6 weeks.

Follow-up Protocol: Weekly X-rays for the first 2-3 weeks are essential to monitor for loss of reduction. If reduction is maintained and DRUJ remains stable, I would continue with conservative treatment. If reduction is lost or DRUJ becomes unstable, I would proceed to ORIF as in adults.

Age Considerations: I would explain that this conservative approach is appropriate for children under 10. For older children and adolescents (over 10 years), remodeling potential decreases significantly and I would treat them like adults with ORIF.

Expected Outcome: With successful conservative management, I would expect excellent outcomes with full recovery and normal growth. The greenstick fracture pattern with intact periosteum actually helps maintain reduction and stability.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Children under 10 can be treated conservatively
This differs significantly from adult treatment
Closed reduction and cast in supination
Confirm DRUJ stability after reduction
Weekly X-ray follow-up for loss of reduction
COMMON TRAPS
✗Automatically treating like an adult with ORIF
✗Not assessing DRUJ stability after closed reduction
✗Not following closely for loss of reduction
✗Not explaining difference from adult treatment to family
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if reduction is lost at 2 weeks?"
"At what age would you treat like an adult?"
"What is the success rate of conservative treatment in children?"
"How much angulation is acceptable in a child?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Persistent DRUJ Instability After Radius Fixation

EXAMINER

"You have just completed ORIF of a Galeazzi fracture with anatomic reduction confirmed on fluoroscopy. However, when you test the DRUJ with the tourniquet down, it is grossly unstable in all positions of rotation. What is your approach and what are your options?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Persistent DRUJ instability after anatomic radius fixation occurs in approximately 20% of Galeazzi fractures and requires additional intervention. This situation demands careful decision-making to prevent chronic DRUJ problems.

Confirm Anatomic Radius Reduction: First, I would carefully re-confirm that the radius reduction is truly anatomic. I would check radial length by comparing to the ulna on fluoroscopy, verify the radial bow is restored (10-12 degrees), and confirm rotation is correct by comparing to the opposite forearm. I would also compare to the opposite side fluoroscopically. Even small malreductions can cause DRUJ instability.

Assess for Ulnar Styloid Fracture: I would look for an ulnar styloid base fracture on the fluoroscopy images. A large displaced base fracture (over 2mm) indicates TFCC avulsion and significant soft tissue disruption. This may need separate fixation.

Treatment Options - My Approach:

First Choice - K-wire Fixation: If the radius is confirmed anatomically reduced, my preferred option would be to pin the DRUJ in reduced position. I would manually reduce the DRUJ and position the forearm in supination. I would then insert two 1.6mm K-wires from the ulna to the radius, crossing the DRUJ but staying above the joint surface (not through the articular cartilage). The wires would be left outside the skin for easy removal. These would stay for 6 weeks then be removed in clinic.

Second Option - Ulnar Styloid Fixation: If there is a large displaced ulnar styloid base fracture, I would fix it with either tension band wiring or small screws (1.5mm or 2.0mm). This restores the TFCC attachment point and may provide enough stability.

Third Option - TFCC Repair: If there is a substantial visible TFCC tear or if the previous options fail to provide stability, I would consider direct TFCC repair through a small dorsal incision. I would use suture anchors to repair the TFCC to the fovea or ulnar styloid base. However, this is more commonly performed as a secondary procedure if instability persists.

Post-operative Management: With K-wires in place, I would immobilize in an above-elbow cast in supination for 6 weeks. The wires would be removed at 6 weeks in clinic without anesthesia, then I would continue with below-elbow cast for 2 more weeks before starting ROM.

Expected Outcome: With additional DRUJ stabilization, the prognosis remains good with approximately 85% achieving good to excellent outcomes, though slightly lower than cases where DRUJ is initially stable.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Persistent DRUJ instability occurs in 20% of cases
Re-confirm anatomic radius reduction first
Pin DRUJ in supination (first-line option)
Fix ulnar styloid base if large and displaced
TFCC repair if substantial tear visible
COMMON TRAPS
✗Ignoring persistent instability and just casting
✗Not confirming radius reduction is truly anatomic
✗Pinning in pronation instead of supination
✗Not assessing for ulnar styloid base fracture
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How exactly do you place the K-wires for DRUJ pinning?"
"What if there is chronic instability 6 months later?"
"What are the salvage options for failed treatment?"
"How long do you leave the K-wires in?"

MCQ Practice Points

Definition Question

Q: What are the two essential components of a Galeazzi fracture-dislocation?

A: Fracture of the radius shaft (typically at junction of middle and distal thirds) PLUS DRUJ disruption (dislocation or subluxation of the distal radioulnar joint). Both components must be present for the diagnosis.

Treatment Question

Q: Why is the Galeazzi fracture called the "fracture of necessity"?

A: Because operative treatment is necessary in adults for good outcomes. Conservative management has a 92% failure rate in adults, while surgical treatment (ORIF with plate) achieves 92% success rate. This term was coined by Hughston in 1957.

Stability Question

Q: In what position is the DRUJ most stable, and why is this clinically important for Galeazzi fractures?

A: The DRUJ is most stable in supination because this position tightens the volar radioulnar ligament and brings the radius over the ulna. After Galeazzi repair, the forearm is immobilized in supination to maximize DRUJ stability during healing. This is based on biomechanical studies.

Comparison Question

Q: How does a Galeazzi fracture differ from a Monteggia fracture in terms of anatomic location?

A:

  • Galeazzi = Radius fracture (distal) + DRUJ disruption (distal joint)
  • Monteggia = Ulna fracture (proximal) + Radial head dislocation (proximal joint)

Mnemonic: G for GRUJ (distal), M for MPRUJ (proximal)

Pediatric Question

Q: How does treatment of Galeazzi fractures differ between children and adults?

A:

  • Adults: Always require ORIF with plate fixation (92% failure with conservative treatment)
  • Children under 10: Can often be treated conservatively with closed reduction and cast in supination (85% success rate)
  • Children over 10: Should be treated like adults with ORIF

This age-based difference is due to remodeling potential in young children.

Complications Question

Q: What is the most common complication after Galeazzi fracture treatment and how can it be prevented?

A: Persistent DRUJ instability is the most common complication (10-15% of cases). Prevention strategies include:

  1. Achieving anatomic radius reduction (restoring length and bow)
  2. Testing DRUJ stability intraoperatively after radius fixation
  3. Immobilizing in supination for 6 weeks
  4. Pinning DRUJ if unstable (do not ignore instability)

Australian Context

Galeazzi fractures account for approximately 3-7% of forearm fractures in adults presenting to Australian emergency departments. They are commonly seen in cycling injuries (particularly mountain biking), motor vehicle accidents, falls during sport (AFL, rugby, surfing), and workplace injuries in construction and manual labor. Males aged 20-40 are most commonly affected, with peak incidence in weekend recreational cyclists.

Most patients are managed in metropolitan trauma centres or regional hospitals with orthopaedic services. Rural patients may require transfer to centers with hand surgery expertise. ORIF is the standard of care in adults, typically performed within 24-48 hours of injury by orthopaedic surgeons or hand surgeons. Day surgery is not appropriate, with typical admission being 1-2 nights. Regional nerve blocks are increasingly used for post-operative analgesia to reduce opioid use.

Hand therapy services are essential for optimal outcomes and are accessible through public hospital outpatient departments and private practices. Medicare rebates are available for physiotherapy through Enhanced Primary Care plans. Typical therapy course is 6-8 weeks with 6-10 sessions. Post-operative analgesia includes paracetamol and NSAIDs as first line, with PBS-listed oxycodone if required (exercise caution with opioids). Prophylactic antibiotics follow eTG guidelines (cephazolin 2g IV).

The main medicolegal risk relates to failure to diagnose DRUJ involvement - the isolated radius fracture may be identified while DRUJ instability is missed. All forearm radiographs must include the wrist to assess DRUJ, and DRUJ examination must be documented in clinical notes. Inadequate post-operative DRUJ assessment is another risk - DRUJ stability testing after radius fixation must be documented, noting the position of maximum stability. Persistent DRUJ instability is a recognized complication even with appropriate treatment, requiring documented informed consent discussion and early recognition if it occurs.

Return to work timelines vary: office work typically 2-3 weeks (with cast), light manual work 8-12 weeks, and heavy manual labor 3-4 months after union is confirmed. Workplace injuries require WorkCover notification (state-specific), with possible independent medical examination and permanent impairment assessment if residual disability occurs (though this is typically none or minimal).

GALEAZZI FRACTURE EXAM CHEAT SHEET

High-Yield Exam Summary

Definition

  • •Radius fracture (middle-distal junction)
  • •PLUS DRUJ disruption (always present)
  • •Fracture of necessity = always ORIF in adults
  • •3-7% of forearm fractures, peak age 30-40

Galeazzi vs Monteggia

  • •Galeazzi: Radius + DRUJ (distal)
  • •Monteggia: Ulna + radial head (proximal)
  • •G for GRUJ (distal), M for MPRUJ (proximal)
  • •Both usually need ORIF in adults

Surgical Approach

  • •ORIF radius FIRST (volar Henry approach)
  • •3.5mm plate, 6+ cortices each side
  • •Restore length, bow (10-12°), rotation
  • •Test DRUJ stability after fixation
  • •80% stable, 20% need additional procedure

DRUJ Management

  • •Test in supination, neutral, pronation
  • •Compare to opposite wrist (key!)
  • •Most stable in supination position
  • •If unstable: pin in supination 6 weeks
  • •Alternative: TFCC repair, styloid fixation

Immobilization

  • •Above-elbow cast in SUPINATION
  • •Supination tightens DRUJ ligaments
  • •6 weeks total immobilization
  • •K-wires removed at 6 weeks if used
  • •Begin wrist ROM after cast removal

Pediatric Difference

  • •Under 10 years: Conservative OK (85% success)
  • •Closed reduction + cast in supination
  • •Weekly X-rays to monitor reduction
  • •Over 10 years: Treat like adults (ORIF)
  • •Remodeling potential key factor

Key Evidence & Outcomes

  • •Conservative in adults: 92% FAILURE
  • •ORIF in adults: 92% SUCCESS
  • •Anatomic radius reduction → DRUJ stability
  • •Hughston 1957: 'Fracture of necessity'
  • •Complications: DRUJ instability (10-15%)

Exam Traps to Avoid

  • •Don't attempt conservative in adults
  • •Don't forget to assess DRUJ intraop
  • •Don't immobilize in pronation
  • •Don't ignore ulnar styloid base fracture
  • •Don't treat all children with surgery
Quick Stats
Reading Time133 min
Related Topics

Acetabular Fractures

Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries

Acute Compartment Syndrome

Ankle Fractures