Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Hallux Rigidus

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Hallux Rigidus

Comprehensive Orthopaedic exam guide to hallux rigidus: classification, grading systems, treatment algorithms comparing cheilectomy vs arthrodesis vs arthroplasty, and surgical decision-making.

complete
Updated: 2025-12-17
High Yield Overview

HALLUX RIGIDUS

First MTP Joint Arthritis | Carp Classification | Grading-Based Treatment Algorithm

40-60years peak age
1-2.5%population prevalence
2:1M greater than F ratio
80-90%cheilectomy satisfaction Grade 1-2

Carp Classification (Most Common)

Grade 0
PatternDorsal osteophyte, full ROM
TreatmentConservative
Grade 1
PatternMild spurring, 20-50% JSN, slight ROM loss
TreatmentCheilectomy
Grade 2
PatternModerate spurring, 50-75% JSN, moderate ROM loss
TreatmentCheilectomy or Interposition
Grade 3
PatternSevere spurring, over 75% JSN, marked ROM loss
TreatmentArthrodesis
Grade 4
PatternStage 3 plus hallux valgus/varus
TreatmentArthrodesis

Critical Must-Knows

  • Grading (Carp) determines treatment: Grade 1-2 = cheilectomy, Grade 3-4 = arthrodesis
  • Cheilectomy requires at least 30 degrees dorsiflexion to be effective
  • Arthrodesis fusion position: 10-15 degrees valgus, 15-20 degrees dorsiflexion, neutral rotation
  • Cheilectomy contraindicated if cartilage loss extends beyond dorsal third of joint
  • First MTP arthrodesis has 90-95% fusion rate with high satisfaction

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Distinguish from hallux valgus (lateral deviation vs stiffness/pain on dorsiflexion)
  • "
    Grind test (compression + rotation) reproduces pain from joint arthritis
  • "
    Dorsal osteophyte causes impingement in toe-off phase of gait
  • "
    Failed cheilectomy can proceed to arthrodesis without major compromise

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Preoperative anteroposterior (AP) radiograph of patient with grade IV arthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint
Click to expand
Preoperative anteroposterior (AP) radiograph of patient with grade IV arthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal jointCredit: Giza E et al. via Int Orthop via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Postoperative anteroposterior MRI of a female patient,three months after surgery.
Click to expand
Postoperative anteroposterior MRI of a female patient,three months after surgery.Credit: Olms K et al. via Open Orthop J via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Postoperative lateral MRI of a female patient, threemonths after surgery.
Click to expand
Postoperative lateral MRI of a female patient, threemonths after surgery.Credit: Olms K et al. via Open Orthop J via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Critical Hallux Rigidus Exam Points

Key Pathophysiology

Degenerative arthritis of first MTP joint. Primary (70%) or secondary to trauma, gout, inflammatory arthropathy. Dorsal osteophyte blocks dorsiflexion needed for toe-off.

Classification Drives Treatment

Carp grading (0-4) based on radiographic changes and ROM. Grade 1-2 = cheilectomy, Grade 3-4 = arthrodesis. Hattrup-Johnson simpler (3 grades) but less granular.

Treatment Algorithm

Conservative first for all grades. Surgical: cheilectomy if dorsal disease only, arthrodesis for advanced disease, arthroplasty controversial due to high failure.

Critical Surgical Decision

Cheilectomy requires adequate cartilage on plantar surface. If cartilage loss extends beyond dorsal third, proceed directly to arthrodesis. Check intraoperatively.

Quick Decision Guide

Patient ScenarioCarp GradeFirst-Line SurgicalKey Pearl
Early, active patient, minimal symptomsGrade 0-1: Dorsal spurring, mild JSNCheilectomy (30% dorsal head + osteophyte)80-90% good results, preserves joint
Moderate disease, preserved plantar cartilageGrade 2: 50-75% JSN, moderate ROM lossCheilectomy vs Interposition arthroplastyIntraop assessment crucial - check cartilage
Advanced arthritis, circumferential cartilage lossGrade 3: Over 75% JSN, severe stiffnessFirst MTP arthrodesis (gold standard)90-95% fusion, 85-90% satisfaction
Grade 3 plus hallux valgus or varus deformityGrade 4: Advanced disease plus deformityFirst MTP arthrodesisCorrect alignment: 10-15° valgus, 15-20° dorsiflexion
Mnemonic

CARPHallux Rigidus Classification Systems

C
Carp grading
Grades 0-4, most commonly used, based on JSN and ROM
A
Assessment radiographic
Dorsal osteophyte, joint space narrowing, subchondral sclerosis
R
ROM measurement
Normal 65-75° dorsiflexion, hallux rigidus typically under 30°
P
Pain on grind test
Compression plus rotation reproduces arthritic pain

Memory Hook:CARP - like a fish mouth that can't open (rigid joint)!

Mnemonic

DORSALCheilectomy Indications

D
Dorsal disease only
Cartilage loss limited to dorsal third of joint
O
Osteophyte prominent
Dorsal spurring causing impingement
R
ROM at least 30 degrees
Minimum dorsiflexion needed for success
S
Stage 1-2 Carp
Early to moderate disease
A
Active patient desires
Wants to preserve joint motion
L
Limited plantar involvement
Plantar cartilage must be preserved

Memory Hook:DORSAL disease = cheilectomy removes the DORSAL bump!

Mnemonic

VDNFirst MTP Arthrodesis Fusion Position

V
Valgus 10-15 degrees
Relative to first metatarsal axis
D
Dorsiflexion 15-20 degrees
Relative to ground with foot plantigrade
N
Neutral rotation
Avoid internal or external rotation

Memory Hook:VDN - Very Deliberate Numbers for fusion position!

Overview and Epidemiology

Why Hallux Rigidus Matters

Hallux rigidus is the most common arthritic condition of the foot, second only to hallux valgus as a disorder of the first MTP joint. Unlike hallux valgus (deformity-driven), hallux rigidus is pain and stiffness-driven, significantly affecting gait and quality of life. Treatment is grading-based with predictable outcomes.

Demographics

  • Age: Bimodal - adolescent (osteochondritis) and 40-60 years (degenerative)
  • Gender: Males twice as common as females
  • Bilateral: 50-80% of cases
  • Occupation: Higher in athletes, dancers, manual laborers

Etiology and Impact

  • Primary (70%): Idiopathic, likely multifactorial (genetics, mechanics, anatomy)
  • Secondary (30%): Trauma, inflammatory arthritis (gout, RA), osteochondritis dissecans
  • Gait impact: Painful toe-off, compensatory external foot progression angle
  • Function loss: Unable to squat, difficulty with stairs, impaired running

Pathophysiology and Mechanisms

First MTP Joint Biomechanics

The first MTP joint undergoes 2-3 times body weight during normal gait, increasing to 8 times body weight with running. Normal dorsiflexion of 65-75 degrees is required for toe-off. Hallux rigidus reduces this to typically under 30 degrees, forcing compensatory mechanisms that alter gait mechanics.

StructureNormal AnatomyHallux Rigidus ChangesClinical Significance
Articular cartilageSmooth, covers entire joint surfaceErosion starts dorsal, progresses plantarDorsal-only disease amenable to cheilectomy
Dorsal capsuleAllows 65-75° dorsiflexionContracted, fibrotic, thickenedCapsular release improves ROM post-cheilectomy
Sesamoid complexGlides smoothly under metatarsal headArthritic changes in advanced diseaseConsider sesamoid debridement if involved
Dorsal osteophyteAbsentProgressive spurring blocking extensionPrimary cause of impingement pain

Normal Gait Mechanics

  • Heel strike: Foot plantigrade
  • Mid-stance: First MTP joint neutral
  • Toe-off: Requires 65-75° dorsiflexion
  • Push-off: 60% body weight through hallux

Hallux Rigidus Compensation

  • Toe-off altered: Cannot achieve normal dorsiflexion
  • External rotation: Foot turns out to avoid MTP dorsiflexion
  • Lateral weight shift: Loads lesser toes abnormally
  • Pain cycle: Dorsal impingement reinforces stiffness

Classification Systems

Carp Classification (Most Commonly Used)

GradeRadiographic FindingsClinical ROMTreatment
0Dorsal osteophyte, no JSN10-20% loss, over 60° dorsiflexionConservative, consider cheilectomy if symptomatic
1Mild spurring, 20-50% JSN, minimal sclerosis20-50% loss, 40-60° dorsiflexionCheilectomy first-line, excellent results
2Moderate spurring, 50-75% JSN, subchondral sclerosis50-75% loss, 20-40° dorsiflexionCheilectomy if plantar cartilage OK, or interposition
3Severe spurring, over 75% JSN, cysts, loose bodiesOver 75% loss, under 20° dorsiflexionArthrodesis gold standard
4Grade 3 changes plus hallux valgus or varusSevere stiffness plus deformityArthrodesis with deformity correction

Carp Grading Key Distinction

The critical decision point is Grade 2: if intraoperative assessment shows cartilage preservation on the plantar surface, cheilectomy can succeed. If cartilage loss is circumferential, proceed directly to arthrodesis. Do not compromise with inadequate debridement.

This classification system correlates well with treatment outcomes and provides clear decision-making framework.

Hattrup-Johnson Classification (Simpler, 3 Grades)

StageRadiographic FindingsTreatment
I - MildDorsal osteophyte, minimal JSN (under 25%)Conservative or cheilectomy
II - ModerateModerate JSN (25-50%), subchondral sclerosis, flatteningCheilectomy or interposition arthroplasty
III - SevereMarked JSN (over 50%), cysts, loose bodies, near ankylosisArthrodesis

When to Use Hattrup-Johnson

Simpler for general communication and research. However, Carp classification is more granular (5 grades vs 3) and provides finer discrimination for treatment selection, particularly the Grade 2 category where management is most nuanced.

Less commonly used in clinical practice compared to Carp, but appears frequently in research literature.

Clinical Assessment

History

  • Pain: Dorsal MTP, worse with toe-off, stairs, squatting
  • Stiffness: Progressive loss of dorsiflexion
  • Gait: External foot progression angle to avoid dorsiflexion
  • Footwear: Difficulty with heels, dress shoes, athletic shoes
  • Activities: Reduced running, dancing, sports participation
  • Previous treatments: Orthotics, injections, activity modification

Examination

  • Look: Dorsal prominence, skin irritation over osteophyte
  • Feel: Tenderness over dorsal MTP, osteophyte palpable
  • Move: Measure dorsiflexion (normal 65-75°), grind test positive
  • Deformity: Assess for hallux valgus/varus component (Carp Grade 4)
  • Gait: Observe toe-off phase, external rotation compensation
  • Neurovascular: Ensure intact (dorsalis pedis, sensation)

Grind Test - Key Diagnostic Maneuver

Compress the first MTP joint while rotating the hallux. Pain reproduction indicates intra-articular pathology (arthritis). Compare with dorsal impingement pain (pain only at end-range dorsiflexion). Grind test specificity distinguishes arthritis from isolated dorsal impingement.

FindingHallux RigidusHallux ValgusTurf Toe
Primary complaintPain and stiffnessDeformity and bunion painAcute traumatic pain
DeformityDorsal osteophyte, usually straight alignmentLateral deviation, medial eminenceSwelling, ecchymosis
ROMRestricted dorsiflexion, painfulVariable, often normal earlyAll motion painful acutely
RadiographsDorsal osteophyte, JSN, sclerosisHallux valgus angle, 1-2 IM angleOften normal, may show avulsion

Investigations

Imaging Protocol

First LineWeight-Bearing AP and Lateral Radiographs

Essential views for grading and planning. AP shows joint space narrowing, medial/lateral osteophytes. Lateral shows dorsal osteophyte (key for cheilectomy planning), assess dorsal 30% of metatarsal head.

AdditionalWeight-Bearing Oblique View

Sesamoid assessment. Evaluates sesamoid arthritis which may require debridement at surgery. More sensitive than AP for lateral osteophytes.

Rarely NeededCT or MRI

CT: Preoperative planning for complex deformity or failed surgery. MRI: If concern for osteochondritis dissecans (young patient) or to assess cartilage (not routine).

Radiographic Features (Progressive)

  • Early (Grade 1): Dorsal osteophyte, maintained joint space
  • Moderate (Grade 2): Flattening of metatarsal head, 50% JSN
  • Advanced (Grade 3): Severe JSN, subchondral sclerosis, cysts
  • Late (Grade 4): Near ankylosis, loose bodies, deformity

Pre-Operative Planning

  • Measure dorsal osteophyte: Extent of resection for cheilectomy
  • Assess joint space: Plantar cartilage preservation?
  • Check sesamoids: Arthritic changes requiring debridement?
  • Measure alignment: Hallux valgus/varus for fusion correction
📊 Management Algorithm
Hallux rigidus radiographic features
Click to expand
Two-panel foot radiograph demonstrating CLASSIC RADIOGRAPHIC FEATURES of hallux rigidus that guide diagnosis and Carp grading. Panel (a): Dorsoplantar (AP) view showing all metatarsals and toes with first MTP joint demonstrating joint space narrowing and prominent dorsal osteophytes (the hallmark finding). Panel (b): Lateral foot view showing the foot profile with dorsal prominence at the first MTP joint. Key diagnostic features visible: (1) DORSAL OSTEOPHYTES at first MTP joint - cause impingement during toe-off phase of gait by blocking the dorsiflexion needed for push-off (60-70 degrees required for normal gait), (2) JOINT SPACE NARROWING - indicates progressive cartilage loss; degree of narrowing determines Carp grading (Grade 1: 20-50% JSN, Grade 2: 50-75% JSN, Grade 3: greater than 75% JSN), (3) SUBCHONDRAL SCLEROSIS - bone response to chronic loading and cartilage loss visible as increased bone density beneath articular surface. The two-view assessment is ESSENTIAL: AP view shows medial/lateral osteophytes and joint space narrowing, while LATERAL VIEW is CRITICAL for assessing dorsal osteophyte size which determines suitability for cheilectomy (cheilectomy requires predominantly dorsal disease with preserved plantar cartilage - lateral view assesses the dorsal 30% that will be resected). Radiographic grading using Carp classification (Grades 0-4) or Hattrup-Johnson (Grades 1-3) drives the treatment algorithm: Grades 1-2 = cheilectomy candidate (joint-preserving), Grades 3-4 = arthrodesis (joint fusion). The presence of large dorsal osteophytes with relatively preserved joint space on this image suggests early disease (Grade 1-2) amenable to cheilectomy, whereas circumferential osteophytes with severe joint space loss would indicate advanced disease requiring arthrodesis.Credit: Iselin LD et al. via BMC Musculoskelet Disord via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Non-Operative Management

Conservative Management Role

All patients should trial non-operative management before surgery, unless severe pain or functional limitation. Success rates vary: 20-30% achieve satisfactory symptom control with conservative measures. Duration of trial: 3-6 months.

Conservative Treatment Algorithm

First-lineFootwear Modification

Wide toe box, stiff sole. Rigid sole reduces MTP dorsiflexion demand. Rocker-bottom sole shifts toe-off proximal. Avoid high heels (increase dorsiflexion demand).

AdjunctOrthotics and Pads

Morton's extension orthotic (carbon fiber plate extending to hallux tip) prevents MTP dorsiflexion. Turf toe plate similar effect. Padding over dorsal osteophyte for shoe pressure.

OngoingActivity Modification

Avoid high-impact activities, running, jumping. Low-impact alternatives: cycling, swimming. Occupational modifications for prolonged standing/walking.

SymptomaticAnti-Inflammatory Medications

NSAIDs for pain and inflammation. Oral or topical. Caution in elderly, renal disease. Not disease-modifying, symptom control only.

Diagnostic and TherapeuticIntra-Articular Injection

Corticosteroid (+ local anesthetic). Diagnostic: confirms intra-articular source. Therapeutic: 3-6 months relief common. Maximum 2-3 injections. Consider hyaluronic acid (less evidence).

When to Abandon Conservative Management

Indications for surgical referral: Failure of 3-6 months conservative treatment, severe pain limiting daily activities, progressive deformity (Grade 4), significant gait disturbance affecting work/recreation. Emphasize to patients that surgery is elective but highly effective.

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
hallux rigidus management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for hallux rigidusCredit: OrthoVellum

Cheilectomy - Joint-Preserving Procedure

Indications:

  • Carp Grade 1-2 (mild to moderate arthritis)
  • Dorsal osteophyte causing impingement
  • Preserved plantar cartilage (critical!)
  • At least 30 degrees dorsiflexion remaining
  • Failed conservative management

Contraindications:

  • Circumferential cartilage loss (intraop finding)
  • Severe stiffness (under 20 degrees dorsiflexion)
  • Grade 3-4 disease
  • Sesamoid arthritis

Cheilectomy Technique

Step 1Approach

Dorsal longitudinal incision over first MTP joint, 3-4 cm. Protect dorsal sensory nerves (medial and lateral cutaneous branches). Incise capsule longitudinally, preserve for repair.

Step 2Assessment

Intraoperative cartilage evaluation. Plantarflex hallux to expose dorsal metatarsal head. Assess cartilage: if intact on plantar two-thirds, proceed with cheilectomy. If circumferential loss, convert to arthrodesis.

Step 3Osteophyte Resection

Remove dorsal 25-30% of metatarsal head. Use oscillating saw or osteotome. Resect from medial to lateral, ensuring complete removal of dorsal ridge. Smooth with rongeur. Remove phalangeal osteophytes.

Step 4Capsular Release

Release dorsal capsular adhesions to improve dorsiflexion. Gentle manipulation to achieve at least 60-70 degrees dorsiflexion. Avoid forced manipulation (fracture risk).

Step 5Closure

Repair capsule loosely (over-tightening limits dorsiflexion). Subcuticular skin closure. Soft dressing, wooden shoe or post-op shoe for 2 weeks.

Pearls

  • 30% rule: Remove dorsal 30% to decompress joint
  • Check motion: Aim for 60-70° intraoperative dorsiflexion
  • Preserve plantar cortex: Critical for stability
  • Early mobilization: Start ROM at 2 weeks

Pitfalls

  • Under-resection: Inadequate decompression, recurrent impingement
  • Over-resection: Metatarsal fracture, instability, transfer metatarsalgia
  • Missed plantar disease: Poor outcome, consider conversion
  • Forced manipulation: Fracture, damage plantar cartilage

Cheilectomy Outcomes

Grade 1-2 disease: 80-90% good-excellent results at 5 years. Pain relief predictable, ROM improvement variable (average 20-30 degree gain). Satisfaction high. Durability: 70-80% avoid further surgery at 10 years. Failed cheilectomy can proceed to arthrodesis without compromise.

These outcomes make cheilectomy an excellent first-line option for appropriate candidates.

Interposition Arthroplasty - Alternative for Grade 2

Concept: Biological spacer between arthritic joint surfaces to maintain motion and reduce pain.

Indications (controversial):

  • Carp Grade 2 (moderate disease)
  • Young, active patient desires motion preservation
  • Inadequate cartilage for cheilectomy alone
  • Patient refuses arthrodesis

Contraindications:

  • Grade 3-4 disease (arthrodesis superior)
  • Low functional demand (arthrodesis simpler)
  • Inflammatory arthropathy

Interposition Technique Options

Option ACapsular Interposition

Use dorsal capsule as biological spacer. After cheilectomy, fold dorsal capsule plantarly between joint surfaces. Secure with suture anchors. Theoretical advantage: autologous, no donor site. Limited evidence.

Option BTendon Interposition

Extensor hallucis brevis (most common) or gracilis allograft. Harvest tendon, roll into ball, place in joint space. Secure to metatarsal head with suture anchors. More bulk than capsule.

Option CSynthetic Spacer

Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) as spacer. Commercially available. Concerns: cost, limited long-term data, potential inflammatory response.

Interposition Arthroplasty Evidence

Limited high-quality evidence. Small studies show 60-80% satisfaction at mid-term (2-5 years), but inferior to cheilectomy for Grade 1-2 and inferior to arthrodesis for Grade 3. Role unclear - consider for Grade 2 patients wanting motion preservation who accept higher re-operation risk.

Most surgeons proceed directly from failed cheilectomy to arthrodesis rather than interposition.

First MTP Arthrodesis - Gold Standard for Advanced Disease

Indications:

  • Carp Grade 3-4 (advanced arthritis)
  • Failed cheilectomy or arthroplasty
  • Circumferential cartilage loss
  • Inflammatory arthropathy (RA, psoriatic)
  • Severe pain with functional limitation

Contraindications (relative):

  • Young, high-demand athletic patient (discuss loss of push-off power)
  • Ipsilateral ankle arthrodesis (limits compensation)
  • Patient expectation of normal gait

Arthrodesis Surgical Technique

Step 1Approach

Dorsal medial incision over first MTP joint, 4-5 cm. Protect medial cutaneous nerve. Capsulotomy, expose joint surfaces.

Step 2Joint Preparation

Remove all cartilage to bleeding subchondral bone. Use oscillating saw to create flat, congruent surfaces. Cup-and-cone technique or planar cuts acceptable. Ream or burr to healthy bleeding bone.

Step 3Position the Hallux (CRITICAL)

Alignment is crucial:

  • Valgus: 10-15 degrees (relative to first metatarsal)
  • Dorsiflexion: 15-20 degrees (relative to ground with foot plantigrade)
  • Neutral rotation: Avoid internal/external rotation
  • Apex contact: Ensure plantar cortical contact for compression

Check alignment with foot plantigrade on sterile block. Hallux should clear ground by 1-2 cm. Assess great toe should align between 2nd-3rd toe.

Step 4Fixation

Plate fixation (preferred): Dorsal or dorsomedial locking plate. Provides stable compression, low-profile. Screw fixation across fusion site.

Alternative: Crossed lag screws (2-3) with optional dorsal plate. Less hardware, risk of malposition.

Confirm position with fluoroscopy (AP, lateral, oblique). Ensure adequate compression.

Step 5Closure

Capsule repair if possible. Subcuticular skin. Soft dressing, posterior slab or CAM boot non-weight-bearing.

Fusion Position Pearls

  • Use sterile block: Simulate weight-bearing to assess dorsiflexion
  • Hallux tip alignment: Should point between 2nd-3rd toes
  • Ground clearance: 1-2 cm when foot plantigrade
  • Avoid excessive dorsiflexion: Cannot compensate, shoe wear difficult

Fixation Pearls

  • Plate preferred: Superior biomechanics, lower nonunion
  • Compression essential: Lag screw technique or plate compression
  • Avoid short screws: Risk of pull-out, inadequate stability
  • Countersink: Minimize hardware prominence

Arthrodesis Outcomes - Exam Favorite

First MTP arthrodesis has excellent outcomes: 90-95% fusion rate, 85-90% patient satisfaction. Pain relief is predictable and reliable. ROM is sacrificed but gait normalizes with minor adaptations (loss of push-off power 10-20%). Complications: malunion (most common, position critical!), nonunion (5-10%), hardware irritation (10-15%). This is the gold standard for Grade 3-4 disease.

Arthrodesis remains the most reliable long-term solution for advanced hallux rigidus.

First MTP Arthroplasty - Limited Role

Types:

  • Hemiarthroplasty: Replace metatarsal head or phalangeal base (not both)
  • Total joint replacement: Metal-polyethylene implant

Theoretical advantages:

  • Preserves motion
  • Avoids fusion position concerns
  • Potential for bilateral procedures

Reality - High Failure Rates:

  • Implant loosening 20-30% at 5 years
  • Synovitis, osteolysis (especially silicone)
  • Revision difficult, bone loss significant
  • Conversion to arthrodesis challenging

Why Arthroplasty Has Limited Role

Unlike hip/knee arthroplasty (proven success), first MTP arthroplasty has poor long-term outcomes. Failure rates are high (20-40% at 10 years), revision is difficult (bone loss), and arthrodesis outcomes are excellent (90%+ satisfaction). Current implants lack proven durability. Arthroplasty is NOT recommended as routine treatment for hallux rigidus.

Exam Answer - Arthroplasty

If asked about first MTP arthroplasty in the exam, acknowledge it exists but emphasize: limited indications (elderly, low demand, medical comorbidities precluding longer fusion surgery), high failure rates, difficulty with revision. Cheilectomy and arthrodesis are the established, evidence-based treatments for hallux rigidus.

First MTP hemiarthroplasty implant
Click to expand
Dorsoplantar foot radiograph demonstrating FIRST MTP HEMIARTHROPLASTY - a motion-preserving surgical option for hallux rigidus with CONTROVERSIAL outcomes. The bright white metallic prosthesis is visible replacing the base of the proximal phalanx (proximal phalangeal hemiarthroplasty) while preserving the native metatarsal head. Key points regarding hemiarthroplasty: (1) INDICATION CONTROVERSY - historically used for Carp Grade 2-3 disease as alternative to arthrodesis in attempt to preserve motion; currently has limited role due to inferior outcomes, (2) TYPES - proximal phalangeal replacement (shown), metatarsal head replacement, or total joint arthroplasty; proximal phalangeal shown here, (3) RESULTS VARIABLE - hemiarthroplasty has HIGHER FAILURE RATES compared to arthrodesis: 10-40% revision rates in some series versus 5-10% for fusion; concerns include implant loosening, subsidence, and recurrent pain, (4) CURRENT CONSENSUS - first MTP ARTHRODESIS remains GOLD STANDARD for advanced disease (Grades 3-4) with 90-95% fusion rate and 85-90% patient satisfaction; arthroplasty reserved for specific scenarios: elderly patients, low-demand individuals, bilateral disease where bilateral arthrodesis would severely impact gait, or medical comorbidities. This image demonstrates that while motion preservation through arthroplasty is conceptually attractive, the INFERIOR OUTCOMES compared to fusion mean arthrodesis is preferred for most patients with advanced hallux rigidus. Exam pearl: candidates must acknowledge arthroplasty exists but emphasize arthrodesis superiority with evidence-based outcomes.Credit: Giza E et al. via Int Orthop via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Hemiarthroplasty post-operative radiograph
Click to expand
Post-operative dorsoplantar foot radiograph 12 months after first MTP hemiarthroplasty showing long-term implant appearance and RADIOGRAPHIC FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT. The large metallic prosthesis replaces the base of the proximal phalanx articulating with the native metatarsal head. Post-operative radiographic assessment evaluates: (1) IMPLANT POSITION - stem should be centered in medullary canal of proximal phalanx with articulating surface aligned with metatarsal head; no subsidence (implant sinking into bone) or migration visible, (2) ALIGNMENT - hallux should maintain 10-15 degrees valgus and appropriate dorsiflexion (15-20 degrees); assess for malposition, (3) COMPLICATIONS TO MONITOR - implant loosening (radiolucency greater than 2mm around stem is concerning), subsidence (progressive sinking), heterotopic ossification (bone formation around joint limiting motion), recurrent osteophyte formation, or transfer metatarsalgia (overload of lesser metatarsals from altered biomechanics). The large size of this implant demonstrates how prostheses attempt to recreate the joint surface geometry. However, LONG-TERM STUDIES show progressive radiolucencies around implants in many cases with revision rates increasing over time. Post-operative protocol after hemiarthroplasty: protected weight-bearing in post-operative shoe 4-6 weeks, progressive ROM exercises, strengthening program. Patients require counseling that PAIN RELIEF AND FUNCTION are generally INFERIOR to arthrodesis with realistic expectations about activity modification. This follow-up radiograph at 12 months demonstrates the need for ongoing surveillance given high complication and revision rates. Teaching point: while hemiarthroplasty is AN option for hallux rigidus, arthrodesis provides more PREDICTABLE AND DURABLE outcomes for advanced disease with superior long-term patient satisfaction and lower revision rates.Credit: Giza E et al. via Int Orthop via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Most foot and ankle surgeons avoid first MTP arthroplasty due to poor outcomes and excellent alternatives.

Surgical Technique

Patient Positioning

Setup Checklist

Step 1Position

Supine on standard operating table. Ankle bump to internally rotate leg, expose medial aspect of first MTP joint. Contralateral limb: flat on table or frog-leg position.

Step 2Tourniquet

Thigh or ankle tourniquet. Ankle preferred for better access. Exsanguinate with Esmarch or elevation. Inflate to 250-300 mmHg (ankle) or 100 mmHg above systolic (thigh).

Step 3Draping

Foot and ankle free-draped. Expose from toes to mid-calf. Ensure C-arm access for lateral and AP views of first MTP joint.

Standard positioning allows both cheilectomy and arthrodesis through same approach.

Dorsal Medial Approach to First MTP Joint

Surgical Approach Steps

Step 1Skin Incision

Landmarks: Medial aspect of first MTP joint, from proximal phalanx to mid-metatarsal. Length: 3-4 cm for cheilectomy, 4-5 cm for arthrodesis. Orientation: Longitudinal, slightly curved following medial border of hallux.

Step 2Superficial Dissection

Identify and protect medial dorsal cutaneous nerve (branches at incision level). Retract gently or preserve in flap. Incise deep fascia longitudinally.

Step 3Capsulotomy

Longitudinal capsular incision over dorsal aspect of first MTP joint. Preserve capsule for repair. Reflect medially and laterally to expose joint surfaces.

Step 4Joint Exposure

Plantarflex hallux to expose dorsal metatarsal head (for cheilectomy) or entire joint (for arthrodesis). Place retractors to protect soft tissues.

Nerve Protection

The medial dorsal cutaneous nerve crosses the incision area. Visualize and protect (retract or preserve in flap) to prevent neuroma formation. Injury rate: 5-10% if not identified, under 2% with careful dissection.

This standard approach provides excellent exposure for all hallux rigidus procedures.

Cheilectomy Detailed Steps

Cheilectomy Procedure

Step 1Intraoperative Assessment

Evaluate cartilage status. Plantarflex hallux maximally to visualize entire metatarsal head. Assess: Is cartilage preserved on plantar two-thirds? If yes, proceed with cheilectomy. If circumferential erosion, convert to arthrodesis.

Step 2Mark Resection Line

30% rule: Mark dorsal 25-30% of metatarsal head for resection. Use electrocautery or marking pen. Confirm with lateral fluoroscopy - resection line should be at junction of dorsal third and middle third.

Step 3Osteophyte Resection

Oscillating saw or osteotome to remove dorsal metatarsal head from medial to lateral. Single cut parallel to plantar surface or multiple passes. Remove phalangeal dorsal osteophytes similarly. Smooth edges with rongeur.

Step 4Assess Sesamoids

Check sesamoid articulation on plantar aspect. If arthritic changes, debride osteophytes. Do not excise sesamoids (destabilizes joint).

Step 5Capsular Release and ROM

Release dorsal capsular adhesions. Gentle manipulation to achieve 60-70 degrees dorsiflexion. Avoid forced manipulation (fracture risk). Confirm ROM improvement before closure.

Step 6Closure

Irrigate wound. Repair capsule loosely (over-tightening restricts dorsiflexion). Subcuticular skin closure. Soft dressing, wooden shoe.

Cheilectomy Critical Technical Point

The key to cheilectomy success is adequate but not excessive resection: 25-30% of dorsal metatarsal head. Under-resection leaves impingement, recurrent symptoms. Over-resection (greater than 30%) risks metatarsal fracture, transfer metatarsalgia, instability. Use fluoroscopy to confirm resection level before closure.

Precise technique with intraoperative cartilage assessment determines cheilectomy outcome.

First MTP Arthrodesis Detailed Steps

Arthrodesis Procedure

Step 1Joint Preparation

Remove all cartilage to healthy bleeding subchondral bone. Options: (A) Planar cuts with oscillating saw - flat surfaces, easier positioning. (B) Cup-and-cone with reamer - congruent fit, rotation stability. Ensure bleeding bone (use curette or burr if sclerotic).

Step 2Provisional Positioning

Position hallux: 10-15 degrees valgus (relative to first metatarsal), 15-20 degrees dorsiflexion (check with foot on sterile block - hallux clears ground 1-2 cm), neutral rotation (hallux points between 2nd-3rd toes). Hold with pointed reduction clamps or K-wires.

Step 3Confirm Alignment

Critical checks: Place foot plantigrade on sterile block - assess ground clearance (1-2 cm). Check hallux tip alignment (between 2nd-3rd toes). Fluoroscopy AP, lateral, oblique - confirm valgus angle, dorsiflexion angle. Adjust if needed.

Step 4Definitive Fixation

Plate fixation (preferred): Dorsal or dorsomedial locking plate. Apply compression across fusion site. Screws: 2-3 each side of fusion, bicortical purchase. Alternative: 2-3 crossed lag screws (medial-lateral and dorsal-plantar) with optional neutralization plate. Confirm screw length (avoid plantar penetration).

Step 5Final Verification

Fluoroscopy all views: AP (valgus angle correct), lateral (dorsiflexion correct), oblique (rotation neutral). Clinical check: Remove K-wires/clamps, assess stability with gentle stress. Ensure adequate compression at fusion site.

Step 6Closure

Irrigate. Capsule repair if possible (often inadequate tissue in arthritis). Subcuticular skin. Soft dressing, posterior slab or CAM boot non-weight-bearing.

Fusion Position Verification

  • Sterile block technique: Essential for accurate dorsiflexion
  • Hallux alignment: Tip between 2nd-3rd toes
  • Ground clearance: 1-2 cm with foot plantigrade
  • Avoid excessive dorsiflexion: Patient cannot compensate

Fixation Principles

  • Plate over screws: 95% vs 88% union (meta-analysis)
  • Compression mandatory: Lag technique or plate compression
  • Bicortical purchase: Avoid screw pull-out
  • Low-profile hardware: Minimize prominence

Preventing Malunion - Most Common Error

Malunion is the most common complication of first MTP arthrodesis (10-15%). Prevention requires meticulous intraoperative technique: Always use sterile block to simulate weight-bearing when checking dorsiflexion. Fluoroscopy alone is insufficient - clinical assessment of ground clearance is essential. Excessive dorsiflexion (over 20 degrees) or insufficient dorsiflexion (under 15 degrees) both cause symptomatic malunion.

Arthrodesis technical success depends on achieving correct fusion position - check, double-check, confirm before final fixation.

Wound Closure

Closure Steps

Step 1Drain Decision

Drain typically not needed for cheilectomy or arthrodesis. Consider for extensive soft tissue dissection or bleeding diathesis.

Step 2Capsule Repair

Cheilectomy: Repair capsule loosely with 2-0 absorbable suture. Avoid tight closure (restricts dorsiflexion). Arthrodesis: Often inadequate capsular tissue due to arthritis - repair if possible.

Step 3Subcutaneous and Skin

Subcutaneous 3-0 absorbable. Skin: subcuticular 4-0 monocryl or interrupted nylon. Steri-strips.

Step 4Dressing

Soft gauze dressing. Cheilectomy: Wooden shoe or post-op shoe, immediate weight-bearing. Arthrodesis: Posterior slab or CAM boot, non-weight-bearing.

Standard closure with attention to capsule repair (cheilectomy) or immobilization (arthrodesis).

Complications

ComplicationIncidenceRisk FactorsManagement
Recurrent stiffness/pain post-cheilectomy15-20% at 5-10 yearsUnder-resection, progression of arthritis, Grade 3-4 diseaseRevision cheilectomy if residual osteophyte, or convert to arthrodesis
Malunion (arthrodesis)10-15% (most common complication)Technical error, inadequate fluoroscopy, poor positioning techniqueIf symptomatic: revision arthrodesis with osteotomy
Nonunion (arthrodesis)5-10%Smoking, diabetes, inadequate fixation, poor bone qualityRevision arthrodesis with bone graft, biologics, rigid fixation
Hardware irritation (arthrodesis)10-15%Prominent plate, low-profile skin, patient factorsHardware removal after union (typically 6-12 months)
Transfer metatarsalgia5-10%Over-resection (cheilectomy), malunion (arthrodesis)Orthotics, metatarsal pads, rarely osteotomy
Infection1-3%Diabetes, smoking, immunosuppressionAntibiotics, wound care, rarely debridement or hardware removal
Nerve injury (sensory)5-10% temporary, 1-2% permanentDorsal medial/lateral cutaneous nervesUsually resolves, neuropathic pain management if persistent

Preventing Malunion - Most Common Arthrodesis Complication

Malunion is the most common significant complication of first MTP arthrodesis. Prevention requires meticulous intraoperative technique: use sterile block to simulate weight-bearing, check hallux alignment (should point between 2nd-3rd toes), ensure 15-20 degrees dorsiflexion (1-2 cm ground clearance), confirm 10-15 degrees valgus. Fluoroscopy in multiple planes before final fixation. Do not accept suboptimal position - reposition and re-fix if needed.

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

Cheilectomy Rehabilitation

Immediate Post-OpDays 0-14

Dressing and footwear: Soft dressing, wooden shoe or post-op shoe. Weight-bearing: Immediate weight-bearing as tolerated in protective shoe. Activity: Elevate foot, ice, minimal walking. Pain control: Oral analgesics, NSAIDs after 48 hours.

Early MobilizationWeeks 2-6

ROM exercises: Start gentle dorsiflexion exercises at 2 weeks (critical!). Manual stretching, active ROM. Goal: regain 60-70 degrees. Footwear: Transition to stiff-soled athletic shoe. Weight-bearing: Full weight-bearing. Activity: Walking, avoid running/jumping.

Progressive LoadingWeeks 6-12

Strengthening: Toe curls, marble pick-up, resistance band dorsiflexion. Proprioception: Balance exercises. Activity: Gradual return to sports, impact activities. Footwear: Normal shoes, avoid high heels initially.

Return to Full Activity3 Months Plus

Return to sport: Running, jumping, cutting at 3 months if ROM adequate. Long-term: Expect 90% recovery by 6 months. Maintain ROM with daily stretching. Avoid excessive high heels long-term.

Critical Cheilectomy Rehab Point

Early ROM exercises are critical to cheilectomy success. Start at 2 weeks - capsular adhesions form quickly. Goal: 60-70 degrees dorsiflexion. Aggressive physiotherapy improves outcomes. Stiffness post-cheilectomy often reflects inadequate rehabilitation, not surgical failure.

Early mobilization maximizes the motion-preservation benefit of cheilectomy.

Arthrodesis Rehabilitation

Protected Non-Weight-BearingWeeks 0-6

Immobilization: CAM boot or below-knee cast. Weight-bearing: Non-weight-bearing with crutches/walker. Activity: Elevate, ice, no ROM exercises (fusion site!). Follow-up: Wound check 2 weeks, X-rays 6 weeks.

Progressive Weight-BearingWeeks 6-12

X-rays at 6 weeks: Assess union. If bridging callus/stable, progress weight-bearing. Weight-bearing: Partial (25-50%) weeks 6-8, increase to full by 12 weeks. Footwear: CAM boot until 12 weeks. Activity: Walking only, no impact.

Transition to ShoesWeeks 12-16

X-rays at 12 weeks: Confirm union (bridging callus 3-4 cortices). Footwear: Transition to stiff-soled athletic shoe if union progressing. Weight-bearing: Full weight-bearing. Activity: Walking, gentle stationary bike.

Return to Activity4-6 Months

Union confirmation: Clinical and radiographic union typically 3-4 months. Activity: Gradual return to desired activities. Sports: Impact sports at 6 months if solid union. Hardware: Consider removal at 12-18 months if symptomatic.

Monitoring for Nonunion

Assess union at each visit: clinical (no pain with palpation/stress) and radiographic (bridging callus on 3-4 cortices). If no progression by 12 weeks, consider CT scan. Risk factors for nonunion: smoking (counsel cessation!), diabetes, NSAIDs (avoid first 6 weeks), inadequate fixation. Early intervention (bone stimulator, revision with graft) improves outcome.

Arthrodesis requires patient compliance with protected weight-bearing protocol for optimal union.

Outcomes and Prognosis

ProcedureBest ForSuccess RateAdvantagesDisadvantages
CheilectomyGrade 1-2, dorsal disease80-90% satisfaction at 5 yearsMotion preserved, simple procedure, low morbidityMay fail (15-20% at 10 years), arthritis progression
Interposition ArthroplastyGrade 2, young patient60-80% satisfaction at 5 yearsMotion preserved, no implantHigher failure than cheilectomy or arthrodesis, limited evidence
ArthrodesisGrade 3-4, failed cheilectomy85-90% satisfaction long-termPredictable pain relief, durable, low revision rateLoss of motion, malunion risk, longer recovery
ArthroplastyLimited role (elderly, low demand)60-80% at 5 years, 60% at 10 yearsMotion preserved (theoretically)High failure, loosening, revision difficult, not recommended

Predictors of Poor Outcome

Cheilectomy: Grade 3-4 disease (wrong procedure), circumferential cartilage loss, inadequate debridement. Arthrodesis: Malunion (affects function, satisfaction), nonunion (5-10%), smoking. General: Inflammatory arthropathy, worker's compensation, unrealistic patient expectations. Patient selection and meticulous technique are critical to optimal outcomes.

Evidence Base and Key Trials

Systematic Review - Cheilectomy Outcomes

2
Lau JTC, Daniels TR • Foot Ankle Int (2001)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic review of cheilectomy for hallux rigidus
  • Overall satisfaction: 82% (range 60-100%)
  • Pain relief more predictable than ROM improvement
  • Better results in earlier grade disease (Grade 1-2)
  • Average ROM improvement: 20-30 degrees
  • Durability: 70-80% avoid further surgery at 10 years
Clinical Implication: Cheilectomy is an effective first-line surgical treatment for Grade 1-2 hallux rigidus with predictable outcomes and joint preservation.
Limitation: Heterogeneous studies, variable grading systems, limited long-term (over 10 years) data.

First MTP Arthrodesis - Long-Term Outcomes

3
Gibson JN, Thomson CE • Foot Ankle Surg (2005)
Key Findings:
  • Retrospective series: 118 first MTP arthrodeses
  • Fusion rate: 93% (110/118)
  • Patient satisfaction: 87% at mean 4.5 years
  • Complications: malunion 12%, nonunion 7%, hardware removal 15%
  • Most malunions were asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic
  • Revision rate: 8% (mostly for nonunion)
Clinical Implication: First MTP arthrodesis provides reliable pain relief and high satisfaction with predictable fusion rates. Position is critical to avoid symptomatic malunion.
Limitation: Retrospective design, no validated outcome measures, variable surgical techniques and fixation methods.

Plate vs Screw Fixation for First MTP Arthrodesis

2
Polzer H, et al • Foot Ankle Int (2019)
Key Findings:
  • Meta-analysis: 16 studies, 1,348 arthrodeses
  • Plate fixation: 95% union rate vs screw fixation: 88% union (statistically significant)
  • Plate: higher hardware removal rate (18% vs 8%)
  • No difference in pain scores or patient satisfaction
  • Plate provides superior biomechanical stability
Clinical Implication: Plate fixation offers higher fusion rates but increased hardware prominence. Consider patient factors (bone quality, body weight) when selecting fixation method.
Limitation: Heterogeneous study designs, variable plate types, retrospective data predominant.

Interposition Arthroplasty - Systematic Review

2
Waizy H, et al • Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (2011)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic review: 18 studies, various interposition materials
  • Overall satisfaction: 60-85% (highly variable)
  • Better outcomes in younger patients (under 60 years)
  • Inferior to cheilectomy for Grade 1-2 disease
  • Inferior to arthrodesis for Grade 3-4 disease
  • Limited long-term data (most studies under 5 years follow-up)
Clinical Implication: Interposition arthroplasty has unclear role in hallux rigidus treatment. Consider only for Grade 2 patients desiring motion preservation who accept higher re-operation risk.
Limitation: Low-quality studies, no RCTs, variable techniques and materials, significant publication bias.

Australian Podiatric Medicine Guidelines - Hallux Rigidus

5
Australian Podiatry Association • Clinical Practice Guideline (2020)
Key Findings:
  • Conservative management recommended for all grades initially
  • Footwear modification and orthotics first-line
  • Cheilectomy for Grade 1-2 disease with failed conservative care
  • Arthrodesis for Grade 3-4 disease
  • Arthroplasty not routinely recommended due to high failure rates
  • Multidisciplinary approach including podiatry, physiotherapy, orthopaedics
Clinical Implication: Australian guidelines emphasize conservative-first approach and evidence-based surgical algorithms consistent with international literature.
Limitation: Expert consensus, limited Australian-specific outcome data, extrapolated largely from international studies.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Classification and Initial Management (2-3 min)

EXAMINER

"A 55-year-old male accountant presents with 2 years of progressive pain and stiffness in his right great toe. Pain is worse with walking, particularly when pushing off. He has tried wider shoes and ibuprofen with minimal relief. On examination, there is a dorsal prominence at the first MTP joint, tenderness on palpation, and dorsiflexion limited to 25 degrees (plantarflexion full). Grind test is positive. Weight-bearing radiographs show a dorsal osteophyte, 60% joint space narrowing, and mild subchondral sclerosis. What is your assessment and management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is hallux rigidus, likely Carp Grade 2 based on the moderate joint space narrowing (50-75%) and significant ROM loss. I would take a systematic approach: First, confirm the diagnosis with history and examination focusing on pain with dorsiflexion and positive grind test, which distinguishes this from hallux valgus or turf toe. Second, review weight-bearing radiographs to grade severity using Carp classification - this appears Grade 2. Third, initial management would be conservative: trial of stiff-soled shoes with rocker bottom, Morton's extension orthotic, NSAIDs, and consider corticosteroid injection for diagnostic and therapeutic benefit. Fourth, if conservative management fails over 3-6 months, surgical options include cheilectomy if plantar cartilage is preserved (need to assess intraoperatively) or consider arthrodesis if disease is more advanced than radiographs suggest. I would counsel about 80-90% satisfaction with cheilectomy for Grade 2 disease but acknowledge risk of progression requiring fusion.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Systematic description and classification (Carp Grade 2)
Conservative management first-line for all grades
Cheilectomy vs arthrodesis decision based on intraoperative cartilage assessment
Realistic outcome expectations (80-90% satisfaction cheilectomy, may fail)
COMMON TRAPS
✗Missing conservative management - all patients should trial non-operative treatment first
✗Committing to cheilectomy without acknowledging need for intraoperative cartilage assessment
✗Incorrect grading (this is Grade 2, not Grade 3)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What are the key features distinguishing Grade 2 from Grade 3?"
"How do you assess cartilage status intraoperatively during cheilectomy?"
"What would you counsel regarding outcomes if this patient chooses surgery?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Surgical Technique - Arthrodesis (3-4 min)

EXAMINER

"A 62-year-old female with severe hallux rigidus (Carp Grade 3, over 75% joint space loss, dorsiflexion 10 degrees) has failed conservative management and wants definitive treatment. You plan a first MTP arthrodesis. Walk me through your surgical technique, focusing on achieving optimal fusion position."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
For this Grade 3 hallux rigidus requiring arthrodesis, my approach focuses on achieving solid fusion in optimal position. Patient positioning is supine with ankle bump. My incision is dorsal medial over the first MTP joint, approximately 4-5 cm, protecting the medial cutaneous nerve. Key steps: First, expose the joint with capsulotomy and assess arthritis severity. Second, prepare joint surfaces by removing all cartilage to bleeding subchondral bone using oscillating saw - I create flat, congruent surfaces with either planar cuts or cup-and-cone technique. Third, position the hallux in optimal alignment - this is critical: 10-15 degrees valgus relative to first metatarsal, 15-20 degrees dorsiflexion relative to ground with foot plantigrade on sterile block, and neutral rotation. I check that the hallux tip points between the 2nd and 3rd toes and clears the ground by 1-2 cm. Fourth, I fix with a dorsal locking plate providing compression across the fusion site, confirming position with fluoroscopy in AP, lateral, and oblique views. Fifth, closure in layers, soft dressing, CAM boot non-weight-bearing for 6 weeks. Postoperatively, protected weight-bearing until radiographic union (typically 12 weeks), then gradual return to activity. I would counsel about 90-95% fusion rate, 85-90% satisfaction, and risks including malunion (most common complication), nonunion (5-10%), and hardware irritation.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Correct fusion position: 10-15° valgus, 15-20° dorsiflexion, neutral rotation
Use sterile block to simulate weight-bearing when assessing dorsiflexion
Plate fixation preferred for superior fusion rates (95% vs 88% screws)
Malunion prevention through meticulous intraoperative positioning and fluoroscopy confirmation
COMMON TRAPS
✗Incorrect fusion angles (examiners will press on specific numbers)
✗Not checking alignment with foot plantigrade on sterile block
✗Missing malunion as most common significant complication
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is your plate fixation technique compared to crossed screws?"
"How do you manage a patient who develops nonunion at 6 months?"
"What position would be considered a symptomatic malunion requiring revision?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Complication Management (2-3 min)

EXAMINER

"A 48-year-old male underwent cheilectomy for Grade 2 hallux rigidus 18 months ago. He returns with recurrent pain and stiffness. Dorsiflexion is now only 20 degrees. Radiographs show progression to Grade 3 disease with near-complete joint space loss and a small residual dorsal osteophyte. How do you manage this patient?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This presentation represents failed cheilectomy with progression of hallux rigidus to Grade 3 disease. My management approach: First, confirm the diagnosis through history (recurrent pain pattern similar to pre-op), examination (reduced ROM to 20 degrees, positive grind test), and radiographs showing Grade 3 changes. Second, assess why cheilectomy failed - likely combination of under-resection (residual osteophyte visible) and disease progression (inherent to the condition, not surgical failure). Third, discuss treatment options: conservative measures can be trialed (stiff-soled shoes, injections) but typically provide limited benefit at this stage. Definitive surgical treatment is first MTP arthrodesis - this is the appropriate salvage procedure for failed cheilectomy with Grade 3 disease. Fourth, counsel the patient that revision cheilectomy is unlikely to succeed given Grade 3 changes and that arthrodesis provides 85-90% satisfaction with predictable pain relief, though motion is sacrificed. The previous cheilectomy does not compromise the arthrodesis outcome. Fifth, if proceeding with arthrodesis, ensure optimal fusion position (10-15 degrees valgus, 15-20 degrees dorsiflexion) and use plate fixation for best fusion rates. I would also counsel about 90-95% fusion rate, longer recovery (3-4 months to union), and need for compliance with protected weight-bearing protocol.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Recognition that failed cheilectomy with Grade 3 progression requires arthrodesis
Understanding that cheilectomy failure is common (15-20% at 10 years) and expected
Revision cheilectomy inappropriate for Grade 3 disease
Arthrodesis not compromised by previous cheilectomy
COMMON TRAPS
✗Attempting revision cheilectomy for Grade 3 disease (wrong treatment)
✗Blaming surgical technique without acknowledging disease progression
✗Not counseling about expected recovery timeline for arthrodesis (3-4 months to union)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What factors predict cheilectomy failure?"
"Would you consider interposition arthroplasty as an alternative to arthrodesis here?"
"How would you modify your arthrodesis technique given the previous surgery?"

MCQ Practice Points

Anatomy Question

Q: What is the normal dorsiflexion range of the first MTP joint required for normal gait? A: 65-75 degrees. This range is required for toe-off phase of gait. Hallux rigidus typically reduces this to under 30 degrees, causing compensatory gait alterations (external foot progression angle, lateral weight shift).

Classification Question

Q: What are the key features distinguishing Carp Grade 2 from Grade 3 hallux rigidus? A: Grade 2: 50-75% joint space narrowing, moderate dorsal/lateral osteophytes, 20-50% ROM loss. Treatment: cheilectomy if plantar cartilage OK. Grade 3: Over 75% joint space narrowing, severe osteophytes, subchondral cysts, over 75% ROM loss (under 20 degrees dorsiflexion). Treatment: arthrodesis. The distinction guides surgical decision-making.

Treatment Algorithm Question

Q: What is the critical intraoperative decision point during cheilectomy for Grade 2 hallux rigidus? A: Assessment of plantar cartilage status. If cartilage is preserved on the plantar two-thirds of the joint, proceed with cheilectomy (30% dorsal head resection). If cartilage loss is circumferential, convert to arthrodesis. Do not compromise with inadequate debridement - this leads to poor outcomes.

Surgical Technique Question

Q: What is the optimal fusion position for first MTP arthrodesis? A: VDN mnemonic: Valgus 10-15 degrees (relative to first metatarsal axis), Dorsiflexion 15-20 degrees (relative to ground with foot plantigrade), Neutral rotation. Check alignment with foot on sterile block - hallux should clear ground by 1-2 cm and point between 2nd-3rd toes. Malunion is the most common complication and is position-dependent.

Outcomes Question

Q: What are the evidence-based success rates for cheilectomy vs arthrodesis in hallux rigidus? A: Cheilectomy (Grade 1-2): 80-90% satisfaction at 5 years, 70-80% avoid further surgery at 10 years. Arthrodesis: 90-95% fusion rate, 85-90% patient satisfaction long-term. Arthrodesis has slightly higher satisfaction but sacrifices motion. Both are evidence-based, appropriate procedures when used for correct indications.

Complication Question

Q: What is the most common significant complication of first MTP arthrodesis and how is it prevented? A: Malunion (10-15%) is the most common complication. Prevention requires meticulous intraoperative technique: use sterile block to simulate weight-bearing, check hallux alignment (between 2nd-3rd toes), ensure 15-20 degrees dorsiflexion (1-2 cm ground clearance), confirm 10-15 degrees valgus, fluoroscopy in multiple planes before final fixation. Do not accept suboptimal position.

Australian Context and Medicolegal Considerations

Australian Practice Patterns

  • Public system: Conservative management first-line (3-6 months trial)
  • Surgical referral: Typically after failed physiotherapy, orthotics, injections
  • Wait times: Public system 6-12 months for elective foot surgery
  • Private: Faster access, patient choice of surgeon/timing

Australian Guidelines

  • Australian Podiatry Association: Conservative-first approach
  • RACS Guidelines: Shared decision-making for elective procedures
  • ACSQHC: Informed consent including alternatives, risks, outcomes
  • Antibiotic prophylaxis: Single dose cefazolin (eTG guidelines)

Medicolegal Considerations

Key documentation requirements:

  • Conservative management trial documented (footwear, orthotics, injections, duration)
  • Informed consent: procedure options (cheilectomy vs arthrodesis), fusion position (loss of motion), outcomes (satisfaction rates, revision rates), complications (malunion, nonunion, infection, nerve injury)
  • Realistic expectations: cheilectomy may fail (15-20% at 10 years), arthrodesis sacrifices motion but reliable pain relief
  • Intraoperative decision-making: if converting from cheilectomy to arthrodesis based on cartilage status, document finding and rationale
  • Malunion prevention: document intraoperative checks (sterile block, fluoroscopy, alignment confirmation)

Common litigation issues: Malunion (position not verified intraoperatively), infection (antibiotic prophylaxis), nerve injury (medial cutaneous nerve), unrealistic expectations (motion after arthrodesis).

HALLUX RIGIDUS

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Anatomy

  • •First MTP joint: 2-3x body weight in gait, 8x with running
  • •Normal dorsiflexion: 65-75 degrees (required for toe-off)
  • •Hallux rigidus: Typically under 30 degrees dorsiflexion
  • •Dorsal osteophyte: Blocks dorsiflexion, causes impingement pain

Carp Classification

  • •Grade 0: Dorsal osteophyte, no JSN = Conservative
  • •Grade 1: 20-50% JSN, mild spurring = Cheilectomy
  • •Grade 2: 50-75% JSN, moderate spurring = Cheilectomy or Interposition
  • •Grade 3: Over 75% JSN, severe changes = Arthrodesis
  • •Grade 4: Grade 3 plus hallux valgus/varus = Arthrodesis

Treatment Algorithm

  • •Conservative first (all grades): Stiff shoes, orthotics, NSAIDs, injections
  • •Cheilectomy: Grade 1-2, plantar cartilage preserved, 80-90% satisfaction
  • •Arthrodesis: Grade 3-4, failed cheilectomy, 90-95% fusion rate
  • •Arthroplasty: Limited role, high failure rates (20-40% at 10 years)

Surgical Pearls

  • •Cheilectomy: Remove dorsal 30% metatarsal head, achieve 60-70° intraop dorsiflexion
  • •Arthrodesis position (VDN): 10-15° Valgus, 15-20° Dorsiflexion, Neutral rotation
  • •Use sterile block to simulate weight-bearing when checking fusion position
  • •Plate fixation: 95% union vs screws 88% (meta-analysis)
  • •Intraop cartilage assessment determines cheilectomy vs arthrodesis

Complications

  • •Malunion (arthrodesis): 10-15%, most common, position-dependent
  • •Nonunion (arthrodesis): 5-10%, smoking major risk factor
  • •Recurrent pain (cheilectomy): 15-20% at 10 years, disease progression
  • •Hardware irritation: 10-15%, may require removal after union
  • •Transfer metatarsalgia: Over-resection or malunion
Quick Stats
Reading Time150 min
Related Topics

Ankle Impingement Syndromes

Anterior Ankle Impingement

Anterior Tibial Tendon Rupture

Baxter's Nerve Entrapment