PIPJ Flexion Deformity
- Hammer Toe: PIPJ flexion with neutral DIPJ and MTPJ - most common lesser toe deformity.
- Claw Toe: MTPJ hyperextension with PIPJ AND DIPJ flexion - often neurological cause.
- Mallet Toe: Isolated DIPJ flexion only - least common, affects terminal tendon.
- Flexible vs Rigid: Correctable with ankle plantarflexed (FDL relaxed) = flexible.
- Flexibility Test: Critical - determines soft tissue vs bone surgery.
- “Plantarflex ankle to test flexibility (relaxes FDL)
- “Always assess MTPJ stability - Drawer test
- “Flexible = FDL tenotomy/transfer
- “Rigid = PIPJ arthroplasty or arthrodesis
- “Address MTPJ if subluxed (Weil osteotomy)
The flexibility test determines your entire surgical approach.
- Flexible: Correct PIPJ with ankle PLANTARFLEXED (this relaxes FDL).
- If it corrects = Flexible → Soft tissue surgery (FDL tenotomy or transfer).
- If fixed = Rigid → Bone surgery (PIPJ arthroplasty or arthrodesis).
- Always check MTPJ - subluxation needs Weil osteotomy.
- Drawer test - anterior draw of proximal phalanx indicates MTPJ instability.
- Hammer Toe
- Neutral/Extended
- Claw Toe
- HYPEREXTENDED
- Mallet Toe
- Neutral
- Hammer Toe
- FLEXED
- Claw Toe
- FLEXED
- Mallet Toe
- Neutral
- Hammer Toe
- Neutral
- Claw Toe
- FLEXED
- Mallet Toe
- FLEXED
- Hammer Toe
- 80% of lesser toe
- Claw Toe
- 15% of lesser toe
- Mallet Toe
- 5% of lesser toe
- Hammer Toe
- Shoe wear, hallux valgus
- Claw Toe
- Neurological (CMT, DM)
- Mallet Toe
- Trauma, long 2nd toe
- Hammer Toe
- FDL/FDB overpull
- Claw Toe
- Intrinsic weakness
- Mallet Toe
- FDP/terminal tendon
Overview and Epidemiology
Hammer Toe is the most common lesser toe deformity, accounting for approximately 80% of all lesser toe pathology. It predominantly affects the 2nd toe due to its length (often longest ray) and relationship with hallux valgus.
Epidemiology
- Prevalence: 2-20% of adult population
- Gender: Women affected 4-5x more than men (footwear)
- Age: Peak 40-60 years
- Location: 2nd toe in 80% of cases
- Bilateral: 40% have bilateral involvement
Pathophysiology and Anatomy
Anatomy
- PIPJ: Proximal interphalangeal joint - site of primary deformity
- Flexors: FDL (flexor digitorum longus), FDB (flexor digitorum brevis)
- Extensors: EDL (extensor digitorum longus), EDB (extensor digitorum brevis)
- Intrinsics: Interossei, lumbricals - flex MTPJ, extend IPJs
Pathophysiology
- Muscle Imbalance: FDL/FDB overpull relative to extensors
- Intrinsic Weakness: Loss of intrinsic function → PIPJ flexion
- Shoe Wear: Tight toe box → toe flexion adaptation
- Hallux Valgus: 2nd toe crowded, forced to flex
- Inflammatory Arthritis: Joint destruction, subluxation
Aetiology
- Footwear: High heels, narrow toe box - most common
- Hallux Valgus: Associated in 50-75% of cases
- Long 2nd Metatarsal: Increased pressure
- Inflammatory Arthritis: RA, psoriatic
- Neurological: Diabetic neuropathy, CMT, CVA (usually claw)
- Trauma: Compartment syndrome, crush injury
Clinical Assessment

History
- Pain: Dorsal PIPJ (shoe rubbing), tip of toe, under metatarsal head
- Callus/Corn: Dorsal PIPJ, tip of toe, interdigital
- Cosmesis: Crooked toe appearance
- Shoe Wear: Difficulty finding comfortable shoes
- Progression: Initially flexible → becomes rigid over time
- Hallux: Associated bunion symptoms
Physical Examination
Examination Technique
-
Standing Assessment
- Observe toe position weight-bearing
- Check for associated hallux valgus
- Assess arch, hindfoot alignment
-
Seated Examination
- Flexibility Test: Most critical exam finding
- Plantarflex ankle (relaxes FDL)
- Attempt to correct PIPJ deformity
- If corrects = Flexible
- If fixed = Rigid
- Flexibility Test: Most critical exam finding
-
MTPJ Assessment
- Drawer Test: Grasp toe, attempt to sublux proximally
- Positive = MTPJ instability (plantar plate injury)
- Assess MTPJ ROM
-
Callus/Skin
- Dorsal PIPJ: From shoe pressure
- Tip of toe: From ground contact
- Interdigital: From adjacent toe pressure
-
Neurovascular
- Capillary refill
- Sensation (diabetic neuropathy common)
Classification Systems
- Type I: Flexible deformity, reducible
- Type II: Semi-rigid, partially reducible
- Type III: Rigid, fixed deformity
- Type IV: Rigid with MTPJ subluxation/dislocation
- Grade 1: Flexible, correctable
- Grade 2: Rigid PIPJ, flexible MTPJ
- Grade 3: Rigid PIPJ and MTPJ
- Grade 4: With MTPJ dislocation
Differential Diagnosis

- Key Deformity / Sign
- PIPJ flexion, neutral MTPJ/DIPJ
- Distinguishing Feature
- Flexibility test guides treatment; dorsal PIPJ corn
- Key Deformity / Sign
- MTPJ extension + PIPJ/DIPJ flexion
- Distinguishing Feature
- Usually multiple toes; look for neurological cause (CMT, diabetes)
- Key Deformity / Sign
- Isolated DIPJ flexion
- Distinguishing Feature
- Tip-of-toe corn; terminal tendon pathology
- Key Deformity / Sign
- Medial/dorsal drift over hallux
- Distinguishing Feature
- Plantar plate tear, positive drawer; precedes fixed deformity
- Key Deformity / Sign
- Dorsal MTPJ subluxation
- Distinguishing Feature
- Positive drawer/squeeze; pain at plantar MTPJ rather than PIPJ
- Key Deformity / Sign
- MTPJ pain, flattened metatarsal head
- Distinguishing Feature
- AVN of metatarsal head on X-ray; joint-line tenderness, not PIPJ
- Key Deformity / Sign
- Interdigital pain, Mulder click
- Distinguishing Feature
- No fixed osseous deformity; numbness in adjacent toes
The Push-Up (Kelikian) Test
The passive flexibility test — correcting the PIPJ with the ankle plantarflexed to relax the FDL — tells you whether the interphalangeal contracture is fixed. The push-up test (Kelikian push-up test) answers a different, complementary question that the topic's own MCQ material relies on: is the deformity being driven from the MTPJ, and will it reduce when the forefoot is loaded?
- Technique: with the patient seated, the examiner pushes upward (dorsally) on the plantar aspect of the metatarsal head, simulating weight-bearing and toe-off, and watches the toe.
- Interpretation: a flexible/dynamic deformity realigns — the toe straightens as the MTPJ is reduced, indicating the interphalangeal posture is secondary to MTPJ position, so soft-tissue balancing (with metatarsal-level correction where the MTPJ is unstable) can realign it. A toe that fails to correct on push-up has a fixed interphalangeal contracture requiring bony PIPJ correction (resection arthroplasty or arthrodesis).
- Putting the tests together: combined with the plantarflexion flexibility test and the dorsal drawer test for MTPJ stability, the push-up test localises the deformity (isolated PIPJ versus MTPJ-driven) and grades its rigidity — exactly what selects soft-tissue versus bony surgery and decides whether a Weil osteotomy is needed. Formal plantar plate grading and repair are developed under plantar plate insufficiency.
Two tests, two questions. Plantarflexing the ankle asks "is the interphalangeal joint fixed?" (it relaxes the FDL). The push-up test asks "is the deformity MTPJ-driven and reducible under load?" A toe that corrects on push-up needs balancing at the MTPJ; a toe that stays bent needs bony correction of the PIPJ.
Investigations
Imaging
Weight-Bearing Radiographs:
- AP View: MTPJ alignment, subluxation, joint space
- Oblique View: PIPJ deformity, osteophytes
- Lateral View: Degree of flexion, PIPJ arthritis
Radiographic Assessment
- MTPJ subluxation (proximal phalanx displaced dorsally)
- PIPJ joint destruction/arthritis
- Associated hallux valgus angle
- Metatarsal length assessment
- Bone quality (inflammatory arthritis)
Special Investigations
- HbA1c: If diabetic neuropathy suspected
- Inflammatory Markers: ESR, CRP if inflammatory arthritis
- Nerve Conduction Studies: If neurological cause suspected (CMT)
Weight-bearing X-rays are essential - non-weight-bearing images miss MTPJ subluxation and underestimate deformity severity.
Management Algorithm

Floating toe is the most common post-operative complaint. The toe has no ground purchase and feels floppy. Prevention: avoid over-resection, use arthrodesis for stability, address MTPJ subluxation. Salvage is difficult.
Complications and Outcomes
Surgical Complications
- Incidence
- 5-10%
- Risk Factors
- Over-resection, tendon imbalance, MTPJ instability
- Prevention/Management
- Limit resection, arthrodesis, address MTPJ
- Incidence
- 5-15%
- Risk Factors
- Inadequate correction, not addressing MTPJ
- Prevention/Management
- Complete correction, treat all pathology
- Incidence
- 3-8%
- Risk Factors
- Pin track contamination, diabetes
- Prevention/Management
- Pin care, early removal if infected
- Incidence
- 5-10%
- Risk Factors
- Excessive scarring, prolonged immobilization
- Prevention/Management
- Early mobilization, physiotherapy
- Incidence
- 2-5%
- Risk Factors
- Technical error, inadequate fixation
- Prevention/Management
- Careful intraoperative assessment
- Incidence
- 5-10%
- Risk Factors
- Shortening adjacent ray, overcorrection
- Prevention/Management
- Address all metatarsals, balanced correction
The toe has no ground purchase and feels floppy. Causes include over-resection at PIPJ, tendon imbalance, and unaddressed MTPJ subluxation. Prevention through conservative bone resection, arthrodesis for stability, and addressing MTPJ pathology is key. Salvage is difficult.
Prevention Strategies
- Conservative bone resection: Avoid over-resection at PIPJ
- Arthrodesis over arthroplasty: More stable correction for rigid deformities
- Address MTPJ: Weil osteotomy if subluxed
- K-wire care: Clean pin sites, adequate duration (3-4 weeks)
- Patient selection: Avoid surgery in poorly controlled diabetics
Postoperative Care
Immediate Postoperative Period (0-2 Weeks)
- Dressing: Bulky postoperative dressing maintaining toe alignment
- K-wire care: If used, wire exits dorsally - keep dry and protected
- Elevation: Essential - foot above heart level to minimize swelling
- Weight-bearing: Heel weight-bearing in stiff-soled postoperative shoe
- First follow-up: Wound check at 10-14 days
- Suture removal: Non-absorbable sutures at 2 weeks
- Swelling management: Expect significant toe swelling for 6-8 weeks
- Activity: Limited ambulation for essential activities only
Early Recovery Phase (2-6 Weeks)
- K-wire removal: If used, remove at 3-4 weeks in clinic
- Active ROM: Begin gentle active toe movements after wire removal
- Footwear: Continue stiff-soled shoe; transition to accommodative shoe with stiff sole
- Buddy taping: Tape corrected toe to adjacent toe for 4-6 weeks post-wire removal
- Progressive weight-bearing: Transition to supportive athletic shoe
- Physical therapy: If stiffness present - focus on PIPJ mobility
- Wound massage: Scar mobilization after complete healing
Late Recovery Phase (6-12 Weeks)
- Footwear transition: Gradual return to regular shoes (wide toe box initially)
- Swelling: Toe swelling may persist 3-6 months - normal finding
- Return to activities: Low-impact exercise at 6-8 weeks, sports at 10-12 weeks
- Final assessment: Evaluate alignment and ROM at 12 weeks
Postoperative Swelling Timeline: Inform patients that toe swelling following hammer toe correction typically peaks at 2-3 weeks and may persist for 3-6 months. Prolonged swelling does not indicate failure if alignment is maintained.
Complications and Management
- Incidence
- 5-15%
- Prevention/Management
- Proper patient selection; address MTPJ if subluxed
- Incidence
- 2-5%
- Prevention/Management
- Avoid excessive plantar plate release
- Incidence
- 3-8%
- Prevention/Management
- Check DIPJ mobility preoperatively
- Incidence
- 10-20%
- Prevention/Management
- Early ROM after fixation; consider arthroplasty in elderly
- Incidence
- 1-3%
- Prevention/Management
- Standard wound care; K-wire pin site care
- Incidence
- 5-10%
- Prevention/Management
- Address 1st ray pathology; consider Weil osteotomy
Outcomes and Prognosis
Expected Outcomes
- Symptom relief in 50-70%
- Deformity NOT corrected
- Typically progress over time
- Average 2-3 years before surgery
- Overall Satisfaction: 80-90%
- Pain Relief: 85-95%
- Deformity Correction: 75-90%
- Recurrence: 5-10%
- Complications: 10-20%
Factors Affecting Outcome
- Positive: Flexible deformity, isolated PIPJ, no MTPJ involvement
- Negative: Rigid deformity, MTPJ subluxation, inflammatory arthritis, diabetic
Return to Activity
- Walking: 2-4 weeks post-op
- Driving: 4-6 weeks
- Dress Shoes: 6-8 weeks
- Sports: 8-12 weeks
- Final Result: 6-12 months
Guidelines, Registries & Global Practice
Global Epidemiology
Lesser-toe deformities are among the most common forefoot complaints worldwide. Population studies report hammer/claw/mallet toes in a substantial minority of adults, rising steeply with age and strongly female-predominant (footwear and a longer second ray are the dominant drivers). Prevalence is higher in older, shod populations and lower in habitually barefoot communities, supporting footwear as a key modifiable factor. Hallux valgus coexists in the majority of symptomatic second-toe deformities.
Side-by-Side Guidance
- Position on lesser-toe surgery
- Flexible vs rigid distinction drives treatment; soft-tissue balancing for flexible, bony correction (arthroplasty/arthrodesis) for rigid; address MTPJ instability concurrently
- Position on lesser-toe surgery
- Exhaust footwear and orthotic measures first; reserve surgery for failed conservative care; counsel explicitly on floating toe and recurrence
- Position on lesser-toe surgery
- Endorses plantar plate staging (Coughlin-Nery) and combined Weil osteotomy plus plantar-plate repair for instability-driven deformity
- Position on lesser-toe surgery
- In neuropathic feet, prioritise deformity offloading and ulcer prevention; weigh surgical correction against wound-healing and vascular risk
There is no single international registry for lesser-toe surgery; comparative evidence comes from case series, the Jay/Malay fixation RCT, and large pooled fixation reviews rather than from arthroplasty-style joint registries.
High- vs Limited-Resource Practice Variation
- High-resource settings: Day-case surgery; growing use of intramedullary fusion implants despite cost and hardware-failure data favouring K-wires; frequent combined bunion + lesser-toe correction.
- Limited-resource settings: Percutaneous K-wire fixation and FDL tenotomy/transfer predominate (low cost, reliable); emphasis on footwear modification and offloading where surgical access is limited.
- Diabetic / neuropathic populations: Worldwide, the threshold for elective bony surgery is raised because of impaired healing; offloading, accommodative footwear and ulcer prevention take priority.
Pathomechanics: The Three Deformity Patterns
Hammer, claw and mallet toes are the visible endpoint of a dynamic imbalance between the extrinsic (long) tendons and the intrinsic muscles of the foot. Three classic pathomechanical patterns, long described in the podiatric and orthopaedic literature, explain how that imbalance arises and predict the foot type that accompanies it:
- Flexor stabilisation — the commonest mechanism behind the acquired hammer toe. In a pronated or flatfoot foot the long and short flexors (FDL/FDB) fire earlier and for longer during stance to try to stabilise an unstable forefoot, overpowering the intrinsics. The unopposed flexors buckle the PIPJ, producing the hammer toe (often with an adductovarus lesser toe). This is the pattern to expect in the flexible, footwear-driven patient with hallux valgus.
- Extensor substitution — occurs during swing phase when the extensor digitorum longus (EDL) is over-recruited to help a weak tibialis anterior dorsiflex the ankle. The EDL overpowers the lumbricals and hyperextends the MTPJ; the toe then buckles at the interphalangeal joints. It is associated with a high-arched (cavus) foot and produces a claw-type posture with prominent MTPJ dorsiflexion.
- Flexor substitution — the least common. When the triceps surae is weak, the deep flexors, tibialis posterior and peroneus longus substitute for push-off; the flexors again overpower the intrinsics and claw the toes. It is seen in the supinated/cavus foot.
Recognising the pattern matters because it points to the underlying driver. A flexible flexor-stabilisation hammer toe responds well to flexor balancing (FDL tenotomy or Girdlestone-Taylor transfer), whereas an extensor- or flexor-substitution (cavus) pattern warns that an unaddressed hindfoot or cavus deformity, and often a neurological cause, will drive recurrence if the toe is treated in isolation — here the toe is the symptom, not the disease.
Flexor stabilisation is the commonest mechanism of the acquired hammer toe and is linked to the pronated/flatfoot foot. Extensor substitution and flexor substitution point instead to a cavus foot and should prompt a search for a neurological cause (see claw toe / cavus foot) before you operate on the toe alone.
Controversies & Areas of Uncertainty
- Arthroplasty vs arthrodesis for rigid deformity — Arthrodesis offers a more stable, lower-recurrence construct but at the cost of a stiff toe and a non-union risk; resection arthroplasty preserves some motion but is more prone to recurrence and floating toe. No high-quality RCT directly settles the choice, so selection remains driven by patient age, activity and surgeon preference.
- Intramedullary implants vs K-wire — The single RCT favours implants for fusion rate and patient-reported scores, yet pooled reviews show higher hardware-failure rates and a 640-894x cost premium with no clear complication benefit. Whether the avoided pin-tract morbidity justifies the cost is unresolved.
- When to address the MTPJ / plantar plate — There is debate over whether all crossover and instability-driven deformities need formal plantar plate repair, or whether a Weil osteotomy with soft-tissue balancing alone suffices. The Coughlin-Nery staging is increasingly used to guide this, but thresholds vary.
- Floating toe is partly unavoidable — Even with meticulous technique, floating toe occurs in a meaningful proportion after Weil osteotomy and plantar plate work; its true preventability and the best salvage remain uncertain.
- Role of percutaneous (minimally invasive) techniques — Percutaneous flexor tenotomy and minimally invasive osteotomies are expanding, but long-term comparative data against open correction are still limited.
MCQ Practice Points
Q: What distinguishes a hammer toe from a claw toe?
A: Hammer toe = PIPJ flexion with neutral MTPJ and DIPJ Claw toe = MTPJ hyperextension + PIPJ/DIPJ flexion
Hammer toe is most commonly 2nd toe, associated with hallux valgus. Claw toe typically affects multiple toes and has neurological associations (Charcot-Marie-Tooth, diabetic neuropathy).
Q: A 55-year-old woman has a painful 2nd hammer toe. The PIPJ deformity corrects passively. What is the first-line surgical treatment?
A: Flexor-to-extensor transfer (Girdlestone-Taylor procedure) - indicated for flexible deformities. Preserves joint motion.
If the PIPJ is fixed/rigid → PIPJ arthrodesis is indicated.
Q: What does the push-up test assess in hammer toe evaluation?
A: Tests MTPJ stability. With examiner pressure under the metatarsal head, a positive test shows correction of PIPJ deformity → indicates the problem is plantar plate/MTPJ driven, not isolated PIPJ contracture. May need Weil osteotomy in addition to toe surgery.
Q: Following hammer toe correction, a patient develops progressive DIPJ hyperextension ("floppy toe"). What is the cause?
A: FDL transection or excessive release during surgery. The FDL is the only active DIPJ flexor. If cut or transferred, unopposed EDL causes DIPJ hyperextension. Prevention: careful identification of FDL vs FDB.
Self-Assessment Quiz
At a Glance
Hammer toe is the most common lesser toe deformity, characterized by PIPJ flexion with neutral DIPJ and MTPJ, affecting the 2nd toe in 80% of cases due to hallux valgus pressure and intrinsic muscle imbalance. The flexibility test (plantarflex ankle to relax FDL) is the critical examination determining surgical approach: flexible deformities respond to soft tissue procedures (FDL tenotomy, Girdlestone-Taylor transfer), while rigid deformities require bone surgery (PIPJ arthroplasty or arthrodesis). Always assess MTPJ stability with drawer test, as subluxation requires concurrent Weil osteotomy. Surgical correction achieves 80-90% good outcomes with proper deformity classification and procedure selection.
HCMDeformity Types - HCM
Hook:HCM - Hammer at PIP, Claw everywhere (neurological), Mallet at DIP (terminal)
PLANTFlexibility Test - PLANT
Hook:PLANT the ankle down to test flexibility - if it corrects with FDL lax, it's flexible.
FRASurgical Options - FRA
Hook:FRA - Flexible gets FDL surgery, Rigid needs Arthroplasty/Arthrodesis.
FIRSComplications - FIRS
Hook:FIRS - Floating toe is the most common complaint post hammer toe surgery.
Viva Scenarios
Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud
“A 55-year-old woman presents with a painful 2nd toe deformity. She has a callus over the dorsal aspect of the PIPJ. On examination, the deformity corrects manually when you plantarflex her ankle.”
“A 62-year-old man has a painful, rigid 2nd toe deformity. The PIPJ does not correct even with the ankle plantarflexed. You also notice the toe is dorsally displaced at the MTPJ level with a positive Drawer test.”
“A patient returns 3 months after hammer toe surgery complaining their 2nd toe feels floppy and doesn't touch the ground when standing. They are unhappy with the result.”
DEFINITION & TYPES
- Hammer = PIPJ flexion, neutral MTPJ/DIPJ (80% of lesser toe)
- Claw = MTPJ extension + PIPJ/DIPJ flexion (neurological)
- Mallet = DIPJ flexion only (5%, terminal tendon)
- 2nd toe most common (80%) - length, hallux valgus
FLEXIBILITY TEST
- Plantarflex ankle (relaxes FDL)
- Attempt to correct PIPJ
- Corrects = FLEXIBLE → soft tissue surgery
- Fixed = RIGID → bone surgery
MTPJ ASSESSMENT
- Drawer test - anterior subluxation
- Positive = plantar plate rupture/MTPJ instability
- Must address if subluxed (Weil osteotomy)
- Missing MTPJ = recurrence
FLEXIBLE SURGERY
- FDL tenotomy (percutaneous stab incision)
- Girdlestone-Taylor (FDL split and transfer dorsally)
- May need MTPJ capsulotomy
- No bone resection needed
RIGID SURGERY
- PIPJ resection arthroplasty (resect P1 head)
- PIPJ arthrodesis (more stable, lower recurrence)
- K-wire 3-4 weeks or intramedullary device
- Weil osteotomy if MTPJ subluxed
COMPLICATIONS
- Floating toe - MOST COMMON (floppy, no purchase)
- Recurrence (5-10%)
- K-wire infection (3-8%)
- Stiffness, mallet toe, transfer lesions
OUTCOMES
- 80-90% satisfaction
- Arthrodesis lower recurrence than arthroplasty
- Conservative doesn't correct deformity
- Full recovery 6-12 months
Evidence Base
- Multicentre RCT, 91 patients randomised to K-wire (n=46) vs 2-piece intramedullary implant (n=45) for PIPJ fusion
- No statistically significant difference in complication rates between groups
- Intramedullary implant group had higher mean Bristol Foot Score, Foot Function Index and a higher fusion rate
- Mean age 58.7 years, confirming the typical older demographic
- Prospective series of 22 patients (40 lesser MTP joints) with instability treated by direct dorsal plantar plate repair plus Weil osteotomy
- Second MTP joint most commonly affected (63%); Grade III tears most frequent
- Defined the anatomical grading correlated with clinical staging for plantar plate dysfunction
- AOFAS score improved from a mean of 52 to 92 points postoperatively
- Retrospective series of 32 patients (47 feet) at mean 6-year follow-up
- Fixed hammer toes corrected by PIPJ arthrodesis with intramedullary Kirschner-wire fixation
- Dislocated lesser MTP joints reduced from 70% preoperatively to 7% postoperatively
- 23 feet excellent, 22 good, 2 fair; no poor results - a stable first ray protected lateral rays
- 24 toes with flexible PIPJ and/or MTPJ deformity treated by Girdlestone-Taylor FDL flexor-to-extensor transfer
- 92% (22 toes) achieved physiological alignment at 6 weeks
- 16% had recurrent or persistent MTPJ extension deformity at final follow-up
- No infections, overcorrection or transverse malalignment
- Review of 3878 PIPJ arthrodesis outcomes (3255 percutaneous K-wires, 347 SmartToe, 218 ToeGrip, 58 buried K-wire)
- Infection rates low across all methods (K-wire 0.3-7%, SmartToe 1.2-5%)
- SmartToe implant had the highest hardware failure rate (up to 20.7%); K-wire the lowest (0.1-4.3%)
- Implants cost 640-894x more than a K-wire with no clear superiority in union
- Reviews indications and technique of central (Weil) metatarsal osteotomy for forefoot pain and MTPJ instability
- Floating toe and joint stiffness identified as the characteristic complications
- Treating only the pain focus underserves the deformity - the high point must be addressed
- Emphasises managing patient expectations and proactive complication avoidance