Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Hoffa Fractures

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Hoffa Fractures

Comprehensive guide to Hoffa fractures - coronal plane fractures of the femoral condyles, classification, surgical fixation techniques for Orthopaedic orthopaedic exam

complete
Updated: 2024-12-18
High Yield Overview

HOFFA FRACTURES - CORONAL FEMORAL CONDYLE FRACTURES

Coronal Plane | Often Missed | Anatomic Reduction Essential | Posterior-to-Anterior Screws

33%Missed on initial imaging
2xMore common laterally
100%Avascular if complete
P-AScrew direction for fixation

LETENNEUR CLASSIFICATION

Type I
PatternPosterior to Blumensaat line
TreatmentORIF with lag screws
Type II
PatternCrosses Blumensaat line
TreatmentORIF with plate/screws
Type III
PatternOblique (smaller fragment)
TreatmentORIF, assess vascularity

Critical Must-Knows

  • Coronal plane fracture - often missed on AP and lateral X-rays
  • Lateral condyle more commonly affected (2:1 ratio)
  • Complete fractures are avascular - no soft tissue attachments
  • Anatomic reduction essential - articular surface fracture
  • Posterior-to-anterior lag screws are gold standard fixation

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Look for sagittal CT - Hoffa often missed on plain films
  • "
    Mechanism: direct blow to flexed knee or axial load
  • "
    Gastrocnemius attachment may aid lateral fragment vascularity
  • "
    Associated with high-energy trauma and other knee injuries
Axial CT showing bicondylar Hoffa fracture
Click to expand
Axial CT imaging demonstrating a bicondylar Hoffa fracture through sequential slices. This 4-panel series shows the coronal plane fracture involving both medial and lateral femoral condyles - a rare pattern. CT with axial sequences clearly delineates the coronal fracture plane that is often invisible on AP and lateral X-rays. Note the characteristic appearance where the posterior condylar fragments are separated from the anterior condyle in the coronal plane. CT is essential for diagnosis and surgical planning of all suspected Hoffa fractures.Credit: PMC Open Access (CC BY)

Critical Hoffa Fracture Exam Points

Easily Missed

33% missed initially on plain radiographs. The coronal plane fracture may not be visible on AP or lateral views. CT is essential for diagnosis and surgical planning. Always suspect in high-energy distal femur trauma.

Complete = Avascular

Complete Hoffa fragments have no soft tissue attachments except posteriorly. They are essentially avascular bone. Anatomic reduction and stable fixation are critical to allow healing.

Anatomic Reduction

This is an articular fracture of the weight-bearing surface. Any step-off leads to post-traumatic arthritis. Anatomic reduction is non-negotiable. Assess under direct visualization.

P-A Lag Screws

Posterior-to-anterior lag screws are the standard fixation. They compress the fragment to the intact condyle. Countersink heads posteriorly to avoid impingement. Multiple screws provide better stability.

Hoffa Fracture Management Decision Guide

FindingImplicationManagement
Undisplaced fragmentMay be managed non-operatively if truly undisplacedVery close follow-up with CT, consider fixation
Displaced Hoffa (any displacement)Will not heal, high risk of displacementOperative fixation required
Associated supracondylar fractureFix Hoffa first to restore condyle anatomyThen address supracondylar component
Comminuted posterior condyleMay need buttress platePosterolateral or posteromedial approach
Open fractureEmergent washout, staged fixationExternal fixation if soft tissue concerns
Mnemonic

HOFFA - Key Points

H
Hidden on X-ray
Coronal plane often missed on AP/lateral
O
ORIF required
Displaced fractures need surgical fixation
F
Femoral condyle (posterior)
Fracture through posterior condyle
F
Fixation P-A
Posterior-to-anterior lag screws
A
Avascular if complete
No soft tissue attachments

Memory Hook:HOFFA reminds you this is Hidden, needs ORIF, involves Femoral condyle, Fixed P-A, and is Avascular

Mnemonic

LATERAL - Why Lateral More Common

L
Lateral blow mechanism
Dashboard injury to flexed knee
A
Anatomic prominence
Lateral condyle more prominent
T
Tension from iliotibial band
ITB may contribute to lateral forces
E
External rotation moment
Common loading pattern
R
Ratio 2:1 lateral to medial
Lateral condyle twice as common
A
Axial load plus flexion
Mechanism creates coronal plane fracture
L
LCL and posterolateral corner may be injured
Associated ligament injuries

Memory Hook:LATERAL condyle is more commonly affected - 2:1 ratio

Mnemonic

SCREW - Fixation Principles

S
Screws in lag mode
Compression across fracture
C
Countersink posteriorly
Avoid posterior impingement
R
Reduction anatomic
Articular step-off unacceptable
E
Enter from posterior
P-A direction for optimal purchase
W
Weight-bearing restriction
Protect fixation postoperatively

Memory Hook:SCREW reminds you of the key fixation principles

Mnemonic

LETENNEUR Classification

I
Posterior to Blumensaat
Fragment entirely behind intercondylar roof
II
Crosses Blumensaat
Fragment extends into weight-bearing zone
III
Oblique/smaller
Oblique fracture plane with smaller fragment

Memory Hook:Types I-II-III: posterior only, crossing line, oblique small

Overview and Epidemiology

Hoffa fractures are coronal plane fractures of the posterior aspect of the femoral condyle. First described by Albert Hoffa in 1904, they are relatively rare but frequently missed injuries.

Mechanism of injury:

  • Direct blow to flexed knee (dashboard injury)
  • Axial load with knee in flexion
  • Combined shear and compression forces
  • Usually high-energy trauma

Why Coronal Plane?

The fracture occurs in the coronal plane because of the loading mechanism. With the knee flexed, a direct blow or axial load creates shear forces that split off the posterior condyle. The coronal orientation is why it's easily missed on AP and lateral X-rays.

Epidemiology:

  • Relatively rare (0.65% of distal femur fractures)
  • Male predominance
  • Peak age 30-50 years
  • High-energy trauma (MVA, motorcycle)
  • May be isolated or associated with other injuries

Associated injuries:

  • Supracondylar/intercondylar femur fractures (30-40%)
  • ACL/PCL injuries
  • Tibial plateau fractures
  • Patellar fractures
  • Neurovascular injury (rare)

Anatomy and Biomechanics

Femoral condyle anatomy:

The distal femur has two condyles that articulate with the tibia:

FeatureLateral CondyleMedial Condyle
ProminenceMore prominentLess prominent
Weight-bearingSmaller areaLarger area
Posterior attachmentLateral gastrocnemiusMedial gastrocnemius
Hoffa frequencyMore common (2:1)Less common

Blumensaat Line

Blumensaat line is the radiographic representation of the intercondylar roof. On lateral X-ray, it's a line along the roof of the intercondylar notch. The Letenneur classification uses this line to categorize Hoffa fractures.

Vascular considerations:

Complete Hoffa fragments are essentially avascular:

  • No anterior soft tissue attachments
  • No ligamentous attachments
  • Only posterior periosteum/capsule
  • Gastrocnemius attachment may provide some blood supply (especially lateral)

Avascular Fragment

A complete Hoffa fragment is essentially avascular free bone. Unlike many fractures where periosteal blood supply aids healing, the Hoffa fragment relies entirely on the healing from the intact condyle after fixation. This emphasizes the importance of stable fixation and anatomic reduction.

Biomechanical considerations:

  • Posterior condyle is weight-bearing in flexion
  • Malreduction leads to altered knee mechanics
  • Any step-off causes accelerated arthritis
  • Fragment may rotate or displace with knee motion

Posterior structures at risk during surgery:

  • Popliteal vessels (central, protected by fascia)
  • Common peroneal nerve (lateral approach)
  • Saphenous nerve (medial approach)
  • Gastrocnemius muscle (retracted, not cut)

Classification Systems

Letenneur Classification (based on fracture line relative to Blumensaat line)

TypeDescriptionFragment LocationImplications
IPosterior to Blumensaat lineBehind intercondylar roofPosterior fragment only
IICrosses Blumensaat lineExtends into weight-bearingLarger fragment, more critical
IIIOblique with smaller fragmentVariableMay be more comminuted

Clinical Significance

Type II fractures involve more weight-bearing surface and may require more extensive fixation. Type III oblique fractures may have smaller fragments that are more challenging to fix.

Classification by Condyle:

TypeCondyleFrequencyApproach
Lateral HoffaLateral condyle65-70%Lateral or posterolateral
Medial HoffaMedial condyle30-35%Medial or posteromedial
Bicondylar HoffaBoth condylesRareCombined approaches

Lateral condyle is more commonly affected due to its prominence and the typical mechanism of injury (direct blow to lateral knee).

Classification by Displacement:

TypeDisplacementManagement
UndisplacedNo articular step-offConsider non-op vs fixation
DisplacedVisible step-off or gapOperative fixation required
ComminutedMultiple fragmentsMay need plate/buttress

Undisplaced Caution

Even undisplaced fractures may displace with knee motion. Many surgeons advocate for fixation of all Hoffa fractures regardless of initial displacement due to the risk of secondary displacement.

Classification with Associated Injuries:

PatternDescriptionSurgical Order
Isolated HoffaHoffa fracture onlyORIF Hoffa
Hoffa + supracondylarCombined injuryFix Hoffa first, then supracondylar
Hoffa + plateauKnee dislocation variantComplex reconstruction
Hoffa + ligamentAssociated ACL/PCL injuryAddress fracture first, stage ligaments

The Hoffa component should be fixed first when associated with supracondylar fracture to reconstitute condyle anatomy before addressing the metaphyseal component.

Clinical Presentation and Assessment

History:

  • Mechanism of injury (dashboard, direct blow, fall)
  • High-energy vs low-energy
  • Associated injuries
  • Pre-injury function and activity level

Physical examination:

Physical Examination Findings

FindingSignificanceAction
Knee swelling/effusionHemarthrosis commonAspiration if tense
Posterior condyle tendernessMay localize Hoffa fracturePalpate both condyles
Limited ROM due to painExpected findingExamine under anesthesia if needed
Ligament laxityAssociated ligament injuryDocument, may need staged repair
Open woundOpen fractureUrgent washout, IV antibiotics
Neurovascular deficitVascular injury or compartment syndromeUrgent intervention

Key examination points:

  • Palpate posterior condyles - may identify tenderness
  • Assess ligamentous stability (may be limited by pain)
  • Neurovascular examination - pulses, motor function, sensation
  • Skin assessment - open wounds, abrasions, fracture blisters
  • Compartment assessment if high-energy mechanism

Index of Suspicion

Have a high index of suspicion for Hoffa fracture in any high-energy knee injury. The fracture is frequently missed on initial X-rays. If the mechanism is consistent (direct blow to flexed knee), order CT even if initial X-rays appear negative.

Investigations

AP and lateral knee radiographs showing classic Hoffa fracture pattern
Click to expand
AP (a) and lateral (b) knee radiographs demonstrating a conjoint bicondylar Hoffa fracture. On the AP view, subtle condylar fracture lines can be seen. The lateral view clearly shows the characteristic coronal plane fracture through the posterior femoral condyles - the hallmark of Hoffa fractures. Note the posterior fragment displacement in the sagittal plane. Plain radiographs miss up to 33% of Hoffa fractures because the coronal fracture plane may not be well-visualized on standard projections.Credit: PMC Open Access (CC BY)

Radiographic assessment:

Plain radiographs:

  • AP, lateral, and oblique views of knee
  • Hoffa fracture may be subtle or invisible
  • Look for double density sign on lateral view
  • Measure fracture fragment size and displacement

Key X-ray findings:

  • Coronal fracture line through posterior condyle
  • Fragment may overlap with intact condyle on lateral
  • Double density sign (superimposed condyle and fragment)
  • Associated supracondylar fracture may be present

CT is Essential

CT with 2D reconstructions is mandatory for all suspected Hoffa fractures. It defines fracture pattern, fragment size, displacement, comminution, and allows surgical planning. Plain radiographs alone are insufficient.

CT imaging:

  • Thin-slice CT with sagittal and coronal reconstructions
  • Assess fracture line orientation
  • Measure fragment size as percentage of condyle
  • Identify comminution
  • Plan screw trajectory

MRI (if indicated):

  • Not routine for Hoffa fractures
  • May be helpful if ligament injury suspected
  • Can assess cartilage damage
  • Usually obtained after fracture healing if persistent symptoms

Key imaging findings to document:

FeatureSignificanceImpact on Surgery
Condyle involvedLateral vs medialDetermines approach
Fragment sizePercentage of condyleFixation method
DisplacementArticular step-offUrgency of fixation
ComminutionMultiple fragmentsMay need plate
Associated fracturesSupracondylar componentSurgical sequence

Management

📊 Management Algorithm
hoffa fractures management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for Hoffa fracturesCredit: OrthoVellum

Indications for non-operative treatment:

  • Truly undisplaced fractures (rare)
  • Non-ambulatory patients
  • Severe medical comorbidities precluding surgery
  • Patient refusal of surgery

Non-operative protocol:

  • Long leg cast or hinged knee brace
  • Non-weight bearing for 6-8 weeks
  • Very close follow-up with serial imaging
  • CT at 2-4 weeks to assess displacement
  • Low threshold for surgery if any displacement

Displacement Risk

Non-operative management carries high risk of secondary displacement. The posterior condyle bears load during knee flexion, and the fracture fragment has no soft tissue attachments to maintain position. Most surgeons favor operative fixation for all Hoffa fractures.

Indications for operative treatment:

  • All displaced fractures (any articular step-off)
  • Undisplaced fractures (strong consideration)
  • Associated supracondylar fracture
  • Multiple fragments requiring stabilization

Timing of surgery:

  • Semi-urgent (within 1-2 weeks)
  • Earlier if open fracture or vascular compromise
  • May delay if severe soft tissue injury

Goals of surgery:

  1. Anatomic reduction of articular surface
  2. Stable fixation allowing early motion
  3. Restoration of condyle anatomy
  4. Prevention of post-traumatic arthritis

Preoperative planning:

  • Review CT images in detail
  • Determine condyle(s) involved
  • Plan approach based on fracture location
  • Consider screw trajectories
  • Prepare for possible plate fixation

Approach selection:

Fracture LocationPreferred ApproachAlternative
Lateral HoffaLateral or posterolateralSwashbuckler
Medial HoffaMedial or posteromedialDirect posterior
BicondylarCombined approachesDirect posterior

Equipment needed: Large fragment cannulated screws (6.5mm or 7.3mm), headless compression screws as an alternative, buttress plate if comminuted, K-wires for provisional fixation, and fluoroscopy.

Surgical Technique

Patient positioning:

  • Supine with bump under ipsilateral hip
  • Knee flexed to 20-30 degrees over bolster
  • Leg free for intraoperative flexion/extension
  • Tourniquet optional

Lateral approach (for lateral Hoffa):

  • Incision along distal IT band to lateral epicondyle
  • Develop interval between IT band and biceps
  • Incise lateral capsule to expose condyle
  • Protect common peroneal nerve posteriorly

Posterolateral approach:

  • Incision posterior to lateral epicondyle
  • Identify and protect peroneal nerve
  • Split lateral gastrocnemius if needed
  • Excellent access to posterior condyle

The posterolateral approach provides direct visualization of the posterior condyle and is often preferred for Hoffa fractures.

Reduction principles:

  1. Expose the fracture:

    • Clear hematoma and debris
    • Visualize articular surface
    • Identify fracture margins
  2. Reduce anatomically:

    • Use pointed reduction clamp
    • May use dental pick or small elevator
    • Reduce under direct vision
  3. Assess reduction:

    • Palpate articular surface for step-off
    • Confirm with intraoperative fluoroscopy
    • No step-off or gap acceptable

Reduction Tips

The fragment often displaces posteriorly and inferiorly. Reduction requires bringing it anterior and superior. A pointed reduction clamp around the condyle provides excellent control. Flexing the knee may aid reduction by relaxing the gastrocnemius.

Standard fixation: Posterior-to-anterior lag screws

Steps:

  1. Achieve and confirm anatomic reduction
  2. Place provisional K-wire from posterior to anterior
  3. Measure screw length
  4. Create gliding hole in posterior fragment
  5. Insert lag screw (6.5mm or 7.3mm)
  6. Countersink screw head posteriorly
  7. Confirm compression and reduction on fluoro
  8. Place additional screw(s) for rotational stability

Key technical points:

  • Minimum 2 screws for rotational control
  • Countersink heads to avoid posterior impingement
  • Perpendicular to fracture for optimal compression
  • Confirm articular reduction after fixation

Screw Direction

Screws must be placed posterior to anterior. Anterior-to-posterior placement puts the screw threads in the avascular fragment rather than the well-vascularized intact bone, compromising fixation.

Headless compression screws:

  • Advantage: No prominent head to countersink
  • Disadvantage: Less compression than headed screws
  • Useful when fragment is small or articular damage concern

Buttress plate:

  • Indicated for comminuted fractures
  • Posterolateral or posteromedial plate
  • Provides additional stability
  • May be combined with lag screws

Anterior-to-posterior screws (second choice):

  • May be needed if posterior access limited
  • Countersink head anteriorly in non-articular zone
  • Less ideal biomechanically
  • Ensure threads purchase far cortex

When a buttress plate is needed, it is applied posteriorly to support the reduced fragments while lag screws provide interfragmentary compression.

Managing Hoffa with supracondylar fracture:

Surgical sequence:

  1. Address Hoffa fragment FIRST
  2. Reduce and fix condyle with lag screws
  3. Then reduce supracondylar component to reconstituted condyle
  4. Fix supracondylar with lateral locked plate or retrograde nail

Fix Hoffa First

When Hoffa fracture is associated with supracondylar fracture, fix the Hoffa component first. This reconstitutes the condyle anatomy, creating a solid block to which the shaft can then be fixed.

Bicondylar Hoffa is rare but challenging. It may need combined medial and lateral approaches or posterior approach with patient prone. Fix both condyles before addressing metaphyseal injury.

Complications

Complications of Hoffa Fractures

ComplicationIncidencePrevention/Management
Nonunion10-20%Anatomic reduction, stable fixation, avoid smoking
MalunionVariableAnatomic reduction at surgery, confirm with fluoro
Post-traumatic arthritis20-30%Anatomic reduction, no step-off acceptable
AVN of fragmentRare if fixedStable fixation allows revascularization
Stiffness15-25%Early ROM, physiotherapy
Infection1-5%Antibiotic prophylaxis, atraumatic technique
Hardware prominenceVariableCountersink screws, consider removal later

Nonunion:

  • Major concern due to avascular fragment
  • Risk factors: inadequate fixation, smoking, displacement
  • Treatment: revision fixation with bone graft
  • May require plate fixation if screws failed

Malunion:

  • Leads to altered knee mechanics
  • Even small step-off causes cartilage wear
  • Prevention is key - confirm reduction intraoperatively
  • Correction requires osteotomy (difficult)

Nonunion Prevention

Nonunion is a significant concern because the Hoffa fragment is essentially avascular. Prevention requires stable fixation with good compression, anatomic reduction, and patient optimization (smoking cessation). If nonunion occurs, revision with bone grafting may be needed.

Post-traumatic arthritis:

  • Occurs in 20-30% despite good treatment
  • Related to cartilage damage at injury
  • Malreduction increases risk
  • May require arthroplasty in severe cases

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

Postoperative protocol:

Day 0-14
  • Knee immobilizer for comfort
  • Toe-touch weight bearing with crutches
  • Ice, elevation, wound care
  • Gentle ROM exercises as pain allows
  • CPM machine optional
Week 2-6
  • Progressive ROM (goal: 0-90 degrees by week 4)
  • Continue partial weight bearing (25-50% body weight)
  • Quadriceps strengthening (isometrics, SLR)
  • Stationary bike when ROM allows
  • Pool exercises if incisions healed
Week 6-12
  • Radiographic assessment of healing
  • Progressive weight bearing based on healing
  • Full weight bearing typically by 8-12 weeks
  • Aggressive ROM (goal: full ROM by 12 weeks)
  • Progressive strengthening
Month 3-6
  • Full activity as tolerated
  • Sport-specific training
  • May require ongoing physiotherapy
  • Hardware removal if symptomatic

Key rehabilitation principles:

  • Early motion prevents stiffness
  • Delayed weight bearing protects fixation
  • Monitor for loss of reduction
  • Individualize based on fixation stability
  • Long-term follow-up for arthritis development

Weight Bearing

Delay full weight bearing until radiographic evidence of healing (typically 8-12 weeks). The posterior condyle bears load in knee flexion, stressing the fixation. Premature weight bearing may lead to loss of reduction or nonunion.

Outcomes and Prognosis

Outcome factors:

FactorBetter OutcomesWorse Outcomes
Reduction qualityAnatomicAny step-off
Fixation stabilityStable, multiple screwsUnstable, single screw
Associated injuriesIsolated HoffaCombined patterns
Patient factorsNon-smoker, youngSmoker, elderly
Fragment sizeLargerSmall/comminuted

Key to Success

The key to good outcomes is anatomic reduction and stable fixation. Any articular step-off leads to accelerated arthritis. Stable fixation allows early motion which prevents stiffness while protecting healing.

Long-term concerns:

  • Post-traumatic arthritis (may develop years later)
  • Stiffness (usually manageable with physiotherapy)
  • Hardware prominence (may need removal)
  • Functional limitations in high-demand activities

Evidence Base

Level IV
📚 Letenneur Classification Study
Key Findings:
  • Original classification system for Hoffa fractures based on relationship to Blumensaat line. Three types described with implications for prognosis and management.
Clinical Implication: Letenneur classification remains the standard. Type II fractures involving weight-bearing surface may require more extensive fixation.
Source: Rev Chir Orthop 1978

Level IV
📚 Nork et al. Surgical Treatment of Hoffa Fractures
Key Findings:
  • Posterior-to-anterior lag screws provided superior fixation. Multiple screws recommended for rotational control. Anatomic reduction correlated with better outcomes.
Clinical Implication: P-A lag screws are the gold standard. Use at least two screws. Anatomic reduction is essential for good outcomes.
Source: J Orthop Trauma 2005

Level IV
📚 Systematic Review of Hoffa Fracture Fixation
Key Findings:
  • Overall union rate 85-95%. Nonunion rate 10-15%. Post-traumatic arthritis in 20-30%. Anatomic reduction was most important prognostic factor.
Clinical Implication: Most Hoffa fractures unite with appropriate treatment. Reduction quality is the key determinant of outcome.
Source: Injury 2017

Level IV
📚 CT Assessment of Hoffa Fractures
Key Findings:
  • CT imaging significantly improved detection of Hoffa fractures. 33% were missed on initial plain radiographs. CT is essential for surgical planning.
Clinical Implication: Always obtain CT for suspected Hoffa fractures. Plain radiographs are insufficient for diagnosis and surgical planning.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008

Laboratory Study
📚 Biomechanical Study of Hoffa Fixation
Key Findings:
  • Two screws provided significantly better rotational stability than single screw. P-A screw orientation provided better purchase than A-P. Headless screws had lower pullout strength than headed screws.
Clinical Implication: Use at least two screws for rotational control. P-A orientation is biomechanically superior. Headed screws provide better fixation.
Source: J Orthop Res 2010

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Missed Hoffa Fracture

EXAMINER

"A 35-year-old man presents to ED after a motorcycle accident. Initial knee X-rays were reported as normal, but he has significant pain and cannot bear weight. You examine him 2 days later in fracture clinic. What is your approach?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This presentation raises concern for a **missed Hoffa fracture**. The combination of high-energy mechanism (motorcycle accident), inability to bear weight, and "normal" X-rays should trigger a high index of suspicion. **Clinical Assessment:** I would examine the knee specifically for: - Posterior condyle tenderness (localized to medial or lateral condyle) - Hemarthrosis (suggesting intra-articular injury) - Ligamentous stability (associated injuries) - Neurovascular status **Imaging:** I would order a **CT scan with sagittal and coronal reconstructions**. Hoffa fractures occur in the coronal plane and are frequently missed on plain radiographs - up to 33% in some series. CT is essential for diagnosis and surgical planning. **If CT confirms Hoffa fracture:** - Assess condyle involved (lateral more common 2:1) - Measure fragment size and displacement - Identify any comminution - Look for associated injuries **Management:** If displaced, I would recommend **operative fixation with posterior-to-anterior lag screws**. The fragment is essentially avascular (no soft tissue attachments), so stable fixation is critical. I would use at least two 6.5mm lag screws, countersinking the heads posteriorly. **Key message:** High-energy knee injuries with normal X-rays should prompt CT imaging to rule out coronal plane fractures like Hoffa.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
High index of suspicion for Hoffa in high-energy knee trauma
33% of Hoffa fractures missed on initial plain X-rays
CT scan is mandatory - coronal plane not well seen on X-rays
Lateral condyle more commonly affected (2:1 ratio)
Complete Hoffa fragments are avascular
Displaced fractures require operative fixation
Posterior-to-anterior lag screws are gold standard
Use at least two screws for rotational control
Countersink screw heads posteriorly
Anatomic reduction is essential for good outcomes
COMMON TRAPS
✗Accepting 'normal' X-rays in high-energy mechanism
✗Not ordering CT scan
✗Delaying diagnosis leads to worse outcomes
✗Underestimating severity of articular injury
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"The CT shows a lateral Hoffa with 5mm displacement. Describe your surgical approach."
"What fixation would you use and why?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Hoffa with Supracondylar Fracture

EXAMINER

"CT scan of a 50-year-old woman after MVA shows a distal femur fracture with both a supracondylar component and a Hoffa fracture of the lateral condyle. How do you approach this complex injury?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a **combined supracondylar-Hoffa fracture** pattern. The key principle is to **address the Hoffa component first** to reconstitute the condyle before fixing the metaphyseal component. **Surgical Sequence:** **Step 1: Position and approach** - Supine with bump under hip - Lateral approach for lateral Hoffa - Extended to allow access for supracondylar fixation **Step 2: Fix the Hoffa fracture FIRST** - Expose the lateral condyle and posterior fragment - Reduce the Hoffa fragment anatomically - Fix with posterior-to-anterior lag screws (minimum 2) - This reconstitutes the condyle as a solid block **Step 3: Address the supracondylar component** - Now reduce the shaft to the reconstituted condyle - Fix with lateral locked plate (most common) - Alternatively, retrograde femoral nail if appropriate **Why this sequence:** The Hoffa fragment is intra-articular and must be anatomically reduced. By fixing it first, I create a stable condylar block. Then I can reduce the metaphyseal fracture to this block. If I tried to fix the supracondylar first, I wouldn't have a stable reference point, and the Hoffa component might malreduce. **Postoperative:** - Hinged knee brace - ROM as tolerated - Delayed weight bearing (10-12 weeks depending on healing) - Regular radiographic follow-up
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Combined supracondylar-Hoffa pattern is challenging
FIX THE HOFFA FIRST - this is the key principle
Hoffa fixation reconstitutes the condyle anatomy
Then reduce shaft to the reconstituted condyle
Lateral locked plate is standard for supracondylar component
Retrograde nail is alternative if entry point accessible
Anatomic articular reduction is priority
Delayed weight bearing due to complex injury
Regular follow-up for healing and complications
Higher complication rate than isolated injuries
COMMON TRAPS
✗Trying to fix supracondylar component first
✗Not recognizing the Hoffa component
✗Inadequate exposure for both components
✗Accepting non-anatomic reduction of articular surface
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"Your lateral plate is blocking ideal screw trajectory for the Hoffa. How do you manage this?"
"How would you sequence this if both condyles had Hoffa fractures?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Nonunion of Hoffa Fracture

EXAMINER

"A patient presents 6 months after Hoffa fracture fixation with persistent pain and CT showing nonunion. The original fixation was with a single 6.5mm screw. What is your management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is an **established nonunion of a Hoffa fracture**, likely contributed to by inadequate initial fixation with only a single screw. **Assessment:** I would take a detailed history focusing on: - Persistent symptoms (pain, instability, locking) - Functional limitations - Previous surgery details - Risk factors for nonunion (smoking, diabetes, poor compliance) **Imaging review:** - CT to assess nonunion gap, fragment viability, articular surface - Assess for hardware failure or migration - Look for early arthritic changes - Assess bone quality **Surgical Plan:** This requires **revision fixation with bone grafting**: **Step 1: Approach** - Same approach as primary surgery (lateral or posterolateral) - May need extended exposure due to scarring **Step 2: Hardware removal** - Remove the failed single screw - Curettage of nonunion site to bleeding bone **Step 3: Reduction and grafting** - Reduce the fragment if displaced - Bone graft to nonunion site (iliac crest autograft or allograft) - May need to mobilize fragment if scarred **Step 4: Revised fixation** - Stronger fixation with multiple screws or buttress plate - Consider headless compression screws if concern about head prominence - Ensure rigid stability **Prevention message:** This case illustrates why **initial fixation should include at least two screws** for rotational control. A single screw allows micromotion which can lead to nonunion in this avascular fragment.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Hoffa nonunion is often due to inadequate initial fixation
Single screw fixation is insufficient for rotational control
Risk factors: smoking, diabetes, single screw, poor reduction
Treatment requires revision surgery with bone graft
Remove hardware, curettage nonunion, graft, revise fixation
Use stronger fixation: multiple screws or buttress plate
Consider patient optimization (smoking cessation)
Long recovery expected after revision
May develop arthritis despite successful union
Prevention: adequate initial fixation with two or more screws
COMMON TRAPS
✗Attempting non-operative management of established nonunion
✗Not bone grafting the nonunion site
✗Repeating same inadequate fixation
✗Not addressing modifiable risk factors
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if the patient is an active smoker? Would you still operate?"
"What bone graft would you use and why?"

MCQ Practice Points

Definition Question

Q: What is a Hoffa fracture? A: A coronal plane fracture of the posterior femoral condyle. The fracture line runs in the coronal plane, separating the posterior condyle from the anterior condyle and shaft.

Imaging Question

Q: Why are Hoffa fractures frequently missed on plain X-rays? A: The fracture occurs in the coronal plane, which is parallel to the X-ray beam on AP view and tangential on lateral view. CT with sagittal reconstructions is required for diagnosis.

Anatomy Question

Q: Why is the Hoffa fragment essentially avascular? A: The fragment has no anterior soft tissue attachments (capsule, ligaments) and only posterior periosteum. It is essentially a free bone fragment relying on fixation-mediated healing.

Fixation Question

Q: Why should screws be placed posterior-to-anterior in Hoffa fracture fixation? A: P-A screw placement puts the threads in the well-vascularized intact bone rather than the avascular fragment, providing better purchase. The screw heads are also easier to countersink posteriorly.

Combined Injury Question

Q: In a combined Hoffa and supracondylar fracture, which component should be fixed first? A: Fix the Hoffa fracture first. This reconstitutes the condyle anatomy, creating a solid block to which the shaft can then be reduced and fixed.

Australian Context

Epidemiology in Australia:

  • Motor vehicle and motorcycle accidents common mechanisms
  • Farm and industrial injuries in rural settings
  • Sports injuries (high-velocity impacts)
  • Relatively uncommon overall

Management considerations:

  • Major trauma centers have experience with complex distal femur fractures
  • Transfer to specialist center may be appropriate
  • CT availability is good across Australia

Rehabilitation:

  • Extended physiotherapy required
  • May need inpatient rehabilitation if multiple injuries
  • Return to manual work may be prolonged

Exam Context

In the Orthopaedic exam, be prepared to discuss why Hoffa fractures are missed (coronal plane not seen on X-rays), the importance of CT imaging, and the technical aspects of fixation (P-A screws, at least two screws, countersinking). Also know the sequence for combined injuries.

HOFFA FRACTURES

High-Yield Exam Summary

DEFINITION AND KEY POINTS

  • •Coronal plane fracture of posterior femoral condyle
  • •33% missed on initial X-rays - CT essential
  • •Lateral condyle more common (2:1 ratio)
  • •Complete fragments are avascular

CLASSIFICATION

  • •Letenneur Type I: Posterior to Blumensaat line
  • •Letenneur Type II: Crosses Blumensaat line (weight-bearing)
  • •Letenneur Type III: Oblique with smaller fragment
  • •Also classified by condyle: lateral, medial, or bicondylar

SURGICAL PRINCIPLES

  • •Anatomic reduction is essential (articular fracture)
  • •Posterior-to-anterior lag screws (gold standard)
  • •Minimum 2 screws for rotational control
  • •Countersink screw heads posteriorly

COMBINED INJURIES

  • •Fix Hoffa FIRST to reconstitute condyle
  • •Then fix supracondylar component
  • •Lateral locked plate or retrograde nail for metaphysis
  • •May need combined approaches for bicondylar

COMPLICATIONS

  • •Nonunion (10-20%) - due to avascular fragment
  • •Malunion - any step-off causes arthritis
  • •Post-traumatic arthritis (20-30%)
  • •Stiffness (15-25%)

TRAPS AND PEARLS

  • •High-energy knee + normal X-rays = get CT
  • •Single screw fixation is insufficient
  • •A-P screws are inferior to P-A
  • •Early motion, delayed weight bearing
  • •Anatomic reduction is non-negotiable
Quick Stats
Reading Time91 min
Related Topics

Acetabular Fractures

Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries

Acute Compartment Syndrome

Ankle Fractures