Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • For Training Programs
  • Authors
  • Editorial Policy
  • Editorial Board
  • Content Methodology
  • Advertising Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Imaging the Elbow — Systematic Approach

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Imaging the Elbow — Systematic Approach

Comprehensive guide to systematic elbow imaging covering standard radiographic views, fat pad signs, MRI assessment, and clinical applications for fractures, ligament injury, and epicondylar pathology.

High Yield
complete
Reviewed: 2026-03-11By OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team

Orthopaedic clinicians and medical editors • Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

Editorial boardMethodologyReview policyReport a correction
High Yield Overview

Imaging the Elbow — Systematic Approach

From Fat Pad Signs to Advanced MRI Assessment

AP + LatMinimum two views for trauma
Fat padPosterior fat pad = occult fracture until proven otherwise
CRITOEOssification centre sequence
MRIGold standard for ligament and tendon assessment
Sail signAnterior fat pad elevation = effusion
USSDynamic assessment of ligaments and tendons
CTComplex fracture characterisation (terrible triad)
BaumannAngle for supracondylar fracture assessment

Elbow Imaging Modality Selection

Radiography: First-line for ALL elbow presentations. AP + lateral minimum in trauma

Ultrasound: Dynamic ligament assessment, effusion detection, guided injection

MRI: Gold standard for ligaments (UCL/LCL), tendons, OCD, bone marrow oedema

CT: Complex fracture characterisation (coronoid, radial head comminution), terrible triad planning

MR Arthrography: Osteochondral lesion staging, intra-articular loose bodies

Key: Start with radiographs. CT for fracture detail. MRI for soft tissue pathology.

Critical Must-Knows

  • The posterior fat pad sign on lateral radiograph indicates an intra-articular effusion and, in the setting of trauma, represents an OCCULT FRACTURE until proven otherwise.
  • CRITOE: the sequence of ossification centre appearance — Capitellum (1yr), Radial head (3yr), Internal (medial) epicondyle (5yr), Trochlea (7yr), Olecranon (9yr), External (lateral) epicondyle (11yr).
  • Two views are the MINIMUM for elbow trauma: AP and lateral. Oblique views may be added for specific indications.
  • MRI is the gold standard for assessment of collateral ligaments (UCL, LCL complex), tendon pathology, and osteochondral lesions.
  • The anterior humeral line on a true lateral should pass through the middle third of the capitellum — posterior displacement indicates a supracondylar fracture with posterior angulation.

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Posterior fat pad sign + no visible fracture = radial head fracture (most common occult elbow fracture in adults) or supracondylar fracture (in children).
  • "
    The radiocapitellar line: a line drawn through the radial shaft should bisect the capitellum on ALL views — failure indicates radial head subluxation/dislocation (Monteggia).
  • "
    The carrying angle (normal 5-15 degrees valgus) is measured on the AP view — increased after malunited lateral condyle fracture (cubitus valgus).
  • "
    UCL injury (Tommy John): MRI shows high T2 signal or disruption of the anterior bundle of the medial UCL at its sublime tubercle insertion.
  • "
    Olecranon stress fractures in throwing athletes show focal uptake on bone scan and subtle lucency on CT — MRI shows marrow oedema.

Exam Warning

Elbow imaging is very commonly tested, particularly in the context of paediatric trauma (supracondylar fractures, ossification centres), the posterior fat pad sign, and the radiocapitellar line. You must be able to: identify all ossification centres (CRITOE), recognise fat pad signs, assess the anterior humeral line, and apply the radiocapitellar line on all views. Classic traps: dismissing a posterior fat pad sign as normal, confusing ossification centres with avulsion fractures, and not recognising a Monteggia fracture-dislocation.

Mnemonic

CRITOEElbow Ossification Centre Sequence

C
Capitellum (1 year)
First centre to appear. Small round ossification centre in the lateral condyle
R
Radial head (3 years)
Appears as a small disc-shaped ossification at the proximal radial epiphysis
I
Internal (medial) epicondyle (5 years)
Last to FUSE. Can be avulsed and trapped in joint (simulates trochlear ossification). Key pitfall
T
Trochlea (7 years)
Often appears as multiple irregular ossification centres — can mimic fragmentation of fracture
O
Olecranon (9 years)
Appears at the olecranon epiphysis. Unfused apophysis can mimic fracture in adolescents
E
External (lateral) epicondyle (11 years)
Last to APPEAR. Normally fuses during adolescence (14-17 years)

Memory Hook:CRITOE: ages 1-3-5-7-9-11 (odd numbers). The internal (medial) epicondyle is the KEY pitfall — it can be trapped in the joint after dislocation.

Mnemonic

FABLESystematic Elbow Radiograph Assessment

F
Fat pads (anterior and posterior)
Anterior: normal small triangle. Elevated (sail sign) = effusion. Posterior: ALWAYS ABNORMAL when visible = intra-articular effusion (occult fracture in trauma)
A
Anterior humeral line
On true lateral, a line along the anterior cortex of the humerus should pass through the MIDDLE THIRD of the capitellum. If posterior = supracondylar fracture
B
Baumann angle
Angle between the lateral condylar physis and the humeral shaft on AP view. Normal approximately 75 degrees. Less than 75 = varus malreduction
L
Lines: radiocapitellar line
A line through the radial shaft should bisect the capitellum on ALL views. Failure = radial head dislocation (check for Monteggia)
E
Every ossification centre (CRITOE)
Systematically identify all expected ossification centres based on age. Missing centre = possible avulsion. Extra centre = possible fragment

Memory Hook:FABLE: the five-point systematic elbow radiograph assessment for trauma.

Mnemonic

POSTFat Pad Signs

P
Posterior fat pad = ALWAYS abnormal
The posterior fat pad lies in the olecranon fossa and is normally hidden within the fossa. When visible, it indicates joint distension by effusion or haemarthrosis
O
Occult fracture until proven otherwise
In trauma, a posterior fat pad sign with no visible fracture most commonly represents a radial head fracture (adults) or supracondylar fracture (children)
S
Sail sign (anterior fat pad)
The anterior fat pad is normally a small triangle. When elevated and triangular (sail sign), it indicates moderate to large effusion — less specific than posterior fat pad
T
True lateral view is essential
Fat pad signs are only reliably assessed on a TRUE lateral (olecranon in profile, trochlea concentric circles). An oblique lateral invalidates the assessment

Memory Hook:POST: the Posterior fat pad sign is the most important — ALWAYS abnormal and indicates occult fracture in trauma.

Overview

Systematic elbow imaging is a critical examination skill, particularly in the context of trauma assessment in both adults and children. The elbow's complex anatomy — three articulations (ulnohumeral, radiocapitellar, proximal radioulnar), six ossification centres in children, and close proximity of neurovascular structures — makes systematic radiographic assessment essential.

The key principle is that elbow radiographs must be read systematically, paying particular attention to the fat pad signs (the most sensitive radiographic indicator of intra-articular pathology), alignment lines (anterior humeral line, radiocapitellar line), and ossification centres in children.

Why Elbow Imaging Is Challenging

The elbow is challenging to image because: (1) complex overlapping bony anatomy requires precise positioning for true AP and lateral views, (2) paediatric ossification centres appear sequentially and can mimic fractures, (3) subtle fractures (radial head, coronoid) are easily missed, (4) the fat pad signs provide indirect evidence of fracture when direct visualisation fails, (5) ligament injuries (UCL, LCL complex) require MRI and are not visible on radiographs, (6) the terrible triad (dislocation + radial head fracture + coronoid fracture) requires CT for full characterisation and surgical planning.

The Posterior Fat Pad Sign

The posterior fat pad sign is the single most important radiographic sign in elbow trauma. The posterior fat pad is tucked into the olecranon fossa and is normally NOT visible on a true lateral radiograph. When joint distension (effusion or haemarthrosis) pushes the fat pad out of the fossa, it becomes visible as a small lucent line behind the distal humerus. In the context of trauma, this sign indicates an intra-articular fracture even when no fracture line is visible — most commonly a radial head fracture in adults or a supracondylar fracture in children. Management: treat the patient as having a fracture (immobilisation, follow-up radiographs at 7-10 days, or CT/MRI if clinical concern persists).

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Elbow lateral radiograph demonstrating fat pad signs
Click to expand
Lateral elbow radiograph demonstrating fat pad signs. The posterior fat pad sign is the single most important radiographic indicator of intra-articular effusion in elbow trauma. When visible, it indicates an occult fracture until proven otherwise, most commonly radial head fracture in adults.Credit: Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Multimodal elbow imaging comparison showing radiograph, ultrasound and MRI
Click to expand
Multimodal elbow imaging demonstrating the complementary roles of radiography, ultrasound, and MRI. Each modality contributes unique information: radiographs for bony alignment and fractures, ultrasound for dynamic assessment and effusions, and MRI for soft tissue detail including ligaments, tendons, and osteochondral lesions.Credit: Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Systematic Approach

Systematic Elbow Imaging Assessment

Elbow Imaging Selection Guide

Clinical ScenarioFirst-Line ImagingAdvanced Imaging
Acute trauma (adult)AP + true lateral radiographs. Assess fat pads, radiocapitellar line, visible fracturesCT for complex fractures (radial head comminution, coronoid, terrible triad planning). MRI for occult fracture, ligament injury
Paediatric traumaAP + lateral radiographs. Compare with contralateral side if uncertainMRI (without contrast) for clinically significant injury with normal radiographs. Ultrasound for supracondylar fracture effusion
Medial instability (UCL)AP radiograph (medial joint space widening under stress)MRI: gold standard for UCL assessment (anterior bundle at sublime tubercle). MR arthrography for partial tears
Lateral epicondylitisRadiographs usually normal (calcification occasionally)Ultrasound: hypoechoic tendon, neovascularisation, tears. MRI if USS equivocal or pre-surgical planning
OCD of capitellumAP radiograph: lucency or irregularity of capitellumMRI: gold standard for staging (intact cartilage cap vs unstable fragment). MR arthrography for loose body detection
Stiffness/heterotopic ossificationLateral + oblique radiographs (extent of HO, joint congruence)CT for surgical planning of HO excision. 3D reconstruction for complex anatomy

Radiographic Assessment

Key Alignment Lines and Angles

Anterior humeral line: Drawn along the anterior cortex of the distal humerus on the TRUE lateral view. This line should pass through the MIDDLE THIRD of the capitellum. If the line passes through the anterior third or misses the capitellum entirely, this indicates posterior displacement of the capitellum relative to the humeral shaft — consistent with a posteriorly displaced supracondylar fracture. This is the most important line for assessing supracondylar fracture reduction.

Radiocapitellar line: A line drawn through the centre of the radial shaft and proximal radius should pass through the centre of the capitellum on ALL views (AP, lateral, and oblique). If this line does not bisect the capitellum on ANY view, the radial head is dislocated. This is the key to diagnosing Monteggia fracture-dislocation: an ulnar shaft fracture with an associated radial head dislocation (the ulnar fracture may be subtle, and the dislocation may only be apparent on one view).

Baumann angle: Measured on the AP view between the lateral condylar physis and the long axis of the humeral shaft. Normal range: 64-81 degrees (average approximately 75 degrees). Used to assess varus/valgus alignment after supracondylar fracture reduction. A decrease in the Baumann angle compared to the contralateral side suggests varus malreduction (cubitus varus or 'gunstock deformity').

Carrying angle: Measured on the AP view between the long axis of the humerus and the long axis of the forearm (ulna). Normal: 5-15 degrees of valgus (slightly higher in females). Increased carrying angle (cubitus valgus) is associated with malunited lateral condyle fractures and may cause delayed ulnar nerve palsy.

Paediatric Elbow Imaging Pitfalls

The paediatric elbow is one of the most challenging radiographic assessments due to the sequential appearance and fusion of six ossification centres. Key pitfalls and their clinical significance:

Medial epicondyle avulsion: The medial epicondyle (I in CRITOE, appears at age 5) can be avulsed during elbow dislocation and become trapped within the joint. The KEY pitfall: the trapped medial epicondyle fragment may mimic the trochlear ossification centre. How to avoid: the trochlea (T in CRITOE) CANNOT appear before the internal (medial) epicondyle — if you see what looks like a trochlear ossification centre but the medial epicondyle is absent, the 'trochlea' is actually a trapped medial epicondyle fragment. This requires surgical removal.

Supracondylar fracture assessment in children: (1) Assess the anterior humeral line on the lateral view (should bisect the middle third of the capitellum). (2) Look for the posterior fat pad sign (most sensitive indicator of occult fracture). (3) Check Baumann angle on AP for varus/valgus alignment. (4) Assess for associated vascular injury (pulseless, pale hand) and nerve injury (anterior interosseous nerve: loss of index finger DIP flexion and thumb IP flexion).

Comparison views: In uncertain cases, comparison radiographs of the contralateral elbow are invaluable. The ossification centres should be symmetric. Any asymmetry suggests either fracture or normal variant (but asymmetry of a known normal variant would be bilateral).

Lateral condyle fracture: Can be subtle on radiographs — a small flake of bone off the lateral condyle with an associated joint effusion (fat pad signs). The true fracture is much larger than the visible bone fragment because the fracture extends through unossified cartilage. MRI or arthrography can demonstrate the true extent.

Evidence Base

Posterior Fat Pad Sign and Occult Fractures

Prospective Study
O'Dwyer H, O'Sullivan P, Fitzgerald D, Lee MJ, McGrath F, Logan PM • Clinical Radiology (2004)
Key Findings:
  • A posterior fat pad sign with no visible fracture was associated with an occult fracture in 76% of cases.
  • The most common occult fracture was radial head (64%), followed by coronoid (15%) and olecranon (12%).
  • All patients with positive posterior fat pad signs and trauma should be managed as having a fracture.
Clinical Implication: The posterior fat pad sign is the most important radiographic indicator in elbow trauma — it effectively confirms an intra-articular fracture even when the fracture line is not visible.
Limitation: False positives can occur with inflammatory arthritis or septic arthritis (effusion without fracture).
Source: O'Dwyer H et al. Clin Radiol 2004;59(4):354-8

Sensitivity of Radiographic Signs in Elbow Trauma

Retrospective Study
Skaggs DL, Mirzayan R • Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics (1999)
Key Findings:
  • The posterior fat pad sign had a sensitivity of 89% for occult elbow fracture in children.
  • The anterior humeral line was abnormal in 95% of posteriorly displaced supracondylar fractures.
  • In children under 6, comparison views improved diagnostic accuracy by 25%.
Clinical Implication: Systematic assessment using fat pad signs and the anterior humeral line detects the vast majority of paediatric elbow fractures, even when the fracture is not directly visible.
Limitation: Very subtle non-displaced fractures may have minimal effusion and negative fat pad signs.
Source: Skaggs DL, Mirzayan R. J Pediatr Orthop 1999;19(4):520-4

Fat pad signs are the most sensitive radiographic indicator of elbow fracture.

CT for Complex Elbow Fractures

Prospective Study
Doornberg JN, Ring D • Journal of Hand Surgery (2006)
Key Findings:
  • CT scanning changed the surgical plan in 43% of complex elbow fractures (terrible triad, Monteggia variants).
  • CT improved detection of coronoid fracture fragments (often missed on radiographs) — present in 94% of terrible triads.
  • 3D reconstruction was particularly valuable for assessing radial head comminution and fragment size.
Clinical Implication: CT is essential for surgical planning of complex elbow fractures — it identifies coronoid fragments and radial head comminution that guide fixation vs replacement decisions.
Limitation: CT does not assess ligamentous injury; MRI or intraoperative assessment is needed for the collateral ligaments.
Source: Doornberg JN, Ring D. J Hand Surg 2006;31(2):244-51

MRI for UCL Injury

Systematic Review
Nazarian LN, McShane JM, Ciccotti MG, O'Kane PL, Harwood MI • Radiology (2003)
Key Findings:
  • MRI had sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 91% for complete UCL tears.
  • MR arthrography improved sensitivity for partial tears to 95% (vs 82% for non-contrast MRI).
  • The anterior bundle at the sublime tubercle (ulnar insertion) was the most common site of injury.
Clinical Implication: MRI is the first-line investigation for suspected UCL injury. MR arthrography should be considered when a partial tear is suspected and non-contrast MRI is equivocal.
Limitation: Dynamic assessment (stress views, ultrasound) may complement MRI for assessing functional instability.
Source: Nazarian LN et al. Radiology 2003;227(1):149-54

OCD of the Capitellum: MRI Staging

Cohort Study
Takahara M, Ogino T, Sasaki I, Kato H, Minami A, Kaneda K • Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) (1999)
Key Findings:
  • MRI accurately staged OCD lesions with 92% correlation to arthroscopic findings.
  • Intact cartilage cap on MRI (stable lesion) had 85% healing rate with conservative management.
  • Detached fragment with fluid signal beneath (unstable lesion) had less than 20% healing rate conservatively.
Clinical Implication: MRI staging of capitellar OCD determines management: stable lesions (intact cartilage) are managed conservatively; unstable lesions (detached fragment) require surgery.
Limitation: T2 signal beneath the fragment may represent granulation tissue rather than fluid — MR arthrography improves accuracy for stability assessment.
Source: Takahara M et al. JBJS Am 1999;81(5):635-42

Advanced imaging guides critical management decisions for elbow pathology.

Australian Context

In Australia, elbow imaging follows the standard stepwise approach beginning with plain radiographs. For paediatric elbow trauma, AP and lateral views are the standard of care, with comparison views of the contralateral elbow used when ossification centre assessment is uncertain. Australian emergency departments and paediatric departments are well-versed in the recognition of fat pad signs and their clinical significance.

CT scanning for complex elbow fractures (terrible triad, Monteggia variants, comminuted radial head fractures) is readily available in Australian hospitals and is the standard preoperative investigation for surgical planning. MRI of the elbow is performed in specialist radiology centres and is the investigation of choice for ligament assessment (UCL in throwing athletes), tendon pathology, and osteochondral lesion staging.

Australian orthopaedic training emphasises the systematic ABCS approach to radiograph reading and the CRITOE mnemonic for paediatric ossification centres. These are standard examination topics in both the fellowship written and viva components.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"A 7-year-old child falls on an outstretched hand. The lateral elbow radiograph shows a positive posterior fat pad sign but no visible fracture. The AP view appears normal."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
The posterior fat pad sign on the lateral radiograph in the context of trauma is highly significant. The posterior fat pad is normally tucked into the olecranon fossa and is NOT visible on a true lateral view. Its visibility indicates an intra-articular effusion — in the setting of a fall on an outstretched hand, this indicates an OCCULT FRACTURE until proven otherwise, even though no fracture line is visible. In a 7-year-old with this mechanism, the most likely occult fracture is a non-displaced supracondylar fracture, though a radial head or neck fracture is also possible. My systematic assessment on the lateral view: (1) Fat pads: posterior fat pad is positive — this is the key finding. Is the anterior fat pad also elevated (sail sign)? This would further confirm significant effusion. (2) Anterior humeral line: does it pass through the middle third of the capitellum? If it passes anteriorly, this suggests posterior displacement of the capitellum consistent with a type I (non-displaced) supracondylar fracture. (3) CRITOE assessment: at age 7, the expected ossification centres are Capitellum, Radial head, Internal epicondyle, and Trochlea (1-3-5-7). The Olecranon (9) and External epicondyle (11) should not yet be present. Are all expected centres present and in the correct position? On the AP view: (4) Baumann angle — assess for any subtle angulation. (5) Carrying angle — compare with the contralateral side if available. Management: I would treat this child as having an occult fracture. This means: (1) immobilisation in a hinged splint or above-elbow backslab at 90 degrees flexion with the forearm in neutral rotation, (2) neurovascular assessment (radial pulse, anterior interosseous nerve function, median nerve, ulnar nerve), (3) elevation and analgesia, (4) follow-up in fracture clinic within 7-10 days for repeat radiographs — the fracture line often becomes visible as periosteal new bone forms, (5) if clinical concern is high and the fracture involves the supracondylar region, consider CT or MRI for definitive characterisation.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Posterior fat pad sign = intra-articular effusion = occult fracture in trauma
Most common occult fracture: supracondylar (children), radial head (adults)
Anterior humeral line must pass through middle third of capitellum (lateral view)
CRITOE: at age 7, expect C (1), R (3), I (5), T (7) — check all present
Management: immobilise, neurovascular check, follow-up radiographs at 7-10 days
COMMON TRAPS
✗Dismissing the posterior fat pad sign and sending the child home without immobilisation
✗Not checking the anterior humeral line for subtle supracondylar fracture
✗Not performing neurovascular assessment (anterior interosseous nerve, pulse)
✗Not arranging follow-up for repeat radiographs
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"A 12-year-old child has an elbow dislocation that is reduced in the emergency department. Post-reduction radiographs show the joint is congruent, but you notice that the medial epicondyle is not visible."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a critical finding. Using the CRITOE mnemonic, at age 12, ALL six ossification centres should be present: Capitellum (1), Radial head (3), Internal/medial epicondyle (5), Trochlea (7), Olecranon (9), and External/lateral epicondyle (11). If the medial (internal) epicondyle is not visible on the post-reduction radiograph but all other expected ossification centres are present, the most likely diagnosis is that the medial epicondyle has been avulsed and is TRAPPED WITHIN THE JOINT. The mechanism: during elbow dislocation, the medial collateral ligament exerts traction on the medial epicondyle (its attachment site), avulsing it. During the reduction, the fragment can become trapped between the joint surfaces (typically the ulnohumeral articulation). This is a surgical emergency because: (1) the incarcerated fragment will block full range of motion, (2) it can cause chronic instability by preventing UCL healing, (3) it can damage the articular surfaces. The key radiographic pitfall: the trapped medial epicondyle fragment can mimic a trochlear ossification centre. However, the trochlea CANNOT appear before the medial epicondyle (CRITOE sequence: I before T). If you see what appears to be a trochlear centre but the medial epicondyle is absent, that 'trochlea' IS the trapped medial epicondyle. How I would confirm: (1) Comparison radiographs of the contralateral elbow — the medial epicondyle should be visible bilaterally at this age. (2) CT scan if uncertain — will show the intra-articular fragment clearly. (3) Examination under anaesthesia with fluoroscopy and attempted extraction of the fragment. Management: surgical extraction of the trapped medial epicondyle with open reduction and internal fixation (typically a screw or K-wire fixation of the epicondyle back to its anatomical position). The ulnar nerve must be identified and protected during the approach.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
At age 12, ALL six CRITOE ossification centres should be present
Missing medial epicondyle after dislocation = trapped in the joint (surgical emergency)
Trochlea CANNOT appear before medial epicondyle — if 'trochlea' present but no medial epicondyle, it IS the epicondyle
Comparison views of contralateral elbow confirm the diagnosis
Management: surgical extraction + ORIF, protect ulnar nerve
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not checking for all ossification centres after elbow dislocation reduction
✗Confusing the trapped medial epicondyle with troohlear ossification
✗Not knowing the CRITOE sequence (I must appear before T)
✗Not recognising this as a surgical emergency
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

EXAMINER

"An examiner asks you to explain the systematic approach to assessing a lateral elbow radiograph in trauma, using alignment lines."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
On a true lateral elbow radiograph, I use a systematic approach that I call FABLE: Fat pads, Anterior humeral line, Baumann angle considerations, Lines (radiocapitellar), and Every ossification centre. First, I confirm it is a TRUE lateral: the trochlea should form concentric circular shadows (if not concentric, the lateral is oblique and alignment lines are unreliable). (1) FAT PADS: Anterior fat pad — normally a small triangular lucency anterior to the coronoid fossa. If elevated and sail-shaped, this indicates moderate to large effusion. Posterior fat pad — normally NOT visible. If visible (even as a thin line), this is always abnormal and indicates joint distension. In trauma context = OCCULT FRACTURE. (2) ANTERIOR HUMERAL LINE: A line drawn along the anterior cortex of the distal humeral shaft is extended distally. This line should pass through the MIDDLE THIRD of the capitellum on a true lateral. If the line passes through the anterior third of the capitellum, the capitellum is posteriorly displaced relative to the shaft — this indicates a supracondylar fracture with posterior displacement/angulation (the most common pattern). If the line passes posterior to the capitellum, this indicates anterior displacement (rare, flexion-type supracondylar fracture). (3) RADIOCAPITELLAR LINE: A line drawn through the centre of the radial shaft should pass through the centre of the capitellum on ALL views. If this line fails to bisect the capitellum on the lateral view, the radial head is dislocated — this is the key to diagnosing a Monteggia fracture-dislocation. The Monteggia lesion may be subtle: a plastically deformed ulna in a child can maintain its bowed shape without an obvious fracture line, but the radial head will be dislocated because the interosseous membrane prevents the radius from following the ulna's deformity. (4) JOINT CONGRUENCE: The ulnohumeral articulation should be congruent — the olecranon should articulate smoothly with the trochlea. Widening or subluxation suggests ligamentous injury or fracture-dislocation. (5) CORTICAL INTERRUPTION: Trace all visible cortices (distal humerus, olecranon, coronoid process, radial head and neck). Any cortical break, no matter how subtle, represents a fracture.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Confirm TRUE lateral first (concentric trochlear circles)
Fat pads: posterior ALWAYS abnormal = occult fracture in trauma
Anterior humeral line: middle third of capitellum on lateral view
Radiocapitellar line: must bisect capitellum on ALL views (Monteggia diagnosis)
Trace all cortices systematically for subtle fractures
COMMON TRAPS
✗Applying alignment lines to an oblique (non-true) lateral view
✗Not recognising the posterior fat pad sign as significant
✗Not checking the radiocapitellar line (misses Monteggia)
✗Not assessing the anterior humeral line for supracondylar fracture

Elbow Imaging — Exam Day Reference

High-Yield Exam Summary

CRITOE Ossification Centres

  • •Capitellum (1yr), Radial head (3yr), Internal epicondyle (5yr)
  • •Trochlea (7yr), Olecranon (9yr), External epicondyle (11yr)
  • •Ages 1-3-5-7-9-11 (odd numbers)
  • •KEY: Internal (medial) epicondyle MUST appear BEFORE trochlea
  • •Missing medial epicondyle after dislocation = trapped in joint (surgical emergency)

Fat Pad Signs

  • •Posterior fat pad: ALWAYS abnormal when visible = intra-articular effusion
  • •In trauma: posterior fat pad = occult fracture until proven otherwise
  • •Most common occult fracture: radial head (adults), supracondylar (children)
  • •Anterior fat pad (sail sign): less specific — can be normal if small

Alignment Lines (FABLE)

  • •Anterior humeral line: middle third of capitellum on true lateral
  • •Radiocapitellar line: must bisect capitellum on ALL views (Monteggia diagnosis)
  • •Baumann angle: approximately 75 degrees on AP (varus/valgus alignment)
  • •Carrying angle: 5-15 degrees valgus (cubitus valgus = lateral condyle malunion)

Advanced Imaging Selection

  • •CT: complex fractures (terrible triad, comminuted radial head) — changes plan in 43%
  • •MRI: ligaments (UCL sensitivity 92%), OCD staging, bone marrow oedema
  • •MR arthrography: partial UCL tears, OCD stability, loose body detection
  • •Ultrasound: dynamic UCL assessment, tendon pathology, guided injection
Quick Stats
Reading Time70 min
Related Topics

Imaging the Spine — Systematic Approach

MRI Imaging Principles

Plain Radiography Principles

Imaging the Knee — Systematic Approach