Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • For Training Programs
  • Authors
  • Editorial Policy
  • Editorial Board
  • Content Methodology
  • Advertising Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

MRI Imaging Principles

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

MRI Imaging Principles

Comprehensive guide to MRI physics including magnetic field principles, signal generation, T1 and T2 relaxation, pulse sequences, and systematic orthopaedic applications for fellowship exam preparation.

Very High Yield
complete
Reviewed: 2026-03-11By OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team

Orthopaedic clinicians and medical editors • Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

Editorial boardMethodologyReview policyReport a correction
High Yield Overview

MRI Imaging Principles

Magnetic Resonance for Orthopaedic Surgeons

1.5-3TClinical field strengths
42.6MHz/T Larmor frequency
0mSv radiation dose
T1Longitudinal relaxation
T2Transverse relaxation
H+Hydrogen proton signal source
63%T1 recovery at 1 time constant
37%T2 signal remaining at 1 time constant

MRI Signal on Standard Sequences

T1-weighted: Fat = bright, Muscle = grey, Water = dark, Bone cortex = dark (no signal)

T2-weighted: Water = bright, Fat = intermediate, Muscle = dark, Bone cortex = dark

STIR: Water/oedema = bright, Fat = suppressed (dark), Pathology highlighted

T1 + Gadolinium: Enhancing tissue = bright (tumour, infection, synovitis)

Key: The appearance of a tissue on MRI depends on the pulse sequence used — the same tissue can appear different on T1 vs T2

Critical Must-Knows

  • MRI uses strong magnetic fields and radiofrequency pulses — NO ionising radiation. Safe for repeated imaging.
  • Signal comes from hydrogen protons (H+) in water and fat, which are abundant in all musculoskeletal tissues.
  • T1 relaxation (longitudinal recovery) determines signal differences based on molecular environment: fat is bright, water is dark on T1.
  • T2 relaxation (transverse decay) determines signal based on free water content: water is bright, fat is intermediate on T2.
  • MRI is the gold standard for soft tissue assessment: ligaments, tendons, cartilage, bone marrow oedema, and infection.

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    T1-weighted: fat = bright white, muscle = grey, water/fluid = dark. Best for anatomy and fat-containing pathology.
  • "
    T2-weighted: water/fluid = bright white, fat = intermediate grey, muscle = dark. Best for pathology detection (oedema, effusion, tears).
  • "
    STIR/fat-suppressed T2: suppresses fat signal to highlight oedema — the most sensitive sequence for bone marrow oedema.
  • "
    Gadolinium shortens T1, making enhancing tissue bright on T1-weighted images — used for tumour, infection, and synovitis assessment.
  • "
    MRI contraindications: cardiac pacemakers (non-MRI-conditional), cochlear implants, ferromagnetic foreign bodies, certain vascular clips.

Exam Warning

MRI physics is a high-yield examination topic. You must be able to explain: the origin of the MRI signal (hydrogen protons), T1 vs T2 relaxation, why fat is bright on T1, why water is bright on T2, the role of gadolinium, indications vs contraindications, and the advantages of MRI over CT for soft tissue assessment. You will frequently be asked to interpret MRI sequences and explain why you would choose specific sequences for specific clinical questions.

Mnemonic

WW-FFMRI Signal Appearance

W
Water is White on T2
Free water (effusion, oedema, CSF) has long T2 relaxation — appears bright on T2-weighted images
W
Water is dark (Washed out) on T1
Free water has long T1 relaxation — appears dark on T1-weighted images
F
Fat is bright (Flashy) on T1
Fat has short T1 relaxation — recovers signal quickly, appearing bright on T1-weighted images
F
Fat is intermediate on T2 (Faded)
Fat has intermediate T2 signal — not as bright as water, not as dark as muscle

Memory Hook:Water White T2, Water Washed-out T1, Fat Flashy T1, Fat Faded T2 — the four rules that unlock MRI interpretation.

Mnemonic

SCRAMMRI Advantages Over CT

S
Soft tissue contrast
Superior contrast between ligaments, tendons, cartilage, muscle, fat, and fluid — CT cannot distinguish soft tissues reliably
C
Cartilage assessment
MRI is the only non-invasive modality that directly images articular cartilage thickness and integrity
R
Radiation-free
No ionising radiation — safe for children, pregnant patients, and serial monitoring
A
Avascular necrosis detection
MRI detects AVN months before plain radiographs, through marrow signal changes
M
Marrow oedema visualisation
STIR and fat-suppressed sequences uniquely detect bone marrow oedema from occult fractures, stress reactions, and contusions

Memory Hook:SCRAM to the MRI scanner when you need soft tissue answers that CT and X-ray cannot provide.

Mnemonic

TISGadolinium Enhancement

T
Tumour
Enhancing components of bone and soft tissue tumours — distinguishes viable tumour from necrosis and oedema
I
Infection
Rim enhancement in abscesses, enhancing soft tissue phlegmon, post-contrast subtraction maps for osteomyelitis
S
Synovitis
Thickened enhancing synovium in inflammatory arthropathy — distinguishes active synovitis from chronic effusion

Memory Hook:TIS: gadolinium lights up Tumour, Infection, and Synovitis — the three main indications for contrast MRI in orthopaedics.

Overview

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard imaging modality for soft tissue assessment in orthopaedic practice. Unlike plain radiography and CT, which rely on ionising radiation and differential X-ray absorption, MRI uses strong magnetic fields and radiofrequency (RF) pulses to generate images based on the behaviour of hydrogen protons within tissue. This produces unparalleled soft tissue contrast without any radiation exposure.

MRI is the modality of choice for evaluating ligament and tendon injuries, meniscal tears, articular cartilage defects, bone marrow oedema (occult fractures, stress reactions, avascular necrosis), soft tissue tumours, and infection. Its multiplanar capability and lack of ionising radiation make it particularly valuable in paediatric imaging and serial monitoring.

The principal limitations of MRI are: long acquisition times (20-45 minutes), claustrophobia, contraindications in patients with certain implants, significant metal artefact from orthopaedic hardware, high cost, and inferior spatial resolution for cortical bone compared to CT.

When to Choose MRI

Ligament and tendon injuries (ACL, rotator cuff, Achilles). Meniscal pathology. Articular cartilage assessment. Bone marrow oedema (occult fractures, stress injuries, AVN). Soft tissue and bone tumour characterisation. Infection (osteomyelitis, septic arthritis). Spinal cord and nerve root assessment. Paediatric musculoskeletal conditions.

When CT Is Better Than MRI

Complex fracture characterisation (acetabulum, tibial plateau, calcaneus). Cortical bone detail and fracture lines. Preoperative 3D planning. Lung metastasis screening. Calcification patterns (tumour matrix, CPPD). Patients with MRI contraindications. Acute trauma where speed is critical.

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

MRI of the musculoskeletal system demonstrating soft tissue contrast capabilities
Click to expand
MRI demonstrating the superior soft tissue contrast achievable with magnetic resonance imaging. Note the clear differentiation between cortical bone (dark signal void), marrow (intermediate-bright depending on sequence), muscle, and subcutaneous fat — information that is impossible to obtain from CT or plain radiography.Credit: Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
MRI demonstrating different tissue signal characteristics on various pulse sequences
Click to expand
Different MRI sequences highlighting how the same anatomical structures produce dramatically different signal intensities depending on the pulse sequence used. This fundamental principle distinguishes MRI from all other imaging modalities.Credit: Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Systematic Approach

Systematic MRI Interpretation Framework

A structured approach to MRI interpretation ensures comprehensive assessment and prevents missed pathology. Apply this checklist to every orthopaedic MRI:

Systematic MRI Interpretation

StepWhat to AssessKey Considerations
1. Identify sequencesConfirm which sequences are present: T1, T2, PD, STIR, post-gadoliniumEach sequence provides different information — you cannot interpret pathology from a single sequence alone
2. T1 anatomyUse T1-weighted images as the anatomical reference: identify all structuresFat is bright, providing natural contrast. Excellent for cortical bone margins, fatty marrow, and anatomical orientation
3. T2/STIR pathologyScan fluid-sensitive sequences for oedema, effusion, and soft tissue injuryBright signal on STIR/fat-suppressed T2 indicates pathology: oedema, tears, inflammation, fluid
4. Correlate T1 and T2Cross-reference findings on both sequences to characterise the underlying tissueBright on T1 and T2 = fat or subacute blood. Dark on T1 and bright on T2 = water/oedema. Dark on both = cortex, fibrous tissue, calcification, haemosiderin
5. All three planesReview axial, sagittal, and coronal images systematicallyCertain pathology is best seen in specific planes (e.g., meniscal tears on sagittal, ACL on sagittal)
6. Extracapsular structuresDo not forget periarticular structures: bursae, nerves, muscles, vesselsCommon exam trap: focusing on the joint while missing a nerve sheath tumour, muscle denervation oedema, or Baker cyst

MRI Physics Fundamentals

The MRI Signal Source

MRI signal originates from hydrogen protons (H+), which are the most abundant MRI-visible nuclei in the body due to the ubiquity of water (H2O) and fat (CH2) in tissues. Each hydrogen proton possesses a quantum property called spin angular momentum, which gives it a small magnetic moment — essentially making each proton a tiny bar magnet.

In the absence of an external magnetic field, proton magnetic moments are randomly oriented and cancel each other out. When the patient enters the MRI scanner, the strong external magnetic field (B0, typically 1.5 or 3 Tesla) causes the protons to align either parallel (low energy, slight majority) or anti-parallel (high energy) to the field. The small excess of parallel protons creates a net magnetisation vector that provides the measurable MRI signal.

Precession and the Larmor Equation

Within the magnetic field, protons do not simply align — they precess (wobble) around the direction of B0, much like a spinning top wobbles around the gravitational axis. The frequency of precession is determined by the Larmor equation:

ω = γ × B0

Where ω is the precessional (Larmor) frequency, γ is the gyromagnetic ratio (42.58 MHz/T for hydrogen), and B0 is the external magnetic field strength. At 1.5T, protons precess at approximately 63.87 MHz; at 3T, approximately 127.74 MHz. This frequency determines the radiofrequency pulse needed to excite the protons.

Excitation and Relaxation

T1 Relaxation (Longitudinal Recovery)

After a radiofrequency (RF) pulse tilts the net magnetisation vector away from the B0 axis, the protons gradually recover their longitudinal magnetisation along B0. This process is called T1 relaxation (also called spin-lattice relaxation because the protons release energy to the surrounding molecular lattice).

T1 is the time constant for 63% recovery of the longitudinal magnetisation.

The rate of T1 recovery depends on how efficiently protons can transfer their excess energy to the surrounding molecular lattice. This is most efficient when molecular tumbling frequencies match the Larmor frequency:

  • Fat has SHORT T1 (approximately 250ms at 1.5T): Fat molecules tumble at frequencies close to the Larmor frequency, enabling rapid energy transfer. Fat therefore recovers signal quickly and appears bright on T1-weighted images.
  • Water has LONG T1 (approximately 2500ms at 1.5T): Small, rapidly tumbling water molecules are inefficient at energy transfer. Water recovers slowly and appears dark on T1-weighted images.
  • Muscle has INTERMEDIATE T1: Between fat and water. Appears grey on T1.

T1-weighted images provide excellent anatomical detail because fat provides natural high-contrast boundaries between structures.

T2 Relaxation (Transverse Decay)

Simultaneously with T1 recovery, the transverse magnetisation component (created by the RF pulse) decays as protons lose phase coherence with each other. This process is called T2 relaxation (also called spin-spin relaxation because it is caused by interactions between neighbouring protons).

T2 is the time constant for the transverse magnetisation to decay to 37% of its initial value.

The rate of T2 decay depends on how homogeneous the local magnetic field is around each proton:

  • Water has LONG T2 (approximately 2500ms): Rapidly tumbling water molecules average out local field inhomogeneities, maintaining phase coherence for a long time. Water therefore retains signal and appears bright on T2-weighted images.
  • Fat has INTERMEDIATE T2 (approximately 80ms): Moderate phase coherence. Appears intermediate grey on T2.
  • Muscle has SHORT T2 (approximately 35ms): Rapid dephasing due to complex molecular interactions. Appears dark on T2.
  • Cortical bone has VERY SHORT T2: Essentially no mobile protons — appears as a signal void (black) on all sequences.

T2-weighted images are the 'pathology sequences' because most pathological processes (inflammation, oedema, tears, infection) increase tissue water content, producing bright T2 signal.

Key MRI Sequences

Essential MRI Sequences for Orthopaedic Imaging

SequenceSignal CharacteristicsBest For
T1-weightedFat = bright, Muscle = grey, Water = dark, Cortex = darkAnatomical detail, fatty infiltration, subacute haemorrhage, post-gadolinium enhancement
T2-weightedWater = bright, Fat = intermediate, Muscle = dark, Cortex = darkPathology detection: effusions, oedema, meniscal tears, ligament injuries
Proton Density (PD)Between T1 and T2; intermediate contrastMeniscal tears (gold standard), cartilage assessment, ligament detail
STIR (Short Tau Inversion Recovery)Fat signal suppressed; water/oedema = very brightBone marrow oedema (most sensitive), occult fractures, stress reactions, tumour spread
Fat-suppressed T2Similar to STIR but uses chemical fat saturation instead of inversionBone marrow oedema, ligament tears, tendon pathology — less uniform fat suppression than STIR at field boundaries
T1 + GadoliniumEnhancing tissue = bright on T1; non-enhancing = darkTumour vascularity, infection (abscess rim), active synovitis, post-operative assessment
Gradient Echo (GRE)Susceptibility sensitive; blooming of haemosiderin and calcificationHaemosiderin (PVNS), calcification, cartilage surface (T2*-weighted GRE)

Critical Exam Pearl: STIR vs Fat-Suppressed T2

Both STIR and fat-suppressed T2 highlight oedema by removing the fat signal, but they work differently. STIR uses an inversion pulse to null fat signal and provides UNIFORM fat suppression across the entire field of view — making it more reliable at field boundaries and around metal. Fat-suppressed T2 uses chemical fat saturation, which is faster but LESS UNIFORM near metal and at the edges of the field. For bone marrow oedema detection, STIR is generally preferred as the more sensitive and robust sequence.

Gadolinium Contrast

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are paramagnetic substances that shorten T1 relaxation time, causing enhancing tissues to appear bright on T1-weighted post-contrast images. Gadolinium is administered intravenously and distributes through the vascular compartment and into the interstitium of tissues with disrupted capillary barriers.

Orthopaedic Indications for Gadolinium

Gadolinium Indications in Orthopaedic MRI

IndicationWhat Enhancement ShowsClinical Value
Tumour characterisationViable tumour enhances; necrotic/cystic areas do notDistinguishes solid from cystic components; guides biopsy site; monitors treatment response
Infection and abscessAbscess shows rim enhancement; phlegmon enhances diffuselyDistinguishes drainable abscess from phlegmon; identifies extent of infection
Synovitis assessmentActive enhancing synovium (thickened, vascular)Distinguishes active inflammatory synovitis from chronic effusion in rheumatoid arthritis
Post-operative assessmentEnhancement pattern around implants; recurrent vs scar tissueRecurrent tumour enhances; post-surgical scar shows progressive enhancement pattern
MR arthrographyDilute intra-articular gadolinium outlines labrum, cartilage, ligamentsGold standard for labral tears (hip and shoulder), SLAP lesions, and loose body detection

Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis (NSF): Gadolinium-based contrast agents can cause NSF in patients with severe renal impairment (eGFR below 30 mL/min/1.73m²). NSF is a serious, potentially fatal fibrosing condition affecting the skin, joints, and internal organs. Group II GBCAs (macrocyclic agents: gadobutrol, gadoterate, gadoteridol) are considered safer and preferred. Always check renal function (eGFR) before administering gadolinium. NSF risk with macrocyclic agents is considered negligible.

MRI Artefacts

Common MRI Artefacts in Orthopaedic Imaging

ArtefactCauseAppearanceReduction Strategies
Metal susceptibility artefactFerromagnetic and paramagnetic implants distort the local magnetic fieldSignal void with surrounding signal pile-up (blooming); geometric distortionMetal artefact reduction sequences (MAVRIC-SL, SEMAC); wider bandwidth; spin echo over gradient echo; lower field strength
Chemical shift artefactFat and water protons precess at slightly different frequenciesBright/dark bands at fat-water interfaces in the frequency-encoding directionWider receiver bandwidth; fat suppression sequences; swap phase/frequency directions
Motion artefactPatient movement during the long acquisitionGhosting (periodic repeating copies) in the phase-encoding directionMotion correction algorithms, breath-holding (not applicable for extremities), faster sequences, patient education
Magic angle artefactStructures oriented at 55 degrees to B0 exhibit artificially increased signalTendon or ligament appears abnormally bright, simulating pathologyConfirm on T2: magic angle should NOT be bright on T2. Reposition if possible
Truncation (Gibbs) artefactIncomplete sampling of sharp signal transitionsAlternating bright and dark lines parallel to high-contrast interfacesIncrease matrix size; occurs at spinal cord-CSF boundary simulating syrinx

Magic Angle Artefact

The magic angle effect is a common source of false positive MRI findings. When a tendon (Achilles, supraspinatus, patellar) or ligament is oriented at approximately 55 degrees to the main magnetic field (B0), the normally dark structure appears bright on short TE sequences (T1, PD), mimicking tendinopathy or a tear. The key to avoiding misdiagnosis is: (1) the abnormal signal should NOT persist on T2-weighted images with long TE, and (2) clinical correlation is essential. This is a frequently examined topic.

Evidence Base

MRI of the Musculoskeletal System

Textbook
Berquist TH • Lippincott Williams and Wilkins (2017)
Key Findings:
  • Comprehensive reference for MRI protocol selection and image interpretation in orthopaedic practice.
  • Details the optimal sequences for each anatomical region including shoulder, knee, hip, spine, and extremities.
  • Provides systematic interpretation frameworks with pathological correlations validated against surgical and arthroscopic findings.
Clinical Implication: This is a standard reference text for musculoskeletal MRI interpretation and is frequently referenced in fellowship examination syllabi.
Limitation: Textbook detail exceeds clinical viva requirements but provides the definitive reference for complex cases.
Source: Berquist TH. MRI of the Musculoskeletal System. 6th ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2017

Sensitivity and Specificity of MRI for ACL Tears

Meta-Analysis
Crawford R, Walley G, Bridgman S, Maffulli N • Clinical Radiology (2007)
Key Findings:
  • MRI sensitivity for complete ACL tears was 86-94% and specificity 95-98% across included studies.
  • Partial ACL tears had lower sensitivity (40-75%) but maintained high specificity.
  • MRI accuracy improved with 3T compared to 1.5T scanners and with dedicated knee coils.
Clinical Implication: MRI is highly accurate for complete ACL tears but less reliable for partial tears — clinical examination remains essential.
Limitation: MRI accuracy depends on field strength, coil selection, sequence protocol, and reader experience.
Source: Crawford R et al. Clin Radiol 2007;62(3):202-11

Clinical MRI evidence supports its role as the primary soft tissue imaging modality.

Metal Artefact Reduction in MRI

Review
Hargreaves BA, Worters PW, Pauly KB, Pauly JM, Koch KM, Gold GE • American Journal of Roentgenology (2011)
Key Findings:
  • MAVRIC and SEMAC sequences significantly reduce metal artefact compared to conventional spin echo sequences.
  • Lower field strength (1.5T vs 3T) produces less metal artefact due to reduced susceptibility effects.
  • Spin echo sequences are less affected by metal than gradient echo sequences.
Clinical Implication: When imaging around orthopaedic implants, specific sequence selection and scanner parameters can dramatically improve diagnostic quality.
Limitation: MAVRIC and SEMAC increase scan time significantly; not available on all scanners.
Source: Hargreaves BA et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197(3):547-55

Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis and Gadolinium

Guideline
American College of Radiology Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media • ACR Manual on Contrast Media (2022)
Key Findings:
  • Group II GBCAs (macrocyclic agents) are associated with no or extremely few confirmed cases of NSF.
  • Renal function screening (eGFR) is recommended before gadolinium administration, particularly for patients at risk.
  • The risk of NSF with macrocyclic agents is considered negligible even in patients with advanced renal disease.
Clinical Implication: Macrocyclic gadolinium agents should be preferentially used, especially in patients at risk. Always check eGFR before gadolinium.
Limitation: Gadolinium deposition in the brain has been reported even with macrocyclic agents, though clinical significance remains uncertain.
Source: ACR Manual on Contrast Media v2022. American College of Radiology; 2022

MRI Safety Considerations for Orthopaedic Implants

Review
Levine GN, Gomes AS, Arai AE, Bluemke DA, Flamm SD, Kanal E • Circulation (2007)
Key Findings:
  • Modern MRI-conditional orthopaedic implants composed of titanium or cobalt-chrome alloys can be safely scanned at 1.5T under specified conditions.
  • Stainless steel implants (older hardware) may pose risks of heating and displacement.
  • A thorough implant checklist and screening questionnaire is essential before any MRI examination.
Clinical Implication: Most modern orthopaedic implants are MRI-conditional at 1.5T. Always verify implant MRI compatibility and follow manufacturer guidelines.
Limitation: Safety data for 3T scanning with certain implants is less comprehensive.
Source: Levine GN et al. Circulation 2007;116(24):2878-91

Safety evidence reinforces the importance of implant screening and contrast agent selection.

Australian Context

MRI availability across Australia has expanded significantly, though access remains unequal between metropolitan and rural settings. Medicare-funded MRI requires scanning on eligible machines and referral from approved providers under specific clinical indications. In orthopaedic practice, common Medicare-funded indications include: suspected internal derangement of the knee following clinical assessment, shoulder pathology in patients being considered for surgery, and spinal conditions with neurological signs.

Australian radiation protection regulations (ARPANSA) classify MRI scanners by field strength, with routine clinical scanning performed at 1.5T and 3T. Ultra-high-field MRI (7T) remains a research tool in Australia. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (RANZCR) publishes MRI safety guidelines that align with international standards and mandate comprehensive screening questionnaires for all patients before scanning.

Australian orthopaedic trainees should be aware that MRI requesting patterns differ between the public and private sectors, with longer wait times for public MRI affecting the timing of surgical decision-making. MR arthrography for labral pathology is widely available at Australian tertiary centres and is increasingly performed in outpatient settings.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"An examiner asks you to explain why fat appears bright on T1-weighted MRI images."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Fat appears bright on T1-weighted images because of its short T1 relaxation time. The MRI signal depends on the rate at which protons recover their longitudinal magnetisation after being excited by a radiofrequency pulse. T1 relaxation, also called spin-lattice relaxation, requires protons to transfer their excess energy to the surrounding molecular lattice. This energy transfer is most efficient when the tumbling frequency of the surrounding molecules closely matches the Larmor (precessional) frequency of the protons. Fat molecules are large, complex lipid chains that tumble at frequencies close to the Larmor frequency at clinical field strengths (1.5-3T). This makes fat extremely efficient at spin-lattice energy transfer, giving it a short T1 relaxation time of approximately 250ms at 1.5T. When the next radiofrequency pulse arrives (set by the TR parameter), fat protons have already recovered most of their longitudinal magnetisation and can produce a strong signal. In contrast, small, rapidly tumbling water molecules have a tumbling frequency far from the Larmor frequency, making them inefficient at T1 relaxation (T1 approximately 2500ms). Water protons have not recovered their magnetisation by the time of the next RF pulse, producing weak signal — hence water appears dark on T1.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Fat has a SHORT T1 due to efficient spin-lattice relaxation
Fat molecular tumbling frequency matches the Larmor frequency
Short T1 means fast magnetisation recovery = strong signal = bright on T1
Water has LONG T1 due to inefficient energy transfer
T1 approximately 250ms for fat vs approximately 2500ms for water at 1.5T
COMMON TRAPS
✗Confusing T1 and T2 relaxation mechanisms
✗Not explaining WHY fat has a short T1 (the tumbling frequency match)
✗Confusing spin-lattice (T1) with spin-spin (T2) relaxation
✗Stating that 'fat is bright because it has more hydrogen' (incorrect — it is about relaxation rates)
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"A 35-year-old runner presents with medial tibial pain. Plain radiographs are normal. You request an MRI."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
In a runner with medial tibial pain and normal radiographs, I am concerned about a tibial stress reaction or stress fracture. The most important MRI sequence is STIR or fat-suppressed T2, which is the most sensitive sequence for bone marrow oedema. On STIR, a stress reaction appears as bright signal within the tibial marrow, particularly along the posteromedial cortex (the typical site for tibial stress injuries). The extent of oedema on STIR helps grade the injury: grade 1 shows periosteal oedema only, grade 2 adds marrow oedema on STIR, grade 3 shows marrow oedema on both T1 and STIR, and grade 4 (stress fracture) shows a visible fracture line. On T1-weighted images, I would look for a corresponding area of low signal replacing the normal bright fatty marrow — this indicates more advanced pathology. If a fracture line is present, it appears as a low-signal line on T1, often perpendicular to the cortex, and may be bright on T2 if there is fluid in the fracture. I would also assess for periosteal reaction (periosteal oedema), soft tissue oedema, and exclude other causes such as medial tibial stress syndrome, tumour, or infection.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
STIR is the most sensitive sequence for bone marrow oedema
Fredericson grading system classifies stress injuries from grade 1 to 4
Grade 4 (stress fracture) shows a visible fracture line on MRI
T1 shows loss of normal bright marrow signal in more advanced grades
Fracture line is low on T1, may be bright on T2 if fluid-filled
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not requesting fluid-sensitive sequences (STIR/fat-suppressed T2)
✗Not knowing the Fredericson grading system
✗Confusing stress reaction (bone marrow oedema only) with stress fracture (visible fracture line)
✗Relying on plain radiographs alone — they are often negative in early stress injuries
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

EXAMINER

"You request a knee MRI for a patient with a previous knee arthroplasty and new onset pain. The MRI shows significant metal artefact."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Imaging around metal implants is challenging because metal distorts the local magnetic field, causing signal void, signal pile-up, and geometric distortion. Several strategies optimise MRI around metal: (1) Use spin echo sequences instead of gradient echo — spin echo uses a 180-degree refocusing pulse which partly corrects for field inhomogeneities caused by metal. Gradient echo sequences have no refocusing pulse and are therefore much more affected by metal susceptibility. (2) Use dedicated metal artefact reduction sequences: MAVRIC-SL (multi-acquisition variable-resonance image combination with slice-encoding for metal artefact correction) and SEMAC (slice encoding for metal artefact correction) are advanced techniques designed specifically for imaging around implants. They reduce artefact by acquiring data at multiple frequencies. (3) Use 1.5T rather than 3T — metal susceptibility effects double at 3T. (4) Increase receiver bandwidth — wider bandwidth reduces chemical shift and susceptibility artefact but increases noise. (5) Use a smaller voxel size (thinner slices, higher matrix) — reduces intravoxel dephasing. (6) Swap frequency and phase encoding directions to move artefact away from the region of interest. (7) Use STIR instead of chemical fat saturation — STIR provides more uniform fat suppression near metal. These strategies can make the difference between a diagnostic and non-diagnostic scan.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Spin echo preferred over gradient echo (180-degree refocusing pulse corrects field inhomogeneities)
MAVRIC-SL and SEMAC are dedicated metal artefact reduction sequences
1.5T produces less metal artefact than 3T
Wider receiver bandwidth reduces artefact but increases noise
STIR provides more uniform fat suppression near metal than chemical fat saturation
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not knowing the difference between spin echo and gradient echo near metal
✗Recommending 3T imaging around metal (it is actually worse)
✗Not mentioning MAVRIC-SL/SEMAC by name
✗Forgetting to change from chemical fat suppression to STIR near metal

MRI Imaging Principles — Exam Day Reference

High-Yield Exam Summary

Signal Basics

  • •Signal source: hydrogen protons (H+) in water and fat
  • •Larmor equation: frequency = 42.58 MHz/T x field strength
  • •No ionising radiation — safe for children, pregnant patients, serial monitoring
  • •1.5T and 3T are standard clinical field strengths

T1 vs T2 Signal

  • •T1: Fat = bright, Water = dark, Muscle = grey
  • •T2: Water = bright, Fat = intermediate, Muscle = dark
  • •STIR: Water/oedema = bright, Fat = suppressed (most sensitive for marrow oedema)
  • •Cortical bone = dark signal void on ALL sequences

Key Sequences

  • •T1 = anatomy and fat; T2/STIR = pathology and oedema
  • •Proton Density = gold standard for meniscal tears
  • •T1 + Gadolinium = tumour, infection, synovitis (TIS)
  • •GRE = haemosiderin (PVNS) and cartilage surface

Gadolinium Safety

  • •NSF risk with severe renal impairment (eGFR less than 30)
  • •Group II macrocyclic agents (gadobutrol, gadoterate) are safest
  • •Always check eGFR before gadolinium administration
  • •Brain deposition reported — clinical significance uncertain

Metal and MRI

  • •Use spin echo over gradient echo near metal
  • •1.5T produces less artefact than 3T
  • •MAVRIC-SL and SEMAC are dedicated metal artefact reduction sequences
  • •STIR provides more uniform fat suppression near metal than chemical fat saturation
Quick Stats
Reading Time77 min
Related Topics

Plain Radiography Principles

CT Imaging Principles

MRI Bone Marrow Signal

MRI Cartilage Assessment