Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • For Training Programs
  • Authors
  • Editorial Policy
  • Editorial Board
  • Content Methodology
  • Advertising Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Imaging the Spine — Systematic Approach

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Imaging the Spine — Systematic Approach

Comprehensive guide to systematic spine imaging covering radiographic alignment assessment, MRI for disc herniation and cord compression, fracture characterisation, and red flag detection for fellowship exam preparation.

Very High Yield
complete
Reviewed: 2026-03-11By OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

Reviewed by OrthoVellum Editorial Team

Orthopaedic clinicians and medical editors • Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

Editorial boardMethodologyReview policyReport a correction
High Yield Overview

Imaging the Spine — Systematic Approach

From Alignment Assessment to MRI Cord Evaluation

ABCDAlignment, Bones, Cartilage/Disc, Soft tissues
3 LinesAnterior, posterior vertebral, spinous process lines
MRIGold standard for disc/cord pathology
CTGold standard for fracture characterisation
CESCauda equina: MRI within hours (surgical emergency)
TLICSThoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity
NEXUS/CCRCervical spine clearance rules
MetsMRI whole spine for metastatic screening

Spine Imaging Modality Selection

Radiography: Screening tool, alignment assessment, degenerative changes

CT: Gold standard for fracture characterisation, canal compromise, 3D reconstruction

MRI: Gold standard for soft tissue pathology — disc, cord, infection, tumour, ligaments

CT Myelography: Alternative to MRI when contraindicated — shows cord compression

Bone Scan/SPECT-CT: Facet joint disease, spondylolysis activity, metastatic screening

Key: Radiographs screen, CT characterises fractures, MRI evaluates soft tissues and cord

Critical Must-Knows

  • Systematic spine radiograph reading follows ABCD: Alignment (3 smooth lines), Bones (vertebral body height/shape), Cartilage/Disc (disc space height), Soft tissues (prevertebral swelling).
  • MRI is the gold standard for disc herniation, cord compression, cauda equina syndrome, infection, and tumour assessment.
  • CT is the gold standard for fracture characterisation — it reveals fracture lines, posterior column involvement, and canal compromise that radiographs miss.
  • Cervical spine clearance: NEXUS criteria or Canadian C-Spine Rule determine the need for imaging after trauma.
  • Red flags requiring urgent MRI: cauda equina symptoms, progressive neurological deficit, suspected cord compression, suspected spinal infection, suspected metastatic disease.

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Prevertebral soft tissue swelling on lateral cervical radiograph: more than 7mm at C2 or more than 21mm at C6 = significant (suspect fracture/haematoma/abscess).
  • "
    Jefferson fracture (C1 burst): lateral mass overhang of more than 7mm (combined bilateral) on AP open-mouth view = transverse ligament disruption (unstable).
  • "
    Hangman fracture (C2 pars): bilateral C2 pedicle fracture — paradoxically often STABLE because the canal enlarges (spinal cord spared).
  • "
    TLICS score guides management: less than 4 = conservative, 4 = borderline, more than 4 = surgical. Components: morphology + posterior ligamentous complex + neurological status.
  • "
    On MRI: loss of T2 high signal in the spinal cord (cord signal change) indicates myelopathy — this is an ominous finding suggesting compressive myelopathy.

Exam Warning

Spine imaging is tested extensively across all examination formats. You must know: ABCD systematic radiograph reading, the three alignment lines on lateral view, cervical spine clearance rules (NEXUS/CCR), prevertebral soft tissue thresholds, MRI interpretation for disc herniation and cord signal change, CT characterisation of fractures, TLICS scoring, and red flags requiring urgent MRI (CES, myelopathy, infection, metastases). Classic traps: missing C7-T1 junction injury on lateral radiograph and not recognising cord signal change on MRI.

Mnemonic

ABCDSystematic Spine Radiograph Reading

A
Alignment (3 smooth lines)
Anterior vertebral line, posterior vertebral line, spinolaminar line — all should be smooth curves on lateral view. Step-off indicates subluxation/dislocation
B
Bones (vertebral body assessment)
Height (anterior vs posterior — wedging), shape (compression, burst), cortical integrity, pedicles (on AP — absent pedicle = winking owl sign = metastasis)
C
Cartilage and disc spaces
Disc space height (loss = degeneration or infection), facet joints (widening = dislocation/subluxation), interspinous distance (widened = posterior ligament disruption)
D
Dens and soft tissues
Odontoid process (fracture), prevertebral soft tissue width (C2: less than 7mm, C6: less than 21mm), paraspinal line (thoracic — widening = fracture/haematoma)

Memory Hook:ABCD: the systematic approach for spine radiographs — Alignment, Bones, Cartilage/Discs, Dens/Soft tissues.

Mnemonic

CRAMSRed Flags Requiring Urgent Spine MRI

C
Cauda equina syndrome
Bladder/bowel dysfunction, saddle anaesthesia, bilateral leg symptoms — MRI within hours, surgical decompression if confirmed
R
Rapidly progressive deficit
Progressive motor weakness, expanding myelopathy — urgent MRI to identify compressive cause (disc, tumour, epidural abscess)
A
Abscess/infection suspected
Fever + back pain + raised inflammatory markers — MRI shows disc space destruction, endplate irregularity, paraspinal/epidural abscess
M
Metastatic disease suspected
Cancer history + new back pain + night pain/weight loss — whole-spine MRI for metastatic screening
S
Spinal cord compression (myelopathy)
Upper motor neurone signs (hyperreflexia, clonus, Babinski) — MRI shows cord compression with or without cord signal change

Memory Hook:CRAMS: these five scenarios demand URGENT MRI — delay risks permanent neurological damage.

Mnemonic

NSAIDNEXUS Criteria for Cervical Spine Clearance

N
No posterior midline cervical tenderness
Palpation of spinous processes from occiput to T1 — any tenderness requires imaging
S
No signs of intoxication
Alcohol or drugs impair clinical assessment reliability
A
Alert (normal level of consciousness)
GCS 15 and fully oriented — altered consciousness requires imaging
I
No focal neurological deficit
No motor or sensory deficit attributable to cervical spine injury
D
No Distracting injury
No significant painful injury elsewhere that could mask cervical spine pain (e.g., long bone fracture, burn)

Memory Hook:NSAID: if ALL five criteria are met, cervical spine can be cleared clinically WITHOUT imaging.

Overview

Systematic spine imaging is fundamental to orthopaedic practice, encompassing acute trauma (fracture/dislocation), degenerative disease (disc herniation, stenosis), infection (discitis/osteomyelitis), and neoplastic conditions (metastases, primary tumours). The imaging approach follows a logical hierarchy: radiographs for screening and alignment, CT for fracture characterisation, and MRI for soft tissue and cord assessment.

Imaging Algorithm

Trauma: (1) Apply NEXUS or CCR to determine need for imaging. (2) If imaging needed: CT is now the primary modality for cervical spine clearance in major trauma (replacing radiographs). (3) If neurological deficit: add MRI for cord, disc, and ligament assessment. Degenerative: radiographs for alignment and deformity, MRI for disc/canal/foraminal assessment if surgical decision-making required. Red flags: urgent MRI for CES, myelopathy, infection, or metastatic disease. Deformity: full-length standing radiographs (scoliosis series) for coronal and sagittal balance.

Critical Interpretation Points

Cervical lateral radiograph must show C7-T1 junction — failure to visualise this level is the most common cause of missed cervical fractures. If C7-T1 is not visible on lateral radiograph, a swimmer's view or CT is required. On MRI: T2 signal change WITHIN the spinal cord (high signal replacing normal cord) indicates myelopathy — this is an ominous finding that often represents irreversible damage and is a stronger predictor of surgical outcome than the degree of anatomical compression alone.

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Lumbar spine MRI four-panel sagittal comparison showing disc and canal pathology
Click to expand
Four-panel sagittal MRI of the lumbar spine demonstrating disc and canal pathology. Systematic MRI assessment includes evaluation of disc morphology (protrusion, extrusion, sequestration), canal diameter, foraminal patency, ligamentum flavum hypertrophy, and facet joint status at each level.Credit: Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
MRI showing vertebral compression fractures with assessment of chronicity
Click to expand
MRI of lumbar spine compression fractures demonstrating the differentiation between acute (bright STIR signal indicating marrow oedema) and chronic (dark signal, height loss, no oedema) fractures. MRI is essential for determining fracture acuity, which guides management decisions including vertebroplasty candidacy.Credit: Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Systematic Approach

Systematic Spine Imaging Assessment

Spine Imaging Selection Guide

Clinical ScenarioFirst-Line ImagingAdvanced Imaging
Cervical spine traumaCT (primary modality in major trauma). NEXUS/CCR for clinical clearanceMRI if neurological deficit, cord compression suspected, or ligamentous injury assessment
Thoracolumbar traumaAP + lateral radiographs. CT for any suspected fractureCT for TLICS scoring (morphology, posterior ligament complex). MRI for cord/conus assessment and posterior ligament integrity
Disc herniation/radiculopathyRadiographs (usually normal or degenerative)MRI: gold standard for disc morphology, nerve root compression, canal stenosis. CT myelography if MRI contraindicated
Suspected infection (discitis)Radiographs (disc space narrowing, endplate irregularity — often delayed)MRI with contrast: gold standard. Shows disc signal change, endplate destruction, paraspinal/epidural abscess. Blood cultures + CRP/ESR
Suspected metastasesRadiographs (may show lytic/blastic lesions, pedicle destruction)Whole-spine MRI: gold standard for metastatic screening. STIR sequence detects marrow infiltration. CT for stability assessment
Cauda equina syndromeDo NOT delay for radiographsURGENT MRI (within hours): sagittal and axial T2 for compression identification. This is a surgical emergency

Clinical Applications

Cervical Spine Imaging

Radiographic assessment (lateral view): Three alignment lines: (1) Anterior vertebral line — follows the anterior cortex of the vertebral bodies. (2) Posterior vertebral line — follows the posterior cortex of the vertebral bodies (the anterior border of the spinal canal). (3) Spinolaminar line — connects the spinolaminar junctions. All three should be smooth lordotic curves. Any step-off suggests subluxation or fracture-dislocation. The atlantodental interval (ADI) should be less than 3mm in adults (less than 5mm in children) — increased ADI suggests transverse ligament disruption or odontoid fracture.

Prevertebral soft tissue width: Measured on the lateral radiograph. At C2: should be less than 7mm (or less than one-third of the vertebral body width). At C6: should be less than 21mm (or less than one full vertebral body width). Widening suggests haematoma from fracture, abscess, or retropharyngeal pathology.

Key cervical fractures: (1) Jefferson fracture (C1 burst): best seen on AP open-mouth view — lateral mass overhang more than 7mm combined (Rule of Spence) = transverse ligament disruption. (2) Hangman fracture (C2 pars): bilateral C2 pedicle fractures — often neurologically intact because canal enlarges. (3) Odontoid fractures (Anderson-D'Alonzo): Type I (tip, rare), Type II (base — most common, highest nonunion risk), Type III (extends into C2 body).

CT for cervical clearance: In major trauma, CT has replaced radiographs as the primary imaging modality for cervical spine clearance. CT sensitivity for cervical fractures is approximately 98% (vs 52-85% for radiographs). MRI is added when there is neurological deficit, suspected ligamentous injury, or persistent clinical concern despite normal CT.

Thoracolumbar Spine Fracture Assessment

TLICS (Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score): This scoring system guides management of thoracolumbar fractures based on three components: (1) Morphology: compression (1 point), burst (2 points), translational/rotational (3 points), distraction (4 points). (2) Posterior ligamentous complex (PLC): intact (0), suspected/indeterminate (2 — MRI may clarify), injured (3). (3) Neurological status: intact (0), nerve root (2), cord/conus (incomplete = 3, complete = 2), cauda equina (3). Total: less than 4 = conservative management. Equal to 4 = borderline (surgeon preference). More than 4 = surgical management.

MRI for PLC assessment: The posterior ligamentous complex (supraspinous ligament, interspinous ligament, ligamentum flavum, facet joint capsules) determines spinal stability. MRI signs of PLC disruption: high T2 signal (oedema/fluid) in the interspinous space, facet joint widening, or frank ligament discontinuity. The STIR sequence is most sensitive. PLC disruption converts a potentially stable compression fracture into an unstable injury requiring surgery.

Differentiating acute vs chronic compression fractures: On MRI, acute fractures show bone marrow oedema (bright on STIR/T2, dark on T1). Chronic fractures show fatty marrow reconstitution (bright on T1, dark on STIR). This distinction is critical for: (1) determining fracture acuity in elderly patients (multiple old fractures may coexist with one acute fracture), (2) vertebroplasty candidacy (only acute, painful fractures respond to vertebroplasty).

Evidence Base

Canadian C-Spine Rule vs NEXUS

Prospective Study
Stiell IG, Clement CM, McKnight RD, Brison R, Schull MJ, Rowe BH, Worthington JR, Eisenhauer MA, Cass D, Greenberg G, MacPhail I, Dreyer J, Lee JS, Bandiera G, Reardon M, Holroyd B, Lesiuk H, Wells GA • New England Journal of Medicine (2003)
Key Findings:
  • The Canadian C-Spine Rule (CCR) had higher sensitivity (99.4%) than NEXUS (90.7%) for clinically important cervical spine injury.
  • CCR was more specific (45.1% vs 36.8%), reducing unnecessary imaging more effectively.
  • Both rules were validated for adult blunt trauma patients with GCS 15.
Clinical Implication: Both CCR and NEXUS can be used to clear the cervical spine clinically. CCR is marginally superior but more complex to apply. Either reduces unnecessary imaging.
Limitation: Neither applies to penetrating trauma, GCS less than 15, or children under 16 years.
Source: Stiell IG et al. N Engl J Med 2003;349(26):2510-8

CT vs Radiography for Cervical Spine Clearance

Meta-Analysis
Holmes JF, Akkinepalli R • Journal of Trauma (2005)
Key Findings:
  • CT sensitivity for cervical fractures was 98% compared to 52% for plain radiographs.
  • CT was particularly superior for detecting upper cervical (C1-C2) and cervicothoracic junction (C7-T1) injuries.
  • Cost-effectiveness analysis supported CT as primary imaging for high-risk trauma patients.
Clinical Implication: CT has replaced plain radiographs as the primary imaging modality for cervical spine clearance in major trauma — radiographs miss approximately half of all fractures.
Limitation: CT involves higher radiation dose. Clinical clearance rules should be applied first to avoid unnecessary imaging.
Source: Holmes JF, Akkinepalli R. J Trauma 2005;58(5):902-5

Evidence strongly supports CT over radiographs for cervical spine clearance in major trauma.

MRI for Posterior Ligamentous Complex Assessment

Prospective Study
Vaccaro AR, Lehman RA, Hurlbert RJ, Anderson PA, Harris M, Hedlund R, Harrop J, Dvorak M, Wood K, Fehlings MG, Fisher C, Zeiller SC, Anderson DG, Bono CM, Stock GH, Brown AK, Kuklo T, Oner FC • Spine (2005)
Key Findings:
  • MRI identified PLC injury with sensitivity 93% and specificity 89%.
  • The TLICS scoring system reliably guided surgical decision-making in thoracolumbar trauma.
  • PLC disruption was the strongest predictor of need for surgical stabilisation.
Clinical Implication: MRI should be obtained in thoracolumbar fractures when PLC integrity is uncertain — it directly influences the TLICS score and surgical decision-making.
Limitation: MRI may overestimate PLC injury due to oedema in the interspinous region. Clinical correlation recommended.
Source: Vaccaro AR et al. Spine 2005;30(20):2325-33

MRI Cord Signal Change and Surgical Outcomes

Systematic Review
Tetreault L, Kopjar B, Nouri A, Arnold P, Barbagallo G, Bartels R, Qiang Z, Singh A, Zileli M, Fehlings MG • Spine (2013)
Key Findings:
  • T2 hyperintensity within the spinal cord on MRI (cord signal change) was present in 60% of patients with cervical myelopathy.
  • Cord signal change was associated with worse neurological outcomes after decompressive surgery.
  • Multilevel cord signal change was a particularly poor prognostic indicator.
Clinical Implication: MRI cord signal change indicates myelopathy and predicts poorer surgical outcomes — it supports earlier surgical intervention before irreversible cord damage occurs.
Limitation: Some patients with cord signal change still improve after surgery. T1 hypointensity (indicating gliosis) is a worse prognostic sign than T2 hyperintensity alone.
Source: Tetreault L et al. Spine 2013;38(22 Suppl 1):S104-10

MRI for Acute vs Chronic Compression Fractures

Imaging Study
Yuh WT, Zachar CK, Barloon TJ, Sato Y, Sickels WJ, Hawes DR • Radiology (1989)
Key Findings:
  • STIR MRI distinguished acute from chronic vertebral compression fractures with 97% accuracy.
  • Acute fractures showed high STIR signal (marrow oedema); chronic fractures showed normal signal.
  • This distinction was critical for vertebroplasty candidacy and differentiating osteoporotic collapse from pathological fracture.
Clinical Implication: STIR MRI is essential for determining fracture acuity in vertebral compression fractures — it guides treatment selection and identifies the symptomatic level.
Limitation: Metastatic fractures may also show high STIR signal — clinical context and additional MRI features (pedicle involvement, convex posterior wall, epidural mass) are needed.
Source: Yuh WT et al. Radiology 1989;172(1):215-8

MRI evidence underpins critical spine imaging decisions.

Australian Context

In Australia, spine imaging follows evidence-based guidelines consistent with international practice. CT has replaced plain radiographs as the primary imaging modality for cervical spine clearance in major trauma in Australian emergency departments. The NEXUS criteria and Canadian C-Spine Rule are both taught and applied in Australian practice.

MRI is the standard investigation for disc herniation, spinal stenosis, myelopathy, and suspected infection or metastatic disease. Australian guidelines mandate urgent MRI for suspected cauda equina syndrome, with surgical decompression within 48 hours of symptom onset being the target for best neurological outcomes.

RANZCR provides referral guidelines for spine imaging that are aligned with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) and Spine Society of Australia recommendations. These emphasise appropriate imaging selection based on clinical presentation and red flag assessment.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"A 30-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after a motorcycle accident. He is alert, GCS 15, and complains of neck pain. He has no neurological deficit."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
I would first apply validated clinical decision rules to determine whether imaging is needed, and if so, which modality. Applying the NEXUS criteria (NSAID): (1) Posterior midline cervical tenderness: YES — he has neck pain, so this criterion is positive. Because one NEXUS criterion is positive, I CANNOT clear the cervical spine clinically — imaging is required. For imaging modality selection: Given the high-energy mechanism (motorcycle accident), I would proceed with CT of the cervical spine rather than plain radiographs. The evidence strongly supports CT over radiographs for cervical spine clearance in significant trauma: CT sensitivity is approximately 98% compared to 52% for plain radiographs. CT is particularly superior for the craniocervical junction (C1-C2) and the cervicothoracic junction (C7-T1), which are the most commonly missed fracture locations on radiographs. My systematic CT assessment using ABCD: Alignment: check anterior vertebral line, posterior vertebral line, and spinolaminar line on sagittal reconstructions. Any step-off indicates subluxation. Check atlantodental interval (less than 3mm normal). Bones: trace vertebral body cortices (C1-T1), check pedicles, lateral masses, and facet joints on axial images. Compare bilateral facets for symmetry. Look for burst characteristics (retropulsion of fracture fragment into the canal). Cartilage/Disc: disc space heights, facet joint alignment (perched/locked facets indicate facet dislocation). Dens/Soft tissues: assess the odontoid process for fracture (Anderson-D'Alonzo Type II is most common and most clinically significant). Prevertebral soft tissue thickening may be visible on sagittal CT. If the CT is NORMAL but the patient has persistent significant neck pain or concerning mechanism: I would add MRI to assess ligamentous structures (disc, ALL, PLL, ligamentum flavum, interspinous ligaments). Ligamentous injury can occur without fracture and may cause delayed instability.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Apply NEXUS or CCR first — if any criterion is positive, imaging is required
CT is primary modality for cervical clearance in major trauma (sensitivity 98% vs 52% radiographs)
ABCD systematic assessment: Alignment, Bones, Cartilage/Disc, Dens/Soft tissues
CT is superior for C1-C2 and C7-T1 (the most commonly missed locations on radiographs)
Add MRI if neurological deficit or persistent clinical concern despite normal CT
COMMON TRAPS
✗Using plain radiographs instead of CT for cervical clearance in major trauma
✗Not applying NEXUS or CCR before ordering imaging
✗Not recognising that CT misses ligamentous injury (MRI needed for this)
✗Not including the C7-T1 junction in assessment
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"A 45-year-old woman presents with a 4-week history of progressive bilateral leg weakness, urinary retention, and saddle anaesthesia. Back pain has been present for 6 months."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This presentation is highly concerning for CAUDA EQUINA SYNDROME (CES), which is a surgical emergency. The triad of bilateral leg weakness, urinary retention, and saddle anaesthesia are the cardinal features. In this patient with a 6-month history of back pain, the most likely underlying cause is a large central disc herniation at the L4-L5 or L5-S1 level compressing the cauda equina, though other causes must be considered (tumour, epidural abscess, epidural haematoma). Imaging: URGENT MRI of the lumbar spine is required — ideally within hours. This should NOT be delayed for plain radiographs or any other investigation. The key MRI findings to look for: (1) Sagittal T2: a large central disc protrusion or extrusion compressing the thecal sac at the level of the cauda equina. The degree of thecal sac compression and the number of nerve roots affected are assessed. (2) Axial T2: cross-sectional assessment showing the relationship of the disc material to the nerve roots within the thecal sac. In CES, the thecal sac is significantly compressed or effaced, with nerve roots displaced or compressed. (3) Alternative pathology: if no disc prolapse is found, look for an intradural tumour (ependymoma, neurofibroma), epidural abscess (ring-enhancing collection with contrast), or epidural haematoma (in anticoagulated patients). (4) I would request contrast-enhanced MRI if infection or tumour is in the differential — gadolinium enhances abscesses (ring enhancement), tumours (solid enhancement), and distinguishes these from non-enhancing disc material. Clinical urgency: Once CES is confirmed on MRI, the patient requires emergency surgical decompression. CES with urinary retention (CES-R = retention type) has the worst prognosis. The timing of surgery is critical — decompression within 48 hours of onset of urinary symptoms is associated with better outcomes, though the earlier the better.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
CES is a surgical emergency — triad: bilateral weakness, urinary retention, saddle anaesthesia
URGENT MRI (within hours) — do NOT delay for radiographs
Most common cause: large central disc herniation (L4-5 or L5-S1)
Differential: tumour, epidural abscess, epidural haematoma
Emergency decompression — ideally within 48 hours of urinary symptom onset
COMMON TRAPS
✗Delaying MRI for radiographs or other investigations (CES is time-critical)
✗Not recognising CES as a surgical emergency
✗Not considering alternative diagnoses (tumour, abscess, haematoma)
✗Not knowing the prognostic significance of urinary retention (CES-R)
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

EXAMINER

"An examiner shows you an MRI of the lumbar spine and asks you to describe your systematic assessment."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
I will describe my systematic assessment on sagittal and axial MRI images. First, I confirm the imaging modality and sequences: T1-weighted (anatomical detail, marrow assessment), T2-weighted (disc hydration, canal fluid, cord/conus), STIR (marrow oedema, acute fractures), and axial T2 at each disc level. Sagittal assessment (T1 and T2): (1) Vertebral body alignment: is there any listhesis (antero or retro)? Grade by Meyerding classification (Grade I: 0-25%, Grade II: 25-50%, Grade III: 50-75%, Grade IV: 75-100%). (2) Vertebral body morphology: height loss (acute vs chronic — check STIR for oedema), marrow signal (normal fatty marrow is bright on T1. Abnormal: diffuse low T1 = infiltrative disease, focal low T1 = metastasis). (3) Disc assessment at each level (L1-2 through L5-S1): Normal disc is bright on T2 (hydrated nucleus pulposus). Degenerate disc is dark on T2 (desiccated). Disc protrusion: broad-based extension beyond vertebral margin (less than 25% of the disc circumference). Disc extrusion: the herniating disc material has a narrower neck than its dome. Disc sequestration: separated fragment no longer in contact with the parent disc. (4) Spinal canal diameter: central stenosis is assessed on mid-sagittal images. The dural sac cross-sectional area on axial images is the most reliable measurement (less than 100mm2 = moderate stenosis, less than 75mm2 = severe). (5) Conus medullaris: confirm normal position (terminates at L1-2 in adults). Low-lying conus suggests tethered cord. Conus signal should be normal (no T2 hyperintensity). Axial assessment (at each disc level): (6) Central canal: is the thecal sac compressed? Ligamentum flavum hypertrophy? Facet joint hypertrophy? (7) Lateral recesses: are the traversing nerve roots compressed? (8) Neural foramina: are the exiting nerve roots compressed by disc, osteophyte, or facet hypertrophy? (9) Facet joints: synovial cyst, effusion, hypertrophy. The GRADE of a disc herniation relates to its direction — central, paracentral, foraminal, or far lateral — each compresses different nerve roots.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Sagittal: alignment (listhesis), vertebral bodies (marrow signal), discs (hydration, herniation type), canal diameter, conus position
Axial: central canal, lateral recesses (traversing nerve root), neural foramina (exiting nerve root), facets
Disc terminology: protrusion (broad base), extrusion (narrow neck), sequestration (separated fragment)
STIR: acute marrow oedema (bright) vs chronic (dark) — determines fracture acuity
Less than 100mm2 dural sac area = moderate stenosis, less than 75mm2 = severe stenosis
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not assessing marrow signal on T1 (metastases, infiltrative disease)
✗Confusing disc protrusion with extrusion terminology
✗Not checking the conus position (tethered cord syndrome)
✗Not distinguishing traversing vs exiting nerve root compression on axial images

Spine Imaging — Exam Day Reference

High-Yield Exam Summary

ABCD Systematic Reading

  • •Alignment: 3 smooth lines on lateral (anterior, posterior vertebral, spinolaminar)
  • •Bones: vertebral body height, pedicles (winking owl = metastasis), cortices
  • •Cartilage/Disc: disc space height, facet joints, interspinous distance
  • •Dens/Soft tissues: odontoid fracture, prevertebral width (C2: less than 7mm, C6: less than 21mm)

Red Flags for Urgent MRI (CRAMS)

  • •Cauda equina syndrome (bladder/bowel dysfunction, saddle anaesthesia)
  • •Rapidly progressive neurological deficit
  • •Abscess/infection (fever + back pain + raised inflammatory markers)
  • •Metastatic disease (cancer history + night pain + weight loss)
  • •Spinal cord compression/myelopathy (UMN signs)

Key Cervical Fractures

  • •Jefferson (C1 burst): lateral mass overhang more than 7mm = transverse ligament torn
  • •Hangman (C2 pars): bilateral C2 pedicle fx — often neurologically intact
  • •Odontoid: Type II (base) = highest nonunion risk
  • •ADI more than 3mm (adults) or more than 5mm (children) = transverse ligament disruption

TLICS Score

  • •Morphology: compression(1), burst(2), translational(3), distraction(4)
  • •PLC: intact(0), suspected(2), injured(3)
  • •Neuro: intact(0), root(2), cord incomplete(3), complete(2), cauda equina(3)
  • •Total: less than 4 = conservative, more than 4 = surgical
Quick Stats
Reading Time68 min
🇦🇺

FRACS Guidelines

Australia & New Zealand
  • NHMRC Guidelines
  • MBS Spine Items
Related Topics

Imaging the Knee — Systematic Approach

Imaging the Elbow — Systematic Approach

MRI Imaging Principles

Plain Radiography Principles