Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Inflammatory Arthritis of the Shoulder

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Inflammatory Arthritis of the Shoulder

Comprehensive guide to Rheumatoid Arthritis and other inflammatory conditions of the shoulder - pathology, classification, and surgical management

complete
Updated: 2025-12-21
High Yield Overview

INFLAMMATORY ARTHRITIS (SHOULDER)

Systemic Disease | Central Erosion | Cuff Status Critical

90%Shoulder involvement in RA
25-40%Rotator cuff tear rate in RA
CentralPattern of wear (acetabularization)
BiologicsHave reduced surgical rates

NEER CLASSIFICATION

Dry Stage
PatternSclerosis, osteophytes, loss of joint space (burned out)
TreatmentArthroplasty
Wet Stage
PatternGranulations, marginal erosions, cysts (active synovitis)
TreatmentSynovectomy / Arthroplasty
Resorptive
PatternSevere bone loss, central migration
TreatmentBone graft / Augmented glenoid

Critical Must-Knows

  • Cuff Status is King: Intact cuff = Anatomic TSA; Torn/Dysfunctional cuff = Reverse TSA or Hemi
  • Glenoid Bone Stock: Central erosion (acetabularization) is hallmark; differs from posterior wear in OA
  • Medical Management First: DMARDs and Biologics have revolutionized care; surgery is for failed medical management
  • Perioperative Risks: Infection risk increased (immunosuppression), skin fragility, osteopenia
  • Cervical Spine: Always clear the C-spine (instability) before airway manipulation

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Always check C-spine flexion/extension views before surgery (Atlanto-axial instability)
  • "
    Hemiarthroplasty historically preferred to avoid glenoid loosening ('rocking horse'), but TKA now standard if bone stock allows
  • "
    Reverse TSA is the workhorse for Rotator Cuff Deficient RA shoulders
  • "
    Deltoid function is the last line of defense - protect it!

RA vs OA Differentiation

In Rheumatoid (RA)

Central Erosion: The humeral head migrates centrally into the glenoid ("acetabularization"). Bone is osteopenic. Osteophytes are rare. Rotator cuff often torn or thinned.

In Osteoarthritis (OA)

Posterior Erosion: The head migrates posteriorly (retroversion). Bone is sclerotic. Large osteophytes (Goat's beard). Rotator cuff usually intact.

Surgical Decision Matrix

ScenarioCuff StatusGlenoid BoneKey Treatment
Early RA, synovitisIntactPreservedArthroscopic Synovectomy
End-stage RAIntactAdequateTotal Shoulder Arthroplasty (TSA)
End-stage RATorn/ThinAdequate/ErodedReverse TSA
Severe bone lossAnySevere ErosionHemiarthroplasty or Augmented Glenoid
Mnemonic

EROSIONRA Shoulder Features

E
Erosions (Marginal)
Starting at bare area
R
Rotator Cuff Pathology
High rate of tears (25-50%)
O
Osteopenia
Poor bone stock for fixation
S
Symmetric
Often bilateral involvement
I
Inflammatory
Elevated ESR/CRP, boggy synovium
O
Old (Central) Wear
Acetabularization of glenoid
N
Neck Instability
C-spine involvement (AAI)

Memory Hook:EROSION reminds you of the destructive nature of RA on both bone and soft tissue.

Mnemonic

DRUGSSurgical Risks in RA

D
Disease Modifying Agents
Stop Methotrexate? (controversial, usually continue)
R
Respiratory
Interstitial lung disease, C-spine instability
U
Ulcers/Skin
Fragile skin, poor wound healing
G
Glenoid Loosening
Soft bone led to high failure rates in early TSAs
S
Sepsis
Higher infection risk due to immunosuppression

Memory Hook:DRUGS reminds you of the perioperative medical optimization required.

Mnemonic

WDRNeer Classification (RA)

W
Wet
Active synovitis, granulations, marginal erosions
D
Dry
Burned out, sclerosis, stiff, lost joint space
R
Resorptive
Severe bone destruction, pencil-in-cup

Memory Hook:Wet (active), Dry (burned out), Resorptive (severe) - guides synovectomy vs arthroplasty.

Overview and Epidemiology

Definition

Inflammatory arthritis of the shoulder encompasses a group of systemic conditions (Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, Ankylosing Spondylitis) causing synovial inflammation, cartilage destruction, and periarticular bone erosions. The hallmark is concentric or central glenoid wear and concurrent soft tissue (rotator cuff) destruction.

Epidemiology:

  • Prevalence: 90% of RA patients develop shoulder symptoms.
  • Gender: Female > Male (3:1).
  • Trend: Surgical incidence declining due to effective biologic therapies.
  • Bilateral: Commonly bilateral involvement.

Pathophysiology:

  1. Synovitis: Hypertrophic inflamed synovium (pannus).
  2. Marginal Erosions: Occurs at "bare area" where cartilage doesn't protect bone.
  3. Cartilage Destruction: Proteolytic enzymes released by pannus.
  4. Cuff Attrition: Pannus invades rotator cuff tendons leading to thinning and rupture.
  5. Central Migration: Humeral head erodes centrally into glenoid vault.

Anatomy and Biomechanics

The Target Organ

In RA, the synovium is the primary site of pathology.

  • Normal: Thin, few cell layers.
  • RA: Massive hypertrophy, angiogenesis, pannus formation.
  • Bare Area: The area of bone within the capsule but not covered by cartilage (e.g., surgical neck, glenoid neck) is the site of initial marginal erosions.

This contrasts with OA, where cartilage wear is the primary event.

Cuff Anatomy in RA

The pannus releases enzymes (collagenase, metalloproteinases) that attack the rotator cuff tendons from the undersurface.

  • Supraspinatus: Most commonly affected.
  • Biceps: Often inflamed (tenosynovitis) or ruptured.
  • Integrity: 25-50% of RA patients have full-thickness tears.

Functional Implication: An intact cuff allows concentric rotation. A massive tear leads to cuff tear arthropathy with superior migration/escape.

Classification Systems

Classic description of RA stages:

StageNameFeaturesTreatment
IWetActive synovitis, marginal erosions, osteopeniaMedical / Synovectomy
IIDrySclerosis, cysts, loss of joint space (burned out)Arthroplasty (TSA)
IIIResorptiveSevere bone loss, pencil-in-cup deformityAugmentation / Reverse

This guides the decision between soft tissue procedures (synovectomy) and reconstruction.

Radiographic Grading (0-5):

  • Grade 0: Normal
  • Grade 1: Soft tissue swelling, periarticular osteopenia
  • Grade 2: Minor joint space narrowing, small erosions
  • Grade 3: Moderate narrowing, marked erosions
  • Grade 4: Severe destruction, loss of joint space, deformation
  • Grade 5: Mutilating changes (gross deformity)

Larsen grading helps quantify joint destruction.

Rheumatoid shoulder pre-operative and post-reverse TSA comparison
Click to expand
47-year-old female with rheumatoid arthritis: (A) Preoperative AP showing severe erosive changes with central humeral head migration (acetabularization pattern), osteopenia, and glenoid erosion characteristic of RA. (B) Post-operative reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Demonstrates surgical management for end-stage inflammatory arthritis with rotator cuff deficiency.Credit: Hyun YS et al. via Clin Orthop Surg via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Rice body formation in rheumatoid shoulder arthritis
Click to expand
AP radiograph showing rice body formation in 28-year-old female with rheumatoid arthritis. Multiple small radiopaque intra-articular bodies (arrows) scattered throughout joint space are characteristic of chronic inflammatory arthritis. Also note periarticular erosions and joint space narrowing typical of RA.Credit: Open-i / NIH via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
AC joint involvement in inflammatory arthritis
Click to expand
Bilateral AC joint comparison: (A) Normal right AC joint, (B) Left AC joint showing erosive inflammatory arthropathy with joint space widening (arrow) and bony erosions. Demonstrates AC joint involvement in inflammatory arthritis - important differential point as AC joint typically spared in primary osteoarthritis.Credit: Noh KC et al. via Clin Orthop Surg via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Clinical Assessment

History

  • Morning Stiffness: Lasting over 1 hour typical.
  • Systemic Symptoms: Fatigue, malaise, other joints (hands/feet).
  • Pain: Nocturnal pain common.
  • Function: Often poor due to stiffness + weakness (cuff).

Physical Exam

  • Inspection: Muscle wasting (spinati), swelling (boggy anteriorly).
  • Palpation: Warmth, effusion, tenderness.
  • Cuff Strength: Often weak (pain or tear). Lag signs indicate massive tears.

Cervical Spine

Always examine the neck. 25-80% of RA patients have C-spine involvement. Subluxation can cause radiculopathy mimicking shoulder pain, or myelopathy.

Thorough neck exam is mandatory.

Radiographs (Trauma Series)

  • AP/Grashey/Axiliary Lateral.
  • Findings:
    • Periarticular osteopenia (washed out).
    • Marginal erosions.
    • Symmetric joint space narrowing.
    • Central migration of head (acetabularization).
    • High riding head: Indicates massive cuff tear.

CT and MRI

  • CT Scan: Essential for glenoid bone stock (central erosion).
  • MRI: Essential for Rotator Cuff integrity (CRITICAL for implant choice).

These guide the choice between Anatomic and Reverse TSA.

Investigations

Diagnostic Workup

Step 1Laboratories

ESR, CRP: Markers of active inflammation. RF, anti-CCP: specific for RA. CBC: Check for anemia of chronic disease or leukopenia (Felty's).

Step 2Pre-op Planning

CT Scan: define glenoid version and bone stock. MRI: define cuff status.

Step 3Medical Optimization

C-Spine Flex/Ext X-rays: Rule out AAI. Cardiac: risk stratification. Meds: Review DMARDs schedule with Rheumatologist.

Synovial Fluid Analysis:

  • If diagnosis unclear or infection suspected (septic arthritis).
  • RA Fluid: WBC 2,000-50,000 (inflammatory), Cloudy, Low viscosity, Glucose low.

Management Algorithm

Medical Management

  • Pharmacotherapy: NSAIDs, DMARDs (Methotrexate), Biologics (TNF-alpha inhibitors).
  • Physical Therapy: Gentle ROM, avoid aggressive strengthening if cuff fragile.
  • Injections: Corticosteroid (limited use - risk of infection/cuff atrophy).

Preop Meds

Methotrexate can typically be continued perioperatively. Biologics are usually held for 1 dosing cycle before surgery to reduce infection risk. Check local guidelines.

Regular monitoring required.

Arthroscopic Synovectomy

  • Indication: "Wet" stage (active synovitis) with preserved joint space and intact cuff.
  • Goal: Reduce pain, slow enzymatic destruction.
  • Outcome: Good pain relief in 70-80% short term.

Does not stop long-term progression.

Arthroplasty Options

1. Hemiarthroplasty

  • Indications: Severe glenoid bone loss, cuff tear arthropathy (historical).
  • Cons: Pain relief less reliable (metal on eroded bone).

2. Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (TSA)

  • Indications: Intact rotator cuff + adequate glenoid bone stock.
  • Outcomes: Superior pain relief to Hemi.

3. Reverse TSA (rTSA)

  • Indications: Rotator Cuff Tear, severe glenoid erosion, elderly.
  • Trend: Becoming standard for many RA shoulders.

Implant choice depends on cuff and bone.

Surgical options for inflammatory shoulder arthritis
Click to expand
Progression of surgical treatment options: (A) Pre-operative erosive arthropathy with loss of joint space, (B) Hemiarthroplasty showing humeral component only (historical option for poor glenoid bone stock), (C) Total shoulder arthroplasty with glenoid component (modern standard if bone stock adequate). Illustrates evolution of surgical management in inflammatory arthritis.Credit: Killian ML et al. via Arthritis Res. Ther. via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Surgical Technique (Key Points)

Anatomic TSA in RA

  • Exposure: Deltopectoral approach. Handle soft tissues gently (fragile).
  • Subscapularis: Often thin/friable. careful takedown and repair.
  • Glenoid:
    • Central wear: May need to ream eccentrically or use augmented component.
    • Fixation: Pegged ingrowth components preferred over cemented (better bone preservation).

Careful soft tissue handling.

Reverse TSA in RA

  • Exposure: Deltopectoral.
  • Glenoid Prep:
    • If central erosion is severe, need to medialize the reaming or use bone graft.
    • Long peg baseplates for osteopenic bone.
  • Humeral Prep:
    • Cementing stem often required if "stove-pipe" humerus.

Deltoid tension is key.

Complications

ComplicationRisk in RAReasonManagement
InfectionHighImmunosuppression, skin fragilityDebridement, antibiotics, explant
Glenoid LooseningModerateOsteopenia, eccentric reamingRevision to Reverse / Bone graft
Periprosthetic #HighCortical thinning (disuse/steroids)ORIF vs Stem revision
Cuff FailureHighProgressive diseaseRevision to Reverse

The 'Rocking Horse' Glenoid

In anatomic TSA, if the rotator cuff is unbalanced or fails, the humeral head migrates superiorly and eccentrically loads the superior rim of the glenoid component. This cyclic "rocking" leads to early loosening.

Postoperative Care

Rehabilitation Protocol:

  • Phase 1 (0-6 weeks): Sling. Passive ROM only (protect Subscap repair). Pendulums.
  • Phase 2 (6-12 weeks): Active assistive ROM. AAROM pulleys.
  • Phase 3 (3-6 months): Active ROM. Gentle strengthening.
  • Phase 4 (6+ months): Full activity.

Specific Considerations in RA:

  • Slower healing: Soft tissue repairs (subscap) take longer.
  • Osteopenia: Avoid aggressive passive stretching (fracture risk).
  • Skin: Care with dressings/tape (tears).

Outcomes and Prognosis

Pain Relief:

  • Arthroplasty (TSA or Reverse) provides excellent pain relief (over 90%) in RA.
  • Function is less predictable than in OA, due to muscles/cuff.

Implant Survival:

  • Anatomic TSA: 90% at 10 years, but accelerated glenoid loosening (radiographic lucency common).
  • Reverse TSA: 85-90% at 10 years. Complication rate slightly higher.
  • Hemi: Lower satisfaction, ongoing glenoid pain.

Summary: Surgery significantly improves Quality of Life, but complication rates (infection, fracture) are higher than in OA.

Evidence Base

Outcomes of TSA in RA

4
Sperling JW, Cofield RH, et al • J Bone Joint Surg Am (2002)
Key Findings:
  • Long term follow up of TSA in RA
  • 93% pain relief
  • High rate of glenoid lucency (loosening) over time
  • Cuff integrity was key predictor of survival
Clinical Implication: TSA provides excellent pain relief in RA, but glenoid loosening is a long-term concern. Cuff status determines longevity.

Reverse TSA for RA

4
Young AA, Walch G, et al • J Bone Joint Surg Am (2011)
Key Findings:
  • Study of Reverse TSA in RA patients
  • Excellent functional outcomes regardless of cuff status
  • Lower revision rate compared to Hemi in cuff-deficient shoulders
  • Infection rate slightly higher than OA
Clinical Implication: Reverse TSA is a reliable option for RA, especially with cuff dysfunction, offering functionality predictable pain relief.

Hemi vs TSA in RA

2
Gartsman GM, et al • J Shoulder Elbow Surg (2000)
Key Findings:
  • Prospective comparison
  • TSA had significantly better pain relief and ROM than Hemi
  • Hemiarthroplasty led to progressive glenoid erosion
Clinical Implication: If the glenoid bone stock and cuff are adequate, Total Shoulder Arthroplasty poses superior functional results to Hemiarthroplasty.

Central Migration Pattern

5
Levigne C, Boileau P • Orthop Clin North Am (2000)
Key Findings:
  • Described 'acetabularization' of the glenoid
  • Contrast with 'posterior wear' of OA
  • Implications for reaming: Central reaming requires care not to breach medial wall
Clinical Implication: Recognizing the central erosion pattern is critical for surgical planning to avoid medial wall penetration during reaming.

Biologics and Surgery

3
Giles JT, et al • Arthritis Rheum (2010)
Key Findings:
  • Risk of infection with TNF inhibitors
  • recommend stopping 1-2 dosing cycles pre-op
  • Restart after wound healing (14 days)
Clinical Implication: Perioperative management of biologics requires careful coordination to balance infection risk vs disease flare.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Early Disease

EXAMINER

"A 45-year-old female with known RA presents with increasing shoulder pain. She is on Methotrexate. X-rays show symmetric joint space narrowing but spherical head. Cuff is 5/5 strength. Management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient has 'Wet Stage' or early RA. Initial management is nonsurgical: maximize medical therapy with her rheumatologist, consider biologics, and gentle PT. If she fails this and has persistent synovitis, I would offer Arthroscopic Synovectomy. This provides pain relief and may slow progression. I would not offer arthroplasty at this young age with preserved bone stock.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Optimize medical management first
Synovectomy for active synovitis with preserved joint
Avoid arthroplasty in young if possible
COMMON TRAPS
✗Offering replacement too early
✗Ignoring medical optimization
✗Injection risks
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How does Methotrexate affect your surgical planning?"
"What findings on MRI would suggest synovectomy is useful?"
"When is Hemiarthroplasty indicated?"
"What are the risks of arthroscopy in RA?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 2: Advanced Disease, Intact Cuff

EXAMINER

"A 65-year-old RA patient has severe glenohumeral pain. X-rays show destruction of joint space and central erosion. MRI shows the Rotator Cuff is INTACT. Options?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
With end-stage arthritis and an intact rotator cuff, the gold standard is Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. This provides better pain relief than Hemi. I would carefully assess the glenoid bone stock on CT scan to ensure I can seat a component. If bone is too poor ('Resorptive' stage), I might consider an augmented component or Hemiarthroplasty, but TSA is preferred.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Intact Cuff = Anatomic TSA
Better outcomes than Hemi
CT scan to assess central erosion
COMMON TRAPS
✗Using Reverse TSA for intact cuff (technically possible but Anatomic is better for ROM)
✗Hemiarthroplasty as first line (inferior pain relief)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How do you manage the subscapularis in RA?"
"What is the infection risk?"
"Describe the glenoid wear pattern."
"What if the posterior cuff is fatty infiltrated?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 3: Cuff Tear Arthropathy

EXAMINER

"A 70-year-old with RA has a painful, pseudoparalyzed shoulder. Unable to lift arm over 45 degrees. X-rays show high riding humeral head and severe arthritis. Plan?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient has RA with secondary Cuff Tear Arthropathy (or massive cuff tear). Anatomic TSA is contraindicated due to the risk of glenoid loosening (rocking horse). Hemiarthroplasty would relive pain but not restore function (pseudoparalysis). The best option is a Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (rTSA). This tensions the deltoid to restore elevation and provides a stable fulcrum.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Cuff deficient = Reverse TSA
Anatomic TSA contraindicated (loosening risk)
Hemiarthroplasty won't fix function
COMMON TRAPS
✗Proposing Anatomic TSA
✗Offering Cuff Repair (won't heal in RA milieu)
✗Forgetting to check Deltoid function
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if the Axillary nerve is damaged?"
"How does rTSA work biomechanically?"
"What are the complications of rTSA?"
"How do you handle severe glenoid erosion?"

MCQ Practice Points

Question 1

Q: What is the most common pattern of glenoid wear in Rheumatoid Arthritis? A. Posterior wear (Retroversion) B. Superior wear C. Central wear (Medialization) D. Anterior wear Answer: C. RA causes central erosion/acetabularization. OA causes posterior wear (B2 glenoid).

Question 2

Q: Which medication is typically held for 1-2 dosing cycles prior to arthroplasty? A. Methotrexate B. TNF-alpha inhibitors (e.g., Adalimumab) C. Prednisone D. Sulfasalazine Answer: B. Biologics are held to reduce infection risk. Methotrexate is typically continued.

Question 3

Q: In an RA patient with end-stage arthritis and a massive rotator cuff tear, the best surgical option is: A. Arthroscopic Debridement B. Hemiarthroplasty C. Anatomic TSA D. Reverse TSA Answer: D. Anatomic TSA will loosen (rocking horse). Hemi won't restore function. Reverse TSA addresses both arthritis and cuff deficiency.

Question 4

Q: Pre-operative evaluation of the RA patient for shoulder surgery MUST include: A. EMG B. Cervical Spine X-rays (Flexion/Extension) C. Bone Scan D. Angiogram Answer: B. Atlanto-axial instability is common and poses a lethal risk during intubation/positioning.

Question 5

Q: The presence of a 'High Riding' humeral head on X-ray indicates: A. Deltoid atrophy B. Rotator Cuff Incompetence C. Axillary nerve palsy D. Posterior dislocation Answer: B. Unopposed deltoid pull migrates the head superiorly when the supraspinatus is torn.

Question 6

Q: Which of the following is a contraindication to unconstrained (Anatomic) TSA? A. Advanced age B. Deficient Rotator Cuff C. Central glenoid wear D. Previous synovectomy Answer: B. Anatomic TSA requires an intact cuff to center the head. Without it, the "rocking horse" effect loosens the glenoid.

Australian Context

PBS and Biologics:

  • Australia has strict criteria (PBS) for biologic DMARDs.
  • Patients failing conventional DMARDs (Methotrexate) are eligible.
  • This has significantly reduced the rate of synovectomies and early arthroplasties seen in Australian hospitals compared to historical data.

Joint Registry (AOANJRR):

  • Shows Reverse TSA usage is increasing exponentially, including for inflammatory arthritis.
  • Revision rates for TSA in RA are slightly higher than for OA, primarily due to infection and soft tissue failure.

Referral Pathways:

  • Rheumatology and Orthopaedics often co-manage.
  • "Combined Clinics" common in major public hospitals (e.g., Royal Adelaide, Alfred, Royal North Shore).

Inflammatory Arthritis

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Concepts

  • •Pathology is Synovitis leads to Pannus leads to Cartilage/Bone Destruction
  • •Central Migration (Acetabularization) is hallmark
  • •Rotator Cuff status determines implant choice (TSA vs Reverse)
  • •Biologics have revolutionized care (fewer surgeries)

Clinical Pearls

  • •Check the Neck! (C-spine instability)
  • •Skin is fragile - handle with care
  • •Infection risk is higher (immunosuppressed)
  • •Bone is osteopenic - avoid aggressive reaming

Surgical Rules

  • •Intact Cuff leads to Anatomic TSA
  • •Torn Cuff leads to Reverse TSA
  • •Active Synovitis (early) leads to Synovectomy
  • •Hold Biologics perioperatively

Complications to Quote

  • •Infection (higher than OA)
  • •Glenoid Loosening (Rocking Horse)
  • •Periprosthetic Fracture
  • •Cuff Failure (if Anatomic done)
Quick Stats
Reading Time59 min
🇦🇺

FRACS Guidelines

Australia & New Zealand
  • AOANJRR Shoulder Registry
  • MBS Shoulder Items
Related Topics

Massive Rotator Cuff Tears

Proximal Biceps Ruptures

ALPSA Lesions

Axillary Nerve Anatomy