MASSIVE ROTATOR CUFF TEARS
Greater than 5cm | 2+ Tendons | Fatty Infiltration
Classification
Critical Must-Knows
- Massive tear = greater than 5cm or 2+ tendons completely torn
- Goutallier Grade 3-4 fatty infiltration = poor repair outcomes
- Pseudoparalysis = inability to actively elevate arm
- Repair if possible, otherwise tendon transfer, SCR, or RSA
- Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for CTA (cuff tear arthropathy)
Examiner's Pearls
- "Irreparable does not mean inoperable
- "Subscapularis preservation important for function
- "Superior capsular reconstruction emerging option
- "RSA converts deltoid to primary mover
Critical Massive RCT Exam Points
Definition
Greater than 5cm tear OR 2+ complete tendon tears. Assessment: MRI for size, retraction, muscle quality. Goutallier grading of fatty infiltration.
Fatty Infiltration
Goutallier Classification (CT/MRI): Grade 0-4. Grades 3-4 (muscle less than fat) predict poor outcomes after repair. Irreversible. May preclude repair.
Pseudoparalysis
Cannot actively elevate arm. Indicates loss of force couple. May still have passive motion. Indicates need for RSA rather than repair alone.
Options
Repair (if reducible, muscle quality acceptable). Partial repair. Tendon transfer (lat dorsi, lower trap). SCR (superior capsular reconstruction). RSA (cuff tear arthropathy).
0-4Goutallier Classification
Memory Hook:Goutallier 3-4 = poor repair outcome, consider alternatives!
Overview and Assessment
Massive rotator cuff tears are defined as tears greater than 5cm in size or involving 2 or more complete tendon ruptures. These present unique challenges for treatment.
Assessment
MRI: Tear size, retraction, tendon involvement. Muscle quality (Goutallier grade).
Goutallier Classification:
- Grade 0: Normal
- Grade 1: Fatty streaks
- Grade 2: Fat less than muscle
- Grade 3: Fat = muscle
- Grade 4: Fat greater than muscle
Grade 3-4 has poor prognosis for repair (muscle cannot recover).
Tangent Sign: Supraspinatus muscle atrophy (does not reach tangent line on scapular spine).
Pathophysiology
Progressive Tear Enlargement
- Mechanical failure cascade: Initial tear increases stress on remaining tendon
- Stress concentration: Adjacent tendon margins bear increased load
- Tear propagation: Anterior-to-posterior or medial progression common
- Critical size threshold: Tears greater than 3cm have higher progression rates
Muscle Changes
Retraction:
- Tendon retracts medially after rupture
- Static retraction indicates chronic irreducible tear
- Retraction beyond glenoid rim = poor repair outcome
Fatty Infiltration (Steatosis):
- Occurs within 3-6 months of complete tear
- Progressive and IRREVERSIBLE
- Goutallier Grade 3-4 fatty changes preclude successful repair
- Muscle replaced by fat cannot regenerate contractile function
Muscle Atrophy:
- Cross-sectional area decreases with disuse
- Tangent sign positive when supraspinatus atrophied
- Atrophy partially reversible if repaired early; fatty infiltration is not
Biomechanical Consequences
- Force couple disruption: Loss of balanced compression of humeral head
- Superior migration: Unopposed deltoid pull causes humeral head ascent
- Acetabularization: Erosion of undersurface of acromion (cuff tear arthropathy)
- Femoralization: Humeral head becomes smooth, rounded (loss of greater tuberosity)
Exam Pearl
Key Distinction: Muscle atrophy may partially recover after repair, but fatty infiltration (Goutallier 3-4) is irreversible. This is why timing of repair matters.
Clinical Presentation
History
Weakness with overhead activities. May have history of acute on chronic pain. Difficulty sleeping on side. Progressive loss of function.
Examination
Pseudoparalysis: Cannot actively elevate arm (often less than 90°). Indicates loss of force couple.
Horn-blower's Sign: Cannot externally rotate in abduction (infraspinatus/teres minor dysfunction).
External Rotation Lag Sign: Cannot maintain externally rotated position (posterior cuff failure).
Belly Press Test: Cannot maintain hand pressure on belly (subscapularis).
Investigations
Imaging
Plain Radiographs:
- AP, axillary lateral, scapular Y views
- Acromiohumeral interval (AHI): Less than 7mm suggests massive tear with superior migration
- Acetabularization: Concave erosion of undersurface of acromion
- Femoralization: Smooth, rounded humeral head
- Glenohumeral arthritis: Suggests cuff tear arthropathy
MRI (Gold Standard):
- Tear size measurement in coronal and sagittal planes
- Tendon retraction (medial to glenoid = poor prognosis)
- Fatty infiltration grading (Goutallier):
- Grade 0: No fat
- Grade 1: Fatty streaks
- Grade 2: Fat less than muscle
- Grade 3: Fat equals muscle
- Grade 4: Fat greater than muscle
- Tangent sign: Positive when supraspinatus does not reach scapular spine tangent (atrophy)
- Occupation ratio: Less than 50% suggests significant atrophy
CT Arthrography:
- Alternative if MRI contraindicated
- Excellent for bone detail
- Can assess fatty infiltration
Classification Schemes
| Classification | Components | Clinical Use |
|---|---|---|
| Patte (retraction) | Stage 1-3 | Predicts reducibility |
| Goutallier (fatty) | Grade 0-4 | Repair outcomes |
| Hamada (CTA) | Grade 1-5 | Arthroplasty planning |
| Warner (tear pattern) | Crescent, U, L | Repair technique selection |
Management

Criteria for Repair:
- Tear that can be reduced to footprint (not statically retracted)
- Acceptable muscle quality (Goutallier 0-2)
- No or minimal arthrosis
Technique: Arthroscopic or open. Double-row/transosseous equivalent for stronger fixation. May need margin convergence, releases.
Partial Repair: If cannot fully close, partial repair still beneficial (biomechanically restore force couples).
Augmentation: Patches (synthetic or biologic) may be used.
Complications
Repair Complications
| Complication | Incidence | Management |
|---|---|---|
| Re-tear | 30-60% in massive tears | Often still functionally better; consider revision or salvage |
| Stiffness | 5-15% | Aggressive rehab; may need MUA or lysis |
| Infection | 1-2% | Debridement, antibiotics |
| Deltoid detachment | 1-2% (open repair) | Repair; may cause significant weakness |
| Nerve injury | Less than 1% | Axillary, suprascapular at risk |
Tendon Transfer Complications
- Failure of transfer healing: Especially latissimus dorsi
- Nerve injury: Thoracodorsal (lat dorsi), spinal accessory (trapezius)
- Persistent weakness: Transfer may not fully restore function
- Loss of donor function: Rarely clinically significant
RSA (Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty) Complications
| Complication | Incidence | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Scapular notching | 30-50% | Mechanical erosion of scapular neck; usually Grade 1-2 |
| Instability | 2-5% | Especially if prior surgery |
| Infection | 1-3% | Propionibacterium acnes common |
| Acromial fracture | 3-7% | Due to increased deltoid tension |
| Baseplate loosening | 1-5% | More common with osteoporosis |
| Hematoma | 2-5% | Dead space in massive RCT |
Exam Pearl
Re-tear Rates: Massive rotator cuff repairs have 30-60% structural failure rates, but patients often have functional improvement despite re-tear due to improved force couples and scar tissue support.
Evidence Base
- Described fatty infiltration classification
- Grade 3-4 = poor repair outcomes
- Muscle does not recover after repair
- Foundation for surgical planning
- Superior capsular reconstruction technique
- Biomechanical restoration of force couples
- Improved elevation with SCR
- Alternative to RSA in younger patients
Exam Viva Scenarios
Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination
Scenario 1: Massive RCT
"A 68-year-old man cannot lift his arm. MRI shows complete supraspinatus and infraspinatus tears with Goutallier Grade 4 fatty infiltration. How do you manage him?"
Scenario 2: Borderline Reparability in Younger Patient - Repair vs Non-Repair Options Decision-Making
"You are seeing a 52-year-old male carpenter in your shoulder clinic who has been referred by his GP for management of a chronic rotator cuff tear. He initially injured his shoulder 18 months ago when he fell off a ladder at work and has had progressive weakness since then. He has failed 6 months of comprehensive physiotherapy and now has significant functional limitations - he cannot perform overhead work and is at risk of losing his job. On examination, he has weakness of forward elevation (active elevation to 110 degrees only), positive external rotation lag sign, and positive hornblower's sign. He has full passive range of motion. There is no significant glenohumeral arthritis on palpation. You review the MRI report which states: 'Complete full-thickness tear of supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons. Tear measures 6cm in anteroposterior dimension. Moderate retraction to level of glenoid margin. Subscapularis appears intact. Goutallier grading: Supraspinatus Grade 3 (fat equals muscle), Infraspinatus Grade 2 (fat less than muscle). Tangent sign positive for supraspinatus (atrophy present). No significant glenohumeral arthritis identified.' His plain radiographs show preserved joint space with an acromiohumeral interval of 6mm (borderline). He asks: (1) Can this tear be repaired? (2) What are my options if it can't be repaired? (3) I'm only 52 and still need to work - what would give me the best chance of getting back to work?"
Scenario 3: Failed Massive RCT Repair with Complex Salvage Decision - Revision, Tendon Transfer, or Arthroplasty?
"You are seeing a 58-year-old female administrative manager in your complex shoulder reconstruction clinic for a second opinion. She underwent arthroscopic repair of a massive rotator cuff tear (supraspinatus and infraspinatus) 14 months ago performed by another surgeon. The operative report describes: 'Arthroscopic double-row repair of massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tear. Supraspinatus and infraspinatus mobilized and repaired to footprint with medial row and lateral row anchors. Margin convergence performed to reduce tension. Subscapularis intact.' Post-operatively, she initially improved for about 3-4 months with physiotherapy. However, her symptoms have gradually returned over the past 6 months. She now has significant pain with overhead activities and progressive weakness. She cannot reach overhead to get items from high cupboards and has difficulty washing her hair. On examination today: Active forward elevation 95 degrees (passive 160 degrees), positive external rotation lag sign, positive hornblower's sign, negative belly press test (subscapularis still intact), no significant glenohumeral tenderness. You review her post-operative MRI (performed at 12 months when symptoms returned) which reports: 'Post-surgical changes with anchor artifacts. Complete re-tear of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus repairs with retraction to the level of the glenoid. Marked progression of fatty infiltration since pre-operative imaging - now Goutallier Grade 3-4 in both supraspinatus and infraspinatus. Subscapularis remains intact. No significant glenohumeral joint arthritis. Acromiohumeral interval 7mm (borderline).' Her plain radiographs show: 'Post-surgical changes including subacromial decompression. Humeral head centered with no superior migration. Acromiohumeral interval preserved at 7mm. No glenohumeral arthritis. No hardware complications.' She is very frustrated and asks: (1) Why did my repair fail? (2) What are my options now? (3) Can you redo the repair? (4) I've read about tendon transfers and reverse shoulder replacement - which is right for me?"
MASSIVE ROTATOR CUFF TEARS
High-Yield Exam Summary
Definition
- •Greater than 5cm tear
- •OR 2+ complete tendon tears
- •Assess size, retraction, muscle quality
Goutallier (Fatty Infiltration)
- •0-2: May repair
- •3: Muscle = fat (borderline)
- •4: Fat greater than muscle (irreparable)
Treatment Options
- •Repair if reducible, good muscle
- •Tendon transfer (lat dorsi, trap)
- •SCR (younger, no arthritis)
- •RSA (CTA, pseudoparalysis)
Key Concepts
- •Pseudoparalysis = loss of force couple
- •CTA = irreparable + arthritis
- •RSA converts deltoid to mover
Australian Context
Massive Rotator Cuff Tears in Australian Practice
Massive rotator cuff tears represent a significant clinical challenge in Australian orthopaedic and shoulder surgery practice, affecting an estimated 4-6% of the general population over age 60, with higher prevalence in manual laborers and overhead workers (tradespersons, painters, electricians). The condition has important implications for work capacity and disability in Australia's aging workforce, particularly as the retirement age extends and older workers remain in physically demanding occupations longer. Massive tears are more common in males (2:1 ratio) and are frequently associated with workplace injury claims under WorkCover schemes, though many patients present with chronic degenerative tears without a clear traumatic event.
In the Australian public hospital system, management of massive rotator cuff tears varies significantly between metropolitan tertiary centres and regional hospitals. Major shoulder surgery units in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth, and Adelaide offer the full spectrum of treatment options including arthroscopic repair attempts, margin convergence techniques, superior capsular reconstruction (SCR), latissimus dorsi transfers, and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). However, these advanced techniques require specialized shoulder surgeons and equipment - SCR requires dermal allograft (expensive, limited availability) or autograft fascia lata, while RSA requires specific implant systems and surgical expertise. Regional and rural patients with massive tears often require referral to tertiary centres, with waiting times in the public system potentially 6-12 months for non-urgent cases, during which tears may progress and muscle quality deteriorate (fatty infiltration advancing from Goutallier 2 to 3-4, making repair less likely to succeed).
From a RACS training perspective, massive rotator cuff tears are heavily emphasized in both written and clinical examinations. Trainees must demonstrate systematic assessment: history (duration, trauma vs degenerative, functional limitations, pseudoparalysis), examination (lag signs, external rotation strength, subscapularis function), and imaging interpretation (MRI assessment of tear size, retraction, Goutallier grading of fatty infiltration, presence of arthritis). The decision-making algorithm is critical exam content: attempt repair if tear is reducible to footprint and muscle quality acceptable (Goutallier 0-2), consider SCR or tendon transfer if irreparable but no arthritis and younger patient (less than 65-70), proceed to RSA if cuff tear arthropathy present or pseudoparalysis in older patient (greater than 70). The Goutallier classification (Grades 0-4 based on ratio of fat to muscle on sagittal MRI) is essential knowledge - Grade 3 (equal fat and muscle) is the critical threshold where repair outcomes decline significantly, and Grade 4 (more fat than muscle) predicts repair failure.
The emergence of reverse shoulder arthroplasty over the past 15 years has revolutionized treatment of massive irreparable tears in Australia, particularly for cuff tear arthropathy and pseudoparalysis in older patients. RSA converts the deltoid into the primary shoulder elevator (reversing the ball-socket relationship, medializing and distalizing the center of rotation), allowing functional arm elevation even without a functioning rotator cuff. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) data shows increasing utilization of RSA for rotator cuff arthropathy (now comprising approximately 40% of all shoulder arthroplasties performed in Australia), with 10-year survival rates of 85-90% comparable to international data. However, RSA is not without complications - instability (5-10%), scapular notching (30-40% radiographically, usually asymptomatic), infection (2-3%), and mechanical complications (loosening, fracture) - and is generally reserved for patients over 65-70 years given concerns about long-term implant survival and revision options in younger patients.
WorkCover and compensation considerations are particularly relevant for massive rotator cuff tears in the Australian context. Many patients sustain acute-on-chronic tears during manual work (lifting, overhead activities) and seek compensation for surgery and lost income. Determining work-relatedness versus pre-existing degenerative disease is often contentious - the presence of Goutallier Grade 3-4 fatty infiltration on initial MRI indicates chronic muscle atrophy predating any acute event, which may complicate compensation claims. Surgeons must provide detailed functional capacity evaluations for WorkCover insurers, including specific limitations (no overhead work, lifting restrictions, no repetitive shoulder use) and return-to-work timelines. The medicolegal implications are significant - failure to properly assess muscle quality and offer appropriate treatment (attempting repair of irreparable tear with Goutallier 4 changes, or conversely denying surgery to a patient who would benefit from RSA) can result in poor outcomes and potential negligence claims.
Treatment Algorithm Based on Patient Factors
Fatty Infiltration Predicts Repair Outcome
- Goutallier classification: Grades 0-4 based on fat/muscle ratio on CT (now MRI)
- Grade 0: Normal muscle, Grade 1: Fatty streaks, Grade 2: Less fat than muscle
- Grade 3: Equal fat and muscle (critical threshold), Grade 4: More fat than muscle
- Fatty infiltration is IRREVERSIBLE even after successful tendon repair
- Grade 3-4 predicts poor functional outcomes after rotator cuff repair
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Cuff Tear Arthropathy
- Original Grammont design: Medialized center of rotation, hemispheric glenosphere
- Converts deltoid to primary shoulder elevator (no cuff needed)
- Indications: CTA with pseudoparalysis, massive irreparable tears age greater than 70
- Reliable pain relief (90%) and functional elevation (80% achieve 90°+)
- Complications: Instability 5-10%, scapular notching 30-40%, infection 2-3%
Superior Capsular Reconstruction for Irreparable Tears
- SCR uses dermal allograft or fascia lata autograft to reconstruct superior capsule
- Restores superior stability, prevents superior migration of humeral head
- Indications: Irreparable posterosuperior tears, age less than 70, no arthritis
- Results: Pain improvement 70-80%, modest strength gains, preserves joint
- Complications: Graft failure 10-20%, limited outcomes if Goutallier Grade 3-4
Massive Rotator Cuff Tear Quick Reference
High-Yield Exam Summary
Definition
- •Greater than 5cm tear
- •OR 2+ complete tendons
- •Assess size, retraction, muscle quality
Goutallier (Fatty Infiltration)
- •0-2: May repair
- •3: Muscle = fat (borderline)
- •4: Fat greater than muscle (irreparable)
Treatment Options
- •Repair if reducible, good muscle
- •Tendon transfer (lat dorsi, trap)
- •SCR (younger, no arthritis)
- •RSA (CTA, pseudoparalysis)
Key Concepts
- •Pseudoparalysis = loss of force couple
- •CTA = irreparable + arthritis
- •RSA converts deltoid to mover