Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Internal Impingement of the Shoulder

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Internal Impingement of the Shoulder

Comprehensive guide to internal impingement - posterosuperior labrum and rotator cuff contact in ABER position, GIRD, throwing athletes, and surgical management for orthopaedic exam

complete
Updated: 2024-12-17
High Yield Overview

INTERNAL IMPINGEMENT - OVERHEAD ATHLETE SYNDROME

Posterosuperior Labrum Contact in ABER | GIRD Essential Sign | Posterior Capsule Stretching First-Line

ABERPosition of impingement (Abduction-External Rotation)
GIRDGlenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit (diagnostic)
90%Throwing athletes affected
25°GIRD threshold for concern

KEY PATHOPHYSIOLOGY STAGES

Stage 1: Adaptive
PatternPosterior capsule tightness, GIRD present
TreatmentStretching, rehab
Stage 2: Contact
PatternPosterosuperior labrum fraying, partial-thickness cuff tears
TreatmentArthroscopic debridement
Stage 3: Failure
PatternFull-thickness cuff tear, labral detachment
TreatmentRepair if symptomatic

Critical Must-Knows

  • Internal impingement is contact between posterosuperior rotator cuff and posterosuperior labrum in ABER position
  • GIRD (glenohumeral internal rotation deficit) is the hallmark clinical finding - side-to-side difference greater than 20-25 degrees
  • SICK scapula (Scapular malposition, Inferior medial border prominence, Coracoid pain, dysKinesis) commonly coexists
  • Conservative treatment first - posterior capsule stretching and scapular stabilization for 3-6 months
  • Arthroscopic debridement only after failed conservative care - debride labrum/cuff, consider posterior capsular release

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Internal impingement is a normal contact phenomenon exaggerated in throwers
  • "
    GIRD is caused by posterior capsule contracture from repetitive throwing
  • "
    Distinguish from external impingement (subacromial) - different pathology
  • "
    Return to throwing requires extensive rehab - 6-12 months typical

Clinical Imaging

MRI arthrogram and arthroscopic correlation of labral pathology
Click to expand
MRI-arthroscopy correlation: (A) Axial MRI arthrogram showing labral pathology with contrast enhancement and arrows indicating anterior capsulolabral complex, (B-C) Arthroscopic views demonstrating labral and capsular pathology. Illustrates diagnostic imaging correlated with surgical findings in shoulder pathology.Credit: Open-i / NIH via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
MRI and arthroscopic correlation of rotator cuff and labral pathology
Click to expand
MRI-arthroscopy correlation: (A) Coronal MRI showing rotator cuff and glenohumeral joint anatomy, (B) Arthroscopic view of glenohumeral joint with instruments showing labral and cuff pathology. Demonstrates correlation between preoperative imaging and intraoperative findings.Credit: Open-i / NIH via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Critical Internal Impingement Exam Points

GIRD is Diagnostic

Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit is the key physical finding. Measure internal rotation at 90 degrees abduction. Side-to-side difference greater than 20-25 degrees indicates pathologic GIRD requiring treatment.

Contact Not Pathologic

Internal impingement is a normal phenomenon in overhead athletes. Contact between posterosuperior cuff and labrum occurs in all shoulders in ABER. It only becomes pathologic when excessive due to GIRD and capsular imbalance.

Conservative First

Non-operative management is first-line for at least 3-6 months. Posterior capsule stretching (sleeper stretch, cross-body adduction) and scapular stabilization are highly effective. Most athletes return to sport without surgery.

SICK Scapula Association

SICK scapula commonly coexists - Scapular malposition, Inferior medial border prominence, Coracoid pain, dysKinesis. Address scapular dysfunction as part of comprehensive rehab. Scapular dyskinesis perpetuates impingement.

Quick Decision Guide - Management Algorithm

StageClinical FindingsImagingTreatment
Early (Adaptive)GIRD present, posterior shoulder pain, no weaknessMRI normal or mild signal changePosterior capsule stretching, scapular rehab, relative rest
Intermediate (Contact)GIRD, pain in ABER position, partial articular-side tearMRI: posterosuperior labral fraying, partial undersurface RTC tear3-6 months conservative first, then arthroscopic debridement if failed
Advanced (Failure)Persistent pain, weakness, loss of velocityMRI: full-thickness RTC tear, labral detachmentArthroscopic repair (labrum, cuff), posterior capsular release
Mnemonic

GIRD - The Pathologic Finding

G
Glenohumeral rotation
Measured at 90 degrees shoulder abduction
I
Internal rotation
Loss of internal rotation compared to other side
R
Relative deficit
Side-to-side comparison critical (not absolute values)
D
Deficit threshold
Greater than 20-25 degrees difference is pathologic

Memory Hook:GIRD is the hallmark finding - always measure and compare to contralateral side

Mnemonic

ABER - Position of Impingement

A
Abduction
90 degrees shoulder abduction
B
B for throwing position
Late cocking phase of throw
E
External rotation
Maximum external rotation (layback)
R
Rotator cuff contact
Posterosuperior cuff contacts posterosuperior labrum

Memory Hook:ABER position reproduces the contact that causes internal impingement

Mnemonic

SICK - Scapular Dysfunction Pattern

S
Scapular malposition
Scapula sits inferior and protracted
I
Inferior medial border
Inferior angle is prominent
C
Coracoid pain
Tenderness over coracoid process
K
dysKinesis
Abnormal scapular motion (winging, dysrhythmia)

Memory Hook:SICK scapula perpetuates internal impingement - must address both issues

Mnemonic

STRETCHES - Conservative Management

S
Sleeper stretch
Side-lying on throwing shoulder, push arm into IR
T
Total arc of motion
Goal: restore total arc (ER + IR)
R
Relative rest
Avoid throwing during acute phase
E
External rotator strengthening
Maintain ER strength balance
T
Timing return to throw
Progressive interval throwing program
C
Cross-body adduction stretch
Stretches posterior capsule
H
Horizontal adduction
Another posterior capsule stretch
E
Evaluate scapula
Scapular stabilization exercises critical
S
Six months minimum
Conservative trial 3-6 months before surgery

Memory Hook:STRETCHES guides comprehensive non-operative management protocol

Overview and Epidemiology

Internal impingement describes the contact between the posterosuperior rotator cuff (supraspinatus and infraspinatus) and the posterosuperior glenoid labrum when the shoulder is in the ABER (abduction-external rotation) position. This is a normal phenomenon that becomes pathologic when exaggerated.

Mechanism and adaptation:

  • Repetitive overhead throwing creates adaptive changes
  • Posterior capsule contracture develops from repetitive microtrauma
  • GIRD (loss of internal rotation) results from posterior tightness
  • Obligate anterior translation occurs to achieve full external rotation
  • Excessive contact between cuff and labrum causes pathologic changes

Normal vs Pathologic

Internal impingement contact occurs in all shoulders during ABER position. It only becomes pathologic when posterior capsule contracture (GIRD) causes excessive contact forces, leading to labral fraying and partial-thickness articular-sided rotator cuff tears.

At-risk populations:

  • Baseball pitchers (most common)
  • Volleyball players (servers, spikers)
  • Tennis players (servers)
  • Swimmers (freestyle, butterfly)
  • Javelin throwers
  • Handball players

Age and presentation:

  • Typically affects adolescents to young adults (15-35 years)
  • Professional and elite amateur athletes most affected
  • Can occur in recreational athletes with high volume
  • Males more common than females (reflecting sport participation)

Pathophysiology and Mechanisms

Normal shoulder kinematics in throwing:

The overhead throw occurs in distinct phases:

  1. Wind-up: Preparation phase
  2. Early cocking: Arm moves into abduction and external rotation
  3. Late cocking: Maximum external rotation (layback) - ABER position
  4. Acceleration: Internal rotation and forward propulsion
  5. Deceleration: Eccentric posterior cuff activity to slow arm
  6. Follow-through: Completion of motion

Late Cocking Phase

Late cocking phase is when internal impingement occurs. The shoulder is in 90 degrees abduction and maximum external rotation (up to 180 degrees in elite throwers). At this position, the posterosuperior cuff is maximally tightened and contacts the posterosuperior labrum.

Glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD):

Definition: Loss of glenohumeral internal rotation in the throwing shoulder compared to the non-throwing shoulder when measured at 90 degrees abduction.

Pathologic threshold: Greater than 20-25 degrees side-to-side difference

Mechanism of GIRD development:

  • Posterior capsule contracture from repetitive eccentric loading during deceleration
  • Posterior rotator cuff tightness (infraspinatus, teres minor)
  • Humeral retroversion (bony adaptation in young throwers - NOT the same as GIRD)
  • Acquired contracture vs congenital retroversion must be distinguished

Biomechanical consequences of GIRD:

The GIRD Cascade

GIRD creates a kinematic chain dysfunction: Posterior capsule tightness → Loss of internal rotation → Obligate anterosuperior humeral translation to achieve external rotation → Increased contact force at posterosuperior labrum → Labral fraying and articular-sided cuff tears → Pain and dysfunction.

Total rotational motion concept:

Healthy throwers often have:

  • Increased external rotation (adaptive gain)
  • Decreased internal rotation (adaptive loss)
  • Preserved total arc of rotation (ER + IR)

Pathologic GIRD occurs when:

  • Total arc of motion is decreased (not just shifted)
  • Internal rotation loss exceeds external rotation gain
  • Side-to-side total arc difference greater than 5-10 degrees

SICK scapula syndrome:

Scapular dyskinesis commonly coexists with internal impingement.

Components:

  • S: Scapular malposition (inferior and protracted positioning)
  • I: Inferior medial border prominence
  • C: Coracoid pain and tenderness
  • K: Dyskinesis (abnormal scapular motion - winging, lack of smooth rhythm)

Mechanism: Repetitive throwing overloads pectoralis minor → Scapular protraction and anterior tilt → Loss of scapular stability → Perpetuates impingement

Pathologic tissue changes:

StructureEarly ChangesAdvanced Changes
Posterior capsuleThickening, contractureSevere tightness, adhesions
Posterosuperior labrumFraying, degenerationDetachment, SLAP-like tears
Rotator cuff (articular side)Partial-thickness tear (less than 50%)High-grade partial or full-thickness tear
InfraspinatusTendinopathy, signal changeTear progression to full thickness

Classification and Staging

Jobe Classification (modified for internal impingement)

StageDescriptionPathologyTreatment
IAdaptive phasePosterior capsule tightness, GIRD present, no structural damageConservative management
IIContact phasePosterosuperior labral fraying, partial articular-sided cuff tearsConservative first, surgery if failed
IIIFailure phaseFull-thickness rotator cuff tear, labral detachmentSurgical repair indicated

Most athletes present in Stage II with contact pathology but no complete structural failure.

This staging guides treatment decisions and prognosis for return to sport.

Ellman Classification (for partial-thickness tears)

GradeDepthDescription
AArticular sideMost common in internal impingement
BBursal sideLess common
CIntrasubstanceWithin tendon substance

Depth grading:

  • Grade 1: Less than 3mm depth
  • Grade 2: 3-6mm depth
  • Grade 3: Greater than 6mm depth (greater than 50% thickness)

Internal impingement typically causes Grade A (articular-sided) tears affecting the posterosuperior cuff (supraspinatus-infraspinatus junction).

Tears greater than 50% thickness or progression to full-thickness require consideration of repair.

Posterosuperior labral tears in internal impingement:

TypeDescriptionTreatment
FrayingDegenerative changes without detachmentDebridement
Partial detachmentPartial separation from glenoidDebridement vs repair
Complete detachmentFull separation (SLAP-like posterior extension)Repair with anchors

Labral Pattern

Unlike anterior Bankart lesions, posterosuperior labral tears in internal impingement are typically degenerative rather than traumatic. They represent contact wear rather than avulsion injury. Most can be debrided rather than repaired.

Repair is indicated when labral detachment is extensive or associated with instability symptoms.

Measuring GIRD (critical for diagnosis):

Technique:

  1. Patient supine
  2. Shoulder abducted to 90 degrees
  3. Elbow flexed 90 degrees
  4. Stabilize scapula to isolate glenohumeral motion
  5. Measure maximum passive internal rotation (compare to contralateral)

Normal values:

  • Slight dominant-arm loss of IR (10-15 degrees) is normal adaptation
  • Total arc should be preserved or increased

Pathologic GIRD:

  • Greater than 20-25 degrees loss of IR compared to contralateral
  • Loss of total arc of motion (ER + IR)
  • Side-to-side total arc difference greater than 5 degrees

Measurement technique must be standardized and scapula stabilized to obtain accurate values.

Clinical Presentation and Assessment

History:

  • Sport: Baseball pitcher most common, volleyball, tennis
  • Symptom onset: Usually gradual, related to high volume (late season)
  • Pain location: Posterior shoulder
  • Position: Pain in late cocking phase (arm back, maximal ER)
  • Functional deficit: Loss of velocity, control, or endurance
  • Associated symptoms: Occasional anterior instability sensation (from anterior translation)

Physical examination:

Physical Examination Findings

TestTechniquePositive FindingSignificance
GIRD measurementSupine, 90deg abduction, measure IRGreater than 20-25deg loss vs contralateralHallmark finding - diagnostic of posterior capsule contracture
Total arc of motionSum of ER + IR at 90deg abductionDecreased total arc vs contralateralIndicates true capsular contracture (not just adaptation)
ABER position pain90deg abduction, maximum ERPosterior shoulder pain reproducedReproduces impingement contact
Sleeper position painSide-lying on affected side, IR armPosterior pain, resistanceTests posterior capsule tightness
Scapular dyskinesisObserve scapular motion with arm elevationWinging, lack of smooth rhythm, asymmetrySICK scapula pattern
Coracoid tendernessPalpate coracoid processFocal tendernessPart of SICK scapula syndrome
Rotator cuff strengthER, IR, supraspinatus testingWeakness suggests tear progressionIndicates structural damage

GIRD Measurement Critical

GIRD measurement is THE key examination finding. Measure internal rotation at 90 degrees abduction with scapula stabilized. Compare to contralateral side. Greater than 20-25 degrees difference is pathologic and requires treatment with posterior capsule stretching.

Additional tests:

  • Posterior impingement sign: Pain with horizontal adduction and internal rotation
  • Internal rotation resistance strength test (IRRST): Resisted IR at 90deg abduction reproduces pain
  • Relocation test: May be positive (anterior translation component)

Differential diagnosis:

ConditionKey Differentiating Features
External (subacromial) impingementPain in forward flexion, positive Neer/Hawkins, different location
Anterior instabilityApprehension in ABER, history of dislocation, positive relocation
SLAP tearBiceps-related symptoms, O'Brien's test positive, overhead motion pain
Cervical radiculopathyNeck pain, dermatomal symptoms, Spurling's test positive
Thoracic outlet syndromeVascular/neurologic symptoms, positive Adson's test

Investigations

Imaging protocol:

Plain radiographs:

  • AP, scapular Y, axillary views
  • Usually normal in early internal impingement
  • May show:
    • Subtle changes at posterosuperior glenoid (sclerosis)
    • Calcification in posterior capsule (chronic)
    • Bennett lesion (posteroinferior glenoid ossification) - related pathology

Bennett Lesion

Bennett lesion is ossification of the posterior band of the inferior glenohumeral ligament at its glenoid insertion. It is seen in up to 20-30% of throwers and represents a separate adaptation, not internal impingement itself. Both can coexist.

MRI/MR arthrography:

MRI is the gold standard for diagnosing internal impingement pathology.

Key findings:

  • ABER view (abduction-external rotation MRI sequence) - best visualizes posterosuperior pathology
  • Posterosuperior labral fraying or detachment
  • Partial-thickness articular-sided rotator cuff tear (high signal on T2)
  • Cystic changes in posterosuperior humeral head (contact zone)
  • Posterior capsular thickening

MRI findings by severity:

FindingEarlyIntermediateAdvanced
LabrumNormalFraying, increased signalDetachment
Rotator cuffNormal or signal changePartial articular-sided tearHigh-grade partial or full-thickness
CapsuleSubtle thickeningModerate thickeningSevere contracture
BoneNormalCystic change humeral headPosterosuperior glenoid wear

Ultrasound:

  • Dynamic examination possible
  • Can visualize partial-thickness cuff tears
  • Operator-dependent
  • Less useful for labral pathology

CT scan:

  • Not typically indicated
  • May be used to assess:
    • Humeral retroversion (bony adaptation in young throwers)
    • Glenoid version
    • Osseous Bennett lesion

Advanced imaging:

  • MR arthrography: May improve sensitivity for labral tears
  • ABER position MRI: Specialized sequence to visualize impingement contact zone

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
internal impingement management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for internal impingementCredit: OrthoVellum

Non-operative treatment is FIRST-LINE for all internal impingement.

Success rate: 70-80% return to sport with conservative management alone

Duration: Minimum 3-6 months trial before considering surgery

Core principles:

  1. Relative rest from throwing (complete rest not required)
  2. Posterior capsule stretching (primary intervention)
  3. Scapular stabilization exercises
  4. Maintain rotator cuff strength
  5. Progressive return to throwing program

Posterior capsule stretching techniques:

  • Sleeper stretch:

    • Lie on throwing shoulder
    • Arm forward at 90 degrees
    • Use opposite hand to push throwing arm into internal rotation
    • Hold 30 seconds, repeat 5 times, 3x daily
  • Cross-body adduction stretch:

    • Bring throwing arm across body
    • Use opposite hand to assist stretch
    • Hold 30 seconds, repeat 5 times, 3x daily
  • Horizontal adduction stretch:

    • Similar to cross-body but at 90 degrees flexion
    • Stretches posterior capsule effectively

Scapular stabilization program:

  • Serratus anterior strengthening (wall slides, push-up plus)
  • Lower trapezius strengthening (prone Y, T, W exercises)
  • Middle trapezius strengthening (rows)
  • Pectoralis minor stretching (doorway stretch)

Rotator cuff strengthening:

  • External rotator focus (infraspinatus, teres minor)
  • Maintain internal rotator strength
  • Avoid excessive ER strengthening (can worsen GIRD)

Conservative management should address the entire kinetic chain including core, legs, and trunk.

Return to throwing protocol (after symptoms resolved and GIRD corrected):

Phase 1: Flat ground throwing (weeks 1-6)

  • Start at 45 feet
  • Progress distance gradually
  • Light intensity only
  • No breaking balls or max effort

Phase 2: Increased intensity (weeks 7-12)

  • Progress to 120 feet
  • Increase velocity gradually
  • Introduce variety of pitches
  • Monitor symptoms closely

Phase 3: Mound throwing (weeks 13-16)

  • Start at 50% effort
  • Progress to game intensity
  • Pitch counts limited
  • Biomechanics analysis

Phase 4: Return to competition (weeks 17-24)

  • Gradual increase in pitch count
  • In-game situations
  • Maintain stretching program

Maintenance Required

Lifelong posterior capsule stretching is required for throwers who have had GIRD. Stopping the stretching program typically leads to recurrence. This is a chronic maintenance issue, not a cure.

Return to full competition typically takes 6-12 months from initial presentation.

Indications for surgery:

  • Failed conservative management (3-6 months minimum)
  • Persistent pain limiting performance
  • Documented structural pathology (cuff tear, labral detachment)
  • Progressive weakness
  • Athlete's career timeline considerations

Contraindications to surgery:

  • Inadequate conservative trial
  • Poor biomechanics not addressed
  • Unrealistic expectations
  • GIRD not corrected preoperatively

Timing considerations:

  • Off-season preferred
  • Allow minimum 6 months before next competitive season
  • Career-ending decisions require extensive counseling

Surgery should be viewed as a last resort after comprehensive non-operative management has failed.

Surgical Technique

Patient positioning:

  • Beach chair or lateral decubitus position
  • Lateral decubitus allows better access to posterior structures
  • Arm in traction (10-15 lbs) for lateral decubitus

Portal placement:

  • Posterior viewing portal: Standard posterior portal
  • Anterior working portal: Mid-glenoid or low anterior
  • Posterolateral accessory portal: For posterior labrum access
  • Port of Wilmington: Anterosuperior portal for suture passage

Diagnostic arthroscopy sequence:

  1. Glenohumeral joint evaluation (anterior, superior)
  2. Posterosuperior inspection (key area)
  3. Labral assessment (fraying, detachment)
  4. Rotator cuff assessment (articular side from joint)
  5. Subacromial space evaluation (rule out external impingement)

Systematic examination ensures all pathology is identified before proceeding with treatment.

Arthroscopic debridement (most common procedure):

Posterosuperior labrum:

  • Debride frayed, degenerative labral tissue
  • Remove unstable fragments
  • Use shaver and radiofrequency device
  • Preserve stable labral tissue (avoid excessive resection)
  • Repair only if large detachment or instability

Partial-thickness rotator cuff tear:

  • Debride to stable margins
  • Remove unstable flaps of tissue
  • Do NOT convert to full-thickness (leave intact bursal side)
  • Repair if greater than 50% thickness or full-thickness

Loose bodies:

  • Remove any loose bodies in posterior recess
  • Common in advanced cases

Debridement Principles

Goal of debridement: Remove painful, mechanically irritating tissue while preserving structural integrity. Do not excise healthy labrum or convert partial cuff tears to full-thickness unless necessary. Debridement addresses symptoms, not "normal" impingement contact.

Debridement alone has 60-70% success rate for return to throwing if GIRD has been corrected preoperatively.

Arthroscopic posterior capsular release (for persistent GIRD):

Indications:

  • GIRD not corrected with conservative stretching
  • Persistent posterior capsule contracture
  • Combined with debridement

Technique:

  • Viewing from anterior portal
  • Working from posterior portal
  • Identify posterior capsule at 7-9 o'clock position (right shoulder)
  • Use radiofrequency device or arthroscopic knife
  • Release posterior-inferior capsule from glenoid
  • Extend release 1-2 cm
  • Protect axillary nerve (stays inferior)
  • Test ROM improvement intraoperatively

Extent of release:

  • Adequate when internal rotation improves by 20-30 degrees
  • Avoid excessive release (risk posterior instability)
  • Some surgeons combine with rotator interval release

Nerve Safety

The axillary nerve runs along the inferior capsule. During posterior-inferior capsular release, stay on the glenoid side and release conservatively (1-2 cm) to avoid nerve injury. Test ROM intraoperatively to confirm adequate release.

Posterior capsular release improves internal rotation immediately and allows more effective postoperative stretching.

Repair indications (less common):

Posterosuperior labral repair:

  • Large detachment (greater than 1 cm)
  • Unstable labrum contributing to symptoms
  • Associated instability symptoms

Technique:

  • Prepare glenoid bone edge (debride to bleeding surface)
  • Place suture anchors at posterosuperior glenoid (1-2 anchors)
  • Pass sutures through labral tissue
  • Reduce labrum to glenoid rim
  • Tie sutures arthroscopically

Rotator cuff repair:

  • Full-thickness tear or high-grade partial (greater than 50%)
  • Debride tear edges
  • Place suture anchors at greater tuberosity
  • Single or double-row repair depending on tear size
  • Typically posterior (infraspinatus) or posterosuperior

Combined procedures:

  • Debridement + posterior capsular release (most common)
  • Labral repair + capsular release
  • Cuff repair + debridement

Return to throwing after repair procedures requires 9-12 months and outcomes are less predictable than debridement alone.

Complications

Complications of Internal Impingement Treatment

ComplicationIncidencePrevention/Management
Failure to return to sport30-40% (surgery)Extensive preop and postop rehab, realistic expectations
Recurrent GIRDCommon if stretching stoppedLifelong posterior capsule stretching program
Stiffness after surgery10-20%Early ROM, avoid over-aggressive capsular release
Posterior instabilityRare (under 5%)Conservative capsular release, avoid excessive release
Progression of cuff tear10-15% if partial tearConsider repair if greater than 50% thickness
Axillary nerve injuryRare (under 1%)Stay glenoid-side during posterior capsular release
Persistent pain20-30%Address biomechanics, kinetic chain, return to sport criteria

Failure to return to sport:

  • Most significant "complication" for athletes
  • Factors: Inadequate rehab, poor biomechanics, unrealistic expectations
  • Prevention: Comprehensive rehab, address kinetic chain, gradual return
  • Management: Continued non-operative care, consider career counseling

Recurrent GIRD:

  • Very common if stretching program abandoned
  • Prevention: Educate athlete on lifelong maintenance
  • Management: Resume stretching program immediately when GIRD detected

Stiffness:

  • Can occur after surgery, especially with capsular release
  • Prevention: Early ROM exercises, avoid immobilization
  • Management: Aggressive physical therapy, consider manipulation under anesthesia if severe

Return to Sport Reality

Return to pre-injury level of throwing occurs in only 60-70% after surgery (compared to 70-80% with conservative management). Surgery is not a shortcut to recovery. Emphasize the superiority of non-operative management when possible.

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

Post-operative protocol (arthroscopic debridement ± posterior capsular release):

Week 0-2
  • Sling for comfort (not strict immobilization)
  • Pendulum exercises day 1
  • Passive ROM to tolerance
  • No stretching yet (allow capsule to heal if released)
  • Ice, pain control
Week 2-6
  • Progress to active-assisted ROM
  • Begin gentle posterior capsule stretching (week 3-4)
  • Scapular stabilization exercises
  • Light rotator cuff strengthening (isometrics)
  • Goal: Full passive ROM by 6 weeks
Week 6-12
  • Advance to full active ROM
  • Progressive rotator cuff strengthening
  • Scapular stabilization progression
  • Light sport-specific activities (no throwing)
  • Confirm GIRD correction
Month 3-4
  • Interval throwing program begins
  • Start at 45 feet, light toss
  • Maintain stretching program
  • Monitor symptoms closely
  • Progress distance gradually
Month 4-6
  • Progress throwing distance and intensity
  • Introduce mound throwing (pitchers)
  • Sport-specific training
  • Return to competition if asymptomatic
  • Typical return 6-9 months for debridement

Athletes who undergo simple debridement can typically return to throwing by 4-6 months with good outcomes.

Post-operative protocol (labral repair or rotator cuff repair):

Week 0-4
  • Sling immobilization (strict for repairs)
  • Pendulum only
  • No active ROM
  • Passive ROM limited (protective)
  • Allow tissue healing
Week 4-8
  • Wean from sling
  • Progress passive ROM
  • Begin active-assisted ROM
  • Gentle isometric strengthening
  • No stress on repair
Week 8-12
  • Full active ROM
  • Progressive rotator cuff strengthening
  • Scapular stabilization
  • No throwing activities yet
  • Ensure tissue healing
Month 3-6
  • Sport-specific strengthening
  • Begin light throwing activities (month 4-5)
  • Interval throwing program
  • Monitor symptoms
  • Biomechanics evaluation
Month 6-12
  • Progress throwing program
  • Return to mound throwing (month 6-9)
  • Return to competition (month 9-12)
  • Maintain stretching program
  • Longer recovery than debridement alone

Return to full throwing after repair procedures requires 9-12 months and outcomes are less predictable.

Lifelong maintenance requirements:

Daily stretching:

  • Posterior capsule stretching continues indefinitely
  • Sleeper stretch: 5 reps x 30 seconds, 2x daily
  • Cross-body adduction: 5 reps x 30 seconds, 2x daily

Ongoing strengthening:

  • Scapular stabilization exercises 3x weekly
  • Rotator cuff strengthening maintenance
  • Core and kinetic chain strengthening

Monitoring:

  • Periodic GIRD measurement (monthly during season)
  • Early intervention if GIRD recurs
  • Annual professional assessment

Biomechanics:

  • Ongoing coaching on throwing mechanics
  • Video analysis periodically
  • Address any compensatory patterns

No Cure, Only Management

Internal impingement and GIRD are chronic conditions requiring lifelong management. Athletes who stop their stretching program will experience recurrence. This must be emphasized during education and counseling.

Compliance with maintenance program is the most important factor for long-term success.

Outcomes and Prognosis

Outcomes with conservative management:

OutcomePercentageNotes
Return to same level70-80%With comprehensive rehab program
Return to lower level10-15%Modified participation
Unable to return10-15%Career-ending

Prognostic factors for conservative success:

  • Early intervention (before structural damage)
  • Compliance with stretching program
  • Correction of GIRD (greater than 20 degrees improvement)
  • Scapular dyskinesis addressed
  • Biomechanical coaching
  • Younger age
  • Shorter symptom duration

Outcomes with surgical management:

ProcedureReturn to SportSatisfactionTimeline
Debridement alone60-70%70-80%6-9 months
Debridement + capsular release65-75%75-85%6-9 months
Labral/cuff repair50-60%60-70%9-12 months

Surgery Not Superior

Conservative management has better outcomes than surgery for internal impingement. Surgery should only be considered after 3-6 months of failed conservative care. The idea that surgery is a "fix" is incorrect - it is a salvage procedure after non-operative failure.

Factors predicting surgical success:

  • GIRD corrected preoperatively
  • Limited structural damage (no full-thickness tears)
  • Debridement only (vs repair procedures)
  • Good preoperative strength
  • Excellent postoperative rehab compliance
  • Realistic expectations

Factors predicting surgical failure:

  • Full-thickness rotator cuff tear
  • Persistent GIRD postoperatively
  • Poor biomechanics not addressed
  • Inadequate rehabilitation
  • Return too early
  • Unrealistic expectations

Long-term considerations:

  • Recurrence of symptoms common if maintenance abandoned
  • Progressive cuff degeneration in some athletes
  • Career longevity may be shortened
  • May need to modify throwing mechanics or volume

Evidence Base

Level IV
📚 Burkhart et al. Internal Impingement of the Shoulder
Key Findings:
  • Described the pathomechanics of internal impingement as contact between posterosuperior rotator cuff and posterosuperior labrum in ABER position. Emphasized that this is a normal phenomenon that becomes pathologic with repetitive overhead activity and posterior capsule contracture.
Clinical Implication: Internal impingement is a contact phenomenon that becomes pathologic. Treatment must address GIRD and posterior capsule tightness, not just debride the contact surfaces.
Source: Arthroscopy 2000

Level III
📚 Wilk et al. GIRD and Throwing Injuries
Key Findings:
  • Prospective cohort of 296 professional baseball pitchers found that those with GIRD greater than 20 degrees had significantly increased risk of shoulder and elbow injuries. GIRD correction through stretching program reduced injury risk.
Clinical Implication: GIRD greater than 20 degrees is pathologic and increases injury risk. Posterior capsule stretching to correct GIRD is essential for injury prevention and treatment.
Source: Am J Sports Med 2009

Level V
📚 Reinold et al. Current Concepts in Internal Impingement
Key Findings:
  • Review of internal impingement pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Emphasized conservative management as first-line with posterior capsule stretching, scapular stabilization, and rotator cuff strengthening. Surgery reserved for failed conservative care.
Clinical Implication: Conservative management should be first-line for minimum 3-6 months. Non-operative treatment has better outcomes than surgery when successful.
Source: Clin Sports Med 2008

Level IV
📚 Mihata et al. Excessive Glenohumeral Horizontal Abduction (GIRD)
Key Findings:
  • Biomechanical study demonstrating that GIRD causes obligate anterior and superior translation of the humeral head during external rotation. This increases contact forces at the posterosuperior labrum and cuff, causing pathologic internal impingement.
Clinical Implication: GIRD causes altered kinematics that increase internal impingement contact forces. Correction of GIRD restores normal kinematics and reduces pathologic contact.
Source: Am J Sports Med 2010

Level IV
📚 Dines et al. Outcomes of Arthroscopic Treatment for Internal Impingement
Key Findings:
  • Retrospective series of 67 overhead athletes treated arthroscopically for internal impingement. 68% returned to prior level of competition. Debridement alone had better outcomes than repair procedures. Failure to correct GIRD preoperatively predicted poor outcomes.
Clinical Implication: Arthroscopic debridement can be successful but outcomes depend on GIRD correction and comprehensive rehabilitation. Debridement alone is superior to repair for internal impingement pathology.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Classic Presentation in Baseball Pitcher

EXAMINER

"A 22-year-old professional baseball pitcher presents with posterior shoulder pain during the late cocking phase of throwing. He has lost 10 mph velocity over the past 2 months. On examination, he has 55 degrees of internal rotation on the throwing side vs 80 degrees on the non-throwing side, measured at 90 degrees abduction. External rotation is 95 degrees bilaterally. What is your diagnosis and management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This young professional pitcher has **internal impingement syndrome with pathologic GIRD**. Let me walk through my assessment and management systematically. **Diagnosis:** The hallmark finding is **GIRD** - 25 degrees loss of internal rotation compared to the non-throwing side (55 vs 80 degrees). This exceeds the pathologic threshold of 20-25 degrees. His symptom of posterior shoulder pain in late cocking position (ABER) is classic for internal impingement. The velocity loss suggests functional impairment. **Total arc of motion calculation:** - Throwing side: 55 (IR) + 95 (ER) = 150 degrees total - Non-throwing side: 80 (IR) + 95 (ER) = 175 degrees total - **Total arc deficit: 25 degrees** - this indicates true posterior capsular contracture, not just adaptive changes. **Initial Investigations:** I would obtain plain radiographs (AP, scapular Y, axillary) to rule out osseous pathology, though these are usually normal. **MRI or MR arthrogram** would be my definitive imaging to assess for posterosuperior labral pathology and partial-thickness articular-sided rotator cuff tears, which are common in this condition. **Management Plan - Conservative First:** I would institute a comprehensive **3-6 month trial of non-operative management**: 1. **Relative rest from throwing** - complete cessation initially 2. **Posterior capsule stretching program**: - Sleeper stretch: 5 reps x 30 seconds, 3 times daily - Cross-body adduction stretch: 5 reps x 30 seconds, 3 times daily 3. **Scapular stabilization exercises** - assess for and treat SICK scapula 4. **Rotator cuff strengthening maintenance** 5. **Biomechanical assessment** of throwing mechanics I would reassess GIRD at 6 weeks. Goal is to restore internal rotation to within 10-15 degrees of the non-throwing side. With 70-80% success rate for return to sport with conservative care, this is the superior first-line treatment. Surgery would only be considered after failed conservative management.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
GIRD diagnosis: 25 degrees IR deficit (55 vs 80 degrees) exceeds 20-25 degree pathologic threshold
Total arc of motion deficit: 25 degrees indicates true capsular contracture
Classic internal impingement presentation: posterior pain in late cocking phase
Velocity loss indicates functional impairment from pain or biomechanical changes
MRI will show posterosuperior labral pathology and possible partial cuff tear
Conservative management is FIRST-LINE: 3-6 months minimum trial
Posterior capsule stretching is the primary treatment (sleeper stretch, cross-body adduction)
Scapular stabilization exercises address common coexisting SICK scapula
Goal: Restore IR to within 10-15 degrees of contralateral side
70-80% return to sport with conservative care (better than surgery)
COMMON TRAPS
✗Recommending surgery without adequate conservative trial
✗Not measuring GIRD properly (must be at 90 degrees abduction with scapula stabilized)
✗Treating as external (subacromial) impingement
✗Not calculating total arc of motion
✗Not recognizing this as a chronic maintenance issue requiring lifelong stretching
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"If he fails 6 months of conservative care and MRI shows a 40% partial articular-sided tear of the posterosuperior cuff, what would you do arthroscopically?"
"How do you differentiate internal impingement from a SLAP tear?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Surgical Decision-Making After Failed Conservative Care

EXAMINER

"The pitcher from Scenario 1 has undergone 4 months of intensive physical therapy with posterior capsule stretching. His GIRD has improved from 25 degrees to 15 degrees. However, he still has posterior shoulder pain when attempting to throw and cannot achieve full velocity. MRI shows posterosuperior labral fraying and a 30% partial articular-sided tear of the infraspinatus. He wants to continue his professional career. What is your recommendation?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a challenging scenario requiring careful decision-making. The athlete has partially responded to conservative care (GIRD improved from 25 to 15 degrees, which is good), but remains symptomatic. I need to determine if surgery is appropriate and if so, what procedure to perform. **Analysis of Conservative Response:** - **Positive**: GIRD improved significantly (25 to 15 degrees) - this demonstrates he is compliant and responsive to stretching - **Positive**: 4 months is an adequate trial duration - **Negative**: Still symptomatic with functional limitation (cannot achieve full velocity) - **Imaging**: 30% partial cuff tear is low-grade (under 50%), labral fraying (not detachment) **Surgical Considerations:** I would have a detailed discussion about **realistic expectations**. Surgery for internal impingement returns only 60-70% of athletes to their pre-injury level (compared to 70-80% with successful conservative care). This is not a guaranteed solution. However, given his career is at stake and he has failed adequate conservative care, I would offer **arthroscopic intervention**: **Surgical Plan:** - **Arthroscopic debridement** of posterosuperior labrum (frayed tissue) - **Debridement of partial cuff tear** to stable margins (NOT conversion to full-thickness) - **Posterior capsular release** (since GIRD not fully corrected despite stretching) - **NO repair** of the 30% partial tear (under 50% threshold) **Rationale:** - Debridement removes mechanically irritating tissue - Posterior capsular release addresses residual GIRD (15 degrees still present) - Preserving partial cuff tear integrity (not converting to full-thickness) optimizes healing - This limited approach has the best success rate (65-75% return to sport) **Postoperative Plan:** - Continue aggressive posterior capsule stretching - Scapular stabilization progression - Interval throwing program starting at 3-4 months - Return to mound throwing at 6 months - Expected return to competition at 6-9 months - **Lifelong maintenance** stretching program (critical) I would counsel that this is a salvage procedure after failed conservative care, not a cure. He must understand the 30-40% chance he will not return to his previous level.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Adequate conservative trial completed (4 months)
GIRD improved significantly (25 to 15 degrees) showing compliance
Still symptomatic with functional limitation - surgery consideration reasonable
30% partial cuff tear is LOW-GRADE (under 50% threshold for repair)
Posterosuperior labral fraying (not detachment) - debridement appropriate
Surgical plan: Debridement + posterior capsular release
Do NOT repair 30% partial tear (avoid converting to full-thickness)
Do NOT perform labral repair (fraying, not detachment)
Posterior capsular release addresses residual GIRD
Expected return to competition: 6-9 months
Realistic expectations: 60-70% return to pre-injury level
Lifelong posterior capsule stretching maintenance required
COMMON TRAPS
✗Converting partial cuff tear to full-thickness (worsens outcome)
✗Performing labral repair for degenerative fraying (unnecessary)
✗Not counseling about realistic return-to-sport rates
✗Offering surgery without adequate conservative trial
✗Not planning for posterior capsular release despite residual GIRD
✗Not emphasizing lifelong maintenance stretching requirement
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"During arthroscopy, you find a 60% partial articular-sided tear. Does this change your management?"
"How would you perform the arthroscopic posterior capsular release and what are the key safety considerations?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Differential Diagnosis Challenge

EXAMINER

"A 19-year-old collegiate volleyball player presents with shoulder pain during serving and spiking. She describes the pain as 'deep inside' her shoulder when her arm is back. She also notes occasional clicking. On examination, she has GIRD of 15 degrees, pain with ABER position, and a positive O'Brien's test. MRI shows posterosuperior labral signal abnormality and a possible SLAP lesion. How do you differentiate between internal impingement and a SLAP tear, and how does this affect your management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is an excellent diagnostic challenge because internal impingement and SLAP tears can coexist and have overlapping presentations in overhead athletes. I need to carefully differentiate the primary pathology to guide appropriate treatment. **Clinical Differentiation:** **Features suggesting INTERNAL IMPINGEMENT:** - Pain specifically in **ABER position** (late cocking phase) - **Posterior shoulder pain** location ("deep inside") - **GIRD present** (15 degrees - borderline pathologic) - Overhead throwing/serving athlete - Pain during deceleration phase **Features suggesting SLAP TEAR:** - **Clicking sensation** (suggests labral pathology) - **Positive O'Brien's test** (specific for superior labral pathology) - Pain with overhead motion in multiple positions - Biceps-related symptoms - Possible trauma history **MRI Interpretation Challenge:** Both conditions affect the superior/posterosuperior labrum, making MRI interpretation difficult. I would look for: - **SLAP lesion**: Superior labral detachment from glenoid with biceps anchor involvement - **Internal impingement**: Posterosuperior labral fraying/degeneration, possible partial articular cuff tear - **Location**: SLAP is superior (12 o'clock), internal impingement is posterosuperior (10-11 o'clock) **Diagnostic Approach:** Given the **overlapping features**, I would consider this likely **internal impingement with possible coexisting SLAP component**. The GIRD (even at 15 degrees), ABER pain, and overhead athlete profile strongly suggest internal impingement as the primary pathology. **Management Strategy:** I would initiate **conservative management targeting internal impingement**: 1. Posterior capsule stretching program (address GIRD) 2. Scapular stabilization (volleyball players have high SICK scapula prevalence) 3. Relative rest from overhead activities 4. 3-6 month trial **Reassessment:** - If symptoms improve with posterior capsule stretching → Internal impingement was primary - If symptoms persist despite GIRD correction → SLAP may be primary pathology **Surgical Considerations (if conservative fails):** During **arthroscopy**, I would definitively diagnose both: - Assess superior labrum for SLAP lesion (peel-back test, probe stability) - Assess posterosuperior labrum for internal impingement changes - Assess articular-sided rotator cuff **Treatment based on findings:** - **If SLAP is primary**: SLAP repair (though outcomes in overhead athletes are poor - would counsel extensively) - **If internal impingement is primary**: Debridement + posterior capsular release - **If both are significant**: Combined procedure (debridement + selective SLAP repair if unstable) **Critical Point:** I would counsel her that **SLAP repairs have poor outcomes in overhead athletes** (under 50% return to sport for volleyball). If a SLAP repair is needed, she may need to consider changing sports or position. Internal impingement treatment has better outcomes for return to sport.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Internal impingement and SLAP tears can COEXIST in overhead athletes
Differentiating features: GIRD (internal impingement), O'Brien's positive (SLAP)
Pain location: Posterior deep (internal impingement), Superior anterior (SLAP)
MRI challenging: Both affect superior/posterosuperior labrum
SLAP is SUPERIOR (12 o'clock), internal impingement is POSTEROSUPERIOR (10-11 o'clock)
Conservative trial targets internal impingement (posterior capsule stretching)
Response to stretching helps differentiate (improves if internal impingement primary)
Arthroscopy provides definitive diagnosis (peel-back test for SLAP)
SLAP repairs have POOR outcomes in overhead athletes (under 50% return to sport)
Internal impingement debridement has BETTER outcomes (60-70% return to sport)
May need to counsel about sport modification if SLAP repair required
Conservative management addresses both conditions (scapular stabilization, capsular stretching)
COMMON TRAPS
✗Assuming they are mutually exclusive (can coexist)
✗Rushing to surgery without conservative trial
✗Performing SLAP repair without extensive counseling about poor outcomes in overhead athletes
✗Not measuring GIRD (key differentiating feature)
✗Ignoring scapular dysfunction (common in volleyball players)
✗Not understanding that internal impingement treatment has better return-to-sport outcomes than SLAP repair
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"If arthroscopy confirms both a Type II SLAP tear and internal impingement changes, which would you address and how?"
"What is the peel-back test and how do you perform it arthroscopically?"

MCQ Practice Points

Definition Question

Q: What is the anatomic contact in internal impingement of the shoulder? A: Posterosuperior rotator cuff (supraspinatus-infraspinatus junction) contacts the posterosuperior glenoid labrum when the shoulder is in ABER (abduction-external rotation) position. This is a normal phenomenon that becomes pathologic with repetitive overhead activity.

GIRD Question

Q: What is the pathologic threshold for GIRD (glenohumeral internal rotation deficit)? A: Greater than 20-25 degrees loss of internal rotation compared to the contralateral shoulder, measured at 90 degrees of shoulder abduction with the scapula stabilized. This indicates posterior capsule contracture requiring treatment.

Management Question

Q: What is first-line treatment for internal impingement syndrome in a throwing athlete? A: Conservative management with posterior capsule stretching (sleeper stretch, cross-body adduction stretch) and scapular stabilization exercises for minimum 3-6 months. This has 70-80% success rate for return to sport, which is superior to surgical outcomes.

SICK Scapula Question

Q: What does the SICK scapula mnemonic stand for? A: S: Scapular malposition (inferior and protracted), I: Inferior medial border prominence, C: Coracoid pain and tenderness, K: dysKinesis (abnormal scapular motion). This commonly coexists with internal impingement and must be addressed in treatment.

Surgical Indication Question

Q: When should arthroscopic debridement be considered for internal impingement? A: After failed conservative management (minimum 3-6 months trial) with persistent pain limiting performance despite GIRD correction efforts, AND documented structural pathology on MRI (posterosuperior labral fraying, partial articular-sided rotator cuff tear).

Return to Sport Question

Q: What percentage of overhead athletes return to pre-injury level after arthroscopic treatment for internal impingement? A: 60-70% after arthroscopic debridement, which is actually lower than the 70-80% success rate with conservative management alone. This emphasizes that surgery is a salvage procedure, not a superior treatment option.

Australian Context

Epidemiology in Australia:

  • Cricket fast bowlers (similar overhead biomechanics to baseball pitchers)
  • Australian rules football players (overhead marking, throw-ins)
  • Competitive swimmers (high volume overhead activity)
  • Tennis players (serving)
  • Volleyball and water polo athletes

Sport-specific considerations:

  • Cricket: Fast bowling action creates similar GIRD and internal impingement risk as baseball pitching
  • AFL: Overhead marking and throw-ins can cause internal impingement in key position players
  • Swimming: Freestyle and butterfly strokes create high repetition overhead loading

Management pathways:

  • Sports medicine physician initial assessment
  • Physiotherapy-led conservative management (first-line)
  • Sports orthopaedic surgeon consultation if surgery considered
  • State institute of sport involvement for elite athletes

Return to sport considerations:

  • Cricket season timing (consider off-season surgery)
  • AFL draft and contract implications
  • Swimming competition calendar
  • Professional vs amateur athlete career considerations

Exam Context

Be prepared to describe the pathomechanics of GIRD causing internal impingement. Understand that posterior capsule stretching is first-line treatment with 70-80% success rate. Know the GIRD measurement technique (90 degrees abduction, scapula stabilized) and pathologic threshold (greater than 20-25 degrees). Emphasize that surgery is reserved for failed conservative care and has inferior outcomes to successful non-operative management.

INTERNAL IMPINGEMENT OF THE SHOULDER

High-Yield Exam Summary

CORE PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

  • •Contact between posterosuperior rotator cuff and posterosuperior labrum in ABER position
  • •Normal phenomenon that becomes pathologic with repetitive overhead activity
  • •GIRD (glenohumeral internal rotation deficit) is the hallmark clinical finding
  • •Posterior capsule contracture → GIRD → Obligate anterior translation → Excessive contact
  • •Results in posterosuperior labral fraying and partial articular-sided cuff tears

GIRD MEASUREMENT

  • •Patient supine, shoulder 90 degrees abduction, elbow 90 degrees flexion
  • •Stabilize scapula to isolate glenohumeral motion
  • •Measure maximum passive internal rotation bilaterally
  • •Pathologic threshold: greater than 20-25 degrees side-to-side difference
  • •Also measure total arc (ER + IR) - loss of total arc indicates true contracture

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

  • •Overhead throwing athletes (baseball, cricket, volleyball, tennis, swimming)
  • •Posterior shoulder pain in late cocking phase (ABER position)
  • •Loss of velocity or performance in throwing/serving
  • •GIRD on examination (greater than 20-25 degrees)
  • •Pain reproduced in ABER position
  • •SICK scapula commonly coexists

SICK SCAPULA

  • •S: Scapular malposition (inferior and protracted)
  • •I: Inferior medial border prominence
  • •C: Coracoid pain and tenderness
  • •K: dysKinesis (abnormal scapular motion)
  • •Must address scapular dysfunction in treatment

CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT (FIRST-LINE)

  • •70-80% return to sport success rate (superior to surgery)
  • •Minimum 3-6 months trial before considering surgery
  • •Posterior capsule stretching: Sleeper stretch, cross-body adduction (5x30sec, 3x daily)
  • •Scapular stabilization exercises (serratus, trapezius strengthening)
  • •Rotator cuff strengthening maintenance
  • •Interval throwing program after symptoms resolve (6-12 months total)
  • •Lifelong maintenance stretching required

SURGICAL MANAGEMENT

  • •Indications: Failed 3-6 months conservative care, persistent symptoms
  • •Arthroscopic debridement: Posterosuperior labral fraying, partial cuff tear
  • •Posterior capsular release: For persistent GIRD
  • •Do NOT repair partial tears under 50% thickness (avoid conversion to full-thickness)
  • •Do NOT repair degenerative labral fraying (debride only)
  • •Return to sport: 60-70% (inferior to conservative management)
  • •Timeline: 6-9 months (debridement), 9-12 months (if repair needed)

IMAGING

  • •Plain radiographs: Usually normal, rule out Bennett lesion
  • •MRI/MRA: Posterosuperior labral fraying, partial articular-sided cuff tear
  • •ABER view MRI: Best visualizes contact zone
  • •Cystic changes in posterosuperior humeral head (contact zone)
  • •Posterior capsular thickening

KEY EXAM PEARLS

  • •Internal impingement is NORMAL contact that becomes PATHOLOGIC
  • •GIRD greater than 20-25 degrees is pathologic threshold
  • •Conservative management has BETTER outcomes than surgery (70-80% vs 60-70%)
  • •Posterior capsule stretching is PRIMARY treatment
  • •Surgery is SALVAGE after failed conservative care, not first-line
  • •SICK scapula commonly coexists - must address scapular dysfunction
  • •Lifelong maintenance stretching required (no cure, only management)
  • •Distinguish from SLAP tears (can coexist but different treatment)
Quick Stats
Reading Time134 min
Related Topics

AC Joint Injuries in Athletes

Achilles Tendinopathy

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

Anterior Shoulder Instability