Hallux IPJ and Lesser Toe IPJ | Post-Traumatic and Degenerative
- Post-traumatic arthritis is the most common cause - previous fracture, dislocation, or turf toe injury
- Hallux IPJ arthritis more symptomatic than lesser toes - essential for push-off in gait
- Arthrodesis (fusion) is gold standard - eliminates pain, stable construct, minimal functional loss
- Fusion position critical: hallux IPJ fused in 10-15° plantar flexion to clear ground during gait
- Inflammatory arthritis (RA, psoriatic) can affect multiple IPJs simultaneously
- “Hallux IPJ fusion position: 10-15° plantar flexion, slight valgus (matches contralateral)
- “Lesser toe PIPJ: arthroplasty (resection) acceptable as motion less critical
- “K-wire fixation sufficient for lesser toes, plate/screw preferred for hallux IPJ
- “Nonunion is NOT rare at the hallux IPJ - the largest series (n=227) reports ~25% radiographic nonunion; many are asymptomatic fibrous unions
Hallux IPJ arthritis is more significant than lesser toe IPJ arthritis. The hallux IPJ contributes to push-off power in gait. Lesser toe IPJs have minimal functional role. Symptomatic hallux IPJ requires surgical treatment; lesser toe IPJ can often be managed conservatively.
Post-traumatic arthritis is the primary cause in younger patients. Previous fracture (especially intra-articular), dislocation, or severe turf toe injury damages articular cartilage. Degenerative arthritis predominates in older patients.
Fusion (arthrodesis) is the gold standard for symptomatic IPJ arthritis. Eliminates pain reliably, stable construct, minimal functional deficit (IPJs have limited motion normally). Arthroplasty reserved for lesser toes.
Radiographic nonunion at the hallux IPJ is frequent (~25% in the largest single-centre series; up to 40% when combined with a first MTP fusion). Crucially, a painless fibrous (pseudarthrotic) union is an acceptable clinical outcome - radiographic nonunion does not predict patient dissatisfaction. Reserve revision for symptomatic, mobile nonunion.
Overview and Epidemiology
Interphalangeal joint arthritis in the foot is less common than MTP arthritis, but when symptomatic (especially hallux IPJ), it significantly impacts gait and footwear. The hallux IPJ is essential for push-off power. Unlike finger IPJs (where motion is critical), toe IPJs have minimal normal motion, making arthrodesis an excellent treatment with minimal functional loss. Post-traumatic arthritis from previous fracture or dislocation is the most common cause in younger patients, while degenerative arthritis predominates in older adults.
- Prevalence: Less common than MTP arthritis (10-15% of forefoot arthritis)
- Age: Post-traumatic (20-50y), degenerative (over 50y)
- Gender: Male = female (post-traumatic), female predominance (degenerative)
- Location: Hallux IPJ greater than 80%, lesser toe PIPJ less than 20%
- Bilateral: Uncommon (unless inflammatory arthritis)
- Previous IPJ fracture (especially intra-articular)
- IPJ dislocation (reduces but cartilage damaged)
- Severe turf toe (hallux IPJ cartilage injury)
- Chronic mallet or hammer toe deformity
- Age over 60 years
- Obesity (increased forefoot load)
- High-impact activities (running, jumping)
- Rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis
- Affects multiple IPJs simultaneously
Anatomy and Pathophysiology
The interphalangeal joints in the foot are hinge joints with minimal normal motion compared to fingers. Hallux IPJ normally has 40-60° dorsiflexion and 0-10° plantar flexion. Lesser toe PIPJ and DIPJ have 30-50° flexion. The collateral ligaments provide medial-lateral stability. The plantar plate (at MTP, not IPJ) does not extend to IPJ level. Because normal IPJ motion is limited, fusion causes minimal functional deficit.
- Normal Motion
- 40-60° dorsiflexion, 0-10° plantar flexion
- Functional Role
- Push-off power in gait, significant
- Arthritis Impact
- High impact - pain with walking, shoe pressure
- Normal Motion
- 30-50° flexion
- Functional Role
- Minimal functional role
- Arthritis Impact
- Low impact - mostly cosmetic and shoe fitting
- Normal Motion
- 20-30° flexion
- Functional Role
- Negligible functional role
- Arthritis Impact
- Rarely symptomatic
Pathophysiological Progression
Post-traumatic: Intra-articular fracture, dislocation, or severe hyperextension injury (turf toe) damages articular cartilage. Even if anatomically reduced, cartilage is permanently injured.
Damaged cartilage undergoes progressive degeneration. Loss of normal proteoglycan and collagen structure. Chondrocytes apoptosis. Subchondral bone exposed in areas.
Complete loss of cartilage. Exposed subchondral bone creates mechanical pain with motion and weight-bearing. Osteophyte formation at joint margins. Joint space narrowing on X-ray.
Joint collapse may occur. Chronic pain leads to altered gait (antalgic). Dorsal osteophytes cause shoe pressure. Surgical intervention required for symptom relief.
Post-Traumatic Arthritis
- Intra-articular fracture (even if well-reduced)
- IPJ dislocation (cartilage shear injury)
- Severe turf toe (hallux IPJ cartilage contusion)
- Repeated microtrauma (athletics)
- Symptoms develop 6 months to 5 years post-injury
- Earlier onset with more severe initial injury
- X-ray changes may precede symptoms
- History of specific injury
- Younger patients (20-50 years)
- Unilateral involvement
- Progressive pain and stiffness
Post-traumatic is most common cause under age 50.
Clinical Presentation and Examination
- Pain location: Specific IPJ (hallux or lesser toe)
- Onset: Post-traumatic (months to years after injury), degenerative (insidious)
- Aggravating factors: Walking, push-off (hallux IPJ), shoe pressure
- Stiffness: Morning stiffness (inflammatory), end-of-day stiffness (degenerative)
- Previous treatment: Often tried NSAIDs, shoe modifications
- Functional impact: Difficulty with walking distance, athletic activities
- Inspection: Swelling, osteophytes (dorsal prominence), malalignment
- Palpation: Tenderness over affected IPJ, warmth if inflamed
- ROM: Reduced ROM, pain at end-range, crepitus with motion
- Deformity: Hallux IPJ hyperextension or flexion contracture, hammer/mallet toe (lesser)
- Gait: Antalgic gait, reduced push-off (hallux IPJ arthritis)
- Footwear: Assess shoe wear pattern, pressure areas
For hallux IPJ arthritis, perform:
- ROM assessment: Compare to contralateral (normally 40-60° dorsiflexion)
- Grind test: Axially load and rotate IPJ - crepitus and pain suggests arthritis
- Dorsal osteophyte: Palpate dorsal joint - prominence indicates advanced disease
- Push-off test: Ask patient to perform single-leg toe raise - weakness/avoidance if painful
These findings confirm symptomatic arthritis requiring treatment.
Differential Diagnosis
- Key Distinguishing Features
- Acute onset, severe pain, erythema, asymmetric
- Diagnostic Test
- Serum uric acid, joint aspiration (urate crystals)
- Key Distinguishing Features
- Acute, fever, systemic illness, recent trauma/surgery
- Diagnostic Test
- Joint aspiration (cell count, culture)
- Key Distinguishing Features
- Acute hyperextension injury, plantar plate tear
- Diagnostic Test
- MRI (plantar plate injury, no chronic arthritis)
- Key Distinguishing Features
- Pain at nail, paronychia, ingrown nail
- Diagnostic Test
- Inspection of nail and nail bed
Assessing Union: Painless Fibrous Union vs Symptomatic Nonunion
Because radiographic nonunion is common (~25%) yet does NOT predict pain or dissatisfaction, the decisive clinical skill after hallux IPJ arthrodesis is distinguishing a benign fibrous union (leave alone) from a symptomatic mobile nonunion (revise). The topic leans on the "painless fibrous union is acceptable" concept throughout, so the operational criteria must be explicit. The largest series (Braswell 2023) defined these categories precisely:
- Radiographic features
- At least two cortices bridging the fusion site; no hardware failure; no lytic gapping around the implant
- Clinical features
- Painless, stable, no motion at IPJ
- Action
- None - solid fusion achieved
- Radiographic features
- Meets the radiographic nonunion definition (fewer than two bridging cortices) but stable-appearing hardware
- Clinical features
- PAINLESS toe with no detectable IPJ motion on examination - behaves like a fusion
- Action
- Accept - a successful clinical endpoint; do NOT revise
- Radiographic features
- Fewer than two bridging cortices, a lytic gap, or hardware loosening/breakage
- Clinical features
- Pain on weightbearing/push-off WITH detectable micromotion or instability at the fusion site
- Action
- Consider revision (re-preparation, compression, rigid re-fixation, bone graft)
How to assess it in clinic. Take weightbearing radiographs (CT only if union is genuinely equivocal or revision is being planned), then stress the toe manually at the IPJ to detect micromotion, and correlate strictly with the patient's pain. A diagnostic local-anaesthetic infiltration of the IPJ that abolishes the pain confirms the joint as the true pain generator before committing to revision - important because adjacent first-MTP arthritis (hallux rigidus) or a neighbouring nail/soft-tissue problem can mimic IPJ pain, and radiographic nonunion at a nearby fused MTP can coexist. In Braswell's cohort it was specifically the patients labelled radiographic nonunion who carried the higher reoperation risk, but reoperation was driven by symptoms and mobility, not the radiograph alone.
Radiographic nonunion is not an operative indication by itself. Revise a hallux IPJ nonunion only when it is BOTH symptomatic (pain on push-off/weightbearing) AND mobile (detectable motion or hardware failure at the fusion site). A painless, stable fibrous union is an accepted successful outcome and should be left alone - operating on it exposes the patient to the risks of surgery with little to gain.
Setting and Checking the Fusion Position Intra-operatively
Malposition - not nonunion - is the most avoidable cause of a disappointed patient: excessive dorsiflexion makes the nail strike the ground at toe-off, while excessive plantarflexion drives the toe tip and dorsal joint into the shoe. The target of roughly 10-15 degrees plantar flexion at the hallux IPJ, slight physiological valgus, and neutral rotation must be set and confirmed on the table, not eyeballed. This is the model answer to the viva follow-up "how would you verify correct position intra-operatively?"
- Reference the contralateral hallux - keep the opposite foot in the field (or note its cascade pre-operatively) and reproduce its resting angle and valgus
- Simulate stance: press a flat rigid plate (instrument tray lid, or the surgeon's flat hand) against the WHOLE plantar forefoot as though the foot were flat on the floor
- The pulp of the great toe should just contact the plate while the nail faces forwards, not skywards
- Too much plantarflexion and the pulp digs in hard; too much dorsiflexion and the toe/nail lifts off the plate and will catch the ground in gait
- Rotation check: the nail plate should lie in the same plane as the lesser-toe nails - no pronation or supination
- Provisional K-wire, then mini-fluoroscopy (AP and lateral) to confirm alignment, surface coaptation, and hardware placement before definitive fixation
- Combined first-ray fusions: set the first MTP position first, then tailor the IPJ to it and re-check whole-ray pulp-to-floor clearance - immobilising the MTP shifts load and geometry onto the IPJ
- Re-assess clearance once definitive fixation is applied, before closure
Say it as a sequence: match the contralateral toe, simulate weightbearing against a flat plate (pulp just touches, nail points forward), confirm neutral rotation against the lesser-toe nail plane, then mini-fluoroscopy to lock in alignment and hardware. Doing this on the table is what prevents the excessive-dorsiflexion malunion that produces nail ground-strike.
Investigations
Plain X-ray Assessment
- AP foot: Shows IPJ alignment and joint space
- Lateral foot: Shows osteophytes, dorsal prominence
- Oblique foot: Additional detail of IPJs
- Joint space narrowing (bone-on-bone in severe cases)
- Osteophyte formation (especially dorsal)
- Subchondral sclerosis
- Subchondral cysts
- Malalignment (flexion or extension deformity)
- Mild: Joint space narrowing, small osteophytes
- Moderate: Significant narrowing, larger osteophytes, sclerosis
- Severe: Bone-on-bone contact, collapse, deformity
X-rays sufficient for diagnosis in most cases.
Management Algorithm
Imaging


The goal is pain relief and restoration of function. For symptomatic hallux IPJ arthritis, arthrodesis (fusion) is the gold standard - reliably eliminates pain with minimal functional deficit. Conservative treatment is first-line for mild symptoms. Lesser toe IPJ arthritis can often be managed conservatively or with arthroplasty (resection) if surgery needed.
Non-Operative Management
- Mild to moderate symptoms
- Patient medically unfit for surgery
- Patient refuses surgery
- Stiff-soled shoes (reduces IPJ motion)
- Rocker-bottom sole (offloads forefoot, reduces push-off stress)
- Extra depth toe box (accommodates dorsal osteophytes)
- Carbon fiber plate insole (stiffens forefoot)
- Morton extension (limits hallux motion)
- NSAIDs for pain and inflammation
- Intra-articular corticosteroid injection (temporary relief 3-6 months)
- Avoid high-impact activities
- Low-impact exercise (swimming, cycling)
- 40-50% achieve acceptable symptom control
- Most eventually progress to surgery
Conservative treatment is palliative, not curative.
Complications
- Incidence
- ~25% (largest HIPJ series); up to 40% if combined with MTP fusion
- Risk Factors
- Diabetes (significant risk factor), inadequate fixation, poor bone quality
- Prevention/Management
- Joint preparation to bleeding bone, compression; revise ONLY if symptomatic mobile nonunion (painless fibrous union is acceptable)
- Incidence
- 5-10%
- Risk Factors
- Incorrect positioning during surgery
- Prevention/Management
- Careful positioning (10-15° plantar flexion hallux), check alignment intra-op
- Incidence
- 5-10%
- Risk Factors
- K-wire fixation
- Prevention/Management
- Pin care, early removal at 3-4 weeks, antibiotics if infected
- Incidence
- Rare
- Risk Factors
- Altered gait mechanics post-fusion
- Prevention/Management
- Proper fusion position, orthotics if symptomatic
- Incidence
- 5%
- Risk Factors
- Excessive plantar or dorsiflexion fusion
- Prevention/Management
- Correct positioning, may need nail removal
- Incidence
- Under 2%
- Risk Factors
- Iatrogenic during exposure
- Prevention/Management
- Careful dissection, protect digital nerves
Incorrect fusion position causes functional problems:
- Excessive dorsiflexion: Nail catches on ground during gait, painful
- Excessive plantar flexion: Dorsal toe pressure in shoes, nail driven dorsally
- Varus or valgus: Medial or lateral shoe pressure, unstable gait
Careful positioning and intra-operative verification essential.
Outcomes and Prognosis
- Rigid fixation (plate preferred over K-wires)
- Good bone quality
- Non-smoker
- Normal body weight
- Compliant with post-op protocol
- Correct fusion position
- Smoking (impairs bone healing)
- Poor bone quality (osteoporosis, RA)
- Inadequate fixation
- Infection
- Non-compliance with weight-bearing restrictions
- Inflammatory arthritis (higher nonunion risk)
Functional Outcomes
- Pain relief and patient satisfaction generally high despite imperfect radiographic union
- Radiographic nonunion ~25% in the largest series; ~21% reoperation rate (Braswell 2023) - but radiographic nonunion did NOT predict dissatisfaction
- Painless fibrous (fibrous ankylosis) union is an accepted clinical endpoint
- Return to shoes: most patients by 3-4 months
- Minimal functional deficit: IPJ has limited normal motion
- Fusion and arthroplasty (resection) both used; resection less predictable but acceptable as motion is non-critical
- Cosmetic and footwear improvement with correction of hammer/mallet toe
older texts quote "over 90% union" for IPJ fusion; the best contemporary data (institutional series, n=227) shows ~25% radiographic nonunion. The reconciling concept is that a stable, painless fibrous union behaves clinically like a solid fusion.
Guidelines, Registries & Global Practice
Global epidemiology. IPJ arthritis of the foot is uncommon relative to first MTP (hallux rigidus) and lesser-toe MTP disease. The hallux IPJ accounts for the large majority of symptomatic cases; isolated lesser-toe IPJ arthritis is usually incidental. Post-traumatic disease (turf toe / hyperextension injury, intra-articular fracture, dislocation) predominates in younger and athletic populations worldwide, while primary degenerative and inflammatory (rheumatoid, psoriatic) disease predominate with age.
Society guidance (side by side). No orthopaedic society publishes an IPJ-arthritis-specific guideline; recommendations are extrapolated from first-ray degenerative-disease and inflammatory-arthritis pathways. Practice converges on a non-operative-first approach with arthrodesis for refractory disease.
- Relevant position
- Stepwise non-operative care for forefoot OA before surgery; arthrodesis for advanced first-ray degeneration
- Practical implication
- Document failed conservative trial before fusion
- Relevant position
- Foot & ankle arthrodesis for end-stage forefoot arthritis; honest consent on nonunion
- Practical implication
- Quote realistic, series-based nonunion figures at consent
- Relevant position
- Optimise DMARD/biologic therapy before elective forefoot surgery in inflammatory arthritis
- Practical implication
- Co-manage with rheumatology; time surgery to disease control
- Relevant position
- Stable internal fixation with adequate joint-surface preparation and compression
- Practical implication
- Preparation to bleeding bone emphasised over specific implant
Registry note. Toe IPJ arthrodesis is not separately tracked by national joint registries (NJR, AOANJRR, AJRR, SHAR), which capture replacement arthroplasty rather than small-joint fusion - so the best evidence remains institutional case series rather than registry data. This is itself an exam-worthy point about the limits of the evidence base.
High- vs limited-resource practice variation. In well-resourced settings, weightbearing radiographs, occasional MRI/ultrasound, plate or screw fixation, and formal gait/footwear rehabilitation are standard. In limited-resource settings, plain radiographs and K-wire fixation (inexpensive, effective) predominate, and accommodative footwear plus simple analgesia carry much of the non-operative burden. Outcomes hinge on joint preparation and patient selection rather than implant cost.
Controversies and Areas of Uncertainty
The dominant controversy. Dedicated series report ~25% radiographic nonunion (Braswell 2023) and up to 40% when combined with MTP fusion (Brodsky 2021) - yet radiographic nonunion does NOT predict pain or satisfaction. A painless fibrous union is widely accepted as a successful clinical endpoint, so routine revision for asymptomatic radiographic nonunion is not justified.
No construct has been shown to reliably reduce IPJ nonunion (single screw vs multiple screws vs screw+plate vs non-screw all comparable). At the first ray more broadly, implant survival is similar across two-screw, plate, and plate+lag-screw constructs; plates carry a higher hardware-removal rate. Joint preparation likely matters more than implant choice.
Arthrodesis is gold standard for the hallux IPJ; resection arthroplasty is reserved for lesser toes where motion is non-critical. There is no robust evidence base for IPJ implant arthroplasty or cheilectomy at the toe IPJ, unlike the better-studied first MTP.
When both joints need fusing, IP nonunion was lowest when the IPJ was fused FIRST (17%) versus MTP-first or simultaneous (both 50%) - a small-series signal, not a guideline, but a plausible mechanical argument (immobilising the MTP loads the IPJ).
MCQ Practice Points
Q: What is the most common cause of hallux IPJ arthritis in patients under 50 years? A: Post-traumatic arthritis - previous intra-articular fracture, IPJ dislocation, or severe turf toe injury causing articular cartilage damage.
Q: What is the gold standard surgical treatment for symptomatic hallux IPJ arthritis? A: Arthrodesis (fusion) - reliably relieves pain with minimal functional deficit (IPJ has limited normal motion). Note: radiographic union is NOT guaranteed (~25% nonunion in the largest series), but a painless fibrous union behaves clinically like a solid fusion.
Q: What is the correct position for hallux IPJ arthrodesis? A: 10-15° plantar flexion, slight valgus to match contralateral great toe, neutral rotation. Excessive dorsiflexion causes nail ground strike; excessive plantar flexion causes shoe pressure.
Q: What fixation method is preferred for hallux IPJ arthrodesis? A: Plate and screw or lag screw - provides rigid fixation with highest union rate. K-wires acceptable for lesser toe IPJs but plate preferred for hallux.
At a Glance
Interphalangeal joint arthritis of the foot most commonly affects the hallux IPJ, which is functionally more significant than lesser toe IPJs due to its contribution to push-off power during gait. Post-traumatic arthritis (previous fracture, dislocation, turf toe injury) is the primary etiology in younger patients, while degenerative and inflammatory causes predominate in older populations. Arthrodesis (fusion) is the gold standard treatment for symptomatic hallux IPJ arthritis, providing reliable pain relief with minimal functional deficit given the normally limited IPJ motion. Contrary to older teaching, radiographic union is NOT guaranteed: the largest published series reports roughly a 25% nonunion rate, but most nonunions are painless fibrous unions that do not require revision. The critical fusion position is 10-15° plantar flexion with slight valgus matching the contralateral toe—excessive dorsiflexion causes the nail to catch on the ground, while excessive plantar flexion creates dorsal nail pressure in footwear. Lesser toe IPJs can be managed with resection arthroplasty as motion is less critical; K-wire fixation suffices for lesser toes while plate/screw fixation is preferred for the hallux.
TRAUMACauses of IPJ Arthritis
Hook:TRAUMA is the most common cause of IPJ arthritis in young patients!
PLANTHallux IPJ Fusion Position
Hook:PLANT the hallux IPJ in slight plantar flexion!
PINSSurgical Approach Complications
Hook:Watch for PINS complications after IPJ arthrodesis!
Exam Viva Scenarios
Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud
“A 35-year-old footballer presents with 2 years of progressive hallux IPJ pain. He sustained a severe turf toe injury 3 years ago. Examination shows reduced hallux IPJ ROM (20° vs normal 60°), crepitus with motion, and tenderness. X-rays demonstrate joint space narrowing, osteophytes, and subchondral sclerosis. What is your diagnosis and management?”
“A 48-year-old female with known rheumatoid arthritis presents with bilateral painful hallux and second toe IPJ swelling and stiffness. She has tried DMARDs and biologics with partial control. X-rays show erosive changes at multiple IPJs bilaterally. She requests surgical treatment for pain relief. How do you approach this?”
“A 52-year-old male presents 6 months after hallux IPJ fusion performed elsewhere. The fusion has healed (solid union on X-ray) but he complains that his great toe nail catches on the ground when walking and is painful. X-rays show the IPJ fused in 30° dorsiflexion. What is the problem and how do you manage it?”
DEFINITION
- IPJ arthritis: hallux IPJ, lesser toe PIPJ/DIPJ
- Hallux IPJ most symptomatic (essential for push-off)
- Post-traumatic (under 50y) vs degenerative (over 60y)
- Inflammatory arthritis: bilateral, multiple IPJs
- Limited normal IPJ motion = fusion causes minimal deficit
CAUSES
- Post-traumatic: fracture, dislocation, turf toe
- Degenerative: age-related (over 60y)
- Inflammatory: RA, psoriatic (bilateral)
- Timeline: symptoms 6mo-5y post-injury
CLINICAL FEATURES
- Pain at specific IPJ with walking
- Reduced ROM, crepitus with motion
- Dorsal osteophytes (palpable prominence)
- X-ray: joint space narrowing, osteophytes, sclerosis
CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT
- Stiff-soled shoes or rocker-bottom
- Carbon fiber plate insole
- NSAIDs, intra-articular steroid
- 40-50% achieve symptom control
HALLUX IPJ FUSION
- Gold standard for failed conservative
- Position: 10-15° plantar flexion, slight valgus
- Fixation: plate/screw or lag screw (no construct eliminates nonunion)
- Radiographic nonunion ~25% (largest series); painless fibrous union is acceptable
- Time to union: typically 8-12 weeks
KEY POINTS
- Hallux IPJ more significant than lesser toes
- Fusion eliminates pain, minimal functional loss
- Correct position critical (10-15° plantar flexion)
- Nonunion ~25% radiographically; diabetes is the key risk factor
- Malunion causes nail or shoe pressure problems
Evidence Base and Key Studies
The Braswell (2023) series below is the landmark contemporary dataset and directly overturns the "over 90% union" figure repeated in older textbooks. Know the ~25% radiographic nonunion / ~21% reoperation numbers AND the reconciling concept (painless fibrous union behaves like a solid fusion) for the viva.
Outcomes After Hallux Interphalangeal Joint Arthrodesis (largest series to date)
- 227 primary hallux IPJ arthrodeses - largest single-centre series published
- Radiographic nonunion rate 25.5% (58/227); reoperation rate 21.1% (48/227)
- Diabetes was a significant risk factor for nonunion (p=0.014)
- No significant difference by smoking status, inflammatory arthritis, or implant type (single screw vs multiple screws vs screw+other vs non-screw)
- Prior first MTP arthrodesis did NOT significantly raise IPJ nonunion rate in this cohort
Ipsilateral Hallux MTP + IP Joint Arthrodesis
- 20 feet (14 rheumatoid arthritis, 5 failed hallux valgus surgery, 1 hallux rigidus)
- All MTP arthrodeses healed, but 8/20 (40%) failed to heal at the IP joint
- IP nonunion lowest when IP fused first (17%) vs MTP first (50%) vs simultaneous (50%)
- IP nonunion did NOT predict AOFAS score or satisfaction; 18/20 patients satisfied
- Median hallux AOFAS rose from 25 to 68; fibrous ankylosis was an acceptable clinical outcome
Fixation Technique and Implant Survival in First MTP/IP Arthrodesis
- 83 patients / 89 fusions comparing two crossed screws vs dorsal plate vs dorsal plate + lag screw
- Overall implant survival 96.5% at 1 year and 94.0% at 10 years - no significant difference between constructs
- Highest union rate with dorsal plate plus lag screw (93.1%)
- Hardware removal higher with plate constructs (10.3%) than two-screw (3.1%)
- Mean AOFAS 83 with no significant difference between fixation groups
Immediate Weightbearing After First-Ray Fusion (HIPJ arthralgia signal)
- 25 first MTP arthrodeses with interfragmentary screw plus dorsal locking plate, immediate full weightbearing
- Overall union 96%; clinical healing ~5.9 weeks, radiographic fusion ~6.8 weeks
- Mean VAS pain fell from 6.6 to 0.6
- 2 patients developed symptomatic hallux IPJ arthralgia after MTP fusion (adjacent-joint load transfer)
First MTP Joint Pain and Turf Toe in Athletes (etiology review)
- Reviews turf toe, sand toe, sesamoiditis, FHL/EHL tendinopathy, gout and hallux rigidus as causes of first-ray pain in athletes
- Turf toe is a hyperextension plantar-plate injury of the first MTP - a recognised precursor to post-traumatic forefoot arthritis
- Weightbearing radiographs and point-of-care ultrasound aid diagnosis
- First-line management is non-surgical: footwear/activity modification, physical therapy, selective injection
Arthrodesis for Hallux Rigidus (contemporary review)
- First MTP arthrodesis remains the cornerstone for advanced first-ray degeneration with favourable long-term outcomes and low revision when fusion succeeds
- Interphalangeal arthritis is an explicitly recognised complication of MTP fusion
- Nonunion and malunion are the principal failure modes requiring revision
- Careful patient selection is emphasised