Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Lower Limb Amputation Levels

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Lower Limb Amputation Levels

Comprehensive guide to lower limb amputation levels - toe, ray, transmetatarsal, Chopart, Lisfranc, Syme, transtibial, knee disarticulation, transfemoral, hip disarticulation. Energy expenditure, prosthetic outcomes, healing considerations for orthopaedic exam

complete
Updated: 2025-01-08
High Yield Overview

LOWER LIMB AMPUTATION LEVELS

Level Selection | Energy Expenditure | Prosthetic Outcomes | Surgical Technique by Level

40-60%Energy savings preserving knee (BKA vs AKA)
12-15cmMinimum transtibial length from tibial tuberosity
80%Vascular disease as primary indication
90%+Transfemoral healing rate

AMPUTATION LEVEL HIERARCHY

Foot (Toe/Ray/TMA)
PatternLocalized gangrene, diabetic foot
TreatmentPreserve foot length, watch for equinovarus
Hindfoot (Chopart/Lisfranc/Syme)
PatternMidfoot disease, heel pad viable
TreatmentEnd-bearing potential, equinus prevention
Transtibial
PatternMost common major amputation
TreatmentLong posterior flap, preserve knee at all costs
Transfemoral
PatternKnee preservation not possible
TreatmentEqual flaps, adductor myodesis critical

Critical Must-Knows

  • Energy expenditure increases proximally: Toe 0%, TMA 10-20%, BKA 40-60%, AKA 90-120%, hip disarticulation 200%+
  • Transtibial minimum length: 12-15cm from tibial tuberosity for prosthetic lever arm
  • Long posterior flap (Burgess technique) is gold standard for transtibial amputation
  • Adductor myodesis to lateral femur prevents abduction contracture in transfemoral
  • Syme amputation provides end-bearing but requires experienced surgeon and viable heel pad

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Preserve the knee - energy expenditure 40-60% less with BKA vs AKA
  • "
    TcPO2 greater than 30-40 mmHg predicts healing at proposed level
  • "
    Bevel anterior tibia 45 degrees in BKA to prevent skin pressure
  • "
    Fibula cut 1-2cm shorter than tibia to prevent pressure symptoms

Critical Lower Limb Amputation Level Exam Points

Energy Expenditure by Level

This is an EXAM FAVOURITE. Energy cost increases with proximal amputation. Toe/ray: baseline. TMA: 10-20% increase. Transtibial: 40-60% increase. Transfemoral: 90-120% increase. Hip disarticulation: greater than 200% increase. Knee preservation is paramount - reduces energy by 40-60%.

Level Selection Algorithm

Choose the most distal level that will heal. Consider: (1) Tissue viability - TcPO2, Doppler, clinical assessment (2) Functional requirements - prosthetic fitting, mobility goals (3) Patient factors - age, comorbidities, rehabilitation potential. Vascular surgery input essential in PVD.

Key Technical Points by Level

Transtibial: Long posterior flap (Burgess), 45-degree anterior tibial bevel, fibula 1-2cm shorter, myodesis. Transfemoral: Equal anterior-posterior flaps, adductor myodesis to lateral femur (prevents abduction contracture), minimum 10-12cm from greater trochanter.

Prosthetic Considerations

Adequate bone length for lever arm and soft tissue padding for socket. End-bearing levels (Syme, knee disarticulation) allow direct weight transfer. Transtibial requires PTB (patellar tendon bearing) socket. Transfemoral uses ischial containment socket. Early prosthetist involvement essential.

Lower Limb Amputation Levels - Comprehensive Comparison

LevelEnergy IncreaseHealing RateProsthetic OutcomeKey Consideration
Toe/Ray amputation0-5%Variable (60-80%)No prosthesis neededHigh revision rate in PVD, watch for transfer ulcers
Transmetatarsal (TMA)10-20%70-80%Toe filler in shoeAchilles lengthening prevents equinovarus
Lisfranc/Chopart20-40%60-75%Difficult prosthetic fittingEquinus deformity common, rarely performed
Syme (ankle disarticulation)20-40%75-85%End-bearing, long lever armRequires viable heel pad, experienced surgeon
Transtibial (BKA)40-60%70-85%PTB socket, excellent functionMOST IMPORTANT: Preserve the knee
Knee disarticulation60-80%85-90%End-bearing, bulky kneeNo bone cut, good for non-ambulatory
Transfemoral (AKA)90-120%90-95%Ischial containment socketAdductor myodesis prevents abduction contracture
Hip disarticulationGreater than 200%95%+Canadian hip prosthesis, limited useReserved for tumor, trauma - high mortality in vascular
Mnemonic

TOES To THIGHAmputation Level Hierarchy

T
Toe amputation
Distal phalanx, toe disarticulation - most distal level
O
Other forefoot
Ray amputation - metatarsal and toe en bloc
E
Extended forefoot
Transmetatarsal (TMA) - through metatarsal shafts
S
Syme amputation
Ankle disarticulation with heel pad preservation
T
Transtibial
Below knee amputation (BKA) - preserve the knee
T
Through knee
Knee disarticulation - end-bearing potential
H
High thigh
Transfemoral (AKA) - above knee amputation
I
Ilium level
Hip disarticulation - complete limb removal
G
Greater pelvis
Hemipelvectomy - rarely performed
H
Hemicorporectomy
Ultimate - translumbar amputation

Memory Hook:From TOES To THIGH - more proximal = more energy, less function

Mnemonic

FLAPSTranstibial Amputation Technique

F
Flap - Long Posterior
Burgess technique - gastrocnemius provides durable coverage
L
Length - 12-15cm minimum
From tibial tuberosity for adequate prosthetic lever arm
A
Anterior tibial bevel
45-degree bevel prevents anterior skin breakdown
P
Position fibula shorter
Cut fibula 1-2cm shorter than tibia
S
Suture myodesis
Attach posterior muscles to anterior tibia through drill holes

Memory Hook:Good FLAPS make a good stump - remember the Burgess long posterior flap

Mnemonic

ZERO TO DOUBLEEnergy Expenditure by Amputation Level

Z
Zero increase
Toe amputation - baseline energy expenditure
E
Eleven to twenty
TMA - 10-20% increase in energy expenditure
R
Roughly 20-40%
Syme amputation - moderate increase
O
Over 40-60%
Transtibial (BKA) - significant but manageable
T
Terrible 90-120%
Transfemoral (AKA) - near doubling of energy
O
Over 200%
Hip disarticulation - more than double baseline
D
Double+
Hemipelvectomy - extremely high energy cost
O
Only young fit patients
Can ambulate with proximal amputations
U
Understand the numbers
This is a common exam question
B
Below knee = Best
Preserve the knee to reduce energy by 40-60%
L
Level selection critical
Most distal level that will heal
E
Every effort - save the knee
Short BKA still better than AKA

Memory Hook:ZERO TO DOUBLE - energy goes from zero to more than double as you go proximal

Overview and Level Selection Principles

Lower limb amputation levels range from toe amputation to hemipelvectomy. The choice of level is critical and determines functional outcome, prosthetic options, energy expenditure, and quality of life.

Key Principles of Level Selection:

  1. Most distal level that will heal - balance function against healing potential
  2. Preserve joints - especially the knee (reduces energy by 40-60%)
  3. Adequate bone length for prosthetic lever arm
  4. Sufficient soft tissue for durable, well-padded closure
  5. Consider prosthetic requirements - early prosthetist involvement

The Golden Rule of Amputation

PRESERVE THE KNEE AT ALL COSTS. A short transtibial amputation that heals is vastly superior to a transfemoral amputation. Energy expenditure for ambulation with transtibial is 40-60% less than transfemoral. Even a very short transtibial (Mazet level) preserves knee proprioception and reduces energy demands.

Amputation Level Categories:

Foot Level Amputations

  • Toe amputation: Distal phalanx or toe disarticulation
  • Ray amputation: Metatarsal and toe en bloc
  • Transmetatarsal (TMA): Through metatarsal shafts
  • Lisfranc: Tarsometatarsal disarticulation
  • Chopart: Midtarsal disarticulation

Major Limb Amputations

  • Syme: Ankle disarticulation with heel pad
  • Transtibial (BKA): Most common major amputation
  • Knee disarticulation: Through-knee amputation
  • Transfemoral (AKA): Above-knee amputation
  • Hip disarticulation: Complete limb removal

Pathophysiology and Energy Expenditure

Energy Expenditure in Amputation

Energy expenditure during ambulation increases with more proximal amputation levels. This is a critical exam topic and understanding the physiology is essential.

Mechanisms of Increased Energy:

  1. Loss of normal gait biomechanics - compensatory movements required
  2. Increased hip and trunk muscle work - to stabilize prosthesis
  3. Loss of ankle push-off - significant energy generator in normal gait
  4. Increased swing phase energy - heavier prosthetic components proximally
  5. Compensatory arm swing - increased upper body work

Energy Expenditure by Amputation Level

Amputation Level% Increase Above BaselineWalking Speed (% of normal)Oxygen Consumption
Toe/Ray amputation0-5%95-100%Minimal increase
Transmetatarsal10-20%85-95%Slight increase
Syme amputation20-40%75-90%Moderate increase
Transtibial (BKA)40-60%65-80%Significant increase
Knee disarticulation60-80%55-70%Substantial increase
Transfemoral (AKA)90-120%40-60%Near doubling
Hip disarticulationGreater than 200%Less than 40%More than double baseline

Energy Expenditure - Exam Favourite

Know these numbers: Transtibial (BKA) = 40-60% increase. Transfemoral (AKA) = 90-120% increase. This represents the energy SAVINGS of preserving the knee. Elderly vascular patients often cannot compensate for the energy demands of transfemoral amputation - many become wheelchair-bound.

Healing Considerations by Level

Factors Affecting Healing:

  • Vascular supply - TcPO2, Doppler signals, clinical perfusion
  • Tissue quality - infection, radiation, previous surgery
  • Patient factors - diabetes, smoking, nutrition, renal disease
  • Surgical technique - tension-free closure, adequate flaps

General Healing Rates by Level:

  • More distal amputations have lower healing rates in vascular disease
  • Transfemoral heals reliably (greater than 90%) but at functional cost
  • Failed distal amputation requiring revision is worse than primary proximal

TcPO2 for Level Selection

Transcutaneous oxygen tension (TcPO2) predicts healing:

  • Greater than 40 mmHg: High probability of healing
  • 20-40 mmHg: Indeterminate - clinical judgment required
  • Less than 20 mmHg: High probability of healing failure

Always request TcPO2 at proposed amputation level in vascular patients.

Clinical Presentation and Level Assessment

Indications for Each Amputation Level

Foot Level Amputations (Toe, Ray, TMA)

Toe Amputation Indications:

  • Localized gangrene of single toe
  • Osteomyelitis limited to phalanges
  • Frostbite with demarcated necrosis
  • Trauma with non-viable toe

Ray Amputation Indications:

  • Gangrene extending to metatarsal head
  • Osteomyelitis involving MTPJ
  • Deep space infection requiring drainage
  • Central ray for web space infection

Transmetatarsal Amputation (TMA) Indications:

  • Multiple toe gangrene
  • Forefoot osteomyelitis
  • Failed toe/ray amputations
  • Adequate midfoot perfusion

Key Considerations:

  • High revision rate in vascular disease (30-50%)
  • Watch for transfer ulcers on remaining toes
  • Achilles lengthening may be needed with TMA to prevent equinovarus
  • Requires adequate midfoot blood supply

Midfoot Amputations (Lisfranc, Chopart)

Lisfranc (Tarsometatarsal) Amputation:

  • Disarticulation through tarsometatarsal joints
  • Rarely performed - unstable foot, equinovarus common
  • May be considered for trauma with viable hindfoot
  • Requires tendo-Achilles lengthening

Chopart (Midtarsal) Amputation:

  • Disarticulation through talonavicular and calcaneocuboid joints
  • Historical interest - rarely performed today
  • Severe equinus deformity inevitable
  • Poor prosthetic options

Avoid Midfoot Amputations

Lisfranc and Chopart amputations are rarely performed due to:

  1. High rate of equinovarus/equinus deformity
  2. Difficult prosthetic fitting
  3. Muscle imbalance (stronger plantarflexors)
  4. Often progress to more proximal amputation Better options: TMA (if viable) or Syme/transtibial (if not).

Syme Amputation (Ankle Disarticulation)

Indications:

  • Trauma with non-viable foot, intact heel pad
  • Congenital deformities (fibular hemimelia)
  • Tumour of foot with clear margins
  • Failed forefoot surgery with viable heel

Requirements:

  • Viable heel pad - essential for weight bearing
  • Adequate posterior tibial artery supply
  • Intact heel pad sensation (preferable)
  • Experienced surgeon

Advantages:

  • End-bearing stump
  • Long lever arm for excellent prosthetic control
  • Energy expenditure lower than transtibial
  • Can bear weight without prosthesis (limited)

Disadvantages:

  • Bulky distal stump - cosmetic concerns
  • Requires specialized prosthesis
  • Technically demanding
  • Heel pad migration risk

Transtibial Amputation (Below-Knee)

Indications:

  • Most common major amputation
  • Vascular disease with adequate healing potential
  • Trauma with intact knee
  • Tumour not involving knee

Level Selection:

  • Minimum: 12-15cm from tibial tuberosity
  • Optimal: Junction of proximal and middle third
  • Maximum: Fibula must allow flap closure

Key Points:

  • PRESERVE THE KNEE - reduces energy by 40-60%
  • Short BKA still better than AKA
  • Long posterior flap (Burgess) is gold standard
  • PTB (patellar tendon bearing) prosthetic socket

Transtibial - The Most Important Level

The difference between transtibial and transfemoral is the most important distinction in lower limb amputation. Knee preservation:

  • Reduces energy expenditure by 40-60%
  • Improves prosthetic control
  • Enables independent ambulation in elderly
  • Maintains near-normal gait pattern

Knee Disarticulation and Transfemoral

Knee Disarticulation Indications:

  • Transtibial not possible (short stump, healing concerns)
  • Trauma with knee involvement
  • Non-ambulatory patients (easier nursing care)
  • Paediatric patients (preserves growth plates)

Transfemoral (AKA) Indications:

  • Failed or contraindicated transtibial
  • Vascular disease with poor healing distally
  • Knee joint pathology (infection, tumour)
  • Trauma with extensive proximal involvement

Transfemoral Key Points:

  • Minimum 10-12cm from greater trochanter
  • Equal anterior-posterior flaps
  • Adductor myodesis to lateral femur - prevents abduction contracture
  • Preserve adductor magnus insertion if possible

Hip Disarticulation and Hemipelvectomy

Hip Disarticulation Indications:

  • Proximal femoral tumour
  • Extensive proximal trauma
  • Uncontrolled infection of thigh
  • Failed transfemoral amputation (rare)

Hemipelvectomy Indications:

  • Pelvic tumour with no other option
  • Extensive infection involving pelvis
  • Rarely performed - high morbidity

Key Considerations:

  • Massive operation with high mortality risk
  • Very high energy expenditure (greater than 200% increase)
  • Most patients wheelchair-bound
  • Canadian hip prosthesis available but limited use
  • Require significant rehabilitation and support

Hip Disarticulation in Vascular Disease

Hip disarticulation for vascular disease carries extremely high mortality (greater than 50% in some series). Consider palliative approach vs surgical risk. Only proceed if sepsis from thigh level threatens life.

Level Selection Algorithm

Level Selection Decision-Making Process

Step 1Assess Indication and Urgency

Determine the underlying cause:

  • Vascular: Assess perfusion, revascularization options
  • Trauma: Injury pattern, soft tissue viability
  • Infection: Sepsis control, staged approach
  • Tumour: Margin requirements, staging
Step 2Evaluate Healing Potential

Vascular assessment:

  • Clinical: Pulses, capillary refill, tissue viability
  • TcPO2: Greater than 30-40 mmHg predicts healing
  • Doppler: Ankle-brachial index, toe pressures
  • Angiography if revascularization considered
Step 3Consider Functional Goals

Patient factors:

  • Age and baseline mobility
  • Cognitive function for prosthetic training
  • Contralateral limb status
  • Upper limb function (for transfers)
  • Social support and living situation
Step 4Select Level - Most Distal That Will Heal

Hierarchy of preservation:

  1. Preserve foot if possible (toe, ray, TMA)
  2. Preserve ankle (Syme) if heel pad viable
  3. PRESERVE KNEE - transtibial if possible
  4. Transfemoral if knee not salvageable
  5. Hip disarticulation only if absolutely necessary
Step 5Multidisciplinary Confirmation

Team involvement:

  • Vascular surgery input for level in PVD
  • Prosthetist early involvement
  • Rehabilitation medicine
  • Pain service (phantom pain prevention)
  • Psychological support

Investigations for Level Selection

Investigation Protocol for Amputation Level Planning

VascularVascular Assessment

Essential for vascular disease patients:

  • Ankle-brachial index (ABI): Less than 0.4 suggests poor healing
  • Toe pressures: Greater than 30 mmHg associated with healing
  • TcPO2 at proposed levels: Greater than 30-40 mmHg predicts healing
  • Duplex ultrasound: Arterial and venous patency
  • CT angiography: If revascularization being considered
ImagingPlain Radiographs and Advanced Imaging

Standard assessment:

  • Plain radiographs of affected limb
  • Assess extent of bone disease (osteomyelitis, tumour)
  • Contralateral limb assessment (vascular patients often bilateral)

Advanced imaging (when indicated):

  • MRI for tumour margins, skip metastases
  • CT for complex trauma, bone quality
  • Nuclear medicine for infection localization
LaboratoryBlood Tests

Preoperative optimization:

  • FBC, coagulation: Anaemia, bleeding risk
  • U and E, creatinine: Renal function (affects healing)
  • HbA1c: Diabetes control (target less than 8%)
  • Albumin, prealbumin: Nutritional status (greater than 30 g/L)
  • CRP, ESR: Infection markers
  • Blood cultures: If sepsis suspected
SpecialistMultidisciplinary Input

Team consultations:

  • Vascular surgery: Revascularization options, level advice
  • Prosthetist: Socket requirements, level optimization
  • Anaesthesia: Perioperative pain plan (phantom pain prevention)
  • Rehabilitation medicine: Function potential assessment
  • Dietitian: Nutritional optimization

TcPO2 is Key for Level Selection

TcPO2 (Transcutaneous Oxygen Tension):

  • Greater than 40 mmHg: 90%+ probability of healing
  • 30-40 mmHg: 75-90% probability - usually proceed
  • 20-30 mmHg: 50-75% - indeterminate, clinical judgment
  • Less than 20 mmHg: Less than 50% - consider more proximal level

Request TcPO2 at BOTH the proposed level AND one level proximal.

Imaging Gallery - Prosthetic Outcomes

Transtibial prosthetic components and functional demonstration
Click to expand
Three-panel comparison demonstrating transtibial (below-knee) prosthetic components and functional outcomes. Panel A: Individual wearing prosthetic with modern energy-storing ankle-foot component during gait, demonstrating natural walking mechanics. Panel B: Close-up of prosthetic socket (custom-fit patellar-tendon bearing design) and pylon (adjustable structural component). Panel C: Prosthetic foot-ankle mechanism with cosmetic covering showing articulating components. Transtibial amputation offers excellent prosthetic outcomes with 40-60% lower energy expenditure compared to transfemoral, emphasizing the critical importance of knee preservation in amputation level selection.Credit: Eshraghi A et al. via PLoS ONE via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Osseointegrated prosthetic fixation system radiographs
Click to expand
Four-panel anteroposterior radiographic series demonstrating osseointegrated prosthetic fixation system. Images show direct skeletal attachment of prosthetic limb via titanium implant, bypassing traditional socket-based suspension. Measurements indicate progressive bone integration (osseointegration) around the fixture. This advanced technique eliminates socket-related complications (skin breakdown, volume fluctuations, pistoning) and provides improved proprioception, increased range of motion, and elimination of socket discomfort. Particularly beneficial for transfemoral amputees with short residual limbs where socket fitting is challenging.Credit: Osseointegrated total knee replacement study via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Radiographic progression from total knee arthroplasty to osseointegrated amputation
Click to expand
Six-panel radiographic progression (A-F) showing evolution from native knee pathology through total knee arthroplasty to osseointegrated prosthetic system. Panels A-B demonstrate pre-operative degenerative knee disease. Panels C-D show initial total knee replacement. Panels E-F illustrate conversion to osseointegrated knee replacement system with direct skeletal attachment for prosthetic limb. Represents salvage option for failed arthroplasty or massive bone loss - an unconventional pathway relevant to amputation level decision-making when arthroplasty fails. Demonstrates how knee disarticulation level can be adapted with emerging osseointegration technology.Credit: Osseointegrated total knee replacement study via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Management Principles by Level

Universal Principles for All Levels

Preoperative:

  1. Optimize medical comorbidities (diabetes, cardiac, renal)
  2. Smoking cessation (refer to Quitline 13 78 48)
  3. Nutritional optimization (albumin greater than 30 g/L)
  4. Early prosthetist involvement
  5. Psychological preparation and support

Intraoperative:

  1. Appropriate level based on healing potential
  2. Adequate bone length for lever arm
  3. Sufficient soft tissue for tension-free closure
  4. Myodesis (muscle to bone) for optimal function
  5. Proper nerve handling - traction neurectomy

Postoperative:

  1. Rigid dressing or IPOP (immediate post-op prosthesis)
  2. Edema control - compression
  3. Phantom pain management
  4. Early rehabilitation and prosthetic fitting
  5. Psychological support

Myodesis vs Myoplasty

Myodesis = muscle sutured directly to bone through drill holes or anchors Myoplasty = muscle sutured to opposing muscle or fascia

Myodesis is the gold standard - provides:

  • Physiological muscle tension
  • Better proprioception
  • Stable residual limb shape
  • Improved prosthetic control

Flap Design by Level

Toe/Ray Amputation:

  • Fish-mouth or racquet incision
  • Equal dorsal and plantar flaps
  • Plantar flap may be longer for padding

Transmetatarsal:

  • Long plantar flap preferred
  • Plantar skin more durable for weight bearing
  • Short dorsal flap

Syme Amputation:

  • Posterior heel pad flap
  • Sagittal incision extended to malleoli
  • Preserve posterior tibial artery to heel pad

Transtibial (BKA):

  • Long posterior flap (Burgess) - gold standard
  • Posterior flap = 1.5 times AP diameter
  • Short anterior flap at bone level
  • Gastrocnemius provides durable coverage

Transfemoral (AKA):

  • Equal anterior and posterior fish-mouth flaps
  • Each flap = one-third circumference
  • Apex at level of bone division

Transtibial Flap Design

The long posterior myocutaneous flap (Burgess technique) is essential for transtibial amputation. The gastrocnemius muscle provides:

  1. Excellent blood supply
  2. Durable weight-bearing tissue
  3. Padding over bone end
  4. Reliable healing

Alternative: Skew flaps (medial/lateral) - used in some centers.

Bone Handling by Level

General Principles:

  • Adequate length for lever arm and prosthetic control
  • Smooth edges - rasp all bone ends
  • Avoid periosteal stripping (prevents ring sequestra)
  • Cover with muscle padding

Transtibial Specifics:

  • Minimum 12-15cm from tibial tuberosity
  • Anterior tibial bevel - 45 degrees to prevent skin pressure
  • Fibula 1-2cm shorter than tibia
  • Smooth edges with rasp

Transfemoral Specifics:

  • Minimum 10-12cm from greater trochanter
  • Junction of middle and distal third optimal
  • Preserve adductors if possible for muscle balance
  • Round edges with rasp

Special Techniques:

  • Ertl procedure: Tibio-fibular synostosis for end-bearing
  • Used in young trauma patients
  • Creates bone bridge between tibia and fibula
  • Allows direct end-bearing potential

Nerve Handling - Traction Neurectomy

Technique:

  1. Identify nerve in proximal wound
  2. Ligate accompanying vessels (artery runs with nerve)
  3. Apply gentle longitudinal traction (2-3cm)
  4. Use fresh sharp blade
  5. Transect cleanly in single motion
  6. Allow nerve to retract into proximal soft tissue
  7. Position away from scar and prosthetic pressure areas

Major Nerves by Level:

LevelMajor Nerves
Toe/RayDigital nerves
TMADeep and superficial peroneal, medial/lateral plantar
TranstibialDeep peroneal, tibial, sural, superficial peroneal
TransfemoralSciatic (divides into tibial and common peroneal), femoral
Hip disarticulationSciatic, femoral, obturator

Vessel Management:

  • Identify and ligate major vessels
  • Suture ligation for large vessels (SFA, popliteal)
  • Diathermy for small vessels
  • Meticulous hemostasis - hematoma increases infection risk

Surgical Technique by Level

Toe Amputation Technique

Indications: Localized gangrene, osteomyelitis of phalanx, frostbite

Technique:

  1. Racquet incision around base of toe
  2. Disarticulate at MTPJ or PIPJ
  3. Identify and ligate digital vessels
  4. Transect digital nerves under traction
  5. Close with interrupted sutures
  6. Leave open if infected (delayed primary closure)

Ray Amputation Technique

Indications: Gangrene to metatarsal head, MTPJ osteomyelitis

Technique:

  1. Racquet incision extending onto dorsum of foot
  2. Incise along metatarsal shaft
  3. Disarticulate at tarsometatarsal joint (or cut metatarsal)
  4. Remove metatarsal and toe en bloc
  5. Preserve intermetatarsal ligaments if possible
  6. Close with slight narrowing of foot
  7. Consider first or fifth ray specifically

Ray Amputation Specifics

First ray amputation: Preserves lateral foot but loses medial weight bearing - shifts weight laterally. Fifth ray amputation: Preserves medial column but narrows foot. Central rays (2nd, 3rd): Can be removed with minimal functional loss. Multiple rays: Consider TMA instead if greater than 2 rays involved.

Transmetatarsal Amputation (TMA)

Indications: Forefoot gangrene, failed toe/ray amputation, osteomyelitis

Preoperative:

  • Confirm midfoot perfusion adequate
  • Mark bone division level (mid-metatarsal shaft)
  • Long plantar flap design

Technique:

TMA Surgical Steps

Step 1Incision and Flap Design

Dorsal incision at level of planned metatarsal division.

Long plantar flap extending to metatarsal heads.

Plantar skin more durable for weight bearing.

Step 2Bone Division

Divide metatarsals with oscillating saw.

Create gentle parabolic curve (2nd metatarsal longest).

Bevel metatarsal heads plantarly to prevent pressure.

Rasp all bone edges smooth.

Step 3Soft Tissue Management

Identify and ligate plantar arteries.

Transect nerves under gentle traction.

Trim plantar muscles flush with bone.

Remove flexor tendons (prevent bowstringing).

Step 4Closure

Plantar flap brought dorsally.

Close deep fascia over bone ends.

Skin closure without tension.

Consider Achilles lengthening to prevent equinus.

TMA - Prevent Equinovarus

Achilles tendon lengthening should be considered with TMA to prevent equinovarus deformity from unopposed triceps surae. Options:

  1. Percutaneous tendo-Achilles lengthening (TAL)
  2. Gastrocnemius recession
  3. Postoperative AFO use

Equinovarus causes stump tip pressure and ulceration.

Syme Amputation (Ankle Disarticulation)

Indications: Trauma with viable heel pad, congenital deformity, failed forefoot surgery

Requirements:

  • Viable heel pad with intact sensation (preferable)
  • Adequate posterior tibial artery
  • Experienced surgeon

Technique:

Syme Amputation Steps

Step 1Incision

Sagittal incision from tip of lateral malleolus.

Across sole of foot at level of metatarsal heads.

To tip of medial malleolus.

Dorsal transverse incision across ankle.

Step 2Disarticulation

Divide anterior structures (tendons, vessels, nerves).

Enter ankle joint anteriorly.

Disarticulate talus from ankle mortise.

Identify and protect posterior tibial artery.

Step 3Heel Pad Dissection

Carefully dissect heel pad from calcaneus.

Maintain attachment to posterior tibial vessels.

Remove calcaneus by sharp dissection from heel pad.

Preserve fat pad attachments.

Step 4Bone Trimming and Closure

Trim malleoli flush with tibial plafond.

Create flat weight-bearing surface.

Dog-ear flares may need trimming.

Centre heel pad under tibia.

Secure heel pad with deep sutures.

Skin closure.

Postoperative:

  • Rigid dressing to prevent heel pad migration
  • Non-weight bearing 6-8 weeks
  • Gradual prosthetic fitting

Transtibial (Below-Knee) Amputation

The most important level to master for exams.

Indications: Vascular disease, trauma, tumor with adequate proximal viability

Level Selection:

  • Minimum: 12-15cm from tibial tuberosity
  • Optimal: Junction of proximal and middle third
  • Posterior flap = 1.5 times AP diameter of leg

Transtibial Amputation Steps (Burgess Technique)

Step 1Positioning and Marking

Supine position, knee slightly flexed.

Mark level at proximal-middle third junction.

Mark anterior fish-mouth at bone level.

Mark long posterior flap (1.5 x AP diameter distally).

Tourniquet if adequate vascularity (avoid in PVD).

Step 2Anterior Dissection

Incise skin and deep fascia anteriorly.

Divide anterior compartment muscles at bone level.

Identify and ligate anterior tibial vessels.

Identify deep peroneal nerve - traction neurectomy.

Divide lateral compartment muscles.

Step 3Bone Division

Score periosteum circumferentially at bone level.

Divide tibia with oscillating saw.

Create 45-degree anterior bevel on tibia.

Divide fibula 1-2cm shorter than tibia.

Rasp all bone edges smooth.

Step 4Posterior Flap Creation

Create long posterior myocutaneous flap.

Include gastrocnemius (and portion of soleus).

Identify and ligate posterior tibial and peroneal vessels.

Identify tibial and sural nerves - traction neurectomy.

Trim soleus muscle to reduce bulk.

Step 5Myodesis and Closure

Drill 2-3 holes in anterior tibia.

Myodesis: Suture posterior muscles to anterior tibia.

Use heavy non-absorbable suture (e.g., Ethibond).

Close deep fascia over muscle flap.

Skin closure without tension.

Rigid dressing or soft dressing per protocol.

Transtibial Technical Points

Four Key Technical Points:

  1. Long posterior flap (Burgess) - gastrocnemius provides durable coverage
  2. 45-degree anterior tibial bevel - prevents skin breakdown
  3. Fibula 1-2cm shorter - prevents fibular pressure symptoms
  4. Myodesis - attach posterior flap to tibia for optimal function

Knee Disarticulation (Through-Knee Amputation)

Indications:

  • Transtibial not possible
  • Non-ambulatory patients (nursing care easier)
  • Pediatric patients (preserves growth plates)
  • Trauma with knee involvement

Advantages:

  • End-bearing potential
  • Long lever arm
  • No bone cutting required
  • Femoral condyles provide good prosthetic fit

Disadvantages:

  • Bulky distal stump
  • Cosmetically challenging prosthetic knee
  • Limited prosthetic options

Technique:

Knee Disarticulation Steps

Step 1Incision

Anterior fish-mouth incision below patella.

Curve around medial and lateral tibial condyles.

Long posterior flap including gastrocnemius origin.

Step 2Anterior Dissection

Divide patellar tendon at tibial tubercle.

Enter knee joint.

Divide cruciate ligaments.

Divide collateral ligaments from femur.

Step 3Posterior Dissection

Disarticulate completely.

Identify popliteal artery and vein - ligate.

Identify tibial and common peroneal nerves.

Traction neurectomy of both.

Step 4Closure

Patella may be retained or removed (surgeon preference).

Suture hamstrings and gastrocnemius over condyles.

Close deep fascia.

Skin closure without tension.

Transfemoral (Above-Knee) Amputation

Indications: Failed/contraindicated transtibial, proximal vascular disease, tumor

Level Selection:

  • Minimum: 10-12cm from greater trochanter
  • Optimal: Junction of middle and distal third of femur
  • Preserve adductor magnus insertion if possible

Transfemoral Amputation Steps

Step 1Marking and Incision

Mark level at middle-distal third junction.

Equal anterior and posterior fish-mouth flaps.

Apex at level of bone division.

Each flap = one-third circumference.

Step 2Anterior Dissection

Incise through quadriceps.

Identify superficial femoral artery and vein - ligate.

Identify femoral nerve - traction neurectomy.

Divide quadriceps at bone level.

Step 3Femur Division

Score periosteum circumferentially.

Divide femur with oscillating saw.

Rasp edges smooth.

Maintain adequate length for lever arm.

Step 4Posterior Dissection

Divide hamstrings and adductors.

Identify sciatic nerve - CRUCIAL.

Ligate accompanying artery before transection.

Traction neurectomy of sciatic nerve.

Step 5Myodesis and Closure

Adductor myodesis to lateral femur - CRITICAL.

Prevents abduction contracture.

Drill holes in lateral femoral cortex.

Suture adductors to lateral femur.

Myodesis of quadriceps and hamstrings over bone end.

Close fascia lata.

Skin closure without tension.

Adductor Myodesis is Essential

Myodesis of adductors to lateral femur prevents abduction contracture. This is the MOST IMPORTANT technical point in transfemoral amputation. Abduction contracture:

  • Impairs prosthetic socket fitting
  • Increases energy expenditure
  • Reduces function significantly

Always mention adductor myodesis in transfemoral amputation.

Hip Disarticulation

Indications:

  • Proximal femoral tumor
  • Extensive trauma
  • Uncontrolled proximal thigh infection
  • Failed transfemoral amputation (rare)

Considerations:

  • Major operation with high morbidity
  • High mortality in vascular patients (greater than 50%)
  • Energy expenditure greater than 200% increase
  • Most patients wheelchair-dependent

Technique (Key Points):

  1. Anterior racquet incision from ASIS around hip
  2. Divide sartorius, rectus femoris, hip flexors
  3. Ligate femoral artery and vein
  4. Divide adductors, iliopsoas
  5. Disarticulate hip joint - divide ligamentum teres
  6. Divide gluteal muscles and sciatic nerve
  7. Close gluteus maximus over acetabulum
  8. Layered closure

Postoperative:

  • ICU monitoring often required
  • High transfusion requirements
  • Early mobilization in wheelchair
  • Canadian-type hip disarticulation prosthesis available

Hip Disarticulation Mortality

Hip disarticulation in vascular disease has mortality rates of 50% or higher. Consider:

  1. Is life-saving surgery needed for sepsis?
  2. Would palliative approach be more appropriate?
  3. Discuss with patient and family extensively
  4. ICU support required

Complications

Wound-Related Complications

Wound Complications by Amputation Level

ComplicationIncidenceRisk FactorsManagement
Wound infection10-20%Diabetes, PVD, malnutritionAntibiotics, drainage, debridement
Wound dehiscence5-15%Tension closure, poor perfusionVAC therapy, revision if extensive
Wound necrosis/failure5-30% (level dependent)Wrong level selection, PVDDebridement, proximal revision
Hematoma5-10%Poor hemostasis, anticoagulationAspiration or surgical evacuation

Revision Rates by Level:

  • Toe/Ray: 30-50% in vascular disease
  • TMA: 20-40%
  • Transtibial: 10-20%
  • Transfemoral: 5-10%

Key Point: More distal amputations have higher revision rates but better function if successful.

Complications by Amputation Level

Toe/Ray Amputation:

  • Transfer ulcers on remaining toes
  • Wound dehiscence
  • Progression of vascular disease

Transmetatarsal:

  • Equinovarus deformity (unopposed triceps surae)
  • Stump tip ulceration
  • Failure to heal

Syme Amputation:

  • Heel pad migration
  • Dog-ear deformity
  • Posterior wound breakdown

Transtibial:

  • Flexion contracture of knee
  • Anterior skin breakdown (bevel inadequate)
  • Fibular pressure symptoms (fibula too long)

Transfemoral:

  • Abduction contracture (inadequate adductor myodesis)
  • Flexion contracture of hip
  • Phantom limb pain

Prevention of Level-Specific Complications

Transtibial:

  • Bevel tibia anteriorly 45 degrees
  • Cut fibula 1-2cm shorter than tibia
  • Prevent knee flexion with positioning

Transfemoral:

  • Adductor myodesis to lateral femur
  • Prone lying to prevent hip flexion contracture

Prevention and Management of Contractures

Knee Flexion Contracture (Transtibial):

  • Prevention: Prone lying, stretching, avoid pillow under knee
  • Early: Stretching, serial casting
  • Established: May require surgical release

Hip Flexion Contracture (Transfemoral):

  • Prevention: Prone lying 30 min twice daily, positioning
  • Keep hip extended when possible
  • Avoid sitting for prolonged periods

Hip Abduction Contracture (Transfemoral):

  • Prevention: Adductor myodesis during surgery
  • Treatment: Difficult - prosthetic modification

Equinovarus (TMA):

  • Prevention: Achilles lengthening, AFO use
  • Treatment: TAL, casting, revision surgery

Contractures Impair Prosthetic Fitting

Contractures are preventable and significantly impair prosthetic fitting and function. Prevention is easier than treatment:

  1. Proper surgical technique (myodesis)
  2. Positioning postoperatively
  3. Early physiotherapy
  4. Patient education

Phantom Limb Pain and Residual Limb Pain

Phantom Limb Pain (PLP):

  • Incidence: 70-80% of amputees
  • Painful sensations in absent limb
  • Character: Burning, shooting, cramping, stabbing

Risk Factors:

  • Preoperative pain (strongest predictor)
  • Traumatic amputation
  • Psychological distress

Management:

  1. Pharmacological: Gabapentinoids, TCAs, SNRIs
  2. Mirror therapy: Strong evidence - visual feedback
  3. TENS: Transcutaneous electrical stimulation
  4. Psychological support: CBT, counseling

Residual Limb Pain:

  • Pain in actual stump (not phantom)
  • Causes: Neuroma, bone spur, infection, poor socket fit
  • Treatment: Address underlying cause

Neuroma Management:

  • Desensitization techniques
  • Injection therapy (local anesthetic, steroid)
  • Surgical revision if refractory

Evidence Base

Energy Expenditure in Lower Extremity Amputees

3
Waters RL, Perry J, Antonelli D, Hislop H • J Bone Joint Surg Am (1976)
Key Findings:
  • Seminal study establishing energy expenditure by amputation level
  • Transtibial amputation: 40-60% increase in energy above baseline
  • Transfemoral amputation: 90-120% increase in energy above baseline
  • Walking speed decreases with more proximal amputation
  • Vascular amputees have higher energy expenditure than traumatic amputees at same level
Clinical Implication: Knee preservation reduces energy expenditure by approximately 50% compared to transfemoral amputation. This data supports aggressive attempts to preserve the knee in all suitable patients.
Limitation: Older study, prosthetic technology has improved. Energy-storing feet may reduce expenditure.

LEAP Study - Limb Salvage vs Amputation in Lower Extremity Trauma

2
Bosse MJ, MacKenzie EJ, Kellam JF, et al. • N Engl J Med (2002)
Key Findings:
  • Prospective multicenter study comparing limb salvage vs amputation
  • No significant difference in functional outcomes at 2 years
  • Salvage group had more secondary procedures and complications
  • Psychological outcomes similar between groups
  • Cost of salvage significantly higher than amputation
Clinical Implication: Early amputation is a reasonable option for severe lower extremity trauma. Salvage does not guarantee better outcomes and may increase morbidity. Decision should be individualized.
Limitation: Selection bias, heterogeneous injuries, 2-year follow-up only.

Burgess Long Posterior Myoplasty Flap for Transtibial Amputation

4
Burgess EM, Romano RL, Zettl JH • Bull Prosthet Res (1969)
Key Findings:
  • Described the long posterior myocutaneous flap technique
  • Gastrocnemius muscle provides durable, well-vascularized coverage
  • Superior healing rates compared to anterior or equal flaps in vascular patients
  • Muscle padding improves prosthetic tolerance
  • Became the worldwide standard for transtibial amputation
Clinical Implication: The Burgess technique (long posterior flap) remains the gold standard for transtibial amputation. The gastrocnemius provides reliable coverage even in compromised patients.
Limitation: Descriptive technique paper without randomized comparison.

TcPO2 for Amputation Level Selection

3
Burgess EM, Matsen FA, Wyss CR, Simmons CW • J Bone Joint Surg Am (1982)
Key Findings:
  • Transcutaneous oxygen tension predicts healing at amputation level
  • TcPO2 greater than 40 mmHg: Greater than 90% healing rate
  • TcPO2 less than 20 mmHg: High failure rate
  • 20-40 mmHg: Indeterminate - requires clinical judgment
  • TcPO2 superior to clinical assessment alone
Clinical Implication: TcPO2 should be measured at proposed amputation level in all vascular patients. Values greater than 30-40 mmHg predict successful healing. Measure at multiple levels to guide decision-making.
Limitation: Technique-dependent results, may vary between laboratories.

Mirror Therapy for Phantom Limb Pain

2
Chan BL, Witt R, Charrow AP, et al. • N Engl J Med (2007)
Key Findings:
  • RCT of mirror therapy for phantom limb pain in combat amputees
  • Mirror therapy group showed significant pain reduction at 4 weeks
  • Control group (covered mirror) showed no improvement
  • Proposed mechanism: Visual feedback resolves cortical conflict
  • Simple, no-cost intervention with strong evidence
Clinical Implication: Mirror therapy is an effective, evidence-based treatment for phantom limb pain. Should be incorporated into standard rehabilitation protocols for all amputees. Cost-effective and no adverse effects.
Limitation: Small sample size, military population, short follow-up period.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOAdvanced

EXAMINER

"A 72-year-old diabetic male with peripheral vascular disease presents with gangrene of his left forefoot extending to the base of all toes. His previous femoral-popliteal bypass is occluded. TcPO2 at the ankle is 25 mmHg and at 15cm below the knee is 42 mmHg. What amputation level would you recommend and why?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient has critical limb ischaemia with forefoot gangrene and failed revascularization. The TcPO2 measurements guide my level selection - at the ankle level, TcPO2 of 25 mmHg is in the indeterminate zone with approximately 50% healing probability, whereas at 15cm below the knee, 42 mmHg predicts greater than 90% healing. My recommendation is transtibial amputation at 15cm from the tibial tuberosity. Although a transmetatarsal amputation might be considered, the ankle TcPO2 of 25 mmHg suggests significant healing risk at that level, and a failed TMA requiring revision is worse than a primary transtibial. The key principle is to choose the most distal level that will heal - but not to choose a level that will fail. I would discuss with vascular surgery to confirm no revascularization options exist to improve distal perfusion. Preserving the knee is my priority as it reduces energy expenditure by 40-60% compared to transfemoral amputation. I would perform a long posterior flap (Burgess technique), with meticulous attention to anterior tibial bevel, fibula length (1-2cm shorter than tibia), and myodesis of the posterior flap.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
TcPO2 greater than 40 mmHg at 15cm predicts reliable healing
Ankle TcPO2 of 25 mmHg is indeterminate - high risk for TMA
Knee preservation reduces energy by 40-60% vs transfemoral
Failed distal amputation requiring revision is worse than primary proximal
Vascular surgery consultation to confirm no revascularization options
COMMON TRAPS
✗Attempting TMA despite poor ankle TcPO2 (high failure risk)
✗Proceeding directly to transfemoral without considering transtibial
✗Not mentioning vascular surgery input for level decision
✗Forgetting to discuss energy expenditure implications
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What surgical technique would you use for transtibial amputation?"
"How would you manage this patient if phantom limb pain develops?"
"What is the expected energy expenditure increase with transtibial vs transfemoral?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"Describe the surgical technique for transtibial amputation, highlighting the key technical points that optimize function and prosthetic fitting."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Transtibial amputation aims to create a functional residual limb optimized for prosthetic fitting. I position the patient supine with the knee slightly flexed. I avoid tourniquet in vascular patients. For level, I aim for minimum 12-15cm from the tibial tuberosity to provide adequate lever arm for prosthetic control. For flap design, I use the Burgess long posterior myocutaneous flap - the anterior incision is fish-mouth shaped at bone level, with the posterior flap extending distally for 1.5 times the AP diameter of the leg. For anterior dissection, I incise through skin and deep fascia, identify and ligate the anterior tibial vessels, and identify the deep peroneal nerve which I transect sharply under gentle traction using traction neurectomy technique. For bone division, I divide the tibia with an oscillating saw, creating a 45-degree anterior bevel to prevent anterior skin pressure - this is critical. The fibula is cut 1-2cm shorter than the tibia to prevent fibular pressure symptoms. I rasp all bone edges smooth. For the posterior flap, I create the long posterior myocutaneous flap based on gastrocnemius, identify and ligate posterior tibial and peroneal vessels, and perform traction neurectomy of the tibial and sural nerves. The crucial step is myodesis - I drill 2-3 holes in the anterior tibia and suture the gastrocnemius flap securely to bone using heavy non-absorbable suture, maintaining physiological muscle tension. I close the deep fascia over the muscle, then achieve skin closure without any tension.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Long posterior flap (Burgess technique) - gastrocnemius for durable coverage
45-degree anterior tibial bevel - prevents skin breakdown
Fibula 1-2cm shorter than tibia - prevents pressure symptoms
Myodesis - muscle to bone for optimal function
Traction neurectomy - reduces neuroma formation
COMMON TRAPS
✗Forgetting the anterior tibial bevel (examiner favourite)
✗Not specifying fibula should be shorter than tibia
✗Describing myoplasty instead of myodesis
✗Not mentioning minimum bone length (12-15cm)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What are the advantages of myodesis over myoplasty?"
"What is the Ertl procedure and when might you consider it?"
"How would you manage a knee flexion contracture postoperatively?"
VIVA SCENARIOAdvanced

EXAMINER

"A 45-year-old man requires transfemoral amputation for a high-grade osteosarcoma of the distal femur. What are the key technical considerations for this amputation that differ from a vascular amputation?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Oncological amputation differs significantly from vascular amputation in several key aspects. First, the primary consideration is achieving adequate oncological margins - I require a minimum of 2cm bone margin proximal to the tumour based on preoperative MRI. I would obtain intraoperative frozen section of the bone margin to confirm clearance. The skin incision must not violate the tumour, and any previous biopsy tract must be excised en bloc with the specimen. For soft tissue margins, I aim for a cuff of normal tissue around the tumour - the exact distance depends on tumour biology and compartmental involvement. I must not enter the tumour at any point as this would contaminate the wound. Staging investigations including whole-bone MRI for skip metastases and CT chest for pulmonary metastases should be complete. For surgical technique, once adequate margins are confirmed, I proceed with standard transfemoral technique - equal anterior and posterior flaps, identification and ligation of the superficial femoral vessels, traction neurectomy of the femoral and sciatic nerves, and importantly, adductor myodesis to lateral femur to prevent abduction contracture. Unlike vascular amputations, healing is usually excellent in young oncology patients, so level selection is dictated by tumour margins rather than healing potential. Postoperative chemotherapy may be indicated based on tumour response. I would discuss this case with the musculoskeletal oncology MDT and ensure the patient understands that amputation is necessary when limb salvage is not possible.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Oncological margins take priority - minimum 2cm bone margin
Excise biopsy tract en bloc with specimen
Never enter the tumour - contamination worsens prognosis
Whole-bone MRI to rule out skip metastases
Frozen section for margin confirmation intraoperatively
COMMON TRAPS
✗Forgetting to mention oncological margin requirements
✗Not mentioning biopsy tract excision
✗Selecting level based on function rather than tumour margins
✗Not involving MDT in decision-making
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What alternatives to amputation exist for distal femoral osteosarcoma?"
"What is rotationplasty and when might you consider it?"
"What chemotherapy regimens are used for osteosarcoma?"

Australian Context

Epidemiology and Healthcare System

Lower limb amputations in Australia are predominantly performed for peripheral vascular disease and diabetes, reflecting the aging population and high prevalence of lifestyle-related conditions. Indigenous Australians have significantly higher rates of diabetes-related amputations compared to non-Indigenous Australians, with rates up to 38 times higher in some studies, highlighting significant health disparities that require targeted intervention.

The Australian healthcare system provides comprehensive amputation care through public hospital networks, with major centers offering multidisciplinary limb preservation services that include vascular surgery, endocrinology, wound care, and orthopaedic surgery. The introduction of Diabetic Foot Units in major hospitals has improved outcomes by enabling early identification of at-risk patients and coordinated care to prevent amputation where possible. Prosthetic services are funded through various state and territory schemes, with the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) providing funding for prosthetics for eligible participants under 65 years of age.

Clinical Guidelines and Resources

Australian clinical practice follows the IWGDF (International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot) guidelines for diabetic foot management, and the Australian and New Zealand Society for Vascular Surgery provides guidance on peripheral arterial disease management. Smoking cessation support is available through Quitline (13 78 48), which should be offered to all patients as smoking significantly impairs healing. Antibiotic prescribing follows Therapeutic Guidelines (eTG), with empiric therapy for diabetic foot infections typically covering gram-positive organisms, gram-negatives, and anaerobes. The PBS subsidizes many medications required for vascular disease management, including antiplatelet agents, statins, and diabetes medications, improving access to medical optimization before and after amputation.

Lower Limb Amputation Levels

High-Yield Exam Summary

Energy Expenditure - KNOW THESE NUMBERS

  • •Toe/Ray: 0-5% increase
  • •TMA: 10-20% increase
  • •Syme: 20-40% increase
  • •Transtibial (BKA): 40-60% increase
  • •Knee disarticulation: 60-80% increase
  • •Transfemoral (AKA): 90-120% increase
  • •Hip disarticulation: Greater than 200% increase
  • •PRESERVE THE KNEE - saves 40-60% energy vs AKA

Transtibial Key Points (FLAPS)

  • •Flap: Long posterior (Burgess technique)
  • •Length: Minimum 12-15cm from tibial tuberosity
  • •Anterior bevel: 45 degrees on tibia
  • •Position fibula: 1-2cm shorter than tibia
  • •Suture myodesis: Posterior muscles to anterior tibia

Transfemoral Key Points

  • •Equal anterior-posterior flaps
  • •Minimum 10-12cm from greater trochanter
  • •ADDUCTOR MYODESIS to lateral femur - prevents abduction contracture
  • •Sciatic nerve - ligate vessel before transection
  • •Myodesis of quadriceps and hamstrings over bone

Level Selection Algorithm

  • •TcPO2 greater than 40 mmHg: 90%+ healing
  • •TcPO2 20-40 mmHg: Indeterminate
  • •TcPO2 less than 20 mmHg: High failure risk
  • •Vascular surgery input for level in PVD
  • •Most distal level that will heal
  • •Failed distal worse than primary proximal

Complications to Know

  • •Phantom limb pain: 70-80% incidence
  • •Knee flexion contracture (BKA): Prone lying, stretching
  • •Hip abduction contracture (AKA): Adductor myodesis prevents
  • •Equinovarus (TMA): TAL prevents
  • •Neuroma: Traction neurectomy technique

Emergency Amputation

  • •Guillotine amputation for life-threatening sepsis
  • •All tissues at same level, no closure
  • •VAC dressing
  • •Revise in 48-72 hours when stable
  • •Life before limb principle
Quick Stats
Reading Time129 min
Related Topics

Amputation Surgical Principles

Bone Transport Techniques

Deformity Analysis - CORA and MAD

Gout and Crystal Arthropathy