Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Clinical Atlas
OrthoVellum
Clinical Atlas

Orthopaedic surgery education for clinical learning and Australian training context. Public pages are educational only and are not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.

Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog & Updates
  • Content Methodology
  • Editorial Policy

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Policy
  • Editorial Board
  • Content Methodology
  • Advertising Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

MRI Sequences in Orthopaedics

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

MRI Sequences in Orthopaedics

Evidence-informed orthopaedic surgery clinical atlas reference for MRI Sequences in Orthopaedics, including presentation, investigations, management principles, and source-backed learning notes.

Very High Yield
complete
Reviewed: 2026-03-11Maintained by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

Editorially maintained by OrthoVellum Editorial Team

Source visibility, AI disclosure, and correction workflow • Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

Editorial boardMethodologyReview policyReport a correction
Educational disclosure

AI-assisted educational content; reviewed for source visibility and editorial coherence.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

High Yield Overview

MRI Sequences in Orthopaedics

Choosing the Right Sequence for Each Clinical Question

T1Anatomy and fat detection
T2Pathology and fluid
PDMeniscal and cartilage gold standard
STIRMost sensitive for bone marrow oedema
GREHaemosiderin and cartilage
DWIInfection vs tumour distinction
Short TET1 and PD: anatomical detail
Long TET2 and STIR: pathology detection

Pulse Sequence Selection Guide

T1-weighted: Short TR (400-600ms), Short TE (10-20ms) → Anatomy, fat, gadolinium

T2-weighted: Long TR (3000-6000ms), Long TE (80-120ms) → Pathology, fluid, oedema

PD-weighted: Long TR (2000-4000ms), Short TE (10-30ms) → Meniscus, cartilage, ligament detail

STIR: TI = 160ms (1.5T), Long TR, Intermediate TE → Bone marrow oedema, most sensitive fluid detection

GRE (T2*): Short TR, Variable TE, Flip angle → Cartilage surface, haemosiderin, loose bodies

Key: TR controls T1 contrast, TE controls T2 contrast — this relationship governs all sequence selection

Critical Must-Knows

  • Pulse sequence selection determines what pathology you can see — the wrong sequence can hide the diagnosis.
  • T1-weighted (short TR, short TE): anatomy, fat, subacute blood. Post-gadolinium enhancement seen on T1.
  • T2-weighted (long TR, long TE): fluid and oedema detection. Pathology is bright — the 'pathology sequence'.
  • Proton Density (long TR, short TE): optimal for meniscal and cartilage assessment. High SNR.
  • STIR: fat suppression via inversion — most sensitive for bone marrow oedema, robust near metal.

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    TR controls T1 weighting (short TR = T1); TE controls T2 weighting (long TE = T2).
  • "
    PD-weighted images have the highest signal-to-noise ratio — making them optimal for detecting subtle meniscal tears.
  • "
    STIR nulls fat at a specific inversion time (TI approximately 160ms at 1.5T) — provides uniform fat suppression.
  • "
    Gradient echo sequences are susceptible to metal and field inhomogeneity — avoid near implants.
  • "
    Magic angle artefact: tendons at 55 degrees to B0 appear bright on short TE sequences (T1, PD) but NOT on T2.

Exam Warning

Understanding MRI sequence selection is essential for viva examinations. You will be asked to specify which sequences you want for specific clinical scenarios and explain WHY. Common exam traps include: confusing PD and T2 weighting, not knowing the difference between STIR and chemical fat suppression, recommending gradient echo near metal implants, and failing to recognise magic angle artefact on PD or T1 images.

Mnemonic

TR-TEMRI Sequence Parameters

T
TR (Repetition Time)
Time between successive RF excitation pulses. Short TR (less than 600ms) = T1 weighting. Long TR (more than 2000ms) = T2 or PD weighting
R
Recovery determines T1 contrast
Short TR does not allow complete T1 recovery — tissues with short T1 (fat) produce more signal = bright. This creates T1 contrast
T
TE (Echo Time)
Time between RF pulse and signal measurement. Short TE (less than 30ms) = T1 or PD weighting. Long TE (more than 60ms) = T2 weighting
E
Echo decay determines T2 contrast
Long TE allows more T2 decay — tissues with long T2 (water) retain signal = bright. This creates T2 contrast

Memory Hook:TR governs T1, TE governs T2 — this is the single most important rule for understanding MRI sequence selection.

Mnemonic

TOPSSSequence Selection by Clinical Question

T
T1 for anatomy
Use T1 when you need anatomical detail: fat planes, cortical margins, and as the baseline for gadolinium enhancement
O
Oedema needs STIR
STIR is the most sensitive sequence for bone marrow oedema — use it for occult fractures, stress reactions, and AVN screening
P
PD for meniscus
Proton density is the gold standard for meniscal tear detection — highest SNR for fibrocartilage assessment
S
Softening on T2
T2 shows pathology (fluid, tears, inflammation) — any process that increases water content will be bright on T2
S
Susceptibility on GRE
Gradient echo for haemosiderin (PVNS), calcification, and loose bodies — susceptibility artefact magnifies these findings

Memory Hook:TOPSS covers the five most common sequence selection decisions in orthopaedic MRI.

Mnemonic

SCATFat Suppression Techniques

S
STIR (inversion recovery)
Nulls fat by exploiting its short T1 using an inversion pulse at TI 160ms. Uniform suppression; works near metal. Cannot be used with gadolinium
C
Chemical fat saturation
Selective RF pulse at fat frequency before each sequence. Fast but INHOMOGENEOUS near metal and field boundaries
A
Around metal = use STIR
Chemical fat saturation fails near metal (frequency shifts). STIR is T1-based and unaffected by frequency shifts
T
T1 post-Gd requires chemical fat sat (not STIR)
STIR suppresses all short T1 tissues — including enhancing tissue. Use chemical fat suppression with gadolinium

Memory Hook:SCAT: STIR vs Chemical fat saturation — know when to use each for perfect fat suppression.

Overview

MRI pulse sequence selection is the critical decision point that determines whether pathology will be visible on the resulting images. Each pulse sequence produces a different image contrast by manipulating the timing parameters (TR, TE, TI, flip angle) that govern how tissue relaxation properties contribute to the final signal. Choosing the wrong sequence for a clinical question can render the diagnosis invisible.

In orthopaedic practice, the core sequences used routinely are: T1-weighted, T2-weighted, proton density (PD)-weighted, STIR, and gradient echo (GRE). Advanced sequences including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI, and quantitative mapping are increasingly used for specific indications.

The key principle is: TR controls T1 contrast, TE controls T2 contrast. A T1-weighted image uses short TR and short TE. A T2-weighted image uses long TR and long TE. A PD-weighted image uses long TR and short TE (maximising signal-to-noise ratio while minimising both T1 and T2 contrast).

Sequence Determines Diagnosis

A meniscal tear is best seen on PD-weighted images (high SNR for fibrocartilage). Bone marrow oedema is best detected by STIR (most sensitive for fluid signals). A rotator cuff tear is best characterised on T2-weighted images (fluid in the torn tendon gap). Gadolinium enhancement for tumour and infection requires T1 post-contrast. Each clinical question has an optimal sequence.

Protocol Selection

Standard orthopaedic MRI protocols include at least three sequences in two planes: typically T1, T2/PD, and STIR in sagittal and coronal planes for most joints. Axial images are added for specific indications. The radiologist selects the protocol, but the referring orthopaedic surgeon should specify the clinical question to ensure the correct sequences are included.

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

MRI sequences demonstrating different tissue contrast characteristics in orthopaedic imaging
Click to expand
MRI sequence comparison demonstrating how different pulse sequences produce dramatically different tissue contrast from the same anatomical region. Understanding these differences is fundamental to MRI interpretation — the same structure can appear bright on one sequence and dark on another.Credit: Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Comparison of MRI sequences showing pathology detection in musculoskeletal imaging
Click to expand
MRI sequences optimised for orthopaedic pathology detection. Note how fluid-sensitive sequences (T2, STIR) highlight oedema and effusion that may be invisible on T1-weighted images. This illustrates why multiple sequences must be obtained and reviewed for comprehensive diagnosis.Credit: Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Systematic Approach

Systematic Sequence Selection

When ordering or interpreting an orthopaedic MRI, follow this systematic approach:

Systematic MRI Sequence Assessment

StepActionRationale
1. Define the clinical questionWhat specific pathology are you looking for?Different pathologies require different sequences — a meniscal tear protocol differs from a tumour staging protocol
2. Select anatomical planeWhich planes best demonstrate the suspected pathology?Sagittal for ACL and meniscus; coronal for MCL, LCL, and rotator cuff; axial for labrum and peroneal tendons
3. Choose core sequencesT1 (anatomy) + T2 or STIR (pathology) + PD (if meniscus/cartilage)These three categories cover the vast majority of orthopaedic diagnostic needs
4. Add contrast if neededGadolinium for tumour, infection, or synovitisT1 fat-suppressed post-contrast; consider dynamic contrast-enhanced for tumour vascularity
5. Consider metal-specific protocolsMAVRIC-SL, SEMAC, spin echo over gradient echo, STIR over chemical fat satStandard protocols fail near metal implants — specific modifications are required
6. Review all sequences systematicallyDo not interpret a single sequence in isolationT1 alone misses oedema; T2 alone misses fatty infiltration. Cross-reference findings across sequences

Core Sequences

T1-Weighted Imaging

Parameters: Short TR (400-600ms), Short TE (10-20ms)

T1-weighted images are the anatomical backbone of any MRI examination. They provide excellent contrast between fat (bright), muscle (grey), and fluid (dark), and their consistent appearance makes them the reference sequence for anatomical orientation.

What T1 shows best:

  • Anatomy: Fat planes between structures provide natural contrast boundaries
  • Fatty infiltration: Chronic rotator cuff tears with fatty replacement of muscle appear bright
  • Fatty bone marrow: Normal adult bone marrow is bright on T1 due to fat content. Loss of this normal brightness (dark marrow) indicates pathology: infiltration, infection, tumour, or oedema
  • Subacute haemorrhage: Methaemoglobin in subacute blood appears bright on T1
  • Gadolinium enhancement: T1 post-contrast is the sequence used to detect enhancement; gadolinium shortens T1, making enhancing tissue brighter

What T1 misses:

  • Oedema (dark on T1, may be subtle against dark background structures)
  • Early soft tissue inflammation without fat replacement
  • Fluid-filled structures blend into dark background

T1 is essential but never sufficient alone — always correlate with fluid-sensitive sequences.

T2-Weighted Imaging

Parameters: Long TR (3000-6000ms), Long TE (80-120ms)

T2-weighted images are the primary diagnostic sequence for detecting pathology. Any process that increases tissue water content — oedema, inflammation, tears, effusion — produces bright signal on T2, making abnormalities highly conspicuous against the darker background of normal tissue.

What T2 shows best:

  • Joint effusions: Bright fluid within joint recesses — easily quantified
  • Ligament and tendon tears: Fluid signal within a disrupted structure
  • Bone marrow oedema: Bright marrow signal replacing normal dark-to-intermediate signal
  • Muscle oedema: Acute muscle strains, denervation oedema, myositis
  • Cysts and bursitis: Fluid-filled structures are very bright
  • Tumour oedema: Surrounding reactive oedema is bright on T2

What T2 misses:

  • Chronic fibrosis and scarring (dark on T2, may be indistinguishable from normal tissue)
  • Subtle fatty infiltration (better seen on T1)
  • Calcification (dark signal void — may be missed if not expected)

T2 with fat suppression is particularly valuable as it highlights fluid against a dark background.

Proton Density-Weighted Imaging

Parameters: Long TR (2000-4000ms), Short TE (10-30ms)

PD-weighted images have the highest signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of all standard MRI sequences. By using long TR (maximising signal from all tissues) and short TE (minimising T2 decay losses), PD images produce bright, detailed images with excellent tissue differentiation.

Why PD is the gold standard for meniscal tears:

  • The high SNR provides superior contrast between the bright meniscal substance (due to its short T2 and intermediate PD) and the signal of intrameniscal tears
  • Meniscal tears appear as abnormal signal extending to the articular surface
  • Grade 1 (small signal within substance), Grade 2 (signal reaching one surface), Grade 3 (signal reaching two surfaces = definite tear)

Other PD applications:

  • Articular cartilage assessment (PD fat-suppressed is increasingly used)
  • Ligament structural detail
  • Tendon assessment (high detail of internal structure)
  • Any situation where maximum signal-to-noise ratio is needed

PD is often combined with fat suppression (PD-FS) for pathology detection while maintaining the high SNR advantage.

STIR (Short Tau Inversion Recovery)

Parameters: TI approximately 160ms at 1.5T (null point for fat), Long TR, Intermediate TE

STIR is a specialised inversion recovery sequence that suppresses fat signal by exploiting the known T1 of fat. An initial 180-degree inversion pulse flips all magnetisation; after a specific time delay (inversion time, TI = approximately 160ms at 1.5T), the fat magnetisation passes through zero (is nulled). The imaging pulse is applied at this exact moment, so fat produces no signal while water-containing pathology remains bright.

STIR advantages:

  • Most sensitive sequence for bone marrow oedema — the combination of fat suppression and fluid sensitivity makes pathology in fatty marrow extremely conspicuous
  • Uniform fat suppression — unlike chemical fat saturation, STIR is based on T1 relaxation rather than frequency differences, making it reliable near metal implants and at field boundaries
  • Best for screening — the high sensitivity makes it ideal for detecting occult fractures, stress reactions, tumour infiltration, and infection

STIR limitations:

  • CANNOT be used with gadolinium: STIR suppresses ALL tissues with short T1 — including gadolinium-enhanced tissue. Post-contrast imaging requires T1 with chemical fat suppression instead
  • Lower SNR than fat-suppressed T2 due to the inversion process
  • Suppresses methaemoglobin (short T1 subacute blood), potentially hiding haematomas

These limitations are commonly examined.

Advanced Sequences

Advanced MRI Sequences in Orthopaedics

SequenceMechanismPrimary Orthopaedic Application
Gradient Echo (GRE/T2*)Uses gradient refocusing instead of 180-degree RF pulse; sensitive to magnetic susceptibilityHaemosiderin detection (PVNS shows blooming), cartilage surface assessment (3D GRE), loose bodies, calcification
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI)Measures random (Brownian) motion of water molecules; restricted diffusion appears brightInfection vs tumour differentiation, abscess detection, vertebral body fracture (acute vs chronic), cellularity of tumours
MR Arthrography (direct)Intra-articular injection of dilute gadolinium then T1-weighted imagingGold standard for labral tears (hip, shoulder), SLAP lesions, loose bodies, cartilage defects, capsular pathology
Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced (DCE)Serial T1 images during gadolinium bolus injection tracking enhancement curvesTumour vascularity mapping, distinguishing viable tumour from necrosis, monitoring treatment response
T2 MappingQuantitative measurement of T2 values in articular cartilage pixel by pixelEarly cartilage degeneration detection before morphological changes visible on standard sequences
MAVRIC-SL / SEMACMulti-spectral imaging around metallic implants with slice and frequency encoding correctionsAssessment of periprosthetic soft tissues around hip and knee arthroplasty components

DWI for Acute vs Chronic Vertebral Fractures

Diffusion-weighted imaging can distinguish acute benign osteoporotic vertebral fractures from pathological fractures (malignant infiltration). Acute benign fractures show high DWI signal in the early phase but increasing ADC values over time (reflecting oedema). Malignant fractures show persistently restricted diffusion (high DWI, low ADC) due to hypercellularity. This distinction is clinically important when a new vertebral compression fracture is found in an elderly patient with a history of malignancy.

Region-Specific Protocols

Standard Knee MRI Protocol

The standard knee MRI includes:

  • Sagittal PD fat-suppressed: Gold standard for meniscal tears, ACL assessment, patellar tendon
  • Coronal T1: Anatomy, medial/lateral compartment, bone stock
  • Coronal PD fat-suppressed or T2 fat-suppressed: Collateral ligaments, bone marrow oedema
  • Axial PD fat-suppressed: Patellofemoral joint, patellar tracking, transverse meniscal ligament
  • Sagittal T1 (optional): Anatomical reference, fatty infiltration

Key structures to assess systematically: ACL, PCL, MCL, LCL, posterolateral corner, medial and lateral menisci, articular cartilage (all compartments), patellar tracking, bone marrow signal, popliteal fossa.

This protocol covers 95% of knee pathology.

Standard Shoulder MRI Protocol

The standard shoulder MRI includes:

  • Coronal oblique T2 fat-suppressed: Rotator cuff tears (supraspinatus, infraspinatus), impingement
  • Coronal oblique T1: Anatomy, fatty infiltration of rotator cuff muscles (Goutallier)
  • Sagittal oblique T2 fat-suppressed: Rotator cuff footprint, AC joint, scapular notch
  • Axial T2 fat-suppressed or PD: Labrum, subscapularis, biceps tendon in the groove, glenohumeral ligaments

For suspected labral pathology, MR arthrography (direct, with dilute intra-articular gadolinium) significantly increases sensitivity for labral tears from approximately 60-70% to 85-95%. Indirect arthrography (IV gadolinium followed by exercise) can be used as an alternative but has lower accuracy.

Assessing the Goutallier scale of fatty infiltration is critical for surgical decision-making.

Standard Hip MRI Protocol

  • Coronal T1: Anatomy, femoral head marrow signal (AVN screening), femoral neck fracture detection
  • Coronal STIR: Bone marrow oedema, occult fractures, early AVN, transient osteoporosis
  • Axial oblique T2 fat-suppressed: Labral assessment, cartilage, periarticular soft tissues
  • Sagittal oblique PD fat-suppressed: Labral and cartilage assessment in the sagittal plane

For labral tear suspicion, MR arthrography is the gold standard with sensitivity of 85-95% compared to approximately 60% for non-arthrographic MRI. In the context of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), radial sequences perpendicular to the femoral neck are obtained to map cam morphology around the entire head-neck junction.

Hip protocols must include the full pelvis on at least one sequence for comparison.

Evidence Base

Sensitivity of MRI Sequences for Meniscal Tears

Meta-Analysis
De Smet AA, Tuite MJ • Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (2006)
Key Findings:
  • Proton density-weighted images had the highest sensitivity for meniscal tears (93%) compared to T2 (85%) and GRE (79%).
  • Fat-suppressed PD sequences provided additional improvement in sensitivity by suppressing competing fat signal.
  • Meniscal tear sensitivity was higher on 3T compared to 1.5T scanners due to improved signal-to-noise ratio.
Clinical Implication: PD-weighted sequences should be the standard for meniscal tear assessment. T2 alone is inferior for this specific indication.
Limitation: Inter-reader variability remains significant, especially for horizontal tears and meniscal root tears.
Source: De Smet AA, Tuite MJ. JAAOS 2006;14(3):157-67

STIR versus Fat-Suppressed T2 for Bone Marrow Oedema

Comparative Study
Schmid MR, Hodler J, Vienne P, Binkert CA, Zanetti M • Radiology (2002)
Key Findings:
  • STIR was more sensitive than fat-suppressed T2 for detecting bone marrow oedema in the foot and ankle (sensitivity 96% vs 84%).
  • Chemical fat suppression was less uniform at the periphery and near tendons, leading to missed lesions.
  • STIR provided more reliable fat suppression across the imaging volume, particularly near metal from previous surgery.
Clinical Implication: STIR should be preferred over fat-suppressed T2 for bone marrow oedema detection, especially in the extremities and near metal.
Limitation: STIR has lower SNR than fat-suppressed T2; both are complementary in a complete protocol.
Source: Schmid MR et al. Radiology 2002;225(3):766-73

These studies establish PD and STIR as the optimal sequences for their respective indications.

MR Arthrography for Labral Tears

Systematic Review
Smith TO, Drew BT, Toms AP, Jerosch-Herold C, Chojnowski AJ • Skeletal Radiology (2012)
Key Findings:
  • Direct MR arthrography had a pooled sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 91% for shoulder labral tears.
  • Non-arthrographic MRI had significantly lower sensitivity (66%) for labral tears.
  • Direct MR arthrography was particularly superior for detecting partial-thickness labral tears and SLAP lesions.
Clinical Implication: Direct MR arthrography should be requested when labral pathology is specifically suspected — non-arthrographic MRI has significant limitations.
Limitation: MR arthrography is invasive, requires fluoroscopic or ultrasound-guided injection, and adds cost and time.
Source: Smith TO et al. Skeletal Radiol 2012;41(2):149-59

Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Vertebral Fracture Differentiation

Meta-Analysis
Niu J, Shen D, Liu G, Wan X, Huang W • European Spine Journal (2016)
Key Findings:
  • DWI combined with ADC mapping had sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 87% for distinguishing benign from malignant vertebral compression fractures.
  • Malignant fractures showed restricted diffusion (low ADC) while benign osteoporotic fractures showed facilitated diffusion (high ADC) after the acute phase.
  • Acute benign fractures may transiently show restricted diffusion, potentially causing false positives in the first 2-3 weeks.
Clinical Implication: DWI should be included in the MRI protocol for vertebral compression fractures when malignancy is in the differential, particularly in patients with a cancer history.
Limitation: Timing of imaging relative to fracture onset is critical — acute benign fractures may mimic malignancy on DWI.
Source: Niu J et al. Eur Spine J 2016;25(8):2610-9

T2 Mapping for Early Cartilage Degeneration

Prospective Study
Mosher TJ, Dardzinski BJ • Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology (2004)
Key Findings:
  • T2 mapping detected elevated T2 values in cartilage with early degenerative changes before visible surface fibrillation on arthroscopy.
  • T2 values correlated with collagen fibre orientation and water content — both disrupted in early osteoarthritis.
  • Quantitative T2 maps provided objective, reproducible measurements of cartilage health.
Clinical Implication: T2 mapping may allow earlier detection and monitoring of cartilage degeneration than conventional morphological MRI sequences.
Limitation: T2 mapping is time-consuming, requires specialised post-processing software, and normative values vary by joint and location.
Source: Mosher TJ, Dardzinski BJ. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2004;8(4):355-68

Advanced sequences expand diagnostic capability beyond standard protocols.

Australian Context

In Australia, MRI protocols for orthopaedic indications are standardised within each institution but may vary between centres. The RANZCR publishes guidelines for minimum acceptable sequences for common orthopaedic indications, ensuring consistent image quality across Australian imaging centres. Medicare-eligible MRI examinations require scanning on equipment meeting specific standards, and clinical indications must meet Medicare criteria for funded imaging.

Australian orthopaedic trainees should be familiar with requesting MRI appropriately: specifying the clinical question, the suspected pathology, and whether contrast or arthrography is indicated. In the Australian public hospital system, communication with the radiologist about the clinical question often determines which sequences are included in the protocol, making effective multidisciplinary communication essential.

MR arthrography is widely available at Australian tertiary centres for both hip and shoulder labral assessment. The trend towards 3T scanning in Australia has improved SNR and spatial resolution but requires protocol optimisation to manage increased susceptibility artefact and specific absorption rate (SAR) considerations.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"You are asked by an examiner: 'You have requested a knee MRI for a 25-year-old footballer with suspected ACL injury. What sequences would you request and why?'"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
For a suspected ACL injury in a young footballer, I would request a standard knee MRI protocol with the following sequences: (1) Sagittal PD fat-suppressed: This is the most important sequence for ACL assessment. The ACL is best visualised in the sagittal plane running from the posterosuperior tibial plateau to the medial wall of the lateral femoral condyle. On PD fat-suppressed images, the normal ACL appears as a low-signal band. A complete tear shows disruption of the fibres with surrounding bright oedema. This sequence also provides the gold standard for meniscal assessment. (2) Coronal PD fat-suppressed or T2 fat-suppressed: This evaluates the MCL and LCL, which are commonly injured with ACL injuries. It also shows bone marrow oedema patterns — the classic 'kissing contusion' pattern of the lateral femoral condyle and posterolateral tibial plateau is virtually pathognomonic for ACL injury. (3) Coronal T1: Provides anatomical detail and identifies any bony avulsion (Segond fracture from the lateral tibial plateau — pathognomonic for ACL injury). (4) Axial PD fat-suppressed: Evaluates the patellofemoral joint, patellar tracking, and provides axial assessment of the menisci and cruciate ligaments. I would specifically ask the radiologist to assess for associated injuries: meniscal tears (occur in 50-70% of ACL injuries), MCL sprains, bone bruises, and posterolateral corner injuries.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Sagittal PD fat-suppressed is the key sequence for ACL and meniscal assessment
Coronal T2/PD fat-suppressed for collateral ligaments and bone marrow contusion pattern
Kissing contusion pattern (lateral femoral condyle + posterolateral tibial plateau) is pathognomonic for ACL injury
Request specific assessment of associated injuries (meniscus, MCL, posterolateral corner)
PD sequences have the highest SNR for meniscal and ligament assessment
COMMON TRAPS
✗Requesting only T2 without PD (PD is superior for meniscal assessment)
✗Not mentioning the bone marrow contusion pattern
✗Not asking for assessment of associated injuries
✗Forgetting axial images for patellofemoral assessment
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"An examiner asks you: 'What is the difference between STIR and fat-suppressed T2? When would you use one over the other?'"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Both STIR and fat-suppressed T2 are fluid-sensitive sequences that suppress fat signal to highlight oedema and pathology, but they achieve fat suppression through different mechanisms with different clinical implications. STIR uses an inversion recovery technique: a 180-degree pulse inverts all magnetisation, and after a specific delay (TI approximately 160ms at 1.5T), the fat magnetisation passes through zero and is nulled. Because this is based on T1 relaxation physics rather than chemical frequency differences, STIR provides UNIFORM fat suppression across the entire field of view and is ROBUST near metal implants and at field boundaries. However, STIR cannot be used with gadolinium because it suppresses ALL tissues with short T1 — including gadolinium-enhanced tissue. Fat-suppressed T2 uses a chemical saturation technique: a selective RF pulse at the fat resonance frequency saturates fat protons before the imaging sequence. This is faster and provides higher SNR than STIR, but it is frequency-dependent and therefore INHOMOGENEOUS near metal (where frequency shifts occur) and at the edges of the magnet bore. In practice, I would use STIR when: imaging near metal implants, imaging extremities (where field homogeneity is reduced at the edge of the bore), screening for bone marrow oedema (maximum sensitivity), and when I do not need gadolinium. I would use fat-suppressed T2 when: imaging the knee or shoulder centrally positioned in the bore (good homogeneity), when higher SNR is important, and when combined with gadolinium enhancement.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
STIR: inversion recovery at TI 160ms — uniform fat suppression, robust near metal
Fat-suppressed T2: chemical frequency saturation — faster, higher SNR, but inhomogeneous near metal
STIR cannot be used with gadolinium (suppresses all short T1 tissues including enhancement)
Use STIR near metal and at field boundaries; use fat-suppressed T2 for central scanning
Both detect oedema, but STIR is more sensitive for bone marrow oedema
COMMON TRAPS
✗Treating STIR and fat-suppressed T2 as interchangeable (they are not)
✗Not knowing that STIR cannot be used with gadolinium
✗Not explaining the mechanism of each technique
✗Not knowing when to choose one over the other clinically
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

EXAMINER

"You are asked to explain magic angle artefact and describe a clinical scenario where it could lead to misdiagnosis."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Magic angle artefact is a well-recognised MRI phenomenon that causes normally dark tendons and ligaments to appear abnormally bright on short TE sequences (T1-weighted and PD-weighted), potentially mimicking tendinopathy or a tear. The physics: collagen fibres in tendons and ligaments contain water molecules with restricted motion that interact through dipole-dipole coupling, which shortens T2 dramatically (making these structures dark on all sequences). However, when the collagen fibres are oriented at approximately 55 degrees to the main magnetic field (B0), the dipole-dipole interactions mathematically cancel out (the term 3cos²θ - 1 equals zero at 55 degrees), causing T2 to increase. This prolonged T2 produces abnormally increased signal on short TE sequences. A classic clinical scenario is the supraspinatus tendon: as it curves over the humeral head, the critical zone (15mm from insertion) often passes through the magic angle orientation to B0. On PD or T1 images, this creates a focal area of increased signal that can be misinterpreted as tendinopathy. Similarly, the Achilles tendon 2-3cm above its insertion, the peroneal tendons at the lateral malleolus, and the patellar tendon at its tibial insertion are all vulnerable to magic angle artefact. The diagnostic safeguard is: magic angle artefact disappears on long TE sequences (T2-weighted with TE greater than 60ms). If the abnormal signal persists on T2, it represents true pathology. If it disappears on T2, it is artefact.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Occurs at 55 degrees to B0 — the 'magic angle' where dipole-dipole coupling cancels
Bright on short TE (T1, PD) but DISAPPEARS on long TE (T2)
Classic locations: supraspinatus critical zone, Achilles, peroneal tendons, patellar tendon
Can mimic tendinopathy or partial tear — a significant diagnostic pitfall
Key safeguard: always confirm pathology on T2 — if signal disappears, it is artefact
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not knowing the magic angle value (55 degrees to B0)
✗Not knowing that the artefact disappears on T2
✗Not mentioning specific anatomical locations where it commonly occurs
✗Diagnosing tendinopathy based on T1 or PD signal alone without T2 confirmation

MRI Sequences in Orthopaedics — Exam Day Reference

High-Yield Exam Summary

TR and TE Control

  • •TR controls T1 contrast: Short TR = T1-weighted (fat bright, water dark)
  • •TE controls T2 contrast: Long TE = T2-weighted (water bright)
  • •Long TR + Short TE = PD (highest SNR, gold standard for meniscus)
  • •STIR: Inversion at TI 160ms (1.5T) nulls fat signal

Best Sequence for

  • •Meniscal tears: PD fat-suppressed (sagittal) — highest sensitivity
  • •Bone marrow oedema: STIR — most sensitive, uniform fat suppression
  • •Rotator cuff: Coronal oblique T2 fat-suppressed
  • •Tumour/Infection: T1 + gadolinium with fat suppression
  • •Haemosiderin (PVNS): GRE/T2* — susceptibility blooming artefact

Fat Suppression

  • •STIR: Uniform suppression, works near metal, CANNOT use with gadolinium
  • •Chemical fat sat: Higher SNR, faster, but fails near metal
  • •Post-gadolinium: MUST use chemical fat sat (NOT STIR)
  • •Near metal: Always choose STIR over chemical fat sat

Magic Angle Artefact

  • •Occurs at 55 degrees to B0 — tendons appear falsely bright
  • •Visible on short TE (T1, PD) — DISAPPEARS on T2 (long TE)
  • •Classic locations: supraspinatus, Achilles, peroneal tendons
  • •Always confirm tendon pathology on T2 before diagnosing a tear

MR Arthrography

  • •Gold standard for labral tears (hip and shoulder)
  • •Sensitivity 87% vs 66% for non-arthrographic MRI
  • •Dilute gadolinium injected intra-articularly
  • •T1 fat-suppressed is the key post-arthrography sequence
Quick Stats
Reading Time79 min
Related Topics

MRI Imaging Principles

Ankle & Foot Imaging: Systematic Interpretation

MRI Bone Marrow Signal

Tumour Imaging: ABCDS Approach