Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Multiple Myeloma of the Spine

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Multiple Myeloma of the Spine

Comprehensive guide to multiple myeloma spinal involvement including diagnosis, imaging criteria, IMWG guidelines, and orthopaedic management for FRACS exam

complete
Updated: 2025-12-24
High Yield Overview

MULTIPLE MYELOMA OF THE SPINE

IMWG Criteria | MRI Patterns | Bone Disease | Orthopaedic Management

80%Have bone disease at diagnosis
49%Spine is most common site
2+Focal lesions on MRI = myeloma
LyticPure lytic (no blastic)

MRI INFILTRATION PATTERNS

Focal
PatternDiscrete lesions in normal marrow
TreatmentMost common pattern at diagnosis
Diffuse
PatternHomogeneous marrow replacement
TreatmentWorst prognosis, higher tumor burden
Mixed
PatternFocal lesions + diffuse change
TreatmentCombined features
Variegated
PatternSalt-and-pepper appearance
TreatmentHeterogeneous involvement

Critical Must-Knows

  • IMWG 2014 criteria: 2 or more focal lesions on MRI (5mm+) = symptomatic myeloma
  • Pure lytic lesions - myeloma NEVER produces blastic/sclerotic response
  • Radiosensitive tumor - radiation highly effective for local control
  • Pathological fracture risk - vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty effective for pain
  • Spinal cord compression - emergency requiring urgent decompression

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    CRAB criteria: Calcium elevated, Renal insufficiency, Anemia, Bone lesions
  • "
    MRI more sensitive than CT for detecting bone marrow infiltration
  • "
    Whole-body low-dose CT has replaced skeletal survey
  • "
    Myeloma is radiosensitive - responds well to radiation therapy

Critical Multiple Myeloma Exam Points

CRAB Criteria

Symptomatic myeloma definition: C=Calcium elevated (over 11 mg/dL), R=Renal insufficiency (creatinine over 2), A=Anemia (Hb under 10), B=Bone lesions. Any one of these with clonal plasma cells = requires treatment.

IMWG Imaging

2014 IMWG criteria include MRI: 2 or more focal lesions (5mm or greater) on MRI OR one or more osteolytic lesions on CT = symptomatic myeloma. Single MRI lesion is NOT diagnostic but warrants investigation.

Lytic Only

Myeloma produces ONLY lytic lesions - never blastic. If you see sclerotic response, consider POEMS syndrome (rare) or other diagnosis. The "punched out" lytic lesions are pathognomonic.

Radiosensitive

Myeloma is radiosensitive - unlike many solid tumor metastases. Radiation provides excellent local control. Surgery reserved for mechanical instability or decompression needs.

Multiple Myeloma vs Metastatic Carcinoma

FeatureMultiple MyelomaMetastatic Carcinoma
Lesion typePURE LYTIC onlyLytic, blastic, or mixed
Primary siteBone marrow (plasma cells)Breast, prostate, lung, kidney, thyroid
Bone scanOften NEGATIVE (no osteoblastic)Usually positive
MRI sensitivityVery high (marrow infiltration)High for lytic lesions
RadiosensitivityHighly radiosensitiveVariable by histology
Systemic markersM-protein, free light chainsTumor markers (PSA, CEA, etc)

At a Glance

Multiple myeloma is a plasma cell malignancy with 80% having bone disease at diagnosis, with the spine being the most common site (49%). It produces only pure lytic lesions (never blastic) - the classic "punched out" appearance. Symptomatic disease is defined by CRAB criteria (Calcium elevation, Renal insufficiency, Anaemia, Bone lesions). The 2014 IMWG criteria include imaging: ≥2 focal lesions (≥5mm) on MRI is diagnostic. Myeloma is highly radiosensitive, so radiation provides excellent local control. Surgery is reserved for mechanical instability (SINS score) or spinal cord decompression; vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty effectively manages painful vertebral lesions.

Mnemonic

CRAB Criteria for Symptomatic Myeloma

C
Calcium elevation
Serum calcium over 11 mg/dL or 0.25 mmol/L above ULN
R
Renal insufficiency
Creatinine over 2 mg/dL or CrCl under 40 mL/min
A
Anemia
Hemoglobin under 10 g/dL or over 2 g/dL below normal
B
Bone lesions
One or more osteolytic lesions on imaging

Memory Hook:CRAB criteria define end-organ damage requiring treatment

Mnemonic

SLiM Criteria - New IMWG Biomarkers

S
Sixty percent
Clonal bone marrow plasma cells 60% or more
Li
Light chain ratio
Involved/uninvolved FLC ratio 100 or more
M
MRI lesions
2 or more focal lesions (5mm+) on MRI

Memory Hook:SLiM criteria added in 2014 - can diagnose myeloma WITHOUT CRAB symptoms

Mnemonic

MRI Infiltration Patterns

F
Focal
Discrete lesions in normal background marrow
D
Diffuse
Homogeneous marrow replacement - worst prognosis
M
Mixed
Combination of focal lesions and diffuse change
V
Variegated
Salt-and-pepper or heterogeneous pattern
N
Normal
Normal marrow (MGUS or early disease)

Memory Hook:FDMVN patterns - Diffuse pattern has worst prognosis

Overview and Epidemiology

Multiple myeloma is a plasma cell neoplasm characterized by clonal proliferation of malignant plasma cells in the bone marrow, monoclonal protein in blood/urine, and end-organ damage including bone disease.

Epidemiology:

  • Second most common hematologic malignancy (after NHL)
  • Approximately 10% of all hematologic cancers
  • Median age at diagnosis: 65-70 years
  • Male to female ratio: 1.4:1
  • Higher incidence in African Americans (2-3x)

Bone Disease Distribution:

SiteFrequencyClinical Significance
Vertebrae49%Most common - compression fractures
Skull35%"Pepper pot" appearance
Pelvis34%May cause pathological fractures
Ribs33%Pain, fracture risk
Proximal femur/humerus20%Impending fracture concern

Pathogenesis of Bone Disease:

Myeloma cells activate osteoclasts and suppress osteoblasts through:

  • RANKL upregulation
  • DKK1 (Dickkopf-1) inhibits Wnt signaling
  • MIP-1alpha (macrophage inflammatory protein)
  • IL-6, IL-1beta, TNF-alpha secretion

Why Pure Lytic?

Myeloma causes ONLY lytic lesions because it suppresses osteoblast activity through DKK1. Without osteoblastic response, bone scans are often negative (no radioisotope uptake). This is why MRI and CT are preferred over bone scan for myeloma.

Pathophysiology

Disease Spectrum

Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance

Precursor condition with low risk of progression:

  • M-protein under 3 g/dL
  • Clonal plasma cells under 10% in marrow
  • No CRAB features or myeloma-defining events
  • 1% per year progression to myeloma
  • No treatment required - observation only

MRI typically normal or minimal abnormality in MGUS.

Smouldering Multiple Myeloma

Intermediate risk without symptoms:

  • M-protein 3 g/dL or more AND/OR
  • Clonal plasma cells 10-60% in marrow
  • No CRAB features or myeloma-defining events
  • Higher risk of progression than MGUS
  • Close monitoring, selected patients may benefit from early treatment

MRI may show focal lesions - 2 or more indicates active myeloma by IMWG criteria.

Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma

Requires treatment when ANY of:

  • CRAB criteria present (end-organ damage)
  • SLiM criteria present (biomarkers)
  • Amyloidosis
  • Recurrent infections

CRAB:

  • Calcium over 11 mg/dL
  • Renal: Cr over 2 mg/dL
  • Anemia: Hb under 10 g/dL
  • Bone: 1 or more lytic lesions

MRI typically shows focal, diffuse, or mixed infiltration.

Solitary Plasmacytoma

Single tumor mass of plasma cells:

  • Solitary Bone Plasmacytoma (SBP): Single bone lesion, no systemic disease
  • Extramedullary Plasmacytoma: Soft tissue (often head/neck)

SBP Criteria:

  • Single bone lesion with histologic proof
  • No clonal plasma cells in marrow
  • Normal M-protein or very low level
  • No other bone lesions on imaging

Treatment: Radiation (40-50 Gy) is curative in 50% Prognosis: 50-60% progress to myeloma within 10 years

Always image entire skeleton to confirm single lesion.

Bone Marrow Infiltration

The pattern of bone marrow infiltration on MRI correlates with prognosis:

PatternDescriptionPrognosisTreatment Response
NormalNo signal abnormalityBestN/A (MGUS/early)
FocalDiscrete lesions, normal backgroundGoodGenerally favorable
DiffuseHomogeneous marrow replacementWorstHigher tumor burden
MixedFocal + diffuse changesIntermediateVariable
VariegatedSalt-and-pepper heterogeneousVariableDepends on extent

Diffuse Pattern Significance

Diffuse bone marrow infiltration on MRI indicates high tumor burden and correlates with worse prognosis and higher ISS stage. These patients often have more severe cytopenias and higher beta-2 microglobulin levels.

Classification and Staging

International Staging System (ISS)

StageCriteriaMedian Survival
IBeta-2 microglobulin under 3.5 mg/L AND Albumin 3.5 g/dL or more62 months
IINeither I nor III44 months
IIIBeta-2 microglobulin 5.5 mg/L or more29 months

ISS is based on two readily available serum markers. Beta-2 microglobulin reflects tumor burden while albumin reflects performance status.

Revised ISS (R-ISS)

Incorporates cytogenetics and LDH for improved prognostication.

R-ISSDefinition
IISS I + standard-risk cytogenetics + normal LDH
IINeither I nor III
IIIISS III + high-risk cytogenetics OR elevated LDH

High-risk cytogenetics include del(17p), t(4;14), and t(14;16). R-ISS provides better prognostication than ISS alone.

IMWG Diagnostic Criteria (2014)

Diagnosis requires clonal bone marrow plasma cells 10% or more OR biopsy-proven plasmacytoma.

PLUS one or more CRAB features (end-organ damage): Calcium elevated (over 11 mg/dL), Renal insufficiency (Cr over 2 mg/dL), Anemia (Hb under 10 g/dL), or Bone lesions (1 or more lytic).

OR SLiM biomarkers: 60% or more clonal plasma cells (S), free light chain ratio 100 or more (Li), or 2 or more focal lesions on MRI 5mm or larger (M).

SLiM criteria allow diagnosis without traditional end-organ damage.

MRI Infiltration Patterns

PatternDescriptionPrognosis
NormalNo signal abnormalityBest (MGUS/early)
FocalDiscrete lesions, normal backgroundGood
DiffuseHomogeneous marrow replacementWorst
MixedFocal + diffuse changesIntermediate
VariegatedSalt-and-pepper heterogeneousVariable

Diffuse pattern correlates with high tumor burden, higher ISS stage, and worse survival. Focal pattern indicates better treatment response.

Single MRI Lesion

A single focal lesion on MRI does NOT meet IMWG criteria for myeloma diagnosis. However, it should prompt further investigation with CT (one lytic lesion on CT IS diagnostic) or biopsy.

Clinical Presentation

Presenting Features

Bone Pain (70% at presentation):

  • Most common symptom
  • Often back pain from vertebral involvement
  • Worse with movement, may improve at rest
  • Pathological fractures common

Systemic Symptoms:

  • Fatigue (anemia)
  • Weight loss
  • Recurrent infections (immunoparesis)
  • Hyperviscosity symptoms (rare)

Spinal Manifestations

Vertebral Compression Fractures:

  • Present in 55-70% at diagnosis
  • May be presenting feature
  • Multiple levels common
  • Thoracolumbar junction most common

Spinal Cord Compression:

  • Emergency presentation
  • From vertebral collapse or extraosseous extension
  • Requires urgent assessment and treatment
  • Good prognosis if treated promptly (radiosensitive)

Radiculopathy:

  • Neural foraminal narrowing
  • Extraosseous tumor extension
  • May present before diagnosis

Red Flags

  • Age over 50 with new back pain
  • Pathological fracture (minimal trauma)
  • Anemia, renal insufficiency
  • Hypercalcemia
  • Elevated ESR/plasma viscosity
  • Recurrent infections

Investigations

Laboratory Studies

Essential Panel:

  • FBC (anemia, rouleaux formation)
  • Renal function, electrolytes
  • Calcium (hypercalcemia)
  • Total protein, albumin (AG ratio)
  • LDH, beta-2 microglobulin

Myeloma-Specific Tests:

  • Serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) - M-spike
  • Urine protein electrophoresis (UPEP) - Bence-Jones protein
  • Serum free light chains (kappa/lambda ratio)
  • Immunofixation (identifies M-protein type)

Bone Marrow:

  • Aspirate and trephine biopsy
  • Plasma cell percentage
  • Cytogenetics/FISH for prognostic markers

Imaging

Whole-Body Low-Dose CT (WBLDCT)

Now preferred first-line imaging (replaced skeletal survey):

  • Sensitivity: 78% vs skeletal survey 50%
  • One lytic lesion on CT = diagnostic criterion
  • Better detection of rib/pelvic lesions
  • Can assess fracture risk

Findings:

  • Punched-out lytic lesions
  • NO sclerotic rim (unlike metastases)
  • Pathological fractures
  • Osteopenia

WBLDCT is first-line imaging for initial staging per IMWG.

Whole-Body MRI (WBMRI)

Most sensitive for bone marrow infiltration:

  • Detects marrow involvement before lysis
  • 2 or more focal lesions = myeloma-defining event
  • Superior for assessing cord compression
  • Essential if negative WBLDCT with high suspicion

MRI Sequences:

  • T1-weighted: Low signal (marrow replacement)
  • T2-weighted/STIR: High signal (cellular infiltration)
  • DWI: High signal (diffusion restriction)

Infiltration Patterns:

  • Focal, diffuse, mixed, variegated, normal

MRI is mandatory if CT negative but myeloma suspected.

FDG-PET/CT

Useful for specific indications:

  • Assessment of extramedullary disease
  • Treatment response monitoring
  • Detection of minimal residual disease
  • Oligo-secretory/non-secretory myeloma

Advantages:

  • Metabolic activity assessment
  • Whole-body coverage
  • Prognostic value (number of focal lesions)

Limitations:

  • False negatives in low-grade disease
  • Radiation exposure

PET-CT complements MRI for comprehensive staging.

Skeletal Survey (Outdated)

Traditional but now replaced by WBLDCT:

  • Sensitivity only 50%
  • Requires 30-50% bone loss to detect lesion
  • Still useful if CT/MRI unavailable

Classic Findings:

  • Punched-out lesions (no sclerotic rim)
  • "Pepper pot skull"
  • Pathological fractures
  • Generalized osteopenia

Skeletal survey no longer recommended as first-line imaging.

Management

📊 Management Algorithm
multiple myeloma spine management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for multiple myeloma spineCredit: OrthoVellum

Systemic Treatment

First-Line Therapy (Haematology):

Orthopaedic surgeons should understand systemic treatment:

  • Triplet therapy: VRd (Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone)
  • Quadruplet therapy: Adding daratumumab for fit patients
  • Autologous stem cell transplant: For eligible patients under 70

Bone-Targeted Therapy:

  • Bisphosphonates: Zoledronic acid monthly
  • Denosumab: Alternative if renal impairment
  • Reduces skeletal events by 40%

Orthopaedic Management

Conservative Measures

Most patients managed non-operatively:

  • Analgesia (WHO ladder)
  • Bracing for vertebral fractures
  • Activity modification
  • Physiotherapy

Vertebral Augmentation:

  • Kyphoplasty/Vertebroplasty highly effective
  • 80-90% pain relief
  • Can be done under local anesthesia
  • Multiple levels in single session
  • Good option for pathological compression fractures

Vertebral augmentation is first-line for painful compression fractures.

Radiation Therapy

Myeloma is HIGHLY radiosensitive:

  • Excellent local control (80-90%)
  • Pain relief in 70-80%
  • Lower doses effective than for carcinoma

Indications:

  • Painful bone lesions
  • Impending pathological fracture
  • Spinal cord compression
  • Solitary plasmacytoma (curative intent)

Typical Doses:

  • Palliation: 20-30 Gy in 5-10 fractions
  • Plasmacytoma: 40-50 Gy for cure

Radiation is first-line for local control in myeloma.

Surgical Indications

Surgery reserved for specific scenarios:

  1. Mechanical instability (SINS 13+)
  2. Spinal cord compression with instability
  3. Failed radiation (rare in myeloma)
  4. Tissue diagnosis if needed
  5. Impending long bone fracture (Mirels 9+)

Surgical Principles:

  • Posterior decompression and stabilization
  • Cement augmentation of screws
  • Minimal blood loss (marrow disease)
  • Coordinate with haematology

Post-operative Radiation:

  • Usually given post-operatively
  • Excellent local control

Surgery + radiation provides definitive local control.

Spinal Cord Compression

Oncological Emergency in Myeloma:

Unlike metastatic carcinoma, myeloma cord compression has excellent prognosis if treated promptly:

Management:

  1. Dexamethasone 10mg IV bolus then 4mg q6h
  2. MRI whole spine (skip lesions common)
  3. Assessment for surgery:
    • If mechanically unstable = surgery + radiation
    • If stable = radiation alone effective
  4. Radiation highly effective (radiosensitive)

Outcomes:

  • Ambulatory patients: 90%+ maintain ambulation
  • Non-ambulatory: 50-70% recover ambulation (better than carcinoma)

Myeloma vs Carcinoma Cord Compression

Unlike metastatic carcinoma, myeloma is highly radiosensitive. If the spine is mechanically stable (SINS under 7), radiation alone is often sufficient for cord compression. Surgery is not automatically required as in radioresistant tumors.

Complications

Skeletal Complications

Pathological Fractures:

  • Vertebral compression fractures (55-70%)
  • Long bone fractures (less common)
  • Rib fractures

Spinal Cord Compression:

  • 5-10% of myeloma patients
  • Usually from vertebral collapse
  • Extraosseous extension less common

Hypercalcemia:

  • Present in 25-30% at diagnosis
  • From osteoclast activation
  • Medical emergency if severe

Treatment-Related Complications

Bisphosphonate Therapy:

  • Osteonecrosis of jaw (ONJ) - 1-10%
  • Renal toxicity (especially zoledronic acid)
  • Atypical femoral fractures (rare)

Surgical Complications:

  • Wound healing issues (immunosuppression)
  • Hardware failure (poor bone quality)
  • Infection risk (hypogammaglobulinemia)

Disease Progression

Extramedullary Disease:

  • Occurs in 10-20% during disease course
  • More aggressive biology
  • Requires modified treatment approach

Evidence Base

IMWG 2014 Diagnostic Criteria Update

III
Rajkumar SV et al. • Lancet Oncol (2014)
Key Findings:
  • Added SLiM biomarkers to CRAB criteria
  • 2 or more focal lesions on MRI = myeloma-defining
  • 60% or more plasma cells = myeloma-defining
  • FLC ratio 100 or more = myeloma-defining
Clinical Implication: MRI now integral to myeloma diagnosis - 2 or more focal lesions can diagnose symptomatic myeloma without CRAB features

Vertebroplasty in Myeloma

IV
Chew C et al. • Skeletal Radiol (2011)
Key Findings:
  • 65 patients with myeloma compression fractures
  • Pain relief in 86% at 6 months
  • No serious complications
  • Multiple levels safely treated
Clinical Implication: Vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty is safe and effective for painful myeloma compression fractures with high success rates

WBLDCT vs Skeletal Survey

II
Hillengass J et al. • Blood (2019)
Key Findings:
  • WBLDCT sensitivity 78% vs skeletal survey 50%
  • WBLDCT detects more osteolytic lesions
  • Lower radiation than conventional CT
  • Now recommended as first-line imaging
Clinical Implication: Whole-body low-dose CT has replaced skeletal survey as first-line imaging for myeloma staging

MRI Patterns and Prognosis

III
Moulopoulos LA et al. • Blood (2015)
Key Findings:
  • Diffuse MRI pattern predicts worse survival
  • Focal pattern has better prognosis
  • MRI patterns correlate with ISS stage
  • Treatment response assessable on MRI
Clinical Implication: MRI infiltration pattern provides important prognostic information - diffuse pattern indicates higher tumor burden and worse prognosis

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

New Diagnosis with Back Pain

EXAMINER

"A 68-year-old man presents with 3 months of progressive thoracic back pain. Blood tests show Hb 9.5, creatinine 1.8, calcium 2.8 mmol/L. SPEP shows M-protein 45 g/L. MRI shows multiple T1-hypointense vertebral lesions."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
**Diagnosis:** This patient has multiple myeloma with CRAB features: - C: Calcium elevated (2.8 mmol/L) - R: Renal insufficiency (Cr 1.8) - A: Anemia (Hb 9.5) - B: Bone lesions on MRI **Immediate Management:** 1. Hydration and bisphosphonate for hypercalcemia 2. Refer to haematology for systemic therapy 3. Pain management **Spinal Disease Assessment:** - Review MRI for cord compression - Calculate SINS if instability concern - Myeloma is radiosensitive **Treatment Options for Spine:** 1. If painful but stable: Analgesia, bracing, consider radiation 2. If compression fracture with severe pain: Vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty 3. If cord compression + unstable: Surgery + radiation 4. If cord compression + stable: Radiation alone **Key Point:** Unlike metastatic carcinoma, myeloma is highly radiosensitive. Surgery not always needed for cord compression if mechanically stable.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Recognize CRAB criteria for diagnosis
MRI is essential for bone disease assessment
Myeloma is radiosensitive - radiation highly effective
Vertebral augmentation excellent for painful fractures
Coordinate with haematology for systemic treatment
COMMON TRAPS
✗Missing hypercalcemia as emergency
✗Assuming surgery required for all cord compression
✗Forgetting myeloma is radiosensitive
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Cord Compression from Myeloma

EXAMINER

"A 72-year-old woman with known myeloma presents with 48-hour history of progressive leg weakness. Examination shows 3/5 bilateral LE power. MRI shows T8 vertebral collapse with Bilsky grade 2 epidural compression."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
**Immediate Actions:** 1. **Dexamethasone** 10mg IV bolus then 4mg q6h 2. Admit for urgent management 3. Bladder scan - catheterize if retention **Key Consideration:** Myeloma is HIGHLY radiosensitive (unlike metastatic carcinoma). **SINS Assessment:** - T8 (semi-rigid) = 1 - Pain (assume mechanical) = 3 - Bone lesion (lytic) = 2 - Alignment (collapse) = 2 - VB collapse (estimate) = 2-3 - Posterolateral (assess MRI) = 0-3 - SINS approximately 10-14 **Management Decision:** If SINS under 7 (stable): - Radiation alone is appropriate - 20-30 Gy in 5-10 fractions - Excellent local control expected If SINS 13+ (unstable): - Surgery for stabilization + post-op radiation - Posterior decompression and instrumentation **This Case:** SINS likely 10-14 - surgical evaluation needed. If instability confirmed, surgery + radiation provides best outcome. **Prognosis:** Better than metastatic carcinoma - 50-70% of non-ambulatory patients regain ambulation with treatment.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Myeloma is radiosensitive - key difference from carcinoma
SINS determines need for surgery vs radiation alone
Steroids provide temporary improvement
Better prognosis than metastatic carcinoma for MESCC
Coordinate urgently with haematology and radiation oncology
COMMON TRAPS
✗Treating like metastatic carcinoma (may not need surgery)
✗Forgetting radiosensitivity of myeloma
✗Not calculating SINS for stability assessment
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Painful Compression Fractures

EXAMINER

"A 65-year-old woman with myeloma in remission presents with severe L1 and L3 compression fractures (50% and 40% collapse). SINS 7. She has severe mechanical pain limiting mobility."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
**Assessment:** - Two painful compression fractures - SINS 7 (indeterminate stability) - Severe pain limiting function - Myeloma in remission **Treatment Options:** **1. Conservative (First-Line):** - Analgesia optimization - TLSO brace - Activity modification - Physical therapy **2. Vertebral Augmentation (Recommended):** - **Kyphoplasty or Vertebroplasty** - Can treat both levels in one session - 80-90% pain relief expected - Can be done under local anesthesia - Minimal recovery time **3. Radiation:** - If augmentation contraindicated - Takes longer to achieve pain relief (2-4 weeks) - Good for residual disease **4. Surgery:** - Not required if SINS under 13 - Reserved for instability or neurology **Recommended Approach:** Vertebral augmentation (kyphoplasty preferred) for both L1 and L3. This provides rapid pain relief, improved mobility, and can be done as outpatient/short stay. **Follow-up:** - Continue bisphosphonate therapy - Monitor for new fractures - Coordinate with haematology
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Vertebral augmentation is first-line for painful myeloma fractures
80-90% pain relief achievable
Multiple levels can be treated in single session
SINS 7 does not require surgical stabilization
Continue bone-targeted therapy
COMMON TRAPS
✗Recommending surgery for SINS 7 (not unstable)
✗Missing vertebral augmentation as excellent option
✗Forgetting to continue bisphosphonates
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Solitary Plasmacytoma

EXAMINER

"A 55-year-old man presents with a single T12 lytic lesion. Biopsy confirms plasmacytoma. Bone marrow shows 5% plasma cells. SPEP shows small M-protein 8 g/L. No CRAB features. Whole-body imaging shows no other lesions."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
**Diagnosis:** **Solitary Bone Plasmacytoma (SBP)** Criteria met: - Single bone lesion with histology - Less than 10% plasma cells in marrow (5%) - Low M-protein (8 g/L) - No CRAB features - No other lesions on whole-body imaging **Staging:** Confirm truly solitary: - Whole-body MRI or PET-CT - No skip lesions - No extramedullary disease **Treatment:** **Definitive Radiation Therapy:** - Dose: 40-50 Gy - Curative intent - Excellent local control (more than 90%) **Prognosis:** - 50% cure rate (no progression) - 50-60% progress to multiple myeloma over 10 years - Risk factors for progression: - Persistent M-protein post-RT - Larger lesion size - Axial skeleton location **Monitoring:** - SPEP every 3-6 months - Annual imaging - Watch for CRAB development **Surgery NOT Required:** - Unless instability or cord compression - Radiation is curative treatment **Key Message:** Solitary plasmacytoma is curable with radiation in 50% of patients. Surgery is not primary treatment.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
SBP is curable with radiation alone in 50%
Confirm truly solitary with whole-body imaging
40-50 Gy for curative intent
Surgery not primary treatment
Long-term monitoring for progression to myeloma
COMMON TRAPS
✗Recommending surgery for solitary lesion
✗Missing that radiation is curative
✗Not confirming solitary nature with whole-body imaging

MULTIPLE MYELOMA SPINE

High-Yield Exam Summary

CRAB Criteria

  • •C: Calcium over 11 mg/dL
  • •R: Renal - Creatinine over 2 mg/dL
  • •A: Anemia - Hb under 10 g/dL
  • •B: Bone - 1 or more lytic lesions
  • •Any CRAB + clonal plasma cells = symptomatic myeloma

SLiM Biomarkers (IMWG 2014)

  • •S: Sixty percent or more plasma cells in marrow
  • •Li: Light chain ratio 100 or more
  • •M: MRI - 2 or more focal lesions (5mm+)
  • •Any SLiM = myeloma WITHOUT needing CRAB

Key Imaging Points

  • •WBLDCT replaced skeletal survey (first-line)
  • •MRI most sensitive for marrow infiltration
  • •2 or more MRI lesions = diagnostic criterion
  • •Bone scan often NEGATIVE (no blastic response)
  • •Pure LYTIC - never blastic in myeloma

MRI Patterns

  • •Focal: Best prognosis, discrete lesions
  • •Diffuse: Worst prognosis, homogeneous replacement
  • •Mixed: Focal + diffuse
  • •Variegated: Salt-and-pepper heterogeneous
  • •Normal: MGUS or early disease

Treatment Pearls

  • •Myeloma is RADIOSENSITIVE - radiation very effective
  • •Vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty for painful fractures
  • •Surgery only if unstable (SINS 13+) or failed RT
  • •Cord compression: If stable = RT alone effective
  • •Bisphosphonates reduce skeletal events by 40%

vs Metastatic Carcinoma

  • •Myeloma: Pure lytic, radiosensitive, bone scan negative
  • •Carcinoma: May be blastic/mixed, variable sensitivity
  • •Myeloma cord compression: RT alone often sufficient
  • •Carcinoma cord compression: Usually needs surgery

MCQ Practice Points

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the SINS score and its role in myeloma spine management?

A: Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS): Evaluates tumor-related spinal instability. Components: Location, pain, bone quality, radiographic alignment, vertebral body collapse, posterolateral involvement. Score 0-6: Stable. 7-12: Potentially unstable (surgical consultation). 13-18: Unstable (surgical stabilization indicated).

Exam Pearl

Q: What are the indications for surgical intervention in spinal myeloma?

A: Neurological deficit from cord compression, spinal instability (SINS greater than 12), intractable pain unresponsive to radiation/chemotherapy, pathological fracture with deformity, need for tissue diagnosis when uncertain. Surgery typically combined with radiation and systemic chemotherapy. Goal is palliation and function preservation.

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the role of vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty in spinal myeloma?

A: Percutaneous cement augmentation provides pain relief and mechanical stability for compression fractures without cord compression. Can be performed under local anesthesia in frail patients. Contraindicated if: posterior wall breach with epidural extension, neurological deficit, coagulopathy. May be combined with radiation.

Exam Pearl

Q: Why do myeloma lesions not appear on bone scan?

A: Myeloma cells secrete osteoclast-activating factors (RANKL, IL-6) causing pure bone resorption while suppressing osteoblast activity (via DKK1). Bone scan relies on osteoblastic activity for tracer uptake. No osteoblast response = no bone scan uptake. Use skeletal survey, whole-body low-dose CT, or MRI for myeloma staging.

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the typical surgical approach for myeloma cord compression?

A: Posterior decompression and stabilization most common - allows access to most vertebral levels, provides immediate stability. Circumferential approach (anterior + posterior) for significant anterior compression or vertebral body destruction. Separation surgery concept: Decompression to create space, then radiation for tumor control.

Australian Context

Multiple myeloma management in Australia follows IMWG international guidelines with treatment coordinated through haematology services. The Myeloma Australia organization provides patient support and education resources.

Bone-targeted therapy with bisphosphonates (zoledronic acid) or denosumab is PBS-listed for myeloma patients with bone disease. Treatment is typically administered monthly for 2 years and then can be de-escalated based on response.

Vertebral augmentation procedures including kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty are available through public and private hospitals, providing effective pain relief for pathological compression fractures. Coordination between haematology, radiation oncology, and orthopaedic/neurosurgery teams is essential for optimal outcomes.

References

  1. Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A, et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(12):e538-48.
  2. Hillengass J, Usmani S, Rajkumar SV, et al. International myeloma working group consensus recommendations on imaging in monoclonal plasma cell disorders. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(6):e302-12.
  3. Moulopoulos LA, Dimopoulos MA, Kastritis E, et al. Diffuse pattern of bone marrow involvement on magnetic resonance imaging is associated with high risk cytogenetics and poor outcome in newly diagnosed, symptomatic patients with multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2012;26(4):683-9.
  4. Chew C, Craig L, Edwards R, et al. Safety and efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty in malignancy: a systematic review. Clin Radiol. 2011;66(1):63-72.
  5. Terpos E, Zamagni E, Lentzsch S, et al. Treatment of multiple myeloma-related bone disease: recommendations from the Bone Working Group of the International Myeloma Working Group. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(3):e119-30.
Quick Stats
Reading Time77 min
🇦🇺

FRACS Guidelines

Australia & New Zealand
  • NHMRC Guidelines
  • MBS Spine Items
Related Topics

ACDF - Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Adjacent Segment Disease

Adult Spinal Deformity

Ankylosing Spondylitis