Pathologic Fracture Management
Exam Essential Concepts:
- Impending vs completed pathologic fractures
- Mirels' scoring system for fracture risk stratification
- Biopsy before fixation principle (with exceptions)
- Reconstruction options based on expected survival
- Complications of instrumentation through tumor
Visual One-Pager
The pathologic-fracture decision in one view:
- Is it pathologic? A low-energy injury through a pre-existing lesion, with pain preceding the fracture. The commonest causes are metastatic carcinoma (breast, lung, prostate, kidney, thyroid) and multiple myeloma.
- Do you know the diagnosis? Biopsy BEFORE instrumenting any indeterminate or solitary lesion - nailing an unrecognised primary sarcoma is the single most damaging error. Known widely-metastatic disease with a typical lesion is the main exception.
- Impending or complete? For an impending fracture, score fracture risk with Mirels (site, pain, lesion type, size) and stabilise the high-risk lesion before it breaks.
- What construct? Match durability to expected survival (Katagiri/SORG): a load-sharing nail or cement-augmented fixation for a short prognosis, an endoprosthesis for periarticular destruction or a long survivor. Bypass the lesion, span the whole bone, and build a construct that does not rely on biological union.
- Team and adjuvants: postoperative radiotherapy, bone-modifying agents and systemic therapy - surgery restores function and relieves pain but does not prolong survival.
Definition & Classification
Pathophysiology
Bone Weakening Mechanisms
Clinical Presentation
Pathologic Fracture Red Flags:
- Progressive bone pain over weeks to months before fracture
- Night pain unrelieved by rest (tumor characteristic)
- Fracture with minimal trauma or normal activity
- Known malignancy history (even if remote)
- Constitutional symptoms: weight loss, fatigue, fever
- Multiple sites of bone pain (polyostotic involvement)
History Components
- Onset: Gradual vs sudden (fracture event)
- Duration: Weeks to months of preceding pain typical
- Character: Dull, aching, progressive
- Timing: Night pain suggests tumor
- Relieving factors: Activity modification, NSAIDs often ineffective
- Red flag symptoms: Fever, night sweats, weight loss, anorexia
- Detailed mechanism assessment critical
- "Twisted getting out of chair" or "stepping off curb" suggests pathologic
- High-energy trauma can occur through pathologic bone (confounding)
- Pain before the fall indicates pre-existing pathology
- Multiple witnesses may clarify mechanism
- Current or previous malignancy (type, stage, treatments)
- Radiation therapy to bone (radiation-induced fractures)
- Prolonged corticosteroid use (osteoporosis, osteonecrosis)
- Metabolic bone disease history
- Previous fractures (pattern recognition)
- Family history (hereditary bone disorders)
- Pre-fracture ambulatory status
- Weight-bearing ability
- Pain limiting function
- Social support and home environment
- Goals and expectations (align with prognosis)
Physical Examination
Clinical Pearl: Examination Priorities:
- Neurovascular status (baseline documentation)
- Skin integrity (open fracture risk with minimal soft tissue trauma)
- Gross deformity and limb alignment
- Palpable mass (soft tissue extension)
- Regional lymphadenopathy (rare but possible)
- Systematic examination for additional lesions
- Swelling, ecchymosis (may be disproportionate)
- Deformity, limb shortening, rotation
- Previous surgical scars (biopsy sites)
- Skin changes (radiation, infection, tumor ulceration)
- Muscle wasting (chronic pain, denervation)
- Point tenderness over fracture site
- Palpable mass or cortical defect
- Temperature (infection, inflammation)
- Crepitus with gentle range of motion
- Proximal and distal joint examination
- Pulse assessment (ABI if concern)
- Capillary refill
- Sensory examination (nerve compression or injury)
- Motor function (avoid stressing fracture)
- Document findings precisely (medicolegal, surgical planning)
- Spine palpation and percussion
- Pelvis compression and distraction
- Contralateral limb examination
- Abdominal examination (organomegaly)
- Chest auscultation (lung metastases)
The examination should identify fracture complications while gathering clues to underlying diagnosis without causing additional patient discomfort or fracture displacement.
Investigations
Imaging Modalities
STABILIZEWorkup Sequence for Pathologic Fractures
Hook:STABILIZE the patient, STABILIZE the diagnosis, STABILIZE the bone - all three must occur for optimal outcomes
Surgical Decision-Making
Biopsy Principles
Biopsy Golden Rules:
- Biopsy before definitive treatment (except known metastatic disease)
- Biopsy tract must be excisable with tumor (if primary sarcoma)
- Avoid contaminating uninvolved compartments
- Coordinate with treating oncologic surgeon before biopsy
- "Whoops" procedures drastically worsen sarcoma outcomes
Differential Diagnosis
The first task when a fracture looks pathologic is deciding what the bone is made of. Confusing a primary sarcoma for a metastasis - and nailing it - is the single most damaging error in this topic. The table below frames the differential the way examiners probe it.
Differentiating Causes of a Lesion at the Fracture Site
Treatment Strategies
Non-Operative Management
Surgical Management
DURABLESurgical Construct Selection
Hook:A DURABLE construct provides pain-free function for the patient's remaining lifespan - match invasiveness to prognosis
Preoperative Embolization of Hypervascular Metastases
The complications and guideline sections repeatedly flag hypervascular tumours and "preoperative embolization" for renal and thyroid metastases, but the technique itself is never described.
- Which tumours. Renal cell carcinoma and follicular thyroid carcinoma are the classically hypervascular skeletal metastases; hepatocellular carcinoma, some neuroendocrine tumours and melanoma can also bleed heavily. Instrumenting these lesions unprepared risks catastrophic, sometimes uncontrollable, intraoperative haemorrhage.
- What it is. Transarterial (angiographic) embolization - selective catheterisation of the tumour's feeding vessels by interventional radiology and occlusion with particles (PVA), gelfoam, coils, or a liquid embolic (Onyx) - devascularises the lesion before open surgery.
- Timing. Best performed within about 24-48 hours before surgery; if the delay is longer, collateral revascularisation returns and the benefit is lost.
- Benefit. Substantially reduces intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirement in hypervascular lesions, making curettage and instrumentation safer, cleaner and quicker.
- Caveats. Post-embolization syndrome (pain, fever, nausea) and non-target embolization can occur; embolization reduces but does not abolish bleeding, so crossmatched blood, careful cell-saver use (tumour) and meticulous haemostasis are still needed. Where embolization is unavailable (limited-resource settings) the threshold to operate on a renal or thyroid metastasis rises.
Q: A patient needs fixation of a femoral metastasis from renal cell carcinoma. What single preoperative step most reduces catastrophic bleeding?
A: Preoperative transarterial (angiographic) embolization of the hypervascular lesion, ideally within 24-48 hours of surgery. Renal cell and follicular thyroid metastases are the classically hypervascular ones; occluding the feeding vessels (particles, coils or Onyx) markedly cuts intraoperative blood loss. You must still crossmatch blood and plan meticulous haemostasis - embolization reduces, but does not abolish, the bleeding risk.
Intraoperative Embolism and Cardiopulmonary Collapse
The complications section lists "cement embolization (rare, can be fatal)" and aggressive reaming, but the distinct and highly examinable hazard of intraoperative cardiopulmonary collapse deserves its own treatment.
- The mechanism. Instrumenting a tumour-filled medullary canal - reaming, nail insertion and especially pressurised cementation - can force tumour thrombus, marrow fat and PMMA monomer/cement into the venous circulation. Emboli lodge in the lungs, causing acute pulmonary hypertension, hypoxia, hypotension and, at worst, cardiac arrest. This is a tumour/fat/cement variant of bone-cement implantation syndrome (BCIS).
- Who is at risk. High tumour burden, hypervascular lesions, long-segment or bilateral instrumentation, and pre-existing cardiopulmonary disease.
- Mitigation. Warn the anaesthetist before reaming and cementing; ream gently and vent the canal (a distal drill hole) to lower intramedullary pressure; use a cement gun with retrograde filling and avoid over-pressurisation; lavage the canal before cementing; maintain euvolaemia; and in very high tumour burden consider a construct that minimises canal pressurisation. Watch for the tell-tale sudden fall in end-tidal carbon dioxide and blood pressure during instrumentation.
Q: During cephalomedullary nailing of a femoral metastasis the patient suddenly desaturates and becomes hypotensive - what has happened and how do you reduce the risk?
A: Reaming, nailing or cementation of a tumour-filled canal can embolize tumour, marrow fat and cement to the lungs, causing acute pulmonary hypertension and cardiovascular collapse (a variant of bone-cement implantation syndrome). Reduce the risk by warning the anaesthetist, venting the canal to lower intramedullary pressure, reaming gently, avoiding over-pressurised cementation (retrograde gun, lavage first) and maintaining euvolaemia. Manage the event with resuscitation, high-flow oxygen and haemodynamic support.
Complications
Prognosis & Outcomes
Katagiri Revised Prognostic Scoring System for Skeletal Metastasis
Prognostic Factors
Primary Tumor Type (Most Important):
Favorable Prognosis (Median Survival greater than 12 Months):
- Breast cancer (especially hormone receptor positive)
- Prostate cancer
- Thyroid cancer (follicular)
- Multiple myeloma
- Renal cell carcinoma (selected patients)
Intermediate Prognosis (6-12 Months):
- Renal cell carcinoma
- Colorectal cancer
- Melanoma
- Unknown primary
Poor Prognosis (Less than 6 Months):
- Lung cancer (especially small cell)
- Pancreatic cancer
- Gastric cancer
- Hepatocellular carcinoma
- Solitary skeletal metastasis: better prognosis
- Multiple skeletal sites: intermediate
- Visceral metastases present: poor prognosis
- Spinal cord compression: worse outcomes
- Hypercalcemia: poor prognostic sign
- Ambulatory, independent: better survival and quality of life
- Requires assistance: intermediate
- Bedridden: poor prognosis, limited benefit from surgery
- Elevated alkaline phosphatase: worse prognosis
- Anemia: associated with reduced survival
- Hypoalbuminemia: malnutrition, poor outcomes
- Hypercalcemia: advanced disease
Functional Outcomes
Patchell Trial: Decompressive Surgery Plus Radiotherapy for Metastatic Cord Compression
Expected Functional Recovery:
Lower Extremity Fractures:
- 75-85% regain ambulatory status
- Median time to weight-bearing: 3-7 days
- Ambulation level may not return to baseline
- Walking aids often required
- Rehabilitation limited by systemic disease progression
Upper Extremity Fractures:
- Greater than 90% achieve functional use
- Earlier return to activities of daily living
- Pain relief more consistent
- Better overall satisfaction
- Pain reduction (most consistent benefit)
- Independence in activities of daily living
- Psychological benefit (sense of control)
- Reduced caregiver burden
- Ability to receive oncologic treatments
- Facilitation of hospice care at home vs hospital
- Disease progression (new metastases, visceral involvement)
- Complications (infection, nonunion, implant failure)
- Deconditioning during recovery
- Chemotherapy side effects
- Depression and anxiety
- Inadequate social support
Survival Data by Treatment
Survival Outcomes: Operative vs Non-Operative Management
Key Insights:
- Surgery does not prolong survival (systemic disease determines longevity)
- Surgery dramatically improves quality of life metrics
- Functional outcomes justify surgical morbidity in appropriate candidates
- Patient selection critical (avoid surgery in moribund patients)
- Goals: palliation, function, independence - not cure
The evidence supports surgical stabilization for functional restoration and quality of life, even in patients with limited prognosis, provided they are medically fit for anesthesia.
Guidelines, Registries & Global Practice
Global Epidemiology
- Bone is the third most common site of metastasis after lung and liver; skeletal metastases develop in 30-40% of patients with advanced solid-organ cancer.
- The five carcinomas that account for the great majority of bone metastases are breast, prostate, lung, kidney and thyroid (mnemonic "BLT with Kosher Pickle"). Breast and prostate dominate because of their high prevalence and prolonged survival.
- Multiple myeloma is the commonest primary malignancy of bone and a major cause of pathologic fracture, with bone involvement in the majority at diagnosis.
- Roughly one in five patients with symptomatic skeletal metastases will require surgery for a skeletal complication during their disease course.
- An ageing global population and improving systemic cancer survival are increasing the prevalence of metastatic bone disease and the lifetime burden of pathologic fracture.
Side-by-Side Guideline Comparison
Major Society Guidance Relevant to Pathologic Fracture
Where guidance genuinely converges, it is on three principles: obtain a diagnosis before instrumenting any indeterminate lesion, manage through a multidisciplinary team, and build a durable, immediately weight-bearing construct because biological union is not expected. Divergence is mostly about thresholds and pathways (e.g. NICE mandates 24-hour timelines for cord compression that other bodies state only as principle).
Registry and Outcome Evidence
- National arthroplasty registries (NJR for England/Wales, AOANJRR in Australia, the Swedish SHAR, the Norwegian and New Zealand registries) increasingly capture tumour/oncology endoprostheses, informing revision and infection rates for megaprostheses used in periarticular metastatic disease.
- Dedicated bone-tumour databases such as the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group registry generated much of the implant-failure data above (e.g. higher failure of plating versus nailing in the humerus, and of osteosynthesis versus endoprosthesis in good-prognosis patients).
- Registry signals consistently show that long expected survival is the dominant risk factor for construct failure, reinforcing prognosis-matched reconstruction.
High- vs Limited-Resource Practice Variation
- Well-resourced settings: ready access to MRI/PET-CT staging, image-guided core biopsy, modular tumour prostheses, custom 3D-printed implants, preoperative embolisation for hypervascular tumours, and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) enabling "separation surgery" for the spine.
- Limited-resource settings: diagnosis may rest on plain radiographs and clinical judgement; intramedullary nailing with cement is often the workhorse because megaprostheses and SBRT are unavailable; embolisation and on-table cell salvage may be inaccessible, raising the threshold for operating on hypervascular renal/thyroid lesions; non-operative palliation with conventional radiotherapy carries greater weight.
- Across all settings the exam-relevant principles are identical - the trade-offs change with available technology and realistic prognosis, not the underlying decision logic.
Endoprosthetic Reconstruction More Durable Than Internal Fixation for Pathologic Proximal Femur Fractures
Implant Choice and Failure in Metastatic Humeral Disease (Scandinavian Sarcoma Group)
Failures After Operation for Skeletal Metastases of Long Bones
SORG Machine-Learning Algorithm for Survival in Extremity Metastases (International Validation)
Key References:
-
Mirels H. Metastatic disease in long bones: a proposed scoring system for diagnosing impending pathologic fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;(249):256-264.
-
Wedin R, Bauer HC, Wersäll P. Failures after operation for skeletal metastatic lesions of long bones. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;(358):128-139.
-
Harrington KD. The management of acetabular insufficiency secondary to metastatic malignant disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63(4):653-664.
-
Steensma M, Boland PJ, Morris CD, Athanasian E, Healey JH. Endoprosthetic treatment is more durable for pathologic proximal femur fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(3):920-926.
-
Weber KL, Lewis VO, Randall RL, et al. An approach to the management of patients with metastatic bone disease. Instr Course Lect. 2004;53:663-676.
Special Populations
Pelvic & Acetabular Lesions
Spine Metastases with Pathologic Fracture
Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS):
Predicts spinal instability in metastatic disease (score 0-18):
Components:
- Location (junctional vs non-junctional)
- Pain (mechanical vs positional vs none)
- Bone lesion (lytic vs mixed vs blastic)
- Spinal alignment (subluxation, kyphosis, scoliosis)
- Vertebral body collapse (greater than 50%, less than 50%, none)
- Posterolateral involvement (bilateral, unilateral, none)
Score Interpretation:
- 0-6: Stable (radiation ± chemotherapy)
- 7-12: Potentially unstable (individualized decision)
- 13-18: Unstable (surgical stabilization indicated)
Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS): Spine Oncology Study Group Consensus
Surgical Indications:
- Spinal instability (SINS greater than or equal to 13)
- Neurologic deficit (cord compression, radiculopathy)
- Intractable pain despite radiation
- Radioresistant tumor
- Tissue diagnosis needed
Surgical Options:
Decompression + Instrumented Fusion:
- Relieves neural compression
- Provides immediate stability
- Allows early mobilization
- Does not address anterior column destruction (may fail)
Separation Surgery + Stereotactic Radiation:
- Minimal decompression (create space for radiation)
- Short-segment stabilization
- High-dose focused radiation post-op
- Emerging paradigm for radiosensitive tumors
Vertebroplasty/Kyphoplasty:
- Compression fractures without instability or cord compression
- Cement stabilization
- Pain relief in 70-90%
- Complications: cement leak, neural injury (rare)
Corpectomy + Reconstruction:
- Anterior column structural support
- Expandable cage or cement
- Combined with posterior stabilization
- Major surgery, reserved for longer survival expected
Spine pathologic fractures require neurosurgical or spine surgery expertise with oncology multidisciplinary team involvement.
Pediatric Pathologic Fractures
Unique Considerations:
Etiology Differences:
- Benign lesions more common (unicameral bone cyst, fibrous dysplasia, enchondroma)
- Primary malignant tumors (osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma) vs metastatic
- Langerhan cell histiocytosis
- Leukemia/lymphoma
Growth Considerations:
- Avoid physeal injury if possible
- Limb-length discrepancy potential
- Remodeling potential greater than adults
- Long-term implant effects
Management Principles:
Benign Lesions:
- Many heal spontaneously after fracture (unicameral bone cyst 15%)
- Initial treatment: fracture immobilization
- Definitive treatment after healing (curettage, grafting)
- Avoid unnecessary surgery during acute phase
Malignant Lesions:
- Multimodal treatment (chemotherapy + surgery ± radiation)
- Limb salvage preferred when feasible
- Physeal-sparing techniques when possible
- Expandable prostheses for young children (accommodate growth)
The pediatric population requires subspecialty expertise with different treatment paradigms focused on cure and long-term function.
Controversies & Areas of Uncertainty
- Mirels threshold for prophylactic fixation. A score of 9 or more is the classic cut-off, but the score is sensitive and poorly specific, so it over-predicts fracture and may lead to over-treatment. There is growing interest in CT-based structural metrics (axial cortical involvement greater than 30 mm, circumferential cortical destruction) and CT-based finite-element ("rigidity") analysis as more specific predictors, though none has displaced Mirels in routine practice.
- Biopsy before fixation in the "obvious" metastasis. When widely metastatic disease is established and the lesion is typical, many surgeons proceed to stabilisation with intra-operative sampling. The counter-argument is that solitary or atypical lesions in a cancer survivor occasionally turn out to be a second primary or sarcoma; the safe default in any doubt is biopsy first.
- Endoprosthesis versus intramedullary nailing for the proximal femur. Registry and cohort data show endoprostheses fail far less often than ORIF and somewhat less than nails, but they are bigger operations with higher early dislocation and infection risk. The decision hinges on expected survival, extent of bone loss and joint involvement rather than a single rule.
- Separation surgery plus SBRT versus aggressive decompression for the spine. The Patchell trial established surgery plus conventional radiotherapy for cord compression, but the modern paradigm increasingly favours minimal "separation" surgery followed by high-dose stereotactic radiotherapy, especially for radioresistant tumours - access to SBRT drives this variation.
- Role and duration of bone-modifying agents. Bisphosphonates and denosumab reduce skeletal-related events, but optimal agent, dosing interval and how to manage rebound hypercalcaemia after stopping denosumab remain debated, as does their role around the time of surgery.
- Cemented intramedullary augmentation. Cement improves immediate fixation and adds a tumoricidal thermal effect, but extravasation, embolism and the loss of future MRI surveillance are real trade-offs; routine versus selective use is not standardised.
MCQ Practice Points
Q: What is the Mirels scoring system for impending pathological fractures?
A: Scores 1-3 points for each: Site (upper limb/lower limb/peritrochanteric), Pain (mild/moderate/functional), Lesion type (blastic/mixed/lytic), Size (less than 1/3, 1/3-2/3, greater than 2/3 of cortex). Total ≥8: Consider prophylactic fixation. Sensitivity ~90%, specificity ~35% for predicting fracture. Guides surgical decision-making for impending fractures.
Q: What are the principles of surgical fixation for pathological fractures?
A: Load-sharing constructs preferred - assume tumor will NOT heal. Locked intramedullary nails for long bone diaphyses. Endoprosthetic replacement for periarticular lesions or extensive bone loss. Cement augmentation fills defects and provides immediate stability. Span entire bone - protect against additional lesions. Radiation post-operatively.
Q: When should pathological lesions be biopsied before fixation?
A: Biopsy first if: Unknown primary, solitary lesion in patient without cancer history, atypical features, suspicion of primary bone tumor. Direct to surgery if: Known cancer with typical metastatic pattern, multiple skeletal lesions, characteristic imaging (renal, breast, lung, prostate patterns). Wrong diagnosis changes entire treatment approach.
Q: What is the life expectancy consideration in pathological fracture surgery?
A: Surgery indicated if expected survival greater than 6 weeks. Prognosis scoring (eg, Katagiri, PATHFx) helps estimate survival. Poor prognosis tumors: Lung, melanoma, hepatocellular. Better prognosis: Breast, prostate, renal (may survive years). Match surgical complexity to prognosis - endoprosthesis for long survivors, simple fixation for poor prognosis.
Q: What is the role of radiation in pathological fracture management?
A: Postoperative radiation (typically 8Gy single fraction or 30Gy/10 fractions) for: Tumor control, pain relief, prevention of progression. Not a substitute for adequate fixation. Begin 2-4 weeks post-op to allow wound healing. Preoperative radiation occasionally used for highly vascular tumors (renal) to reduce intraoperative bleeding.
At a Glance
Pathologic fractures occur through bone weakened by underlying disease, most commonly metastatic carcinoma (breast, lung, prostate, renal, thyroid) or multiple myeloma. The Mirels' scoring system (site, pain, lesion type, size) guides prophylactic fixation decisions - a score ≥9 indicates high fracture risk warranting stabilization. The principle of biopsy before fixation applies unless the primary tumor is known with certainty. Reconstruction choice depends on expected survival: short survival favours load-sharing devices (IM nails, endoprostheses), while longer survival may warrant more durable reconstructions. Lytic lesions in the femur (especially peritrochanteric) carry highest fracture risk.
MIRELSMIRELS Scoring Mnemonic
Hook:Think of MIRELS as a mirror reflecting fracture risk - if the score shows high numbers, the fracture is about to appear in the mirror of reality
Clinical Decision Scenarios
Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud
“A 68-year-old woman with metastatic breast cancer (ER+/PR+) presents with 3 months of progressive right thigh pain. She is ambulatory with a cane. Radiograph shows a 4cm lytic lesion in the subtrochanteric region with greater than 50% cortical destruction on the lateral cortex. She is currently on an aromatase inhibitor. How do you approach this case?”
“A 55-year-old man presents with acute pain and deformity of his left arm after lifting a bag of groceries. Radiograph shows a mid-diaphyseal humeral fracture through a 3cm lytic lesion. He has no history of malignancy. Radial nerve is intact. How do you manage this patient?”
“A 62-year-old man with known metastatic prostate cancer presents with 2 weeks of progressive thoracic back pain, now with bilateral leg weakness (power 3/5), a sensory level at T6, and difficulty voiding. MRI shows a T6 metastasis with vertebral body collapse, epidural extension and cord compression. How do you manage him?”
Mirels Score - Know Cold
- Site: Upper limb (1), Lower limb (2), Peritrochanteric (3)
- Pain: Mild (1), Moderate (2), Functional (3)
- Lesion: Blastic (1), Mixed (2), Lytic (3)
- Size: Less than 1/3 (1), 1/3-2/3 (2), Greater than 2/3 (3)
- Score greater than or equal to 9 = Prophylactic fixation indicated
- Score 8 = Individualized decision, consider fixation
- Score less than or equal to 7 = Observation acceptable with monitoring
Biopsy Principles (Common Exam Question)
- Biopsy before treatment EXCEPT: known metastatic disease with typical lesion, life/limb emergency
- Coordinate with treating oncologic surgeon BEFORE biopsy
- Biopsy tract must be excisable en bloc with tumor
- Longitudinal incision in line with definitive surgery
- Core needle preferred (80-90% diagnostic, minimal contamination)
- Never violate adjacent compartments or joint
- Mark tract with clip/suture for later excision
- Whoops procedures devastate sarcoma outcomes
Surgical Construct Principles
- Stabilize entire bone (nail) vs lesion only (plate)
- Bypass lesion by minimum 2 cortical diameters each direction
- Load-sharing (nail) preferred over load-bearing (plate)
- Cement augmentation: immediate stability, thermal necrosis, improved screw purchase
- Early weight-bearing priority (quality of life in palliative care)
- Durability must match prognosis: short (less than 6m) simple, intermediate (6-12m) durable, long (greater than 12m) prosthesis
- Nail advantages: minimally invasive, entire bone, allows radiation
- Plate advantages: periarticular, allows curettage, upper extremity
Staging Workup Sequence
- Radiographs: AP/lateral affected bone + joints above/below
- Skeletal survey: multiple myeloma or identify additional lesions
- CT chest/abdomen/pelvis: identify primary tumor, visceral mets
- MRI affected bone: marrow involvement, soft tissue extent, skip lesions
- Bone scan or PET-CT: systemic skeletal survey
- Labs: CBC, CMP, LFTs, calcium, ALP, SPEP/UPEP, PSA (if appropriate)
- Biopsy: tissue diagnosis (coordinate with oncologist)
- MDT discussion: oncology, radiation oncology, radiology
Prognosis by Primary Tumor
- Long survival (greater than 12m): Breast (ER+), Prostate, Thyroid, Myeloma
- Intermediate (6-12m): Renal, Colon, Melanoma, Unknown primary
- Short (less than 6m): Lung (especially small cell), Pancreas, Liver
- Presence of visceral metastases cuts survival in half
- Ambulatory status crucial predictor of functional recovery
- Surgery improves quality of life but NOT survival duration
- Use Katagiri score or similar to guide reconstruction durability
Complications to Discuss
- Intraoperative: hemorrhage (hypervascular tumors - embolize), cement extravasation (joint/nerve), fracture propagation
- Early: infection (5-15%, higher with chemo/radiation), wound dehiscence, VTE
- Late: implant failure (5-15% at 1 year), nonunion (expected, construct must not rely on healing), local progression
- Cement complications: thermal necrosis, embolization (rare, potentially fatal), joint penetration
- Revision: escalate construct durability (plate to nail to prosthesis), higher complication rate, balance with prognosis
Special Situations
- Pelvis/Acetabulum: Harrington classification (I-IV), Class III-IV need THA/custom implant
- Spine: SINS score (greater than or equal to 13 unstable, needs fixation), vertebroplasty for compression fractures without instability
- Pediatric: benign lesions common, fracture may induce healing (UBC), malignant needs multimodal treatment
- Radiation: adjuvant post-op (2-3 weeks delay for wound healing), NOT substitute for fixation in high-risk lesions
- Hypervascular tumors: renal, thyroid - preoperative embolization, crossmatch blood, anticipate hemorrhage