Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Pectoralis Major Ruptures

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Pectoralis Major Ruptures

Comprehensive guide to pectoralis major ruptures - anatomy, Tietjen classification, bench press mechanism, surgical repair techniques, and operative versus nonoperative outcomes for orthopaedic exam

complete
Updated: 2024-12-17
High Yield Overview

PECTORALIS MAJOR RUPTURES - THE BENCH PRESS INJURY

Eccentric Loading | Axillary Fold Loss | Surgical Repair Best for Active | Tietjen Classification

80%Occur during bench press
20-40Peak age range (years)
SternalHead involved (most common)
2-8wkOptimal surgical window

TIETJEN CLASSIFICATION (BY RUPTURE LOCATION)

Type I
PatternMuscle belly rupture
TreatmentUsually nonoperative
Type II
PatternMusculotendinous junction
TreatmentConsider operative in active
Type III
PatternTendon rupture
TreatmentOperative preferred (best results)

Critical Must-Knows

  • Mechanism is eccentric loading in abduction and external rotation (bench press lowering phase)
  • Sternal head is most commonly injured (inserts more distally on humerus)
  • Clinical triad: ecchymosis, loss of anterior axillary fold, palpable defect
  • MRI confirms diagnosis, shows location of tear and degree of retraction
  • Surgical repair produces superior strength and cosmesis in active individuals
  • Bone anchors or transosseous tunnels to lateral bicipital groove of humerus

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Pectoralis major has two heads: clavicular (upper) and sternal (lower, larger)
  • "
    Sternal head inserts more distally on humerus - experiences greater tension
  • "
    Injury occurs during eccentric phase of bench press (lowering weight)
  • "
    Complete ruptures show loss of anterior axillary fold and palpable defect
  • "
    Surgery within 2-8 weeks produces best outcomes for active individuals

Critical Pectoralis Major Rupture Exam Points

Mechanism Recognition

Eccentric contraction during bench press - injury occurs when lowering a heavy weight with shoulder in abduction and external rotation. The sternal head experiences maximal tension at this position and fails first.

Clinical Diagnosis

Classic triad: anterior chest ecchymosis, loss of anterior axillary fold (asymmetric), and palpable defect with humeral insertion ruptures. Resisted adduction reproduces pain and weakness.

Surgical Timing

Optimal window is 2-8 weeks. Acute (under 2 weeks) has tissue friability. After 8 weeks, tissue retraction and scarring make repair difficult. Chronic cases may need reconstruction.

Operative Indications

Active individuals benefit most from surgical repair. Type III (tendon ruptures) produce best surgical outcomes. Surgery restores 95-100% of strength versus 60-70% with nonoperative management.

Quick Decision Guide - Treatment Selection

Tear TypePatient ProfileTreatmentExpected Outcome
Type I (muscle belly)Any activity levelNonoperative (sling, early motion)Good functional outcome, some weakness acceptable
Type II (MTJ)Active, athleticConsider operativeVariable - better with surgery in high demand
Type III (tendon)Active, athletic, youngOperative (bone anchors/tunnels)95-100% strength return, excellent cosmesis
Type III (tendon)Sedentary, elderlyDiscuss options (may choose nonop)60-70% strength, cosmetic deficit acceptable to some
Chronic (over 3 months)Symptomatic weaknessReconstruction (allograft augmentation)Inferior to acute repair, reasonable improvement
Mnemonic

BENCH - Pectoralis Major Rupture Features

B
Bench press mechanism
Eccentric loading during lowering phase
E
Ecchymosis anterior chest
Bruising visible over chest wall
N
No anterior axillary fold
Loss of fold with complete rupture
C
Clavicular and sternal heads
Sternal head most commonly injured
H
Humeral insertion site
Lateral bicipital groove - surgical repair site

Memory Hook:BENCH reminds you of the classic injury mechanism and the key clinical findings

Mnemonic

TIETJEN - Classification by Location

T
Type I = muscle belly Tear
Intramuscular rupture - nonoperative
I
Type II = In between (MTJ)
Musculotendinous junction - consider operative
E
Type III = End (tEndon)
Tendon rupture - best surgical results
T
Timing matters (2-8 weeks)
Optimal surgical window
J
Junction to humerus repair
Bone anchors or transosseous tunnels
E
Eccentric contraction causes
Lowering phase of bench press
N
Need MRI for diagnosis
Confirms location and degree of retraction

Memory Hook:TIETJEN classification helps guide operative versus nonoperative decision

Mnemonic

STERNAL - Anatomy and Function

S
Sternal head larger
Lower, larger portion of muscle
T
Twists 180 degrees
Fibers twist to insert on humerus
E
External rotation vulnerable
Combined with abduction increases risk
R
Rib attachments (ribs 2-6)
Origin of sternal head
N
Narrow tendon insertion
All fibers converge to 5cm insertion
A
Adduction primary action
Horizontal adduction and internal rotation
L
Lateral bicipital groove
Insertion site on humerus

Memory Hook:STERNAL anatomy explains why the sternal head is most vulnerable to rupture

Mnemonic

REPAIR - Surgical Principles

R
Recognize early (2-8 weeks best)
Optimal tissue quality window
E
Expose deltopectoral interval
Standard surgical approach
P
Prepare humeral footprint
Decorticate lateral bicipital groove
A
Anchors or tunnels
Bone anchors (easier) or transosseous
I
Insert sutures through tendon
Locking Krackow or whipstitch pattern
R
Repair with arm in adduction/IR
Decreases tension on repair

Memory Hook:REPAIR outlines the key steps in surgical management

Overview and Epidemiology

Pectoralis major rupture is an uncommon injury that predominantly affects young, athletic males during weightlifting activities. The incidence has increased over the past 20 years due to the popularity of resistance training and heavy bench press exercises.

Mechanism of injury:

  • Eccentric contraction during bench press lowering phase (80% of cases)
  • Shoulder positioned in abduction and external rotation
  • Sudden excessive load or loss of control during lowering
  • Sternal head experiences greatest tension and fails first
  • Other mechanisms: water skiing, wrestling, football tackles, rock climbing

Why Bench Press?

The bench press places the pectoralis major at maximal tension when the shoulder is in abduction and external rotation during the eccentric (lowering) phase. The sternal head inserts more distally on the humerus and experiences greater tensile forces than the clavicular head.

Epidemiology:

  • Age: predominantly 20-40 years (peak athletic activity)
  • Gender: male predominance (over 95% of cases)
  • Sport: weightlifting (especially bench press), football, wrestling, rugby
  • Side: right side more common in right-handed individuals (stronger side)
  • Increasing incidence: related to popularity of gym training and heavier weights

Risk factors:

  • Anabolic steroid use (tendon strength not matched to muscle hypertrophy)
  • Previous pectoralis injury
  • Inadequate warm-up
  • Excessive weight/poor technique
  • Sudden increase in training intensity

Pathophysiology and Mechanisms

Pectoralis major anatomy:

The pectoralis major is a large, fan-shaped muscle of the anterior chest wall with complex fiber orientation.

Two heads:

  1. Clavicular head (upper portion)

    • Origin: medial half of anterior clavicle
    • Smaller, more horizontal fibers
    • Inserts more proximally on humerus
  2. Sternal head (lower portion)

    • Origin: anterior sternum and costal cartilages of ribs 2-6
    • Larger, represents about 80% of muscle mass
    • Fibers twist 180 degrees before insertion
    • Inserts more distally on humerus (experiences greater tension)

Insertion:

  • Both heads converge to form a flat tendon approximately 5cm wide
  • Inserts on lateral lip of bicipital groove of humerus
  • Fibers twist so that sternal head inserts superior to clavicular head
  • Insertion is 2-3cm long on humeral shaft

Function:

  • Primary: adduction and internal rotation of shoulder
  • Horizontal adduction (bringing arm across chest)
  • Clavicular head: flexion of shoulder
  • Sternal head: extension from flexed position
  • Important for pushing, throwing, and climbing activities

Fiber Twist Anatomy

The pectoralis major fibers undergo a 180-degree twist before insertion. The lowest sternal fibers (from rib 6) insert most superiorly on the humerus, while the clavicular fibers insert inferiorly. This creates a mechanical disadvantage for the sternal fibers during eccentric loading.

Biomechanics of injury:

When the shoulder is in abduction and external rotation (bottom of bench press):

  • Pectoralis major is maximally stretched
  • Eccentric contraction occurs as weight is lowered (muscle lengthening under load)
  • Sternal head experiences greatest tension (distal insertion = longer moment arm)
  • Failure typically occurs at musculotendinous junction or tendinous insertion
  • Complete rupture more common than partial

Blood supply:

  • Pectoral branch of thoracoacromial artery (main supply)
  • Lateral thoracic artery
  • Perforating branches from internal mammary
  • Rich blood supply - rarely a concern for healing

Nerve supply:

  • Lateral pectoral nerve (C5-C7) - clavicular head
  • Medial pectoral nerve (C8-T1) - sternal head
  • Nerves enter from deep surface - generally not at risk during repair

Classification Systems

Tietjen Classification (by anatomic location - most commonly used)

TypeLocationCharacteristicsTreatment
Type IMuscle bellyIntramuscular tearUsually nonoperative
Type IIMusculotendinous junctionMTJ disruptionVariable - consider operative in active
Type IIITendon ruptureInsertion avulsion or tendon failureOperative preferred (best results)

Clinical relevance:

  • Type I: least common, typically incomplete, good nonoperative outcomes
  • Type II: intermediate zone, may have both muscle and tendon involvement
  • Type III: most common (60-70%), best surgical results, complete rupture typical

Type III Best for Surgery

Type III (tendon) ruptures have the best surgical outcomes because healthy tendon can be securely repaired to bone. Type I (muscle) ruptures are difficult to repair and do reasonably well nonoperatively.

By degree of rupture:

GradeDescriptionClinical Features
PartialIncomplete tearPain, ecchymosis, maintained contour
CompleteFull-thickness ruptureLoss of axillary fold, palpable defect, significant weakness

Partial tears:

  • More common in Type I (muscle belly)
  • Maintained anterior axillary fold
  • Resisted testing painful but strength relatively preserved
  • Usually managed nonoperatively

Complete tears:

  • More common in Type III (tendinous)
  • Loss of anterior axillary fold (key clinical sign)
  • Palpable defect with humeral insertion ruptures
  • Significant weakness with horizontal adduction
  • Operative management preferred in active individuals

Complete ruptures typically require surgical intervention in active patients to restore strength and cosmesis.

By timing:

CategoryTimeframeCharacteristicsSurgical Considerations
AcuteUnder 2 weeksTissue edema, friableMay delay surgery slightly for tissue quality
Subacute2-8 weeksOptimal surgical windowBest tissue quality, minimal retraction
ChronicOver 8 weeksTissue retraction, scarringMore difficult repair, may need reconstruction

Surgical timing considerations:

  • Acute (under 2 weeks): tissues edematous and friable, may have poorer tissue quality
  • Subacute (2-8 weeks): optimal window - edema resolved, minimal scarring
  • Chronic (over 8 weeks): tendon retraction, muscle atrophy, scarring make direct repair difficult
  • Very chronic (over 6 months): may require allograft reconstruction rather than direct repair

Surgery within the 2-8 week window produces the most reliable and strongest repairs.

Combined classification approach:

For clinical decision-making, consider:

  1. Location (Tietjen Type I/II/III)
  2. Completeness (partial vs complete)
  3. Timing (acute/subacute/chronic)
  4. Patient factors (age, activity level, demands)

Typical patterns:

PatternDescriptionTypical Management
Complete Type III, subacute, young athleteClassic operative caseBone anchor repair
Partial Type II, acute, recreational athleteMixed pictureTrial nonoperative, consider surgery if symptomatic
Complete Type III, chronic, sedentary patientDelayed presentationCounsel regarding options

This comprehensive approach guides individualized treatment planning.

Clinical Presentation and Assessment

Acute presentation:

Patients typically present shortly after injury with a characteristic history and clinical findings.

History:

  • Mechanism: bench press (80%), other weightlifting, contact sports, or trauma
  • Sensation: "pop" or "tearing" felt in anterior chest/shoulder
  • Pain: immediate, severe anterior chest pain
  • Swelling: rapid onset of chest wall swelling
  • Weakness: inability to continue exercise, difficulty with pushing activities
  • Previous injuries: prior pectoralis strain or partial tears

The Pop

Patients frequently report hearing or feeling a "pop" during the injury (70-80% of cases). This occurs at the moment of tendon failure and is a strong indicator of complete rupture.

Physical examination:

Clinical Examination Findings

FindingSignificanceTiming
Ecchymosis over anterior chestBleeding from torn muscle/tendonAppears within 24-48 hours, peaks at 3-5 days
Loss of anterior axillary foldComplete rupture of tendon (asymmetry when comparing sides)Immediate if complete; more obvious after swelling subsides
Palpable defectTendon retraction from humeral insertionEasier to palpate after acute swelling resolves (1-2 weeks)
Asymmetric muscle contourMedial bunching of muscle bellyProgressive as swelling decreases
Weakness with resisted adductionLoss of primary pectoralis functionImmediate; quantifiable with strength testing
Pain with resisted testingActive inflammation and tissue injuryAcute phase; improves over weeks

Specific examination maneuvers:

  1. Visual inspection

    • Patient upright with arms by sides
    • Compare anterior axillary folds bilaterally
    • Asymmetry indicates complete rupture
    • May see medial muscle bunching
  2. Palpation

    • Palpate along course of pectoralis major
    • Feel for defect at humeral insertion
    • Compare to contralateral side
    • Easier after acute swelling subsides (1-2 weeks)
  3. Strength testing

    • Horizontal adduction against resistance (primary test)
    • Internal rotation against resistance
    • Forward elevation (clavicular head function)
    • Compare to contralateral side
  4. Special tests

    • Press test: patient presses palms together in front of chest - look for asymmetric contraction
    • Wall push: observe anterior axillary fold during wall push-up

Functional deficits:

  • Difficulty with pushing activities (push-ups, bench press)
  • Weakness with throwing or striking
  • Cosmetic deformity may be primary concern for some patients
  • Daily activities usually not significantly affected

Investigations

Imaging is essential for:

  • Confirming diagnosis
  • Determining location of tear (Tietjen classification)
  • Assessing completeness of tear
  • Identifying degree of tendon retraction
  • Surgical planning

Plain radiographs:

Usually normal in isolated pectoralis rupture.

May show:

  • Soft tissue swelling over anterior chest
  • Rarely: avulsion fracture of humeral insertion (very uncommon)

Limitations: cannot visualize muscle or tendon pathology

Ultrasound:

Can be useful in experienced hands but operator-dependent.

Advantages:

  • Dynamic examination
  • Can assess degree of retraction
  • Lower cost than MRI

Disadvantages:

  • Operator-dependent
  • Limited by body habitus and acute swelling
  • Less detailed than MRI

Not first-line imaging in most centers.

MRI (gold standard):

MRI is Diagnostic Standard

MRI is the investigation of choice for pectoralis major rupture. It confirms the diagnosis, localizes the tear (Tietjen type), assesses completeness, measures retraction, and guides surgical planning.

MRI protocol:

  • Axial, coronal, and sagittal sequences
  • STIR or fat-suppressed sequences show edema
  • Focus on humeral insertion and muscle-tendon junction

Key MRI findings:

FindingSignificance
Location of tearType I (muscle), II (MTJ), or III (tendon)
CompletenessPartial versus complete disruption
Tendon retractionDistance from humeral insertion (affects surgical difficulty)
Muscle edema/hematomaAcute injury findings
Muscle atrophyChronic injury indicator
Tendon qualityImportant for surgical planning

Retraction Distance

The degree of tendon retraction on MRI is important for surgical planning. Less than 2cm retraction is easily repaired directly to bone. Greater than 5cm retraction may require allograft augmentation in chronic cases.

CT scan:

Rarely indicated. May be useful if:

  • Avulsion fracture suspected
  • MRI contraindicated
  • Combined bony injury present

When to image:

Timing of imaging:

  • Acute: MRI can be performed immediately if diagnosis uncertain
  • Preferred timing: 5-7 days after injury allows acute swelling/edema to decrease, improving image quality
  • Chronic: MRI shows atrophy and retraction for reconstruction planning

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
Management algorithm for pectoralis major ruptures.
Click to expand
Decision-making algorithm for the management of pectoralis major ruptures based on classification, chronicity, and patient activity level.Credit: OrthoVellum

Emergency/acute management:

All patients with suspected pectoralis major rupture:

  1. Ice and analgesia for comfort
  2. Sling for comfort (not immobilization requirement)
  3. Avoid active adduction/internal rotation to prevent further injury
  4. Clinical examination once acute pain controlled
  5. MRI to confirm diagnosis and classify injury (can wait 5-7 days for better quality)

Not an Emergency

Pectoralis major rupture is not a surgical emergency. Optimal surgical timing is 2-8 weeks, allowing time for thorough assessment, patient counseling, and surgical planning.

Initial counseling:

  • Explain diagnosis and Tietjen classification
  • Discuss operative versus nonoperative options
  • Review expected outcomes with each approach
  • Consider patient's activity level and goals
  • Arrange follow-up after MRI results available

Shared decision-making with thorough counseling is essential for optimal patient satisfaction.

Decision algorithm:

The choice between operative and nonoperative management depends on:

  1. Tear characteristics (Type I/II/III, complete vs partial)
  2. Patient factors (age, activity level, occupation, goals)
  3. Timing (acute vs chronic)

Operative indications (relative):

  • Type III (tendinous) complete tears in active individuals (strongest indication)
  • Type II (MTJ) complete tears in high-demand patients
  • Young, athletic patients with high functional demands
  • Failed nonoperative management with symptomatic weakness
  • Patient desire for cosmetic restoration

Nonoperative indications:

  • Type I (muscle belly) tears (difficult to repair surgically)
  • Partial tears of any type (initial trial)
  • Elderly, sedentary patients who accept functional deficit
  • Significant medical comorbidities
  • Patient preference after informed counseling

Evidence-based comparison:

OutcomeOperativeNonoperative
Strength return95-100% of contralateral60-70% of contralateral
CosmesisRestoration of axillary foldPersistent deformity
EnduranceNear-normalReduced
Patient satisfaction90-95%60-70%

Surgery produces superior outcomes in active individuals with complete tendinous ruptures.

Nonoperative management:

For selected patients (partial tears, Type I, or patient preference):

Phase 1 (Weeks 0-2): Protection

  • Sling for comfort (not mandatory)
  • Ice and analgesia
  • Avoid stretching and active adduction
  • Gentle ROM in pain-free range
  • No strengthening

Phase 2 (Weeks 2-6): Motion

  • Progressive ROM exercises
  • Gentle stretching as tolerated
  • Light isometric exercises (pain-free)
  • Continue to avoid heavy loading

Phase 3 (Weeks 6-12): Strengthening

  • Progressive resistance training
  • Focus on scapular stabilizers and rotator cuff
  • Gradual return to pushing exercises
  • Avoid maximal bench press

Phase 4 (3-6 months): Return to activity

  • Sport-specific training
  • Gradual return to weightlifting (if desired)
  • Accept limitations with heavy bench press
  • Permanent activity modification may be needed

Expected outcomes:

  • 60-70% strength return
  • Permanent cosmetic deformity
  • Endurance deficits with repetitive activities
  • Most daily activities unaffected

Patients must understand these permanent deficits before choosing nonoperative treatment.

Surgical Technique

Deltopectoral approach (standard)

Positioning:

  • Beach chair or supine with bump under shoulder
  • Arm free-draped to allow positioning
  • Head of bed elevated 30-45 degrees

Incision:

  • Deltopectoral interval from clavicle to deltoid insertion
  • Typically 8-12cm incision
  • Can extend distally for better exposure of humeral insertion

Dissection:

  • Identify deltopectoral interval (cephalic vein is landmark)
  • Develop interval (vein usually taken laterally with deltoid)
  • Retract deltoid laterally, pectoralis major medially
  • Identify torn pectoralis major tendon (retracted medially)
  • The tendon may be significantly retracted - require careful mobilization

Key anatomic considerations:

  • Cephalic vein: preserve or ligate if necessary
  • Coracoid: landmark for orientation
  • Long head biceps: medial to surgical field
  • Axillary nerve: deep and inferior (safe with proper retraction)

The deltopectoral approach provides excellent visualization of the humeral insertion and allows tendon mobilization.

Mobilizing and preparing the torn tendon:

Step 1: Identify tendon stump

  • May be retracted medially several centimeters
  • Remove hematoma and organizing clot
  • Identify both clavicular and sternal heads
  • Assess tissue quality

Step 2: Mobilize tendon

  • Gently mobilize tendon to reach footprint without tension
  • Release adhesions between tendon and surrounding tissue
  • Do not over-mobilize - preserve blood supply
  • Chronic tears may require extensive mobilization

Step 3: Prepare tendon for repair

  • Debride damaged/nonviable tissue from tendon edge
  • Place Krackow or whipstitch sutures through tendon
  • Use non-absorbable suture (Number 2 FiberWire, Ultrabraid, or similar)
  • Typically 4-6 sutures through tendon
  • Leave suture tails long for passage through bone

Suture Pattern Critical

A locking Krackow or whipstitch pattern provides secure tendon purchase and prevents suture pull-through. Using high-strength non-absorbable suture (Number 2) is essential for the forces across this repair.

Preparing the humeral footprint:

Step 1: Expose lateral bicipital groove

  • Identify and protect long head of biceps tendon
  • Footprint is lateral lip of bicipital groove
  • Approximately 2-3cm area on anterior humerus

Step 2: Prepare footprint

  • Debride soft tissue from insertion site
  • Lightly decorticate bone (keep cortex intact for anchor purchase)
  • Create bleeding bone surface to promote healing
  • Measure footprint dimensions

Step 3: Place bone anchors OR create tunnels

Option A: Bone anchors (more common, easier)

  • Place 3-4 suture anchors in lateral bicipital groove
  • Spacing approximately 1cm apart
  • Typical configuration: proximal, middle, distal anchors
  • 5.0mm or 5.5mm anchors with dual-loaded Number 2 suture

Option B: Transosseous tunnels (traditional)

  • Drill 2-3mm holes in lateral cortex
  • Create convergent tunnels exiting posterolaterally
  • Pass sutures through tunnels
  • Tied over bone bridge or button posteriorly

Both techniques produce good results. Bone anchors are technically easier and faster.

Completing the repair:

Step 1: Position arm

  • Place arm in adduction and internal rotation
  • This decreases tension on repair
  • Assistant holds arm or use positioning device

Step 2: Pass and tie sutures

  • Pass anchor sutures (or tunnel sutures) through prepared tendon
  • Typically use suture passer or large needles
  • Ensure secure purchase through tendon
  • Bring tendon to footprint and tie sutures
  • Tie with arm in adduction to avoid excessive tension

Step 3: Assess repair

  • Inspect repair site for secure apposition
  • Test repair strength by gently taking arm through passive ROM
  • Repair should be solid enough to allow early motion protocol
  • If repair feels weak, consider additional sutures or augmentation

Step 4: Closure

  • Repair deltopectoral interval if it was split
  • Close subcutaneous tissues
  • Skin closure
  • Place in sling with arm in neutral rotation

Tension-Free Repair

The repair should be performed with the arm in adduction and internal rotation to minimize tension. Excessive tension on the repair increases risk of failure. If tendon won't reach without tension, chronic retraction is present and augmentation may be needed.

Management of chronic ruptures (over 3 months):

Challenges:

  • Tendon retraction and scarring
  • Muscle atrophy
  • Tendon stump may be degraded
  • Direct repair may not be possible

Techniques for chronic cases:

1. Aggressive mobilization

  • Extensive release of adhesions
  • May require releasing conjoint tendon attachments
  • Cautious mobilization to avoid neurovascular injury

2. Allograft augmentation

  • Use when gap is greater than 2-3cm
  • Achilles tendon allograft most commonly used
  • Whipstitch allograft to native tendon
  • Fix allograft to humeral footprint with anchors
  • Creates a bridge for tendon-to-bone healing

3. Alternative techniques

  • Fascia lata autograft augmentation
  • Dermal allograft augmentation
  • Combined tendon transfers (rarely needed)

Outcomes:

  • Chronic reconstructions have inferior outcomes to acute repairs
  • Strength recovery 70-85% (versus 95-100% with acute repair)
  • Higher re-rupture risk
  • Patients should be counseled regarding limitations

Surgery within 2-8 weeks avoids these complications and produces best results.

Complications

Complications of Pectoralis Major Rupture Treatment

ComplicationIncidencePrevention/Management
Re-rupture5-10% (surgical)Secure repair, protect during healing, patient compliance
InfectionLess than 5%Sterile technique, prophylactic antibiotics, early recognition
Hematoma/seroma5-10%Hemostasis, drainage if symptomatic, usually resolves
Stiffness/contracture10-15%Early ROM protocol, avoid over-immobilization, PT
Persistent weakness10-20% (nonoperative)Set expectations, strengthen compensatory muscles
Cosmetic deformity60-70% (nonoperative)Counsel pre-treatment, surgical option if unacceptable
Nerve injuryLess than 5%Careful dissection, protect axillary and lateral pectoral nerves
Anchor failure/pulloutLess than 5%Adequate bone stock, proper technique, appropriate anchor size

Re-rupture:

  • Most common after return to heavy bench press too early
  • Risk higher with inadequate rehabilitation compliance
  • Chronic repairs have higher re-rupture risk than acute
  • Prevention: staged return to activity, patient education, adequate healing time

Infection:

  • Rare due to excellent blood supply
  • Present with wound drainage, erythema, fever
  • Treatment: antibiotics, may need washout
  • Deep infection may compromise repair

Persistent weakness:

  • More common with nonoperative management (expected)
  • May occur with surgical repair if tissue quality poor or chronic injury
  • Compensatory strengthening of surrounding muscles helpful
  • Functional impact varies by patient demands

Cosmetic concerns:

  • Asymmetric axillary fold is primary cosmetic complaint
  • Nearly universal with nonoperative management of complete ruptures
  • Surgery restores contour in 90-95% of cases
  • Important to discuss pre-treatment as may be patient's primary concern

Return to Bench Press

The most common cause of re-rupture is premature return to heavy bench press (before 6 months). Patient education about staged return to lifting is critical. Many surgeons recommend permanent modification to avoid maximal single-rep bench press.

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

Post-surgical rehabilitation protocol:

Rehabilitation is critical to successful outcome. Protocol must balance early motion (to prevent stiffness) with protection of repair (to allow healing).

Weeks 0-2: Protection Phase
  • Sling immobilization with arm in neutral rotation
  • Remove sling for hygiene and gentle elbow/wrist ROM
  • No active shoulder motion
  • No passive stretching
  • Ice and elevation for swelling control
  • Focus on patient education regarding restrictions
Weeks 2-4: Early Motion
  • Begin passive ROM with therapist supervision
  • Gentle pendulum exercises
  • Avoid terminal external rotation and abduction (stresses repair)
  • Continue sling between exercises
  • No active shoulder motion yet
  • Begin scapular retraction exercises (pain-free)
Weeks 4-6: Active Motion
  • Discontinue sling
  • Begin active-assisted ROM in all planes
  • Progress to active ROM as tolerated
  • Continue to avoid combined abduction and external rotation
  • Light isometrics in adduction and internal rotation
  • Avoid resistance exercises
Weeks 6-12: Strengthening Phase
  • Progressive resistance exercises
  • Focus on internal rotation and adduction strengthening
  • Rubber band exercises, light dumbbells
  • Begin chest press with light weight (limited ROM initially)
  • Gradually increase ROM and resistance
  • Continue to avoid maximal external rotation
Months 3-6: Advanced Strengthening
  • Progressive resistance training
  • Sport-specific exercises
  • Can begin bench press with light-moderate weight
  • Avoid maximal single-rep lifts
  • Focus on proper form and controlled motion
  • Most patients return to full activity by 6 months
Months 6-12: Return to Sport
  • Gradual return to pre-injury activity levels
  • May return to competitive sports after 6 months
  • Return to heavy weightlifting after 6-9 months
  • Permanent modification: avoid maximal single-rep bench press
  • Emphasize proper warm-up and technique
  • Full strength recovery may take up to 12 months

Key rehabilitation principles:

Protected Motion Critical

The first 6 weeks are critical for tendon-to-bone healing. Aggressive early motion can lead to repair failure. Passive ROM is safe. Active motion begins at 4-6 weeks. Resistance is delayed until 6 weeks minimum.

Milestones:

  • 6 weeks: full passive ROM expected
  • 12 weeks: full active ROM, beginning strength training
  • 6 months: return to sport, near-normal strength
  • 12 months: full strength recovery, unrestricted activity

Return to bench press:

  • Light bench press at 3 months (50% body weight)
  • Moderate bench press at 6 months (80% body weight)
  • Heavy bench press after 9-12 months
  • Avoid maximal single-rep attempts permanently

Outcomes and Prognosis

Outcomes by treatment:

Outcome MeasureSurgical RepairNonoperative
Strength (peak torque)95-100% of contralateral60-70% of contralateral
EnduranceNear-normalSignificantly reduced
CosmesisRestoration of fold in 90-95%Permanent asymmetry
Patient satisfaction90-95%60-70%
Return to sportOver 90% at pre-injury level60-70% at pre-injury level
Return to bench pressOver 90% (with modifications)Less than 50% at pre-injury level

Prognostic factors for surgical outcome:

Favorable:

  • Acute repair (within 8 weeks)
  • Type III (tendinous) ruptures
  • Good tissue quality
  • Patient age under 40 years
  • High motivation and compliance with rehabilitation
  • Absence of steroid use

Unfavorable:

  • Chronic presentation (over 3 months)
  • Poor tissue quality (chronic, steroid use)
  • Type I (muscle belly) tears
  • Patient noncompliance with rehabilitation
  • Premature return to heavy lifting

Surgery Wins for Athletes

For active individuals with complete Type III tears, surgical repair produces significantly superior outcomes compared to nonoperative management. Near-complete strength recovery and restoration of cosmesis justify the surgical risks.

Long-term outcomes:

Studies with 5-10 year follow-up show:

  • Maintained strength and function with surgical repair
  • Over 90% patient satisfaction long-term
  • Re-rupture rare after first year (less than 5%)
  • Most patients return to all activities including weightlifting
  • Permanent modification recommended: avoid maximal single-rep bench press

Complications affecting outcome:

  • Re-rupture (5-10%): usually due to premature return to lifting
  • Persistent weakness (10-15%): more common with chronic repairs
  • Stiffness (10-15%): usually improves with continued therapy
  • Chronic pain (less than 10%): may require further evaluation

Evidence Base

Level IV
📚 Bak et al. Epidemiology of Pectoralis Major Rupture
Key Findings:
  • First large case series describing mechanism (weightlifting 85%), demographics (male, 20-40 years), and clinical presentation. Established the classic triad: ecchymosis, loss of anterior axillary fold, palpable defect.
Clinical Implication: Classic clinical presentation allows diagnosis without imaging in most cases. MRI confirms location and guides treatment.
Source: Am J Sports Med 2000

Level III
📚 Schepsis et al. Surgical Versus Nonoperative Treatment
Key Findings:
  • Comparative study showing surgical repair produced 97% strength return versus 56% with nonoperative management. Cosmetic restoration significantly better with surgery (91% vs 0%). Patient satisfaction higher with surgery.
Clinical Implication: Surgery produces superior functional and cosmetic outcomes in active individuals. Establishes surgery as preferred treatment for complete ruptures in high-demand patients.
Source: Am J Sports Med 2000

Level IV
📚 Wolfe et al. Chronic Pectoralis Major Rupture Reconstruction
Key Findings:
  • Chronic ruptures (over 6 months) can be successfully reconstructed using Achilles tendon allograft. Strength recovery 75-85% (inferior to acute repair but better than nonoperative). Technique involves allograft bridge from retracted tendon to humeral footprint.
Clinical Implication: Chronic cases are still operative candidates but outcomes inferior to acute repair. Allograft augmentation necessary for chronic retraction.
Source: Am J Sports Med 2003

Level III
📚 ElMaraghy and Devereaux. Systematic Review of Outcomes
Key Findings:
  • Systematic review of 203 cases showed surgical repair produced better strength (97% vs 71%), higher patient satisfaction, and better cosmesis compared to nonoperative. Re-rupture rate 5-8% overall. Timing of surgery (acute vs chronic) affected outcome.
Clinical Implication: Best evidence synthesis supporting surgical repair for active individuals. Reinforces importance of timing (2-8 weeks optimal).
Source: Clin J Sport Med 2012

Level V
📚 Haley and Zacchilli. Surgical Technique and Results
Key Findings:
  • Comprehensive review of surgical technique using bone anchors versus transosseous tunnels. Both produce equivalent results. Described deltopectoral approach and Krackow suture technique. Emphasized early motion protocol to prevent stiffness.
Clinical Implication: Standardized surgical approach and postoperative protocol. Bone anchors simpler and faster than tunnels with equivalent outcomes.
Source: J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2009

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Acute Complete Rupture in Athlete

EXAMINER

"A 28-year-old competitive powerlifter presents to your clinic 10 days after feeling a 'pop' in his chest during bench press. He has anterior chest ecchymosis and asymmetric anterior axillary folds. MRI shows a complete pectoralis major tendon rupture at the humeral insertion with 3cm retraction. What is your assessment and management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Thank you. This gentleman has sustained a **complete pectoralis major rupture, Tietjen Type III** (tendinous insertion). This is the classic presentation: young athlete, bench press mechanism with audible pop, and the clinical triad of ecchymosis, loss of anterior axillary fold, and tendon retraction on MRI. **Assessment:** This is an **excellent candidate for surgical repair** because: (1) he is young and highly active with competitive weightlifting demands, (2) it is a Type III complete tendon rupture (best surgical results), (3) timing is optimal at 10 days (approaching the ideal 2-8 week window), and (4) retraction is only 3cm (easily brought to footprint without tension). **Management Plan:** I would counsel him regarding **surgical versus nonoperative** options. With nonoperative management, he can expect 60-70% strength return, permanent cosmetic deformity, and likely inability to return to competitive powerlifting. With surgical repair, expected outcomes are 95-100% strength recovery, restoration of axillary fold contour, and high likelihood of return to sport with modifications. **Surgical Approach:** I would plan surgery within the next 1-2 weeks (optimal 2-8 week window). The procedure involves: - **Deltopectoral approach** to expose the humeral insertion - Mobilize the retracted tendon stump - **Prepare tendon** with locking Krackow sutures using Number 2 non-absorbable suture - Prepare humeral footprint (lateral bicipital groove) with light decortication - Place **3-4 suture anchors** in the footprint - Repair tendon to bone with arm in adduction and internal rotation - Early motion protocol starting at 2 weeks **Postoperative Care:** Protected ROM for 6 weeks, progressive strengthening after 6 weeks, and return to sport at 6 months. Critical counseling: he must **permanently avoid maximal single-rep bench press** to minimize re-rupture risk, but can return to competition with proper technique and modifications. The key is recognizing this as a surgical indication in a high-demand athlete with optimal timing for excellent outcomes.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Type III (tendon) complete rupture - best candidate for surgery
Young, competitive athlete with high functional demands
Classic presentation: pop during bench press, ecchymosis, asymmetric fold
MRI confirms diagnosis, location (Type III), and retraction (3cm)
Surgical repair indicated: produces 95-100% strength versus 60-70% nonoperative
Timing is optimal at 10 days (approaching 2-8 week window)
Deltopectoral approach with bone anchor repair to humeral footprint
Use Krackow sutures with Number 2 non-absorbable suture
Protected rehabilitation with early motion starting week 2
Return to sport at 6 months with permanent modification (no max single reps)
COMMON TRAPS
✗Recommending nonoperative management for a young athlete
✗Not recognizing Type III as surgical indication
✗Delaying surgery beyond optimal window
✗Not counseling about permanent activity modifications
✗Allowing premature return to heavy bench press
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"Walk me through your surgical technique step-by-step."
"What would you do differently if this was a chronic injury presenting at 6 months?"
"What if he refuses surgery - what are his expected outcomes?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Partial Tear Management Decision

EXAMINER

"A 35-year-old recreational gym-goer presents with anterior chest pain after bench press 3 weeks ago. He has mild ecchymosis but maintained anterior axillary fold contour. MRI shows a Type II musculotendinous junction partial thickness tear (estimated 60% of tendon thickness). He works as an accountant but enjoys weightlifting 3-4 times per week. What would you recommend?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Thank you. This is a **Type II partial thickness tear** at the musculotendinous junction - a challenging decision between operative and nonoperative management. **Assessment:** The key factors influencing my decision are: (1) **partial tear** (not complete), (2) **Type II location** (MTJ - intermediate zone), (3) **maintained axillary fold** (suggests preservation of some tendon continuity), (4) **recreational athlete** (high enough demand to benefit from surgery but not elite), and (5) **3 weeks post-injury** (entering optimal surgical window if we choose operative). **Initial Management - Trial of Nonoperative:** I would initially recommend a **trial of nonoperative management** for this partial tear because: - Partial tears have better nonoperative outcomes than complete ruptures - His occupational demands are low (desk work) - Recreational rather than competitive athlete - Maintained axillary fold suggests functional fibers remaining **Nonoperative Protocol:** - Protected ROM for 4-6 weeks avoiding terminal abduction/external rotation - Progressive strengthening starting at 6 weeks - Reassess at 3 months for strength and symptoms - Modified return to weightlifting emphasizing technique **Criteria for Surgical Consideration:** I would **reconsider surgery** if at 3 months he has: - Persistent significant weakness (less than 70% strength) - Inability to return to desired activities - Progressive symptoms or clinical worsening - Patient dissatisfaction with outcome **If Surgery Chosen:** The technique would involve deltopectoral approach, identifying the partial tear at MTJ, completing the tear to healthy tissue edges, and repairing to humeral footprint with anchors. However, Type II tears have **less predictable surgical results** than Type III because MTJ tissue quality is more variable. **Counseling:** I would have a detailed discussion about expected outcomes: nonoperative may achieve 80-90% strength (better than complete tears), but surgery might achieve 95% with added surgical risks. For a recreational athlete, the risk-benefit often favors nonoperative initial trial with surgery as backup option if unsatisfactory.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Partial tear (60%) at Type II location (MTJ)
Maintained axillary fold suggests functional fibers remain
Recreational athlete with moderate functional demands
Initial trial of nonoperative is reasonable for partial tears
Partial tears have better nonoperative outcomes than complete ruptures
Reassess at 3 months - surgery remains option if outcome poor
Surgery for partial tears less predictable than Type III complete tears
Type II (MTJ) tissue quality more variable than healthy tendon
Decision influenced by patient's functional demands and goals
Shared decision-making after discussing outcomes of both approaches
COMMON TRAPS
✗Automatically choosing surgery for all tears regardless of completeness
✗Not considering trial of nonoperative for partial tears
✗Not reassessing at interval before deciding surgery unnecessary
✗Not discussing that surgery has risks and not guaranteed better outcome
✗Making decision without shared decision-making with patient
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What percentage of partial tears eventually require surgery?"
"At what threshold of partial tear thickness would you recommend primary surgery?"
"How would your management differ if he was a professional athlete?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Delayed Presentation Reconstruction

EXAMINER

"A 32-year-old patient presents 8 months after a pectoralis major rupture that was initially managed nonoperatively. He has significant weakness (40% of contralateral side on isokinetic testing), cosmetic deformity, and difficulty with his occupation as a firefighter. MRI shows Type III tear with 6cm retraction and muscle atrophy. He requests surgical treatment. What would you offer?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Thank you. This is a **chronic pectoralis major rupture** with significant retraction presenting a challenging reconstructive problem. **Assessment:** The key factors are: (1) **chronic injury** (8 months - well beyond optimal surgical window), (2) **significant retraction** (6cm - direct repair likely impossible), (3) **muscle atrophy** (indicates chronic denervation and disuse), (4) **functional deficit** (40% strength - severely symptomatic), and (5) **occupational demands** (firefighter requires strength). He is a **candidate for reconstruction** but must understand limitations. **Realistic Counseling:** I would have an honest discussion about expected outcomes: - **Chronic reconstruction outcomes inferior to acute repair**: 70-85% strength recovery (versus 95-100% with acute repair) - **Higher re-rupture risk** due to tissue quality - **More complex surgery** with greater risks - **Recovery longer** than acute repairs (9-12 months) - **May not achieve occupational requirements** despite surgery **Surgical Planning:** For 6cm retraction, I would plan **allograft augmentation**: **Technique:** - Deltopectoral approach - Identify and mobilize retracted pectoralis tendon (aggressive mobilization required) - Assess gap to humeral footprint - with 6cm retraction, likely 3-4cm gap remains - Use **Achilles tendon allograft** as augmentation - Whipstitch allograft to native tendon using Krackow pattern - Prepare humeral footprint on lateral bicipital groove - Fix allograft to bone using 4-5 suture anchors - Test repair - should reach footprint without excessive tension **Alternative if Inadequate Tissue:** - Dermal allograft patch augmentation - Consider autograft fascia lata (if allograft not available) **Postoperative Protocol:** - More conservative than acute repairs - Extended immobilization (4 weeks) before ROM - Delayed strengthening (3 months minimum) - Return to full duty may take 12 months - May require permanent occupational modifications **Expectations:** He needs to understand that surgery **may improve his current 40% strength to 70-85%**, which is a meaningful improvement but falls short of normal. If 70-85% strength is insufficient for his occupation, he may need vocational counseling. I would offer surgery with realistic expectations while ensuring he understands the **definite limitations of chronic reconstruction**.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Chronic rupture (8 months) with 6cm retraction - complex reconstruction
Cannot achieve direct repair with this degree of retraction
Allograft augmentation (Achilles tendon) necessary
Expected outcome 70-85% strength (inferior to acute repair at 95-100%)
Muscle atrophy indicates chronic injury - affects potential for recovery
Higher risks: re-rupture, infection, persistent weakness
Recovery timeline longer (12 months versus 6 months for acute)
May not achieve occupational requirements for firefighting
Critical to set realistic expectations before proceeding
Patient must understand this is reconstruction, not acute repair
COMMON TRAPS
✗Promising outcomes equivalent to acute repair
✗Attempting direct repair with 6cm retraction (will fail under tension)
✗Not discussing allograft augmentation option
✗Not counseling about inferior outcomes and higher risks
✗Not addressing occupational fitness limitations
✗Using same postoperative protocol as acute repairs
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"Walk me through your allograft augmentation technique."
"What if he cannot accept 70-85% strength for his occupation?"
"Would you consider any other muscle transfers or reconstructive options?"

MCQ Practice Points

Mechanism Question

Q: What is the most common mechanism of pectoralis major rupture? A: Eccentric contraction during bench press lowering phase (80% of cases). The shoulder is in abduction and external rotation, placing maximal tension on the sternal head which fails at the musculotendinous junction or tendinous insertion.

Anatomy Question

Q: Why is the sternal head of pectoralis major more commonly injured than the clavicular head? A: The sternal head (1) inserts more distally on the humerus creating greater moment arm and tension, (2) undergoes 180-degree fiber twist before insertion creating mechanical disadvantage, and (3) represents 80% of muscle mass experiencing greater force.

Classification Question

Q: According to Tietjen classification, which type has the best surgical outcomes? A: Type III (tendon rupture) has best outcomes because healthy tendon tissue can be securely repaired to bone with anchors or tunnels. Type I (muscle belly) is difficult to repair and does better nonoperatively.

Clinical Diagnosis Question

Q: What is the classic clinical triad of complete pectoralis major rupture? A: (1) Ecchymosis over anterior chest, (2) loss of anterior axillary fold (asymmetry), and (3) palpable defect at humeral insertion. This triad allows clinical diagnosis before imaging.

Surgical Timing Question

Q: What is the optimal timing for surgical repair of pectoralis major rupture? A: 2-8 weeks post-injury. Acute (under 2 weeks) has tissue friability and edema. After 8 weeks, tissue retraction and scarring make direct repair difficult. This window provides best tissue quality for secure repair.

Outcomes Question

Q: What strength recovery can be expected with surgical repair versus nonoperative management? A: Surgical repair achieves 95-100% of contralateral strength, while nonoperative management achieves 60-70% of contralateral strength. This difference justifies surgery in active individuals with complete ruptures.

Australian Context

Epidemiology in Australia:

  • Increasing incidence due to popularity of CrossFit, powerlifting, and gym culture
  • Common in AFL, rugby union, and rugby league players
  • Occupational injuries in physically demanding professions (firefighters, police, military)

Presentation patterns:

  • Often present to emergency departments acutely
  • May be referred from sports medicine physicians or physiotherapists
  • Elite athletes may have team physician involvement

Management pathway:

  • Acute presentation: ED assessment, MRI arranged as outpatient
  • Referral to orthopaedic surgeon with sports medicine interest
  • Surgery typically performed at private or metropolitan public hospitals
  • Access to MRI within 1-2 weeks in most areas

Implant availability:

  • Suture anchors widely available (various manufacturers)
  • Achilles tendon allograft accessible through tissue banks
  • Consider implant costs in private versus public settings

Return to work/sport:

  • Workers' compensation considerations for occupational injuries
  • Fitness-for-duty assessments for firefighters, police, military
  • Return to sport decisions may involve multiple stakeholders (team physicians, coaches)
  • AFL/NRL/Rugby Australia guidelines for contact sport return

Surgical expertise:

  • Consider referral to surgeon with sports medicine fellowship training
  • Major trauma centers have experience with complex reconstructions
  • May need to transfer chronic/complex cases to tertiary center

Exam Context

Be prepared to discuss operative versus nonoperative decision-making based on tear type, patient factors, and functional demands. Know the Tietjen classification, surgical technique with bone anchors, and expected outcomes. Understand timing considerations (2-8 week optimal window) and chronic reconstruction challenges.

PECTORALIS MAJOR RUPTURES

High-Yield Exam Summary

CLINICAL TRIAD

  • •1. Ecchymosis over anterior chest wall
  • •2. Loss of anterior axillary fold (asymmetry)
  • •3. Palpable defect at humeral insertion
  • •Plus: History of 'pop' during bench press (70-80%)

TIETJEN CLASSIFICATION

  • •Type I: Muscle belly rupture (nonoperative usually)
  • •Type II: Musculotendinous junction (consider operative)
  • •Type III: Tendon rupture (operative best results)
  • •Type III has best surgical outcomes - healthy tendon to bone

MECHANISM

  • •Eccentric contraction (lowering phase) of bench press (80%)
  • •Shoulder in abduction and external rotation
  • •Sternal head most vulnerable (distal insertion, fiber twist)
  • •Other: wrestling, football, water skiing, rock climbing

IMAGING

  • •MRI is gold standard for diagnosis
  • •Shows: location (Type I/II/III), completeness, retraction
  • •Timing: can do acutely or wait 5-7 days for better quality
  • •Plain X-rays usually normal (rarely avulsion fracture)

OPERATIVE INDICATIONS

  • •Type III complete tears in active individuals (strongest indication)
  • •Young athletic patients with high functional demands
  • •Failed nonoperative with symptomatic weakness
  • •Optimal timing: 2-8 weeks (best tissue quality)

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

  • •Deltopectoral approach to humeral insertion
  • •Mobilize tendon, Krackow sutures with Number 2 nonabsorbable
  • •Bone anchors (3-4) to lateral bicipital groove OR transosseous tunnels
  • •Repair with arm in adduction and internal rotation (decreases tension)
  • •Chronic (over 3 months): allograft augmentation (Achilles) for gaps

OUTCOMES

  • •Surgical: 95-100% strength, 90-95% satisfaction, fold restored
  • •Nonoperative: 60-70% strength, permanent deformity
  • •Re-rupture: 5-10% (usually premature heavy lifting)
  • •Return to sport: 6 months with permanent modifications

EXAM TRAPS

  • •Don't treat all tears surgically - partial tears may do well nonop
  • •Don't miss optimal timing (2-8 weeks) - avoid delay
  • •Don't attempt direct repair of chronic with large retraction - need allograft
  • •Don't allow return to max bench press before 9-12 months
  • •Don't forget to counsel about permanent activity modifications
Quick Stats
Reading Time128 min
Related Topics

AC Joint Injuries in Athletes

Achilles Tendinopathy

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

Anterior Shoulder Instability