Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Pelvic Ring Injuries

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Pelvic Ring Injuries

Comprehensive guide to pelvic ring injuries - Young-Burgess classification, hemodynamic management, surgical stabilization for orthopaedic exam

complete
Updated: 2024-12-16
High Yield Overview

PELVIC RING INJURIES

Ring Injury Concept | LC vs APC vs VS | Hemorrhage Control First

3-8%Trauma patients have pelvic fracture
20-50%Mortality in open pelvic fractures
60%LC mechanism most common
2.5cmSymphysis diastasis threshold

YOUNG-BURGESS CLASSIFICATION

LC I-III
PatternLateral Compression
TreatmentInternal rotation, sacral impaction
APC I-III
PatternAnteroposterior Compression
TreatmentExternal rotation, 'open book'
VS
PatternVertical Shear
TreatmentVertical displacement, worst prognosis
CM
PatternCombined Mechanism
TreatmentMixed patterns

Critical Must-Knows

  • Pelvis is a ring - injury in one place means injury elsewhere
  • Hemorrhage is the killer - venous plexus bleeds profusely (90% of bleeding)
  • Binder at greater trochanters - reduces volume and tamponades bleeding
  • Posterior ring = stability - assess SI ligaments on CT
  • Vertical shear = worst stability - complete posterior disruption

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    LC injuries often stable (impaction posteriorly)
  • "
    APC diastasis greater than 2.5cm = posterior injury
  • "
    Preperitoneal packing for venous bleeding
  • "
    L5 transverse process fracture = unstable injury

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

pelvic-ring-injuries imaging 1
Click to expand
Clinical imaging for pelvic-ring-injuriesCredit: Abdelfattah AA et al. - J Orthop Surg Res via PMC4762161 (CC-BY 4.0)
pelvic-ring-injuries imaging 2
Click to expand
Clinical imaging for pelvic-ring-injuriesCredit: Open-i / NIH via PMC4992797 (CC-BY 4.0)
pelvic-ring-injuries imaging 3
Click to expand
Clinical imaging for pelvic-ring-injuriesCredit: Diagnostics (MDPI) 2022 via PMC8870907 (CC-BY 4.0)
pelvic-ring-injuries imaging 4
Click to expand
Clinical imaging for pelvic-ring-injuriesCredit: Diagnostics (MDPI) 2022 via PMC8870907 (CC-BY 4.0)
Complex pelvic ring fracture X-ray showing symphysis diastasis and SI joint disruption
Click to expand
Complex pelvic ring fracture with widening of symphysis pubis and bilateral SI joint disruption (arrows). This combined APC III and vertical shear pattern carries the highest mortality.Credit: Radiology Case Reports 2023 - PMC10492189 (CC-BY 4.0)
APC open book pelvic injury with external fixator and CT correlation
Click to expand
Two-panel APC (anteroposterior compression) 'open book' injury: (a) AP pelvis showing pubic symphysis diastasis greater than 2.5cm with external fixator applied for provisional stabilization and Foley catheter. (b) Axial CT at SI joint level demonstrating the posterior ring component - sacroiliac joint subluxation. APC injuries with symphysis widening over 2.5cm always have posterior ring injury requiring stabilization.Credit: Open-i/NIH - CC BY 4.0

Critical Pelvic Ring Injury Points

Ring Concept

Pelvis is an osseo-ligamentous ring. A break in one place implies a break elsewhere. Always assess entire ring on CT.

Hemorrhage Control

Venous plexus = 90% of bleeding. Control with pelvic binder then preperitoneal packing then angioembolization.

Young-Burgess

LC = lateral compression (most common). APC = open book (external rotation). VS = vertical shear (worst).

Stability

Posterior ring = stability. VS and APC III have complete posterior disruption = globally unstable.

At a Glance: Quick Decision Guide

Clinical ScenarioDiagnosisUrgencyAction
Stable BP, isolated pubic rami fractureLC I (Stable)RoutineMobilize WBAT, analgesia
Rotationally unstable, symphysis widenedAPC II / LC IIUrgentORIF symphysis, assess posterior ring
Vertical displacement, L5 TP fractureVertical ShearUrgentSkeletal traction, posterior fixation
Unstable BP, open book on X-rayAPC III (Unstable)EmergentPelvic binder, MTP, OT/Angio
Mnemonic

POSTPelvic Stability

P
Posterior ring
Posterior structures determine stability
O
Only intact
If posterior intact = rotationally stable
S
SI joint
SI joint disruption = unstable
T
Three planes
VS disrupts all 3 planes

Memory Hook:POSTerior ring determines stability - assess the back of the ring!

Mnemonic

GAPRadiographic Signs of Instability

G
Gap greater than 2.5cm
Symphysis diastasis
A
Avulsion
L5 transverse process or ischial spine
P
Posterior displacement
SI widening or vertical shift

Memory Hook:Mind the GAP - it means instability!

Mnemonic

BINDHemorrhage Control

B
Binder
At greater trochanters immediately
I
Internal rotation
Tape legs together
N
No rocking
Do not test stability repeatedly
D
Damage control
Packing + embolization

Memory Hook:BIND the pelvis to save the life.

Mnemonic

FABCOpen Pelvic Fracture

F
Fecal diversion
Diverting colostomy for rectal tears
A
Antibiotics
Broad spectrum, early
B
Bleeding control
Packing, binder, IR
C
Clean wounds
I&D, leave open

Memory Hook:FABC - the ABCs of open pelvis come after stopping the bleed!

Overview and Epidemiology

Why This Topic Matters

Pelvic ring injuries are life-threatening emergencies. The pelvis can hold 4+ liters of blood. Understanding classification, stability, and hemorrhage control is essential for the trauma component of orthopaedic exams.

Demographics

  • Young adults: High-energy (MVA, fall from height)
  • Elderly: Low-energy falls, osteoporotic bone
  • Polytrauma: 20% have associated pelvic injury
  • Pedestrians vs car: High-energy mechanism

Associated Injuries

  • Urological: 10-15% (bladder, urethra)
  • Neurological: 10-15% (lumbosacral plexus)
  • Vascular: Life-threatening hemorrhage
  • GI: Rectal tears (open fracture)

Anatomy and Biomechanics

The Ring Concept

The pelvis is a TRUE RING structure. A break in one location always implies a second break elsewhere. The ring can break through bone (fracture) or ligament (dislocation). Always assess the ENTIRE ring on CT.

Key Ligamentous Stabilizers

Pelvic Ligaments and Function

LigamentLocationFunctionInjury Pattern
Interosseous SIBetween sacrum and iliumSTRONGEST - resists vertical shearDisrupted in VS, APC III
Dorsal SIPosterior to SI jointResists posterior translationDisrupted in APC II-III
Ventral SIAnterior to SI jointResists external rotation (weakest)First to fail in APC
SacrospinousSacrum to ischial spineResists external rotationTorn in APC II-III
SacrotuberousSacrum to ischial tuberosityResists vertical shear, external rotationTorn in VS
Pubic SymphysisAnterior ringProvides 10-15% stability onlyWidened in APC

Vascular Anatomy

Venous Plexus (90% of Bleeding)

  • Presacral plexus: Extensive, low pressure
  • Prevesical plexus: Around bladder
  • Tamponaded by packing: Direct pressure works
  • Source of most hemorrhage

Arterial (10% of Bleeding)

  • Superior Gluteal Artery: Most common
  • Internal Pudendal Artery: Perineal injuries
  • Obturator Artery: Anterior ring
  • Corona Mortis: Anastomosis at risk in Stoppa approach

Vertical Stability

Vertical stability depends on the interosseous sacroiliac ligaments - the strongest ligaments in the body. If disrupted (VS or APC III), the hemipelvis migrates superiorly and the patient is globally unstable.

Classification Systems

Young-Burgess Classification

Young-Burgess Classification

TypeMechanismDeformityPosterior InjuryStability
LC ILateralInternal rotationIpsilateral sacral impactionStable
LC IILateralInternal rotationCrescent (iliac wing) fractureRotationally unstable
LC IIILateral + contralateral APCWindsweptContralateral SI disruptionGlobally unstable
APC IAP compressionDiastasis less than 2.5cmIntactStable
APC IIAP compressionDiastasis greater than 2.5cmAnterior SI disruptedRotationally unstable
APC IIIAP compressionComplete diastasisComplete SI disruptionGlobally unstable
VSVerticalCephalad displacementComplete disruptionMost unstable

The 2.5cm Rule

Symphysis diastasis greater than 2.5cm indicates disruption of the sacrospinous ligament (APC II) and posterior ring injury. This is the threshold for surgical intervention.

Lateral compression type 1 pelvic fracture on axial CT
Click to expand
Lateral Compression Type 1 (LC I): Axial CT showing fracture of right superior and inferior pubic rami with ipsilateral sacral impaction. Most common mechanism (60%), typically stable pattern.Credit: Diagnostics (MDPI) 2022 - PMC8870907 (CC-BY 4.0)
APC type 1 pelvic fracture showing symphysis diastasis
Click to expand
Anteroposterior Compression Type 1 (APC I): Scout and axial CT showing pubic symphysis diastasis. Note: APC I has less than 2.5cm diastasis with intact posterior structures.Credit: Diagnostics (MDPI) 2022 - PMC8870907 (CC-BY 4.0)
APC type 3 open book pelvic fracture on CT with 3D reconstruction
Click to expand
APC Type 3 'Open Book': Axial CT and 3D reconstructions showing complete symphysis diastasis with anterior and posterior SI joint disruption. This is globally unstable requiring urgent fixation.Credit: Diagnostics (MDPI) 2022 - PMC8870907 (CC-BY 4.0)
Vertical shear pelvic fracture showing L5 transverse process avulsion
Click to expand
Vertical Shear (VS): Axial CT showing L5 transverse process avulsion (black arrow), sacral fracture, and SI joint disruption. VS has highest mortality - complete posterior disruption with vertical instability.Credit: Diagnostics (MDPI) 2022 - PMC8870907 (CC-BY 4.0)

Tile Classification (AO/OTA)

Tile Classification

TypeDescriptionStability
Type AStable - does not involve posterior ringStable
Type BRotationally unstable, vertically stablePartial
Type CRotationally AND vertically unstableUnstable

Subtypes:

  • A1: Avulsion fractures
  • A2: Iliac wing fractures, stable rami
  • B1: Open book (external rotation)
  • B2: Lateral compression (internal rotation)
  • B3: Bilateral B injuries
  • C1: Unilateral complete disruption
  • C2: Bilateral complete disruption
  • C3: Associated acetabular fracture

The Tile classification guides stability assessment and treatment planning.

Denis Sacral Fracture Zones

Denis Zones

ZoneLocationNeuro RiskStructure at Risk
Zone IAlar (lateral)5-6%L5 nerve root
Zone IIForaminal28%S1-S2 nerve roots
Zone IIICentral canal57%Cauda equina, bowel/bladder

Zone III = Cauda Equina

Central (Zone III) sacral fractures have 57% neurological injury rate. Always assess bowel/bladder function and consider urgent decompression.

Clinical Assessment

History

  • Mechanism: MVA, fall from height, crush
  • Energy level: High-energy = high suspicion
  • Symptoms: Pelvic pain, inability to walk
  • Red flags: Blood at meatus, gross hematuria

Examination

  • Look: Leg length discrepancy, rotation
  • Feel: Symphysis gap, SI tenderness
  • DO NOT rock pelvis - disrupts clot
  • PR/PV exam: Rule out open fracture

Open Pelvic Fracture

A rectal or vaginal tear communicating with a pelvic fracture = Open Fracture. Mortality up to 50%. Requires fecal diversion (colostomy), aggressive debridement, and broad-spectrum antibiotics.

Specific Examination Findings

Examination Findings by Injury Pattern

FindingInjury PatternClinical Significance
Leg length discrepancy (shortened)Vertical ShearHemipelvis migrated superiorly
External rotation deformityAPC injuryOpen book pattern
Internal rotation (windswept)LC injuryContralateral side in external rotation
Scrotal/labial hematomaUrethral injuryDo NOT insert Foley - needs urethrogram
Blood at meatusUrethral injuryContraindication to blind catheterization
Morel-Lavallée lesionDegloving injuryAvoid incision through for surgery

Neurological Assessment

  • L5: Ankle dorsiflexion (Tibialis Anterior), sensation dorsal webspace
  • S1: Ankle plantarflexion (Gastrocnemius), sensation lateral foot
  • S2-S4: Perianal sensation, sphincter tone, bulbocavernosus reflex

Investigations

Imaging Protocol

First LineAP Pelvis X-ray

Standard trauma radiograph. Assess symmetry, rami fractures, symphysis width, SI joints. Look for L5 transverse process fracture (indicates unstable injury).

Additional ViewsInlet and Outlet Views

Inlet (40° caudad): AP displacement, sacral impaction. Outlet (40° cephalad): Vertical displacement, sacral foramina.

Gold StandardCT Scan with 3D Reconstruction

Mandatory for surgical planning. Defines posterior ring injury, sacral fractures, acetabular involvement. 3D reconstruction for complex patterns.

If UnstableCT Angiography

Arterial blush indicates active arterial bleeding requiring embolization. Performed in hemodynamically stable patients.

L5 Transverse Process Fracture

A fracture of the L5 transverse process indicates avulsion of the iliolumbar ligament - a strong marker of unstable pelvic ring injury (vertical shear pattern).

Pelvic inlet and outlet radiograph views
Click to expand
Standard pelvic trauma views: (a) Outlet view (40° cephalad) - assesses vertical displacement and sacral foramina. (b) Inlet view (40° caudad) - assesses AP displacement and SI joint widening.Credit: Diagnostics (MDPI) 2022 - PMC8870907 (CC-BY 4.0)
Standard three-view pelvic trauma series from CT reconstructions
Click to expand
Three-panel CT-generated pelvic radiographs demonstrating the standard trauma series: (a) AP pelvis view - standard screening view assessing symphysis width and SI joint symmetry. (b) Inlet view (40° caudal tilt) - best for assessing anteroposterior displacement and sacral impaction. (c) Outlet view (40° cephalad tilt) - best for assessing vertical displacement and sacral fractures. These CT reconstructions can substitute for plain films when CT is performed.Credit: Abdelfattah AA et al., J Orthop Surg Res - CC BY 4.0

Additional Investigations

Urological Assessment

  • Retrograde urethrogram: If blood at meatus
  • Cystogram: If gross hematuria
  • CT urogram: Ureteric injury assessment
  • Suprapubic catheter: If urethral injury confirmed

Laboratory Studies

  • FBC: Baseline Hb (expect drop)
  • Coagulation: INR, fibrinogen (TXA consideration)
  • Crossmatch: 6 units PRBC minimum
  • Lactate: Marker of shock severity

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
Pelvic Ring Management Algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for pelvic ring injuries. Hemodynamically Unstable: Binder, then Responder (Fixation) vs Non-Responder (Packing/Embo). Young-Burgess Classification.Credit: OrthoVellum

Pelvic Hemorrhage Algorithm

  1. Pelvic Binder - at greater trochanters, NOT iliac crests
  2. Massive Transfusion Protocol - 1:1:1 ratio (PRBC:FFP:Platelets)
  3. FAST Scan - if positive, laparotomy first
  4. Preperitoneal Packing - venous bleeding (90%)
  5. Angioembolization - arterial bleeding (10%)

Sequential approach for hemodynamically unstable patient:

  • Immediate: Pelvic binder at greater trochanters, internal rotation of legs
  • Concurrent: MTP with 1:1:1 ratio, permissive hypotension (SBP 80-90), TXA within 3 hours
  • Assessment: FAST scan - positive means laparotomy, negative suggests pelvic source
  • Intervention: PPP for venous bleeding (90%), angioembolization for arterial (10%)

This structured approach optimizes hemorrhage control.

Indications:

  • Hemodynamic instability with pelvic source
  • Negative FAST (excludes intraperitoneal injury)
  • Addresses venous bleeding (90% of pelvic hemorrhage)

Technique:

  • Approach: Midline or Pfannenstiel incision
  • Space: Retzius and paravesical spaces
  • Packs: 3-6 laparotomy pads per side
  • Removal: Planned return at 24-48 hours

Preperitoneal Packing vs Angioembolization

PPP is faster and addresses the 90% venous component. Angioembolization takes longer but addresses arterial bleeding. Many trauma centers use BOTH - packing first, angio if still unstable.

Indications:

  • Arterial bleeding (CT showing contrast blush)
  • Hemodynamic instability despite PPP
  • Persistent hemorrhage

Common Targets:

  • Superior Gluteal Artery: Most common source
  • Internal Pudendal Artery: Perineal injury association
  • Obturator Artery: Anterior ring disruption
  • Lateral Sacral Arteries: Posterior ring injury

Timing Considerations:

  • Center-dependent capability
  • Takes longer than PPP (60-90 min vs 20 min)
  • May be used in sequence with PPP

Angioembolization complements surgical packing for complete hemorrhage control.

Surgical Management

Operative vs Non-Operative

Management by Injury Pattern

PatternStabilityTreatment
LC I, APC IStableNon-operative: WBAT, analgesia
LC II, APC IIRotationally unstableOperative: Anterior +/- posterior fixation
LC III, APC III, VSGlobally unstableOperative: Anterior AND posterior fixation

Absolute Indications for Surgery:

  • Hemodynamic instability requiring stabilization
  • Open pelvic fracture
  • Symphysis diastasis greater than 2.5cm
  • Posterior ring disruption (SI dislocation, displaced sacral fracture)
  • Vertical shear injury

Surgical indications are based on instability patterns and associated soft tissue injuries.

External Fixation

Role:

  • Resuscitation frame: Acute stabilization in DCO
  • Definitive treatment: Selected APC II injuries
  • Temporary stabilization: Bridge to definitive fixation

External Fixator Constructs

TypePin PlacementAdvantagesDisadvantages
Anterior (Supra-acetabular)Gluteus medius pillarStrongest, best biomechanicsTechnically demanding
Iliac CrestIliac crestEasier placementWeaker, abdominal compression
C-ClampPosterior pelvisRapid posterior compressionNerve injury risk

Supra-acetabular Pins

Aiello technique: Pins placed 2-3cm above AIIS, angled 60° medially into the thickest bone (gluteus medius pillar). Provides strongest fixation for anterior frames.

Anterior Ring Fixation

Symphysis Plating:

  • Approach: Pfannenstiel incision
  • Technique: 4-6 hole 3.5mm or 4.5mm plate
  • Tips: Rectus abdominis preserved, avoid bladder
  • Risks: Bladder injury, infection, heterotopic ossification

Rami Fixation:

  • Retrograde superior rami screws: Minimally invasive, good for simple rami fractures
  • Anterior plate: For comminuted rami fractures via Stoppa approach

Corona Mortis

Aberrant connection between obturator and external iliac vessels crosses the superior ramus. Present in 30-70% of patients. Ligate before plating to prevent catastrophic hemorrhage.

Posterior Ring Fixation

Gold Standard: Iliosacral (IS) Screws

  • Technique: Percutaneous under fluoroscopy
  • Targets: S1 body (largest corridor), S2 body
  • Views: Inlet, outlet, lateral sacral
  • Risks: L5/S1 nerve root injury, cauda equina

Posterior Fixation Options

TechniqueIndicationAdvantagesConsiderations
IS ScrewsSI dislocation, Zone I-II sacral fracturesMinimally invasive, strongRequires fluoroscopy, dysmorphism limits
Trans-sacral ScrewsBilateral instabilityCross midline for strengthBoth sides must have safe corridor
Lumbopelvic FixationVS, U-shaped sacral fracturesResists vertical shearLarger surgery, L5-S1 stress
Posterior PlatingZone III sacral fracturesDirect reduction, decompressionHigh infection rate, wound issues

Safe Zones for IS Screws

S1 Corridor Boundaries:

  • Anterior: Alar slope (avoid iliac vessels, L5 root)
  • Posterior: Neural canal (avoid cauda equina)
  • Superior: S1 endplate (avoid disc)
  • Inferior: S1 foramen (avoid S1 root)

Sacral dysmorphism (30-40%) narrows the safe zone - always assess on preoperative CT.

Sequence of Fixation

Posterior First

In combined injuries (anterior + posterior), fix the posterior ring FIRST. Restoring the posterior ring restores hemipelvic height and rotation, making anterior reduction easier.

Complications

Complications Overview

ComplicationIncidenceRisk FactorsManagement
Hemorrhage/death8-15% mortalityOpen fracture, VS patternBinder, packing, embolization
DVT/PE35-60% DVTImmobility, pelvic vein injuryMechanical + chemical prophylaxis
InfectionUp to 50% (open)Open fracture, Morel-LavalléeAntibiotics, debridement, colostomy
Neurological injury10-15%Zone II-III sacral, VSDecompression, observation
Urogenital injury10-15%APC pattern, anterior ringUrology consult, suprapubic catheter
Chronic painUp to 60%Posterior ring injuryMultimodal analgesia, PT
Sexual dysfunctionUp to 40%Pudendal nerve injuryCounseling, medication
MalunionVariableInadequate reductionOsteotomy if symptomatic

Morel-Lavallée Lesion

Closed degloving injury - subcutaneous tissue sheared from fascia, fills with blood/fat. High infection risk if operated through. Aspirate or debride if infected. Avoid direct incision through the lesion.

Postoperative Care

Postoperative Protocol

Day 0-1Immediate Postoperative

ICU monitoring if polytrauma. DVT prophylaxis (mechanical + LMWH when safe). Wound checks. Pain control.

Day 1-3Mobilization

Stable patterns (LC I, APC I): Weight-bear as tolerated (WBAT). Unstable patterns: Toe-touch weight bearing (TTWB) 6-12 weeks.

2 WeeksFirst Follow-up

Wound check, suture removal. Check X-rays for hardware position. Assess neuro status.

6 WeeksProgress

Repeat X-rays. Advance weight-bearing if healing. Continue PT.

3 MonthsFull Weight-Bearing

Full weight-bearing if radiographic healing. Return to activities. Monitor for chronic pain, sacroiliac dysfunction.

Weight-Bearing Protocol

Weight-Bearing by Pattern

PatternImmediate6 Weeks12 Weeks
LC I, APC I (stable)WBATFull WBReturn to activity
LC II, APC II (partially unstable)TTWBPWBFull WB
VS, APC III (globally unstable)NWBTTWBPWB to Full WB

Outcomes and Prognosis

Mortality

Mortality by Injury Pattern

GroupMortality RateKey Factors
Stable (LC I, APC I)Less than 5%Isolated injury, hemodynamically stable
Unstable (LC II-III, APC II-III)10-20%Hemorrhage, associated injuries
Vertical Shear20-30%Highest energy, most associated injuries
Open Pelvic Fracture20-50%Infection, hemorrhage, rectal/vaginal tears

Functional Outcomes

Return to Function

  • 60-80% return to pre-injury employment
  • 70-80% walk without aids at 1 year
  • Up to 60% report chronic pelvic pain
  • Higher function with stable patterns

Quality of Life

  • Chronic pain: Most common long-term issue
  • Sexual dysfunction: Up to 40%
  • Sitting intolerance: With malunion
  • Psychological impact: PTSD common after major trauma

Prognostic Factors

Predictors of Poor Outcome

Poor prognostic factors:

  • Open pelvic fracture
  • Vertical shear mechanism
  • Associated head injury
  • Increasing age
  • High ISS (Injury Severity Score)
  • Neurological deficit at presentation
  • Requirement for massive transfusion

Evidence Base

Pelvic Binder Efficacy

Level III
Croce MA et al • J Trauma (2007)
Key Findings:
  • Early pelvic binding reduced transfusion requirements and mortality in unstable pelvic fractures. Most effective when applied in pre-hospital or ED setting.
Clinical Implication: Pelvic binder is first-line mechanical intervention for hemorrhage control.

Preperitoneal Packing (PPP)

Level IV
Cothren CC et al • J Trauma (2007)
Key Findings:
  • PPP achieved hemorrhage control in 85% of patients, faster than angioembolization. Secondary angio required in only 13%.
Clinical Implication: PPP is effective for venous bleeding (90% of pelvic hemorrhage) and can be done simultaneously with laparotomy.

Early vs Late Fixation

Level III
Vallier HA et al • J Bone Joint Surg Am (2010)
Key Findings:
  • Fixation within 24 hours reduced complications (ARDS, pneumonia, MOF) and length of stay compared to delayed fixation.
Clinical Implication: Early stabilization following DCO principles improves outcomes in polytrauma patients.

Iliosacral Screw Safety

Level IV
Routt ML et al • J Orthop Trauma (2000)
Key Findings:
  • Defined safe corridors for S1 and S2 screws. Sacral dysmorphism (30-40%) narrows safe zones, requiring careful preoperative CT planning.
Clinical Implication: Preoperative CT analysis for sacral dysmorphism is mandatory before percutaneous fixation.

CT vs Plain Radiographs

Level IV
Starr AJ et al • J Orthop Trauma (2002)
Key Findings:
  • Plain radiographs (AP, Inlet, Outlet) missed 30% of posterior ring injuries compared to CT scan.
Clinical Implication: CT is mandatory for accurate classification and surgical planning of pelvic ring injuries.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Hemodynamically Unstable Pelvic Fracture

EXAMINER

"32-year-old pedestrian struck by car. BP 70/40, HR 130. AP pelvis shows open book injury with 6cm symphysis diastasis. FAST scan is positive."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a life-threatening emergency - an APC III open book injury with hemodynamic instability and positive FAST indicating both intraperitoneal and retroperitoneal hemorrhage. My immediate priorities are: First, apply a pelvic binder at the greater trochanters to reduce pelvic volume. Second, activate massive transfusion protocol with 1:1:1 ratio. Third, given the positive FAST, I would proceed directly to the operating theatre for laparotomy to address intraperitoneal bleeding, and simultaneously perform preperitoneal packing to tamponade the pelvic venous bleeding. I would NOT send this patient to CT. External fixation can be applied after packing if needed. Once stable, I would obtain CT for definitive planning.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
APC III = globally unstable (complete posterior disruption)
Positive FAST = laparotomy for intraperitoneal bleeding
Pelvic binder at greater trochanters (NOT iliac crests)
Preperitoneal packing for venous bleeding (90%)
Do NOT delay for CT in unstable patient
COMMON TRAPS
✗Sending unstable patient to CT scanner
✗Forgetting to apply pelvic binder
✗Delaying laparotomy for angiography
✗Placing binder at iliac crests (too high)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if FAST was negative?"
"Describe the approach for preperitoneal packing."
"When would you consider angioembolization?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Vertical Shear Injury

EXAMINER

"25-year-old male fell 4 meters from scaffolding. X-ray shows cephalad migration of left hemipelvis by 4cm. L5 transverse process fracture noted. Hemodynamically stable."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a Vertical Shear injury - the most unstable pelvic ring pattern. The vertical migration of 4cm and L5 transverse process fracture confirm complete disruption of the interosseous sacroiliac ligaments and iliolumbar ligament avulsion. My approach would be: First, ensure pelvic binder applied and DVT prophylaxis started. Second, obtain CT scan to fully characterize the posterior injury and assess for sacral fracture. Third, apply skeletal traction (distal femur) to reduce the vertical displacement preoperatively. For definitive treatment, I would perform posterior ring fixation FIRST - likely iliosacral screws if safe corridor exists, or lumbopelvic fixation if not. Then address anterior ring as needed. Weight-bearing would be restricted for 12 weeks given the severity of posterior disruption.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Vertical Shear = globally unstable (worst pattern)
L5 TP fracture = iliolumbar ligament avulsion
Skeletal traction for preoperative reduction
Lumbopelvic fixation if IS screws not safe
Non-weight bearing for 12 weeks
COMMON TRAPS
✗Treating with external fixator alone (does not resist vertical force)
✗Allowing early weight-bearing
✗Missing the L5 TP fracture significance
✗Not assessing for sacral dysmorphism before IS screws
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How do you assess for sacral dysmorphism?"
"What are the safe corridors for IS screws?"
"When would you use lumbopelvic fixation?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Morel-Lavallée Lesion with Acetabular Fracture

EXAMINER

"45-year-old motorcyclist with acetabular fracture. On examination, there is a large, boggy, fluctuant area over the greater trochanter. The skin is intact but mobile over underlying tissue."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a Morel-Lavallée lesion - a closed degloving injury where subcutaneous tissue is sheared off the underlying fascia, creating a cavity that fills with blood, fat, and lymph. This is a critical finding that affects my surgical planning. I would aspirate the lesion under sterile conditions and send for culture. If not infected, I would consider delay of surgery 7-10 days while monitoring. Most importantly, I would NOT make my surgical incision directly through the lesion due to the high infection risk. I would use an alternative approach if possible, or perform aggressive debridement of the lesion cavity at the time of surgery. The patient needs counseling that infection risk is elevated.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Morel-Lavallée = closed degloving injury
High infection risk if operated through
Aspirate and culture
Consider delay of surgery or alternative approach
If operating through, aggressive debridement required
COMMON TRAPS
✗Ignoring the lesion (leads to infection, necrosis)
✗Incising directly through it for surgery
✗Confusing with simple hematoma
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What organisms are commonly cultured?"
"How would you manage an infected Morel-Lavallée?"
"What is the skin blood supply in this area?"

MCQ Practice Points

Classification Question

Q: What is the most common mechanism of pelvic ring injury?

A: Lateral compression (LC) - accounts for approximately 60% of pelvic fractures. The internal rotation of the hemipelvis often causes impaction of the sacrum posteriorly.

Stability Question

Q: What is the primary determinant of pelvic ring stability?

A: Posterior ring integrity - specifically the interosseous sacroiliac ligaments. The posterior ring provides 60% of pelvic stability. Complete posterior disruption (VS, APC III) results in global instability.

Technical Question

Q: At what level should a pelvic binder be applied?

A: At the level of the greater trochanters - NOT at the iliac crests. This level provides optimal reduction of pelvic volume and internal rotation of the hemipelvis.

Threshold Question

Q: What symphysis diastasis indicates posterior ring injury?

A: Greater than 2.5cm - this threshold indicates disruption of the sacrospinous/sacrotuberous ligaments (APC II pattern) and mandates assessment of the posterior ring.

Anatomy Question

Q: What is the significance of an L5 transverse process fracture?

A: Indicates avulsion of the iliolumbar ligament - a strong marker of vertical shear injury and globally unstable pelvic ring.

Hemorrhage Question

Q: What percentage of pelvic hemorrhage is venous vs arterial?

A: 90% venous (from presacral and prevesical plexus), 10% arterial (from internal iliac branches). This explains why preperitoneal packing is effective.

Australian Context

Trauma Systems

  • Level 1 Trauma Centers: 24/7 IR and trauma surgery
  • Transfer protocols: Early activation for pelvic trauma
  • Prehospital: Binder application by paramedics
  • MERT/RSQ: Retrieval services for remote areas

Australian Epidemiology

  • Pelvic fractures account for approximately 3% of all skeletal injuries
  • Bimodal age distribution: young MVA, elderly falls
  • Mortality rate ranges from 5-20% depending on injury severity
  • Higher incidence in rural and remote areas due to MVA patterns

ACSQHC Guidelines

  • Early surgery within 48 hours for hip fractures (applies to pelvic trauma principles)
  • Orthogeriatric models of care for elderly trauma patients
  • VTE prophylaxis protocols

PELVIC RING INJURIES

High-Yield Exam Summary

Young-Burgess Classification

  • •LC: Lateral compression (internal rotation) - 60% of fractures
  • •APC: AP compression (external rotation, 'open book')
  • •VS: Vertical shear (vertical displacement) - worst pattern
  • •Diastasis greater than 2.5cm = posterior injury (APC II+)

Stability Assessment

  • •Posterior ring = stability (60%)
  • •LC I, APC I = stable
  • •LC II, APC II = rotationally unstable
  • •LC III, APC III, VS = globally unstable

Hemorrhage Control

  • •Binder at greater trochanters FIRST
  • •90% bleeding is venous (packing works)
  • •MTP with 1:1:1 ratio + TXA
  • •Positive FAST = laparotomy

Fixation Principles

  • •Fix POSTERIOR ring first (restores height)
  • •IS screws = gold standard for SI disruption
  • •Lumbopelvic fixation for VS and U-sacral fractures
  • •Assess sacral dysmorphism before IS screws

Key Numbers

  • •Symphysis greater than 2.5cm = posterior injury
  • •L5 TP fracture = VS pattern marker
  • •Mortality 20-50% for open pelvic fractures
  • •Sacral dysmorphism in 30-40%
Quick Stats
Reading Time96 min
Related Topics

Acetabular Fractures

Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries

Acute Compartment Syndrome

Ankle Fractures