Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Periprosthetic Hip Fracture

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Periprosthetic Hip Fracture

Comprehensive guide to periprosthetic hip fractures and Vancouver classification for FRCS exam preparation

complete
Updated: 2025-12-25
High Yield Overview

PERIPROSTHETIC HIP FRACTURE

Vancouver Classification | Stem Stability | Bone Stock

VancouverClassification
B1/B2/B3Key types
StemStability determines treatment
RevisionFor loose stems

Vancouver Classification

A (AG/AL)
PatternAround trochanter
TreatmentUsually conservative
B1
PatternAround stem, stem stable, good bone
TreatmentORIF (cable plate)
B2
PatternAround stem, stem loose, good bone
TreatmentRevision stem
B3
PatternAround stem, stem loose, poor bone
TreatmentRevision + augmentation
C
PatternBelow stem
TreatmentORIF (standard)

Critical Must-Knows

  • Vancouver classification based on fracture location, stem stability, bone stock
  • B1 = stem stable → ORIF. B2 = stem loose → Revision
  • Stem stability is KEY determinant of treatment
  • Assess with X-rays (lucent lines, subsidence) and intraoperatively
  • Cable plates for ORIF around stem

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    A = Around trochanters (above stem tip)
  • "
    B = Around stem body (B1/B2/B3)
  • "
    C = Below stem (treat as standard fracture)
  • "
    Cementless stems loosen differently to cemented

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

AP X-ray showing Vancouver B periprosthetic femoral fracture around cemented THA stem - fracture line visible at stem tip level with fracture displacement and possible stem loosening.
Click to expand
AP X-ray showing Vancouver B periprosthetic femoral fracture around cemented THA stem - fracture line visible at stem tip level with fracture displaceCredit: Aleem IS et al. - J Orthop Case Rep via Open-i (NIH) - PMC4845407 (CC-BY 4.0)
2-panel (a,b) periprosthetic fracture treated with long revision cephalomedullary nail: (a) AP view showing full construct from hip to distal femur, (b) lateral view confirming nail position with inte
Click to expand
2-panel (a,b) periprosthetic fracture treated with long revision cephalomedullary nail: (a) AP view showing full construct from hip to distal femur, (Credit: Aleem IS et al. - J Orthop Case Rep via Open-i (NIH) - PMC4845407 (CC-BY 4.0)
2-panel (A,B) Vancouver B1 fracture ORIF: (A) pre-op AP showing periprosthetic fracture around stable THA stem, (B) post-op AP showing cable plate fixation with cerclage wires and locking plate constr
Click to expand
2-panel (A,B) Vancouver B1 fracture ORIF: (A) pre-op AP showing periprosthetic fracture around stable THA stem, (B) post-op AP showing cable plate fixCredit: Open-i / NIH via Open-i (NIH) - PMC4972891 (CC-BY 4.0)
Periprosthetic hip fracture Vancouver B1 treated with cable plate ORIF
Click to expand
Two-panel radiograph series (A, B) demonstrating Vancouver B1 periprosthetic fracture management. (A) Pre-operative AP showing fracture around a stable THA stem with good bone stock. (B) Post-operative AP showing successful ORIF with a cable plate construct - note the cables encircling the femur above and locking screws below the fracture for stable fixation while preserving the well-fixed stem.Credit: PMC - CC BY 4.0

Critical Periprosthetic Hip Fracture Points

Vancouver B

B1: Stem stable, good bone → ORIF with cable plate. B2: Stem loose, good bone → Revision stem. B3: Stem loose, poor bone → Revision with augmentation (impaction grafting, megaprosthesis).

Stem Stability

KEY QUESTION: Is the stem stable or loose? Check X-rays for lucent lines, subsidence. Intraoperative assessment is definitive. If loose, cannot just fix fracture.

ORIF Technique

Cable plates for B1 and C. Cables wrap around femur and stem. Locking screws distally (unicortical if around stem, bicortical below stem).

Type C

Fracture below stem (well distal). Stem usually not involved. Treat as standard femoral fracture with plate +/- cables, or IM nail if enough space.

At a Glance

Periprosthetic hip fractures around total hip arthroplasty are classified using the Vancouver system based on fracture location, stem stability, and bone stock. The key clinical question is whether the stem is stable or loose - this determines treatment. Type B1 (stable stem, good bone) is treated with ORIF using cable plates. Type B2 (loose stem, good bone) requires revision to a longer stem. Type B3 (loose stem, poor bone) needs revision with bone augmentation (impaction grafting, megaprosthesis). Type A fractures (around trochanters) are usually treated conservatively, while Type C (below stem) is treated as a standard femoral shaft fracture.

Mnemonic

B1-B2-B3Vancouver B Types

B1
Stable stem, good bone
ORIF (cables)
B2
Loose stem, good bone
Revision stem
B3
Loose stem, poor bone
Revision + augment

Memory Hook:B1 = ORIF. B2/B3 = Revision (loose = revise)!

Mnemonic

SLIPSSigns of Stem Loosening

S
Subsidence
Stem sinking distally over time
L
Lucent lines
Greater than 2mm around stem
I
Implant migration
Varus or valgus tilt
P
Particle debris
Osteolysis from wear particles
S
Stem motion
Gross motion on intraop assessment

Memory Hook:If the stem SLIPS, it's loose - needs revision!

Mnemonic

ABCVancouver Classification Location

A
Around trochanters
AG (greater) or AL (lesser)
B
Body of stem
Around stem (B1/B2/B3)
C
Clear below stem
Distal to stem tip

Memory Hook:ABC = Above stem, Body of stem, Clear below stem!

Overview

Periprosthetic hip fractures are fractures around a total hip arthroplasty. They are increasingly common as more THRs are performed and the population ages.

Risk Factors

Patient: Osteoporosis, female, advanced age, rheumatoid arthritis.

Implant: Revision surgery, cementless stems (higher risk than cemented), osteolysis.

Technical: Cortical perforation, stress risers.

Pathophysiology

Periprosthetic fractures result from the complex interaction between bone quality, implant characteristics, and mechanical forces.

Mechanisms of Fracture

Intraoperative fractures:

  • Occur during primary or revision arthroplasty
  • Femoral preparation: Broaching, reaming, or rasping can split cortex
  • Implant insertion: Press-fit stems generate hoop stresses that can crack cortex
  • Uncemented stems: Higher intraoperative fracture risk (1-3%) vs cemented (0.1-1%)
  • Risk factors: Osteoporotic bone, tight canal, oversized components, varus positioning

Postoperative fractures (more common):

  • Early (less than 5 years post-THR): Usually trauma-related, often at stress risers
  • Late (greater than 5 years post-THR): Combination of bone loss and trauma
  • Spontaneous: Severe osteoporosis or osteolysis may result in atraumatic fracture

Bone Changes Around Implants

Stress shielding:

  • Stiff femoral stem carries load, bypassing proximal femur
  • Reduced mechanical stimulus leads to bone resorption (Wolff's law)
  • Proximal bone density decreases up to 30% in first 2 years
  • More pronounced with:
    • Fully porous-coated stems (stiffer)
    • Larger diameter stems
    • Younger, more active patients
  • Clinical significance: Weakened bone at risk of fracture with minimal trauma

Osteolysis:

  • Wear particles (polyethylene, metal, ceramic) trigger inflammatory response
  • Macrophages release cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6) activating osteoclasts
  • Progressive bone resorption creates cavitary and cortical defects
  • Gruen zones 1 and 7 (proximal medial and lateral) most commonly affected
  • Compromises both fracture risk and fixation options

Cortical remodeling:

  • Adaptive remodeling around stem alters bone architecture
  • Proximal: Cortical thinning from stress shielding
  • Distal (stem tip): Cortical thickening from stress concentration
  • Hypertrophy: Calcar remodeling, endosteal scalloping
  • Net effect: Altered bone quality makes fracture more likely

Biomechanical Factors

Stress concentration at stem tip:

  • Stem tip acts as fulcrum during loading
  • Bending moment greatest 2-3 cortical diameters below stem tip
  • Type C fractures commonly occur at this location
  • Longer, stiffer stems increase stress concentration

Torsional stress:

  • Hip rotation generates torsional forces on femoral shaft
  • Cemented stems: Cement-bone interface can fail in torsion
  • Uncemented stems: Bone-implant interface may fail if not well-fixed
  • Spiral fractures result from excessive torsion

Cyclic loading:

  • Repeated loading cycles cause fatigue micro-damage
  • Normally repaired by bone remodeling
  • If damage accumulates faster than repair: stress fracture
  • May present as impending fracture with progressive pain

Anatomy and Biomechanics

Understanding the anatomy of the proximal femur and hip arthroplasty is essential for classifying and managing periprosthetic fractures.

Proximal Femoral Anatomy

Bone anatomy:

  • Greater trochanter: Insertion of hip abductors (gluteus medius, gluteus minimus). Fractures here (Type AG) affect abduction strength.
  • Lesser trochanter: Insertion of iliopsoas. Avulsion (Type AL) may indicate underlying osteolysis and stem loosening.
  • Femoral shaft: Cortical bone tube surrounding the stem. Bone quality critical for fixation.
  • Calcar: Medial cortex at femoral neck base, often resected or resorbed around stems.

Vascular supply:

  • Femoral head blood supply disrupted by arthroplasty (not relevant to fracture healing)
  • Femoral shaft: Nutrient artery plus periosteal blood supply
  • Fracture healing relies on periosteal and endosteal blood supply
  • Extensive soft tissue stripping during ORIF may compromise healing

Hip Arthroplasty Components

Femoral stem types:

  • Cemented: Cement mantle transmits forces to bone. Fracture through cement or at cement-bone interface. Generally more stable initially.
  • Uncemented: Press-fit, relies on bone ingrowth. May have extensive porous coating (fully coated) or proximal coating (proximally coated). Stress shielding can weaken proximal bone over time.

Stem geometry:

  • Straight stems: Easier to bypass with long revision stems
  • Curved/anatomic stems: May limit revision options
  • Modular stems: Allow length adjustment but have junction points that may fail

Biomechanical Considerations

Forces on proximal femur:

  • Hip joint reaction force: 3-5x body weight during walking
  • Abductor muscle force: Stabilizes pelvis in single-leg stance
  • Torsional forces: Rotational stress on femoral shaft
  • Bending moments: Anterior bow of femur creates bending stress

Effect of stem on bone stress:

  • Stress shielding: Stiff stem bypasses proximal bone, reducing load. Leads to bone resorption (Wolff's law). Common in fully coated stems.
  • Stress concentration: Stem tip acts as stress riser. Type C fractures often occur 2-3 cortical diameters below stem tip.
  • Cortical windows: Surgical defects (e.g., cerclage wire holes, screw holes from prior surgery) create weak points.

Fracture stability determinants:

  • Stem fixation: Loose stem cannot support ORIF. Must revise if loose.
  • Bone stock: Poor bone (osteoporosis, osteolysis, radiation) reduces healing potential and screw purchase.
  • Fracture pattern: Transverse fractures more stable than comminuted or spiral patterns.

Clinical Assessment

Thorough clinical assessment guides diagnosis, classification, and treatment planning.

History

Mechanism of injury:

  • Low-energy trauma: Fall from standing height most common. Indicates pathological fracture through weakened bone.
  • High-energy trauma: Rare but possible (MVA). May have associated injuries.
  • Spontaneous: Severe osteoporosis or osteolysis may cause atraumatic fracture.

Pain characteristics:

  • Acute onset: Suggests acute fracture
  • Chronic/progressive pain: May indicate impending fracture or loosening
  • Pain location: Groin (hip), thigh (shaft), knee (referred from hip)

Functional history:

  • Pre-injury mobility: Walking aids, distance, independence
  • Time since THR: Recent vs remote (affects loosening likelihood)
  • Previous revisions: Higher risk of bone loss and complications
  • Reason for THR: Osteoarthritis, fracture, inflammatory arthritis (affects bone quality)

Medical history:

  • Osteoporosis: Fragility fractures, DEXA scan results, current treatment
  • Medications: Bisphosphonates, steroids, anticoagulation
  • Comorbidities: Cardiac, respiratory, renal disease (affects surgical risk)
  • Smoking, alcohol: Impair bone healing

Physical Examination

Inspection:

  • Deformity: Shortening, rotation (usually external rotation if displaced)
  • Swelling: Thigh swelling common, ecchymosis may appear after several days
  • Surgical scars: Previous hip incisions (lateral, posterior, anterolateral)
  • Leg length: Measure from umbilicus to medial malleolus (compare to contralateral)

Palpation:

  • Tenderness: Localized to fracture site (trochanteric, shaft, distal thigh)
  • Crepitus: May be palpable with gentle manipulation
  • Soft tissue: Check for tense compartments (rare but possible)

Range of motion:

  • Hip ROM: Painful and limited. Do not force motion if fracture suspected.
  • Knee ROM: Check to rule out ipsilateral knee injury

Neurovascular examination (CRITICAL):

  • Femoral artery: Palpate femoral, popliteal, dorsalis pedis, posterior tibial pulses
  • Femoral nerve: Test quadriceps strength (knee extension), sensation over anterior thigh
  • Sciatic nerve: Test ankle dorsiflexion (deep peroneal), plantarflexion (tibial), sensation
  • Document carefully: Baseline neurovascular status essential for medicolegal reasons

Clinical Pearl

Sciatic nerve palsy can occur with periprosthetic fractures, especially posterior fracture-dislocations or during revision surgery. Always document motor (ankle dorsiflexion/plantarflexion) and sensory examination. Sciatic nerve injury dramatically worsens prognosis.

Systems Assessment

Medical optimization:

  • Cardiorespiratory fitness: Exercise tolerance, functional capacity
  • Anemia: Common in elderly, may need pre-op transfusion
  • Anticoagulation: Warfarin, DOACs - plan reversal for surgery
  • Nutrition: Albumin, protein-calorie malnutrition impairs healing

Frailty assessment:

  • Cognitive function: Delirium risk, ability to comply with weight-bearing restrictions
  • Social support: Home situation, carers, discharge planning needs
  • Goals of care: Some patients may decline surgery if severe comorbidities

Investigations

Systematic imaging and laboratory investigations establish diagnosis, guide classification, and inform treatment planning.

Plain Radiography

Essential views:

  • AP pelvis: Assesses both hips, allows comparison to contralateral side. Shows acetabular component, pelvic discontinuity if present.
  • AP hip: Centered on affected hip, better visualization of stem and proximal femur.
  • Lateral hip: Cross-table or frog lateral. Shows anterior/posterior displacement, stem position in sagittal plane.
  • Full-length femur: AP and lateral of entire femur from hip to knee. Essential to see entire prosthesis and exclude distal fracture.

Radiographic assessment (Vancouver classification):

1. Fracture location:

  • Type A: Fracture line involves trochanters (AG = greater, AL = lesser). Stem tip uninvolved.
  • Type B: Fracture around or at level of stem. Most common and challenging.
  • Type C: Fracture well below stem tip. Prosthesis not directly involved.

2. Stem stability (CRITICAL for B1 vs B2 distinction):

Signs of loose stem:

  • Subsidence: Stem has migrated distally compared to immediate post-op X-rays. Measure distance from lesser trochanter to stem shoulder.
  • Lucent lines: Radiolucent line around stem greater than 2mm, especially if progressive or circumferential.
  • Cement mantle fracture: Broken cement indicates stem loosening (cemented stems).
  • Varus/valgus tilt: Stem alignment changed from original position.
  • Pedestal formation: Bone formation at stem tip blocking further subsidence (indicates prior loosening).

Signs of stable stem:

  • No subsidence: Stem position unchanged from post-operative X-rays.
  • Bone ingrowth: Spot welds, cortical hypertrophy, trabecular remodeling (uncemented stems).
  • Intact cement mantle: No fracture lines in cement (cemented stems).
  • No lucent lines: Or only thin, non-progressive radiolucent lines less than 1mm.

3. Bone stock:

  • Good bone: Adequate cortical thickness, normal bone density, minimal osteolysis.
  • Poor bone: Severe osteoporosis, extensive osteolysis (especially Gruen zones 1, 7, 8), cortical thinning, cavitary defects.

Comparison X-rays Essential

Always obtain previous post-operative X-rays for comparison. Without these, assessing stem stability and subsidence is very difficult. Contact the hospital/surgeon who performed the THR to obtain historical imaging.

Advanced Imaging

CT scan:

  • Indications: Complex fracture patterns, assess bone stock, surgical planning for revision, evaluate cement mantle.
  • Advantages: Better visualization of fracture displacement, bone defects, osteolysis. 3D reconstructions helpful for complex cases.
  • Limitations: Metal artifact from prosthesis. Metal artifact reduction software (MARS) improves image quality.

MRI:

  • Rarely indicated for acute fractures (metal artifact prohibitive)
  • Possible uses: Assess soft tissues (muscle tears), occult fractures, infection (if suspected)

Bone scintigraphy/SPECT-CT:

  • Not routine for acute fractures
  • Possible use: Differentiate fracture from loosening in chronic pain, assess for infection

Laboratory Investigations

Routine blood tests:

  • FBC: Hemoglobin (anemia common, may need transfusion), WCC (infection screen)
  • U&E: Renal function (important for surgical planning, contrast if CT needed)
  • Coagulation: INR if on warfarin, assess bleeding risk
  • Bone profile: Calcium, phosphate, ALP (osteoporosis/metabolic bone disease screen)
  • CRP/ESR: Elevated in fracture, but very high levels raise infection concern

Infection screen (if any suspicion of prosthetic joint infection):

  • CRP and ESR: Elevated in infection but also in fracture
  • Aspiration: If infection suspected, aspirate hip under image guidance for cell count, culture, alpha-defensin
  • Synovial fluid analysis: WCC greater than 3000 cells/μL or PMN greater than 80% suggests infection

Bone health assessment:

  • Vitamin D: Deficiency common in elderly, correct before surgery
  • PTH: If hypercalcemia or renal dysfunction
  • DEXA scan: May be arranged electively post-operatively to guide osteoporosis treatment

Vancouver Classification

Vancouver Classification System

TypeLocationStem StatusBone StockTreatment
A (AG)Greater trochanterStableN/AConservative (unless displaced)
A (AL)Lesser trochanterStableN/AConservative (check for loosening)
B1Around stemStableGoodORIF with cable plate
B2Around stemLooseGoodRevision to long stem
B3Around stemLoosePoorRevision + augmentation
CBelow stem tipStableVariableStandard ORIF or IM nail

Stem Stability Assessment

Critical Decision Point: The distinction between B1 and B2 determines treatment (ORIF vs revision). Always confirm stem stability intraoperatively - X-ray findings can be misleading. If uncertain, assume B2 (loose) and plan for revision. It is safer to revise a stable stem than ORIF a loose one.

Type A (Trochanters)

AG: Greater trochanter fracture. AL: Lesser trochanter fracture.

Usually conservative treatment unless significant displacement affecting abductor function (AG) or suggests stem loosening (AL avulsion from osteolysis).

Type B (Around Stem)

B1: Fracture around stem, stem STABLE, adequate bone stock.

  • ORIF with cable plate (cerclage cables + plate).

B2: Fracture around stem, stem LOOSE, adequate bone stock.

  • Revision to longer stem +/- ORIF.

B3: Fracture around stem, stem LOOSE, poor bone stock.

  • Revision with augmentation (impaction grafting, allograft struts, tumor prosthesis if severe).

Type C (Below Stem)

Fracture distal to stem (not involving prosthesis directly).

Treat as standard femoral shaft fracture: Plate (with cables proximally if needed) or IM nail (if space allows above fracture for nail entry).

Management Pathway

📊 Management Algorithm
Management algorithm for Periprosthetic Fracture Hip
Click to expand
Management algorithm for Periprosthetic Fracture HipCredit: OrthoVellum

Periprosthetic Hip Fracture Management Algorithm

Emergency DepartmentInitial Assessment

History: Mechanism (low energy = pathological), pain severity, ambulatory status pre-injury, medical comorbidities.

Examination: Neurovascular status, wound (open fracture rare), leg length/rotation, implant type/age.

Imaging: AP pelvis + lateral hip X-rays. Compare to previous post-op films if available.

Radiology ReviewClassification

Determine fracture location: A (trochanter), B (around stem), C (below stem).

Assess stem stability: Look for lucent lines (greater than 2mm), subsidence, varus tilt, cement mantle fracture.

Evaluate bone stock: Gruen zones, osteolysis, cortical thickness.

Classification drives treatment: B1 vs B2 is the critical distinction.

24-48 hoursPreoperative Planning

B1 (stable stem): Plan ORIF - cable plate system, cables + screws, lateral approach.

B2/B3 (loose stem): Plan revision - long uncemented stem, possible augmentation (struts, impaction grafting).

Type C: Standard femoral fracture fixation - plate or nail if space permits.

Prepare: Blood available, implants/instruments ready, consider cell saver.

Within 48 hoursSurgical Treatment

Confirm classification intraoperatively: Test stem stability under direct vision.

B1: ORIF with cables (proximal) + locking screws (distal). Unicortical around stem.

B2/B3: Remove loose stem, revision with long cementless bypass stem (4-6 inches past fracture).

Augmentation for B3: Strut allografts, impaction grafting, or proximal femoral replacement.

6-12 weeksPostoperative Care

Weight-bearing: Protected (toe-touch to partial) for 6-12 weeks, then progress per X-ray union.

Monitoring: Serial X-rays at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months. Check for union, subsidence, loosening.

Complications: Nonunion (5-10% for ORIF), re-fracture, infection, dislocation (revision), implant failure.

Rehabilitation: Physical therapy, gait training, falls prevention, osteoporosis treatment.

Management

Indications: Vancouver B1 (stable stem), Vancouver C.

Technique:

  • Lateral approach
  • Cable plate (Dall-Miles or similar)
  • Cerclage cables around stem/bone and plate
  • Unicortical locking screws around stem (cannot penetrate stem)
  • Bicortical screws below stem

Principles: Bypass fracture with 2-3 cables above and screws 2-3 cortical diameters below.

Post-op: Protected weight-bearing 6-12 weeks. Monitor union.

Indications: Vancouver B2 (loose stem), Vancouver B3 (loose stem + poor bone).

Principles: If stem is loose, ORIF alone will fail. Must revise to stable fixation.

B2 (good bone):

  • Remove loose stem
  • Revision to long uncemented stem bypassing fracture
  • May add cable plate or strut allograft for support

B3 (poor bone):

  • Challenging - may need:
    • Impaction grafting (cement + bone graft for biological augmentation)
    • Strut allografts (cortical struts cerclaged on)
    • Megaprosthesis/proximal femoral replacement if extensive bone loss

Post-op: Careful weight-bearing. High complication rate.

Surgical Techniques Comparison

FeatureORIF (B1/C)Revision Stem (B2)Revision + Augmentation (B3)
IndicationStable stem OR below stemLoose stem, good bone stockLoose stem, poor bone stock
ApproachLateralLateral or posterolateralExtended lateral or transfemoral
FixationCable plate + screwsLong uncemented stemLong stem + struts/grafts/megaprosthesis
Stem bypassN/A (stem retained)4-6 inches past fractureEntire proximal femur if PFR
AugmentationCables onlyMay add strutsStruts, impaction grafting, or PFR
Weight-bearingTDWB 6-12 weeksTDWB/PWB 6-12 weeksTDWB 12+ weeks
Union rate90-95%85-90%70-80%
Complication riskLow-moderateModerateHigh
Vancouver B periprosthetic fracture around femoral stem
Click to expand
AP radiograph demonstrating a Vancouver B-type periprosthetic femur fracture around a total hip arthroplasty femoral stem. The fracture occurs at the level of the stem with visible displacement. Assessment of stem stability (stable B1 vs loose B2/B3) is critical for treatment planning - this determines whether ORIF or revision arthroplasty is required.Credit: PMC - CC BY 4.0
Periprosthetic fracture treated with long revision nail
Click to expand
Two-panel radiograph series (a, b) showing periprosthetic femur fracture managed with a long revision construct. AP and lateral views demonstrate the nail spanning from the hip to distal femur, bypassing the fracture site by several cortical diameters. This technique provides stable fixation for fractures where standard internal fixation is insufficient.Credit: PMC - CC BY 4.0

Complications

Periprosthetic hip fractures and their treatment carry significant complication risks, both from the fracture itself and the surgical management required.

Nonunion

Incidence: 5-10% after ORIF, higher in revision surgery. Risk factors: Poor bone quality, inadequate fixation, radiation therapy, loose stem. Management: Revision to long stem with bone grafting, or conversion to arthroplasty if severe.

Infection

Risk: 2-5% for ORIF, 5-15% for revision surgery. Elderly patients with comorbidities at higher risk. Prevention: Perioperative antibiotics, meticulous technique. Treatment: Debridement +/- implant retention vs two-stage revision depending on timing and organism.

Re-fracture

Incidence: 3-8%, typically at plate/nail ends (stress riser). Prevention: Ensure adequate fixation length bypassing lesions. Management: Extension of fixation or revision to longer implant. Consider bone quality and patient factors.

Neurovascular Injury

Sciatic nerve: At risk in posterior approaches and revision surgery (1-2%). Femoral vessels: Anterior cortical penetration risk. Prevention: Careful surgical technique, avoid over-retraction. Management: Early recognition, nerve exploration if deficit.

Dislocation

Incidence: 2-10% after revision arthroplasty, higher with proximal femoral replacement. Risk factors: Abductor deficiency, component malposition, multiple revisions. Management: Closed reduction, consider constrained liner or dual mobility cup for recurrent cases.

Implant Failure

Causes: Inadequate fixation, bone loss progression, screw pullout, plate breakage. Risk factors: Poor bone quality, inadequate construct, patient non-compliance. Management: Revision surgery with improved fixation, cement augmentation, or conversion to arthroplasty.

Prevention Strategies

Key prevention measures: Adequate fixation length (bypass fracture/lesion by 2-3 cortical diameters), cement augmentation in poor bone, protected weight-bearing until union, treatment of osteoporosis, early recognition and management of complications.

Medical Complications

Thromboembolic events: DVT/PE risk 2-5% despite prophylaxis. Elderly patients with prolonged immobility at highest risk. Mechanical and pharmacological prophylaxis essential.

Cardiopulmonary complications: MI, pneumonia, respiratory failure more common in elderly patients undergoing revision surgery. Medical optimization and early mobilization critical.

Mortality: 30-day mortality 2-5%, one-year mortality 10-20%. Higher in elderly, comorbid patients. Comparable to native hip fractures. Early surgery and medical optimization improve outcomes.

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

Successful outcomes require structured postoperative care addressing both the fracture and the underlying prosthesis.

Postoperative Rehabilitation Protocol

Hospital PhaseImmediate Postoperative (0-2 weeks)

Pain management: Multimodal analgesia (paracetamol, NSAIDs if safe, opioids as needed). Regional techniques where appropriate.

Mobilization: Early mobilization critical. Weight-bearing status depends on fixation:

  • B1 ORIF: Touch/partial weight-bearing (10-20kg) for 6-12 weeks
  • B2/B3 revision: Touch/partial weight-bearing for 6-12 weeks, may progress based on construct
  • Type C: Partial weight-bearing, progress as tolerated

Thromboprophylaxis: LMWH or rivaroxaban for minimum 35 days. Mechanical prophylaxis (TED stockings, pneumatic compression).

Wound care: Monitor for signs of infection. Drain removal when output less than 30mL/24hr.

OutpatientEarly Phase (2-6 weeks)

Physiotherapy: Gait training with aids, hip range of motion, isometric strengthening. Avoid hip flexion greater than 90 degrees initially.

Radiographs: 6-week X-rays to assess alignment, fixation, early union. Look for hardware loosening, subsidence.

Weight-bearing progression: May advance to partial weight-bearing (30-50% body weight) if X-rays satisfactory and pain controlled.

Osteoporosis treatment: Initiate if not already on treatment. Calcium/vitamin D supplementation, consider bisphosphonates or denosumab.

RecoveryIntermediate Phase (6-12 weeks)

Radiographs: 12-week X-rays critical. Assess for:

  • Callus formation (ORIF cases)
  • Stem stability (revision cases)
  • Hardware integrity
  • Alignment maintenance

Weight-bearing: Progress to weight-bearing as tolerated if union progressing. Full weight-bearing by 12 weeks for most B1 ORIF if united.

Strengthening: Progressive resistance exercises for hip abductors, extensors, quadriceps. Pool therapy if available.

Functional RecoveryLate Phase (3-6 months)

Radiographs: 6-month X-rays. Should see union in ORIF cases, stable fixation in revision cases.

Functional goals: Independent ambulation, stairs, return to activities of daily living. Gait aids may still be needed.

Driving: May resume when safely able to perform emergency stop (typically 6-8 weeks, check insurance requirements).

Return to work: Depends on occupation. Sedentary work 6-12 weeks, physical work 3-6 months.

MaintenanceLong-term (6-12 months+)

Annual review: Monitor for late complications (loosening, periprosthetic osteolysis, further fractures).

Osteoporosis management: Continue long-term. DEXA scan to monitor bone density. Treat underlying causes.

Falls prevention: Home assessment, balance training, review medications, treat visual/vestibular issues.

Surveillance: Educate patient on warning signs requiring urgent review (pain, deformity, wound issues).

Discharge Planning

Equipment needs: Elevated toilet seat, shower chair, reaching aids, walking frame or crutches.

Home modifications: Remove trip hazards, install grab rails, ensure bedroom/bathroom on same level if possible.

Support services: Consider home care package, meals on wheels, community physiotherapy. Involve occupational therapy.

Patient education: Hip precautions (avoid low chairs, crossing legs), weight-bearing restrictions, signs of complications, when to seek help.

Evidence Base

Vancouver Classification (Duncan & Masri, 1995)

Expert Consensus
Key Findings:
  • Original description of Vancouver classification system
  • Based on fracture location, stem stability, and bone stock
  • Became gold standard for periprosthetic hip fracture classification
  • Guides treatment algorithm used worldwide
Clinical Implication: Vancouver classification is the universal language for periprosthetic femoral fractures and dictates treatment strategy. Know it cold for exams.

Cable Plate Fixation for Type B1 (Ricci et al, 2005)

Level III
Key Findings:
  • Cable-plate constructs achieve union in over 90% of B1 fractures
  • Combination of cerclage cables and locking screws provides stable fixation
  • Unicortical screws around stem prevent implant impingement
  • Lower revision rate compared to historical plate-only fixation
Clinical Implication: Cable plate systems are the standard of care for Vancouver B1 fractures with stable stems. Cerclage provides compression while avoiding stem penetration.

Long Stem Revision for B2/B3 (Lindahl et al, 2006)

Level III
Key Findings:
  • Long uncemented stems bypassing fracture by 2 cortical diameters achieve stability
  • Extensively porous-coated stems allow biological fixation despite poor bone
  • Union rates 85-95% with appropriate stem length
  • Structural allografts improve fixation in severe bone loss
Clinical Implication: For loose stems (B2/B3), revision with long bypass stem is mandatory. ORIF alone will fail if stem is loose. Bypass the fracture adequately.

B3 Management Strategies (Munro et al, 2014)

Level IV
Key Findings:
  • B3 fractures have highest revision and complication rates
  • Options: long stem + struts, impaction grafting, proximal femoral replacement
  • Megaprosthesis appropriate for severe bone loss or salvage
  • Australian registry data shows increasing use of modular tumor prostheses for B3
Clinical Implication: B3 fractures are challenging. Proximal femoral replacement is a valid option for elderly patients with severe bone loss when reconstruction is not feasible.

Surgical Timing and Outcomes (Bhattacharyya et al, 2007)

Level II
Key Findings:
  • 30-day mortality after periprosthetic femoral fracture is 2.1%, 1-year mortality 10.9%
  • Mortality higher than primary THA but lower than native hip fractures
  • Early surgery (within 48 hours) associated with better outcomes
  • Medical optimization critical - many elderly with comorbidities
  • Surgical fixation superior to nonoperative management for mortality and function
Clinical Implication: Periprosthetic fractures carry significant mortality risk in elderly patients. Early surgical intervention with medical optimization is preferred when feasible. Balance surgical risks with benefits of early mobilization.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Periprosthetic Fracture

EXAMINER

"A patient with a THR falls and has a fracture around the mid-stem. X-rays show the stem is well-fixed with no lucency. How do you classify and manage?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a **periprosthetic hip fracture** around the mid-stem of a THR. Using the Vancouver classification, the fracture is around the stem (Type B). The key determinant is stem stability. From the X-rays, the stem appears well-fixed with no lucent lines, suggesting it is **stable**. This would make it a **Vancouver B1** fracture (fracture around stem, stem stable, adequate bone stock). For B1 fractures, the treatment is **ORIF**. I would use a cable plate system - a lateral plate applied to the femur with cerclage cables passing around both the bone and the prosthesis proximally to hold the fracture and plate. Bicortical screws can be used below the stem tip. Around the stem, I would use unicortical locking screws or rely on the cables, since the stem occupies the medullary canal. However, I must confirm stem stability intraoperatively. I would examine for any motion at the bone-implant interface. If I find the stem is actually loose, this would change to a B2 and I would need to revise the stem. Post-operatively, the patient would be protected weight-bearing for 6-12 weeks while the fracture heals, with serial X-rays to monitor.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Vancouver B1 = stem stable, around stem
B1 treatment = ORIF with cable plate
Must confirm stem stability intraoperatively
If loose = B2 = needs revision
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not knowing Vancouver classification
✗Not confirming stem stability
✗Not knowing when to revise vs ORIF
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How would you manage B2?"
"What about Vancouver C?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Vancouver B3 with Poor Bone Stock

EXAMINER

"An 82-year-old woman with a THR from 15 years ago falls. X-rays show a fracture around the stem with significant stem loosening and extensive osteolysis. There is minimal remaining cortical bone in the proximal femur. What is your classification and surgical plan?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a **Vancouver B3** periprosthetic fracture - fracture around a **loose stem** with **poor bone stock**. This is the most challenging type of periprosthetic fracture requiring complex reconstruction. **Classification:** - **Location**: Around stem (Type B) - **Stem stability**: Loose (evident from lucency, subsidence, and likely gross motion) - **Bone stock**: Poor (extensive osteolysis, minimal cortical bone) - **Vancouver B3** **Surgical Planning:** **Preoperative Assessment:** - CT scan to assess bone loss extent (Paprosky classification) - Medical optimization (elderly patient, likely comorbidities) - Blood availability (expect significant bleeding in revision) - Consent for possible proximal femoral replacement **Reconstruction Options:** 1. **Long cementless stem with augmentation** (if some bone remains): - Remove loose stem - Long extensively porous-coated stem (bypassing fracture by 4-6 inches) - Cortical strut allografts cerclaged around proximal femur - Provides biological fixation despite poor bone 2. **Impaction grafting** (if contained defects): - Morselized bone graft impacted into defect - Cemented long stem - Mesh to contain graft - Allows bone regeneration 3. **Proximal femoral replacement** (megaprosthesis - preferred in this case): - Given age (82), extensive bone loss, and fracture - Tumor prosthesis replacing proximal femur - Immediate stability without relying on bone healing - Allows early mobilization critical in elderly - Abductor reconstruction with synthetic mesh or allograft **My Preferred Approach for this Patient:** Given the extensive bone loss and patient age, I would proceed with **proximal femoral replacement**: - Extended lateral approach - Remove loose stem and necrotic bone - Modular tumor prosthesis (proximal body + stem) - Recreate offset and leg length - Reconstruct abductors (critical for function) - Cable fixation of remaining bone to prosthesis **Postoperative:** - Touch weight-bearing for 6-12 weeks - High risk: dislocation (abductor compromise), infection, subsidence - Goal: return to mobility, not athletic function
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
B3 = loose stem + poor bone stock (most challenging)
Assess bone loss with CT (Paprosky classification)
Options: Long stem + struts, impaction grafting, PFR
PFR appropriate for elderly with extensive bone loss
Abductor reconstruction critical for function
High complication rate - manage expectations
COMMON TRAPS
✗Attempting ORIF on loose stem (will fail)
✗Underestimating bone loss severity
✗Not preparing for proximal femoral replacement
✗Inadequate stem bypass length
✗Not counseling about high complications
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is Paprosky classification?"
"How do you reconstruct abductors in PFR?"
"What if patient refuses megaprosthesis?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Intraoperative Surprise - B1 or B2?

EXAMINER

"You are fixing what you thought was a Vancouver B1 fracture with planned ORIF. During surgery, when you test the stem, you find it has some motion. What do you do?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a critical intraoperative decision point. I planned for B1 (ORIF) but intraoperatively discovered the stem is actually **loose** - making this a **Vancouver B2** requiring revision, not ORIF. **Immediate Assessment:** - **Quantify motion**: Gross motion or just subtle movement? - **Check adequacy of exposure**: Can I assess stem properly? - **Re-examine X-rays** in theater: Did I miss lucent lines? - **Assess bone quality**: Can this support revision stem? **Decision Making:** If **gross motion** (clearly loose): - This is definitely **B2** (or B3 if bone poor) - **ORIF will fail** - stem will continue to subside - Must convert to revision If **subtle motion only**: - May represent incomplete fixation but not loosening - Consider proceeding with ORIF **if**: - No radiographic loosening signs - Stem well-positioned - Motion is minimal and non-reproducible - Add extra cables/strut for security - Close monitoring postoperatively **If Committing to Revision (Gross Loosening):** **Step 1: Communicate** - Inform team: "We need to convert to revision" - Call for revision implants and instruments - Notify anesthesia (longer procedure) **Step 2: Implant Availability** - Do I have long revision stems available? - Do I have cables, struts, or other augmentation? - If NO implants: **Do not proceed** - ORIF a loose stem will fail - Consider temporary cable cerclage for stability - Wake patient, explain, re-consent for revision - Return in 1-2 weeks with proper implants **Step 3: If Implants Available - Proceed** - Remove loose stem (may need extended trochanteric osteotomy) - Size for long uncemented stem (bypass fracture by 4-6 inches) - May add strut allografts or cables for fracture - Achieve press-fit distal fixation - Anatomic offset and leg length **Key Principle:** **Better to revise a stable stem than ORIF a loose one.** If in doubt, revise. An ORIF on a loose stem has a nearly 100% failure rate. **Consent Issue:** - Patient consented for ORIF, not revision - If **life/limb threatening**: Implied consent to do what's necessary - If **not emergent** and no implants: Stop, wake patient, re-consent **Learning Point:** This scenario emphasizes why preoperative assessment is critical. Always have revision implants available "just in case" when operating on borderline B1/B2 fractures.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Intraoperative stem assessment is definitive
Gross motion = loose = must revise
ORIF on loose stem will fail
Have revision implants available if B1/B2 uncertain
If no implants: stop procedure, re-plan
Consent considerations for conversion
COMMON TRAPS
✗Proceeding with ORIF despite loose stem
✗Not having revision implants available
✗Ignoring subtle warning signs
✗Not communicating change of plan to team
✗Proceeding without proper equipment
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How do you remove a well-fixed cemented stem?"
"What is extended trochanteric osteotomy?"
"Consent issues in intraoperative conversion?"

MCQ Practice Points

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the Vancouver classification of periprosthetic femoral fractures?

A: Type A: Trochanteric (AG greater, AL lesser). Type B1: Around stem, stem stable. Type B2: Around stem, stem loose, adequate bone. Type B3: Around stem, stem loose, poor bone stock. Type C: Below stem tip. Classification guides treatment: B1 - ORIF; B2/B3 - revision with long stem; C - standard fixation.

Exam Pearl

Q: How do you assess stem stability in a Vancouver B periprosthetic fracture?

A: Radiographic signs of loosening: Subsidence, varus migration, progressive radiolucent lines greater than 2mm, cement mantle fracture, particle debris. Intraoperatively: Inability to impact stem, gross motion. Preoperative planning: Serial radiographs showing migration. If uncertain, assume B2 (loose) and plan for revision - safer to revise a stable stem than ORIF an unstable one.

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the treatment algorithm for Vancouver B1 periprosthetic fractures?

A: B1 (stable stem, good bone): ORIF with plates - use cerclage wires/cables proximally, locking screws distally. Consider anterior locking plate or cable-plate constructs. Goal: Protect well-fixed stem while achieving fracture union. Long-stemmed revision NOT required if stem truly stable. Union rates over 90% with appropriate fixation.

Exam Pearl

Q: What reconstruction options exist for Vancouver B3 fractures?

A: B3 (loose stem, poor bone): Long uncemented extensively porous-coated stem (bypass fracture by 2 cortical diameters), proximal femoral replacement (tumor prosthesis) for severe bone loss, allograft-prosthetic composite. Cement contraindicated with poor bone stock. May require structural allograft for severe deficiency.

Exam Pearl

Q: What are risk factors for periprosthetic hip fractures?

A: Patient factors: Osteoporosis, female sex, advancing age, rheumatoid arthritis, previous revision. Implant factors: Uncemented stems higher intraoperative risk, cemented stems higher postoperative risk (stress risers at cement tips). Technical factors: Aggressive reaming, eccentric stem placement, cortical perforation. Incidence increasing with aging THA population.

Australian Context

Australian Epidemiology and Practice

Periprosthetic Hip Fractures in Australia:

  • AOANJRR data shows increasing incidence of periprosthetic fractures as primary THA population ages
  • Approximately 1-2% cumulative revision rate for periprosthetic fracture at 15 years post primary THA
  • Cementless stems have higher intraoperative fracture risk; cemented stems have higher postoperative risk

RACS Orthopaedic Training Relevance:

  • Vancouver classification is essential FRACS knowledge for Part II examination
  • Understanding B1 vs B2 differentiation and treatment algorithm frequently examined in vivas
  • Intraoperative assessment of stem stability is critical decision point

AOANJRR Registry Data:

  • Registry tracks periprosthetic fracture as a specific revision indication
  • Long cementless stems used for revision have documented outcomes
  • Proximal femoral replacement increasingly used for B3 fractures with severe bone loss

PBS Considerations:

  • Osteoporosis treatment including bisphosphonates and denosumab PBS-subsidised for fracture prevention
  • Vitamin D supplementation widely recommended for osteoporosis management
  • Falls prevention programs available through Medicare-funded chronic disease management

eTG Recommendations:

  • Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis per eTG (cefazolin first-line)
  • VTE prophylaxis mandatory following periprosthetic fracture surgery
  • Antibiotic guidelines for management of infected revision cases

Australian Practice Patterns:

  • Major arthroplasty centres have established periprosthetic fracture pathways
  • Cable plate systems (Dall-Miles, Ogden) and locking plate systems widely available
  • Megaprosthesis and proximal femoral replacement available at tertiary centres for salvage

PERIPROSTHETIC HIP FRACTURE

High-Yield Exam Summary

Vancouver Classification

  • •A: Trochanters (AG/AL) - conservative
  • •B: Around stem
  • •C: Below stem - standard ORIF

Vancouver B

  • •B1: Stable stem → ORIF (cable plate)
  • •B2: Loose stem, good bone → Revision
  • •B3: Loose stem, poor bone → Revision + augment

Key Principle

  • •Stem stability is KEY
  • •Check X-rays for lucency/subsidence
  • •Confirm intraoperatively

ORIF Technique

  • •Cable plate system
  • •Cables around bone and stem
  • •Unicortical screws around stem
Quick Stats
Reading Time110 min
Related Topics

Anterior Process Calcaneus Fractures

Basicervical Fractures

Bosworth Fracture-Dislocations

Calcaneal Tuberosity Fractures