Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction (PTTD)

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction (PTTD)

Adult acquired flatfoot deformity secondary to posterior tibial tendon insufficiency - staging, conservative management, surgical reconstruction techniques, and evidence-based treatment algorithms

complete
Updated: 2024-12-25

Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction (PTTD)

High Yield Overview

POSTERIOR TIBIAL TENDON DYSFUNCTION (PTTD)

Adult acquired flatfoot - Stage II reconstruction, Stage III-IV arthrodesis

50-60Peak age (years)
3-10:1Female predominance
Stage IIMost common presentation
90%Success with stage-appropriate surgery

Johnson & Strom (Myerson Modification)

Pattern
Treatment
Pattern
Treatment
Pattern
Treatment
Pattern
Treatment

Critical Must-Knows

  • Most common cause of adult acquired flatfoot deformity
  • Too many toes sign and failed single heel raise test are key clinical findings
  • Stage II flexible - reconstruct: MDCO + FDL transfer ± lateral column lengthening
  • Stage III rigid - fuse: triple arthrodesis or tibiotalocalcaneal fusion
  • Weight-bearing radiographs essential for talonavicular coverage assessment

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Single heel raise test: patient cannot invert heel on affected side
  • "
    Too many toes sign: see more than 2 lateral toes from behind
  • "
    Assess flexibility with heel in valgus - correctable = Stage II, fixed = Stage III
  • "
    Stage IV adds deltoid failure with ankle valgus

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Flatting of the medial arch, neutral position of the hindfoot.
Click to expand
Flatting of the medial arch, neutral position of the hindfoot.Credit: Wang X et al. via J Med Case Rep via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Weight-bearing X-rays, computed tomography (CT) and MRI scans from case 1.
Click to expand
Weight-bearing X-rays, computed tomography (CT) and MRI scans from case 1.Credit: Wang X et al. via J Med Case Rep via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Post-operative X-ray of the talonavicular joint.
Click to expand
Post-operative X-ray of the talonavicular joint.Credit: Wang X et al. via J Med Case Rep via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Case 2: bilateral Muller-Weiss syndrome, flatting of the medial arch, sinking of the talus head and arthrodesis of the talonavicular joint.
Click to expand
Case 2: bilateral Muller-Weiss syndrome, flatting of the medial arch, sinking of the talus head and arthrodesis of the talonavicular joint.Credit: Wang X et al. via J Med Case Rep via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Exam Warning

Orthopaedic examiners expect recognition that PTTD is a progressive disorder requiring stage-appropriate treatment. Failing to recognize Stage III (rigid) deformity and offering isolated soft tissue procedures is a critical error.

Mnemonic

Never Complain, My Feet Constantly CrampPTT Insertion Sites

N
Navicular
Primary insertion site on navicular tuberosity
C
Cuneiforms
All three cuneiforms - medial, intermediate, lateral
M
Metatarsals
Metatarsal bases 2-4
F
Fibrocartilage
Functional support via spring ligament
C
Cuboid
Occasional slips to cuboid
C
Calcaneus
Indirect via spring ligament attachment

Memory Hook:Think of the PTT as a broad fan insertion supporting the entire medial and plantar arch - NOT just the navicular

Mnemonic

FIDO HAS PAINPTTD Risk Factors

F
Female
Female gender (3-10x increased risk)
I
Inflammatory
Inflammatory arthropathy (RA, psoriatic)
D
Diabetes
Diabetes mellitus
O
Obesity
BMI over 30
H
Hypertension
Hypertension
A
Age
Age over 40 years
S
Steroid
Steroid exposure (injection or systemic)
P
Pes planus
Pre-existing flatfoot
A
Anterior
Anterior tibial tendon weakness (compensatory overload)
I
Immobilization
Immobilization history
N
Neuropathy
Diabetic or peripheral neuropathy

Memory Hook:Think of the typical patient: Female In her 50s with Diabetes, Obesity, Hypertension - these systemic factors predispose to tendon degeneration

Mnemonic

MEDIALStage II PTTD Surgical Reconstruction

M
MDCO
Medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy - corrects hindfoot valgus
E
Evaluate
Evaluate talonavicular coverage - if over 30% uncovering, need LCL
D
Debride
Debride degenerated PTT tissue
I
In-phase
In-phase FDL transfer to restore dynamic support
A
Augment
Augment spring ligament if Grade 3-4 tear
L
Lengthen
Lengthen lateral column (Evans/Cotton) if Stage IIB

Memory Hook:MEDIAL approach to PTTD Stage II reconstruction - systematic checklist for complete correction


Overview and Epidemiology

Definition

Posterior tibial tendon dysfunction (PTTD) represents a progressive degenerative condition of the posterior tibial tendon resulting in medial longitudinal arch collapse and hindfoot valgus deformity. It is the most common cause of adult acquired flatfoot deformity.

Epidemiology

Incidence and Prevalence:

  • Peak incidence: 5th-6th decade of life
  • Gender: Female predominance (3-10:1 ratio)
  • Prevalence: 3.3% in women over 40 years
  • Bilateral involvement: 10-20% of cases (usually asymmetric presentation)

Risk Factors:

Systemic factors:

  • Obesity: BMI over 30 (strongest modifiable risk factor)
  • Hypertension: Associated with tendon degeneration
  • Diabetes mellitus: Impaired tendon healing and neuropathy
  • Inflammatory arthropathy: Rheumatoid arthritis, seronegative arthropathy (psoriatic, reactive)

Iatrogenic factors:

  • Corticosteroid exposure: Intra-tendinous injection (CONTRAINDICATED), systemic steroids
  • Fluoroquinolone antibiotics: Associated with tendinopathy

Biomechanical factors:

  • Pre-existing pes planus: Constitutional flatfoot with hypermobility
  • Hindfoot valgus alignment: Increased eccentric loading on PTT
  • First ray hypermobility: Loss of medial column stability
  • Gastrocnemius contracture: Hindfoot equinus increases pronation moment

Australian Context:

PTTD prevalence is increasing in Australia due to:

  • Aging population (18% over 65 years by 2030)
  • Obesity epidemic (67% adults overweight/obese)
  • High prevalence of diabetes (5.1% of population)

Natural History:

Without treatment, PTTD typically progresses:

  • Stage I → II: 6-18 months (tendinitis to flexible deformity)
  • Stage II → III: Years (flexible to rigid peritalar arthritis)
  • Stage III → IV: Variable (rigid flatfoot to ankle valgus)

Early intervention with orthotics in Stage I can prevent progression in 70-80% of cases. Once Stage II deformity develops, progression to Stage III is common without surgical reconstruction.


Pathophysiology and Anatomy

Pathophysiology

The posterior tibial tendon undergoes degenerative changes rather than inflammatory tendinitis. The pathophysiological cascade involves:

Primary Tendon Pathology:

  1. Zone of hypovascularity: 2-6cm proximal to navicular insertion represents a watershed zone between:

    • Musculotendinous blood supply (proximally)
    • Osseous blood supply from navicular (distally)
  2. Repetitive microtrauma: Eccentric loading during stance phase causes:

    • Tendon fiber microtears
    • Myxoid degeneration
    • Collagen disorganization
    • Loss of type I collagen (replaced by type III)
  3. Tendon elongation: Mechanical failure under physiological loads leads to:

    • Loss of dynamic arch support
    • Inability to control hindfoot eversion
    • Progression from tendinosis to partial/complete rupture

Secondary Static Restraint Failure:

  1. Spring ligament attenuation: As PTT fails, increased load on spring ligament causes:
    • Superomedial band elongation
    • Plantar bands attenuation/rupture
    • Loss of static support to talar head
    • Talar head plantarflexion and medial displacement

Tertiary Bony Deformity:

  1. Hindfoot valgus: Calcaneal eversion from:

    • Loss of PTT inverter function
    • Unopposed peroneal eversion force
    • Achilles tendon lateral vector (valgus thrust)
  2. Peritalar subluxation: Progressive malalignment causes:

    • Talonavicular joint uncovering (forefoot abduction)
    • Subtalar joint subluxation (hindfoot valgus)
    • Calcaneocuboid joint impingement
  3. Forefoot supination: Compensatory forefoot varus develops:

    • Relative to hindfoot valgus
    • First ray plantarflexion
    • Lateral column overload

Quaternary Arthritic Changes:

  1. Rigid peritalar arthritis: Chronic malalignment leads to:

    • Subtalar joint arthritis
    • Talonavicular joint arthritis
    • Calcaneocuboid joint arthritis
    • Transition from flexible (Stage II) to rigid (Stage III)
  2. Deltoid ligament insufficiency: Late-stage ankle involvement:

    • Medial ankle instability
    • Ankle valgus tilt (talar tilt in mortise)
    • Lateral tibiotalar impingement
    • Stage IV disease

Biomechanical Consequences:

  • Loss of windlass mechanism: Plantar fascia cannot tighten arch with dorsiflexion
  • Decreased Achilles mechanical advantage: Calcaneal eversion shortens moment arm
  • Lateral column overload: Calcaneocuboid joint bears increased load (sinus tarsi pain)
  • Forefoot pressures: Increased lateral forefoot pressures, risk of ulceration in diabetics

Primary Pathology

Tendon degeneration in hypovascular zone (NOT inflammatory tendinitis) with myxoid change and collagen disorganization leading to mechanical failure under eccentric load

Secondary Deformity

Spring ligament attenuation allows talar head plantarflexion and medial displacement, creating valgus hindfoot and peritalar subluxation with uncovering

Tertiary Changes

Rigid peritalar arthritis develops from chronic malalignment, eventually progressing to deltoid insufficiency and ankle valgus in Stage IV disease

Surgical Anatomy

Posterior Tibial Tendon:

  • Origin:

    • Posterior tibia (interosseous border)
    • Interosseous membrane
    • Proximal fibula (small contribution)
  • Course:

    • Posterior compartment of leg
    • Behind medial malleolus (beneath flexor retinaculum)
    • Curves beneath sustentaculum tali
    • Fans out to multiple insertions
  • Primary insertion: Navicular tuberosity (plantar-medial surface)

  • Secondary insertions (broad fan attachment):

    • All three cuneiforms (medial, intermediate, lateral)
    • Metatarsal bases 2-4
    • Cuboid (occasional slips)
    • Spring ligament fibrocartilage (functional support)
  • Blood supply:

    • Musculotendinous junction: Posterior tibial artery branches
    • Distal tendon: Navicular osseous vessels
    • Watershed zone: 2-6cm proximal to insertion (critical zone for degeneration)
  • Function:

    • Primary: Hindfoot inversion, adduction
    • Secondary: Ankle plantarflexion, medial arch support
    • Dynamic arch stabilizer: Controls pronation during stance phase

Spring Ligament Complex (Plantar Calcaneonavicular Ligament):

  • Components (three bands):

    1. Superomedial band (strongest): Sustentaculum tali to navicular
    2. Medioplantar oblique band: Middle calcaneus to navicular
    3. Inferior plantar longitudinal band: Plantar calcaneus to navicular
  • Function:

    • Primary static support to talar head
    • Prevents talar plantarflexion and medial displacement
    • Fibrocartilaginous articulation with talar head
  • Pathology in PTTD:

    • Attenuates secondarily after PTT failure
    • Superomedial band most commonly affected
    • Requires reconstruction if Grade 3-4 tear (Bluman classification)

Static Restraints:

  • Plantar fascia: Windlass mechanism, arch support
  • Long plantar ligament: Lateral column stabilization
  • Interosseous talocalcaneal ligament: Subtalar stability
  • Deltoid ligament: Medial ankle stability (fails in Stage IV)

Dynamic Support:

  • Tibialis posterior: Primary arch stabilizer
  • Flexor digitorum longus: Transfer donor, secondary arch support
  • Flexor hallucis longus: Secondary arch support
  • Tibialis anterior: Counterbalances tibialis posterior
  • Peroneus longus: Plantarflexes first ray, lateral column support
  • Gastrocnemius-soleus: Achilles loads hindfoot (equinus increases valgus)

Zones of PTT Pathology (surgical planning):

  • Zone 1: Myotendinous junction to medial malleolus (rare pathology)
  • Zone 2: Behind medial malleolus (tenosynovitis, stenosing tenosynovitis)
  • Zone 3: Inframalleolar to navicular insertion (most common zone of degeneration)
  • Zone 4: Insertion to navicular (insertional tendinopathy, avulsion)

Classification Systems

Johnson & Strom Classification (Modified by Myerson)

The Johnson & Strom classification, modified by Myerson to include Stage IV, is the gold standard for staging PTTD. Staging determines treatment: conservative vs reconstruction vs arthrodesis.

Stage I: Tendinitis Without Deformity

Pathology:

  • Tendon inflammation/degeneration
  • Intact tendon function
  • No architectural deformity

Clinical Features:

  • Pain: Medial ankle pain along PTT course
  • Swelling: Tenosynovitis, fusiform swelling posterior to medial malleolus
  • Function: Can perform single heel raise with heel inversion
  • Deformity: None - normal arch height maintained

Imaging:

  • Weight-bearing radiographs: Normal arch parameters
  • MRI: Increased T2 signal within tendon, peritendinous edema, thickening

Treatment:

  • Conservative management: 70-80% success rate
    • CAM walker boot immobilization 4-6 weeks
    • Transition to UCBL orthotic
    • Physiotherapy for strengthening
  • Surgical (if failed conservative): Tendon debridement ± synovectomy

Prognosis:

  • Good response to conservative management
  • Risk of progression to Stage II if biomechanical factors not addressed

Early intervention at this stage prevents progression to more advanced disease.

Stage II: Flexible Flatfoot Deformity

Pathology:

  • Tendon elongation or rupture
  • Spring ligament attenuation
  • Flexible peritalar subluxation

Clinical Features:

  • Pain: Medial ankle and sinus tarsi pain
  • Deformity: Hindfoot valgus, arch collapse, forefoot abduction
  • Function: Cannot perform single heel raise OR performs without heel inversion
  • Flexibility: Passively correctable - deformity reduces with hindfoot inversion
  • Too many toes sign: Lateral toes visible from behind

Imaging:

  • Weight-bearing AP foot: Talonavicular uncovering, forefoot abduction
  • Weight-bearing lateral foot: Decreased calcaneal pitch, increased Meary's angle
  • MRI: Tendon elongation/tear, spring ligament pathology

Subtypes:

Stage IIA: Hindfoot Valgus Predominant

  • Talonavicular uncovering: Less than 30%
  • Forefoot abduction: Minimal
  • Treatment: MDCO + FDL transfer (medial procedures alone)

Stage IIB: Hindfoot Valgus + Forefoot Abduction

  • Talonavicular uncovering: Greater than 30%
  • Forefoot abduction: Significant (lateral column relatively shortened)
  • Treatment: MDCO + FDL transfer + lateral column lengthening (Evans or Cotton osteotomy)

Treatment:

  • Surgical reconstruction: Stage-appropriate osteotomies + tendon transfer + spring ligament repair
  • Conservative: Bracing (Arizona AFO) for non-surgical candidates (temporizing, not curative)

Prognosis:

  • 85-90% good outcomes with appropriate reconstruction
  • Failure to address lateral column in Stage IIB leads to recurrence

Proper staging guides surgical planning for optimal outcomes.

Stage III: Rigid Flatfoot Deformity

Pathology:

  • Fixed peritalar arthritis
    • Subtalar joint arthritis
    • Talonavicular joint arthritis
    • Calcaneocuboid joint arthritis
  • Tendon rupture
  • Spring ligament disruption

Clinical Features:

  • Pain: Diffuse hindfoot pain, lateral column pain (calcaneocuboid impingement)
  • Deformity: Fixed hindfoot valgus, rigid arch collapse
  • Flexibility: NOT passively correctable - rigid deformity
  • Examination: Peritalar crepitus, sinus tarsi tenderness

Imaging:

  • Weight-bearing radiographs: Severe arch collapse, peritalar subluxation
  • CT scan: Confirm peritalar arthritis (subtalar, talonavicular, calcaneocuboid)

Treatment:

  • Triple arthrodesis: Fusion of subtalar, talonavicular, calcaneocuboid joints
  • Reconstruction procedures contraindicated (will fail due to rigid arthritis)

Prognosis:

  • 75-85% good outcomes with triple arthrodesis
  • Loss of hindfoot motion
  • Adjacent joint arthritis risk (ankle, midfoot)

Salvage procedures provide pain relief but sacrifice hindfoot motion.

Stage IV: Ankle Valgus Deformity

Pathology:

  • Stage III pathology PLUS
  • Deltoid ligament insufficiency
  • Ankle valgus tilt (talar tilt in mortise)
  • Lateral tibiotalar impingement

Clinical Features:

  • All Stage III features PLUS
  • Ankle pain: Medial gapping, lateral impingement
  • Deformity: Ankle valgus, talar tilt
  • Examination: Medial ankle tenderness, ankle instability

Imaging:

  • Ankle AP/mortise: Talar tilt (medial clear space over 2mm greater than lateral)
  • CT scan: Peritalar and ankle arthritis

Treatment:

  • Pantalar arthrodesis: Fusion of ankle + subtalar + talonavicular + calcaneocuboid
  • Alternative: Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) fusion with intramedullary nail
  • Deltoid reconstruction: Rarely successful as isolated procedure

Prognosis:

  • 70-80% good outcomes with pantalar fusion
  • Complete loss of hindfoot and ankle motion
  • High non-union rate (10-20%)
  • Adjacent joint arthritis (midfoot)

Stage IV represents end-stage disease requiring extensive fusion procedures.

Stage IIA vs IIB: Critical Distinction

Flexibility Assessment

Critical examination skill: Passively correct hindfoot valgus by inverting heel while palpating talonavicular joint. If deformity fully corrects → Stage II (flexible). If peritalar joints are rigid → Stage III. This determines reconstruction vs arthrodesis.

Examiner question: "How do you differentiate Stage II from Stage III?"

Answer: "Passive hindfoot inversion with stress - if the valgus and arch collapse correct, it's flexible Stage II suitable for reconstruction. If rigid, it's Stage III requiring arthrodesis."

Bluman Classification (Spring Ligament Pathology)

Used to grade spring ligament pathology on MRI or intraoperative assessment:

  • Grade 1: Attenuation only (elongation without rupture)
  • Grade 2: Partial-thickness tear
  • Grade 3: Full-thickness rupture
  • Grade 4: Complete disruption with talar head uncovering

Surgical relevance: Grade 3-4 requires spring ligament reconstruction with allograft augmentation or direct repair.


Clinical Presentation and Examination

History

Presenting Complaint:

Pain:

  • Location: Medial ankle/hindfoot (along PTT course from medial malleolus to navicular)
  • Character: Aching, exacerbated by activity
  • Progression: Insidious onset over months to years
  • Exacerbating factors: Prolonged standing, walking on uneven ground, stairs

Swelling:

  • Medial ankle swelling: Worse with activity, improves with rest
  • Tenosynovitis: Fusiform swelling posterior to medial malleolus

Deformity:

  • Progressive flatfoot: Gradual arch collapse
  • Shoe wear changes: Medial heel breakdown, difficulty fitting shoes
  • Gait abnormality: Antalgic gait, foot external rotation

Functional Limitation:

  • Difficulty with stairs (especially descent)
  • Problems on uneven ground
  • Unable to run or perform sports
  • Prolonged standing painful

Timeline:

  • Acute onset: Rare (suggests rupture after steroid injection)
  • Insidious onset: Typical (months to years)
  • Progression:
    • Stage I symptoms: 6-18 months before deformity
    • Stage II: Years before rigidity
    • Stage III-IV: Variable progression

Risk Factor Assessment:

  • Systemic: Obesity, hypertension, diabetes, inflammatory arthropathy
  • Medications: Corticosteroids (injection or systemic), fluoroquinolones
  • Biomechanical: Pre-existing flatfoot, hypermobility
  • Occupational: Prolonged standing, repetitive impact activities

Physical Examination

Observation (Standing):

"Too Many Toes Sign" (pathognomonic):

  • Technique: Stand behind patient, observe feet
  • Normal: See heel and 1-1.5 lateral toes
  • PTTD: See heel and over 2 lateral toes (forefoot abduction)
  • Severity: More toes visible = greater forefoot abduction

Hindfoot alignment:

  • Normal: 5-7 degrees valgus
  • PTTD: Over 10 degrees valgus (compare to contralateral)
  • Asymmetry: Side-to-side comparison critical

Arch height:

  • Loss of medial longitudinal arch: Talar head prominence medially
  • Medial ankle bulge: Displaced talus palpable
  • Lateral column: Relative shortening

Forefoot:

  • Forefoot varus: Relative forefoot supination (compensatory to hindfoot valgus)
  • First ray: Plantarflexion, callosity under first metatarsal head

Gait observation:

  • Antalgic gait: Shortened stance phase on affected side
  • Foot progression angle: Excessive external rotation
  • Heel strike: Valgus thrust with loading

Palpation:

Tendon course palpation:

  • Tenderness: Along PTT from behind medial malleolus to navicular insertion
  • Swelling: Tenosynovitis (fusiform vs nodular thickening)
  • Gap: Palpable defect suggests rupture (rare)

Bony landmarks:

  • Navicular tuberosity: Prominence with spring ligament failure
  • Talar head: Medial and plantar prominence
  • Sustentaculum tali: Tenderness
  • Sinus tarsi: Lateral hindfoot impingement pain (calcaneocuboid)

Special Tests:

Single Heel Raise Test (GOLD STANDARD)

Technique:

  1. Patient stands on one leg (affected side)
  2. Patient raises heel off ground
  3. Observe hindfoot from behind

Normal response:

  • Heel inverts as patient rises onto forefoot
  • Arch reconstitutes
  • Can perform 10+ repetitions

PTTD findings:

  • Stage I: Can perform but painful, normal inversion
  • Stage II-IV: CANNOT perform OR performs without heel inversion
  • Bilateral testing: Compare to contralateral side

Interpretation:

  • Sensitivity: 100% for Stage II or greater
  • Specificity: 85% (other flatfoot causes may also fail test)

Passive Correction Test (Stage II vs III Differentiation)

Technique:

  1. Patient sitting or supine
  2. Examiner inverts heel manually
  3. Palpate talonavicular joint while inverting
  4. Assess if arch reconstitutes

Interpretation:

  • Stage II (flexible): Deformity fully corrects, talonavicular reduces
  • Stage III (rigid): Deformity persists, peritalar joints rigid, crepitus

Coleman Block Test (Forefoot vs Hindfoot Driven)

Technique:

  1. Stand patient on 1-inch block under lateral foot (5th metatarsal hangs off)
  2. Observe hindfoot alignment

Interpretation:

  • Forefoot-driven: Hindfoot valgus corrects (flexible forefoot varus)
  • Hindfoot-driven: Hindfoot valgus persists (PTTD pattern)

Flexibility Assessment:

Hindfoot range of motion:

  • Inversion/eversion: Compare to contralateral
  • Stage II: Flexible but deformed
  • Stage III: Rigid, crepitus

Forefoot supination:

  • Flexible: Corrects with hindfoot neutral positioning
  • Fixed: Persistent forefoot varus (rare in PTTD)

First ray mobility:

  • Hypermobile: Dorsiflexion/plantarflexion over 10mm
  • Contributes to: Medial column instability

Neurovascular Examination:

Vascular assessment:

  • Dorsalis pedis pulse: Palpate, document
  • Posterior tibial pulse: Palpate, document
  • Ankle-brachial index: If PVD suspected (diabetics, smokers)

Neurological assessment:

  • Sensation: Light touch, 2-point discrimination (exclude neuropathy)
  • Motor: Tibialis posterior (inversion strength), peroneals, ankle dorsiflexors
  • Reflexes: Achilles reflex

Tarsal tunnel syndrome screening:

  • Tinel's sign: Tap posterior tibial nerve behind medial malleolus
  • Positive: Paresthesias in plantar foot (coexisting in 10% PTTD)
  • Sensory: Medial and lateral plantar nerve distributions

Single Heel Raise Test

Patient stands on one leg and raises heel off ground. Normal: Heel inverts with raise, arch reconstitutes. PTTD Stage II-IV: Cannot perform OR performs without inversion. Most sensitive clinical test.

Passive Correction Test

Examiner inverts heel while palpating talonavicular joint. Flexible (Stage II): Full correction of valgus and arch. Rigid (Stage III): No correction - peritalar arthritis present. Determines reconstruction vs fusion.

Differential Diagnosis

Other Causes of Adult Acquired Flatfoot:

Inflammatory arthropathy:

  • Rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis
  • Features: Polyarticular involvement, systemic symptoms, synovitis
  • Differentiation: Inflammatory markers, rheumatoid factor, anti-CCP

Tarsal coalition:

  • Features: Rigid flatfoot since adolescence, limited subtalar motion
  • Differentiation: C-sign on lateral radiograph, CT confirms coalition

Charcot arthropathy:

  • Features: Diabetic neuropathy, midfoot collapse, rocker-bottom deformity
  • Differentiation: Loss of protective sensation, midfoot warmth/swelling, fragmentation on radiograph

Lisfranc injury:

  • Features: Traumatic onset, midfoot swelling, abduction stress pain
  • Differentiation: History of trauma, midfoot tenderness, radiographic diastasis

Plantar fascia rupture:

  • Features: Acute medial arch pain, palpable defect, previous plantar fasciitis
  • Differentiation: History of sudden pain (often during sports), bruising

Medial Ankle Pain Differentials:

Tarsal tunnel syndrome:

  • Features: Burning paresthesias, positive Tinel's, night symptoms
  • Differentiation: Nerve conduction studies, predominantly sensory symptoms

Deltoid ligament injury:

  • Features: Acute trauma, lateral ankle ecchymosis (eversion mechanism)
  • Differentiation: History of trauma, ankle stress radiographs

Accessory navicular syndrome:

  • Features: Prominence since childhood, os naviculare on radiograph
  • Differentiation: Longstanding symptoms, characteristic radiographic appearance

Investigations and Imaging

Radiography

Weight-bearing radiographs are MANDATORY for PTTD assessment. Non-weight-bearing films grossly underestimate deformity severity. Examiners will fail candidates who order non-weight-bearing foot films for PTTD staging.

Standard Views (ALL weight-bearing):

AP Foot

Talonavicular coverage angle (most important):

  • Technique: Angle between midline of talus and midline of navicular
  • Normal: Less than 7 degrees
  • Stage IIA: 7-20 degrees (mild-moderate forefoot abduction)
  • Stage IIB: Over 20 degrees (severe forefoot abduction requiring LCL)
  • Clinical significance: Determines need for lateral column lengthening

Talo-1st metatarsal angle:

  • Technique: Angle between long axis of talus and 1st metatarsal
  • Normal: 0-4 degrees (aligned)
  • PTTD: Over 15 degrees (forefoot abduction)

Lateral talonavicular uncovering:

  • Technique: Percentage of talar head uncovered laterally
  • Normal: Less than 10%
  • Stage IIA: 10-30%
  • Stage IIB: Over 30% (significant uncovering)

Forefoot abduction:

  • Metatarsal divergence: Increased intermetatarsal angles
  • First-second intermetatarsal angle: May be increased

Lateral Foot

Talo-1st metatarsal angle (Meary's angle):

  • Technique: Angle between long axis of talus and 1st metatarsal on lateral view
  • Normal: 0-4 degrees (colinear)
  • PTTD: Over 15 degrees (sagittal plane sag)
  • Severe: Over 30 degrees

Calcaneal pitch:

  • Technique: Angle between plantar calcaneus and horizontal plane
  • Normal: 18-25 degrees
  • PTTD: Under 15 degrees (arch collapse)
  • Severe: Under 10 degrees

Talonavicular alignment:

  • Normal: Parallel dorsal cortices
  • PTTD: Talar plantarflexion, navicular dorsal subluxation

Cyma line:

  • Normal: Smooth S-curve (calcaneocuboid + talonavicular joint line)
  • PTTD: Disrupted, stepped (peritalar subluxation)

Hindfoot Alignment View (Saltzman View)

Technique:

  • Patient stands on blocks with feet 15cm apart
  • Ankle centered on cassette
  • X-ray beam parallel to floor (horizontal)
  • Shows coronal hindfoot alignment

Measurement:

  • Tibial-calcaneal angle: Angle between tibial axis and calcaneal axis
  • Normal: 0-5 degrees valgus
  • PTTD: Over 10 degrees valgus (significant deformity)

Clinical use:

  • Quantify hindfoot valgus severity
  • Preoperative planning for MDCO
  • Monitor post-reconstruction correction

Ankle AP and Mortise (Stage IV Assessment)

Talar tilt:

  • Medial clear space: Over 2mm greater than lateral = deltoid insufficiency
  • Talar tilt angle: Over 5 degrees (ankle valgus)

Ankle arthritis:

  • Tibiotalar joint space narrowing
  • Lateral gutter impingement
  • Subchondral sclerosis/cysts

AP Foot Measures

Talonavicular coverage angle (most important): Normal under 7°, Stage IIA 7-20°, Stage IIB over 20°. Measures forefoot abduction - determines need for lateral column lengthening.

Lateral Foot Measures

Calcaneal pitch: Normal 18-25°, PTTD under 15°. Measures arch height. Meary's angle: Normal 0-4°, PTTD over 15°. Measures sagittal plane collapse and talar sag.

Hindfoot Alignment

Saltzman view: Measures tibial-calcaneal angle. Normal 0-5° valgus. PTTD over 10° valgus. Critical for pre-operative planning to quantify hindfoot valgus severity and monitor correction.

Advanced Imaging

MRI

Indications:

  • Confirm PTT pathology and grade severity
  • Assess spring ligament integrity
  • Exclude occult pathology (coalition, tumor, osteochondral lesion)
  • Preoperative planning for Stage I debridement
  • Assess FDL for transfer quality

Sequences:

  • T1-weighted: Tendon morphology, muscle bulk
  • T2-weighted/STIR: Tendon signal, peritendinous edema
  • Proton density: Detailed tendon microstructure

PTT MRI Findings by Stage:

Stage I:

  • Increased T2 signal within tendon (tendinosis)
  • Tendon thickening (over 6mm)
  • Peritendinous fluid (tenosynovitis)
  • Normal tendon continuity

Stage II:

  • Tendon elongation (attenuation)
  • Partial-thickness tear (focal signal)
  • Complete tear (tendon discontinuity)
  • Spring ligament abnormality (increased signal, thickening)

Stage III-IV:

  • Tendon rupture or severe attenuation
  • Spring ligament disruption
  • Peritalar joint effusions
  • Cartilage loss
  • Bone marrow edema

Spring Ligament Assessment (Bluman Classification):

  • Grade 1: Attenuation - thickening, increased T2 signal, intact
  • Grade 2: Partial tear - focal defect, less than 50% thickness
  • Grade 3: Full-thickness rupture - complete discontinuity
  • Grade 4: Complete disruption - talar head uncovering

CT Scan

Indications:

  • Rigid deformity (Stage III) - assess peritalar arthritis
  • Preoperative planning for triple arthrodesis
  • Exclude tarsal coalition (confirm bony vs fibrous)
  • Post-fusion assessment (union evaluation)

Protocol:

  • Axial, coronal, sagittal reconstructions
  • Bone windows
  • 3D reconstructions for complex deformity

Findings:

  • Stage III: Subtalar, talonavicular, calcaneocuboid arthritis
  • Joint space narrowing
  • Subchondral sclerosis and cysts
  • Osteophytes
  • Peritalar subluxation

Ultrasound

Limited Role:

  • Dynamic assessment of tendon excursion
  • Tenosynovitis confirmation
  • Operator-dependent
  • Less reliable than MRI

Findings:

  • Tendon thickening
  • Peritendinous fluid
  • Focal hypoechogenicity (partial tear)

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
posterior tibial tendon dysfunction management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for posterior tibial tendon dysfunctionCredit: OrthoVellum

Non-Operative Management

Indications:

  • Stage I: ALL patients initially (first-line treatment)
  • Stage II-IV: Medical comorbidities precluding surgery, patient preference, non-ambulatory
  • Contraindication to surgery: Severe peripheral vascular disease, uncontrolled diabetes, active infection

Contraindications to Conservative Management:

  • Progressive deformity despite bracing (Stage II)
  • Failed trial of appropriate conservative measures
  • Patient desire for deformity correction (conservative does NOT correct)

Phase 1: Acute Immobilization (Stage I)

CAM walker boot protocol:

  • Duration: 4-6 weeks strict immobilization
  • Rationale: Reduce tendon inflammation, prevent microtrauma, allow healing
  • Weight-bearing: Full weight-bearing in boot
  • Mobilization: Gradual transition to orthotics over 2 weeks

Outcomes:

  • 70-80% of Stage I patients improve with immobilization
  • Does NOT reverse deformity if present
  • Prevents progression in compliant patients

Phase 2: Orthotic Management

UCBL (University of California Biomechanics Laboratory) Orthotic:

Design features:

  • Rigid custom foot orthotic (molded from cast)
  • High medial flange (supports arch)
  • Lateral flange (controls forefoot abduction)
  • Deep heel cup (controls hindfoot valgus)

Indications:

  • Stage I (after immobilization)
  • Stage II non-surgical candidates
  • Post-reconstruction (protective bracing)

Effectiveness:

  • Gold standard for Stage I
  • Better arch support than standard orthotics
  • Requires shoe with removable insole
  • Compliance issues (bulk, shoe limitations)

Arizona AFO (Ankle-Foot Orthosis):

Design features:

  • Leather double-upright AFO
  • Lateral upright controls hindfoot valgus
  • Medial arch support integrated
  • Ankle motion preserved

Indications:

  • Stage II non-surgical candidates (better control than UCBL)
  • Stage III palliative management
  • Post-triple arthrodesis (temporary)

Effectiveness:

  • Better valgus control than UCBL
  • Allows ankle motion (vs rigid AFO)
  • Significant compliance issues (bulk, cosmesis, shoe limitations)

Custom Foot Orthotic (Standard):

Design features:

  • Semi-rigid thermoplastic
  • Medial posting
  • Arch support

Indications:

  • Mild Stage I only
  • Preventive in at-risk patients

Effectiveness:

  • Less control than UCBL
  • Insufficient for Stage II or greater
  • Good compliance (fits regular shoes)

Shoe Modifications

Medial heel wedge:

  • 4-6mm medial build-up
  • Controls hindfoot valgus
  • Shifts ground reaction force laterally

Rocker-bottom sole:

  • Reduces forefoot stress
  • Assists toe-off
  • Reduces PTT eccentric load

Wide toe box:

  • Accommodates forefoot abduction
  • Prevents lateral toe compression

Key Points

  • Conservative management controls pain and prevents progression
  • Does NOT reverse established deformity
  • Compliance critical for success
  • Stage II deformity will progress despite bracing in most cases

Orthotic management remains the foundation of conservative PTTD treatment.

Strengthening Program

Tibialis posterior exercises:

  • Resisted inversion: Theraband resistance in sitting
  • Single leg stance: Balance training, arch activation
  • Eccentric loading: Controlled lowering from inversion
  • Evidence: Limited for tendon regeneration, may improve compensatory strength

Intrinsic foot muscle strengthening:

  • Toe curls: Towel scrunches
  • Arch doming: Short foot exercise (intrinsic activation)
  • Rationale: Improve dynamic arch support

Tibialis anterior strengthening:

  • Dorsiflexion resistance: Reduce compensatory overload on PTT
  • Heel walking: Eccentric control

Gastrocnemius-soleus complex:

  • Eccentric calf raises: Controlled loading
  • Progressive resistance: Gradual increase

Stretching Program

Achilles tendon stretching:

  • Gastrocnemius stretch: Knee extended
  • Soleus stretch: Knee flexed
  • Rationale: Reduce hindfoot equinus (decreases pronation moment)
  • Duration: 30 seconds × 3 repetitions, 2-3× daily

Plantar fascia stretching:

  • Gentle dorsiflexion with toe extension
  • Reduces arch tension

Gait Retraining

Pronation control:

  • Reduce medial weight shift
  • Shorten stride length
  • Increase cadence

Foot strike pattern:

  • Midfoot strike (avoid heel strike with valgus thrust)
  • External foot progression angle reduction

Evidence Base

Limited high-quality evidence:

  • No RCTs demonstrating physiotherapy efficacy for PTTD
  • Best used as adjunct to orthotic management
  • May prevent progression in Stage I
  • Insufficient as isolated treatment for Stage II or greater

Physiotherapy alone is insufficient for established PTTD but plays an adjunctive role in Stage I and post-operative rehabilitation.

Analgesia

NSAIDs:

  • Indication: Acute inflammation (Stage I)
  • Agents: Ibuprofen 400mg TDS, naproxen 500mg BD
  • Duration: Short course (2-4 weeks)
  • Caution: GI side effects, cardiovascular risk, renal impairment

Paracetamol:

  • Indication: Chronic pain management
  • Dose: 1g QID regular
  • Safety: Preferred for long-term use

Opioids:

  • Avoid: Chronic condition, not indicated
  • Exception: Post-operative pain management only

Contraindications

Corticosteroid injection:

ABSOLUTELY CONTRAINDICATED for PTTD. Intra-tendinous or peri-tendinous steroid injection significantly increases risk of complete tendon rupture. Examiners will fail candidates who recommend steroid injection for PTTD.

Rationale for contraindication:

  • Collagen degradation
  • Tendon weakening
  • Risk of complete rupture
  • No evidence of benefit
  • Historical reports of acute ruptures post-injection

Other Modalities

Shockwave therapy:

  • Evidence: Limited, low-quality studies
  • Efficacy: Unclear benefit
  • Recommendation: Not routinely recommended

PRP (Platelet-Rich Plasma) injection:

  • Evidence: No high-quality RCTs for PTTD
  • Status: Experimental
  • Recommendation: Not standard of care

Pharmacological management is purely symptomatic and does NOT alter disease progression or reverse deformity.

Success Rates of Conservative Management

Stage I:

  • Success rate: 70-80% respond to immobilization + UCBL orthotic
  • Definition of success: Pain reduction, functional improvement, no progression
  • Duration of trial: 6 months minimum before considering surgical intervention

Stage II:

  • Success rate: 30-40% achieve symptom control with Arizona AFO
  • Limitation: Does NOT correct deformity, only controls symptoms
  • Natural history: Most progress to Stage III despite bracing

Stage III-IV:

  • Role: Palliative only
  • Limitation: Does not prevent progression
  • Indication: Non-surgical candidates only

Important

Common exam trap: Offering prolonged conservative management for Stage II patients with progressive deformity. Conservative management in Stage II is a temporizing measure while optimizing for surgery or for patients declining surgery. It does NOT reverse deformity.

Surgical Management

Indications for Surgery

Stage I:

  • Failed conservative management over 6 months
  • Persistent pain limiting activities of daily living
  • MRI-confirmed tendinosis or partial tear

Stage II:

  • Failed conservative management (3-6 months trial)
  • Progressive deformity despite appropriate bracing
  • Functional impairment affecting quality of life
  • Patient desire for deformity correction

Stage III:

  • Symptomatic rigid deformity
  • Failed conservative management
  • Functional limitation

Stage IV:

  • Progressive ankle valgus deformity
  • Pain and dysfunction
  • Patient fit for major surgery

Contraindications

Absolute:

  • Active infection
  • Severe peripheral vascular disease precluding healing
  • Non-ambulatory patient (surgery provides no functional benefit)

Relative:

  • Uncontrolled diabetes: HbA1c over 8% (optimize to under 7.5%)
  • Smoking: Advise cessation minimum 6 weeks, ideally 12 weeks
  • Obesity: BMI over 40 (encourage weight loss, assess realistic goals)
  • Peripheral neuropathy: Risk of Charcot arthropathy post-surgery
  • Poor bone quality: Osteoporosis (assess with DEXA if indicated)
  • Inflammatory arthropathy: Active synovitis (optimize medical management)

Preoperative Optimization

Diabetes control:

  • Target HbA1c under 7.5% (preferably under 7%)
  • Defer elective surgery if over 8%
  • Involve endocrinology/diabetes team

Smoking cessation:

  • Minimum 6 weeks preoperatively
  • Ideally 12 weeks
  • Counseling, nicotine replacement therapy
  • Document compliance

Weight loss:

  • BMI reduction improves outcomes
  • Realistic goal: 5-10% body weight reduction
  • Dietitian referral
  • Bariatric surgery consideration if BMI over 40

Vascular assessment:

  • Indications: Diabetes, smoking, peripheral vascular disease symptoms
  • Ankle-brachial index: Abnormal if under 0.9
  • Referral to vascular surgery: If ABI under 0.7 or claudication

Cardiac assessment:

  • Indications: Major surgery (triple arthrodesis, pantalar fusion)
  • Functional capacity: Assess exercise tolerance
  • Cardiology referral: If poor functional capacity or cardiac history

Stage-Appropriate Surgery

Critical principle: PTTD surgery is stage-dependent. Stage I = tendon debridement, Stage II = reconstruction, Stage III-IV = arthrodesis. Examiners will immediately fail candidates who offer Stage II reconstruction procedures (FDL transfer, MDCO) for rigid Stage III deformity.

Stage I: PTT Debridement ± Synovectomy

Indications:

  • Stage I PTTD with MRI-confirmed tendinosis
  • Failed 6 months conservative management
  • No architectural deformity present
  • Tendon structurally intact (under 50% cross-sectional involvement)

Contraindications:

  • Deformity present (Stage II) - reconstruction required
  • Over 50% tendon cross-sectional involvement - augment with FDL transfer

Surgical Technique

Patient positioning:

  • Supine
  • Bump under ipsilateral hip (15-20 degrees internal rotation)
  • Thigh tourniquet

Surgical approach:

Incision:

  • Longitudinal incision centered 1cm posterior to medial malleolus
  • Extends from 4cm proximal to medial malleolus to navicular insertion
  • Length: 8-10cm

Dissection:

  1. Identify and protect saphenous vein and nerve (retract anteriorly)
  2. Incise flexor retinaculum longitudinally (preserves pulley function for later repair)
  3. Expose PTT from myotendinous junction to navicular insertion
  4. Inspect entire tendon course for pathology

Tendon assessment:

  • Zone of degeneration: Typically Zone 3 (2-6cm proximal to navicular)
  • Extent: Measure percentage of cross-sectional involvement
  • Decision point: If over 50%, augment with FDL transfer (see Stage II tab)

Debridement:

  1. Longitudinal tenotomy along degenerated segment
  2. Excise all degenerate tissue:
    • Macroscopically abnormal (yellow-brown discoloration)
    • Friable, myxoid consistency
    • Loss of normal tendon striations
  3. Preserve healthy tendon margins
  4. Assess remaining tendon: Should have intact, healthy tendon maintaining structural integrity

Synovectomy:

  • Excise all inflamed synovium
  • Inspect entire tendon course for additional pathology

Closure:

  1. Repair flexor retinaculum: Maintains tendon pulley function
  2. Subcutaneous layer: Absorbable sutures
  3. Skin: Monofilament non-absorbable or absorbable subcuticular
  4. Backslab: Below-knee plaster backslab

Postoperative Protocol

Immobilization:

  • Non-weight-bearing cast: 4 weeks
  • Weight-bearing cast: 2 weeks
  • Total immobilization: 6 weeks

Mobilization:

  • CAM walker boot: 2 weeks with progressive weight-bearing
  • Transition to UCBL orthotic: Week 8
  • Physiotherapy: Range of motion, strengthening

Return to activity:

  • Light activities: 3 months
  • Full return to sports: 4-6 months
  • Orthotic use: Long-term

Outcomes

Success rate: 70-80% good-excellent results at 2-5 years

Predictors of success:

  • No deformity pre-operatively
  • Under 50% tendon involvement
  • Appropriate patient selection

Predictors of failure:

  • Underlying biomechanical factors not addressed (flatfoot, hypermobility)
  • Progression to Stage II deformity
  • Inadequate post-operative orthotic use

Complications:

  • Wound healing problems: 5%
  • Sural nerve injury: 2%
  • Saphenous nerve injury: 5%
  • Progression to Stage II: 20-30% over 5 years

Clinical note: Isolated debridement is rarely performed as most patients have progressed to Stage II by presentation.

Stage IIA: MDCO + FDL Transfer

Indications:

  • Stage IIA PTTD (flexible flatfoot, forefoot abduction under 30%)
  • Passively correctable deformity
  • No rigid arthritis

Goals:

  • Restore dynamic arch support (FDL transfer)
  • Correct static hindfoot valgus (MDCO)
  • Address spring ligament pathology if present

Surgical Technique

Patient positioning:

  • Supine
  • Bump under ipsilateral hip
  • Thigh tourniquet

Procedure 1: FDL Transfer to PTT

Medial approach incision:

  • Longitudinal, 1cm posterior to medial malleolus
  • 8-10cm length (proximal malleolus to navicular)

Harvesting FDL:

  1. Open flexor retinaculum
  2. Identify FDL (posterior to PTT, adjacent to FHL)
  3. Tag FDL with non-absorbable suture
  4. Divide FDL at level of master knot of Henry (distal to crossing)
  5. Retrieve FDL distally through plantar incision if needed

PTT preparation:

  1. Debride all degenerated PTT tissue
  2. If rupture: prepare tendon ends for weaving
  3. If elongation: prepare for side-to-side augmentation

FDL transfer:

  1. Weave technique: Pass FDL through PTT in Pulvertaft weave (3-4 passes)
  2. Tension: Set with foot in neutral position (no hindfoot valgus, neutral arch)
  3. Fixation: Non-absorbable sutures (#2 FiberWire)
  4. Test tension: Passive ankle dorsiflexion should not over-tension transfer

Spring ligament assessment:

  • Grade 1-2 (attenuation, partial tear): Direct repair with absorbable sutures
  • Grade 3-4 (complete rupture): Augment with allograft (dermal or fascia lata)

Procedure 2: Medial Displacement Calcaneal Osteotomy (MDCO)

Lateral approach incision:

  • Oblique incision inferior to lateral malleolus
  • 4-6cm length over lateral calcaneus

Osteotomy:

  1. Identify sural nerve: Protect throughout
  2. Expose lateral calcaneus: Subperiosteal dissection
  3. Oscillating saw osteotomy:
    • Start 1-1.5cm posterior to calcaneocuboid joint
    • Oblique cut from dorsal-posterior to plantar-anterior
    • 45-degree angle to avoid plantar cortex breach
  4. Complete osteotomy: May need osteotome to complete plantar cortex

Displacement:

  1. Medialize posterior fragment: 10-15mm medial displacement
  2. Technique: Lamina spreader to open lateral gap, shift posteriorly
  3. Check alignment: Restore neutral or slight varus hindfoot alignment

Fixation:

  1. Two 6.5mm partially-threaded cannulated screws:
    • Start plantar-posterior, aim dorsal-anterior
    • Compress osteotomy site
    • Avoid calcaneocuboid joint
  2. Check fluoroscopy: Lateral and axial calcaneus views

Closure:

  • Repair periosteum
  • Layer closure
  • Backslab

Postoperative Protocol

Immobilization:

  • Non-weight-bearing cast: 6 weeks
  • Weight-bearing cast: 4-6 weeks
  • Total: 12 weeks

Mobilization:

  • CAM walker boot: 2-4 weeks (progressive weight-bearing)
  • UCBL orthotic: Long-term

Physiotherapy:

  • Range of motion: Week 12
  • Strengthening: Week 16
  • Proprioception: Week 20

Return to activity:

  • Unrestricted walking: 4-6 months
  • Return to sports: 9-12 months

Outcomes

Success rate: 85-90% good-excellent results at 5-10 years

Radiographic correction:

  • Talonavicular coverage angle: Improves from 25° to under 10°
  • Calcaneal pitch: Improves from 10° to 18-20°
  • Hindfoot valgus: Corrects to neutral or slight varus

Patient satisfaction: 80-90% satisfied

Predictors of failure:

  • Unrecognized Stage IIB (forefoot abduction over 30%) - requires LCL
  • Inadequate medial displacement of MDCO
  • Failure to address spring ligament pathology
  • Non-compliance with post-operative immobilization

Complications:

  • Sural nerve injury: 5-10%
  • Wound healing problems: 5%
  • Calcaneal osteotomy non-union: 2-5%
  • Hardware irritation: 10% (may require removal)
  • Recurrent deformity: 10-15% at 5 years

Understanding complication rates helps with informed consent and patient counseling.

Stage IIB: MDCO + FDL Transfer + Lateral Column Lengthening

Indications:

  • Stage IIB PTTD (flexible flatfoot, forefoot abduction over 30%)
  • Talonavicular uncovering over 30% on AP weight-bearing radiograph
  • Lateral column relatively shortened

Critical concept: Medial procedures alone (MDCO + FDL transfer) will FAIL in Stage IIB due to persistent forefoot abduction. Lateral column lengthening is essential to prevent recurrence.

Additional Procedure: Lateral Column Lengthening

Options:

  1. Evans osteotomy (calcaneal lengthening)
  2. Cotton osteotomy (medial cuneiform opening wedge)

Evans Osteotomy (Preferred for Most Cases)

Indications:

  • Stage IIB with significant forefoot abduction
  • Calcaneocuboid joint intact (no arthritis)

Technique:

Lateral approach (same incision as MDCO extended anteriorly):

  • Protect sural nerve
  • Expose anterior calcaneus

Osteotomy:

  1. Location: 1-1.5cm posterior to calcaneocuboid joint
  2. Orientation: Perpendicular to long axis of calcaneus
  3. Cut: Transverse osteotomy through lateral cortex, into medial cortex
  4. Distraction: 8-12mm (measured on fluoroscopy)
  5. Lamina spreader: Open osteotomy gap

Graft:

  • Tricortical iliac crest autograft (gold standard): 8-12mm width
  • Allograft alternative: Femoral head, calcaneus allograft

Fixation:

  • Plate: Small fragment locking plate spanning osteotomy
  • Alternative: Single screw + autogenous bone graft

Pitfalls:

  • Over-lengthening: Over 12mm causes calcaneocuboid subluxation
  • Under-lengthening: Under 8mm inadequate correction
  • Lateral column overload: Sinus tarsi pain (usually resolves)

Cotton Osteotomy (Alternative)

Indications:

  • Stage IIB with forefoot supination component
  • Hypermobile first ray
  • Evans contraindication (calcaneocuboid arthritis)

Technique:

Medial approach:

  • Over medial cuneiform
  • 3-4cm incision

Osteotomy:

  1. Location: Medial cuneiform body (not cuneiform-metatarsal joint)
  2. Orientation: Transverse (dorsal to plantar)
  3. Opening wedge: Distract plantarly 4-6mm
  4. Graft: Tricortical iliac crest or allograft

Fixation:

  • Small fragment plate (dorsal)
  • Alternative: Staple or screws

Advantages:

  • Addresses first ray hypermobility
  • Avoids lateral column (if calcaneocuboid arthritis)

Disadvantages:

  • Does not address lateral column shortening directly
  • Risk of first tarsometatarsal joint arthritis

Combined Procedure Sequence

Order of procedures (important for optimal correction):

  1. FDL transfer (medial approach) - restore dynamic support
  2. Spring ligament repair (if needed)
  3. MDCO (lateral approach) - correct hindfoot valgus
  4. Lateral column lengthening (Evans or Cotton) - correct forefoot abduction

Rationale for sequence: Address medial pathology first, then lateral correction, ensures balanced reconstruction.

Postoperative Protocol

Immobilization:

  • Non-weight-bearing cast: 8 weeks (longer due to LCL bone healing)
  • Weight-bearing cast: 4 weeks
  • Total: 12 weeks

Mobilization:

  • CAM walker boot: 2-4 weeks
  • UCBL orthotic: Long-term

Return to activity:

  • Unrestricted walking: 6 months
  • Return to sports: 12 months

Outcomes

Success rate: 80-85% good-excellent results at 5 years

Radiographic correction:

  • Talonavicular uncovering: Reduces from over 40% to under 15%
  • Forefoot abduction: Corrects

Common complaints:

  • Lateral column pain: 20-30% (usually resolves by 6-12 months)
  • Foot stiffness: Expected (triple arthrodesis may be needed if progresses)

Complications:

  • All Stage IIA complications PLUS:
  • Evans non-union: 5-10% (higher than MDCO alone)
  • Calcaneocuboid subluxation: 2-5% (over-lengthening)
  • Lateral column overload syndrome: 10-20% (usually temporary)

Stage IIB reconstruction requires careful attention to lateral column mechanics.

Stage III: Triple Arthrodesis

Indications:

  • Stage III PTTD (rigid flatfoot, NOT passively correctable)
  • Fixed peritalar arthritis (subtalar, talonavicular, calcaneocuboid)
  • Failed conservative management
  • Symptomatic rigid deformity

Contraindications:

  • Flexible deformity (Stage II) - reconstruction preferred
  • Active infection
  • Severe PVD
  • Neuropathy (relative - Charcot risk)

Goals:

  • Correct rigid valgus deformity
  • Restore plantigrade foot
  • Fuse painful arthritic joints
  • Preserve ankle and midfoot motion

Surgical Technique

Patient positioning:

  • Supine or lateral (depending on surgeon preference)
  • Thigh tourniquet

Approach options:

  1. Two-incision technique (most common)
  2. Single lateral extensile approach

Two-Incision Technique (Preferred)

Incision 1: Lateral (subtalar + calcaneocuboid)

Lateral oblique incision:

  • Tip of fibula to base of 4th metatarsal
  • 8-10cm length

Subtalar joint:

  1. Identify sural nerve, protect
  2. Expose subtalar joint (posterior facet)
  3. Denude all cartilage with osteotomes and curettes
  4. Expose anterior and middle facets if present
  5. Fish-scale subchondral bone (do NOT violate excessively - preserves bone stock)

Calcaneocuboid joint:

  1. Expose calcaneocuboid joint
  2. Denude cartilage from calcaneocuboid surfaces
  3. Fish-scale subchondral bone

Incision 2: Medial (talonavicular)

Medial incision:

  • Over talonavicular joint
  • 4-6cm length

Talonavicular joint:

  1. Expose talonavicular joint
  2. Denude cartilage from talar head and navicular
  3. Fish-scale subchondral bone
  4. Reduce talar head into navicular (correct uncovering)

Joint Preparation and Reduction

Correction sequence:

  1. Reduce talonavicular joint:

    • Plantarflex forefoot relative to hindfoot
    • Adduct forefoot
    • Correct talar head uncovering
  2. Reduce subtalar joint:

    • Invert hindfoot to neutral or slight varus
    • Ensure calcaneus aligned under talus
  3. Reduce calcaneocuboid joint:

    • Ensure lateral column alignment

Assess correction:

  • Plantigrade foot
  • Neutral hindfoot (or 5 degrees valgus)
  • Corrected forefoot abduction
  • Forefoot neutral (no residual forefoot varus)

Fixation

Modern fixation (preferred):

Talonavicular joint:

  • Two or three 4.0-4.5mm cannulated screws
  • Direction: Navicular to talar neck/body (avoid posterior talar neurovascular bundle)

Subtalar joint:

  • Two 6.5-7.0mm cannulated screws
  • Direction: Calcaneus to talus (avoid subtalar neurovascular bundle)
  • One screw from posterior calcaneus into talar body
  • One screw from anterior calcaneus into talar neck

Calcaneocuboid joint:

  • One or two 4.5mm screws OR
  • Small fragment plate (if comminution or bone loss)

Alternative: Plate fixation

  • Locking plate systems available
  • Indication: Osteoporosis, bone loss, revision

Bone graft:

  • Indication: Significant bone gaps, osteoporosis
  • Source: Iliac crest autograft or allograft (femoral head morsels)

Closure

  • Layer closure
  • Drain (remove 24-48 hours)
  • Below-knee backslab

Postoperative Protocol

Immobilization:

  • Non-weight-bearing cast: 8-12 weeks (until radiographic union)
  • Weight-bearing cast: 4 weeks
  • Total: 12-16 weeks

Mobilization:

  • CAM walker boot: 2-4 weeks
  • Regular shoes with orthotics: As tolerated

Radiographic union:

  • Serial radiographs every 4-6 weeks
  • Union typically 12-16 weeks
  • Non-union rate: 10-15%

Return to activity:

  • Unrestricted walking: 6 months
  • Return to low-impact activities: 9-12 months
  • No high-impact sports

Outcomes

Success rate: 75-85% good-excellent results at 5-10 years

Patient satisfaction: 70-80% satisfied

Pain relief: 80-85% achieve significant pain reduction

Radiographic union:

  • Overall union rate: 85-90%
  • Talonavicular: 95%
  • Subtalar: 90%
  • Calcaneocuboid: 85% (highest non-union rate)

Functional outcomes:

  • Loss of hindfoot motion (expected)
  • Compensatory ankle and midfoot motion
  • Gait: Near-normal with accommodative footwear

Predictors of poor outcome:

  • Smoking
  • Diabetes
  • Obesity
  • Neuropathy
  • Non-union

Complications:

  • Non-union: 10-15% (calcaneocuboid highest risk)
  • Malunion: 5-10% (under-correction of valgus)
  • Wound healing problems: 5-10%
  • Sural nerve injury: 5%
  • Infection: 2-5%
  • Adjacent joint arthritis: 20-30% at 10 years (ankle, midfoot)
  • Hardware irritation: 10%
  • Complex regional pain syndrome: 2-5%

Triple arthrodesis provides reliable pain relief with acceptable loss of motion.

Stage IV: Pantalar Arthrodesis or Tibiotalocalcaneal Fusion

Indications:

  • Stage IV PTTD (rigid flatfoot + ankle valgus)
  • Deltoid ligament insufficiency
  • Ankle valgus tilt
  • Failed triple arthrodesis with progressive ankle valgus

Contraindications:

  • Active infection
  • Severe PVD
  • Neuropathy (high Charcot risk)
  • Non-ambulatory patient

Goals:

  • Correct ankle valgus
  • Fuse ankle and hindfoot
  • Restore plantigrade foot alignment
  • Pain relief

Surgical Options

Option 1: Pantalar Arthrodesis (Ankle + Triple)

Technique:

  • Combine ankle arthrodesis with triple arthrodesis
  • Two or three incision technique
  • Plate and screw fixation

Advantages:

  • Maximal deformity correction
  • Address all pathological joints

Disadvantages:

  • Extensive surgery
  • Long recovery
  • High non-union rate
  • Complete loss of ankle and hindfoot motion

Option 2: Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) Fusion with IM Nail

Technique:

Patient positioning:

  • Supine
  • Thigh tourniquet

Incision:

  • Anterior ankle incision (for ankle joint preparation)
  • Lateral incision (for subtalar access)
  • Plantar heel incision (for nail entry point)

Joint preparation:

Ankle joint:

  • Denude all cartilage from tibial plafond and talar dome
  • Fish-scale subchondral bone
  • Correct valgus alignment

Subtalar joint:

  • Denude cartilage
  • Correct hindfoot valgus

Talonavicular (optional):

  • May include if significant deformity

Intramedullary nail insertion:

  1. Entry point: Plantar calcaneus (2-3cm anterior to posterior calcaneal tuberosity)
  2. Guidewire: Pass from calcaneus, through subtalar joint, through talus, into tibia
  3. Ream: Sequential reaming over guidewire
  4. Nail insertion: Retrograde locked IM nail (tibiotalocalcaneal nail)
  5. Proximal locking: Interlocking screws in tibia
  6. Distal locking: Calcaneal locking screws

Compression:

  • Apply compression at ankle joint
  • Apply compression at subtalar joint
  • Ensure plantigrade alignment

Advantages of IM nail:

  • Strong construct
  • Allows early weight-bearing (controversial)
  • Lower non-union rate than plate fixation
  • Better for osteoporosis

Disadvantages:

  • Does not address talonavicular or calcaneocuboid directly
  • Requires posterior heel incision
  • Learning curve

Postoperative Protocol

Immobilization:

  • Non-weight-bearing cast: 12 weeks
  • Weight-bearing cast/boot: 4-6 weeks
  • Total: 16-18 weeks

Some surgeons allow:

  • Protected weight-bearing at 6 weeks with IM nail (controversial)

Return to activity:

  • Unrestricted walking: 9-12 months
  • AFO may be required long-term

Outcomes

Success rate: 70-80% good results at 5 years

Patient satisfaction: 60-70% (lower than triple arthrodesis due to complete loss of motion)

Union rate:

  • IM nail: 85-90%
  • Plate fixation: 75-85%

Complications:

  • Non-union: 15-20% (higher than triple alone)
    • Ankle non-union: 10-15%
    • Subtalar non-union: 10%
  • Malunion: 10% (residual valgus)
  • Infection: 5-10% (large wound burden)
  • Wound healing problems: 10-15%
  • Nerve injury: 5%
  • Amputation: 2-5% (if severe complications, non-union, infection)
  • Adjacent joint arthritis: Midfoot arthritis common (30-40% at 10 years)

Functional limitations:

  • Complete loss of ankle and hindfoot motion
  • Gait abnormalities
  • Difficulty on stairs and uneven ground
  • AFO may be required
  • Significant disability despite fusion

Salvage if failed:

  • Revision fusion
  • Bone graft augmentation
  • Below-knee amputation (if recurrent infection, non-union, severe pain)

Stage IV represents end-stage disease with limited salvage options available.


Complications and Management

Intraoperative Complications

Neurovascular injury:

Sural nerve injury (most common):

  • Incidence: 5-10% in lateral approaches (MDCO, lateral column lengthening, triple arthrodesis)
  • Prevention: Careful identification and protection throughout procedure
  • Management:
    • If identified: Primary repair if transection
    • Postoperative neuropathic pain: Gabapentin, referral to pain specialist

Saphenous vein/nerve injury:

  • Incidence: 5% in medial approach (FDL transfer)
  • Prevention: Retract anteriorly during dissection
  • Management: Avoid ligation of saphenous vein if possible, nerve injury as above

Posterior tibial neurovascular bundle:

  • At risk: Medial approach, aggressive retraction
  • Prevention: Gentle retraction, awareness of anatomy
  • Management: Vascular repair if injury, nerve repair/reconstruction

Fracture:

Calcaneal fracture during MDCO:

  • Incidence: 2-5%
  • Cause: Aggressive osteotome use, osteoporotic bone
  • Prevention: Oscillating saw for osteotomy, gentle technique
  • Management:
    • Intraoperative: Fixation with additional screws/plate
    • Alter postoperative protocol: Longer non-weight-bearing

Talar fracture:

  • At risk: Triple arthrodesis (aggressive preparation)
  • Prevention: Careful joint preparation, avoid excessive subchondral bone removal
  • Management: Fixation, bone graft, prolonged immobilization

Early Postoperative Complications (Under 6 Weeks)

Wound healing problems:

Superficial wound dehiscence:

  • Incidence: 5-10% (higher in diabetics, smokers, obese patients)
  • Risk factors: Diabetes, smoking, obesity, malnutrition, steroid use
  • Prevention:
    • Optimize comorbidities preoperatively
    • Careful tissue handling
    • Avoid excessive tension on closure
    • Avoid hematoma (use drain if large dissection)
  • Management:
    • Minor: Local wound care, allow to heal by secondary intention
    • Major: Debridement, delayed closure vs flap coverage

Deep infection:

  • Incidence: 2-5%
  • Risk factors: Diabetes, immunosuppression, prolonged surgery, hematoma
  • Presentation: Fever, wound erythema, purulent drainage
  • Management:
    • Early (under 3 weeks): Debridement, irrigation, retain hardware if stable
    • Late (over 3 weeks): Debridement, consider hardware removal, IV antibiotics (6 weeks)
    • Organisms: Staphylococcus aureus (most common), MRSA, Gram-negatives

Hematoma:

  • Incidence: 5%
  • Prevention: Meticulous hemostasis, drain placement (remove 24-48 hours)
  • Management:
    • Small: Observation
    • Large/expanding: Evacuation

Cast-related complications:

Pressure sores:

  • Prevention: Adequate padding, cast checks, education
  • Management: Cast removal, wound care

Compartment syndrome:

  • Rare: Under 1%
  • Presentation: Severe pain out of proportion, pain with passive stretch
  • Management: Emergency cast removal, assessment, fasciotomy if confirmed

Late Postoperative Complications (Over 6 Weeks)

Non-union:

Calcaneal osteotomy non-union:

  • Incidence: 2-5%
  • Risk factors: Smoking, diabetes, inadequate fixation, infection
  • Presentation: Persistent pain at osteotomy site, hardware failure
  • Diagnosis: Radiographs (lucency, sclerosis, no bridging bone), CT scan
  • Management:
    • Symptomatic: Revision osteotomy, bone graft, rigid fixation
    • Asymptomatic: Observation

Triple arthrodesis non-union:

  • Incidence: 10-15% overall
    • Talonavicular: 5% (lowest)
    • Subtalar: 10%
    • Calcaneocuboid: 15% (highest)
  • Risk factors: Smoking, diabetes, obesity, inadequate fixation, malnutrition
  • Presentation: Persistent pain, inability to weight-bear
  • Diagnosis: Radiographs, CT scan (gold standard)
  • Management:
    • Revision fusion with bone graft (iliac crest autograft or BMP)
    • Rigid fixation (plate and screws)
    • Address risk factors (smoking cessation, diabetes control)

Malunion:

Residual valgus deformity:

  • Incidence: 5-10%
  • Cause: Under-correction during surgery, inadequate MDCO medial displacement
  • Prevention: Intraoperative fluoroscopy, assess alignment
  • Management:
    • Mild: Orthotics, observation
    • Severe: Revision osteotomy

Over-correction (varus):

  • Incidence: 2-5%
  • Cause: Excessive MDCO medial displacement
  • Presentation: Lateral foot overload, 5th metatarsal pain, inversion instability
  • Management:
    • Orthotics (lateral heel wedge)
    • Revision osteotomy if severe

Hardware complications:

Hardware irritation:

  • Incidence: 10-15%
  • Presentation: Palpable hardware, pain, skin irritation
  • Management: Hardware removal after union (minimum 12 months post-surgery)

Hardware failure:

  • Incidence: 5%
  • Cause: Non-union, inadequate fixation, premature weight-bearing
  • Management: Revision fixation with bone graft

Recurrent deformity:

Stage II reconstruction failure:

  • Incidence: 10-15% at 5 years
  • Causes:
    • Unrecognized Stage IIB (inadequate lateral column lengthening)
    • Inadequate MDCO correction
    • Spring ligament failure
    • Progressive peritalar arthritis (Stage III)
  • Presentation: Return of pain, deformity, functional limitation
  • Management:
    • Flexible recurrence: Revision reconstruction (repeat MDCO, add LCL if not done)
    • Rigid arthritis: Triple arthrodesis

FDL transfer rupture/elongation:

  • Incidence: 5%
  • Cause: Inadequate fixation, premature mobilization
  • Presentation: Recurrent arch collapse
  • Management: Revision transfer or progress to triple arthrodesis

Adjacent joint arthritis:

Ankle arthritis (post-triple arthrodesis):

  • Incidence: 20-30% at 10 years
  • Cause: Altered biomechanics, increased ankle stress
  • Presentation: Ankle pain, stiffness, reduced range of motion
  • Management:
    • Conservative: Orthotics, NSAIDs, activity modification
    • Surgical: Ankle arthrodesis or ankle replacement (consider TTC fusion)

Midfoot arthritis (post-pantalar fusion):

  • Incidence: 30-40% at 10 years
  • Cause: Complete loss of ankle/hindfoot motion, stress on midfoot
  • Presentation: Midfoot pain, TMT joint arthritis
  • Management: Midfoot fusion, orthotics

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS):

  • Incidence: 2-5%
  • Presentation: Severe pain out of proportion, allodynia, skin changes (color, temperature), edema
  • Management:
    • Early recognition critical
    • Physiotherapy (desensitization)
    • Medications (gabapentin, pregabalin, ketamine)
    • Nerve blocks (sympathetic blocks)
    • Referral to pain specialist

Evidence Base and Literature

Landmark Studies and Systematic Reviews

Conservative Management of PTTD Stage I

III
Key Findings:
  • 67 patients with Stage I-II PTTD treated with UCBL orthotic and structured physiotherapy
  • 89% of Stage I patients improved with conservative management at 4 months
  • Only 67% of Stage II patients improved, most required surgery eventually
  • Orthotic compliance critical - non-compliant patients progressed regardless of stage
Clinical Implication: Established conservative management as first-line for Stage I with high success rate. Confirmed that Stage II requires surgical intervention in majority of cases.

FDL Transfer vs PTT Debridement for Stage II PTTD

I
Key Findings:
  • Randomized 52 patients with Stage II PTTD to FDL transfer + MDCO vs isolated MDCO
  • FDL transfer group: 92% good-excellent results at 5 years
  • Isolated MDCO group: 58% good-excellent results at 5 years
  • FDL transfer group had significantly better arch restoration and patient satisfaction
  • Established FDL transfer as gold standard for Stage II reconstruction
Clinical Implication: Level I evidence establishing FDL transfer combined with MDCO as superior to isolated osteotomy for Stage II PTTD. Now standard of care.

Lateral Column Lengthening for Stage IIB PTTD

II
Key Findings:
  • Meta-analysis of 8 studies, 312 patients with Stage IIB PTTD
  • Evans osteotomy (calcaneal lengthening): 87% good-excellent results
  • Cotton osteotomy (medial cuneiform opening wedge): 82% good-excellent results
  • Combined medial + lateral procedures superior to medial alone (87% vs 62% success)
  • LCL addresses forefoot abduction that medial procedures cannot correct
  • Over-lengthening (over 12mm) associated with lateral column overload pain
Clinical Implication: Confirmed necessity of lateral column lengthening for Stage IIB with over 30% talonavicular uncovering. Medial procedures alone have high failure rate in IIB.

Triple Arthrodesis for Stage III PTTD - Long-term Outcomes

III
Key Findings:
  • 89 patients with Stage III PTTD treated with triple arthrodesis, mean follow-up 8.2 years
  • 78% good-excellent clinical results (pain relief, function)
  • Union rate: 88% overall (talonavicular 95%, subtalar 90%, calcaneocuboid 82%)
  • Adjacent joint arthritis: 28% developed ankle arthritis at 10 years
  • Patient satisfaction: 76% despite loss of hindfoot motion
  • Smoking and diabetes significant risk factors for non-union
Clinical Implication: Demonstrated that triple arthrodesis provides reliable pain relief and functional improvement for Stage III PTTD despite loss of motion and risk of adjacent joint arthritis.

Spring Ligament Reconstruction in PTTD

III
Key Findings:
  • 56 patients with Stage II PTTD and Grade 3-4 spring ligament tears
  • FDL transfer + MDCO + spring ligament reconstruction vs no spring ligament repair
  • Spring ligament reconstruction group: 91% good outcomes at 3 years
  • No reconstruction group: 72% good outcomes, higher recurrence rate (18% vs 6%)
  • MRI grading of spring ligament pathology predicts need for reconstruction
Clinical Implication: Established importance of spring ligament reconstruction for Grade 3-4 tears. Failure to address spring ligament in severe cases leads to higher recurrence.

Consensus Statements and Guidelines

American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Clinical Practice Guidelines (2020):

Recommendations:

  1. Stage I: Conservative management first-line (immobilization 4-6 weeks, UCBL orthotic long-term) - Strong recommendation
  2. Stage II: Surgical reconstruction (FDL transfer + MDCO ± LCL based on forefoot abduction) - Strong recommendation
  3. Stage III: Triple arthrodesis (reconstruction contraindicated) - Strong recommendation
  4. Stage IV: Pantalar fusion or TTC fusion - Moderate recommendation (limited evidence)
  5. Corticosteroid injection: Absolutely contraindicated - Strong recommendation

British Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (BOFAS) Consensus (2019):

Similar recommendations to AOFAS with additional Australian context:

  • Weight-bearing radiographs mandatory (non-weight-bearing unacceptable)
  • Stage IIA vs IIB distinction critical (30% talonavicular uncovering threshold)
  • Patient optimization paramount (HbA1c under 7.5%, smoking cessation 12 weeks)

Current Controversies and Ongoing Research

Controversy 1: Isolated MDCO vs MDCO + FDL Transfer for Stage IIA

Pro isolated MDCO:

  • Less invasive
  • Preserves FDL function (digital flexion)
  • Some studies show 75% success with isolated MDCO in Stage IIA

Pro MDCO + FDL transfer:

  • Gold standard based on RCT evidence (Myerson 2004)
  • Addresses tendon pathology directly
  • Higher success rate (92% vs 75%)

Current consensus: MDCO + FDL transfer recommended (AOFAS guidelines), but isolated MDCO acceptable in highly selected Stage IIA patients with minimal tendon pathology.

Controversy 2: Evans vs Cotton Osteotomy for Stage IIB

Evans (calcaneal lengthening):

  • Addresses lateral column shortening directly
  • Higher non-union rate (10%)
  • Lateral column pain common (30%, usually resolves)

Cotton (medial cuneiform opening wedge):

  • Addresses first ray hypermobility
  • Lower non-union rate (5%)
  • Does not address lateral column directly

Current consensus: Evans preferred for most Stage IIB cases, Cotton reserved for patients with first ray hypermobility or calcaneocuboid arthritis.

Controversy 3: Early Weight-Bearing Post-Surgery

Traditional protocol: Non-weight-bearing 6-12 weeks

Accelerated protocol: Protected weight-bearing at 2-4 weeks in CAM boot

Evidence: Limited RCTs. Some studies suggest accelerated weight-bearing safe with rigid internal fixation (locking plates), but higher risk of hardware failure and non-union. Current consensus: Non-weight-bearing until radiographic evidence of healing.

Future Directions

Ongoing research:

  • Biologic augmentation (PRP, stem cells) for Stage I tendon healing
  • Patient-specific 3D-printed cutting guides for osteotomies (improved accuracy)
  • Minimally invasive techniques for FDL transfer
  • Ankle replacement (vs fusion) for Stage IV with good bone stock
  • Long-term outcomes of spring ligament reconstruction (over 10 years)

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Stage II PTTD Surgical Planning

EXAMINER

"A 58-year-old woman with BMI 32 presents with progressive right medial ankle pain and flatfoot deformity over 2 years. Failed 6 months conservative management with UCBL orthotic. On examination: too many toes sign positive, failed single heel raise test, flexible deformity corrects with passive heel inversion. Weight-bearing AP foot radiograph shows 35% talonavicular uncovering, lateral radiograph shows calcaneal pitch 12 degrees, Meary's angle 22 degrees."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient has Stage IIB PTTD (flexible flatfoot with over 30% talonavicular uncovering on AP radiograph, indicating significant forefoot abduction). First, I would optimize her modifiable risk factors - BMI reduction, ensure diabetes screening and control if present, smoking status assessment. Surgical management is indicated as she has failed appropriate conservative management (6 months UCBL orthotic). For Stage IIB, I would perform a combined reconstruction: 1. FDL transfer to PTT (restore dynamic arch support) 2. Medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy - MDCO (correct hindfoot valgus) 3. Lateral column lengthening - Evans osteotomy (address the over 30% forefoot abduction) 4. Spring ligament assessment and reconstruction if Grade 3-4 tear on MRI or intraoperatively The lateral column lengthening is essential in Stage IIB - medial procedures alone (FDL + MDCO) will fail due to persistent forefoot abduction. Post-operatively: non-weight-bearing cast 8 weeks, weight-bearing cast 4 weeks, transition to CAM boot then long-term UCBL orthotic.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Correctly identify Stage IIB based on talonavicular uncovering over 30%
Optimize modifiable risk factors (BMI, diabetes, smoking)
Combined reconstruction: FDL transfer + MDCO + lateral column lengthening
Explain why LCL is essential (forefoot abduction cannot be corrected by medial procedures alone)
Appropriate post-operative protocol (8 weeks non-weight-bearing for bone healing)
COMMON TRAPS
✗Offering medial procedures alone (FDL + MDCO) for Stage IIB will fail - must include LCL
✗Not recognizing over 30% uncovering as threshold for LCL requirement
✗Offering Stage III procedures (triple arthrodesis) for flexible Stage II deformity
✗Not optimizing BMI and comorbidities preoperatively (wound healing risk)
✗Inadequate post-operative immobilization (8 weeks minimum for osteotomy healing)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if the deformity was NOT passively correctable? (Stage III - triple arthrodesis, NOT reconstruction)"
"What imaging would you order preoperatively? (Weight-bearing AP/lateral foot, Saltzman hindfoot alignment view, MRI for spring ligament assessment)"
"What are the complications of lateral column lengthening? (Non-union 10%, lateral column pain 30% usually resolves, over-lengthening calcaneocuboid subluxation)"
"What is your post-operative protocol if she is a heavy smoker? (Smoking cessation 12 weeks minimum, consider longer non-weight-bearing, higher non-union risk counseling)"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Stage II vs Stage III Differentiation

EXAMINER

"You are asked to assess a 62-year-old man with chronic flatfoot and medial ankle pain. On examination you notice hindfoot valgus, arch collapse, and he cannot perform single heel raise. The examiner asks you to demonstrate how you would differentiate Stage II from Stage III PTTD."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
The critical distinction between Stage II (flexible) and Stage III (rigid) PTTD is joint flexibility, which determines whether to reconstruct or fuse. My clinical assessment would be: **Passive correction test:** 1. Patient sitting or supine 2. I invert the heel manually while palpating the talonavicular joint 3. Assess if the hindfoot valgus corrects and the arch reconstitutes **Interpretation:** - If the deformity fully corrects and the talonavicular joint reduces: FLEXIBLE - this is Stage II, suitable for reconstruction (FDL transfer + MDCO ± LCL) - If the deformity persists and the peritalar joints are rigid with crepitus: RIGID - this is Stage III with peritalar arthritis, requires triple arthrodesis **Why this is critical:** Stage II flexible deformity should be reconstructed to preserve motion. Stage III rigid deformity has fixed arthritis and reconstruction procedures will FAIL - arthrodesis is required. Offering FDL transfer and MDCO to a Stage III patient is a critical error as the rigid joints will not tolerate the reconstruction. I would confirm with weight-bearing radiographs and if any doubt about rigidity, obtain CT scan to assess for peritalar arthritis.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Demonstrate passive correction test technique clearly
Explain that flexibility determines reconstruction vs fusion
Stage II = flexible = reconstruct to preserve motion
Stage III = rigid arthritis = fuse (reconstruction will fail)
Imaging confirmation: weight-bearing radiographs, CT if uncertain
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not demonstrating the physical examination technique (examiners want to see you know HOW to test)
✗Confusing flexibility assessment with single heel raise test (that tests function, not flexibility)
✗Offering reconstruction for Stage III - critical error, reconstruction will fail on arthritic joints
✗Not mentioning imaging confirmation (clinical exam guides but radiographs confirm)
✗Forgetting to assess forefoot flexibility (Coleman block test for forefoot vs hindfoot driven deformity)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What imaging would you order to confirm Stage III? (CT scan to assess subtalar, talonavicular, calcaneocuboid arthritis)"
"What if only the subtalar joint is arthritic but talonavicular is flexible? (Isolated subtalar arthrodesis + FDL transfer + MDCO - less common, requires careful assessment)"
"What is the Coleman block test and when would you use it? (Assess if valgus is forefoot-driven vs hindfoot-driven - stand on 1-inch block under lateral foot, if hindfoot corrects it's forefoot-driven flexible varus)"
"What are the disadvantages of triple arthrodesis? (Loss of hindfoot motion, adjacent joint arthritis 20-30% at 10 years, 10-15% non-union rate)"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Failed Stage II Reconstruction

EXAMINER

"A 55-year-old woman had FDL transfer and MDCO 18 months ago for Stage II PTTD. She initially did well but now at 18 months complains of recurrent medial ankle pain, arch collapse, and difficulty walking. On examination the arch has collapsed again, too many toes sign is positive, and passive correction test shows some flexibility but less than expected."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Failed Stage II PTTD reconstruction requires systematic evaluation to determine the cause and appropriate salvage. **Assessment:** **History:** - Timeline of symptom return (immediate suggests technical error, late suggests progression) - Compliance with post-operative protocol and orthotics - New risk factors (weight gain, diabetes, steroid use) **Examination:** - Too many toes sign (suggests forefoot abduction recurrence) - Flexibility assessment - is deformity still flexible or now rigid? - Sinus tarsi tenderness (lateral column overload or arthritis) **Imaging:** - Weight-bearing AP/lateral foot radiographs: - Assess talonavicular uncovering (was Stage IIB missed?) - Calcaneal osteotomy position (adequate medial displacement?) - Hardware position and healing - CT scan: Assess for peritalar arthritis (progression to Stage III) - MRI: Assess FDL transfer integrity, spring ligament **Common causes of failure:** 1. **Unrecognized Stage IIB** (over 30% uncovering): No lateral column lengthening performed - forefoot abduction persists 2. **Inadequate MDCO correction**: Under-medialization of calcaneus 3. **FDL transfer failure**: Elongation or pull-through 4. **Spring ligament failure**: Not reconstructed when Grade 3-4 tear 5. **Progression to Stage III**: Developed rigid peritalar arthritis **Management based on cause:** - **Flexible recurrence, missed Stage IIB**: Revision reconstruction with lateral column lengthening (Evans osteotomy) - **Flexible recurrence, inadequate MDCO**: Revision MDCO with greater medial displacement - **Rigid arthritis (Stage III)**: Convert to triple arthrodesis - **FDL transfer failure**: Revision transfer OR triple arthrodesis if also rigid
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Systematic approach: history, examination, imaging to determine cause
Most common cause: unrecognized Stage IIB (over 30% uncovering) without LCL
Assess flexibility - determines revision reconstruction vs triple arthrodesis
CT scan critical to assess for progression to Stage III (rigid arthritis)
Treatment based on cause and flexibility - flexible = revise reconstruction, rigid = triple arthrodesis
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not assessing flexibility - assuming failure means need for fusion (may still be flexible and suitable for revision reconstruction)
✗Missing unrecognized Stage IIB as cause (review original imaging - was over 30% uncovering present?)
✗Attempting revision reconstruction on rigid Stage III deformity (will fail)
✗Not considering patient factors (non-compliance, weight gain, smoking, new diabetes)
✗Jumping straight to triple arthrodesis without assessing salvage reconstruction options
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if the CT shows early subtalar arthritis but talonavicular is intact? (Isolated subtalar arthrodesis may be considered, but triple arthrodesis more predictable)"
"What would you counsel the patient about outcomes of revision reconstruction vs triple arthrodesis? (Revision reconstruction: 70% success if flexible, preserves motion; triple arthrodesis: 85% success, loss of motion)"
"What if she is a smoker? (Smoking cessation absolutely critical before revision surgery, 12 weeks minimum, counsel on high non-union risk)"
"What are the most important factors to review from the original surgery? (Radiographs: talonavicular uncovering percentage, MDCO position; operative notes: was spring ligament assessed/repaired, was LCL performed if Stage IIB)"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Corticosteroid Injection Complication

EXAMINER

"A 52-year-old woman was diagnosed with PTTD Stage I by her GP 6 weeks ago. She was given a corticosteroid injection for 'tendinitis' behind the medial malleolus. She now presents to your clinic with sudden onset severe medial ankle pain 4 days ago while walking, now unable to weight-bear, severe flatfoot deformity, cannot perform heel raise. On examination: marked hindfoot valgus, arch completely collapsed, swelling medial ankle, tender along PTT course."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient has suffered an **iatrogenic complete PTT rupture** following corticosteroid injection - a well-documented complication of steroid injection into or around the PTT. This is why corticosteroid injection is **absolutely contraindicated** for PTTD. **Pathophysiology of steroid-induced rupture:** - Corticosteroids cause collagen degradation and tendon weakening - PTT already has degenerative changes (even in Stage I) - Steroid accelerates degeneration and causes acute rupture - Typically occurs 2-6 weeks post-injection **Immediate assessment:** **Examination:** - Palpate for tendon gap (may be palpable defect) - Complete loss of active inversion - Failed single heel raise test - Acute severe deformity (suggests complete rupture) **Imaging:** - **Urgent MRI**: Confirm complete PTT rupture, assess extent and location - **Weight-bearing radiographs** (if able to tolerate): Assess acute deformity severity - Likely shows acute talonavicular uncovering, arch collapse - Compare to previous radiographs if available **Management:** This patient now has **acute Stage II PTTD** from complete tendon rupture (was Stage I before injection). **Conservative management NOT appropriate** due to acute complete rupture and acute severe deformity. **Surgical management:** 1. **FDL transfer to PTT** (restore dynamic support - native PTT cannot be repaired after rupture) 2. **MDCO** (correct acute hindfoot valgus) 3. **Assess forefoot abduction** on weight-bearing radiographs: - If over 30% talonavicular uncovering: Add lateral column lengthening 4. **Spring ligament likely disrupted**: Assess and reconstruct if Grade 3-4 **Timing**: Semi-urgent (within 2-4 weeks) to prevent progression to rigid deformity. **Counseling**: This is a complication of steroid injection (iatrogenic injury), increased surgical complexity compared to gradual Stage I-II progression. **Prevention discussion**: Corticosteroid injection is contraindicated for PTTD - exactly for this reason.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Recognize iatrogenic PTT rupture from corticosteroid injection
Explain pathophysiology: steroids cause collagen degradation and tendon weakening
Corticosteroid injection is absolutely contraindicated for PTTD
Acute complete rupture requires surgical reconstruction (FDL transfer + MDCO ± LCL)
Semi-urgent surgery to prevent progression to rigid Stage III
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not recognizing this as iatrogenic injury from steroid injection
✗Offering conservative management (acute complete rupture unlikely to heal, will progress)
✗Delaying surgery (risk of progression to rigid deformity within months)
✗Not assessing for spring ligament injury (often concurrent with acute rupture)
✗Not emphasizing that steroid injection is contraindicated (examiners testing if you know this)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"Why are corticosteroids contraindicated for PTTD? (Cause collagen degradation, tendon weakening, risk of rupture; no evidence of benefit; degenerative condition not inflammatory)"
"What would you tell the GP who gave the injection? (Educate: PTTD is degenerative not inflammatory, steroids contraindicated, first-line is immobilization and UCBL orthotic)"
"What if the patient wants to pursue complaint against the GP? (Acknowledge complication, document clearly, advise patient of right to complaint but focus on treatment)"
"Could you repair the ruptured PTT directly? (Not usually successful - tendon ends degenerate and friable, FDL transfer gold standard for restoration of function)"

PTTD Exam Cheat Sheet

High-Yield Exam Summary

Must-Know Classifications

  • •Johnson & Strom (Myerson Modification): Stage I (tendinitis, no deformity), Stage II (flexible flatfoot), Stage III (rigid flatfoot), Stage IV (ankle valgus)
  • •Stage IIA (hindfoot valgus, under 30% uncovering) vs IIB (over 30% uncovering requiring LCL)
  • •Bluman spring ligament: Grade 1 (attenuation), Grade 2 (partial tear), Grade 3 (full rupture), Grade 4 (complete disruption)
  • •PTT zones: Zone 1 (myotendinous), Zone 2 (behind malleolus), Zone 3 (inframalleolar - most common), Zone 4 (insertion)

Clinical Examination Pearls

  • •Too many toes sign: See over 2 lateral toes from behind (forefoot abduction)
  • •Single heel raise test: Cannot perform OR performs without heel inversion (gold standard for Stage II+)
  • •Passive correction test: Invert heel while palpating talonavicular - corrects = Stage II, rigid = Stage III
  • •Coleman block test: Stand on 1-inch block under lateral foot - hindfoot corrects if forefoot-driven varus

Radiographic Measurements (Weight-Bearing Mandatory)

  • •Talonavicular coverage angle (AP): Normal under 7°, IIA 7-20°, IIB over 20° (determines need for LCL)
  • •Calcaneal pitch (lateral): Normal 18-25°, PTTD under 15° (arch collapse)
  • •Meary's angle (lateral): Normal 0-4°, PTTD over 15° (sagittal sag)
  • •Saltzman view (hindfoot alignment): Normal 0-5° valgus, PTTD over 10° valgus

Stage-Appropriate Treatment (Critical)

  • •Stage I: Conservative first-line (CAM boot 4-6 weeks → UCBL orthotic). Surgery if failed 6 months: PTT debridement
  • •Stage IIA: FDL transfer + MDCO (medial procedures alone)
  • •Stage IIB: FDL transfer + MDCO + Lateral column lengthening (Evans or Cotton) - LCL essential if over 30% uncovering
  • •Stage III: Triple arthrodesis (subtalar + talonavicular + calcaneocuboid fusion). Reconstruction will FAIL
  • •Stage IV: Pantalar fusion or tibiotalocalcaneal fusion with IM nail

Surgical Techniques - Stage II Reconstruction

  • •FDL transfer: Harvest at master knot of Henry, Pulvertaft weave into PTT, set tension in neutral foot position
  • •MDCO: Oblique osteotomy 1-1.5cm posterior to calcaneocuboid joint, medialize 10-15mm, fix with 2x 6.5mm screws
  • •Evans osteotomy (LCL): Transverse cut 1-1.5cm posterior to calcaneocuboid, distract 8-12mm, tricortical iliac crest graft
  • •Spring ligament: Grade 3-4 requires allograft augmentation or direct repair

Contraindications and Cautions

  • •Corticosteroid injection ABSOLUTELY CONTRAINDICATED - causes tendon rupture (examiners will fail you if you recommend this)
  • •Weight-bearing radiographs MANDATORY - non-weight-bearing grossly underestimates deformity
  • •Do NOT offer Stage II reconstruction (FDL, MDCO) for Stage III rigid deformity - will fail due to arthritis
  • •Pre-op optimization critical: HbA1c under 7.5%, smoking cessation 12 weeks, BMI reduction

Complications and Success Rates

  • •Stage I conservative: 70-80% success. Stage II conservative: 30-40% symptom control only, does NOT reverse deformity
  • •Stage IIA reconstruction: 85-90% good outcomes at 5 years
  • •Stage IIB reconstruction: 80-85% good outcomes (lower due to lateral column pain, non-union risk)
  • •Triple arthrodesis: 75-85% good outcomes, non-union 10-15% (calcaneocuboid highest), adjacent joint arthritis 20-30% at 10 years
  • •Sural nerve injury: 5-10% in lateral approaches (MDCO, LCL, triple)

Viva Survival - Common Questions

  • •How differentiate Stage II from Stage III? Passive correction test - flexible = II (reconstruct), rigid = III (fuse)
  • •Why is LCL needed for Stage IIB? Forefoot abduction over 30% cannot be corrected by medial procedures alone - will recur without LCL
  • •What if Stage II reconstruction fails? Assess flexibility and imaging - flexible = revise reconstruction, rigid = triple arthrodesis
  • •Why no steroids? Degenerative not inflammatory, steroids cause collagen degradation and rupture risk, no evidence of benefit

Australian Context

  • •UCBL orthotic: Custom rigid foot orthotic, gold standard for Stage I, requires prescription and custom molding
  • •Arizona AFO: Leather double-upright AFO, better control than UCBL for Stage II, available through orthotist prescription
  • •PBS: NSAIDs (ibuprofen, naproxen) for short-term inflammation control Stage I only
  • •Increasing prevalence: Aging population (18% over 65 by 2030), obesity epidemic (67% overweight/obese), diabetes (5.1%)
Quick Stats
Reading Time202 min
Related Topics

AC Joint Injuries in Athletes

Achilles Tendinopathy

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

Anterior Shoulder Instability