Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Primary Bone Tumors of the Spine

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Primary Bone Tumors of the Spine

Comprehensive guide to primary malignant spine tumors including chordoma, chondrosarcoma, osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma - diagnosis, imaging, staging and surgical management for FRACS exam

complete
Updated: 2025-12-24
High Yield Overview

PRIMARY BONE TUMORS OF THE SPINE

Chordoma | Chondrosarcoma | Osteosarcoma | Ewing Sarcoma

5%Of all spine tumors are primary
50%Sacrococcygeal chordoma location
70%5-yr survival chordoma (en bloc)
20%Local recurrence with wide margins

ENNEKING STAGING (MUSCULOSKELETAL TUMORS)

Stage I (Low Grade)
PatternG1, intracompartmental (A) or extracompartmental (B)
TreatmentWide excision often curative
Stage II (High Grade)
PatternG2, intracompartmental (A) or extracompartmental (B)
TreatmentWide/radical excision + adjuvant therapy
Stage III (Metastatic)
PatternAny grade with distant metastases
TreatmentPalliative unless oligometastatic

Critical Must-Knows

  • Chordoma - most common primary malignant spine tumor, arises from notochord remnants, sacrum 50%, skull base 35%
  • Chondrosarcoma - second most common, arises from cartilage, ring-and-arc calcifications on CT
  • En bloc resection is goal for chordoma/chondrosarcoma (chemotherapy and radiation resistant)
  • Ewing sarcoma - pediatric/young adult, highly chemo/radiosensitive, permeative bone destruction
  • Osteosarcoma - rare in spine, requires neoadjuvant chemo, osteoid matrix on imaging

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Chordoma - T2 hyperintense, physaliferous cells (vacuolated), brachyury positive
  • "
    Chondrosarcoma - ring-and-arc calcifications, arises from posterior elements
  • "
    Marginal excision = 50-70% local recurrence vs 20% with wide margins
  • "
    Ewing and osteosarcoma require chemotherapy unlike chordoma/chondrosarcoma

Critical Primary Spine Tumor Exam Points

Chordoma Location

Know the distribution: Sacrococcygeal 50%, skull base (clivus) 35%, mobile spine 15%. In mobile spine, cervical is more common than thoracic/lumbar. Arises from notochord remnants along the neuraxis.

En Bloc Resection

Surgical margin is key - chordoma and chondrosarcoma are resistant to chemotherapy and conventional radiation. Wide en bloc resection (Enneking) is the only chance for cure. Intralesional = 100% recurrence.

Ewing Sarcoma

Different from chordoma - highly chemosensitive and radiosensitive. Treatment is chemotherapy + surgery or radiation. Peak age 10-25 years. Permeative destruction with soft tissue mass. t(11;22) translocation.

Imaging Features

Know distinguishing features: Chordoma = T2 hyperintense, lobulated, midline. Chondrosarcoma = ring-and-arc calcifications. Osteosarcoma = osteoid matrix, sunburst pattern. Ewing = permeative lytic.

Primary Malignant Spine Tumors - Comparison

FeatureChordomaChondrosarcomaOsteosarcomaEwing Sarcoma
Age at presentation40-70 years30-70 years10-30 years10-25 years
LocationMidline, sacrum 50%Posterior elementsVariableAny location
Cell of originNotochord remnantCartilageOsteoblastNeural crest
Imaging hallmarkT2 hyperintenseRing-arc calcificationOsteoid matrixPermeative lytic
Chemo/RT sensitiveNo/MinimalNoYes (chemo)Yes (both)
Primary treatmentWide en blocWide en blocNeoadjuvant chemo + surgeryChemo + surgery/RT

At a Glance

Primary bone tumors of the spine represent only 5% of all spine tumors but require distinct management from metastases. Chordoma is the most common primary malignant spine tumor, arising from notochord remnants with 50% in the sacrococcygeal region—characterized by physaliferous cells, brachyury positivity, and T2 hyperintensity on MRI. Chondrosarcoma shows ring-and-arc calcifications and arises from posterior elements. Both chordoma and chondrosarcoma are resistant to chemotherapy and radiation, making en bloc resection with wide margins the only curative option—marginal excision results in 50-70% local recurrence. In contrast, Ewing sarcoma (pediatric, t(11;22) translocation) is highly chemosensitive and radiosensitive.

Mnemonic

Primary Spine Tumors - CEOS

C
Chordoma
Notochord origin, sacrum/clivus, T2 bright, brachyury+, en bloc excision
E
Ewing sarcoma
Pediatric, permeative lytic, t(11;22), chemo/radiosensitive
O
Osteosarcoma
Bone-forming, sunburst, neoadjuvant chemotherapy essential
S
Sarcoma (Chondro-)
Cartilage origin, ring-arc calcifications, posterior elements

Memory Hook:CEOS tumors - Chordoma and Chondrosarcoma need En bloc, Others (Ewing, Osteo) Sensitive to chemo

Mnemonic

Chordoma Key Features

P
Physaliferous cells
Pathognomonic vacuolated cells on histology
B
Brachyury
Immunohistochemical marker, highly specific
S
Sacrum
50% occur in sacrococcygeal region
T
T2 hyperintense
Very bright on T2 MRI due to mucin content
N
Notochord
Arises from embryonic notochord remnants

Memory Hook:PBSTN - Physaliferous cells with Brachyury positivity in Sacral tumors that are T2 bright from Notochord

Mnemonic

Enneking Staging System

I
Stage I (Low Grade)
G1 lesion - A=intracompartmental, B=extracompartmental
II
Stage II (High Grade)
G2 lesion - A=intracompartmental, B=extracompartmental
III
Stage III
Any grade with regional or distant metastases

Memory Hook:I-II-III: Low-High-Mets. Stage IIB is most common surgical presentation

Overview and Epidemiology

Primary malignant bone tumors of the spine are rare, accounting for only 5% of all spinal tumors. The most common types are chordoma, chondrosarcoma, osteosarcoma, and Ewing sarcoma.

Relative Incidence of Primary Spine Tumors:

Tumor Type% of Primary Spine TumorsTypical AgeGender
Chordoma40%40-70 yearsM more than F (2:1)
Chondrosarcoma20%30-70 yearsM=F
Osteosarcoma10%10-30 yearsM more than F
Ewing Sarcoma5%10-25 yearsM more than F
Others25%VariableVariable

Key Epidemiological Points:

Chordoma and chondrosarcoma are tumors of adulthood, while Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma predominantly affect children and young adults. Understanding age at presentation helps narrow the differential diagnosis.

Location Matters

Primary spine tumors have characteristic locations: Chordoma = midline (sacrum, clivus, vertebral body). Chondrosarcoma = posterior elements. Ewing sarcoma = any location. Osteosarcoma = vertebral body or posterior elements.

Pathophysiology

Cellular Origins

Notochordal Origin

Chordoma arises from remnants of the embryonic notochord - the primordial axial skeleton that guides vertebral development.

Pathological Features:

  • Physaliferous cells - vacuolated cells containing mucin (pathognomonic)
  • Lobulated architecture with fibrous septae
  • Abundant myxoid matrix

Immunohistochemistry:

  • Brachyury positive (highly specific diagnostic marker)
  • Cytokeratin positive (EMA, CK8/18)
  • S-100 positive

Three histological subtypes: conventional (most common), chondroid (better prognosis), and dedifferentiated (worst prognosis with high-grade sarcomatous component).

Cartilaginous Origin

Arises from cartilaginous tissue, often in posterior elements of vertebrae where cartilaginous growth plates are present.

Pathological Features:

  • Malignant chondrocytes in hyaline cartilage matrix
  • Variable cellularity correlates with grade
  • Myxoid change common in high-grade tumors

Grading:

  • Grade I: Well-differentiated, low cellularity
  • Grade II: Moderate cellularity, some nuclear atypia
  • Grade III: High cellularity, marked atypia, mitoses

Grade determines prognosis: 5-year survival is 90% for Grade I vs 30% for Grade III.

Osteoblastic Origin

Primary osteosarcoma of spine is rare (3-5% of all osteosarcomas). Characterized by malignant cells producing osteoid matrix.

Pathological Features:

  • Malignant spindle cells with osteoid production
  • Subtypes: osteoblastic, chondroblastic, fibroblastic
  • High mitotic rate

Immunohistochemistry:

  • SATB2 positive (osteoblastic marker)
  • Variable alkaline phosphatase
  • Negative for cytokeratins

Secondary osteosarcoma can occur in Paget disease or post-radiation.

Neural Crest Origin

Member of the Ewing sarcoma family of tumors (ESFT), likely derived from neural crest or mesenchymal stem cells.

Pathological Features:

  • Small round blue cells
  • Homer-Wright rosettes (not always present)
  • Minimal cytoplasm, round nuclei

Molecular:

  • EWSR1-FLI1 fusion (t(11;22)(q24;q12)) in 85%
  • Other fusions: EWSR1-ERG, EWSR1-ETV1
  • CD99 positive (membrane staining)

The characteristic translocation is diagnostic and differentiates from other small round cell tumors.

Classification and Staging

Enneking Surgical Staging System

Standard staging for musculoskeletal tumors.

StageGradeCompartmentMetastases
IALow (G1)IntracompartmentalM0
IBLow (G1)ExtracompartmentalM0
IIAHigh (G2)IntracompartmentalM0
IIBHigh (G2)ExtracompartmentalM0
IIIAnyAnyM1

Most spine tumors at presentation are Stage IIB (extracompartmental) due to anatomic complexity of spine.

Weinstein-Boriani-Biagini (WBB) Surgical Staging

Anatomical staging system specific to spine tumors.

Radial Zones (1-12):

  • Vertebra divided like clock face
  • Zone 4-8: Vertebral body
  • Zone 10-3: Posterior elements

Layers (A-E):

  • A: Extraosseous soft tissue
  • B: Intraosseous superficial
  • C: Intraosseous deep
  • D: Extraosseous epidural
  • E: Extraosseous intradural

WBB staging guides surgical planning for en bloc resection.

Chordoma-Specific Considerations

No specific staging system exists for chordoma. Use Enneking combined with anatomical location.

Anatomical Distribution:

  • Sacrococcygeal: 50%
  • Skull base (clivus): 35%
  • Mobile spine: 15%

Prognostic Factors:

  • Surgical margin status (most important)
  • Histological subtype
  • Tumor size
  • Location (skull base worst access)

Primary treatment is wide surgical excision with goal of negative margins.

WHO Classification of Bone Tumors (2020)

Notochordal Tumors:

  • Benign notochordal cell tumor
  • Chordoma (conventional, chondroid, dedifferentiated)

Chondrogenic Tumors:

  • Chondrosarcoma (Grade I, II, III)
  • Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma
  • Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma

Osteogenic Tumors:

  • Osteosarcoma (conventional and subtypes)
  • Secondary osteosarcoma

Ewing Sarcoma Family:

  • Ewing sarcoma (defined by fusion gene)

WHO grading correlates with prognosis and guides treatment.

Clinical Presentation

Presenting Symptoms

Pain (Most Common):

  • Localized back pain, often insidious onset
  • Typically progressive over months
  • Night pain and rest pain common
  • May be mechanical or constant

Neurological Symptoms:

  • Radiculopathy from nerve root compression
  • Myelopathy if cord compression
  • Cauda equina syndrome with sacral tumors
  • Bowel/bladder dysfunction (late)

Tumor-Specific Presentations

Chordoma:

  • Sacral: Low back pain, sciatica, constipation, urinary symptoms
  • May present with palpable presacral mass on rectal examination
  • Skull base: Cranial nerve palsies, headache

Ewing Sarcoma:

  • Often presents with systemic symptoms
  • Fever, weight loss, elevated inflammatory markers
  • May mimic infection

Osteosarcoma:

  • Pain and swelling
  • Pathological fracture possible
  • Elevated alkaline phosphatase

Red Flags

  • Pain worse at night or at rest
  • Progressive neurological deficit
  • Weight loss, fever
  • Mass lesion palpable
  • Pathological fracture

Investigations

Imaging

Initial Assessment

Often first imaging modality, but sensitivity is limited.

Key Features:

  • Lytic vs sclerotic pattern
  • Bone destruction
  • Matrix mineralization
  • Soft tissue mass

Tumor-Specific Findings:

  • Chordoma: Midline lytic destruction, soft tissue mass
  • Chondrosarcoma: Stippled/ring-arc calcifications
  • Osteosarcoma: Dense sclerosis, sunburst periosteal reaction
  • Ewing: Permeative/moth-eaten destruction

Plain films may be normal in early disease. Advanced imaging always required.

Bone Detail Assessment

Essential for surgical planning and biopsy guidance.

Advantages:

  • Best for bone architecture detail
  • Matrix characterization (calcification, osteoid)
  • Fracture assessment
  • Biopsy guidance

Tumor-Specific CT Features:

  • Chordoma: Midline lytic destruction, soft tissue mass
  • Chondrosarcoma: Ring-and-arc calcifications (pathognomonic)
  • Osteosarcoma: Dense osteoid matrix, sunburst pattern
  • Ewing: Permeative destruction, cortical breakthrough

CT angiography useful for vascular mapping pre-operatively.

Gold Standard for Spine Tumors

Essential for all primary spine tumors.

Sequences:

  • T1: Anatomical detail, marrow replacement
  • T2/STIR: Tumor extent, edema
  • Post-contrast: Enhancement pattern, vascularity
  • DWI: Cellularity assessment

Tumor-Specific MRI Features:

  • Chordoma: Very high T2 signal (mucin), lobulated, enhances
  • Chondrosarcoma: High T2 signal, ring-arc pattern
  • Osteosarcoma: Variable signal, heterogeneous enhancement
  • Ewing: T2 hyperintense, permeative, marked enhancement

Whole spine MRI to assess skip metastases.

Staging and Monitoring

Bone Scan:

  • Limited sensitivity for primary tumors
  • Useful for skeletal metastases screening
  • Chordoma may be cold on bone scan

PET-CT:

  • FDG uptake correlates with grade
  • Staging for metastatic disease
  • Treatment response assessment
  • SUV correlates with prognosis

Limitations:

  • Low-grade tumors may be FDG-negative
  • Post-treatment changes confound interpretation

PET-CT increasingly used for staging and monitoring.

Biopsy

Principles:

  • Biopsy tract must be excisable with definitive surgery
  • CT-guided preferred for spine
  • Avoid contaminating multiple compartments
  • Discuss approach with treating surgeon first

Biopsy Planning Critical

Poorly planned biopsy can compromise subsequent en bloc resection. The biopsy tract will need excision, so coordinate with the surgeon who will perform definitive surgery BEFORE biopsy.

Management

📊 Management Algorithm
primary bone tumors spine management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for primary bone tumors spineCredit: OrthoVellum

Surgical Principles

Gold Standard for Chordoma/Chondrosarcoma

Goal is negative surgical margins without violating tumor capsule.

Margin Types (Enneking):

  • Intralesional: Through tumor (contamination)
  • Marginal: Through reactive zone
  • Wide: Through normal tissue, cuff around tumor
  • Radical: Entire compartment (rarely achievable in spine)

Outcomes by Margin:

  • Intralesional: 100% recurrence
  • Marginal: 50-70% recurrence
  • Wide: 20-30% recurrence

En bloc vertebrectomy is technically demanding and requires experienced spine oncology team.

Sacral Chordoma Resection

Most common location for chordoma.

Surgical Approach:

  • Combined anterior-posterior approach
  • Level of resection determines function
  • Above S2-S3: Bladder/bowel/sexual dysfunction
  • Below S3: May preserve some function

Reconstruction:

  • Spinopelvic instrumentation
  • Bone graft or cage
  • Soft tissue flap for wound coverage

Key Points:

  • Preoperative embolization reduces blood loss
  • Rectal involvement may require colostomy
  • High complication rate (wound, infection, neuro)

Functional outcome depends on level of nerve root sacrifice.

Vertebrectomy Techniques

Spondylectomy (En Bloc):

  • Total vertebrectomy including posterior elements
  • Staged approach often required
  • Circumferential reconstruction

WBB-Guided Planning:

  • Zones involved determine approach
  • Single vs multiple level
  • Epidural involvement (Layer D)

Technical Considerations:

  • Neural element sacrifice may be required
  • Spinal cord cannot be sacrificed
  • Adjacent level involvement increases difficulty

Total spondylectomy achieves best margins but highest morbidity.

Radiation and Chemotherapy

Chordoma/Chondrosarcoma:

  • Resistant to conventional radiation
  • Proton/carbon ion therapy may improve local control
  • Chemotherapy not effective
  • Targeted therapy under investigation (imatinib, EGFR inhibitors)

Osteosarcoma:

  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy mandatory (MAP protocol)
  • Surgery follows chemotherapy
  • Histologic response predicts prognosis

Ewing Sarcoma:

  • Chemotherapy before and after surgery
  • Radiation if margins inadequate
  • VDC/IE protocol standard

Treatment differs markedly between tumor types.

Treatment Algorithm

Chordoma/Chondrosarcoma:

  1. Staging (MRI, CT, PET)
  2. Biopsy (coordinated with surgeon)
  3. En bloc resection with wide margins
  4. Consider proton therapy if margins positive

Osteosarcoma:

  1. Staging
  2. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (10-12 weeks)
  3. Surgical resection
  4. Adjuvant chemotherapy based on necrosis

Ewing Sarcoma:

  1. Staging including whole-body PET
  2. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  3. Surgery or radiation (or both)
  4. Maintenance chemotherapy

Chemosensitivity Determines Treatment

Chordoma and chondrosarcoma are NOT chemosensitive - surgery is primary treatment. Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma ARE chemosensitive - chemotherapy is integral to treatment. This fundamental difference determines management approach.

Complications

Surgical Complications

Early:

  • Wound complications (most common, especially sacral)
  • Cerebrospinal fluid leak
  • Neurological deficit
  • Massive blood loss (average 2-5L for sacral tumors)

Late:

  • Hardware failure
  • Pseudarthrosis
  • Adjacent level disease
  • Chronic pain

Neurological Deficits

Sacral Resection:

  • S1 sacrifice: Ankle plantar flexion weakness
  • S2 sacrifice: Bladder/bowel dysfunction likely
  • S3 sacrifice: Definite bladder/bowel/sexual dysfunction

Mobile Spine:

  • Nerve root sacrifice may be required for clear margins
  • Spinal cord injury risk with en bloc techniques

Local Recurrence

Risk Factors:

  • Intralesional vs en bloc surgery
  • Positive surgical margins
  • Tumor grade
  • Dedifferentiated histology

Management of Recurrence:

  • Re-resection if feasible
  • Radiation therapy (proton/carbon ion)
  • Palliative care if unresectable

Postoperative Care

En Bloc Spine Tumor Resection Protocol

Postoperative Rehabilitation Timeline

Days 0-3ICU Phase
  • Intensive care monitoring for first 24-72 hours
  • Hemodynamic monitoring (blood loss often 2-5L for sacral resections)
  • Drain management and output monitoring
  • Pain management (multimodal, patient-controlled analgesia)
  • DVT prophylaxis (mechanical initially, chemical once hemostasis assured)
  • Wound assessment for flap viability if soft tissue reconstruction
Days 3-14Ward Phase
  • Mobilisation with physiotherapy (weight-bearing status per surgeon)
  • Wound care and drain removal when output minimal
  • Bladder/bowel function monitoring (especially sacral resections)
  • Nutritional support for wound healing
  • Begin rehabilitation for neurological deficits
Weeks 2-6Early Recovery
  • Outpatient wound checks every 1-2 weeks
  • Progressive mobilisation and physiotherapy
  • Brace if spinal instability concern
  • Imaging at 6 weeks to assess instrumentation
  • Referral for radiation oncology if margins positive (proton therapy)
Months 3-24Ongoing
  • Surveillance imaging every 3-6 months (MRI for local, CT chest for metastases)
  • Functional rehabilitation for neurological deficits
  • Oncology follow-up for adjuvant therapy if indicated
  • Psychological support for adaptation to functional deficits

Outcomes

Survival by Tumor Type

Tumor5-Year Survival (Wide Excision)5-Year Survival (Marginal/Intralesional)Key Prognostic Factor
Chordoma65-70%35-40%Surgical margin status
Chondrosarcoma Grade I90%70%Tumor grade
Chondrosarcoma Grade III30%10-15%Tumor grade
Ewing Sarcoma (localized)60-70%Similar (chemo-dependent)Response to chemotherapy
Osteosarcoma40-50%20-30%Necrosis rate post-chemo

Local Recurrence Rates

  • Wide margin: 20-30% local recurrence
  • Marginal margin: 50-70% local recurrence
  • Intralesional: Approaching 100% local recurrence

Margin Status is Key

For chordoma and chondrosarcoma, surgical margin status is the MOST IMPORTANT prognostic factor. En bloc resection with wide margins is the only chance for long-term disease control. Proton beam therapy can help salvage positive margins.

Evidence Base

En Bloc Resection for Chordoma

IV
Boriani S et al. • Spine (2006)
Key Findings:
  • 52 patients with chordoma of mobile spine
  • Wide en bloc resection: 28% local recurrence
  • Intralesional excision: 64% local recurrence
  • 5-year survival: 65% with en bloc vs 40% intralesional
Clinical Implication: En bloc resection with wide margins significantly reduces local recurrence and improves survival in spinal chordoma compared to intralesional surgery

Sacral Chordoma Outcomes

IV
Fuchs B et al. • J Bone Joint Surg Am (2005)
Key Findings:
  • 52 patients with sacral chordoma
  • Wide resection: 5-year local recurrence 22%
  • Contaminated margins: 5-year recurrence 67%
  • Survival correlated with margin status
Clinical Implication: Surgical margin status is the most important prognostic factor for sacral chordoma - wide negative margins essential for disease control

Spine Ewing Sarcoma

IV
Marco RA et al. • Spine (2005)
Key Findings:
  • Multimodality treatment essential
  • Chemotherapy + surgery superior to chemo alone
  • 5-year survival 50-60% for localized disease
  • Local control improves with surgery
Clinical Implication: Ewing sarcoma of spine requires multimodal therapy - neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and/or radiation provides best outcomes

Proton Therapy for Chordoma

III
Stacchiotti S et al. • Lancet Oncol (2017)
Key Findings:
  • Proton therapy improves local control vs photons
  • 5-year local control 80-85% with high-dose protons
  • Useful for positive margins or unresectable disease
  • Carbon ion may provide additional benefit
Clinical Implication: Proton beam therapy offers improved local control for chordoma compared to conventional radiation, particularly useful when wide surgical margins cannot be achieved

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Sacral Mass in Adult

EXAMINER

"A 55-year-old man presents with 12 months of progressive low back and buttock pain. MRI shows a large destructive sacral mass that is very bright on T2-weighted imaging. The mass extends presacrally."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
**Most Likely Diagnosis:** Sacral chordoma - given the location (sacrum), age (middle-aged adult), and MRI characteristics (T2 hyperintense). **Differential Diagnosis:** - Chordoma (most likely) - Giant cell tumor of sacrum - Metastatic disease - Chondrosarcoma - Sacral schwannoma **Investigations:** 1. CT scan - bone destruction pattern, calcifications 2. CT chest/abdomen - staging 3. PET-CT - metabolic activity, metastases 4. Biopsy - CT-guided, coordinated with surgeon **Biopsy Planning:** CRITICAL - discuss with surgeon first. Biopsy tract must be excisable with definitive surgery. Posterior approach preferred. **If Chordoma Confirmed:** 1. MDT discussion (spine oncology surgeon, radiation oncologist, medical oncologist) 2. Staging workup complete 3. En bloc sacrectomy with wide margins 4. Combined anterior-posterior approach likely 5. Preoperative embolization 6. Spinopelvic reconstruction **Key Points:** - Wide en bloc resection is only chance for cure - Chemotherapy ineffective - Proton therapy if margins positive - Expect functional deficits depending on level
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Sacral chordoma is most likely diagnosis with T2 hyperintense sacral mass
Biopsy planning MUST involve treating surgeon
En bloc resection with wide margins is treatment of choice
Chemotherapy and conventional radiation are NOT effective
Functional deficit depends on level of nerve root sacrifice
COMMON TRAPS
✗Performing biopsy without surgical planning
✗Recommending chemotherapy for chordoma
✗Performing intralesional curettage
✗Forgetting preoperative embolization
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Posterior Element Tumor with Calcifications

EXAMINER

"A 45-year-old woman presents with thoracic back pain. CT shows a mass arising from the posterior elements of T7 with characteristic ring-and-arc calcifications. There is extension into the spinal canal."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
**Diagnosis:** Spinal chondrosarcoma - based on posterior element origin and pathognomonic ring-and-arc calcifications. **Key Imaging Features:** - Ring-and-arc calcifications (cartilage matrix) = chondrosarcoma - Posterior element origin = typical for spinal chondrosarcoma - Extension into canal = extracompartmental (Stage IIB likely) **Staging:** 1. Full spine MRI - extent of disease, skip lesions 2. CT chest - lung metastases (rare at presentation) 3. PET-CT - metabolic activity (correlates with grade) 4. WBB staging for surgical planning **Biopsy:** - CT-guided through posterior approach - Tract through planned surgical field - Establishes diagnosis and grade **Management:** If Low Grade (Grade I): - En bloc resection with wide margins - Excellent prognosis if margins negative - No adjuvant therapy If High Grade (Grade II-III): - En bloc resection essential - Consider proton therapy if margins positive - Chemotherapy not effective **Surgical Approach:** - Posterior only may be possible for posterior element tumor - Combined if vertebral body involved - Decompression + stabilization - May need to sacrifice nerve roots for clear margins **Prognosis:** - Grade I: 90% 5-year survival with wide excision - Grade III: 30% 5-year survival
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Ring-and-arc calcifications are pathognomonic for chondrosarcoma
Posterior element origin is typical location for spine chondrosarcoma
En bloc resection is primary treatment
Grade determines prognosis
Chemotherapy is NOT effective
COMMON TRAPS
✗Missing the ring-and-arc calcifications
✗Performing intralesional surgery
✗Recommending chemotherapy
✗Not staging with chest CT
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Pediatric Patient with Spinal Mass

EXAMINER

"A 14-year-old boy presents with 6 weeks of back pain, fever, and weight loss. MRI shows a destructive lumbar vertebral body lesion with large paraspinal soft tissue mass. WCC and ESR are elevated."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
**Differential Diagnosis:** Given age and presentation, key differentials are: 1. Ewing sarcoma - most likely primary malignancy 2. Osteomyelitis - clinical presentation similar 3. Osteosarcoma - less likely with this presentation 4. Lymphoma - can present similarly 5. Langerhans cell histiocytosis **Why Ewing Sarcoma is likely:** - Age (10-25 years peak) - Systemic symptoms (fever, weight loss) - Destructive vertebral body lesion - Large soft tissue mass - Elevated inflammatory markers **Initial Workup:** 1. Bloods: FBC, CRP, ESR, LDH, ALP 2. Blood cultures (exclude infection) 3. CT chest - lung metastases common in Ewing 4. Whole-body PET-CT - staging 5. Bone marrow aspirate - exclude metastases **Biopsy:** - Essential for diagnosis - CT-guided from posterior approach - Send for histology + molecular studies - t(11;22) translocation = diagnostic of Ewing **If Ewing Sarcoma Confirmed:** 1. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (VDC/IE protocol) 2. Restaging after chemotherapy 3. Surgical resection vs radiation 4. Adjuvant chemotherapy **Surgical Considerations:** - Aim for en bloc if feasible post-chemotherapy - May need anterior + posterior approach - Reconstruct with cage and instrumentation - Radiation if margins inadequate **Prognosis:** - Localized disease: 60-70% 5-year survival - Metastatic at presentation: 20-30% 5-year survival
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Ewing sarcoma presents with systemic symptoms unlike other spine tumors
t(11;22) translocation is diagnostic
Ewing is highly chemosensitive - neoadjuvant therapy essential
Surgery OR radiation provides local control
Must stage with PET-CT and bone marrow
COMMON TRAPS
✗Treating as osteomyelitis without biopsy
✗Proceeding to surgery without chemotherapy
✗Missing distant metastases before treatment
✗Forgetting to check bone marrow
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Recurrent Sacral Chordoma

EXAMINER

"A 60-year-old man who had sacral chordoma resection 3 years ago presents with increasing sacral pain. MRI shows a 4cm presacral mass consistent with local recurrence. There is no distant disease on PET-CT."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
**Assessment:** Local recurrence of sacral chordoma with no distant metastases. **Key Questions:** 1. What was initial margin status? (likely positive or marginal if recurred) 2. What is current functional status? 3. What was level of previous resection? 4. Is re-resection technically feasible? **Investigation:** - Review previous operative notes and pathology - High-quality MRI pelvis - CT angiography - relationship to iliac vessels - PET-CT - confirm no distant disease - Consider biopsy if diagnosis uncertain **Management Options:** **If Resectable:** 1. Re-resection with wide margins 2. Combined anterior-posterior approach 3. Higher complication rate than primary surgery 4. May require vascular surgery involvement 5. Expect worse functional outcome **If Unresectable:** 1. Proton beam therapy or carbon ion therapy 2. High doses (70+ Gy) for local control 3. Clinical trials (imatinib, EGFR inhibitors) 4. Palliative care if symptomatic **Surgical Considerations:** - Scar tissue makes dissection difficult - Higher blood loss expected - Increased wound complication rate - May need plastic surgery for soft tissue coverage - Colostomy/urostomy may be required **Prognosis:** - 5-year survival after recurrence: 50% - Further recurrence likely if re-resected - Proton therapy can provide durable local control **Counselling:** Honest discussion about limited options and likely functional consequences. Multidisciplinary approach essential.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Recurrent chordoma management depends on resectability
Re-resection has higher morbidity than primary surgery
Proton/carbon ion therapy for unresectable disease
Chemotherapy remains ineffective
MDT discussion essential for complex decisions
COMMON TRAPS
✗Recommending conventional radiation (ineffective)
✗Assuming chemotherapy will help
✗Not confirming absence of distant disease before major surgery
✗Underestimating surgical difficulty of re-resection

PRIMARY BONE TUMORS SPINE

High-Yield Exam Summary

Tumor Types

  • •Chordoma: Notochord origin, sacrum 50%, T2 bright, brachyury+
  • •Chondrosarcoma: Cartilage origin, posterior elements, ring-arc calcifications
  • •Osteosarcoma: Bone-forming, osteoid matrix, sunburst pattern
  • •Ewing: Neural crest, pediatric, t(11;22), permeative lytic

Treatment Differences

  • •Chordoma/Chondrosarcoma: En bloc resection (chemo/RT resistant)
  • •Osteosarcoma: Neoadjuvant chemo + surgery + adjuvant chemo
  • •Ewing: Chemo + surgery or radiation + chemo
  • •Margin status is critical for chordoma/chondrosarcoma

Enneking Staging

  • •Stage I: Low grade (G1), A=intra, B=extra compartmental
  • •Stage II: High grade (G2), A=intra, B=extra compartmental
  • •Stage III: Any grade with metastases
  • •Most spine tumors present as Stage IIB

Surgical Margins

  • •Intralesional: Through tumor = 100% recurrence
  • •Marginal: Through reactive zone = 50-70% recurrence
  • •Wide: Cuff of normal tissue = 20-30% recurrence
  • •Radical: Entire compartment (rarely achievable in spine)

Sacral Chordoma

  • •Combined anterior-posterior approach
  • •Level of resection determines function
  • •Above S2-S3: Bladder/bowel dysfunction
  • •Preoperative embolization essential
  • •Proton therapy if margins positive

Exam Pearls

  • •Ring-arc calcification = chondrosarcoma
  • •T2 hyperintense sacral mass = chordoma until proven otherwise
  • •Pediatric + systemic symptoms + spine mass = Ewing
  • •Biopsy tract must be excisable - coordinate with surgeon

MCQ Practice Points

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the most common primary malignant bone tumor of the spine? A: Chordoma. It arises from notochordal remnants and occurs predominantly in the sacrum (50%), skull base (35%), and mobile spine (15%). It is a slow-growing, locally aggressive tumor with high recurrence rates.

Exam Pearl

Q: What histological finding is pathognomonic for chordoma? A: Physaliphorous cells (bubbly vacuolated cells) arranged in lobules within a myxoid matrix. These cells are positive for brachyury immunostaining, which is the most specific marker for chordoma.

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the Enneking staging system for spinal tumors and how does it guide surgery? A: The WBB (Weinstein-Boriani-Biagini) system adapted for spine divides the vertebra into 12 sectors and 5 layers (A-E). It determines surgical margin possibilities - wide excision (en bloc) is possible when tumor is contained within sectors/layers that can be resected together.

Exam Pearl

Q: What radiation modality is preferred for chordoma and chondrosarcoma of the spine? A: Proton beam therapy or carbon ion therapy. These tumors are relatively radioresistant to conventional photon therapy but respond to particle therapy which delivers higher doses with sharp dose fall-off protecting the spinal cord.

Australian Context

Primary bone tumors of the spine are managed through specialized sarcoma centers with multidisciplinary teams including spine surgeons, musculoskeletal oncologists, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists. In Australia, major sarcoma services exist in tertiary centers such as the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, and Princess Alexandra Hospital.

Access to proton beam therapy is available through the Australian Bragg Centre in Adelaide for patients with chordoma requiring adjuvant radiation therapy. The Australasian Sarcoma Study Group coordinates clinical trials and registry data for rare sarcomas including spinal tumors.

Given the rarity of these tumors and complexity of treatment, referral to a specialist sarcoma service is strongly recommended for all patients with suspected primary malignant spine tumors before biopsy is performed.

References

  1. Boriani S, Bandiera S, Biagini R, et al. Chordoma of the mobile spine: fifty years of experience. Spine. 2006;31(4):493-503.
  2. Fuchs B, Dickey ID, Yaszemski MJ, et al. Operative management of sacral chordoma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(10):2211-6.
  3. Murphey MD, Andrews CL, Flemming DJ, et al. Primary tumors of the spine: radiologic pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 1996;16(5):1131-58.
  4. Marco RA, Gentry JB, Rhines LD, et al. Ewing's sarcoma of the mobile spine. Spine. 2005;30(7):769-73.
  5. Stacchiotti S, Sommer J. Building a global consensus approach to chordoma: a position paper from the medical and patient community. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(2):e71-83.
Quick Stats
Reading Time85 min
🇦🇺

FRACS Guidelines

Australia & New Zealand
  • NHMRC Guidelines
  • MBS Spine Items
Related Topics

ACDF - Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Adjacent Segment Disease

Adult Spinal Deformity

Ankylosing Spondylitis