Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Radial Neck Fractures Pediatric

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Radial Neck Fractures Pediatric

Comprehensive exam-ready guide to pediatric radial neck fractures - classification, reduction techniques, and outcomes

complete
Updated: 2025-12-17
High Yield Overview

RADIAL NECK FRACTURES

Pediatric | O'Brien Classification | Reduction Techniques

5-10%Of pediatric elbow fractures
9-10yPeak age
30°Threshold for reduction
10%With elbow dislocation

O'BRIEN CLASSIFICATION (By Angulation)

Type I (less than 30°)
PatternMinimally angulated
TreatmentNon-operative
Type II (30-60°)
PatternModerate angulation
TreatmentClosed reduction
Type III (greater than 60°)
PatternSevere angulation
TreatmentClosed/percutaneous reduction
Type IV (90°)
PatternComplete displacement
TreatmentOften requires open reduction

Critical Must-Knows

  • Less than 30° angulation = no reduction needed in children less than 10 years
  • Less than 45° angulation = acceptable in children over 10 years
  • Closed reduction techniques: supination and valgus, Israeli technique (thumb pressure)
  • Patterson technique: percutaneous K-wire joystick reduction
  • Avoid open reduction if possible - high rate of stiffness and AVN

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Radial head does not appear until age 3-5, neck fractures more common in children
  • "
    Posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) at risk - assess finger/thumb extension
  • "
    Open reduction associated with higher complication rates
  • "
    Metaizeau technique: ESIN reduction without opening

Critical Exam Concepts

Reduction Threshold

Less than 30° angulation = No reduction needed. Aim for less than 30° in young children, less than 45° in adolescents. The radial head has significant remodeling potential.

Avoid Open Reduction

Open reduction has higher complications. Associated with stiffness, AVN, radioulnar synostosis. Try closed, then percutaneous, then intramedullary (Metaizeau) before opening.

PIN Injury

Posterior interosseous nerve at risk. Assess finger and thumb extension before and after any intervention. Usually neurapraxia. Watch for iatrogenic injury during percutaneous methods.

Mechanism

Valgus force with axial load. Fall on outstretched hand with elbow extended. Associated with Monteggia variants and elbow dislocation in 10% of cases.

Quick Decision Guide by Angulation

AngulationClassificationManagement
Less than 30°O'Brien Type INon-operative - cast
30-45°O'Brien Type IIClosed reduction attempted
45-60°O'Brien Type II-IIIClosed or percutaneous reduction
Greater than 60°O'Brien Type III-IVPercutaneous/Metaizeau/consider open
Mnemonic

30-45Angulation Thresholds

3
30° younger children
Less than 10 years: accept up to 30°
0
0 intervention if less than threshold
No reduction needed below threshold
4
45° older children
Over 10 years: accept up to 45°
5
5 degrees less remodeling per year
Older = less remodeling = stricter criteria

Memory Hook:30 for young, 45 for old - both end in fives!

Mnemonic

CIPOMReduction Escalation

C
Closed reduction
Supination, valgus, thumb pressure
I
Israeli technique
Direct pressure on radial head
P
Percutaneous K-wire
Patterson joystick technique
O
Open reduction
Last resort - higher complications
M
Metaizeau technique
ESIN reduction without opening

Memory Hook:Escalate systematically - avoid open if possible!

Mnemonic

SASAComplications of Open Reduction

S
Stiffness
Loss of pronation/supination most common
A
AVN
Avascular necrosis of radial head
S
Synostosis
Radioulnar synostosis
A
Arthritis
Post-traumatic radiohumeral arthritis

Memory Hook:SASA remember why to avoid open!

Overview and Epidemiology

Why Neck Not Head?

In children, the radial head is largely cartilaginous and the neck is weaker. Force transmission causes neck fractures rather than head fractures seen in adults. The radial head ossification center appears at age 3-5 years.

Epidemiology

  • 5-10% of pediatric elbow fractures
  • Peak age 9-10 years
  • Equal male to female ratio
  • Usually falls (playground, sports)
  • Associated injuries common (50%)

Associations

  • Elbow dislocation (10%)
  • Olecranon fractures
  • Ulna fractures (Monteggia variant)
  • Medial epicondyle fractures
  • Capitellum injuries

Anatomy and Biomechanics

Critical Anatomy

The posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) runs anteriorly around the radial neck. At risk during injury and during percutaneous/open procedures. Enters supinator at arcade of Frohse. Assess finger and thumb extension.

Radial Head Vascularity

Blood supply: Primarily through periosteal vessels around the neck. Intramedullary flow minimal.

AVN risk: Disruption of periosteal vessels during open reduction can cause AVN. Preserve soft tissues if surgery needed.

Remodeling: Excellent potential in children due to physis contribution to growth and robust blood supply.

Posterior Interosseous Nerve

Course: PIN is deep branch of radial nerve. Courses around radial neck anteriorly, enters supinator via arcade of Frohse.

Function: Motor to finger extensors (EDC, EIP) and thumb extensors (EPL, EPB). No sensory.

Testing: Assess thumb IP extension, finger MCP extension. Loss indicates PIN injury.

Radiocapitellar Joint

Articulation: Radial head with capitellum. Allows flexion-extension and rotation.

Stability: Annular ligament stabilizes radial head. Disruption allows dislocation.

Forearm rotation: Radius rotates around ulna. Neck angulation limits pronation and supination ROM.

Classification Systems

O'Brien Classification (By Angulation)

TypeAngulationTreatment
Type ILess than 30°Non-operative
Type II30-60°Closed reduction
Type IIIGreater than 60°Percutaneous or open reduction
Type IV90° (complete displacement)Usually requires open reduction

Key point: Angulation measured from shaft axis on lateral X-ray.

Judet Classification (By Displacement)

GradeDescriptionDisplacement
Grade IAngulation less than 30°None
Grade II30-60° angulationLess than 50% displacement
Grade IIIGreater than 60° angulation50-100% displacement
Grade IVComplete displacementDissociation

Note: Combines angulation and translation for prognosis.

Clinical Assessment

History

  • Fall on outstretched hand
  • Valgus mechanism
  • Lateral elbow pain
  • Difficulty with rotation
  • Associated dislocation

Examination

  • Lateral elbow tenderness
  • Swelling radiocapitellar region
  • Limited pronation/supination
  • PIN function (finger/thumb extension)
  • Elbow stability

PIN Assessment

Test BEFORE any intervention. Ask child to extend fingers at MCPs and thumb at IP joint. Compare to other side. PIN injury presents as weak or absent extension. Usually neurapraxia with complete recovery.

Associated Injuries

50% have associated elbow injuries. Check for olecranon fracture, medial epicondyle fracture, elbow dislocation. Monteggia variant may have associated radial neck injury.

Investigations

X-ray Protocol

Standard views: AP and lateral elbow.

Measurements: Angulation on lateral view - angle between radial shaft and head/neck line.

Associated injuries: Check for elbow dislocation, ulna fracture, olecranon fracture.

Angulation Measurement

Lateral view: Draw line through radial shaft axis. Draw line through center of radial head perpendicular to articular surface.

Normal: These lines should be nearly collinear (less than 15° normally).

Angulation: Angle between these lines determines classification and treatment.

Management

📊 Management Algorithm
radial neck fractures pediatric management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for radial neck fractures pediatricCredit: OrthoVellum

Key Principle

Avoid open reduction if possible. Open reduction has significantly higher rates of stiffness, AVN, and synostosis. Escalate through closed, then percutaneous, then intramedullary techniques before considering open.

Non-Operative Management

Indications: Angulation less than 30° in younger children (under 10 years). Angulation less than 45° in adolescents. Stable elbow.

Protocol: Above-elbow cast or splint for 2-3 weeks. Early ROM exercises after. Full activity at 6 weeks.

Outcomes: Excellent. These fractures remodel well.

Closed Reduction Techniques

Patterson technique (supination-valgus): Under sedation, apply valgus stress while supinating forearm. Direct thumb pressure over radial head.

Israeli technique: Direct pressure over radial head with thumb while reducing.

Post-reduction: Above-elbow cast for 3-4 weeks. Check X-ray to confirm reduction maintained.

Percutaneous Reduction (Patterson K-Wire)

Indication: Failed closed reduction, angulation 30-60°.

Technique: Insert K-wire into fracture site. Use as joystick to reduce angulated head. May leave wire for stability or remove.

Caution: PIN at risk - approach from lateral, avoid anterior penetration.

Metaizeau Intramedullary Technique

Indication: Significant angulation (greater than 60°), failed percutaneous.

Technique: Flexible nail inserted through distal radius (avoiding physis). Advanced to radial head. Used to reduce angulated head by lever action.

Advantage: Avoids open reduction while achieving reduction.

Open Reduction

Indication: Failed all closed techniques. Incarcerated fragment. Associated injuries requiring surgery.

Approach: Kocher (posterolateral) most common.

Caution: Minimize soft tissue dissection. Preserve periosteal blood supply. Higher complication rate.

Fixation: Usually K-wires or small screws if fragment large enough.

Reduction Escalation

Escalate systematically. Closed reduction first (supination-valgus, Israeli). If failed, percutaneous K-wire (Patterson). If failed, Metaizeau ESIN. Open only as last resort due to complications.

Surgical Technique Considerations

Percutaneous K-Wire Reduction

Setup: Patient supine. Fluoroscopy. Sedation or GA.

Approach: Insert 1.5-2mm K-wire from lateral side into fracture site adjacent to tilted radial head.

Reduction: Use wire as joystick. Lever angulated head back into position while applying gentle supination.

Post-reduction: Above-elbow cast. Wire removed at 2-3 weeks.

Open Reduction

Indication: Failed closed/percutaneous techniques.

Incision: Between ECU and anconeus (Kocher interval).

Identify: Radial head. Preserve annular ligament if intact.

Reduce: Minimize tissue stripping. Fix with K-wire or small fragment screw.

Protect PIN: Avoid excessive anterior retraction.

Complications

Complications of Radial Neck Fractures

ComplicationIncidenceManagement
Loss of ROM20-50%Usually pronation/supination. Most improve with time.
PIN injury5-10%Usually neurapraxia. Observe. Most recover.
AVN radial head5-10%Related to open reduction. May need excision if symptomatic.
Radioulnar synostosisRareCross-union. May need excision.
MalunionVariableAccept some angulation. Remodeling helps.
Heterotopic ossificationRareMay limit motion. Excise if mature and symptomatic.

Open Reduction Complications

Open reduction has 2-3x higher complication rates. Stiffness rates up to 50% with open vs 10-20% with closed. AVN and synostosis almost exclusively with open procedures. This is why escalation through closed techniques is so important.

Postoperative Care

Post-Treatment Protocol

Week 0-3Immobilization

Above-elbow cast or splint. Elbow at 90°. Neutral forearm rotation. Non-weight bearing.

Week 3-6Early Motion

Remove cast. Begin active ROM - focus on pronation/supination. Avoid passive stretching.

Week 6-12Progressive Activity

Progressive strengthening. Return to light activities. Avoid contact sports.

Months 3-6Full Activity

Full return to sports. Monitor for late stiffness. Some ROM loss may persist but often not functional.

Outcomes and Prognosis

Prognosis by Treatment

Non-operative (less than 30°): Excellent prognosis. Full ROM expected. Complete remodeling.

Successful closed reduction: Good outcomes. Some minor ROM loss common but rarely functional.

Percutaneous/Metaizeau: Intermediate outcomes. Better than open reduction.

Open reduction: Higher complication rates. Significant stiffness in up to 50%. AVN risk.

Special Considerations

Radial Neck with Elbow Dislocation

Frequency: 10% of radial neck fractures associated with dislocation.

Priority: Reduce dislocation first. Assess radial head position after.

Management: May need fixation if radial head unstable after dislocation reduced.

Monteggia-Like Injuries

Definition: Ulna fracture with radial head/neck injury.

Recognition: Always assess PRUJ and radiocapitellar alignment on all forearm X-rays.

Treatment: Anatomic reduction of ulna usually reduces radial head. May need direct reduction if persistently displaced.

Evidence Base and Key Studies

O'Brien Classification Study

4
O'Brien PI. • Clin Orthop Relat Res (1965)
Key Findings:
  • Developed angulation-based classification
  • Established 30° as threshold for reduction
  • Identified relationship between angulation and outcomes
  • Described remodeling potential in children
Clinical Implication: Angulation guides treatment. Less than 30° = non-operative.
Limitation: Original descriptive study.

Closed vs Open Reduction Outcomes

4
Tibone JE, Stoltz M. • J Bone Joint Surg Am (1981)
Key Findings:
  • Open reduction had higher complication rates
  • Stiffness more common with open treatment
  • Closed reduction preferred when possible
  • Long-term follow-up showed satisfactory outcomes
Clinical Implication: Avoid open reduction if possible due to higher complications.
Limitation: Retrospective comparison.

Patterson Percutaneous Technique

5
Patterson RF. • J Bone Joint Surg Am (1934)
Key Findings:
  • Described K-wire joystick technique
  • Allows reduction without open surgery
  • Lower morbidity than open reduction
  • Still widely used today
Clinical Implication: Percutaneous reduction preferred over open when closed fails.
Limitation: Original case description.

Metaizeau Intramedullary Technique

4
Metaizeau JP, Lascombes P. • J Pediatr Orthop (1993)
Key Findings:
  • Described ESIN technique for radial neck
  • Avoids open reduction entirely
  • Good reduction achieved in most cases
  • Lower complication rate than open
Clinical Implication: Metaizeau technique offers closed reduction for severe angulation.
Limitation: Technique description and case series.

Long-term Outcomes Study

4
Vocke AK, Von Laer L. • J Pediatr Orthop B (1998)
Key Findings:
  • Followed radial neck fractures long-term
  • Most had good functional outcomes
  • Some ROM loss common but rarely limiting
  • Remodeling significant in younger children
Clinical Implication: Long-term prognosis generally good. Accept residual angulation if remodeling expected.
Limitation: Retrospective long-term follow-up.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Moderately Angulated Radial Neck

EXAMINER

"A 9-year-old girl falls on an outstretched hand. X-ray shows a radial neck fracture with 40° angulation. Finger and thumb extension are normal. How would you manage this?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a moderately angulated radial neck fracture in a 9-year-old. With 40° angulation, this exceeds the 30° threshold for non-operative management in younger children. I would attempt closed reduction. First, I confirm no neurovascular deficit - PIN function is normal. Under sedation, I would attempt closed reduction using the Patterson technique: apply valgus stress to the elbow while supinating the forearm and applying direct thumb pressure over the radial head. If successful on fluoroscopy check, I would immobilize in an above-elbow cast for 3 weeks. If closed reduction fails, I would proceed to percutaneous K-wire reduction using the wire as a joystick. I would avoid open reduction if at all possible due to higher complication rates including stiffness and AVN. Post-treatment, I would expect good outcomes with possible minor ROM loss that improves with time.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
40° exceeds 30° threshold = needs reduction
Confirm PIN function before intervention
Closed reduction first (Patterson technique)
Percutaneous K-wire if closed fails
Avoid open due to complications
COMMON TRAPS
✗Accepting 40° without reduction attempt
✗Going straight to open reduction
✗Not documenting PIN function
✗Not knowing reduction techniques
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the Patterson technique?"
"Why avoid open reduction?"
"What are the complications of radial neck fractures?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Severely Angulated Radial Neck

EXAMINER

"An 8-year-old boy has a radial neck fracture with 70° angulation and moderate translation. Closed reduction under sedation failed to improve angulation beyond 50°. What are your next steps?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
With 70° angulation and failed closed reduction leaving 50° residual, further intervention is needed. For an 8-year-old, I would not accept 50° angulation as this may cause significant functional limitation in pronation and supination. My next step would be percutaneous reduction using the Patterson K-wire technique. Under fluoroscopy, I would insert a 1.5-2mm K-wire from the lateral side into the fracture site adjacent to the tilted radial head. Using the wire as a joystick while maintaining supination and valgus, I would attempt to lever the head back into position. If this fails to achieve adequate reduction, I would consider the Metaizeau intramedullary technique - inserting a flexible nail through the distal radius to lever the head from below. This allows reduction without opening the joint. Open reduction would be my last resort as it carries significantly higher rates of stiffness, AVN, and synostosis. If I can achieve less than 30° with any of these techniques, the outcome should be acceptable.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
50° residual is not acceptable in 8-year-old
Patterson K-wire percutaneous reduction next
Metaizeau ESIN if percutaneous fails
Open reduction last resort
Target less than 30° final angulation
COMMON TRAPS
✗Accepting 50° angulation
✗Jumping straight to open reduction
✗Not knowing escalation pathway
✗Not explaining Metaizeau technique
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"Describe the Metaizeau technique"
"What approach for open reduction?"
"What are the risks of open reduction?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 3: PIN Injury After Reduction

EXAMINER

"You perform closed reduction of a radial neck fracture. Post-reduction, the child cannot extend their fingers at the MCPs or their thumb at the IP joint. What is your assessment and management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This clinical picture describes a posterior interosseous nerve palsy following reduction. The PIN is a purely motor nerve that innervates the finger extensors (EDC, EIP) and thumb extensors (EPL, EPB). It runs anteriorly around the radial neck and is at risk during both injury and reduction maneuvers. My first step would be to obtain post-reduction X-rays to confirm the reduction is anatomic and the radial head is concentrically reduced. If the reduction is satisfactory, I would treat this conservatively as most PIN injuries in this context are neurapraxia from stretch or traction during reduction. I would document the deficit clearly and reassure the family that recovery is expected. I would use a wrist extension splint to protect the hand while recovery occurs. Recovery typically happens over 3-6 months. I would arrange regular follow-up to monitor for recovery. If there is no recovery by 3 months, I would obtain nerve conduction studies. Surgical exploration would only be considered if there is complete failure of recovery by 6 months or if there is concern for nerve laceration.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
PIN palsy = finger/thumb extension loss
Most are neurapraxia - will recover
Confirm adequate reduction on X-ray
Wrist extension splint to protect
Observe 3-6 months, explore only if no recovery
COMMON TRAPS
✗Immediate nerve exploration
✗Not recognizing PIN vs radial nerve injury
✗Not confirming reduction is adequate
✗Over-investigating early
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the course of the PIN?"
"When would you explore the nerve?"
"How would you distinguish radial from PIN injury?"

MCQ Practice Points

Angulation Threshold Question

Q: What angulation threshold is acceptable for non-operative management in a 7-year-old? A: Less than 30°. Younger children have greater remodeling potential. Older children (over 10) = 45° threshold.

Nerve at Risk Question

Q: Which nerve is at risk in radial neck fractures? A: Posterior interosseous nerve (PIN). Motor branch of radial nerve. Test finger and thumb extension.

Reduction Technique Question

Q: What technique uses a K-wire as a joystick for radial neck reduction? A: Patterson technique. Percutaneous K-wire inserted adjacent to radial head, used to lever head into position.

Complication Question

Q: Why should open reduction be avoided in radial neck fractures? A: Higher complication rates. Stiffness (up to 50%), AVN, and radioulnar synostosis all more common with open reduction.

Classification Question

Q: What is O'Brien Type III radial neck fracture? A: Greater than 60° angulation. Usually requires percutaneous or open reduction.

Metaizeau Question

Q: What is the Metaizeau technique? A: ESIN reduction. Flexible nail inserted through distal radius, used to lever radial head from below without opening.

Australian Context

Epidemiology

  • Common presentation in Australian pediatric EDs
  • Falls in playgrounds, trampolines common
  • Sports injuries (gymnastics, cricket)
  • Often managed at pediatric tertiary centers

Practice

  • Conservative management preferred
  • Metaizeau technique widely used for severe angulation
  • Open reduction avoided when possible
  • Good access to pediatric orthopedic services

RADIAL NECK FRACTURES

High-Yield Exam Summary

Angulation Thresholds

  • •Less than 30° = non-operative (under 10 years)
  • •Less than 45° = non-operative (over 10 years)
  • •Greater than 30-45° = reduction indicated
  • •Greater than 60° = percutaneous or ESIN/open

O'Brien Classification

  • •Type I: less than 30° (non-operative)
  • •Type II: 30-60° (closed reduction)
  • •Type III: greater than 60° (perc/open)
  • •Type IV: 90°/complete (usually open)

Reduction Escalation

  • •Closed first (Patterson supination-valgus)
  • •Then percutaneous K-wire joystick
  • •Then Metaizeau ESIN
  • •Open reduction LAST resort

Avoid Open Because

  • •Stiffness up to 50%
  • •AVN of radial head
  • •Radioulnar synostosis
  • •Higher overall complication rate

PIN Injury

  • •5-10% incidence
  • •Test finger/thumb extension
  • •Usually neurapraxia
  • •Recovery expected 3-6 months
Quick Stats
Reading Time62 min
Related Topics

Acetabular Fractures

Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries

Acute Compartment Syndrome

Ankle Fractures