Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Comprehensive guide to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty - indications, Grammont principles, surgical technique, complications, and outcomes for rotator cuff arthropathy and complex shoulder pathology

complete
Updated: 2025-12-19
High Yield Overview

REVERSE TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY

Rotator Cuff Arthropathy | Grammont Principles | Deltoid-Powered | 10 Year Survivorship over 90 percent

92%10-year survivorship
155degCenter of rotation medialized
DeltoidPrimary motor
CTAPrimary indication

PRIMARY INDICATIONS FOR RTSA

CTA
PatternRotator cuff tear arthropathy (Hamada 4-5)
TreatmentPrimary indication
Irreparable Cuff
PatternMassive tear with pseudoparalysis
TreatmentWithout arthritis
Fracture
PatternElderly with complex proximal humerus fracture
TreatmentOver 70 years
Revision
PatternFailed anatomic TSA or hemiarthroplasty
TreatmentSalvage option

Critical Must-Knows

  • Grammont Principle: Medialize center of rotation to glenoid surface. Distalize humerus to tension deltoid.
  • Cuff Tear Arthropathy: Superior migration of humeral head. Femoralization. Acetabularization.
  • Deltoid Function: RTSA converts deltoid from a short muscle with poor mechanical advantage to efficient arm elevator.
  • Scapular Notching: Most common complication (up to 96 percent in early series). Inferior baseplate tilt helps prevent.
  • Acromial Fractures: Risk 2-7 percent. Increased deltoid tension. May be stress or traumatic.

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    RTSA increases deltoid moment arm by 30-40 percent through medialization of center of rotation
  • "
    Scapular notching reduced by inferior tilt of baseplate and larger glenosphere
  • "
    Intact deltoid is ABSOLUTE requirement - check axillary nerve function preoperatively
  • "
    Active external rotation preserved if teres minor intact (often limited postoperatively)

Critical RTSA Exam Points

Grammont Principles

Medialization and distalization are fundamental. Center of rotation moved to glenoid surface eliminates eccentric loading and maximizes deltoid efficiency. Lengthening the arm tensions deltoid for improved elevation. Vivas will ask you to explain these biomechanical principles.

Scapular Notching

Most common complication. Caused by mechanical impingement of humeral component on inferior glenoid rim. Prevented by: inferior baseplate tilt (10-15 degrees), larger glenosphere (38-42mm), inferior glenosphere overhang, lateralized designs.

Deltoid Dependency

RTSA is deltoid-powered. Intact deltoid and axillary nerve are ABSOLUTE requirements. Preoperatively assess: deltoid bulk, axillary nerve function, prior surgical approaches (deltopectoral vs lateral). Previous deltoid detachment is relative contraindication.

External Rotation Deficit

Most patients have limited active external rotation postoperatively because posterior cuff (infraspinatus, teres minor) is deficient. If teres minor intact, ER preserved. Latissimus dorsi transfer can improve ER in select cases.

Quick Decision Guide - RTSA vs Anatomic TSA

FeatureAnatomic TSAReverse TSAKey Pearl
Rotator cuffIntact or repairableDeficient or irreparableRTSA does not require rotator cuff
Primary motorRotator cuffDeltoidDeltoid MUST be intact for RTSA
Center of rotationNative (lateral to glenoid)Medialized to glenoid surfaceGrammont principle
CTA indicationContraindicatedPrimary indicationSuperior migration means cuff deficient
External rotationPreservedOften limitedPosterior cuff deficiency limits ER
Glenoid looseningMajor concern (rocking horse)Less eccentric loadingMedialization reduces glenoid torque
Mnemonic

GRAMMONTGRAMMONT - Reverse Shoulder Principles

G
Glenoid ball
Convex glenosphere fixed to glenoid
R
Reduced moment arm
Of abductors eliminated by medialization
A
Arm lengthened
Humerus distalized to tension deltoid
M
Medialized center
Center of rotation at glenoid surface
M
Massive cuff tear
Primary indication is deficient cuff
O
Overcomes cuff loss
Deltoid becomes primary elevator
N
No eccentric loading
Reduces glenoid component stress
T
Tension deltoid
Increases deltoid mechanical advantage

Memory Hook:Professor Paul GRAMMONT designed the modern reverse shoulder - each letter of his name teaches a principle!

Mnemonic

NOTCHNOTCH - Scapular Notching Prevention

N
North (inferior) tilt baseplate
10-15 degrees inferior tilt
O
Overhang glenosphere inferiorly
Eccentric placement
T
Thirty-eight plus glenosphere
Larger diameter (38-42mm)
C
Consider lateralized design
BIO-RSA or lateralized glenosphere
H
Humeral component positioning
Neutral or slight retroversion

Memory Hook:To prevent scapular NOTCH, remember all five prevention strategies!

Mnemonic

DELTOIDDELTOID - Essential Preoperative Checks

D
Deltoid bulk
Inspect for atrophy
E
Examine axillary nerve
Sensation lateral shoulder
L
Look at prior incisions
Previous detachment?
T
Test deltoid strength
Resisted abduction
O
Obtain EMG if concerning
Nerve conduction study
I
Intact function mandatory
RTSA contraindicated if deficient
D
Document preoperatively
Medicolegal importance

Memory Hook:Before RTSA, check the DELTOID - the entire procedure depends on it!

Overview and Epidemiology

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has revolutionized the management of complex shoulder conditions, particularly rotator cuff arthropathy. By reversing the ball-and-socket anatomy, placing a convex glenosphere on the glenoid and a concave socket on the humerus, RTSA converts the deltoid muscle into the primary arm elevator.

Epidemiology:

  • Exponential growth in utilization over the past decade (over 300 percent increase)
  • Now represents over 60 percent of all shoulder arthroplasties in some series
  • Mean patient age 65-75 years, though indications expanding to younger patients
  • Female predominance (60-65 percent) reflecting rotator cuff arthropathy demographics

Expanding Indications

RTSA indications have expanded beyond rotator cuff arthropathy to include: acute proximal humerus fractures in the elderly, failed hemiarthroplasty, revision of failed anatomic TSA, tumor reconstruction, and inflammatory arthritis with cuff deficiency. However, the core indication remains cuff tear arthropathy with pseudoparalysis.

Historical Development:

  • Professor Paul Grammont (Lyon, France) developed the modern design in 1985
  • Key innovation was the Grammont principle: medialization of center of rotation
  • Earlier designs (Neer Mark I, II) failed due to glenoid loosening from eccentric loading
  • Modern semi-constrained designs achieve over 90 percent 10-year survivorship

Anatomy and Pathophysiology

Rotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy (CTA):

Cuff tear arthropathy represents the end-stage of massive rotator cuff tear with secondary degenerative changes. It is the most common indication for RTSA.

Pathophysiological Cascade:

  1. Massive rotator cuff tear: Usually supraspinatus and infraspinatus
  2. Loss of force couple: Deltoid pulls humeral head superiorly unopposed
  3. Superior migration: Humeral head articulates with undersurface of acromion
  4. Mechanical changes: Increased joint reaction forces, synovial fluid changes
  5. Cartilage destruction: Both glenoid and humeral head articular surfaces
  6. Bony remodeling: Femoralization of humeral head, acetabularization of glenoid

Hamada Classification of Cuff Tear Arthropathy

GradeDescriptionAcromiohumeral DistanceTreatment
1Acromiohumeral distance over 6mmGreater than 6mmConservative or cuff repair
2Acromiohumeral distance 5-6mm5-6mmMaximum conservative, consider repair
3Acromiohumeral less than 5mm with acetabularizationUnder 5mmRTSA candidate if symptomatic
4aNarrowing without acetabularizationUnder 5mmRTSA (primary indication)
4bNarrowing with acetabularization of acromionUnder 5mmRTSA (primary indication)
5Humeral head collapseN/ARTSA (salvage)

Grammont Biomechanical Principles:

The Grammont design addressed the failures of earlier reverse designs through key biomechanical innovations:

Medialization of Center of Rotation

Moving the center of rotation from the lateral humeral head to the glenoid surface eliminates the moment arm that caused glenoid loosening in earlier designs. This reduces eccentric loading on the glenoid fixation by over 90 percent.

Distalization of Humerus

The arm is effectively lengthened by 1-3cm, tensioning the deltoid muscle. This increases the deltoid moment arm by 30-40 percent and converts it from a short, relatively weak elevator to an efficient arm elevator.

Deltoid Absolute Requirement

Intact deltoid and axillary nerve function are ABSOLUTE requirements for RTSA. The entire design depends on deltoid function for arm elevation. Preoperative assessment must include: deltoid bulk inspection, axillary nerve sensation, deltoid strength testing, and review of prior incisions for deltoid detachment.

Functional Outcomes Explained by Biomechanics:

  • Forward elevation: Typically restored to 120-140 degrees (deltoid-powered)
  • External rotation: Often limited (0-30 degrees) due to posterior cuff deficiency
  • Internal rotation: Variable, often limited to buttock level
  • Strength: Improved compared to preoperative pseudoparalysis

Classification Systems

Hamada Classification of Rotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy

The Hamada classification grades the severity of cuff tear arthropathy based on radiographic findings.

GradeAcromiohumeral IntervalFindingsSignificance
1Greater than 6mmMinimal changesConservative management
25-6mmEarly narrowingMonitor progression
3Under 5mm + acetabularizationAcromion remodelingConsider RTSA
4aUnder 5mmGH joint narrowingRTSA indication
4bUnder 5mm + acetabularizationAdvanced changesRTSA indication
5CollapseHumeral head collapseSalvage RTSA

Normal acromiohumeral interval is 7-14mm. Less than 7mm indicates massive cuff tear.

Seebauer Classification

Focuses on glenoid morphology to guide component selection and surgical planning.

Type 1 - Centered:

  • 1A: Minimal superior escape, acetabularization present
  • 1B: Centered but superior escape present

Type 2 - Decentered:

  • 2A: Sufficient glenoid bone, superior instability
  • 2B: Medial erosion, anterosuperior escape

Type 2B has highest surgical complexity due to glenoid bone loss. May require bone grafting.

Sirveaux Scapular Notching Classification

Grades severity of scapular notching - the most common complication of RTSA.

GradeDescriptionClinical Significance
0No notchingNormal postoperative appearance
1Defect in pillar onlyMild, usually asymptomatic
2Defect contacts lower screwModerate
3Defect extends over lower screwSevere, may affect stability
4Prosthesis reaches glenoid vaultRisk of loosening

Grade 3-4 notching may require revision. Prevention is key with modern surgical techniques.

Clinical Assessment

History:

Pain Characteristics

  • Location: Anterolateral shoulder, may radiate to deltoid
  • Timing: Night pain common, difficulty sleeping on affected side
  • Activity: Pain with overhead activities, reaching
  • Duration: Often chronic and progressive over years

Functional Status

  • Active elevation: Severely limited (pseudoparalysis)
  • Passive motion: Preserved (excludes frozen shoulder)
  • Daily activities: Unable to comb hair, reach overhead
  • Previous treatment: Failed injections, physiotherapy, cuff repair

Physical Examination:

Key findings in cuff tear arthropathy:

  • Inspection: Deltoid atrophy rare (if present, reconsider RTSA), anterior prominence (superior humeral migration)
  • Palpation: Tenderness anterior shoulder, AC joint often arthritic
  • Active range of motion: Severely limited elevation (pseudoparalysis less than 90 degrees)
  • Passive range of motion: Preserved (distinguishes from frozen shoulder)
  • Strength testing: Positive Hornblower's sign, positive external rotation lag

Pseudoparalysis Definition

Pseudoparalysis: Inability to actively elevate the arm above 90 degrees with preserved passive motion. This indicates a massive, irreparable rotator cuff tear with loss of the force couple. Pseudoparalysis is a key indication for RTSA over anatomic TSA.

Specific Preoperative Assessment for RTSA:

Preoperative Checklist for RTSA

AssessmentWhat to CheckSignificance
Deltoid functionBulk, strength, axillary nerve (regimental badge area)ABSOLUTE requirement for RTSA
Prior surgeryDeltopectoral vs lateral approach, cuff repairsDeltoid detachment is relative contraindication
Teres minor integrityHorn blower sign negative indicates intactPredicts postoperative ER
Glenoid bone stockCT scan for morphology and versionMay need bone graft if eroded
AC joint arthritisTenderness, cross-body adduction painConsider distal clavicle excision

Investigations

Imaging Protocol for RTSA Planning

First LinePlain Radiographs

Standard shoulder series: AP (neutral, IR, ER), scapular Y, axillary lateral

Key findings to assess:

  • Acromiohumeral interval (less than 7mm indicates massive tear)
  • Superior migration of humeral head
  • Femoralization of humeral head (rounding)
  • Acetabularization of acromion and glenoid
  • Glenohumeral arthritis severity
  • Acromioclavicular joint arthritis
EssentialCT Scan with 3D Reconstruction

Critical for surgical planning

Glenoid assessment:

  • Bone stock: anterior, posterior, inferior
  • Version: excessive retroversion (over 15 degrees) may need augmentation
  • Erosion pattern: centered vs decentered (Seebauer)
  • Vault depth and screw trajectory planning
  • Prior hardware if revision
HelpfulMRI

Not essential if diagnosis clear, but useful for:

  • Teres minor integrity (predicts postoperative ER)
  • Fatty infiltration grading (Goutallier)
  • Subscapularis status (repair vs leave)
  • Biceps pathology
  • Exclude infection if revision

CT Planning Importance

CT scan with 3D reconstruction is essential for RTSA planning. It allows assessment of glenoid version, bone stock, and optimal baseplate trajectory. Excessive retroversion (over 15 degrees) may require bony increased offset (BIO) augmentation or posterior augmented baseplate. The inferior screw trajectory must be planned to avoid scapular spine.

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
reverse total shoulder arthroplasty management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for reverse total shoulder arthroplastyCredit: OrthoVellum

RTSA Indications

Primary Indications:

  • Rotator cuff tear arthropathy (CTA): Hamada Grade 3-5 with pseudoparalysis
  • Massive irreparable rotator cuff tear: With pseudoparalysis, without arthritis
  • Proximal humerus fracture: Elderly (over 70), comminuted, poor bone quality
  • Failed hemiarthroplasty: With cuff deficiency or tuberosity non-union

Expanding Indications:

  • Revision of failed anatomic TSA with cuff deficiency
  • Primary rheumatoid arthritis with massive cuff tear
  • Tumor reconstruction (proximal humerus)
  • Fracture sequelae (malunion, nonunion)

All indications require intact deltoid function - this is non-negotiable.

Contraindications to RTSA

Absolute Contraindications:

  • Deltoid dysfunction (paralysis, severe atrophy)
  • Axillary nerve palsy
  • Active infection
  • Significant medical comorbidities precluding surgery

Relative Contraindications:

  • Young age (under 60) - high revision risk over lifetime
  • Prior deltoid detachment (lateral approach with poor repair)
  • Severe glenoid bone loss (may need bone graft or custom implant)
  • Charcot arthropathy
  • Patient non-compliance with postop restrictions

Carefully consider risk-benefit in younger patients due to long-term revision rates.

Treatment Algorithm

Conservative Management:

  • Activity modification and analgesia
  • Physiotherapy focusing on remaining muscles (deltoid, periscapular)
  • Injections for symptomatic relief (subacromial, glenohumeral, AC joint)
  • Role is limited in CTA with pseudoparalysis

Surgical Indications:

  • Failed conservative management (3-6 months minimum)
  • Significant functional impairment (pseudoparalysis)
  • Uncontrolled pain affecting quality of life
  • Elderly patient willing to accept activity restrictions

RTSA provides reliable pain relief and functional improvement in appropriately selected patients.

Surgical Technique

Patient Positioning

Beach chair position:

  • Upright 60-70 degrees, head secured
  • Arm free-draped for full access
  • Ensure ability to maximally extend arm for humeral preparation
  • Radiolucent table for intraoperative imaging

Surgical Approach

Deltopectoral approach (most common):

Deltopectoral Approach Steps

Step 1Incision

Start from coracoid, extend distally over deltopectoral groove (approximately 15cm). Identify cephalic vein and retract laterally (protects deltoid blood supply).

Step 2Deep Dissection

Develop deltopectoral interval. Identify conjoint tendon (medial), coracoid. Release clavipectoral fascia lateral to conjoint. Identify subscapularis and biceps.

Step 3Subscapularis Management

Options: tenotomy, lesser tuberosity osteotomy, or peel. Lesser tuberosity osteotomy provides best healing in RTSA. Tenotomy also acceptable given cuff already deficient.

Step 4Humeral Head Resection

Dislocate shoulder anteriorly. Use cutting guide or freehand. Resection level and version critical. Many systems use 20-30 degrees retroversion. Preserve deltoid attachment.

Deltopectoral approach preserves deltoid origin and is preferred for RTSA.

Glenoid Preparation and Baseplate

Critical Steps:

  1. Exposure: Adequate retraction with Fukuda or Darrach retractors. Remove labrum and capsule circumferentially. Visualize entire glenoid face.

  2. Reaming: Ream to remove cartilage and expose subchondral bone. Create flat surface. Avoid excessive medialization (weakens vault).

  3. Baseplate Positioning:

    • Inferior tilt: 10-15 degrees to reduce scapular notching
    • Inferior placement: Flush or 1-2mm overhang inferiorly
    • Neutral version: 0-10 degrees of retroversion acceptable
    • Central post: In line with scapular spine
  4. Fixation: Central post + peripheral screws. Inferior screw is critical (longest screw, into scapular spine). Ensure rigid fixation before glenosphere attachment.

  5. Glenosphere Selection: Larger diameters (38-42mm) reduce notching and improve ROM. Eccentric glenospheres allow more inferior overhang.

Scapular Notching Prevention

Scapular notching is the most common complication (up to 96 percent in early series). Modern techniques have reduced this to 20-30 percent. Key prevention: inferior baseplate tilt, inferior glenosphere overhang, large glenosphere diameter, and considering lateralized designs (BIO-RSA).

Humeral Preparation and Component

Key Steps:

  1. Version: Typically 20-30 degrees retroversion (system-dependent). Some surgeons prefer 0-10 degrees to optimize stability.

  2. Height: Distalization of humerus by 1-3cm. Trial components assess tension and stability. Arm should just clear glenoid component with gentle traction.

  3. Sizing: Trial to assess stability and ROM. Too tight causes stiffness and acromial fracture risk. Too loose causes instability.

  4. Cemented vs Uncemented:

    • Uncemented press-fit preferred in good bone
    • Cemented for poor bone quality, fractures, revisions
  5. Final Reduction: Reduce carefully. Check stability in all positions. Confirm ROM (target over 120 degrees forward flexion).

Maintain arm at side for 4-6 weeks postoperatively to allow soft tissue healing.

Complications

RTSA Complications Overview

ComplicationIncidencePreventionManagement
Scapular Notching20-50 percentInferior tilt, large glenosphere, lateralized designObservation unless symptomatic/progressive
Instability2-10 percentAppropriate tensioning, avoid excessive retroversionRevision with larger glenosphere, humeral insert
Acromial Fractures2-7 percentAvoid excessive arm lengtheningBrace, limited abduction, rarely ORIF
Infection1-4 percentAntibiotics, sterile techniqueDebridement or staged revision
Nerve Injury1-2 percent (usually neurapraxia)Careful retraction, avoid overtensioningObservation, usually recovers
Periprosthetic Fracture1-3 percentCareful technique, assess bone qualityORIF or revision

Acromial Fractures

Acromial fractures are unique to RTSA due to increased deltoid tension. Risk factors include: excessive arm lengthening, osteoporotic bone, female sex, and rheumatoid arthritis. Present with sudden pain and weakness. Management is often conservative with limited abduction and sling immobilization. May catastrophically affect outcome if displaced.

Instability Patterns:

  • Anterior: Most common, excessive retroversion, subscapularis failure
  • Posterior: Rare, excessive anteversion
  • Superior: Very rare, deltoid dysfunction

Postoperative Care

RTSA Rehabilitation Protocol

Weeks 0-6Phase 1: Protection
  • Sling immobilization for 4-6 weeks
  • No active shoulder motion
  • Elbow, wrist, hand exercises permitted
  • Pendulum exercises (gravity-assisted) from week 2
  • Avoid combined abduction and external rotation (instability position)
Weeks 6-12Phase 2: Early Motion
  • Begin active-assisted ROM exercises
  • Progress to active ROM as tolerated
  • Forward flexion and abduction focus
  • Gentle external rotation (often limited, do not force)
  • Periscapular strengthening
Weeks 12-24Phase 3: Strengthening
  • Progressive deltoid strengthening
  • Isometric to isotonic exercises
  • Functional activities as tolerated
  • Avoid heavy lifting (greater than 10kg) long-term
6 months and beyondPhase 4: Maintenance
  • Full activities of daily living expected
  • Ongoing home exercise program
  • Lifelong activity modifications (no contact sports, heavy lifting)
  • Annual follow-up with radiographs

Activity Restrictions (Long-term):

  • Avoid lifting greater than 10-15kg (risk of acromial stress fracture, instability)
  • No contact sports or high-impact activities
  • Swimming, golf, and tennis often possible with low demand

Outcomes and Prognosis

Functional Outcomes:

  • Forward elevation: Improves from mean 50 degrees to 120-140 degrees
  • External rotation: Often limited postoperatively (0-30 degrees average)
  • Internal rotation: Variable, often to sacrum/buttock level
  • Pain relief: Excellent in over 90 percent of patients

Survivorship:

  • 92-95 percent 10-year implant survivorship in modern series
  • Revision rates higher in younger patients (under 60)
  • Glenoid loosening is long-term concern with medialized designs
  • Lateralized designs may have improved long-term outcomes (under investigation)

Predictors of Good Outcome:

  • Intact teres minor (better external rotation)
  • Adequate deltoid function preoperatively
  • Patient understanding of activity restrictions
  • Primary indication (CTA) vs complex revision
  • Surgeon experience with RTSA technique

Evidence Base

Grammont Design Outcomes

Level IV
Frankle M et al • J Bone Joint Surg Am (2005)
Key Findings:
  • Early series of 60 RTSAs with mean 33 month follow-up
  • ASES score improved from 34 to 68
  • Forward elevation improved from 55 to 105 degrees
  • Scapular notching in 96 percent of patients
Clinical Implication: RTSA provides reliable pain relief and function improvement, but scapular notching was universal in early designs.

Long-term Survivorship of RTSA

Level IV
Favard L et al • J Shoulder Elbow Surg (2011)
Key Findings:
  • Series of 527 Grammont-design RTSAs
  • 89 percent survival at 10 years
  • Glenoid loosening most common failure mode
  • Younger patients had higher revision rates
Clinical Implication: RTSA has acceptable long-term survivorship, but careful patient selection is required especially in younger patients.

BIO-RSA Lateralization Study

Level III
Boileau P et al • J Shoulder Elbow Surg (2017)
Key Findings:
  • Compared standard Grammont to BIO-RSA with lateral bone graft
  • BIO-RSA showed reduced scapular notching (19 vs 62 percent)
  • No difference in instability or ROM at 2 years
  • Lateralization may improve impingement-free ROM
Clinical Implication: Lateralized designs reduce scapular notching and may improve long-term outcomes.

RTSA for Proximal Humerus Fractures

Level II
Dezfuli B et al • J Bone Joint Surg Am (2016)
Key Findings:
  • Randomized trial comparing RTSA to hemiarthroplasty for complex PHF in elderly
  • RTSA superior at 2 years: Constant score 56 vs 40
  • Greater tuberosity healing not required for RTSA function
  • Higher complication rate with hemiarthroplasty (tuberosity failure)
Clinical Implication: RTSA is preferred over hemiarthroplasty for complex PHF in elderly patients.

Teres Minor Integrity and External Rotation

Level IV
Simovitch RW et al • J Shoulder Elbow Surg (2007)
Key Findings:
  • Intact teres minor predicted better external rotation postoperatively
  • Hornblower positive patients had limited ER (mean 10 degrees)
  • Hornblower negative patients had better ER (mean 30 degrees)
  • MRI assessment of teres minor helpful preoperatively
Clinical Implication: Assess teres minor integrity preoperatively to counsel patients about expected external rotation.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"A 72-year-old female presents with a 2-year history of right shoulder pain and progressive weakness. She cannot lift her arm above 90 degrees. X-ray shows superior migration of the humeral head with acromiohumeral distance of 4mm."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

This patient likely has rotator cuff tear arthropathy (CTA). My approach:

History

  • Duration and progression of symptoms
  • Night pain, functional limitations
  • Previous treatments (injections, physiotherapy, prior surgery)
  • Hand dominance and activity demands

Examination

  • Deltoid function: Bulk, strength, axillary nerve sensation - CRITICAL
  • Active vs passive ROM (pseudoparalysis if active less than 90, passive full)
  • External rotation lag sign, Hornblower's test (teres minor)
  • Prior surgical scars

Investigations

  • Full X-ray series confirms CTA (Hamada Grade 4)
  • CT with 3D reconstruction for glenoid morphology and planning
  • MRI to assess teres minor integrity (optional)

Management

With Hamada Grade 4 CTA, pseudoparalysis, and intact deltoid, I would recommend Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

I would counsel her on expected outcomes: good pain relief, forward elevation to 120-140 degrees, but limited external rotation. Activity restrictions include avoiding lifting over 10kg.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Recognize Hamada Grade 4 CTA as primary RTSA indication
Confirm deltoid function before proceeding with RTSA
CT essential for glenoid assessment and planning
Counsel on expected outcomes including limited ER
COMMON TRAPS
✗Offering anatomic TSA for CTA (contraindicated - cuff deficient)
✗Not assessing deltoid function preoperatively
✗Promising normal external rotation postoperatively
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What are the Grammont principles?"
"How would you position the glenoid baseplate to reduce scapular notching?"
"What if deltoid was deficient?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

EXAMINER

"You are discussing consent for RTSA. The patient asks about the main complications."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

I would discuss the following complications:

Common Complications

  • Scapular notching (20-50 percent): Wear from humeral component impinging on inferior glenoid. Usually asymptomatic, modern techniques have reduced incidence.
  • Limited external rotation: Expected due to posterior cuff deficiency, not a complication per se.

Less Common but Important

  • Infection (1-4 percent): May require washout or staged revision.
  • Instability (2-10 percent): May require revision surgery.
  • Acromial fractures (2-7 percent): Due to increased deltoid tension. Managed conservatively unless displaced.
  • Nerve injury (1-2 percent): Usually temporary (neurapraxia).

Long-term Issues

  • Component loosening: May occur over 10-15 years, revision may be required.
  • Activity restrictions: Lifelong avoidance of heavy lifting and contact sports.

Overall, 10-year survivorship is over 90 percent and patient satisfaction is high in appropriately selected patients.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Scapular notching is most common radiographic complication
Acromial fractures are unique to RTSA
10-year survivorship over 90 percent
Lifelong activity restrictions required
COMMON TRAPS
✗Minimizing complications
✗Not mentioning acromial fractures (exam favorite)
✗Forgetting to discuss long-term activity restrictions
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How do you prevent scapular notching?"
"How would you manage an unstable RTSA?"
"What is the management of an acromial stress fracture post-RTSA?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

EXAMINER

"A 68-year-old male is 6 weeks post-RTSA and presents with sudden pain and inability to lift his arm. He denies trauma. X-ray shows an acromial fracture."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Acromial fracture is a recognized complication of RTSA. My approach:

Assessment

  • History: Sudden onset pain, any precipitating event, mechanism
  • Examination: Tenderness over acromion, assess for displacement, deltoid function
  • Imaging: AP and scapular Y views, CT if needed for fracture characterization

Classification (Levy and Badman)

  • Type I: Acromial spine
  • Type II: Posterior acromion
  • Type III: Anterior acromion (worst prognosis, deltoid origin affected)

Management

  • Non-displaced fractures: Conservative management with sling, limited abduction for 6-12 weeks. Most heal with fibrous union.
  • Displaced fractures: May require ORIF with plate fixation, though surgical outcomes are unpredictable.
  • Type III with deltoid disruption: Very poor prognosis, may be unsalvageable.

Prevention is key: avoid excessive arm lengthening, recognize osteoporotic patients at higher risk.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Acromial fractures are unique to RTSA due to increased deltoid tension
Most are managed conservatively with limited abduction
Displacement and location determine prognosis
Prevention by avoiding excessive arm lengthening
COMMON TRAPS
✗Recommending aggressive ORIF for all fractures
✗Not understanding the mechanism (deltoid tension)
✗Ignoring the poor prognosis of Type III fractures
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What are the risk factors for acromial fractures post-RTSA?"
"How would you counsel a patient with osteoporosis about this risk?"
"What other complications are unique to RTSA compared to anatomic TSA?"

MCQ Practice Points

Grammont Principle

Q: What is the key biomechanical principle of the Grammont design? A: Medialization of the center of rotation to the glenoid surface, which eliminates eccentric loading on the glenoid component and increases the deltoid moment arm by 30-40 percent.

Scapular Notching Prevention

Q: How do you prevent scapular notching in RTSA? A: Inferior tilt of baseplate (10-15 degrees), larger glenosphere diameter (38-42mm), inferior glenosphere overhang, and consider lateralized (BIO-RSA) designs.

Deltoid Requirement

Q: What is the absolute requirement for RTSA? A: Intact deltoid function and axillary nerve. RTSA is deltoid-powered and cannot function without it.

Hamada Classification

Q: What Hamada grade indicates RTSA is the appropriate treatment? A: Hamada Grade 4 or 5 with pseudoparalysis. Grade 4a/4b show acromiohumeral interval under 5mm with glenohumeral arthritis. Grade 5 shows humeral head collapse.

External Rotation Prediction

Q: What predicts external rotation after RTSA? A: Teres minor integrity. If Hornblower's sign is negative (teres minor intact), expect better postoperative external rotation (mean 30 degrees). If positive, expect limited ER (mean 10 degrees).

Acromial Fractures

Q: What complication is unique to RTSA compared to anatomic TSA? A: Acromial stress fractures (2-7 percent) due to increased deltoid tension from arm lengthening. Usually managed conservatively unless displaced.

Australian Context

Prevalence and Practice:

  • RTSA utilization has increased dramatically in Australia over the past decade
  • Now represents the majority of shoulder arthroplasties for rotator cuff arthropathy
  • Australian Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) tracks outcomes nationally

Access to Care:

  • Available in major metropolitan centers and larger regional hospitals
  • Public hospital wait times may be 6-12 months
  • Private sector typically offers shorter wait times
  • Specialist shoulder surgeons perform majority of RTSAs

Medicare Considerations:

  • Medicare benefits available for RTSA procedure
  • Prosthesis benefits list covers implants
  • Gap payments may apply depending on surgeon and private health insurance

Training:

  • RTSA technique included in AOA orthopaedic training curriculum
  • Subspecialty shoulder fellowship recommended for complex cases
  • Regular cadaveric and simulation training courses available

RTSA Exam Essentials

High-Yield Exam Summary

Grammont Principles

  • •Medialize center of rotation to glenoid surface
  • •Distalize humerus to tension deltoid (increase moment arm 30-40 percent)
  • •Eliminates eccentric glenoid loading
  • •Deltoid becomes primary arm elevator

Indications

  • •Rotator cuff tear arthropathy (Hamada 4-5) is primary indication
  • •Massive irreparable RC tear with pseudoparalysis
  • •Complex proximal humerus fracture in elderly (over 70)
  • •Failed anatomic TSA or hemiarthroplasty with cuff deficiency

Complications

  • •Scapular notching (20-50 percent) - prevent with inferior tilt and larger glenosphere
  • •Acromial fractures (2-7 percent) - unique to RTSA
  • •Instability (2-10 percent) - anterior most common
  • •Limited external rotation - expected with posterior cuff deficiency

Exam Traps

  • •Deltoid MUST be intact - absolute requirement for RTSA
  • •Anatomic TSA contraindicated in CTA (cuff deficient)
  • •Teres minor integrity predicts postoperative ER
  • •Counsel on lifelong activity restrictions
Quick Stats
Reading Time90 min
🇦🇺

FRACS Guidelines

Australia & New Zealand
  • AOANJRR Shoulder Registry
  • MBS Shoulder Items
Related Topics

Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (Anatomic)

Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty

Shoulder Arthroplasty Anatomy

Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications