Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Scaphoid Fractures

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Scaphoid Fractures

Comprehensive guide to scaphoid fractures - Herbert classification, blood supply, nonunion risk factors, and management for orthopaedic exam

complete
Updated: 2024-12-15
High Yield Overview

SCAPHOID FRACTURES - MOST COMMON CARPAL FRACTURE

Retrograde Blood Supply | High Nonunion Risk | Anatomic Snuffbox Tenderness

70%Of carpal fractures
WaistMost common location (70%)
RetrogradeBlood supply pattern
5-15%Nonunion rate

HERBERT CLASSIFICATION

Type A
PatternStable acute fractures
TreatmentCast immobilization
Type B
PatternUnstable acute fractures
TreatmentOperative fixation recommended
Type C
PatternDelayed union
TreatmentConsider operative
Type D
PatternEstablished nonunion
TreatmentSurgery required

Critical Must-Knows

  • Retrograde blood supply - enters distally, proximal pole at risk
  • Waist fractures are most common (70%) and highest AVN risk
  • Proximal pole fractures have highest nonunion and AVN rates
  • Anatomic snuffbox tenderness is key clinical finding
  • If suspected but X-ray negative - treat as fracture or get MRI

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Blood supply via dorsal carpal branch of radial artery - enters distally
  • "
    Proximal pole has no direct blood supply - depends on intraosseous flow
  • "
    Displacement over 1mm, angulation over 15°, or comminution = unstable = surgery
  • "
    Herbert screw allows early motion without cast

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

PA radiograph of wrist showing scaphoid fracture with scaphoid bone highlighted
Click to expand
PA radiograph demonstrating a scaphoid fracture. The scaphoid bone is highlighted (red box with arrow) showing the typical location between the radius and the carpal row. This is the most common carpal bone fracture, accounting for 70% of all carpal injuries.Credit: Diagnostics (MDPI) (PMC11545356) - CC-BY
Herbert Classification of scaphoid fractures showing Type A stable and Type B unstable patterns
Click to expand
Herbert Classification: Type A fractures (top row) are STABLE - A1 tubercle fracture, A2 non-displaced waist fracture. Type B fractures (bottom row) are UNSTABLE - B1 oblique distal third, B2 displaced waist, B3 proximal pole, B4 fracture-dislocation. This classification guides treatment decisions.Credit: Life (MDPI) (PMC10381215) - CC-BY
Humpback deformity on lateral X-ray and CT showing dorsal angulation of scaphoid malunion
Click to expand
Humpback Deformity - the classic malunion pattern: (a) Lateral radiograph showing dorsal angulation (arrow), (b) Sagittal CT reformation demonstrating the full extent of collapse with dorsal prominence. This deformity results from volar cortex collapse and requires corrective osteotomy with bone grafting.Credit: Life (MDPI) (PMC10381215) - CC-BY
PA radiograph showing Herbert screw fixation of scaphoid fracture
Click to expand
Herbert Screw Fixation: PA radiograph showing a headless compression screw (variably threaded) fixing a scaphoid fracture. The screw is countersunk beneath the articular surface, allowing early motion without cast immobilization. This is the gold standard surgical treatment for unstable (Type B) fractures.Credit: Life (MDPI) (PMC10381215) - CC-BY

Additional Imaging Examples

3-panel series demonstrating subtle and occult scaphoid fractures
Click to expand
Radiographically occult and subtle scaphoid fractures - 3-panel series: (a) PA wrist radiograph with arrow indicating subtle scaphoid waist fracture line that could easily be missed. (b) Magnified view showing fracture detail. (c) Follow-up radiograph with arrow demonstrating healing fracture with callus formation. This demonstrates the clinical challenge of detecting scaphoid fractures on initial films - 10-20% are occult. Clinical suspicion (snuffbox tenderness) should prompt either presumptive treatment or MRI confirmation.Credit: Open-i/PMC - CC BY 4.0
4-view scaphoid radiographic series
Click to expand
Standard 4-view scaphoid radiographic series (2x2 grid): PA, lateral, oblique, and scaphoid (ulnar deviation) views showing clear bicortical fracture line through the scaphoid waist. ALL FOUR VIEWS are required for initial assessment - waist fractures are most common (70%) and can be subtle on single views. This demonstrates the importance of dedicated scaphoid imaging protocol.Credit: Dias J et al. - BMC Musculoskelet Disord (CC-BY 4.0)
PA with ulnar deviation showing scaphoid waist fracture
Click to expand
PA view with ulnar deviation (scaphoid view) demonstrating a minimally displaced scaphoid waist fracture with approximately 1mm displacement. The ulnar deviation elongates the scaphoid to better visualize the waist, making fracture lines more apparent. This dedicated view should always be obtained when scaphoid fracture is suspected.Credit: USU Teaching File - MedPix (CC-BY 4.0)
2-panel comparison showing occult scaphoid fracture
Click to expand
2-panel (A-B) demonstration of occult scaphoid fracture: (A) Conventional PA radiograph shows no obvious fracture - the scaphoid appears normal. (B) Panoramic view with black arrow revealing subtle fracture line. UP TO 20% of scaphoid fractures are NOT visible on initial X-rays. This is why clinical suspicion (anatomic snuffbox tenderness) should prompt treatment as fracture or MRI confirmation.Credit: Ezoddini Ardakani F et al. - Iran J Radiol (CC-BY 4.0)

Critical Scaphoid Fracture Exam Points

Blood Supply

Retrograde blood supply via dorsal carpal branch of radial artery. Blood enters at the distal pole, flows proximally. Proximal pole fractures have highest AVN risk because they are distal to the blood entry.

X-ray Negative

10-20% of scaphoid fractures not visible on initial X-ray. If clinical suspicion high (snuffbox tenderness), either treat as fracture with cast/splint or MRI (most sensitive) to confirm. Don't dismiss.

Nonunion Risk Factors

Proximal pole location, displacement greater than 1mm, delay in treatment greater than 4 weeks, smoking, and comminution increase nonunion risk. These factors guide operative vs conservative decision.

Herbert Classification

Type A (stable) = cast. Type B (unstable) = surgery recommended. Type C (delayed) and Type D (nonunion) = surgery required. Know the subtypes.

Quick Decision Guide

PatternKey FindingTreatment
Herbert A1 (tubercle)Extra-articular, very stableSplint 4-6 weeks, excellent prognosis
Herbert A2 (waist, non-displaced)Stable incomplete fractureScaphoid cast 8-12 weeks or consider screw
Herbert B1 (oblique distal)Unstable distal fractureOperative fixation recommended
Herbert B2 (displaced waist)Displaced greater than 1mmOperative fixation recommended
Herbert B3 (proximal pole)High AVN and nonunion riskOperative fixation strongly recommended
Herbert B4 (trans-scaphoid perilunate)Complex carpal injuryUrgent operative fixation
Herbert D (nonunion)Failed to heal, often with AVNSurgery with bone graft +/- vascularized graft
Mnemonic

SCAPHOIDSCAPHOID - Key Features

S
Snuffbox tenderness
Key clinical sign
C
Carpal most common
70% of carpal fractures
A
AVN risk proximal pole
Due to retrograde blood supply
P
Proximal pole highest risk
For nonunion and AVN
H
Herbert classification
A = stable, B = unstable
O
Occult fractures common
10-20% X-ray negative initially
I
Immediate MRI if needed
Most sensitive investigation
D
Displaced = surgery
Over 1mm displacement = operative

Memory Hook:SCAPHOID fractures need careful assessment and often surgery

Mnemonic

RETROGRADERETROGRADE - Blood Supply Pattern

R
Radial artery source
Dorsal carpal branch
E
Enters distally
Blood enters at distal pole
T
Travels proximally
Intraosseous flow to proximal pole
R
Risk at proximal pole
Highest AVN risk
O
Only source
No significant proximal entry
G
Gauge nonunion risk
Location predicts outcome
R
Reverse pattern
Unlike most bones
A
AVN if disrupted
Proximal pole dies
D
Dorsal ridge entry
Main blood entry point
E
Essential to know
Guides treatment

Memory Hook:Blood flows RETROGRADE - enters distal, travels to proximal pole

Mnemonic

HERBERTHERBERT - Classification

H
Heals well (Type A)
Stable acute fractures
E
Emergency operative (Type B)
Unstable acute fractures
R
Risky if delayed (Type C)
Delayed union
B
Bone graft needed (Type D)
Established nonunion
E
Eight-twelve weeks cast (A2)
Non-displaced waist
R
Review at 6 weeks
Assess healing
T
Types increase in severity
A to D more complex

Memory Hook:HERBERT classification: A = stable, B = unstable, C = delayed, D = nonunion

Mnemonic

PANDAPANDA - Surgical Indications

P
Proximal pole
High nonunion risk with cast
A
Athletes/Active
Faster return to activity
N
Non-reducible displacement
Displacement greater than 1mm
D
DISI pattern
Carpal instability (SL angle greater than 60°)
A
Associated carpal injury
Perilunate or trans-scaphoid injury

Memory Hook:Think of a PANDA - these fractures need surgery to avoid becoming extinct (nonunion)!

Overview and Epidemiology

Scaphoid fractures are the most common carpal fracture and the second most common wrist fracture (after distal radius). They are critical to diagnose and treat appropriately due to the high risk of nonunion and avascular necrosis.

Mechanism of injury:

  • Fall on outstretched hand (FOOSH) - most common
    • Wrist in dorsiflexion and radial deviation
    • Axial load through thenar eminence
    • Compresses scaphoid between radius and capitate
  • Sports injuries - common in young males
  • Motor vehicle accidents

Typical Patient

The typical scaphoid fracture patient is a young male (15-30 years) with a FOOSH injury playing sports or from a fall. This demographic has highest incidence. Be suspicious in any young person with wrist pain after fall.

Location distribution:

  • Waist fractures: 70% (most common, highest absolute numbers of nonunion)
  • Proximal pole: 20% (highest percentage nonunion and AVN)
  • Distal pole/tubercle: 10% (excellent prognosis)

Anatomy and Blood Supply

Scaphoid anatomy:

  • Boat-shaped carpal bone (Greek: skaphe = boat)
  • Links proximal and distal carpal rows
  • 80% covered by articular cartilage - limits blood entry points
  • Oblique orientation in coronal and sagittal planes
  • Tubercle palpable palmarly

Key relationships:

  • Proximal: articulates with radius (scaphoid fossa)
  • Distal: articulates with trapezium and trapezoid
  • Medial: articulates with lunate and capitate
  • Forms floor of anatomic snuffbox

Blood supply (Critical to understand):

Retrograde Blood Supply

The scaphoid has retrograde blood supply. The dorsal carpal branch of the radial artery provides 70-80% of blood supply via dorsal ridge. Blood enters distally and flows proximally. The proximal pole has no direct blood supply - entirely dependent on intraosseous flow.

Blood supply details:

  • 70-80%: Dorsal carpal branch - enters at dorsal ridge (waist level)
  • 20-30%: Palmar branch - enters at tubercle and distal pole
  • Proximal pole: No direct blood supply, relies on intraosseous vessels
  • This explains why proximal pole fractures have highest AVN risk

Implications:

  • Waist fractures interrupt blood flow to proximal pole
  • More proximal fractures = higher AVN risk
  • Displaced fractures disrupt intraosseous vessels
  • May take longer to heal than other carpal fractures

Classification Systems

Herbert Classification (most commonly used)

TypeSubtypeDescription
AStable acute fractures
A1Fracture of tubercle
A2Incomplete fracture through waist
BUnstable acute fractures
B1Distal oblique fracture
B2Complete fracture of waist
B3Proximal pole fracture
B4Trans-scaphoid perilunate dislocation
B5Comminuted fractures
CDelayed union
DEstablished nonunion
D1Fibrous nonunion
D2Pseudarthrosis

Herbert Key Points

Type A = stable = conservative treatment reasonable. Type B = unstable = operative treatment recommended. Type B criteria: displaced, proximal pole, oblique, or with perilunate dislocation.

Herbert Classification of scaphoid fractures illustration
Click to expand
Herbert Classification: Type A fractures are stable (A1 tubercle, A2 non-displaced waist). Type B fractures are unstable (B1-B5) and generally require operative fixation.Credit: Life (MDPI) 2023 - PMC10381215 (CC-BY 4.0)

Anatomical Location Classification

LocationIncidenceNonunion RiskAVN Risk
Proximal pole20%HighestHighest
Waist70%ModerateModerate
Distal pole5%LowLow
Tubercle5%Very lowNone

Key point: Location determines prognosis regardless of displacement

Criteria for Instability (Surgery Recommended)

  • Displacement over 1mm
  • Angulation over 15° (DISI pattern)
  • Step-off over 1mm
  • Comminution
  • Proximal pole location
  • Carpal malalignment
  • Associated perilunate injury

Unstable Features

Any fracture with over 1mm displacement, angulation, or proximal pole location should be considered for operative fixation. These have unacceptable nonunion rates with conservative treatment.

Nonunion Classification

By vascularity:

  • Viable: normal proximal pole density
  • AVN: increased proximal pole density (sclerotic)

By pattern:

  • Fibrous union: some healing but not solid
  • Pseudarthrosis: sclerotic edges, no healing potential
  • Scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC)

SNAC Wrist Stages:

StageArthritis Location
IRadial styloid - scaphoid
IIScaphoid fossa (radioscaphoid)
III+ Capitolunate joint
IV+ Radiolunate (pancarpal)

Clinical Presentation and Assessment

History:

  • Mechanism (FOOSH typical)
  • Time since injury
  • Hand dominance
  • Occupation (manual worker implications)
  • Smoking status (affects healing)
  • Previous wrist injury

Physical examination:

Physical Examination Findings

FindingTestSignificance
Anatomic snuffbox tendernessPalpate between EPL and EPB/APLClassic sign, 90% sensitive
Scaphoid tubercle tendernessPalpate palmarly at wrist creaseEqually sensitive, more specific
Pain with axial compressionCompress thumb metacarpalScaphoid compression test
Pain with resisted supinationWatson test componentSuggests scaphoid involvement
Reduced grip strengthCompare to contralateralMay indicate fracture
Swelling dorsal wristObserve/palpateLess obvious than other wrist fractures

Key clinical points:

Clinical Diagnosis

Anatomic snuffbox tenderness has high sensitivity (~90%) but low specificity. Scaphoid tubercle tenderness is equally sensitive and more specific. If both present with appropriate mechanism, treat as scaphoid fracture even if X-ray is negative.

Watson's test (for scaphoid instability):

  • Pressure on scaphoid tubercle while moving wrist from ulnar to radial deviation
  • Clunk or pain = positive
  • Indicates scapholunate ligament injury or instability

Investigations

Radiographic assessment:

Standard scaphoid series (4 views):

  • PA in ulnar deviation - elongates scaphoid
  • Lateral - assess angulation, DISI
  • 45° semi-pronated oblique - scaphoid profile
  • AP with clenched fist - shows displacement
Scaphoid fracture X-ray demonstrating typical fracture patterns
Click to expand
Radiographic views of scaphoid fracture. The scaphoid series includes PA in ulnar deviation to elongate the scaphoid, lateral view, and oblique views to visualize the fracture line.Credit: Diagnostics (MDPI) 2024 - PMC11545356 (CC-BY 4.0)
Multiple radiographic views of scaphoid fractures
Click to expand
Comparison of scaphoid fracture appearances on different radiographic views. Note how the fracture line visibility varies depending on the projection angle.Credit: Diagnostics (MDPI) 2024 - PMC11545356 (CC-BY 4.0)

X-ray Limitations

10-20% of scaphoid fractures are NOT visible on initial X-ray. If clinical suspicion is high (snuffbox tenderness, appropriate mechanism), either treat as fracture or obtain MRI for definitive diagnosis. Do not dismiss based on normal X-ray alone.

Advanced imaging:

MRI (Gold standard for occult fractures):

  • Sensitivity 100%, Specificity 99% for fractures
  • Shows bone marrow edema before visible fracture line
  • Detects associated soft tissue injuries
  • Can assess vascularity (gadolinium enhancement)

CT scan:

  • Best for fracture characterization
  • Shows displacement and angulation precisely
  • Assess healing (union vs nonunion)
  • Surgical planning for complex fractures

Bone scan:

  • High sensitivity, low specificity
  • Positive within 72 hours (earlier than X-ray changes)
  • Less used now with MRI availability

Approach to occult fracture:

  1. Clinical suspicion + negative X-ray
  2. Options:
    • Treat as fracture: Cast, repeat X-ray 10-14 days (bone resorption shows fracture)
    • MRI: Immediate definitive diagnosis (cost-effective if high clinical suspicion)
    • CT: If fracture confirmed, characterize for treatment planning

Management

📊 Management Algorithm
Scaphoid fracture management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm based on displacement and location. Note the aggressive fixation indications for proximal pole fractures.Credit: OrthoVellum

Conservative management indications:

  • Herbert Type A fractures (tubercle, non-displaced waist)
  • Non-displaced, stable fractures
  • Patient preference (understanding risks)
  • Medical contraindications to surgery
Casting Protocol
  • Scaphoid (thumb spica) cast
  • Thumb IP joint free
  • Wrist in slight flexion and radial deviation
  • Controversy: above vs below elbow (evidence mixed)
  • Duration: 8-12 weeks minimum
Follow-up
  • X-ray at 6 weeks
  • If healing: continue cast to 8-12 weeks
  • If not healed: CT to assess, consider surgery
  • Prolonged immobilization for proximal fractures (up to 20 weeks)

Cast Immobilization Controversy

The position and extent of casting is debated. Evidence is mixed on above vs below elbow and thumb position. Key principles: stable fractures can heal in cast, but 8-12 weeks minimum and regular follow-up are essential.

Indications for Surgery

Absolute:

  • Displaced fractures (over 1mm)
  • Proximal pole fractures
  • Associated carpal instability/dislocation
  • Nonunion
  • AVN with collapse

Relative:

  • Non-displaced waist fracture (for early return to function)
  • Patient preference (avoid prolonged casting)
  • Athletes or manual workers
  • Unstable fracture pattern

Proximal Pole

All proximal pole fractures should strongly be considered for operative fixation. The combination of precarious blood supply and small fragment makes conservative treatment high-risk for nonunion and AVN.

Surgical Technique

Headless Compression Screw (Herbert Screw)

  • Gold standard for acute fractures
  • Variable pitch provides compression
  • Buried entirely within bone
  • Allows early motion without cast

Technique options:

  • Volar approach (preferred for most)
    • Access through thenar muscles
    • Good for waist and distal fractures
    • Screw placed perpendicular to fracture
  • Dorsal approach (for proximal pole)
    • Access between 3rd and 4th compartments
    • Better for proximal pole fractures
    • Screw enters at central axis

Other fixation:

  • K-wires (temporary or adjunct)
  • Mini-fragment screws (rarely now)

Screw Position

The ideal screw position is along the central axis of the scaphoid, perpendicular to the fracture. This provides best compression and lowest risk of screw cutout. Fluoroscopy or navigation helps achieve this.

Herbert screw fixation of scaphoid fracture on PA radiograph
Click to expand
PA radiograph showing surgical fixation of a scaphoid fracture with a headless compression screw (Herbert-type). The variable-pitch screw is countersunk beneath the articular surface, allowing early mobilization.Credit: Life (MDPI) 2023 - PMC10381215 (CC-BY 4.0)

Nonunion Management

Assessment:

  • CT to assess bone stock, humpback deformity
  • MRI with gadolinium to assess vascularity
  • Clinical assessment of arthritis

Treatment options:

Non-vascularized bone graft:

  • For viable proximal pole
  • Wedge graft for humpback deformity (Fisk-Fernandez)
  • Usually from iliac crest or distal radius

Vascularized bone graft:

  • For AVN of proximal pole
  • Options: 1,2 ICSRA (from distal radius), medial femoral condyle
  • Brings new blood supply to avascular fragment

Salvage procedures (SNAC wrist):

  • Proximal row carpectomy
  • Scaphoid excision and four-corner fusion
  • Total wrist fusion or arthroplasty

AVN of Proximal Pole

If the proximal pole is avascular (sclerotic on X-ray, no enhancement on MRI), standard bone grafting has high failure rate. Vascularized bone graft is recommended to provide new blood supply.

Arthroscopic-Assisted Fixation

  • Gaining popularity
  • Allows direct visualization of reduction
  • Assess for associated ligament injuries
  • Minimally invasive screw placement

Advantages:

  • Assess articular reduction
  • Evaluate scapholunate ligament
  • Reduced soft tissue disruption
  • Faster recovery

Limitations:

  • Technically demanding
  • Learning curve
  • May not be suitable for all fractures

Arthroscopic techniques continue to evolve with improved instrumentation.

Complications

Complications of Scaphoid Fractures

ComplicationIncidenceManagement
Nonunion5-15% (higher proximal)Surgery with bone graft
Avascular necrosis (AVN)13-50% proximal poleVascularized bone graft
Malunion (humpback)VariableCorrective osteotomy if symptomatic
Post-traumatic arthritis (SNAC)Progressive with nonunionSalvage procedures
Stiffness10-20%Physiotherapy, rarely surgical
Hardware prominenceVariableScrew removal
Missed diagnosisCommonHigh index of suspicion, MRI

Nonunion:

  • Most common significant complication
  • Risk factors: proximal pole, displacement, delay, smoking
  • Leads to progressive arthritis if untreated
  • Treatment: bone graft, +/- vascularized graft for AVN
2-panel showing delayed union at 4 months
Click to expand
2-panel (A-B) scaphoid fracture at 4 months post-injury showing delayed union: (A) Conventional PA view with doubtful healing appearance. (B) Panoramic view demonstrating persistent fracture line concerning for delayed union/nonunion. Failure to achieve union by 4 months (Herbert Type C) typically requires surgical intervention with bone grafting to prevent progression to established nonunion.Credit: Ezoddini Ardakani F et al. - Iran J Radiol (CC-BY 4.0)

Avascular necrosis:

  • Proximal pole most at risk
  • Appears sclerotic on X-ray
  • MRI with gadolinium assesses vascularity
  • Treatment: vascularized bone graft
AVN sclerosis of proximal pole scaphoid on X-ray and CT
Click to expand
Avascular necrosis of the proximal pole: (a) PA radiograph showing marked sclerosis (arrow) of the proximal pole after scaphoid fracture. (b) Coronal CT confirming sclerosis indicating AVN - a key complication requiring vascularized bone graft.Credit: Life (MDPI) 2023 - PMC10381215 (CC-BY 4.0)

SNAC Wrist Progression

Scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) wrist follows predictable arthritis pattern: Stage I (radial styloid), Stage II (radioscaphoid), Stage III (capitolunate), Stage IV (radiolunate/pancarpal). Treatment depends on stage.

Malunion - Humpback deformity:

  • Scaphoid collapses into flexion
  • Creates DISI pattern of carpus
  • Affects carpal kinematics
  • Treatment: wedge osteotomy to restore anatomy
Humpback deformity after scaphoid fracture on lateral X-ray and CT
Click to expand
Humpback deformity: (a) Lateral radiograph showing dorsal prominence (arrow) after scaphoid malunion. (b) Sagittal CT demonstrating the full extent of deformity with scaphoid collapse into flexion, causing DISI pattern.Credit: Life (MDPI) 2023 - PMC10381215 (CC-BY 4.0)

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

Post-operative protocol:

Day 0-14
  • Bulky dressing and thumb spica splint
  • Elevation
  • Finger motion immediately
  • Wound check at 10-14 days
Week 2-6
  • Convert to removable thumb spica splint
  • Begin gentle wrist ROM
  • Active finger motion
  • May remove splint for exercises
Week 6-12
  • X-ray/CT to assess healing
  • If united: progressive ROM and strengthening
  • If not united: continue protection
  • Wean from splint as comfort allows
3-6 months
  • Full activity after confirmed union
  • Grip strengthening
  • Return to sport/work
  • Final outcome assessment

Key rehabilitation principles:

  • Early finger motion is critical
  • Wrist motion after initial healing (2-4 weeks for operative)
  • Confirm union before loading
  • Grip strength returns over 6-12 months

Operative Advantage

A key advantage of operative fixation with a Herbert screw is the ability to begin early motion without prolonged casting. This is particularly valuable for athletes and manual workers who cannot tolerate 8-12 weeks in cast.

Outcomes and Prognosis

Outcomes by fracture type:

TypeConservative UnionOperative UnionNotes
TubercleOver 95%N/AExcellent prognosis
Distal waist, non-displaced90-95%95%+Cast reasonable
Waist, displaced60-70%90-95%Surgery recommended
Proximal pole60-70%85-90%Surgery strongly recommended

Prognostic factors:

  • Fracture location (proximal worse)
  • Displacement (over 1mm = worse)
  • Time to treatment (delay = worse)
  • AVN present (much worse)
  • Smoking (significant negative impact)

Time to Treatment

Delay in diagnosis/treatment over 4 weeks significantly increases nonunion risk. This is why treating suspected fractures (clinical signs, negative X-ray) is important. The mantra: "If in doubt, treat as a scaphoid fracture."

Evidence Base

Level IV
📚 Herbert and Fisher. Herbert Screw
Key Findings:
  • Described the Herbert screw - variable pitch, headless compression screw. Achieved high union rates (over 95%) and allowed early mobilization without cast.
Clinical Implication: Herbert screw became gold standard for operative fixation of scaphoid fractures. Allows early motion without prolonged immobilization.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Br 1984

Level I
📚 Dias et al. SWIFFT Trial
Key Findings:
  • RCT comparing cast vs surgery for non-displaced scaphoid waist fractures. No significant difference in patient-reported outcomes at 1 year. Surgery had faster return to work/sport.
Clinical Implication: For non-displaced waist fractures, both treatments are reasonable. Surgery offers faster return to function; cast avoids surgical risks. Patient preference and occupation guide decision.
Source: Lancet 2020

Level I
📚 Buijze et al. Systematic Review
Key Findings:
  • Meta-analysis showed operative fixation has lower nonunion rate (0-5%) compared to cast (5-15%) for acute waist fractures. Time to union and return to activity faster with surgery.
Clinical Implication: Surgery provides more predictable union and faster recovery. Consider strongly for athletes, manual workers, or those intolerant of prolonged casting.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010

Level IV
📚 Gelberman and Menon. Blood Supply
Key Findings:
  • Described retrograde blood supply of scaphoid. 70-80% via dorsal carpal branch entering at dorsal ridge. Proximal pole has no direct blood supply.
Clinical Implication: Understanding blood supply explains why proximal pole fractures have highest AVN risk and why operative fixation is strongly recommended for these fractures.
Source: J Hand Surg Am 1980

Level III
📚 Merrell et al. Cost Analysis
Key Findings:
  • Immediate MRI for suspected scaphoid fracture was cost-effective compared to treating all suspected fractures and repeating X-rays. Reduced unnecessary treatment.
Clinical Implication: MRI is cost-effective for clinically suspected scaphoid fracture with negative X-ray. Provides definitive diagnosis and avoids unnecessary casting.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: X-ray Negative Suspected Scaphoid

EXAMINER

"A 22-year-old man falls playing football, landing on his outstretched hand. He has anatomic snuffbox tenderness and scaphoid tubercle tenderness. X-rays are normal. How do you manage this patient?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Thank you. This young man has clinical findings highly suggestive of a **scaphoid fracture** despite normal initial X-rays. This is a common clinical scenario - **10-20% of scaphoid fractures are not visible on initial X-ray**. **Clinical Findings:** - **FOOSH mechanism** - classic for scaphoid injury - **Anatomic snuffbox tenderness** - 90% sensitive - **Scaphoid tubercle tenderness** - equally sensitive, more specific - Both positive = high probability of fracture **Management Options:** **Option 1: Treat as fracture** - Apply **thumb spica splint or cast** - Review in **10-14 days** with repeat X-ray - Bone resorption at fracture edges makes fracture visible - If still negative but clinical suspicion remains - MRI or CT **Option 2: Immediate MRI (my preference)** - **Gold standard** for occult scaphoid fractures - Sensitivity and specificity approaching 100% - Definitive diagnosis immediately - Avoids unnecessary immobilization if negative - Shows any alternative diagnosis (ligament injury, other fracture) - Cost-effective when clinical suspicion is high **My Recommendation:** Given the high clinical suspicion (young male, FOOSH, both snuffbox and tubercle tender), I would arrange **MRI**. This provides immediate definitive diagnosis and allows appropriate treatment planning. **If MRI shows fracture:** - Characterize location and displacement - Treat based on Herbert classification - Non-displaced waist = cast or surgery (patient choice) - Displaced or proximal pole = surgery recommended **If MRI negative:** - Reassure patient - Diagnose alternative pathology if present - Avoid unnecessary 8-12 weeks in cast **Key message:** Never dismiss a patient with clinical findings of scaphoid fracture because of normal X-ray.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
10-20% of scaphoid fractures not visible on initial X-ray
Snuffbox and tubercle tenderness = high suspicion
Two options: treat as fracture or MRI
MRI is gold standard - sensitivity/specificity near 100%
MRI is cost-effective when clinical suspicion high
Treat as fracture means cast + repeat X-ray at 10-14 days
Bone resorption makes fracture visible on delayed X-ray
Never dismiss based on normal X-ray alone
Treatment depends on MRI findings
Patient avoids unnecessary casting if MRI negative
COMMON TRAPS
✗Dismissing patient because X-ray is normal
✗Not examining scaphoid tubercle (more specific)
✗Not arranging follow-up if treating empirically
✗Over-immobilizing without definitive diagnosis
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if the MRI shows a non-displaced waist fracture?"
"What if the patient is a professional athlete?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Displaced Scaphoid Fracture

EXAMINER

"A 28-year-old mechanic presents 2 days after a fall. X-rays show a displaced scaphoid waist fracture with 2mm displacement and carpal instability (DISI pattern). How do you manage this?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Thank you. This patient has a **displaced scaphoid waist fracture** with **2mm displacement** and evidence of **DISI (dorsal intercalated segment instability)**. This is a **Herbert Type B2 fracture** requiring operative treatment. **Why Surgery is Indicated:** 1. **Displacement greater than 1mm** - nonunion rate with cast treatment is unacceptably high (30-40%) 2. **DISI pattern** - indicates carpal instability, ligament injury likely 3. **Young manual worker** - needs reliable healing and good function **Pre-operative Assessment:** - **CT scan** to characterize fracture: - Confirm displacement and angulation - Assess comminution - Plan surgical approach - Counsel regarding: - Nonunion and AVN risk (even with surgery) - Need to stop smoking - Time off work **Surgical Plan:** **Approach:** For waist fracture, I would use a **volar approach**: - Incision over scaphoid tubercle - Interval through thenar muscles - Excellent access for reduction and screw placement **Fixation:** - **Anatomic reduction** - critical to restore carpal alignment - **Headless compression screw** (Herbert-type) - Central axis placement for optimal compression - May need K-wire reduction aid **Addressing DISI:** - DISI pattern suggests scapholunate ligament injury - May need to assess and address SL ligament - Pinning of scapholunate interval if significant injury **Technical Points:** - Reduce fracture anatomically (may need open reduction) - Restore scaphoid length and alignment - Screw perpendicular to fracture line - Confirm position with fluoroscopy - Assess carpal alignment after fixation **Postoperative:** - Thumb spica splint for comfort - Early ROM at 2 weeks - Confirm healing before heavy loading - CT at 6-8 weeks to assess union
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Displaced over 1mm = Herbert Type B = operative indication
DISI pattern suggests carpal instability
CT scan for surgical planning
Volar approach for waist fractures
Anatomic reduction is critical
Headless compression screw (Herbert-type)
Central axis placement for best compression
May need to address scapholunate ligament
Early motion advantage of operative fixation
CT at 6-8 weeks to confirm union
COMMON TRAPS
✗Attempting conservative treatment for displaced fracture
✗Not recognizing DISI as sign of instability
✗Poor screw position (not central axis)
✗Missing associated SL ligament injury
✗Not using CT for planning
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is DISI and why does it matter?"
"How would you approach a proximal pole fracture?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Scaphoid Nonunion

EXAMINER

"A 35-year-old presents with chronic wrist pain. He recalls an injury 2 years ago that was never treated. X-rays show scaphoid nonunion with humpback deformity and sclerosis of the proximal pole. How do you assess and manage this patient?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Thank you. This patient has an **established scaphoid nonunion** (Herbert Type D) with two concerning features: **humpback deformity** and **proximal pole sclerosis** suggesting avascular necrosis (AVN). This is a complex clinical problem. **Assessment:** **History:** - Duration and nature of pain - Functional limitations - Grip strength loss - Previous treatment (or lack thereof) **Examination:** - Range of motion (likely reduced) - Grip strength (compare to contralateral) - Tenderness pattern - Signs of arthritis (crepitus, swelling) **Imaging:** **X-rays show:** - Nonunion with sclerotic edges - Humpback deformity (scaphoid flexed) - Proximal pole sclerosis (concerning for AVN) - Assess for SNAC arthritis changes **CT Scan:** - Assess bone stock - Quantify humpback deformity - Evaluate for cyst formation - Assess arthritis extent **MRI with Gadolinium (Critical):** - Assess **vascularity of proximal pole** - Enhancement = viable - No enhancement = avascular = needs vascularized graft **Treatment Planning:** **If proximal pole is VIABLE (enhances on MRI):** - Open reduction - Correction of humpback deformity - **Non-vascularized bone graft** (wedge graft - Fisk-Fernandez) - Usually iliac crest or distal radius - Compression screw fixation **If proximal pole is AVASCULAR (no enhancement):** - Standard bone graft has high failure rate - Need **vascularized bone graft** options: - **1,2 ICSRA graft** (from distal radius) - **Medial femoral condyle** free flap - Brings new blood supply to dead bone
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Established nonunion = Herbert Type D
Humpback deformity = scaphoid collapsed into flexion
Proximal pole sclerosis suggests AVN
MRI with gadolinium essential to assess vascularity
CT to assess bone stock and deformity
Check for SNAC arthritis changes
Viable proximal pole = non-vascularized bone graft
Avascular proximal pole = vascularized bone graft
Options: 1,2 ICSRA or medial femoral condyle
SNAC III-IV = salvage procedures
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not assessing proximal pole vascularity
✗Using non-vascularized graft for AVN
✗Missing established arthritis (SNAC)
✗Not correcting humpback deformity
✗Not counseling about guarded prognosis
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is a 1,2 ICSRA graft?"
"When would you choose proximal row carpectomy vs four-corner fusion?"

MCQ Practice Points

Blood Supply Question

Q: What is the blood supply pattern of the scaphoid? A: Retrograde - the dorsal carpal branch of the radial artery enters at the distal pole (dorsal ridge) and blood flows proximally. The proximal pole has no direct blood supply - it relies entirely on intraosseous vessels. This is why proximal pole fractures have highest AVN risk.

Classification Question

Q: In Herbert classification, what defines a Type B fracture? A: Unstable acute fractures. Subtypes: B1 (distal oblique), B2 (displaced waist), B3 (proximal pole), B4 (trans-scaphoid perilunate), B5 (comminuted). Type B fractures generally require operative fixation.

Imaging Question

Q: What is the best investigation for a clinically suspected scaphoid fracture with negative X-rays? A: MRI - sensitivity and specificity approaching 100%. It shows bone marrow edema before fracture line is visible on X-ray and can identify alternative diagnoses. CT is better for characterizing known fractures.

Location Question

Q: Which scaphoid fracture location has the highest nonunion and AVN rate? A: Proximal pole - due to the retrograde blood supply, the proximal pole is entirely dependent on intraosseous vessels. Fractures here interrupt this flow, leading to highest rates of nonunion (up to 30-40%) and AVN (up to 50%).

Treatment Question

Q: What is the indication for vascularized bone graft in scaphoid nonunion? A: Avascular necrosis of the proximal pole. Standard non-vascularized bone graft has high failure rate when the proximal pole is avascular. Vascularized grafts (1,2 ICSRA or medial femoral condyle) bring new blood supply to the dead bone.

Australian Context

Scaphoid Fractures in Australia

Epidemiology and Common Mechanisms:

  • Most common carpal fracture in young males (15-30 years)
  • Peak incidence in sports-active population: AFL, rugby league/union, skateboarding, cycling
  • Significant incidence in manual workers (construction, trades)
  • Fall on outstretched hand (FOOSH) is the classic mechanism
  • Increasing recognition in elderly population (lower energy trauma)

Clinical Practice Patterns:

  • Emergency departments see high volume of suspected scaphoid injuries
  • Clinical examination with anatomic snuffbox tenderness is standard screening
  • MRI access varies significantly between metropolitan and regional areas
  • Where MRI unavailable, empiric treatment (thumb spica cast) with follow-up X-ray at 10-14 days remains common practice
  • Herbert screw fixation widely available at major trauma centers
  • Vascularized bone grafting typically performed at specialized hand surgery units

Medicolegal Considerations:

  • Missed scaphoid fracture is one of the most common orthopaedic litigation cases in Australia
  • Failure to diagnose or inadequate follow-up arrangements are key risk factors
  • Standard of care requires:
    • Documented clinical examination (snuffbox tenderness, scaphoid tubercle tenderness)
    • Appropriate imaging (minimum 4 views: PA, lateral, scaphoid views, or dedicated scaphoid series)
    • If clinical suspicion persists despite negative X-ray: either immobilize and follow-up OR arrange MRI
    • Clear documentation of follow-up plan and safety-netting advice
    • Patient education about risks of non-compliance

RACS Training Implications:

  • Scaphoid fractures are core curriculum for orthopaedic SET training
  • Expected knowledge for Part II clinical examination:
    • Herbert classification system
    • Blood supply anatomy (retrograde flow, AVN risk)
    • Indications for operative vs conservative management
    • Management of occult fractures
    • Treatment algorithms for nonunion and AVN

Access and Equity Issues:

  • MRI availability limited in rural/remote Australia
  • Telemedicine consultations increasingly used for regional management
  • Transfer to tertiary centers may be required for complex cases (nonunion, AVN requiring vascularized grafting)
  • Cost considerations: MRI is bulk-billed under Medicare for appropriate indications

Workplace Implications:

  • WorkCover claims common for industrial injuries
  • Return-to-work timing critical for manual laborers
  • Operative fixation often preferred to minimize time off work (vs 8-12 weeks casting)
  • Functional outcomes and grip strength important for compensation assessments

PBS and Medication Considerations:

  • Analgesia (simple + opioid short-term) PBS-subsidized
  • Calcium and vitamin D supplementation for bone health
  • Smoking cessation support essential (Quitline 13 7848) - smoking impairs fracture healing

FRACS Exam Focus

Be prepared to discuss retrograde blood supply anatomy, Herbert classification, management algorithm for X-ray negative but clinically suspected fractures, and nonunion treatment options (vascularized vs non-vascularized bone graft indications). Medicolegal aspects of missed diagnosis are frequently examined.

SCAPHOID FRACTURES

High-Yield Exam Summary

BLOOD SUPPLY

  • •Retrograde - enters distally, flows proximally
  • •Dorsal carpal branch of radial artery
  • •Enters at dorsal ridge (waist level)
  • •Proximal pole has NO direct blood supply

HERBERT CLASSIFICATION

  • •Type A: Stable (A1=tubercle, A2=non-displaced waist)
  • •Type B: Unstable (B1-B5, see subtypes)
  • •Type C: Delayed union
  • •Type D: Established nonunion

OPERATIVE INDICATIONS

  • •Displacement greater than 1mm
  • •Proximal pole fractures
  • •Associated carpal instability
  • •Nonunion
  • •Relative: athlete, manual worker, patient choice

X-RAY NEGATIVE MANAGEMENT

  • •10-20% not visible initially
  • •Option 1: Treat as fracture, repeat X-ray 10-14 days
  • •Option 2: MRI (gold standard, 100% sensitive)
  • •Never dismiss with clinical findings

NONUNION TREATMENT

  • •Assess proximal pole vascularity (MRI + gadolinium)
  • •Viable: non-vascularized bone graft (Fisk-Fernandez)
  • •AVN: vascularized bone graft (1,2 ICSRA, MFC)
  • •SNAC wrist: salvage procedures

KEY NUMBERS

  • •70% waist fractures (most common)
  • •20% proximal pole (highest AVN risk)
  • •10-20% X-ray negative initially
  • •5-15% nonunion rate overall
  • •greater than 1mm displacement = surgery
Quick Stats
Reading Time109 min
Related Topics

Acetabular Fractures

Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries

Acute Compartment Syndrome

Ankle Fractures