Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

SNAC Wrist

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

SNAC Wrist

Comprehensive guide to Scaphoid Nonunion Advanced Collapse - staging, surgical treatment options, 4-corner fusion, proximal row carpectomy for orthopaedic exam

complete
Updated: 2024-12-16
High Yield Overview

SNAC WRIST - SCAPHOID NONUNION ADVANCED COLLAPSE

Progressive Arthritis | Identical Pattern to SLAC | Motion-Preserving Salvage

100%Nonunion progresses if untreated
97%Radioscaphoid OA by 10 years
50%Motion preserved with 4CC/PRC
Stage IVRadiolunate OA - rare

SNAC STAGING SYSTEM

Stage I
PatternRadial styloid OA only
TreatmentNonunion repair + styloidectomy
Stage II
PatternScaphocapitate OA
TreatmentScaphoid excision + 4CC or PRC
Stage III
PatternCapitolunate OA added
TreatmentScaphoid excision + 4CC or PRC
Stage IV
PatternPancarpal OA (radiolunate)
TreatmentTotal wrist fusion/arthroplasty

Critical Must-Knows

  • Identical arthritis pattern to SLAC wrist - only etiology differs (nonunion vs SL dissociation)
  • Radiolunate joint preserved until Stage IV - allows motion-preserving procedures
  • Stage I window: May still attempt nonunion repair with styloidectomy
  • Stage II/III treatment: 4-corner fusion or proximal row carpectomy - comparable outcomes
  • 97% develop radioscaphoid OA within 10 years if nonunion untreated

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    SNAC = SLAC pattern from different etiology
  • "
    Lunate stays congruent with radius - preserved articulation
  • "
    4CC fuses capitate-lunate-hamate-triquetrum after scaphoid excision
  • "
    PRC removes entire proximal row - capitate articulates with lunate fossa

Critical SNAC Wrist Concepts for Exams

SNAC = SLAC Pattern

Identical arthritis progression: Radial styloid then scaphocapitate then capitolunate then pancarpal. Treatment concepts are the same - only etiology differs (nonunion vs SL dissociation).

Radiolunate Preserved

Radiolunate joint preserved until Stage IV because lunate maintains normal articulation with radius. This allows motion-preserving salvage procedures in most patients.

Stage Determines Treatment

Stage I: May still repair nonunion (window closes with progression). Stage II/III: Motion-preserving salvage (4CC or PRC). Stage IV: Total wrist fusion.

4CC vs PRC Debate

Both preserve approximately 50% wrist motion with comparable outcomes. 4CC maintains carpal height better. PRC is simpler with faster rehabilitation. Choice depends on surgeon and patient factors.

At a Glance Table

SNAC Wrist Stages and Management

StageArthritis LocationKey FeaturesTreatment Options
Stage IRadial styloid onlyLast window for nonunion repair, 97% progress if untreatedNonunion repair + styloidectomy OR motion-preserving salvage
Stage IIScaphocapitate addedMidcarpal involvement, radiolunate preserved4-corner fusion OR proximal row carpectomy
Stage IIICapitolunate addedFurther proximal migration, radiolunate still preserved4-corner fusion OR proximal row carpectomy
Stage IVPancarpal (radiolunate)Rare, all joints involvedTotal wrist fusion OR total wrist arthroplasty
Mnemonic

R-S-C-PSNAC Stage Progression

R
Radial styloid
Stage I - styloid impinges on malrotated scaphoid
S
Scaphocapitate
Stage II - midcarpal joint involvement begins
C
Capitolunate
Stage III - capitate migrates proximally
P
Pancarpal
Stage IV - radiolunate finally involved (rare)

Memory Hook:RSC-P: Radial Styloid, ScaphoCapitate, CapitoLunate, Pancarpal - same sequence as SLAC!

Overview

SNAC (Scaphoid Nonunion Advanced Collapse) wrist represents the predictable pattern of progressive arthritis that develops following untreated or failed treatment of scaphoid nonunion. It shares an identical arthritis progression pattern with SLAC (Scapholunate Advanced Collapse) wrist, differing only in the underlying etiology.

The natural history of untreated scaphoid nonunion leads to SNAC wrist in the vast majority of cases, with Mack et al. demonstrating radioscaphoid arthritis in 97% of patients within 10 years. Understanding this progression is essential for:

  • Counseling patients regarding the importance of scaphoid nonunion treatment
  • Staging the disease to guide appropriate surgical management
  • Selecting motion-preserving versus motion-eliminating procedures

Anatomy

Normal Carpal Kinematics

The scaphoid serves as a critical link between the proximal and distal carpal rows:

  • Span function: Bridges radiocarpal and midcarpal joints
  • Load transmission: Transfers approximately 60% of axial load from distal row to radius
  • Motion coupling: Coordinates proximal row flexion-extension with distal row motion

Consequences of Scaphoid Nonunion

When scaphoid nonunion occurs:

Distal Fragment Behavior:

  • Flexes with the distal carpal row
  • Creates dorsal intercalated segment instability (DISI) pattern
  • Causes abnormal contact between dorsal lip of distal fragment and radial styloid

Proximal Fragment Behavior:

  • Extends with the lunate (remains linked)
  • May develop AVN (especially proximal pole fractures)
  • Loses normal articulation with distal fragment

Altered Load Transmission:

  • Abnormal point loading at styloscaphoid articulation
  • Increased stress across scaphocapitate joint
  • Progressive cartilage degeneration in predictable sequence

Why Radiolunate Joint is Preserved

The radiolunate joint remains congruent and normally loaded because:

  • Lunate maintains spherical articulation with lunate fossa of radius
  • No abnormal shear or point loading across this joint
  • Preserved until very late stage disease (Stage IV - rare)

This preservation of the radiolunate articulation is the key anatomic feature that allows motion-preserving salvage procedures in SNAC wrist.

Mnemonic

CONGRUENTWhy Radiolunate Preserved

C
Congruous
Lunate maintains congruent articulation
O
Optimal
Optimal contact area maintained
N
Normal
Normal load distribution preserved
G
Geometric
Geometric fit unchanged
R
Radius
Radius fossa shape accommodates lunate
U
Unchanged
Unchanged throughout SNAC stages I-III
E
Essential
Essential for salvage procedures
N
No
No abnormal shear forces
T
Target
Target for motion preservation

Memory Hook:CONGRUENT lunate: The radiolunate joint stays CONGRUENT until very late disease

Pathophysiology

Mechanism of Progressive Collapse

The progression from scaphoid nonunion to advanced collapse follows a predictable sequence:

Stage 1: Styloscaphoid Arthritis

  1. Nonunion allows distal fragment to flex
  2. Dorsal lip of distal fragment contacts radial styloid
  3. Abnormal point loading causes cartilage wear
  4. Osteophyte formation at styloid tip ("beaking")

Stage 2: Scaphocapitate Arthritis

  1. Loss of scaphoid span function
  2. Capitate migrates proximally
  3. Abnormal articulation between capitate and scaphoid fragments
  4. Midcarpal joint degeneration begins

Stage 3: Capitolunate Arthritis

  1. Further proximal migration of capitate
  2. Capitate-lunate articulation becomes incongruent
  3. Articular cartilage loss at capitolunate joint
  4. Radiolunate joint still preserved

Stage 4: Pancarpal Arthritis (Rare)

  1. Occurs only with severe long-standing disease
  2. Finally involves radiolunate articulation
  3. Loss of spherical lunate-radius relationship
  4. No motion-preserving options possible

Progressive Nature

Untreated scaphoid nonunion leads to SNAC wrist in 97% of patients within 10 years (Mack 1984). The window for nonunion repair closes as arthritis progresses. Early treatment prevents this irreversible cascade.

Comparison: SNAC vs SLAC

FeatureSNAC WristSLAC Wrist
EtiologyScaphoid nonunionScapholunate dissociation
MechanismDistal fragment malrotationScaphoid flexion, lunate extension
Stage IRadial styloid OARadial styloid OA
Stage IIScaphocapitate OAScaphocapitate OA
Stage IIICapitolunate OACapitolunate OA
Stage IVPancarpal (rare)Pancarpal (rare)
TreatmentIdenticalIdentical

SNAC = SLAC

Key exam point: SNAC and SLAC wrist have identical arthritis progression patterns. The only difference is the underlying cause. This means treatment algorithms are the same for both conditions at each stage.

Classification Systems

SNAC Staging System

Radial Styloid Arthritis

Location: Between radial styloid and scaphoid

X-ray findings:

  • Styloid "beaking" (osteophyte formation)
  • Narrowed styloscaphoid joint space
  • Sclerosis at styloid tip
  • Preserved scaphocapitate and capitolunate joints

Clinical significance: Window for nonunion repair still open - last chance to restore near-normal wrist function

Treatment: Nonunion repair with bone graft and radial styloidectomy OR motion-preserving salvage

Scaphocapitate Arthritis

Location: Midcarpal joint (capitate-scaphoid)

X-ray findings:

  • Joint space narrowing at scaphocapitate articulation
  • Sclerosis and osteophytes at midcarpal level
  • Proximal migration of capitate begins
  • Preserved radiolunate and capitolunate joints

Clinical significance: Motion-preserving salvage indicated - repair window has closed

Treatment: Four-corner fusion OR proximal row carpectomy (both provide 50% ROM preservation)

Capitolunate Arthritis

Location: Capitate-lunate articulation added

X-ray findings:

  • All Stage II findings plus
  • Capitolunate joint space narrowing
  • Proximal capitate migration more pronounced
  • Still preserved radiolunate joint

Clinical significance: Motion-preserving salvage still possible despite capitolunate involvement

Treatment: Four-corner fusion OR proximal row carpectomy (same as Stage II)

Pancarpal Arthritis

Location: All carpal articulations including radiolunate

X-ray findings:

  • Radiolunate joint space loss
  • Diffuse arthritic changes throughout carpus
  • Severe proximal row collapse

Clinical significance: Motion-preserving procedures no longer possible - radiolunate joint compromised

Treatment: Total wrist fusion (arthrodesis) OR total wrist arthroplasty (selected patients)

Note: This stage is rare - most patients present or are treated at earlier stages

Clinical Assessment

History

Presenting Complaints:

  • Wrist pain, often long-standing
  • Decreased grip strength
  • Limited wrist motion
  • History of prior scaphoid fracture (often remote)
  • May recall wrist injury years prior that was never treated

Pain Characteristics:

  • Activity-related initially
  • May become constant in advanced stages
  • Dorsoradial location typically
  • Worse with gripping and loading

Functional Limitations:

  • Difficulty with push-ups or weight-bearing on hand
  • Problems with twisting motions (opening jars)
  • Reduced work capacity (especially manual laborers)
  • Sports participation affected

Physical Examination

Inspection:

  • Dorsal wrist swelling (synovitis)
  • Reduced visible wrist motion
  • Possible radial deviation deformity

Palpation:

  • Tenderness over radial styloid
  • Anatomical snuffbox tenderness
  • Scaphoid tubercle tenderness
  • May have palpable crepitus with motion

Range of Motion:

  • Reduced flexion and extension
  • Reduced radial deviation
  • Document pre-operative ROM for comparison

Special Tests:

  • Watson scaphoid shift test: May be difficult due to nonunion
  • Grip strength: Typically reduced
  • Radiolunate grind test: Positive only in Stage IV

Provocative Testing

Scaphocapitate Grind Test:

  • Axially load wrist while moving through flexion-extension
  • Positive: Pain or crepitus at midcarpal level
  • Suggests Stage II or higher

Capitolunate Stress Test:

  • Direct pressure over capitate with wrist in neutral
  • Positive: Tenderness suggests Stage III involvement

Investigations

level=2>

Plain Radiographs

Standard Views:

  • PA view: Overall carpal alignment, joint spaces
  • Lateral view: Carpal height ratio, DISI pattern
  • Scaphoid views: Nonunion characteristics, fragment positions

Key X-ray Findings by Stage:

StagePA View FindingsLateral View Findings
IStyloid beaking, styloscaphoid narrowingDISI pattern (SL angle greater than 70 degrees)
IIScaphocapitate narrowing, sclerosisProximal capitate migration
IIICapitolunate narrowing addedFurther capitate migration
IVRadiolunate narrowingComplete carpal collapse

Measurements:

  • Scapholunate angle: Greater than 70 degrees indicates DISI
  • Carpal height ratio: Decreased with proximal migration
  • Radiolunate angle: Normal until Stage IV

CT Scan

Indications:

  • Assess nonunion characteristics
  • Evaluate proximal pole vascularity (indirect)
  • Pre-operative planning for salvage procedures
  • Better visualization of arthritic changes

Findings:

  • Nonunion site: Gap, cystic changes, sclerosis
  • Fragment positions and rotation
  • Articular surface integrity at each joint
  • Cystic changes in carpal bones

MRI

Indications:

  • Proximal pole vascularity assessment (if considering repair)
  • Evaluate ligamentous structures
  • Assess for associated pathology

Key Findings:

  • Proximal pole signal: Low T1 signal suggests AVN
  • Cartilage assessment: Can visualize articular damage
  • SL ligament: Often attenuated or torn

Management

📊 Management Algorithm
snac wrist management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for snac wristCredit: OrthoVellum

Non-operative Treatment

Limited Role in SNAC:

  • May provide temporary symptom relief
  • Does not alter disease progression
  • Generally used only for:
    • Patients unfit for surgery
    • Patients declining surgery
    • Bridge to definitive treatment

Options:

  • Activity modification
  • Splinting/bracing
  • NSAIDs
  • Intra-articular corticosteroid injections

Non-operative Limitations

Non-operative treatment does NOT prevent SNAC progression. Untreated disease continues to advance through stages. Surgery is indicated for symptomatic SNAC in appropriate surgical candidates.

Management Algorithm

Mnemonic

S.T.A.G.ESNAC Treatment Algorithm

S
Stage I - Save
May still attempt nonunion repair + styloidectomy
T
Transition
Stage I-II transition - decision point for salvage
A
Arthrodesis 4CC
Stage II/III - 4-corner fusion option
G
Gone - PRC
Stage II/III - Proximal row carpectomy option
E
End-stage fusion
Stage IV - Total wrist fusion required

Memory Hook:S.T.A.G.E guides treatment: Save (repair), Transition, Arthrodesis (4CC), Gone (PRC), End-stage (TWF)

Primary Goal: Attempt salvage of scaphoid nonunion if possible

Option 1: Nonunion Repair + Radial Styloidectomy

  • Requirements:
    • Viable proximal pole (MRI assessment)
    • Repairable nonunion configuration
    • Patient willing to accept prolonged recovery
  • Technique:
    • Open reduction internal fixation of nonunion
    • Vascularized or non-vascularized bone graft
    • Radial styloidectomy (2-3mm) to address OA
    • Headless compression screw fixation
  • Outcomes:
    • Union rates 70-90% with appropriate selection
    • If successful, prevents SNAC progression
    • Return to near-normal wrist function

Option 2: Proceed to Motion-Preserving Salvage

  • Indicated if:
    • Proximal pole AVN present
    • Nonunion not reconstructable
    • Patient prefers single definitive procedure

If nonunion repair is not feasible, proceed directly to Stage II/III salvage procedures (4CC or PRC).

Both stages treated with motion-preserving salvage procedures

The rationale for treating Stage II and III similarly:

  • Radiolunate joint preserved in both
  • Same procedures applicable
  • Similar expected outcomes

Four-Corner Fusion (4CC/SLAC Procedure)

Concept: Excise scaphoid, fuse capitate-lunate-hamate-triquetrum

  • Technique: Dorsal approach, scaphoid excision, cartilage preparation, bone grafting, plate fixation
  • Advantages: Maintains carpal height, better grip strength
  • Disadvantages: Nonunion risk (5-10%), longer recovery, hardware complications
  • Outcomes: 80-90% pain relief, 50% ROM, 60-80% grip strength

Proximal Row Carpectomy (PRC)

Concept: Excise entire proximal row; capitate articulates with lunate fossa

  • Technique: Complete proximal row excision, early motion protocol
  • Advantages: Simpler, faster rehab, no nonunion risk
  • Disadvantages: Loss of carpal height, requires intact cartilage
  • Contraindications: Capitate head or lunate fossa cartilage damage
  • Outcomes: 80-90% pain relief, 50% ROM, 60-80% grip strength

Both procedures provide comparable outcomes with similar patient satisfaction rates.

Radiolunate joint involvement eliminates motion-preserving options

Total Wrist Fusion (Arthrodesis)

Gold standard for Stage IV SNAC:

  • Complete radiocarpal fusion
  • Includes carpometacarpal joints
  • Position: 10-15 degrees extension, neutral deviation
  • Fixation: Dorsal plate spanning radius to metacarpals
  • Outcomes: 90%+ pain relief, strong stable wrist

Advantages:

  • Definitive pain relief
  • Strong, stable wrist
  • Durable long-term results
  • Appropriate for heavy laborers

Disadvantages:

  • Loss of all wrist motion
  • Compensatory motion at other joints
  • May affect function significantly

Total Wrist Arthroplasty

Alternative for selected low-demand patients:

  • Low-demand individuals
  • Bilateral disease
  • Need for preserved motion

Limitations:

  • Less durable than fusion
  • Higher complication rate
  • Strict activity restrictions
  • Not suitable for laborers

Summary: Total wrist fusion remains the gold standard for Stage IV disease, providing reliable pain relief and durability.

4CC vs PRC Comparison

Four-Corner Fusion vs Proximal Row Carpectomy

Feature4CCPRC
Technical difficultyMore demandingSimpler
Operating timeLongerShorter
Nonunion risk5-10%None
Hardware complicationsPossibleNone
Carpal heightBetter maintainedDecreased
RehabilitationSlower (8-12 weeks)Faster (6-8 weeks)
ROM outcomesSimilar (50%)Similar (50%)
Pain reliefSimilar (80-90%)Similar (80-90%)
Grip strengthSimilarSimilar
Revision optionsConvert to TWFConvert to TWF or TWA
Cartilage requirementNoneCapitate head + lunate fossa intact

PRC Requirement

Critical for exam: PRC requires intact cartilage on the capitate head AND the lunate fossa. If either articular surface is damaged, PRC is contraindicated - proceed to 4CC.

Surgical Technique

Step 1: Approach

  • Dorsal longitudinal incision
  • Develop interval between 3rd and 4th extensor compartments
  • Ligate terminal branch of posterior interosseous nerve
  • Perform dorsal capsulotomy

Step 2: Scaphoid Excision

  • Identify and excise scaphoid completely
  • Careful removal of all fragments
  • Preserve volar radiocarpal ligaments

Step 3: Cartilage Preparation

  • Remove cartilage from capitate, lunate, hamate, triquetrum
  • Preserve subchondral bone plate initially
  • Create bleeding bone surfaces

Step 4: Bone Grafting

  • Harvest cancellous bone from distal radius or iliac crest
  • Pack graft into prepared fusion surfaces
  • Fill scaphoid void

Step 5: Fixation

  • Options: Circular dorsal plate (most common), spider plate, individual screws, K-wires
  • Ensure compression across all fusion surfaces

Step 6: Closure

  • Capsular closure if possible
  • Extensor retinaculum repair
  • Skin closure and splint in neutral position

The four-corner fusion creates a stable construct while preserving the radiolunate articulation.

Step 1: Approach

  • Same dorsal approach as 4CC
  • Good visualization of entire proximal row

Step 2: Carpal Excision

  • Excise scaphoid first (easiest access)
  • Then excise lunate
  • Finally excise triquetrum
  • Complete removal of all proximal row bones

Step 3: Cartilage Assessment

  • Critical step: Inspect capitate head and lunate fossa
  • If cartilage damaged, convert to 4CC or consider fusion
  • If intact, proceed with PRC

Step 4: Reduction

  • Allow capitate to reduce into lunate fossa
  • Check ROM for smooth, painless motion
  • Assess stability

Step 5: Closure

  • Capsular repair
  • Consider temporary K-wire if unstable
  • Early motion protocol

PRC is a simpler procedure with faster recovery but requires intact cartilage.

Complications

Four-Corner Fusion Complications

Nonunion (5-10%)

  • Most significant complication
  • Risk factors: Smoking, inadequate fixation, poor bone quality
  • Management: Revision with bone graft, improved fixation

Hardware Problems

  • Prominent hardware causing extensor tendon irritation
  • Screw loosening
  • Plate failure
  • May require hardware removal after union

Stiffness

  • ROM less than expected
  • Usually from prolonged immobilization
  • Therapy may improve

DRUJ Issues

  • Pre-existing DRUJ arthritis may become symptomatic
  • Consider concurrent Darrach or DRUJ fusion

Radiocarpal Arthritis Progression

  • Radiolunate joint may develop arthritis long-term
  • May require conversion to total wrist fusion

Proximal Row Carpectomy Complications

Progressive Arthritis

  • Cartilage wear at radiocapitate articulation
  • Concern for long-term durability
  • May require conversion to fusion

Carpal Instability

  • Capitate subluxation rare
  • Usually stable construct

Weakness

  • Grip strength typically 60-80% of normal
  • Some patients disappointed with strength

Conversion to Fusion

  • May be needed if progressive arthritis develops
  • PRC does not "burn bridges" for future fusion

General Complications

Infection: Standard surgical infection risk Nerve injury: Superficial radial nerve, PIN Stiffness: Expected - counsel patients pre-operatively Complex regional pain syndrome: Rare but devastating

Postoperative Care

Four-Corner Fusion Protocol

Week 0-2:

  • Bulky dressing and splint
  • Strict elevation
  • Finger range of motion exercises

Week 2-6:

  • Short arm cast or removable splint
  • Continue finger motion
  • No loading

Week 6-12:

  • Serial radiographs to assess fusion
  • Begin wrist ROM when fusion evident
  • Gradual strengthening

Week 12+:

  • Progressive loading as tolerated
  • Full activities when fully fused (typically 3-4 months)
  • Grip strengthening program

Proximal Row Carpectomy Protocol

Week 0-2:

  • Bulky dressing and splint
  • Elevation
  • Finger motion

Week 2-6:

  • Begin active wrist ROM
  • Splint for comfort between exercises
  • No loading

Week 6-12:

  • Progressive strengthening
  • Discontinue splint
  • Gradual return to activities

Week 12+:

  • Full activities as tolerated
  • Typically faster recovery than 4CC

Outcomes/Prognosis

Natural History Without Treatment

  • 97% develop radioscaphoid OA within 10 years
  • Progressive pain and functional decline
  • Eventual pancarpal arthritis in some
  • Grip strength deterioration

Outcomes After Surgical Treatment

Stage I - Nonunion Repair + Styloidectomy:

  • Union rates 70-90% with proper selection
  • If union achieved, good long-term function
  • Prevents SNAC progression

Stage II/III - 4CC:

  • Pain relief: 80-90%
  • ROM: 50% of normal (30-40 degrees F/E arc)
  • Grip: 60-80% of normal
  • Patient satisfaction: 75-85%
  • Revision rate: 5-10% (mostly nonunion)

Stage II/III - PRC:

  • Pain relief: 80-90%
  • ROM: 50% of normal
  • Grip: 60-80% of normal
  • Patient satisfaction: 75-85%
  • 10-year survival: 90%+ in most series

Stage IV - Total Wrist Fusion:

  • Pain relief: 90%+
  • ROM: 0 degrees (complete fusion)
  • Grip: Often improves from pre-operative
  • High satisfaction for appropriate patients

Evidence Base

SNAC Natural History Study

IV
Mack GR, Bosse MJ, Gelberman RH, Yu E • J Hand Surg Am (1984)
Key Findings:
  • 97% of untreated scaphoid nonunions developed radioscaphoid arthritis within 10 years. Progression to advanced collapse is predictable and time-dependent.
Clinical Implication: Establishes the importance of treating scaphoid nonunion to prevent SNAC wrist development

4CC vs PRC Long-Term Outcomes

V
Cohen MS, Kozin SH • Hand Clinics (2001)
Key Findings:
  • Both 4-corner fusion and proximal row carpectomy provide comparable pain relief, motion, and patient satisfaction for SNAC/SLAC Stage II and III wrists.
Clinical Implication: Choice between 4CC and PRC can be based on surgeon preference and patient factors rather than outcome differences

Proximal Row Carpectomy Long-Term Results

IV
Jebson PJ, Hayes EP, Engber WD • J Hand Surg Am (2003)
Key Findings:
  • PRC provides durable pain relief with 90%+ survival at 10 years. Radiocapitate arthritis develops but is often asymptomatic.
Clinical Implication: PRC is a durable motion-preserving option with good long-term outcomes

Four-Corner Fusion Outcomes

IV
Vance MC, Hernandez JD, DiDonna ML • J Hand Surg Am (2005)
Key Findings:
  • 4CC achieves 90% union rates with circular plate fixation. Motion preserved at approximately 50% of normal. Nonunion is the primary complication.
Clinical Implication: Modern fixation techniques have improved 4CC union rates and reliability

SNAC/SLAC Treatment Meta-Analysis

II
Mulford JS, Ceulemans LJ, Nam D, Axelrod TS • J Hand Surg Am (2009)
Key Findings:
  • Meta-analysis of 4CC vs PRC shows no significant difference in pain relief, ROM, grip strength, or patient satisfaction between procedures for SNAC/SLAC wrists.
Clinical Implication: Both procedures are equivalent options - selection based on individual factors

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

SNAC Stage II Management

EXAMINER

"A 48-year-old mechanic presents with wrist pain. He recalls injuring his wrist playing football 15 years ago but never sought treatment. X-rays show an ununited scaphoid fracture with scaphocapitate joint arthritis but a preserved radiolunate joint."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Exceptional Answer Framework:

This is a classic SNAC Stage II presentation - scaphoid nonunion with established scaphocapitate arthritis but preserved radiolunate articulation. The 15-year history confirms Mack's observation that 97% develop radioscaphoid arthritis within 10 years.

Treatment rationale: Stage II has passed the window for nonunion repair - established arthritis means the damaged joint surfaces cannot be salvaged. Motion-preserving procedures are indicated because the radiolunate joint remains intact.

Options: Both 4CC and PRC provide equivalent outcomes in literature (Cohen 2001, Mulford meta-analysis 2009). I would discuss both with the patient:

  • 4CC: Better carpal height maintenance, may suit heavy laborer, 5-10% nonunion risk
  • PRC: Simpler, faster rehab, requires intact capitate head cartilage

For a 48-year-old mechanic, I would lean toward 4CC for better grip strength and carpal height, but either is acceptable based on shared decision-making.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Identify as SNAC Stage II based on scaphocapitate arthritis with preserved radiolunate
Explain that nonunion repair window has closed with established arthritis
Discuss motion-preserving options: 4-corner fusion vs proximal row carpectomy
Note that both procedures provide similar outcomes (50% ROM, 80-90% pain relief)
Consider patient factors: heavy manual work may favor 4CC for carpal height
COMMON TRAPS
✗Attempting nonunion repair in presence of established arthritis
✗Fusing the preserved radiolunate joint unnecessarily
✗Proceeding to total wrist fusion when motion-preservation is possible
✗Performing PRC without assessing capitate head cartilage
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How would you examine the capitate head cartilage intra-operatively?"
"What if you found capitate head cartilage damage during PRC?"
"What is the expected ROM after 4-corner fusion?"
"How does this compare to SLAC wrist treatment?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

SNAC Stage I - Repair Window

EXAMINER

"A 32-year-old woman presents with wrist pain. She fractured her scaphoid 2 years ago and was treated in cast but the fracture never united. X-rays show an established nonunion with mild radial styloid osteophyte formation but preserved midcarpal and radiolunate joints. MRI shows T1 signal present in the proximal pole."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Exceptional Answer Framework:

This 32-year-old with SNAC Stage I represents the critical decision point - the last opportunity for nonunion repair before committing to salvage procedures.

Key assessment points:

  • Proximal pole vascularity: MRI T1 signal confirms viability - essential for repair
  • Arthritis limited to radial styloid only - midcarpal joints preserved
  • Young age and potential for near-normal wrist with successful repair

My approach: I would offer nonunion repair with bone grafting and radial styloidectomy. Options include:

  • Non-vascularized corticocancellous graft (iliac crest or distal radius)
  • Vascularized graft if any concern about vascularity (1,2-ICSRA pedicled graft)
  • Headless compression screw fixation
  • 2-3mm radial styloidectomy to address existing OA

Union rates at 70-90% with proper selection. Success means prevention of SNAC progression and near-normal long-term function - far superior to motion-preserving salvage outcomes.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Identify as SNAC Stage I - only radial styloid arthritis present
Stage I represents the last window for nonunion repair
MRI showing T1 signal indicates viable proximal pole (no AVN)
Option: Nonunion repair + vascularized/non-vascularized graft + styloidectomy
If successful, prevents SNAC progression and maintains near-normal wrist
COMMON TRAPS
✗Going straight to salvage procedure without considering repair
✗Missing assessment of proximal pole vascularity
✗Performing nonunion repair without addressing the styloid OA
✗Underestimating the value of preservation in a young patient
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What determines if you can repair versus need salvage?"
"How would you assess proximal pole vascularity?"
"What graft options would you consider?"
"What is the union rate for nonunion repair at this stage?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

SNAC vs SLAC - Pattern Recognition

EXAMINER

"You are shown X-rays of two patients with wrist arthritis. Patient A has scaphocapitate arthritis with a scaphoid nonunion. Patient B has scaphocapitate arthritis with a widened scapholunate interval. Both have preserved radiolunate joints."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Exceptional Answer Framework:

This scenario tests understanding that SNAC and SLAC are mechanistically different conditions that produce identical arthritis patterns.

Pattern explanation: Both conditions disrupt the scaphoid's role as a carpal link:

  • SNAC: Nonunion allows distal fragment to flex abnormally
  • SLAC: SL dissociation allows entire scaphoid to flex

In both cases, the result is abnormal radial styloid contact, followed by scaphocapitate, then capitolunate arthritis. The radiolunate joint is preserved because the lunate maintains its normal articulation with the radius.

Treatment: Identical for both at each stage - the etiology doesn't change what joints are arthritic or which are preserved. Stage II treatment options (4CC or PRC) are equivalent for both SNAC and SLAC.

The naming convention exists because the underlying cause and natural history differ - SNAC from nonunion, SLAC from ligament injury. But once arthritis is established, management is the same.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Patient A has SNAC Stage II (nonunion-related collapse)
Patient B has SLAC Stage II (scapholunate dissociation-related collapse)
Both have identical arthritis patterns despite different etiologies
Treatment options are the same for both at this stage
Either 4CC or PRC appropriate for both patients
COMMON TRAPS
✗Suggesting different treatments based on etiology alone
✗Not recognizing that SNAC and SLAC have identical patterns
✗Missing that both have Stage II disease
✗Recommending different surgical procedures for the two conditions
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"Why do SNAC and SLAC have the same arthritis pattern?"
"If the patterns are identical, why name them differently?"
"Does the etiology affect the choice between 4CC and PRC?"
"Which joint is last to develop arthritis in both conditions?"

MCQ Practice Points

Pattern Recognition Question

Q: What is the relationship between SNAC wrist and SLAC wrist arthritis patterns?

A: They are identical. Both progress in the same sequence: radial styloid to scaphocapitate to capitolunate to pancarpal. The only difference is the underlying etiology (scaphoid nonunion vs scapholunate dissociation).

Preserved Joint Question

Q: Which carpal articulation is preserved until late-stage SNAC wrist, and why?

A: The radiolunate joint is preserved until Stage IV because the lunate maintains its normal congruent articulation with the lunate fossa of the radius. There is no abnormal loading across this joint until very late disease.

Treatment Selection Question

Q: What is the critical cartilage requirement for proximal row carpectomy?

A: PRC requires intact cartilage on both the capitate head AND the lunate fossa of the radius. If either surface is damaged, PRC is contraindicated - proceed to 4-corner fusion instead.

Stage I Window Question

Q: Why is Stage I SNAC wrist particularly important?

A: Stage I represents the last window for nonunion repair. If the proximal pole is viable and the nonunion is repairable, treatment at Stage I can restore near-normal wrist function and prevent progression. Once Stage II develops, salvage procedures become necessary.

Outcomes Comparison Question

Q: How do outcomes compare between 4-corner fusion and proximal row carpectomy?

A: Similar outcomes for both procedures: 80-90% pain relief, approximately 50% of normal ROM (30-40 degrees flexion-extension arc), 60-80% grip strength, and 75-85% patient satisfaction. The choice is based on surgeon and patient factors, not outcome differences.

Australian Context

SNAC wrist surgery is performed at specialized hand surgery centers throughout Australia, with both four-corner fusion and proximal row carpectomy being commonly performed procedures. Total wrist fusion is available at major metropolitan centers for Stage IV disease.

The epidemiology of scaphoid nonunion and subsequent SNAC wrist in Australia follows international patterns, with sports-related injuries being a significant contributor in the younger population. Australian Hand Surgery Society registry data demonstrates outcomes consistent with international literature for both motion-preserving procedures.

SNAC and SLAC wrist are common topics in Orthopaedic orthopaedic fellowship examinations, with particular emphasis on pattern recognition, staging systems, and treatment algorithms. Candidates should be familiar with the identical arthritis progression patterns of both conditions despite their different etiologies.

Both 4CC and PRC have established track records in Australian practice with comparable patient satisfaction and functional outcomes.

SNAC WRIST

High-Yield Exam Summary

Pattern (= SLAC)

  • •Radial styloid leads to Scaphocapitate leads to Capitolunate leads to Pancarpal
  • •Radiolunate preserved until Stage IV (rare)
  • •97% develop radioscaphoid OA within 10 years if untreated
  • •Etiology differs (nonunion vs SL dissociation) but arthritis pattern identical
  • •Treatment algorithms same for SNAC and SLAC at each stage

Staging

  • •Stage I: Radial styloid OA only - repair window
  • •Stage II: Scaphocapitate OA - salvage indicated
  • •Stage III: Capitolunate OA added - salvage indicated
  • •Stage IV: Pancarpal OA (rare) - total fusion

Treatment by Stage

  • •Stage I: Nonunion repair + styloidectomy (if viable proximal pole)
  • •Stage II/III: 4CC or PRC (both preserve 50% ROM)
  • •Stage IV: Total wrist fusion or arthroplasty
  • •Stage I decision: MRI T1 signal confirms proximal pole viability for repair
  • •Stage II/III: Choice between 4CC and PRC based on patient factors, not outcomes

4CC vs PRC

  • •Similar outcomes: 80-90% pain relief, 50% ROM
  • •4CC: Better carpal height, 5-10% nonunion risk
  • •PRC: Simpler, faster rehab, needs intact cartilage
  • •PRC requirement: Capitate head + lunate fossa cartilage intact

Key Points

  • •SNAC = SLAC pattern, different etiology
  • •Stage I = last chance for repair
  • •Radiolunate preservation enables motion-preserving salvage
  • •Choose 4CC vs PRC based on patient factors, not outcomes
  • •Mack 1984: 97% develop radioscaphoid OA within 10 years
  • •4CC/PRC both achieve 80-90% pain relief, 50% ROM preservation
Quick Stats
Reading Time86 min
Related Topics

Acetabular Fractures

Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries

Acute Compartment Syndrome

Ankle Fractures