SNAC WRIST - SCAPHOID NONUNION ADVANCED COLLAPSE
Progressive Arthritis | Identical Pattern to SLAC | Motion-Preserving Salvage
SNAC STAGING SYSTEM
Critical Must-Knows
- Identical arthritis pattern to SLAC wrist - only etiology differs (nonunion vs SL dissociation)
- Radiolunate joint preserved until Stage IV - allows motion-preserving procedures
- Stage I window: May still attempt nonunion repair with styloidectomy
- Stage II/III treatment: 4-corner fusion or proximal row carpectomy - comparable outcomes
- 97% develop radioscaphoid OA within 10 years if nonunion untreated
Examiner's Pearls
- "SNAC = SLAC pattern from different etiology
- "Lunate stays congruent with radius - preserved articulation
- "4CC fuses capitate-lunate-hamate-triquetrum after scaphoid excision
- "PRC removes entire proximal row - capitate articulates with lunate fossa
Critical SNAC Wrist Concepts for Exams
SNAC = SLAC Pattern
Identical arthritis progression: Radial styloid then scaphocapitate then capitolunate then pancarpal. Treatment concepts are the same - only etiology differs (nonunion vs SL dissociation).
Radiolunate Preserved
Radiolunate joint preserved until Stage IV because lunate maintains normal articulation with radius. This allows motion-preserving salvage procedures in most patients.
Stage Determines Treatment
Stage I: May still repair nonunion (window closes with progression). Stage II/III: Motion-preserving salvage (4CC or PRC). Stage IV: Total wrist fusion.
4CC vs PRC Debate
Both preserve approximately 50% wrist motion with comparable outcomes. 4CC maintains carpal height better. PRC is simpler with faster rehabilitation. Choice depends on surgeon and patient factors.
At a Glance Table
SNAC Wrist Stages and Management
| Stage | Arthritis Location | Key Features | Treatment Options |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stage I | Radial styloid only | Last window for nonunion repair, 97% progress if untreated | Nonunion repair + styloidectomy OR motion-preserving salvage |
| Stage II | Scaphocapitate added | Midcarpal involvement, radiolunate preserved | 4-corner fusion OR proximal row carpectomy |
| Stage III | Capitolunate added | Further proximal migration, radiolunate still preserved | 4-corner fusion OR proximal row carpectomy |
| Stage IV | Pancarpal (radiolunate) | Rare, all joints involved | Total wrist fusion OR total wrist arthroplasty |
R-S-C-PSNAC Stage Progression
Memory Hook:RSC-P: Radial Styloid, ScaphoCapitate, CapitoLunate, Pancarpal - same sequence as SLAC!
Overview
SNAC (Scaphoid Nonunion Advanced Collapse) wrist represents the predictable pattern of progressive arthritis that develops following untreated or failed treatment of scaphoid nonunion. It shares an identical arthritis progression pattern with SLAC (Scapholunate Advanced Collapse) wrist, differing only in the underlying etiology.
The natural history of untreated scaphoid nonunion leads to SNAC wrist in the vast majority of cases, with Mack et al. demonstrating radioscaphoid arthritis in 97% of patients within 10 years. Understanding this progression is essential for:
- Counseling patients regarding the importance of scaphoid nonunion treatment
- Staging the disease to guide appropriate surgical management
- Selecting motion-preserving versus motion-eliminating procedures
Anatomy
Normal Carpal Kinematics
The scaphoid serves as a critical link between the proximal and distal carpal rows:
- Span function: Bridges radiocarpal and midcarpal joints
- Load transmission: Transfers approximately 60% of axial load from distal row to radius
- Motion coupling: Coordinates proximal row flexion-extension with distal row motion
Consequences of Scaphoid Nonunion
When scaphoid nonunion occurs:
Distal Fragment Behavior:
- Flexes with the distal carpal row
- Creates dorsal intercalated segment instability (DISI) pattern
- Causes abnormal contact between dorsal lip of distal fragment and radial styloid
Proximal Fragment Behavior:
- Extends with the lunate (remains linked)
- May develop AVN (especially proximal pole fractures)
- Loses normal articulation with distal fragment
Altered Load Transmission:
- Abnormal point loading at styloscaphoid articulation
- Increased stress across scaphocapitate joint
- Progressive cartilage degeneration in predictable sequence
Why Radiolunate Joint is Preserved
The radiolunate joint remains congruent and normally loaded because:
- Lunate maintains spherical articulation with lunate fossa of radius
- No abnormal shear or point loading across this joint
- Preserved until very late stage disease (Stage IV - rare)
This preservation of the radiolunate articulation is the key anatomic feature that allows motion-preserving salvage procedures in SNAC wrist.
CONGRUENTWhy Radiolunate Preserved
Memory Hook:CONGRUENT lunate: The radiolunate joint stays CONGRUENT until very late disease
Pathophysiology
Mechanism of Progressive Collapse
The progression from scaphoid nonunion to advanced collapse follows a predictable sequence:
Stage 1: Styloscaphoid Arthritis
- Nonunion allows distal fragment to flex
- Dorsal lip of distal fragment contacts radial styloid
- Abnormal point loading causes cartilage wear
- Osteophyte formation at styloid tip ("beaking")
Stage 2: Scaphocapitate Arthritis
- Loss of scaphoid span function
- Capitate migrates proximally
- Abnormal articulation between capitate and scaphoid fragments
- Midcarpal joint degeneration begins
Stage 3: Capitolunate Arthritis
- Further proximal migration of capitate
- Capitate-lunate articulation becomes incongruent
- Articular cartilage loss at capitolunate joint
- Radiolunate joint still preserved
Stage 4: Pancarpal Arthritis (Rare)
- Occurs only with severe long-standing disease
- Finally involves radiolunate articulation
- Loss of spherical lunate-radius relationship
- No motion-preserving options possible
Progressive Nature
Untreated scaphoid nonunion leads to SNAC wrist in 97% of patients within 10 years (Mack 1984). The window for nonunion repair closes as arthritis progresses. Early treatment prevents this irreversible cascade.
Comparison: SNAC vs SLAC
| Feature | SNAC Wrist | SLAC Wrist |
|---|---|---|
| Etiology | Scaphoid nonunion | Scapholunate dissociation |
| Mechanism | Distal fragment malrotation | Scaphoid flexion, lunate extension |
| Stage I | Radial styloid OA | Radial styloid OA |
| Stage II | Scaphocapitate OA | Scaphocapitate OA |
| Stage III | Capitolunate OA | Capitolunate OA |
| Stage IV | Pancarpal (rare) | Pancarpal (rare) |
| Treatment | Identical | Identical |
SNAC = SLAC
Key exam point: SNAC and SLAC wrist have identical arthritis progression patterns. The only difference is the underlying cause. This means treatment algorithms are the same for both conditions at each stage.
Classification Systems
SNAC Staging System
Radial Styloid Arthritis
Location: Between radial styloid and scaphoid
X-ray findings:
- Styloid "beaking" (osteophyte formation)
- Narrowed styloscaphoid joint space
- Sclerosis at styloid tip
- Preserved scaphocapitate and capitolunate joints
Clinical significance: Window for nonunion repair still open - last chance to restore near-normal wrist function
Treatment: Nonunion repair with bone graft and radial styloidectomy OR motion-preserving salvage
Clinical Assessment
History
Presenting Complaints:
- Wrist pain, often long-standing
- Decreased grip strength
- Limited wrist motion
- History of prior scaphoid fracture (often remote)
- May recall wrist injury years prior that was never treated
Pain Characteristics:
- Activity-related initially
- May become constant in advanced stages
- Dorsoradial location typically
- Worse with gripping and loading
Functional Limitations:
- Difficulty with push-ups or weight-bearing on hand
- Problems with twisting motions (opening jars)
- Reduced work capacity (especially manual laborers)
- Sports participation affected
Physical Examination
Inspection:
- Dorsal wrist swelling (synovitis)
- Reduced visible wrist motion
- Possible radial deviation deformity
Palpation:
- Tenderness over radial styloid
- Anatomical snuffbox tenderness
- Scaphoid tubercle tenderness
- May have palpable crepitus with motion
Range of Motion:
- Reduced flexion and extension
- Reduced radial deviation
- Document pre-operative ROM for comparison
Special Tests:
- Watson scaphoid shift test: May be difficult due to nonunion
- Grip strength: Typically reduced
- Radiolunate grind test: Positive only in Stage IV
Provocative Testing
Scaphocapitate Grind Test:
- Axially load wrist while moving through flexion-extension
- Positive: Pain or crepitus at midcarpal level
- Suggests Stage II or higher
Capitolunate Stress Test:
- Direct pressure over capitate with wrist in neutral
- Positive: Tenderness suggests Stage III involvement
Investigations
level=2>
Plain Radiographs
Standard Views:
- PA view: Overall carpal alignment, joint spaces
- Lateral view: Carpal height ratio, DISI pattern
- Scaphoid views: Nonunion characteristics, fragment positions
Key X-ray Findings by Stage:
| Stage | PA View Findings | Lateral View Findings |
|---|---|---|
| I | Styloid beaking, styloscaphoid narrowing | DISI pattern (SL angle greater than 70 degrees) |
| II | Scaphocapitate narrowing, sclerosis | Proximal capitate migration |
| III | Capitolunate narrowing added | Further capitate migration |
| IV | Radiolunate narrowing | Complete carpal collapse |
Measurements:
- Scapholunate angle: Greater than 70 degrees indicates DISI
- Carpal height ratio: Decreased with proximal migration
- Radiolunate angle: Normal until Stage IV
CT Scan
Indications:
- Assess nonunion characteristics
- Evaluate proximal pole vascularity (indirect)
- Pre-operative planning for salvage procedures
- Better visualization of arthritic changes
Findings:
- Nonunion site: Gap, cystic changes, sclerosis
- Fragment positions and rotation
- Articular surface integrity at each joint
- Cystic changes in carpal bones
MRI
Indications:
- Proximal pole vascularity assessment (if considering repair)
- Evaluate ligamentous structures
- Assess for associated pathology
Key Findings:
- Proximal pole signal: Low T1 signal suggests AVN
- Cartilage assessment: Can visualize articular damage
- SL ligament: Often attenuated or torn
Management

Non-operative Treatment
Limited Role in SNAC:
- May provide temporary symptom relief
- Does not alter disease progression
- Generally used only for:
- Patients unfit for surgery
- Patients declining surgery
- Bridge to definitive treatment
Options:
- Activity modification
- Splinting/bracing
- NSAIDs
- Intra-articular corticosteroid injections
Non-operative Limitations
Non-operative treatment does NOT prevent SNAC progression. Untreated disease continues to advance through stages. Surgery is indicated for symptomatic SNAC in appropriate surgical candidates.
Management Algorithm
S.T.A.G.ESNAC Treatment Algorithm
Memory Hook:S.T.A.G.E guides treatment: Save (repair), Transition, Arthrodesis (4CC), Gone (PRC), End-stage (TWF)
Primary Goal: Attempt salvage of scaphoid nonunion if possible
Option 1: Nonunion Repair + Radial Styloidectomy
- Requirements:
- Viable proximal pole (MRI assessment)
- Repairable nonunion configuration
- Patient willing to accept prolonged recovery
- Technique:
- Open reduction internal fixation of nonunion
- Vascularized or non-vascularized bone graft
- Radial styloidectomy (2-3mm) to address OA
- Headless compression screw fixation
- Outcomes:
- Union rates 70-90% with appropriate selection
- If successful, prevents SNAC progression
- Return to near-normal wrist function
Option 2: Proceed to Motion-Preserving Salvage
- Indicated if:
- Proximal pole AVN present
- Nonunion not reconstructable
- Patient prefers single definitive procedure
If nonunion repair is not feasible, proceed directly to Stage II/III salvage procedures (4CC or PRC).
4CC vs PRC Comparison
Four-Corner Fusion vs Proximal Row Carpectomy
| Feature | 4CC | PRC |
|---|---|---|
| Technical difficulty | More demanding | Simpler |
| Operating time | Longer | Shorter |
| Nonunion risk | 5-10% | None |
| Hardware complications | Possible | None |
| Carpal height | Better maintained | Decreased |
| Rehabilitation | Slower (8-12 weeks) | Faster (6-8 weeks) |
| ROM outcomes | Similar (50%) | Similar (50%) |
| Pain relief | Similar (80-90%) | Similar (80-90%) |
| Grip strength | Similar | Similar |
| Revision options | Convert to TWF | Convert to TWF or TWA |
| Cartilage requirement | None | Capitate head + lunate fossa intact |
PRC Requirement
Critical for exam: PRC requires intact cartilage on the capitate head AND the lunate fossa. If either articular surface is damaged, PRC is contraindicated - proceed to 4CC.
Surgical Technique
Step 1: Approach
- Dorsal longitudinal incision
- Develop interval between 3rd and 4th extensor compartments
- Ligate terminal branch of posterior interosseous nerve
- Perform dorsal capsulotomy
Step 2: Scaphoid Excision
- Identify and excise scaphoid completely
- Careful removal of all fragments
- Preserve volar radiocarpal ligaments
Step 3: Cartilage Preparation
- Remove cartilage from capitate, lunate, hamate, triquetrum
- Preserve subchondral bone plate initially
- Create bleeding bone surfaces
Step 4: Bone Grafting
- Harvest cancellous bone from distal radius or iliac crest
- Pack graft into prepared fusion surfaces
- Fill scaphoid void
Step 5: Fixation
- Options: Circular dorsal plate (most common), spider plate, individual screws, K-wires
- Ensure compression across all fusion surfaces
Step 6: Closure
- Capsular closure if possible
- Extensor retinaculum repair
- Skin closure and splint in neutral position
The four-corner fusion creates a stable construct while preserving the radiolunate articulation.
Complications
Four-Corner Fusion Complications
Nonunion (5-10%)
- Most significant complication
- Risk factors: Smoking, inadequate fixation, poor bone quality
- Management: Revision with bone graft, improved fixation
Hardware Problems
- Prominent hardware causing extensor tendon irritation
- Screw loosening
- Plate failure
- May require hardware removal after union
Stiffness
- ROM less than expected
- Usually from prolonged immobilization
- Therapy may improve
DRUJ Issues
- Pre-existing DRUJ arthritis may become symptomatic
- Consider concurrent Darrach or DRUJ fusion
Radiocarpal Arthritis Progression
- Radiolunate joint may develop arthritis long-term
- May require conversion to total wrist fusion
Proximal Row Carpectomy Complications
Progressive Arthritis
- Cartilage wear at radiocapitate articulation
- Concern for long-term durability
- May require conversion to fusion
Carpal Instability
- Capitate subluxation rare
- Usually stable construct
Weakness
- Grip strength typically 60-80% of normal
- Some patients disappointed with strength
Conversion to Fusion
- May be needed if progressive arthritis develops
- PRC does not "burn bridges" for future fusion
General Complications
Infection: Standard surgical infection risk Nerve injury: Superficial radial nerve, PIN Stiffness: Expected - counsel patients pre-operatively Complex regional pain syndrome: Rare but devastating
Postoperative Care
Four-Corner Fusion Protocol
Week 0-2:
- Bulky dressing and splint
- Strict elevation
- Finger range of motion exercises
Week 2-6:
- Short arm cast or removable splint
- Continue finger motion
- No loading
Week 6-12:
- Serial radiographs to assess fusion
- Begin wrist ROM when fusion evident
- Gradual strengthening
Week 12+:
- Progressive loading as tolerated
- Full activities when fully fused (typically 3-4 months)
- Grip strengthening program
Proximal Row Carpectomy Protocol
Week 0-2:
- Bulky dressing and splint
- Elevation
- Finger motion
Week 2-6:
- Begin active wrist ROM
- Splint for comfort between exercises
- No loading
Week 6-12:
- Progressive strengthening
- Discontinue splint
- Gradual return to activities
Week 12+:
- Full activities as tolerated
- Typically faster recovery than 4CC
Outcomes/Prognosis
Natural History Without Treatment
- 97% develop radioscaphoid OA within 10 years
- Progressive pain and functional decline
- Eventual pancarpal arthritis in some
- Grip strength deterioration
Outcomes After Surgical Treatment
Stage I - Nonunion Repair + Styloidectomy:
- Union rates 70-90% with proper selection
- If union achieved, good long-term function
- Prevents SNAC progression
Stage II/III - 4CC:
- Pain relief: 80-90%
- ROM: 50% of normal (30-40 degrees F/E arc)
- Grip: 60-80% of normal
- Patient satisfaction: 75-85%
- Revision rate: 5-10% (mostly nonunion)
Stage II/III - PRC:
- Pain relief: 80-90%
- ROM: 50% of normal
- Grip: 60-80% of normal
- Patient satisfaction: 75-85%
- 10-year survival: 90%+ in most series
Stage IV - Total Wrist Fusion:
- Pain relief: 90%+
- ROM: 0 degrees (complete fusion)
- Grip: Often improves from pre-operative
- High satisfaction for appropriate patients
Evidence Base
SNAC Natural History Study
- 97% of untreated scaphoid nonunions developed radioscaphoid arthritis within 10 years. Progression to advanced collapse is predictable and time-dependent.
4CC vs PRC Long-Term Outcomes
- Both 4-corner fusion and proximal row carpectomy provide comparable pain relief, motion, and patient satisfaction for SNAC/SLAC Stage II and III wrists.
Proximal Row Carpectomy Long-Term Results
- PRC provides durable pain relief with 90%+ survival at 10 years. Radiocapitate arthritis develops but is often asymptomatic.
Four-Corner Fusion Outcomes
- 4CC achieves 90% union rates with circular plate fixation. Motion preserved at approximately 50% of normal. Nonunion is the primary complication.
SNAC/SLAC Treatment Meta-Analysis
- Meta-analysis of 4CC vs PRC shows no significant difference in pain relief, ROM, grip strength, or patient satisfaction between procedures for SNAC/SLAC wrists.
Exam Viva Scenarios
Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination
SNAC Stage II Management
"A 48-year-old mechanic presents with wrist pain. He recalls injuring his wrist playing football 15 years ago but never sought treatment. X-rays show an ununited scaphoid fracture with scaphocapitate joint arthritis but a preserved radiolunate joint."
Exceptional Answer Framework:
This is a classic SNAC Stage II presentation - scaphoid nonunion with established scaphocapitate arthritis but preserved radiolunate articulation. The 15-year history confirms Mack's observation that 97% develop radioscaphoid arthritis within 10 years.
Treatment rationale: Stage II has passed the window for nonunion repair - established arthritis means the damaged joint surfaces cannot be salvaged. Motion-preserving procedures are indicated because the radiolunate joint remains intact.
Options: Both 4CC and PRC provide equivalent outcomes in literature (Cohen 2001, Mulford meta-analysis 2009). I would discuss both with the patient:
- 4CC: Better carpal height maintenance, may suit heavy laborer, 5-10% nonunion risk
- PRC: Simpler, faster rehab, requires intact capitate head cartilage
For a 48-year-old mechanic, I would lean toward 4CC for better grip strength and carpal height, but either is acceptable based on shared decision-making.
MCQ Practice Points
Pattern Recognition Question
Q: What is the relationship between SNAC wrist and SLAC wrist arthritis patterns?
A: They are identical. Both progress in the same sequence: radial styloid to scaphocapitate to capitolunate to pancarpal. The only difference is the underlying etiology (scaphoid nonunion vs scapholunate dissociation).
Preserved Joint Question
Q: Which carpal articulation is preserved until late-stage SNAC wrist, and why?
A: The radiolunate joint is preserved until Stage IV because the lunate maintains its normal congruent articulation with the lunate fossa of the radius. There is no abnormal loading across this joint until very late disease.
Treatment Selection Question
Q: What is the critical cartilage requirement for proximal row carpectomy?
A: PRC requires intact cartilage on both the capitate head AND the lunate fossa of the radius. If either surface is damaged, PRC is contraindicated - proceed to 4-corner fusion instead.
Stage I Window Question
Q: Why is Stage I SNAC wrist particularly important?
A: Stage I represents the last window for nonunion repair. If the proximal pole is viable and the nonunion is repairable, treatment at Stage I can restore near-normal wrist function and prevent progression. Once Stage II develops, salvage procedures become necessary.
Outcomes Comparison Question
Q: How do outcomes compare between 4-corner fusion and proximal row carpectomy?
A: Similar outcomes for both procedures: 80-90% pain relief, approximately 50% of normal ROM (30-40 degrees flexion-extension arc), 60-80% grip strength, and 75-85% patient satisfaction. The choice is based on surgeon and patient factors, not outcome differences.
Australian Context
SNAC wrist surgery is performed at specialized hand surgery centers throughout Australia, with both four-corner fusion and proximal row carpectomy being commonly performed procedures. Total wrist fusion is available at major metropolitan centers for Stage IV disease.
The epidemiology of scaphoid nonunion and subsequent SNAC wrist in Australia follows international patterns, with sports-related injuries being a significant contributor in the younger population. Australian Hand Surgery Society registry data demonstrates outcomes consistent with international literature for both motion-preserving procedures.
SNAC and SLAC wrist are common topics in Orthopaedic orthopaedic fellowship examinations, with particular emphasis on pattern recognition, staging systems, and treatment algorithms. Candidates should be familiar with the identical arthritis progression patterns of both conditions despite their different etiologies.
Both 4CC and PRC have established track records in Australian practice with comparable patient satisfaction and functional outcomes.
SNAC WRIST
High-Yield Exam Summary
Pattern (= SLAC)
- •Radial styloid leads to Scaphocapitate leads to Capitolunate leads to Pancarpal
- •Radiolunate preserved until Stage IV (rare)
- •97% develop radioscaphoid OA within 10 years if untreated
- •Etiology differs (nonunion vs SL dissociation) but arthritis pattern identical
- •Treatment algorithms same for SNAC and SLAC at each stage
Staging
- •Stage I: Radial styloid OA only - repair window
- •Stage II: Scaphocapitate OA - salvage indicated
- •Stage III: Capitolunate OA added - salvage indicated
- •Stage IV: Pancarpal OA (rare) - total fusion
Treatment by Stage
- •Stage I: Nonunion repair + styloidectomy (if viable proximal pole)
- •Stage II/III: 4CC or PRC (both preserve 50% ROM)
- •Stage IV: Total wrist fusion or arthroplasty
- •Stage I decision: MRI T1 signal confirms proximal pole viability for repair
- •Stage II/III: Choice between 4CC and PRC based on patient factors, not outcomes
4CC vs PRC
- •Similar outcomes: 80-90% pain relief, 50% ROM
- •4CC: Better carpal height, 5-10% nonunion risk
- •PRC: Simpler, faster rehab, needs intact cartilage
- •PRC requirement: Capitate head + lunate fossa cartilage intact
Key Points
- •SNAC = SLAC pattern, different etiology
- •Stage I = last chance for repair
- •Radiolunate preservation enables motion-preserving salvage
- •Choose 4CC vs PRC based on patient factors, not outcomes
- •Mack 1984: 97% develop radioscaphoid OA within 10 years
- •4CC/PRC both achieve 80-90% pain relief, 50% ROM preservation