Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Subaxial Cervical Spine Fractures

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Subaxial Cervical Spine Fractures

Comprehensive guide to subaxial cervical spine injuries - SLIC classification, AO Spine classification, surgical decision-making, anterior vs posterior approaches for orthopaedic exam

complete
Updated: 2024-12-16
High Yield Overview

SUBAXIAL CERVICAL SPINE FRACTURES

C3-C7 Injuries | SLIC Score Guides Treatment | Anterior vs Posterior Approach

C5-C6Most common level
SLIC 4+Surgical threshold
55%Associated spinal cord injury
MRIEssential for soft tissue assessment

SLIC CLASSIFICATION

SLIC 0-3
PatternStable injury pattern
TreatmentNon-operative (collar)
SLIC 4
PatternIndeterminate
TreatmentSurgeon discretion
SLIC 5+
PatternUnstable injury
TreatmentSurgical stabilization

Critical Must-Knows

  • SLIC score (morphology + DLC + neurology) guides surgical decision-making
  • Disco-ligamentous complex (DLC) is the key determinant of instability
  • MRI essential to assess DLC integrity and cord compression
  • Anterior approach for disc/vertebral body pathology, posterior for facet/lamina
  • Combined approach for severe instability or when anterior alone insufficient

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    SLIC 4 or more indicates surgical management
  • "
    Indeterminate DLC on MRI = 1 point, disrupted = 2 points
  • "
    Incomplete cord injury with ongoing compression = urgent surgery
  • "
    Facet dislocations often require posterior reduction first

Critical Subaxial Cervical Spine Exam Points

SLIC Score Calculation

Three components: Morphology (0-4) + DLC status (0-2) + Neurological status (0-4). Score of 4 or more indicates surgical intervention. Know each component scoring.

DLC Assessment

Disco-ligamentous complex includes disc, ALL, PLL, ligamentum flavum, interspinous ligaments, facet capsules. MRI required for assessment. Disrupted DLC = unstable.

Approach Selection

Anterior approach: corpectomy/discectomy, kyphosis correction, ventral compression. Posterior approach: facet injuries, lamina fractures, posterior tension band disruption.

Neurological Status

Complete injury: stable neurology, timing less critical. Incomplete injury with compression: urgent decompression within 24 hours improves outcomes (STASCIS data).

Quick Decision Guide

SLIC ScoreInjury PatternTreatmentKey Pearl
0-3Compression fracture, intact DLCRigid collar 6-12 weeksNon-op if DLC intact - most common scenario
4Indeterminate stabilitySurgeon preferenceMRI critical - DLC status determines treatment
5-6Burst + DLC disruptionSurgical stabilizationConsider anterior corpectomy with cage
7+Fracture-dislocation + incomplete SCIUrgent surgical decompressionWithin 24h for incomplete SCI with compression
Mnemonic

MDNSLIC Score Components

M
Morphology
0-4 points: compression, burst, distraction, translation
D
DLC status
0-2 points: intact, indeterminate, disrupted
N
Neurological status
0-4 points: intact to complete cord injury

Memory Hook:MDN - Morphology, DLC, Neurology determine stability - score 4 or more means surgery!

Mnemonic

CBDTMorphology Scoring

C
Compression = 1
Compression fracture without burst
B
Burst = 2
Anterior and posterior cortex involved
D
Distraction = 3
Flexion-distraction or extension injury
T
Translation/rotation = 4
Facet dislocation, severe instability

Memory Hook:C1-B2-D3-T4: Compression 1, Burst 2, Distraction 3, Translation 4 - easy to remember!

Mnemonic

DAPLICDLC Components

D
Disc
Intervertebral disc
A
ALL and PLL
Anterior and posterior longitudinal ligaments
P
Posterior ligaments
Ligamentum flavum, interspinous, supraspinous
L
Ligamentum flavum
Between laminae
I
Interspinous
Between spinous processes
C
Capsule
Facet joint capsules

Memory Hook:The DLC is the key - if disrupted, the spine is unstable regardless of bone injury!

Mnemonic

AVPApproach Selection

A
Anterior for Anterior pathology
Disc herniation, vertebral body, kyphosis
V
Ventral decompression
Direct removal of retropulsed bone/disc
P
Posterior for Posterior injury
Facet fractures, lamina, posterior ligaments

Memory Hook:Anterior pathology = Anterior approach; Posterior pathology = Posterior approach - match the pathology to the approach!

Overview and Epidemiology

Subaxial cervical spine injuries (C3-C7) represent approximately 50% of all cervical spine fractures. These injuries carry significant morbidity due to the high rate of associated spinal cord injury.

Epidemiology:

  • Bimodal age distribution (young trauma, elderly falls)
  • Male predominance (3:1)
  • Most common at C5-C6 level (greatest mobility)
  • MVA and falls are primary mechanisms
  • Associated spinal cord injury in up to 55%

Why C5-C6?

The C5-C6 level is most commonly injured because it represents the transition zone between the more mobile middle cervical spine and the relatively stiffer lower cervical spine. This biomechanical transition creates a stress concentration point.

Mechanism patterns:

  • Flexion-compression: Burst fractures, teardrop fractures
  • Extension-compression: Lamina fractures, hangman's variants
  • Flexion-distraction: Facet dislocations, posterior ligament disruption
  • Axial compression: Burst fractures
  • Lateral flexion: Unilateral injuries

Anatomy and Biomechanics

Key anatomical structures:

The subaxial cervical spine (C3-C7) has consistent anatomy with:

  • Vertebral body - primary load-bearing structure
  • Facet joints - 45-degree orientation, guide motion
  • Uncovertebral joints - resist lateral translation
  • Intervertebral disc - shock absorption, motion
  • Ligamentous structures - stability through ROM

The Disco-Ligamentous Complex (DLC)

The DLC is the primary determinant of stability. It includes:

  • Intervertebral disc
  • Anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL)
  • Posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL)
  • Ligamentum flavum
  • Interspinous and supraspinous ligaments
  • Facet capsules

If the DLC is disrupted, the injury is unstable regardless of bony injury severity.

Spinal cord considerations:

  • Cervical cord enlargement (C4-T1) - higher injury consequence
  • Space available for cord = canal diameter minus cord diameter
  • Normal canal diameter approximately 17mm
  • Cord diameter approximately 10mm
  • Stenosis increases injury severity for same energy

Biomechanical Motion Segments

LevelPrimary MotionClinical Significance
C3-C4Flexion/extensionEarly degenerative changes
C4-C5Flexion/extensionCommon stenosis level
C5-C6Maximum motionMost common injury level
C6-C7Transition zoneStress concentration
C7-T1Cervicothoracic junctionMechanically critical

Neurological anatomy:

  • Cervical nerve roots exit above their numbered vertebra (C6 root exits C5-C6 foramen)
  • Exception: C8 root exits below C7 (no C8 vertebra)
  • Root injury more common than cord injury in unilateral facet injuries
  • Cord injury more common with bilateral facet dislocations

Classification Systems

Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification (SLIC)

The SLIC system is the most widely used classification for guiding treatment decisions.

Component 1: Morphology (0-4 points)

PatternPointsDescription
No abnormality0Normal alignment and structure
Compression1Loss of anterior height, intact posterior
Burst2Anterior and posterior cortex involved
Distraction3Abnormal separation of vertebrae
Translation/rotation4Horizontal displacement or rotation

Component 2: Disco-Ligamentous Complex (0-2 points)

DLC StatusPointsMRI Findings
Intact0Normal signal, no disruption
Indeterminate1Isolated interspinous widening, subtle changes
Disrupted2High signal in disc, widened facets, ligament rupture

Component 3: Neurological Status (0-4 points)

StatusPointsModifier
Intact0No neurological deficit
Root injury1Single nerve root deficit
Complete cord injury2ASIA A
Incomplete cord injury3ASIA B, C, or D
Ongoing compression with incomplete SCI+1Add to incomplete score

SLIC Treatment Threshold

  • SLIC 0-3: Non-operative (rigid collar 6-12 weeks)
  • SLIC 4: Indeterminate (surgeon preference)
  • SLIC 5+: Operative treatment recommended

AO Spine Subaxial Classification

The AO Spine classification provides a more detailed morphological description.

Type A: Compression Injuries

  • A0: Minor, non-structural
  • A1: Wedge compression
  • A2: Split fracture
  • A3: Incomplete burst
  • A4: Complete burst

Type B: Tension Band Injuries

  • B1: Monosegmental posterior disruption
  • B2: Posterior tension band disruption with vertebral body injury
  • B3: Anterior tension band disruption (hyperextension)

Type C: Translation Injuries

  • Any injury with translation/rotation
  • Highest instability

Neurological Modifiers (N0-Nx):

  • N0: Intact
  • N1: Transient deficit resolved
  • N2: Radiculopathy
  • N3: Incomplete SCI
  • N4: Complete SCI
  • Nx: Cannot be assessed

AO vs SLIC

While AO provides excellent morphological description, SLIC remains more practical for treatment decision-making in clinical practice and is more commonly examined.

Allen-Ferguson Mechanistic Classification

Historically important, describes injury mechanism:

Flexion-Compression (FC)

  • Stage 1-4 based on progression
  • Teardrop fractures

Flexion-Distraction (FD)

  • Facet subluxation to dislocation
  • Stage 1: Facet subluxation less than 50%
  • Stage 2: Unilateral facet dislocation
  • Stage 3: Bilateral facet dislocation

Extension-Compression (EC)

  • Lamina fractures
  • Extension teardrop

Extension-Distraction (ED)

  • Hyperextension injury
  • Anterior disc disruption

Lateral Flexion (LF)

  • Unilateral compression
  • Transverse process fractures

Vertical Compression (VC)

  • Burst fractures
  • Jefferson-type at subaxial levels

Allen-Ferguson Context

Allen-Ferguson helps understand mechanism and predict associated injuries. However, SLIC has largely replaced it for treatment planning as it directly incorporates neurological status and DLC assessment.

Clinical Assessment

History:

  • Mechanism of injury (high vs low energy)
  • Time since injury
  • Any neurological symptoms (weakness, numbness, bladder/bowel)
  • Previous cervical spine problems
  • Medical comorbidities affecting surgical decision

Physical examination:

General Assessment

  • Airway: Consider early intubation if unstable
  • Breathing: Diaphragmatic if high cord injury
  • Circulation: Neurogenic shock (bradycardia + hypotension)
  • Associated injuries: Head, chest, polytrauma

Spine Examination

  • Inspection: Bruising, deformity, step-off
  • Palpation: Tenderness, interspinous widening
  • Range of motion: Do NOT test if unstable suspected
  • Log-roll: Clear entire spine

Neurological examination:

ASIA Impairment Scale

GradeDescriptionMotor/Sensory
ACompleteNo motor or sensory below level
BSensory incompleteSensory but no motor below level
CMotor incompleteMotor below level, less than half key muscles grade 3+
DMotor incompleteMotor below level, at least half key muscles grade 3+
ENormalNormal motor and sensory

Document Neurological Status

Complete neurological examination documented at presentation is essential for:

  • Baseline for monitoring deterioration
  • Surgical decision-making
  • Prognostication
  • Medicolegal protection

Key dermatomal landmarks:

  • C4: Shoulder
  • C5: Lateral arm, deltoid
  • C6: Thumb, wrist extensors
  • C7: Middle finger, triceps
  • C8: Little finger, finger flexors
  • T1: Medial arm, intrinsics

Myotomal testing:

  • C5: Deltoid, biceps
  • C6: Wrist extensors, brachioradialis
  • C7: Triceps, wrist flexors
  • C8: Finger flexors
  • T1: Finger abduction (intrinsics)

Investigations

Imaging Protocol

ImmediateCT Cervical Spine

First-line imaging for trauma. Thin-cut CT from occiput to T1. Sagittal and coronal reconstructions essential. Sensitivity more than 99% for fractures.

If neurological deficit or instabilityMRI Cervical Spine

Essential for DLC assessment. Shows disc herniation, ligament rupture, cord contusion, epidural hematoma. STIR sequences best for ligament injury.

If upper thoracic unclearCT Thoracic Spine

Extend imaging to assess cervicothoracic junction. Often obscured on plain films.

Post-operativeCT for fusion assessment

Thin-cut CT at 3-6 months to assess fusion. Earlier if concerns about hardware.

CT interpretation:

Key features to document:

  • Vertebral body morphology (compression, burst, translation)
  • Facet alignment (subluxation, perched, locked)
  • Canal compromise (percentage)
  • Fragment retropulsion
  • Spinous process widening (suggests posterior ligament injury)

MRI for SLIC

MRI is mandatory for SLIC scoring because DLC status cannot be determined from CT alone. Indeterminate or disrupted DLC significantly changes the score and treatment recommendation.

MRI interpretation:

  • T2/STIR high signal in disc: Disruption
  • Widened interspinous space with edema: Posterior ligament injury
  • Facet fluid/widening: Capsule disruption
  • Cord signal change: Contusion/hemorrhage (poor prognostic sign)
  • Epidural hematoma: May require urgent decompression

Imaging Modality Selection

ScenarioPrimary ImagingAdditional Imaging
Trauma, neurologically intactCT cervical spineMRI if surgery planned
Trauma with neurological deficitCT then urgent MRICT angiography if high suspicion dissection
Indeterminate stability on CTMRI for DLCFlexion-extension rarely indicated acutely
Post-operative assessmentX-ray seriesCT at 3-6 months for fusion

Management Algorithm

Initial Management

All patients with suspected cervical spine injury require:

  • Immobilization with rigid collar
  • Log-roll precautions
  • Neurological documentation
  • MAP optimization (target 85-90mmHg for incomplete SCI)
📊 Management Algorithm
Treatment algorithm flowchart for subaxial cervical fractures using SLIC
Click to expand
Subaxial Cervical Fracture Treatment Algorithm - SLIC scoring-based decision pathwayCredit: OrthoVellum

Indications for Non-Operative Treatment

SLIC score 0-3 with:

  • Intact disco-ligamentous complex
  • No neurological deficit
  • Minimal displacement
  • Stable fracture pattern

Protocol:

  • Hard collar (Miami J, Philadelphia) for 6-12 weeks
  • Serial lateral X-rays at 2, 6, and 12 weeks
  • Assess for progressive kyphosis or translation
  • ROM exercises after collar removed
  • Physiotherapy for strengthening

Monitoring:

  • Kyphosis progression more than 10 degrees = surgical consideration
  • Development of neurological symptoms = urgent MRI
  • Failure to heal at 12 weeks = consider surgery

When Non-Op Fails

Conversion to surgery indicated for:

  • Progressive kyphosis more than 10-15 degrees
  • Late neurological deterioration
  • Persistent instability on flexion-extension films
  • Non-union at 3-6 months

Surgical Indications

Absolute indications:

  • SLIC score 5 or more
  • Incomplete neurological deficit with ongoing compression
  • Unstable fracture-dislocation
  • Bilateral facet dislocation
  • Progressive neurological deficit

Relative indications:

  • SLIC 4 (surgeon discretion)
  • Polytrauma requiring early mobilization
  • Unable to tolerate collar (burns, skin breakdown)
  • Patient preference with appropriate counseling

Timing:

  • Urgent (less than 24h): Incomplete SCI with ongoing compression (STASCIS)
  • Early (24-72h): Most unstable injuries without SCI
  • Delayed: Stable patients, complete SCI

STASCIS Evidence

The Surgical Timing in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (STASCIS) showed that decompression within 24 hours for incomplete SCI improves neurological outcomes by at least 2 ASIA grades in 19.8% vs 8.8% for late surgery.

Anterior vs Posterior Approach

Anterior approach indications:

  • Vertebral body fracture requiring corpectomy
  • Disc herniation causing ventral compression
  • Kyphotic deformity correction
  • Anterior column deficiency

Anterior approach advantages:

  • Direct decompression of ventral pathology
  • Better kyphosis correction
  • Single position (supine)
  • Familiar anatomy for most surgeons

Posterior approach indications:

  • Facet fracture/dislocation
  • Posterior element injury
  • Posterior tension band disruption
  • Need for multilevel fixation

Posterior approach advantages:

  • Stronger fixation with lateral mass screws
  • Better for facet reduction
  • Can address posterior ligament injury
  • More levels can be instrumented

Combined approach indications:

  • Severe instability (3-column injury)
  • Anterior corpectomy with posterior tension band failure
  • Circumferential decompression needed
  • Revision for failed single approach

Approach Selection Guide

Injury PatternPreferred ApproachRationale
Compression fracture with retropulsionAnterior corpectomyDirect decompression of canal
Burst fracture with kyphosisAnterior corpectomy + cageRestores height and lordosis
Unilateral facet dislocationPosterior reduction + fusionFacet reduction easier posteriorly
Bilateral facet dislocationPosterior first, consider anteriorReduce facets, then stabilize
Fracture-dislocation with SCICombined anterior-posteriorMaximum stability and decompression

Surgical Technique

Pre-operative Planning

Consent Points

  • Neurological injury: Risk of worsening (1-2%)
  • Infection: Superficial 2-3%, deep less than 1%
  • Dysphagia (anterior): 50% early, 5% persistent
  • Hardware failure: 5-10%
  • Adjacent segment disease: Long-term risk
  • Recurrent laryngeal nerve (anterior): 2-5%

Equipment Checklist

  • Imaging: Fluoroscopy or navigation
  • Implants: Plates/screws (anterior), lateral mass screws (posterior)
  • Cage/graft: Structural allograft or cage for corpectomy
  • Neuromonitoring: SSEPs and MEPs
  • Cell saver: For multilevel procedures

Anterior Cervical Approach (Smith-Robinson)

Step-by-Step Technique

Step 1Positioning

Supine on radiolucent table. Head in neutral with gentle traction (Gardner-Wells if needed). Shoulder roll to extend neck. Arms tucked at sides.

Step 2Approach

Transverse incision at appropriate level (C5-6 at thyroid cartilage). Develop plane between carotid sheath laterally and trachea/esophagus medially. Retract longus colli muscles.

Step 3Exposure

Identify level with fluoroscopy. Mark with needle if uncertain. Expose vertebral bodies and discs. Preserve anterior longitudinal ligament if possible.

Step 4Decompression

Discectomy or corpectomy as indicated. Remove PLL to decompress canal. Visualize dura. Remove retropulsed fragments.

Step 5Reconstruction

Cage or graft to restore height. Size appropriately (1-2mm larger). Position centrally. Confirm alignment on fluoroscopy.

Step 6Fixation

Anterior plate spanning construct. Bicortical screws (4-5mm engaging posterior cortex). Confirm position with lateral fluoroscopy.

Avoid Esophageal Injury

Esophageal perforation is rare but devastating. Risk factors include:

  • Previous anterior surgery
  • Prominent osteophytes
  • Excessive retraction
  • Long operative time

Protect with gentle retractor placement and intermittent release.

Posterior Cervical Approach

Step-by-Step Technique

Step 1Positioning

Prone on Jackson table or with Mayfield head holder. Ensure neck neutral to slight flexion. Eyes and pressure points padded. Arms tucked.

Step 2Approach

Midline incision over spinous processes. Dissect subperiosteally to lateral mass. Maintain hemostasis. Identify levels with fluoroscopy.

Step 3Lateral Mass Screws

Entry point: 1mm medial and 1mm caudal to center of lateral mass. Trajectory: 30 degrees lateral, 15-20 degrees cephalad. Depth 14-18mm.

Step 4Reduction (if facet dislocation)

Open facet joint capsules. Gentle distraction. Use Moe or Penfield to reduce locked facets. Confirm reduction with fluoroscopy.

Step 5Decompression (if needed)

Laminectomy or laminoplasty for posterior compression. Foraminotomy for root decompression. Preserve as much bone as possible.

Step 6Fusion

Decorticate lateral masses and facets. Apply local autograft (from laminectomy) and/or allograft. Compress across construct.

Lateral Mass Screw Safety

The vertebral artery is at risk if screws are placed too laterally or the trajectory is too medial. The Magerl technique (30 degrees lateral, 15-20 degrees cephalad) keeps screws safe.

Combined Anterior-Posterior Approach

Indications:

  • Severe 3-column instability
  • Anterior corpectomy with posterior tension band disruption
  • Failed single approach
  • Circumferential decompression needed

Staging options:

  1. Same day anterior-posterior: Flip patient (longer, single anesthetic)
  2. Staged: Posterior first, anterior 5-7 days later (allows swelling to settle)
  3. Anterior-posterior-anterior: Rare, for extreme instability

Sequence considerations:

  • Posterior first if facet reduction needed (allows reduction before anterior fixation)
  • Anterior first if primary pathology ventral and posterior is supplemental

Combined Approach Risks

Combined approaches have increased risks:

  • Longer operative time
  • Greater blood loss
  • Higher infection rate
  • Increased swelling (airway compromise)
  • Consider staging if significant anterior edema

Intraoperative Troubleshooting

Common Problems and Solutions

ProblemCauseSolution
Cannot reduce facetLocked facet, interposed fragmentIncrease distraction, open facet capsule, remove fragment
Vertebral artery bleedingLateral screw trajectory, dissection too lateralPack with hemostatic agent, complete surgery, do NOT attempt repair
CSF leakDural tear during decompressionPrimary repair if possible, dural sealant, lumbar drain
Neuromonitoring changesCord compression, hypotension, positioningStop, check BP, optimize positioning, consider wake-up test

Complications

Complications of Subaxial Cervical Fractures and Surgery

ComplicationIncidencePrevention/Management
Neurological deterioration1-3%Careful reduction, neuromonitoring, appropriate timing
Dysphagia (anterior)Up to 50% earlyGentle retraction, minimize operative time
Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury2-5%Right-sided approach (unless revision), careful retraction
Hardware failure5-10%Appropriate construct length, bone quality assessment
Non-union/pseudarthrosis5-10%Adequate graft, smoking cessation, consider BMP
Adjacent segment diseaseUp to 25% at 10 yearsLimit fusion length, preserve motion where possible
Infection1-3%Prophylactic antibiotics, meticulous technique
Vertebral artery injuryLess than 1%Preoperative CT angiography, careful screw placement

Neurological deterioration:

  • Most feared complication
  • Risk higher with incomplete SCI
  • Prevention: neuromonitoring, careful reduction, avoid over-distraction

Dysphagia after anterior surgery:

  • Very common early (50%)
  • Usually resolves within weeks
  • Persistent in 5-10%
  • Consider thin liquids initially, speech pathology review

Right vs Left Approach

Left-sided approach is traditionally preferred because the recurrent laryngeal nerve has a more consistent course in the tracheoesophageal groove. On the right, it loops around the subclavian artery and has a variable course. However, right-sided revision is preferred if previous left approach.

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

Rehabilitation Timeline

ImmediateDay 0-1
  • ICU monitoring if SCI or high-risk
  • Neurological checks every 4 hours
  • DVT prophylaxis
  • Early mobilization assessment
  • Speech pathology if anterior (nil by mouth initially)
EarlyDays 2-7
  • Transition to ward if stable
  • Begin mobilization with collar
  • Physiotherapy assessment
  • Diet advancement (anterior)
  • Wound check
IntermediateWeeks 2-6
  • Wound review at 2 weeks
  • Continue hard collar
  • X-ray at 6 weeks
  • Progressive mobilization
  • SCI rehabilitation if indicated
ProgressiveWeeks 6-12
  • X-ray assessment of fusion
  • Consider collar weaning if stable
  • Increase activity
  • Physio for strengthening
Late3-6 months
  • CT to confirm fusion
  • Collar removal if fused
  • Return to work assessment
  • Long-term follow-up for adjacent segment disease

Collar protocol:

  • Most surgeons use hard collar for 6-12 weeks post-operatively
  • Earlier removal if rigid internal fixation and good bone quality
  • Longer if osteoporosis, multilevel, or concern about stability

Outcomes and Prognosis

Neurological outcomes:

  • Complete SCI (ASIA A): Minimal recovery expected, focus on rehabilitation
  • Incomplete SCI: Significant potential for recovery, especially with early decompression
  • Root injury: Usually good recovery over 6-12 months

Factors affecting outcome:

  • Severity of initial injury
  • Timing of decompression (for incomplete SCI)
  • Quality of reduction and stabilization
  • Patient factors (age, comorbidities, smoking)
  • Compliance with rehabilitation

STASCIS Outcomes

Early surgery (less than 24 hours) for incomplete SCI results in:

  • 19.8% improve at least 2 ASIA grades (vs 8.8% late)
  • Lower complication rates
  • Shorter ICU stay
  • Faster rehabilitation

Long-term considerations:

  • Adjacent segment disease in up to 25% at 10 years
  • Hardware removal rarely needed unless symptomatic
  • Ongoing surveillance for late instability
  • Return to contact sports controversial

Evidence Base

STASCIS: Surgical Timing in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study

2
Fehlings et al • PLOS ONE (2012)
Key Findings:
  • Multicenter prospective cohort study of 313 patients
  • Early surgery (less than 24h) vs late (more than 24h) for acute SCI
  • Early surgery: 19.8% improved at least 2 ASIA grades vs 8.8%
  • No increase in complications with early surgery
Clinical Implication: Decompression within 24 hours for incomplete SCI improves neurological outcomes.
Limitation: Not randomized - selection bias possible.

SLIC Validation Study

4
Vaccaro et al • Spine (2007)
Key Findings:
  • Development and validation of SLIC classification
  • High inter-rater reliability (kappa 0.71)
  • SLIC score correlated with treatment recommendations
  • Score 4 or more reliably identifies surgical candidates
Clinical Implication: SLIC provides reproducible system for treatment decision-making in subaxial cervical injuries.
Limitation: Retrospective validation, limited prospective data.

AO Spine Subaxial Classification

4
Vaccaro et al • European Spine Journal (2016)
Key Findings:
  • Comprehensive morphological classification
  • Incorporates neurological status and modifiers
  • High reliability across centers
  • Complements SLIC for detailed description
Clinical Implication: AO classification provides detailed morphological description but SLIC remains more practical for treatment decisions.
Limitation: Complexity may limit routine clinical use.

Anterior vs Posterior Approach Comparison

3
Kwon et al • Journal of Neurosurgery Spine (2006)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic review of approach selection
  • Anterior better for ventral pathology and kyphosis
  • Posterior better for multilevel and facet injuries
  • Combined approach for severe instability
Clinical Implication: Match surgical approach to primary pathology - anterior for anterior problems, posterior for posterior.
Limitation: Heterogeneous studies, no RCTs comparing approaches.

Australian Cervical Spine Guidelines

5
ANZCA/ASA • Perioperative Guidelines (2020)
Key Findings:
  • Early involvement of spinal surgery team
  • MRI within 24 hours for neurological deficit
  • MAP target 85-90mmHg for SCI
  • Standardized collar protocols
Clinical Implication: Australian guidelines emphasize early imaging, MAP optimization, and multidisciplinary care.
Limitation: Consensus-based guidelines.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: SLIC Score Application

EXAMINER

"A 35-year-old motorcyclist presents after an MVA. CT shows a C5 burst fracture with 50% canal compromise. He has weakness in his right deltoid (4/5) but otherwise intact neurology. MRI shows high signal in the C5-6 disc and widened interspinous space at C5-6. What is your assessment and management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient has sustained a **subaxial cervical spine injury** that I will assess using the **SLIC classification**. **SLIC Score calculation:** - **Morphology**: Burst fracture = 2 points - **DLC status**: High signal in disc AND widened interspinous space indicates **disrupted DLC** = 2 points - **Neurological status**: Single root deficit (C5) = 1 point - **Total SLIC Score = 5** A score of **5 or more indicates surgical treatment** is recommended. **My management:** - Immediate immobilization in hard collar - MAP optimization (target 85-90 if any concern for cord) - Surgical decompression and stabilization within 24-72 hours **Surgical approach:** Given the burst fracture with canal compromise and ventral pathology, I would favor an **anterior approach** with: - C5 corpectomy to directly decompress the canal - Structural cage reconstruction - Anterior plate fixation C4-C6 However, given the posterior ligament disruption (DLC disrupted), I would consider whether supplemental **posterior fixation** is needed for adequate stability. If there is any concern, I would plan a **combined anterior-posterior procedure**. I would counsel the patient about risks including neurological injury, dysphagia, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, and need for possible revision or adjacent segment disease long-term.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Calculate SLIC score systematically: Morphology + DLC + Neurology
Burst fracture = 2, Disrupted DLC = 2, Root injury = 1 = Total 5
SLIC 5 or more = surgical indication
MRI essential for DLC assessment
Anterior approach for ventral pathology/burst
Consider combined approach if posterior ligaments disrupted
COMMON TRAPS
✗Forgetting to assess DLC on MRI
✗Underscoring the morphology (burst is 2, not 1)
✗Not considering combined approach with DLC disruption
✗Missing the root deficit contribution to score
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if the SLIC score was 4?"
"How would you manage if MRI showed complete cord transection?"
"What if the patient was neurologically intact but SLIC was 5?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Approach Selection

EXAMINER

"Walk me through your approach selection for a C6-7 fracture-dislocation with bilateral facet dislocation and an associated C6-7 disc herniation causing cord compression. The patient has ASIA C incomplete SCI."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a severe injury with **bilateral facet dislocation**, **disc herniation**, and **incomplete spinal cord injury**. This is a surgical emergency requiring prompt decompression. **Key considerations:** 1. **Incomplete SCI with compression** - needs urgent decompression (STASCIS data supports surgery within 24 hours) 2. **Bilateral facet dislocation** - severe posterior instability, needs reduction 3. **Disc herniation** - ventral compression that must be addressed **Approach selection - I would recommend a staged or combined anterior-posterior approach:** **Step 1: Posterior approach first** - Bilateral facet dislocations are best reduced from posteriorly - Open reduction of facets under direct vision - This is safer than closed reduction given the disc herniation (risk of cord compression if reduced closed) - Posterior lateral mass screw fixation C5-C7 (one above, one below) **Step 2: Anterior approach (same sitting or staged)** - After posterior reduction and stabilization - Anterior discectomy at C6-7 to remove the herniated disc - This directly addresses the ventral compression - Cage reconstruction and anterior plate **Why posterior first?** - Allows safe reduction of facets - Avoids risk of pushing disc into cord during closed reduction - Creates stable construct to work with anteriorly **Neuromonitoring** is essential throughout - baseline SSEPs and MEPs before positioning, continuous monitoring during reduction. Post-operatively, I would maintain in hard collar for 6-12 weeks and begin rehabilitation with spinal cord injury team involvement.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Bilateral facet dislocation is highly unstable
Incomplete SCI with compression = urgent decompression
Posterior first for facet reduction when disc herniation present
Combined approach addresses both posterior and anterior pathology
Neuromonitoring essential during reduction
COMMON TRAPS
✗Attempting closed reduction with known disc herniation
✗Only addressing one column of injury
✗Forgetting the urgency with incomplete SCI
✗Not using neuromonitoring during reduction
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if MRI showed no disc herniation - would your approach change?"
"How would you perform the posterior reduction?"
"What are the risks of combined same-day surgery?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Complication Management

EXAMINER

"You have performed an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion at C5-6 for a trauma patient. Post-operatively, he develops increasing stridor and respiratory distress 6 hours after surgery. How do you manage this?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a **surgical emergency** - post-operative airway compromise after anterior cervical surgery. **Immediate management:** 1. **Call for help** - anesthetist, ENT/airway specialist, senior colleague 2. **High-flow oxygen** and sit patient up if possible 3. **Prepare for emergency surgical exploration** 4. **Have tracheostomy/cricothyroidotomy equipment ready** **Differential diagnosis:** - **Retropharyngeal hematoma** - most likely and most dangerous - Soft tissue swelling/edema - Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (bilateral - rare but severe) - Hardware displacement causing airway compression **Decision making:** - If **rapidly deteriorating** - emergent bedside wound opening to decompress hematoma (life-saving, do not wait for theatre) - If **stable enough** - lateral X-ray/CT neck to assess for hematoma, displacement - **Do NOT attempt blind reintubation** - may be impossible and waste time **Bedside emergency decompression:** - Open skin and platysma at bedside - Evacuate hematoma - This may be life-saving - can always repair in theatre after **If reintubation needed:** - Consider awake fiberoptic intubation if time permits - ENT standby for surgical airway - Video laryngoscopy with experienced operator **Prevention for future:** - Meticulous hemostasis - Consider drain for multilevel or revision cases - Close monitoring first 24 hours - Low threshold for imaging with any swallowing or breathing concerns
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Post-op airway compromise is a surgical emergency
Retropharyngeal hematoma is most likely cause
Do not hesitate to open wound at bedside if deteriorating
Call for help early - anesthetist, ENT
Prevention through meticulous hemostasis
COMMON TRAPS
✗Delaying surgical decompression for imaging
✗Attempting multiple blind intubation attempts
✗Not recognizing the severity and urgency
✗Waiting for theatre instead of bedside decompression if critical
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What drainage would you use and when would you remove it?"
"How would you counsel a patient about this risk preoperatively?"
"What factors increase hematoma risk?"

MCQ Practice Points

SLIC Scoring Question

Q: A patient has a C6 burst fracture (CT), high signal in disc on MRI, and no neurological deficit. What is the SLIC score? A: Morphology (burst) = 2 + DLC (disrupted) = 2 + Neurology (intact) = 0 = SLIC 4 (indeterminate - surgeon discretion)

DLC Assessment Question

Q: Which MRI finding indicates disrupted disco-ligamentous complex? A: High signal in disc, widened interspinous space with edema, facet widening with fluid. All three suggest DLC disruption = 2 points on SLIC.

Approach Selection Question

Q: What is the preferred approach for a C5 burst fracture with retropulsed fragment causing cord compression? A: Anterior corpectomy - allows direct decompression of ventral canal compression and restoration of anterior column height.

Timing Question

Q: What does STASCIS show about timing of surgery for incomplete SCI? A: Surgery within 24 hours results in 19.8% improving at least 2 ASIA grades vs 8.8% for late surgery.

Lateral Mass Screw Question

Q: What is the trajectory for lateral mass screws in the subaxial cervical spine? A: Entry 1mm medial and caudal to center of lateral mass. Trajectory 30 degrees lateral and 15-20 degrees cephalad (Magerl technique).

Nerve Root Anatomy Question

Q: A C5-6 disc herniation will compress which nerve root? A: C6 nerve root - cervical nerve roots exit above their numbered vertebra (C6 root exits C5-6 foramen).

Australian Context and Medicolegal Considerations

Trauma System

  • Major trauma centers have 24/7 spine surgery capability
  • State-based trauma networks coordinate care
  • Early transfer for SCI to specialized units
  • STASCIS principles adopted nationally

Australian Guidelines

  • ANZCA/ASA perioperative guidelines for cervical spine
  • State trauma guidelines (Victoria, NSW)
  • Spinal cord injury units (Austin, Royal North Shore)
  • Emphasis on early definitive care

Medicolegal Considerations

Key documentation requirements:

  • Baseline neurological examination before ANY intervention
  • Imaging review and interpretation documented
  • SLIC score or equivalent classification recorded
  • Informed consent including neurological risks, approach-specific complications
  • Timing decisions documented with rationale

Common litigation issues:

  • Delayed diagnosis of cervical injury
  • Inadequate imaging (missed on plain films)
  • Neurological deterioration during transfer or reduction
  • Failure to document baseline neurology

Transfer considerations:

  • All incomplete SCI should be transferred to major trauma center
  • Early notification of receiving spinal team
  • Optimize MAP during transfer (85-90mmHg)
  • Avoid secondary insults (hypoxia, hypotension)

SUBAXIAL CERVICAL SPINE FRACTURES

High-Yield Exam Summary

SLIC Classification

  • •Morphology: Compression=1, Burst=2, Distraction=3, Translation=4
  • •DLC: Intact=0, Indeterminate=1, Disrupted=2
  • •Neurology: Intact=0, Root=1, Complete SCI=2, Incomplete=3, +1 if ongoing compression
  • •SLIC 0-3=non-op, 4=indeterminate, 5+=surgical

Key Anatomy

  • •C5-C6 most common injury level
  • •DLC = disc + ALL/PLL + posterior ligaments + facet capsules
  • •Cervical roots exit ABOVE numbered vertebra (C6 at C5-6)
  • •Vertebral artery at risk with lateral screw trajectory

Approach Selection

  • •Anterior: burst, disc, ventral compression, kyphosis
  • •Posterior: facet injury, posterior ligaments, multilevel
  • •Combined: severe instability, 3-column injury
  • •Posterior first if facet dislocation + disc herniation

Surgical Pearls

  • •Lateral mass screws: 1mm medial/caudal, 30deg lateral, 15-20deg cephalad
  • •Neuromonitoring essential for reduction
  • •Right approach traditionally preferred (RLN anatomy)
  • •Consider combined if DLC disrupted with corpectomy

Complications

  • •Dysphagia 50% early, 5% persistent
  • •RLN injury 2-5%
  • •Hardware failure 5-10%
  • •Adjacent segment disease 25% at 10 years
Quick Stats
Reading Time101 min
Related Topics

Acetabular Fractures

Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries

Acute Compartment Syndrome

Ankle Fractures