Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Supracondylar Fractures (Adult)

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Supracondylar Fractures (Adult)

Comprehensive guide to adult supracondylar humerus fractures covering anatomy, classification, surgical approaches, and complications for Orthopaedic examination

complete
Updated: 2024-12-17
High Yield Overview

SUPRACONDYLAR FRACTURES (ADULT)

Extraarticular Metaphyseal Fracture | Extension vs Flexion Type | High Stiffness Rate

10%Of distal humerus fractures
50%Functional ROM loss post-treatment
5-25°Extension loss common outcome
Peak 50-60yOsteoporotic bone common

AO/OTA 13-A CLASSIFICATION

13-A1
PatternExtraarticular, simple fracture
TreatmentPlate fixation
13-A2
PatternExtraarticular, metaphyseal wedge
TreatmentDual plating
13-A3
PatternExtraarticular, complex metaphyseal
TreatmentDual plating ± bone graft

Critical Must-Knows

  • Extraarticular by definition - articular involvement = intercondylar fracture
  • Extension type (95%) - distal fragment displaces posteriorly
  • Flexion type (5%) - distal fragment displaces anteriorly
  • Adults differ from children - osteoporotic bone, stiffness is major issue
  • Dual column fixation preferred even for extraarticular fractures

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Draw the distinction from pediatric supracondylar fractures clearly
  • "
    Examiners expect discussion of extension vs flexion type
  • "
    Know the surgical approaches - posterior vs lateral vs medial
  • "
    Discuss stiffness prophylaxis and early ROM protocols

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Clinical features of the probands. A: P1 at the age of 7 yrs. Note hypertelorism, several bruises on forehead and shins, mild pectus excavatum and slightly bowed legs. B-D: P2. Note the mildly blue sc
Click to expand
Clinical features of the probands. A: P1 at the age of 7 yrs. Note hypertelorism, several bruises on forehead and shins, mild pectus excavatum and sliCredit: Malfait F et al. via Orphanet J Rare Dis via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Exam Warning

Adult supracondylar fractures are EXTRAARTICULAR by definition. If there is articular involvement, it is an intercondylar fracture (AO 13-C). Examiners will test this distinction. Extension type (95%) has posterior displacement of the distal fragment - do not confuse with the mechanism!

At a Glance

Adult supracondylar humerus fractures are extraarticular metaphyseal fractures representing 10% of distal humerus fractures. Unlike pediatric supracondylar fractures (which occur in 5-7 year olds via FOOSH), adult fractures occur in osteoporotic bone (peak 50-60 years) via axial loading. Extension type (95%) shows posterior displacement of the distal fragment. The major concern is stiffness (up to 50% functional ROM loss), not deformity as in children. Treatment requires dual column plating for stable fixation allowing early ROM. Know the AO 13-A classification: A1 (simple), A2 (wedge), A3 (complex metaphyseal). Articular involvement reclassifies as intercondylar fracture (13-C).

Adult vs Pediatric Supracondylar Fractures

FeatureAdultPediatric

Mnemonics

Mnemonic

EXTENDExtension Type Features

E
Extension mechanism
Fall onto outstretched hand with elbow extended
X
X-ray shows posterior displacement
Distal fragment displaces posteriorly
T
Tension side anterior
Anterior cortex in tension, posterior in compression
E
Ecchymosis anterior
Soft tissue bruising anteriorly
N
Ninety-five percent
95% of supracondylar fractures are extension type
D
Deformity S-shaped
Classic S-shaped deformity on lateral view

Memory Hook:EXTEND reminds you of the mechanism and that this is the common (95%) type with posterior displacement

Mnemonic

STIFFComplications in Adult Supracondylar Fractures

S
Stiffness
Most common complication - up to 50% functional ROM loss
T
Triceps weakness
From approach or scarring
I
Infection
Higher with extensile approaches
F
Fixation failure
Especially in osteoporotic bone
F
Fracture nonunion
More common than pediatric

Memory Hook:Adult elbows get STIFF - this is the main concern, not deformity like in children

Mnemonic

PLATESDual Plating Principles

P
Perpendicular or parallel
Both configurations acceptable per AO
L
Long plates preferred
At least 6 cortices proximal to fracture
A
Articular reduction first
Even though extraarticular, restore anatomy
T
Two columns stabilized
Medial and lateral columns independently fixed
E
Early ROM protocol
Stable fixation allows early mobilization
S
Screw density important
Maximum screw purchase in distal fragments

Memory Hook:PLATES reminds you of the dual plating technique for stable fixation allowing early ROM

Overview and Epidemiology

Adult supracondylar humerus fractures are extraarticular fractures occurring in the metaphyseal region of the distal humerus, proximal to the condyles. They represent approximately 10% of all distal humerus fractures in adults.

Key Distinguishing Features

  • Extraarticular by definition - any articular involvement classifies as intercondylar (13-C)
  • Metaphyseal location - between the supracondylar ridges and olecranon fossa
  • Different from pediatric - mechanism, bone quality, and outcomes differ significantly

Epidemiology

FactorAdult PatternPediatric Comparison
Peak Age50-60 years (osteoporotic)5-7 years
GenderFemale predominant (2:1)Male predominant
MechanismAxial load, direct traumaFOOSH hyperextension
Associated InjuriesWrist fractures, other fragilityIsolated injury typical

Bimodal Distribution

  • Young adults (20-40): High-energy trauma (MVA, falls from height)
  • Elderly (50+): Low-energy falls on osteoporotic bone

Anatomy and Biomechanics

Dual Column Concept

The distal humerus consists of two columns forming a triangular architecture:

Medial Column

  • Extends from supracondylar ridge to medial epicondyle
  • Contains the trochlea (articulates with ulna)
  • Common flexor origin attachment
  • Ulnar nerve courses posteriorly

Lateral Column

  • Extends from supracondylar ridge to lateral epicondyle
  • Contains the capitellum (articulates with radius)
  • Common extensor origin attachment
  • More robust than medial column

Supracondylar Region

The supracondylar area is the weakest point due to transition from cylindrical diaphysis to flat metaphysis, thin cortical bone bridging the columns, olecranon and coronoid fossae creating stress risers, and the supracondylar ridges which mark the proximal extent.

Load Transmission

Forces across the elbow are transmitted through the dual column system:

  • 60% through radiocapitellar joint (lateral column)
  • 40% through ulnotrochlear joint (medial column)

Fracture Mechanics

Extension Type (95%)

  • Mechanism: Axial load with elbow in extension or direct blow
  • Force vector: Anterior-to-posterior
  • Displacement: Distal fragment displaces posteriorly
  • Tension side: Anterior cortex (where plate ideally placed)

Flexion Type (5%)

  • Mechanism: Direct blow to posterior elbow or fall on flexed elbow
  • Force vector: Posterior-to-anterior
  • Displacement: Distal fragment displaces anteriorly
  • Tension side: Posterior cortex

Stability Considerations

Stability requires restoration of both columns (single column fixation is insufficient), and rigid fixation is needed for early ROM.

At-Risk Structures

Ulnar Nerve

  • Runs in cubital tunnel behind medial epicondyle
  • At risk with:
    • Medial column fracture displacement
    • Medial surgical approach
    • Plate placement
  • Routine transposition debated (50% of surgeons do so)

Radial Nerve

  • Pierces lateral intermuscular septum 10cm above lateral epicondyle
  • At risk with:
    • Proximal fracture extension
    • Anterolateral approach

Median Nerve and Brachial Artery

  • Run anteriorly in antecubital fossa
  • Less commonly injured than in pediatric fractures
  • Risk with anterior spike of proximal fragment

Vascular Considerations

Brachial artery injury is less common than in pediatric fractures. Collateral circulation is usually adequate, and a pulseless but perfused limb may be observed.

Classification Systems

Adult supracondylar fractures are classified under AO/OTA 13-A (extraarticular distal humerus).

Type 13-A1: Simple Extraarticular

Single fracture line with transverse or short oblique pattern. Subtypes include A1.1 (apophyseal avulsion), A1.2 (simple metaphyseal), and A1.3 (simple metaphyseal with instability).

Type 13-A2: Metaphyseal Wedge

Wedge fragment in metaphysis with more comminution than A1. Subtypes include A2.1 (intact wedge), A2.2 (fragmented wedge), and A2.3 (fragmented wedge with instability).

Type 13-A3: Complex Metaphyseal

Significant comminution with no simple fracture pattern. Subtypes include A3.1 (spiroid pattern), A3.2 (irregular pattern), and A3.3 (irregular with bone loss).

By Displacement Direction

TypeDirectionPercentageMechanismKey Feature
ExtensionPosterior95%Axial load/hyperextensionS-shaped deformity on lateral
FlexionAnterior5%Direct posterior blowReverse deformity

By Fracture Pattern

PatternDescriptionStabilityFixation Challenge
TransversePerpendicular to shaftRelatively stableStandard dual plating
ObliqueAngled fracture lineLess stableMay need lag screws
SpiralRotational componentVariableLonger plates needed
ComminutedMultiple fragmentsUnstableBridge plating, bone graft

By Bone Quality

Critical consideration: Good bone allows standard plate fixation. Osteoporotic bone requires locking plates with possible cement augmentation. Severely osteoporotic bone warrants consideration of primary TEA.

History

Mechanism of Injury

High-Energy (Young Adults)

  • Motor vehicle accidents
  • Falls from height
  • Sports injuries
  • Industrial accidents

Low-Energy (Elderly)

  • Simple falls from standing
  • Osteoporotic fractures
  • Minimal trauma in fragility bones

Key History Points

QuestionRelevance
Hand dominanceFunctional importance
OccupationManual labor vs sedentary
Pre-injury functionBaseline ROM, arthritis
Previous elbow surgeryMay affect approach
Medical comorbiditiesSurgical fitness, bone quality
AnticoagulationBleeding risk, hematoma
Smoking statusWound healing, union

A thorough history guides surgical planning and informs prognosis.

Examination

Inspection

  • Swelling: Significant periarticular swelling
  • Deformity: S-shaped (extension) or reverse S-shaped (flexion)
  • Skin: Open wounds, tenting, blisters
  • Ecchymosis: Anterior (extension), posterior (flexion)

Palpation

  • Assess column integrity
  • Point tenderness over fracture site
  • Crepitus with gentle movement
  • Triangle of Hueter: Normal in supracondylar (extraarticular)

Range of Motion

  • Do not force examination in acute setting
  • Document pre-injury ROM if possible
  • Assess elbow and forearm rotation

Special Tests

TestAssessingNormal Finding
Triangle of HueterArticular alignmentEquilateral triangle (preserved in supracondylar)
Forearm rotationDRUJ/PRUJFull pronation/supination
Elbow stabilityLigamentsNot testable acutely

Examination must be systematic and documented.

Nerve Examination

Ulnar Nerve (Most Commonly Affected)

  • Motor: First dorsal interosseous, finger abduction
  • Sensory: Small finger and ulnar half ring finger
  • Test: Cross fingers, card test
  • Document pre-operative status - critical for medicolegal

Radial Nerve

  • Motor: Wrist and finger extension
  • Sensory: First dorsal web space
  • Test: Wrist extension against resistance

Median Nerve

  • Motor: Thumb opposition, index finger flexion
  • Sensory: Palmar thumb, index, middle fingers
  • Test: OK sign, FPL function

Anterior Interosseous Nerve (AIN)

  • Motor: FPL, FDP to index, pronator quadratus
  • Test: OK sign (can't make circle)

Vascular Assessment

  • Radial and ulnar pulses
  • Capillary refill
  • Compare to contralateral side
  • Doppler if pulses not palpable

Document neurovascular status before any intervention. Ulnar nerve injury is common with medial column involvement. Pre-operative deficit changes surgical planning and is medicolegally important.

Investigations

Standard Views

AP View

  • Assess column integrity
  • Measure fracture angle
  • Evaluate medial/lateral displacement
  • Look for articular involvement (would classify as intercondylar)

Lateral View

  • Confirm extraarticular nature
  • Extension type: Posterior displacement of distal fragment
  • Flexion type: Anterior displacement of distal fragment
  • S-shaped deformity (extension type)
  • Assess coronoid and olecranon fossa involvement

Radiographic Signs

FindingIndicates
Posterior displacementExtension type (95%)
Anterior displacementFlexion type (5%)
S-shaped deformity (lateral)Extension type
Fat pad signHemarthrosis (may have less effusion if capsule torn)
Intact columnsGood prognosis
Column comminutionMore challenging fixation

Full-Length Humerus

Full-length humerus views are required for plate length planning, to exclude proximal extension, and to evaluate for pathologic fracture.

Indications

  • Unclear fracture pattern on plain films
  • Assessment of comminution degree
  • Confirm extraarticular vs intercondylar
  • Preoperative planning for complex patterns

Protocol

  • Thin-cut axial images (1-2mm)
  • 3D reconstructions essential for surgical planning
  • Coronal and sagittal reformats
  • Include full distal humerus

Key Assessments

AssessmentClinical Relevance
Articular surfaceConfirm extraarticular (supracondylar)
Comminution extentPlate length, grafting needs
Column involvementApproach planning
Bone qualityFixation strategy
Posterior wallPlate positioning

CT 3D Utility

CT 3D reconstruction is the gold standard for surgical planning. It helps confirm the fracture is truly extraarticular (supracondylar) and not an intercondylar pattern requiring intraarticular reconstruction.

MRI

Limited role in acute fracture management but may assess:

  • Ligament integrity
  • Soft tissue interposition
  • Occult pathology

DEXA Scan

Consider in:

  • Low-energy fractures in elderly
  • Planning for fragility fracture pathway
  • Informing fixation strategy (locking plates, cement)

Angiography

Indications:

  • Hard signs of vascular injury (pulseless cold limb)
  • Expanding hematoma
  • Bruit/thrill
  • Active hemorrhage

Nerve Conduction Studies

NCS are not typically performed acutely but may be useful for documenting pre-existing neuropathy, evaluating post-operative nerve dysfunction, and medicolegal documentation.

Management Algorithm

Non-Operative Indications

Non-operative management is appropriate for minimally displaced fractures (under 5mm), stable patterns on stress views, non-ambulatory patients with minimal functional demands, and patients with medical comorbidities precluding surgery or patient preference after informed consent.

Operative Indications (Most Cases)

Surgery is indicated for displacement over 5mm, any angulation, unstable patterns, polytrauma requiring mobilization, open fractures, and cases with vascular injury requiring repair.

Week 0-2

Long arm splint in 90° flexion with ice and elevation. Begin hand and shoulder exercises.

Week 2-4

Convert to hinged brace. Begin gentle ROM within brace targeting full extension to 90° flexion range.

Week 4-6

Increase ROM progressively, begin strengthening, and wean from brace.

Week 6 Onwards

Full ROM exercises, progressive strengthening, and return to activities.

Expected Outcomes

Non-operative management often results in poor ROM recovery with high rates of stiffness. This approach is reserved for truly stable patterns or poor surgical candidates.

Surgical Technique

Posterior Approach (Most Common)

Indications

  • Complex fracture patterns
  • Need for dual column access
  • Olecranon osteotomy planned

Technique

  1. Position: Lateral decubitus or prone
  2. Midline posterior incision
  3. Full-thickness flaps
  4. Identify and protect ulnar nerve
  5. Access columns via:
    • Triceps-splitting
    • Triceps-reflecting (Bryan-Morrey)
    • Olecranon osteotomy

Advantages

  • Excellent exposure
  • Allows dual plating
  • Can extend proximally/distally

Disadvantages

  • Extensile dissection
  • Triceps dysfunction risk
  • Higher stiffness rates

Lateral Approach (Kocher)

Indications

  • Simple lateral column fractures
  • Less comminuted patterns

Technique

  1. Lateral skin incision
  2. Interval: anconeus and ECU
  3. Protect radial nerve
  4. Access lateral column

Medial Approach

Indications

  • Isolated medial column fractures
  • Ulnar nerve exploration needed

Technique

The medial approach involves a medial skin incision, identification of the ulnar nerve first, protection or transposition of the nerve, then access to the medial column.

Dual Plating (Gold Standard)

Plate Configuration

ConfigurationPlacementAdvantages
Perpendicular (90-90)Medial + posterolateralIncreased torsional stability
ParallelMedial + lateral directlyGood compression

Principles

  • Minimum 6 cortices proximal to fracture in each column
  • Maximum screw density in distal fragments
  • Locking screws in osteoporotic bone
  • Anatomic plates match distal humerus contour

Screw Placement

ZoneScrew TypeConsideration
ProximalNon-locking or locking6+ cortices
MetaphysealLockingBridge comminution
DistalLockingMaximum purchase
Across fractureLag screwsFor simple patterns only

Technical Pearls

  1. Reduce articular surface first (if any involvement)
  2. Provisional K-wire fixation
  3. Plate one column, reduce other, plate second
  4. Check impingement through ROM
  5. Intraoperative imaging confirms position

Dual Plating Rationale

Even for extraarticular supracondylar fractures, dual column plating is preferred over single column fixation. This provides sufficient stability for early ROM - the key to preventing stiffness.

Indications

  • Complex fracture patterns
  • Need for articular visualization (if concern for extension)
  • TEA approach

Technique

Osteotomy Types

TypeDescriptionAdvantage
ChevronV-shaped, apex proximalRotational stability
TransverseStraight cutSimpler, faster

Steps

  1. Mark osteotomy at bare area (non-articular)
  2. Pre-drill screw holes before osteotomy
  3. Score with saw, complete with osteotome
  4. Elevate olecranon with triceps attached
  5. Excellent articular and column exposure

Fixation of Osteotomy

MethodAdvantageDisadvantage
Tension band wireSimple, reliableHardware prominence
PlateLow profileMore expensive
Intramedullary screwLow profileLess compression

Complications

  • Non-union (5-10%)
  • Hardware prominence
  • Need for removal

Pre-drill the osteotomy fixation holes BEFORE making the osteotomy. This ensures accurate reduction and avoids technical difficulties later.

Osteoporotic Bone

Challenges

  • Poor screw purchase
  • Comminution
  • Implant cutout risk

Solutions

StrategyApplication
Locking platesMandatory
Longer platesDistribute load
Cement augmentationSelected screws
Primary TEASevere osteoporosis, low demand

High-Energy Trauma

Considerations

  • Associated injuries
  • Soft tissue status
  • Damage control principles

Staged Approach

  1. Temporary spanning external fixator
  2. Soft tissue recovery (7-14 days)
  3. Definitive ORIF

Open Fractures

Gustilo GradeManagement
IDebridement, primary ORIF
IIDebridement, ORIF if soft tissue allows
IIIAStaged, external fixation first
IIIB/CComplex reconstruction, may need TEA

Elderly Low-Demand

Consider primary Total Elbow Arthroplasty (TEA) if:

  • Age over 65-70 with comminuted fracture
  • Severe osteoporosis
  • Low functional demands
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Pre-existing arthritis

TEA Trade-off

TEA for acute distal humerus fractures has good short-term outcomes but lifelong 5kg lifting restriction. Discuss this tradeoff with examiners - ORIF preferred in younger, active patients.

Complications

Neurovascular Injury

Ulnar Nerve (Most Common)

  • Incidence: 15-20% (neuropraxia)
  • Causes: Initial injury, surgical manipulation, hardware
  • Management: Observation 3 months, then exploration if no recovery

Radial Nerve

  • Incidence: 5-10%
  • Causes: Proximal fracture extension, lateral approach
  • Management: As above

Vascular Injury

  • Less common than pediatric
  • Brachial artery at risk anteriorly
  • May require vascular repair

Infection

TypeIncidenceManagement
Superficial2-5%Antibiotics, wound care
Deep1-3%Debridement, IV antibiotics
Chronic osteomyelitisRareStaged reconstruction

Wound Complications

Wound issues include skin necrosis (especially with posterior approach), dehiscence, and hematoma. Risk is higher with diabetes, smoking, and anticoagulation.

Stiffness (Most Common)

Stiffness is the NUMBER ONE complication in adult supracondylar fractures. Up to 50% of patients lose functional ROM. This is why stable fixation enabling early ROM is paramount.

Risk Factors

  • Prolonged immobilization
  • Heterotopic ossification
  • Intra-articular adhesions
  • Complex fracture pattern
  • Poor compliance with rehab

Prevention

  • Stable fixation (dual plating)
  • Early ROM (within 2 weeks)
  • Indomethacin prophylaxis (for HO)
  • Aggressive physiotherapy

Management

TimingApproach
Under 6 monthsPhysiotherapy, static progressive splinting
6-12 monthsConsider manipulation under anesthesia
Over 12 monthsSurgical release (arthroscopic or open)

Heterotopic Ossification

  • Incidence: 5-25%
  • Risk factors: Head injury, burns, delayed surgery
  • Prevention: Indomethacin 75mg daily x 6 weeks OR single-dose radiation
  • Treatment: Excision if mature (12-18 months) and symptomatic

Malunion

TypeConsequenceManagement
VarusCubitus varus, instabilityCorrective osteotomy
ValgusTardy ulnar nerve palsyOsteotomy ± nerve transposition
ExtensionLoss of flexionUsually tolerated
FlexionLoss of extensionUsually tolerated

Nonunion

Nonunion occurs in 2-5% of cases. Risk factors include smoking, diabetes, infection, and inadequate fixation. Management involves revision ORIF with bone graft or consideration of TEA.

Hardware Failure

IssueCausePrevention
Screw pulloutOsteoporosisLocking screws, cement
Plate failureInadequate fixationLonger plates, dual plating
Hardware looseningNonunionEnsure union before loading

Hardware Prominence

  • Common posteriorly
  • May require removal after union
  • Use low-profile plates when possible

Ulnar Nerve Irritation

  • From medial plate or screws
  • May require transposition
  • Consider anterior transposition at index procedure

Implant Removal

Indications:

  • Hardware prominence
  • Nerve irritation
  • Patient request (after union)
  • Infection

Timing: Minimum 12-18 months post-fixation with confirmed radiographic union.

Postoperative Care

Rehabilitation Protocol

Phase 1: Protection (Week 0-2)

GoalActivity
Pain controlMultimodal analgesia
Wound healingDressings, monitor for infection
Edema controlElevation, compression
Begin ROMPassive and active-assisted as pain allows
AvoidValgus stress, loaded extension

Phase 2: Early Motion (Week 2-6)

GoalActivity
ROM progressionActive ROM full arc
Forearm rotationFull pronation/supination
Gentle strengtheningIsometrics only
Targets0-130° flexion/extension arc
SplintingNight extension splint if stiffness

Phase 3: Strengthening (Week 6-12)

GoalActivity
Progressive strengtheningResistance exercises
Functional activitiesADLs, light work
Continue ROMMaintain gains
Targets75% strength of contralateral

Phase 4: Return to Activity (3-6 months)

GoalActivity
Full strengtheningSport-specific or occupational
Impact activitiesGradual return
MonitoringEnsure no stiffness regression

Follow-up Schedule

Postoperative Visits

TimepointAssessment
2 weeksWound check, remove sutures, begin ROM
6 weeksX-ray, ROM assessment
3 monthsX-ray, functional assessment
6 monthsFinal ROM, strength testing
12 monthsDischarge if stable

Imaging Protocol

  • 6 weeks: AP and lateral - callus formation
  • 3 months: Confirm union progression
  • 6 months: Final union confirmation
  • PRN: If concern for nonunion or hardware failure

Outcomes and Prognosis

Functional Outcomes

Expected ROM

OutcomeORIFTEA
Flexion arc100-130°90-130°
Extension loss10-30°20-30°
PronationNear fullNear full
SupinationNear fullNear full

Functional Scoring

ScoreGood Outcome Threshold
MEPS (Mayo Elbow Performance)Over 80 points
DASHUnder 20 points
Grip strengthOver 75% contralateral

Outcome Predictors

Favorable

  • Young age
  • Simple fracture pattern
  • Good bone quality
  • Early ROM initiation
  • Compliant patient

Unfavorable

  • Elderly
  • Comminution
  • Osteoporosis
  • Delayed treatment
  • Smoking
  • Diabetes

Return to Activities

ActivityExpected Return
Desk work2-4 weeks
Driving6-8 weeks
Light manual work3-4 months
Heavy manual work6+ months
Contact sports6-12 months

Long-term Considerations

  • Post-traumatic arthritis: 10-20% develop symptomatic arthritis
  • Stiffness: Most common permanent sequela
  • Hardware removal: May be needed in 10-20%
  • Secondary TEA: Salvage for failed ORIF or severe stiffness

Evidence Base

Dual Plating vs Single Plate

Level III
Key Findings:
  • Dual plating provides superior biomechanical stability
  • Allows earlier mobilization without loss of fixation
  • Single plate fixation associated with higher failure rates
  • Perpendicular and parallel configurations equivalent
Clinical Implication: Dual column plating is standard of care for adult distal humerus fractures including supracondylar patterns

Perpendicular vs Parallel Plating

Level I (Biomechanical)
Key Findings:
  • Perpendicular plating: Superior torsional stability
  • Parallel plating: Better axial stiffness
  • No significant clinical difference in outcomes
  • Both configurations acceptable
Clinical Implication: Surgeon preference and fracture pattern should guide configuration choice - both are acceptable

TEA vs ORIF for Elderly

Level I
Key Findings:
  • RCT comparing ORIF vs TEA in patients over 65
  • TEA: Better early function (DASH scores)
  • ORIF: More complications, reoperations
  • TEA: Lifelong activity restrictions (5kg limit)
Clinical Implication: Consider primary TEA for comminuted fractures in elderly low-demand patients with osteoporotic bone

Olecranon Osteotomy Outcomes

Level IV
Key Findings:
  • Chevron osteotomy: 5-10% nonunion rate
  • Pre-drilling reduces nonunion risk
  • Hardware prominence requiring removal: 20%
  • Does not compromise function if heals
Clinical Implication: Olecranon osteotomy remains valuable for complex patterns despite hardware-related complications

Heterotopic Ossification Prophylaxis

Level III
Key Findings:
  • Indomethacin 75mg daily for 6 weeks reduces HO
  • Single-dose radiation (700cGy) equally effective
  • High-risk patients benefit most (head injury, burns)
  • Routine prophylaxis debated in standard cases
Clinical Implication: Consider HO prophylaxis in high-risk patients; routine use is surgeon-dependent

Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Low-Energy Fracture in 55F

EXAMINER

"A 55-year-old woman presents with a low-energy supracondylar humerus fracture. X-rays show posterior displacement. How would you manage this?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Initial Assessment:

  • Confirm extraarticular pattern (supracondylar not intercondylar)
  • Full neurovascular examination - especially ulnar nerve
  • CT scan for surgical planning and to confirm no articular involvement
  • Assess bone quality - likely osteoporotic at this age

Treatment Plan:

  • Operative management indicated - displaced fracture
  • Dual column plating via posterior approach
  • Locking plates given likely osteoporosis
  • Consider cement augmentation if severely osteoporotic

Key Principles:

  • Stable fixation to enable early ROM (prevent stiffness)
  • Perpendicular or parallel plating both acceptable
  • Minimum 6 cortices proximal fixation per column
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Confirm extra-articular status with CT
Assess ulnar nerve function pre-op
Dual column plating is gold standard
Locking plates for osteoporotic bone
Goal: Stable fixation for early ROM
COMMON TRAPS
✗Missing ulnar nerve palsy
✗Using single plate fixation
✗Delaying surgery/ROM leading to stiffness
✗Not getting CT scan
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if she was 85 with dementia?"
"How does the ulnar nerve course relate to your approach?"
"When would you consider non-operative management?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Complex Elderly Fracture

EXAMINER

"Describe your approach to a comminuted supracondylar fracture in an 80-year-old with rheumatoid arthritis and severe osteoporosis."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Special Considerations:

  • Age and osteoporosis: Poor fixation purchase expected
  • Rheumatoid arthritis: May have pre-existing joint destruction
  • Comminution: Difficult reconstruction

Treatment Options:

  1. ORIF with dual locking plates: Longest possible plates, maximum distal screw density, consider cement.
  2. Primary Total Elbow Arthroplasty (TEA): Indicated given age, osteoporosis, RA, comminution. Reliable pain relief.

My Recommendation: Primary TEA would be my preference given the combination of factors. Patient counseling regarding activity restrictions (5kg lifetime limit) is essential.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Recognize poor bone stock and RA factors
Consider primary TEA vs ORIF
TEA indications: Elderly, RA, comminution, low demand
TEA limitation: 5kg lifting restriction
ORIF technique: Locking plates + cement augmentation
COMMON TRAPS
✗Attempting ORIF in unreconstructable bone
✗Ignoring RA impact on joint/ligaments
✗Not counseling about TEA restrictions
✗Using non-locking plates
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What approach would you use for TEA?"
"What are the complications of TEA?"
"How does RA affect your fixation strategy?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 3: Post-Op Stiffness

EXAMINER

"Six months post-ORIF of a supracondylar fracture, your patient has 30-100° of flexion. How do you manage this stiffness?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Assessment:

  • Current arc: 70° (30-100°) - functionally limiting
  • main deficits: Loss of terminal flexion and extension
  • Inv: X-rays (union, HO), CT (if HO suspected), Inflammatory markers (infection)

Management at 6 Months:

  1. Continue conservative: Intensive physiotherapy, static progressive splinting (extension and flexion).
  2. Surgical options:
    • Arthroscopic release (preferred if no HO)
    • Open release (if HO or complex)

Timing: If HO present, wait 12-18 months for maturation. If capsular only, can operate earlier.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Stiffness is common (50%)
Investigate for mechanical blocks (HO, hardware, malunion)
Physio and splinting first line
Surgical release: Arthroscopic or Open
HO requires maturation before excision
COMMON TRAPS
✗Operating on immature HO (recurrence risk)
✗Ignoring infection as a cause
✗Not trying static progressive splinting first
✗Promising full ROM return
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How do you prevent HO?"
"What implies HO is mature?"
"What is the role of continuous passive motion (CPM)?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 4: Surgical Technique Viva

EXAMINER

"You are planning ORIF for an adult supracondylar fracture. Describe your surgical approach and fixation strategy."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Plan: CT 3D recon. Posterior midline incision.

Approach: Identify ulnar nerve FIRST. Triceps-splitting or reflecting approach (e.g. Bryan-Morrey) or Olecranon Osteotomy for max exposure.

Fixation:

  • Anatomic reduction of columns
  • Dual plating (medial + posterolateral OR parallel)
  • Min 6 cortices proximal, max screws distal
  • Checking ROM intra-op

Closure: Layered closure, ulnar nerve transposition if indicated/irritated.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Posterior approach standard
Identify ulnar nerve early
Dual plating configuration options
Rigid fixation principles
Checking ROM/Stability on table
COMMON TRAPS
✗Injury to ulnar nerve
✗Inadequate proximal fixation (short plates)
✗Single column fixation
✗Not checking impingement/ROM
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"When do you transpose the ulnar nerve?"
"What if you can't get anatomical reduction?"
"How do you confirm reduction intra-operatively?"

MCQ Practice Points

Q1: Extension Type

Q: In an extension-type adult supracondylar fracture, the distal fragment displaces in which direction?

A: Posteriorly (Answer B). Extension type (95% of cases) has posterior displacement of the distal fragment. The mechanism is axial load with elbow extended, causing the distal fragment to angulate posteriorly. Creates classic S-shaped deformity on lateral view.

Q2: Classification

Q: A supracondylar humerus fracture with involvement of the articular surface should be classified as which AO type?

A: AO 13-C (Answer C). By definition, supracondylar fractures are EXTRAARTICULAR (13-A). Any articular involvement makes it an intercondylar fracture (13-C). This distinction is critical as it changes surgical planning and prognosis.

Q3: Fixation

Q: What is the preferred fixation for adult supracondylar humerus fractures?

A: Dual column plating (Answer C). Dual column plating (perpendicular or parallel) is the gold standard. It provides stability for early ROM, which is critical to prevent stiffness - the most common complication. Single plate fixation has higher failure rates.

Q4: Main Complication

Q: What is the most common complication following adult supracondylar humerus fractures?

A: Stiffness (Answer C). Stiffness is the NUMBER ONE complication, with up to 50% of patients losing functional ROM. This is why stable fixation enabling early ROM is the primary treatment goal. Extension loss is most common.

Q5: Nerve at Risk

Q: Which nerve is most commonly injured in extension-type supracondylar fractures?

A: Ulnar Nerve (Answer C). The ulnar nerve is most commonly affected (neurapraxia) due to its proximity to the medial column and potential tethering in the cubital tunnel. Radial nerve injury is also possible with proximal extension or lateral approach.

Q6: Surgical Exposure

Q: Which surgical approach offers the maximal visualization of the articular surface for complex intra-articular fractures?

A: Olecranon Osteotomy (Answer D). While the triceps-splitting/reflecting approaches preserve the extensor mechanism, an olecranon osteotomy provides the most extensile view of the articular surface, essential for restoring congruity in complex comminuted patterns (AO 13-C3).

Australian Context

Adult supracondylar fractures in Australia mirror international patterns with a bimodal distribution: high-energy trauma in young adults and low-energy osteoporotic fractures in elderly patients. The Australian Orthopaedic Association supports dual column plating as standard of care for displaced fractures, with increasing acceptance of primary TEA for elderly patients with comminution and osteoporosis based on Level I evidence.

Local considerations include access to specialized upper limb units for complex reconstructions, physiotherapy resources for early ROM protocols essential to prevent stiffness, and bone health assessment pathways for fragility fractures. Prosthesis availability includes modern locking plate systems and various TEA designs through major orthopaedic suppliers. ANZORS-funded research continues to evaluate ORIF versus TEA outcomes in the Australian population, and ACI guidelines emphasize early mobilization protocols post-fixation.

Adult Supracondylar Fractures

High-Yield Exam Summary

Definition & Classification

  • •Extraarticular distal humerus fractures in metaphyseal region
  • •AO/OTA 13-A (extraarticular): A1 simple, A2 wedge, A3 complex
  • •Any articular extension = Intercondylar (AO 13-C)
  • •Extension type (95%) vs Flexion type (5%)

Key Exam Concepts

  • •Stiffness is THE major complication (vs deformity in kids)
  • •Dual column plating is gold standard fixation
  • •Minimum 6 cortices proximal fixation per column
  • •Primary TEA valid for elderly, osteoporotic, comminuted

Crucial Management Steps

  • •CT Scan standard for surgical planning
  • •Identify Ulnar Nerve early in posterior approach
  • •Rigid fixation (LOCKING in osteporosis) allows early ROM
  • •Pre-drill olecranon osteotomy before cutting

Common Pitfalls

  • •Confusing supracondylar (extraarticular) with intercondylar
  • •Using single plate fixation (high failure rate)
  • •Delaying ROM leads to Stiffness (50% incidence)
  • •Missing ulnar nerve palsy or vascular injury
Quick Stats
Reading Time95 min
Related Topics

Elbow Imaging: Systematic Interpretation

Acetabular Fractures

Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries

Acute Compartment Syndrome