Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

THA Neurovascular Injury

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

THA Neurovascular Injury

Prevention, recognition, and management of neurovascular complications in total hip arthroplasty

complete
Updated: 2025-12-17
High Yield Overview

THA NEUROVASCULAR INJURY

Prevention-First | Recognition Patterns | Salvage Techniques

0.6-3.5%nerve injury rate
0.2-0.3%vascular injury rate
80%sciatic nerve injuries
72hcritical decompression window

Injury Classification

Neuropraxia
PatternTemporary conduction block, recovers weeks-months
TreatmentObservation
Axonotmesis
PatternAxon disruption, intact endoneurium
TreatmentObservation up to 6 months
Neurotmesis
PatternComplete nerve transection
TreatmentSurgical exploration/repair
Vascular
PatternArterial or venous injury requiring intervention
TreatmentImmediate vascular surgery

Critical Must-Knows

  • Sciatic nerve: 80% of nerve injuries, peroneal division affected more than tibial
  • Risk factors: developmental dysplasia, revision surgery, lengthening over 4cm, posterior approach
  • Clinical signs: immediate foot drop (peroneal), calf pain with ankle plantarflexion (vascular)
  • Management: immediate component removal if lengthening over 4cm with nerve palsy
  • Prognosis: 40-70% recovery with neuropraxia, poor recovery with complete nerve division

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Always check limb length intraoperatively before final component insertion
  • "
    Sciatic nerve most at risk with posterior approach; femoral nerve with anterior approach
  • "
    Vascular injury may present with delayed compartment syndrome (24-48 hours)
  • "
    Early exploration (within 72 hours) improves nerve recovery outcomes

Critical THA Neurovascular Injury Exam Points

High-Risk Scenarios

Developmental dysplasia of hip (DDH) requires meticulous planning. Sciatic nerve at risk with inferior hip centre placement and limb lengthening. Femoral nerve vulnerable with anterior retractors.

Immediate Recognition

Post-anaesthesia examination is critical. Test foot dorsiflexion, plantarflexion, and toe movements immediately. Check distal pulses and capillary refill bilaterally.

Prevention Strategy

Limit limb lengthening to under 4cm. Use intraoperative fluoroscopy to verify leg lengths. Position sciatic nerve under direct vision in posterior approaches.

Time-Critical Management

72-hour window for nerve exploration. Early decompression improves outcomes. Vascular injury requires immediate consultation and surgical intervention.

Quick Decision Guide - Neurovascular Injury Recognition and Management

Clinical ScenarioDiagnosisImmediate ActionKey Pearl
Immediate foot drop post-THA, sensory loss dorsum of footSciatic nerve injury (peroneal division)Document deficit, check leg length, consider revision if over 4cm lengtheningRecovery likely if neuropraxia, document baseline EMG at 3 weeks
Complete sciatic palsy with severe pain, no motor functionProbable neurotmesis or vascular compromiseUrgent vascular assessment, MRI/USS, early surgical exploration within 72hTime to decompression critical for nerve recovery
Absent distal pulses, cold limb, compartment syndrome signsVascular injury with ischaemiaImmediate vascular surgery consult, duplex USS, prepare for explorationArterial injury may present with delayed compartment syndrome
Anterior thigh numbness, weak hip flexion/knee extensionFemoral nerve injury (anterior approach complication)Remove anterior retractors, document deficit, observe initiallyUsually neuropraxia from retractor pressure, recovers over weeks
Mnemonic

SPIDERSciatic Nerve Anatomy at Hip

S
Sciatic notch exit
Nerve exits pelvis through greater sciatic notch inferior to piriformis
P
Posterior to hip joint
Runs 2-3cm posterior to acetabular rim, vulnerable with posterior approach
I
Inferior to piriformis
85% of population, nerve passes under piriformis muscle belly
D
Divisions: peroneal and tibial
Peroneal division lateral and more vulnerable to stretch injury
E
External rotators cover
Protected by short external rotators (quadratus femoris, obturators)
R
Risk with retraction
Excessive retraction or lengthening over 4cm causes traction injury

Memory Hook:The sciatic nerve is a SPIDER web of danger - runs posteriorly through the notch, divisions at risk with retraction and lengthening!

Mnemonic

REVISERisk Factors for Nerve Injury in THA

R
Revision surgery
5-10 times higher risk than primary THA due to scarring and anatomy distortion
E
Excessive lengthening
Lengthening over 4cm increases nerve traction injury risk exponentially
V
Vascular disease
Atherosclerosis increases vascular injury risk, especially external iliac artery
I
Inferior hip centre
DDH with high hip dislocation - nerve on stretch when hip reduced inferiorly
S
Surgical approach
Posterior approach: sciatic nerve; anterior: femoral nerve at risk
E
Extreme positioning
Excessive flexion, adduction, or rotation during surgery increases nerve stretch

Memory Hook:REVISE your surgical plan when these risk factors are present - prevention is key to avoiding nerve complications!

Mnemonic

PALSYSigns of Sciatic Nerve Injury

P
Peroneal division affected
Foot drop - inability to dorsiflex ankle and extend toes
A
Ankle inversion weak
Peroneal muscles weak, tibialis anterior affected
L
Lateral foot numbness
Sensory loss dorsum of foot, lateral leg (superficial peroneal nerve)
S
Sole sensation intact
Tibial division less commonly affected, plantarflexion may be preserved
Y
Years to recover
Axonotmesis may take 12-24 months for recovery, complete palsy has poor prognosis

Memory Hook:Sciatic PALSY primarily affects the peroneal division - foot drop is the hallmark, recovery takes years if axons are damaged!

Overview and Epidemiology

Neurovascular complications remain among the most feared and devastating complications of total hip arthroplasty. Despite being relatively uncommon, the profound impact on patient function and quality of life makes prevention and early recognition paramount.

Why This Topic Matters

Nerve and vascular injuries can result in permanent disability, litigation, and patient dissatisfaction. Understanding the anatomy, risk factors, and prevention strategies is essential for safe THA practice. This is a high-yield exam topic as examiners want to ensure trainees can identify at-risk patients and manage complications appropriately.

Nerve Injury Epidemiology

  • Sciatic nerve: 80% of all nerve injuries
  • Peroneal division: affected more than tibial (lateral position, less connective tissue support)
  • Femoral nerve: 10-15% of nerve injuries, associated with anterior approach
  • Superior gluteal nerve: 5% of injuries, abductor weakness
  • Recovery rate: 40-70% for neuropraxia, under 20% for complete transection

Vascular Injury Patterns

  • External iliac artery: most commonly injured vessel
  • Common femoral artery: at risk with anterior approach
  • Superior/inferior gluteal vessels: posterior approach risks
  • Presentation: immediate bleeding, delayed pseudoaneurysm, AVF
  • Mortality risk: 5-10% with major vascular injury

Anatomy and Biomechanics

Sciatic Nerve Anatomy

The sciatic nerve is the largest nerve in the body, formed from the L4-S3 nerve roots. Understanding its anatomical course and relationships is critical for THA prevention strategies.

Critical Distance Relationships

The sciatic nerve exits the pelvis through the greater sciatic notch, passing beneath the piriformis muscle in 85% of individuals. At the level of the hip joint, the nerve lies 2-3cm posterior to the posterior acetabular rim. This distance is critical - excessive posterior wall reaming, retractor placement, or cement extrusion can directly injure the nerve.

Anatomical StructureCourse at Hip LevelInjury MechanismClinical Consequence
Sciatic nerve (peroneal division)Lateral and posterior to tibial division, 2-3cm behind acetabulumLimb lengthening over 4cm, direct trauma, retractor compressionFoot drop, numbness dorsum of foot, poor recovery if axonotmesis
Sciatic nerve (tibial division)Medial division, more connective tissue supportLess commonly injured, usually with complete sciatic injuryCalf weakness, sole numbness, better prognosis than peroneal
Femoral nerveAnterior to hip, beneath inguinal ligament lateral to femoral arteryAnterior retractor compression, haematoma, cement extravasationWeak quadriceps, anterior thigh numbness, often neuropraxia
Superior gluteal nerveExits above piriformis, innervates gluteus medius and minimusExcessive superior dissection, retractor trauma during exposureTrendelenburg gait, abductor weakness, often unrecognised

Vascular Anatomy

Arterial Supply at Risk

External iliac artery runs along pelvic brim, at risk with:

  • Medial acetabular screw penetration
  • Intrapelvic cement extravasation
  • Anterior retractor overzealous placement

Common femoral artery vulnerable with:

  • Anterior approach direct injury
  • Femoral neck osteotomy saw injury
  • Femoral canal perforation anteriorly

Venous Drainage

External iliac vein most commonly injured vessel:

  • Thinner wall than artery, easily torn
  • Presents with bleeding, haematoma formation
  • May cause delayed DVT if unrecognised

Gluteal vessels at risk with posterior approach:

  • Bleeding controlled with packing usually
  • Pseudoaneurysm rare but reported

Classification Systems

Patient-Related Risk Factors

Risk FactorMechanismRisk IncreasePrevention Strategy
Developmental dysplasia of hip (DDH)High hip centre requires inferior placement, sciatic nerve on stretchUp to 10 times higher riskSubtrochanteric shortening osteotomy if lengthening over 4cm planned
Revision THAScarring distorts anatomy, nerve encased in scar tissue5-10 times higher risk than primaryCareful dissection, consider nerve monitoring, limit lengthening
Post-traumatic arthritisAltered anatomy from previous fracture, retained hardware3-5 times higher riskPre-operative CT imaging to plan approach and identify nerve course
Previous nerve injuryReduced nerve tolerance to stretch, scarring around nerveVariable, may be permanent deficitEMG/NCS pre-operatively to document baseline, avoid further trauma

DDH and Nerve Injury Risk

In Crowe IV DDH (femoral head above roof level), the sciatic nerve is often significantly shortened due to chronic hip dislocation. Reducing the hip to anatomical centre without femoral shortening can result in over 5-6cm of limb lengthening and near-certain nerve palsy. Always plan for subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy in these cases.

Surgical Technique Risk Factors

Surgical FactorNerve at RiskMechanismPrevention
Posterior approachSciatic nerveRetractor placement, excessive external rotation, cement extrusionVisualise nerve before retractor, limit retraction time, protect with sponge
Anterior approachFemoral nerve, lateral femoral cutaneous nerveAnterior retractor compression against pelvis, haematomaLimit retractor force and duration, release intermittently during case
Limb lengthening over 4cmSciatic nerve (peroneal division)Traction injury, nerve stretched beyond elastic limitIntraoperative fluoroscopy, compare to contralateral side, consider shortening
Acetabular protrusio repairExternal iliac vesselsMedial wall screw perforation, graft migrationPre-operative CT measurement, intraoperative fluoroscopy, limit screw length

Cement Extrusion Risk

Cement extruding medially through acetabular defects can compress the external iliac vessels or femoral nerve. This may present as delayed vascular compromise or progressive nerve palsy hours to days post-operatively. Use cement restrictors and bone graft for medial wall defects.

Understanding these risk factors allows for proactive prevention strategies and informed consent discussions.

Anatomical Variations Increasing Risk

Sciatic Nerve Variations

Piriformis relationship (important for posterior approach):

  • 85% - nerve exits below piriformis (standard anatomy)
  • 12% - nerve divides at sciatic notch, peroneal through piriformis
  • 3% - nerve exits above piriformis

Clinical implication: Cannot predict from external landmarks, assume vulnerable anatomy.

Vascular Anomalies

Femoral artery variants:

  • High bifurcation of common femoral (5%)
  • Accessory obturator artery (20-30%)
  • Aberrant external iliac course

Risk mitigation: Pre-operative vascular imaging in revision cases or protrusio repair.

These anatomical variations emphasise the importance of careful dissection and adherence to recognised surgical landmarks rather than relying on presumed anatomy.

Clinical Assessment and Diagnosis

Immediate Post-Operative Examination

The single most important step in diagnosing neurovascular injury is a systematic post-anaesthesia examination before the patient leaves the operating theatre.

Post-Operative Neurovascular Assessment Protocol

ImmediateRecovery Room Assessment

Before leaving theatre, assess:

  • Foot dorsiflexion (peroneal division of sciatic nerve)
  • Foot plantarflexion (tibial division)
  • Toe extension and flexion
  • Hip flexion and knee extension (femoral nerve)
  • Distal pulses (dorsalis pedis, posterior tibial)
  • Capillary refill bilaterally
  • Compare to pre-operative baseline if documented
Within 1 hourDocumentation

Document findings in medical record:

  • Motor power (0-5 MRC scale)
  • Sensory examination (light touch, pinprick)
  • Vascular status (pulses, temperature, colour)
  • Compare to contralateral limb
  • Any change from pre-operative baseline
Immediate actionAbnormal Findings

If deficit identified:

  • Inform supervising consultant immediately
  • Check leg length differential (clinical and radiographic)
  • Review intraoperative notes for risk factors
  • Consider urgent imaging if vascular concern
  • Initiate management algorithm

The Missed Diagnosis

Failure to perform immediate post-operative neurovascular examination is the most common reason for delayed diagnosis of nerve injury. Patients emerging from anaesthesia may not recognise or report subtle motor or sensory deficits. A missed nerve injury in the immediate post-operative period becomes far more difficult to prove causation and manage appropriately.

Clinical Patterns by Nerve

Nerve InjuredMotor DeficitSensory LossSpecial Signs
Sciatic (complete)Foot drop, no ankle movement, toe paralysisEntire foot below ankle numb except medial ankleHigh-stepping gait, foot slap when walking
Sciatic (peroneal division)Foot drop, weak ankle eversion, toe extension lossDorsum of foot and lateral leg numbMost common pattern, foot drop immediately evident
Sciatic (tibial division)Weak plantarflexion, toe flexion loss, ankle inversion weakSole of foot numb, sensory loss calf posteriorlyLess common, patient may still walk but with abnormal gait
Femoral nerveWeak hip flexion, unable to extend knee, quadriceps wastingAnterior thigh and medial leg numbnessUnable to straight leg raise, knee buckles with weight bearing

Vascular Injury Recognition

Immediate Presentation

Acute vascular injury presents with:

  • Absent or diminished distal pulses
  • Cold, pale limb compared to contralateral
  • Expanding haematoma in wound or thigh
  • Hypotension if significant blood loss
  • Pain out of proportion (compartment syndrome developing)

Delayed Presentation

Delayed vascular complications:

  • Pseudoaneurysm (pulsatile mass, bruit)
  • Arteriovenous fistula (continuous thrill)
  • Compartment syndrome (24-48 hours post-op)
  • DVT from venous injury
  • Heterotopic ossification from haematoma

Investigations

Initial Investigations

Investigation Pathway for Suspected Nerve Injury

ImmediateClinical Assessment

Bedside examination:

  • Systematic motor and sensory testing
  • Document deficit with MRC grading
  • Measure leg lengths clinically
  • Assess for compartment syndrome signs
Within 1-2 hoursRadiographic Assessment

Plain radiographs (AP pelvis, lateral hip):

  • Component position and orientation
  • Limb length discrepancy measurement
  • Femoral offset restoration
  • Cement extrusion medially
  • Acetabular screws penetrating medial wall
3 weeks post-injuryBaseline EMG/NCS

Electromyography and nerve conduction studies:

  • Distinguish neuropraxia from axonotmesis
  • Baseline for monitoring recovery
  • Localise level of injury
  • Guide prognosis discussions
If indicatedAdvanced Imaging

MRI pelvis/hip (if surgical exploration planned):

  • Nerve compression from haematoma or cement
  • Assess nerve continuity
  • Rule out space-occupying lesion

CT angiography (if vascular injury suspected):

  • Active extravasation
  • Pseudoaneurysm
  • Arteriovenous fistula

Vascular Investigation Protocol

Arterial Injury Investigation

Immediate (within 1 hour):

  • Duplex ultrasound (bedside) to assess flow
  • Ankle-brachial pressure index (ABPI) - compare to contralateral
  • Compartment pressure measurement if clinical concern

Urgent (within 6 hours):

  • CT angiography (gold standard) - defines level and extent of injury
  • Conventional angiography if intervention planned

Management decision:

  • ABPI under 0.5 = urgent vascular surgery consultation
  • Hard signs of vascular injury = immediate theatre for exploration
  • Soft signs = close observation with serial ABPI and duplex

Hard signs requiring immediate exploration include absent pulses, expanding haematoma, pulsatile bleeding, and limb ischaemia.

Venous Injury Investigation

Clinical features:

  • Large haematoma formation
  • Limb swelling disproportionate to surgery
  • Persistent bleeding from drain
  • Hypotension without obvious bleeding source

Investigations:

  • Duplex ultrasound to assess for DVT
  • CT venography if major vessel injury suspected
  • Serial haemoglobin measurements

Management:

  • Small venous injuries often self-limiting with compression
  • Large haematoma may require drainage to prevent compression of adjacent structures
  • DVT prophylaxis adjusted based on bleeding risk

Venous injuries are less immediately life-threatening than arterial but can lead to significant morbidity from haematoma mass effect and DVT.

Timing of EMG/NCS

Q: When should you perform baseline EMG/NCS after suspected nerve injury? A: 3 weeks post-injury. Earlier EMG is unhelpful as Wallerian degeneration takes 2-3 weeks to develop. Performing EMG at 3 weeks establishes baseline severity, allows distinction between neuropraxia and axonotmesis, and provides prognostic information. Repeat studies at 3 months and 6 months monitor recovery trajectory.

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
tha neurovascular injury management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for tha neurovascular injuryCredit: OrthoVellum

Nerve Injury Management Algorithm

Immediate Management (0-24 hours):

First 24 Hours

0-2 hoursDiagnosis Confirmation
  • Document deficit completely (motor, sensory)
  • Review intraoperative events
  • Measure leg length radiographically
  • Assess severity: complete vs partial palsy
2-6 hoursComponent Assessment
  • If limb lengthening over 4cm AND complete palsy → urgent revision
  • If cement extrusion compressing nerve → urgent revision
  • If haematoma causing compression → urgent evacuation
  • If neuropraxia likely (partial deficit, no lengthening) → observation
6-12 hoursDecision Point

Criteria for urgent component removal:

  • Limb lengthening over 4cm with complete sciatic palsy
  • Progressive deficit (was partial, now complete)
  • Severe pain suggesting nerve compression
  • Vascular compromise accompanying nerve injury

If observation chosen, close neurovascular monitoring is essential.

Observation Protocol (if no immediate revision):

  • Daily neurovascular examination
  • Foot drop splint (ankle-foot orthosis) to prevent contractures
  • Physiotherapy for passive range of motion
  • EMG/NCS at 3 weeks
  • Re-assess at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months

Critical 72-Hour Window

If nerve injury fails to improve by 72 hours, or worsens, consider surgical exploration. Early nerve decompression (within 72 hours) has been shown to improve recovery rates. Beyond 72 hours, the benefit of exploration diminishes unless there is clear evidence of compressive pathology.

Vascular Injury Management

Immediate Recognition and Response:

PresentationInvestigationManagementTimeline
Intraoperative bleeding (pulsatile, uncontrolled)Direct visualisation, vascular surgery consult intraoperativelyImmediate vascular repair, potential for graft or bypassDo not close wound - call vascular immediately
Post-op absent pulses, cold limbABPI, duplex USS, CT angiography urgentImmediate vascular exploration, thrombectomy or bypassWithin 6 hours to prevent limb loss
Expanding haematoma, stable pulsesSerial haemoglobin, CT to assess size and sourceObservation if stable, drainage if compartment syndrome riskMonitor every 2-4 hours for first 24 hours
Delayed pseudoaneurysm (weeks-months post-op)Duplex USS, CT angiography, vascular surgery referralEndovascular coiling or open repair depending on anatomySemi-urgent (days to weeks) - risk of rupture

Compartment Syndrome Risk:

Vascular injury causing haematoma or reperfusion after ischaemia can lead to compartment syndrome, typically 24-48 hours post-operatively.

Compartment Syndrome Monitoring

Clinical signs: Pain out of proportion to examination, pain with passive stretch of muscles, tense compartments, progressive motor/sensory deficit.

Measurement: Compartment pressure over 30mmHg or within 30mmHg of diastolic BP is diagnostic.

Management: Immediate fasciotomy of all four compartments of leg. Delayed diagnosis leads to permanent sequelae (Volkmann's contracture, amputation).

Revision Surgery for Nerve Injury

Indications for Revision:

  1. Limb lengthening over 4cm with complete sciatic nerve palsy
  2. Cement extrusion compressing neurovascular structures
  3. Component malposition causing direct nerve compression
  4. Progressive neurological deficit despite initial observation
  5. Haematoma causing nerve compression not resolving with drainage alone

Surgical Options:

Component Exchange

Goal: Reduce limb length to under 4cm differential

Technique:

  • Remove acetabular component, insert smaller liner
  • Reduce femoral offset with different stem/head combination
  • Consider femoral shortening osteotomy if needed
  • Verify leg length with fluoroscopy before closure

Nerve Decompression

Goal: Release external compression of nerve

Technique:

  • Extend posterior approach proximally
  • Identify sciatic nerve at sciatic notch
  • Trace distally to identify compression point
  • Remove cement, haematoma, or scar tissue
  • Do NOT manipulate nerve itself (risk of further injury)

Expected Outcomes:

  • Component revision for lengthening: 50-60% recover useful function
  • Nerve decompression for compression: 40-70% improvement
  • Timing critical: better outcomes if within 72 hours
  • Complete nerve transection: poor prognosis regardless of intervention

Understanding when to revise versus observe is a key decision point that examiners will explore in viva scenarios.

Surgical Technique - Prevention Strategies

Prevention is far superior to management. This section outlines specific intraoperative techniques to minimise neurovascular injury risk.

Patient Positioning and Setup

Positioning for Nerve Protection

For Posterior ApproachLateral Decubitus Position

Standard positioning:

  • Lateral position, affected side up
  • Lower limb flexed at hip and knee for stability
  • Upper limb (operative) free to move through range
  • Pelvic posts anterior and posterior to stabilise pelvis

Nerve protection:

  • Avoid excessive flexion at hip (over 90 degrees) - increases sciatic nerve tension
  • Avoid extreme internal rotation - stretches sciatic nerve
  • Position operative limb in 20-30 degrees flexion, neutral rotation at rest
For Anterior ApproachSupine Position

Standard positioning:

  • Supine on radiolucent table
  • Operative leg on extension attachment
  • Perineal post for countertraction

Nerve protection:

  • Limit hip extension beyond neutral (femoral nerve stretch)
  • Release anterior retractors every 15-20 minutes
  • Avoid excessive lateral translation of femoral shaft (femoral nerve compression)

Proper positioning sets the foundation for safe exposure and reduces baseline nerve tension throughout the case.

Safe Exposure Techniques by Approach

Posterior Approach - Sciatic Nerve Protection:

Step-by-Step Nerve Protection

Step 1Superficial Dissection
  • Identify sciatic nerve before placing deep retractors
  • Palpate nerve posterior to short external rotators
  • Place blunt retractor or sponge stick posterior to protect nerve
  • Mark nerve position with suture if anatomy unclear
Step 2Capsulotomy
  • Capsulotomy along femoral neck, staying anterior to nerve course
  • Avoid excessive posterior capsule release (nerve adherent to posterior capsule in revision cases)
  • Release capsule under direct vision, not blindly with scissors
Step 3Retractor Placement
  • Anterior retractor on anterior wall of acetabulum (safe)
  • Posterior retractor placed MEDIALLY, not posterior to acetabulum
  • Blunt retractors only, pointed retractors can impale nerve
  • Release retractors every 20 minutes to reduce ischaemia
Step 4During Reaming
  • Hand-held retraction during acetabular reaming
  • Assistant monitors retractor position continuously
  • Do not ream excessively posterior (risk of cement extrusion toward nerve)

Anterior Approach - Femoral Nerve Protection:

Internervous Plane

The anterior approach utilises the interval between tensor fascia lata (superior gluteal nerve) and sartorius/rectus femoris (femoral nerve). This is a true internervous plane.

Key: Stay in the muscular interval, avoid excessive medial dissection where femoral nerve and vessels lie.

Retractor Strategy

Anterior retractor (over femoral neck):

  • Against bone, not soft tissue
  • Release every 15 minutes
  • Avoid levering against anterior structures

Medial retractor (protecting femoral vessels):

  • Hand-held only, not self-retaining
  • Intermittent placement during femoral preparation

Safe exposure requires vigilance, anatomical knowledge, and willingness to adjust retractor position frequently rather than static retraction.

Intraoperative Leg Length Assessment

Pre-operative Planning:

  • Templating to plan appropriate offset and leg length restoration
  • Measure contralateral limb length as baseline
  • Identify anatomical landmarks (lesser trochanter to centre of rotation)

Intraoperative Measurement Techniques:

TechniqueMethodAccuracyLimitation
Pin-to-pin measurementSteinmann pins in iliac crest and femoral shaft, measure with rulerWithin 5mm in experienced handsRequires identical positioning, pelvis must be stable
Intraoperative fluoroscopyAP pelvis image, measure medial calcar to ischial tuberosity bilaterallyWithin 3-5mm, objective documentationRequires true AP pelvis, adds radiation exposure
Shuck testAssess stability with trial reduction, attempt to distract femoral headQualitative, not quantitativeDoes not provide actual measurement, can lead to over-lengthening

The 4cm Rule

Limb lengthening over 4cm is the single strongest predictor of post-operative nerve palsy. Multiple studies demonstrate exponential increase in nerve injury risk beyond this threshold. If templating suggests over 4cm lengthening will be required, consider:

  1. Subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy (DDH, high dislocation)
  2. Accept lower hip centre (balance lengthening vs biomechanics)
  3. Staged procedure (soft tissue release first, definitive THA later)

Document leg length measurement before closing and discuss in operation note.

Cement Application to Prevent Extrusion

Acetabular Cementing:

Medial Wall Protection

Risk: Cement extrusion through thin medial wall can compress external iliac vessels or obturator nerve.

Prevention:

  • Bone graft medial wall defects before cementing
  • Use cement restrictor or mesh to contain cement
  • Low-pressure injection technique
  • Monitor for medial extrusion with fluoroscopy during injection

Posterior Wall Awareness

Risk: Cement extrusion posteriorly can directly contact or compress sciatic nerve.

Prevention:

  • Do not over-ream posteriorly
  • Visualise posterior wall integrity before cementing
  • Place posterior retractor to shield nerve during cement injection
  • Remove excess cement immediately before polymerisation

Femoral Cementing:

  • Anterior perforation risk: Femoral canal reaming can perforate anteriorly, especially in dysplastic femurs or revision with thin anterior cortex
  • Prevention: Hand-feel during reaming, use radiographic landmarks, consider uncemented stem if canal abnormal
  • Cement pressurisation: Use cement gun and canal restrictor, but avoid excessive pressurisation in thin cortices (risk of perforation and cement extrusion)

Meticulous cement technique is essential to prevent both immediate and delayed neurovascular complications from cement mass effect.

Complications

Beyond the primary nerve and vascular injuries, several secondary complications can arise from neurovascular injury or its management.

ComplicationIncidenceRisk FactorsManagement
Permanent nerve palsy20-60% of nerve injuries have residual deficitComplete transection, delayed diagnosis, axonotmesisAFO splint, tendon transfer (tibialis posterior to dorsum), arthrodesis
Chronic neuropathic pain30-40% of patients with nerve injuryIncomplete recovery, neuroma formationNeuropathic pain medications (gabapentin, pregabalin), pain clinic referral
Compartment syndrome5-10% of vascular injuriesDelayed presentation, haematoma, reperfusion injuryImmediate fasciotomy all four compartments, may require amputation if delayed
PseudoaneurysmUnder 1% of THAs, more common in revisionArterial wall injury with contained ruptureEndovascular coiling or open repair, risk of rupture if untreated
Deep infectionIncreased with haematoma and revision surgeryLarge haematoma, compromised soft tissues, multiple surgeriesIrrigation and debridement, antibiotic suppression, may require implant removal
Heterotopic ossificationUp to 20% with large haematomaSoft tissue trauma, haematoma, re-operationProphylaxis with indomethacin or radiation, excision if symptomatic at 1 year

The Medicolegal Landscape

Nerve injury after THA is a common source of litigation. Key factors in defensibility:

  1. Documentation: Pre-operative documentation of baseline neurovascular exam
  2. Informed consent: Specific discussion of nerve injury risk (especially in high-risk cases)
  3. Intraoperative measurement: Document leg length measurement before closing
  4. Immediate recognition: Post-operative neurovascular exam documented in recovery room
  5. Appropriate management: Timely revision or observation with clear rationale documented

Failure in any of these areas significantly weakens the medicolegal position.

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

Immediate Post-Operative Management (0-48 hours)

First 48 Hours Care

0-2 hoursRecovery Room
  • Neurovascular examination before leaving OR
  • Document baseline neurological status
  • Check leg lengths radiographically (AP pelvis)
  • Ensure distal pulses present and documented
  • Pain management protocol initiated
2-24 hoursWard Monitoring
  • Neurovascular checks every 4 hours for first 24 hours
  • Monitor for compartment syndrome signs (pain, paraesthesia, pressure)
  • Drain output monitoring (excessive bleeding may indicate vascular injury)
  • Weight bearing as per protocol (protected if nerve injury suspected)
Days 1-224-48 Hours
  • Physiotherapy assessment for gait and transfers
  • If foot drop present: AFO splint fitted
  • Passive range of motion exercises to prevent contractures
  • Continue neurovascular observations if deficit present

Early recognition and appropriate initial management set the foundation for optimal recovery outcomes.

Rehabilitation for Nerve Injury

Neuropraxia Recovery Protocol:

Weeks 0-6

Goals: Prevent contractures, maintain joint mobility

  • AFO splint worn continuously (removable for hygiene)
  • Passive range of motion exercises daily
  • Protected weight bearing with walking aid
  • Weekly physiotherapy review
  • EMG/NCS at 3 weeks to establish baseline

Weeks 6-12

Goals: Monitor recovery, strengthen recovering muscles

  • Continue AFO if no dorsiflexion power
  • Active-assisted exercises as motor recovery returns
  • Electrical stimulation may help (evidence limited)
  • Repeat EMG at 12 weeks to assess trajectory
  • Discuss prognosis based on recovery pattern

Axonotmesis Recovery Timeline:

  • Nerve regenerates at 1mm per day (1 inch per month)
  • Sciatic nerve injury at hip level to foot: 80-90cm distance
  • Expected time to reach foot muscles: 24-30 months
  • Functional recovery may take 2-3 years
  • Many patients have incomplete recovery

When to Abandon Hope?

If no clinical or electrophysiological evidence of recovery by 6 months, complete recovery is unlikely. Consider secondary procedures (tendon transfer, arthrodesis) at 12-18 months if no significant recovery. Do not wait indefinitely - delayed tendon transfers have worse outcomes.

Secondary Procedures for Residual Deficits

For Persistent Foot Drop:

ProcedureIndicationExpected OutcomeTiming
Ankle-foot orthosis (AFO)All patients with foot drop acutely, long-term if no recoveryAllows safe ambulation, prevents contractures, cosmetically acceptableImmediate and ongoing
Tendon transfer (tibialis posterior to dorsum)Persistent foot drop with no recovery, adequate tibialis posterior strengthRestore active dorsiflexion, eliminate AFO in 70-80%, improved gait12-18 months post-injury if no recovery
Ankle arthrodesisComplete sciatic palsy, no plantarflexion or dorsiflexionStable ankle, allows weight bearing, requires AFO or shoe modification12-24 months post-injury, last resort

Tendon Transfer Technique:

  • Transfer tibialis posterior tendon through interosseous membrane to dorsum of foot
  • Attach to middle cuneiform and base of 2nd-4th metatarsals
  • Patient must have MRC grade 4 or greater tibialis posterior strength
  • Post-operative immobilisation 6 weeks, then intensive physiotherapy
  • Functional dorsiflexion achieved in 70-80% of carefully selected patients

These salvage procedures can significantly improve quality of life for patients with permanent nerve injuries.

Outcomes and Prognosis

Recovery Patterns by Injury Severity

Injury TypeRecovery TimelineExpected OutcomePrognostic Factors
Neuropraxia (conduction block)Days to weeks, complete by 3 monthsFull recovery in 70-90% of casesEarly signs of recovery (within 6 weeks) predict full recovery
Axonotmesis (axon damage)Months to years, 1mm per day regenerationPartial recovery in 40-60%, significant functional deficit commonProximal injuries (at hip) have worse prognosis than distal (below knee)
Neurotmesis (complete division)No spontaneous recovery expectedPoor outcome despite repair, under 10% useful functionSurgical repair within 72 hours improves outcomes slightly

Functional Outcomes After Nerve Injury

Factors Predicting Good Recovery

  • Partial deficit at presentation (incomplete nerve injury)
  • Early improvement (within 6 weeks suggests neuropraxia)
  • Young patient (better neuronal regeneration capacity)
  • No lengthening (injury from transient compression, not traction)
  • Isolated peroneal division (less disability than complete sciatic)

Factors Predicting Poor Recovery

  • Complete palsy from time of surgery (suggests neurotmesis)
  • Limb lengthening over 4cm (traction injury, poor prognosis)
  • No improvement by 6 months (unlikely to recover significantly)
  • Elderly patient (reduced regeneration capacity)
  • Complete sciatic nerve injury (severe functional impairment)

Counselling Patients on Prognosis

When counselling patients with nerve injury post-THA:

Initial conversation (first week): "We have identified a nerve injury affecting your foot movement. The majority of these injuries recover over time, though it may take many months. We will monitor closely with nerve studies at 3 weeks and 3 months."

If no recovery by 3 months: "Unfortunately, your nerve injury appears to be more severe than we initially hoped. While some continued recovery is possible over the next 12-18 months, we need to discuss adaptive strategies including ankle braces and the possibility of future tendon transfer surgery if recovery plateaus."

At 12-18 months if no recovery: "Based on the lack of significant improvement, we do not expect further spontaneous recovery. We should discuss secondary procedures such as tendon transfer or ankle fusion to improve your function and quality of life."

Honest, staged discussions aligned with recovery trajectory maintain trust and set realistic expectations.

Evidence Base and Key Studies

Sciatic Nerve Palsy After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Mayo Clinic Experience

3
Schmalzried TP, Amstutz HC, Dorey FJ • Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Am) (1991)
Key Findings:
  • Retrospective review of 3,126 primary THAs, 0.7% nerve palsy rate
  • Risk factors: DDH (5.2% incidence), revision surgery (3.2%), lengthening over 4cm (7.6%)
  • Complete palsy: only 28% recovered fully, 44% had no recovery
  • Partial palsy: 68% recovered fully
  • Early exploration (within 1 week) improved recovery in compression injuries
Clinical Implication: Limb lengthening over 4cm and DDH are the strongest modifiable risk factors for nerve injury. Complete palsies have poor prognosis, emphasising the importance of prevention.
Limitation: Retrospective study from single high-volume centre, heterogeneous surgical techniques and implants over study period.

Vascular Injury in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Review of the Scottish Arthroplasty Project Database

3
Blom AW, Pattison G, Whitehouse S, et al. • Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Br) (2003)
Key Findings:
  • 5,606 THAs analysed, 0.25% vascular injury rate
  • External iliac artery most commonly injured (60% of vascular injuries)
  • Mortality rate from vascular injury: 9%
  • Acetabular protrusio and revision surgery were significant risk factors
  • Delayed presentation (pseudoaneurysm) occurred in 30% of vascular injuries
Clinical Implication: Vascular injuries are rare but potentially fatal. High index of suspicion needed in protrusio repair and revision cases. Delayed presentation is common, requiring vigilance in post-operative period.
Limitation: Registry data subject to underreporting bias, particularly for minor vascular injuries managed conservatively.

Results of Revision for Sciatic Nerve Palsy After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

4
Eggli S, Hankemayer S, Muller ME • Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1999)
Key Findings:
  • 27 patients with sciatic nerve palsy after THA, 21 underwent revision surgery
  • Revision within 72 hours: 62% good recovery
  • Revision after 1 week: 33% good recovery
  • Component removal alone (without nerve exploration) sufficient if due to lengthening
  • Direct nerve repair rarely indicated, decompression alone usually adequate
Clinical Implication: Early revision surgery (within 72 hours) improves outcomes when nerve injury is due to compression or excessive lengthening. Timing is critical for optimising neurological recovery.
Limitation: Small case series from single centre, lacks control group of conservatively managed patients for comparison.

Prevention of Sciatic Nerve Injury in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Intraoperative Somatosensory Evoked Potential Monitoring

4
Katirji MB, Lanska DJ, Shrier DA, et al. • The Journal of Arthroplasty (1992)
Key Findings:
  • Prospective study of 43 high-risk THAs with SSEP monitoring
  • SSEP changes detected in 9 patients (21%) during surgery
  • All SSEP changes reversed with intervention (component adjustment, retractor release)
  • No nerve palsies in monitored group vs 3.7% in historical controls
  • SSEP most sensitive to lengthening and retractor compression
Clinical Implication: Intraoperative neuromonitoring can detect impending nerve injury and allow real-time intervention. May be considered in very high-risk cases (severe DDH, major leg length discrepancy planned).
Limitation: Small study, neuromonitoring adds cost and complexity, not widely available or used in routine THA practice.

Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) - Nerve Injury Data

3
AOANJRR Annual Report • Australian Government (2023)
Key Findings:
  • Nerve injury rate in primary THA: 0.5% (consistent with international data)
  • Revision THA nerve injury rate: 2.1% (four-fold increase)
  • DDH diagnosis associated with 3.6 times higher nerve injury risk
  • Posterior approach: 0.6% nerve injury; anterior approach: 0.3% (statistically significant)
  • No difference in nerve injury rates between cemented and uncemented implants
Clinical Implication: Australian data confirms international nerve injury rates. Posterior approach carries higher nerve injury risk than anterior approach, though absolute rates are low for both. DDH remains highest risk diagnosis.
Limitation: Registry data relies on surgeon reporting, likely underestimates minor neuropraxias that resolve spontaneously.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Immediate Post-Operative Foot Drop (2-3 min)

EXAMINER

"You have just completed a primary THA via posterior approach for severe secondary osteoarthritis in a 55-year-old man. The anaesthetist calls you to recovery as the patient is unable to dorsiflex his right foot. What is your assessment and management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a concerning post-operative sciatic nerve palsy affecting the peroneal division. I would take a systematic approach: First, I would immediately examine the patient to confirm the deficit - assess foot dorsiflexion, plantarflexion, toe extension, and sensory examination of the dorsum of foot and lateral leg. I would compare to the pre-operative examination if documented. Second, I would review the intraoperative events - was there difficulty with exposure, excessive retraction, or awareness of nerve tension? I would check the leg length both clinically and radiographically with an AP pelvis X-ray. Third, I would determine the severity - is this a complete sciatic palsy or isolated peroneal division injury? Is there any vascular compromise? Based on these findings, my management depends on the leg length differential. If lengthening is over 4cm and the palsy is complete, I would proceed urgently to revision surgery to reduce the leg length. If lengthening is under 4cm and the deficit is partial, I would observe with close neurovascular monitoring, arrange AFO splinting, and plan EMG/NCS at 3 weeks. I would document everything thoroughly and counsel the patient about the injury, prognosis, and management plan.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Immediate systematic examination to confirm deficit and severity
Check leg length radiographically - critical decision point
Differentiate complete vs partial palsy, sciatic vs isolated peroneal
Management algorithm: lengthening over 4cm + complete palsy = urgent revision
COMMON TRAPS
✗Failing to examine immediately (assuming it's anaesthetic effect)
✗Not checking leg length before deciding on management
✗Delaying revision in clear indication (over 4cm lengthening, complete palsy)
✗Not documenting pre-operative neurological status makes causation difficult to prove
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if the lengthening is 3.5cm - would you still revise?"
"What are the components of EMG/NCS and when would you order them?"
"What would you tell the patient about prognosis at this stage?"
"How would you technically reduce the leg length if you proceed to revision?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: DDH THA Planning with High Dislocation (3-4 min)

EXAMINER

"You are planning a THA for a 42-year-old woman with Crowe IV developmental dysplasia of the hip. The hip is dislocated 8cm superiorly. Walk me through your approach to minimising nerve injury risk."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a high-risk case for sciatic nerve injury due to the chronic hip dislocation and significant limb length discrepancy that will result from reduction to the anatomical hip centre. My strategy involves meticulous pre-operative planning and intraoperative technique to limit nerve stretch. First, pre-operative assessment: I would obtain full-length standing radiographs to measure the true leg length discrepancy (typically the dislocated side appears shorter). CT or MRI can help identify the sciatic nerve course, which may be significantly shortened. I would counsel the patient specifically about nerve injury risk and the possibility of staged surgery. Second, templating: I would template for anatomical hip centre restoration if possible, but calculate the expected lengthening. If this exceeds 4cm, I would plan a subtrochanteric femoral shortening osteotomy. Third, surgical approach: I would use a posterior approach with extensile exposure to allow direct visualisation of the sciatic nerve. I would identify the nerve early and protect it throughout the procedure. Fourth, intraoperative execution: Perform the subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy before hip reduction if planned. Use intraoperative fluoroscopy to measure leg lengths. Accept slightly high hip centre if needed to limit lengthening to under 4cm. Test nerve tension with trial reduction before final implantation. Fifth, consider staged approach: If anatomy is severely abnormal, perform soft tissue release and femoral shortening first, then definitive THA 6-12 weeks later after soft tissue adaptation. Throughout, the goal is to limit final leg length differential to under 4cm while restoring hip biomechanics as much as safely possible.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Pre-operative planning with imaging to identify nerve course and measure true LLD
Subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy if over 4cm lengthening anticipated
Extensile exposure with direct nerve visualisation
Intraoperative fluoroscopy to verify leg lengths before final components
COMMON TRAPS
✗Attempting to reduce to anatomical centre without shortening osteotomy (guaranteed nerve injury)
✗Not counselling patient about nerve injury risk and possible staged procedure
✗Underestimating true leg length discrepancy (apparent vs true LLD in DDH)
✗Not considering high hip centre as acceptable compromise to limit nerve stretch
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"Describe your technique for subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy"
"What is the maximum acceptable leg length discrepancy?"
"How would you manage a nerve palsy that develops despite shortening osteotomy?"
"What are the biomechanical consequences of accepting a high hip centre?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Delayed Vascular Complication (2-3 min)

EXAMINER

"A 68-year-old man underwent revision THA for aseptic loosening 6 weeks ago. He presents to the emergency department with a painful, pulsatile mass in his groin. Examination reveals a 4cm pulsatile swelling with a bruit. Distal pulses are present. What is your diagnosis and management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This presentation is highly concerning for a femoral artery pseudoaneurysm, a delayed vascular complication of the revision THA. My immediate management would be to ensure haemodynamic stability and assess for signs of rupture or distal ischaemia. I would investigate urgently with duplex ultrasound as a first-line investigation to confirm the pseudoaneurysm and assess its size and relationship to surrounding structures. CT angiography would provide definitive anatomical detail and help plan intervention. The differential diagnosis includes arteriovenous fistula (which would have a continuous thrill rather than pulsatile mass), haematoma (no pulsation or bruit), or abscess (fever, inflammatory markers elevated). Given the likely diagnosis of pseudoaneurysm, I would immediately consult vascular surgery. Treatment options depend on the anatomy: endovascular coiling or stenting may be possible for favourable anatomy, or open surgical repair with patch angioplasty or interposition graft may be required. This is semi-urgent rather than immediately life-threatening since distal perfusion is maintained, but there is a risk of rupture or expansion. Prevention strategies for future cases include meticulous haemostasis during revision surgery, careful retractor placement to avoid arterial injury, and awareness that cement or screw penetration can cause delayed arterial injury. I would counsel the patient about the need for intervention to prevent rupture and the good prognosis with appropriate treatment.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Recognise pseudoaneurysm as delayed vascular complication (weeks to months post-op)
Urgent imaging with duplex USS and CT angiography
Immediate vascular surgery consultation
Treatment options: endovascular vs open repair depending on anatomy
COMMON TRAPS
✗Dismissing as simple haematoma without imaging (can lead to fatal rupture)
✗Delaying vascular surgery consultation (this needs specialist management)
✗Attempting aspiration or biopsy (can cause catastrophic bleeding)
✗Not recognising that distal pulses can be present with pseudoaneurysm
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What intraoperative factors increase pseudoaneurysm risk?"
"How would management differ if there were no distal pulses?"
"What is the difference between pseudoaneurysm and arteriovenous fistula?"
"What are the long-term outcomes after endovascular repair of pseudoaneurysm?"

MCQ Practice Points

Nerve Anatomy Question

Q: The sciatic nerve at the level of the hip joint runs approximately how far posterior to the posterior acetabular rim? A: 2-3cm posterior. This distance is critical for safe posterior approach. The nerve exits the pelvis through the greater sciatic notch beneath the piriformis muscle and runs posterior to the acetabulum protected by the short external rotators. Excessive posterior wall reaming, retractor placement directly posterior, or cement extrusion can directly injure the nerve at this level.

Risk Factor Question

Q: What is the single strongest modifiable risk factor for sciatic nerve palsy after THA? A: Limb lengthening over 4cm. Multiple studies demonstrate exponential increase in nerve injury risk beyond 4cm lengthening. This is modifiable through careful templating, intraoperative measurement, and femoral shortening osteotomy when indicated. Other risk factors like DDH diagnosis and revision surgery are not modifiable, but lengthening can be controlled by surgical technique.

Diagnosis Question

Q: When is the optimal timing for baseline EMG/NCS after suspected nerve injury? A: 3 weeks post-injury. Wallerian degeneration takes 2-3 weeks to develop, so earlier EMG is unhelpful. At 3 weeks, EMG can distinguish neuropraxia (no denervation changes) from axonotmesis (fibrillation potentials, positive sharp waves). Repeat studies at 3 months and 6 months monitor recovery trajectory and guide prognosis.

Management Question

Q: What is the indication for urgent revision surgery in immediate post-operative sciatic nerve palsy? A: Limb lengthening over 4cm with complete sciatic palsy. This combination indicates traction injury that is unlikely to recover without removing the cause of traction. Component revision to reduce leg length to under 4cm differential should be performed urgently (within 24-72 hours). Partial palsies with less than 4cm lengthening can be observed initially with close monitoring.

Prognosis Question

Q: What is the expected recovery rate for neuropraxia after THA? A: 70-90% full recovery. Neuropraxia is a temporary conduction block without structural nerve damage. Recovery typically occurs over days to weeks (maximum 3 months). If no recovery by 3 months, the injury was likely more severe than neuropraxia (axonotmesis or neurotmesis), and prognosis worsens significantly. Early signs of recovery within 6 weeks are a positive prognostic indicator.

Vascular Injury Question

Q: Which vessel is most commonly injured during THA and what is the typical mechanism? A: External iliac artery, injured by medial acetabular screw penetration or cement extrusion. The external iliac artery runs along the pelvic brim just medial to the acetabulum. In acetabular protrusio repair or revision with medial wall defects, screws or cement can penetrate the thin medial wall and directly injure the vessel. This may present immediately with bleeding or in delayed fashion as pseudoaneurysm. Pre-operative CT to measure medial wall thickness and intraoperative fluoroscopy during screw insertion reduce this risk.

Australian Context and Medicolegal Considerations

AOANJRR Data on Nerve Injury

Australian registry findings:

  • Overall nerve injury rate: 0.5% primary THA, 2.1% revision THA
  • Higher rates in DDH diagnosis (3.6 times baseline risk)
  • Posterior approach: 0.6% vs anterior approach: 0.3%
  • No difference between cemented and uncemented implants
  • Recovery data: 60% recover fully, 30% partial recovery, 10% no recovery

These Australian-specific data inform consent discussions and risk stratification.

Australian Guidelines

ACSQHC (Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care):

  • Informed consent must include specific discussion of nerve injury risk
  • Documentation of pre-operative neurovascular examination is required
  • Post-operative neurovascular examination should be documented within 24 hours
  • Incident reporting for all nerve injuries (even if temporary)
  • Root cause analysis for permanent nerve injuries

Medicolegal Considerations in Australia

Key documentation requirements for defensible practice:

  1. Pre-operative documentation:

    • Baseline neurovascular examination documented in medical record
    • Pre-operative leg length measurement or apparent LLD noted
    • Specific consent discussion documented if high-risk case (DDH, revision, protrusio)
  2. Intraoperative documentation:

    • Approach used and any anatomical difficulties encountered
    • Leg length measurement technique and result (pin-to-pin, fluoroscopy)
    • Final leg length differential documented before closure
    • Any intraoperative concerns about nerve or vascular structures
  3. Post-operative documentation:

    • Neurovascular examination in recovery room before patient leaves theatre
    • Motor power graded (0-5 MRC scale) for foot dorsiflexion, plantarflexion, toe movements
    • Sensory examination of foot and leg dermatomes
    • Vascular status (pulses, capillary refill, temperature)
    • Documentation of normal findings is as important as abnormal
  4. Management documentation:

    • If deficit identified: rationale for revision vs observation clearly stated
    • Timing of any intervention and reason for timing
    • Patient counselling about injury, prognosis, and treatment plan
    • Follow-up plan including EMG timing and specialist referrals

Common litigation issues in Australia:

  • Failure to document pre-operative neurological examination
  • Excessive limb lengthening (over 4cm) without documented consent discussion
  • Delayed recognition of nerve injury (no post-operative examination)
  • Failure to revise when indicated (over 4cm lengthening with complete palsy)
  • Inadequate informed consent discussion in high-risk cases

Australian legal precedents emphasise that nerve injury itself is a recognised complication and not necessarily negligent, but failure to recognise, document, or appropriately manage the injury can constitute negligence.

Australian Hospital Systems and Pathways

Public Hospital Pathway

Acute nerve injury management:

  • Immediate consultant orthopaedic review
  • Neurology or neurosurgery consult if unclear diagnosis
  • Access to EMG/NCS typically 2-4 weeks wait in public system
  • Physiotherapy and AFO fitting usually available same admission
  • Follow-up in public arthroplasty clinic at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months

Private Hospital Pathway

Private practice considerations:

  • Immediate access to EMG/NCS if available in private rooms
  • Direct neurology referral for complex cases
  • Patient may need transfer to public system for complex vascular intervention
  • Private physiotherapy and orthotist services for AFO
  • Closer follow-up schedule often possible in private practice

THA NEUROVASCULAR INJURY

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Anatomy

  • •Sciatic nerve: 2-3cm posterior to acetabular rim, exits below piriformis in 85%
  • •Peroneal division: lateral and more vulnerable, less connective tissue support
  • •Femoral nerve: lies lateral to femoral artery beneath inguinal ligament
  • •External iliac artery: runs along pelvic brim, at risk with medial screws/cement

Injury Classification

  • •Neuropraxia: conduction block, recovers weeks-months (70-90% full recovery)
  • •Axonotmesis: axon disruption, 1mm/day regeneration (40-60% partial recovery)
  • •Neurotmesis: complete transection, poor prognosis (under 10% recovery)
  • •Distinguish with EMG at 3 weeks (Wallerian degeneration takes 2-3 weeks)

Risk Factors and Prevention

  • •Lengthening over 4cm: strongest modifiable risk factor (limit with shortening osteotomy)
  • •DDH: 3-10x higher risk, plan subtrochanteric shortening if Crowe III-IV
  • •Revision THA: 5-10x higher risk than primary, careful dissection essential
  • •Posterior approach: visualise nerve, blunt retractors medially, release every 20 min

Recognition and Diagnosis

  • •Post-anaesthesia exam MANDATORY: test foot dorsiflexion, plantarflexion, toe movements
  • •Sciatic (peroneal): foot drop, dorsum foot numbness (80% of nerve injuries)
  • •Femoral nerve: weak quadriceps, anterior thigh numbness (anterior approach)
  • •EMG/NCS at 3 weeks baseline, repeat at 3 and 6 months to monitor recovery

Management Algorithm

  • •Lengthening over 4cm + complete palsy = urgent revision within 24-72h
  • •Lengthening under 4cm + partial palsy = observe with AFO, close monitoring
  • •Vascular injury (absent pulses, cold limb) = immediate vascular surgery consult
  • •No recovery by 6 months = consider secondary procedures (tendon transfer at 12-18 months)

Key Evidence and Prognosis

  • •Schmalzried 1991: lengthening over 4cm = 7.6% nerve injury rate
  • •Eggli 1999: revision within 72h improves recovery (62% vs 33% good outcomes)
  • •AOANJRR 2023: 0.5% primary THA, 2.1% revision THA nerve injury rates
  • •Recovery timeline: neuropraxia 3 months, axonotmesis 24-36 months maximum
Quick Stats
Reading Time150 min
Related Topics

Adult Hip Dysplasia

Ankle Arthritis

Aseptic Loosening in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Avascular Necrosis of the Hip