Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Thoracic Disc Herniation

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Thoracic Disc Herniation

Comprehensive evidence-based guide to thoracic disc herniation - rare pathology, myelopathy risk, surgical approach selection, and outcomes for FRACS orthopaedic exam preparation

complete
Updated: 2025-12-25
High Yield Overview

THORACIC DISC HERNIATION

Rare | T8-T12 Common | Cord at Risk | Anterior Approach Preferred

0.5-1%Of all disc herniations
T8-T12Most common levels (75%)
40-70%Calcified (harder to remove)
NOPosterior laminectomy for central

ANATOMICAL CLASSIFICATION

Central
PatternMidline location
TreatmentAnterior approach mandatory
Centrolateral
PatternParacentral (most common)
TreatmentAnterior or posterolateral
Lateral/Foraminal
PatternFar lateral
TreatmentMay use posterolateral approach

Critical Must-Knows

  • Rare pathology - only 0.5-1% of all symptomatic disc herniations
  • Lower thoracic predominance - 75% occur at T8-T12 where relatively more motion
  • Myelopathy is primary concern - narrow canal, cord cannot be retracted
  • Posterior laminectomy CONTRAINDICATED for central discs - high paraplegia risk
  • Anterior/anterolateral approaches - transthoracic, costotransversectomy, thoracoscopic
  • Artery of Adamkiewicz at T9-L2 (usually left) - major blood supply to cord

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    40-70% of thoracic discs are calcified (complicates surgical removal)
  • "
    Central disc from posterior = catastrophic cord injury
  • "
    Many thoracic discs asymptomatic (incidental MRI findings)
  • "
    Transthoracic approach provides best visualization but requires thoracotomy

High-Yield Thoracic Disc Exam Points

Why Posterior is Contraindicated

Thoracic spinal cord CANNOT be safely retracted. The canal is narrow with limited CSF space. Attempting to access a central disc posteriorly requires cord manipulation - this causes irreversible paraplegia. This is the most important exam point.

Artery of Adamkiewicz

The major radicular artery (arteria radicularis magna) supplying the lower two-thirds of the spinal cord. Located T9-L2 in 80%, predominantly left side (75-80%). Damage causes anterior spinal artery syndrome and paraplegia.

Approach Selection

Central disc: Transthoracic, thoracoscopic, or costotransversectomy. Centrolateral: Anterior or posterolateral. Lateral: Transpedicular or lateral extracavitary. Location determines approach.

Calcification Challenge

40-70% of thoracic discs are calcified (increases with age). Calcified discs are harder to remove surgically (like concrete). Requires high-speed burr. CT essential for surgical planning. Increases cord injury risk.

Mnemonic

THORACICTHORACIC - Why Central Discs Need Anterior Approach

T
Tight canal
Narrow thoracic spinal canal with limited space
H
High risk
Cord injury risk if retracted from posterior
O
Only anterior safe
Access disc from front without cord manipulation
R
Retraction impossible
Cord cannot be safely retracted dorsally
A
Adamkiewicz at risk
Major radicular artery T9-L2 left
C
Calcified discs common
40-70% calcified, harder to remove
I
Irreversible paraplegia
Posterior approach catastrophic
C
CT shows calcification
Essential for surgical planning

Memory Hook:THORACIC reminds you why posterior approach to central disc = paraplegia

Mnemonic

APPROACHESAPPROACHES - Surgical Approach Selection

A
Anterior for central
Transthoracic or thoracoscopic
P
Posterolateral options
Costotransversectomy, transpedicular
P
Posterior contraindicated
For central herniations
R
Rib removal (costo)
Costotransversectomy removes rib and TP
O
Open or VATS
Transthoracic can be open or thoracoscopic
A
Adamkiewicz left T9-L2
Protect major radicular artery
C
CT for calcification
Plan for calcified discs
H
High-speed burr needed
For calcified disc removal
E
Extracavitary lateral
For far lateral discs
S
Single lung ventilation
Required for transthoracic approach

Memory Hook:APPROACHES covers all surgical options and critical technical points

Mnemonic

T8-T12T8-T12 - Most Common Levels

T8-T12
Lower thoracic
75% of thoracic disc herniations occur here
Motion
More mobile
Transitional zone has relatively more motion
Kyphosis
Thoracolumbar junction
Mechanical stress concentration

Memory Hook:T8-T12 is the zone - lower thoracic has relatively more motion than upper

Overview and Epidemiology

Thoracic disc herniation is a rare spinal pathology accounting for only 0.5-1% of all symptomatic disc herniations. [1] The thoracic spine's inherent stability from rib cage articulation protects the discs from the degenerative changes commonly seen in cervical and lumbar regions. However, when thoracic disc herniations do occur, they pose unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to the narrow spinal canal and proximity to the spinal cord.

Historical Context:

  • First surgical treatment described by Mixter and Barr in 1934
  • Early posterior approaches resulted in high rates of neurological deterioration (up to 33%) [2]
  • Modern era defined by anterior and anterolateral approaches pioneered in 1960s-1980s
  • Current outcomes significantly improved with proper approach selection

Geographic and Demographic Distribution:

  • Incidence: Estimated 1 per 1,000,000 population annually [1]
  • Age: Peak presentation in 4th-6th decades (40-60 years)
  • Gender: Slight male predominance (male:female ratio approximately 1.5:1)
  • Level distribution: 75% occur at T8-T12 (lower thoracic), 25% at T1-T7 (upper/mid thoracic)

Why Lower Thoracic?

The lower thoracic spine experiences relatively more motion than the upper thoracic due to:

  • Transitional anatomy approaching thoracolumbar junction
  • Reduced rib cage constraint
  • Mechanical stress concentration at kyphosis-lordosis transition
  • Greater axial loading compared to upper thoracic

Asymptomatic Disc Herniations

Studies using MRI screening of asymptomatic individuals found thoracic disc abnormalities in 37% of subjects under 40 years and 73% over 40 years. [3] Not all thoracic disc herniations are symptomatic or require treatment. Clinical correlation is essential.

Associated Conditions:

  • Scheuermann's disease - may predispose to thoracic disc degeneration
  • Ankylosing spondylitis - increased fracture risk but also disc disease
  • Degenerative scoliosis - asymmetric loading patterns
  • Trauma - acute disc herniation rare but possible with high-energy mechanism

Anatomy and Biomechanics

Thoracic Spinal Canal Anatomy:

The thoracic spinal canal is the narrowest region of the vertebral column:

  • Spinal cord fills 40-50% of canal (cervical: 25%, lumbar: cauda equina)
  • Limited CSF space dorsally - cord is close to posterior elements
  • Canal diameter: 12-14mm at T5-T8 (narrowest point)
  • Cord diameter: 8-10mm in thoracic region

Why Cord Cannot Be Retracted

In the cervical spine, the cord occupies only 25% of the canal with ample CSF allowing safe posterior retraction. In the thoracic spine, the cord occupies 40-50% of the canal with minimal CSF dorsally. Attempting to retract the cord posteriorly causes direct mechanical injury and vascular compromise leading to irreversible paraplegia. This is the fundamental reason posterior laminectomy is contraindicated for central thoracic discs.

Vascular Anatomy - Artery of Adamkiewicz:

The arteria radicularis magna (artery of Adamkiewicz) is the largest anterior segmental medullary artery supplying the lower two-thirds of the spinal cord via the anterior spinal artery. [4]

FeatureDetails
LocationT9-L2 in 80% of population (range T5-L4)
SideLeft side in 75-80% of cases
Most common levelT9-T11
SupplyLower thoracic and lumbosacral cord segments
Clinical significanceInjury causes anterior spinal artery syndrome (paraplegia, loss of pain/temperature, preserved proprioception)

Adamkiewicz Critical Points for Viva

Examiner: "What is the artery of Adamkiewicz and why is it important in thoracic surgery?"

Answer: "The artery of Adamkiewicz is the major anterior radicular artery supplying the lower two-thirds of the spinal cord. It's located at T9-L2 in 80% of individuals, more commonly on the left side. During thoracic surgery, especially at these levels, we must be careful with segmental vessel ligation as damaging this artery causes anterior spinal artery syndrome with paraplegia and loss of pain and temperature sensation below the lesion. Some surgeons obtain preoperative CT angiography to identify it, though this is not routine."

Thoracic Disc Anatomy:

Thoracic intervertebral discs are:

  • Thinner than lumbar discs (height 5-7mm vs 10-12mm lumbar)
  • Less mobile due to rib cage constraints
  • More prone to calcification with age (40-70% of symptomatic herniations are calcified) [5]
  • Smaller nucleus pulposus relative to annulus compared to lumbar

Biomechanical Considerations:

The thoracic spine is stabilized by:

  • Rib cage articulations (costovertebral and costotransverse joints)
  • Longer spinous processes (shingled arrangement)
  • Coronal plane facet orientation (limits rotation, allows lateral flexion)
  • Thoracic kyphosis (anterior column loading)

Relatively less motion in upper/mid thoracic (2-4 degrees per level) increases at thoracolumbar junction (6-8 degrees at T11-T12).

Pathophysiology

Mechanisms of Disc Herniation:

Unlike lumbar discs where extrusion through posterior annulus is common, thoracic disc pathology has distinct features:

  1. Central herniation - nucleus migrates posteriorly compressing cord centrally
  2. Posterolateral herniation - most common pattern (60-70%), may cause myelopathy or radiculopathy
  3. Lateral/foraminal - pure radiculopathy without myelopathy (15-20%)
  4. Giant herniation - rare, extensive canal compromise

Calcification Pathophysiology:

Thoracic discs undergo dystrophic calcification more frequently than cervical or lumbar discs due to:

  • Lower metabolic activity and vascularity in thoracic discs
  • Chronic mechanical stress with minimal motion (repetitive microtrauma)
  • Age-related degenerative changes with calcium deposition in nucleus and annulus
  • Scheuermann's disease association (endplate irregularities promote degeneration)

Clinical Significance of Calcification

Calcified thoracic discs:

  • Identified on CT scan (essential preoperative imaging)
  • Behave like bone during surgery - cannot be removed with rongeurs or curettes
  • Require high-speed burr for safe removal (diamond burr reduces heat)
  • Increased risk of dural tear and cord injury during removal
  • May cause acute traumatic herniation (calcified disc acts as missile with high-energy trauma)

Cord Compression Pathomechanics:

Thoracic disc herniation causes myelopathy through:

  • Direct mechanical compression - cord flattened against posterior canal
  • Vascular compromise - compression of anterior spinal artery or radicular arteries
  • Cord edema - seen as T2 hyperintensity on MRI (reversible in early stages)
  • Myelomalacia - chronic compression leads to cord necrosis (irreversible)

Difference from Cervical and Lumbar:

FeatureCervicalThoracicLumbar
Neural structureCord with spaceCord (tight fit)Cauda equina (nerve roots)
Compression toleranceModerate (CSF buffer)Poor (no buffer)Good (roots mobile)
Posterior approachOften safeCONTRAINDICATEDStandard approach
Calcification rate10-20%40-70%5-10%

Classification Systems

Anatomical Location Classification (most clinically relevant)

This classification determines surgical approach selection:

Anatomical Location and Approach Selection

LocationDefinitionFrequencyClinical FeaturesPreferred Approach
CentralMidline, posterior central canal20-30%Myelopathy, bilateral findings, no radiculopathyAnterior only (transthoracic, thoracoscopic)
CentrolateralParacentral, eccentric60-70%Myelopathy plus radiculopathy, most commonAnterior or posterolateral
Lateral/ForaminalFar lateral, in or beyond foramen10-15%Radiculopathy only, no myelopathyPosterolateral safe (transpedicular, lateral extracavitary)

This classification is critical for determining surgical approach and predicting outcomes.

Disc Morphology Classification:

Based on disc material characteristics:

  • Soft disc herniation - nucleus pulposus extrusion through annular tear (30-60%)
  • Hard disc herniation - calcified disc material (40-70%)
  • Ossified posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) - separate entity but similar presentation
  • Cartilaginous node - Schmorl's node with posterior extension (rare)

Temporal Classification:

  • Acute - traumatic herniation (rare, high-energy mechanism)
  • Subacute - symptoms developing over weeks to months
  • Chronic - slow progression over years, often calcified

Morphology affects surgical difficulty and approach selection.

Extent of Herniation:

  • Protrusion - disc bulge with intact annulus
  • Extrusion - nucleus through annular tear, base narrower than herniation
  • Sequestration - free fragment with no disc continuity

This classification parallels lumbar disc nomenclature but has less clinical impact in thoracic spine as location is the primary determinant of management.

Clinical Presentation

Symptom Patterns:

Thoracic disc herniation presents with three main clinical syndromes:

1. Myelopathy (50-70% of symptomatic cases):

Progressive spinal cord compression causes:

  • Lower extremity weakness - UMN pattern (spasticity, hyperreflexia)
  • Gait dysfunction - spastic, wide-based, scissoring gait
  • Sensory level - at or below level of herniation
  • Bowel/bladder dysfunction - urgency, frequency, retention (late finding)
  • Positive Babinski sign - UMN lesion
  • Hyperreflexia - below level of lesion
  • Loss of abdominal reflexes - at level of compression

Brown-Séquard Syndrome

Lateral thoracic disc herniations may cause Brown-Séquard syndrome (hemicord syndrome):

  • Ipsilateral: Motor weakness (corticospinal tract), loss of proprioception and vibration (dorsal columns)
  • Contralateral: Loss of pain and temperature (spinothalamic tract crosses) This is classic exam material for thoracic spine pathology.

2. Radiculopathy (25-40%):

Thoracic radicular pain has unique features:

  • Band-like pain around chest or abdomen following intercostal nerve distribution
  • Mimics visceral pathology - cardiac (chest pain), abdominal (pancreatitis, cholecystitis)
  • Worse with cough, sneeze, Valsalva - increased intraspinal pressure
  • No classic dermatomal pattern - thoracic dermatomes less distinct than limb dermatomes
  • May have sensory changes in thoracic dermatome (hypesthesia or hyperesthesia)

3. Axial Pain Alone (10-20%):

  • Chronic midline thoracic back pain
  • Mechanical pattern (worse with activity, better with rest)
  • May be the only symptom for years
  • Often leads to delayed diagnosis

Natural History:

Without treatment:

  • 25-50% progress to more severe myelopathy [6]
  • Gradual worsening over months to years (slow progression)
  • Acute deterioration rare but possible (especially traumatic herniation)
  • Spontaneous improvement uncommon once myelopathy develops

Physical Examination:

Motor Examination:

  • Lower extremity strength testing (hip flexion, knee extension, ankle dorsi/plantarflexion)
  • Spasticity assessment (increased tone, clonus)
  • Gait evaluation (spastic, ataxic patterns)

Sensory Examination:

  • Pinprick and light touch to identify sensory level
  • Proprioception and vibration (dorsal column function)
  • Temperature sensation (often lost with pain in spinothalamic dysfunction)

Reflex Examination:

  • Lower extremity reflexes (hyperreflexia below lesion)
  • Pathological reflexes (Babinski, Hoffman's if cervical involvement)
  • Abdominal reflexes (T8-T12 - may be absent at level of lesion)

This completes the neurological examination findings.

Ambulation Assessment:

  • Independent, assistive device, wheelchair-bound
  • Distance and endurance
  • Stairs capability

Activities of Daily Living:

  • Dressing, toileting, bathing
  • Fine motor skills (if upper thoracic)
  • Bowel/bladder continence

Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) Score for thoracic myelopathy (0-11 scale):

  • Motor function lower extremities (0-4)
  • Sensory function lower extremities (0-2)
  • Sphincter function (0-3)

Functional assessment provides baseline for measuring surgical outcomes.

Urgent/Emergent Presentations:

  • Acute onset or rapid progression of weakness
  • Bowel/bladder dysfunction (retention or incontinence)
  • Complete motor loss below level
  • Sensory level with rapid ascending pattern

Differential Diagnosis Red Flags:

  • Constitutional symptoms - fever, night sweats, weight loss (infection, tumor)
  • Trauma history - fracture, epidural hematoma
  • Anticoagulation - spontaneous epidural hematoma
  • History of malignancy - metastatic disease more common than primary disc

These findings require urgent MRI and consideration of emergency surgery.

Investigations

Imaging Modalities:

MRI - Diagnostic Modality of Choice:

SequencePurposeKey Findings
T2-weighted sagittalAssess cord signal, CSF, discDisc appears dark, cord compression visible, T2 hyperintensity in cord indicates edema/myelomalacia
T2-weighted axialDetermine herniation locationCentral vs centrolateral vs lateral classification
T1-weightedAnatomical detailDisc-cord relationship, vertebral body marrow
T1 post-contrastRule out tumor, infectionEnhancement suggests neoplasm or infection vs bland disc

MRI Findings:

  • Disc herniation - posterior disc protrusion or extrusion
  • Cord compression - flattening or displacement of spinal cord
  • Cord signal change - T2 hyperintensity indicates edema (reversible) or myelomalacia (irreversible)
  • Location - central, centrolateral, or lateral
  • Levels involved - single or multiple

T2 Hyperintensity Prognostic Value

Cord signal change on T2-weighted MRI has prognostic significance:

  • No signal change - better surgical outcomes, more reversible compression
  • Faint/mild hyperintensity - cord edema, still potentially reversible
  • Intense hyperintensity - myelomalacia (cord necrosis), poor prognosis, likely permanent deficit

This helps counsel patients on expected recovery and surgical urgency.

CT Scan - Essential for Surgical Planning:

Indications:

  • All operative candidates - assess for calcification
  • MRI contraindicated - pacemaker, claustrophobia
  • CT myelography - if MRI not available (water-soluble contrast via lumbar puncture)

CT Findings:

  • Disc calcification - appears as high-density material (40-70% of cases)
  • Bony anatomy - pedicle size for transpedicular approach
  • Ossification - OPLL vs calcified disc
  • Extent of calcification - plan for burr use vs rongeur removal

Plain Radiographs:

Limited value but may show:

  • Disc space narrowing at affected level
  • Calcified disc - visible on lateral radiograph (pathognomonic when present)
  • Scheuermann's changes - irregular endplates, Schmorl's nodes
  • Overall alignment - kyphosis, scoliosis

Not diagnostic but may raise suspicion in appropriate clinical context.

Electrodiagnostic Studies:

Somatosensory Evoked Potentials (SSEPs):

  • Baseline - establish preoperative cord function
  • Intraoperative monitoring - detect cord ischemia during surgery

Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs):

  • More sensitive than SSEPs for detecting motor pathway injury
  • Used during thoracic discectomy to guide safe decompression

EMG/NCS:

  • Limited role in thoracic radiculopathy (intercostal muscles difficult to study)
  • May help exclude peripheral nerve lesions

Differential Diagnosis Investigations:

Consider other causes of thoracic myelopathy:

  • Tumor - MRI with contrast (enhancement)
  • Infection - inflammatory markers (CRP, ESR), blood cultures, MRI
  • Demyelination - brain MRI, CSF analysis
  • Vascular - dural arteriovenous fistula (spinal angiography)
  • Metabolic - B12, copper, vitamin E levels

Management

📊 Management Algorithm
Management algorithm for Thoracic Disc Herniation
Click to expand
Management algorithm for Thoracic Disc HerniationCredit: OrthoVellum
Clinical Algorithm— Thoracic Disc Herniation Management Algorithm
Loading flowchart...

Conservative Management:

Indications:

  • Mild radiculopathy without motor weakness
  • Axial pain only (no neurological deficit)
  • Asymptomatic incidental finding
  • Medical comorbidities precluding surgery
  • Patient preference after informed discussion

Treatment Protocol:

  • Analgesia: NSAIDs, acetaminophen, neuropathic pain agents (gabapentin, pregabalin)
  • Activity modification: Avoid provocative activities, ergonomic adjustments
  • Physical therapy: Core strengthening, posture training (limited role in thoracic disc)
  • Monitoring: Serial neurological examinations, MRI if worsening

Success Rate: 30-50% of patients with mild symptoms improve with conservative care [7]

When to Abandon Conservative Treatment:

  • Development of myelopathy
  • Progressive motor weakness
  • Bowel/bladder dysfunction
  • Intractable pain despite optimal management

Myelopathy is NOT a Conservative Diagnosis

Progressive myelopathy from thoracic disc herniation is a surgical indication. Unlike cervical myelopathy where some mild cases may stabilize, thoracic myelopathy has a narrow canal with less compensatory capacity. Delaying surgery risks irreversible cord damage. Do not attempt prolonged conservative management in the presence of myelopathy.

Surgical Approaches

Indications:

  • Central or centrolateral disc herniation
  • Best visualization of disc-cord interface
  • Gold standard for calcified central discs

Approach:

  • Position: Lateral decubitus, affected side up
  • Incision: Posterolateral thoracotomy at rib level corresponding to disc (e.g., 9th rib for T8-T9 disc)
  • Single lung ventilation: Deflate ipsilateral lung for exposure
  • Rib resection: Remove rib, divide intercostal muscles
  • Pleural entry: Enter pleural cavity, pack lung anteriorly
  • Identify level: Count ribs, confirm with intraoperative radiograph
  • Expose vertebral bodies: Dissect parietal pleura, identify disc space
  • Segmental vessels: Ligate at disc level (beware Adamkiewicz)
  • Discectomy: Remove disc anterior and posterior longitudinal ligament
  • Decompress cord: Remove all herniated material, ensure cord decompression
  • Fusion: Consider corpectomy and cage if extensive removal (optional)
  • Closure: Chest tube, layer closure

Advantages:

  • Excellent visualization
  • Direct access to disc without cord manipulation
  • Can remove calcified disc safely

Disadvantages:

  • Requires thoracotomy (post-thoracotomy pain)
  • Single lung ventilation (pulmonary complications)
  • May need cardiothoracic surgery assistance
  • Longer hospital stay

This completes the transthoracic approach description.

Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS):

Indications:

  • Central or centrolateral disc (same as open transthoracic)
  • Soft disc herniation (calcified disc more challenging)
  • Surgeon expertise in thoracoscopic technique

Technique:

  • Position: Lateral decubitus
  • Ports: 3-4 ports (camera, working instruments)
  • Single lung ventilation: Deflate ipsilateral lung
  • Identify level: Thoracoscopic visualization, fluoroscopy
  • Parietal pleura incision: Over disc space
  • Discectomy: Remove disc and posterior longitudinal ligament
  • Decompression: Visualize dural pulsation

Advantages:

  • Minimally invasive (smaller incisions)
  • Less post-thoracotomy pain
  • Faster recovery, shorter hospital stay
  • Equivalent outcomes to open in experienced hands [8]

Disadvantages:

  • Steep learning curve
  • Limited tactile feedback
  • Difficult for large calcified discs
  • Requires specialized equipment and expertise

Thoracoscopic technique is gaining popularity as expertise develops.

Posterolateral Costotransversectomy:

Indications:

  • Centrolateral or lateral disc herniation
  • Avoid thoracotomy in high-risk pulmonary patients
  • Calcified disc accessible from posterolateral trajectory

Technique:

  • Position: Prone
  • Incision: Midline or paramedian over affected level
  • Expose rib and transverse process: Subperiosteal dissection
  • Rib resection: Remove 5-8cm of rib lateral to costotransverse joint
  • Transverse process removal: Rongeur transverse process
  • Identify pedicle: Medial to resection
  • Access disc: Work medial to pedicle to reach lateral disc
  • Limited discectomy: Remove accessible herniated material
  • Avoid cord retraction: Stay lateral, decompress indirectly

Advantages:

  • Avoids thoracotomy (no chest tube, single lung ventilation)
  • Familiar posterior exposure for spine surgeons
  • Good for lateral herniations

Disadvantages:

  • Limited visualization of central canal
  • Cannot safely decompress midline disc
  • Indirect decompression for centrolateral discs
  • Rib removal causes postoperative pain

This approach is a compromise between anterior visualization and posterior familiarity.

Transpedicular Approach:

Indications:

  • Lateral or foraminal disc herniation
  • Pure radiculopathy without myelopathy

Technique:

  • Posterior midline approach
  • Remove pedicle and superior facet
  • Access lateral disc and foramen
  • Foraminal decompression

Lateral Extracavitary Approach:

Indications:

  • Anterolateral pathology
  • Vertebral body tumor or infection
  • Some lateral disc herniations

Technique:

  • Posterolateral incision 8cm from midline
  • Remove rib, transverse process, pedicle, facet
  • Mobilize paraspinal muscles
  • Access anterior and lateral vertebral body

Posterior Laminectomy:

Indications:

  • CONTRAINDICATED for central thoracic disc
  • Only acceptable for far lateral disc with no cord compression
  • Decompression of stenosis (not disc)

Why Contraindicated:

  • Cord cannot be safely retracted
  • Historical series showed 33% neurological deterioration [2]
  • Irreversible paraplegia from cord manipulation

These alternative approaches have specific limited indications.

Surgical Pearls:

Managing Calcified Disc

Calcified thoracic disc removal:

  • Use high-speed diamond burr (reduces heat compared to cutting burr)
  • Thin posterior shell of calcified disc first (like eggshell)
  • Micro-rongeurs to remove fragments through thin shell
  • Avoid levering against cord - this causes direct injury
  • Copious irrigation during burring to reduce heat
  • Monitor SSEPs/MEPs throughout to detect early cord ischemia

Intraoperative Neuromonitoring:

All thoracic disc surgeries should have:

  • SSEPs - baseline and continuous monitoring
  • MEPs - more sensitive for motor pathway
  • Alarm criteria: 50% amplitude decrease or 10% latency increase
  • Response to changes: Stop manipulation, increase MAP, consider aborting

Complications

Surgical Complications:

Approach-Specific Complications

ComplicationTransthoracicThoracoscopicCostotransversectomy
Neurological deterioration5-10%5-8%10-15%
Pulmonary complications15-20%10-15%Less than 5%
CSF leak/dural tear5-10%5-8%Less than 5%
Vascular injury2-5%2-4%Less than 2%
Post-thoracotomy pain20-30%10-15%5-10%

Major Complications:

1. Neurological Deterioration (5-15%):

  • Paraplegia - most feared complication
  • Worsening myelopathy - cord manipulation or ischemia
  • Mechanisms: Direct cord injury, vascular injury (Adamkiewicz), spinal cord ischemia
  • Prevention: Avoid cord retraction, neuromonitoring, gentle technique, anterior approach for central disc
  • Management: High-dose steroids controversial, supportive care, rehabilitation

2. Pulmonary Complications (10-20% with thoracotomy):

  • Pneumothorax - inadequate chest tube drainage
  • Pleural effusion - post-thoracotomy inflammation
  • Pneumonia - single lung ventilation, atelectasis
  • Prolonged air leak - pleural space issues
  • Prevention: Chest physiotherapy, incentive spirometry, adequate chest tube management
  • Management: Chest tube management, antibiotics if pneumonia, supportive care

3. CSF Leak and Dural Tear (5-10%):

  • Incidental durotomy - especially with calcified disc removal
  • CSF fistula - persistent leak through wound
  • Pseudomeningocele - CSF collection
  • Prevention: Careful dural dissection, burr away from dura
  • Management: Primary repair if identified, oversew with 6-0 Prolene, consider lumbar drain if persistent, revision surgery if pseudomeningocele symptomatic

4. Vascular Injury (2-5%):

  • Artery of Adamkiewicz - anterior spinal artery syndrome (paraplegia)
  • Segmental arteries - bleeding, cord ischemia
  • Aorta - rare but catastrophic (anterior approaches)
  • Prevention: Identify Adamkiewicz preoperatively (CT angiography), careful vessel ligation, maintain MAP during surgery
  • Management: Control bleeding, vascular surgery consultation if major vessel, supportive care for cord ischemia

Post-Thoracotomy Pain Syndrome

Chronic post-thoracotomy pain affects 20-30% of patients after open transthoracic approach. This is intercostal neuralgia from rib retraction and nerve injury. It can be severe and persistent, affecting quality of life. Counsel patients preoperatively. Consider thoracoscopic approach to reduce this risk. Manage with neuropathic pain medications, nerve blocks, and pain clinic referral if severe.

Minor Complications:

  • Wound infection (2-5%) - superficial or deep, antibiotics or debridement
  • Seroma - fluid collection, usually self-limiting
  • Intercostal neuralgia - rib retraction injury, chronic pain
  • Horner's syndrome - sympathetic chain injury (upper thoracic), ptosis/miosis/anhidrosis
  • Chylothorax - thoracic duct injury (left-sided approaches above T6), milky chest tube output, conservative management or ligation

Complications of Non-Operative Management:

  • Progressive myelopathy (25-50%) - delayed surgery may have worse outcomes
  • Irreversible cord damage - myelomalacia from prolonged compression
  • Chronic pain - persistent radiculopathy or axial pain
  • Functional decline - loss of ambulation, wheelchair dependence

Postoperative Care and Outcomes

Immediate Postoperative Management:

ICU/HDU Monitoring
Mobilization
Ward Care
Early Rehabilitation
Advanced Rehabilitation

Rehabilitation Protocol:

Phase 1 (Weeks 0-6):

  • Goals: Pain control, wound healing, basic mobility
  • Activities: Walking, gentle range of motion, respiratory exercises
  • Restrictions: No lifting over 5kg, no twisting, no strenuous activity

Phase 2 (Weeks 6-12):

  • Goals: Restore function, improve strength
  • Activities: Progressive resistance training, core strengthening, balance
  • Restrictions: Gradual increase in lifting, avoid high-impact activities

Phase 3 (Weeks 12+):

  • Goals: Return to full activities, work, sports
  • Activities: Sport-specific training, unrestricted activities as tolerated
  • Monitoring: Serial neurological examinations, functional outcome measures

Outcome Measures:

MeasureDescriptionUse
mJOA scoreModified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (0-11)Myelopathy severity and improvement
Nurick Grade0-5 scale of myelopathySimple grading system
VASVisual Analog Scale for pain (0-10)Pain assessment
ODIOswestry Disability IndexFunctional limitation
SF-36Quality of life measureGeneral health status

Surgical Outcomes:

Based on systematic reviews and case series [9,10]:

Neurological Improvement:

  • 60-80% improve or stabilize after surgery
  • 15-20% no change
  • 5-10% worsen (neurological deterioration)

Factors Associated with Better Outcomes:

  • Shorter duration of symptoms (less than 12 months better than over 24 months)
  • No preoperative T2 signal change on MRI (myelomalacia predicts poor recovery)
  • Younger age (under 60 years better outcomes)
  • Soft disc (calcified discs more difficult, higher complication rate)
  • Lateral location (central discs more challenging, worse outcomes)

Factors Associated with Worse Outcomes:

  • Long-standing myelopathy (over 24 months)
  • Severe preoperative deficits (non-ambulatory, Nurick grade 4-5)
  • Cord signal change (myelomalacia on MRI)
  • Older age (over 70 years)
  • Multiple medical comorbidities

Recovery Timeline

Neurological recovery after thoracic discectomy:

  • Immediate - decompression relieves mechanical pressure
  • Weeks to months - cord edema resolves, early motor return
  • 6-12 months - continued improvement (cord remyelination)
  • 12-18 months - plateau of recovery

Counsel patients that maximum recovery takes 12-18 months. Early postoperative neurological status may not reflect final outcome. Continue therapy and rehabilitation throughout recovery period.

Return to Activities:

  • Desk work: 6-8 weeks (sooner if minimally invasive approach)
  • Manual labor: 12-16 weeks
  • Contact sports: 6 months (after full recovery and rehabilitation)
  • Driving: 4-6 weeks (when off narcotics and able to perform emergency stop)

Evidence Base

IV
📚 Arce and Dohrmann (1985)
Key Findings:
  • Historical series of 38 thoracic disc herniations
  • Posterior laminectomy resulted in 33% neurological deterioration
  • Anterior and anterolateral approaches superior outcomes
  • Established that posterior approach contraindicated for central discs
Clinical Implication: Landmark paper demonstrating danger of posterior laminectomy for central thoracic disc. Changed surgical practice toward anterior approaches.
Source: Surgical Neurology

IV
📚 Stillerman et al (1998)
Key Findings:
  • Large series of 100 thoracic discectomies
  • Transthoracic and costotransversectomy approaches compared
  • Transthoracic better for central, costotransversectomy for lateral
  • 70% good to excellent outcomes with appropriate approach selection
Clinical Implication: Approach selection based on disc location critical for optimal outcomes.
Source: Journal of Neurosurgery

IV
📚 Court and Kraus (2005)
Key Findings:
  • Review of surgical approaches to thoracic disc
  • Thoracoscopic outcomes comparable to open transthoracic
  • Less morbidity with minimally invasive approaches
  • Steep learning curve for thoracoscopic technique
Clinical Implication: Thoracoscopic approach is effective alternative when expertise available, reduces pulmonary morbidity.
Source: Neurosurgery Focus

III
📚 Quint et al (2012)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic review of thoracic discectomy outcomes
  • Overall neurological improvement in 60-80% of patients
  • Calcified discs associated with higher complication rates
  • Preoperative myelomalacia (T2 signal) predicts poor recovery
Clinical Implication: Prognostic factors help patient counseling. Cord signal change on MRI important predictor.
Source: European Spine Journal

Current Controversies:

1. Calcified Disc Management:

  • Some advocate leaving small calcified fragments vs complete removal
  • Risk of incomplete decompression vs risk of cord injury during aggressive removal
  • No high-quality comparative data

2. Fusion After Discectomy:

  • Some surgeons perform fusion after extensive discectomy or corpectomy
  • Others perform discectomy alone without fusion
  • Thoracic spine stability from rib cage may allow discectomy without fusion
  • No RCT data comparing outcomes

3. Asymptomatic Disc Treatment:

  • Incidental thoracic disc herniations common on MRI
  • No clear consensus on surveillance vs prophylactic surgery
  • Generally observe unless developing symptoms

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOAdvanced

Scenario 1: Central Calcified Thoracic Disc with Myelopathy

EXAMINER

"A 55-year-old male presents with 6-month history of progressive lower limb weakness and gait dysfunction. MRI shows a central T10-T11 disc herniation with cord compression and T2 signal change. CT confirms the disc is heavily calcified. How would you manage this patient?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a case of thoracic myelopathy secondary to central calcified thoracic disc herniation at T10-T11. This is a surgical indication given progressive neurological deficit. First, I would complete my assessment with a thorough neurological examination to document baseline function, assess myelopathy severity using the mJOA score, and determine functional capacity. The MRI findings of T2 signal change indicate myelomalacia which suggests some irreversible cord damage and would temper my prognostic expectations. The critical decision point is surgical approach. For a central thoracic disc, posterior laminectomy is absolutely contraindicated because the thoracic cord cannot be safely retracted - attempting posterior access would cause catastrophic neurological injury. I would plan an anterior or anterolateral approach. Given this is T10-T11, I would prefer a transthoracic approach, likely left-sided to avoid the liver, working with cardiothoracic surgery. This requires single lung ventilation, rib resection, and direct anterior access to the disc space. The CT showing heavy calcification means I cannot simply remove the disc with rongeurs - I will need a high-speed diamond burr to thin the posterior shell of the calcified disc carefully, working anterior to the cord without any retraction. Intraoperative neuromonitoring with SSEPs and MEPs is essential. I would be mindful of the artery of Adamkiewicz which is typically at T9-L2, more commonly on the left side. I would counsel the patient about risks including neurological deterioration, paraplegia, pulmonary complications from thoracotomy, and the fact that recovery takes 12-18 months with the T2 signal change suggesting some deficits may be permanent.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Central disc = anterior approach mandatory, posterior contraindicated
Calcified disc requires high-speed burr, not rongeurs
T2 signal change indicates myelomalacia - temper prognosis
Transthoracic approach with cardiothoracic assistance
Artery of Adamkiewicz T9-L2 (usually left) - preserve segmental vessels
Neuromonitoring essential (SSEPs, MEPs)
Recovery 12-18 months, some deficits may be permanent
COMMON TRAPS
✗Suggesting posterior laminectomy - instant fail
✗Not mentioning why posterior is contraindicated
✗Forgetting about calcification requiring burr
✗Not knowing artery of Adamkiewicz location and significance
✗Not tempering prognosis given T2 signal change
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"Why exactly is posterior laminectomy contraindicated for central thoracic disc?"
"What is the artery of Adamkiewicz and where is it located?"
"How would you remove a calcified disc safely?"
"What does T2 hyperintensity in the cord signify prognostically?"
"What if the patient deteriorates postoperatively?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 2: Lateral Thoracic Disc with Radiculopathy

EXAMINER

"A 45-year-old female presents with 3-month history of band-like chest pain around the left T8 dermatome. No lower limb weakness. MRI shows a lateral T7-T8 disc herniation in the left foramen. How would you manage this?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a case of thoracic radiculopathy from a lateral T7-T8 disc herniation. The key distinction here is that she has radiculopathy only with no evidence of myelopathy - no lower limb weakness, no gait dysfunction, no cord compression symptoms. This changes my management approach significantly compared to central discs. First, I would complete my assessment to confirm this is truly isolated radiculopathy without any subtle myelopathy signs - check lower limb reflexes, plantar responses, gait, and ensure no sensory level. Review the MRI carefully to confirm the disc is truly lateral/foraminal without central canal compromise or cord compression. For isolated radiculopathy without myelopathy, I would initially trial conservative management for 6-12 weeks including analgesia with NSAIDs and neuropathic pain agents like gabapentin, activity modification, and patient education. Thoracic radiculopathy can mimic cardiac or abdominal pathology so ensuring the patient understands the spinal origin helps compliance. If conservative management fails and pain remains intractable, surgical options for a lateral disc are different from central discs. Because this is lateral/foraminal without cord compression, I could use a posterolateral approach - either transpedicular or costotransversectomy. These avoid the need for thoracotomy and anterior approaches. The transpedicular approach removes the pedicle to access the foramen and lateral disc. This is much less morbid than transthoracic surgery and appropriate when there is no cord compression. I would counsel about surgical risks being lower than for central discs but still including dural tear, nerve injury, and the possibility that radicular pain may not completely resolve even with adequate decompression.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Lateral disc with radiculopathy only = different management from central
No myelopathy = trial conservative management first
Conservative: NSAIDs, gabapentin, activity modification, 6-12 weeks
Lateral location allows posterolateral approach (transpedicular, costotransversectomy)
Avoid thoracotomy morbidity when safe to do so
Radicular pain may persist despite adequate decompression
COMMON TRAPS
✗Rushing to anterior approach for all thoracic discs
✗Not distinguishing radiculopathy from myelopathy
✗Skipping conservative trial for isolated radiculopathy
✗Not recognizing lateral disc allows safer posterolateral approach
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"When would you not trial conservative management?"
"Describe the transpedicular approach for lateral thoracic disc"
"What are the boundaries of the thoracic foramen?"
"What if she develops myelopathy during conservative trial?"
VIVA SCENARIOAdvanced

Scenario 3: Approach Selection Dilemma

EXAMINER

"A 60-year-old patient with significant COPD and FEV1 of 45% predicted has thoracic myelopathy from a centrolateral T9-T10 disc herniation. How do you approach surgical decision-making?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This case presents a challenging decision regarding surgical approach in a high-risk pulmonary patient. The patient has myelopathy indicating a surgical indication, but the COPD with FEV1 45% makes him high risk for thoracotomy with single lung ventilation. For a centrolateral disc, I have options including transthoracic, thoracoscopic, or costotransversectomy. In this high-risk patient, I would carefully weigh the risks and benefits of each approach. First, I would optimize his pulmonary function preoperatively - respiratory medicine consultation, bronchodilators, incentive spirometry training, smoking cessation if applicable. Consider pulmonary function testing and cardiopulmonary exercise testing to quantify risk. I would discuss with cardiothoracic surgery and anesthesia regarding tolerability of single lung ventilation. For this patient, I might favor costotransversectomy over transthoracic to avoid thoracotomy and single lung ventilation, even though visualization is not as good. The costotransversectomy is performed prone, removes the rib and transverse process, and allows access to the lateral disc space without entering the pleural cavity. For a centrolateral disc, this may provide adequate decompression without the pulmonary morbidity of thoracotomy. Alternatively, if expertise available, thoracoscopic (VATS) approach may reduce pulmonary complications compared to open thoracotomy while maintaining anterior visualization. The trade-off is between optimal visualization with transthoracic versus reduced morbidity with costotransversectomy in a patient who may not tolerate thoracotomy. If the disc were truly central rather than centrolateral, I would have no choice but anterior approach despite the risks, and would need very careful perioperative pulmonary management. The patient must understand the increased risks given his comorbidities and the possibility that his lung function may not return to baseline after thoracotomy.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Centrolateral disc allows approach options (anterior or posterolateral)
COPD with FEV1 45% = high risk for single lung ventilation
Optimize pulmonary function preoperatively
Costotransversectomy avoids thoracotomy but limited visualization
VATS may reduce morbidity vs open if expertise available
Balance surgical access vs patient risk factors
Central disc would force anterior approach despite risks
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not recognizing COPD as significant risk for thoracotomy
✗Forcing transthoracic approach without considering alternatives
✗Not involving multidisciplinary team (cardiothoracic, anesthesia)
✗Not optimizing patient preoperatively
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What FEV1 would you consider prohibitive for thoracotomy?"
"How does costotransversectomy differ from transthoracic in outcomes?"
"What if his pulmonary function deteriorates postoperatively?"
"Could you consider non-operative management given his risks?"

MCQ Practice Points

Why Posterior is Contraindicated

Q: Why is posterior laminectomy contraindicated for central thoracic disc herniation?

A: The thoracic spinal cord cannot be safely retracted. The thoracic canal is narrow (12-14mm diameter) with the cord occupying 40-50% of the space. There is minimal CSF dorsally. Attempting to access a central disc from behind requires retracting the cord posteriorly, which causes direct mechanical injury and vascular compromise resulting in irreversible paraplegia. In contrast, the cervical canal has more space (cord occupies only 25%) allowing safer posterior retraction. The lumbar spine has nerve roots (cauda equina) which can be retracted. This is the single most important concept in thoracic disc surgery.

Artery of Adamkiewicz

Q: What is the artery of Adamkiewicz and why is it clinically important?

A: The arteria radicularis magna (artery of Adamkiewicz) is the largest anterior segmental medullary artery supplying the lower two-thirds of the spinal cord via the anterior spinal artery. It is located at T9-L2 in 80% of individuals, most commonly at T9-T11, and enters from the left side in 75-80%. Clinically, it's important because injury during thoracic surgery (especially when ligating segmental vessels during transthoracic approach or anterior spinal procedures) can cause anterior spinal artery syndrome with paraplegia, loss of pain and temperature sensation below the lesion, but preservation of proprioception (dorsal columns spared). Some surgeons obtain preoperative CT angiography to identify its location, though this is not routine.

Calcification Assessment

Q: What imaging modality best assesses calcification in thoracic disc herniation and why is this important?

A: CT scan is the best modality for assessing disc calcification. 40-70% of symptomatic thoracic disc herniations are calcified, and this is critical surgical information because calcified discs behave like bone - they cannot be removed with standard rongeurs or curettes. The surgeon must use a high-speed diamond burr to carefully thin the posterior shell of the calcified disc (like an eggshell) and then remove fragments. This increases operative time, difficulty, and risk of dural tear and cord injury. Preoperative knowledge of calcification allows proper surgical planning and patient counseling about increased risks.

T2 Signal Change Prognosis

Q: What is the prognostic significance of T2 hyperintensity in the spinal cord on MRI?

A: T2 hyperintensity (increased signal) in the spinal cord indicates cord edema or myelomalacia:

  • Mild/faint hyperintensity suggests cord edema which is potentially reversible with decompression
  • Intense hyperintensity suggests myelomalacia (cord necrosis) which is irreversible
  • Patients with no T2 signal change have better surgical outcomes
  • Patients with myelomalacia have poor recovery potential - many deficits will be permanent despite adequate surgical decompression

This information helps counsel patients about realistic expectations. A patient with severe myelomalacia should understand that surgery prevents further deterioration but may not restore lost function.

Approach Selection Algorithm

Q: How do you select surgical approach for thoracic disc herniation?

A: Location-based algorithm:

  • Central disc → Anterior approach mandatory (transthoracic, thoracoscopic) - posterior contraindicated
  • Centrolateral disc → Anterior or posterolateral (transthoracic, costotransversectomy) - surgeon preference and patient factors
  • Lateral/foraminal disc → Posterolateral acceptable (transpedicular, lateral extracavitary) - no need for thoracotomy

Additional considerations:

  • Calcified disc → Anterior approach preferred (better visualization for burr work)
  • COPD/pulmonary disease → Favor costotransversectomy or VATS over open thoracotomy
  • Surgeon expertise → Thoracoscopic requires specialized training

Australian Context

Thoracic disc herniation surgery is performed at tertiary spine centers in Australia given the rarity of the condition. Expertise is concentrated at quaternary hospitals with neurosurgery and orthopaedic spine services, typically requiring multidisciplinary spine units including cardiothoracic surgery collaboration for transthoracic approaches.

Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis follows eTG Antibiotic guidelines with cefazolin 2g IV at induction for spine surgery. Neuropathic pain agents including gabapentin and pregabalin are PBS-listed for management of thoracic radiculopathy. DVT prophylaxis with enoxaparin is standard postoperatively.

Australian spinal rehabilitation units provide comprehensive postoperative care including inpatient rehabilitation for patients with significant myelopathy, outpatient physiotherapy, and occupational therapy for return to work. Limited Australian-specific registry data exists for thoracic disc surgery due to rarity, with outcomes generally consistent with international literature showing 60-80% neurological improvement.

THORACIC DISC HERNIATION

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Epidemiology

  • •0.5-1% of all disc herniations (RARE)
  • •75% occur at T8-T12 (lower thoracic)
  • •Peak age 40-60 years
  • •40-70% are calcified (complicates surgery)

Critical Anatomy

  • •Narrow thoracic canal (12-14mm diameter)
  • •Cord occupies 40-50% of canal (vs 25% cervical)
  • •Limited CSF space dorsally
  • •Artery of Adamkiewicz at T9-L2 (usually LEFT)

Why Posterior is Contraindicated

  • •Cord CANNOT be safely retracted in thoracic spine
  • •Historical posterior laminectomy: 33% deterioration
  • •Central disc from posterior = PARAPLEGIA
  • •Must use anterior or anterolateral approach

Clinical Presentation

  • •Myelopathy 50-70%: weakness, spasticity, gait dysfunction
  • •Radiculopathy 25-40%: band-like chest/abdominal pain
  • •Axial pain 10-20%: chronic thoracic back pain
  • •T2 hyperintensity = myelomalacia (poor prognosis)

Investigations

  • •MRI: Diagnostic modality of choice
  • •CT: Essential for calcification assessment
  • •T2 signal change: Edema vs myelomalacia (prognosis)
  • •Neuromonitoring: SSEPs and MEPs intraoperatively

Approach Selection

  • •CENTRAL: Anterior only (transthoracic, VATS)
  • •CENTROLATERAL: Anterior or posterolateral (costotransversectomy)
  • •LATERAL: Posterolateral OK (transpedicular)
  • •Calcified disc: Anterior preferred (better visualization)

Transthoracic Approach

  • •Lateral decubitus, single lung ventilation
  • •Rib resection, enter pleural cavity
  • •Ligate segmental vessels (beware Adamkiewicz)
  • •Direct anterior disc access, burr for calcified disc

Calcified Disc Technique

  • •High-speed DIAMOND burr (reduces heat)
  • •Thin posterior shell like eggshell
  • •Remove fragments through thin shell
  • •Copious irrigation, NO levering against cord

Complications

  • •Neurological deterioration 5-15% (paraplegia worst)
  • •Pulmonary 10-20% (pneumothorax, effusion, pneumonia)
  • •CSF leak/dural tear 5-10%
  • •Chronic post-thoracotomy pain 20-30%

Outcomes

  • •60-80% improve or stabilize
  • •Recovery takes 12-18 months (counsel patient)
  • •Better if: short duration, no T2 change, younger, soft disc
  • •Worse if: long-standing, myelomalacia, older, calcified

Viva Killer Points

  • •Posterior laminectomy for central disc = CONTRAINDICATED
  • •Why: Cord cannot be retracted (narrow canal)
  • •Adamkiewicz: T9-L2, LEFT side, anterior spinal artery supply
  • •Calcified disc (40-70%): CT essential, requires burr
Quick Stats
Reading Time128 min
Related Topics

ACDF - Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Adjacent Segment Disease

Adult Spinal Deformity

Ankylosing Spondylitis