Deformity Correction | CORA Concept | Osteotomy Techniques
- CORA (Center of Rotation of Angulation) = intersection of proximal and distal anatomic axes - osteotomy at CORA corrects angulation without translation
- Indications for correction: Angular deformity over 10-15°, rotational over 15-20°, shortening over 2cm, symptomatic, or predisposing to arthritis
- Closing wedge: Inherently stable, shortens limb (~2mm per degree per 10cm), best when shortening acceptable
- Opening wedge: Lengthens limb, preserves bone stock, requires bone graft if gap over 1cm, higher nonunion risk
- Dome osteotomy: Allows multiplanar correction, no length change, technically demanding
- “CORA = intersection of proximal and distal anatomic axes - osteotomy at CORA corrects angulation without translation
- “Closing wedge: 1° correction = 1.75mm wedge base per 10cm length, inherently stable, shortens limb
- “Opening wedge: Lengthens limb, requires graft if gap over 1cm, higher nonunion risk (10-15%)
- “Mechanical axis deviation (MAD) is abnormal well beyond the normal 8-10mm medial to the knee centre - the axis does NOT normally pass through the centre
Overview and Epidemiology
A tibial malunion is a fracture that has healed in a non-anatomic position, causing deformity, functional impairment, or a predisposition to arthritis. The deformity may be angular, rotational or shortening; the functional cost is gait disturbance and joint dysfunction; the arthritis follows abnormal joint loading. Correcting it requires systematic evaluation, preoperative planning that includes calculating the CORA, and the appropriate osteotomy technique.
Acceptable alignment and the threshold for correction. The alignment accepted when a tibial shaft fracture is treated is tighter than the deformity at which an established malunion is corrected. The two sets of numbers answer different questions, and the right-hand columns are the indications for correction.
- Acceptable (tibial shaft fracture)
- Varus/valgus under 5°; AP angulation under 10°
- Malunion threshold for correction
- Over 10-15°
- Consequence past the threshold
- Mechanical axis deviation
- Acceptable (tibial shaft fracture)
- Under 10°
- Malunion threshold for correction
- Over 15-20°
- Consequence past the threshold
- Functional impairment
- Acceptable (tibial shaft fracture)
- Under 10mm
- Malunion threshold for correction
- Over 2cm
- Consequence past the threshold
- Gait asymmetry
Epidemiology. Between 5 and 10% of tibial shaft fractures develop a malunion. The peak age is 20-40 years, the years of high-energy trauma, and men outnumber women by 2:1. The distal third is the most common location, with poor blood supply and difficult fixation as the reasons. The risk factors are high-energy injury, an open fracture, poor initial reduction, inadequate fixation and non-compliance with treatment.
Anatomy and Pathophysiology
The mechanical axis. It runs from the centre of the femoral head through the knee to the centre of the ankle, and it does not pass through the middle of the knee. It normally lies about 8-10mm medial to the knee centre with a spread of roughly 7mm either side, so an axis passing up to around 15mm medial remains within the normal range.
Mechanical axis deviation (MAD). Deviation is significant when it lies medially well beyond that band, or when there is any appreciable lateral deviation. Angular deformity in the femur or the tibia causes it, deviation beyond the normal band causes abnormal compartmental loading, and sustained deviation predisposes to compartmental arthritis.
The CORA. The centre of rotation of angulation is the intersection of the proximal and distal anatomic axes, and it lies at the apex of the deformity. Calculate it by drawing both axes on full-length standing radiographs and identifying where they cross.
Why the CORA decides the osteotomy. An osteotomy at the CORA gives a pure angular correction, without translation. An osteotomy away from the CORA creates a translation deformity, which is undesirable.
Angular malunion. Varus overloads the medial compartment and valgus the lateral, and either predisposes to arthritis. In the sagittal plane an apex-anterior malunion causes knee hyperextension and an apex-posterior malunion a knee flexion contracture, each with a gait disturbance.
Rotational malunion. Internal or external, it makes the foot progression angle abnormal and disturbs gait, and the patient has difficulty with activities that require rotation.
Shortening. It produces gait asymmetry, compensated by pelvic tilt or equinus. The functional cost is fatigue, back pain and joint overload.
Classification Systems
A malunion is described by deformity type, by severity and by location. Type determines the treatment approach, severity guides the treatment decision, and location determines the surgical approach and technique.
- Angular - varus/valgus (frontal plane), apex anterior/posterior (sagittal plane), or combined (multiplanar). Treated by osteotomy at the CORA.
- Rotational - internal or external rotation. Treated by derotational osteotomy.
- Shortening - under 2cm is usually acceptable; over 2cm may need correction. Treated by lengthening osteotomy, or accepted with a shoe lift.
- Intra-articular - joint surface step-off. Treated by intra-articular osteotomy if early, or by arthroplasty or arthrodesis once arthritis is established.
Clinical Assessment
History. The complaints are activity-related joint pain at the knee or ankle, gait disturbance and difficulty with activities, and a visible deformity or leg length discrepancy. Establish the previous tibial fracture and how it was treated, and the risk factors listed above.
Inspection and palpation. Look for visible angulation, rotation and shortening, check standing alignment and leg length, and watch the gait, which may be antalgic, Trendelenburg, or equinus if the leg is short. Palpate for tenderness at the malunion site and a palpable deformity, and note previous surgical scars.
Movement. Knee movement may be limited by a proximal malunion and ankle movement by a distal one. The foot progression angle is the clinical measure of rotation.
Measuring the deformity. Every component must be assessed: angulation in the frontal and sagittal planes, rotation, shortening and translation. At the bedside:
- Mechanical axis - standing alignment assessment
- Rotation - compared with the contralateral side, knee flexed 90°
- Length - block test and tape measure
Differential diagnosis. The painful, deformed or symptomatic post-fracture lower leg is not always a malunion needing osteotomy. Distinguish the entities below before planning correction.
- Key feature
- Healed fracture in non-anatomic position; deformity stable
- Discriminating test
- Full-length standing films + CT (bone bridged, MAD measured)
- Implication
- Corrective osteotomy if symptomatic / mechanical
- Key feature
- Persistent pain, motion or lucency at fracture line
- Discriminating test
- No bridging callus on CT; tenderness on stressing site
- Implication
- Treat the nonunion (revision fixation, graft) first
- Key feature
- Joint-line pain, stiffness, joint-space loss
- Discriminating test
- Weight-bearing joint views show arthritis, not shaft deformity
- Implication
- Osteotomy alone insufficient - may need fusion / arthroplasty
- Key feature
- Pain, warmth, prior open injury or wound issue
- Discriminating test
- Raised CRP/ESR, sinus, MRI; consider biopsy
- Implication
- Eradicate infection before any reconstruction
- Key feature
- Pain over plate / prominent nail, no deformity
- Discriminating test
- Local tenderness over implant; alignment normal
- Implication
- Hardware removal, not osteotomy
- Key feature
- Radiographic malalignment but no symptoms
- Discriminating test
- Functional scores normal; MAD within knee
- Implication
- Observe - do not operate on the radiograph
Investigations
Radiographs. Full-length standing AP and lateral radiographs, hip to ankle, are essential. They show the mechanical axis, the angular deformity and limb length, and they are the films on which the CORA is calculated. Local AP and lateral views of the tibia show the malunion site and any previous hardware. The key measurements:
- Mechanical axis deviation (MAD)
- Anatomic axis angles
- Limb length discrepancy
CT. CT with 3D reconstruction is essential for preoperative planning. Its uses:
- 3D reconstruction - assesses multiplanar deformity, calculates the CORA and plans the osteotomy
- Rotation protocol - compares with the contralateral limb, quantifies the rotational deformity and plans a derotational osteotomy
- Intra-articular assessment - joint surface step-off and articular congruity, and planning of an intra-articular osteotomy if needed
Other imaging. MRI and bone scan are not routine and are indicated only for specific concerns. MRI assesses the articular cartilage when the malunion is intra-articular, and the soft tissues; a bone scan assesses for arthritis.
Management Algorithm
The decision. Assess every deformity component on full-length standing radiographs and CT, calculate the CORA and measure the MAD. If the deformity passes the thresholds in the overview, is symptomatic, or predisposes to arthritis, proceed with correction; if the patient is asymptomatic and the deformity minimal, consider observation.
Operative indications. The absolute indications are a symptomatic malunion with significant deformity, or a deformity past its threshold with the consequence that threshold carries: angulation with mechanical axis deviation, rotation with functional impairment, shortening with gait asymmetry. The relative indications are an asymptomatic malunion that predisposes to arthritis, and the patient's preference for correction. Surgery is elective, after the fracture has healed, at 6-12 months post-injury.
Non-operative treatment. Observation suits an asymptomatic malunion with deformity under the thresholds, a patient who prefers it, and a patient with medical contraindications to surgery. It consists of activity modification, orthotics if needed and serial monitoring, and the outcome is acceptable if the malunion is asymptomatic and the deformity minimal.
Planning and the operation. Choose the osteotomy type (closing wedge, opening wedge, dome) and the fixation (plate, nail or external fixator), and consider bone graft if an opening wedge gap is over 1cm. At surgery the osteotomy is made at the CORA, or at the planned location, and every component is corrected. Verify the correction intraoperatively by fluoroscopy and clinical assessment, then fix with a rigid construct.
- Threshold
- Over 10-15°
- Treatment
- Osteotomy at CORA
- Outcome
- 85-90% good results
- Threshold
- Over 15-20°
- Treatment
- Derotational osteotomy
- Outcome
- 85-90% good results
- Threshold
- Over 2cm
- Treatment
- Lengthening osteotomy
- Outcome
- 80-85% good results
- Threshold
- Step-off over 2mm
- Treatment
- Intra-articular osteotomy
- Outcome
- 70-80% good results
Surgical Technique
Indications. Angular deformity correction in good-quality bone when shortening is acceptable or desired. It is the preferred wedge when shortening is acceptable.
Trade-offs. Bone-on-bone contact makes it inherently stable. It also heals faster and holds the reduction more easily. It shortens the limb, by about 2mm per degree per 10cm, so it may not be suitable if lengthening is needed.
- Direct approach to the malunion site
- Identify and mark the CORA with K-wires under fluoroscopy
- Make two cuts converging at the CORA
- Calculate the wedge: 1° of correction = 1.75mm of wedge base per 10cm length
- Excise the calculated wedge
- Close the gap and compress the osteotomy
- Fix with a compression plate, at least 6 cortices each side
The Fibula in Tibial Malunion Correction
A two-bone segment. Any plan to realign the tibia must account for the fibula. An intact, or separately malunited, fibula behaves as a lateral strut that tethers the tibia and blocks correction, and it is the most likely mechanical cause when a tibial osteotomy will not reach the planned alignment intraoperatively.
In the published series. The operative series in the evidence base routinely add a fibular procedure: Sanders performed a fibular osteotomy "as needed" during oblique tibial correction, and Hintermann corrected "malunion of the fibula" alongside the distal tibia in every case of his supramalleolar series.
When the fibula tethers correction.
- Angular correction (varus/valgus, especially at the middle and distal thirds) - the fibula resists closing or opening the tibial wedge to the planned angle
- Lengthening - a united fibula prevents distraction of the tibial segments
- Derotation - a solidly healed fibula resists rotating the distal tibial fragment
- Distal-third or ankle malunion - a short, externally rotated malunited fibula holds the talus in a malaligned position, so it must be osteotomised and realigned first to let the talus re-centre under the tibia, the same principle as correcting a malunited ankle fracture
Technique. Make the fibular osteotomy through a separate lateral incision, ideally at a different level from the tibial cut, to reduce the risk of tibiofibular cross-union or synostosis. An oblique cut allows some sliding for length and easier fixation. A proximal fibular osteotomy puts the common peroneal nerve at risk and a distal one the superficial peroneal nerve.
When not to. Do not osteotomise a fibula that is not tethering. For a short-segment sagittal (procurvatum or recurvatum) correction with a compliant fibula, an unnecessary cut simply adds a second bone to heal.
Complications
Overall, complications follow 15-20% of corrective osteotomies, among them nonunion, loss of correction and overcorrection.
- Incidence
- 10-15%
- Risk Factors
- Opening wedge, smoking, poor fixation, inadequate graft
- Prevention/Management
- Bone graft if gap over 1cm, rigid fixation, smoking cessation
- Incidence
- 5-10% (usually minor)
- Risk Factors
- Inadequate fixation, premature weight bearing, poor bone quality
- Prevention/Management
- Rigid fixation (minimum 6 cortices each side), protected weight bearing
- Incidence
- 10-15%
- Risk Factors
- Inadequate planning, poor intraoperative assessment
- Prevention/Management
- Meticulous planning, intraoperative verification (fluoroscopy, clinical)
- Incidence
- 5-10%
- Risk Factors
- Previous surgery, compromised soft tissue
- Prevention/Management
- Careful technique, prophylactic antibiotics
- Incidence
- 5-10%
- Risk Factors
- Proximal tibia (peroneal nerve)
- Prevention/Management
- Identify and protect nerves
When it goes wrong. A nonunion is managed by revision fixation with bone graft. Loss of correction needs revision fixation if it is significant, and over- or undercorrection a revision osteotomy if it is symptomatic.
Postoperative Care
The early phase. A splint is used initially, for 2 weeks, and knee and ankle movement starts immediately, with physiotherapy for range of motion and strengthening. Weight bearing depends on the fixation: a closing wedge held with a rigid plate may allow early weight bearing, whereas opening wedge and dome osteotomies need protected weight bearing for 6-12 weeks.
Rehabilitation protocol.
- Weeks 0-2 - splint or cast; non-weight bearing or touch-down weight bearing; knee and ankle range-of-motion exercises; ice and elevation
- Weeks 2-6 - walking boot if distal; progressive weight bearing if fixation is stable; continued range of motion and strengthening; balance and proprioception
- Weeks 6-12 - progression to full weight bearing, full range of motion, progressive activity
- Weeks 12+ - full weight bearing; return to activity once union is confirmed; continued monitoring with serial radiographs
Union and hardware. Union typically takes 3-4 months postoperatively. Consider hardware removal if it is prominent or symptomatic, usually after union is confirmed, at 6-12 months.
Outcomes and Prognosis
Overall. Corrective osteotomy succeeds, with good correction and union, in 85-90%, and 80-85% return to their pre-injury level at 6-12 months postoperatively. Return depends on deformity severity, treatment method and rehabilitation compliance.
By osteotomy. Union and maintenance of correction differ between the wedges.
- Union
- 90-95%
- Correction maintained
- 90-95%
- Note
- Inherently stable
- Union
- 85-90%
- Correction maintained
- 85-90%
- Note
- Requires graft, higher nonunion risk
- Union
- 85-90%
- Correction maintained
- -
- Note
- Technically demanding
Pain. Correction brings immediate pain relief in 70-80%, maintained in the long term if the correction is maintained. Pain relief depends on the quality of the correction and the presence of arthritis.
Arthritis. With correction, 80-85% prevent or delay arthritis; without it, 50-60% develop arthritis at 10 years. Deformity severity and joint involvement are the risk factors.
What predicts a good result. Good preoperative planning with the CORA calculated, rigid fixation, adequate bone graft for an opening wedge, and complete rehabilitation all favour it. Inadequate planning, poor fixation, inadequate bone graft, smoking and premature weight bearing work against it.
Prevention and Return to Sport
Prevention. Primary prevention is proper initial fracture reduction, adequate fixation, close follow-up during healing, and early intervention if a malunion is developing. Once a malunion is present, secondary prevention is corrective osteotomy if indicated, to prevent progression to arthritis and maintain function.
Return to sport. Usually at 6-12 months postoperatively, depending on union and rehabilitation, once the criteria are met:
- Full union confirmed
- Full range of motion, equal to the contralateral side
- Strength greater than 90% of the contralateral side
- No pain or instability
Guidelines, Registries & Global Practice
Global Epidemiology
- Tibial shaft fractures are among the most common long-bone fractures, with population incidence commonly quoted around 16-22 per 100,000 per year; high-energy diaphyseal injuries predominate in young men and fragility-type injuries in older women.
- Symptomatic malunion is a minority outcome but a recognised one: long-term cohorts (van der Schoot, PMID 8836057) found roughly half of 88 healed lower-leg fractures retained at least 5 degrees of malalignment while only 20% had any symptoms at 15 years, and a small 3D study after nailing (Boucher/Bhandari, PMID 12172277 - 13 patients) found about 77% malaligned by convention with no measurable functional penalty. The population signal is that most malalignment is tolerated; the 13-patient null is too small to prove it on its own.
- Distal-third deformity is the least forgiving because malalignment is referred to the ankle (Puno, PMID 1941305).
Side-by-Side Guidance
- Emphasis
- Deformity analysis, CORA / osteotomy rules
- Practical position
- Plan from full-length standing films; osteotomy and correction axis through the CORA
- Emphasis
- Get initial fixation right to prevent malunion
- Practical position
- Open-fracture and shaft standards stress acceptable alignment at index surgery
- Emphasis
- Symptom- and function-led correction
- Practical position
- Reconstruct for symptomatic deformity / mechanical-axis malalignment, not radiographs alone
- Emphasis
- Joint-preserving realignment before salvage
- Practical position
- Supramalleolar / periarticular osteotomy preferred while cartilage is intact
Registry and Outcome Notes
- No arthroplasty-style registry tracks corrective osteotomy itself, but national hip-and-knee registries (NJR UK, AJRR US, AOANJRR Australia, SHAR Sweden) capture the downstream end-points - arthroplasty for post-traumatic arthritis - that uncorrected malalignment can drive.
- High tibial osteotomy registry and series data inform the malunion debate on hinge fractures and loss of correction (e.g. lateral hinge fracture incidence around 24% in opening-wedge HTO, PMID 31273455), reinforcing the value of protecting the far cortex/hinge.
High- vs Limited-Resource Practice
- Well-resourced settings: CT with 3D reconstruction, computer-assisted / patient-specific guides, and hexapod circular frames for gradual multiplanar correction are routine options.
- Limited-resource settings: Correction relies on careful clinical and plain-radiograph planning, acute single-cut osteotomy with plate or nail fixation, and judicious use of simpler external fixators; the deformity-analysis principles are unchanged even where advanced imaging is unavailable.
Q: What are the key points examiners look for in tibial malunion vivas? A: CORA concept (osteotomy at CORA corrects without translation), a symptom/mechanical-axis-led indication qualified by deformity level and joint status, and the osteotomy menu (closing vs opening wedge, oblique, dome, derotational, supramalleolar). Be ready to calculate the CORA and to say when realignment must be combined with fusion / arthroplasty.
Related pages: Tibial Shaft Fractures is where this problem is prevented — the acceptable-alignment thresholds argued over on this page are decided at the index operation, and the commonest source of malunion is a proximal-third fracture nailed in the classic apex-anterior, valgus position; Tibial Nonunion is the other failure of union and frequently coexists, which is why the Kane series carded above treats malunion and nonunion in the same breath; Malunion and Delayed Union covers the general principles across long bones; Deformity Analysis - CORA and MAD is the prerequisite for every plan here and holds the joint-orientation angles, the osteotomy rules and the mechanical-axis measurement in full — a correction planned without it is a guess; Taylor Spatial Frame, Hexapod Frame Deformity Correction and Ilizarov External Fixation are the gradual-correction alternatives to the acute osteotomies described here, and are the answer when deformity is multiplanar, when length must be regained, or when the soft tissues will not tolerate an acute correction; Limb Lengthening Principles for the shortening that usually accompanies angular malunion; Pilon Fractures and Tibial Plateau Fractures are the intra-articular injuries whose malunion is a different problem — an incongruent joint surface, not a bent bone, and not correctable by a diaphyseal osteotomy; Ankle Arthritis is the endpoint the Puno data say distal malunion drives, and the page to read before offering a supramalleolar osteotomy; Compartment Syndrome of the Leg is a real risk of acute correction and lengthening in a scarred limb; and Paediatric Rotational Profile for the torsional measurement technique, because a rotational malunion is diagnosed on CT against the contralateral side rather than estimated clinically.
Controversies and Areas of Uncertainty
The "safe" thresholds quoted in textbooks are pragmatic conventions, not hard biomechanical limits, and several long-running debates affect everyday decisions.
Classic cadaveric and clinical work argues angulation predisposes to arthritis, yet 3D outcome data (Boucher/Bhandari) found 77% of nailed tibiae malaligned by convention with no functional penalty at 5.5 years. Weigh that null carefully: it comes from 13 patients, in a paper whose stated purpose was to introduce a 3D measurement technique. The stronger version of the same argument is van der Schoot's 88-patient cohort, where malalignment did produce more radiographic arthritis yet only 20% of patients had any symptoms at 15 years, and symptoms correlated with knee arthritis rather than with malalignment itself. The honest position: treat symptomatic mechanical-axis deviation, not an isolated degree measurement.
A given angle produces more joint malalignment the closer the apex is to a joint (Puno). A distal deformity is far less forgiving than the same angle mid-shaft, so the threshold to correct should fall as the deformity approaches the ankle.
No high-level randomised data favour one over the other for diaphyseal malunion. Closing wedge gives immediate bone contact and stability but shortens; opening wedge preserves length but adds a gap to heal. Acute correction vs gradual correction (hexapod / circular frame) is a parallel debate, with frames favoured for large, multiplanar or length deformities and where soft tissues are poor.
When malunion coexists with established adjacent arthritis, realignment alone underperforms (Kane and Raikin). Whether to stage osteotomy then later fusion / replacement, or to combine in one procedure, remains surgeon- and patient-specific.
Examiners reward candidates who say the indication for correction is symptomatic deformity or demonstrable mechanical-axis malalignment, qualified by deformity level (distal less tolerant) and joint status (correct the joint too if already arthritic) - rather than reciting a single degree cut-off as if it were absolute.
MCQ Practice Points
Q: What is CORA and why is it important? A: CORA (Center of Rotation of Angulation) = intersection of proximal and distal anatomic axes - Osteotomy AT the CORA corrects angulation without translation. Osteotomy AWAY from CORA creates translation deformity. Critical for preoperative planning.
Q: What are the indications for tibial malunion correction? A: Angular deformity over 10-15°, rotational over 15-20°, shortening over 2cm, symptomatic, or predisposing to arthritis - the mechanical axis normally passes about 8-10mm MEDIAL to the knee centre (spread roughly 7mm), so judge significance against that band rather than against zero.
Q: How do you calculate the wedge size for a closing wedge osteotomy? A: 1° correction = 1.75mm wedge base per 10cm bone length - Example: 15° varus correction at 10cm level = 26mm wedge base width. Closing wedge shortens limb (~2mm per degree per 10cm).
Q: When is opening wedge osteotomy preferred over closing wedge? A: When lengthening is desired or bone preservation is critical - Opening wedge lengthens limb and preserves bone stock. Requires bone graft if gap over 1cm. Higher nonunion risk (10-15%) than closing wedge.
Q: How do you assess rotational malunion? A: CT rotation protocol comparing to contralateral limb - Radiographs cannot reliably show rotation. Clinical assessment: For tibia, assess foot progression angle with knee flexed 90°. Intraoperatively, use K-wire markers in proximal and distal segments.
Q: What is normal mechanical axis and when is deviation significant? A: The mechanical axis runs from the femoral head centre through the knee to the ankle centre, and it normally passes about 8-10mm MEDIAL to the knee centre - not through it, with a spread of roughly 7mm. Deviation well beyond that band, or any appreciable lateral deviation, is significant and predisposes to compartmental arthritis.
Exam Viva Scenarios
Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud
“A 35-year-old man presents 8 months after tibial shaft fracture treated with IM nail. He has medial knee pain with activity. Standing radiographs show 18 degrees varus deformity with mechanical axis deviation of 15mm medial to knee center. The malunion is in the middle third of the tibia.”
“A 30-year-old athlete presents 10 months after tibial shaft fracture. He has difficulty with cutting and pivoting activities. Clinical examination shows 25 degrees internal rotation compared to the contralateral side. CT rotation protocol confirms 25 degrees internal rotation malunion. The malunion is in the middle third.”
“A 48-year-old labourer presents 14 months after a distal-third tibial fracture treated non-operatively in a cast. He has activity-related anteromedial ankle pain. Standing films show a 12 degrees valgus, apex-medial deformity in the distal metaphysis with a mildly tilted talus; the ankle joint space is largely preserved. There is no shaft tenderness and inflammatory markers are normal.”
Key Concepts
- CORA = Center of Rotation of Angulation (intersection of proximal and distal axes)
- Osteotomy at CORA corrects angulation without translation
- Osteotomy away from CORA creates translation deformity
- Mechanical axis: Femoral head center → knee center → ankle center
Indications
- Angular deformity: Over 10-15° (MAD well beyond the normal 8-10mm medial band)
- Rotational deformity: Over 15-20° (functional impairment)
- Shortening: Over 2cm (gait asymmetry)
- Symptomatic: Pain, functional impairment
- Predisposing to arthritis: Abnormal joint loading
Osteotomy Techniques
- Closing wedge: Stable, shortens (~2mm per degree per 10cm), 90-95% union
- Opening wedge: Lengthens, needs graft if gap over 1cm, 85-90% union
- Dome: Multiplanar, no length change, technically demanding
- Derotational: For rotational malunion, clinical verification critical
Preoperative Planning
- Full-length standing radiographs (mechanical axis, CORA calculation)
- CT scan with 3D reconstruction (multiplanar deformity)
- Rotation protocol (compare to contralateral)
- Calculate CORA, measure all components (angulation, rotation, length, translation)
Complications
- Nonunion: 10-15% (opening wedge, prevent with graft and rigid fixation)
- Loss of correction: 5-10% (prevent with rigid fixation)
- Overcorrection/undercorrection: 10-15% (prevent with meticulous planning)
- Infection: 5-10% (careful technique)
Evidence Base
Angular malunion drives adjacent-joint arthritis (15-year follow-up)
- 49% healed with at least 5° malalignment at long-term review
- Malaligned fractures had significantly more knee and ankle arthritis
- Supports anatomic reduction to minimise late degenerative change
Ankle (not knee) malalignment predicts poor outcome
- Ankle malalignment correlated strongly with poor outcome (p=0.001)
- Knee outcome did not correlate with knee malalignment (p=0.82)
- Distal-third deformity is less well tolerated than proximal
Oblique osteotomy for multiplanar tibial malunion
- Single oblique osteotomy corrects combined coronal and sagittal deformity
- Coronal correction to within 1° of normal; union at 4.5 months
- 10 of 12 excellent results with lag screw plus neutralisation plate
Supramalleolar osteotomy for distal-tibial / ankle malunion
- 87.5% good or excellent at 7-year follow-up
- Realignment restored a congruent ankle in the majority
- Joint-preserving alternative to fusion / replacement for distal malunion
Combined osteotomy plus TTC nail for malunion with hindfoot arthritis
- Single-stage osteotomy plus TTC nail for malunion with established arthritis
- VAS pain 8.3 to 2.8; AOFAS hindfoot 43 to 76
- Realignment alone is insufficient once the joint is destroyed
Conventional alignment thresholds are exceeded but not always symptomatic
- ONLY 13 PATIENTS met eligibility criteria (from 71 identified) - the 77% is 10 of 13
- 77% met conventional malunion criteria after IM nailing
- Alignment did not correlate with any of three functional scores at 5.5 years - a null from 13 patients
- Plain films differed significantly from 3D analysis for coronal deformity (p=0.0003)
CORA and the osteotomy rules of deformity correction
- CORA = intersection of proximal and distal axes, at the apex of deformity
- Osteotomy and ACA through CORA = pure angular correction, no translation
- Osteotomy away from CORA mandates translation to restore the axis