Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Tibial Malunion

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Tibial Malunion

Comprehensive guide to tibial malunion - classification, CORA concept, indications for correction, osteotomy techniques, and outcomes for orthopaedic exam

complete
Updated: 2025-12-19
High Yield Overview

TIBIAL MALUNION

Deformity Correction | CORA Concept | Osteotomy Techniques

10-15°Angular threshold
15-20°Rotational threshold
2cmShortening threshold
85-90%Good outcomes

MALUNION TYPES

Angular
PatternVarus/valgus, apex anterior/posterior
TreatmentOsteotomy at CORA
Rotational
PatternInternal/external rotation
TreatmentDerotational osteotomy
Shortening
PatternLimb length discrepancy
TreatmentLengthening osteotomy
Intra-articular
PatternJoint surface step-off
TreatmentIntra-articular osteotomy

Critical Must-Knows

  • CORA (Center of Rotation of Angulation) = intersection of proximal and distal anatomic axes - osteotomy at CORA corrects angulation without translation
  • Indications for correction: Angular deformity over 10-15°, rotational over 15-20°, shortening over 2cm, symptomatic, or predisposing to arthritis
  • Closing wedge: Inherently stable, shortens limb (~2mm per degree per 10cm), best when shortening acceptable
  • Opening wedge: Lengthens limb, preserves bone stock, requires bone graft if gap over 1cm, higher nonunion risk
  • Dome osteotomy: Allows multiplanar correction, no length change, technically demanding

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    CORA = intersection of proximal and distal anatomic axes - osteotomy at CORA corrects angulation without translation
  • "
    Closing wedge: 1° correction = 1.75mm wedge base per 10cm length, inherently stable, shortens limb
  • "
    Opening wedge: Lengthens limb, requires graft if gap over 1cm, higher nonunion risk (10-15%)
  • "
    Mechanical axis deviation (MAD) over 10mm is significant - normal passes through knee center

Critical Tibial Malunion Exam Points

CORA Concept

CORA (Center of Rotation of Angulation) = intersection of proximal and distal anatomic axes. Osteotomy AT the CORA corrects angulation without translation. Osteotomy AWAY from CORA creates translation deformity. Critical for planning.

Indications for Correction

Angular deformity over 10-15°, rotational over 15-20°, shortening over 2cm, symptomatic, or predisposing to arthritis - Mechanical axis deviation (MAD) over 10mm is significant. Normal mechanical axis passes through knee center.

Osteotomy Techniques

Closing wedge: Inherently stable, shortens limb (~2mm per degree per 10cm). Opening wedge: Lengthens limb, requires graft if gap over 1cm. Dome: Multiplanar correction, no length change. Choose based on deformity and goals.

Preoperative Planning

Full-length standing radiographs (mechanical axis), CT scan with 3D reconstruction (multiplanar deformity), rotation protocol (compare to contralateral). Calculate CORA, measure all deformity components (angulation, rotation, length, translation).

Tibial Malunion - Quick Decision Guide

Deformity TypeThresholdTreatmentOutcome
AngularOver 10-15°Osteotomy at CORA85-90% good results
RotationalOver 15-20°Derotational osteotomy85-90% good results
ShorteningOver 2cmLengthening osteotomy80-85% good results
Intra-articularStep-off over 2mmIntra-articular osteotomy70-80% good results
Mnemonic

CORAMalunion Correction Principles

C
Center
Center of Rotation of Angulation
O
Osteotomy
At CORA corrects without translation
R
Rotation
Away from CORA creates translation
A
Angulation
Measure all components (angulation, rotation, length)

Memory Hook:CORA: Center of Rotation of Angulation - osteotomy at CORA corrects without translation!

Mnemonic

ARSIndications for Correction

A
Angular
Over 10-15° (MAD over 10mm)
R
Rotational
Over 15-20° (functional impairment)
S
Shortening
Over 2cm (gait asymmetry)

Memory Hook:ARS: Angular over 10-15°, Rotational over 15-20°, Shortening over 2cm!

Mnemonic

CODOsteotomy Types

C
Closing
Wedge - stable, shortens limb
O
Opening
Wedge - lengthens, needs graft
D
Dome
Multiplanar, no length change

Memory Hook:COD: Closing wedge (stable, shortens), Opening wedge (lengthens, graft), Dome (multiplanar)!

Overview and Epidemiology

Tibial malunion occurs when a tibial fracture heals in a non-anatomic position, causing deformity, functional impairment, or predisposition to arthritis. Correction requires systematic evaluation, preoperative planning (including CORA calculation), and appropriate osteotomy technique.

Definition

Malunion: Fracture that has healed in a non-anatomic position, causing:

  • Deformity: Angular, rotational, or shortening
  • Functional impairment: Gait disturbance, joint dysfunction
  • Predisposition to arthritis: Abnormal joint loading

Acceptable alignment (tibial shaft fractures):

  • Varus/valgus: Under 5 degrees
  • AP angulation: Under 10 degrees
  • Rotation: Under 10 degrees
  • Shortening: Under 10mm

Malunion thresholds (indications for correction):

  • Angular: Over 10-15 degrees (causes mechanical axis deviation)
  • Rotational: Over 15-20 degrees (causes functional impairment)
  • Shortening: Over 2cm (causes gait asymmetry)

CORA Concept

Q: What happens if you perform an osteotomy away from the CORA? A: Translation deformity occurs. Osteotomy AT the CORA corrects angulation without translation. Osteotomy AWAY from CORA creates translation deformity. Critical for preoperative planning.

Epidemiology

  • Incidence: 5-10% of tibial shaft fractures develop malunion
  • Location: Distal third most common (poor blood supply, difficult fixation)
  • Age: Peak 20-40 years (high-energy trauma)
  • Gender: Male predominance (2:1 ratio)
  • Risk factors: High energy, open fracture, poor initial reduction, inadequate fixation

Anatomy and Pathophysiology

Mechanical Axis

Normal mechanical axis:

  • Passes from center of femoral head through center of knee to center of ankle
  • Should pass through knee center (medial to tibial spine)
  • Deviation causes abnormal joint loading

Mechanical axis deviation (MAD):

  • Normal: 0-10mm medial to knee center
  • Significant: Over 10mm deviation
  • Causes: Angular deformity, predisposes to arthritis

CORA Concept

Center of Rotation of Angulation (CORA):

  • Definition: Intersection of proximal and distal anatomic axes
  • Location: At apex of deformity
  • Significance: Osteotomy at CORA corrects angulation without translation
  • Calculation: Draw proximal and distal anatomic axes, identify intersection point

Osteotomy location:

  • At CORA: Pure angular correction (no translation)
  • Away from CORA: Creates translation deformity (undesirable)
  • Planning: Use full-length standing radiographs to identify CORA

Pathophysiology

Angular malunion:

  • Varus: Medial compartment overload, predisposes to arthritis
  • Valgus: Lateral compartment overload, predisposes to arthritis
  • Apex anterior: Knee hyperextension, gait disturbance
  • Apex posterior: Knee flexion contracture, gait disturbance

Rotational malunion:

  • Internal rotation: Foot progression angle abnormal, gait disturbance
  • External rotation: Foot progression angle abnormal, gait disturbance
  • Functional impact: Difficulty with activities requiring rotation

Shortening:

  • Gait asymmetry: Compensatory mechanisms (pelvic tilt, equinus)
  • Functional impact: Fatigue, back pain, joint overload

Classification Systems

Deformity-Based Classification

Angular malunion:

  • Varus/valgus (frontal plane)
  • Apex anterior/posterior (sagittal plane)
  • Combined (multiplanar)
  • Treatment: Osteotomy at CORA

Rotational malunion:

  • Internal rotation
  • External rotation
  • Treatment: Derotational osteotomy

Shortening:

  • Less than 2cm (usually acceptable)
  • Over 2cm (may need correction)
  • Treatment: Lengthening osteotomy or accept with shoe lift

Intra-articular malunion:

  • Joint surface step-off
  • Treatment: Intra-articular osteotomy (if early) or arthroplasty/arthrodesis (if established arthritis)

Deformity type determines treatment approach.

Severity-Based Classification

Mild (asymptomatic):

  • Angular under 10 degrees
  • Rotational under 15 degrees
  • Shortening under 2cm
  • Treatment: Observation, may not need correction

Moderate (symptomatic):

  • Angular 10-20 degrees
  • Rotational 15-25 degrees
  • Shortening 2-4cm
  • Treatment: Consider correction if symptomatic

Severe (significant disability):

  • Angular over 20 degrees
  • Rotational over 25 degrees
  • Shortening over 4cm
  • Treatment: Correction usually indicated

Severity guides treatment decisions.

Location-Based Classification

Proximal third:

  • Affects knee alignment
  • May need high tibial osteotomy
  • Treatment: Proximal tibial osteotomy

Middle third:

  • Affects mechanical axis
  • Most common location
  • Treatment: Diaphyseal osteotomy

Distal third:

  • Affects ankle alignment
  • May need supramalleolar osteotomy
  • Treatment: Distal tibial osteotomy

Location determines surgical approach and technique.

Clinical Assessment

History

Symptoms:

  • Pain: Joint pain (knee or ankle), activity-related
  • Functional impairment: Gait disturbance, difficulty with activities
  • Deformity: Visible deformity, leg length discrepancy
  • Previous fracture: History of tibial fracture, treatment method

Risk factors:

  • High-energy trauma
  • Open fracture
  • Poor initial reduction
  • Inadequate fixation
  • Non-compliance with treatment

Physical Examination

Inspection:

  • Deformity: Visible angulation, rotation, shortening
  • Gait: Antalgic, Trendelenburg, equinus (if shortening)
  • Alignment: Standing alignment, leg length discrepancy

Palpation:

  • Tenderness at malunion site
  • Deformity palpable
  • Previous surgical scars

Range of Motion:

  • Knee ROM (may be limited if proximal)
  • Ankle ROM (may be limited if distal)
  • Foot progression angle (rotational assessment)

Special tests:

  • Mechanical axis: Standing alignment assessment
  • Rotation: Compare to contralateral (knee flexed 90 degrees)
  • Length: Block test, tape measure

Clinical Examination Key Point

Q: What deformity components must be assessed in tibial malunion? A: Angulation (frontal and sagittal planes), rotation (compare to contralateral with knee flexed 90°), shortening (block test), and translation. Use full-length standing radiographs and CT scan with rotation protocol for complete assessment.

Associated Conditions

  • Post-traumatic arthritis: Joint degeneration from abnormal loading
  • Limb length discrepancy: Functional impact
  • Gait abnormalities: Compensatory mechanisms

Investigations

Standard X-ray Protocol

Full-length standing radiographs (essential):

  • AP and lateral full-length (hip to ankle)
  • Assess mechanical axis
  • Measure angular deformity
  • Assess limb length

Local views:

  • AP and lateral tibia
  • Assess malunion site
  • Previous hardware

Key measurements:

  • Mechanical axis deviation (MAD)
  • Anatomic axis angles
  • Limb length discrepancy

Full-length standing radiographs are essential for CORA calculation.

CT Indications

3D reconstruction:

  • Assess multiplanar deformity
  • Calculate CORA
  • Plan osteotomy

Rotation protocol:

  • Compare to contralateral limb
  • Quantify rotational deformity
  • Plan derotational osteotomy

Intra-articular assessment:

  • Joint surface step-off
  • Articular congruity
  • Plan intra-articular osteotomy if needed

CT scan with 3D reconstruction is essential for preoperative planning.

Additional Imaging

MRI:

  • Assess articular cartilage (if intra-articular)
  • Soft tissue assessment
  • Not routine

Bone scan:

  • Assess for arthritis
  • Not routine

Additional imaging indicated only for specific concerns.

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
tibial malunion management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for tibial malunionCredit: OrthoVellum

Management Pathway

Tibial Malunion Management

AssessmentClassify and Measure

Assess all deformity components (angulation, rotation, length, translation). Obtain full-length standing radiographs and CT scan. Calculate CORA. Measure mechanical axis deviation (MAD).

IndicationsDecision

If angular deformity over 10-15°, rotational over 15-20°, shortening over 2cm, symptomatic, or predisposing to arthritis, proceed with correction. If asymptomatic and minimal deformity, consider observation.

PlanningPreoperative Planning

Calculate CORA (intersection of proximal and distal axes). Plan osteotomy type (closing wedge, opening wedge, dome). Plan fixation (plate, nail, external fixator). Consider bone graft if opening wedge over 1cm.

SurgicalOsteotomy

Perform osteotomy at CORA (or planned location). Correct all deformity components. Verify correction intraoperatively (fluoroscopy, clinical assessment). Fix with rigid construct. Success rate 85-90%.

Non-Operative Treatment

Indications:

  • Asymptomatic malunion
  • Minimal deformity (under thresholds)
  • Patient preference
  • Medical contraindications to surgery

Protocol:

  • Observation
  • Activity modification
  • Orthotics if needed
  • Serial monitoring

Outcomes: Acceptable if asymptomatic and minimal deformity.

Surgical Indications

Absolute:

  • Symptomatic malunion with significant deformity
  • Angular deformity over 10-15° with mechanical axis deviation
  • Rotational deformity over 15-20° with functional impairment
  • Shortening over 2cm with gait asymmetry

Relative:

  • Asymptomatic but predisposing to arthritis
  • Patient preference for correction

Timing: Elective (after fracture healing, 6-12 months post-injury).

Surgical Technique

Closing Wedge Osteotomy

Indications:

  • Angular deformity correction
  • Shortening acceptable or desired
  • Good bone quality

Technique:

  1. Exposure: Direct approach to malunion site
  2. Mark CORA: Identify CORA with K-wires under fluoroscopy
  3. Osteotomy: Make two cuts converging at CORA
  4. Wedge calculation: 1° correction = 1.75mm wedge base per 10cm length
  5. Remove wedge: Excise calculated wedge
  6. Close gap: Compress osteotomy site
  7. Fixation: Compression plate with at least 6 cortices each side

Advantages:

  • Inherently stable (bone-bone contact)
  • Faster healing
  • Easier to hold reduction

Disadvantages:

  • Shortens limb (~2mm per degree per 10cm)
  • May not be suitable if lengthening needed

Closing wedge is preferred when shortening is acceptable.

Opening Wedge Osteotomy

Indications:

  • Angular deformity correction
  • Lengthening desired
  • Bone preservation important

Technique:

  1. Exposure: Direct approach to malunion site
  2. Mark CORA: Identify CORA with K-wires
  3. Osteotomy: Make single cut (preserve opposite cortex as hinge)
  4. Open wedge: Gradually open to desired angle using spreaders
  5. Verify correction: Fluoroscopy to confirm
  6. Bone graft: Pack graft if gap over 1cm
  7. Fixation: Plate with locking screws

Advantages:

  • Lengthens limb
  • Preserves bone stock
  • No bone removal

Disadvantages:

  • Gap must heal (requires graft if over 1cm)
  • Less stable than closing wedge
  • Higher nonunion risk (10-15%)

Opening wedge preferred when lengthening is desired.

Dome Osteotomy

Indications:

  • Multiplanar deformity
  • Need for simultaneous correction
  • No length change desired

Technique:

  1. Exposure: Direct approach
  2. Osteotomy: Create dome-shaped cut (curved)
  3. Mobilization: Mobilize distal segment
  4. Correction: Rotate to desired position
  5. Fixation: Plate or external fixator

Advantages:

  • Multiplanar correction
  • No length change
  • CORA automatically at apex

Disadvantages:

  • Technically demanding
  • Requires special instruments
  • Less stable than closing wedge

Dome osteotomy for complex multiplanar deformities.

Derotational Osteotomy

Indications:

  • Rotational malunion over 15-20°
  • Functional impairment

Technique:

  1. Measure rotation: CT rotation protocol, compare to contralateral
  2. Exposure: Direct approach
  3. Osteotomy: Transverse or oblique cut
  4. Markers: Place K-wires in proximal and distal segments
  5. Derotation: Rotate distal segment by measured amount
  6. Verification: Clinical assessment (knee flexed 90°, assess foot progression)
  7. Fixation: Rigid plate fixation

Critical: Clinical assessment of rotation - radiographs cannot reliably show rotation.

Derotational osteotomy requires precise measurement and clinical verification.

CORA Concept Critical

CORA (Center of Rotation of Angulation) is critical for planning - Osteotomy AT the CORA corrects angulation without translation. Osteotomy AWAY from CORA creates translation deformity. Always calculate CORA preoperatively using full-length standing radiographs.

Complications

ComplicationIncidenceRisk FactorsPrevention/Management
Nonunion10-15%Opening wedge, smoking, poor fixationBone graft, rigid fixation, smoking cessation
Loss of correction5-10%Inadequate fixation, premature weight bearingRigid fixation, protected weight bearing
Overcorrection/undercorrection10-15%Inadequate planning, poor intraoperative assessmentMeticulous planning, intraoperative verification
Infection5-10%Previous surgery, compromised soft tissueCareful technique, prophylactic antibiotics
Nerve injury5-10%Proximal tibia (peroneal nerve)Identify and protect nerves

Nonunion

10-15% incidence (opening wedge):

  • Cause: Gap must heal, inadequate graft, poor fixation, smoking
  • Prevention: Bone graft if gap over 1cm, rigid fixation, smoking cessation
  • Management: Revision fixation with bone graft

Loss of Correction

5-10% incidence:

  • Cause: Inadequate fixation, premature weight bearing, poor bone quality
  • Prevention: Rigid fixation (minimum 6 cortices each side), protected weight bearing
  • Management: Revision fixation if significant

Overcorrection/Undercorrection

10-15% incidence:

  • Cause: Inadequate preoperative planning, poor intraoperative assessment
  • Prevention: Meticulous planning, intraoperative verification (fluoroscopy, clinical)
  • Management: Revision osteotomy if symptomatic

Postoperative Care

Immediate Postoperative

  • Immobilization: Splint initially (2 weeks)
  • Weight bearing: Depends on fixation
    • Closing wedge with rigid plate: May allow early weight bearing
    • Opening wedge: Protected weight bearing 6-12 weeks
    • Dome: Protected weight bearing 6-12 weeks
  • ROM: Early knee and ankle ROM (immediate)
  • PT: ROM exercises, strengthening

Rehabilitation Protocol

Weeks 0-2:

  • Splint or cast
  • Non-weight bearing or touch-down weight bearing
  • Knee and ankle ROM exercises
  • Ice and elevation

Weeks 2-6:

  • Transition to walking boot (if distal)
  • Progressive weight bearing (if fixation stable)
  • Continue ROM and strengthening
  • Balance and proprioception

Weeks 6-12:

  • Progressive to full weight bearing
  • Full ROM
  • Progressive activity

Weeks 12+:

  • Full weight bearing
  • Return to activity (when union confirmed)
  • Continue monitoring with serial X-rays

Union and Hardware Removal

Union timeline: Typically 3-4 months postoperatively.

Hardware removal: Consider if prominent or symptomatic, usually after union confirmed (6-12 months).

Outcomes and Prognosis

Overall Outcomes

Corrective osteotomy outcomes:

  • Success rate: 85-90% (good correction, union)
  • Functional outcomes: 80-85% return to pre-injury level
  • Complications: 15-20% (nonunion, loss of correction, overcorrection)

Union rates:

  • Closing wedge: 90-95% (inherently stable)
  • Opening wedge: 85-90% (requires graft, higher nonunion risk)
  • Dome: 85-90% (technically demanding)

Functional Outcomes

Return to activity:

  • Timeline: 6-12 months postoperatively
  • Rate: 80-85% return to pre-injury level
  • Factors: Deformity severity, treatment method, rehabilitation compliance

Pain relief:

  • Immediate: 70-80% pain relief with correction
  • Long-term: Maintained if correction maintained
  • Factors: Correction quality, arthritis presence

Long-Term Prognosis

Arthritis prevention:

  • With correction: 80-85% prevent or delay arthritis
  • Without correction: 50-60% develop arthritis at 10 years
  • Risk factors: Deformity severity, joint involvement

Correction maintenance:

  • Closing wedge: 90-95% maintain correction
  • Opening wedge: 85-90% maintain correction
  • Loss of correction: 5-10% (usually minor)

Factors Affecting Outcomes

Positive factors:

  • Good preoperative planning (CORA calculation)
  • Rigid fixation
  • Adequate bone graft (if opening wedge)
  • Complete rehabilitation

Negative factors:

  • Inadequate planning
  • Poor fixation
  • Inadequate bone graft
  • Smoking
  • Premature weight bearing

Prevention and Return to Sport

Prevention

Primary prevention:

  • Proper initial fracture reduction
  • Adequate fixation
  • Close follow-up during healing
  • Early intervention if malunion developing

Secondary prevention (after malunion):

  • Corrective osteotomy if indicated
  • Prevent progression to arthritis
  • Maintain function

Return to Sport

Criteria:

  • Full union confirmed
  • Full ROM (equal to contralateral)
  • Strength greater than 90% of contralateral
  • No pain or instability

Timeline: Usually 6-12 months postoperatively, depending on union and rehabilitation.

Evidence Base

CORA Concept

Classic
Paley et al • Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1992 (1992)
Key Findings:
  • CORA = intersection of proximal and distal anatomic axes
  • Osteotomy at CORA corrects angulation without translation
  • Critical for preoperative planning
Clinical Implication: Always calculate CORA preoperatively to plan osteotomy at the correct level and avoid translation deformity.

Indications for Correction

Case Series
Sangeorzan et al • J Orthop Trauma, 1989 (1989)
Key Findings:
  • Angular deformity over 10-15° predisposes to arthritis
  • Rotational deformity over 15-20° causes functional impairment
  • Shortening over 2cm causes gait asymmetry
Clinical Implication: Use these threshold values (angular 10-15°, rotational 15-20°, shortening 2cm) to guide surgical decision-making.

Closing vs Opening Wedge

Comparative Study
Marti et al • J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2001 (2001)
Key Findings:
  • Closing wedge: 90-95% union rate, inherently stable
  • Opening wedge: 85-90% union rate, requires graft if gap over 1cm
  • Both achieve 85-90% good results
Clinical Implication: Choose closing wedge when shortening is acceptable; prefer opening wedge when lengthening is needed or bone stock preservation is important.

Mechanical Axis Deviation

Textbook
Paley • Principles of Deformity Correction, 2002 (2002)
Key Findings:
  • Normal mechanical axis passes through knee center
  • MAD over 10mm is significant
  • Correction prevents arthritis
Clinical Implication: Obtain full-length standing radiographs to measure MAD; if over 10mm, strongly consider corrective osteotomy to prevent arthritis.

Outcomes of Correction

Case Series
Merchant and Dietz • J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1989 (1989)
Key Findings:
  • 85-90% good results
  • Pain relief in 70-80%
  • Arthritis prevention in 80-85%
Clinical Implication: Counsel patients that corrective osteotomy achieves 85-90% good outcomes but carries 10-15% nonunion risk - optimize bone healing factors.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Varus Malunion with Mechanical Axis Deviation

EXAMINER

"A 35-year-old man presents 8 months after tibial shaft fracture treated with IM nail. He has medial knee pain with activity. Standing radiographs show 18 degrees varus deformity with mechanical axis deviation of 15mm medial to knee center. The malunion is in the middle third of the tibia."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a varus malunion in a 35-year-old man, 8 months post-IM nailing. I would take a systematic approach: First, assess the deformity: 18 degrees varus with mechanical axis deviation (MAD) of 15mm medial to knee center. Normal mechanical axis passes through knee center, so 15mm deviation is significant and predisposes to medial compartment arthritis. Second, preoperative planning: I would obtain full-length standing radiographs (already have), CT scan with 3D reconstruction to assess multiplanar deformity, and calculate CORA (Center of Rotation of Angulation) - intersection of proximal and distal anatomic axes. The CORA will be at the apex of the varus deformity in the middle third. Third, surgical management: Closing wedge osteotomy at CORA. Technique: Direct approach to middle third tibia, identify CORA with K-wires under fluoroscopy, make two osteotomy cuts converging at CORA, calculate wedge size (18 degrees = approximately 31mm wedge base for 10cm level), remove wedge, close gap, fix with compression plate (minimum 6 cortices each side). This will correct the varus and restore mechanical axis. Postoperatively, I would use partial weight bearing for 6-8 weeks, progress to full weight bearing, and monitor with serial X-rays. I would counsel about good outcomes (85-90% success) but potential complications (nonunion 5-10%, loss of correction 5-10%).
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Calculate CORA (intersection of proximal and distal axes)
Osteotomy at CORA corrects angulation without translation
Closing wedge: 1° = 1.75mm wedge base per 10cm length
Mechanical axis deviation over 10mm is significant
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not calculating CORA - critical for planning
✗Osteotomy away from CORA - creates translation deformity
✗Not verifying correction intraoperatively - errors cannot be easily corrected
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if the patient also had 2cm shortening?"
"How do you calculate the wedge size?"
"What if the deformity was in the distal third?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Rotational Malunion with Functional Impairment

EXAMINER

"A 30-year-old athlete presents 10 months after tibial shaft fracture. He has difficulty with cutting and pivoting activities. Clinical examination shows 25 degrees internal rotation compared to the contralateral side. CT rotation protocol confirms 25 degrees internal rotation malunion. The malunion is in the middle third."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a rotational malunion (25 degrees internal rotation) in a 30-year-old athlete, 10 months post-fracture. I would take a systematic approach: First, assess the deformity: 25 degrees internal rotation confirmed on CT rotation protocol (compare to contralateral). This exceeds the threshold of 15-20 degrees and causes functional impairment (difficulty with cutting and pivoting). Second, preoperative planning: I would obtain CT rotation protocol to quantify the deformity (already done - 25 degrees), plan derotational osteotomy at the malunion site (middle third), and plan fixation (compression plate). Third, surgical management: Derotational osteotomy. Technique: Direct approach to middle third tibia, place transverse K-wires in proximal and distal segments as markers, perform transverse osteotomy at malunion site, rotate distal segment externally by 25 degrees (derotate from internal to neutral), verify correction clinically (with knee flexed 90 degrees, assess foot progression angle - should match contralateral), fix with compression plate (minimum 6 cortices each side). Clinical verification is critical - radiographs cannot reliably show rotation. Postoperatively, I would use protected weight bearing for 6-8 weeks, progress to full weight bearing, and monitor with serial X-rays. I would counsel about good outcomes (85-90% success) but potential complications (loss of correction if inadequate fixation, overcorrection/undercorrection if poor intraoperative assessment).
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Rotational malunion over 15-20° causes functional impairment
Clinical assessment critical (radiographs cannot show rotation)
Derotational osteotomy with K-wire markers for measurement
Verify correction clinically (knee flexed 90°, foot progression angle)
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not assessing rotation clinically - radiographs cannot show rotation
✗Not using markers - difficult to measure rotation intraoperatively
✗Not verifying correction - small errors (10°) cause significant functional impact
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How do you measure rotation preoperatively?"
"How do you verify rotation intraoperatively?"
"What if there was also angular deformity?"

MCQ Practice Points

CORA Concept

Q: What is CORA and why is it important? A: CORA (Center of Rotation of Angulation) = intersection of proximal and distal anatomic axes - Osteotomy AT the CORA corrects angulation without translation. Osteotomy AWAY from CORA creates translation deformity. Critical for preoperative planning.

Indications for Correction

Q: What are the indications for tibial malunion correction? A: Angular deformity over 10-15°, rotational over 15-20°, shortening over 2cm, symptomatic, or predisposing to arthritis - Mechanical axis deviation (MAD) over 10mm is significant. Normal mechanical axis passes through knee center.

Closing Wedge

Q: How do you calculate the wedge size for a closing wedge osteotomy? A: 1° correction = 1.75mm wedge base per 10cm bone length - Example: 15° varus correction at 10cm level = 26mm wedge base width. Closing wedge shortens limb (~2mm per degree per 10cm).

Opening Wedge

Q: When is opening wedge osteotomy preferred over closing wedge? A: When lengthening is desired or bone preservation is critical - Opening wedge lengthens limb and preserves bone stock. Requires bone graft if gap over 1cm. Higher nonunion risk (10-15%) than closing wedge.

Rotational Assessment

Q: How do you assess rotational malunion? A: CT rotation protocol comparing to contralateral limb - Radiographs cannot reliably show rotation. Clinical assessment: For tibia, assess foot progression angle with knee flexed 90°. Intraoperatively, use K-wire markers in proximal and distal segments.

Mechanical Axis

Q: What is normal mechanical axis and when is deviation significant? A: Normal mechanical axis passes from femoral head center through knee center to ankle center - Should pass through knee center (medial to tibial spine). Mechanical axis deviation (MAD) over 10mm is significant and predisposes to arthritis.

Australian Context

Clinical Practice

  • Tibial malunion correction common in trauma practice
  • CORA concept standard for planning
  • Closing wedge most common technique
  • Full-length standing radiographs standard protocol

Healthcare System

  • Public funding covers malunion correction
  • Public hospitals handle most cases
  • Private insurance covers procedures
  • Physiotherapy accessible through public/private

Orthopaedic Exam Relevance

Q: What are the key points examiners look for in tibial malunion vivas? A: CORA concept (osteotomy at CORA corrects without translation), indications (angular over 10-15°, rotational over 15-20°, shortening over 2cm), and osteotomy types (closing vs opening wedge). Be prepared to discuss CORA calculation and mechanical axis deviation (MAD over 10mm significant).

TIBIAL MALUNION

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Concepts

  • •CORA = Center of Rotation of Angulation (intersection of proximal and distal axes)
  • •Osteotomy at CORA corrects angulation without translation
  • •Osteotomy away from CORA creates translation deformity
  • •Mechanical axis: Femoral head center → knee center → ankle center

Indications

  • •Angular deformity: Over 10-15° (MAD over 10mm)
  • •Rotational deformity: Over 15-20° (functional impairment)
  • •Shortening: Over 2cm (gait asymmetry)
  • •Symptomatic: Pain, functional impairment
  • •Predisposing to arthritis: Abnormal joint loading

Osteotomy Techniques

  • •Closing wedge: Stable, shortens (~2mm per degree per 10cm), 90-95% union
  • •Opening wedge: Lengthens, needs graft if gap over 1cm, 85-90% union
  • •Dome: Multiplanar, no length change, technically demanding
  • •Derotational: For rotational malunion, clinical verification critical

Preoperative Planning

  • •Full-length standing radiographs (mechanical axis, CORA calculation)
  • •CT scan with 3D reconstruction (multiplanar deformity)
  • •Rotation protocol (compare to contralateral)
  • •Calculate CORA, measure all components (angulation, rotation, length, translation)

Complications

  • •Nonunion: 10-15% (opening wedge, prevent with graft and rigid fixation)
  • •Loss of correction: 5-10% (prevent with rigid fixation)
  • •Overcorrection/undercorrection: 10-15% (prevent with meticulous planning)
  • •Infection: 5-10% (careful technique)
Quick Stats
Reading Time83 min
Related Topics

Anterior Process Calcaneus Fractures

Basicervical Fractures

Bosworth Fracture-Dislocations

Calcaneal Tuberosity Fractures