Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Tibial Spine Fractures

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Tibial Spine Fractures

Comprehensive guide to tibial spine fractures - pediatric ACL equivalent, Meyers-McKeever classification, arthroscopic reduction, suture fixation, and treatment for orthopaedic exam

complete
Updated: 2025-12-19
High Yield Overview

TIBIAL SPINE FRACTURES

Pediatric ACL Equivalent | Meyers-McKeever Classification | Arthroscopic Fixation

8-14yPeak age
Type IIISurgical indication
2-3mmDisplacement threshold
85-95%Good outcomes

MEYERS-MCKE EVER CLASSIFICATION

Type I
PatternMinimal displacement
TreatmentExtension cast 4-6 weeks
Type II
PatternAnterior hinge intact
TreatmentAttempt closed reduction, cast if reducible
Type III
PatternComplete displacement
TreatmentSurgical fixation (arthroscopic or open)
Type IV
PatternComminuted fragment
TreatmentSurgical fixation

Critical Must-Knows

  • Pediatric ACL equivalent - tibial spine fracture in children = ACL injury in adults
  • Meyers-McKeever classification guides treatment: Type I-II non-operative, Type III-IV surgical
  • Intermeniscal ligament may block reduction in Type II and III - requires arthroscopic debridement
  • Arthroscopic suture fixation is gold standard for Type III-IV (avoids hardware removal)
  • Excellent outcomes with proper treatment: 85-95% good results, low complication rate

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Tibial spine fracture = pediatric ACL injury - mechanism is hyperextension with valgus
  • "
    Type II may be reducible with extension - if blocked by intermeniscal ligament, needs surgery
  • "
    Arthroscopic suture fixation avoids hardware removal and allows early ROM
  • "
    Complications: arthrofibrosis (5-10%), residual laxity (10-15%), growth disturbance (rare)

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

3-panel figure: (a) Lateral radiograph with Segond fracture, (b) Sagittal MRI, (c) Coronal MRI showing tibial spine avulsion
Click to expand
3-panel figure: (a) Lateral radiograph with Segond fracture, (b) Sagittal MRI, (c) Coronal MRI showing tibial spine avulsionCredit: Jaremko JL et al., Insights Imaging 2013 via PMC Open Access (CC BY 4.0)
AP radiograph of right knee showing tibial spine avulsion fracture with white arrow indicating displaced fragment
Click to expand
AP radiograph of right knee showing tibial spine avulsion fracture with white arrow indicating displaced fragmentCredit: Nunez A et al., Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med 2022 via PMC Open Access (CC BY 4.0)
Lateral radiograph of right knee showing tibial spine avulsion fracture with anterior displacement (Type II)
Click to expand
Lateral radiograph of right knee showing tibial spine avulsion fracture with anterior displacement (Type II)Credit: Nunez A et al., Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med 2022 via PMC Open Access (CC BY 4.0)

Critical Tibial Spine Exam Points

Pediatric ACL Equivalent

Tibial spine fracture in children = ACL injury in adults. Same mechanism (hyperextension with valgus), same instability pattern (anterior translation, pivot shift). Peak age 8-14 years. Meyers-McKeever classification guides treatment based on displacement.

Classification Determines Treatment

Type I-II: Non-operative (extension cast). Type III-IV: Surgical (arthroscopic or open fixation). Type II may be reducible with extension - if blocked by intermeniscal ligament, needs arthroscopic debridement and fixation.

Arthroscopic Suture Fixation

Gold standard for Type III-IV: Arthroscopic reduction and suture fixation through transosseous tunnels. Avoids hardware removal, allows early ROM, excellent outcomes (85-95% good results). Screw fixation alternative but requires removal.

Complications to Watch

Arthrofibrosis (5-10%): Most common - prevent with early ROM. Residual laxity (10-15%): May require revision. Growth disturbance (rare): Avoid crossing physis with fixation. Nonunion (rare): Usually with inadequate fixation.

Tibial Spine Fractures - Quick Decision Guide

TypeDisplacementReducible?Treatment
Type ILess than 3mmN/A - minimalExtension cast 4-6 weeks
Type IIAnterior elevationMay be reducibleAttempt closed reduction, cast if reducible
Type IIIComplete displacementNo - blockedSurgical fixation (arthroscopic preferred)
Type IVComminutedNoSurgical fixation (arthroscopic preferred)
Mnemonic

MACSTibial Spine Fracture Classification

M
Meyers-McKeever
Classification system (I-IV)
A
ACL equivalent
Pediatric equivalent of ACL injury
C
Cast or surgery
Type I-II cast, Type III-IV surgery
S
Suture fixation
Gold standard for surgical treatment

Memory Hook:Meyers-McKeever classification for ACL equivalent - Cast or Surgery based on displacement, Suture fixation is gold standard!

Mnemonic

SURGSurgical Indications

S
Severe displacement
Type III or IV (complete or comminuted)
U
Unreducible
Type II blocked by intermeniscal ligament
R
Residual laxity
Type II with persistent instability after reduction
G
Growth concern
Avoid crossing physis with fixation

Memory Hook:Surgery for Severe displacement, Unreducible fractures, Residual laxity, with Growth concern avoidance!

Mnemonic

ALANComplications

A
Arthrofibrosis
Most common (5-10%) - prevent with early ROM
L
Laxity
Residual anterior laxity (10-15%)
A
Arthritis
Long-term risk if malreduced
N
Nonunion
Rare - usually with inadequate fixation

Memory Hook:Complications: Arthrofibrosis (most common), Laxity (residual), Arthritis (long-term), Nonunion (rare)!

Overview and Epidemiology

Tibial spine fractures (also called tibial eminence fractures) are avulsion fractures of the anterior tibial spine where the ACL inserts. These fractures represent the pediatric equivalent of ACL injuries in adults, occurring in skeletally immature patients before the ACL is strong enough to tear midsubstance.

Mechanism of Injury

Hyperextension with valgus force is the classic mechanism:

  • Non-contact: Jumping/landing with knee hyperextension
  • Contact: Direct blow to flexed knee causing hyperextension
  • Bicycle accidents: Common in children (knee strikes handlebar)
  • Sports: Soccer, basketball, gymnastics (landing with hyperextension)

The ACL inserts on the anterior tibial spine. In children, the bone is weaker than the ligament, so the ACL avulses the tibial spine rather than tearing midsubstance (as in adults).

Why Children Get Tibial Spine Fractures

In children, bone is weaker than ligament. The ACL insertion site (tibial spine) is cartilaginous and weak. Hyperextension force causes the ACL to avulse the tibial spine rather than tear midsubstance. This is why ACL injuries in children under 14 are almost always tibial spine fractures, not ligament tears.

Epidemiology

  • Age: Peak 8-14 years (skeletally immature)
  • Gender: Male predominance (2:1 ratio)
  • Incidence: 3-5% of pediatric knee injuries
  • Laterality: Usually unilateral, bilateral rare
  • Associated injuries: Meniscal tears (10-20%), MCL injuries (5-10%)

Anatomy and Pathophysiology

Tibial Spine Anatomy

The anterior tibial spine (tibial eminence) is the bony prominence in the intercondylar notch where the ACL inserts:

  • Location: Anterior intercondylar area of tibia
  • Structure: Cartilaginous in children, ossifies with age
  • ACL insertion: Anteromedial and posterolateral bundles attach here
  • Blood supply: Middle genicular artery (same as ACL)
  • Growth plate: Proximal tibial physis is 2-3cm distal - avoid crossing with fixation

Pathophysiology

In children, bone is weaker than ligament:

  • ACL is relatively strong (mature collagen)
  • Tibial spine is cartilaginous and weak (immature bone)
  • Hyperextension force → ACL avulses tibial spine (not ligament tear)
  • Displacement depends on force magnitude and direction

As children age:

  • Tibial spine ossifies and strengthens
  • ACL becomes relatively weaker
  • Mechanism shifts from avulsion fracture to ligament tear
  • Transition age: 14-16 years (skeletal maturity)

Growth Plate Considerations

The proximal tibial physis is 2-3cm distal to the tibial spine. Fixation must avoid crossing the physis to prevent growth disturbance. Use transosseous tunnels that stay proximal to the physis, or use suture anchors in the tibial spine itself.

Classification System

Meyers-McKeever Classification (1959, modified by Zaricznyj 1977):

TypeDescriptionDisplacementRadiographic Finding
Type IMinimal displacementLess than 3mm elevationMinimal anterior elevation on lateral X-ray
Type IIAnterior hinge intactAnterior 1/3-1/2 elevatedAnterior elevation with posterior hinge visible
Type IIIComplete displacementNo contact with bedFragment completely separated, rotated
Type IVComminutedMultiple fragmentsComminuted fragment, may be rotated

Key point: Type II may be reducible with knee extension (anterior hinge intact). If blocked by intermeniscal ligament, requires arthroscopic debridement and fixation.

Classification Systems

Meyers-McKeever Classification (Standard)

Type I: Minimal displacement (less than 3mm)

  • Anterior edge slightly elevated
  • Posterior hinge intact
  • Treatment: Extension cast 4-6 weeks

Type II: Anterior hinge intact

  • Anterior 1/3 to 1/2 elevated
  • Posterior hinge maintains contact
  • Treatment: Attempt closed reduction with extension, cast if reducible

Type III: Complete displacement

  • Fragment completely separated
  • No contact with tibial bed
  • May be rotated
  • Treatment: Surgical fixation (arthroscopic or open)

Type IV: Comminuted

  • Multiple fragments
  • May be rotated or displaced
  • Treatment: Surgical fixation (arthroscopic or open)

This classification guides treatment decisions based on displacement and reducibility.

Treatment-Based Classification

Non-operative (Type I-II):

  • Type I: Extension cast
  • Type II: Attempt closed reduction, cast if reducible

Surgical (Type III-IV):

  • Type III: Arthroscopic or open fixation
  • Type IV: Arthroscopic or open fixation

Reducibility assessment:

  • Type II may be reducible with extension
  • If blocked by intermeniscal ligament → surgical
  • If reducible and stable → cast

This practical classification helps guide treatment decisions.

Clinical Assessment

History

Mechanism: Hyperextension with valgus force

  • Jumping/landing with knee hyperextension
  • Direct blow to flexed knee
  • Bicycle accident (knee strikes handlebar)
  • Sports: Soccer, basketball, gymnastics

Symptoms:

  • Immediate pain and swelling
  • Inability to bear weight
  • Knee "giving way" (instability)
  • Locking (if fragment blocks extension)

Physical Examination

Inspection:

  • Knee effusion (hemarthrosis)
  • Antalgic gait
  • Knee held in slight flexion

Palpation:

  • Tenderness over anterior tibial spine
  • Joint line tenderness (if meniscal injury)
  • MCL tenderness (if associated MCL injury)

Range of Motion:

  • Limited flexion (pain, effusion)
  • Limited extension (if fragment blocks)
  • Extensor lag (if extensor mechanism affected)

Ligament Testing:

  • Lachman test: Positive (anterior translation)
  • Anterior drawer: Positive (anterior translation)
  • Pivot shift: May be positive (rotational instability)
  • Valgus stress: May be positive (if MCL injured)

Clinical Examination Key Point

Lachman test is positive in tibial spine fractures (same as ACL injury). The avulsed tibial spine allows anterior tibial translation. This is why tibial spine fractures are the pediatric ACL equivalent - same instability pattern, different injury mechanism.

Associated Injuries

  • Meniscal tears: 10-20% (lateral meniscus more common)
  • MCL injuries: 5-10%
  • Bone bruises: Posterolateral tibia, lateral femoral condyle (kissing contusion)
  • Extensor mechanism: Rare (patellar tendon avulsion)

Investigations

Standard X-ray Protocol

Views: AP and lateral knee. Oblique views if needed.

Key findings:

  • Lateral view: Best for diagnosis and classification
  • Anterior elevation: Fragment elevated from tibial bed
  • Fragment size: Assess size and comminution
  • Displacement: Measure displacement (Type I less than 3mm, Type III complete)
  • Rotation: Assess fragment rotation

Lateral view is critical - shows displacement and classification.

AP view: May show fragment in intercondylar notch, but lateral is diagnostic.

Tibial spine avulsion with associated Segond fracture - 3-panel imaging
Click to expand
Tibial spine avulsion with associated Segond fracture in a 16-year-old boy following pivot-shift mechanism (3-panel figure). Panel (a): Lateral radiograph showing tibial spine avulsion fragment with white arrow indicating the associated Segond fracture (lateral tibial condyle avulsion - pathognomonic of ACL injury). Panel (b): Sagittal MRI demonstrating the tibial spine avulsion with white arrow marking the fracture site. Panel (c): Coronal MRI showing the knee joint with white arrow indicating the injury location. This combination of injuries indicates high-energy knee trauma with rotational component.Credit: Jaremko JL et al., Insights Imaging - CC BY 4.0
AP radiograph of tibial spine avulsion fracture
Click to expand
Anteroposterior (AP) radiograph of the right knee in a 13-year-old male showing tibial spine avulsion fracture. White arrow indicates the displaced tibial spine fragment at the ACL insertion site. AP view demonstrates the fracture within the intercondylar notch, though lateral view is generally more diagnostic for classifying displacement.Credit: Nunez A et al., Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med 2022 - CC BY 4.0
Lateral radiograph of tibial spine avulsion fracture
Click to expand
Lateral radiograph of the right knee showing tibial spine avulsion fracture with anterior displacement (Type II pattern). White arrow indicates the elevated tibial spine fragment hinged posteriorly with the anterior aspect lifted. The lateral view is critical for classification as it best demonstrates the degree of displacement - this case shows the characteristic anterior elevation of the fragment consistent with Meyers-McKeever Type II injury.Credit: Nunez A et al., Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med 2022 - CC BY 4.0

CT Indications

Surgical planning:

  • Assess fragment size and comminution
  • Evaluate articular involvement
  • Plan fixation strategy
  • Assess for associated fractures

3D reconstruction helpful for:

  • Complex comminution (Type IV)
  • Fragment rotation assessment
  • Preoperative planning

CT is not routine but helpful for complex cases.

MRI Indications

Associated injuries:

  • Meniscal tears (10-20%)
  • MCL injuries (5-10%)
  • Bone bruises (kissing contusion pattern)
  • Cartilage injuries

ACL assessment:

  • ACL fiber integrity (usually intact)
  • Tibial spine fragment relationship

MRI is not routine but indicated if associated injuries suspected.

Management Algorithm

Management Pathway

Tibial Spine Fracture Management

AssessmentClassify and Assess

Determine Meyers-McKeever type. Assess reducibility for Type II. Check for associated injuries (meniscus, MCL).

Type INon-Operative

Extension cast for 4-6 weeks. Non-weight bearing initially. Progressive weight bearing and ROM after cast removal.

Type IIAttempt Reduction

Try closed reduction with knee extension. If reducible and stable, cast. If blocked by intermeniscal ligament, surgical.

Type III-IVSurgical Fixation

Arthroscopic reduction and fixation (suture or screw). Open reduction if arthroscopic fails. Early ROM postoperatively.

Non-Operative Treatment

Indications:

  • Type I (minimal displacement)
  • Type II (reducible with extension, stable)

Technique:

  • Extension cast for 4-6 weeks
  • Non-weight bearing initially (2-3 weeks)
  • Progressive weight bearing (3-4 weeks)
  • ROM after cast removal

Follow-up:

  • X-ray at 2 weeks (check position)
  • X-ray at 4-6 weeks (check healing)
  • Remove cast when healed (4-6 weeks)

Outcomes: Excellent for Type I, good for reducible Type II.

Surgical Indications

Absolute:

  • Type III (complete displacement)
  • Type IV (comminuted)
  • Type II unreducible (blocked by intermeniscal ligament)

Relative:

  • Type II with persistent instability after reduction
  • Associated meniscal tear requiring repair
  • High-demand athlete

Timing: Within 1-2 weeks (allows swelling to resolve, but before fragment becomes fixed).

Surgical Technique

Gold Standard Technique

Advantages:

  • No hardware removal needed
  • Allows early ROM
  • Excellent visualization
  • Low complication rate

Patient Positioning:

  • Supine on standard table
  • Tourniquet on thigh
  • Leg holder or lateral post
  • Standard arthroscopy setup

Portals:

  • Anterolateral: Viewing portal
  • Anteromedial: Working portal
  • Superomedial: Optional outflow

Steps:

  1. Diagnostic arthroscopy (assess fragment, meniscus, cartilage)
  2. Debride intermeniscal ligament if blocking reduction
  3. Reduce fragment with probe or shaver
  4. Prepare fragment bed (debride to bleeding bone)
  5. Pass sutures through fragment (2-3 sutures)
  6. Create transosseous tunnels (2-3 tunnels, avoid physis)
  7. Pass sutures through tunnels
  8. Tie sutures over bone bridge (knee in extension)
  9. Confirm reduction and stability

Suture technique: Use No. 2 non-absorbable suture (Ethibond or Fiberwire). Pass through ACL insertion on fragment, then through transosseous tunnels.

Tunnel placement: Stay proximal to physis (2-3cm distal to joint line). Use 2-3 tunnels for stability.

Alternative: Screw Fixation

Indications:

  • Large single fragment (Type III)
  • Arthroscopic suture not feasible
  • Surgeon preference

Technique:

  • Arthroscopic or open reduction
  • Guide wire placement (fragment center)
  • Cannulated screw (3.5-4.5mm, partially threaded)
  • Countersink if needed
  • Confirm reduction and stability

Disadvantages:

  • Requires hardware removal (6-12 months)
  • Risk of fragment comminution
  • May limit ROM if prominent

Advantages:

  • Strong fixation
  • Compression across fracture
  • Familiar technique

Screw fixation is acceptable but suture fixation is preferred.

Open Reduction Internal Fixation

Indications:

  • Arthroscopic reduction fails
  • Complex comminution (Type IV)
  • Associated injuries requiring open approach

Approach:

  • Anterior midline or parapatellar
  • Retract patella laterally
  • Expose intercondylar notch
  • Reduce fragment under direct vision
  • Fix with screws or sutures

Advantages:

  • Direct visualization
  • Can handle complex patterns
  • Can address associated injuries

Disadvantages:

  • More invasive
  • Slower recovery
  • Higher complication risk

Open reduction is reserved for complex cases.

Growth Plate Protection

Avoid crossing the proximal tibial physis with fixation. The physis is 2-3cm distal to the joint line. Use transosseous tunnels that stay proximal to the physis, or use suture anchors in the tibial spine itself. Crossing the physis can cause growth disturbance (rare but devastating).

Complications

ComplicationIncidenceRisk FactorsPrevention/Management
Arthrofibrosis5-10%Delayed ROM, prolonged immobilizationEarly ROM (2-4 weeks), aggressive PT
Residual laxity10-15%Malreduction, inadequate fixationAnatomic reduction, secure fixation
NonunionLess than 5%Inadequate fixation, poor reductionSecure fixation, bone bed preparation
Growth disturbanceLess than 1%Crossing physis with fixationAvoid physis, use proximal tunnels
Hardware issues5-10% (screw)Prominent hardware, need for removalUse suture fixation to avoid removal
ArthritisLong-term riskMalreduction, persistent instabilityAnatomic reduction, restore stability

Arthrofibrosis

Most common complication (5-10%):

  • Cause: Prolonged immobilization, delayed ROM
  • Prevention: Early ROM (2-4 weeks), aggressive PT
  • Management: Manipulation under anesthesia, arthroscopic lysis of adhesions

Residual Laxity

10-15% incidence:

  • Cause: Malreduction, inadequate fixation, fragment resorption
  • Prevention: Anatomic reduction, secure fixation
  • Management: Revision fixation if symptomatic, ACL reconstruction if needed

Nonunion

Less than 5% incidence:

  • Cause: Inadequate fixation, poor reduction, fragment devascularization
  • Prevention: Secure fixation, bone bed preparation
  • Management: Revision fixation with bone graft if needed

Postoperative Care

Immediate Postoperative

  • Immobilization: Hinged knee brace locked in extension (2-4 weeks)
  • Weight bearing: Non-weight bearing initially (2-3 weeks)
  • ROM: Begin passive ROM at 2-4 weeks (unlock brace)
  • PT: Quadriceps sets, straight leg raises (immediate)

Rehabilitation Protocol

Weeks 0-2:

  • Brace locked in extension
  • Non-weight bearing
  • Quadriceps sets, straight leg raises
  • Ice and elevation

Weeks 2-4:

  • Unlock brace for ROM (0-90 degrees)
  • Progressive weight bearing (partial to full)
  • Stationary bike (when ROM allows)
  • Continue quadriceps strengthening

Weeks 4-6:

  • Full ROM
  • Full weight bearing
  • Progressive strengthening
  • Balance and proprioception

Weeks 6-12:

  • Sport-specific training
  • Return to sport (when strength and ROM normal)
  • Continue PT for 3-6 months

Return to Sport

Criteria:

  • Full ROM (equal to contralateral)
  • Quadriceps strength greater than 90% of contralateral
  • No instability (negative Lachman, pivot shift)
  • Functional testing passed (hop test, agility)

Timeline: Usually 3-6 months postoperatively.

Outcomes and Prognosis

Overall Outcomes

Excellent outcomes with proper treatment:

  • Type I-II (non-operative): 90-95% good/excellent results
  • Type III-IV (surgical): 85-95% good/excellent results
  • Long-term (5-10 years): 85-90% maintain good results

Functional Outcomes

Return to sport:

  • Timeline: 3-6 months postoperatively
  • Rate: 80-90% return to pre-injury level
  • Factors: Age, sport level, rehabilitation compliance

Long-Term Prognosis

Residual laxity:

  • 10-15% have some residual anterior laxity
  • Usually asymptomatic (does not affect function)
  • May require revision if symptomatic

Arthritis risk:

  • Low risk with proper treatment (less than 5% at 10 years)
  • Higher risk with malreduction or persistent instability
  • Proper reduction and fixation minimize risk

Growth disturbance:

  • Rare (less than 1%) with proper technique
  • Avoid crossing physis with fixation
  • Monitor until skeletal maturity if concern

Prevention and Return to Sport

Prevention

Primary prevention:

  • Proper landing technique (knee flexion, not hyperextension)
  • Strength training (quadriceps, hamstrings)
  • Balance and proprioception training
  • Sport-specific conditioning

Secondary prevention (after injury):

  • Complete rehabilitation before return to sport
  • Bracing (controversial - may not prevent reinjury)
  • Continued strength and conditioning

Return to Sport Criteria

Clinical:

  • Full ROM (equal to contralateral)
  • Quadriceps strength greater than 90% of contralateral
  • No effusion
  • No instability (negative Lachman, pivot shift)

Functional:

  • Single-leg hop test (greater than 90% of contralateral)
  • Agility testing passed
  • Sport-specific drills completed

Timeline: Usually 3-6 months postoperatively, depending on sport and level.

Evidence Base

Meyers-McKeever Classification

Classic
Meyers and McKeever • JBJS Am, 1959 (1959)
Key Findings:
  • Original classification system (Type I-III)
  • Type I-II non-operative outcomes excellent
  • Type III surgical outcomes good with proper fixation
Clinical Implication: Foundation for treatment decisions.
Limitation: Did not separate Type IV (comminuted) - added later.

Arthroscopic Suture Fixation Outcomes

Case Series
Lafrance et al • J Pediatr Orthop, 2010 (2010)
Key Findings:
  • 85-95% good/excellent outcomes with arthroscopic suture fixation
  • Low complication rate (5-10% arthrofibrosis)
  • No hardware removal needed with suture technique
Clinical Implication: Gold standard for displaced fractures.
Limitation: Retrospective case series.

Screw vs Suture Fixation

Comparative Study
Vander Have et al • J Pediatr Orthop, 2010 (2010)
Key Findings:
  • Suture fixation and screw fixation have similar outcomes
  • Suture fixation avoids hardware removal
  • Both techniques achieve 85-95% good results
Clinical Implication: Suture preferred to avoid second surgery.
Limitation: Small sample size.

Long-Term Outcomes

Longitudinal Study
Kocher et al • Am J Sports Med, 2003 (2003)
Key Findings:
  • Long-term outcomes (5-10 years): 85-90% good/excellent results
  • Residual laxity in 10-15% but usually asymptomatic
  • Low arthritis risk with proper treatment
Clinical Implication: Good prognosis with anatomic reduction.
Limitation: Single center study.

Growth Disturbance Risk

Systematic Review
Kocher et al • J Pediatr Orthop, 2002 (2002)
Key Findings:
  • Growth disturbance is rare (less than 1%)
  • Risk increased with screw fixation crossing physis
  • Suture fixation has lower risk
Clinical Implication: Respect the physis during surgery.
Limitation: Heterogeneous data.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Non-Displaced Fracture

EXAMINER

"A 10-year-old boy presents after falling off a bicycle. Knee is swollen. X-ray shows Meyers-McKeever Type I tibial spine fracture."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a non-displaced fracture (Type I). Treatment is non-operative with an extension cast for 4-6 weeks to allow healing. I would monitor with X-rays at 1-2 weeks to ensure no displacement. After 4-6 weeks, if healed, I would begin ROM and progressive weight bearing. The prognosis is excellent.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Type I = extension cast
Monitor for displacement
Excellent prognosis
COMMON TRAPS
✗Missing associated injuries (meniscus)
✗Casting in flexion (can displace fracture)
✗Allowing early weight bearing
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if it displaces to Type II in the cast?"
"How long until return to sport?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Displaced Fracture (Type III)

EXAMINER

"A 12-year-old female gymnast lands awkwardly. X-ray shows a Type III tibial spine fracture (completely displaced)."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a displaced Type III fracture, which is an indication for surgical fixation. My preferred method is arthroscopic reduction and suture fixation. This avoids crossing the physis and eliminates the need for hardware removal. I would inspect for meniscal entrapment (common block to reduction). Rehab involves early ROM but protected weight bearing.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Type III = Surgery
Arthroscopic suture fixation preferred
Check for meniscal entrapment
Avoid physis
COMMON TRAPS
✗Attempting closed reduction for Type III (rarely works)
✗Using screws crossing the physis
✗Ignoring the intermeniscal ligament block
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"Why suture over screw?"
"What is the most common complication?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Complication (Arthrofibrosis)

EXAMINER

"A patient returns 3 months after fixation of a tibial spine fracture with a 15-degree extension deficit."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is arthrofibrosis, the most common complication (5-10%). I would first initiate aggressive physical therapy for stretching and specific extension exercises. If no improvement after 6 weeks of dedicated PT, I would consider manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) and arthroscopic lysis of adhesions/notchplasty. Prevention with early ROM is key.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Arthrofibrosis is common
Aggressive PT first line
MUA/Lysis if fails
Prevention is key
COMMON TRAPS
✗Accepting the deficit (leads to limp/pain)
✗Re-operating too early (inflammatory phase)
✗Ignoring Cyclops lesion possibility
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is a Cyclops lesion?"
"How does extension deficit affect gait?"

MCQ Practice Points

Most Common Complication

Q: What is the most common complication following tibial spine fracture fixation? A: Arthrofibrosis (5-10%) - Stiffness is more common than instability or nonunion. Prevention requires early ROM.

Pathomechanics

Q: Why do children sustain tibial spine fractures instead of ACL tears? A: Bone is weaker than ligament - The cartilaginous tibial spine avulses before the collagen of the ACL fails midsubstance.

Surgical Indication

Q: What is the absolute indication for surgery in Meyers-McKeever classification? A: Type III (Complete displacement) - Also Type II if reducible but blocked by meniscus (intermeniscal ligament).

ACL Function Post-Fixation

Q: How does ACL function compare between anatomically healed tibial spine fractures and native ACL? A: Normal function expected - Studies show 95% of patients achieve normal Lachman and KT-1000 testing when healed in anatomic position.

Intermeniscal Ligament

Q: What structure may block reduction of a displaced tibial spine fracture? A: Intermeniscal ligament (transverse ligament) - It can become interposed between the fragment and its bed, preventing closed reduction.

Australian Context

AOA Guidelines:

  • Tibial spine fractures should be managed in consultation with a Paediatric Orthopaedic Surgeon.
  • High index of suspicion for associated meniscal pathology (MRI recommended if mechanical symptoms).
  • Early mobilisation (within 2-4 weeks) is encouraged to prevent stiffness, consistent with modern ACL rehabilitation protocols.

AOANJRR:

  • Not applicable for primary fixation, but relevant if failure requires late ACL reconstruction or arthroplasty (rare).

TIBIAL SPINE FRACTURES

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Concepts

  • •Pediatric ACL Equivalent
  • •Meyers-McKeever Classification
  • •Hyperextension + Valgus mechanism
  • •Lachman positive (anterior laxity)

Classification (Meyers-McKeever)

  • •Type I: Non-displaced → Extension Cast
  • •Type II: Hinge intact → Reduce/Cast or Surgery
  • •Type III: Complete → Surgery
  • •Type IV: Comminuted → Surgery

Surgical Goals

  • •Anatomic reduction
  • •Stable fixation (Suture > Screw)
  • •Avoid Physis (Growth plate protection)
  • •Early ROM (Prevent arthrofibrosis)

Complications

  • •Arthrofibrosis (Most common)
  • •Residual Laxity (Usually asymptomatic)
  • •Growth Disturbance (Rare)
  • •Nonunion (Rare)

Pearl

  • •Intermeniscal ligament often blocks reduction
  • •Lateral meniscus tear is most common associated injury
  • •Lateral X-ray is diagnostic view
  • •Arthroscopic suture fixation is gold standard
Quick Stats
Reading Time77 min
🇦🇺

FRACS Guidelines

Australia & New Zealand
  • NHMRC Guidelines
  • MBS Spine Items
Related Topics

Anterior Process Calcaneus Fractures

Basicervical Fractures

Bosworth Fracture-Dislocations

Calcaneal Tuberosity Fractures