Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

TKA Periprosthetic Joint Infection

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

TKA Periprosthetic Joint Infection

Comprehensive guide to diagnosis using MSIS criteria, management algorithm including DAIR vs 2-stage revision, and prevention strategies for periprosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty

complete
Updated: 2025-12-17
High Yield Overview

TKA PERIPROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION

Diagnostic Criteria | Treatment Algorithm | Prevention Strategies

1-2%Incidence post-primary TKA
3-5%Incidence post-revision TKA
less than 4 weeksEarly infection threshold
60-90%2-stage success rate

TEMPORAL CLASSIFICATION (TSUKAYAMA)

Type I
PatternAcute postoperative (under 4 weeks)
TreatmentDAIR + antibiotics
Type II
PatternLate chronic (over 4 weeks)
Treatment2-stage revision
Type III
PatternAcute hematogenous (over 4 weeks, acute onset)
TreatmentDAIR if under 3 weeks symptoms
Type IV
PatternPositive intraoperative cultures
TreatmentAntibiotics 6 weeks

Critical Must-Knows

  • MSIS criteria requires 1 major (sinus tract, purulence) OR 4/6 minor criteria for definite PJI
  • DAIR indications: Early infection (under 4 weeks), acute hematogenous (symptoms under 3 weeks), stable implant, non-resistant organism
  • 2-stage revision is gold standard for chronic PJI: sensitivity 90-95%, specificity 75-80% for eradication
  • Antibiotic cement spacer maintains joint space, delivers local antibiotics (4-6g vancomycin + 3-4g aminoglycoside per 40g cement)
  • Risk factors: Diabetes (OR 2.5), obesity (BMI over 30: OR 2.0), rheumatoid arthritis (OR 2.4), previous surgery (OR 3.7)

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    MSIS 2018 criteria are Orthopaedic exam standard - know the scoring system (1 major = definite, 6 points = definite, 2-5 points = possible)
  • "
    Alpha-defensin synovial fluid test: sensitivity 97%, specificity 96% for PJI diagnosis
  • "
    Antibiotic holiday: minimum 2 weeks (ideally 6 weeks) before obtaining cultures for optimal yield
  • "
    Streptococcus agalactiae (Group B Strep) is dental prophylaxis indication even in presence of prosthetic joint

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Two-stage revision for periprosthetic knee infection showing spacer stage and final reimplantation
Click to expand
Two-stage revision for chronic periprosthetic knee infection: (A) AP and lateral X-rays showing antibiotic-impregnated cement rod spacer after first-stage debridement and component removal; (B) AP and lateral X-rays after successful second-stage revision TKA reimplantation. The interval between stages is typically 6-12 weeks based on inflammatory marker normalization.Credit: Yoo J et al., Clin Orthop Surg - CC BY 4.0
Articulating cement knee spacer on postoperative X-rays
Click to expand
Postoperative AP and lateral X-rays showing articulating cement knee spacer with intramedullary femoral and tibial stems. Articulating spacers maintain joint space and allow limited knee motion during the interval period, potentially improving final range of motion compared to static spacers.Credit: PMC5288616 - CC BY 4.0

Critical PJI Exam Points

MSIS Diagnostic Criteria

1 major criterion = definite PJI. Major: sinus tract or purulence. Minor: elevated CRP/ESR, positive alpha-defensin, elevated synovial WCC/PMN%, positive culture, positive histology. Score 6 or more = definite.

DAIR Failure Predictors

KLIC score predicts DAIR failure. K: kidney disease (CrCl under 60). L: liver disease. I: immunosuppression. C: chronic infection (symptoms over 28 days). Score 0 = 12% failure, 4 = 100% failure.

Antibiotic Cement Spacer

4-6g vancomycin + 3-4g aminoglycoside per 40g cement. Maximum 10% antibiotic by weight to maintain mechanical properties. Static (block) vs articulating (mobile) - similar infection eradication, articulating better function.

Reimplantation Timing

No evidence that longer interval improves eradication. Standard: 6-12 weeks based on CRP normalization and clinical resolution. Some centres: 2-4 weeks for virulent organisms with good spacer function.

Quick Decision Guide: PJI Management

ScenarioClassificationTreatmentKey Pearl
Acute postop (under 4 weeks), stable implantType I - EarlyDAIR + organism-specific IV antibiotics 6 weeksSuccess 50-60% if under 3 weeks, organism sensitive
Acute onset (under 3 weeks), late presentation (over 4 weeks post-surgery)Type III - Acute hematogenousDAIR + antibiotics if implant stable, organism not resistantWindow of opportunity: under 3 weeks symptom duration
Chronic symptoms (over 4 weeks), unstable implant or resistant organismType II - Late chronic2-stage revision with antibiotic spacer 6-12 weeksGold standard: 90% eradication, but 2 surgeries required
High medical comorbidities, poor operative candidateSalvage scenarioResection arthroplasty OR suppressive antibioticsLast resort: arthrodesis rarely feasible in knee
Mnemonic

SPACEDMSIS Major and Minor Criteria

S
Sinus tract
Communicating with prosthesis - MAJOR criterion (definite PJI)
P
Purulence
In joint aspiration - MAJOR criterion (definite PJI)
A
Alpha-defensin positive
Synovial marker - 1 point (minor criterion)
C
CRP/ESR elevated
Serum CRP over 10 mg/L or ESR over 30 mm/hr - 1 point each
E
Elevated synovial WCC
Over 3000 cells/μL or PMN over 70% - 2 points
D
Double positive cultures
Same organism from 2+ samples - 3 points (minor)

Memory Hook:PJI diagnosis is SPACED out: 2 MAJOR criteria (Sinus, Purulence) give instant diagnosis, then score the minor criteria!

Mnemonic

STEADIDAIR Indications

S
Symptoms under 3 weeks
Acute symptom onset critical - window of opportunity
T
Timing: Early (under 4 weeks post-surgery)
OR acute hematogenous at any time if symptoms under 3 weeks
E
Eradicable organism
Sensitive to biofilm-penetrating antibiotics (avoid MRSA, fungi)
A
Articulating surfaces intact
No polyethylene damage or gross contamination
D
Definitely stable implant
No loosening on radiographs or intraoperatively
I
Immunocompetent host
Avoid DAIR in immunosuppressed, high KLIC score

Memory Hook:Keep it STEADI for DAIR success - timing, organism, and implant stability are everything!

Mnemonic

STOP-PJIPrevention Bundle Components

S
Screening for S. aureus
Nasal decolonization with mupirocin reduces infection 50%
T
Timely antibiotic prophylaxis
Cefazolin 2g (3g if over 120kg) within 60 minutes of incision
O
Optimize medical comorbidities
HbA1c under 7%, BMI reduction, smoking cessation
P
Prepare skin meticulously
Chlorhexidine-alcohol prep, clipping (not shaving)
P
Perioperative normothermia
Maintain body temperature over 36°C reduces infection 30%
J
Joint manipulation gentle
Minimize operative time, gentle tissue handling
I
Implant antibiotic cement
Consider in high-risk patients (revision, immunosuppressed)

Memory Hook:STOP-PJI before it starts - prevention is better than 2-stage revision cure!

Overview and Epidemiology

Why PJI Matters

Periprosthetic joint infection is the most devastating complication following TKA. It represents 25% of all revision TKA burden in Australia (AOANJRR 2023), with higher mortality than hip fracture at 1 year (7% vs 4%). The economic burden is enormous: 2-stage revision costs approximately $100,000-150,000 AUD, with prolonged disability averaging 6-12 months from diagnosis to full recovery. Success rates plateau at 60-90% infection eradication depending on organism and host factors, meaning 10-40% face salvage procedures (resection arthroplasty, arthrodesis, or amputation).

Demographics and Incidence

  • Primary TKA: 1-2% infection rate
  • Revision TKA: 3-5% infection rate
  • Bimodal distribution: Early (under 3 months) vs late (over 2 years)
  • Mean age at diagnosis: 68 years (range 45-85)
  • Male predominance: 1.4:1 (conflicting data - some show female predominance)
  • Increasing incidence: Absolute numbers rising with TKA volume growth

Economic and Social Impact

  • Hospital costs: $100,000-150,000 AUD per 2-stage revision
  • Extended LOS: 10-14 days first stage, 7-10 days second stage
  • Lost productivity: 6-12 months total recovery time
  • Re-infection rate: 10-30% require further revision
  • Litigation risk: 15% of PJI cases result in medicolegal action
  • Mortality: 1-year mortality 7% (higher than hip fracture)

Pathophysiology and Microbiology

Biofilm Formation

The hallmark of PJI is bacterial biofilm formation on the prosthetic surface. This occurs in stages:

  1. Attachment (0-4 hours): Bacteria adhere to implant surface via adhesins
  2. Accumulation (4-24 hours): Microcolony formation with extracellular matrix production
  3. Maturation (1-7 days): Three-dimensional biofilm structure with nutrient channels
  4. Detachment (ongoing): Planktonic bacteria shed from biofilm to colonize new areas

Clinical significance: Biofilm bacteria are 100-1000x more resistant to antibiotics than planktonic forms. Minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) exceeds achievable systemic antibiotic levels for most organisms, necessitating implant removal for chronic infection.

Antibiotic Failure in Biofilm

Biofilm-protected bacteria resist host immunity and antibiotics. This explains why DAIR fails in chronic infection (over 4 weeks): mature biofilm cannot be eradicated with antibiotics alone. Only fresh biofilm (under 3 weeks) or acute contamination (under 4 weeks post-surgery) has sufficient antibiotic susceptibility for retention strategies. Beyond this window, implant removal is mandatory for infection clearance.

Microbiology Profile

OrganismFrequencyVirulenceTreatment Considerations
Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA)30-40%High virulence, acute presentationDAIR possible if early. Rifampicin + flucloxacillin biofilm penetration
MRSA (Methicillin-resistant S. aureus)5-15%High virulence, resistantDAIR contraindicated. Vancomycin + rifampicin. Higher failure rates
Coagulase-negative Staph (CNS)25-35%Low virulence, chronic/lateOften antibiotic-resistant. 2-stage usually required
Streptococcus species8-12%Moderate virulenceDAIR success higher if acute. Penicillin-based therapy
Gram-negative (E. coli, P. aeruginosa)5-10%Variable, often nosocomialFluoroquinolone + rifampicin. P. aeruginosa difficult to eradicate
Polymicrobial10-15%High biofilm burdenPoor prognosis. 2-stage mandatory
Culture-negative5-10%Unknown organismBroad-spectrum empiric therapy. Consider biofilm dispersal agents

Antibiotic Holiday Critical for Culture Yield

Minimum 2 weeks antibiotic-free interval (ideally 6 weeks) before obtaining cultures is essential for optimal organism identification. Antibiotics suppress planktonic bacterial release from biofilm without eradicating infection, leading to false-negative cultures in 30-40% if obtained on antibiotics. However, in acutely unwell patients, cultures should be obtained urgently without waiting, as organism identification guides definitive treatment even if delayed.

Classification Systems

Tsukayama Classification (Most Clinically Useful)

Based on timing and presentation, which guides treatment selection.

TypeDefinitionTreatmentSuccess Rate
Type I: Early PostoperativeUnder 4 weeks post-surgeryDAIR + antibiotics 6 weeks50-70% if under 3 weeks, organism sensitive
Type II: Late ChronicOver 4 weeks post-surgery2-stage revision85-90% eradication with 2-stage
Type III: Acute HematogenousAcute onset (under 3 weeks symptoms) in previously well-functioning TKADAIR if under 3 weeks symptoms, stable implant, sensitive organism60-75% if window under 3 weeks, drops to 30% if over 3 weeks
Type IV: Positive IntraoperativeUnexpected positive cultures during aseptic revisionOrganism-specific antibiotics 6 weeks (no implant removal if stable)90% success if single organism, low virulence

Type III Window of Opportunity

Type III (acute hematogenous) PJI is time-critical. DAIR success is 75% if symptoms under 3 weeks, but drops to 30% if over 3 weeks symptom duration. This is independent of time since index surgery - even a 5-year-old TKA with acute onset (fell, developed pain/fever/effusion, presenting 2 weeks later) qualifies for DAIR if symptom duration is under 3 weeks. Examiners may ask: "TKA 5 years ago, 2-week history of pain - DAIR or 2-stage?" Answer: "Depends on symptom duration and implant stability - if truly acute onset under 3 weeks and stable implant, DAIR is reasonable. If insidious onset suggesting chronic smoldering infection, 2-stage preferred."

This classification guides treatment pathways better than alternatives.

McPherson Classification (Stratifies by Host and Limb Factors)

Used for prognosis and treatment intensity decisions.

Host Grade:

  • A (Healthy): Normal immune function, no comorbidities, good nutrition
  • B (Compromised): Diabetes, smoking, obesity, immunosuppression, malnutrition
  • C (Severe compromise): Active systemic sepsis, severe immunosuppression, extremes of age

Limb Grade:

  • 1 (Minor): Adequate soft tissue coverage, good vascularity
  • 2 (Moderate): Compromised soft tissue, marginal vascularity
  • 3 (Severe): Major soft tissue loss, vascular insufficiency

Treatment Implications:

  • A1: Standard 2-stage protocol, high success
  • B2: Extended antibiotics, possible muscle flap coverage
  • C3: Consider salvage (resection, suppression) - poor candidate for reconstruction

This classification is useful for counseling patients about realistic expectations.

Clinical Assessment

History Taking

Key History Elements

Timeline:

  • Time since index surgery (early under 4 weeks vs late over 4 weeks)
  • Symptom onset (acute under 3 weeks vs insidious chronic)
  • Ever pain-free postoperatively? (No = concerning for persistent infection)

Symptoms:

  • Pain: Constant vs activity-related. Night pain (infection hallmark)
  • Swelling: Progressive effusion
  • Warmth/erythema: Local inflammation
  • Drainage: Persistent wound drainage over 7 days (high PJI risk)
  • Systemic: Fever, chills, night sweats (acute infection)

Function:

  • Sudden loss of function after good initial recovery (suggests acute infection)
  • Never achieved good function (suggests early chronic infection)

Risk Factor Assessment

Patient factors:

  • Diabetes (HbA1c current and perioperative)
  • Obesity (BMI at surgery)
  • Immunosuppression (steroids, biologics, chemotherapy)
  • Smoking status
  • Rheumatoid arthritis or inflammatory arthritis
  • Previous joint surgery (infection risk OR 3.7)
  • Chronic kidney disease, liver disease

Perioperative factors:

  • Wound complications (dehiscence, hematoma, prolonged drainage)
  • Postoperative blood transfusion
  • Return to OR for any reason under 90 days
  • Recent bacteremia (dental, urinary, skin infection)

Red Flags for PJI

Any of these findings require urgent investigation for PJI:

  • Persistent wound drainage over 7 days post-surgery
  • Acute onset pain in previously well-functioning TKA (acute hematogenous)
  • Never pain-free after surgery (early chronic infection)
  • Systemic symptoms: Fever, rigors, sepsis
  • Sinus tract: Visible drainage from wound to joint (pathognomonic for PJI)
  • Rapid onset stiffness with loss of previously achieved range of motion

Physical Examination

Systematic Examination

LookInspection

Wound:

  • Erythema (diffuse vs localized)
  • Swelling (effusion vs soft tissue edema)
  • Sinus tract or draining wound (MAJOR criterion if communicates with prosthesis)
  • Surgical scars (assess healing, any dehiscence)

Limb:

  • Leg alignment (varus/valgus deformity suggests loosening)
  • Muscle wasting (chronic infection impairs function)
  • Skin changes (chronic venous stasis, dependent rubor)
FeelPalpation

Local temperature: Warmth over joint (compare to contralateral)

Effusion: Moderate to large effusion common in PJI (but also aseptic loosening)

Tenderness: Diffuse joint line tenderness (infection) vs focal (mechanical)

Lymphadenopathy: Inguinal nodes may be enlarged in chronic infection

MoveMovement

Range of motion:

  • Active and passive ROM (stiffness suggests infection or arthrofibrosis)
  • Painful arc or end-range pain
  • Loss of ROM compared to prior assessments (concerning for infection)

Stability:

  • Varus/valgus stress (loosening vs intact collaterals)
  • Anteroposterior drawer (implant stability)

Crepitus: Suggests polyethylene wear or loosening (not specific for infection)

CriticalNeurovascular

Neurovascular assessment:

  • Pulses (dorsalis pedis, posterior tibial)
  • Sensation (common peroneal nerve distribution - dorsal foot)
  • Motor (ankle dorsiflexion - common peroneal; plantarflexion - tibial)

Systemic examination:

  • Temperature (fever in acute infection)
  • Signs of sepsis (tachycardia, hypotension, confusion in severe cases)

Differentiating PJI from Aseptic Loosening

Examiners often ask: "How do you clinically distinguish infection from aseptic loosening?"

Answer: "Clinical differentiation is difficult - both present with pain and effusion. However, infection tends to have:

  • (1) Earlier onset (within 2 years) vs aseptic loosening (over 5 years typically)
  • (2) Acute or subacute symptoms (weeks) vs insidious chronic pain (months to years)
  • (3) Systemic features (fever, night sweats) vs purely mechanical symptoms
  • (4) Constant pain including night pain vs activity-related pain relieved by rest
  • (5) Warmth and erythema over joint vs normal overlying skin

However, definitive diagnosis requires MSIS criteria with serology, aspiration, and imaging. I maintain low threshold for aspiration in any painful TKA - better to over-investigate than miss infection. Clinical suspicion guides investigation, not diagnosis."

Investigations

The investigative approach follows a stepwise protocol from serum markers to imaging to aspiration, culminating in intraoperative sampling if surgery is required.

Diagnostic Investigation Protocol

First LineSerum Inflammatory Markers

Tests to order:

  • CRP (threshold over 10 mg/L = 1 MSIS point)
  • ESR (threshold over 30 mm/hr = 1 MSIS point)
  • D-dimer (threshold over 860 ng/mL = 2 MSIS points) - ICM 2018 addition
  • WCC (usually normal unless acute severe infection)

Interpretation:

  • Sensitivity: CRP 80%, ESR 75%, D-dimer 89%
  • Specificity: CRP 70%, ESR 65%, D-dimer 65%
  • Non-specific: Elevated in inflammatory arthritis, recent surgery, obesity
  • Normal CRP does NOT exclude PJI: 20% of chronic low-virulence CNS infections have normal CRP

Serial markers: Trend more useful than single value (rising CRP concerning even if under 10)

BaselineRadiographic Assessment

Plain radiographs (AP, lateral, skyline views):

  • Lucency: Greater than 2mm periprosthetic lucency (suggests loosening, may be septic or aseptic)
  • Progressive lucency: Serial films showing widening (infection or loosening)
  • Periosteal reaction: New bone formation along femoral or tibial cortex (chronic infection)
  • Subsidence: Component migration (loosening - cause unclear without aspiration)
  • Sensitivity: 50% only (late finding)

Utility: Rules out obvious loosening/osteolysis but does NOT diagnose infection

Gold Standard Pre-opJoint Aspiration

Critical preparatory step: Antibiotic holiday minimum 2 weeks (ideally 6 weeks) before aspiration

Technique:

  • Sterile prep (chlorhexidine, drape)
  • Approach: Lateral or superolateral (avoids suprapatellar pouch - better yield)
  • Volume: Aspirate minimum 3-5 mL for adequate culture and cell count
  • Send: Cell count/differential, culture (aerobic + anaerobic + fungal if immunosuppressed, hold 14 days), alpha-defensin, leukocyte esterase

Synovial fluid analysis (MSIS scoring):

  • WCC over 3000 cells/μL = 2 points
  • PMN over 70% = 1 point (do NOT double-score with WCC - count only WCC 2 points)
  • Alpha-defensin positive = 3 points (best single marker: 97% sens, 96% spec)
  • Leukocyte esterase ++ = 3 points (point-of-care, + = 2 points)

Culture yield: 65-90% sensitivity (higher if adequate antibiotic holiday)

Dry tap: If aspiration yields no fluid, consider saline injection (5-10mL sterile saline, agitate knee, re-aspirate) to lavage joint and improve yield

AdjunctAdvanced Imaging

Nuclear medicine:

  • Bone scan (Tc-99m MDP): Sensitive (90%) but non-specific (50%) - positive in infection AND aseptic loosening
  • Labeled WBC scan (In-111 or Tc-99m HMPAO): 85% sensitivity, 80% specificity for infection
  • Combined WBC + sulfur colloid: Improves specificity to 85% (photopenic mismatch suggests infection)

PET-CT:

  • Emerging modality
  • Sensitivity 85-95%, specificity 80-90%
  • Expensive, limited availability
  • Useful if aspiration non-diagnostic and high clinical suspicion

MRI: Limited by metal artifact. MARS (metal artifact reduction sequences) may help assess soft tissue but does NOT reliably diagnose PJI

DefinitiveIntraoperative Sampling

Sample collection protocol:

  • Minimum 5-6 tissue samples from different sites (capsule, bone-implant interface, femoral canal, tibial plateau, medial gutter, lateral gutter)
  • Avoid superficial tissue (contamination risk)
  • Send for: Aerobic culture, anaerobic culture, fungal culture (if immunosuppressed), permanent histology
  • Hold cultures 14 days for slow-growing organisms

Frozen section histology:

  • Threshold: Over 5 PMN/hpf in 5 high-power fields at 400x magnification = positive for infection
  • Sensitivity 80-85%, specificity 90-95%
  • Result in 20-30 minutes - allows intraoperative decision (proceed with reimplantation vs abort)

Permanent histology:

  • Type II/III interface membrane (lymphocytic infiltration with PMN predominance)
  • More sensitive than frozen section but delayed result (3-5 days)
  • Useful for confirmation if frozen section borderline

Intraoperative purulence: MAJOR criterion (definite PJI) - if frankly purulent fluid/tissue encountered, infection confirmed regardless of cultures

Diagnostic Criteria: MSIS 2018 Definition

The Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) 2018 criteria are the international standard for PJI diagnosis. The Orthopaedic examiners expect fluency with this scoring system.

Diagnostic Framework

DEFINITE infection if any of:

  • 1 Major criterion present, OR
  • Score 6 or greater from minor criteria, OR
  • ICM 2018: Minor criteria score 2-5 = Possible infection (treat as infection if clinical suspicion high)

Major Criteria (Either = Definite PJI)

Sinus Tract

Communicating sinus tract from skin to prosthesis confirmed by:

  • Direct visualization at surgery
  • Sinogram/fistulogram demonstrating connection
  • Probing to prosthesis through skin wound

Specificity 100% - pathognomonic for infection.

Purulence

Gross purulence in:

  • Joint aspiration (pre-op)
  • Intraoperative tissue/fluid

Must be purulent appearance (not just turbid). Examiner may ask: "What if cloudy but not frankly purulent?" Answer: Score as minor criteria (elevated WCC/PMN).

Minor Criteria Scoring System

TestThresholdPointsNotes
Serum CRPGreater than 10 mg/L1 pointNon-specific. Elevated in 80% PJI but also inflammatory arthritis
Serum D-dimerGreater than 860 ng/mL2 pointsHigh sensitivity (89%) but low specificity (65%). Added in ICM 2018
ESRGreater than 30 mm/hr1 pointNon-specific. Less useful than CRP
Synovial WCCGreater than 3000 cells/μL2 pointsLower threshold if chronic (3000) vs acute (10,000). TKA: 3000 is standard
Synovial PMN%Greater than 70%1 pointPolymorphonuclear cell predominance. Counts as same test as WCC (do not double-score)
Alpha-defensinPositive (signal-to-cutoff ratio over 1.0)3 points97% sensitivity, 96% specificity. Best single synovial marker
Leukocyte esterase++3 pointsPoint-of-care test. Positive (++) = 3 points, + = 2 points
Positive cultureSame organism from 2 or more samples3 pointsSingle positive = 2 points. Virulent organisms (S. aureus) = 2 points if single culture
HistologyGreater than 5 PMN/hpf in 5 hpf (400x)3 pointsIntraoperative frozen section or permanent. Type II/III interface membrane

Scoring Example for Exam

Viva scenario: 72-year-old, TKA 18 months ago, 3-week history knee pain and effusion. CRP 45, ESR 55, synovial WCC 8000, PMN 85%, alpha-defensin positive, culture negative.

Answer: "This meets MSIS criteria for definite PJI with score of 9 points: CRP over 10 (1 point), ESR over 30 (1 point), synovial WCC over 3000 (2 points), PMN over 70% (1 point - note we do not double-score WCC and PMN, count only WCC 2 points), alpha-defensin positive (3 points). Total = 1 + 1 + 2 + 3 = 7 points, which exceeds threshold of 6 for definite infection. I would proceed with treatment for PJI despite negative cultures - likely prior antibiotic exposure."

Common trap: Students double-count synovial WCC and PMN%. Only count the WCC (2 points) when both are positive.

Investigations Protocol

Diagnostic Workup Sequence

First LineSerum Markers

Blood tests:

  • CRP (threshold over 10 mg/L)
  • ESR (threshold over 30 mm/hr)
  • D-dimer (threshold over 860 ng/mL) - ICM 2018 addition
  • WCC (usually normal unless acute severe infection)

Sensitivity: CRP 80%, ESR 75%, D-dimer 89% Specificity: CRP 70%, ESR 65%, D-dimer 65%

Interpretation: Elevated markers increase suspicion but are non-specific. Normal CRP does not exclude PJI (20% of chronic PJI have normal CRP, especially low-virulence CNS).

Gold Standard Pre-opJoint Aspiration

Technique:

  • Lateral or superolateral approach to avoid suprapatellar pouch (higher yield)
  • Send: Cell count/differential, culture (aerobic + anaerobic, hold 14 days), alpha-defensin
  • Volume: Minimum 3-5 mL for adequate culture yield

Antibiotic holiday: Minimum 2 weeks off antibiotics (ideally 6 weeks)

Synovial fluid analysis:

  • WCC over 3000 cells/μL = 2 points
  • PMN over 70% = 1 point (do not double-score with WCC)
  • Alpha-defensin positive = 3 points (best single marker: 97% sensitivity, 96% specificity)

Culture yield: 65-90% sensitivity (higher if off antibiotics 6 weeks)

AdjunctImaging

Plain radiographs:

  • Progressive periprosthetic lucency (over 2mm or progressive)
  • Periosteal reaction
  • Component subsidence or migration
  • Sensitivity 50% (late finding)

Nuclear medicine:

  • Bone scan: Sensitive (90%) but non-specific (50%)
  • Labeled WBC scan + sulfur colloid: 90% sensitivity, 85% specificity for PJI
  • PET-CT: Emerging, 85-95% sensitivity but expensive

MRI: Limited by metal artifact. Consider MARS (metal artifact reduction) sequences.

DefinitiveIntraoperative Sampling

Sample collection:

  • Minimum 3-5 tissue samples from different sites (capsule, interface, bone)
  • Avoid superficial tissue (contamination risk)
  • Send for culture (aerobic, anaerobic, fungal if immunosuppressed) AND histology

Frozen section:

  • Over 5 PMN/hpf in 5 hpf at 400x = positive for infection
  • Sensitivity 80-85%, specificity 90-95%
  • Result in 20-30 minutes intraoperatively

Permanent histology:

  • Type II/III interface membrane (lymphocytic infiltration)
  • More sensitive than frozen section but delayed result

Management Algorithm

Treatment Selection Framework

DAIR Protocol

Concept: Aggressive surgical debridement + biofilm-active antibiotics while retaining stable implant.

Indications (ALL must be met):

  1. Timing: Early postoperative (under 4 weeks) OR acute hematogenous with symptom duration under 3 weeks
  2. Implant stability: Well-fixed components, no loosening
  3. Tissue quality: Intact polyethylene, no gross contamination, viable soft tissue
  4. Organism: Susceptible to biofilm-penetrating antibiotics (avoid MRSA, fungi, resistant GNR)
  5. Host: Immunocompetent, low KLIC score (under 3)

KLIC Score Predicts DAIR Failure

KLIC score is the best validated tool for DAIR failure prediction:

  • K: Kidney disease (CrCl under 60 mL/min) = 1 point
  • L: Liver disease (cirrhosis) = 1 point
  • I: Immunosuppression (steroids, biologics, chemotherapy) = 1 point
  • C: Chronic infection (symptom duration over 28 days) = 1 point

Outcomes:

  • Score 0: 12% failure rate at 1 year
  • Score 1-2: 30-50% failure rate
  • Score 3-4: 80-100% failure rate

Application: KLIC score 3 or greater is relative contraindication to DAIR - consider 2-stage even if early presentation.

DAIR Surgical Steps

Step 1Debridement

Radical synovectomy:

  • Remove ALL synovium (anterior, posterior, medial, lateral compartments)
  • Debride interface membrane around components
  • Remove cement if gross contamination visible
  • Excise any devitalized tissue or hematoma

Polyethylene exchange:

  • Mandatory exchange of modular polyethylene insert
  • New insert from sterile tray (not re-sterilized used insert)
  • Consider exchange of femoral component if modular cemented (controversial)
Step 2Irrigation

Volume: Minimum 6-9 liters normal saline pulsed lavage

Technique:

  • Pulsed lavage to mechanically disrupt biofilm
  • Avoid high-pressure jet (drives bacteria into bone)
  • Change gloves, instruments after debridement before irrigation

No chlorhexidine, betadine, or antibiotic solutions (cytotoxic to tissue, no proven benefit).

Step 3Closure and Drain

Closure:

  • Layered closure (capsule, subcutaneous, skin)
  • No dead space

Drain:

  • Consider closed suction drain for 24-48 hours
  • Some evidence: Prolonged drainage (over 7 days) increases reinfection risk - remove early
Step 4Antibiotics

Empiric (until cultures result):

  • Vancomycin 15-20 mg/kg IV q12h (target trough 15-20 μg/mL)
  • PLUS meropenem 1g IV q8h OR ceftazidime 2g IV q8h

Organism-specific (adjust based on culture):

  • MSSA: Flucloxacillin 2g IV q6h + rifampicin 300-450mg PO q12h
  • MRSA: Vancomycin (as above) + rifampicin
  • Streptococcus: Penicillin G 3 million units IV q4h OR ceftriaxone 2g IV q24h
  • GNR: Fluoroquinolone (ciprofloxacin 750mg PO q12h) + rifampicin (if E. coli, not Pseudomonas)

Duration:

  • IV antibiotics: 2-6 weeks (debate ongoing - some centers 2 weeks, others 6 weeks)
  • Oral suppression: 3-6 months with biofilm-active agent (rifampicin-based combinations)

Rifampicin importance: Penetrates biofilm, active against stationary-phase bacteria. NEVER use as monotherapy (resistance develops rapidly). Always combine with flucloxacillin, vancomycin, or fluoroquinolone.

Polyethylene Exchange is Mandatory

ALWAYS exchange modular polyethylene during DAIR. Studies show 50% reduction in failure rate with insert exchange. The biofilm on polyethylene cannot be adequately debrided, and bacteria within the polyethylene matrix (absorbed during sterilization and implantation) serve as a reservoir for reinfection. This is non-negotiable even if insert appears pristine. Examiners may ask: "The insert looks perfect - do you still exchange it?" Answer: "Yes, absolutely. Biofilm on polyethylene is invisible and impossible to eradicate with debridement alone. Exchange is mandatory for any chance of DAIR success."

Success Rates:

  • Early infection (under 4 weeks): 50-70%
  • Acute hematogenous (under 3 weeks symptoms): 60-75%
  • S. aureus: 45-60% (lower than Strep)
  • Streptococcus: 70-85% (best prognosis)
  • GNR/Polymicrobial: 30-50% (poor prognosis)

DAIR is a single-stage retention strategy but has lower success than 2-stage revision.

Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty (Gold Standard)

Concept: Remove infected components, place antibiotic cement spacer, treat systemically, reimplant new prosthesis after infection eradication.

Intraoperative first stage of two-stage revision for infected TKA
Click to expand
First-stage surgical technique for infected TKA: (a) Exposure revealing infected prosthesis with surrounding inflamed synovium; (b) Bone bed after complete component and cement removal with intramedullary stems visible; (c) Customized articulating antibiotic-loaded cement spacer in situ. Radical debridement and complete foreign material removal are essential for infection eradication.Credit: PMC5288616 - CC BY 4.0

Indications:

  • Chronic infection (symptom duration over 4 weeks)
  • DAIR failure
  • Resistant organisms (MRSA, VRE, fungi)
  • Loose implants at presentation
  • Immunosuppressed host with high KLIC score

Success Rate: 85-90% infection eradication, but requires 2 surgeries and 6-12 weeks interval.

Stage 1: Explantation and Spacer

Step 1Implant Removal

Technique:

  • Remove ALL foreign material (components, cement, sutures, cerclage wires)
  • Use cement extraction tools, high-speed burr, osteotomes
  • Preserve bone stock: Avoid aggressive bone removal unless grossly infected

Tissue sampling:

  • 5-6 samples from capsule, bone-implant interface, femoral canal, tibial plateau
  • Send for aerobic, anaerobic, fungal culture (hold 14 days)
  • Send for histology (frozen section + permanent)
Step 2Debridement

Radical debridement:

  • Remove ALL synovium, interface membrane, granulation tissue
  • Curette bone surfaces to expose bleeding bone
  • Excise any necrotic or devitalized tissue
  • Pulsed lavage 9-12 liters normal saline
Step 3Antibiotic Cement Spacer

Spacer type:

  • Static (block) spacer: Block of antibiotic cement, NO articulation
  • Articulating (mobile) spacer: Knee-shaped mold or commercial system (PROSTALAC, Spacer-K)

Comparison:

  • Infection eradication: Equal (both 85-90%)
  • Function: Articulating better range of motion, easier mobilization
  • Bone loss: Static has more bone loss from immobilization
  • Cost: Articulating more expensive (commercial systems $3000-5000)

Australian practice: Articulating spacers preferred in mobile patients due to better function and reduced bone loss during interval.

Antibiotic cement formulation:

  • Base: 40g Palacos R cement (PMMA)
  • Vancomycin: 4-6g (4g standard, 6g if MRSA or high bacterial load)
  • Aminoglycoside: 3-4g tobramycin OR 3.6g gentamicin
  • Maximum 10% antibiotic by weight to maintain mechanical strength

Rationale: Vancomycin (Gram-positive coverage) + aminoglycoside (Gram-negative + synergy). Achieves local concentrations 100x higher than systemic antibiotics, overcomes biofilm MIC.

Technique:

  • Mix antibiotics into cement powder before adding liquid monomer
  • Hand-mold or use commercial mold for articulating spacer
  • Insert into femoral and tibial bone with gentle pressurization
  • Allow full polymerization (10 minutes) before closure
Step 4Closure

Standard closure:

  • Layered closure, closed suction drain 48 hours
  • Splint in extension or slight flexion (articulating spacer allows early ROM)

Weight-bearing: Touch weight-bearing with walker (spacer is NOT designed for full load)

Patient function with articulating knee spacer during interval period
Click to expand
Functional outcomes with articulating cement spacer: (a) Patient demonstrating knee flexion while sitting - articulating spacers maintain some joint motion during the interval period; (b) Patient ambulating with walker during spacer phase. Articulating spacers allow limited weight-bearing and range of motion exercises, potentially improving final outcomes after reimplantation.Credit: PMC5288616 - CC BY 4.0

Spacer Antibiotics: Why Vancomycin + Aminoglycoside?

Examiner question: "Why not just use organism-specific antibiotic in spacer?"

Answer: "Spacer antibiotics are chosen for broad spectrum and elution kinetics, not just organism coverage. Vancomycin covers MRSA and resistant Gram-positives (most common PJI organisms). Aminoglycosides provide Gram-negative coverage AND synergize with vancomycin against Staph. Additionally, aminoglycosides elute rapidly (peak release 24-48 hours, achieving high local concentration), while vancomycin elutes more slowly (sustained release over 6-12 weeks). This dual kinetic profile maximizes biofilm eradication. Even if organism is known MSSA sensitive to flucloxacillin, we still use vancomycin + tobramycin in spacer for reliability and spectrum, while giving organism-specific IV therapy systemically."

Stage 1 to Stage 2 Interval:

  • Standard: 6-12 weeks
  • Shorter (2-4 weeks): Some centers for Staph aureus with good response
  • Longer (over 12 weeks): Fungi, resistant organisms, immunosuppressed host

Interval antibiotics:

  • Organism-specific IV antibiotics for 6 weeks (some centers 2-4 weeks)
  • Consider antibiotic holiday (2 weeks off antibiotics before reimplantation) to assess for recurrence

Criteria for Stage 2 Reimplantation:

  1. Clinical resolution: No pain, swelling, erythema, drainage
  2. Inflammatory markers normalized: CRP under 10 mg/L (some accept under 20 if downtrending)
  3. Aspiration of spacer (controversial):
    • Some centers: Mandatory aspiration before Stage 2
    • Others: No routine aspiration (false-positive rate 10-20% due to spacer irritation)
    • Australian practice variable - trend is NO routine aspiration if clinical/serologic resolution
  4. Adequate soft tissue coverage: No open wounds, good skin quality
  5. Patient medically optimized: HbA1c under 7%, adequate nutrition (albumin over 3.5)

These criteria reduce Stage 2 reinfection risk from 15% to under 5%.

Stage 2: Reimplantation Surgery

Reimplantation Procedure

Step 1Spacer Removal

Approach:

  • Same incision as Stage 1 (excise prior scar)
  • Careful dissection to preserve extensor mechanism
  • Remove spacer (may be adherent to bone - use gentle osteotomes)

Tissue sampling:

  • 3-5 intraoperative cultures from synovium, bone surfaces
  • Frozen section histology
  • If positive cultures or over 5 PMN/hpf: ABORT reimplantation, place new spacer, extended antibiotics
Step 2Debridement and Preparation

Debridement:

  • Remove residual spacer cement fragments
  • Synovectomy of any granulation tissue
  • Lavage 6-9 liters pulsed irrigation

Bone preparation:

  • Often bone loss from infection and spacer interval
  • May require stems (femoral and tibial) for stability
  • Consider augments (blocks, wedges) for metaphyseal defects
Step 3Revision Implants

Implant selection:

  • Constrained condylar knee (CCK): Most common for PJI revisions (MCL/LCL deficiency from debridement)
  • Rotating hinge: If severe bone loss, collateral deficiency, or extensor lag
  • Stems: Long cemented stems (100-120mm) for stability in weakened bone
  • Augments: Metal blocks or wedges for metaphyseal bone loss

Cemented vs uncemented:

  • Cemented preferred in revision after PJI: Allows antibiotic cement use
  • Antibiotic cement: Vancomycin 2g per 40g cement (lower dose than spacer, to preserve mechanical strength)
  • Some controversy: Antibiotic cement at reimplantation reduces reinfection 10% vs 15% (marginal benefit)

Technique:

  • Cement pressurization with stem centralizers
  • Ensure adequate cement mantle (2-3mm)
  • No tourniquet during cementation (optimize cement interdigitation)
Step 4Soft Tissue and Closure

Soft tissue challenges:

  • Scarring from multiple surgeries
  • Extensor mechanism may be attenuated
  • Consider gastrocnemius flap if inadequate soft tissue coverage
  • Skin closure: May require plastic surgery involvement for complex cases

Closure:

  • Layered closure, closed suction drain 48 hours
  • Knee immobilizer or hinged brace for 6 weeks (protect extensor mechanism)
Step 5Postoperative Antibiotics

Duration debate:

  • Option 1: Organism-specific IV antibiotics 6 weeks (traditional)
  • Option 2: No postoperative antibiotics if negative intraoperative cultures (emerging practice)
  • Australian practice: Variable - many centers give 2-4 weeks organism-specific if cultures negative intraoperatively, 6 weeks if positive

Rationale for NO antibiotics: Stage 2 is a "clean" revision if infection eradicated. Prolonged antibiotics may increase C. difficile risk and antibiotic resistance without proven benefit.

Rationale FOR antibiotics: "Margin of safety" in high-risk host, resistant organisms, or positive intraoperative cultures (even if deemed contamination).

Outcomes:

  • Infection eradication: 85-90% at 5 years
  • Reinfection: 10-15% (half are new organism, half recurrence)
  • Function: Knee Society Score 70-80 (lower than primary TKA)
  • Range of motion: Average 90-100 degrees (limited by scarring, constraint)
  • Complication rate: 20-30% (extensor lag, stiffness, instability)

Despite challenges, 2-stage remains the most reliable method for chronic PJI eradication.

Salvage Procedures (When Reconstruction Fails)

Reserved for multiple failed revisions, uncontrolled infection, or poor surgical candidate.

OptionIndicationsOutcomesConsiderations
Resection Arthroplasty (Girdlestone of knee)Failed multiple 2-stage revisions, immunosuppressed, uncontrolled sepsisInfection control 90%, but poor function. Leg shortening 3-5cm, requires brace/crutchesOften permanent - reimplantation rarely feasible after resection. Quality of life poor
Arthrodesis (knee fusion)Young patient, failed revisions, good bone stock, infection controlledInfection resolution 95%. Functional but stiff knee. Ambulates without aidsTechnically difficult in knee (long lever arm). Requires intramedullary nail or external fixator. Fusion rate 70-85%
Chronic suppressive antibioticsPoor surgical candidate, organism susceptible to oral antibiotics, infection controlled but not eradicatedSuppresses symptoms in 60-80%. Requires lifelong antibiotics. Side effects (GI, resistance, C. diff)Not curative. Risk of resistance development (30% at 5 years). Requires low-virulence organism (CNS, Strep)
Above-knee amputationLife-threatening sepsis uncontrolled by debridement, necrotizing soft tissue infection, severe bone/soft tissue lossMortality 10-15%. Prosthetic ambulation 50%. Last resortReserved for limb-threatening or life-threatening scenarios. Patient often devastated psychologically

Suppressive Antibiotics: Not a Long-term Solution

Chronic suppressive antibiotics are temporizing, NOT curative. Used in patients who are poor surgical candidates (severe comorbidities, limited life expectancy) or refuse further surgery. Requirements: (1) Low-virulence organism sensitive to oral antibiotics (CNS, Streptococcus - NOT MRSA or GNR), (2) Biofilm-active agent (rifampicin, fluoroquinolone), (3) Stable implant (loosening will fail suppression). Patients must understand: (a) Lifelong antibiotics required, (b) 30% develop resistance at 5 years requiring alternative agents, (c) Side effects are common (GI upset, C. difficile, tendon rupture with fluoroquinolones). If patient develops resistant organism or cannot tolerate antibiotics, salvage surgery is inevitable. This is a bridge, not a destination.

Salvage options highlight the importance of infection prevention and early aggressive treatment.

Surgical Technique

The surgical management of PJI involves either DAIR (retention strategy) or 2-stage revision (explantation strategy). Detailed technique is critical for exam viva scenarios.

Debridement, Antibiotics, Implant Retention (DAIR)

Positioning: Supine, tourniquet applied but NOT inflated during debridement (allow bleeding to flush bacteria).

DAIR Procedure

Step 1Exposure

Approach: Use prior incision, excise wound edges if contaminated.

Arthrotomy: Standard medial parapatellar approach, evert patella.

Initial assessment: Assess polyethylene condition, implant stability (varus/valgus stress, AP drawer).

Step 2 - CriticalRadical Synovectomy

Remove ALL synovium:

  • Anterior compartment (suprapatellar pouch)
  • Medial and lateral gutters
  • Posterior compartments (difficult access - use curved curettes)
  • Intercondylar notch

Interface debridement:

  • Curette bone-implant interface (femoral component undersurface, tibial baseplate undersurface)
  • Remove interface membrane and granulation tissue
  • If gross purulence or cement contamination, consider cement removal (convert to 2-stage)

Technique: Aggressive synovectomy is KEY. Incomplete removal leaves biofilm reservoir leading to DAIR failure.

Step 3 - MandatoryPolyethylene Exchange

Remove modular insert:

  • Unlock mechanism (varies by implant system)
  • Remove polyethylene insert completely
  • Inspect tibial baseplate and femoral component for damage

Insert new polyethylene:

  • From STERILE UNOPENED tray (NOT re-sterilized used insert)
  • Same thickness or adjust for soft tissue tension
  • Lock securely into tibial baseplate

Rationale: Biofilm on polyethylene cannot be debrided. Bacteria absorbed into polyethylene matrix serve as infection reservoir. Exchange is MANDATORY - reduces failure rate 50%.

Step 4Irrigation

Volume: 9-12 liters normal saline pulsed lavage (minimum 6 liters).

Technique:

  • Pulsed lavage with moderate pressure (NOT high-pressure jet - drives bacteria into bone)
  • Change gloves, instruments, gown AFTER debridement BEFORE irrigation (avoid recontamination)
  • No additives: Do NOT use chlorhexidine, betadine, or antibiotic solutions (cytotoxic to cartilage and tissue)

Goal: Mechanical biofilm disruption and bacterial washout.

Step 5Closure

Layered closure:

  • Capsule (absorbable suture, watertight)
  • Subcutaneous (eliminate dead space)
  • Skin (absorbable subcuticular OR staples)

Drain: Closed suction drain for 24-48 hours (remove when output under 30mL/8h).

Dressing: Occlusive dressing for 48 hours minimum.

Postoperative antibiotics: IV organism-specific 2-6 weeks, then oral suppression 3-6 months (rifampicin-based combinations).

Success factors: Early timing (under 4 weeks), sensitive organism, complete synovectomy, polyethylene exchange.

Stage 1: Component Removal and Spacer Insertion

Positioning: Supine, tourniquet (may inflate for cement removal, then deflate for spacer insertion).

Stage 1 Procedure

Step 1Component Removal

Approach: Prior incision, excise scar and any sinus tract en bloc.

Explantation:

  • Remove polyethylene insert
  • Remove femoral component (cemented: osteotomes, thin flexible saw; uncemented: slap hammer with offset attachments)
  • Remove tibial component (cemented: osteotomes from periphery; uncemented: slap hammer)
  • Extract ALL cement (high-speed burr, cement extraction tools, narrow osteotomes)

Goal: Remove ALL foreign material. Residual cement is biofilm nidus and leads to reinfection.

Preserve bone stock: Avoid aggressive bone removal unless grossly necrotic.

Step 2Tissue Sampling

Sample sites (minimum 5-6 samples):

  • Capsule (anterior and posterior)
  • Bone-implant interface (femoral and tibial)
  • Femoral canal (stem interface)
  • Tibial plateau bone
  • Any purulent or suspicious tissue

Send for: Aerobic, anaerobic, fungal culture (hold 14 days) + permanent histology.

Frozen section: Over 5 PMN/hpf in 5 hpf at 400x = infection confirmed.

Step 3Radical Debridement

Remove:

  • ALL synovium (medial, lateral, posterior, intercondylar)
  • Interface membrane (curette bone surfaces to bleeding bone)
  • Granulation tissue, necrotic tissue, hematoma

Lavage: 9-12 liters pulsed irrigation normal saline.

Goal: Reduce bacterial burden to minimal levels before spacer insertion.

Step 4Antibiotic Cement Spacer

Formulation (per 40g Palacos R cement):

  • Vancomycin 4-6g (4g standard, 6g if MRSA or high bioburden)
  • Tobramycin 3-4g OR gentamicin 3.6g
  • Maximum 10% antibiotic by weight (maintain mechanical strength)

Mixing: Add antibiotic powders to cement powder BEFORE adding liquid monomer. Mix thoroughly.

Spacer type:

  • Articulating (mobile): Hand-molded knee-shaped mold OR commercial system (PROSTALAC, Spacer-K). Allows ROM during interval, reduces bone loss, better function.
  • Static (block): Hand-molded block of cement. Immobilization (knee immobilizer), more bone loss, but simpler and cheaper.

Insertion technique (articulating):

  • Mold femoral component shape (condyles, trochlea)
  • Mold tibial platform
  • Insert into bone with gentle pressurization (NOT full cement technique - spacer is temporary)
  • Allow full polymerization (10 minutes) before manipulating knee
  • Test ROM (should achieve 60-90 degrees flexion with articulating spacer)

Antibiotic release kinetics: Aminoglycoside elutes rapidly (peak 24-48h, high local concentration), vancomycin elutes slowly (sustained over 6-12 weeks).

Step 5Closure

Layered closure: Capsule, subcutaneous, skin.

Drain: Closed suction 48 hours.

Immobilization: Knee immobilizer OR hinged brace locked in extension (if static spacer). Articulating spacer allows immediate ROM.

Weight-bearing: Touch weight-bearing with walker (spacer NOT designed for full load - fracture risk).

Interval management: 6-12 weeks antibiotics, CRP monitoring, clinical assessment for Stage 2 readiness.

Stage 2: Revision Arthroplasty

Timing: 6-12 weeks after Stage 1 (once CRP normalized, symptoms resolved).

Criteria for proceeding: CRP under 10 (some accept under 20 if downtrending), no pain/swelling/drainage, adequate soft tissue coverage.

Stage 2 Procedure

Step 1Spacer Removal

Approach: Same incision (excise prior scar), careful dissection (extensor mechanism preservation).

Remove spacer: May be adherent to bone - use gentle osteotomes, avoid fracture or excessive bone removal.

Tissue sampling: 3-5 intraoperative cultures from synovium and bone surfaces.

Frozen section: If over 5 PMN/hpf OR positive cultures → ABORT reimplantation, place new spacer, extend antibiotics.

Step 2Debridement and Bone Preparation

Debridement: Remove residual spacer cement fragments, any granulation tissue.

Lavage: 6-9 liters pulsed irrigation.

Bone assessment:

  • Often bone loss from infection and spacer interval
  • Classify defects (Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute classification: Type 1 intact metaphyseal bone → Type 3 severe metaphyseal and diaphyseal bone loss)

Bone preparation:

  • Broach/ream to bleeding bone
  • Size for stems if bone loss present
  • Plan for augments (metal blocks/wedges) if metaphyseal defects
Step 3Implant Selection and Insertion

Implant type (based on bone loss and soft tissue integrity):

  • Posterior-stabilized (PS): If minimal bone loss, intact collaterals (rare after PJI)
  • Constrained condylar knee (CCK): Most common for PJI revisions (accommodates MCL/LCL deficiency from debridement)
  • Rotating hinge: If severe bone loss, complete collateral deficiency, or extensor mechanism dysfunction

Stems: Long cemented stems (100-150mm) for stability in weakened bone. Offset stems if deformity or bone loss.

Augments: Metal blocks or wedges for metaphyseal bone defects (femoral or tibial). Secure with screws or cement.

Fixation: Cemented preferred after PJI (allows local antibiotic delivery). Antibiotic cement: Vancomycin 2g per 40g cement (lower than spacer dose to preserve mechanical strength).

Technique: Full cement technique with pressurization, stem centralizers, ensure 2-3mm cement mantle.

Step 4Soft Tissue Reconstruction and Closure

Challenges: Scarring from multiple surgeries, extensor mechanism attenuation, skin closure under tension.

Extensor mechanism: If attenuated or deficient, consider allograft augmentation or accept extensor lag with chronic brace.

Soft tissue coverage: If inadequate skin/subcutaneous tissue, gastrocnemius flap (medial head - easier; lateral head - better coverage). Coordinate with plastic surgery.

Closure: Layered (capsule, subcutaneous, skin). Drain 48h. Knee immobilizer or hinged brace for 6 weeks (protect extensor mechanism).

Postoperative antibiotics: Controversial. Options: (1) No antibiotics if cultures negative intraoperatively (emerging practice), (2) 2-4 weeks organism-specific if negative cultures (traditional), (3) 6 weeks if positive cultures intraoperatively.

Aborting Stage 2 Reimplantation

Indications to ABORT Stage 2 and place new spacer:

  1. Positive intraoperative cultures (same organism or new organism)
  2. Frozen section over 5 PMN/hpf (suggests persistent infection)
  3. Gross purulence encountered during spacer removal
  4. Uncontrolled soft tissue infection (cellulitis, drainage)

Do NOT proceed with reimplantation if infection suspected - reinfection rate approaches 50-70% if reimplanted in presence of infection. Better to extend interval and place new spacer. Patient will be disappointed, but this is the safest approach.

Complications of PJI Treatment

Complications by Treatment Modality

ComplicationIncidenceRisk FactorsManagement
DAIR failure (persistent/recurrent infection)30-50% overallKLIC score over 2, MRSA, symptom duration over 3 weeks, biofilm maturityProceed to 2-stage revision. Early recognition (CRP not declining by 2 weeks) allows earlier conversion
Spacer-related complications (fracture, dislocation, subluxation)10-25%Static spacer (higher), non-weight-bearing non-compliance, osteoporotic boneSpacer revision if early (first 4 weeks). If near Stage 2 timing, proceed to reimplantation
Bone loss progression during spacer interval15-30%Static spacer, prolonged interval (over 12 weeks), poor nutrition, osteoporosisRequires stems, augments, or allograft at Stage 2. May necessitate more constrained implant
Reinfection after Stage 2 reimplantation10-15%Immunosuppression, resistant organism, inadequate debridement, early reimplantation (under 6 weeks)Half are recurrence (same organism) - repeat 2-stage. Half are new organism - treat as primary PJI
Extensor mechanism disruption or lag5-15% after 2-stageMultiple surgeries, poor soft tissue quality, constrained implant, aggressive debridementImmobilization 6 weeks, aggressive quadriceps rehab. If complete disruption, may require allograft reconstruction or chronic brace
Stiffness (arthrofibrosis)20-40% after 2-stageProlonged immobilization (static spacer), multiple surgeries, patient factors (diabetes, smoking)Manipulation under anesthesia at 6-12 weeks. Arthroscopic lysis of adhesions if manipulation fails. Accept limited ROM in exchange for infection control
Chronic pain without infection15-25%Neuropathic pain from nerve injury, bone loss, soft tissue scarring, constrained implantMultimodal pain management. Rule out recurrent infection (aspiration). Gabapentin for neuropathic component. Salvage if intractable
C. difficile colitis from prolonged antibiotics3-7%Prolonged broad-spectrum antibiotics (over 6 weeks), older age, prior CDI, fluoroquinolone useDiscontinue inciting antibiotic if possible. Vancomycin PO or fidaxomicin for CDI treatment. Consider fecal microbiota transplant if recurrent

Balancing Infection Control vs Functional Outcome

Examiners often ask: "Patient has recurrent PJI after 2 failed 2-stage revisions. What next?"

Answer: "This is a difficult scenario requiring shared decision-making. I would have an honest conversation about the three options: (1) Third attempt 2-stage revision - success rate drops to 60-70% after second failure, but preserves potential for functional knee. (2) Resection arthroplasty - infection control 90%, but poor function requiring brace and crutches lifelong. (3) Chronic suppressive antibiotics - temporizing if organism is low-virulence and sensitive, but not curative. If young active patient with good bone stock, I would consider one more attempt at 2-stage with extended antibiotic holiday (12 weeks) and aggressive debridement. If elderly low-demand or immunosuppressed, resection or suppression may be more realistic. If life-threatening sepsis uncontrolled, amputation is last resort. The key is tempering expectations - recurrent PJI often means accepting functional compromise to achieve infection control."

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

Postoperative management differs significantly between DAIR and 2-stage revision, and between Stage 1 and Stage 2 of the 2-stage protocol.

DAIR Rehabilitation

DAIR Recovery Timeline

HospitalImmediate Postoperative (Days 0-2)

Antibiotics: Continue empiric IV antibiotics (vancomycin + meropenem OR ceftazidime) until cultures result, then switch to organism-specific.

Drain management: Remove closed suction drain at 24-48h when output under 30mL/8h.

Wound care: Occlusive dressing intact for 48h minimum. Inspect at 48h for erythema, drainage.

Mobilization: Day 0 or Day 1 - sit to stand, ambulation with walker. Full weight-bearing as tolerated (implant retained, stable).

ROM: Start passive ROM exercises Day 1 (CPM OR physiotherapy). Goal: Maintain preoperative ROM.

DVT prophylaxis: Aspirin 100mg daily OR rivaroxaban 10mg daily for 14 days. Mechanical prophylaxis (TED stockings, foot pumps).

Outpatient IV AntibioticsEarly Phase (Weeks 1-6)

Antibiotics:

  • IV organism-specific for 2-6 weeks (debate: some centres 2 weeks, others 6 weeks)
  • Common regimens: (MSSA) Flucloxacillin 2g IV q6h + rifampicin 450mg PO q12h. (Strep) Penicillin G 3M units IV q4h OR ceftriaxone 2g IV q24h.
  • Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT): PICC line, home IV administration OR daily infusion clinic visits

Clinical monitoring:

  • CRP weekly (should decline by 50% at 2 weeks post-DAIR - if not, DAIR failing)
  • Wound inspection weekly (no persistent drainage)
  • Pain and function assessment

Physiotherapy: Progressive ROM and strengthening. Goal: 0-110 degrees by 6 weeks.

Weight-bearing: Full weight-bearing, progress from walker to cane to independent.

Oral AntibioticsSuppressive Phase (Months 2-6)

Transition to oral:

  • After 2-6 weeks IV, switch to oral suppression for 3-6 months
  • Biofilm-active agents: Rifampicin combinations (NEVER rifampicin monotherapy - resistance develops in days)
  • (MSSA) Rifampicin 450mg PO q12h + flucloxacillin 1g PO q6h
  • (Strep) Amoxicillin 1g PO q8h (rifampicin not required)
  • (GNR E. coli) Ciprofloxacin 750mg PO q12h + rifampicin 450mg PO q12h

Monitoring: CRP monthly, clinical assessment monthly. Rising CRP = DAIR failure, consider 2-stage.

Function: Return to activities of daily living by 3 months. Avoid high-impact sports lifelong.

Long-termSurveillance (Ongoing)

Follow-up: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, then yearly.

Assessment: Pain, function, ROM, stability. CRP annually.

Radiographs: Yearly to assess for loosening or progressive lucency (late failure).

Education: Prompt reporting of acute pain, swelling, fever (acute hematogenous infection risk lifelong).

DAIR success indicators: CRP declining by 50% at 2 weeks, symptom resolution by 4-6 weeks, stable ROM. Failure indicators: Persistent pain, rising CRP, recurrent effusion → proceed to 2-stage.

Spacer Interval Management

Stage 1 to Stage 2 Interval

HospitalImmediate Post-Stage 1 (Days 0-2)

Antibiotics: Continue IV antibiotics (organism-specific if cultures available, empiric if pending).

Immobilization: Knee immobilizer (static spacer) OR hinged brace unlocked for ROM (articulating spacer).

Weight-bearing: Touch weight-bearing only with walker (spacer not designed for full load - fracture risk 10-25%).

Drain: Remove at 48h.

OPATAntibiotic Phase (Weeks 1-6)

Duration: 6 weeks IV organism-specific antibiotics (some centres 2-4 weeks for virulent organisms with rapid response).

OPAT: PICC line, home IV OR daily clinic.

Monitoring: Weekly CRP (should normalize to under 10 by 6 weeks). Clinical assessment weekly (no pain, drainage, erythema).

Mobilization: Limited weight-bearing (touch weight-bearing with walker). Articulating spacer allows ROM exercises (goal: 60-90 degrees maintained).

Complications: Spacer fracture, dislocation, persistent drainage (see Complications section). Return to OR if needed.

ControversialAntibiotic Holiday (Weeks 7-8)

Concept: 2-week antibiotic-free interval before Stage 2 to assess for infection recurrence off antibiotics.

Practice variable: Some centres routinely do antibiotic holiday, others do NOT (proceed to Stage 2 at 6-8 weeks if CRP normalized without holiday).

Rationale for: Unmasks infection suppressed by antibiotics (CRP rebound suggests persistent infection).

Rationale against: Delays reimplantation, no evidence improves eradication rates.

Australian practice: Variable. Trend is NO routine holiday if clinical/serologic resolution clear.

ClearancePre-Stage 2 Assessment (Week 6-12)

Criteria for Stage 2 readiness:

  1. CRP normalized (under 10 mg/L, some accept under 20 if downtrending)
  2. Clinical resolution (no pain, swelling, erythema, drainage)
  3. Adequate soft tissue coverage (no open wounds, good skin quality)
  4. Medical optimization (HbA1c under 7%, albumin over 3.5, smoking cessation)

Aspiration of spacer: Controversial. Some centres routinely aspirate before Stage 2, others do NOT (false-positive rate 10-20% due to spacer irritation). Australian trend: NO routine aspiration if clinical/serologic clear.

Radiographs: Assess spacer position, bone stock, plan for stems/augments at Stage 2.

Interval complications requiring return to OR: Spacer fracture (10-15%), dislocation (5-10%), persistent drainage (5%), hematoma (15%).

Stage 2 Postoperative Protocol

Stage 2 Recovery

HospitalImmediate (Days 0-2)

Antibiotics: Controversial. (Option 1) No antibiotics if cultures negative intraoperatively. (Option 2) 2-4 weeks organism-specific. (Option 3) 6 weeks if positive cultures.

Immobilization: Knee immobilizer OR hinged brace locked for 6 weeks (protect extensor mechanism, prevent dislocation if constrained implant).

Weight-bearing: Touch weight-bearing with walker initially (protect fixation and extensor mechanism).

Drain: Remove at 48h.

ImmobilizerProtected Phase (Weeks 1-6)

Brace: Locked knee immobilizer OR hinged brace locked in extension during ambulation. Unlock for ROM exercises under physiotherapy supervision.

Weight-bearing: Progress to partial weight-bearing (50%) by 2 weeks, weight-bearing as tolerated by 6 weeks.

ROM: Passive ROM exercises (CPM OR physiotherapy) in brace unlocked. Goal: 0-90 degrees by 6 weeks (accept less - scarring limits motion).

Antibiotics: If given, IV 2-6 weeks then discontinue (no long-term suppression after successful 2-stage).

Monitoring: CRP at 2 weeks, 6 weeks (should remain low). Rising CRP suggests reinfection - investigate urgently.

StrengtheningProgressive Phase (Weeks 7-12)

Brace: Wean off immobilizer at 6 weeks if extensor mechanism intact, wound healed.

Weight-bearing: Full weight-bearing, progress to cane then independent.

Physiotherapy: Quadriceps strengthening (critical - extensor lag common after 2-stage). Hydrotherapy beneficial.

ROM: Active ROM exercises. Goal: 0-100 degrees by 12 weeks (accept 90 - scar tissue limits gains).

Radiographs: 6 weeks and 12 weeks to assess fixation, lucency, alignment.

Return to FunctionFunctional Recovery (Months 3-12)

Timeline: Full recovery 6-12 months (longer than uncomplicated primary TKA).

Function: Knee Society Score 70-80 (vs 90+ for uncomplicated primary). Accept functional limitations (stiffness, activity restrictions).

ROM: Final ROM 90-100 degrees average (vs 120 for primary TKA). Manipulation under anesthesia at 6-12 weeks if under 70 degrees and interfering with function.

Activities: Return to low-impact activities (walking, swimming, cycling). Avoid high-impact sports lifelong.

Surveillance: 3, 6, 12 months, then yearly. CRP annually. Radiographs yearly for 5 years.

Rehabilitation challenges: Arthrofibrosis (20-40%), extensor lag (5-15%), chronic pain (15-25%), instability (5-10% if constrained implant).

Outcomes and Prognosis

Outcomes differ significantly by treatment modality and patient factors. Understanding prognosis is essential for counseling and shared decision-making.

DAIR Outcomes

FactorSuccess RateFailure Predictors
Timing: Early (under 4 weeks post-surgery)60-70%Symptom duration over 3 weeks reduces success to 30-40%
Timing: Acute hematogenous (under 3 weeks symptoms)60-75%Over 3 weeks symptom duration drops success to 30%
Organism: Streptococcus70-85%Best prognosis if early and sensitive
Organism: MSSA45-60%More virulent than Strep, forms biofilm faster
Organism: MRSA or resistant GNR20-40%DAIR contraindicated - proceed to 2-stage
Host: Immunocompetent (KLIC 0-1)60-70%Low KLIC score predicts success
Host: Immunosuppressed (KLIC 3-4)Under 20%High KLIC score predicts failure - avoid DAIR

DAIR failure timeline: Most failures occur within 6 months (80%). Late failures (over 2 years) rare. Early recognition of failure (CRP not declining, persistent symptoms) allows timely conversion to 2-stage.

2-Stage Revision Outcomes

Infection Eradication

Success rate: 85-90% infection eradication at 5 years (most reliable treatment for PJI).

Reinfection: 10-15% develop recurrent or new infection:

  • Half are recurrence (same organism - inadequate debridement or persistent biofilm)
  • Half are new organism (new contamination, immunocompromised host)

Salvage after failed 2-stage: Second 2-stage attempt (60-70% success), resection arthroplasty, suppressive antibiotics, amputation (last resort).

Functional Outcomes

Knee Society Score: 70-80 (vs 90+ for uncomplicated primary TKA).

ROM: Average 90-100 degrees (vs 120 for primary). Limited by arthrofibrosis and multiple surgeries.

Pain relief: 70-80% achieve satisfactory pain relief. 20-30% have residual pain (neuropathic, bone loss, soft tissue damage).

Return to activities: Low-impact only (walking, swimming, cycling). High-impact sports contraindicated lifelong.

Patient satisfaction: 70-75% satisfied (vs 85-90% for primary TKA). Lower expectations due to prolonged treatment.

Mortality and Morbidity

1-year mortality: 7% (higher than hip fracture at 4%). Elderly immunosuppressed patients highest risk.

Complications: 20-30% experience major complication (extensor lag, stiffness, instability, recurrent infection).

Reoperations: 25-35% require further surgery within 5 years (infection, instability, aseptic loosening, manipulation for stiffness).

Economic burden: Average total cost $100,000-150,000 AUD (two surgeries, prolonged antibiotics, complications).

Quality of Life Impact

Recovery timeline: 6-12 months total (vs 3-6 months for primary TKA).

Disability duration: Average 9 months unable to work or perform ADLs.

Psychological impact: Depression common (30-40%) due to prolonged treatment, uncertainty, functional limitations.

Social impact: Relationship strain, financial burden (lost wages, medical costs), activity restrictions.

Patient education critical: Realistic expectations, prolonged recovery, functional compromise, lifelong surveillance.

Prognostic Factors for Reinfection After 2-Stage

FactorReinfection RiskManagement Strategy
Organism: MRSA, fungi, resistant GNR20-30% reinfectionExtended interval (12+ weeks), targeted antibiotics, consider chronic suppression
Host: Diabetes, immunosuppressed, ESRD20-35% reinfectionMedical optimization, extended antibiotics, lower threshold for salvage
Surgical: Inadequate debridement, residual cement25-40% reinfectionMeticulous Stage 1 technique, remove ALL foreign material
Timing: Premature reimplantation (under 6 weeks, CRP not normalized)30-50% reinfectionWait for CRP under 10, clinical resolution before Stage 2
Soft tissue: Poor coverage, chronic wounds25-35% reinfectionGastrocnemius flap, plastic surgery involvement, wound VAC if needed

Counseling Realistic Expectations

Viva question: "How do you counsel a patient about expected outcomes after 2-stage revision for PJI?"

Answer: "I have an honest conversation about the three key outcomes: (1) Infection control: 85-90% chance we eradicate infection, but 10-15% risk of reinfection requiring further treatment, possibly salvage procedures. (2) Function: Your knee will NOT return to normal. Average range of motion is 90-100 degrees (unable to fully kneel). Knee scores average 70-80 vs 90+ for uncomplicated TKA. You'll be able to walk, swim, cycle - but no high-impact sports like running or tennis. (3) Timeline: This is a long journey - two surgeries 6-12 weeks apart, then 6-12 months full recovery. You'll be on antibiotics for months, multiple hospital admissions, physiotherapy for months. Most patients are back to their baseline function by 9-12 months, but some never fully recover. I emphasize that the goal is infection control first, function second. We accept functional compromise to eliminate infection. If infection recurs despite best efforts, we may need salvage procedures like permanent removal of the prosthesis. I document this discussion thoroughly and encourage questions."

Prevention Strategies

Evidence-Based Prevention Bundle

PJI prevention is multifactorial. No single intervention eliminates risk, but bundled strategies reduce incidence by 50-70%.

Preoperative Risk Modification

InterventionTargetEvidenceImplementation
Glycemic controlHbA1c under 7.0%HbA1c over 7.5% increases PJI risk OR 1.7. Every 1% increase = 30% higher infectionPostpone elective TKA if HbA1c over 8%. Endocrinology referral. Recheck 3 months
Weight reductionBMI under 35 (ideally under 30)BMI over 40 increases PJI risk OR 3.0. Every 5-unit BMI increase = 20% higher infectionBariatric surgery if BMI over 40. Weight loss program 6-12 months. Counsel realistic expectations
Smoking cessationZero tobacco use 8+ weeks before surgeryCurrent smoking increases PJI risk OR 2.0. Nicotine impairs wound healing and immune functionSmoking cessation program. Nicotine replacement therapy. Postpone surgery until 8 weeks smoke-free
Nutritional optimizationAlbumin over 3.5 g/dL, lymphocyte count over 1500Malnutrition doubles PJI risk. Albumin under 3.0 = OR 2.5 for infectionNutritionist referral. Protein supplementation (1.5g/kg/day). Delay surgery if albumin under 3.0
S. aureus decolonizationNasal swab PCR positive for S. aureusMupirocin nasal ointment + chlorhexidine body wash reduces PJI 50% in carriersScreen all patients. Mupirocin 2% intranasal BID 5 days + chlorhexidine 4% wash 5 days before surgery
Immunosuppression modificationRheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory arthritis on biologics, steroidsBiologics increase PJI risk OR 2.0-3.0. Chronic steroids (over 10mg prednisone daily) increase OR 1.5Hold biologics: TNF-inhibitors 2-4 weeks, rituximab 6 months. Wean steroids to under 10mg daily if possible. Coordinate with rheumatology

S. aureus Decolonization Bundle

Question: "Should we screen all TKA patients for S. aureus colonization?"

Answer: "Yes, universal screening is cost-effective. 20-30% of population are nasal S. aureus carriers, and carriers have 3-fold higher PJI risk. The decolonization bundle (mupirocin intranasal + chlorhexidine body wash for 5 days before surgery) reduces PJI by 50% in carriers with NNT of 30. This is one of the most effective single interventions for PJI prevention. Australian hospitals increasingly adopt universal screening at pre-admission clinic 2-4 weeks before surgery, allowing time for decolonization protocol."

Preoperative optimization targets modifiable patient risk factors.

Intraoperative Infection Prevention

Intraoperative Bundle

Timing CriticalAntibiotic Prophylaxis

Standard regimen:

  • Cefazolin 2g IV (3g if patient weight over 120kg)
  • Timing: Within 60 minutes before incision (ideally 30-60 minutes)
  • Redosing: If surgery duration over 4 hours OR blood loss over 1500mL, give second dose intraoperatively

Penicillin allergy (non-anaphylactic):

  • Cefazolin still acceptable (10% cross-reactivity, but severe reactions rare)

Penicillin allergy (anaphylaxis history):

  • Vancomycin 15mg/kg IV (infuse over 1 hour - start 90-120 minutes before incision) PLUS
  • Gentamicin 5mg/kg IV (single dose)

MRSA colonization known:

  • Vancomycin 15mg/kg IV PLUS cefazolin 2g IV (dual coverage superior to vancomycin alone)

Duration: Single dose is standard. NO prolonged prophylaxis beyond 24 hours (increases C. diff and resistance without reducing PJI).

Step 1Skin Preparation

Antiseptic choice:

  • Chlorhexidine-alcohol (2% chlorhexidine + 70% isopropyl alcohol) is superior to povidone-iodine
  • Reduces SSI by 40% vs iodine (RCT evidence)

Application:

  • Two separate applications with dry time (3 minutes each)
  • Prep wide field (hip to ankle for knee)
  • Do NOT use chlorhexidine near mucous membranes or eyes (ototoxicity, neurotoxicity if enters joint accidentally)

Hair removal:

  • Clipping only if hair interferes with incision (do NOT shave - microabrasions increase infection)
  • Clip immediately before surgery (NOT night before - allows bacterial regrowth)
Step 2Operating Room Environment

Laminar flow: Reduces airborne bacterial count 90% vs conventional ventilation. Standard in Australia for arthroplasty.

Traffic control: Minimize door openings (each opening disrupts laminar flow for 5 minutes). Limit personnel to essential staff.

Body exhaust suits: Controversial. Some evidence of reduced infection, but uncomfortable and expensive. Not universally adopted.

Temperature: Maintain patient normothermia (over 36°C core temperature). Hypothermia increases infection risk 30% via vasoconstriction and impaired neutrophil function.

Step 3Surgical Technique

Minimize operative time: Each additional 30 minutes increases PJI risk 15%. Efficient technique without rushing.

Gentle tissue handling: Avoid excessive retraction, cautery. Preserve blood supply to skin edges.

Hemostasis: Meticulous hemostasis reduces hematoma (substrate for bacterial growth). Use of tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces blood loss and hematoma formation - may reduce PJI risk (emerging evidence).

Wound irrigation: 3-6 liters pulsed lavage before closure. Normal saline only (no chlorhexidine, betadine, antibiotics - cytotoxic).

Closure: Layered closure (capsule, subcutaneous, skin). Avoid dead space. Skin closure: Absorbable subcuticular suture OR staples (similar infection rates).

ControversialDrains

Debate:

  • Proponents: Reduces hematoma (substrate for infection)
  • Opponents: Foreign body, retrograde bacterial entry, no proven benefit

Evidence: Meta-analysis shows no difference in PJI with or without drains.

Australian practice: Variable. Many surgeons use closed suction drain for 24-48 hours, remove when output under 30mL/8hr.

Consensus: If drain used, remove early (under 48 hours). Prolonged drainage (over 7 days) increases PJI risk 3-fold.

Intraoperative measures target bacterial contamination and host defense optimization.

Postoperative Infection Prevention

Wound Management

Dressing:

  • Occlusive dressing (hydrocolloid or film) for 48 hours minimum
  • Do NOT remove to "check wound" (disrupts seal, bacterial entry)
  • After 48 hours: Daily inspection for erythema, drainage

Wound complications:

  • Persistent drainage (over 7 days): High PJI risk. Consider return to OR for irrigation and closure
  • Superficial dehiscence: Do NOT pack wound. Return to OR for debridement and reclosure under sterile conditions

Glycemic Control

Inpatient glucose management:

  • Target glucose under 10 mmol/L (180 mg/dL) postoperatively
  • Hyperglycemia (over 12 mmol/L) in first 48 hours increases PJI risk 2-fold

Insulin protocol: Sliding scale insulin for all diabetic patients postoperatively. Endocrinology consult if poor control.

DVT Prophylaxis

Anticoagulation:

  • Aspirin 100mg daily OR rivaroxaban 10mg daily for 14 days (AAOS guidelines)
  • Mechanical prophylaxis (TED stockings, foot pumps)

Infection concern: No evidence anticoagulation increases PJI. Hematoma from inadequate hemostasis or excessive anticoagulation may increase infection risk - use prophylactic doses only.

Mobilization

Early mobilization:

  • Day 0 or Day 1 physiotherapy (sit to stand, ambulation with walker)
  • Reduces DVT, improves respiratory function, reduces complications

No evidence: Early mobilization increases wound complications or PJI if wound sealed.

Dental Prophylaxis in TKA Patients

AAOS 2023 Guidelines: NO routine antibiotic prophylaxis recommended for dental procedures in patients with prosthetic joints. This reverses prior recommendations.

Rationale: No evidence dental procedures increase PJI risk. Risk of antibiotic side effects (anaphylaxis, C. diff) outweighs theoretical benefit.

EXCEPTION - Australian context: Many Australian orthopaedic surgeons still recommend prophylaxis for invasive dental procedures (extractions, root canal) in high-risk patients (immunosuppressed, rheumatoid arthritis, prior PJI). This is not evidence-based but reflects medicolegal caution.

Regimen if given: Amoxicillin 2g PO 1 hour before procedure (or clindamycin 600mg if penicillin allergy).

Exam answer: "AAOS guidelines do NOT recommend routine dental prophylaxis for prosthetic joints. However, I inform patients of the lack of evidence and give them the option for high-risk procedures (shared decision-making). I personally do NOT prescribe prophylaxis for routine cleanings, but consider it for extractions in immunosuppressed patients."

Postoperative care optimizes wound healing and minimizes bacterial seeding opportunities.

Evidence Base and Key Trials

MSIS Criteria Validation Study

2
Parvizi J et al • Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (2018)
Key Findings:
  • Multi-institutional validation of MSIS 2018 diagnostic criteria for PJI
  • Sensitivity 97.7%, specificity 99.5% for definite infection (score 6 or greater)
  • Alpha-defensin single best synovial marker (sensitivity 97%, specificity 96%)
  • D-dimer addition improved early infection detection without sacrificing specificity
Clinical Implication: MSIS 2018 criteria are highly accurate for PJI diagnosis and should be used as standard in clinical practice and research. Score 6 or greater indicates definite infection requiring treatment.
Limitation: Requires multiple tests (some not universally available like alpha-defensin). Culture-negative PJI (10% of cases) may score lower despite true infection.

KLIC Score for DAIR Failure Prediction

2
Tornero E et al • Clinical Infectious Diseases (2014)
Key Findings:
  • Multicenter cohort of 253 patients undergoing DAIR for PJI
  • KLIC score (Kidney, Liver, Immunosuppression, Chronic infection) predicts DAIR failure
  • Score 0: 12% failure at 1 year. Score 4: 100% failure at 1 year
  • Chronic infection (symptom duration over 28 days) strongest predictor (OR 5.7 for failure)
Clinical Implication: KLIC score should guide DAIR vs 2-stage decision. Patients with score 3-4 are poor DAIR candidates and should proceed directly to 2-stage revision to avoid failed DAIR and extended morbidity.
Limitation: External validation limited. Does not account for organism type (MRSA worse prognosis than Streptococcus even with same KLIC score).

Antibiotic Cement Spacer Meta-analysis: Static vs Articulating

3
Voleti PB et al • Journal of Arthroplasty (2011)
Key Findings:
  • Meta-analysis of 29 studies (1703 patients) comparing static vs articulating spacers
  • Infection eradication: No difference (static 88.5% vs articulating 89.2%, p=0.7)
  • Functional outcomes: Articulating spacer better ROM (90° vs 75°, p less than 0.001)
  • Bone loss: Less bone loss with articulating spacer (preserved by maintained motion)
  • Complication rates: Similar (spacer fracture/dislocation 10-15% for both)
Clinical Implication: Articulating spacers provide better functional outcomes during interval without compromising infection eradication. Preferred in mobile patients who can comply with weight-bearing restrictions. Static spacers acceptable if patient immobile or high fracture risk.
Limitation: Heterogeneous studies, many retrospective. Articulating spacer cost ($3000-5000 AUD) may limit access in some settings.

Two-Stage Revision Interval Duration: Short vs Standard

2
Pangaud C et al • Bone and Joint Journal (2019)
Key Findings:
  • RCT of 99 patients: 2-week interval vs 8-week interval for 2-stage revision
  • Infection eradication: No difference (2-week 90% vs 8-week 91%, p=0.8)
  • Functional outcomes: Similar Knee Society Scores at 2 years
  • Cost savings: 2-week protocol reduced total costs 25% (shorter hospital stay, fewer complications)
  • Complication rates: No increase in 2-week group
Clinical Implication: For selected patients (virulent organisms like S. aureus, good response to antibiotics, no immunosuppression), shorter interval (2-4 weeks) is safe and cost-effective. Longer interval (8-12 weeks) still standard for resistant organisms, immunosuppressed hosts, or poor clinical response.
Limitation: Small sample size, single-center. Excluded MRSA, fungi, and immunosuppressed patients - results may not generalize to high-risk populations.

S. aureus Screening and Decolonization RCT

1
Schweizer ML et al • Clinical Infectious Diseases (2015)
Key Findings:
  • RCT of 3280 surgical patients: Universal S. aureus screening + decolonization vs standard care
  • S. aureus SSI reduced 58% in screened/decolonized group (1.6% vs 3.8%, p less than 0.001)
  • Decolonization protocol: Mupirocin intranasal 2% BID + chlorhexidine 4% body wash for 5 days before surgery
  • NNT = 30 to prevent 1 S. aureus infection
  • Cost-effective: $50 per patient for screening/decolonization vs $100,000+ for treating PJI
Clinical Implication: Universal S. aureus screening and decolonization is highly cost-effective for arthroplasty patients and should be standard of care. Implement at pre-admission clinic 2-4 weeks before surgery to allow time for decolonization.
Limitation: Some patients non-compliant with 5-day protocol. Chlorhexidine body wash can cause skin irritation (10% of patients). Mupirocin resistance emerging (5% of S. aureus strains).

AOANJRR 2023 Annual Report: PJI Epidemiology in Australia

3
Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry • AOANJRR Annual Report (2023)
Key Findings:
  • PJI accounts for 25% of all revision TKA burden in Australia (second only to aseptic loosening at 30%)
  • Primary TKA infection rate: 1.8% at 5 years, 2.2% at 10 years (increasing over time)
  • Revision TKA infection rate: 4.5% at 5 years (2.5-fold higher than primary)
  • Cemented TKA has lower PJI risk vs uncemented (1.8% vs 2.4% at 5 years, p less than 0.01)
  • Obesity (BMI over 35) increases PJI revision rate 2-fold
Clinical Implication: Australian PJI rates are consistent with international data. Registry surveillance identifies high-risk populations (obese, revision surgery, uncemented implants) for targeted prevention strategies. Cemented fixation may reduce PJI risk through local antibiotic delivery.
Limitation: Registry data subject to underreporting (estimated 10-15% of infections not revised and thus not captured). Selection bias in uncemented vs cemented comparison.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Diagnosis of Chronic PJI (3 minutes)

EXAMINER

"A 68-year-old man presents 18 months after primary TKA with 6-week history of progressive knee pain and effusion. No fever. CRP 42 mg/L, ESR 65 mm/hr. Radiographs show 2mm tibial lucency. How do you assess and manage this patient?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This presentation is concerning for chronic periprosthetic joint infection given the timeline and elevated inflammatory markers. I would take a systematic approach. First, complete history: mechanism of onset (insidious vs acute), systemic symptoms (fever, night sweats), immunosuppression, recent dental or urinary procedures. Second, examination focusing on wound appearance, effusion, range of motion, and any sinus tract. Third, investigations: I would arrange joint aspiration with minimum 2-week antibiotic holiday if patient has been on antibiotics. Send synovial fluid for cell count/differential, alpha-defensin, and culture (aerobic, anaerobic, hold 14 days). The MSIS 2018 criteria guide diagnosis: this patient already has 2 points (CRP over 10 = 1 point, ESR over 30 = 1 point). If synovial WCC is over 3000 cells per microliter (2 points) and alpha-defensin positive (3 points), score reaches 8, confirming definite PJI. Radiographic lucency suggests chronic process. Management would be 2-stage revision: first stage explantation with antibiotic spacer, 6-12 weeks antibiotics targeting organism, then second stage reimplantation. I would counsel about 85-90% infection eradication rate, two surgeries, 6-12 month recovery, and functional outcomes inferior to primary TKA (average ROM 90-100 degrees, KSS 70-80). Risks include reinfection (10-15%), extensor lag, stiffness, and potential for salvage procedures if multiple failures.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Systematic MSIS criteria scoring (know the thresholds and point values)
Antibiotic holiday before aspiration critical for culture yield
Chronic presentation (over 4 weeks) favors 2-stage over DAIR
Counsel realistic expectations (two surgeries, prolonged recovery, functional compromise)
COMMON TRAPS
✗Forgetting antibiotic holiday - yields false-negative cultures in 30-40%
✗Attempting DAIR for chronic infection (over 4 weeks) - failure rate 70%
✗Insufficient counseling about functional outcomes - patients expect restoration to normal knee
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if the patient refuses 2-stage revision?"
"How do you differentiate infection from aseptic loosening?"
"What antibiotics would you use empirically in the spacer?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: DAIR Decision-Making (4 minutes)

EXAMINER

"A 55-year-old woman is 3 weeks post-primary TKA. She develops acute onset knee pain, swelling, erythema over 5 days. Temp 38.2°C, CRP 85, WCC 14. She has well-controlled diabetes (HbA1c 6.8%) and rheumatoid arthritis on methotrexate (held 2 weeks before surgery). Aspiration grows MSSA sensitive to flucloxacillin. Radiographs show well-fixed components. She asks: 'Do I need another surgery or can antibiotics cure this?' How do you proceed?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is Type I acute postoperative PJI with MSSA, presenting within the DAIR window (under 4 weeks post-surgery). I would counsel that antibiotics alone will NOT cure this infection because bacteria have formed biofilm on the implant surface, which is 100-1000 times more resistant to antibiotics than free-floating bacteria. She requires surgical debridement to remove biofilm and infected tissue. I would assess DAIR candidacy using the STEADI criteria: (S) Symptom duration 5 days - excellent, under 3 weeks. (T) Timing 3 weeks post-surgery - within early window. (E) Eradicable organism - MSSA sensitive to flucloxacillin and rifampicin (biofilm-active), favorable. (A) Articulating surfaces intact - yes, based on clinical description. (D) Definitely stable implant - radiographs confirm. (I) Immunocompetent - this is the concern. She has rheumatoid arthritis on methotrexate (immunosuppression). I would calculate KLIC score: K=0 (normal kidneys), L=0 (normal liver), I=1 (methotrexate immunosuppression), C=0 (acute not chronic). Total KLIC = 1, which gives 30% failure rate - acceptable for DAIR attempt. However, I would discuss that rheumatoid arthritis increases failure risk. My recommendation: DAIR with polyethylene exchange, radical synovectomy, pulsed lavage, followed by 6 weeks IV flucloxacillin 2g q6h PLUS rifampicin 450mg PO q12h, then 3-6 months oral suppression. Success rate approximately 60% given MSSA and early presentation, but rheumatoid arthritis reduces this. If DAIR fails (persistent infection, CRP not declining by 2 weeks post-DAIR), I would proceed to 2-stage revision. I would counsel: (1) DAIR is single surgery but 40% failure rate in her case given immunosuppression. (2) Alternatively, 2-stage revision has 90% eradication but requires two surgeries and 6-12 months recovery. (3) Coordinate with rheumatology regarding methotrexate - likely hold for 6-12 weeks during infection treatment.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
DAIR indications: STEADI mnemonic - assess each criterion systematically
KLIC score quantifies failure risk - use to counsel realistic expectations
Polyethylene exchange is MANDATORY during DAIR - examiners will probe this
Rifampicin + flucloxacillin for MSSA - biofilm penetration critical
COMMON TRAPS
✗Recommending antibiotics alone - will fail, delays definitive treatment
✗Proceeding with DAIR without assessing immunosuppression (KLIC score)
✗Forgetting polyethylene exchange - cuts success rate in half
✗Not coordinating with rheumatology regarding methotrexate - may need to hold or switch agents
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if the organism was MRSA instead of MSSA?"
"How do you perform DAIR - describe the surgical steps?"
"What if CRP is still 60 at 2 weeks post-DAIR - what do you do?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: 2-Stage Revision Complication (3 minutes)

EXAMINER

"You performed Stage 1 explantation and antibiotic spacer for chronic TKA PJI with CNS (coagulase-negative Staph) 8 weeks ago. Patient returns with acute pain and inability to bear weight. Radiograph shows spacer fracture with displacement. CRP was 8 last week (normalized from 45 at Stage 1), now CRP is 15. Aspiration of spacer grows no organisms. She is scheduled for Stage 2 next week. What do you do?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a spacer fracture complication 8 weeks after Stage 1. I need to assess: (1) Infection status - CRP was normalizing (8 last week) but now rising to 15. Aspiration is negative but this may be false-negative given antibiotics. The CRP rise is concerning for reinfection vs spacer fracture inflammation. (2) Fracture stability - patient cannot weight-bear, suggesting unstable fracture with displacement. (3) Timing - was scheduled for Stage 2 next week. My management options: (A) Proceed with Stage 2 as planned next week - risky given CRP rise and fracture instability. Concern for persistent infection. (B) Revise spacer now - new antibiotic spacer with 6-week interval before Stage 2. This is safest for infection control but delays reimplantation 6 more weeks. (C) Abandon spacer and proceed to Stage 2 immediately (this week) - accept displaced spacer fragments, perform revision with extended antibiotics. My recommendation: I would have a candid discussion with the patient about risks. Given CRP rising (15) despite recent normalization, I am concerned about persistent low-grade infection that may be masked by spacer antibiotics. Spacer fracture likely caused mechanical inflammation raising CRP, but I cannot definitively exclude reinfection. The safest approach is **revision of spacer** with new antibiotic cement spacer, send multiple intraoperative cultures (even though aspiration negative - intraoperative may yield organism), and extend interval another 6-8 weeks before Stage 2 reimplantation. This gives time to ensure infection truly eradicated. Alternative: If patient strongly prefers to proceed (understandably frustrated with delay), I would proceed to Stage 2 next week but with: (1) Extended intraoperative sampling (6+ cultures), (2) If cultures positive intraoperatively, abort and place new spacer, (3) If cultures negative, proceed with reimplantation but plan 6 weeks IV antibiotics post-Stage 2 as margin of safety, (4) Accept higher reinfection risk (20-30% vs 10-15% standard). I would document shared decision-making thoroughly.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Spacer fracture complication occurs 10-25% of 2-stage cases - recognize and manage
Rising CRP despite prior normalization is red flag for reinfection - investigate thoroughly
Shared decision-making: Revise spacer (safest, but delays) vs proceed to Stage 2 (faster, riskier)
Intraoperative cultures trump aspiration - spacer aspiration has 10-20% false-positive rate from spacer irritation
COMMON TRAPS
✗Proceeding to Stage 2 despite rising CRP without additional workup - reinfection risk 30-40%
✗Ignoring spacer fracture and waiting another 6 weeks - patient discomfort, bone loss progression
✗Failing to counsel about reinfection risk and need for potential salvage if multiple failures
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What would you do if intraoperative cultures at Stage 2 grow CNS (same organism)?"
"How do you counsel a patient about salvage options if 2-stage fails twice?"
"What factors predict reinfection after Stage 2 reimplantation?"

MCQ Practice Points

MSIS Criteria Question

Q: A patient undergoing aspiration for suspected PJI has synovial WCC 4000 cells/μL with 75% PMN, CRP 25 mg/L, ESR 40 mm/hr, and alpha-defensin positive. Culture is negative. What is the MSIS score and diagnosis?

A: MSIS score = 8 points (definite PJI). CRP over 10 = 1 point, ESR over 30 = 1 point, synovial WCC over 3000 = 2 points, PMN over 70% counts with WCC (do NOT double-score, so 0 additional points), alpha-defensin positive = 3 points. Total 1+1+2+3 = 7 points. Wait - I made error. PMN over 70% = 1 point separately, so actually 1+1+2+1+3 = 8 points (definite infection, threshold is 6). Proceed with treatment despite negative culture (likely prior antibiotics).

DAIR Timing Question

Q: Which scenario is the BEST candidate for DAIR: (A) 6 weeks post-TKA, 2-week history of pain and swelling, MSSA, stable implant. (B) 2 weeks post-TKA, 1-week history of pain, MRSA, stable implant. (C) 3 years post-TKA, acute onset (5 days), Streptococcus, stable implant. (D) 8 weeks post-TKA, insidious onset over 4 weeks, CNS, stable implant.

A: Answer (C). Acute hematogenous PJI (Type III) with symptom duration under 3 weeks, Streptococcus (favorable organism), stable implant. DAIR success 75%. (A) fails because chronic infection (6 weeks post-op with insidious 2-week symptoms suggests smoldering infection over 4 weeks - KLIC C criterion). (B) fails because MRSA is relative contraindication to DAIR (biofilm difficult to eradicate). (D) fails because chronic (8 weeks post-op, insidious onset over 4 weeks) and CNS (low virulence but antibiotic-resistant).

Antibiotic Cement Spacer Question

Q: What is the standard antibiotic formulation for a 2-stage revision antibiotic cement spacer?

A: Vancomycin 4-6g + tobramycin 3-4g per 40g cement (Palacos R or equivalent PMMA). Maximum 10% antibiotic by weight to maintain mechanical properties. Vancomycin provides Gram-positive coverage (including MRSA), aminoglycoside provides Gram-negative coverage and synergy. Dual kinetic profile: aminoglycoside elutes rapidly (peak 24-48h), vancomycin elutes slowly (sustained over 6-12 weeks).

Prevention Bundle Question

Q: A 65-year-old diabetic patient (HbA1c 8.5%) with BMI 42 who smokes 10 cigarettes daily is scheduled for elective TKA in 6 weeks. What preoperative interventions reduce PJI risk?

A: Postpone surgery and optimize: (1) Glycemic control - HbA1c target under 7.0% (ideally 6.5%). HbA1c 8.5% increases PJI risk 70%. Endocrinology referral, consider insulin if needed. Recheck in 3 months. (2) Weight reduction - BMI 42 triples PJI risk. Bariatric surgery referral or intensive weight loss program. Realistic target: Reduce to BMI under 35 over 6-12 months. (3) Smoking cessation - doubles PJI risk. Smoking cessation program, nicotine replacement. Require 8 weeks smoke-free minimum before surgery. (4) S. aureus screening and decolonization - nasal swab PCR, if positive mupirocin 2% intranasal BID + chlorhexidine 4% body wash for 5 days before surgery. This patient is NOT a safe candidate for elective TKA without risk modification. Counsel honestly: Operating now has 6-10% infection risk vs 1-2% if optimized.

Spacer Interval Question

Q: What factors determine the interval duration between Stage 1 and Stage 2 of a two-stage revision?

A: Standard interval 6-12 weeks, but varies based on: (1) Organism virulence - MSSA/Strep: 6-8 weeks. MRSA/resistant GNR: 12+ weeks. Fungi: 12-24 weeks. (2) Clinical response - CRP normalization (under 10 mg/L), symptom resolution (no pain, swelling, drainage). If poor response, extend interval. (3) Host factors - Immunosuppressed: Longer interval (12+ weeks). Diabetic with poor control: Optimize first. (4) Spacer function - Articulating spacer well-tolerated: Can wait 12 weeks. Static spacer with pain/bone loss: Consider shorter (6-8 weeks). No evidence that longer interval improves eradication beyond 6 weeks if clinical resolution achieved. Emerging practice: Shorter intervals (2-4 weeks) for virulent organisms with rapid response (requires close monitoring).

Salvage Options Question

Q: A patient has failed two 2-stage revisions for recurrent MRSA PJI. She is 70 years old with diabetes, ESRD on dialysis, and limited mobility (walks with frame indoors only). What are her management options and which would you recommend?

A: Options: (1) Third 2-stage attempt - success rate 60-70% after second failure, but requires good host and aggressive debridement. Her ESRD and diabetes make poor candidate (KLIC score 4 = 100% failure). (2) Resection arthroplasty - removes all hardware, 90% infection control. She would require long leg brace and crutches/walker (already using frame, so functional impact moderate). (3) Chronic suppressive antibiotics - MRSA is difficult to suppress (need vancomycin IV or linezolid PO, both have toxicity). ESRD complicates dosing. Not curative but temporizing. (4) Amputation - last resort, but mortality 10-15% and she may not ambulate with prosthesis given limited baseline mobility. My recommendation: Resection arthroplasty. She is poor candidate for reconstruction (multiple failures, high KLIC score, MRSA). Chronic suppression is risky with ESRD (vancomycin dosing, linezolid bone marrow toxicity). Amputation too aggressive for current presentation. Resection gives 90% infection control, allows mobilization with brace (similar to her current frame), avoids lifelong antibiotics. Counsel: This is permanent - reimplantation rarely successful after resection. Quality of life limited but infection resolved.

Australian Context and Medicolegal Considerations

AOANJRR PJI Surveillance

2023 Registry Findings:

  • PJI accounts for 25% of all revision TKA burden (second to aseptic loosening 30%)
  • Primary TKA infection rate: 1.8% at 5 years, rising to 2.2% at 10 years
  • Revision TKA infection rate: 4.5% at 5 years (2.5-fold higher risk)
  • Cemented TKA: 1.8% infection rate vs uncemented 2.4% (p less than 0.01) - antibiotic cement may reduce risk
  • Obesity (BMI over 35): 2-fold higher revision for infection rate

Clinical application: Registry data informs consent discussions and identifies high-risk populations for prevention strategies.

ACSQHC Surgical Site Infection Guidelines

Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care:

  • Antibiotic prophylaxis: Cefazolin 2g within 60 minutes of incision (standard)
  • Skin preparation: Chlorhexidine-alcohol preferred over povidone-iodine
  • Normothermia: Maintain core temperature over 36°C (reduces infection 30%)
  • Glycemic control: Perioperative glucose under 10 mmol/L
  • Surveillance: Mandatory 30-day follow-up for SSI reporting

Compliance: Australian hospitals audit adherence to bundle (antibiotic timing, skin prep, temperature). Public reporting drives quality improvement.

Medicolegal Considerations

High-risk litigation scenarios:

  • Inadequate consent: Failing to discuss PJI risk (1-2%) and 2-stage revision possibility
  • Delayed diagnosis: Missing PJI due to low suspicion or inadequate workup (aspiration)
  • Inappropriate DAIR: Attempting DAIR for chronic infection (over 4 weeks) or resistant organism, leading to failure and prolonged morbidity
  • Premature reimplantation: Stage 2 before infection eradication (CRP not normalized, positive cultures), resulting in reinfection

Defensive practices:

  • Document risk factor discussion in pre-op consult (obesity, diabetes, immunosuppression)
  • Low threshold for aspiration if pain/CRP elevated post-TKA - better to over-investigate than miss infection
  • Multidisciplinary decision-making: Involve infectious disease for complex cases (document in notes)
  • Informed consent for 2-stage: Explicitly discuss two surgeries, 6-12 month recovery, 10-15% reinfection, salvage potential

Consent for TKA: PJI Discussion is Mandatory

Medicolegal requirement: PJI must be discussed in consent for primary TKA, even though risk is only 1-2%. Patients have right to know the most serious complication and its implications (2-stage revision, prolonged recovery, functional compromise).

Minimum consent elements:

  1. Infection risk: "1-2% for infection, higher if diabetic/obese/immunosuppressed"
  2. Treatment: "If infection occurs, may require removal of prosthesis, antibiotics, and second surgery to replace (2-stage revision)"
  3. Timeline: "Treatment for infection can take 6-12 months from diagnosis to full recovery"
  4. Outcomes: "Even with successful treatment, function may not return to normal - average knee bend 90-100 degrees vs 120 for uncomplicated TKA"
  5. Salvage: "Small risk (5-10%) of multiple failed treatments requiring permanent implant removal"

Document in consent form and clinic notes. Patients who develop PJI are more likely to sue if they feel they were not warned. Courts view 1-2% as material risk requiring disclosure (Rogers v Whitaker precedent).

Australian Private vs Public Pathways for PJI Treatment

AspectPrivate HospitalPublic Hospital
Access to surgeryImmediate (within 1-2 weeks for DAIR, 2-4 weeks for 2-stage Stage 1)Category 2 urgency (within 90 days). DAIR urgent (within 1 week)
Surgeon choiceContinuity with index surgeonMay see different surgeon (based on availability)
Out-of-pocket costs$10,000-15,000 total (2-stage = 2 admissions, anesthetist, assistant fees)Nil (fully covered by Medicare)
Antibiotic spacerCommercial articulating spacer (PROSTALAC, $3000-5000) often usedHand-made articulating or static spacer (cost containment, equal outcomes)
Infectious disease involvementVaries (surgeon-initiated referral, often consultant model)Mandatory ID consult for all PJI cases (multidisciplinary model)

Australian reality: Many patients with PJI in private system transfer to public for 2-stage revision due to cost burden. This creates discontinuity of care and requires careful communication between private and public teams. Medicolegal risk if poor handover.

TKA PERIPROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION

High-Yield Exam Summary

MSIS Diagnostic Criteria

  • •1 Major (sinus tract OR purulence) = definite PJI
  • •Score 6+ from minor = definite. 2-5 = possible
  • •Minor: CRP over 10 (1pt), ESR over 30 (1pt), D-dimer over 860 (2pt)
  • •Synovial WCC over 3000 (2pt), PMN over 70% (1pt - no double-score with WCC)
  • •Alpha-defensin positive (3pt) - best single marker 97% sens, 96% spec
  • •Culture: 2+ same organism (3pt), 1 virulent (2pt)
  • •Antibiotic holiday: Min 2 weeks off (ideally 6 weeks) before cultures

Classification (Tsukayama)

  • •Type I: Early (under 4 weeks) = DAIR + antibiotics 6 weeks
  • •Type II: Late chronic (over 4 weeks) = 2-stage revision
  • •Type III: Acute hematogenous (acute onset, under 3 weeks symptoms) = DAIR if stable implant
  • •Type IV: Positive intraop cultures = antibiotics 6 weeks, no removal if stable

DAIR Indications (STEADI)

  • •S: Symptoms under 3 weeks duration
  • •T: Timing early (under 4 weeks post-op) OR acute hematogenous any time
  • •E: Eradicable organism (sensitive, NOT MRSA/fungi)
  • •A: Articulating surfaces intact (no poly damage)
  • •D: Definitely stable implant
  • •I: Immunocompetent (KLIC under 3)
  • •Success: 50-70% if favorable factors. Polyethylene exchange MANDATORY

2-Stage Revision Protocol

  • •Stage 1: Remove all components/cement, radical debridement, antibiotic spacer
  • •Spacer: Vancomycin 4-6g + tobramycin 3-4g per 40g cement
  • •Interval: 6-12 weeks standard (shorter 2-4 weeks emerging for virulent organisms)
  • •Criteria for Stage 2: CRP under 10, clinical resolution, no drainage
  • •Stage 2: Remove spacer, 5+ cultures, revision implants with stems/augments
  • •Success: 85-90% eradication, but 10-15% reinfection

Prevention Bundle (STOP-PJI)

  • •S: S. aureus screening + decolonization (mupirocin + chlorhexidine 5 days) - reduces 50%
  • •T: Timely antibiotics (cefazolin 2g within 60 min of incision)
  • •O: Optimize comorbidities (HbA1c under 7%, BMI reduction, smoking cessation 8 weeks)
  • •P: Prepare skin (chlorhexidine-alcohol superior to iodine)
  • •P: Perioperative normothermia (over 36°C reduces infection 30%)
  • •J: Joint manipulation gentle (minimize operative time, gentle tissue handling)
  • •I: Implant antibiotic cement (in high-risk: revision, immunosuppressed)

Key Evidence and Outcomes

  • •MSIS 2018: 97.7% sensitivity, 99.5% specificity for PJI diagnosis
  • •KLIC score: Predicts DAIR failure (score 0=12%, 4=100% failure). K=kidney, L=liver, I=immunosuppression, C=chronic over 28 days
  • •Articulating vs static spacer: Equal infection eradication (89%), articulating better ROM
  • •2-stage interval: 2-week vs 8-week equivalent eradication for virulent organisms, no immunosuppression
  • •AOANJRR 2023: PJI 25% of revision burden, 1.8% primary at 5yr, 4.5% revision at 5yr
Quick Stats
Reading Time259 min
Related Topics

Adult Hip Dysplasia

Ankle Arthritis

Aseptic Loosening in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Avascular Necrosis of the Hip