TKA Wound Complications
TKA WOUND COMPLICATIONS
Wound complications following total knee arthroplasty encompass a spectrum from
Critical Must-Knows
- Key point requiring clinical understanding
- Key point requiring clinical understanding
- Key point requiring clinical understanding
Examiner's Pearls
- "Exam point to remember
- "Exam point to remember
- "Exam point to remember
Critical Decision Points
Risk Factors for TKA Wound Complications
Epidemiology
Incidence and Burden
Overall Incidence
Wound complications after TKA represent a significant clinical challenge with substantial implications for patient outcomes and healthcare costs.
Primary TKA
Revision TKA
Infection Progression
Healthcare Cost
Australian Context
The Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) data demonstrates approximately 70,000 knee arthroplasties performed annually in Australia. With a 2% wound complication rate, this translates to approximately 1,400 significant wound problems annually requiring additional intervention. The burden is disproportionately higher in regional centres where access to plastic surgery may be limited.
Medicare data indicates increasing revision burden, with wound-related complications contributing to early revision rates. The AOANJRR 2023 annual report identifies infection (encompassing wound complications) as the leading cause of early revision within 2 years of primary TKA.
Temporal Patterns
| Time Period | Wound Complication Type | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| 0-7 days | Wound drainage, haematoma | Most common period |
| 1-2 weeks | Superficial infection, early dehiscence | Critical intervention window |
| 2-4 weeks | Delayed healing, skin necrosis | Decision point for flap coverage |
| 1-3 months | Chronic wound, sinus formation | Indicates deep infection |
Patient and Surgical Factors
Host Factors
Understanding and optimizing modifiable risk factors is essential for prevention. The literature consistently identifies patient-related factors as the primary determinants of wound healing.
Obesity (BMI greater than 35)
- Most significant modifiable risk factor
- BMI greater than 40 increases risk 6-fold
- Weight loss of 5-10% significantly reduces risk
- Consider bariatric referral for BMI greater than 45
Diabetes Mellitus
- HbA1c greater than 8% associated with 2-3x increased risk
- Perioperative glucose control critical (target less than 10 mmol/L)
- Preoperative optimization period 3-6 months ideal
- Continuous glucose monitoring perioperatively recommended
Smoking
- Current smoking doubles wound complication risk
- Minimum 4 weeks cessation recommended preoperatively
- 8 weeks cessation optimal for microvascular recovery
- Quitline referral (13 7848) as standard practice
Nutrition
- Albumin less than 3.5 g/dL associated with poor healing
- Prealbumin more sensitive marker of acute nutrition status
- Total lymphocyte count less than 1500 indicates immunocompromise
- Dietitian referral for optimization
Medications
- Corticosteroids: prednisolone greater than 10mg daily increases risk
- Methotrexate: continue through surgery (current evidence)
- Biologics: hold 1-2 dosing cycles preoperatively
- Anticoagulation: increases haematoma risk
Surgical Factors
Incision Placement
Tissue Handling
Haemostasis
Closure Technique
Risk Stratification
| Risk Category | Characteristics | Management Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Low Risk | BMI less than 30, non-smoker, HbA1c less than 7%, no previous surgery | Standard precautions |
| Moderate Risk | BMI 30-40, controlled diabetes, previous surgery | Enhanced optimization, consider drain |
| High Risk | BMI greater than 40, HbA1c greater than 8%, immunosuppression, PVD | Multidisciplinary optimization, extended antibiotics, plastic surgery consultation |
| Very High Risk | Prior radiation, scleroderma, multiple risk factors | Consider primary flap coverage, staged approach |
Classification
Classification of Wound Complications
Anatomical Classification
Definition: Involvement of skin and subcutaneous tissue only, without extension to deep fascia or joint.
Types:
- Prolonged drainage: Serous or serosanguinous discharge beyond 5-7 days
- Superficial dehiscence: Partial separation without fascial involvement
- Skin necrosis: Full-thickness skin death, variable extent
- Superficial infection: Cellulitis, suture abscess, superficial SSI
Key Features:
- Intact deep fascia on probing
- No communication with joint space
- Culture typically skin flora
- Systemic symptoms absent or mild
Temporal Classification
| Timing | Classification | Aetiology | Implications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Less than 2 weeks | Acute | Technical factors, haematoma, early infection | Best prognosis if addressed promptly |
| 2-4 weeks | Subacute | Healing failure, skin necrosis evolving | Window for salvage with soft tissue procedures |
| Greater than 4 weeks | Delayed/Chronic | Established necrosis, chronic wound, biofilm | Higher risk of deep infection, more complex reconstruction |
| Greater than 3 months | Late | Sinus tract, chronic infection | Usually indicates PJI requiring staged revision |
Severity Grading
Grade I - Minor
- Prolonged drainage less than 10 days
- Responds to local measures
- No skin necrosis
- Normal inflammatory markers
Grade II - Moderate
- Drainage 10-14 days OR superficial dehiscence
- Requires theatre for washout/closure
- Limited skin necrosis (less than 2cm)
- Elevated but improving inflammatory markers
Grade III - Major
- Drainage greater than 14 days OR deep dehiscence
- Skin necrosis greater than 2cm
- Exposed capsule or extensor mechanism
- Persistently elevated inflammatory markers
Grade IV - Severe
- Exposed prosthesis
- Full-thickness necrosis
- Failed previous intervention
- Deep infection confirmed
Clinical Presentation
Clinical Presentation and Assessment
History
Key Questions:
- Timing of symptom onset relative to surgery
- Character of drainage (serous, serosanguinous, purulent, haemoserous)
- Volume of drainage (saturating dressings, frequency of changes)
- Associated symptoms (fever, increasing pain, swelling)
- Compliance with postoperative instructions
- Any trauma or falls
Red Flags:
- Fever greater than 38.5 degrees C
- Increasing pain after initial improvement
- Purulent drainage at any time
- Systemic symptoms (malaise, rigors)
- Failure of wound to progress after 5-7 days
Examination
Wound Assessment:
- Extent of erythema (mark and date margins)
- Character of drainage on dressing
- Presence of necrosis (eschar, purple discoloration)
- Wound edge approximation
- Tension on closure
- Evidence of haematoma
Surrounding Skin:
- Tissue turgor and quality
- Previous scars
- Skin grafts or flaps
- Evidence of venous insufficiency
Investigations
Blood Tests
Joint Aspiration
Wound Swab
Imaging
Differential Diagnosis
| Condition | Features | Distinguishing Factors |
|---|---|---|
| Haematoma | Early, fluctuant, ecchymosis | Usually presents day 0-3; decreasing with time |
| Seroma | Non-tender, fluctuant, clear fluid | May be late; aspirate is straw-coloured |
| Superficial Infection | Erythema, warmth, tenderness | Responds to antibiotics; markers mildly elevated |
| Deep Infection | Systemic symptoms, joint involvement | Elevated markers, positive aspirate |
| Wound Tension/Necrosis | Progressive skin changes | May have minimal drainage initially |
| Fat Necrosis | Firm, tender nodules | Obese patients; may drain oily fluid |
Prevention Strategies
Preoperative Optimization
Diabetes Control
- Target HbA1c less than 8% (ideally less than 7%)
- Endocrinology referral for poor control
- Perioperative glucose monitoring protocol
- Insulin sliding scale in hospital
Nutrition
- Albumin target greater than 3.5 g/dL
- Preoperative oral supplements (e.g., Ensure, Resource)
- Consider parenteral nutrition if severely malnourished
- Vitamin C and zinc supplementation
Smoking Cessation
- Minimum 4 weeks preoperative cessation
- Nicotine replacement therapy acceptable
- Quitline referral (13 7848)
- Consider varenicline/bupropion
Weight Optimization
- Target BMI less than 40 for elective surgery
- Dietitian and exercise physiologist referral
- Consider bariatric surgery referral for BMI greater than 50
- 5-10% weight loss reduces risk significantly
Surgical Technique
Incision Planning
- Use previous incision if adequate
- Most lateral incision preferred if multiple
- Minimum 7cm skin bridge between incisions
- Full-thickness skin flaps
- Avoid undermining
Tissue Handling
- No-touch technique for skin edges
- Avoid Army-Navy retractors on skin edges
- Self-retaining retractors with care
- Minimal cautery to dermis
- Preserve subcutaneous fat layer
Haemostasis
- Tourniquet use controversial; if used, release before closure
- Tranexamic acid (topical or IV) reduces haematoma
- Meticulous point haemostasis
- Consider drain in high-risk patients (controversial)
Closure Principles
- Layered closure essential
- Capsular closure: absorbable braided suture
- Deep dermal: absorbable monofilament (critical layer)
- Skin: staples or running subcuticular
- Minimal tension on skin edges
- Consider barbed suture for capsule
Postoperative Care
Dressing Management
Drain Management
Early Mobilization
DVT Prophylaxis
Management Algorithm

Decision Framework
Indications:
- Drainage less than 5 days, decreasing trend
- Superficial erythema responding to elevation
- Normal or minimally elevated inflammatory markers
- No systemic symptoms
- Stable wound appearance
Management:
- Bed rest with leg elevated
- Dressing changes as needed (sterile technique)
- Cease anticoagulation if safe
- Consider compression
- Daily wound review
- Oral antibiotics if superficial infection
Endpoint Criteria:
- Wound dry for 48 hours
- Erythema resolved
- Inflammatory markers normalizing
- Patient afebrile
Failure Criteria (Proceed to Theatre):
- No improvement at 48-72 hours
- Progression of drainage or erythema
- Rising inflammatory markers
- New systemic symptoms
Specific Scenarios
| Scenario | Initial Management | Escalation Trigger | Definitive Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drainage day 3-5, stable | Observation, bed rest, elevation | No improvement 48hr | I&D, direct closure |
| Drainage greater than 7 days | Theatre within 24-48hr | Deep tissue involvement | I&D +/- NPWT |
| Skin necrosis 2-4cm | Debridement, assess depth | Exposed capsule | Local flap coverage |
| Exposed prosthesis | Urgent plastic surgery consult | Unable to cover locally | Free flap or staged revision |
| Proven deep infection | DAIR protocol | Virulent organism, loose implant | Staged revision |
NPWT (Negative Pressure Wound Therapy)
Role in TKA Wound Complications:
- Bridge to definitive closure
- Promotes granulation tissue
- Reduces oedema and drainage
- Allows serial debridement
- NOT a definitive treatment for exposed prosthesis
Technique:
- White foam over exposed tissue (less adherent)
- Black foam for granulation (more aggressive)
- Continuous pressure 75-125 mmHg
- Changes every 48-72 hours
- Not through joint capsule if exposed
Contraindications:
- Active bleeding
- Malignancy in wound
- Untreated osteomyelitis
- Exposed vessels without coverage
Soft Tissue Coverage Options
Local Flaps
Anatomy:
- Two heads: medial and lateral
- Medial head larger, more commonly used
- Vascular pedicle: sural arteries (branches of popliteal)
- Pivot point at musculotendinous junction
Indications:
- Proximal and middle third TKA wounds
- Exposed proximal prosthesis
- Soft tissue defects up to 10x15cm
Technique:
- Medial approach for medial head
- Identify and protect saphenous nerve
- Divide tendon at musculotendinous junction
- Rotate into defect
- Split-thickness skin graft over muscle
Advantages:
- Reliable blood supply
- Good tissue bulk
- Well-established technique
- Can be performed under tourniquet
Limitations:
- Cannot reach distal third of wound
- Cosmetic deficit of calf
- Minor functional impact (minimal weakness)
Coverage Algorithm by Location
| Wound Location | First-Line Coverage | Second-Line Coverage |
|---|---|---|
| Proximal third (above patella) | Medial gastrocnemius flap | Lateral gastrocnemius, free flap |
| Middle third (patella level) | Gastrocnemius flap | Propeller flap, free flap |
| Distal third (below patella) | Hemisoleus flap | Propeller flap, free flap |
| Extensive (full incision) | Combined gastrocnemius-soleus | Free latissimus dorsi |
Outcomes
Outcomes and Prognosis
Success Rates
Primary Closure
Gastrocnemius Flap
Free Flap
Overall Prosthesis Retention
Factors Affecting Outcome
| Factor | Favourable | Unfavourable |
|---|---|---|
| Timing of Intervention | Less than 2 weeks from symptom onset | Greater than 4 weeks |
| Inflammatory Markers | Normalizing trend pre-flap | Persistently elevated |
| Cultures | Negative at time of coverage | Positive, especially MRSA/resistant organisms |
| Patient Factors | Non-smoker, controlled diabetes | Uncontrolled diabetes, active smoking |
| Wound Aetiology | Mechanical (wound tension, haematoma) | Established deep infection |
Complications of Flap Coverage
Early (less than 2 weeks):
- Flap necrosis (partial or complete): 5-10%
- Haematoma: 5%
- Seroma: 10-15%
- Skin graft failure: 10-20%
Late (greater than 2 weeks):
- Chronic wound/sinus: 10-15%
- Deep infection requiring revision: 10-20%
- Stiffness (loss of ROM): 20-30%
- Cosmetic concerns: common
Long-Term Outcomes
Prosthesis Survival:
- At 2 years: 75-85% with early treatment
- At 5 years: 65-75%
- Revision rates higher than uncomplicated TKA
Functional Outcomes:
- ROM typically reduced (average loss 10-20 degrees flexion)
- Oxford Knee Score reduced by 5-10 points versus uncomplicated
- Patient satisfaction variable (70-80% satisfied)
- Return to activities possible but delayed
Exam Viva Scenarios
Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination
TKA Wound Complications
High-Yield Exam Summary
Key Numbers
- •Wound complication rate: 1-4% primary TKA, 4-12% revision
- •Persistent drainage greater than 5-7 days requires intervention
- •BMI greater than 40 = 6-fold increased risk
- •HbA1c target: less than 8% (ideally less than 7%)
- •Albumin target: greater than 3.5 g/dL
- •Smoking cessation: minimum 4 weeks, optimal 8 weeks
- •Skin bridge minimum: 7cm between incisions
- •Flap coverage success: 90-95% gastrocnemius
- •Prosthesis retention early treatment: 75-85%
- •Prosthesis retention late treatment: 50-60%
Classification
- •Superficial: skin and subcutaneous only, intact fascia
- •Deep: through fascia, potential joint communication
- •Acute: less than 2 weeks (best prognosis)
- •Subacute: 2-4 weeks (window for salvage)
- •Delayed: greater than 4 weeks (higher infection risk)
Management Triggers
- •48-72 hour rule: if no improvement, proceed to theatre
- •Any exposed prosthesis = urgent flap consultation
- •Necrosis greater than 2cm = likely needs flap
- •Positive cultures at coverage = worse prognosis
- •NPWT is bridge to closure, not definitive treatment
Flap Coverage
- •Gastrocnemius: workhorse, proximal and middle third
- •Medial head most commonly used (larger)
- •Soleus: middle to distal third
- •Free flap: failed local options, large defects
- •Early plastic surgery involvement improves outcomes
Risk Factors (WOUND RISK)
- •Weight (BMI greater than 35)
- •Oral steroids and immunosuppression
- •Uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c greater than 8%)
- •Nutrition poor (albumin less than 3.5)
- •Dermatologic conditions
- •Revision surgery or previous incisions
- •Inflammatory arthropathy
- •Smoking (current or recent)
- •Knee previous radiation or surgery
Prevention Pearls
- •Chlorhexidine washes x5 days preoperatively
- •MRSA decolonization if carrier (mupirocin)
- •No-touch technique for skin edges
- •Layered closure with deep dermal sutures (critical)
- •Tranexamic acid reduces haematoma
- •Undisturbed dressing 48-72 hours postoperatively
Summary
Key Takeaways
Prevention is Better Than Cure
- Optimize modifiable risk factors preoperatively (obesity, diabetes, smoking, nutrition)
- Meticulous surgical technique with emphasis on tissue handling
- Layered closure with attention to deep dermal layer
- Appropriate postoperative wound care
Early Recognition and Intervention
- Persistent drainage beyond 5-7 days is a red flag
- 48-72 hour rule: if conservative measures fail, proceed to theatre
- Trend of inflammatory markers more important than absolute values
- Low threshold for surgical exploration in high-risk patients
Definitive Management
- Aggressive debridement and lavage in theatre
- Direct closure if possible; NPWT as bridge if not
- Early plastic surgery involvement for complex wounds
- Gastrocnemius flap is the workhorse for soft tissue coverage
Outcomes
- Early treatment (less than 2 weeks) preserves 75-85% of prostheses
- Delayed treatment (greater than 4 weeks) drops to 50-60%
- Gastrocnemius flap has 90-95% success rate
- Functional outcomes reduced but acceptable with successful salvage