Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (Anatomic)

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (Anatomic)

Comprehensive guide to Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (TSA) including indications, surgical technique, and outcomes.

complete
Updated: 2026-01-02
High Yield Overview

TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY (ANATOMIC)

Gold Standard for OA | Intact Cuff Required | 95% Survival

over 90%10-Year Survival
95%Pain Relief
under 1%Infection Rate
15-20yExpected Lifespan

Walch Classification

Type A
PatternConcentric wear (A1 minor, A2 major)
TreatmentStandard Glenoid
Type B
PatternPosterior subluxation (B1 narrow, B2 biconcave)
TreatmentCorrect Version
Type C
PatternDysplastic (Retroversion over 25 deg)
TreatmentComplex/Reverse

Critical Must-Knows

  • Requires INTACT rotator cuff (contraindicated if torn)
  • Walch B2 (biconcave) is the most common operative challenge
  • Subscapularis management is critical for success
  • Axillary nerve is at risk during inferior capsular release
  • Glenoid loosening is the main mode of long-term failure

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    External Rotation lag = Cuff tear (Contraindication for aTSA)
  • "
    Pseudoparalysis vs Stiffness differentiation is key
  • "
    Lesser tuberosity osteotomy has highest subscap healing rate
  • "
    Critical Shoulder Angle under 30 degrees associated with OA

Critical Exam Points

At a Glance

Anatomic vs Reverse TSA

FeatureAnatomic TSAReverse TSAKey Pearl
IndicationOA with Intact Rotator CuffCuff Tear Arthropathy, FractureCuff status determines choice
BiomechanicsRestores normal anatomyMedializes center of rotationAnatomic needs cuff; Reverse needs deltoid
Range of MotionBetter ER/IR (if cuff healthy)Limited IR, Good ElevationAnatomic feels more 'natural'
ComplicationsGlenoid loosening (late)Notching, Stress fracture (early)Loosening main fail mode in aTSA

Mnemonics

Mnemonic

ABCWalch Types

A
Aligned
Centered head, central wear
B
Back
Backwards (Posterior subluxation/wear)
C
Crazy
Crazy retroversion (over 25 deg)

Memory Hook:Easy as ABC: Aligned, Backwards, Crazy retroversion.

Mnemonic

MACStructures at Risk

M
Musculocutaneous
Medial to conjoined tendon
A
Axillary
Inferior border of subscapularis
C
Cephalic
In deltopectoral groove

Memory Hook:Big MAC Attack: Beware the nerves during approach.

Mnemonic

PINContraindications

P
Paralysis
Deltoid/Cuff dysfunction (Axillary N. injury)
I
Infection
Active or recent sepsis
N
Neuropathic
Charcot joint (Rapid destruction)

Memory Hook:Don't put a PIN/Prosthesis In a Neuropathic joint!

Overview and Epidemiology

Definition Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (TSA) is a surgical procedure that involves replacing the damaged humeral head with a metal sphere and the glenoid with a polyethylene dish, strictly replicating the native anatomy. The success of the procedure relies entirely on a functioning rotator cuff to compress the head into the glenoid ("concavity compression") and generate rotation.

Epidemiology

  • Trends: While Anatomic TSA volume is increasing globally, Reverse TSA (rTSA) volume has grown exponentially and now surpasses aTSA in many registries (including Australia and USA). This is due to expanded indications for Reverse TSA (such as cuff tear arthropathy, fractures, and revision), as well as the desire to avoid late glenoid loosening associated with anatomic implants.
  • Demographics: Typically active patients aged 60-75 years with primary osteoarthritis. Patients under 50 present a significant challenge due to concerns about implant longevity—specifically the "polyethylene problem."
  • Risk Factors:
    • Primary: Osteoarthritis (genetic, age-related).
    • Secondary: Previous trauma (Post-traumatic OA), instability surgery (Capsulorraphy Arthropathy—over-tightening leads to posterior wear), Avascular Necrosis (Steroids, Alcohol, Sickle Cell), Inflammatory Arthritis (Rheumatoid), and Hemochromatosis ("Iron fist, iron shoulder").

Pathophysiology of Osteoarthritis Primary OA is characterized by a predictable sequence of joint destruction:

  1. Cartilage Loss: Early loss of articular cartilage, often starting centrally or posteriorly.
  2. Posterior Wear: The hallmark of shoulder OA is posterior glenoid wear (retroversion) and posterior humeral subluxation. This eccentric loading creates a "Rocking Horse" phenomenon. The humeral head acts as a fulcrum, levering the glenoid component out of the bone if not corrected.
  3. Soft Tissue Contracture: The subscapularis and anterior capsule become contracted and scarred, drastically limiting external rotation. The posterior capsule stretches due to chronic subluxation but is rarely the primary problem.
  4. Osteophyte Formation: Large osteophytes form on the inferior humeral head ("Goat's Beard") which can encroach on the axillary nerve space.

The Young Patient Dilemma

In patients under 50 years, glenoid components have high failure rates due to polyethylene wear and loosening (aseptic loosening is the #1 failure mode). The "Ream and Run" procedure (Hemiarthroplasty with concentric glenoid reaming) is an option for high-demand patients willing to undergo extended rehab. Reverse TSA is generally avoided due to finite lifespan and salvage difficulties.

Anatomy and Biomechanics

Normal Anatomy

  • Glenoid Version: Typically retroverted 2-8° relative to the axis of the scapula body. However, the scapula itself is anteverted 30° on the thorax. The net result is a glenoid face that is slightly retroverted relative to the body axis.
  • Inclination: Superior inclination is typically 0-5°.
  • Critical Shoulder Angle (CSA): The angle between the glenoid inclination and the lateral acromion edge.
    • CSA under 30°: Associated with Osteoarthritis. The deltoid force vector compresses the joint, leading to cartilage wear.
    • CSA over 35°: Associated with Cuff Tears. The deltoid force vector shears superiorly, pulling the head into the supraspinatus.

Biomechanics of Concavity Compression The shoulder is inherently an unstable joint (golf ball on a tee). Stability in aTSA is dynamic, provided by the rotator cuff.

  • Concavity Compression: The rotator cuff muscles pull the humeral head into the glenoid concavity, creating a stable fulcrum.
  • Force Couples:
    • Coronal Plane: Deltoid (upward force) vs Supraspinatus/Infraspinatus (compressive/downward force).
    • Axial Plane: Subscapularis (anterior) vs Infraspinatus/Teres Minor (posterior).
  • Implication: Any deficiency in the cuff leads to eccentric loading (edge loading) of the glenoid component, causing the "Rocking Horse" phenomenon and early loosening. This is why an intact cuff is non-negotiable for aTSA.

Biomechanical Goals of aTSA

  1. Restore Version: Correct retroversion to neutral or slight retroversion (within 10°) to prevent eccentric loading. This centers the humeral head on the glenoid, distributing forces evenly across the cement interface.
  2. Restore Head Height: Reproduce the relationship between tuberosities and articular surface height (typically 8mm above the Greater Tuberosity). Restoring the native Center of Rotation (COR) is vital for cuff mechanics. If the head is placed too high, the cuff is over-tensioned; if too low, the cuff is lax, leading to instability.
  3. Restore Offset: Lateralization is critical for proper deltoid tensioning and the length-tension relationship of the rotator cuff. Loss of global offset leads to weakness and impingement.

Retroversion Correction Limit

Avoid correcting more than 10 degrees of retroversion with eccentric reaming alone. This removes excessive anterior bone stock, compromising peg fixation. ("Robbing Peter to pay Paul"). For over 10-15 degrees of correction, use augmented glenoids (Wedge) or bone graft to preserve bone stock.

Classification Systems

Walch Classification of Glenoid Morphology

Critical for pre-operative planning and implant selection. Developed to describe glenoid morphology in primary osteoarthritis using CT scans.

TypeMorphologyPathologyTreatment Strategy
Type A (Centered)Concentric wearA1: Minor erosion A2: Major erosion (Protrusio)Standard Glenoid
Type B (Subluxed)Posterior wearB1: Posterior narrowing B2: Biconcave (Paleo/Neo)Correction Required (Augment/Ream)
Type C (Dysplastic)Retroversion over 25°Developmental dysplasiaComplex (Bone Graft vs Reverse)

Samilson-Prieto Classification (Dislocation Arthropathy)

Used for OA secondary to instability (Capsulorraphy Arthropathy).

  • Grade 1: Under 3mm osteophyte on humerus or glenoid.
  • Grade 2: 3-7mm osteophyte.
  • Grade 3: Over 7mm osteophyte.

This classification guides the expected complexity of soft tissue releases. Higher grades typically require more extensive anterior release (Z-plasty) and posterior capsular releases to regain external rotation.

Clinical Assessment

History

  • Pain: Deep, aching, toothache-like. Worse at night.
  • Function: Difficulty with ADLs (esp. hygiene, reaching back, toileting). Females complain about bras; males about wallets.
  • Stiffness: Progressive loss of ER and Abduction. "Screwing in a lightbulb" is difficult.
  • Crepitus: Audible/palpable grinding ("Ratchet-like").

Examination

  • Look: Supra/Infraspinatus atrophy (Chronic cuff tear?). Anterior scar?
  • Feel: Posterior joint line tenderness. Anterior subluxation of the humeral head.
  • Move: Blocked ER (capsular restriction). Scapulothoracic compensation (shrugging).
  • Power: MUST test Cuff integrity. ER Lag sign? Belly Press? Lift-off?

The Pseudoparalysis Trap

Differentiate Pseudoparalysis (Cuff failure = Cannot lift arm actively but Full PASSIVE ROM) from Stiffness (OA = Cannot lift arm actively AND Limited PASSIVE ROM).

Stiff shoulder = Anatomic TSA. Pseudoparalytic shoulder = Reverse TSA.

Imaging and Investigations

Imaging Protocol

Step 1Plain Radiographs (Trauma Series)
  • AP (Grashey): Joint space loss, subchondral sclerosis, osteophytes ("Goat's Beard" on inferior humerus).
  • Axillary Lateral: CRITICAL. Assess posterior subluxation (percentage) and version. Look for biconcavity.
  • Outlet: Acromial shape and cuff status signs (high riding head).
Step 2CT Scan (Mandatory)
  • Version: Quantify retroversion (Friedman method).
  • Bone Stock: Assess glenoid vault depth for peg penetration.
  • Planning: Essential for PSI (Patient Specific Instrumentation) guides to execute version correction accurately.
Step 3MRI (Selective)
  • Indication: If cuff strength is equivocal on exam or history of tear.
  • Finding: Fatty infiltration (Goutallier over 2 contraindicates aTSA) and tendon retraction (Patte).

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
Management Algorithm
Click to expand
Algorithm for shoulder arthritis based on Age, Cuff Status, and Glenoid Morphology.Credit: OrthoVellum

Osteoarthritis with Intact Cuff

Decision Pathway

Concentric (A)Standard aTSA

Standard glenoid component (All-poly pegged). Reaming to expose subchondral bone. Excellent outcomes expected.

Eccentric (B1/B2)Corrective aTSA
  • Mild (under 10°): Eccentric reaming (high side down).
  • Severe (over 10°): Augmented Glenoid (Wedge) or PSI.
  • Goal: Center the head to prevent early loosening. Avoid reaming over 10° to preserve bone.

Osteoarthritis with Cuff Tear

Decision Pathway

Repairable?Young Patient

Consider aTSA + Cuff Repair (High failure rate). Or Hemiarthroplasty (CTA head). Note: Very controversial area. Outcomes generally inferior to intact cuff.

IrreparableCuff Tear Arthropathy

Reverse TSA is the Gold Standard. Anatomic TSA is contraindicated due to "Rocking Horse" loosening: the head migrates superiorly and loads the superior glenoid rim, causing early failure.

Non-Operative Management

Medications

  • NSAIDs: First line for pain and inflammation.
  • Analgesia: Paracetamol/codeine sparingly. Avoid opioids.
  • Injections:
    • Corticosteroid: Short term relief. WARNING: Increases risk of infection if performed under 3 months before arthroplasty.
    • Hyaluronic Acid: Variable evidence, less risk.

Therapy

  • Maintain ROM: Stretching to prevent secondary adhesive capsulitis.
  • Strengthening: Scapular stabilizers and cuff to maintain centering.
  • Activity Modification: Avoid heavy overhead loading and impact activities.

Treatment Options

OptionIndicationProsCons
Arthroscopic DebridementYoung (under 50), mechanical symptomsLow risk, buys timeUnpredictable pain relief
HemiarthroplastyYoung laborer, insufficient glenoid boneNo glenoid loosening riskGlenoid erosion pain
Anatomic TSAClassic OA, Intact cuffBest ROM, Normal anatomyGlenoid loosening risk
Reverse TSACuff tear arthropathy, ElderlyReliable with no cuffLimited rotation, contour

Surgical Technique

Deltopectoral Approach

The workhorse approach for TSA. It is an extensile, internervous approach that preserves the deltoid origin, which is crucial for rehabilitation.

Exposure Steps

Step 1Incision

Incision from coracoid tip to deltoid insertion (~10-15cm). Identify Cephalic vein in the deltopectoral groove. Pearl: Retract Cephalic vein laterally with Deltoid to preserve venous drainage from the arm (most branches come from deltoid). Ligate small feeding branches (The "Delta" vein).

Step 2Deep Dissection

Incise clavipectoral fascia lateral to the conjoined tendon. Identify "Conjoined Tendon" (Coracobrachialis/Short head Biceps). Retract Medially. Danger: Musculocutaneous nerve enters coracobrachialis 5-8cm distal to coracoid. Do not retract heavily here. Use a self-retainer (Kolbel).

Step 3Subscapularis Takedown

External rotate the arm. Identify the "Three Sisters" (anterior circumflex humeral vessels) at the inferior border. Ligate/cauterize. Techniques:

  • Tenotomy: 1cm medial to insertion (easier to repair later).
  • Peel: Sharply from lesser tuberosity.
  • Osteotomy: Lesser tuberosity osteotomy (Highest healing rate).
Step 4Capsulotomy

Release capsule inferiorly and anteriorly. Protect Axillary Nerve! Palpate it in the quadrangular space before releasing. The "Tug Test" ensures safety. Release the inferior capsule off the humeral neck (not the glenoid side yet) to mobilize the humerus.

Nerve Monitoring

Use of nerve monitoring is controversial. It does not prevent injury but may alert the surgeon. The "Tug Test" (palpating the nerve) remains the most reliable method of confirmation.

Joint Preparation and Implantation

Bone Cuts and Reaming

HumerusNeck Cut
  • Dislocate head. This often requires circumferential capsular release.
  • Identify anatomic neck. Remove osteophytes to define the true neck.
  • Cut in 30° retroversion (or use patient specific guides).
  • Protect the supraspinatus insertion superiorly.
  • Sizing: Choose head size that matches native diameter (coverage) and radius of curvature. Avoid "Over-stuffing" the joint which tightens the cuff.
GlenoidExposure and Reaming
  • "Release, Release, Release": Inferior capsule and labrum must be excised to see the glenoid face.
  • Use a specific glenoid retractor (Fukuda) to push humerus posterior.
  • Place central guide pin. Ream to correct version.
  • Correction: If B2 glenoid, use eccentric reaming (ream the high/paleo side) or augmented component.
CementingFixation
  • Clean and dry the vault.
  • Pressurize cement into peg holes (using syringe).
  • Insert component and hold until set.
  • Crucial: Ensure perfect seating to prevent rocking. Any motion during setting creates a cement-implant gap.

Glenoid Fixation

Modern standard is All-Polyethylene Pegged glenoid with cement. Metal-backed glenoids have higher historical failure rates (though new porous metals showing promise). Pegs offer better stress distribution than keels in most biomechanical studies.

Closure and Rehab

  • Subscapularis Repair: The most critical step for stability.
    • Use heavy non-absorbable sutures (#2 or #5).
    • Bone-to-bone healing (Osteotomy) is superior to tendon-to-bone.
    • Ensure tension-free repair. If tight, perform anterior capsular release.
  • Testing: Check ER limit on table (e.g., safe to 30 degrees).
  • Drain: Optional (reduce hematoma).
  • Sling: Immobilizer with abduction pillow to take tension off the repair.

Post-Op Protocol

Protect the Subscapularis! No active Internal Rotation and No Passive External Rotation beyond intra-op limit for 6 weeks. Rupture of the repair is catastrophic.

Navigation and PSI In complex B2/B3 glenoids, standard instrumentation is inaccurate (often under-correcting retroversion).

  • PSI (Patient Specific Instrumentation): Pre-operative CT planning creates a 3D mold that sits on the glenoid face/coracoid to guide the central pin. Evidence suggests improved accuracy of version correction compared to standard guides. The guides are typically printed in sterile nylon and allow for precise pin placement within 2-3 degrees of the plan. This is particularly useful in "B2" glenoids where the native landmarks are eroded.
  • Navigation/Robotics: Real-time feedback on version and inclination. Useful for trainees and difficult morphology. Optical or accelerometer-based systems are available, though cost remains a barrier to widespread adoption in the public system.

Complications

ComplicationTimingCauseManagement
Subscapularis FailureEarly (under 3mo)Poor repair/complianceRepair (under 3mo) or Pec Transfer/Reverse
Glenoid LooseningLate (over 5-10y)Eccentric load/Rocking HorseRevision to Reverse TSA
InfectionAcute/LateC. acnes (slow growing)Debridement or 2-stage Revision
InstabilityEarlyMalversion/Soft tissue imbalanceRevision usually required
Periprosthetic FractureIntra-op/LateReaming/TraumaCerclage/Plate/Revision Stem

The C. acnes Menace

Cutibacterium acnes is a slow-growing anaerobe in shoulder skin flora. Causes indolent infections (pain, loosening) without systemic signs (normal WCC/CRP). Require anaerobic culture holding for 14 days. Prophylaxis includes Benzoyl Peroxide pre-op wash.

Diagnosis of Infection Diagnosing shoulder periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is notoriously difficult due to the low-virulence nature of C. acnes.

  • Serum Markers: CRP and ESR are often NORMAL.
  • Aspiration: High rate of dry tap or false negatives.
  • Intra-op: Fluid/Tissue cultures are gold standard. Hold cultures for 14 days as C. acnes is slow growing.
  • Sonication: Explant sonication increases sensitivity by disrupting the biofilm.

Nerve Injury Nerve injury is a feared complication.

  • Axillary Nerve: 1-2% incidence. Traction injury or direct laceration during inferior release. Monitor deltoid function.
  • Musculocutaneous Nerve: Retractor injury. Biceps weakness. Do not place retractors deep to conjoined tendon.
  • Suprascapular Nerve: Injury during posterior release or retractor placement.

Rotator Cuff Failure Secondary cuff failure leads to superior migration and "Rocking Horse" loosening of the glenoid. This is the main reason for avoiding aTSA in patients with questionable cuff status. If the cuff fails, the mechanics of the joint are destroyed, and conversion to Reverse TSA is required.

Postoperative Care

Rehabilitation Protocol

Phase 1 (0-6 weeks)Protection
  • Sling full time.
  • Passive Elevation to 90° only in scapular plane.
  • ER restricted to neutral (protect subscap).
  • NO Active Internal Rotation (protect repair).
  • Goal: Protect the subscapularis repair while preventing adhesive capsulitis.
Phase 2 (6-12 weeks)Activation
  • Wean sling.
  • Active Assisted → Active ROM.
  • Hydrotherapy.
  • Begin gentle internal rotation.
  • Goal: Regain active control and range of motion.
Phase 3 (over 3 months)Strengthening
  • Cuff strengthening (bands).
  • Scapular stabilization.
  • Return to golf/swimming ~4-6 months.
  • Goal: Functional restoration and strength.

Outcomes and Prognosis

  • Pain: 90-95% achieve excellent pain relief. Anatomic TSA is the gold standard for pain relief in OA.
  • Function: Range of motion typically superior to Reverse TSA (better rotation). Patients often forget they have a replacement.
  • Satisfaction: High patient satisfaction scores (Subjective Shoulder Value ~90%).
  • Durability: Young age (under 55) is strongest predictor of revision. Glenoid loosening remains the primary mode of failure.

Evidence Base

Anatomic vs Reverse for OA (over 70 yrs)

Wright et al • JBJS Am (2019)
Key Findings:
  • No significant difference in PROMs (ASES, WORC) at 2 years.
  • Reverse had slightly lower complication rate implies reliability in older age.
  • Anatomic had superior range of motion.
Clinical Implication: In patients over 70 with OA, Reverse is a reasonable alternative even with intact cuff to avoid late failure.

Walch B2 Correction

Iannotti et al • JSES (2018)
Key Findings:
  • Incomplete correction of retroversion leads to early failure.
  • Augmented glenoids (Wedge) showed superior correction compared to reaming alone.
  • Standard glenoids failed earlier in B2 morphology.
Clinical Implication: Use augmented glenoids or PSI for B2/B3 glenoids to ensure version correction.

Subscapularis Management

Lapner et al • JBJS (2013)
Key Findings:
  • Compared Tenotomy vs Peel vs Osteotomy.
  • Lesser Tuberosity Osteotomy had highest healing rate (100%) on Ultrasound.
  • No clinical difference in strength at 2 years.
Clinical Implication: Osteotomy provides the most biological healing environment.

Peg vs Keel Glenoids

Lazarus et al • JSES (2002)
Key Findings:
  • Keeled glenoids had higher radiolucency lines.
  • Pegged glenoids had better cement interdigitation.
  • Pegs are preferred for standard fixation.
Clinical Implication: Pegged glenoids are the modern standard.

Stemless vs Stemmed

Denard et al • JSES (2020)
Key Findings:
  • Stemless implants show equivalent clinical outcomes to stemmed implants.
  • Canal sparing preserves bone for future revision.
  • Requires good metaphyseal bone quality.
Clinical Implication: Stemless implants are becoming the standard for primary OA in good bone.

Revision Burden

AOANJRR • Annual Report (2023)
Key Findings:
  • Revision rate of Anatomic TSA is higher than Reverse TSA at 10 years in patients over 75.
  • Main cause of failure in young patients is loosening.
  • Main cause of failure in older patients (over 75) is cuff failure.
Clinical Implication: Registry data supports shift to Reverse TSA in elderly.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

The Young Arthritic Shoulder

EXAMINER

"A 45-year-old weightlifter presents with severe primary OA (Walch B2). He wants a replacement. Discuss options."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This case presents a classic 'Young Patient Dilemma'. At 45, he is significantly below the ideal age for arthroplasty, and his high demand (weightlifting) puts any glenoid component at extreme risk of early aseptic loosening. My approach would be: 1. **Detailed History & Exam**: Confirm it is true OA and not cuff tear arthropathy. Assess his exact functional demands. 2. **Non-Arthroplasty Options (First Line)**: - **Arthroscopic CAM (Comprehensive Arthroscopic Management)**: Debridement, capsular release, osteophyte excision, and axillary nerve release. This is a temporizing measure that can buy 2-5 years. 3. **Arthroplasty Options (Salvage)**: - **Hemiarthroplasty with 'Ream and Run'**: Resurfacing the humeral head and concentrically reaming the glenoid (without implanting plastic). This avoids the 'weak link' (polyethylene) but requires a grueling rehab and is unpredictable for pain relief. - **Anatomic TSA**: If he insists on a replacement, an Anatomic TSA is the option, but I would counsel him extensively that he *must* modify his activities (no heavy bench press/overhead) and that revision is likely within 10-15 years. - **Reverse TSA**: Contraindicated. It has a finite lifespan and limits rotation/function too much for a young active male. **Conclusion**: I would push for a CAM procedure or Ream-and-Run if he is motivated, reserving aTSA as a last resort.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Respect patient age (under 50 is the danger zone)
Polyethylene wear is the enemy
Avoid Reverse TSA in young/active patients
Counsel regarding strict activity restrictions
COMMON TRAPS
✗Offering Reverse TSA immediately (poor longevity)
✗Ignoring the B2 deformity (must be corrected even in Hemi)
✗Promising 'normal' shoulder function for weightlifting
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the Ream and Run procedure?"
"How do you technically correct a B2 deformity?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Subscapularis Failure

EXAMINER

"6 months post TSA, patient complains of weakness and anterior pain. On exam, positive belly press. X-rays show anterior subluxation."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
The history and examination findings are highly suspicious for **Subscapularis Failure** (rupture of the repair). This is a devastating complication as the subscapularis is the primary anterior restraint. **Workup**: - **Imaging**: - **Ultrasound**: Good screening tool if metal artifact is minimal. - **MRI (MARS)**: Gold standard to visualize the tendon status. - **Axillary X-ray**: Confirms anterior subluxation of the head. - **Infection**: **Crucial Step**. Rule out infection (CRP/ESR/Aspiration). C. acnes infection is a common cause of early failure/pain and can weaken the tendon repair site. **Management**: - **Acute (less than 3 months)**: If caught early and tissue quality is good, direct repair can be attempted, but success rates are variable. - **Chronic/Irreparable**: - **Pectoralis Major Transfer**: Historically described but results in arthroplasty are poor/unpredictable. - **Revision to Reverse TSA**: This is the only reliable salvage. The Reverse design provides inherent stability and does not rely on the subscapularis. **Prevention**: - Intra-operative protection (Osteotomy vs Tenotomy). - Post-operative restrictions (No active IR suitable timeframe).
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Subscapularis is the anterior stabilizer in aTSA
Anterior escape = Subscap failure
Rule out infection (C. acnes)
Reverse TSA is the salvage operation
COMMON TRAPS
✗Ignoring infection workup (treating as mechanical only)
✗Attempting direct repair in chronic/retracted cases
✗Ignoring the component position (malversion may have caused the failure)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What are the signs of subscap failure on X-ray?"
"How prevents this intra-operatively?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Glenoid Lucency

EXAMINER

"Routine 5 year follow up. Patient asymptomatic. X-ray shows 2mm lucency around the glenoid peg."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This finding represents **Radiographic Loosening** (Lazarus lines), but importantly the patient is *asymptomatic*. **Interpretation**: - **Lazarus Classification**: Graded 0-5. Low grades (incomplete lucency) are very common and often non-progressive. - **Clinical Correlation**: The key is *pain*. If there is no start-up pain, night pain, or feelings of instability, this is likely stable fibrous ingrowth or non-progressive lucency. **Management**: - **Observation**: This is the correct course. Serial X-rays (AP and Axillary) every 6-12 months to monitor for progression or migration (the 'shifting' component). - **Red Flags**: If the component shifts position, tilts, or if the patient develops pain, then it becomes 'Clinical Loosening'. - **Workup (if symptomatic)**: Infection workup (CBC, ESR, CRP, Aspiration) and CT scan to assess bone stock. **Summary**: 'Treat the patient, not the X-ray'. A 2mm lucency in an asymptomatic patient requires surveillance, not surgery.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Treat the patient not the X-ray
Lazarus lines are common and often benign
Pain is the differentiator between radiographic and clinical loosening
Serial monitoring is mandatory
COMMON TRAPS
✗Revising asymptomatic loosening based on X-ray alone
✗Assuming it is aseptic (always keep infection in mind if pain starts)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How do you classify glenoid lucencies (Lazarus)?"
"What is the risk of progression to frank loosening?"

MCQ Practice Points

Glenoid Loosening

Q: What is the most common cause of late failure in Anatomic TSA? A: Aseptic loosening of the glenoid component, often due to the 'Rocking Horse' effect from eccentric loading or cuff failure.

Walch B2

Q: A Walch B2 glenoid is characterized by what morphology? A: Biconcavity (Paleoglenoid and Neoglenoid) and posterior subluxation.

Critical Shoulder Angle

Q: A Critical Shoulder Angle (CSA) under 30 degrees is associated with what pathology? A: Osteoarthritis. (Conversely, over 35 degrees is associated with Cuff Tears).

Axillary Nerve

Q: Where is the Axillary nerve at risk during the deltopectoral approach? A: Inferior border of Subscapularis. It must be palpated ('Tug test') or visualized before tenotomy or inferior capsular release.

Contraindication

Q: Why is Deltoid paralysis an absolute contraindication for TSA? A: Powered by Deltoid. Both Anatomic and Reverse rely on the deltoid for elevation. A flail shoulder cannot be salvaged by arthroplasty.

Infection

Q: What is the most common organism causing periprosthetic infection in shoulder arthroplasty? A: Cutibacterium acnes (formerly Propionibacterium acnes). It is an indolent, slow-growing anaerobe.

Australian Context

Epidemiology According to the AOANJRR, the use of Anatomic TSA is declining relative to Reverse TSA, even for osteoarthritis, especially in patients over 70 years. However, Anatomic TSA remains the preferred option for younger patients to maximize range of motion.

Prosthesis Selection Most glenoids used in Australia are cemented All-Polyethylene. Metal-backed/Hybrid glenoids have a higher revision rate for loosening but are sometimes used for augmented fixation in B2/B3 glenoids. The registry continues to show superior long-term survival for cemented all-poly glenoids.

Cost and Access The prostheses are covered under the TGA and private health insurance. Public hospital access is limited by waiting lists. New technologies like Patient Specific Instrumentation (PSI) and Navigation are increasingly utilized to improve glenoid component positioning, especially in challenging B2/B3 deformities.

Anatomic TSA Summary

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Indications

  • •OA with Intact Cuff
  • •AVN
  • •Inflammatory Arthritis
  • •Post-traumatic Arthritis

Key Steps

  • •Deltopectoral Approach
  • •Subscapularis Management
  • •Version Correction
  • •Glenoid Cementing

Complications

  • •Subscap Failure/Rupture
  • •Glenoid Loosening (Long term)
  • •Periprosthetic Fracture
  • •Infection (C. acnes)

Classification

  • •Walch A (Centered)
  • •Walch B (Posterior Subluxation)
  • •Walch C (Dysplastic)
  • •Samilson-Prieto (Dislocation AR)

Evidence

  • •Equal PROMs to Reverse in elderly
  • •Better ROM than Reverse
  • •Subscap osteotomy best healing
  • •Pegged glenoids superior to keeled

Exam Pearls

  • •'Intact Cuff' is the key
  • •'B2 Glenoid' is the challenge
  • •Axillary nerve 'Tug Test'
  • •Young patient = Poly wear risk
Quick Stats
Reading Time82 min
🇦🇺

FRACS Guidelines

Australia & New Zealand
  • AOANJRR Shoulder Registry
  • MBS Shoulder Items
Related Topics

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty

Shoulder Arthroplasty Anatomy

Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications