Isolated shear fractures of the humeral trochlea
- Rare Entity: Isolated trochlea fractures are rare. Usually part of a transcondylar or capitellum fracture.
- Shear Injury: Like the capitellum, these are coronal shear fractures with no soft tissue attachments (free floating).
- Double Arc Sign: On lateral X-ray, seen as a second arc behind the capitellum (often missed).
- Surgical Approach: Requires a medial approach (Over-the-top or Osteotomy) for visualization.
- βMissed Diagnosis: Often misdiagnosed as a medial epicondyle fracture or 'sprain'.
- βUlnar Nerve: High risk of injury due to proximity.
- βInstability: Loss of the trochlea causes ulno-humeral instability.
Isolated trochlea fractures are invisible on AP X-ray (overlapped by ulna). The lateral view shows the "Double Arc" sign but is subtle.
The fragment has NO soft tissue attachments. It is purely articular. Blood supply is entirely retroactive from subchondral bone (which is fractured). High AVN risk.
Look for associated Elbow Dislocation or Capitellum fracture (creates a Type IV capitellum fracture).
You cannot plan this surgery without a CT scan. It defines Articular comminution.
- Treatment
- Cast Immobilization
- Approach
- N/A
- Key Factor
- Very rare to be stable.
- Treatment
- **ORIF**
- Approach
- Medial Column/Osteotomy
- Key Factor
- Headless compression screws (A-P or P-A).
- Treatment
- **TEA (Total Elbow)**
- Approach
- Posterior
- Key Factor
- Bone stock usually too poor for screws.
- Treatment
- **Excision**
- Approach
- Medial
- Key Factor
- Only if fragment is less than 20% of surface.
Double ArcRadiographic Signs
Hook:Seeing double? Check the trochlea.
M-U-TThe Medial Column
Hook:Don't be a MUT, check the nerve.
Overview and Epidemiology
A Trochlea fracture (specifically Laugier's fracture) is an isolated coronal shear fracture of the joint surface of the trochlea. It does not involve the columns (unless associated with complex fractures).
- Extremely Rare. Represents less than 1% of distal humerus fractures.
- Demographics: Young males (high energy) or Osteoporotic females.
- Pathoanatomy: The trochlea is the "spool" of the elbow. It provides intrinsic stability (constrained joint). Loss of the trochlea allows the ulna to slide medially/laterally or dislocate.
Anatomy
- Trochlea: A spool-shaped structure covered in cartilage through an arc of 300 degrees.
- Sulcus: The central groove articulates with the trochlear notch of the ulna.
- Medial Ridge: More prominent than lateral ridge. Provides valgus stability.
- Center of Rotation: The axis of rotation passes through the center of the trochlea (and capitellum).
- Articular Contact: The ulna articulates with the trochlea in both flexion and extension. Loss of the trochlea results in rapid ulnar migration and instability.
- Watershed: The trochlea is supplied by small vessels entering via the medial capsule and non-articular areas.
- Fracture: The fracture is intra-articular and separates the bone from its blood supply (like an iceberg). High risk of AVN/Non-union.
- Posterior Comminution: Indicates disruption of the posterior vascular supply.
- Ulnar Nerve: Runs immediately posterior to the medial epicondyle. Must be identified and protected (or transposed) in any medial approach.
- Medial Antebrachial Cutaneous Nerve (MABCN): At risk during the superficial dissection. Injury causes painful neuroma.
- Flexor-Pronator Mass: Originates from the medial epicondyle. Must be elevated or split to access the anterior aspect of the trochlea.
- Triceps: Inserts on the olecranon, but its medial border covers the posterior aspect of the medial column.
Classification Systems
- 13-A: Extra-articular.
- 13-B: Partial Articular.
- B1: Lateral Sagittal (Capitellum).
- B2: Medial Sagittal (Trochlea - Rare).
- B3: Frontal/Coronal Plane (Shear).
- B3.1: Capitellum alone (Hahn-Steinthal).
- B3.2: Trochlea alone (Laugier).
- B3.3: Capitellum + Trochlea (McKee).
Posterior Comminution (Dubberley Modifier B): The Prognostic Driver
The Dubberley A/B modifier is mentioned repeatedly across this topic - the anatomy notes posterior comminution "indicates disruption of the posterior vascular supply," the CT is read for it, and the outcomes section ties higher AVN and failure to it - yet what it actually means and how it changes the operation is never developed. It is the single most important prognostic variable in these coronal-shear fractures, so it deserves to be assembled.
the primary fracture is an anterior coronal-plane shear of the articular surface (the "wafer" of cartilage and subchondral bone). Modifier B means there is, in addition, comminution of the posterior aspect of the condyle/column - the back wall behind the shear fragment is broken rather than intact.
- It strips the blood supply. The trochlea's vessels enter posteriorly and through the non-articular medial margin. Posterior comminution disrupts this posterior vascular pedicle, so the articular fragment is rendered largely avascular - hence the higher rates of AVN and non-union with modifier B.
- It removes the buttress for fixation. Anterior-to-posterior headless compression screws work by compressing the shear fragment against an intact posterior cortex/column that acts as the backstop. If the posterior wall is comminuted, there is nothing to compress against - screws alone pull the fragment into the defect, lose purchase, and fail. The construct must be changed.
- Dubberley A (no posterior comminution): the posterior buttress is intact - headless compression screws (anterior-to-posterior, countersunk) are usually sufficient.
- Dubberley B (posterior comminution): anticipate the need to rebuild or bypass the missing back wall - a posterior/medial column buttress plate (often with bone graft) to support the articular reconstruction, lower the threshold for a wider exposure, and counsel the patient on the substantially higher risk of AVN, non-union and secondary surgery. Where the joint is unreconstructable in a low-demand elbow, this is the pattern that tips toward total elbow arthroplasty.
- Modifier A
- Intact - acts as a backstop
- Modifier B (posterior comminution)
- Comminuted - no backstop for compression
- Modifier A
- Largely preserved
- Modifier B (posterior comminution)
- Posterior pedicle disrupted - fragment devascularised
- Modifier A
- Headless compression screws (A-P)
- Modifier B (posterior comminution)
- Add posterior/column buttress plate +/- graft; screws alone inadequate
- Modifier A
- Better union, lower AVN
- Modifier B (posterior comminution)
- Higher AVN, non-union and reoperation; may favour TEA if unreconstructable
The Dubberley B modifier is the answer to "what makes this fracture worse?" Posterior comminution does two things: it devascularises the articular fragment (more AVN/non-union) and it destroys the backstop that anterior-to-posterior screws compress against - so the plan shifts from screws alone to a posterior/column buttress plate, and an unreconstructable B pattern in a low-demand elbow is a TEA candidate.
Clinical Assessment
- Fall on outstretched hand (FOOSH) with elbow slightly flexed and in varus?
- Direct blow?
- Pain, swelling, inability to move elbow.
- Swelling: Medial sided bruising (Ecchymosis).
- Palpation: Tenderness over medial column.
- ROM: Block to flexion/extension implies a mechanical block (loose fragment).
- Neurology: CHECK ULNAR NERVE. Tardy ulnar nerve palsy is a late complication, but acute neuropraxia is common from the blow.
- Key clue
- Medial pain; AP often normal; mechanical block
- Best test
- True lateral X-ray + CT
- Distinguishing feature
- Double-arc sign; medial coronal fragment, ulnohumeral incongruity
- Key clue
- Lateral pain; block to flexion
- Best test
- Lateral X-ray + CT
- Distinguishing feature
- Fragment lateral; 'double-arc' classically here too but capitellar
- Key clue
- Lateral pain, painful rotation
- Best test
- AP/lateral, radiocapitellar view
- Distinguishing feature
- Pain on pronation/supination, not pure flexion block
- Key clue
- Prior dislocation, gross instability
- Best test
- CT + stress views
- Distinguishing feature
- Posterolateral instability; radial head + LCL injury
- Key clue
- Medial pain, valgus laxity, ulnar symptoms
- Best test
- AP X-ray (extra-articular)
- Distinguishing feature
- Extra-articular avulsion; NOT a coronal articular shear
- Key clue
- Pain, swelling, no bony lesion
- Best test
- MRI if X-ray/CT negative
- Distinguishing feature
- Diagnosis of exclusion β beware missing an occult shear fragment
Investigations
- AP: Often looks normal or shows a faint "flake" medially.
- Lateral: The Diagnostic View. Look for:
- Double Arc Sign (Two semi-circles).
- Superior migration of the fragment.
- "Chewed up" appearance of the joint line.
- Absolute Requirement.
- 2D Views:
- Coronal: Shows the shearing nature and size of the fragment.
- Sagittal: Shows posterior comminution (Dubberley B).
- 3D Reconstruction:
- Essential for preoperative planning of screw trajectory.
- Determine if you can screw Front-to-Back (easier) or need Back-to-Front (harder).
Management Algorithm

Decision Making:
-
Fragment Size:
- Small (less than 20%): Excision.
- Large (greater than 20%): Fixation.
-
Displacement:
- Non-displaced: Cast (verify with CT).
- Displaced: ORIF.
-
Bone Quality:
- Good: Headless Screws.
- Poor (Elderly): TEA (Total Elbow Arthroplasty).
Surgical Techniques
- Incision over medial supracondylar ridge.
- Identify Ulnar Nerve. Release cubital tunnel.
- Elevate flexor-pronator mass anteriorly (or split it).
- Limitation: Hard to see the lateral extent of the trochlea.
- Pre-drill the medial epicondyle.
- Perform osteotomy.
- Reflect flexor mass distally.
- Benefit: Excellent view of the trochlea.
- Repair: Screw fixation of the epicondyle at the end.
- Typically used for intercondylar fractures, but can be used here for posterior access.
ARCSurgical Goals
Hook:Restore the ARC of motion.
Complications
- Nonunion / AVN:
- The fragment is devoid of soft tissue attachments.
- AVN creates a sequestrum which causes pain and locking.
- Treatment: Excision and TEA.
- Arthritis:
- Rapid onset if step-off remains.
- "The elbow tolerates congruity poorly."
- Ulnar Neuropathy:
- Due to surgical handling or scar tissue.
- Routine anterior transposition is debated but often done in complex cases.
- Heterotopic Ossification (HO):
- Medial side is lower risk than lateral/posterior, but still possible.
Postoperative Care
- Phase 1 (0-2 Weeks):
- Splint at 90 degrees.
- Elevation.
- Phase 2 (2-6 Weeks):
- Active Motion: Start AROM immediately if fixation is rigid.
- Gravity assisted flexion/extension.
- Avoid varus stress.
- Phase 3 (6+ Weeks):
- Strengthening.
- Wean splint.
Outcomes/Prognosis
Evidence is limited to retrospective series and one pooled meta-analysis (Fisher et al, JSES Int 2022, 45 studies / 899 patients). The figures below are the best-available pooled estimates for coronal-shear fractures (capitellum and/or trochlea), not isolated trochlear data, which remains case-report level.
- Functional result: Good with anatomic reduction and rigid fixation β mean MEPI ~91 and arc ~19 to 138 degrees in the Dubberley series; mean DASH ~24 in the Tanwar headless-screw series.
- Reoperation: ~14% pooled (contracture release, hardware removal, ulnar nerve procedures).
- Post-traumatic arthritis: ~21% pooled β driven by residual articular step-off.
- Heterotopic ossification: ~12% pooled. Routine pharmacological prophylaxis is NOT supported for isolated injuries; reserve for high-risk cases (associated dislocation/head injury, extensive dissection).
- Avascular necrosis / nonunion: ~7% pooled β higher with posterior comminution (Dubberley B) that strips the residual blood supply.
- ROM: A flexion contracture of 10 to 20 degrees is common and usually functional.
- Failures in the elderly: Comminution unreconstructable for stable fixation favours primary TEA (McKee RCT).
Guidelines, Registries & Global Practice
Global epidemiology
- Isolated coronal-shear fractures of the distal humerus are rare (apparent capitellum fractures are roughly 1% of all elbow fractures); the truly isolated trochlear (Laugier) variant is rarer still and reported only at case-series level worldwide.
- Bimodal: high-energy injuries in young adults (FOOSH with the elbow near extension) and low-energy fragility fractures in osteoporotic older women.
- There is no dedicated society guideline for this specific fracture; management is extrapolated from distal humerus articular-fracture principles common to AO, BOA and AAOS teaching.
Side-by-side principles (no fracture-specific national guideline exists)
- Emphasis
- Anatomic articular reduction + absolute stability, early motion
- Practical message
- Buried headless compression screws; reconstruct the articular block first
- Emphasis
- Specialist upper-limb/major-trauma pathway, early definitive care
- Practical message
- Refer complex intra-articular elbow injuries to a unit with elbow expertise and TEA capability
- Emphasis
- CT-based planning, ORIF for reconstructable fractures
- Practical message
- Primary TEA reserved for low-demand elderly with unreconstructable comminution
- Emphasis
- Joint-preserving fixation; arthroplasty as a considered salvage
- Practical message
- Function-led rehab; outcome reporting via MEPS/DASH
Registry note
- National joint registries (NJR England/Wales, AOANJRR Australia, SHAR Sweden, NZJR) capture total elbow arthroplasty implant survival and revision, which informs the salvage/elderly arm of this fracture β but they do not track ORIF of coronal-shear fractures, so primary-fixation outcomes rely on published series and the Fisher meta-analysis.
High- vs limited-resource practice
- Well-resourced: Routine pre-op CT with 3D reconstruction, headless compression screw systems, intra-operative fluoroscopy, and TEA available as backup.
- Limited-resource: CT may be unavailable, so a meticulous true-lateral radiograph and intra-operative assessment carry more weight; standard partially-threaded/mini-fragment screws may substitute for headless implants, and arthroplasty backup may be absent β pushing decisions toward fixation or, for tiny fragments, excision.
Why the Trochlea Is the Primary Osseous Stabiliser
The anatomy section notes that "loss of the trochlea results in rapid ulnar migration and instability" and the clinical section relies on the drop sign (the ulnohumeral distance widening when the trochlea is displaced). The reason both are true is that the trochlea is the principal bony constraint of the ulnohumeral joint - this is the biomechanical fact that drives the entire fix-don't-excise philosophy of these fractures.
- The trochlea is a spool (the sulcus) flanked by a tall medial ridge and a smaller lateral ridge. The greater sigmoid (trochlear) notch of the ulna wraps around this spool through nearly its full flexion-extension arc.
- This bony interlock - not the ligaments - is the primary restraint to varus, valgus and axial (medial/lateral) translation of the ulna at the elbow. The medial collateral ligament resists valgus and the lateral ulnar collateral ligament resists varus/posterolateral rotatory instability, but they act on an intact bony fulcrum. The trochlea is the keystone; the ligaments are the guy-ropes.
- Because the articulation is highly congruent (a constrained ginglymus/hinge), even small losses of trochlear height or width change the geometry the ulna tracks on.
- Remove or displace the trochlear spool and the ulna has nothing to sit in - it migrates medially or laterally and can frankly subluxate or dislocate, regardless of whether the collateral ligaments are intact. This is why a competent MCL/LUCL does not protect a trochlea-deficient elbow.
- On a true AP radiograph this manifests as the drop sign / widened ulnohumeral interval - a radiographic surrogate for the lost bony containment.
- It explains why reconstruction is strongly preferred over excision: excising the trochlea removes the joint's primary stabiliser. Fragment excision is therefore reserved for a small fragment (under one-fifth of the articular surface) that is not contributing to containment; excising a larger trochlear fragment leaves an unstable, incongruent elbow.
- It explains why an unreconstructable trochlea in a low-demand elbow is treated with total elbow arthroplasty (a linked/semi-constrained implant re-creates the lost bony constraint) rather than excision arthroplasty.
- Resists
- Medial/lateral translation, varus/valgus, axial congruity
- If lost
- Ulna migrates/subluxates even with intact ligaments - reconstruct it
- Resists
- Valgus
- If lost
- Valgus laxity, but only with a competent bony fulcrum
- Resists
- Varus / posterolateral rotatory instability
- If lost
- PLRI - but cannot compensate for a missing trochlea
The trochlea is the bony keystone of the ulnohumeral hinge: the ligaments only work around an intact spool. That is why the drop sign appears when it displaces, why you preserve and fix rather than excise (excision is limited to fragments under about one-fifth of the surface), and why an unreconstructable joint goes to a linked total elbow rather than excision arthroplasty.
Controversies & Areas of Uncertainty
The isolated trochlear (Laugier) fracture is rare enough that almost every management decision rests on extrapolation from capitellar / coronal-shear series rather than dedicated evidence.
- Surgical approach: Anterolateral vs extended-lateral vs medial-column/epicondyle osteotomy. Pooled data hint at fewer complications with the anterolateral approach for Dubberley A, but the meta-analysis explicitly concludes evidence is insufficient to mandate one approach. A pure isolated-trochlear fragment is medial and may still need a medial exposure.
- Screw direction: Anterior-to-posterior (technically easier, countersunk under cartilage) vs posterior-to-anterior (preserves articular cartilage, mechanically stronger but harder for an anterior shear fragment). No comparative data exist.
- Excision vs fixation of small fragments: The "less than 20% excise" rule is a pragmatic teaching heuristic, not an evidence-derived threshold; the trochlea is load-bearing and intrinsically stabilising, so most authors favour fixation whenever technically feasible.
- HO prophylaxis: Routine indomethacin/radiotherapy is unproven for isolated coronal-shear injuries and carries its own risks (nonunion, GI); use is selective.
- Ulnar nerve handling: In-situ decompression vs routine anterior transposition during a medial approach remains debated, with no trochlear-specific data.
- Primary TEA threshold: RCT support exists for the elderly OTA-13C elbow, but the age/comminution threshold for choosing TEA over a salvageable ORIF is not defined for isolated articular shear patterns.
MCQ Practice Points
Q: What is the 'Double Arc Sign' on a lateral elbow radiograph pathognomonic for? A: Capitellum and Trochlea shear fractures (McKee Type IV / Dubberley).
Q: Which column of the distal humerus supports the Trochlea? A: The Medial Column.
Q: Which nerve is most at risk during fixation of a Laugier fracture? A: Ulnar Nerve (Posterior to medial epicondyle).
Q: What is the preferred fixation method for a Type I coronal shear fracture? A: Headless Compression Screws (A-P direction).
Q: What factor most strongly predicts failure of fixation? A: Posterior Comminution (Dubberley B).
Clinical Decision Scenarios
Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud
βA 60-year-old female presents with a 'swollen elbow' after a fall. X-ray AP looks normal. She cannot flex past 90 degrees.β
βIntra-op, you have fixed the trochlea fracture but the screw heads are prominent in the articular surface.β
βA 78-year-old osteoporotic woman has a comminuted coronal-shear distal humerus fracture involving the trochlea and capitellum (Dubberley 3B). At surgery the articular fragments crumble and you cannot achieve fixation stable enough for early motion.β
Key Concepts
- Coronal Shear Injury
- Double Arc Sign
- Medial Approach
- Headless Screws
Classification (Dubberley)
- Type 1: Capitellum
- Type 2: Cap + Trochlea (Fused)
- Type 3: Cap + Trochlea (Mallet)
- Modifier B: Posterior Comminution
Imaging
- Lateral View is key
- CT Mandatory
- Rule out terrible triad
- Rule out capitellum fx
Complications
- Ulnar Neuropathy
- AVN (Thal)
- Stiffness (Loss of extension)
- Arthritis
Evidence
Apparent capitellum fractures are more complex
- 21 articular distal humerus fractures; what looks like an isolated capitellum fracture often involves up to 5 components including the posterior trochlea.
- All fractures stabilised with implants buried beneath the articular surface healed, with no residual ulnohumeral instability.
- Average ulnohumeral arc 96 degrees (range 55 to 140); 10 of 21 required a second procedure, most often for contracture release.
Dubberley classification & outcome of capitellar/trochlear fractures
- 28 ORIF patients (mean age 43); fractures classified Types 1 to 3 by capitellar/trochlear involvement with modifier A/B for posterior comminution.
- More complex fractures needed more extensive surgery, had more complications/secondary procedures and poorer outcomes; overall mean MEPI 91 and arc 19 to 138 degrees.
- 2 comminuted fractures failed to unite and were converted to total elbow arthroplasty.
ORIF of coronal-plane capitellum/trochlea via anterolateral approach
- 10 patients with coronal-plane distal humerus fractures fixed with headless compression screws through an anterolateral approach.
- Mean DASH 24; union in all at a mean of 10 weeks (range 8 to 12).
- Low complication burden: one Broberg-Morrey grade 2 arthritis and one Brooker grade 1 heterotopic ossification.
Does surgical approach affect coronal-shear outcomes? (meta-analysis)
- Systematic review/meta-analysis of 45 studies, 899 patients (mean age 44.9); reoperation rate 13.8%.
- Pooled complications: post-traumatic arthritis 21.2%, heterotopic ossification 12.0%, nerve injury 7.8%, avascular necrosis 7.4%.
- For Dubberley A fractures, complication rate was higher with the extended-lateral (25.8%) than the anterolateral (16.7%) approach, but evidence is insufficient to mandate one approach.
TEA vs ORIF for displaced distal humerus fractures in the elderly (RCT)
- Multicentre RCT, 42 patients over 65 with OTA 13C fractures; TEA gave better MEPS at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months than ORIF (e.g. 86 vs 73 at 2 years).
- 5 of 21 (24%) randomised to ORIF were not amenable to stable fixation and converted to TEA intra-operatively.
- Reoperation rates (TEA 12% vs ORIF 27%) were not statistically different.
Salvage of unstable distal humerus nonunion
- 15 unstable distal humerus nonunions treated with rigid fixation, contracture release and autograft.
- 12 of 15 united (mean arc 95 degrees); 3 failed and were converted to total elbow arthroplasty.
- 6 of the 12 united cases needed further surgery for painful implants, ulnar neuropathy or contracture.
Laugier's isolated trochlear shear fracture
- First description of the isolated coronal shear fracture of the humeral trochlea, eponymous 'Laugier fracture'.
- Recognised the resulting ulnohumeral incongruity and instability.