Aspherical Femoral Head | Males | Anterosuperior
- Aspherical femoral head with loss of head-neck offset
- Alpha angle greater than 55° on lateral view is diagnostic
- Young athletic males predominantly affected
- Anterosuperior labral and cartilage damage from shear mechanism
- Hip arthroscopy or surgical dislocation for treatment
- “Pistol grip deformity on AP pelvis
- “FADIR test positive (flexion, adduction, internal rotation)
- “Outside-in cartilage damage (acetabular side first)
- “Associated with early osteoarthritis
Clinical Imaging
Imaging Atlas




Aspherical femoral head creates bump at head-neck junction. Lost offset causes impingement on flexion + internal rotation. Anterosuperior location most common.
Measured on lateral view (Dunn, cross-table, MRI). Angle between femoral neck axis and point where head becomes aspherical. Greater than 55° = cam morphology.
Outside-in mechanism: Cam bump shears acetabular cartilage from labrum, causing delamination. Differs from pincer (labral crushing, central cartilage damage).
Femoral osteochondroplasty: Resect cam bump to restore sphericity. Arthroscopic (most common) or open surgical dislocation. Labral repair/debridement as needed.
At a Glance
Cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) results from an aspherical femoral head with loss of head-neck offset, creating a bump that impinges on the acetabular rim during hip flexion and internal rotation. It predominantly affects young athletic males and causes anterosuperior labral and cartilage damage through an outside-in shear mechanism (acetabular cartilage delamination from the labrum). Diagnosis requires an alpha angle greater than 55° on lateral radiographs or MRI (Dunn view). The "pistol grip" deformity is visible on AP pelvis, and clinical examination reveals a positive FADIR test. Treatment is femoral osteochondroplasty (arthroscopic or open surgical dislocation) to restore head sphericity, with concurrent labral repair. Combined cam-pincer morphology is actually most common (86% of FAI cases).
CAM-PINCam vs Pincer
Hook:CAM is Males/Femoral, PIN is Females/Acetabular!
55-CAMAlpha Angle
Hook:55 degrees is the threshold for CAM morphology!
SHEARCartilage Damage Pattern
Hook:SHEAR describes cam damage: cartilage sheared from labrum outside-in!
Overview and Epidemiology
Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a recognized cause of hip pain and early osteoarthritis, particularly in young adults. Cam-type FAI is the most common form, characterized by an aspherical femoral head.
Epidemiology:
- Prevalence: Cam morphology present in 10-15% of asymptomatic population
- Demographics: Young athletic males predominantly affected
- Age: Typically presents 20-40 years of age
- Sports: High risk in soccer, hockey, martial arts, rowing
- Association: Strong link to early-onset hip osteoarthritis
Pathophysiology and Pathoanatomy
Cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) occurs when an aspherical femoral head impinges on the acetabulum during flexion and internal rotation. The "cam" refers to the bump that acts like a cam in an engine, causing abnormal contact.
Pathoanatomy
The cam lesion is an abnormal bony prominence at the anterosuperior femoral head-neck junction, causing loss of normal head-neck offset. This may result from abnormal epiphyseal development, particularly in young athletes during growth.
Mechanism of Damage
During hip flexion and internal rotation, the cam bump is driven into the anterosuperior acetabulum. This causes shear forces that strip the acetabular cartilage from the labrum ("outside-in" damage). The labrum is also crushed. This differs from pincer mechanism.
Clinical Presentation
History
Young athletic males typically present with groin pain. Pain is activity-related, particularly with sports requiring hip flexion (soccer, hockey, martial arts). May describe mechanical symptoms such as clicking or catching. Prolonged sitting may aggravate symptoms.
Examination
FADIR Test (Anterior Impingement Test): Flexion, Adduction, Internal Rotation reproduces groin pain. This is the most sensitive test for FAI.
FABER Test: Flexion, Abduction, External Rotation assesses SI joint but also stresses the hip.
Range of Motion: Internal rotation in flexion is typically reduced and painful.
Gait: Usually normal unless advanced damage.
Diagnosis

AP Pelvis: May show "pistol grip" deformity (loss of concavity at head-neck junction). Assess for coxa profunda or other acetabular abnormalities suggesting combined morphology.
Lateral View (Dunn, Cross-Table, Frog Lateral): Essential for measuring alpha angle. Shows anterosuperior bump.
Alpha Angle: Angle between the femoral neck axis and a line from the center of the femoral head to the point where the head becomes aspherical. Greater than 55° indicates cam morphology.
MRI/MRA: Shows labral and cartilage damage. Radial sequences best for assessing cam lesion circumferentially. Arthrogram improves sensitivity for labral tears.
Differential Diagnosis of Young Adult Hip / Groin Pain
| 0 | 1 | 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cam FAI | Aspherical head, alpha angle over 55 degrees, anterior groin pain, positive FADIR, reduced internal rotation in flexion | Dunn/cross-table lateral + MRA |
| Pincer FAI | Acetabular over-cover (coxa profunda, protrusio, crossover/retroversion signs), often middle-aged women, circumferential labral damage | AP pelvis (rim signs) + MRA |
| Acetabular dysplasia | Under-coverage, lateral centre-edge angle under 20-25 degrees, instability/apprehension rather than impingement | AP pelvis (LCEA), false-profile view |
| Athletic pubalgia / adductor-related groin pain | Pain at pubic symphysis/adductor origin, resisted adduction painful, normal hip ROM, negative FADIR | Resisted tests + MRI pubic plate |
| Iliopsoas tendinopathy / internal snapping | Audible/palpable anterior snap on hip extension from flexion, tender psoas, relieved by psoas injection | Dynamic ultrasound + diagnostic injection |
| Hip osteoarthritis | Older patient, global ROM loss, joint space narrowing, Tonnis 2-3, rest/start-up pain | Weight-bearing AP pelvis |
| Stress fracture femoral neck / GTPS / referred lumbar | Risk factors (load, RED-S), lateral trochanteric tenderness, or radicular pattern; hip joint not the source | MRI / diagnostic injection / spine assessment |
A negative response to an intra-articular local anaesthetic injection (less than 50% pain relief) should prompt reconsideration of an extra-articular or referred cause before any joint-preserving surgery.
Investigations
A focused, stepwise work-up confirms the diagnosis, grades joint damage and excludes mimics.
- Plain radiographs (first line) — AP pelvis (pistol-grip deformity, acetabular over-cover, Tonnis grade) plus a lateral (Dunn 45/90, cross-table or frog-leg) to measure the alpha angle and assess head-neck offset.
- Alpha angle — over 55 degrees supports cam morphology; cohort data suggest 60 degrees for a definite deformity and around 78 degrees for a pathological deformity.
- MRI / MR arthrography — assesses the labrum, chondral surfaces (Outerbridge grade) and the cam lesion circumferentially (radial sequences); arthrography improves sensitivity for labral tears.
- CT (3D reconstruction) — best for precise bony mapping of the cam lesion and surgical planning, and for assessing version.
- Diagnostic intra-articular local anaesthetic injection — confirms the hip joint as the pain source (expect over 80% temporary relief) and helps exclude extra-articular causes; under 50% relief should prompt reconsideration of the diagnosis.
Management

Activity Modification: Avoid provocative activities (deep hip flexion, impact sports).
Physiotherapy: Core strengthening, hip stability, range of motion exercises. Address any muscular imbalances.
NSAIDs/Analgesia: Symptomatic relief.
Injection: Intra-articular local anesthetic/steroid can confirm hip as pain source and provide temporary relief.
Conservative treatment may provide symptom relief but does not address underlying morphology or prevent progression of cartilage damage.
Complications
Disease-related
- Progressive anterosuperior chondrolabral damage and labral tearing
- Secondary osteoarthritis, particularly with persistently elevated alpha angles
Surgery-related (arthroscopic osteochondroplasty)
- Under-resection — residual cam morphology is the commonest cause of persistent symptoms and revision arthroscopy
- Over-resection — risk of femoral neck stress fracture and iatrogenic hip instability
- Iatrogenic chondral/labral injury during portal placement or traction
- Traction-related neurapraxia (pudendal, lateral femoral cutaneous, sciatic) — usually transient
- Heterotopic ossification (reduced with NSAID prophylaxis), adhesions, and rarely deep infection or venous thromboembolism
- Progression to total hip arthroplasty — markedly more likely when pre-existing OA (Tonnis 2 or more, Outerbridge III-IV) is present
Open surgical dislocation
- Trochanteric osteotomy non-union or hardware irritation
- Avascular necrosis is rare when the medial femoral circumflex artery is protected
Evidence Base
- Proposed FAI as a mechanism for early (non-dysplastic) hip OA, based on more than 600 surgical dislocations
- Distinguished cam (aspherical head) from pincer (acetabular over-cover) impingement
- Concept centres on hip motion rather than axial loading
- Argued early surgical correction may decelerate degenerative progression
- Defined the alpha angle on oblique-axial MRI to quantify head-neck concavity
- Mean alpha angle 74 degrees in 39 symptomatic impingement hips vs 42 degrees in 35 controls (p less than 0.001)
- Good inter-observer reproducibility across four observers
- Reduced head-neck offset distinguishes impinging from normal hips
- 302 hips analysed; cam impingement damages anterosuperior acetabular cartilage with labrum-cartilage separation (outside-in)
- Cam: aspherical head shears cartilage off bone while the labrum is initially spared
- Pincer: circumferential narrow strip of damage with the labrum crushed against the rim
- Labral damage signifies ongoing impingement and rarely occurs in isolation
Exam Viva Scenarios
Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud
“A 25-year-old male soccer player has right groin pain worse with kicking. FADIR test is positive. How do you assess and manage him?”
“You are seeing a 26-year-old professional footballer in your sports clinic with 9 months of right groin pain. The pain is worse with running, cutting, and deep squatting. He has failed 4 months of physiotherapy and activity modification. His plain X-rays show bilateral cam morphology with alpha angles of 62° on the right and 58° on the left. He has no symptoms in his left hip whatsoever. An MRI arthrogram of his right hip shows an anterosuperior labral tear and Outerbridge grade II chondral changes to the acetabulum. He is asking about hip arthroscopy for his right hip, but is also concerned because he has 'the same bone problem' in his left hip and wants to know if he should have both hips operated on at the same time to prevent future problems. How do you counsel this patient about surgical management?”
“You are seeing a 28-year-old man in your clinic who underwent right hip arthroscopy with cam osteochondroplasty and labral repair 18 months ago. He initially improved for 6 months post-operatively but has had progressive worsening of groin pain over the past year. He now has constant pain with activities of daily living, difficulty with stairs, and uses a cane for walking. On examination, he has a positive FADIR test, marked restriction of internal rotation (5° vs 30° on the left), and an antalgic gait. His pre-operative X-rays (which you obtain from the referring surgeon) show cam morphology with an alpha angle of 68° but also Tonnis grade 1 osteoarthritis. His new X-rays show Tonnis grade 2 osteoarthritis with joint space narrowing to 2mm (previously 3mm), subchondral sclerosis, and early cyst formation. MRI shows complete loss of acetabular cartilage (Outerbridge grade IV) in the anterosuperior quadrant. The patient is devastated that the surgery 'failed' and is now reading online about revision hip arthroscopy. What is your assessment and management plan?”
MCQ Practice Points
Q: What alpha angle indicates cam morphology? A: Greater than 55°. Measured on lateral view. Angle between neck axis and point where head becomes aspherical.
Q: What is the pattern of cartilage damage in cam FAI? A: Outside-in - the cam bump shears acetabular cartilage from the labrum, starting at the labral chondral junction. This differs from pincer (labral crushing, central acetabular damage).
Q: Who typically gets cam FAI? A: Young athletic males. Pincer is more common in middle-aged females. Combined morphology is most common overall (86%).
Controversies & Areas of Uncertainty
- Surgery vs conservative care. UK FASHIoN (Lancet 2018) favoured arthroscopy over personalised physiotherapy at 12 months by a clinically significant margin, whereas the smaller military FAIT trial (Am J Sports Med 2018) found no difference at 2 years with very high crossover. The two best Level I trials therefore point in different directions, making patient selection and shared decision-making central.
- Which alpha-angle threshold? Commonly quoted cut-offs range from 50 to 60 degrees for "cam morphology," while cohort data (Agricola, CHECK/Chingford) suggest 60 degrees for presence of a deformity and around 78 degrees for a pathological deformity that predicts end-stage OA. There is no single agreed number; the morphology must be symptomatic.
- Morphology is not disease. Cam morphology is present in 10-25% of asymptomatic adults and is far higher in adolescent athletes. The Warwick Agreement defines FAI syndrome as the triad of symptoms, clinical signs and imaging findings — imaging morphology alone is never an indication for surgery.
- Does correction prevent OA? Cam morphology is a strong risk factor for hip OA, but there is no high-quality evidence that prophylactic osteochondroplasty in an asymptomatic hip prevents future OA, so prophylactic surgery is not recommended.
- Adequacy of resection. Both under-resection (residual cam, the commonest reason for revision arthroscopy) and over-resection (risk of femoral neck fracture, iatrogenic instability) are recognised failure modes; intra-operative imaging and dynamic assessment are used to titrate resection.
- Labrum: repair vs debridement vs reconstruction. Repair is generally favoured over debridement where tissue quality allows; reconstruction is reserved for irreparable or deficient labra, with evolving evidence.
Guidelines, Registries & Global Practice
Global epidemiology
- Cam morphology is found in roughly 10-25% of asymptomatic adults and is markedly over-represented in adolescent and adult athletes in flexion-loading sports (football/soccer, ice hockey, basketball), where prevalence in some male cohorts approaches or exceeds 30%.
- It develops during skeletal maturation, more in males, and high-impact sport during the growth spurt is associated with larger cam morphology.
- Symptomatic FAI presents typically in active 20-40 year olds; cam morphology is a recognised risk factor for progression to hip osteoarthritis.
Side-by-side guidance
| 0 | 1 | 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Warwick Agreement (international consensus) | FAI syndrome = symptoms + clinical signs + imaging findings (all three required) | Diagnosis is clinical, not radiographic alone |
| BOA / UK practice (NICE-appraised arthroscopy) | Arthroscopy an option for symptomatic FAI after considering conservative care | Patient selection, supported by FASHIoN |
| AAOS / North American practice | Joint preservation in selected younger patients without established OA | Avoid arthroscopy once significant OA present |
| EFORT / European consensus | Correct morphology and treat intra-articular damage in symptomatic patients | Restore head-neck offset, repair labrum where possible |
Registry & long-term data
- Hip-preservation procedures are not as comprehensively captured by joint registries as arthroplasty, but conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) is the key registry-relevant outcome: pre-existing osteoarthritis (Tonnis 2 or more, joint space under 2 mm, Outerbridge III-IV) strongly predicts early conversion to THA after arthroscopy.
- For patients who ultimately undergo THA, large national registries (NJR — UK, AJRR — USA, AOANJRR — Australia, Swedish and Norwegian registries) consistently show higher revision rates in younger, more active patients, reinforcing the value of delaying arthroplasty in this young population.
High- vs limited-resource practice variation
- In well-resourced settings, MR arthrography, dedicated hip arthroscopy and open surgical dislocation are available, and management is individualised with formal physiotherapy programmes.
- In limited-resource settings, diagnosis relies on plain radiographs (AP pelvis plus a lateral such as Dunn or cross-table for the alpha angle) and clinical examination; structured activity modification and physiotherapy are first-line, with surgery reserved for clear, refractory cases at referral centres.
Key Facts
- Aspherical femoral head (cam bump)
- Alpha angle greater than 55 degrees
- Young athletic males
- Anterosuperior location
Clinical
- Groin pain with hip flexion
- FADIR test positive
- Reduced internal rotation
- Sports with deep flexion provocative
Damage Pattern
- Outside-in mechanism
- Acetabular cartilage delamination
- Labral damage
- Leads to OA
Treatment
- Conservative first
- Arthroscopic osteochondroplasty
- Labral repair
- Good outcomes with preserved joint