Genetics & Modes of Inheritance in Orthopaedics
Overview & Introduction
Medical genetics recurs in the basic-science viva because so much of orthopaedic practice rests on a handful of single-gene (Mendelian) disorders with predictable inheritance: the skeletal dysplasias, the connective-tissue diseases, haemophilic arthropathy and the hereditary tumour syndromes. The examiner is rarely testing molecular detail. They want to see that you can read a pedigree, name the pattern, attach the gene and counsel recurrence risk in a few clean sentences.
How the page is built. The four classic patterns come first (autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, X-linked recessive and dominant, mitochondrial), then the concepts that make real pedigrees messy (penetrance, expressivity, anticipation, mosaicism, de novo mutation), then what the pattern changes in clinic. The anchor conditions run through all of it so the genetics is never abstract: FGFR3 and achondroplasia, COL1A1/COL1A2 and osteogenesis imperfecta, FBN1 and Marfan syndrome, EXT1/EXT2 and multiple hereditary exostoses, NF1, and PHEX and X-linked hypophosphataemic rickets.
The four-question pedigree drill. For any pedigree, ask in order:
- Is the trait in every generation (suggests dominant) or does it skip (suggests recessive)?
- Are both sexes affected roughly equally (autosomal) or is there a strong male predominance (consider X-linked recessive)?
- Is there male-to-male transmission? That proves autosomal inheritance and excludes X-linkage.
- Is transmission exclusively maternal, to all children (mitochondrial)?
Four questions resolve almost every exam pedigree.
Autosomal dominant inheritance
One allele is enough. In autosomal dominant (AD) inheritance a single mutant allele produces the phenotype, so the affected person is a heterozygote and each of their children has a 50% chance of inheriting the allele. The pedigree shows the trait in every generation (vertical transmission), in both sexes, and with male-to-male transmission, which rules out X-linkage because a father gives his sons a Y, not his X. Calling an obvious male-to-male pedigree "X-linked" is the classic trip-up; it is the single most decisive clue and points to autosomal dominant inheritance.
Why the family history can be blank. Many AD conditions arise from new (de novo) mutations: about 80% of achondroplasia, and a large share of NF1 and OI. A negative family history therefore does not exclude an AD disorder, and a family should never be reassured that a sporadic case "isn't genetic".
How one allele does the damage. AD conditions often result from a gain-of-function mutation, a dominant-negative effect (a faulty subunit poisoning a multimer, as in OI), or haploinsufficiency.

The conditions. The high-yield AD pairings, with the mechanism the examiner may ask for:
- Gene
- FGFR3
- Mechanism / note
- Gain-of-function; suppresses growth-plate chondrocytes; ~80% de novo
- Gene
- COL1A1 / COL1A2
- Mechanism / note
- ~85% AD; dominant-negative effect on type I collagen
- Gene
- FBN1 (fibrillin-1)
- Mechanism / note
- Connective tissue; tall, arachnodactyly, scoliosis, aortic root
- Gene
- EXT1 / EXT2
- Mechanism / note
- Multiple osteochondromas; small malignant transformation risk
- Gene
- NF1 (neurofibromin)
- Mechanism / note
- Scoliosis, pseudarthrosis of tibia, café-au-lait spots
- Gene
- COMP and others
- Mechanism / note
- Epiphyseal dysplasia; early osteoarthritis
Keep the gene-disease pairs crisp: confusing COMP (MED/pseudoachondroplasia) with COL2A1 (SED/Stickler), or FBN1 (Marfan) with TGFBR1/2 (Loeys-Dietz), loses easy marks.
What the phenotypes look like. The films behind the pairings.





Autosomal recessive inheritance
Two hits needed. In autosomal recessive (AR) inheritance both alleles must be mutated. The affected child usually has unaffected carrier parents, the trait commonly skips generations, both sexes are affected equally, and the risk rises with consanguinity. Two carrier parents have a 25% chance of an affected child, 50% carriers, 25% unaffected.
The orthopaedic examples. Many inborn errors of metabolism and storage disorders with skeletal manifestations (the mucopolysaccharidoses, for example), some severe or lethal forms of OI, and conditions such as diastrophic dysplasia follow AR inheritance.

X-linked & mitochondrial inheritance
X-linked recessive. Males are hemizygous, with a single X, so one mutant X-allele causes disease; the conditions therefore predominantly affect males and are transmitted through carrier females. A carrier mother passes the condition, on average, to half her sons and carrier status to half her daughters. An affected father makes all his daughters carriers and none of his sons affected, because a son receives his Y, and that absence of male-to-male transmission is the key negative clue. The orthopaedic examples are Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy (dystrophin) and haemophilia A/B (factor VIII/IX), which the surgeon meets as haemophilic arthropathy.

X-linked dominant. A single mutant X-allele causes disease in both sexes. An affected father transmits to all daughters and no sons; an affected mother to 50% of each. The classic orthopaedic example is X-linked hypophosphataemic rickets (PHEX): rickets or osteomalacia resistant to plain vitamin D, treated with phosphate and active vitamin D.
Mitochondrial. Mitochondria and their DNA are inherited only from the egg, so an affected mother passes the disorder to all her children and an affected father to none. Both sexes are affected. Heteroplasmy, a mix of normal and mutant mitochondria, explains the variable severity. Relevant to some mitochondrial myopathies. This is also the discriminator from X-linked recessive inheritance: both seem to spare father-to-son transmission, but only mitochondrial inheritance is strictly maternal to all children.

Haemophilic arthropathy: the X-linked pedigree written on a joint. Factor VIII/IX deficiency writes itself on the joint, and the surgeon inherits the arthropathy: repeated haemarthroses, with the elbow and the ankle as the high-yield targets. Once the joint is gone, factor replacement does not restore cartilage; arthroplasty does. Counsel the inheritance first, then operate with factor cover and haematology in the room.



Concepts that modify the simple pattern
Real pedigrees are messier than the four patterns. The concepts below explain why, and they drive counselling and recurrence-risk estimates.
- Meaning
- Proportion of mutation carriers who show ANY phenotype
- Orthopaedic relevance
- Reduced penetrance can make AD conditions appear to skip a generation
- Meaning
- Severity/features vary between carriers of the same mutation
- Orthopaedic relevance
- e.g. wide severity range in NF1, Marfan
- Meaning
- New mutation absent in parents
- Orthopaedic relevance
- ~80% of achondroplasia; negative family history does not exclude AD. Paternal age effect: FGFR3 mutations arise almost exclusively on the PATERNAL allele and rise with father's age, so ask the father's age, not the mother's
- Meaning
- Earlier onset / worse in successive generations
- Orthopaedic relevance
- Trinucleotide-repeat disorders (e.g. myotonic dystrophy)
- Meaning
- Mutation confined to a parent's gonadal cells; the parent is clinically NORMAL and blood testing is NEGATIVE
- Orthopaedic relevance
- RAISES sibling recurrence risk above the population rate despite two unaffected, test-negative parents. Classically quoted in OI - never tell such a family the risk is zero
- Meaning
- Mutation arises AFTER fertilisation, so it is present in a patch of tissue and absent from the germline
- Orthopaedic relevance
- Points the OPPOSITE way: recurrence risk is essentially ZERO and the condition is not heritable. This is the whole explanation for McCune-Albright and Ollier disease
- Meaning
- One gene affecting multiple organ systems
- Orthopaedic relevance
- Marfan: skeletal + ocular + cardiovascular
Penetrance and expressivity in the clinic. Reduced penetrance and variable expressivity can make an AD trait appear to skip a generation or look mild in a known carrier. An "unaffected" relative may still carry the gene, so never declare an at-risk relative "unaffected, therefore non-carrier" without testing.
The mosaic bone diseases: genetic, but not inherited. A family asks whether a bone condition will be passed on, and for one group the answer is no even though the disease is unquestionably genetic. These are the conditions caused by a mutation arising after fertilisation, confined to the cell lineages descended from that one cell and absent from the germline.
Fibrous dysplasia and McCune-Albright syndrome. An activating GNAS mutation. It can only ever be mosaic, and the reason makes the fact stick: a constitutional (germline) activating GNAS mutation is not survivable, so every living patient necessarily acquired theirs post-zygotically. How early the mutation occurred determines the phenotype. Very early gives widespread polyostotic disease with café-au-lait patches and endocrinopathy (McCune-Albright); later gives monostotic fibrous dysplasia. The café-au-lait borders are the clue to the mosaicism itself, following developmental lines with the classically ragged "coast of Maine" edge, unlike the smooth "coast of California" borders in NF1.
Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome. Mosaic IDH1 or IDH2 mutations. The unilateral or strikingly asymmetric distribution of enchondromas is the mosaicism made visible: only the affected cell lineage carries the mutation, so the disease respects no bilateral symmetry.
What to tell the family. The condition is genetic in origin but not heritable, and the recurrence risk for siblings and for the patient's own children is essentially that of the general population. This is the opposite counsel from germline mosaicism, and confusing the two is the error to avoid: one raises the risk you would otherwise quote, the other removes it.
What still needs surveillance is the tumour risk, not the family. Ollier and Maffucci carry a substantial lifetime risk of malignant transformation to chondrosarcoma, and Maffucci adds spindle-cell haemangiomas and a broader visceral malignancy risk. These patients need long-term follow-up for their own sake even though no one else in the family is at risk.

Clinical Relevance: counselling & orthopaedic management
Knowing the inheritance pattern is not academic. It changes what you screen for, who you refer and what you tell the family, and the orthopaedic surgeon is often the first to recognise a heritable skeletal phenotype, so a structured response carries marks and changes care.
- Inheritance / counselling point
- AD, high penetrance; EXT1 disease tends more severe
- Orthopaedic surveillance & management implication
- Lifelong awareness of malignant transformation to secondary chondrosarcoma (~0.5-5% per the cited Bovee review); investigate a lesion that grows after skeletal maturity or becomes painful
- Inheritance / counselling point
- AD; pleiotropy means cardiac risk dominates prognosis
- Orthopaedic surveillance & management implication
- Mandatory cardiology referral for AORTIC ROOT surveillance before elective spinal/scoliosis or limb surgery; monitor scoliosis and protrusio acetabuli
- Inheritance / counselling point
- AD, ~50% de novo, near-complete penetrance, very variable expressivity
- Orthopaedic surveillance & management implication
- Watch dystrophic scoliosis (rapid, short-segment, kyphotic) and congenital tibial pseudarthrosis; low threshold for MRI
- Inheritance / counselling point
- Mostly AD dominant-negative; severe/recessive forms exist
- Orthopaedic surveillance & management implication
- Bisphosphonate therapy, fracture/deformity management, telescoping rods; consider non-accidental injury mimic
- Inheritance / counselling point
- AD, ~80% de novo; homozygous (two affected parents) is lethal
- Orthopaedic surveillance & management implication
- Foramen magnum/cervicomedullary and spinal stenosis surveillance; guarded limb-lengthening counselling; FGFR3-directed therapy (vosoritide) emerging
- Inheritance / counselling point
- X-linked dominant; affected father transmits to all daughters, no sons
- Orthopaedic surveillance & management implication
- Phosphate + active vitamin D (or burosumab); correct deformity only once medically optimised to avoid recurrence
The counselling answer the examiner wants. When asked to counsel a family, structure it:
- Confirm the pattern and recurrence risk: 50% for an AD heterozygote's offspring, 25% for two AR carriers.
- Flag that a de novo case has a low sibling risk but 50% for the patient's own children, while germline mosaicism in a phenotypically normal parent can still raise sibling risk.
- Acknowledge reduced penetrance and variable expressivity before reassuring any relative.
- Refer to clinical genetics for formal counselling, confirmatory testing and discussion of prenatal or preimplantation options.
Surgeons recognise the phenotype and coordinate; they do not give definitive genetic counselling alone.
How the diagnosis is confirmed. "Refer for confirmatory testing" means choosing the right molecular test for the question:
- Karyotype: whole-chromosome analysis for aneuploidy and balanced translocations.
- FISH: targeted detection of a specific locus or microdeletion.
- Chromosomal microarray (array-CGH / SNP array): genome-wide copy-number; the first-tier test for unexplained developmental delay or multiple congenital anomalies.
- Targeted (Sanger) single-gene testing: when one gene or variant is expected (the recurrent FGFR3 mutation in achondroplasia, or a known familial variant).
- Multigene NGS panels: for a phenotype with locus heterogeneity (a skeletal-dysplasia or OI panel).
- Whole-exome / whole-genome sequencing: for the undiagnosed or atypical case.
Pick by scenario. A known familial pathogenic variant calls for targeted testing of that variant; a clinically obvious single-gene condition for that gene; a heterogeneous or unclear phenotype for a panel or exome.
Reproductive options when the mutation is known. Once the causative variant is identified, clinical genetics can offer the family:
- Prenatal diagnosis: chorionic villus sampling (CVS, ~11-14 weeks, placental tissue) or amniocentesis (from ~15-16 weeks, amniocytes). Both are definitive for the known variant but invasive, with a small miscarriage risk.
- Preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disease (PGT-M): IVF with embryo biopsy to transfer only unaffected embryos; it requires a known familial mutation and avoids a termination decision.
- Non-invasive prenatal testing (cell-free DNA) is largely a screen, mainly for aneuploidy, and does not replace definitive testing for most monogenic skeletal disorders.
Viva practice
Viva practice
Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud
“You are shown a pedigree in which an orthopaedic condition appears in every generation, affects men and women about equally, and includes a clearly affected father with an affected son. What is the mode of inheritance, what does that tell you, and name some orthopaedic examples.”
“How would you recognise X-linked recessive inheritance on a pedigree, and how does it differ from mitochondrial inheritance? Give an orthopaedic example of each.”
Exam cheat sheet
Pattern recognition
- AD: every generation, both sexes, male-to-male transmission, 50% risk
- AR: skips generations, carrier parents, consanguinity, 25% risk
- X-linked recessive: mainly males via carrier females, no male-to-male transmission
- Mitochondrial: maternal only, all children of an affected mother
AD conditions (gene)
- Achondroplasia (FGFR3, gain-of-function, ~80% de novo)
- Osteogenesis imperfecta (COL1A1/2, dominant-negative, ~85%)
- Marfan (FBN1); MHE (EXT1/2); NF1 (neurofibromin)
X-linked / other
- Duchenne (dystrophin), haemophilia (FVIII/IX) - X-linked recessive
- X-linked hypophosphataemic rickets (PHEX) - X-linked dominant
- Affected father: all daughters carriers, no affected sons
Modifying concepts
- Penetrance (shows phenotype) vs expressivity (severity)
- De novo mutation + germline mosaicism affect recurrence risk
- Anticipation (trinucleotide repeats); pleiotropy (Marfan)
Evidence Base
Osteogenesis imperfecta
- About 85% of osteogenesis imperfecta is caused by DOMINANT autosomal mutations in the type I collagen genes COL1A1 and COL1A2, affecting collagen quantity or structure.
- Recessive, dominant and X-linked defects in many other genes (collagen processing, secretion, post-translational modification, osteoblast regulation) also cause OI, complicating classification.
- Manifestations extend beyond bone (cardiovascular, pulmonary, skin, hearing, dentinogenesis imperfecta) - an example of pleiotropy.
Achondroplasia: Development, pathogenesis, and therapy
- Autosomal dominant GAIN-OF-FUNCTION mutations in FGFR3 cause achondroplasia and related chondrodysplasias (hypochondroplasia, SADDAN, thanatophoric dysplasia).
- Increased FGFR3 signalling paradoxically SUPPRESSES growth-plate chondrocyte proliferation and maturation, reducing endochondral bone elongation.
- Illustrates how a single recurrent dominant mutation produces a defined skeletal phenotype and how therapies aim to counter excess FGFR3 signalling.
Multiple osteochondromas
- Multiple osteochondromas is an AUTOSOMAL DOMINANT disorder; germline mutations in the tumour-suppressor genes EXT1 or EXT2 are found in almost 90% of patients.
- Malignant transformation of an osteochondroma to secondary peripheral chondrosarcoma is estimated at 0.5-5% - the most important complication.
- Antenatal diagnosis is technically possible when the exact familial mutation is known; regular follow-up is justified for early detection of malignancy.
The OI inheritance and classification facts come from Marini et al. (Nat Rev Dis Primers 2017, DOI); the achondroplasia FGFR3 gain-of-function mechanism from Ornitz & Legeai-Mallet (Dev Dyn 2017, DOI); and the multiple-hereditary-exostoses EXT1/EXT2 genetics and chondrosarcoma risk from Bovée (Orphanet J Rare Dis 2008, DOI). All three are narrative reviews (Level V), appropriate for established genetic facts rather than comparative effectiveness. The remaining gene-condition pairings (Marfan-FBN1, NF1-neurofibromin, X-linked hypophosphataemic rickets-PHEX) are standard, well-established medical genetics.