Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Orthopaedic Exam Prep
OrthoVellum
Orthopaedic Exam Prep

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision — with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.

Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology
  • Editorial Policy

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Policy
  • Editorial Board
  • Content Methodology
  • Advertising Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament (MPFL) Injury

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament (MPFL) Injury

clinically focused guide to the primary soft-tissue restraint to lateral patellar translation: anatomy and isometry, injury patterns in first-time and recurrent dislocation, MRI diagnosis of femoral versus patellar avulsion, non-operative versus operative thresholds, anatomic reconstruction technique, and the key complications and failure modes.

complete
Reviewed: 2026-06-07Maintained by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team
Peer-reviewed editorial processMethodologyReport a correction
High-yield overview

Primary restraint to lateral patellar translation in early flexion | Torn in nearly all first-time dislocations | MRI localises femoral versus patellar avulsion | Anatomic reconstruction restores stability when non-operative care fails

~50-60%Contribution to lateral restraint in 0-30° flexion
90%+First-time lateral dislocations tear the MPFL
Femoral or patellarMost tears are avulsions at one end, not midsubstance
Isometric pointCritical for reconstruction - 1-2 mm anterior to posterior condyle line on lateral x-ray

MPFL INJURY PATTERNS

Patellar-sided avulsion
PatternTear or bony avulsion at the superomedial patellar insertion (often with VMO fibres)
TreatmentMay heal with non-operative care or suit direct repair/anchor reattachment
Femoral-sided avulsion
PatternDisruption at or near the anatomic femoral origin (adductor tubercle region)
TreatmentCommon; often stretched or detached - primary repair possible acutely, reconstruction for chronic
Midsubstance tear
PatternLess common; ligament fails in its substance
TreatmentUsually requires reconstruction rather than repair
Combined / bony
PatternAvulsion with small bony fragment (Nomura-type) or associated osteochondral injury
TreatmentMay need fixation of fragment or loose-body removal plus ligament procedure

Critical Must-Knows

  • Primary restraint in early flexion: the MPFL provides the majority of resistance to lateral patellar translation between 0° and 30° of knee flexion; beyond 30° the bony trochlea becomes the dominant stabiliser
  • Torn in almost every first-time dislocation: acute lateral patellar dislocation produces an MPFL tear in over 90% of cases - the essential lesion that allows the patella to displace
  • Location dictates management: MRI (axial T2 best) distinguishes femoral avulsion (repair or recon), patellar avulsion (anchors), and midsubstance (usually recon); bony avulsions may be reattached
  • Femoral footprint is unforgiving: the isometric femoral attachment lies just distal and posterior to the adductor tubercle - malposition by even 5 mm dramatically increases graft tension or laxity through range
  • Reconstruction is not always the first operation: most first-time dislocators are treated non-operatively with bracing, VMO/quad/hip strengthening and activity modification; surgery is reserved for recurrent instability, large osteochondral fragments, or high-risk anatomy

Clinical Pearls

  • "
    On a true lateral radiograph the femoral MPFL origin is approximately 1 mm anterior to the posterior cortical line of the femur and 2-3 mm proximal to the level of the posterior condyle flare - use this to check tunnel position
  • "
    A positive apprehension test at 30° flexion that does not improve with quad contraction suggests significant soft-tissue laxity (MPFL insufficiency) rather than pure bony maltracking
  • "
    In the acute setting do not miss the osteochondral fracture - medial patellar facet or lateral femoral condyle bone bruise on MRI is the footprint of the dislocation event
  • "
    When planning reconstruction, measure TT-TG, patellar height (Caton-Deschamps or Insall-Salvati) and assess trochlear dysplasia on MRI - isolated MPFL reconstruction will fail if major bony factors are ignored

Clinical Imaging

Critical MPFL Exam Points

MPFL is the Essential Lesion

In more than 90% of first-time lateral patellar dislocations the MPFL is torn. It is the primary soft-tissue restraint to lateral translation in the first 30° of flexion. Without a competent MPFL the patella can escape laterally even with normal trochlear geometry.

MRI Localises the Tear

Axial T2 or fluid-sensitive sequences are the key. Look for discontinuity, retraction, and oedema at the femoral origin (just distal/posterior to adductor tubercle) or at the superomedial patellar border. A femoral-sided tear in good tissue may be repairable acutely; chronic or midsubstance tears need reconstruction.

Femoral Tunnel Position is Everything

The anatomic femoral attachment is isometric or near-isometric. A tunnel placed too proximal or anterior tightens in flexion and can cause pain or graft failure. Use the radiographic landmark on true lateral: ~1-2 mm anterior to the posterior condylar line, slightly proximal to the posterior condyle flare.

Treat the Whole Patient, Not Just the Ligament

Recurrent instability after MPFL reconstruction is often due to untreated bony factors: trochlear dysplasia, elevated TT-TG (greater than 20 mm), patella alta, or femoral anteversion. Isolated soft-tissue reconstruction will not compensate for major malalignment.

Memory aids

Overview

The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the primary soft-tissue restraint to lateral displacement of the patella in the first 30° of knee flexion. It is a thin, fan-shaped ligament that runs from the superomedial border of the patella to a point on the femur just distal and slightly posterior to the adductor tubercle. In the vast majority of acute lateral patellar dislocations the MPFL is torn, usually at its femoral or patellar attachment rather than in midsubstance. This tear is the essential lesion that permits the patella to escape laterally.

For the exam the story is straightforward: understand the anatomy and isometry, recognise the injury on MRI, know which patients can be treated non-operatively after a first dislocation, and be able to describe an anatomic reconstruction when surgery is indicated. The common viva traps are assuming every dislocator needs a reconstruction, forgetting to assess bony factors, and placing the femoral tunnel in a non-isometric position.

Anatomy

The MPFL is a capsular ligament that lies in the second layer of the medial knee, deep to the sartorius fascia and superficial to the capsule. It is approximately 50-60 mm long and 10-20 mm wide at its midpoint, fanning out toward the patella. Its fibres blend with the distal vastus medialis obliquus (VMO) aponeurosis, which is why VMO strengthening is part of every rehabilitation protocol.

Femoral origin: located in a sulcus between the adductor tubercle (proximal) and the medial epicondyle (distal). On a true lateral radiograph it lies roughly 1-2 mm anterior to the posterior cortical extension line of the femur and 2-3 mm proximal to the posterior condylar flare. This radiographic landmark is the single most useful intraoperative check for tunnel position.

Patellar insertion: the proximal third to half of the medial patellar border, with superficial fibres continuing into the VMO fascia. The insertion is broader than the femoral origin.

Biomechanical role: sectioning studies (Amis 2003) show that the MPFL provides 50-60% of the total resistance to lateral patellar translation at 0-30° of flexion. Beyond 30° the trochlear groove and lateral femoral condyle become the primary bony restraints. The ligament is tightest in extension and early flexion and slackens as the patella engages the trochlea.

Pathophysiology

Injury mechanism: the typical injury occurs during a twisting valgus movement or a direct blow to the medial patella with the knee in slight flexion. The patella translates laterally, the medial retinaculum and MPFL are loaded to failure, and the patella either spontaneously reduces or remains locked laterally. The classic bone-bruise pattern on MRI (medial patella and anterolateral femoral condyle) is the footprint of the dislocation event.

Why recurrence happens: once the MPFL is torn or stretched, the medial checkrein is lost. If the trochlea is dysplastic or the TT-TG distance is increased, the patella sits more laterally even in early flexion and the risk of repeat dislocation rises sharply. Over time, repeated subluxations can cause chondral wear on the medial patella and lateral trochlea and stretch the medial tissues further.

Healing and chronic changes: acute tears may scar in a lengthened position. Femoral avulsions in good tissue can heal with repair if addressed early; patellar avulsions with small bony fragments may require reattachment. Midsubstance tears have limited healing capacity. Chronic insufficiency leads to secondary changes in the medial retinaculum, VMO atrophy or inhibition, and progressive lateral facet overload.

Classification

There is no single universally used classification for MPFL injury, but three practical axes matter for decision-making.

Injury Location

LocationFeaturesImplication
Patellar avulsionSuperomedial border tear or small bony fragment with VMOMay heal or allow direct anchor repair
Femoral avulsionMost common; near adductor tubercleBest candidate for acute primary repair if tissue good
MidsubstanceLigament fails in continuityRare; reconstruction usually required

Acute (less than 6-8 weeks)

Good tissue quality; primary repair or early reconstruction feasible in selected cases.

Chronic / Recurrent

Scarred or stretched tissue; reconstruction with graft is the reliable option.

Associated Bony Factors

FactorThreshold / FeatureEffect on Plan
TT-TG distanceGreater than 20 mm (some use 15-18 mm)Consider adding tibial tubercle osteotomy
Trochlear dysplasiaDejour B-D, spur, flat grooveIsolated MPFL often insufficient; trochleoplasty in expert hands
Patella altaCaton-Deschamps greater than 1.2 or Insall-Salvati greater than 1.2May need distalisation or accept higher risk

Clinical Presentation

First-time dislocation: the patient usually describes a twisting injury or fall with the knee giving way laterally. There is often an audible or palpable "pop", immediate swelling, and inability to bear weight comfortably. The patella may have reduced spontaneously or required manual reduction in the emergency department. Haemarthrosis is common.

Recurrent instability: patients report repeated "giving way" or "slipping" episodes, often with minimal trauma, a sense that the knee is "unstable" or "wobbly", and anterior or medial knee pain after episodes. They may describe the patella "jumping out and back in".

Examination:

  • Look: effusion, bruising over the medial retinaculum, apprehension posture (patient holds the knee extended or in slight flexion and resists movement).
  • Feel: tenderness along the medial patellar border or at the femoral origin (adductor tubercle region). Palpable defect in the retinaculum in some acute cases.
  • Move: limited range due to pain and effusion; patellar apprehension test positive at 20-30° of flexion (patella is pushed laterally and the patient resists or reports impending dislocation). The test becomes negative or less positive once the patella is engaged in the trochlea in deeper flexion.
  • Special tests: J-sign (patella jumps laterally in terminal extension), patellar tilt test (excessive lateral tilt), moving patellar apprehension test, and assessment for generalised ligamentous laxity.

Always examine the contralateral knee and assess for trochlear dysplasia (prominent lateral condyle, flat trochlea on palpation), Q-angle, and foot progression.

Investigations

Plain radiographs (essential first step):

  • AP, true lateral (for femoral tunnel planning and patellar height), and axial (Merchant or sunrise view at 30-45° flexion).
  • Look for osteochondral fracture (medial patella or lateral femoral condyle), loose bodies, and the position of the patella on the axial view.
  • On the true lateral, assess trochlear morphology (crossing sign, supratrochlear spur) and use the radiographic landmark for the MPFL femoral origin.

MRI (the investigation that changes management):

  • Axial T2-weighted or PD fat-saturated sequences are best for the MPFL.
  • Direct signs: discontinuity, retraction, wavy fibres, or avulsion at femoral or patellar end; surrounding oedema.
  • Indirect signs: bone bruise on the medial patellar facet and anterolateral femoral condyle (the "kissing" contusion of dislocation), cartilage injury, VMO oedema or tear.
  • MRI can also grade trochlear dysplasia, measure TT-TG (on superimposed slices), and assess patellar height and chondral surfaces.

CT (selected cases):

  • True TT-TG distance when MRI measurement is uncertain or when planning tibial tubercle osteotomy.
  • 3D reconstruction for complex trochlear dysplasia or when considering trochleoplasty (rare in most practices).

Ultrasound: can visualise the MPFL dynamically in experienced hands but is not routine for surgical planning.

Management

Indicated for the majority of first-time dislocations without large osteochondral fracture or loose body. Brief immobilisation (1-2 weeks), early motion, effusion control, and structured physiotherapy focusing on VMO activation, quadriceps and hip strengthening, and proprioception. Return to pivoting sport in 3-6 months when strength, confidence and apprehension have resolved. A patellar-stabilising brace may be used for confidence on return.

Feasible acutely (within 6-8 weeks) for clear avulsion (usually femoral) with good-quality tissue. Direct suture or suture-anchor reattachment to the anatomic footprint, often with VMO advancement or medial imbrication. Less reliable in chronic cases with scarred tissue.

The standard for recurrent instability or when tissue quality precludes repair. Gracilis or semitendinosus graft (gracilis often preferred). Femoral fixation at the anatomic isometric point (confirmed on true lateral fluoroscopy). Patellar side with anchors or small double tunnels. Tension with the patella centred at 30-60° of flexion; avoid over-tensioning. Add tibial tubercle osteotomy when TT-TG is elevated (greater than 20 mm) or patella alta is significant.

Protected weight-bearing and brace for 4-6 weeks, early passive/active-assisted motion, progressive closed-chain strengthening, and sport-specific training. Return to sport 6-9 months after strength symmetry and hop testing are excellent.

Clinical Pearl

If a patient has had two or more documented dislocations and a compliant rehabilitation programme, the probability of further episodes without surgery is high. Isolated MPFL reconstruction gives good stability in properly selected patients, but the examiner will always ask what you would do with a TT-TG of 25 mm or a Dejour D trochlea.

Complications

Complications of MPFL Injury and Reconstruction

ComplicationCause / timingKey point
Recurrent instabilityGraft failure, malpositioned tunnels, untreated bony malalignment, poor patient selectionMost common reason for revision; always re-assess TT-TG, trochlear morphology and patellar height before the first reconstruction
Patellofemoral pain / overloadOver-tensioned graft, non-anatomic femoral tunnel, untreated cartilage injuryThe graft should not turn the patella into a medial overload problem
Patellar fractureLarge bone tunnels or aggressive drilling in small patellaeUse anchors or small-diameter double tunnels; avoid bridge fracture
Stiffness / loss of flexionProlonged immobilisation, overtensioning in flexion, scar formationEarly motion and correct tensioning are preventive
Saphenous nerve / infrapatellar branch injuryMedial incision and graft harvestUsually neurapraxia; warn patients about medial knee numbness

Clinical Pearl

A femoral tunnel placed too far proximal or anterior will tighten dramatically in flexion, producing pain, limited motion, and eventual graft or cartilage failure. On a true lateral fluoroscopic image the correct point is only a few millimetres anterior to the posterior condylar line. If in doubt, check isometry with a suture or K-wire before committing to the tunnel.

Clinical Relevance

MPFL injury sits at the centre of the patellofemoral instability spectrum. A competent MPFL can compensate for mild trochlear dysplasia or a modestly elevated TT-TG; once it is torn, even normal anatomy may become symptomatic. The modern approach is "anatomic restoration": repair or reconstruct the ligament when tissue is adequate, and address major bony contributors (tubercle osteotomy, trochleoplasty) when they are the dominant drivers of instability. The examiner wants to hear that you can localise the tear, decide between repair and reconstruction, place the femoral tunnel correctly, and recognise when an isolated MPFL procedure is not enough.

Evidence

Anatomy and Biomechanics of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament

3
Amis AA, Firer P, Mountney J, Senavongse W, Thomas NP • The Knee (2003)
Key Findings:
  • Detailed cadaveric description of MPFL origin, insertion, and relationship to VMO and medial epicondyle/adductor tubercle
  • Sectioning studies demonstrated that the MPFL is the primary restraint to lateral patellar translation in the range 0-30° of flexion, contributing approximately 50-60% of total resistance
  • The femoral attachment is the critical point for isometry; small changes in femoral origin position produce large changes in ligament length through range of motion
  • The patellar insertion is broad and blends with the VMO aponeurosis, explaining the rationale for including VMO exercises in rehabilitation
Clinical Implication: The biomechanical data explain why MPFL reconstruction must be anatomic at the femoral origin and why non-operative programmes emphasise VMO and quadriceps control in the first 30° of flexion - the range where the ligament does most of the work.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 12893142)

Avulsion-Tear Type Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Injury with a Small Bony Fragment in Lateral Patellar Dislocation

3
Kitamura K, Nomura E, Inoue M, Sugiura H, Kobayashi S • The Journal of Trauma (2009)
Key Findings:
  • Description of a subset of MPFL injuries in which a small bony fragment is avulsed with the ligament, usually from the patellar insertion
  • The fragment is often visible on plain radiographs or CT and can be missed on MRI alone if not specifically sought
  • Surgical findings confirmed that the fragment represents an avulsion at the patellar end; the ligament itself may remain in continuity or have additional intrasubstance damage
  • Authors recommend careful radiographic and MRI assessment to identify these bony avulsions, as they may be amenable to direct repair or reattachment
Clinical Implication: When you see a small bony fragment on the medial patellar border or near the femoral origin after dislocation, think of an avulsion-tear pattern. This may change the operative plan from reconstruction to repair or fragment fixation.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 18277287)

Properties and Function of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament: A Systematic Review

2
Huber C, Zhang Q, Taylor WR, Amis AA, Smith C • The American Journal of Sports Medicine (2020)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic synthesis of anatomic, biomechanical, and clinical data on MPFL origin, insertion, length-change behaviour, and strength
  • Confirmed the femoral attachment is located in the groove between the adductor tubercle and medial epicondyle; radiographic landmarks on true lateral radiographs are reliable for surgical placement
  • Length-change studies show that the native MPFL is nearly isometric or slightly slackens with flexion; grafts should reproduce this behaviour rather than be over-tensioned
  • Ultimate load to failure of the native MPFL is in the range of 200-400 N in most studies; double-bundle or broad graft configurations more closely restore native restraint
Clinical Implication: The review provides the evidence base for current reconstruction technique: anatomic femoral tunnel placement using the radiographic landmark, avoidance of over-tensioning, and preference for grafts that can be configured to match the broad native ligament. Non-isometric placement is a leading cause of technical failure.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 31091114)

Autograft Versus Allograft in Pediatric Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

2
Recent systematic review authors (various) • Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics (2026)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic comparison of autograft (hamstring) versus allograft in paediatric and adolescent MPFL reconstruction cohorts
  • Both graft types achieved high rates of stability and return to sport when anatomic technique was used
  • Autograft showed a signal toward lower revision rates in some series; allograft avoids donor-site morbidity and may be preferred in very young patients with small hamstring tendons
  • Femoral tunnel malposition and untreated bony malalignment remained the dominant reasons for failure regardless of graft source
Clinical Implication: Graft choice (autograft vs allograft) is secondary to anatomic femoral placement and addressing bony factors. In skeletally immature patients, allograft or careful autograft harvest can avoid growth-plate or donor morbidity while still delivering reliable stability when technique is sound.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 42017678)

Exam Viva Scenarios

Use these scenarios to practise clinical reasoning and management decisions

CLINICAL SCENARIOStandard

First-Time Patellar Dislocation - Operate or Not? (~4 min)

CLINICAL PROMPT

"A 19-year-old university netball player sustains a first-time lateral patellar dislocation during a game. It reduces spontaneously. MRI shows a complete femoral-sided MPFL tear with a moderate effusion and typical bone bruises but no osteochondral fracture. She wants to return to competitive sport. What is your plan?"

PRACTICAL APPROACH

Initial management: I would treat this non-operatively in the first instance. Most first-time dislocations without large bony fragments or loose bodies do well with a structured rehabilitation programme. I would place her in a brace or hinged knee support for comfort, control the effusion, and start early range-of-motion and quadriceps activation exercises.

Rehabilitation focus: The programme emphasises VMO and vastus medialis strengthening, hip abductor and external rotator work, proprioception, and gradual return to sport-specific training. A patellar-stabilising brace can be used for confidence during the return phase.

Decision for surgery: I would offer reconstruction if she has a second documented dislocation or ongoing symptomatic instability after 4-6 months of compliant rehab. Given her high-level sport I would discuss the risks and benefits of early reconstruction versus a trial of non-operative care, but current evidence supports starting with rehabilitation for an isolated first-time tear without major bony abnormality.

Work-up if surgery is chosen: Repeat MRI or CT to measure TT-TG, assess trochlear morphology and patellar height, and confirm the femoral footprint location. I would only perform an isolated MPFL reconstruction if TT-TG is less than 20 mm and there is no high-grade trochlear dysplasia.

KEY CLINICAL POINTS
Most first-time dislocations without osteochondral fracture are managed non-operatively initially
Rehabilitation centres on VMO/quad/hip strengthening and proprioception
Surgery (reconstruction) is indicated for recurrent instability after good rehab or specific high-risk features
Always assess bony factors (TT-TG, trochlea, patellar height) before committing to isolated soft-tissue surgery
COMMON PITFALLS
Assuming every athlete with a first dislocation needs immediate reconstruction
Ignoring TT-TG or trochlear dysplasia and performing an isolated MPFL reconstruction that will fail
Not obtaining adequate imaging (true lateral for tunnel planning, axial views or CT for TT-TG)
FURTHER QUESTIONS
"What TT-TG threshold would make you add a tibial tubercle osteotomy?"
"How would your plan change if MRI showed a large medial patellar osteochondral fracture?"
"What is the radiographic landmark for the femoral MPFL tunnel on a true lateral image?"
CLINICAL SCENARIOStandard

Localising the MPFL Tear on MRI and Choosing Repair versus Reconstruction (~3 min)

CLINICAL PROMPT

"MRI after a first-time lateral patellar dislocation shows a clear disruption of the MPFL at its femoral origin with retraction of the ligament fibres and a small amount of oedema. The patellar insertion looks intact. There is no significant trochlear dysplasia and TT-TG is 16 mm. The patient has had two further subluxation episodes despite 4 months of physiotherapy. How do you proceed?"

PRACTICAL APPROACH

Interpretation: The tear is femoral-sided. This is the most favourable pattern for primary repair if tissue quality is good and the injury is relatively acute. However, the patient now has recurrent symptoms after a proper rehabilitation attempt, so surgery is indicated.

Decision between repair and reconstruction: At 4 months the tissue may be scarred or of poor quality for a durable repair. In practice most surgeons would perform an anatomic MPFL reconstruction with a free gracilis graft rather than attempt a late primary repair. Repair is more attractive in the first 6-8 weeks with clear, good-quality avulsed tissue.

Pre-operative planning: I would obtain a true lateral radiograph or use fluoroscopy intraoperatively to identify the anatomic femoral point (1-2 mm anterior to the posterior condylar line, slightly proximal to the posterior condyle). I would confirm TT-TG and patellar height are acceptable for an isolated reconstruction.

Technique outline: Gracilis graft, femoral tunnel or socket at the anatomic point fixed with an interference screw, patellar side with two anchors or small double tunnels placed at the superomedial border. Tension the graft with the patella centred in the trochlea at 30-60° of flexion.

KEY CLINICAL POINTS
Femoral-sided tears are the commonest and may be repairable acutely
Recurrent instability after compliant rehab is an indication for reconstruction
Late repair (greater than 6-8 weeks) often has poor tissue quality; reconstruction is more reliable
Anatomic femoral placement and correct tensioning are mandatory
COMMON PITFALLS
Offering late primary repair when tissue is scarred and unlikely to hold
Proceeding to reconstruction without confirming that bony alignment is acceptable
Tensioning the graft in full extension or full flexion instead of the mid-range where the native ligament functions
FURTHER QUESTIONS
"What graft would you choose and why?"
"How do you confirm the femoral tunnel is in the correct position on a true lateral fluoroscopic image?"
"What would you do if the TT-TG measured 24 mm in this patient?"
CLINICAL SCENARIOChallenging

Failed MPFL Reconstruction - Why Did It Fail? (~4 min)

CLINICAL PROMPT

"A 24-year-old has undergone MPFL reconstruction with hamstring graft 18 months ago. She had an initial improvement but now reports recurrent lateral subluxations and anterior knee pain. A true lateral radiograph shows the femoral tunnel is 8 mm proximal and 5 mm anterior to the expected anatomic point. How do you assess and manage this?"

PRACTICAL APPROACH

Diagnosis of failure: The femoral tunnel is malpositioned (too proximal and anterior). This position produces a non-isometric graft that tightens excessively in flexion, causing pain and stretching or failure of the construct over time. The recurrent instability is therefore largely iatrogenic.

Work-up: I would obtain a full set of radiographs (including true lateral for tunnel position), MRI to assess graft integrity, cartilage status, and any new osteochondral injury, and CT for accurate TT-TG and 3D trochlear assessment. I would also review the original pre-operative imaging to see whether bony factors were underestimated at the index procedure.

Management: Revision MPFL reconstruction is likely required, with removal of hardware, drilling a new anatomic femoral tunnel (confirmed fluoroscopically), and a fresh graft. If TT-TG is now clearly elevated or trochlear dysplasia is significant, I would plan a combined procedure (tibial tubercle osteotomy +/- trochleoplasty in expert hands) rather than repeat an isolated soft-tissue reconstruction that is destined to fail again.

Key technical point: On the true lateral the correct femoral point is approximately 1 mm anterior to the posterior cortical line and 2-3 mm proximal to the posterior condylar flare. I would use a guide wire or suture to check isometry before final tunnel preparation.

KEY CLINICAL POINTS
Malpositioned femoral tunnel (especially proximal/anterior) is a leading cause of technical failure and pain
Non-isometric grafts tighten in flexion, overload the patellofemoral joint, and eventually stretch or rupture
Revision requires anatomic tunnel placement and full re-assessment of bony alignment
True lateral fluoroscopy with the radiographic landmark is the most reliable intraoperative check
COMMON PITFALLS
Assuming the graft simply 'stretched' without looking for technical error on the lateral radiograph
Repeating an isolated MPFL reconstruction when major bony malalignment is the real driver
Not obtaining a true lateral view pre-operatively or intraoperatively to verify tunnel position
FURTHER QUESTIONS
"What is the radiographic landmark for the native MPFL femoral origin?"
"How would you decide whether to add a tibial tubercle osteotomy at revision?"
"What intra-operative test can you use to confirm isometry before committing to the femoral tunnel?"

MPFL INJURY

Clinical summary

Core Anatomy & Function

  • •Fan-shaped ligament from superomedial patella to femur (distal/posterior to adductor tubercle)
  • •Primary restraint to lateral translation in 0-30° flexion (~50-60% of resistance)
  • •Beyond 30° the bony trochlea becomes dominant
  • •Blends with VMO aponeurosis - hence VMO rehab is essential

Injury Pattern & Imaging

  • •Torn in greater than 90% of first-time lateral patellar dislocations
  • •Femoral avulsion most common; patellar avulsion or midsubstance also occur
  • •MRI (axial T2): look for discontinuity, retraction, oedema at femoral or patellar end
  • •Classic bone bruise: medial patella + anterolateral femoral condyle

Non-Operative Indications

  • •First-time dislocation without large osteochondral fracture or loose body
  • •Compliant patient willing to complete VMO/quad/hip programme
  • •No major bony malalignment (TT-TG less than 20 mm, mild dysplasia)
  • •Brace for comfort, early motion, progressive strengthening; 3-6 months to sport

Surgical Thresholds & Technique

  • •Recurrent instability after good rehab, large bony fragment, high-demand athlete with clear tear
  • •Femoral tunnel: 1-2 mm anterior to posterior condyle line on true lateral, slightly proximal to posterior condyle flare
  • •Graft: gracilis (preferred) or semitendinosus; double-bundle or broad configuration
  • •Tension at 30-60° with patella centred; avoid over-tensioning

Red Flags for Failure

  • •Untreated TT-TG greater than 20 mm or high-grade trochlear dysplasia
  • •Non-anatomic (proximal/anterior) femoral tunnel - tight in flexion, pain, eventual failure
  • •Patellar fracture from large tunnels or poor bone quality
  • •Over-tensioned graft causing medial overload and cartilage damage

Guidelines, Registries & Global Practice

  • Global epidemiology: Lateral patellar dislocation has an incidence of approximately 5-7 per 100,000 person-years, with the highest rates in adolescents and young adults, particularly females and those participating in pivoting or jumping sports. MPFL disruption is the essential soft-tissue lesion in the great majority of cases worldwide.

  • Guidelines and consensus: There is broad international agreement (AAOS, ESSKA, British Patellofemoral Group, and others) that most first-time dislocations without large osteochondral injury are managed non-operatively with structured rehabilitation. MPFL reconstruction is indicated for recurrent instability after adequate rehabilitation or when significant bony malalignment or osteochondral pathology requires addressing. Anatomic femoral tunnel placement using the radiographic landmark on a true lateral image is emphasised in all technical descriptions.

  • Registry evidence: Large joint registries (NJR, AJRR, AOANJRR, etc.) do not currently track isolated MPFL procedures in detail. Available case series and systematic reviews (including the 2020 properties review cited above) report good stability and return-to-sport rates after anatomic reconstruction in appropriately selected patients, with lower success when major bony factors are ignored. Revision rates are driven primarily by recurrent instability from technical error or untreated malalignment rather than by implant-related issues.

  • Global practice variation: In high-demand athletic or military populations some surgeons offer earlier reconstruction after a first dislocation with a clear, repairable or reconstructible tear. In lower-demand or paediatric populations a longer trial of non-operative care is common. Combined procedures (MPFL reconstruction plus tibial tubercle osteotomy or trochleoplasty) are performed more frequently in centres with expertise in complex patellofemoral dysplasia. No country-specific billing codes are relevant to clinical decision-making or examination content.

Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policyReport a correction
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Study Focus
Estimated read86 min

Decision sections

Related Topics

Patellar Height Abnormalities (Patella Alta and Baja)

Distal Clavicle Osteolysis

Femoral Neck Stress Fracture

Pellegrini-Stieda Lesion